HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/15/1992 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK -
Held J~nP 1 S 1997 19
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Dublin City Council was called to order by Mayor
Jan Rozanski at 7:30 p.m. on Monday, June 15, 1992 and Mr. Amorose led the Pledge of
Allegiance.
Members of Council present for roll call were: Mr. Amorose, Mr. Strip, Mr. Kranstuber,
Mayor Rozanski, Mr. Sutphen, and Mrs. King. Mr. Campbell was absent (excused).
Mr. Foegler, Acting City Manager in Mr. Hansley's absence, and Mr. Stephen Smith, Law
Director, were also present.
Annroval of Minutes of Tune 1, 1992 Meeting
Mr. Kranstuber moved and Mr. Amorose seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the
June 1, 1992 meeting.
Mrs. King commented that the minutes should be corrected on Page 2, in the first
paragraph. After the word "will", strike the rest of the sentence and insert instead, "work
to reduce the current high levels of agricultural pollution and restore the forest buffer along
the banks of the Scioto." There was no objection to this correction.
Vote on the Motion - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor
Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, abstain.
Correspondence
The Clerk reported that a notice has been sent to Council regarding transfer of a liquor
permit from the Indoor Golf Center to Norm's Place at 6314 Cosgray Road, where a future
restaurant is planned. There were no objections to this transfer.
Comments from Visitors
James Grexard, 5716 Chatterfield Lane, Llewellyn Farms Civic Association president, stated
that he was representing residents of the neighborhood, approximately 175 homeowners, and
presented a petition to Council regarding the proposed water tower sites.
He expressed several concerns regarding the water tower site issue:
1. First, he is dissatisfied with the telephone response of the Planning & Zoning and
Development staff since a meeting on May 13 with several businesses and the civic
association.
2. The water tower should be built in an undeveloped area, instead of in an already
developed area.
3. There will be two to four water towers eventually, and it would be more economical
to construct them two at a time.
4. Believes that the residents of Llewellyn have not been included in meetings where
Ashland Chemical was invited for input.
5. Proposes that it be built a mile away, west of I-270. States there is no water
pressure problem in the Llewellyn Farms neighborhood.
~ 6. Commented that Mayor Rozanski is associated with The Edwards Company, the
developer which will benefit from the installation of the proposed water tower and
asked if the Mayor will abstain from voting on this issue.
Mayor Rozanski responded, stating:
1. He is aware of only one meeting which took place, and Llewellyn Farms Civic
Association was invited and a representative did attend.
2. Council has previously authorized purchase of land at the corner of Rings and Blazer
Parkway in order to extend Blazer Parkway south and to provide land for the needed
water tower. At the present time, the proposed water tower will be built on this site
as planned. There has been some discussion between the Planning staff and
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 2 Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK F R
Hel 19
residents and businesses in the area regarding some alternate sites. He asked Mr.
Foegler to comment on this.
3. He will abstain from voting if the site is on Mr. Edwards' land, but not if it is on
the site purchased for this purpose at Rings and Blazer Parkway.
Mr. Foegler commented:
1. That the City has for some time established the Blazer and Rings site as the
preferred site. As the design phase was being initiated, the Edwards Company and
Ashland Chemical approached the City staff regarding other options. Council's
posture has been that there has been an established site which is the preferred site
unless something else can be worked out. Ashland and The Edwards Company are
the largest land holders in the area of Rings and 270, the identified location where
the system requires the tower and the storage. These are the two property holders
most directly impacted by the proposed water tower, and they may have some
flexibility in providing an alternate site.
2. In conjunction with the consultant hired by the City, staff has over the past six
months looked at alternate sites in terms of the system's needs and project flexibility.
Reports consistently state, as described in the meeting, that from the system's
perspective, Wilcox to Frantz along Rings is where additional water supply is
needed.
3. The goal of the process undertaken since that time regarding exploration of
additional sites is merely to lessen the impacts on the area. At this time, the site
previously chosen by Council is still the preferred site.
4. A site under recent consideration was on Bradenton inside a tall stand of trees,
behind Sherex. The immediate impact would have been lessened by shading the
base of the tower. Edwards and Ashland had supported this option, but in view of
the neighborhood opposition, staff recognizes that this is not a viable option.
5. As Bobbie Clarke relayed to Mr. Greyard recently, there are no other meetings
scheduled. Staff is still looking at whether sites beyond the one already purchased
would be feasible. Staff has asked The Edwards Company if they would be willing
to trade any land for this site, and thereby lessen the impact on the entire area.
6. Regarding moving the tower to the west, representatives from the southwest quadrant
are concerned about how that would impact their growing residential area.
7. Regardless of where it is located, the tower, given its height, will be visible from
all of the southern two-thirds of Dublin. The system needs the additional storage;
this facility has been planned since 1989.
8. Staff will continue to explore additional options to minimize impact on surrounding
areas, but at this point in time, the selected site is at Rings and Blazer Parkway.
Mr. Greyard asked if the water tower is being installed to service the proposed Edwards
development in the area. He stated that Llewellyn Farms has adequate water supply at this
time.
Mr. Sutphen commented that this is part of a system consisting of the entire City of
Columbus and surrounding municipalities. Having experienced water shortages in recent
years in the Dublin area, Mr. Sutphen is supportive of the needs of the system for water
towers.
Mayor Rozanski commented that the system is designed by the City of Columbus, and they
designate where the water towers are needed with the use of computer models. Council
purchased this property with every intention to install the necessary water tower.
Mr. Greyard stated that the tax dollars paid by large corporations are obviously more
important to the City than the concerns of the residents.
Mr. Kranstuber stated that he is not as informed as other members of Council may be
regarding proposed water tower sites, and asked Mr. Foegler to explain the alternate sites.
Mr. Foegler stated that the water master plan for the past number of years has identified the
approximate area of I-270 and Rings as the next needed site for a water tower location. The
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 3 Meeting
DAYTON LE AL BLANK
Held ~,,,~.s, i oo~ 19
six acre purchase for the Blazer extension had a residual portion useable for the water
tower. This has always been viewed as the most logical location for the water tower to
serve the area. There is no legal mandate that the tower be built at this site, however.
Mr. Kranstuber asked about the other sites under consideration for the water tower.
g, Larry Lehner, Vice President of the Llewellyn Farms Civic Association, 4136 Hertford
Lane, stated that the group opposes the Rings and Blazer site which has been selected by
Council.
Mr. Foegler clarified that Mr. Greyard had previously stated that the civic association is
opposed to the Bradenton site located behind Sherex. This was one option explored by the
City. '
Mr. Kranstuber stated he would like to have a map with all of the proposed sites.
Mr. Lehner clarified that their group is opposed to the Bradenton site behind Sherex. He
added that they are also opposed to the Blazer site.
Mayor Rozanski stated that he is also opposed to the Bradenton site.
Mr. Kranstuber commented that he cannot give opinions on these proposed sites since
Council does not have enough information before them this evening to address the issue.
He asked the civic groups to keep Council abreast of their concerns.
Mr. Lehner asked that Council keep the civic association advised of the status of this issue.
He further added that if individuals had been aware of the proposed water tower site in
1989, they probably would have purchased property elsewhere.
Mayor Rozanski clarified that there has only been one meeting on this topic, and the civic
group was invited to that meeting. The Blazer and Rings site has been discussed publicly
many times and it has been included in the Capital Improvements budgets for many years.
Council has not made any final decision in the building process for the water tower.
Mr. Strip pointed out that Council did not know the residents were bringing this issue to
Council tonight; the issue is not on Council agenda and thus Council members are not
prepared for a discussion tonight. He asked that the group stay in touch with the City
regarding this issue and that they designate two or three people as contacts for the City in
regard to the issue.
Mr. Lehner asked if the water tower is being installed under a mandate from the City of
Columbus, and whether this water tower will assist the Columbus portion that draws from
this area.
Mr. Strip responded that the tower will support the system as a whole, the entire northwest
quadrant of the county - it is not designated to service a particular area.
Mr. Lehner asked, with the development of the area west of I-270 and additional water
towers to be built out there, why it is necessary to build this water tower in the "back
yards" of the Llewellyn residents at this time.
Mrs. King commented that her concern is that Council needs to be given an opportunity to
listen to the citizens, and the citizens need to understand the technical and economic aspects
of the water tower decision. She added that water is an essential resource for everyone, and
after experiencing water shortages, most people will agree that water towers are a welcome
addition. She commented that water towers are critical to the amount of school taxes paid
by residents, insofar as adequate water supplies will allow the City to bring commercial and
industrial development to the City and thereby reduce the tax burden on residential
taxpayers. She also added that the water tower is an essential part of the emergency
protection system for the City. With input from the residents, Council will make a good
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 4 Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK F R
Hel 19
decision regarding this issue.
Mr. Kranstuber asked what the process will be for selection of the site.
Mr. Foegler stated that the Rings and Blazer site has been Council's choice for the water
tower unless there is an alternate site established. Staff will follow Council's direction as
far as what process will be followed.
Mayor Rozanski stated that until staff recommends that there is a better site, Council will
use the Blazer and Rings site for the water tower.
Mr. Kranstuber asked that the issue be studied and five or six options be given to Council.
He believes the best location would be on raw, undeveloped land, so that anyone purchasing
land would be aware that a tower is planned on the site. He stated that the location should
be as far from residential areas as possible. He requested that the residents call the City
Manager or a Council member directly if they have difficulty reaching the Development
Department.
Mr. Lehner stated that the Waterford Civic Association has been notified of the issue as
well.
Mayor Rozanski added that all Council members are available to attend civic association
meetings upon an invitation.
Carolyn Dimond 4189 Haymaker Lane. Llewellyn resident, stated that the neighborhood
is fearful that if the water tower is installed, the Edwards Company will then build the
proposed mall in the area. Residents believe that the water tower is associated with the
proposed mall's need for water. Expressed fear that politics are impacting these decisions.
Mr. Sutphen responded that Mr. Olausen, a City consulting engineer, had designated in a
study years ago that the water tower was needed in this area -long before the development
was proposed by The Edwards Company. Council had purchased the Blazer property with
intentions of installing a water tower on the site.
Ms. Dimond expressed fear that residential buyers will not come to the area with the
commercial development that a mall may bring.
Mr. Sutphen stated that perhaps Council should schedule a meeting to explain why the
system requires water towers in certain locations.
Ms. Dimond stated that the residents would welcome having a chance to give input on these
issues. She again asked if the water tower would service the mall.
Mr. Strip responded that the water tower has no connection whatsoever with the proposed
mall development; it is a tower required by the system to benefit the entire northwest area.
Mayor Rozanski stated that the mall will be serviced by the Dublin water towers regardless
of whether the tower is built. .
Mrs. King commented that she was not certain if development could continue in this area
of Dublin or in nearby Columbus without the water tower installation. She asked Mr.
Olausen to comment regarding future development in the quadrant.
Mr. Olausen stated that another water tower is scheduled to be built around the year 2000
further west of this area, in the vicinity of Avery Road. In terms of what the tower does,
it brings supply of water to the area and works in conjunction with the main tanks located
on I-270 at Smokey Row Road. It does provide water for future development; as the City
of Dublin grows to the west, a water tower is needed. Without water towers, there can be
no significant growth as there will be no water to support the growth.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 5 Meeting
DAYT N LE AL BLA K
Hel 19
Ms. Dimond asked if the tower would have to be located within I-270 or could it be located
outside of I-270.
Mayor Rozanski again stated that Columbus' experts have designated a location inside of
270 as the area where a tower is needed.
Mr. Foegler further clarified that there is a water capital program which has been updated
every year for the past five years which identifies the ultimate addition of two towers inside
of 270 and two towers outside of 270 within the next 15 years. The first tower needed is
one of the inside 270 towers; the next tower needed will be outside of 270.
Chuck Postlewaite, Llewellyn resident, stated that it would be helpful if residents could have
access to staff recommendations and City of Columbus data prior to the time Council
discusses the issue. Also stated that he would like to get the original information considered
by the Council and the information to be considered by Council in the future.
Mayor Rozanski responded that Council will make arrangements to copy the Llewellyn
Civic Association on any information that comes to them.
Mr. Foegler stated that the water master plan has been the guiding document. Dan Booth
periodically reports regarding recommended improvements, i.e., water towers. This is all
public information. The information on this site was a policy decision made at the time the
property was purchased. He added that Dan Booth works with the City of Columbus to
determine what the needs are based on growth, and recommends improvements year by
year.
Mr. Postlewaite asked to see copies of the reports from each year.
Mr. Foegler agreed to make this information available to the persons designated by the civic
association.
Mrs. King invited any other persons to give their name to the clerk if they would like this
information.
Sherri Sav ~e 6003 McIntyre Drive. Columbus, stated that area residents have been unable
to get information from the Dublin Planning Commission regarding how the City of Dublin
will protect its residents from the effects of the mall, i.e., increased crime and traffic. They
have been unable to get a response from the Dublin Planning Department. She expressed
the concern of area residents that the Mayor of Dublin works for The Edwards Company,
the developer of the proposed mall.
Mayor Rozanski responded that he works for F.A. Kohler, a company owned by Mr.
Edwards, but that Mr. Edwards has no day-to-day involvement in the company. Mayor
Rozanski has no contact with Mr. Edwards, and has not spoken to him in 8 months. The
Mayor works on a commission basis for the company, and pays his own expenses for travel
and entertainment. Mr. Edwards owns eight or nine other companies as well.
Ms. Savage asked what kind of protection they can be offered as Dublin citizens from the
proposed mall development.
Mr. Strip stated that there is little that this Council can do in regard to a proposed
Columbus development, or a Westerville development, or a development in any other
municipality. Council would like to help these citizens, but realistically, it will be very
difficult.
Ms. Savage responded that in conversations she's had with the Columbus Development
Commission, they have stated repeatedly that if Dublin would take an official stand on the
mall, it could make a big difference. But she has been unable to get a response from
Dublin's Planning Department.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 6 Meeting
DAYT N LE AL B NK
Hel 19
Mayor Rozanski stated that the City of Columbus has not contacted Dublin to get any input
on this proposed mall.
Mrs. King commented that the best chance for success in resolving this issue is a coalition
of well-informed citizens from each neighborhood working together cooperatively to address
problems.
Mr. Kranstuber suggested that staff present to Council at the next meeting the status of the
proposed development with the City of Columbus.
Mr. Foegler stated that in view of the complicated issues involved in this rezoning in
Columbus, he would not recommend that Council take a position without taking the time
to review and study all of the aspects.
Mr. Kranstuber commented that he would rather have the mall development come to the
City of Dublin rather than to Columbus. There would then be greater control over traffic
issues, building standards, and other factors which would impact Dublin.
Ms. Savage stated that as a matter of record, for Council to say that they will get together
and look at the facts does offer some reassurance to area residents.
Kevin Shoemaker 4201 Rin sg` Road, Llewellyn resident, stated that the residents were not
trying to be accusatory this evening. In the past, when the Tuttle interchange was being
built, the City of Dublin came to the residents of Llewellyn and talked about the traffic
problems, the school problems, about Frantz Road being built to funnel traffic away from
the school and the park. The residents are now asking for a continuing dialogue with the
City of Dublin before the proposed mall is developed and the resulting traffic and crime
problems occur.
The Mayor stated that the City of Dublin has always maintained a policy of communicating
regularly with its residents regarding issues and will continue to do so.
Legislation
Ordinance No. 81-92 - An Ordinance to Adopt the Proposed Tax Budget for Fiscal
Year 1993. (Public Hearing -Second Reading)
The Mayor requested that proponents and opponents come forward and sign in. There were
no opponents to the ordinance.
Ms. Grigsby commented that this is the beginning of the 1993 operating budget process.
She requested that this be passed by emergency at the next reading.
There will be a third reading of the ordinance at the Ju)y 6, 1992 Council meeting.
Ordinance No. 31-92 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change of Zoning of 41.374 Acres
Located on the East Side of Avery Road, 3000 Feet South of Brand Road to be
Rezoned from R-1, Restricted Suburban Residential District, to PLR, Planned Low
.a Density Residential District. (Third Reading)
Mrs. King commented that she has concerns with the costs of providing services to all of
the new residential developments currently in process, and determining at what point it is
no longer cost-effective to allow this rapid growth. Council members have all agreed that
it is important to maintain a balance between new residential development and commercial
development in order to keep a strong tax base.
Mr. Kranstuber concurred, especially in view of the amount of multi-family development
proposed for the southwest quadrant.
Mr. Amorose asked for the developer's assurance that the no-build zone would be included
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page ~ Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK R
Hel 19
on the preliminary plat. Mr. Kelley agreed that this would be included on the preliminary
plat being prepared.
Vote on the Ordinance - Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr.
Kranstuber, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mrs. King, yes.
' Ordinance No. 78-92 - An Ordinance Vacating a .174 Acre Section of Dublin Road
Right-of--Way. (Second Reading)
Mr. Roy Lovell, 4980 Dublin Road, stated that he has supplied pictures to Council to
provide additional information on the requested vacation. Mr. Lovell explained that the
strip of land in question is behind the stone walls, and he has owned the property for 38
years. •
Mr. Smith commented that Mr. Lovell has been extremely patient with the long process
involved in this vacation, and suggested that Council proceed quickly to approve this.
A third reading of the Ordinance is scheduled for the July 6, 1992 Council meeting.
Ordinance No. 86-92 - An Ordinance Appointing a Member to the Tree and
Landscape Advisory Commission, and Declaring an Emergency. (First Reading)
Mr. Strip introduced the Ordinance and moved that the three-time reading rule be waived
and treat as emergency legislation.
Mr. Amorose seconded the motion.
Vote on the Motion -Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr.
. Amorose, yes; Mrs. King, yes.
Mrs. King stated that the subcommittee of Council who had reviewed the applications for
this position recommends that John Crane of Llewellyn Farms be appointed to the Tree and
Landscape Advisory Commission. His selection was based upon his community volunteer
record and the need for additional representation from the southern portion of the
community on boards and commissions.
Vote on the Ordinance - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mayor
Rozanski, yes; Mrs. King, yes.
Ordinance No. 88-92 - An Ordinance Authorizing Certain Items of Compensation
Relative to the Appointment of a New City Engineer, Directing the City Manager and
Finance Director to Approve the Expenditure of Funds for Said Items, and Declaring
an Emergency. (First Reading)
Mr. Sutphen introduced the Ordinance.
Mr. Foegler commented that this legislation is consistent with discussions held between
Council and Mr. Harding. It is not inconsistent with what has previously been done for top
level positions within the City. Additional items being provided via this legislation are a
$300 per month vehicle allowance, $500 per month temporary housing allowance, and a
$5,000 moving allowance for the new City Engineer.
Mr. Strip commented that he would prefer to see the relocation allowance more closely tied
to the actual moving expenses. He would prefer to have this figure computed on a case-by-
case basis rather than establishing a precedent amount.
Mr. Foegler responded that in view of the national searches being conducted for various key
City positions, Mr. Harding has indicated that he believes this type of policy should be
incorporated into next year's compensation plan.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 8 Meeting
DAYf N LE AL BLA K
Hel 19
Mr. Strip moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as emergency legislation so
that the City Engineer position can be filled quickly.
Mr. Amorose seconded the motion.
` Vote on the Motion - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor
Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes.
Vote on the Ordinance -Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr.
Strip, yes; Mrs. King, yes.
Ordinance No. 89-92 - An Ordinance Amending Section 7 ("Vacation Leave"),
Subsection 7.B of Ordinance No. 17-90 ("Compensation Plan") and Declaring an
Emergency. (First Reading)
Mr. Sutphen introduced the Ordinance.
Mr. Foegler commented that this Ordinance addresses the policy change needed regarding
the credit for public sector service outside of the state of Ohio and thus the earned vacation
credit upon hiring a candidate with many years of experience outside of the state of Ohio.
Mr. Strip stated that the policy change does make sense; however, he wants to register his
disagreement with giving an employee 24 vacation days per year upon hiring, as this
essentially represents an 8 or 9 percent increase in salary.
Mrs. King and Mr. Amorose concurred with Mr. Strip's concerns.
4 Mr. Foegler stated that this issue will be examined the next time the compensation plan is
brought before Council.
Council members concurred.
Mrs. King moved to waive the three-time reading rule and treat this as emergency
legislation.
Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion.
Vote on the Motion - Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mrs King, yes; Mayor
Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes.
Vote on the Ordinance - Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr.
Strip, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes.
Ordinance No. 90-92 - An Ordinance Amending the Annual Appropriations for Fiscal
Year 1992, and Declaring an Emergency. (First Reading)
Mr. Strip introduced the Ordinance and moved to waive the three-time reading rule and treat
as emergency legislation.
. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion.
Ms. Grigsby explained that the requests for additional appropriations involve legal fees and
bond counsel fees related to two capital improvements projects: Tuner Road and State
Route 161.
Vote on the Motion - Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mrs. King,
yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes.
Vote on the Ordinance - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mayor
Rozanski, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Strip, yes.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 9 Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK R
Hel 19
Ordinance No. 91-92 - An Ordinance Amending Ordinance 1492, Section 1,
Establishing the User Fees and Capacity Charges for the Sewer System, and Declaring
an Emergency. (First Reading)
" Mr. Sutphen introduced the Ordinance.
Mr. Foegler explained that this amends the previously passed sewer rate ordinance,
clarifying that the sewage rates are based upon water entering the sewage system, not simply
water consumed. Staff is requesting this amendment be passed as an emergency because
the water and sewer rate ordinances aze effective July 1, 1992.
Mr. Strip moved to waive the three-time reading rule and treat as emergency legislation.
Mr. Kranstuber seconded the motion.
Vote on the Motion - Mr. Strip, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Sutphen,
yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes.
Vote on the Ordinance - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mrs.
King, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes.
Ordinance No. 92-92 - An Ordinance to Accept an Annexation of 139.183+/- Acres
in Washington Township to the City of Dublin. (First Reading)
Mr. Foegler stated that staff has no comments on the ordinance at this time.
Mr. Smith stated that discussion on the ordinance will• take place at either the second or
third reading.
There will be a second reading of the Ordinance at the July 6, 1992 Council meeting.
Ordinance No. 93-92 - An Ordinance to Accept the Lowest/Best Bid for the S.R. 161
Improvements Project, and Declaring an Emergency. (First Reading).
Mr. Sutphen introduced the Ordinance.
Mark Jones, Project Coordinator, gave an overview of the bids on the project. The lowest
and best bid was from Complete General Construction which includes traffic signals,
decorative street lights for the historic district, brick sidewalks, utility relocation and burial,
storm sewer replacement and repair, and an additional traffic signal at Dale and Riverside
Drive. Project will commence June 30 and be completed December 1.
Mr. Jones commented that access to all businesses will be maintained throughout the
construction. The lane numbers will be the same throughout, but they will be slightly
narrowed; turn movements will be maintained. Traffic maintenance costs aze included in
the bid for the project. He added that the traffic lights •will be of the mast-arm design and
will have a black finish in the historic district and dazk brown finish in the other areas to
match the street lights.
Regazding the Bridge and High intersection, Mr. Jones stated that there will be signalized
left-turn movements in all four directions and two through lanes eastbound and westbound
after the project is completed.
Mr. Sutphen moved to waive the three-time reading rule and treat as emergency legislation.
Mr. Strip seconded the motion.
Vote on the Motion - Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr.
Amorose, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes.
Vote on the Ordinance -Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen,
yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 10 Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLA
Hel 19
Mayor Rozanski commented that this is the fourth major capital improvements project
commenced within the last thirty days.
Mrs. King commended the staff for making all of this possible.
Ordinance No. 94-92 - An Ordinance Authorizing a Contract for the Continued
Employment of the City Manager. (First Reading)
Mr. Kranstuber introduced the Ordinance.
Mayor Rozanski commented that the city manager's contract expires in July and Council
needs to discuss the new contract in an executive session in the very near future.
There will be a second reading of the Ordinance at the July 6, 1992 Council meeting.
Ordinance No. 95-92 - An Ordinance Amending Ordinance 34-92, Establishing a
Cooperative Agreement with the State of Ohio, Department of Transportation, on the
S.R. 161 Widening Project, and Declaring an Emergency. (First Reading)
Mr. Sutphen introduced the Ordinance.
Mr. Strip moved to waive the three-time reading rule and treat as emergency legislation.
Mrs. King seconded the motion.
Vote on the Motion - Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mrs.
King, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes.
Vote on the Ordinance -Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr.
Amorose, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes.
Ordinance No. 96-92 - An Ordinance Authorizing the City Manager to Enter Into
a Contract for the Installation of School Flashers on Muirfield Drive at Sells Mill Drive
Without Formal Advertising and Competitive Bidding, and Declaring an Emergency.
(First Reading)
Mr. Sutphen introduced the Ordinance and moved to waive the three-time reading rule and
treat as emergency legislation.
Mr. Strip seconded the motion..
Mrs. King stated that this legislation is in response to the recommendations made by the
Safety Committee, approved by Council, for improvements at the Sells Mill/Muirfield Drive
intersection. Area residents brought their concerns to the Committee in late 1991; Council
adopted the recommendations in December of 1991; and implementation of the
recommendations has been continuing over the past few months.
Mayor Rozanski commented that he is hopeful that in the future, with a new City Engineer
on board, these types of safety concerns will be addressed at the time of road construction
instead of when problems arise at a later date.
Vote on the Motion - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr.
Amorose, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Strip, yes.
Vote on the Ordinance -Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr.
Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes.
Other
1992 Street Resurfacing Program
Mr. Olausen, Acting City Engineer, directed Council's attention to a memorandum
distributed outlining the 1992 Street Resurfacing Program. Data was gathered by City
inspectors regarding the need for repair on all City streets. The greatest number of streets
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 11 Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK RM
Hel 19
in need of repair are located in the Muirfield area in some of the older portions. Staff is
proposing a slurry seal for many streets where structural repairs are not needed and where
the street surface is even. The 1992 program also includes crack sealing and curb repair
where necessary. There is also some full depth asphalt replacement where needed.
Mr. Sutphen asked if there is a list of additional curb or gutter repair that would be done
- if the bid for the entire project was lower than expected, thus freeing up some already
budgeted monies.
Mr. Olausen responded that the program as proposed includes 1,000 feet of additional curb
to be repaired, but not yet identified. There is some additional crack seal and full depth
pavement repair included in the proposal.
Mr. Foegler commented that the appropriation this year is $450,000, so some low priority
items may have to be eliminated.
Mrs. King asked if the curb repair line item covers repairs such as that needed at 8720
Finlarig Drive, where the resident contacted Mrs. King in October regarding curb repair.
It was too late in the year to repair it then, but she asked for assurance that it would be
included in this year's program.
Mr. Olausen stated that this is the specific intent of the curb repair item, and he will ensure
that the curb repair is done at 8720 Finlarig Drive.
Mayor Rozanski commented that it is important that the streets be cleaned within a short
time after the resurfacing program to ensure removal of loose gravel.
Mr. Olausen stated that Mr. Johnson's staff are scheduled to street clean following project
completion.
The project is now scheduled to go to bid.
Sidewalk Waiver - Brighton Park
Ms. Fierce stated that the Zoning Code has specified since 1986 that sidewalks shall be
constructed on both sides of all streets except as waived by Council. As a matter of policy,
staff has interpreted the Code to apply to development on all new streets as well as existing
streets. The developer of Brighton Park believed that sidewalks were required only on new
streets, and the issue was not adequately addressed at time of preliminary plat approval.
The applicant is requesting an alternative to installing a sidewalk on the Rings Road
frontage -providing three easements from Wilcox Road to the internal streets. Staff
believes that the alternative will provide sufficient east to west access from Wilcox to the
new park located on the south side of Rings Road and recommends approval of the waiver.
Mr. Olausen added that this item was not picked up during the review process by staff nor
in the design process on the developer's part. There is a significant drainage ditch on the
north side of the development; installation of the sidewalk would require shifting of the
drainage ditch to the south and into the back yards of some of the lots on the plan. Thus,
staff was looking for alternatives to the sidewalk requirement as Ms. Fierce has stated.
Mayor Rozanski stated that the ditch as proposed in the plans will be 6 feet deep.
Mr. Sutphen reminded Council that ditches of this depth have been enclosed on 161 and on
Martin Road at City expense; he believes that curbs and gutters should be required with
developments.
Jerry Turner, consulting engineer, Bird and Bull, stated that he is in attendance this evening
representing Davidson-Phillips, the developer of Brighton Park. He reported that at the
time of preliminary plat approval and based upon information contained in the zoning text,
he believed that they were not required to install sidewalks along Rings Road. As a result
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 12 Meeting
DAYT N L AL B NK
Hel 19
of this, they designed a drainage system to incorporate both the ditch and also the swale that
is associated with Rings Road. They believed that this was the most economical and the
most feasible way to address the drainage issues with Rings Road. As Mr. Olausen stated,
it will be difficult to install a sidewalk along Rings Road unless curbs and gutters are
" incorporated. The developer did not know that he would be required to curb and gutter
Rings Road. Mr. Turner commented that he had visited some other subdivisions similar to
this one -Coventry Woods, Heather Glen and some along Dublin Road -all of which do
not have sidewalks, but rather an open ditch along the road.
Mr. Strip commented that the deep ditches are dangerous to drivers. Council has closed
many ditches at the City's expense, and the ditches should be enclosed by the developers
who can in turn pass along these costs to the buyers of the properties.
Mr. Olausen clarified that the ditch as shown on the plans will not create a hazard as
presently configured. The ditch carries a lot of water, and would be quite expensive to
enclose. It is crossed by a bridge on Wilcox Road.
Discussion followed regarding whether the ditch is in the right-of--way, and who will be
responsible for maintenance of the ditch.
Mr. Turner stated that the ditch is in a 40-foot easement that abuts the existing 30-foot
right-of--way. It was his understanding that the easement would be granted to the City for
storm drainage purposes. From the last meeting, he was under the impression that the
homeowners' association would be responsible for maintenance of the ditch. At the time
the project commenced in 1991, he believed he had the City's approval for an open ditch;
it will be cost prohibitive to enclose the ditch. The project would have been dropped at that
time if the developer had been required to enclose the ditch. The developer has an
approved set of drawings for the ditch, and is now requesting a waiver of a portion of the
sidewalk along Rings Road - a sidewalk which they believe is unnecessary.
Mr. Foegler noted that the preliminary design discussion took place with the previous City
Engineer. Construction drawings have been prepared at this point in time. Staff has been
looking for another means to handle the east-west movement of pedestrian traffic; there are
some benefits in the alternate plan proposed.
Mayor Rozanski asked the applicant to confirm that in return for the ditch, he will built an
eight-foot wide bike path between lots 1 and 2, 12 and 13, and 32 and 33, and as previously
agreed between lots 7 and 51.
Mr. Turner confirmed this. He added that the developer is presently negotiating for the
property immediately east of this property, and the bike path will be continued through this
development if they are successful in obtaining zoning approval for the same.
David Ruma Davidson and Phillips, asked where the sidewalk should be installed if it is,
in fact, required. There is no safe location for the sidewalk.
Mr. Foegler commented that Council recognizes this can only be installed with ditch
enclosure, and the engineer is currently addressing the feasibility of ditch enclosure. The
storm sewer necessary at this location would be a 96 to 100 inch storm sewer.
Mr. Ruma stated that if he knew he would be required to pipe the ditch, he would never
have undertaken the project.
Mr. Foegler stated that the largest problem with the project initially was how to provide
stormwater detention on the site because of the topography and the stream. These were
factors which impacted on the ultimate design of the storm drainage system. Regarding
detention basin not located in City property, the maintenance responsibility would be with
the association. The City would retain the right to enter the property to ensure that the
drainage ditch functions properly. A drainage easement does not mean the City mows it,
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 13 Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK F R
Held ~,-~T, i oo~ 19
but rather that the City retains access to the property to ensure proper drainage function.
Mr. Strip stated that the developer should be required to maintain the drainage ditches until
such time as the homeowners' association would assume the responsibility.
Mr. Ruma responded that as part of the deed restriction requirements, a forced
homeowners' association with an assessment is required.
Mr. Foegler added that on the recorded plat, the maintenance obligations will be indicated
as a matter of record.
Mr. Kranstuber asked how the proposed alternative would meet Dublin's desire to be
pedestrian friendly.
Mr. Foegler explained that there would be good north-south movement on Wilcox, good
east-west movement in a safe setting, good access to the proposed interior park, and that
the alternative provides for a good continued east-west movement to the next development
on the east. The City still retains the ability and intent to install conventional sidewalks on
the north side of Rings Road.
Mr. Kranstuber asked what the cost would be to enclo$e the ditch and install a bike path
over it.
Mr. Turner estimated the costs in excess of $100,000.
Mr. Kranstuber then commented that this would not be an excessive amount per lot. He
doesn't believe the sidewalk requirement should be waived unless there are extraordinary
circumstances which warrant it.
Mrs. King stated that she recognizes the technical problems, but is not satisfied that the
proposed compromise meets the goal of apedestrian-friendly city to the same level that
sidewalk installation would provide. Her concern is that residents won't be able to find the
sidewalk as proposed in the alternative, and will walk along the ditch on Rings Road instead
of on the interior sidewalk.
Mr. Sutphen stated that Council would be setting a different standard for some developers
than for others. He believes that curbs, gutters and sidewalks are very important to the
residents of Dublin.
Steve Krakowski, Wilcox Road, stated that he is representing the Southwest Area Residents
Association who provided a package to Council on this issue. He requested that the
statement of the Association be included in the record regarding this issue.
Chris Zigo, 5671 Wilcox Road, asked that options be explored regarding moving the ditch.
Area residents support the installation of a sidewalk along the south side of Rings Road to
provide a means for pedestrian traffic. He commented that the southeast corner of Rings
and Wilcox will be used as a detention area with the relocation of Cramer Creek and will
not be aesthetically pleasing.
Mr. Smith stated that Council tonight is only reviewing and voting upon a request to waive
the sidewalk requirement. If the applicant wants to present alternatives, he suggested that
the sidewalk waiver application be withdrawn.
Mr. Ruma commented that the development is extremely behind schedule. To move the
ditch further in will result in loss of lots. He does not see a reasonable location for
installation of the sidewalk.
Mr. Strip agreed with Mr. Smith that the applicant would be wise to withdraw the sidewalk
waiver and come back to Council with a compromise alternative.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 14 Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK
Held ~9~°~ - 19
Mr. Amorose asked if there were street tree requirements along the road.
Mr. Ruma stated that to his knowledge, there were not.
' Mr. Sutphen stated that the minutes from Planning & Zoning stipulate installation of
sidewalks and street trees for the development.
Discussion followed regarding the language of the Code and whether it applies to existing
or new streets.
Mr. Foegler stated that the project will have to be re-engineered to meet the sidewalk
requirements. The sidewalk waiver issue should have been addressed much earlier in the
process. Staff accepts responsibility for not resolving this earlier. The City is now
requiring plats to have typical sections of roads with all of the improvements. This was
previously not required. This should eliminate confusion about these requirements in the
future.
Mr. Kranstuber took issue with the fact that the developer was not aware of these
requirements given the minutes of both P&Z and Council. He asked if Council can legally
waive these requirements.
Mr. Smith stated that Council put a procedure for sidewalk waiver into place in 1986.
During the time period of rezoning, preliminary plat, and final development plan, there is
an appellate process available for a waiver at any time. He added that the developer must
take some responsibility for the situation -the staff is not entirely to blame. He again
recommended that the applicant withdraw his request for a waiver and submit an alternate
proposal to Council.
Mrs. King proposed a compromise, in consideration of the joint responsibility of staff and
the developer for this situation. She suggested that the ambiguity be removed from the
Code in regard to sidewalk installation, and that sidewalks be required on existing as well
as new roads. She asked if the applicant would be willing to make a payment based upon
the costs of installing a sidewalk along Rings Road in lieu of providing it. Those funds
could then be used with City funds to make the southwest quadrant of the City more
pedestrian friendly. This would be agreed upon with the understanding that any future
neighboring development would require sidewalks and' street trees as mandated by Code.
Mr. Strip reiterated that he did not understand how the developer could be unaware of the
requirements for street trees and sidewalks.
Mr. Kranstuber read the Code section pertaining to sidewalks, "Sidewalks shall be
constructed on all streets except as waived by Council." Based upon the record, he does
not believe staff should take responsibility for the applicant's lack of knowledge of the
requirement.
Mayor Rozanski stated that the applicant did not believe that Rings Road was part of their
- development, as it was an existing street. He believes the statute is ambiguous regarding
new or existing streets.
~t
Mr. Turner stated that he is withdrawing his request for the waiver of sidewalks at this
time.
Revised Concert Plan -The Hunt Club
Ms. Fierce presented slides of the site and surrounding area to Council. The site is a 26-
acre rectangle located on the south side of (proposed) Enterprise Drive between Avery Road
and Wilcox Road. It is located directly across the street from the Heather Glen subdivision.
The land is currently zoned R-I, Restricted Industrial District, and the applicant is
requesting PUD amended concept plan with multi-family housing. The P&Z Commission
reviewed the proposal at their April 16 meeting. They expressed concerns about the density
and the architecture and disapproved the plan by a vote of 3-4. The proposal calls for 288
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 15 Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK R N .
Hel
-lung 1~~-loQ~ 19
garden-style apartment units with atwo-story building. The applicant will extend Enterprise
Drive with a 60-foot right of way, 36 feet of pavement from Wilcox Road to Avery Road
just opposite Dan Sherri Avenue. The proposal includes parkland of approximately 4 acres.
Parkland requirements were reduced to accommodate open spaces between apartment
buildings. Staff believes the proposal provides a good transition between the industrial land
to the north and the single family area to the south. It provides an important east-west road
at the developer's expense. The revised plan presents a less dense layout than what was
originally proposed. The vote tonight is on a concept plan relating to land uses; it is
intended to give feedback to the developer on the land use concept. Staff recommends
approval in terms of its concept and general layout with the following conditions:
1. That all engineering features and considerations be designed and built as approved
by the City Engineer in accordance with City standards.
2. That the Avery Road waterline is extended to form an interconnection at Shier-Rings
Road.
3. That sufficient design details be provided within the preliminary plan stage of the
PUD to define the expected quality of the project, including varying the building
type, identifying architecture/materials, etc.
Mrs. King asked that it be made clear that sidewalks and street trees will be required along
all roads.
Mr. Strip asked why staff is recommending giving up the Restricted Industrial zoning at this
location.
Mr. Foegler responded that staff believes that multi-family is a better transition from
industrial to the single-family residential in the south, and that this is a good opportunity to
secure a major east-west arterial which will be built in conjunction with this project.
Mr. Sutphen commented that he doesn't believe these benefits justify the trade-off. He
added that the project is not imaginative and is too dense.
Mr. Foegler stated that the major elements of this concept plan are the east-west road, the
land use, and the density. If these elements are not acceptable, it does not make sense to
examine the architecture, building layouts, etc. He added that the Restricted Industrial is
a very permissive zone, and staff recognizes that this zone need to be improved to ensure
better quality industrial development.
Mr. Kranstuber added that he will not give up commercial land unless it is an extremely
attractive and better transitional proposal. He believes that school crowding problems will
result from this type of zoning.
Ronald Davis. attorney representing Triangle Investment, stated that staff has been very
interested in removing this land from the industrial zoning category. The applicant lost by
a close vote at P&Z because of the proposed density. P&Z members agreed that this
concept plan is the correct type of buffer between the industrial ground north of the tract
and the residential to the south and east. He pointed out some of the benefits of the
- proposal:
1. Five plus acres for parks are being dedicated at a value of over $40,000 per acre.
. If the land remains industrial, there will be no parkland.
2. A 2,150 foot street is being constructed at the developer's cost of $400,000 a major
street to service the residential development to the east.
3. Approximately one year following construction, approximately $175,000 per year
in real estate taxes will be generated, more than 50 percent of which will go to
Dublin.
4. There will be additional City income tax generated by the residents.
5. If the land remains industrial, the possibility of receiving taxes in the near future are
remote. Tax abatements are a standard request with industrial development.
6. The development will have an attractive 1.4 acre lake, a community house, pool and
tennis courts, with beautiful and well-maintained landscaping.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 16 Meeting
DAYTON LE AL BLAN
Held Ong 1~-1~a2 19
7. Reasonable rental rates will provide housing for young people who work in Dublin
and cannot find affordable housing in the area.
8. The number of students generated to Dublin Schools by the development would be
approximately 12.
The density cannot be lowered because of the cost of the land, the cost of construction of
" Enterprise Drive at $400,000, and the cost of the construction of off-site storm sewers of
$175,000. This is not a suitable location for higher priced, upscale apartments. He asked
that Council approve the Concept Plan as presented this evening.
Mrs. King commented that amulti-family development does make sense as a transition
between industrial and residential, but in view of the many apartment and condominium
developments in Dublin and surrounding areas currently under construction, she questions
the need for additional units of this type. She commented that it would be helpful if staff
could provide updates on the count of single-family and multi-family units of different
densities currently in the development process. This information would also be helpful to
the development community. She expressed concern that the amount of residential
development currently underway may possibly threaten the balance between commercial and
residential. This may also impact the marketing of these proposed units.
Mr. Kranstuber stated that he had understood from staff that when the Community Plan is
updated, there will be computer models available to project sewer and water needs, traffic
problems, etc.
Mr. Foegler agreed that the data bases are currently available to monitor multi-family and
single-family development underway.
Mr. Kranstuber added that he is not opposed to apartment or other development, but he
believes that Dublin's standards dictate more creativity, less density, better architectural
integration, more diversity. He believes it is Council's obligation to monitor the number
of apartment developments approved, especially for the southwest area.
Mr. Strip commented that the City receives income tax from the people who work in
Dublin, not from those who live here. He added that, for Mr. Davis' information, this
particular drawing was presented to Council for another project on Tuller Road only a few
weeks ago and Council strongly disapproved it at that time.
Mr. Davis responded that while this unit may not have been acceptable in the Tuller Road
area, they felt it would be appropriate in this industrial area. He added that the City staff
is supportive of this proposal, and yet neither P&Z nor Council have followed staff's
recommendations. This makes no sense whatsoever to the applicant.
Mr. Strip commented that neither the Council nor the P&Z Commission rubber-stamps what
staff approves; there is instead a system in place of checks and balances. He added that it
will require five votes to override P&Z.
Mr. Kranstuber stated that he has heard over 150 to 250 applications over the past years as
a member of P&Z. Work sessions were scheduled only for this application, where staff and
P&Z members met to resolve issues with the concept plan. He believes that the applicant
was given feedback all along regarding the proposal and given the opportunity to make
revisions.
Mr. Davis responded that staff was supportive of this concept plan.
Mr. Kranstuber commented that land use is a policy decision, not a staff decision.
Mayor Rozanski stated that staff works for the City of Dublin; Council is elected by the
residents of Dublin. Council does not exist to rubber-stamp whatever staff proposes or
supports. Staff works with the developers to enable them to get approval for their projects.
It is not staff's job to decide what type of project will be built within the City.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 17 Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK F R
Held 7.un,-..? ~Q~ 19
Mr. Strip moved to sustain the vote of P&Z Commission and to deny the Concept Plan as
submitted.
Mr. Amorose seconded the motion.
Vote on the Motion - Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr.
Strip, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mrs. King, yes.
Reports from Council Committees
Mr. Strip, Finance Committee, reported that there are four requests for funding to be
reviewed by Council this evening:
1. American Cancer Society's request for bed tax funding was previously turned down;
they have since revised their request and are asking for a contribution for police and
maintenance costs. Finance Committee believes this request does not meet the
requirements for funding, and thus recommends it be turned down.
2. The Ohio Association of Police Chiefs has scaled down their original request for bed
tax funds to a request for $1, 620 for promotional mailing and $1,000 for bus
transportation costs within the City of Dublin. Finance Committee recommends the
award of $500 for promotional mailing and $500 for transportation costs. He
commended Dublin's Police Chief Ferrell for not attempting to influence the
Committee's decision on this request, even though the Chief is an officer of the
Association.
3. Dublin Historical Society has requested reallocation of funds previously approved
for the Coffman House Gardens. They also request reallocation of funds for $800
to $1,000 for purchase of a grow light lab. The Committee recommends approval
y of both of these requests for reallocation of funds. They are seeking new funds of
$4,000 for irrigation of the garden. Finance Committee recommends the award of
• . up to $2,500 in matching funds for this purpose.
4. Dublin Counseling Center has requested an allocation of $28,000 which was
budgeted for 1992 under the City's contingency funds. The Finance Committee
recommends approval of this allocation -the same amount given last year to the
Center.
Mayor Rozanski expressed concern about the proposed irrigation system for the Coffman
House garden. At the time monies were appropriated for the garden, the Historical Society
agreed to contribute volunteer hours for maintenance of the garden. He does not believe
they can duplicate an historically correct irrigation system for $4,000.
Mr. Amorose responded that irrigation is a vital component of the success of the garden
project. Without proper irrigation, the garden will not thrive. Dollars will be saved in the
long run with installation of an underground sprinkling system. He encourages them to use
the pond as a source of water for the irrigation system. He supports funding for up to
$2,500 in matching funds -whether fund-raising means donation of materials, labor, or of
monies.
Mr. Strip commented that the Finance Committee discussed rewriting of the criteria for bed
tax funding. Staff and the Committee will meet to further refine the criteria.
~ Mr. Strip moved that the Finance Committee recomrr?endations on the four requests be
approved by Council.
Mr. Amorose seconded the motion.
Vote on the Motion -Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr.
Amorose, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes.
Mr. Strip stated that he will notify the applicants of their awards by letter tomorrow.
Mr. Kranstuber, Community Center Committee, reported that he had worked with Ms.
Jordan to put together a summary report of the last meeting of the Committee. He asked
Council members to review the report.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 18 Meeting
DAYTON LE AL BLANK
Hel
~~a,-~~~., ~ oo~ 19
Mr. Strip commented that Council had specifically indicated that the seniors' area would be
serviced by a separate entrance and become an independent part of the building.
Mr. Amorose stated that he recalled that the entrance was to be covered and would include
a ramp.
" Regarding the shuffleboard and horseshoe options, Council members agreed that it would
not be included due to the high cost. Horseshoe pits are already available in Coffman Park.
Mayor Rozanski agreed to check his notes to see if Council had voted to include racquetball
Court.
Ms. Jordan commented that she would like to change the specifications for storage from
"one room" in each area to "adequate" . This would provide flexibility if additional storage
is necessary. Council agreed with this change. She also requested that administrative space
be included as was discussed at the meeting, and Council agreed to include administrative
space.
Mr. Strip stated that spectator seating for the pool should be added to the list of inclusions.
Council members agreed that the report, with these modifications, accurately reflects what
was decided upon at the June 8 meeting.
Mr. Kranstuber commented that architectural firms interested in the project will be
requested to provide a statement of qualifications to Council within the next couple of days.
Following this process, four to six firms will be requested to submit formal RFP's for the
project. Time line is four weeks for statement of qualifications, and four to six weeks for
formal RFP's. He added that he will be sending a letter to Council members within the
next two weeks regarding their preferences for items to be included in Phase 1. This will
be used to give the architect a framework to work within to provide four or five proposals
to Council for Phase 1.
Mrs. King commented that she believes it is important to secure a commitment from the
school district regarding pool use and associated financial support prior to voting to
including the pool in the first phase of the project.
Mr. Kranstuber agreed to speak with the staff members at the district regarding these issues.
Mayor Rozanski commented that the school board, not the staff would be making this
decision.
Mr. Kranstuber stated that he will request that Council adopt this report after the
modifications previously discussed are made.
Mrs. King, Safety Committee, reported that the minutes of Friday's meeting have been
distributed to Council and thanked the clerk for timely preparation. She directed their
attention to the Committee's recommendation to staff that the safety island at the Muirfield
Drive/Sells Mill intersection be installed quickly. She thanked Council for passing the
legislation this evening authorizing the installation of school flashing lights at the
intersection.
Comments from Staff
Ms. Grigsby reported that bids will be accepted beginning tomorrow on the Tuller Road
notes. The term on the notes will be slightly longer than some of the other recently issued
notes and will hopefully correspond with the completion of the project. The field work for
the City's audit has been completed; the audit report should be issued within the next two
to three weeks. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) will be ready for
inclusion in the next Council packet.
Ms. Jordan stated that the summer programs opened today with approximately 500 children
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 19 Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK O., RM N .
Held Jung 1~, 1403 19
enrolled. Operations ran very smoothly overall. Trabue Nature Reserve project is well
underway; bridges will be placed on Tuesday and paving will follow shortly thereafter.
This will be a wonderful addition to the bikeway system.
w Council Roundtable
Mr. Amorose announced that the Dublin Kiwanis Frog Jump will take place on Saturday,
~ June 27 from 11 a. m. to 5:30 p. m. He invited Council members to stop at the event for
to assist with judging. He also reminded Council that the Dublin Garden Club Tour is
scheduled for Sunday, June 28 from 1 to 5 p. m. ; his garden will be included on the tour.
Mr. Kranstuber requested that staff provide, within the next few months, a summary of the
bikeway plan and its status.
Ms. Jordan responded that this plan will be updated with the Community Plan in the near
future. She agreed to provide a summary report to Mr. Kranstuber regarding the bikepath
status as soon as possible.
Mr. Sutphen stated that Mr. Smith will be updating Council on the Browning Court issue
within the next few days.
Mayor Rozanski commented about the great job done by the staff and especially the Police
Department during the Tournament.
Mr. Strip moved and Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion to adjourn to Executive Session to
discuss legal matters and contracts.
Vote on the Motion - Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mrs.
~ King, yes; Mayor Rozanski, yes; Mr. Strip, yes.
Mayor Rozanski announced that Council will not reconvene following the Executive
Session.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:45 p.m.
~Y / ,
or, Presiding O,.er ~
Clerk of Council