HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-03-26 Work Session MinutesDUBLIN CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION
AUGUST 3, 2026
Minutes
Mayor Amorose Groomes called the Monday, August 3, 2026 work session to order at 6:30 p.m.
Council members present: Ms. Alutto, Mayor Amorose Groomes, Vice Mayor De Rosa, Ms. Johnson,
Mr. Keeler and Ms. Kramb. Dr. Lam was absent.
Staff present: Ms. O’Callaghan, Mr. Barker, Ms. Rauch, Mr. Will, Mr. Gracia, Chief Paez, Mr. Rubino,
Ms. Hunter, Ms. Murray, Ms. Babbitt and Mr. Ashrawi.
Ms. Kramb led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Metro Center Revitalization Update
City Manager Megan O'Callaghan introduced the topic for the work session, noting that its purpose
was to update Council on implementation efforts for the Metro Center Revitalization Plan, to review
the strategy to date, and to provide an opportunity for Council to offer direction going forward.
Ms. O'Callaghan opened with a review of the Bridge Street District redevelopment as a relevant
reference point, acknowledging that questions had been received from Council regarding the
timeline and process used to implement that project. She emphasized that the Bridge Park
experience was not presented as a prescriptive model for Metro Center, but rather as a real-world
illustration of how a major redevelopment effort is sequenced and coordinated between public and
private interests.
The Bridge Street District encompasses approximately two square miles, with the original Bridge
Park development covering roughly 33 acres. Early visioning began in 2008 with a study trip to
Greenville, South Carolina, followed by corridor planning between 2010 and 2012. From
approximately 2011 to 2015, the City developed zoning code, completed a rezoning, adopted
streetscape and signage guidelines, and concluded associated planning efforts. Financial and
agreement work including a cooperative agreement with the schools, a Community Reinvestment
Area (CRA) development agreement, and the creation of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) districts,
followed that regulatory foundation. Concurrently, public infrastructure investments were
incorporated into the Capital Improvement Program, covering transportation, park, and utility
improvements. The first development agreement with the private partner was executed in August
2015, with Phase 1 construction commencing around that same time.
Ms. O'Callaghan underscored that the key takeaway from the Bridge Park experience was that it
required several years of coordinated planning, regulatory work, financial structuring, property
acquisition, and infrastructure investment all proceeding in a carefully sequenced manner
alongside private development activity.
Metro Center Background and Overview
Mr. Will provided a history of the Metro Center planning effort. The Metro Center study area is
bounded by I-270 to the west, Frantz Road to the east, Blazer Parkway to the south, and Upper
Metro Place to the north. It encompasses approximately 22 properties within the office park itself,
Council Work Session
August 3, 2026
Page 2 of 4
with additional properties along Blazer Parkway, representing approximately 100 different
businesses in total.
Mr. Will noted several defining characteristics of the area: approximately 7,500 surface parking
spaces covering roughly 90 acres of asphalt, limited connectivity with all access channeled through
Frantz Road, and nearly 2,000,000 square feet of existing development — approximately
1,500,000 of which is office space. A notable gap in the current mix is the absence of residential
uses. A significant portion of the existing office inventory is classified as Class B, and a market
analysis conducted in 2023 identified a risk of further quality decline if proactive steps were not
taken. Data also showed that visitor and worker activity at Metro Center had recovered to
approximately 75 percent of pre-pandemic levels, while the Bridge Park and Historic District areas
had not only fully rebounded but significantly exceeded prior activity levels.
A further complicating factor unique to Metro Center, as compared to Bridge Park, is the regional
stormwater system. The stormwater ponds are held in common ownership and are governed by an
owner's association memorandum of agreement, meaning that any action affecting even a few
parcels has implications for the broader group of property owners.
Mr. Will summarized the Metro Center Revitalization Plan, which was adopted by Council in
December 2024. The plan was built upon visioning work conducted in 2021 and 2022 and was
intended to serve as an implementation-oriented document. It was guided by four principles:
redefining the identity of Metro Center, rebalancing the district by introducing residential and other
uses, reimagining water and open space through a signature green infrastructure feature, and
strengthening mobility and pedestrian connections.
Three design concepts were developed and presented during the planning process — the Green
Grid, Central Park, and Blue Meander (also called Waterway Park). Council ultimately supported
the Blue Meander/Waterway Park concept, which envisions relocating the stormwater ponds from
their current location to the interior of the loop, enabling new development to front onto
reimagined water courses and pedestrian areas. Mr. Will acknowledged that this concept is the
most complex of the three, as it requires maintaining existing pond functionality while constructing
replacement stormwater infrastructure elsewhere.
The plan identified a 17-acre catalytic site along Frantz Road, encompassing the former Max and
Erma's restaurant location, portions of the existing ponds, frontage along Frantz Road, and
adjacent parking areas. Key public infrastructure investments identified in the plan include the
Waterway Park, a Metro-Blazer connector road, a potential I-270 pedestrian and bicycle crossing,
the Metro Bike Loop as an extension of the Signature Trail, improvements to Frantz Road, a
transition to structured or shared parking arrangements, and utility upgrades to support new
development.
Implementation Progress and Current Challenges
Mr. Will described the work underway since the plan's adoption. The City has engaged Sasaki to
develop design guidelines addressing site design, architecture, and landscaping standards. McBride
Dale has been engaged to develop a zoning road map and accompanying code. Staff planned to
present an introduction to Planning and Zoning Commission in September 2026, followed by a
return with draft guidelines and zoning materials for initial review and feedback prior to Council
consideration. Staff has been meeting regularly with the Metro Owners Association, including its
newly reconstituted board, and with HOA representatives for residential areas east of Frantz Road.
Current challenges identified include the complexity of transferring common-ownership stormwater
ponds to City ownership, deed restrictions that currently limit development to auto-centric uses
Council Work Session
August 3, 2026
Page 3 of 4
(though staff noted these restrictions may not be incorporated and thus may be navigable), the
logistical difficulty of relocating the ponds in a phased manner while keeping existing stormwater
management intact, the need to assemble adequate property for development, and identifying
qualified private development partners.
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) funding for the 2026-2030 period includes allocations for the
catalytic site, stormwater improvements, streetscaping, and broader infrastructure such as the
Metro-Blazer connector.
Vice Mayor De Rosa asked about the status of the remaining regulatory work, confirming that the
design guidelines and zoning code represented the one major outstanding piece needed to attract
private development interest. Ms. Rauch and Mr. Will confirmed that these elements were more
than halfway complete and that the goal was to bring them before Planning and Zoning
Commission in September, with a realistic path to Council consideration by the end of 2026 or
early 2027.
Ms. Kramb drew a parallel to the Bridge Street District experience, noting that even before the
Bridge Street code was formally adopted, some early development applications were reviewed
against draft guidelines. She asked whether a similar interim approach would apply in Metro
Center, and Ms. Rauch confirmed that the same framework could be used if a developer wished to
proceed before the code was finalized, though she noted most developers would likely prefer to
wait for regulatory certainty.
Mr. Keeler observed that, measured against the Bridge Park timeline of roughly seven years from
visioning to construction, Metro Center was not behind schedule — and in fact may be facing a
significantly more complicated set of conditions. He noted the importance of translating the level of
public investment made at Bridge Park into comparable commitments for Metro Center, estimating
that inflation-adjusted land acquisition costs alone could range from 32 to 39 million dollars and
that public infrastructure investments could approach 136 million dollars. He also suggested that
efforts should be made to build enthusiasm among existing property owners, who stand to benefit
substantially from successful redevelopment.
Ms. Alutto expressed support for the overall direction and echoed the importance of moving the
code and guidelines forward as promptly as possible while ensuring thorough review. She also
requested that future updates include more detail on marketing and outreach strategies to
generate momentum around the catalytic development zone, particularly as the regulatory
framework was being finalized. She commended staff for their collaborative approach with
property owners rather than relying on a more prescriptive or adversarial posture.
Vice Mayor De Rosa offered a different emphasis on the Bridge Park comparison, noting that the
more instructive lesson was not the timeline itself but rather the sequencing. Specifically, she
highlighted that the City did not commit its largest public infrastructure investments until a private
development partner was in place and the full framework — plan, code, and agreements — was
established. She observed that Metro Center currently lacked that private partner commitment,
and she urged the Council and staff to focus on what specific steps and incentives would be
needed to attract a catalytic developer. She requested that staff develop a clearer picture of the
projected timeline and the tools such as TIF, CIP programming, and other economic development
instruments that would be used to secure a development partner.
Mayor Amorose Groomes sought clarification on the nature of the code being developed, and Mr.
Will confirmed that it would build upon the existing Mixed Use Regional (MUR) framework,
emphasizing design quality and appropriate uses rather than a traditional form-based code. Mayor
Amorose Groomes expressed a preference for some gap in timing between adoption of the design
Council Work Session
August 3, 2026
Page 4 of 4
guidelines and code on the one hand and the area-wide rezoning on the other, to ensure adequate
public process. Mr. Will noted that the rezoning would be brought to Council alongside the
guidelines and code rather than separately, and that property owner outreach on rezoning
implications had already begun.
Ms. Kramb encouraged staff to directly notify all residents east of Frantz Road — not solely
through HOA leadership channels — of upcoming Planning and Zoning Commission meetings and
materials. She also emphasized the importance of using the word "rezoning" explicitly in all public
communications, noting that ambiguous language in prior community planning efforts had caused
confusion and concern among residents.
Mr. Will confirmed that the City had been proactively communicating with HOA representatives at
each step of the process, notifying them in advance of Planning and Zoning Commission
appearances and sharing preview materials from the design guidelines.
Ms. O'Callaghan confirmed that staff had received sufficient direction from Council to move
forward and expressed appreciation for the feedback.
There being no further business for discussion, the meeting was adjourned at 7:17 p.m.
(u_ “he
Presiding Officer — Mayor
Clerk of Cofincil