Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/16/1995 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO., Held October 16, 1995 19 Mayor Campbell called the work session of Dublin City Council to order at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, October 16, 1995. Staff Comments MrMr. Hanslev thanked Council members who attended the walk-through of the Recreation Center this evening. Mr. Foegler reported the following: 1. Based on previous discussions with Council regarding the need for a design study for the Muirfield/Avery/33 overpass and with sufficient reserves in the appropriated capital fund for 1995, staff plans to proceed with retaining a consultant for this study. The cost estimate is $17,000. Mrs. Stillwell asked about the timeframe for completion. Mr. Kindra responded that the study can be completed within 60 to 90 days after the consultant is retained. 2. As indicated to Council members involved with the Coffinan Road alignment issue, staff continues to explore the costs associated with burying of the electrical wires in that area. The power company estimates the cost at $400 to $450,000 to bury the above ground electric from Emerald Parkway at its intersection with Coffman to Post Road -essentially the Willow Grove frontage, the Blankenship frontage, and the creek. Staff is working with the utility company within the franchise agreement negotiations, and exploring the feasibility of the City independently bidding this project to Columbus Southern Power's specifications to reduce the cost. Installing conduit in the manholes at this time would cost 0$200,000 and would allow for future burial. There is a timing issue involved for this fast-tracked project. Staff will have an analysis completed soon of the alternatives. 3. In regard to the Coffman Road alignment, staff has forwarded plans to all of the parties involved. Jim Fox of Willow Grove has indicated their basic support. Feedback from other organizations is positive, but final discussions will take place this week. The revised alignment does not impact the Coffman House property, retains the tree and the existing curb line, and maintains the maximum protectable area for Willow Grove in terms of landscaping and the brick wall treatment. 4. Staff is exploring the feasibility of cost sharing for enclosure of the ditch on the north side of Tuttle Road (between Frantz and'I-270) with the Edwards Company and other property owners. Estimated cost is of the enclosure is $50,000. Dublin had encouraged this improvement within the Tuttle Crossing Boulevard improvements being made by the mall developer, but Columbus did not require it. Staff can provide information to Council for review at their next meeting. Mr. Kindra commented as follows: 1. He will bring two contract award proposals to Council on November 6 -one for the Post Road widening for the Recreation Center and the other for the first phase of Emerald Parkway. 2. The contractor for the sanitary sewer to serve the Balgriffin subdivision has requested closure of Wilcox Road at Rings for 3 to 5 days during construction. The city will inform the .area residents of the plans. 3. ODOT notified him today that a Dublin resident has raised a concern about the need for a fence at the Post Road crossing over 270 to prevent someone from throwing items off the bridge. The estimated cost is $25,200 and the fence would be a typical chain link fence. If the City desires a different type of fence, the price difference would have to be borne by the City. Following discussion; Mayor Campbell moved to instruct staff to send a letter to the State asking them to explore other alternatives before undertaking construction of the fence on this site and to .request that they examine this site in conjunction with all of the other similar sites across the county. Mr. Strip seconded the motion. Vote on the motion -Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Strip, yes. Ms. Puskarcik reported that the recent Columbus Dispatch article regarding the Community Center contained some errors: (1) it indicated that: the City would in the future build a separate senior center; and 2) it indicated that unless the Community Recreation Center is self-sufficient in terms of funding, the senior center will not be built. The reporter will print a retraction stating that future plans do not include a separate senior center, but the information regarding self-sufficiency was obtained from a City official and the reporter is comfortable with that information as printed. Staff is considering submitting a one paragraph letter to the editor of the Dis ab tch clarifying the financing ~ a.:. , ~ ~ ~ x~ a , x RECORD OF PROCEED-INGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 2 Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLAN Held October 16, 1995 19 for Phase 2. Mayor Campbell called the formal meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Mr. Zawaly led. the Pledge of Allegiance. R 11 all Council members present were: Mayor Campbell, Mrs. Boring, Mr. Kranstuber, Mrs. Stillwell, Mr. Strip, and Mr. Zawaly. Mrs. King arrived at 8 p.m. due to an airline delay. Staff members present included: Mr. Hansley, Mr. Foegler, Mr. Seidensticker, Ms. Grigsby, Mr. Kindra, Ms. Clarke, Mr. Lenz, Ms. Puskarcik, Ms. Bearden, Ms. Jordan, and Lt. Geis. Approval of Minutes of October 2, 1995 Meeting Mr. Zawaly noted a correction to page 6 where it should state that the Commission agreed to an implementation date of January 1, 2000, not 1995. Mr. Zawaly moved approval with this correction. Mr. Kranstuber seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. Correspondence The clerk reported that there was no correspondence requiring Council action. Comments from Visitors Claire Wolfe, 5521 Indian Hill Road stated that she is still waiting for a reply from the City regarding her request for data on the 745 intersection with Emerald Parkway. Mr. Foegler had stated that extending the bridge over 745 would cost an additional $6 to $12 million. She is seeking data to support that figure in comparison to the cost of the interchange on 745 in view of the blasting required for the intersection, raising the level of the road, and purchasing additional property. According to the Dublin Villager, a MORPC study recommends that no improvements to enhance traffic flow be made to the 745 scenic corridor. The only improvements they suggest to Dublin Road are to preserve aesthetic and rural qualities. Citizens have been promised for the last ten years by members of Dublin City Council that there will be no interchange at 745. She would like a response tonight. Mayor Campbell responded that in 1990, Council voted for a Scioto bridge location that would intersect with 745 in this location. So, for the record, for at least the past five years, that has not been the promise of Council. Ms. Wolfe stated that the 1985 rezoning of the McKitrick property promised citizens that there would not be an interchange on 745. This was debated again in 1989. Council voted on the bridge location in 1990, but it did not mean the bridge would intersection with 745. Mr. Foegler stated that he has reviewed the records and documents back to 1985 and discussed this with staff working at the City at that time. Council had reserved the right within the McKitrick rezoning to require the cul-de-sac road to go through and connect to Dublin Road. The action was reaffirmed in the 1988 Community Plan when the Thoroughfare Plan showed a connector road to Dublin Road with Coffman Road. The 1989 bridge design studies, adopted by Council in 1990 showed the intersections with Dublin Road .and Riverside Drive, including lane alignments, turning movements and turn lanes. Council's final action regarding selection of that site was delayed while staff performed additional studies showing how that bridge would interconnect with roadways to the east and west so that it did not just connect .Dublin Road and Riverside Drive. With the McKitrick rezoning this year, staff responded to a request regarding the additional bridge .cost for connecting the high point on the McKitrick property to Riverside Drive. Burgess & Niple was asked to provide estimates on this -the exact figure he does not recall. No additional cost analysis or study has been done because it is staff's sense that Council's previous actions had established the policy in regard to this road alignment. If Council desires, additional design study and cost estimates can be provided. Mayor Campbell noted that once the decision was made on the bridge location, it was always the intention that the bridge extend from 745 to 257 and be connected to the east and the west with the goal of taking traffic off 161 and the 161 bridge. He attended the meetings and voted, and the votes consistently were for a road that would come'. down the hill, tie in at the bridge, cross the river, tie in at the other side of the river and go up. There was never discussion about a bridge crossing from the top of one hill across the valley. , RECOF~D OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 3 Meeting DAY~'ON LEGAL BLANK Held October 16, 1995 19 Mr. Kranstuber noted that Council does not have data to debate this matter tonight. He believes, however, that the bridge location and the 1985 zoning cal-de-sac aze separate issues. Following additional discussion, Mayor Campbell suggested that staff research the records and provide Ms. Wolfe with the information. Mr. Foegler stated that he will provide documentation to Ms. Wolfe from the 1985 rezoning, from the 1988 Community Plan, and from the bridge location discussions up to the 1990 decision. Discussion followed. Mr. Foegler .added that at this point, staff is not looking at other options unless it is the direction of Council to do so. The issue Ms. Wolfe has raised. is that a span would be less costly than the excavation and blasting needed for the intersection. He emphasized. that the cost of such a span would be many times the cost of the intersection. The cost of the entire road with intersection improvements from Coffman to Dublin Road is approximately $6 million and the span added $5 to $6 million to that cost. Mayor Campbell requested that staff also forward to Ms. Wolfe the estimates for this span which Burgess & Niple provided previously. Mr. Foegler stated that he will include the same information presented at the rezoning hearings in the spring. Mrs. Boring and Mr. Kranstuber requested a copy of the information as well. Mr. Zawaly added that Council and staff are dedicated to open, participatory government and welcome citizens like Dr. Wolfe who are interested in obtaining the facts. Council Roundtable Mr. Stria thanked Ms. Jordan, Tim and Maclaine Manus, and Mr. Banchefsky for joining him on the motorcycle ride program sponsored by Parks and Recreation. It was very enjoyable. Mrs. Stillwell reported that she has distributed Leadership Dublin brochures to Council and staff. She is Council's appointed representative to this group which is sponsored by the Dublin Chamber of Commerce. They are now seeking recruits for the first class and she encouraged Council to give brochures to interested individuals. Council members should note that on March 13, a program is scheduled on Dublin municipal structure and she hopes Council members will participate. Mr. Zawalv commented regarding the draft brochures for Council meeting procedures which were forwazded to Council. He pointed out that the timing may not be optimal in view of the many changes anticipated with the proposed Charter revisions and related Council Rules of Order changes. Ms. Puskazcik responded that these brochures will be produced in-house and can be revised as needed at low cost. Mayor Campbell stated that: 1. Mr. Foegler has provided a memo to Council responding to issues raised regarding tax abatements. This should clear up some ambiguities reported recently in the newspapers. 2. The current review of the income tax status provided by staff describes a growth in income tax collections in the 15 to 20 percent range. This represents a significant increase over last year and this trend will hopefully continue based upon the recent level of economic development. This is a positive indication that the City is headed in the right direction. v.,-.~ 3. There has been discussion and debate regazding how to handle the dissemination of ' information from the City about the pending referendum, and he believes a public discussion is needed at this time. Mr. Foegler stated that staff was asked to speak to the East Dublin Civic Association last evening, and the Association requested a factual description of the differences between the 1990 and 1995 Schottenstein rezonings. This document has been distributed tonight to Council and was distributed to the residents who attended last night's meeting. Mr. Sranstuber stated that a separate memo was faxed to Council on Sunday with a draft of a proposed fact sheet for distribution. He has concerns about the rationale portion where staff attempted to extrapolate from the minutes the rationale for the votes. The document does not contain the rationale for the "no" votes. In addition, some of the information is now invalid, e.g., that the rezoning includes a Mt. Carmel health care facility which no longer exists. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 4 Meeting GAYTON LEGAL BLANK Held October 16, 1995 19 Mr. Strip noted that his comments are generic and do not involve this particular issue. He believes Council should not be involved - it is the public information officer's duty to decide what information should be circulated by the City as she deems appropriate. She should be charged with the responsibility of being objective. Mrs. Boring believes this matter is Council's business. She is concerned with the reactionary position being taken by the City in response to a call from the developer. She notes that the east side of Dublin has developed unlike any other part of Dublin -retail first. She disagrees strongly mvolved.r She addledtthat the fact sheet onluld decide the referendum and the City should not be y gives one side of the story. Mrs. Stillwell stated that Council took their action in March and she believes that the matter should be left in he hands of thevoters. She acknowledged that it is difficult to maintain the neutral ..position that is needed. In regard to the rationale, the City needs to respect the fact that it was a five to two vote. It is not appropriate for the City to be in the business of producing information which contains persuasion. She would prefer that the City do nothing in this regard. Mrs. King noted that, due to her travel schedule, she has not reviewed the draft documents. She had hoped that the City could produce accurate information on which the public could make a good decision. She has concerns, however, that there is now a tremendous amount of inaccurate information on both sides of the issue and she holds both parties responsible. Her goal is to put good information in the hands of the voters. Mr. Zawaly stated that he agrees with the. reaction to the memo containing all of the various rationale.. It would be unfair to the public to publish something like this. He does agree with Mrs. King that the leadership responsibilities of .this Council demand that the facts be published. The comparison document of the 1990 with the 1995 rezoning is a very good rendition of the facts. It is the City's responsibility to provide the facts to the voters. Mayor Campbell stated that the referendum matter has long-term implications for the City in regard to future applications for development. It is also important not to divide the City over this issue. He urges everyone to refrain from personal attacks because of the resulting divisiveness which will hurt the entire community. He believes that the City has the obligation to disseminate the facts so that the voters have the same information available to them that Council had when they made their decision. His only additional suggestion would. be to include the financial implications of the vote. He would like to give staff direction from Council on how to proceed. Mrs. Boring emphasized that the fact sheet does not include the concession of the 1990 rezoning that there would be no furniture store and the 1990 commitment to small, neighborhood retail. All of the records of the rezoning are public and available for review by interested citizens. Mr. Kranstuber commented that a favorable factor of the 1995 rezoning was the Mt. Carmel piece which no longer exists. This is not made clear in the information. He believes the City has no business in getting involved other than in a' very cursory, factual way - a "yes" vote means the rezoning for 1995 stays in place, while a "no" vote means that the 1990 zoning will be reinstated. Mayor Campbell noted that Mt. Carmel is no longer a part of the proposal because of the filing of the referendum. He would like to give staff some direction tonight since Council will not meet again until November 6, just before the November. 7 election. Mr. Foegler stated that the difference between the 1995 zoning versus the 1990 zoning is that the 1995 zoning includes a 33-acre campus zoned for professional offices, health care uses, and related .items. Staff believes that there is no legal requirement in the 1990 zoning for neighborhood uses. That was obtained by virtue of the 10,000 square feet size per use space. The comparison document is merely a list of the restrictions under the zoning codes and the law that would be enforced under the interpretation. Mrs. Boring moved that no additional staff time be spent on this matter, that this document be available for public inquiry only and not issued by the City, and that the matter be left up to the voters. Mr. Kranstuber seconded the motion. Discussion followed about making the information available versus distributing it. Mr. Hansley commented that misinformation quoting City officials was circulated, and he believes the City has an obligation to correct the misinformation. He would prefer that the motion direct staff -----_.,~...~,.~..,,.,,,~.,Fn,.i~,,.,_i,, I i i lip i; t i RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 5 Meeting DA`(rON LEGAL BLANK C Held October 16, 1995 19 to disseminate information to inform the public about this ballot issue within a broad framework, leaving the details to staff. Mrs. King proposed an amendment to the motion, to have staff spend no more time developing written materials. Mrs. Boring accepted the amendment. Mr. Kranstuber accepted the amendment. Mr. Zawaly commented that there are two separate documents being discussed -one is the memo with rationales and the other is a factual representation of the differences between the 1990 and 1995 rezoning. He believes the City has a responsibility to the public to publish the facts since there has been so much misinformation. Ms. Clarke noted that there are three inaccuracies contained it the charts she prepared over the weekend and she suggests that these be corrected before distribution. Following more discussion, Mr. Kranstuber proposed that staff correct the technical inaccuracies and provide the document to those who request it. Mr. Foegler commented that, based upon Council's discussion, staff would add language stating that the document is not a summary of the relative benefits or negative aspects of the rezoning, but simply a summary of the legal restrictions and land use modifications contained in the 1990 versus the 1995 rezoning. It does not deal with the relative perceived community benefits or negative impacts on the community. Discussion followed about how the information will be disseminated. Mr. Strip proposed a substitute motion, that staff be instructed to prepare the technical corrections r---~ to assure fairness and equality in presentation to the "Summary of Major Differences in the Zoning Restrictions for the Northeast Quad PUD" document and that it be freely dissemflnated upon request. Mr. Zawaly seconded the motion. Mrs. Boring withdrew her motion. Mr. Kranstuber agreed to withdraw his second. Mrs. Boring suggested amending the motion to include Mr. Foegler's caveats. Mr. Foegler clarified. that he will add language to indicate that the document is not an intended articulation of the relative benefits or negative aspects of the rezoning. Mr. Strip accepted this amendment. Mr. Zawaly seconded the amendment. Vote on the motion -Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes. Council Roundtable (contJ Mrs. King thanked Mr. Foegler for the response prepared to the commentary by Herb Cook in the October 11 Dublin News. Mr. Cook has indicated his willingness to publish the response to set the record straight about the economic development incentives being offered by Dublin. Mayor Campbell noted: 1. A memo was provided to Council last week regarding the major league soccer discussion. He requested that Council members contact Mr. Hansley with their thoughts regarding the proposal. 2. He thanked all present for taking the time for a difficult discussion to bring resolution to the issue of information on the referendum. 3. Happy Birthday to Mrs. King and a Happy Belated Birthday to Mrs. Boring. Legislation Ordinance No. 18-95 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 11.927 Acres of Land Located Along. the West Side of I-270, Approximately 500 Feet South of Shier-Rings Road from: RI, Restricted Industrial District to: PCD, Planned Commerce District. (Corporate Park of Dublin) (Third Reading) (Applicant: Equity Dublin Associates, Bonnie Reinberg, Agent, 22035 Chagrin Boulevard, Beachwood, OH 44122) Mayor Campbell noted that a memo in the packet from staff indicated a request that this be tabled until November 20. The issues have not been resolved at this point, and the owner/applicant is unable to be present tonight for further discussion. -e. I, RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin Cit Council Meetin Minutes of Y g Page 6 Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLA K Held ~ October 16, 1995 19 Mr. Strip moved to table the ordinance until November 20, 1995. Mrs. Boring seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mrs. King, yes. The ordinance is tabled until November 20, 1995, Resolution No. 24-95 - A Resolution Accepting the Vision Statement of the Dublin Community Plan. (Third Reading) Mr. Hansley stated that staff is requesting that this item be tabled per the memo provided tonight. Ms. Clarke stated that the Steering Committee met last week and they have requested that the resolution be tabled until the first meeting in January. They will continue to work on the rest of the document while the vision statement is begin reworked. Mayor Campbell noted that Dave King, Chair of the Committee will keep Council updated on the progress of the Committee. to facilitate communication. Mrs. Stillwell moved to table the resolution'until January 8, 1996. Mrs. Boring seconded the motion. Mrs. King stated that she is hopeful that many of the tabled items can be addressed prior to year end so that those who have been through the public discussion are present. Vote on the motion -Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr.' Strip, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, no; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. The resolution is tabled until January 8, 1996. Ordinance No. 100-95 - An Ordinance Vacating a Sanitary Sewer Easement in Reserve A of Shamrock R. (Third Reading) Mr. Hansley noted that staff recommends approval at this time. Vote on the ordinance -Mayor Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes. Ordinance No. 103-95 - An Ordinance Amending Section 1189 (Signs) of the Planning and Zoning Code. (Second Reading) Mr. Hansley stated that staff is requesting that the second reading or public hearing of this ordinance be tabled until November 20 since it amends the Planning Code. The Planning Commission will have a recommendation prior to that time. Mr. Kranstuber moved to table the second reading (public hearing) until November 20, 1995. Mr. Zawaly seconded the motion. Vote on the motion -Mrs. King, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr, Zawaly, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes. There will be a public hearing of the ordinance at the November 20, 1995 Council meeting. Resolution No. 28-95 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Convey aRight-of--Way Easement to the Columbus Southern Power: Company Which Will Provide Service to the Dublin Recreation Center, and Declaring an Emergency. (First Reading) Mr. Kranstuber introduced the resolution. Mr. Hansley explained that staff is recommending approval by emergency of this resolution which provides an easement for power lines to serve the recreation center. Mr. Zawaly moved to waive the three-time reading rule and treat this as emergency legislation. Mr. Strip seconded the motion. Vote on the motion -Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes. Vote on the resolution - Mr. Strip, yes; Mrs: Boring, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. .Resolution No. 29-95 - A Resolution in Support of the ClJTA Levy on the November 7, 1995 Ballot, and Declaring an Emergency. (First Reading) Mrs. Stillwell introduced the resolution. Mayor Campbell summarized that information was provided in the packet to Council regarding the need to support the COTA levy. The levy will benefit Dublin because there will be additions to service levels, including loops through town, smaller buses serving neighborhoods, and a connector to the Tuttle Crossing area to other suburbs. Mrs. Stillwell moved to waive the three-time reading rule and treat this as emergency legislation. Mrs. King seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mx. Kranstuber, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mrs.. Stillwell, yes. Vote on the resolution -Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Campbell, . m o - „ I I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin Cit Council Meetin Minutes of y g Page ~ Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK C F Held October 16, 1995 19 yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. King, yes. Mayor Campbell requested that the clerk provide a copy to the COTA representatives. Resolution No. 30-95 - A Resolution of Support for the Franklin County Alcohol, Drug ~ Addiction and Mental Health (ADAMH) Service Levy, and Declaring an Emergency. (First Reading) Mr. Zawaly introduced the resolution. Mr. Strip moved to waive the three-time reading rule and treat this as emergency legislation. He noted that Dublin Counseling Center receives support form this agency. Mr. Zawaly seconded the motion. Vote on the motion -Mrs. Kin es' Mr. Str g, y ip, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes;.Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. Vote on the resolution - Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes. Mayor Campbell asked that the clerk forward a copy to the ADAMH representatives. Council Committees Mr. Zawaly, Charter Review & Revision Commission stated that Council has scheduled a workshop session on the proposed revisions on Mondaq, October 23 beginning at 7 p.m. Mr. Kranstuber, Public Services Committee stated that the Committee will meet on Tuesday, October 24 at 5:30 p.m. The agenda includes review of the bikepath information and the Dublin Party House matters previously referred by Council. He noted that a memo was recently forwarded to all of Council regarding the proposed rec center fees, and suggested that the Committee review them for recommendation to Council. Mrs. Stillwell moved to refer the fee structure to the.Public Services Committee for recommendation to Council. Mr. Zawaly seconded the motion. Vote on the motion -Mrs. King, yes, Mr. Strip, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes. Mr. Kranstuber noted that in view of the full agenda, he plans to defer discussion of the Muirfield maintenance agreement until November. The November meeting would then be dedicated to that issue. Mrs. King requested that the bikepath materials be provided to all of Council. Mr. Kranstuber agreed and requested that staff do so. Mayor Campbell asked about Council's preferences in handling .the Clerk of Council evaluation process. Mrs. Stillwell, Administrative Committee asked that Council members complete the evaluations and forward them to her for compilation. She noted that the anniversary date for the clerk is November 19. Following brief discussion, Mayor Campbell suggested that Council members provide the evaluations meet ng. Stillwell by October 23 so that the Committee can have them prior to their October 25 Mrs. Stillwell moved to adjourn to Executive Session for purposes of land acquisition discussion. Mr. Strip seconded the motion. Vote on the motion -Mrs. King, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Strip, yes. Mayor Campbell announced that the meeting will not be reconvened following the executive session. The meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m. Ma r - resid g O r Clerk of Council ~ . iii i : ~ i : ,