HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/09/1997 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin ('ity ('~uncil MPetina paaP ~ Meeting
YT N AL B NK 00. FORM NO. 10148
Held June 9, 1997 19
Mayor Kranstuber called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Present were Mr. Campbell, Ms.
Hide Pittaluga, Mr. McCash and Mayor Kranstuber.
Mayor Kranstuber moved to adjourn to executive session for discussion of land acquisition and
personnel matters.
Ms. Hide Pittaluga seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mayor
Kranstuber, yes.
Mrs. Boring arrived at 6:05 p.m. Mr. Reiner arrived at 6:40 p.m. Mrs. Stillwell was absent
(excused).
The meeting was reconvened at 7:15 p.m.
Mr. McCash led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll Call
Council members present were: Mayor Kranstuber, Mr. Campbell, Mrs. Boring, Mr. McCash,
s. Hide Pittaluga, and Mr. Reiner. Mrs. Stillwell was absent (excused).
Staff members present included: Mr. Hansley, Mr. Helwig, Mr. Smith, Ms. Grigsby, Mr.
arding, Ms. Clarke, Mr. Kindra, Ms. Jordan, Mr. McDaniel, Chief Geis, Mr. Lenz, Ms.
Barden, Ms. Crandall, and Mr. Hahn.
royal f Minutes of Ma 19 1997 Meetin
ayor Kranstuber moved approval of the minutes of the meeting of May 19, 1997.
. Reiner seconded the motion.
n hem ti n - Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr.
cCash, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes..
orres ondence
he clerk reported that notices were sent to Council regarding the following liquor permit
pplications: RLB Investments, dba Carfagna's Dublin at 6500 Riverside Drive for a new D-2
ermit; WHCMB, Inc., 600 Metro Place N. for a new DSA permit; CH, Inc., Perimeter Mall
or a new D2 permit; and Ohio Golf, Inc., dba Teed Off Indoor Golf Center for a new D 1
ermit.
here was no objection from Council to the issuance of these permits.
roclamations/S ecial Reco nition
he following students from Dublin Scioto High School were recognized by City Council for
heir achievements in the creative and visual arts field as well as academics: Allison Sires,
radd Birmingham, Matthew C. Reed, Dan McMahon, Jacob Dudley, and Lucas Christman.
om Meter Ohio Association of Consultin En ineers presented a Community Improvement
ward to the City of Dublin for the Emerald Parkway project Phase 1 and 2 in recognition of
he parkway's beautification of the City and the traffic improvements which have resulted from
he parkway. Burgess & Niple nominated the City for this award. Mr. Meter also presented
albir Kindra with a public service award in recognition of his outstanding service to the public
n his capacity as City Engineer.
h f Office
ayor Kranstuber administered the Oath of Office to newly appointed Police Sergeant Rodney
arnes.
hief Geis noted that Sergeant Barnes has served on the Dublin Police force for over 10 years.
he Mayor and members of Council congratulated Sergeant Barnes on his promotion.
itizen Comments
oe R an 8267 Riverside Drive stated that he has come to Council to discuss storm water
roblems and has brought a videotape demonstrating the problems which have worsened
ollowing recent heavy rains. The City has performed the work previously authorized to
orrect the drainage problems, however the problems remain. Mr. Ryan added that he has
sked the developer of Wedgewood Hills to attend the meeting tonight to respond to his
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of nli lin City f'rtrnmril ~clpetir~ I'agg 3 Meeting
AL NK C FORM NO. 10148
Held June 9, 1997 19
concerns, but Mr. Ruma is not present. Mr. Ryan described in detail the storm water
problems which are caused by water bypassing the detention basin.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that his recollection is that Council had previously directed staffto
undertake the measures recommended by Camp, Dresser and McKee to correct the problems.
He suggested putting this item on as an agenda item for a future meeting.
Mr. Hansley suggested that Council take additional testimony from Mrs. Brooks regarding this
problem and then have the City's storm water consultants update them on the situation.
Council can then refer the matter back to staff, to Committee or place it on an upcoming
Council agenda.
Mr. Ryan noted that there is now property damage involved and something needs to be done
to address it.
7ulie Brooks, 8237 Riverside Drive commented that they have tried to work through this
situation over the past 3 years with Council, Council committees and staff. She and her
husband and Mrs. Pinney are all long-time residents. The problems began after the
development of Wedgewood South. There has been a great deal of damage done to their
roperty and they have had to pay for the repairs. She urged Council to find the right forum in
hich to address the problem. She is concerned about the City consultant's recommendation
hich could result in relocating the problem 5 houses down the road.
s. Boring noted that the City adheres to MORPC standards which call for the storm water
ischarge after development to be no greater than before development. After 3 years of
iscussion about the problem, she would support halting the issuance of building permits until
y he problem with the detention pond is fixed.
s. Brooks added that the City is incurring the expense of trying to fix the problems, but the
ottom line is that this is not Dublin's problem but a developer problem. If the problems are
of addressed, however, they will have to initiate legal action against the City or the developer
o resolve the problems.
hri 1 in m Dr r and M Kee storm water consultants for the City, stressed that it
s everyone's intention to solve the problem. He noted that the hay bales put in by the
eveloper are for purposes of sediment control, but there is a significant problem with the flow
oming down. They plan to revisit the volume in the detention basin upstream from Mrs.
inney. They previously looked at the two year, five year and 100 year design storm, but did
of consider any of the design storms in between those ranges. It may be beneficial to look at
ome of those to see if that basin is overtopping. If it is, it is not meeting the design
equirements. The recent rainfall event of 4.4 inches of rain in 48 hours was such a significant
vent that the rainfall data run through the model showed that the basin was overtopped. This
ould explain the amount of water coming down the north and south side of Westbury Road.
f more volume can be provided up in that detention basin, this will not be happen. The water
ill only come out of the 8 inch pipe and the flow will be greatly reduced.
s. Boring asked about relining the detention basin to make it function correctly.
- Kindra responded that Mr. Ruma was directed to prepare the lining and has not done so to
Last week, a second letter was sent reminding him of this commitment.
wing discussion, Mr. Helwig agreed to have staff report back in 2 weeks on the status of
zalysis and the repair work.
Maurer. 7451 Dublin Road noted that he is very sensitive to the evolution of democratic
tions and the battles fought to remove any sign of secret government. He continues to
that Section 3.06(d) of the Revised Charter is a provision that can lend itself to
~ndalous abuse of power. If there is not a reason for this clause, he suggests that Council
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting paQP Meeting
YT AL B NK CO. FORM NO. 10148
Hel' June 9, 1997 19
remove the clause. He does not understand how this issue came up in the first place or who
thought they needed a blank check to do anything. He does not believe that Council can have
an ordinance which will demonstrate what the additional need for executive session is, since at
that point, the confidentiality would be compromised.
Mr. McCash responded that the Revised Charter was put on the ballot, people were notified
about the proposal, voted on it, and the majority vote ruled. If Mr. Maurer does not support
this clause, he has the power of initiative to remove it. Further, if a future Council member
abuses this provision related to executive sessions, Mr. Maurer has the right to recall the
member.
Mayor Kranstuber added that the Revised Charter was voted upon by the citizens. The
Charter Committee was a citizen group made up of 2 Council members and 5 citizens. Council
does not have the authority to change the Charter.
Staff Comments
s. Jordan noted that a reception will be held on Saturday, June 28 at the Rec Center to honor
r. Bruce Graham for his contributions to Dublin. The dedication of the plaque will be at 1:30
p. m.
EGISLATION
blic Hearin & Second Readin -Ordinances
rdinance 62-97 (Amended) - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for
.337 Acres Located Approximately 700 Feet South of Perimeter Drive on the
outheast Corner of (future) Venture Drive, and Abutting US 33/SR 161 from: PCD,
Tanned Commerce District to: PCD, Planned Commerce District. (Gordon Flesch
ompany, Inc. -Perimeter Center) (Applicant: Mark Daniels, Meacham & Apel
rchitects, 5640 Frantz Road, Dublin, OH)
egistered as proponents of the rezoning were: Robert Apel, 5640 Frantz Road, Dublin,
H; Tom Flesch, 1006 Circle on the Green, Worthington, OH; and Tim Kelton, Ruscilli
onstruction. There were no registered opponents.
r. McCash indicated he would abstain from this matter and left the room.
s. Clarke stated that this site is located on the south side of proposed Venture Drive. The
roposal is fora 33,000 square foot building to house Gordon Flesch Company with 120
mployees. She showed a slide of the site location to Council. The rezoning application
as reviewed by Planning Commission on May 1, 1997 and was approved with 10
onditions:
That the construction of the site be coordinated with the construction of public
roadways and facilities, subject to the approval of the City Engineer;
That signage requirements of the proposed text be revised to the satisfaction of staff,
and thereafter be returned to the Commission for final determination;
That all Engineering division requirements be met on design of public roads, private
drives, site utilities and improvements, and storm water management;
That a required 60 foot landscaped mound provided along US 33/SR 161 with trees
planted a minimum of one tree per 30 feet (or fraction thereof) be included in the
text, and that the landscape plan meet Code, subject to staff approval;
That all service structures, including rooftop mechanicals and screening, be shown
on site plan and building elevation drawings, and that details be provided and be
acceptable to staff;
That the text require Dublin lighting guidelines to be met, and that a complete site
lighting plan which meets those requirements be submitted;
That a sidewalk be constructed along the frontage of the new road;
That the fencing for tree preservation along the east property line be field verified by
the staff and be installed along the drip line of the trees prior to and during all
phases of construction;
That the finished floor elevation and site grading be coordinated with the Justice
Center site; and
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City C'~uncil Meeting paaP 4 Meeting
B NK FORM NO. 10148
Held June 9, 1997 19
I
10. That all changes required above be incorporated into a revised plan that is submitted
within two weeks.
Ms. Clarke added that on Thursday, June 5, 1997, Planning Commission recommended
approval of the proposed sign package by a split vote. Staff believes the sign package is
supportable since the US 33 corridor has much potential for future freeway development
n and should be given the same opportunities for signage as along I-270. There is a TIF for
this project which provides that the City will build the road and associated improvements.
The preliminary plat for the road is on tonight's agenda under the "Other" portion.
Mr. Reiner asked if the setbacks for US 33 are the same as those for I-270. He is interested
in learning what the linear feet measurement is from the edge of pavement to the setback.
Mr. Kindra responded that he does not know what the setbacks are without checking.
Mayor Kranstuber asked about the square footage of the sign as proposed.
Ms. Clarke responded that in total, the signage is 105 square feet - an 80 foot ground sign
oriented toward US 33 and a 25 foot ground sign along Venture Drive. Under the Dublin
Code, this site would permit one 50 square foot sign. To qualify for a second sign, the site
would have to have 100 feet of frontage. The site has only 50 feet.
Mayor Kranstuber asked about other sites along 161 and whether they have been granted
signage in excess of the 50 square feet.
Ms. Clarke stated that she cannot recall any cases in the time she has been here.
Ms. Hide Pittaluga asked how the signage relates to the rezoning application.
Ms. Clarke responded that this rezoning is for a Planned Commerce District and the
roposal includes the signage. The signage package is a part of the rezoning and must be
considered as such.
r. Smith clarified that Council can choose to adopt the recommendation of Planning
Commission or modify it, or send it back for further review.
r. Campbell noted that during the Planning Commission review process, a wall sign
acing US 33 was eliminated. If this site was located along I-270, the freeway sign would
e acceptable. The Venture Drive sign will not be seen from the freeway side, and the pie
hape of this site necessitates a sign at Venture Drive.
s. Clarke confirmed that the site has a narrow frontage with a 200 foot long driveway and
veryone has agreed that it is not unreasonable to have a sign on the driveway as well as
ong the freeway.
r. Campbell stated that the remaining issue with this application is the sign facing the
reeway. He asked if US 33 in that stretch is a comparable road to I-270 which is a half
ile away. He believes that they are similar limited access freeways, both have medians,
encing, 55 to 65 mph speeds.
s. Clarke stated that 2 years ago, staff had included US 33 in the amendments to the sign
ode for corporate signage. Council removed the US 331ocation and allowed the larger
ignage along I-270 only. Staff still supports the larger signage for the portion of US 33
hat lies to the west of I-270. She noted that the P&Z vote was split 3-2 on this 80 square
oot sign on US 33.
r. Reiner asked about the size of the plats along 161 in comparison to those along 270.
his would impact the size of signage allowed.
s. Clarke stated that the text for Perimeter does not prohibit establishment of smaller lots.
he Duke sites have generally been between 4 and 7 acres. The corporate signage,
owever, is not provided on the basis of the size of the lot but on the basis that it is a
orporate office, amulti-story building, and also on the basis of the setback from right-of-
ay.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting paoP 5 Meeting
Y7 N AL BLANK CO. FORM NO. 10148
Hela June 9, 1997 19
I
Mrs. Boring noted her concerns with the P&Z process. Staff had first recommended
disapproval of the sign in their report but then revised the report a few days later to
recommend the signage. She is also concerned that if a larger sign is approved with this
rezoning and if the property is later sold to a retailer, could the retailer have an 80 square
foot sign?
Ms. Clarke responded that the 80 square foot sign is specifically a corporate office
privilege.
Mrs. Boring emphasized that she does not believe the 33/161 corridor should be treated the
same as I-270 for signage.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that the issue for him is not whether the 33/161 corridor should be
treated as 270, but whether signage has been previously approved at this size along 33/161.
The present standards have been in existence for a long time, and he would want to hear a
compelling reason to make an exception.
Mayor Kranstuber asked the representative for the applicant to testify.
Bob Apel, Meacham & Apel Architects, representing Mark Daniels distributed additional
drawings to Council members. He noted that the exposure to this site on US 33/161 is
limited because of the underpass as shown on the site plan. He added that the front of this
property has 40 feet more setback than the other properties along this area because the
right-of--way was extended for possible ramp increase from the interchange. The speed of
the road and the limited access going to the west are mitigating factors which should impact
the decision. This rezoning is an integral part of the TIF legislation to be considered later
on tonight's agenda. He believes that it would be difficult to sell this site unless the same
signage opportunities are provided as are to I-270 sites. The applicant is willing to accept a
compromise of a 50 foot sign on US 33 and a 25 foot sign on Venture Drive with the
stipulation that if a new sign Code is adopted in the meantime which allows 33 frontage to
be treated as the I-270 frontage for signage, that the applicant can then have the 80 foot
sign, subject to staff review.
Mr. Campbell moved to adopt the recommendation of the Planning Commission with the
modification that the signage as discussed will comply with the present Code, but if the
Code is modified that the applicant will be entitled to comply with the updated Code for
the freeway signage, subject to approvalby staff. The applicant will then not have to come
back to Council for further review of the signage.
Mr. Reiner seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion -Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes;
Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes.
Vote on the ordinance -Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mr.
Campbell, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes.
Tom Flesch}~plicant stated that he appreciates Council's consideration of their request.
He noted that the name of the company is lengthy and for this reason, the signage request is
greater than average. He is satisfied with the compromise reached on this matter.
Ordinance 7497 - An Ordinance Amending the Annual Appropriations for the Fiscal
Year Ending December 31, 1997.
Registered as a proponent of the ordinance were: Joyce Witte, 274 Beckley Lane; Robert
Quisnel, 267 Longbranch; and Tom Peoples, 266 Monterey Drive.
There were no registered opponents.
Ms. Crandall stated that staff has been working with the residents of Waterford Village on
the traffic issues for several months. The issues are speed and cut-through traffic. The
Police division has done enforcement and the neighborhood has done citizen patrol. Traffic
calming devices were discussed by staff with the residents in March, and the residents have
indicated they are in favor of the installation of speed humps. Staff is recommending
installation of 5 to 6 temporary traffic calming devices to see if they reduce the speed and
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes Of l7iihlin rlity C"rnmril MPPtin~_ ~~sg ~ Meeting
B NK CO. FORM NO. 10148
Help June 9, 1997 19
volume of traffic, and also to see how the residents respond to the increased signage and
speed humps in their neighborhood.
In response to Mrs. Boring, Mr. Kindra stated that the installation of the speed humps could
be done in conjunction with the 1997 street maintenance program. He would recommend a
M trial period of at least 6 months to evaluate their effectiveness.
Mrs. Boring indicated that she would like to have the devices in place for a full four
seasons to assess their impact. She would also request another meeting with the residents
involved to ensure that signage is kept to an absolute minimum.
Mr. Hansley pointed out that there are minimum levels of signage for liability reasons.
Mr. McCash asked why the residents indicated a preference for speed humps as opposed to
chokers or other calming measures.
Ms. Crandall responded that some of the other traffic calming devices presented safety
issues in regard to emergency vehicle access. The flat top speed humps were also one of
the lower cost solutions considered and the preferred alternative for the residents.
r. Kindra stated that the speed humps as proposed will not cause problems for snow plows
r fire trucks. Staff will assess their effectiveness and report back to Council after the trial
eriod is completed.
r. McCash noted that in recent reviews of subdivision plats, the requirement has been to
ave two access points in and out such as at Killilea. He could foresee a situation where
peed humps will have to be installed throughout subdivision streets to reduce the speed and
iscourage cut-through traffic. Perhaps the developers should be required to install the
" " peed humps at the time of construction.
r. Kindra responded that this situation is unique and there is a problem with cut-through
raffic and speeding. The recommendation of staff is to use speed humps for this situation.
ollowing this trial period, a policy can be proposed for adoption by Council.
r. Hansley added that Council can always request that another option be tested in another
ocation at the conclusion of this trial.
ayor Kranstuber stated that he would take testimony from those who signed in to speak.
m P 1 2 M n r Dri stated that he has resided with his family in Waterford
or the past 18 years and he has a well defined view of the situation. He is past president
d a current member of the Waterford Village Civic Association. They have asked
ouncil in the past for assistance with these problems. Police officers have indicated to
im that, in their opinion, Monterey is the worst cut-through street in Dublin. He would
upport traffic calming measures to either divert traffic or to slow it down to ensure the
afety of the children in the subdivision and the safety of the residents entering and exiting
heir driveways.
n r h stated that the neighborhood resembles a school
layground in terms of the number of children and activities. He has personally observed
ehicles traveling in excess of 50 mph. A neighbor's mailbox was hit by a car recently,
d this could have easily been a child. The residents are not engineers but concerned
arents. His concern is with the lives and safety of the children who reside in the
eighborhood.
kl stated that she would like to address some of Mr. McCash's
oncerns about other neighborhoods' problems with traffic and speeding. She spoke with
rs. Stillwell on Friday and they would like to convene a meeting with the Transportation
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting page 7 Meeting
q NK FORM NO. 10148
Held June 9, 1997 19
~ Task Force and staff for representatives of subdivisions who have similar problems. The
goal would be policy development. Mr. Reiner has told her that in Europe, these devices
are very commonly used. Several areas in Columbus have used these traffic calming
measures. What they are requesting is flat top speed humps stamped to look like
cobblestone to tie in with the aesthetics of Old Dublin. If the Monterey Drive experiment is
sn, , successful, they would then request installation on Longbranch and Waterford Drive.
Another factor in this situation is that Waterford is the only subdivision in Dublin that does
not have sidewalks throughout. Their concern as parents is to make Dublin a safer and
better place. She thanked staff and Council for their willingness to work with the residents
and to listen and take action. She is looking forward to a successful outcome.
Mrs. Witte added that there is an ineffective crosswalk in front of Mr. People's house and
they would suggest it be removed permanently or relocated one street down where there is
already a ramp cut into the curb. The residents would support having a crosswalk at the
corner of Stonefence and Waterford which is a dangerous crossing.
Following discussion, Mr. Hansley suggested that the trial period be one year before a final
decision is made.
Mr. Campbell noted that this matter was very courteously presented and he commends the
citizens for the way this matter was brought to Council. The distinguishing factor in this
case seems to be the unanimity of the residents regarding the speed humps. This factor
gives Council a degree of comfort with the proposed solution.
Mayor Kranstuber noted that Council has not previously authorized the installation of speed
humps, but he does agree with Mr. Campbell's observations.
Ms. Hide Pittaluga stated that in the Llewellyn Farms situation, a consultant had
recommended installation of traffic humps but staff did not. This is the second time she has
indicated her support of speed humps which are a logical, common sense approach to the
problem. She does not believe Llewellyn Farms needs to be revisited because the solution
to their problems was determined to be a traffic light.
Mr. McCash proposed modifications to the ordinance as drafted:
He moved to revise the second "Whereas" clause to state that "Council has been provided
with traffic studies indicating that excessive speeds and above average cut-through traffic
occur."
Ms. Hide Pittaluga seconded this motion.
Mr. McCash proposed an additional "Whereas" clause stating, "Whereas Waterford Village
does not have public sidewalks, and pedestrians are therefore required to utilize the
roadway for pedestrian traffic."
Mrs. Boring stated that she agrees with the first change but not the second. Muirfield does
not have sidewalks and neither will Campden Lakes. She would suggest that the Public
Services Committee develop a policy with the input of the Transportation Task Force and
neighborhood representatives, but that Council should proceed with the speed hump trial in
Waterford.
Following discussion about the time period for the experiment, Mr. McCash moved to
insert the language "for a period of 12 months " in the second section.
Mr. Reiner seconded the amendment.
yQte on the two amendments - Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mayor
Kranstuber, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes.
Mr. McCash commented further that this problem needs to be addressed city-wide. Some
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of n»hlin City ('rn,nril Meet PaaP R Meeting
A 8 NK CO. FORM NO. 10148
Held June 9, 1997 19
have suggested that the City double the fines for speeding in residential neighborhoods.
This would likely require increasing the penalty to a fourth degree misdemeanor which
requires a mandatory court appearance. Perhaps a bright yellow sign could be installed
under the 25 mph limit stating that fines are doubled in this area.
Mrs. Boring stated that she would prefer to discuss these options at a Public Services
Committee under a policy discussion.
She moved to refer the policy to address speeding problems in neighborhoods to the Public
Services Committee.
Mr. McCash seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes;
Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. McCash, yes.
Vote on the ordinance -Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mayor
Kranstuber, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes.
Ordinance 75-97 - An Ordinance Accepting the Lowest/Best Bid for Mosquito Spray
Formula.
Mr. Hansley stated that staff is recommending that Clarke Mosquito Control Products be
awarded the bid as outlined in the report.
Vote on the ordinance - Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs.
Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes.
Ordlinance 76-97 - An Ordinance Accepting the Lowest/Best Bid for the Emerald
Parkway Landscaping.
` Mr. Hansley introduced the City's landscape architect consultant, Jim Burkhart.
" Jim Burkhart, James Burkhart & Associates thanked Council and the City for the
opportunity to design the project. He presented slides to Council of the proposed Emerald
Parkway landscaping.
Mr. Campbell stated that the Emerald Parkway road project was quite controversial in the
City, and he wants to ensure that all of the commitments made will be fulfilled with this
lan.
r. Burkhart assured Council that the landscaping plan fulfills all of the commitments.
r. Campbell asked if the plan is feasible to be done throughout the length of Emerald
arkway. The desire of Council was to have Emerald Parkway make a statement, with a
distinctive and consistent look all across Dublin from Sawmill to Tuttle Crossing.
Companies are spending a lot of dollars to have an address on Emerald Parkway and the
City made commitments that the appearance of the road would be very upscale.
r. Burkhart responded that only three or four cities in the entire region have the
andscaping standards of Dublin. He emphasized that if the City purchases the base bid or
are minimum, there will still be a better median strip than most of the communities across
olumbus.
ollowing brief discussion about the necessity of the various components of the plan, Mr.
ampbell summarized that the big ticket items in the plan are $130,000 of stone stucco
ails, $91,000 of stamped concrete at the median, and $218,000 for the irrigation system.
n response to Council members, Mr. Burkhart stated that the irrigation system is tied into
he City's water system. The initial cost of the system is high because it includes a
ophisticated central computer component to monitor the system to prevent over watering,
o detect leaks, etc.
e noted that the cost of the landscaping for this portion will be substantially higher than
he rest of the parkway because of the expensive sound walls, the expensive fencing, and
he landscaping along the high school site.
r. Helwig confirmed that this portion of the roadway is 6,024 feet and there are 19,300
eet remaining. This portion constitutes about one-fourth of the total length of Emerald
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin Cry o mcil Meeting PaaP 9 Meeting
YT N AL B NK CO. FORM NO. 10148
Hela June 9, 1997 19
~ Parkway.
Ms. Hide Pittaluga indicated she would prefer to spend the monies up-front on the
infrastructure and perhaps involve garden clubs or other entities in carrying out the overall
plan for perennials and such items.
Mr. McCash asked if traffic enforcement will be more difficult because of the landscaped
walls.
Mr. Burkhart responded that the walls are only 30 inches high and will not interfere with
traffic enforcement.
Mrs. Boring expressed concern about the yearly costs for the water for the landscaping.
Mr. Burkhart estimated that the water use would be approximately 1.2 million gallons
which is about $1, 600 per year.
In response to Mr. Campbell, Mr. Burkhart stated that removing the irrigation system
would not limit the types of plantings but would instead necessitate much hand watering and
maintenance.
Mr. Burkhart stated that there are sleeves in the roadway for the irrigation system and that
the bid includes prevailing wage.
Mr. Reiner asked about the durability of the stone walls in the salt zone.
Mr. Burkhart stated that studies so far have shown that the material is durable.
Mr. Reiner stated that stamped concrete can crack over time, but pavers last indefinitely.
He believes the need for the irrigation system must be balanced against the cost. A drought
~ situation occurs infrequently, and the landscaped median in Muirfield is often burned out in
late summer. He would support eliminating the irrigation system and including the smaller
perennials and extra trees.
Mr. Burkhart emphasized that the cost of maintenance and hand watering the landscaping is
considerable.
Mr. Hahn commented that at the present time, none of the median strips in the City have
irrigation systems. Some park areas are fully irrigated, however. The operating cost
projections of the base plan were $10,000 for labor and materials and $17,000 for the full
package. These costs were based on the assumption of an irrigation system being installed.
He added that one of his concerns about this project is safety of the workers in maintaining
the median areas - it may be necessary to shut down a lane to maintain some of the areas.
Mr. Campbell noted that it is important to stay within budget for this project even though
the irrigation system may be desirable. The system can be added later if funds are
available.
Mr. Burkhart stated that he is a firm believer in proper irrigation. The system cost can be
reduced if some of the control items are eliminated. He could cut the costs by
approximately $30,000 if a manual system is used.
Mr. McCash indicated he would prefer to stay within the TIF budget and remove the
irrigation system at this time. He would also support changing the stamped concrete to
brick pavers.
Ms. Hide Pittaluga stated that an irrigation system will provide more flexibility in planning
for the beds. The perennials are important for the aesthetics of the project.
Mrs. Boring stated that she would support leaving the irrigation system out in order to stay
within budget.
Mr. Reiner stated that if the irrigation system is not included, it is important that the Parks
division be staffed to maintain the plantings the first year since this is the City's
responsibility. He added that the landscape ordinance for the City requires that trees are of
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Pave 1(1 Meeting
AYi E AL NK CO. FORM NO. 10148
Held June 9, 1997 19
high quality and not grown in the south.
Mr. Hahn commented that although Council has approved staffing increases for his
division, they are unable to fill many seasonal positions due to the labor market conditions.
The horticultural crew is now at about 60 percent of authorized staffing.
It was the consensus of Council to eliminate the irrigation system and to use pavers instead
of stamped concrete.
Mr. Helwig asked that Council consider adding trees on both sides of the bridge at a cost of
$17,500 as outlined in the memo.
It was the consensus of Council to put trees on the north side and to use 7 to 8 foot trees in
the same quantity, as suggested by Mr. Reiner.
Mr. Helwig noted that the total costs of the items selected by Council, including $10,500
for the trees on the north side of the bridge is $595,752. The budget was estimated at
$565,000.
Mr. McCash suggested that spray coatings be used on the walls to protect them from the
salt.
Mr. Smith suggested that the ordinance specify that the total cost not exceed $600,000.
Staff can then follow the direction given by Council tonight in regard to the alternates.
Vote on the ordinance - Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor
Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes.
Ordinance 82-97 - An Ordinance Declaring Improvements to Certain Parcels of Real
Property to be a Public Purpose, Describing the Public Infrastructure Improvements
to be made to Benefit Those Parcels, Requiring the Owners Thereof to Make Service
Payments in Lieu of Taxes, Authorizing a City Agreement with Ruscilli Construction
Co., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and Trust and Olde Poste Properties, Columbus
Building, L.L.C. and Brentlinger Enterprises with Respect to Those Payments,
Establishing a Municipal Public Improvement Tax Increment Equivalent end for the
Deposit of Such Service Payments, Authorizing a Related Amendment of an
Agreement with the Dublin City School District, and Declaring an Emergency.
Mr. Hansley noted that this is the tax increment financing agreement for the Midwestern
Auto Group and Gordon Flesch developments.
Mr. Kranstuber moved to treat this as emergency legislation.
Mr. Campbell seconded the motion.
Ms. Grigsby stated that the need for emergency is to comply with the time frames for the
public improvements to be made to accommodate these developments.
Vote on the motion - Mr. McCash, abstain; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor
Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes.
Vote on the ordinance - Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes;
Mr. Campbell, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. McCash, abstain.
Tabled Ordinances Scheduled for Action
Ordinance 41-97 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 14.78 Acres of
Land Located at the Southeast Corner of Perimeter Loop Road and Perimeter Drive
from: PCD, Planned Commerce District to: PCD, Planned Commerce District.
(Midwestern Auto Group) (Applicant: Chris Cline, 37 W. Bridge Street representing
Charles Aeh, Midwestern Auto Group, 5016 Post Road, Dublin, OH 43017)
Ms. Clarke noted that atwo-page addendum to the text was distributed this evening.
She noted that the text was amended based on the discussion at the public hearing regarding
signage. She believes that the text represents the direction given by Council, and staff
recommends approval of the ordinance with the amended text.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting PAQP 11 Meeting
A NK C FORM N 10148
~ Held June 9, 1997 19
Mr. Reiner asked about the landscape changes on the display "fingers".
Mr. Cline stated that the short finger is virtually all display area.
Ms. Clarke noted that in regard to the landscaping plan, she cannot verify staff's
acceptance.
Mr. Cline stated that Ms. Newcomb had verified that the landscaping changes were
~ acceptable.
Mayor Kranstuber moved approval of the ordinance with the conditions of Planning and
Zoning, the text and the addendum submitted to Council tonight.
Mr. McCash seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms.
Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mr. McCash, yes.
Ordinance 63-97 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 4.25 Acres
Located at the Terminus of David Road, Approximately 720 Feet North of SR 161
from: R-4, Suburban Residential District to: PCD, Planned Commerce District, and
Declaring an Emergency. (AEP Proposed David Road Substation) (Applicant: Roy
Strawser, American Electric Power, 215 North Front Street, Columbus, OH 43215)
Ms. Clarke stated that the applicant and staff are now satisfied with the text submitted to
Council. Planning Commission believes that at some point in the future, a communications
tower on this site may be desirable. The City encourages locating these towers on existing
structures wherever possible, so this permissible use was added to the text. It also includes
that such a tower would be subject to the approval of the Board of Zoning Appeals or other
appropriate authority at the time.
~ Ms. Hide Pittaluga stated that she is concerned with including a provision about a
communications tower when the entire telecommunications issues for the City have not been
resolved. This is premature.
Mr. Hansley responded that this text change merely grants this as a permissive use, and it
seems logical to include it at this time.
Bob Schnell, mother of Edith Schnell of David Road stated that he specifically asked at
another meeting if there would be a communications tower there and someone had assured
him that there would not.
Ms. Clarke confirmed that the response to this question did not come from City staff.
Mr. Campbell noted that he does not recall any discussion previously about a tower at this
location.
Mr. McCash proposed that it would make more sense to allow one communications tower
at this location rather than have an electrical substation here and a cellular tower at Martin
Road which was one of the other sites under consideration. He would prefer to change the
language to "cellular tower" from "towers" and stipulate that it would have to be attached to
the existing structure on the site.
` Ms. Hide Pittaluga stated that she would have preferred to have the input of the Service
Director on this matter. She believes it is inappropriate to add this provision• she would
3,,..
rather see that portion done as a separate rezoning matter.
Ms. Hide Pittaluga moved to delete the language that refers specifically to the towers.
The motion died for lack of a second.
Ms. Hide Pittaluga asked that Mr. McDaniel follow up with a report outlining how this
ordinance will affect the pending telecommunications ordinance.
Following discussion, Mr. Campbell moved to add on page 6, "further, a communications
tower which equals or exceeds 36 feet in height plus related facilities will be permitted to be
mounted on the existing electrical substation structures if approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting, Page 12 Meeting
YT AL BLANK O. FORM N 10148
Held June 9, 1997 19
rs. Boring seconded the motion.
n h m i n -Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Hide
ittaluga, no; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes.
r r. Hansley commented that staff will make any other appropriate changes in the text in
eeping with this amendment.
ayor Kranstuber moved to treat this as emergency legislation.
rs. Boring seconded the motion.
r. Hansley stated that the need for the emergency with this rezoning is that Dublin will
ace an energy crisis as soon as next summer unless immediate construction of this
substation takes place.
n m i n -Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mr.
einer, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes.
- Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes;
r. McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes.
k r n ' h li stated that the engineers have indicated that if a
ommunications tower is added to this site, they would put it on the transmission tower
hich is adjacent to the substation equipment. Council may wish to clarify this in their
mendment to the text.
esolution 09-96 - A Resolution to Repeal the Existing Council Rules of Order and
o Adopt New Council Rules of Order.
' r. Campbell stated that a copy of the proposed Rules incorporating all of the changes was
'ncluded in the packet.
There was no further discussion.
n h 1 i - Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes;
r. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes.
r i in - in n
Ordinance 73-97 - An Ordinance Amending Ordinance 52-96 to Revise the Fee for an
Amusement Device Operation Review in Appendix "A" of the Schedule of Fees and
Service Charges for City of Dublin Services.
Mayor Kranstuber introduced the ordinance.
Mr. Hansley stated that staff is asking that this be held over for second reading and public
hearing at the next Council meeting.
There will be a public hearing on the ordinance at the June 23 Council meeting.
Ordinance 83-97 - An Ordinance Amending the Planning & Zoning Code to Establish
the Historic Development District (Section 153.11.
Mr. McCash introduced the ordinance and suggested that it be referred to Planning &
Zoning Commission.
Mrs. Stillwell stated that she supports referral to Planning & Zoning Commission, and P&Z
can then invite the Old Dublin Association and ARB to work with them on this matter.
Mr. McCash commented that he believes there should be a task force set up for review
following the referral to Planning & Zoning.
He moved to refer it to Planning and Zoning Commission.
Mr. Reiner seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion -Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Reiner,
yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes.
Other
Preliminary Plat -Venture Drive
Ms. Clarke stated that the Venture Drive preliminary plat was approved by Planning
Commission on May 15, 1997. The proposal is to extend a loop street to the south of
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting PaaP ~ ~ Meeting
NK CO. FORM NO. 10148
Held June 9, 1997 19
existing Perimeter Drive, opposite Metatec Drive and Wall Street. It includes 2,900 feet of
linear road with 23-foot wide pavement. It will have 5-foot sidewalks on both sides of the
street, 8-foot tree lawns, street trees, etc. The street will be used for access to the MAG
dealership and to the Gordon Flesch site and will be installed under a TIF agreement.
Planning Commission recommended approval with 5 conditions:
. l . That the existing trees on the site be indicated on the preliminary plat and
construction plans, and that tree preservation area be indicated (including the
landmark tree), subject to staff approval;
2. That a tree preservation plan be undertaken to protect trees during all phases of
construction, including initial grading and utility installation, and that the plan
incorporate sturdy fencing at the dripline of the trees to be protected;
3. That all public improvements be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer;
4. That the design and construction of public improvements be coordinated with the
MAG and Gordon Flesch sites; and
5. That access to Perimeter Drive be controlled in accordance with the notes on this
preliminary plat.
The plat was approved unanimously by the Commission.
Mayor Kranstuber moved to approve the preliminary plat of Venture Drive with the
conditions of Planning Commission.
Mr. Reiner seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion -Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor
Kranstuber, yes; Mr. McCash, abstain; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes.
('ouncil Round Table/Committee Reports
" Ms. Hide PittaluQa stated that:
1. A preliminary meeting was held on uniform city-wide signage. She will keep them
apprised of the progress on this.
2. She cannot attend the Community Development Committee meeting on the 16th as
she will be out of town.
3. She asked that Council review the Indian Mounds information forwarded from Ms.
Jordan. She will be advocating preservation of this national historic landmark.
Mr. Campbell reported several items:
1. The Greenway Study of Franklin County was included in the Council packet. He
was surprised to see that the study did not mention Dublin's commitment to share
information from the City's storm water study which involves the Scioto River
tributary for the entire region. Dublin is spending over $500,000 per year for the
next several years for storm water management, and he is hopeful that the next draft
of the study will include this fact. He would like to see Dublin get some credit for
their efforts in storm water management for the region.
2. Craig Barnham, owner of Oscar's in Old Dublin, is developing a building across the
street from their present location and they will have to pursue a variance for
parking. The fee for this application is $1,300 and he is asking ask that staff
consider recommending waiving of this fee in order to foster business in Old
Dublin.
Ms. Grigsby responded that the City Manager can grant this waiver which must be ratified
by Council at the following meeting.
k.
3. A few months ago, he had indicated to Council and staff that he was not planning to
run for re-election. A number of people asked him to give second thought to this
decision. While he was flattered by the nice comments and grateful for the support,
he has decided not to run for re-election in the fall for a number of reasons. At this
point, he would like to officially announce that he will not run for re-election to
Council in the fall.
Mr. McCash noted that a Community Development Committee meeting is scheduled for
Monday, June 16 from 6 to 8 p. m. in the new Council planning room.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City ('ouncil Meeting Pave ~ 4 Meeting
N AL B NK CO. FORM NO. X0148
Held June 9, 1997 19
Mrs. Boring:
1. Asked Mr. Kindra about the parking situation for high school students and the
problems created for the residents of the Woods of Indian Run.
Following brief discussion, Mrs. Boring moved to refer the parking issues in the Woods of
Indian Run to staff for resolution.
Mayor Kranstuber seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mr. Campbell, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring,
yes; Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes.
2. Regarding the I-270 bridge maintenance issues, she agrees with Mr. Kindra's
position as outlined in the letter to the state. She asked that he keep Council
apprised of this matter.
3. She asked if staff needs direction regarding moving the house in Old Dublin.
Ms. Clarke reported that there is an existing building at 56 N. High Street approved as a
pub. In re-examining their costs, the applicant determined it would be more economical to
build a new structure. They are not proposing to demolish the existing structure, but want
to know if there is any willingness on the part of the City to assist with finding a new site
for the red house. They suggested the gas station sites as a possible home.
Mr. Lenz added that the house as it now stands can stay, but once it moves, it will have to
be reviewed as a new house and likely cannot meet code. He confirmed that the building is
historic and was constructed in the 1860's.
Ms. Hide Pittaluga stated that a plan is needed for Old Dublin before these decisions can be
made. There needs to be focus to the efforts.
~ Mr. McCash stated that he does not favor moving this house to one of the gas station sites
or to Coffman Park. He believes, however that it should stay in the Old Dublin area.
Ms. Hide Pittaluga summarized that until an overall plan is established with the Community
Plan update, Council prefers not to take action on this request.
Mayor Kranstuber moved to adjourn to executive session for land, personnel and legal
matters.
Mr. Reiner seconded the motion.
Mayor Kranstuber noted that the meeting will not be reconvened following the session.
Vote on the motion - Ms. Hide Pittaluga, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor
Kranstuber, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Campbell, yes.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:20 p.m.
G~
ayor -Presiding Officer
Clerk of Council
