HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 15-26RECORD OF ORDINANCES
BARRETT BROTHERS - DAYTON, OHIO Form 6220S
15-26
Ordinance No. Passed ,
AMENDING CHAPTERS 72 AND 75 OF DUBLIN’S CODIFIED
ORDINANCES TO ENHANCE SAFETY REGULATIONS FOR
MICROMOBILITY DEVICES AND OTHER SIMILAR DEVICES
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin recognizes ongoing community concerns related to the
general safe and courteous operations of micromobility devices, and
WHEREAS, it is periodically necessary to amend Dublin’s Code to protect the health,
safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Dublin, and
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin Code needs to be updated to establish the general
safe and courteous operations of micromobility devices and strengthen regulatory
tools in accordance with current conditions and community expectations, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State
of Ohio, of its elected members concurring, that:
Section 1. Chapters 72 and 75 of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Dublin
are hereby amended as set forth in the attachments to this Ordinance.
Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective on the earliest date permitted by law.
Passed this Ge day of Vow Ch. , 2026.
Mayor — Presiding Officer
ATTEST:
Clérk of Council
To: Members of Dublin City Council
From: Megan O’Callaghan, City Manager
Date: February 17, 2026
Initiated By: Michael E. Barker, Deputy City Manager
Justin Páez, Chief of Police
Jean-Ellen M. Willis, P.E., Director of Transportation & Mobility
J.M. Rayburn, AICP, Planner II
Thad Boggs, Assistant Law Director
Re: Ordinance 15-26 – Amending Various Sections of Codified Ordinances: §70.01 –
Traffic Code Definitions, §75.02 – Rules for bicycles, motorcycles and
snowmobiles, §75.06 – Riding on roadway, §75.10 – Electric Bikes and adding
Sections §75.11 – Operation of electric personal assistive mobility devices,
§75.12 – Micromobility devices, and §75.13 – Parental Responsibilities
Background
The City of Dublin launched a micromobility pilot program in 2022 to assess the feasibility and
community impacts of mobility options within the city. Most recently, City Council adopted
Resolution 29-25, which extended the pilot for an additional twelve-month period to conclude on
June 1, 2026. During this extension, staff has advanced Council’s direction to update the City Code
regarding the operation and regulation of micromobility devices, with the adoption of revisions
marking the conclusion of the pilot program.
At the January 20, 2026, Council Meeting, staff introduced current micromobility-related code,
proposed revisions, and an education plan to be deployed.
Summary
Council broadly supported the proposed code revisions, but directed staff to clarify the definition of
“miniature motorcycles” and remove helmet requirements for micromobility device riders. In
particular, Council sought to clarify the “miniature motorcycles” definition to ensure community
members understand that both gas-powered and electric-powered miniature motorcycles are
banned under the proposed code.
Consistent with Council’s direction, staff amended the proposed revisions to remove helmet
requirements and expressly state that both combustion-powered and electric-powered miniature
motorcycles are banned in most circumstances under the proposed code. While the helmet
provision requirements for micromobility, bicycle and class 1 and class 2 e-bikes were removed,
additional information regarding helmet requirements and rental devices is included for Council’s
consideration.
Additionally, since the January 20th meeting, an inquiry was received requesting resolution of the
conflicting provisions in Sections 75.04 and 75.06 regarding riding bicycles and similar devices on
the right side of the roadway. Staff agreed with the concerns and drafted proposed language for
Section 75.06 to eliminate the conflicting provision.
Proposed Code Revisions
Office of the City Manager
5555 Perimeter Drive • Dublin, OH 43017
Phone: 614.410.4400 Memo
Ordinance 15-26 – Amending Various Sections of Codified Ordinances: §70.01 – Traffic Code
Definitions, §75.02 – Rules for bicycles, motorcycles and snowmobiles, §75.06 – Riding on
roadway, §75.10 – Electric Bikes and adding Sections §75.11 – Operation of electric personal
assistive mobility devices, §75.12 – Micromobility devices, and §75.13 – Parental Responsibilities
February 17, 2026
Page 2 of 9
As part of the proposed micromobility code updates, several targeted revisions are included to
clarify existing prohibitions, remove outdated or conflicting provisions, and better align the Code
with current state law and Council direction. The following sections summarize key changes related
to the prohibition of miniature motorcycles, helmet requirements, and roadway positioning rules,
and explain how the proposed revisions improve clarity, consistency, and enforceability.
1. Miniature Motorcycle Prohibition
Specifically, proposed Section 75.06(C), which emphasizes and clarifies the existing ban
prohibiting miniature motorcycles from being operated on public roadways, shared-use
paths, sidewalks, and public parks, now includes this clarifying sentence:
“This prohibition applies to miniature motorcycles powered by any type of
engine or motor, including but not limited to gas-powered miniature
motorcycles and electric-powered miniature motorcycles."
2. Helmets
The draft included a helmet requirement for riders under the age of 18 years old. That
requirement has been deleted from the proposed code. Existing helmet requirements
for Class 3 electric bicycle and motorized bicycle (i.e., “moped”) riders remain in the
proposed code.
3. Riding on the Edge of the Roadway
Existing Code
Existing Section 75.06 includes two provisions regarding riding bicycles and motorized
bicycles on the right side of the roadway:
• 75.06(A) requires bicycle and motorized bicycle riders to “ride as near to the right
side of the roadway as practicable…”
• 75.06(B) requires bicycle and motorized bicycle riders to ride “within three feet of
the right edge of the roadway.”
In addition to the Section 75.06 (B) conflicting with Section 75.06(A), Section 75.06 (B)
also conflicts with Section 75.04, which allows bicycle riders to ride abreast in certain
circumstances and includes enumerated conditions where a rider is not required to ride
“at the edge of the roadway.”
These provisions were all enacted in the 1980s via Ordinance 36-84 to align with the
Ohio Revised Code. The legislative history for Ordinance 36-84 is attached for your
reference. Today, there is no three-foot requirement in the applicable Ohio Revised
Code Section. See R.C. 4511.55.
Proposed Revisions
The proposed code now deletes existing Section 75.06(B). This revision ensures the
Code is consistent and aligns with current state law.
Helmet Considerations
While the proposed code revisions remove the helmet requirement as directed, additional
clarification is provided regarding the previously drafted code for helmets and the impact
on riders using rental micromobility devices.
Ordinance 15-26 – Amending Various Sections of Codified Ordinances: §70.01 – Traffic Code
Definitions, §75.02 – Rules for bicycles, motorcycles and snowmobiles, §75.06 – Riding on
roadway, §75.10 – Electric Bikes and adding Sections §75.11 – Operation of electric personal
assistive mobility devices, §75.12 – Micromobility devices, and §75.13 – Parental Responsibilities
February 17, 2026
Page 3 of 9
• Regional Coordination and Policy Alignment
As part of the revision process, staff reviewed micromobility regulations across Central
Ohio—including recently updated codes in New Albany and Upper Arlington—to
understand regional approaches to ensure consistency across similar jurisdictions.
New Albany, Columbus and Bexley require helmets for riders under 18. Westerville goes
further, requiring helmets for all ages1, while Worthington and Hilliard have more
limited or no helmet requirements, as shown in the table below.
Policy Type Jurisdictions
All Riders Required Westerville
Minors Only (Under 18) New Albany, Columbus, Bexley
Class 3 E-Bike Only Worthington
Recommended (Not Required) Upper Arlington
No Helmet Requirement Hilliard
Dublin’s proposal, as presented at the January 20, 2026, meeting, would require riders
under 18 years old to wear helmets on all devices, in addition to all Class 3 e-bike riders
wearing helmets, which would be consistent with New Albany, Columbus, Bexley, and
(to a lesser extent) Westerville.
• Rental Devices and State Law
The Veo End User Agreement establishes clear age and responsibility requirements.
Veo’s terms stipulate that account holders must be at least 18 years old and that
minors are prohibited from using e-devices, including scooters and e-bikes.
Veo’s policy, which appears to be the industry standard, is stricter than Ohio law. R.C.
4511.514 prohibits renting shared micromobility devices to anyone under the age of 16.
This establishes a statutory minimum age regardless of Veo’s terms.
This 18 years old rental requirement is consistent with the proposed helmet provisions,
as individuals eligible to rent shared micromobility devices would be above the age
threshold for which helmet use would be required under the previously proposed code.
In instances where a parent or legal guardian creates an account for a minor, the draft
code’s parent accountability provision would apply, which prohibits parents or legal
guardians from allowing or knowingly permitting a child to violate any provision of the
chapter.
• Additional Draft Code Considerations
Refinements to the draft micromobility code could be incorporated for the second
reading, anticipated for the March 9, 2026, meeting, should Council desire. Potential
1 Westerville’s website asserts that helmets are required for “all ages, all e-bike classes, [and] all scooters.”
See Link. Those requirements are not incorporated into Westerville’s code, however.
Ordinance 15-26 – Amending Various Sections of Codified Ordinances: §70.01 – Traffic Code
Definitions, §75.02 – Rules for bicycles, motorcycles and snowmobiles, §75.06 – Riding on
roadway, §75.10 – Electric Bikes and adding Sections §75.11 – Operation of electric personal
assistive mobility devices, §75.12 – Micromobility devices, and §75.13 – Parental Responsibilities
February 17, 2026
Page 4 of 9
conflicts related to rental devices and helmet requirements could be addressed through
one of the following approaches:
i. Amend § 75.14, Micromobility Device Fleet Company Permitting and Operation,
to explicitly state that no micromobility device fleet company may permit an
individual under the age of 18 to create an account or operate a rental e-device.
This clarification would eliminate any regulatory conflict for users of shared
micromobility devices, should a helmet requirement apply to individuals under
18, and would avoid requiring riders to bring a helmet to rent an e-device.
ii. Insert helmet requirements back into the draft code and revise to require helmet
use only for operators under the age of 16. This approach would align with
Ohio’s low-speed micromobility device law and the minimum legal age to operate
a motor vehicle, and would avoid requiring riders to bring a helmet to rent an e-
device.
Education Plan
Dublin has a robust, multi-channel micromobility education framework in place. Existing youth
programming, school partnerships, community events, and online resources will be leveraged and
updated to reflect the final code amendments, reinforcing an education-first approach to safety
and compliance. The following programs highlight the extensive bike education Dublin provides to
our residents, youth, and visitors.
• Bicycle education in DCRC’s programming
Safety City has been incorporated into the Dublin Community Recreation Center’s My First
Camp (ages 4–6) and Discovery Camp (ages 7–9) programs and is no longer offered as a
standalone program. Each camp session includes a designated Safety Education Week, a
change implemented several years ago to increase participation and broaden the reach of
safety education for youth.
During Safety Education Week, the Washington Township Fire Department and Dublin Police
Department provide instruction on age-appropriate safety topics, including bicycle safety and
the role of police officers who patrol by bicycle. Bicycle safety education is also offered earlier
in the week through structured activities, worksheets, and informational materials for parents.
As staffing and time allow, an optional supplemental activity may be provided focusing on basic
riding skills, helmet use, and introductory roadway safety concepts.
• Dublin Bike Roadeo
The City hosts the Dublin Bike Roadeo annually in May as a hands-on safety education event
promoting safe and responsible bicycling and micromobility use for school-aged children. The
event, led by the Dublin Police Department, emphasizes core safety principles such as proper
helmet use and includes a structured skills and test course. Participants can also test-ride
rentable micromobility devices in a controlled environment to learn safe operating practices,
with this year’s Bike Roadeo scheduled for Saturday, May 16, 2026, as part of Experience
Public Works Day.
• Mobility Concierge Pop-up Meetings
Ordinance 15-26 – Amending Various Sections of Codified Ordinances: §70.01 – Traffic Code
Definitions, §75.02 – Rules for bicycles, motorcycles and snowmobiles, §75.06 – Riding on
roadway, §75.10 – Electric Bikes and adding Sections §75.11 – Operation of electric personal
assistive mobility devices, §75.12 – Micromobility devices, and §75.13 – Parental Responsibilities
February 17, 2026
Page 5 of 9
The City’s Mobility Concierge program provides residents and visitors with a convenient, in-
person opportunity to ask questions, offer feedback, and learn more about micromobility and
other transportation options in Dublin. Offered as weekly community office hours on Fridays
from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. from May 29 through September 11 at the East Plaza Pavilion in
Riverside Crossing Park, the program features rotating, themed topics while remaining open to
questions across all areas of mobility. The Mobility Concierge includes access to bike and park
guides, as well as other educational materials.
• Slow Down Dublin
The Slow Down Dublin campaign is a community-focused, data-driven initiative within Dublin’s
broader Speed Management Program that educates residents, drivers, bicyclists, and scooter
riders about safe street behavior and fosters a culture of mutual respect on shared roadways.
Through collaboration among City staff, the Dublin Police, and community members, the
campaign offers a range of accessible educational tools and resources, including yard signs, car
magnets, stickers, speed studies, outreach videos, and online information at
dublinohiousa.gov/speed-management, to raise awareness about speed safety and support
responsible decision-making by all road users.
Figure 1: Screenshot of Slow Down Dublin educational outreach video
Since its inception, the City has promoted this messaging through social media, traditional
media segments, and ongoing resident communications, reinforcing the importance of slowing
down in neighborhoods and along shared-use paths while highlighting how appropriate speeds
enhance safety for people walking, biking, rolling, and scooting throughout the community.
• School Resource Officers
Ordinance 15-26 – Amending Various Sections of Codified Ordinances: §70.01 – Traffic Code
Definitions, §75.02 – Rules for bicycles, motorcycles and snowmobiles, §75.06 – Riding on
roadway, §75.10 – Electric Bikes and adding Sections §75.11 – Operation of electric personal
assistive mobility devices, §75.12 – Micromobility devices, and §75.13 – Parental Responsibilities
February 17, 2026
Page 6 of 9
Figure 2: Screenshot of Back to School safety video from Dublin SROs on social media
There are seven School Resource Officers (SROs) serving in Dublin’s nine elementary schools,
four middle schools and three high schools. There is also a lieutenant committed to serving
Dublin City Schools who oversees the unit. The City of Dublin leverages SROs to bridge the gap
between police officers and students, helping to advance education and appropriate
enforcement related to bicycling, scooters, and other micromobility devices. Through direct
engagement with students and through social media campaigns, as shown in Figure 2, SROs
reinforce safe riding behaviors, helmet use, and compliance with City micromobility regulations,
complementing the City’s broader micromobility education efforts and supporting an education-
first approach to safety.
Figure 3: Screenshot of draft Micromobility SRO Interactive Tool
Ordinance 15-26 – Amending Various Sections of Codified Ordinances: §70.01 – Traffic Code
Definitions, §75.02 – Rules for bicycles, motorcycles and snowmobiles, §75.06 – Riding on
roadway, §75.10 – Electric Bikes and adding Sections §75.11 – Operation of electric personal
assistive mobility devices, §75.12 – Micromobility devices, and §75.13 – Parental Responsibilities
February 17, 2026
Page 7 of 9
As part of the program development materials, Dublin’s School Resource Officer assigned to
Coffman High School developed an interactive web-based resource to help students and
parents understand where various devices may be operated, as well as applicable age and
potential helmet requirements. While this tool is in a draft form, it will be further refined and
updated following adoption of the final code amendments, including thorough vetting for
accuracy, adherence to branding standards and other pertinent messages. The tool could also
be placed on the City’s micromobility web page or used with other educational materials.
• Partnership with Dublin City Schools
In partnership with Dublin City Schools, the City provides content to the schools’ weekly and
monthly newsletters. This information is targeted to parents and includes updates about
upcoming events, community feedback opportunities and campaign reminders (such as Slow
Down Dublin). These efforts are also used to promote awareness of bike education, safety and
micromobility program materials.
• Online Resources
The City of Dublin provides a suite of online mobility resources to help residents and visitors
navigate the community safely and comfortably. These webpages, covering bicycling,
motorized mobility devices, and overall mobility options, offer clear, easy-to-understand
guidance on rules, safety expectations, and available transportation choices. To support
ongoing education and evolving community needs, the City can update existing videos to
include micromobility and develop new content as appropriate, with all resources accessible in
English and multiple other languages.
• The Bicycling in Dublin webpage provides comprehensive resources to promote safe and
responsible bicycling, including guidance on bike safety and path etiquette, locations of
bicycle repair stations, free bike registration through Dublin Police, and recognition of
Dublin as a Silver-level Bicycle Friendly Community (link). Link to Bicycling in Dublin:
https://dublinohiousa.gov/bicycling-in-dublin/
Figure 4: Path Etiquette Information on the Bicycling in Dublin webpage
Ordinance 15-26 – Amending Various Sections of Codified Ordinances: §70.01 – Traffic Code
Definitions, §75.02 – Rules for bicycles, motorcycles and snowmobiles, §75.06 – Riding on
roadway, §75.10 – Electric Bikes and adding Sections §75.11 – Operation of electric personal
assistive mobility devices, §75.12 – Micromobility devices, and §75.13 – Parental Responsibilities
February 17, 2026
Page 8 of 9
• The Motorized Mobility Devices in Dublin webpage offers clear guidance on the legal and
safe use of devices such as electric scooters, e-bikes, electric skateboards, and golf
carts, including an educational matrix detailing where different device types may
operate, age and licensing requirements, prohibited devices, and restrictions on
sidewalks and shared use paths (link). Link to Motorized Mobility Devices in Dublin:
https://dublinohiousa.gov/motorized-mobility-devices-in-dublin/.
Figure 5: Screenshot of Part of the Educational Matrix
In addition, a separate memo and legal opinion regarding golf carts and their operation
in Dublin are included with the attachments to this memo.
• The Mobility in Dublin webpage highlights the City’s partnership with Veo to provide
shared micromobility options, including electric scooters, pedal bikes, and e-bikes, and
outlines safe riding and parking practices, device operation areas, and proper etiquette
for streets, sidewalks, and shared use paths. Together, these resources enhance public
understanding of micromobility, reinforce safety expectations, and support the City’s
broader goal of expanding accessible, multimodal transportation options throughout the
community. Link to Mobility in Dublin: https://dublinohiousa.gov/mobility/
Figure 6: Screenshot of Micromobility Information
Ordinance 15-26 – Amending Various Sections of Codified Ordinances: §70.01 – Traffic Code
Definitions, §75.02 – Rules for bicycles, motorcycles and snowmobiles, §75.06 – Riding on
roadway, §75.10 – Electric Bikes and adding Sections §75.11 – Operation of electric personal
assistive mobility devices, §75.12 – Micromobility devices, and §75.13 – Parental Responsibilities
February 17, 2026
Page 9 of 9
Additional resources will also be published online, including the Active Transportation Safety Guide,
which provides a comprehensive, plain-language overview of safety requirements and regulations
applicable to vulnerable road users, such as pedestrians, bicyclists, and micromobility device users,
and the Micromobility Matrix (Proposed Law), which is designed to visually identify devices subject
to specific regulatory requirements and location restrictions.
Together, these established programs, partnerships, and communication channels provide a strong
foundation for micromobility education in Dublin, including any associated penalties. As the City
moves forward with updates to the micromobility code, these existing educational resources will be
intentionally expanded and aligned to incorporate the new rules, regulations and penalties, along
with clear guidance on safe operation, etiquette, and shared-space expectations. By building on
trusted, well-used platforms, from youth programming and community events to school
engagement and online tools, the City can efficiently reinforce consistent messaging, support an
education-first approach, and promote safe, responsible micromobility use across all ages and
modes.
Recommendation
Staff requests Council direction on whether to reinstate a helmet provision in the draft
micromobility code prior to second reading. Based on Council feedback, staff will incorporate any
revisions for consideration at the March 9, 2026 public hearing and second reading of Ordinance
15-26.
To: Members of Dublin City Council
From: Megan O’Callaghan, City Manager
Date: January 13, 2026
Initiated By: Michael E. Barker, Deputy City Manager
Justin Páez, Chief of Police
Jean-Ellen M. Willis, P.E., Director of Transportation & Mobility
J.M. Rayburn, AICP, Planner II
Thaddeus Boggs, Assistant Law Director
Re: Micromobility Device Code Revisions and Policy Recommendations
Background
The City of Dublin launched a micromobility pilot program in 2022 to assess the feasibility and
community impacts of mobility options within the city. Most recently, City Council adopted
Resolution 29-25, which extended the pilot for an additional twelve-month period to conclude on
June 1, 2026. During this extension, staff has advanced Council’s direction to update the City Code
regarding the operation and regulation of micromobility devices, with the adoption of revisions
marking the conclusion of the pilot program. Micromobility continues to support several key City
initiatives, including Council’s Visionary Goals, the Economic Development Strategic Plan, the
Community Health Needs Assessment, Envision Dublin, and the Metro Center Revitalization Plan.
This memo provides an update on the City’s ongoing efforts to review and regulate micromobility
devices, including e-bikes, scooters, and mini-motorcycles, following discussion with the Public
Services Committee on September 10, 2025. Staff reviewed current Ohio law and Dublin City Code
provisions to assess how these devices are defined and regulated.
As a result of this review, Staff has prepared draft code revisions to better manage the use of
micromobility devices throughout the community. The proposed updates are intended to enhance
safety, clarify responsibilities for operators and fleet companies, and ensure consistent,
understandable standards as micromobility devices continue to grow in popularity for both
transportation and recreational purposes.
Existing Code Provisions
The existing code is explained below and serves as the foundation for managing e-mobility in
Dublin. However, the existing regulations are limited in scope as the market and technology for
personal electric vehicles rapidly evolve.
In addition to the summary below, an existing-law Micromobility Matrix is also included in your
materials to serve as a quick reference for understanding which devices are currently legal, how
they can be operated, and where they can be operated.
E-Bikes
As provided at the September 2025 Public Services Committee meeting, Dublin’s Codified
Ordinances Sections 70.01 and 75.10—based on Ohio Revised Code Sections 4511.01 and
Office of the City Manager
5555 Perimeter Drive • Dublin, OH 43017
Phone: 614.410.4400 Memo
Memo re. Review of Shared Use Path Regulations and Ongoing Work toward Micromobility Revisions
January 13, 2026
Page 2 of 8
4511.522—define and regulate the use of e-bikes. These regulations categorize e-bikes into three
classes based on the type and level of motor assistance, as well as the maximum possible speed. A
Class 1 e-bike is equipped with fully operable pedals and a motor under 750 watts that helps only
when the rider is pedaling, ceasing once the bicycle reaches 20 miles per hour. A Class 2 e-bike
also features operable pedals and a motor under 750 watts but may help regardless of pedaling,
stopping assistance at 20 miles per hour. Finally, a Class 3 e-bike has operable pedals and a motor
under 750 watts that assists only during pedaling but continues assistance until the bicycle reaches
28 miles per hour.
Based on these classifications, Class 1 and Class 2 e-bikes are permitted on shared use paths and
sidewalks unless otherwise posted, whereas Class 3 e-bikes are prohibited from operating on
shared use paths and sidewalks. These distinctions guide the City’s regulation and management of
e-bikes throughout Dublin’s transportation network.
Mini-Motorcycles
Under current code, mini-motorcycles are considered “all-purpose vehicles,” under §75.20. Mini-
motorcycles are not permitted on public roads outside the unique circumstance when a mini-
motorcycle is operated “off and alongside a street or highway for limited distances” to transport
the mini-motorcycle from a place it is unloaded to a place where it is “intended and [legally]
authorized to be operated.” See §75.23.
Mini-motorcycles are also not permitted on sidewalks or shared use paths under existing state law.
See R.C. §4511.23.
Micromobility Devices
Dublin’s current micromobility regulations are largely controlled by the Ohio Revised Code. Current
state law allows micromobility devices to be operated on streets, sidewalks and shared use paths.
See R.C. §4511.514(A)(1). And while state law sets a minimum age of sixteen years old to rent a
micromobility device, there is no minimum age requirement to operate a private device. See R.C.
§4511.514(C). Lastly, current state law does not require helmets and establishes a blanket 20
miles per hour speed limit when operating micromobility devices. See R.C. §4511.514(D).
Current Dublin law slightly restrains state law by restricting the operation of micromobility devices
to streets with a speed limit of 25 miles per hour or lower. See Resolution 29-25.
Draft Code Revisions
City staff have prepared draft revisions to the City Code to better define and regulate micromobility
devices and their use within Dublin. These draft revisions are intended to integrate micromobility
devices into Dublin’s existing traffic code, establish clear responsibilities for fleet companies,
promote safe and responsible device usage, and ensure consistent management of micromobility
devices on public infrastructure.
In addition to establishing local code for traditional micromobility devices, and in response to the
feedback received at the September 2025 Public Services Committee meeting, the proposed code
revisions also explicitly prohibit the use of mini-motorcycles on streets, sidewalks, and shared use
paths in Dublin. The proposed micromobility code provisions, including the proposed changes
addressed above, are summarized below:
Micromobility Devices
1. Definitions
Memo re. Review of Shared Use Path Regulations and Ongoing Work toward Micromobility Revisions
January 13, 2026
Page 3 of 8
a. Micromobility devices: One- or two-wheeled devices weighing less than 120 pounds,
powered by electricity or human effort, with a maximum speed of 20 mph on level
pavement. Electric skateboards are also classified as micromobility devices.
b. Devices explicitly excluded: Bicycles, electric bicycles, wheelchairs and other
FDA/ADA-regulated mobility devices, motorized bicycles and mopeds, scooters
requiring a license, miniature motorcycles, snowmobiles, and other vehicles defined
elsewhere in City Code.
2. General Operator Requirements
a. Follow traffic laws similar to bicycles and motor vehicles.
b. Yield to pedestrians and human-powered vehicles.
c. Give an audible signal before passing.
d. Wear a helmet if you are under 18 years old.
3. Parking
a. If on a sidewalk, cannot unduly interfere with pedestrian traffic and must leave an
unobstructed path of at least four feet.
b. Cannot block bike lanes, driveways, driveway approaches, loading zones, shared
use paths, building entrances, curb ramps, crosswalks, or benches.
c. Fleet Companies such as Veo are subject to additional parking regulations as
defined in the Service Level Agreement.
4. Where Micromobility Devices Can Be Operated
a. Streets with a speed limit of 25 miles per hour or lower.
b. Sidewalks
c. Shared use Paths.
d. The City has the authority to establish additional regulations governing where and
how fast micromobility devices can be operated based on pedestrian, driver, and
operator safety considerations. This would be done by administrative order and be
published on the City’s website.
5. Fleet Companies
a. A “Micromobility Device Fleet Company” manages shared fleets of micromobility
devices and/or bicycles within a designated service area under a permit and Memo
of Understanding with the City.
b. Company Prohibitions & Responsibilities:
i. Cannot operate or be located in the public right of way without entering
into an agreement with the City.
ii. Cannot allow riders to operate in streets or the public right of way without
the City’s authorization.
iii. Comply with all terms and conditions of the Company’s permit.
iv. Comply with all City micromobility rules and regulations.
Memo re. Review of Shared Use Path Regulations and Ongoing Work toward Micromobility Revisions
January 13, 2026
Page 4 of 8
Bicycles, Electric Bicycles, Traditional Skateboards, Rollerblades, Motorized Bicycles, and Mopeds
1. Definitions
a. Bicycles, Electric Bicycles (E-Bikes), Traditional Skateboards, Rollerblades, Motorized
Bicycles, and Mopeds are already defined elsewhere in the Code.
2. Operation
a. Bicycles, Class 1, and Class 2 Electric Bicycles continue to be permitted on roads,
sidewalks, and shared use paths.
b. Class 3 Electric Bicycles continue to be permitted on roads and prohibited on
sidewalks and shared use paths.
c. Traditional Skateboards and Rollerblades continue to be permitted on sidewalks and
shared use paths and prohibited on roads.
d. Motorized Bicycles and Mopeds continue to be prohibited on sidewalks and shared
use paths and permitted on roads if all other licensing and registration requirements
are met.
3. Helmets
a. Individuals operating these devices will be required to wear helmets if the
individuals are under the age of 18.
b. Only Class 3 Electric Bicycle riders are required to wear helmets under current law.
Miniature Motorcycles
1. Current: Prohibited on streets, sidewalks, and shared use paths under the prohibition on
All-Purpose Vehicles. See §75.20-75.23.
2. Proposed: Expressly and more prominently prohibited on streets, sidewalks, shared use
paths, and public parks under the applicable proposed code sections.
Parent Accountability
1. Current: Unlike other municipalities in Central Ohio, including New Albany and Upper
Arlington, Dublin does not currently have a provision in the traffic code that holds parents
or guardians accountable for knowingly allowing their children to violate the traffic code.
2. Proposed: Expressly and more prominently states that parents or legal guardians may not
allow or knowingly permit a child to violate any provision of this chapter.
Enforcement:
1. First offenses are minor misdemeanors; penalties escalate for repeat offenses.
2. Law enforcement may impound vehicles operated in violation.
Additional Considerations
1. Mini-Motorcycles in Parks
The Public Services Committee requested that staff examine the feasibility of designating a
space within a City park for the use of mini-motorcycles. A review of existing City Code
(§96.27) indicates that motorized vehicles, including mini-motorcycles, are generally prohibited
within public parks, except on park drives or in designated parking areas. While establishing a
Memo re. Review of Shared Use Path Regulations and Ongoing Work toward Micromobility Revisions
January 13, 2026
Page 5 of 8
designated area for mini-motorcycle use could be considered, staff’s analysis identified several
factors and potential challenges associated with this option, including:
• Safety Risks
Motorized vehicles in parks present potential safety risks to pedestrians, children, and pet
owners. Enforcing restrictions that limit mini-motorcycle riders to designated areas would
be challenging and largely reliant on voluntary compliance. Additional regulatory
considerations, including vehicle size and power, rider age, registration, and speed limits,
would further increase the complexity of enforcement and oversight.
• Noise Impacts
Mini-motorcycles, particularly those powered by internal combustion engines, can generate
significant noise that disrupts nearby residents and park visitors. This noise interferes with
the peaceful and quiet environment that parks are intended to provide.
• Environmental Impacts
Parks are often designed to maintain natural or low-maintenance landscapes. The
operation of motorized vehicles can damage turf, contribute to erosion, and introduce
exhaust emissions, undermining the environmental integrity of these spaces.
• Conflicts with Existing Uses
Dublin’s parks are multi-use spaces intended for walking, cycling, and family recreation.
Introducing areas for motorized vehicles could displace or conflict with these established
activities. Recent City investments, such as the skate park in Coffman Park and the bike
pump track at Emerald Fields Park, demonstrate a focus on supporting non-motorized
recreation and highlight the importance of preserving intended park uses.
Given the safety, noise, environmental, and land-use concerns, staff does not recommend
designating any area within existing City parks for the use of mini-motorcycles. Maintaining
parks as safe, quiet, and multi-use recreational spaces aligns with the City’s priorities and
ensures that parklands continue to serve the broadest range of community needs.
2. Regional Coordination and Policy Alignment
As part of the code revision process, staff reviewed micromobility regulations in other Central
Ohio communities, including a focus on recently updated codes in New Albany and Upper
Arlington, to understand regional approaches, ensure consistency where appropriate, and
provide context for evaluating Dublin’s proposed code revisions. Overall, the proposed code
closely aligns with peer cities on safety and operational standards while offering additional
clarity and flexibility.
The table below summarizes key elements of Dublin’s proposed micromobility code compared
with peer Central Ohio communities, highlighting areas of alignment, differences, and notable
features.
Dublin’s proposed code combines the best practices from peer cities while filling gaps in helmet
requirements, parental accountability, mini-motorcycle restrictions, and parking standards. It is
more comprehensive and flexible, providing clear rules for safe operation across streets,
sidewalks, and shared use paths.
Memo re. Review of Shared Use Path Regulations and Ongoing Work toward Micromobility Revisions
January 13, 2026
Page 6 of 8
Table 1: Central Ohio Cities Micromobility Code Comparison
City
Where Devices
May Be
Operated Helmet Rules
Parental
Responsibility Parking Rules
Mini‑
Motorcycle
Rules
Key
Distinctions
Dublin
(Pro-
posed)
Streets with
speed limits of
25 mph or less,
sidewalks, and
shared use
paths; City may
restrict use in
specific areas as
needed
Helmets
required for
riders under
18; required
for Class 3 e-
bikes
Parents may
not authorize
or knowingly
permit a child
to violate the
code
Clear parking
rules to prevent
blocking
sidewalks, paths,
and rights-of-way
Not allowed on
streets,
sidewalks, or
shared use
paths
More detailed
and flexible than
most peers;
balances safety,
clarity, and local
control
New
Albany
Streets,
sidewalks, and
shared use
paths; e-bikes
and scooters on
sidewalks only if
motor is not
engaged
Helmets
required for
riders under
18
Parents may
be held
responsible if
they authorize
or knowingly
allow violations
No detailed
micromobility
parking standards
Not allowed on
streets,
sidewalks, or
shared use
paths
Sets a 10 mph
speed limit on
sidewalks and
shared use
paths, with
authority to
adjust limits
Upper
Arling-
ton
Streets; sidewalk
use restricted in
some areas; not
allowed in parks
Helmets
recommended
(not required)
for riders
under 18
Parents may
be held
responsible
No specific
micromobility
parking rules
Not allowed on
sidewalks,
public park
paths, or school
grounds
Code is shorter
and less
detailed;
devices banned
in parks and
business district
sidewalks
Colum-
bus
Streets with
speed limits up
to 35 mph;
sidewalks not
allowed
Helmets
required for
riders under
18
Parents may
be held
responsible if
they knowingly
allow violations
Detailed parking
rules for shared
micromobility
programs
Generally not
allowed on
sidewalks;
addressed
separately
Riders must be
at least 16 years
old to ride on
streets
Bexley Streets, shared
use paths, and
sidewalks
Helmets
required for
riders under
18
Parents may
be held
responsible
No special
micromobility
parking rules
beyond general
right-of-way laws
Not allowed on
sidewalks, in
public parks, or
on school
grounds
Code closely
follows Ohio
Revised Code
Worth-
ington
Streets,
sidewalks, and
shared use paths
under state law
Helmets
required only
for Class 3 e-
bikes
No parental
responsibility
provisions
No specific
micromobility
parking rules
Governed by
state law only
Relies more on
state law; fewer
local rules
Wester-
ville
Streets, shared
use paths, and
trails, with
added limits
Helmets
required for all
e-scooter and
e-bike riders
Not specifically
addressed
General parking
rules for bicycles;
no codified
ordinances for
other
micromobility
parking.
Limited under
general vehicle
and path rules
Sets a 15 mph
speed limit on
city trails; no
bicycles on
sidewalk within
business district
or shopping
center
Hilliard Streets,
sidewalks, and
shared use paths
No helmet
requirements
for e-scooters
or bicycles
No parental
responsibility
provisions
Parking rules exist
but are less
detailed
Not specifically
restricted
No limits based
on street speed
Memo re. Review of Shared Use Path Regulations and Ongoing Work toward Micromobility Revisions
January 13, 2026
Page 7 of 8
3. Community Survey Results
The City conducted the Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey from December 12
to December 28, 2025, receiving 312 responses to gauge public awareness of micromobility
devices and support for potential regulatory changes. The survey asked respondents about
their familiarity with micromobility devices; support for additional safety regulations such as
speed limits and area restrictions; helmet requirements for riders under 18; parental
responsibility for minors’ unsafe use; continued prohibition of miniature motorcycles on streets,
sidewalks, and shared use paths; and whether current regulations should be simplified and
clarified.
Results showed that most respondents were very or somewhat familiar with micromobility
devices, and there was strong overall support for increased safety measures, including clearer
rules and targeted restrictions (approximately 86% supportive), youth helmet requirements
(about 88% supportive), holding parents or guardians accountable when minors are knowingly
allowed to ride unsafely (about 78% supportive), and maintaining the existing ban on
miniature motorcycles (over 93% supportive). Respondents frequently cited concerns about
speed differentials, youth safety, and enforcement on shared use paths, while also
emphasizing the need for clearer, easier-to-understand regulations.
Overall, the survey results indicate broad community support for revising the City’s
micromobility regulations to improve safety and clarity. The detailed summary of the survey
results is attached to this memo for Council’s reference.
4. Education Plan
As part of this broader micromobility initiative, staff has developed an education strategy to
enhance pedestrian safety and clearly communicate the City’s expectations for the safe and
legal operation of micromobility devices and other similar devices, with the goal of promoting
informed and responsible use. The education plan is designed to make it easy for all residents
and visitors to understand, with particular emphasis on families and younger riders.
To further these goals, staff has developed additional graphics and plain language materials
that make it easy for residents and visitors to learn about the operations and restrictions of
micromobility devices in Dublin. These resources include the Micromobility Matrix – Current
Law, the Micromobility Matrix – Proposed Law, and an Active Transportation Safety Guide. The
matrices visually indicate which devices are subject to certain regulations and location
restrictions. The Active Transportation Safety Guide is a comprehensive plain language
overview of safety requirements and regulations applicable to vulnerable road users, including
pedestrians, bicyclists, and micromobility device users. Both documents are attached to this
memo for reference.
Building on these resources, a public education campaign will be developed to reinforce the
City’s messaging. This campaign will use a variety of communication tools—such as social
media, email, flyers, newsletters, QR codes, and signage—to help the community understand
how micromobility devices should be safely and responsibly operated in Dublin.
Next Steps
If City Council is satisfied with the draft code after incorporating any feedback, staff will bring
forward an ordinance for Council’s consideration to formally amend the City Code.
Memo re. Review of Shared Use Path Regulations and Ongoing Work toward Micromobility Revisions
January 13, 2026
Page 8 of 8
0127206.0607929 4925-5211-8391v4
In addition, staff will continue to engage with partners across the Central Ohio region to remain
aligned on emerging best practices. This regional coordination will help ensure that Dublin is
consistent with the approaches being implemented in neighboring communities, supporting a
cohesive and informed framework for micromobility regulation.
Recommendation
Staff requests feedback from City Council on the following items:
1. Is City Council supportive of the proposed code revisions?
2. Is City Council supportive that mini-motorcycles should not be permitted on Dublin streets,
sidewalks, shared use paths, and within parks?
3. Are there any additional elements City Council would like incorporated into the draft code
revisions or education plan?
Micromobility Code (Redline)
§ 72.085 OPERATION OF ELECTRIC PERSONAL ASSISTIVE MOBILITY DEVICES.
(A) (1) Electric personal assistive mobility devices may be operated on the public streets, highways,
sidewalks, and paths and portions of roadways set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles in accordance
with this section.
(2) Except as otherwise provided in this section, those sections of this Trafflc Code that by their
nature are applicable to an electric personal assistive mobility device apply to the device and the person
operating it whenever it is operated upon any public street, highway, sidewalk, or path or upon any
portion of a roadway set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles.
(3) The municipality may regulate or prohibit the operation of electric personal assistive mobility
devices on public streets, highways, sidewalks, and paths, or portions of roadways set aside for the
exclusive use of bicycles, under its jurisdiction.
(B) No operator of an electric personal assistive mobility device shall do any of the following:
(1) Fail to yield the right-of-way to all pedestrians and human-powered vehicles at all times;
(2) Fail to give an audible signal before overtaking and passing a pedestrian;
(3) Operate the device at night unless the device or its operator is equipped with or wearing both of
the following:
(a) A lamp pointing to the front that emits a white light visible from a distance of not less than 500
feet;
(b) A red refiector facing the rear that is visible from all distances from 100 feet to 600 feet when
directly in front of lawful lower beams of head lamps on a motor vehicle;
(4) Operate the device on any portion of a street or highway that has an established speed limit of 55
miles per hour or more;
(5) Operate the device upon any path set aside for the exclusive use of pedestrians or other specialized
use when an appropriate sign giving notice of the specialized use is posted on the path;
(6) If under 18 years of age, operate the device unless wearing a protective helmet on the person’s
head with the chin strap properly fastened;
(7) If under 16 years of age, operate the device unless, during the operation, the person is under the
direct visual and audible supervision of another person who is 18 years of age or older and is responsible
for the immediate care of the person under 16 years of age.
(C) No person who is under 14 years of age shall operate an electric personal assistive mobility device.
(D) No person shall distribute or sell an electric personal assistive mobility device unless the device is
accompanied by a written statement that is substantially equivalent to the following: “WARNING: TO
REDUCE THE RISK OF SERIOUS INJURY, USE ONLY WHILE WEARING FULL PROTECTIVE
EQUIPMENT –
(E) Nothing in this section affects or shall be construed to affect any rule of the Director of Natural
Resources or a board of park district commissioners governing the operation of vehicles on lands under
the control of the Director or board, as applicable.
(F) Penalty.
(1) Whoever violates division (B) or (C) of this section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor and shall be
punished as follows:
(a) The offender shall be flned $10;
(b) If the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to a violation of division (B) or
(C) of this section or a substantially similar state law or municipal ordinance, the court, in addition to
imposing the flne required under division (F)(1)(a) of this section, shall do one of the following:
1. Order the impoundment for not less than one day but not more than 30 days of the electric
personal assistive mobility device that was involved in the current violation of that division. The court
shall order the device to be impounded at a safe indoor location designated by the court and may assess
storage fees of not more than $5 per day; provided the total storage, processing, and release fees assessed
against the offender or the device in connection with the device’s impoundment or subse quent release
shall not exceed $50.
2. If the court does not issue an impoundment order pursuant to division (F)(1)(b)1. of this section,
issue an order prohibiting the offender from operating any electric personal assistive mobility device on
the public streets, highways, sidewalks, and paths and portions of roadways set aside for the exclusive
use of bicycles for not less than one day but not more than 30 days.
(2) Whoever violates division (D) of this section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor.
(R.C. § 4511.512) Penalty, see § 70.99
CHAPTER 75: BICYCLES, ELECTRIC BICYCLES, MICROMOBILITY DEVICES,
MOTORCYCLES, MINIATURE MOTORCYCLES, MOTORIZED BICYCLES, ROLLER
SKATES, SKATEBOARDS, AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, SLEDS, SNOWMOBILES,
AND TOY VEHICLES
§ 75.01 CODE APPLICATION TO BICYCLES, ELECTRIC BICYCLES, AND
MICROMOBILITY DEVICES.
(A) The provisions of this Trafflc Code that are applicable to bicycles and, electric bicycles, motorized
bicycles, and micromobility devices apply whenever a bicycle or, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or
micromobility device is operated upon any street, shared-use path, sidewalk, or upon any path set aside
for the exclusive use of bicycles.
(B) Except as provided in division (D) of this section, a bicycle operator, or electric bicycle operator, or
micromobility device operator who violates any provisions of this title described in division (A) of this
section that is applicable to bicycles or, electric bicycles, or micromobility devices may be issued a ticket,
citation, or summons by a law enforcement offlcer for the violation in the same manner as the operator
of a motor vehicle would be cited for the same violation. A person who commits any such violation while
operating a bicycle, or electric bicycle, or micromobility device shall not have any points assessed against
the person’s driver’s license, commercial driver’s license, temporary instruction permit, or probationary
license under R.C. § 4510.036.
(C) Except as provided in division (D) of this section, in the case of a violation of any provision of this
title described in division (A) of this section by a bicycle operator, electric bicycle operator, micromobility
device operator, or motor vehicle operator when the trier of fact flnds that the violation by the motor
vehicle operator endangered the lives of bicycle riders, or electric bicycle riders, or micromobility device
riders at the time of the violation, the court, notwithstanding any provision of the Ohio Revised Code to
the contrary, may require the bicycle operator, electric bicycle operator, micromobility operator, or motor
vehicle operator to take and successfully complete a bicycling skills course approved by the court in
addition to or in lieu of any penalty otherwise prescribed by this Trafflc Code or the Ohio Revised Code
for that violation.
(D) Divisions (B) and (C) of this section do not apply to violations of R.C. § 4511.19, or a substantially
equivalent municipal ordinance.
(R.C. § 4511.52)
(E) The provisions of this Trafflc Code shall apply to bicycles, electric bicycles, and micromobility
devices, except those which by their nature are not applicable.
('80 Code, § 373.01)
§ 75.02 RULES FOR BICYCLES, ELECTRIC BICYCLES, MOTORIZED BICYCLES,
MICROMOBILITY DEVICES, MOTORCYCLES AND SNOWMOBILES.
(A) For purposes of this section SNOWMOBILE has the same meaning as given that term in R.C. §
4519.01.
(B) RULES FOR OPERATION
(1) No person operating a bicycle or electric bicycle shall ride other than upon or astride the
permanent and regular seat attached thereto or carry any other person upon such bicycle or electric
bicycle other than upon a flrmly attached and regular seat thereon, and no person shall ride upon a
bicycle or electric bicycle other than upon such a flrmly attached and regular seat.
(2) No person operating a micromobility device shall ride other than upon or astride the permanent
and regular platform attached thereto, and no person shall ride upon a micromobility device other than
upon such a flrmly attached and regular platform.
(23) No person operating a motorcycle shall ride other than upon or astride the permanent and
regular seat or saddle attached thereto, or carry any other person upon such motorcycle other than upon
a flrmly attached and regular seat or saddle thereon, and no person shall ride upon a motorcycle other
than upon such a flrmly attached and regular seat or saddle.
(34) No person shall ride upon a motorcycle that is equipped with a saddle other than while sitting
astride the saddle, facing forward, with one leg on each side of the motorcycle.
(45) No person shall ride upon a motorcycle that is equipped with a seat other than while sitting upon
the seat.
(56) No person operating a bicycle or electric bicycle shall carry any package, bundle or article that
prevents the driver from keeping at least one hand upon the handle bars.
(7) No person operating a micromobility device shall carry any package, bundle, or article that
prevents the user from utilizing both the handlebars and the standing platform.
(68) No bicycle, electric bicycle, micromobility device, motorized bicycle, or motorcycle shall be used
to carry more persons at one time than the number for which it is designed and equipped.
(9) No motorcycle shall be operated on a highway when the handlebars rise higher than the
shoulders of the operator when the operator is seated in the operator’s seat or saddle.
(C) (1) Except as provided in division (C)(3) of this section, no person shall operate or be a passenger on
a snowmobile or motorcycle without using safety glasses or other protective eye device. Except as
provided in division (C)(3) of this section, no person who is under the age of 18 years, or who holds a
motorcycle operator’s endorsement or license bearing a “novice” designation that is currently in effect as
provided in R.C. § 4507.13, shall operate a motorcycle on a highway, or be a passenger on a motorcycle,
unless wearing a protective helmet on the person’s head, and no other person shall be a passenger on a
motorcycle operated by such a person unless similarly wearing a protective helmet. The helmet, safety
glasses, or other protective eye device shall conform with rules adopted by the Ohio Director of Public
Safety. The provisions of this paragraph or a violation thereof shall not be used in the trial of any civil
action.
(2) (a) Except as provided in division (C)(3) of this section, no person shall operate a motorcycle with a
valid temporary instruction permit and temporary instruction permit identiflcation card issued by the
Registrar of Motor Vehicles pursuant to R.C. § 4507.05 unless the person, at the time of such operation, is
wearing on the person’s head a protective helmet that conforms with rules adopted by the Ohio Director
of Public Safety.
(b) No person shall operate a motorcycle with a valid temporary instruction permit and temporary
instruction permit identiflcation card issued by the Registrar of Motor Vehicles pursuant to R.C. § 4507.05
in any of the following circumstances:
1. At any time when lighted lights are required by R.C. § 4513.03(A)(1);
2. While carrying a passenger;
3. On any limited access highway or heavily congested roadway.
(3) Divisions (C)(1) and (C)(2)(a) of this section do not apply to a person who operates or is a passenger
in an autocycle or cab-enclosed motorcycle when the occupant compartment top is in place enclosing the
occupants.
(D) Nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting the carrying of a child in a seat or trailer
that is designed for carrying children and is flrmly attached to the bicycle or electric bicycle.
(E) Except as otherwise provided in this division, whoever violates division (B) or (C)(1) or (C)(2) of this
section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has
been convicted of or pleaded guilty to one predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offense, whoever violates
division (B) or (C)(1) or (C)(2) of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If, within one
year of the offense, the offender previously has been convicted of two or more predicate motor vehicle or
trafflc offenses, whoever violates division (B) or (C)(1) or (C)(2) of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor of
the third degree.
(R.C. § 4511.53) ('80 Code, § 373.02) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.03 ATTACHING MOTORCYCLE, MINIATURE MOTORCYCLE, BICYCLE,
ELECTRIC BICYCLE, MOTORIZED BICYCLE, MICROMOBILITY DEVICE, ROLLER
SKATES, OR SLED, SKATEBOARD, OR TOY VEHICLE TO VEHICLE.
(A) (1) No person riding upon any motorcycle, miniature motorcycle, bicycle, electric bicycle,
motorized bicycle, micromobility device, coaster, roller skates, sled, skateboard, or toy vehicle shall attach
the same or self to any vehicle upon a roadway.
(2) No operator shall knowingly permit any person riding upon any motorcycle, miniature
motorcycle, bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, micromobility device, coaster, roller skates, sled,
skateboard, or toy vehicle to attach the same or self to any vehicle while it is moving upon a roadway.
This section does not apply to the towing of a disabled vehicle.
(B) Except as otherwise provided in this division, whoever violates this section is guilty of a minor
misdemeanor. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded
guilty to one predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offense, whoever violates this section is guilty of a
misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been
convicted of two or more predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offenses, whoever violates this s ection is
guilty of a misdemeanor of the third degree.
(C) If the offender commits the offense while distracted and the distracting activity is a contributing
factor to the commission of the offense, the offender is subject to the additional flne established under
§ 70.99(B).
(R.C. § 4511.54) ('80 Code, § 373.03) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.04 RIDING BICYCLES, AND MICROMOBILITY DEVICES, MOTORIZED BICYCLES,
AND MOTORCYCLES ABREAST.
(A) Persons riding bicycles, electric bicycles, micromobility devices, motorized bicycles, or motorcycles
upon a roadway shall ride not more than two abreast in a single lane, except on paths or parts of
roadways set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles, electric bicycles, micromobility devices, motorized
bicycles, or motorcycles.
(B) This section does not require a person operating a bicycle or, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or
micromobility device to ride at the edge of the roadway when it is unreasonable or unsafe to do so.
Conditions that may require riding away from the edge of the roadway include when necessary to avoid
flxed or moving objects, parked or moving vehicles, surface hazards, or if it otherwise is unsafe or
impracticable to do so, including if the lane is too narrow for the bicycle or, electric bicycle, motorized
bicycle, or micromobility device and an overtaking vehicle to travel safely side by side within the lane.
(C) Except as otherwise provided in this division, whoever violates this section is guilty of a minor
misdemeanor. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded
guilty to one predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offense, whoever violates this section is guilty of a
misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been
convicted of two or more predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offenses, whoever violates this section is
guilty of a misdemeanor of the third degree.
(D) If the offender commits the offense while distracted and the distracting activity is a contributing
factor to the commission of the offense, the offender is subject to the additional flne established under
§ 70.99(B).
(R.C. § 4511.55(B), (C), (D)) ('80 Code, § 373.04) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.05 SIGNAL DEVICES ON BICYCLES, ELECTRIC BICYCLES, MOTORIZED
BICYCLES, AND MICROMOBILITY DEVICES.
(A) Every bicycle, or electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device when in use at the
times specifled in § 74.02, shall be equipped with the following:
(1) A lamp mounted on the front of either the bicycle or, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle,
micromobility device, or the operator that shall emit a white light visible from a distance of at least 500
feet to the front and 300 feet to the sides. A generator-powered lamp that emits light only when the
bicycle or, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device is moving may be used to meet this
requirement.
(2) A red refiector on the rear that shall be visible from all distances from 100 feet to 600 feet to the
rear when directly in front of lawful lower beams of head lamps on a motor vehicle;
(3) A lamp emitting either fiashing or steady red light visible from a distance of 500 feet to the rear
shall be used in addition to the red refiector. If the red lamp performs as a refiector in that it is visible as
specifled in division (A)(2) of this section, the red lamp may serve as the refiector and a separate refiector
is not required.
(B) Additional lamps and refiectors may be used in addition to those required under division (A) of this
section, except that red lamps and red refiectors shall not be used on the front of the bicycle or electric
bicycle and white lamps and white refiectors shall not be used on the rear of the bicycle or electric
bicycle.
(C) A bicycle or, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device may be equipped with a
device capable of giving an audible signal, except that a bicycle or, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or
micromobility device shall not be equipped with nor shall any person use upon a bicycle , or electric
bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device any siren or whistle.
(D) Every bicycle, and electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device shall be equipped
with an adequate brake when used on a shared-use path, sidewalk, street or highway.
(E) Except as otherwise provided in this division, whoever violates this section is guilty of a minor
misdemeanor. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded
guilty to one predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offense, whoever violates this section is guilty of a
misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been
convicted of two or more predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offenses, whoever violates this s ection is
guilty of a misdemeanor of the third degree.
(R.C. § 4511.56)
(F) Motorized bicycles shall be equipped with rearview mirrors.
(Ord. 36-84, passed 8-6-84)
('80 Code, § 373.06) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.06 RIDING ON ROADWAY, SHARED-USE PATHS, SIDEWALKS, TRAILS, AND
OTHER AREAS.
(A) Every person operating a bicycle, electric bicycle, or motorized bicycle, or micromobility device
upon a roadway shall ride as near to the right side of the roadway as practicable obeying all trafflc rules
applicable to vehicles and exercising due care when passing a standing vehicle or one proceeding in the
same direction.
(Ord. 53-82, passed 10-18-82)
(B) Every person operating a bicycle, or electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device
upon the roadway shall operate such vehicle within three feet of the right edge of the roadway.
(Ord. 36-84, passed 8-6-84)
('80 Code, § 373.07) Penalty, see § 70.99
(C) (1) The City Manager or his or her designee is authorized to designate where and at what speed
bicycles, electric bicycles, motorized bicycles, or micromobility devices may be operated based on trafflc
and pedestrian safety considerations, including prohibiting the operation of certain devices on certain
streets, sidewalks, paths, or trails and establishing maximum speed limits when operating a device on
certain streets, sidewalks, trails, and other related paths within the public right-of-way.
(2) The operation of bicycles, class 1 and class 2 electric bicycles, and micromobility devices is
permitted on sidewalks, shared-use paths, and paths set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles, unless the
City Manager or his or her designee prohibits or otherwise restricts the devices’ use on such a path.
(3) No person shall operate a bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device on a
path that is intended to be used primarily for mountain biking, hiking, equestrian use, or other similar
uses, or any other single track or natural surface trail that has historically been reserved for non -
motorized use, unless the City Manager or his or her designee authorizes the use on such a path.
(D) No person shall operate a miniature motorcycle on any public roadway, shared-use path, or
sidewalk, or in any public park.
(E) No person shall operate a micromobility device, bicycle, electric bicycle, or miniature motorcycle in
a parking garage.
(F) No person shall operate a motorized bicycle on any public sidewalk or shared-use path, unless
otherwise permitted by the City Manager or his or her designee.
(G) No person shall operate a micromobility device on a public roadway with a speed limit greater than
25 miles per hour.
(H) No person shall operate a bicycle, electric bicycle, or micromobility device on a street, sidewalk, or
shared use-path unless, if the operator is under the age of 18, the operator is wearing a helmet on the
operator’s head with the chinstrap securely fastened.
§ 75.07 RECKLESS OPERATION.
No person shall operate a bicycle, electric bicycle, or motorized bicycle, micromobility device, or other
similar device:
(A) Without due regard for the safety and rights of pedestrians and drivers and occupants of all other
vehicles, and so as to endanger the life, limb or property of any person while in the lawful use of the
streets or sidewalks or any other public or private property;
(B) Without exercising reasonable and ordinary control over such bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized
bicycle, micromobility device, or similar device;
(C) In a weaving or zigzag course unless such irregular course is necessary for safe operation in
compliance with law;
(D) As applicable per bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, micromobility device, or other similar
device, Wwithout both hands upon the handle grips except when necessary to give the required hand
and aim signals, or as provided in § 75.02(D);
(E) At a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing.
('80 Code, § 373.08) (Ord. 53-82, passed 10-18-82) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.08 PARKING OF BICYCLE, ELECTRIC BICYCLE, OR MOTORIZED BICYCLE, OR
MICROMOBILITY DEVICE.
(A) No person shall park a bicycle, electric bicycle, or motorized bicycle, or micromobility device upon
a sidewalk in such a manner so as to unduly interfere with pedestrian trafflc or upon a roadway so as to
unduly interfere with vehicular trafflc.
(B) No bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device shall be parked along a
sidewalk such that it leaves an unobstructed path of less than four feet.
(C) When parking a bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device, the device
shall not block motor vehicle driving lanes, bicycle lanes, driveways and driveway approaches, loading
zones, pedestrian paths, shared-use paths, building entrances, curb ramps, crosswalks, or benches.
('80 Code, § 373.09) (Ord. 53-82, passed 10-18-82) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.09 MOTORIZED BICYCLE OPERATION, EQUIPMENT AND LICENSE.
(A) No person shall operate a motorized bicycle upon a highway or any public or private property used
by the public for purposes of vehicular travel or parking, unless all of the following conditions are met:
(1) The person is 14 or 15 years of age and holds a valid probationary motorized bicycle license issued
after the person has passed the test provided for in this section, or the person is 16 years of age or older
and holds either a valid commercial driver's license issued under R.C. Chapter 4506 or a driver's license
issued under R.C. Chapter 4507 or a valid motorized bicycle license issued after the person has passed the
test provided for in this section, except that if a person is 16 years of age, has a valid probationary
motorized bicycle license and desires a motorized bicycle license, he isthey are not required to comply
with the testing requirements provided for in this section;
(2) The motorized bicycle is equipped in accordance with the rules adopted under division (B) of this
section and is in proper working order.
(3) The person, if under 18 years of age, is wearing a protective helmet on the person's head with the
chin strap properly fastened and the motorized bicycle is equipped with a rear -view mirror.
(4) The person operates the motorized bicycle when practicable within 3 feet of the right edge of the
roadway obeying all trafflc rules applicable to vehicles.
(B) The Director of Public Safety, subject to R.C. §§ 119.01 through 119.13, shall adopt and promulgate
rules concerning protective helmets, the equipment of motorized bicycles, and the testing and
qualiflcations of persons who do not hold a valid driver's or commercial driver's license. The test shall be
as near as practicable to the examination required for a motorcycle operator's endorsement under R.C. §
4507.11. The test shall also require the operator to give an actual demonstration of the operator's ability
to operate and control a motorized bicycle by driving one under the supervision of an examining offlcer.
(C) Every motorized bicycle license expires on the birthday of the applicant in the fourth or eighth year
after the date it is issued, based on the period of renewal requested by the applicant. No motorized
bicycle license shall be issued for a period longer than eight years. A person who is 65 years of age or
older may only apply for a motorized bicycle license that expires on the birthday of the applicant in the
fourth year after the date it is issued.
(D) No person operating a motorized bicycle shall carry another person upon the motorized bicycle.
(E) The protective helmet and rear-view mirror required by division (A)(3) of this section shall, on and
after January 1, 1985, conform with rules adopted by the director under division (B) of this section.
(F) Whoever violates division (A), (D), or (E) of this section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor. (R.C. §
4511.521) ('80 Code, § 373.10)
(G) As used in this Code, ELECTRIC PERSONAL ASSISTIVE MOBILITY DEVICE means a self-
balancing two non-tandem wheeled device that is designed to transport only one person, has an electric
propulsion system of an average of 750 watts, and when ridden on a paved level surface by an operator
who weighs 170 pounds has a maximum speed of less than 20 miles per hour.
(R.C. § 4501.01(TT)) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.10 ELECTRIC BICYCLES.
(A) (1) On and after January 1, 2020, manufacturers and distributors of electric bicycles shall
permanently afflx a label, in a prominent location, to each electric bicycle. The label shall specify
whether the electric bicycle is a class 1, class 2, or class 3 electric bicycle, the top assisted speed that the
electric bicycle is capable of reaching, and the motor wattage of the electric bicycle.
(2) No person shall modify an electric bicycle in a manner that changes the top assisted speed that the
electric bicycle is capable of reaching unless the person also modifles the label required under division
(A)(1) of this section to refiect the modiflcation.
(B) (1) The manufacturer of an electric bicycle shall ensure that the electric bicycle complies with the
equipment and manufacturing requirements for bicycles established by the consumer product safety
commission under 16 C.F.R. §§ 1512 et seq.
(2) The manufacturer shall manufacture all class 1 electric bicycles and class 3 electric bicycles so that
when the rider ceases pedaling the electric motor ceases to provide assistance. The manufacturer shall
manufacture all class 2 electric bicycles so that when the rider applies the brakes or releases or activates a
switch or similar mechanism the electric motor ceases to provide assistance.
(3) All class 3 electric bicycles shall be equipped with a speedometer that displays the speed of the
electric bicycle in miles per hour.
(C) (1) The operation of a class 1 electric bicycle and a class 2 electric bicycle is permitted on a path set
aside for the exclusive use of bicycles or on a shared-use path, unless the county, township, municipal
corporation, other local authority, or state agency as deflned in R.C. § 1.60 with control over the path by
resolution, ordinance, or rule prohibits the use of a class 1 electric bicycle or class 2 electric bicycle on
such a path.
(2) No person shall operate a class 3 electric bicycle on a path set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles
or a shared-use path unless that path is within or adjacent to a highway or the county, township,
municipal corporation, or local authority, or state agency as deflned in R.C. § 1.60 with control over the
path by resolution, ordinance, or rule authorizes the use of a class 3 electric bicycle on such a path.
(3) No person shall operate a class 1 electric bicycle, a class 2 electric bicycle, or a class 3 electric
bicycle on a path that is intended to be used primarily for mountain biking, hiking, equestrian use, or
other similar uses, or any other single track or natural surface trail that has historically been reserved for
non- motorized use, unless the county, township, municipal corporation, other local authority, or state
agency as deflned in R.C. § 1.60 with control over the path by resolution, ordinance, or rule authorizes the
use of a class 1 electric bicycle, a class 2 electric bicycle, or a class 3 electric bicycle on such a path.
(4) Divisions (C)(2) and (C)(3) of this section do not apply to a law enforcement offlcer, or other person
sworn to enforce the criminal and trafflc laws of the state, using an electric bicycle while in the
performance of the offlcer's duties.
(D) (1) No person under 16 years of age shall operate a class 3 electric bicycle; however, a person under
16 years of age may ride as a passenger on a class 3 electric bicycle that is designed to accommodate
passengers.
(2) No person shall operate or be a passenger on a class 3 electric bicycle unless the person is wearing
a protective helmet that meets the standards established by the Consumer Product Safety Commission or
the American Society for Testing and Materials.
(E) (1) Except as otherwise provided in this division, whoever operates an electric bicycle in a manner
that is prohibited under division (C) of this section and whoever violates division (D) of this section is
guilty of a minor misdemeanor. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been
convicted of or pleaded guilty to one predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offense, whoever violates this
section is guilty of a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If, within one year of the offens e, the offender
previously has been convicted of two or more predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offenses, whoever
violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor of the third degree.
(2) The offenses established under division (E)(1) of this section are strict liability offenses and strict
liability is a culpable mental state for purposes of R.C. § 2901.20. The designation of these offenses as strict
liability offenses shall not be construed to imply that any other offense, for which there is no specifled
degree of culpability, is not a strict liability offense.
(R.C. § 4511.522)
§ 75.11 OPERATION OF ELECTRIC PERSONAL ASSISTIVE MOBILITY DEVICES.
(A) As used in this Code, ELECTRIC PERSONAL ASSISTIVE MOBILITY DEVICE means a self-
balancing two non-tandem wheeled device that is designed to transport only one person, has an electric
propulsion system of an average of 750 watts, and when ridden on a paved level surface by an operator
who weighs 170 pounds has a maximum speed of less than 20 miles per hour.
(B) (1) Electric personal assistive mobility devices may be operated on the public streets, highways,
sidewalks, and paths and portions of roadways set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles in accordance
with this section.
(2) Except as otherwise provided in this section, those sections of this Trafflc Code that by their
nature are applicable to an electric personal assistive mobility device apply to the device and the person
operating it whenever it is operated upon any public street, highway, sidewalk, or path or upon any
portion of a roadway set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles.
(3) The municipality may regulate or prohibit the operation of electric personal assistive mobility
devices on public streets, highways, sidewalks, and paths, or portions of roadways set aside for the
exclusive use of bicycles, under its jurisdiction.
(C) No operator of an electric personal assistive mobility device shall do any of the following:
(1) Fail to yield the right-of-way to all pedestrians and human-powered vehicles at all times;
(2) Fail to give an audible signal before overtaking and passing a pedestrian;
(3) Operate the device at night unless the device or its operator is equipped with or wearing both of
the following:
(a) A lamp pointing to the front that emits a white light visible from a distance of not less than 500
feet;
(b) A red refiector facing the rear that is visible from all distances from 100 feet to 600 feet when
directly in front of lawful lower beams of head lamps on a motor vehicle;
(4) Operate the device on any portion of a street or highway that has an established speed limit of 55
miles per hour or more;
(5) Operate the device upon any path set aside for the exclusive use of pedestrians or other specialized
use when an appropriate sign giving notice of the specialized use is posted on the path;
(6) If under 18 years of age, operate the device unless wearing a protective helmet on the person’s
head with the chin strap properly fastened;
(7) If under 16 years of age, operate the device unless, during the operation, the person is under the
direct visual and audible supervision of another person who is 18 years of age or older and is responsible
for the immediate care of the person under 16 years of age.
(D) No person who is under 14 years of age shall operate an electric personal assistive mobility device.
(E) No person shall distribute or sell an electric personal assistive mobility device unless the device is
accompanied by a written statement that is substantially equivalent to the following: “WARNING: TO
REDUCE THE RISK OF SERIOUS INJURY, USE ONLY WHILE WEARING FULL PROTECTIVE
EQUIPMENT –
(F) Nothing in this section affects or shall be construed to affect any rule of the Director of Natural
Resources or a board of park district commissioners governing the operation of vehicles on lands under
the control of the Director or board, as applicable.
(G) Penalty.
(1) Whoever violates division (B) or (C) of this section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor and shall be
punished as follows:
(a) The offender shall be flned $10;
(b) If the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to a violation of division (B) or
(C) of this section or a substantially similar state law or municipal ordinance, the court, in addition to
imposing the flne required under division (F)(1)(a) of this section, shall do one of the following:
1. Order the impoundment for not less than one day but not more than 30 days of the electric
personal assistive mobility device that was involved in the current violation of that division. The court
shall order the device to be impounded at a safe indoor location designated by the court and may assess
storage fees of not more than $5 per day; provided the total storage, processing, and release fees assessed
against the offender or the device in connection with the device’s impoundment or subse quent release
shall not exceed $50.
2. If the court does not issue an impoundment order pursuant to division (F)(1)(b)1. of this section,
issue an order prohibiting the offender from operating any electric personal assistive mobility device on
the public streets, highways, sidewalks, and paths and portions of roadways set aside for the exclusive
use of bicycles for not less than one day but not more than 30 days.
(2) Whoever violates division (D) of this section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor.
(R.C. § 4511.512) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.12 MICROMOBILITY DEVICES.
(A) “Micromobility device” means a device weighing less than 120 pounds, with one or two wheels, is
propelled by an electric motor or human power, and has an attainable speed on a paved level surface of
not more than 20 miles per hour when propelled by the electric motor. Electric skateboards are also
classifled as micromobility devices under this Code.
(B) A micromobility device does not include the following:
(1) Bicycle;
(2) Electric bicycle of any class;
(3) Electric powered wheelchair or other similar mobility devices regulated by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) or under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA);
(4) Miniature motorcycle or motorcycle;
(5) Motorized bicycle, moped, or scooter requiring an operator’s lienselicense or motorcycle
endorsement to operate on public roadways;
(6) Snowmobile;
(7) Any other device which can be deflned under a different name within this code, including Electric
Personal Assistive Mobility Devices as deflned in § 75.11 of this code and All-Purpose Vehicles as deflned
in § 75.20 of this code.
(C) No person shall operate a micromobility device unless:
(1) The operator yields the right-of-way to all pedestrians and human-powered vehicles;
(2) The operator gives an audible signal before overtaking and passing a pedestrian;
(3) If the operator is under the age of 18, the operator wears a helmet.
§ 75.13 Parental Responsibility.
(A) No parent or guardian of any child shall authorize or knowingly permit any such child to violate
any of the provisions of this chapter.
(B) Any person who violates this section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor for a flrst offense. If such
person commits a second offense within one year after the flrst offense, the person is guilty of a fourth-
degree misdemeanor. For each subsequent offense committed within one year of the flrst offense, the
person is guilty of a third-degree misdemeanor.
§ 75.14 MICROMOBILITY DEVICE FLEET COMPANY PERMITTING AND
OPERATION.
(A) “Micromobility Device Fleet Company” shall mean a company that manages a fieet of shared
micromobility devices and/or bicycles by deploying fieets within a designated service area under a
Memorandum of Understanding and with a permit.
(B) No Micromobility Device Fleet Company shall operate or be located in the public right of way
without entering into an agreement with the City.
(C) Micromobility Device Fleet Companies shall:
(1) not allow users to operate in public streets or the public right of way, unless authorized by the City
Manager or his or her designee;
(2) comply with all terms and conditions of the Micromobility Device Fleet Company’s permit or
other document providing privileges to operate in the public right of way; and
(3) comply with all applicable regulations promulgated by the City; and
(D) The City reserves the right to establish civil flnes or penalties for non-compliance with applicable
regulations. The City Manager is hereby authorized to establish such schedule of civil flnes or penalties,
which may include suspension of privileges to op erate a micromobility device fieet in the public right of
way.
0127206.0607929 4914-5410-0855v3 0127206.0607929 4914-8112-3966v4
§ 75.15 PENALTIES.
(A) Unless a penalty has otherwise been prescribed in a section of Chapter 75, any person who violates
a provision in Chapter 75 is guilty of a minor misdemeanor for a flrst offense. If such person commits a
second offense within one year after the flrst offense, the person is guilty of a fourth-degree
misdemeanor. For each subsequent offense committed within one year of the flrst offense, the person is
guilty of a third-degree misdemeanor.
(B) In addition to the penalty prescribed in Section 75.15 (A), any person who violates a provision in
Chapter 75 while operating a bicycle, micromobility device, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, miniature
motorcycle, or other similar device may be subject to having such device impounded by the Dublin
Police Department.
Formatted: Line spacing: Multiple 1.16 li
Formatted: *LBFileStampAtCursor,FSC
Device Representative Image Sidewalks Shared-Use Paths Street Max Capable Speed Age Restrictions Multiple Passengers Helmet Required Registration Required Insurance Required Equipment regulations Inspection Code Provisions & Additional Safety Regulations
Bicycles Yes Yes
All streets except
freeway N/A No age restrictions
If designed for more
than one person No No No No No
75.02 - Rules for Bicycles
75.02(B)(6) - Passengers
R.C. 4511.711 - Sidewalk
R.C. 4511.55 - Operating Bicycles on roadway
Class 1 & Class 2 E-Bikes
Yes, if the motor is not
engaged.Yes
All streets except
freeway 20 mph No age restrictions
If designed for more
than one person No No No Yes No
75.02(B)(6) - Passengers
75.10(C)(1) - Shared-use paths
R.C. 4511.522 - Device requirements
R.C. 4511.711 - Sidewalk
R.C. 4511.55 - Operating E-Bikes on roadway
Class 3 E-Bikes
Yes, if the motor is not
engaged.No
All streets except
freeway 28 mph
16 years or older to
operate
If designed for more
than one person Yes No No Yes
No (manufacturer
label must be on the
device)
75.02(B)(6) - Passengers
75.10(C)(2) - Shared-use paths
75.10 - E-Bike rules, helmets, & equipment
regulations
R.C. 4511.711 - Sidewalk
Skateboards & Rollerblades Yes Yes No N/A No age restrictions N/A No No No No No
72.019 - Streets
96.19 - Conduct while operating skateboards and
roller skates in a park
Electric Scooters Yes Yes
All streets except
freeway 20 mph
No age restrictions for
private devices N/A No No No Yes No
R.C. 4511.514 - State micromobility device
regulations
No Local code has been established.
Electric Skateboards Yes Yes No N/A No age restrictions N/A No No No No No
72.019 - Streets
96.19 - Conduct while operating skateboards and
roller skates in a park
Motorized Bicylces & Mopeds No No
All streets except
freeway 20 mph
14 (with a moped license)
16 (with a traditional
driver's license)No
Yes (if under 18 years
old)Yes Yes Yes Yes
R.C. 4501.01 - Speed
OAC 4501-23-04 - Registration
R.C. 4511.521(A)(3) - Helmet
R.C. 4511.521(D) - Passengers
Miniature Motorcycles No No No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
R.C. 4511.713 - Bike Paths
75.23 - Streets
Shared/Rented Micromobility Devices Yes Yes 25 mph or lower 20 mph 16 years or older to rent
If designed for more
than one person No No No Yes No
R.C. 4511.514 - State micromobility device
regulations
Resolution 29-25
Electric Personal Assistive Mobility
Device Yes Yes 55 mph or lower 20 mph
16 (14 if under the
supervision of a parent or
guardian at the time of
riding)No
Yes (if under 18 years
old)No No Yes No
72.085 - General Regulations
75.09(G) - Definition
Micromobility Matrix - CURRENT LAW
Device Representative Image Sidewalks Shared-Use Paths Street Max Capable Speed Age Restrictions Multiple Passengers Helmet Required Registration Required Insurance Required Equipment regulations Inspection Code Provisions & Additional Safety Regulations
Bicycles Yes Yes
All streets except
freeway N/A No age restrictions
If designed for more
than one person
Yes (if under 18 years
old)No No No No
75.02 - Rules for Bicycles
75.02(B)(6) - Passengers
R.C. 4511.711 - Sidewalk
R.C. 4511.55 - Operating Bicycles on roadway
Class 1 & Class 2 E-Bikes
Yes, if the motor is not
engaged.Yes
All streets except
freeway 20 mph No age restrictions
If designed for more
than one person
Yes (if under 18 years
old)No No Yes No
75.02(B)(6) - Passengers
75.10(C)(1) - Shared-use paths
R.C. 4511.522 - Device requirements
R.C. 4511.711 - Sidewalk
R.C. 4511.55 - Operating E-Bikes on roadway
Class 3 E-Bikes No No
All streets except
freeway 28 mph
16 years or older to
operate
If designed for more
than one person Yes No No Yes
No (manufacturer label
must be on the device)
75.02(B)(6) - Passengers
75.10(C)(2) - Shared-use paths & sidewalks
75.10 - E-Bike rules, helmets, & equipment
regulations
R.C. 4511.711 - Sidewalk
Skateboards & Rollerblades Yes Yes No N/A No age restrictions N/A
Yes (if under 18 years
old)No No Yes No
72.019 - Streets
96.19 - Conduct while operating skateboards and
roller skates in a park
Electric Scooters Yes Yes 25 mph or lower 20 mph
No age restrictions for
personal device
If designed for more
than one person
Yes (if under 18 years
old)No No Yes No
75.02(B)(8) - Passengers
75.06 - Roads, sidewalks, SUP
75.12 - Max capable speed
75.12(C) - age, helmet
R.C. 4511.514 - State micromobility regulations
Electric Skateboards Yes Yes 25 mph or lower N/A No age restrictions N/A
Yes (if under 18 years
old)No No Yes No
72.019 - Streets
96.19 - Conduct while operating skateboards and
roller skates in a park
Motorized Bicylces & Mopeds No No
All streets except
freeway 20 mph
14 (with a moped license)
16 (with a traditional
driver's license)No
Yes (if under 18 years
old)Yes Yes Yes Yes
75.06(C)(2) - Shared-use paths
R.C. 4501.01 - Capable Speed
OAC 4501-23-04 - Registration
R.C. 4511.521(A)(3) - Helmet
R.C. 4511.521(D) - Passengers
Miniature Motorcycles No No No N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 75.06 - road, SUP, sidewalk, park.
Shared/Rented Micromobility Devices Yes Yes 25 mph or lower 20 mph 16 years or older to rent
If designed for more
than one person
Yes (if under 18 years
old)No No Yes No
75.12 - Micromobility Device regulations
75.13 - Micromobility Fleet Operator Regulations
R.C. 4511.514 - State micromobility device
regulations.
Electric Personal Assistive Mobility Device Yes Yes 55 mph or lower 20 mph
16 (14 if under the
supervision of a parent or
guardian at the time of
riding)No
Yes (if under 18 years
old)No No Yes No 75.11 - Definition & Regulations
Micromobility Matrix - PROPOSED LAW
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
SAFETY GUIDE
The City of Dublin – November 2025
Contents
Introduction .............................................................................................................. 2
General Information ................................................................................................ 2
Obey Traffic Control Devices .................................................................................... 2
No Walking or Biking on Freeways ............................................................................ 2
Pay Attention to Local Laws ...................................................................................... 2
Pedestrians................................................................................................................ 3
Crossing the Street at Crosswalks ............................................................................ 3
Right of Way in Crosswalks ....................................................................................... 3
Crossing at Intersections with Traffic Signals ........................................................... 4
Crossing Away from Intersections and Crosswalks .................................................. 4
Bicycles and E-Bikes ................................................................................................. 5
Bicycles and Electric Bicycles .................................................................................. 5
Riding on the Road ................................................................................................... 5
Riding on Sidewalks, Paths, & Trails.......................................................................... 5
Micromobility Devices .............................................................................................. 6
Is it a Micromobility Device? ..................................................................................... 6
Who Can Ride? ......................................................................................................... 6
Riding on Sidewalks, Paths, and Streets ................................................................... 6
Parking Micromobility Devices ................................................................................. 7
Introduction
This Active Transportation Safety Guide provides an overview of the rules that apply to
walking, biking, and using micromobility devices such as electric scooters and e-bikes
within the City of Dublin.
This guide combines state statutes from the Ohio Revised Code with Dublin’s local
ordinances to create a single resource. It explains key deflnitions, operating rules,
equipment requirements, and includes practical guidance for safe and lawful travel on
sidewalks, shared-use paths, and streets. Whether you are walking, riding a bike, or using a
micromobility device, this guide is designed to promote safety, accessibility, and
consistency across our transportation network.
General Information
Obey Traffic Control Devices – like STOP and YIELD Signs, Traffic Signals, Striping and
the like (Dublin §70.23; Dublin
Chapter 75; ORC §4511.12)
Drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists, and
micromobility riders must follow all
official traffic control devices unless
directed otherwise by a police officer.
This includes traffic signals, signs, and
pavement markings/striping.
No Walking or Biking on Freeways (Dublin §70.08; ORC §4511.051)
Pedestrians, bicyclists, and micromobility riders are generally prohibited from using
freeways. A freeway is a divided, multi-lane highway designed exclusively for through
traffic, with no intersections. All interstates and other limited-access highways are
classifled as freeways and pedestrians or other vulnerable road users are not permitted to
use the facility.
Pay Attention to Local Laws (Dublin §70.21; ORC §4511.07)
Local governments, including the City of Dublin, may adopt traffic regulations to address
safety and efficiency. The City Manager can establish rules for parking, designate one-way
streets, and manage other traffic operations. Dublin may also set requirements for bicycle
use, or other micro-mobility devices, including registration or licensing.
Pedestrians
Crossing the Street at Crosswalks (Dublin §72.078; ORC §4511.01, §4511.49)
Pedestrians should cross streets at crosswalks whenever possible and, when practicable,
keep to the right half of the crosswalk. Crosswalks may be marked with white lines or
decorative treatments such as brick pavers, but they exist at every intersection even when
unmarked, unless signs speciflcally state otherwise. Mid-block crosswalks, located
between intersections, are always marked using one of these visual treatments to ensure
visibility and safety.
Right of Way in Crosswalks (Dublin §72.075; ORC §4511.46, §4511.452)
At intersections without traffic signals, intersections where the signals are malfunctioning,
or at mid-block crosswalks (crosswalks not at intersections), pedestrians must wait for a
safe gap in traffic while waiting on the side of the road. Once the pedestrian enters the
crosswalk, drivers approaching in the same half of the roadway are required to yield, while
drivers on the opposite side may continue. After the pedestrian reaches the opposite half
of the roadway, those drivers are then required to yield. It is important to note that the
presence of painted crosswalk markings and/or fiashing signs do not change this
requirement but instead only highlights the crossing area for both pedestrians and drivers.
Crossing at Intersections with Traffic Signals (Dublin §70.27; ORC §4511.13, §4511.14)
Pedestrians must follow pedestrian control signals when they are present. Pedestrian
signals use symbols to indicate when to cross a street:
Steady walking person: You may begin crossing the street.
Flashing raised hand: Do not start crossing, but you may
flnish if you are already in the crosswalk.
Steady raised hand: Do not enter the crosswalk.
If pedestrian signals are not provided, the vehicular signals can be used to determine when
it is safe to cross. Cross when the parallel traffic has a green light. Do not enter the
crosswalk when parallel traffic has a green arrow (such as a right-turn or left-turn signal),
solid yellow, or red light. At stop -controlled intersections or those with fiashing red lights,
pedestrians may cross after checking for and flnding a safe gap in traffic while waiting on
the side of the road.
Crossing Away from Intersections and Crosswalks (Dublin §72.077; ORC §4511.48)
When crossing at a location that is not an
intersection or a marked crosswalk,
pedestrians must yield the right-of-way to all
vehicles on the roadway. Pedestrians are not
permitted to cross between adjacent
signalized intersections unless they use a
marked crosswalk.
Bicycles and E-Bikes
Bicycles and Electric Bicycles (Dublin §75.10; ORC §4511.01, §4511.522)
Bicycles are considered vehicles, so all traffic rules that apply to vehicles also apply to
bicycles, whether a manually powered bicycle or an electric bicycle, also known as an E-
Bike. There are three classes of E-bikes:
1. Class 1: Provides electric assistance only while pedaling and stops assisting at 20
mph.
2. Class 2: Provides electric assistance whether or not you are pedaling but stops
assisting at 20 mph.
3. Class 3: Provides electric assistance only while pedaling and stops assisting at 28
mph. Importantly, unlike bicycles and Class 1/Class 2 e-bikes, riders must be 16
years or older to operate a Class 3 e-bike. Further, and again unlike bicycles and
Class 1/Class 2 e-bikes, Class 3 e-bike riders must wear a helmet.
Riding on the Road (Dublin §75.06, §75.10)
While bike lanes provide a safe option for riders because cars are prohibited from driving in
bike lanes, cyclists are not required to use them. Riders may choose the general traffic lane
if conditions make bike lanes unsafe or uncomfortable. If a rider chooses to travel in a
general traffic lane, the rider must ride as close to the right side of the road as possible.
Riding on Sidewalks, Paths, & Trails (ORC §4511.522; Dublin §75.06, §75.10)
Sidewalks & Shared-Use Paths
Manually powered bicycles, Class 1 e-bikes, and Class 2 e-bikes are permitted on shared-
use paths and sidewalks unless otherwise posted. Shared-use paths are designed for
multiple users such as walkers, joggers, skaters, and cyclists. Class 3 e-bikes are
prohibited from operating on shared-use paths and sidewalks. When riding on sidewalks or
shared-use paths, all bicyclists, whether manually powered or an E-Bike, must yield to
pedestrians.
Trails
In Dublin, E-bikes are not permitted on trails primarily intended for hiking, mountain biking,
or on any natural surface trail unless speciflcally authorized by the City. City officials may
designate where E-bikes are allowed, including sidewalks, shared-use paths, and streets.
Micromobility Devices
Is it a Micromobility Device? (Dublin §75.12)
A micromobility device is a lightweight vehicle, with one or two wheels, is powered by an
electric motor and/or human effort, and can reach a maximum speed of 20 mph when
powered by an electric motor. Common examples include electric scooters and similar
compact devices designed for short trips. Electric skateboards are also micromobility
devices. Bicycles, e-bikes, mopeds, miniature motorcycles, and other devices are not
micromobility devices and are subject to each device’s own code regulations, which can
be found in Chapter 75 of the City Code.
The City has the authority to set rules and designate where micromobility devices can
operate to ensure safety for riders and pedestrians. There is no location in Dublin where
gas-powered devices, like mini-bikes or miniature motorcycles, are permitted on the
sidewalks and shared use paths.
Who Can Ride? (Dublin §75.12)
For a privately-owned micromobility device, there is not an age limit to ride. For rented
devices, Dublin’s partner VEO requires riders to be at least 18 years old to rent their
micromobility devices.
If under the age of 18, riders are required to wear a helmet.
Riding on Sidewalks, Paths, and Streets (Dublin §75.06; ORC §4511.514)
Micromobility devices, such as electric scooters, may be operated on sidewalks, shared-
use paths, bike lanes, and streets. In Dublin, those devices can only be operated on streets
with a posted speed limit of 25 mph or less. When riding on sidewalks or shared-use paths,
riders must always yield to pedestrians and give an audible signal, such as a bell or verbal
alert before passing.
When operating in the street or in a bike lane, riders must follow the same rules that apply
to bicyclists and drivers. This includes obeying all traffic signs and signals, yielding to
pedestrians in crosswalks, and riding on the right side of the roadway.
Riders should also be aware that the City is authorized to: (1) limit where micromobility
devices can be ridden based on traffic and pedestrian safety considerations; and (2)
establish speed limits for riding micromobility devices on certain sidewalks or paths.
Parking Micromobility Devices (Dublin §75.08, §75.13)
In Dublin, shared/rented micromobility devices are required to be parked at a bicycle rack
or in a designated micromobility corral. Privately-owned devices must not block
pedestrian traffic and leave at least four feet of clear space for accessibility.
0127206.0607929 4908-9764-9271v2
Micromobilit y Proposed
Code Amendments Sur vey
SURVEY RESPONSE REPORT
12 December 2022 - 28 December 2025
PROJECT NAME:
Motorized Mobility in Dublin
SURVEY QUESTIONS
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 1 of 75
Q1 How familiar are you with “micromobility devices” such as bicycles, e -bikes,
skateboards….continue the list ?
147 (47.1%)
147 (47.1%)
140 (44.9%)
140 (44.9%)
25 (8.0%)
25 (8.0%)
Very familiar Somewhat familiar Not familiar
Question options
Mandatory Question (312 response(s))
Question type: Radio Button Question
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 2 of 75
Anonymous
12/12/2025 08:15 AM
Manual devices powered by a motor yet limited in street worthiness
or distance
Anonymous
12/12/2025 08:48 AM
Devices that support short range trips and are usually powered by a
small electric motor.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 09:41 AM
scooters, electric scooters, electric bikes, bikes, electric skateboard,
skateboards, small motorcycles
Anonymous
12/12/2025 09:54 AM
Scooters, birds, rentable e-bikes, one wheels etc. I work on OSU
campus where these devices are extremely commonplace. I work in
public safety where I have seen college students who have suffered
minor and severe injuries as a result of accidents involving these
devices.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 09:57 AM
Our sons have e-bikes.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 10:00 AM
They are a pain in the ass. Zipping around Wellington place on the
sidewalks. We watched two kids in a dune buggy going Over 20 mph
up and down the sidewalks to the roads and almost got hit by a car.
When I told the parents those were not allowed on the street unless
you are a licensed driver he told me I was wrong. Police officer went
to other kids house and they continue to tie on sidewalks.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 10:01 AM
A micromobility device is a small, lightweight vehicle designed for
short-distance travel, typically in urban or campus environments, and
usually intended for single-person use.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 10:30 AM
They can be utilized for all ages. To get from point A to point B.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 12:15 PM
Why are you calling skateboards micromobility devices?
Anonymous
12/12/2025 01:33 PM
I’ve used them. Scooters, e-bikes.
Q2 If very or somewhat familiar, what is your understanding of "micromobility devices?"
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 3 of 75
Anonymous
12/12/2025 03:37 PM
I see them all over our neighborhood. Sidewalks, streets, through our
yard! The kids don’t follow safety or street rules. Very dangerous!
Anonymous
12/13/2025 04:37 AM
I see them all the time on the street, and on the bike paths
Anonymous
12/13/2025 05:40 AM
These devices are still requiring some physical activity by the
user:peddling pushing etc
Anonymous
12/13/2025 11:14 AM
They are exploding in popularity and pose significant risk to users and
pedestrians.
Anonymous
12/13/2025 12:40 PM
Electric powered 2 wheel devices.
Anonymous
12/15/2025 07:47 AM
I understand that micromobility devices means devices such as
scooters, seated scooters, or other devices with a top speed of 20
mph.
Anonymous
12/15/2025 01:35 PM
You have e devil ces that can range from 12mph to 30+ mph. Most
kids riding these devices have no idea how to handle that speed.
Hitting the higher speeds on shared paths is crazy and dangerous.
Anonymous
12/15/2025 10:14 PM
These are things like bikes and scooters which can help folks make
"last mile" connections to destinations
Anonymous
12/16/2025 02:08 AM
They are the best!
Anonymous
12/16/2025 08:33 AM
I see them constantly on my street, the sidewalk, the bike paths, the
parks, everywhere.
Anonymous
12/16/2025 08:01 PM
Motorized vehicles
Anonymous
12/18/2025 06:30 AM
devices for recreation or transportation that are smaller than a car but
more enhanced than a regular bicycle - have some sort of motor or
motorized pedals
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 4 of 75
Anonymous
12/18/2025 11:54 AM
These are modes of transportation for individual riders to get around
without using their muscles or driving an internal combustion
engine/EV.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:01 PM
Smaller transportation devices that travel at lower speeds as
compared to vehicles that travel on the road.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:04 PM
They are small personal devices designed to help people get around.
Usually they are electric. They are lower speed and smaller than cars
(but some can go pretty fast for a pedestrian area I think.)
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:10 PM
Motorized bicycles, e-bikes, hover boards…any device that has
power behind it.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:16 PM
. see them as powered vehicles for one person. They run the gamut
from tiny wheeled scooters to high powered ebikes. The concept
includes powered wheel chairs for handicapped persons, to
transportation and to pure entertainment.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:24 PM
Electric bikes and scooters
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:27 PM
Small, lightweight vehicles typically operated by a single person. It
includes both human powered and electric powered vehicles such as
bicycles, e-bike, scooters and skateboards.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:30 PM
A devise that moves an individual that is not a car or bius. I think the
determination of this classification is determined by weigh or maybe
course power.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:41 PM
My understanding is that they are used mostly by teenagers with very
little regard for the safety of pedestrians, bike riders, or themselves.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:59 PM
Devices that allow you to get around other than regulation
vehicles/motorcycles.
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 5 of 75
Anonymous
12/18/2025 01:24 PM
E bikes, E skateboards, even regular bicycles
Anonymous
12/18/2025 01:39 PM
Small personal transportation, mainly two-wheels, powered or
otherwise, intended mainly for short distance travel
Anonymous
12/18/2025 02:07 PM
E-scooters e-bikes etc
Anonymous
12/18/2025 02:40 PM
Personal vehicles with partial or full battery power assist, usually for 1
person.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 03:28 PM
These devices share the road, have public parking and drop off
services and the companies may receive government subsidies fir
their operations, to name a few but not all inclusive list.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 04:01 PM
Mobility devices powered by batteries and are allowed to be used on
Dublin trail system.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 05:09 PM
A misguided attempt to reduce traffic from automobiles around the
City of Dublin.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 05:18 PM
Alternatives to cars and buses, which transport one person.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 06:44 PM
I consider them all to be motorized vehicles and understand that,
while they may be able to go faster than 25 mph, they are not street
legal in a strict sense, except for e-bikes. In general, they are not
allowed on sidewalks and often not allowed or they are speed-limited
on multi-use paths.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 08:04 PM
Small transportation devices that are meant to be at lower speeds
Anonymous
12/18/2025 09:58 PM
They are electric single passenger vehicles. They often go waaay too
fast for pedestrian spaces and sidewalks.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 03:51 AM
I see young kids flying down roads and bike paths on these devices
without awareness to any traffic laws or any sense of awareness to
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 6 of 75
cars, people, or anything else happening around them. They pass
cars, ride on the wrong side of the road, and also fly down the bike
paths with no regard for folks walking on the bike paths.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 04:46 AM
not sure what you are asking
Anonymous
12/19/2025 04:47 AM
Electric motored transportation like bikes, scooters etc.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 06:00 AM
I know ebikes and mini-motorcycles are becoming more popular with
kids. I think parents buy these for their kids without understanding the
risks around them or providing education and enforcement
Anonymous
12/19/2025 06:36 AM
something that is not licensed as a vehicle, that can utilize sidewalks,
shared use paths and sometimes roads. It has smaller wheels, 2 or 4,
and can't go too fast.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 06:54 AM
A micromobility device is a small, lightweight vehicle for short urban
trips, powered by humans, electricity, or a mix, including e-bikes and
e-scooters, designed for convenience, to reduce congestion, and
offer an alternative to cars, often available through shared apps.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 07:14 AM
I've ridden bicycles for many years. Used bike trails/paths. Never on
roads.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 07:31 AM
They are motorized vehicles capable of speeds greater than walking
or running or most non-motorized bikes/scooters/etc.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 11:27 AM
Devices meant to transport someone the 'last mile' to their
destination.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 12:46 PM
They are supposed to be an alternative to driving cars in the city and
smaller business communities
Anonymous
12/19/2025 01:14 PM
They are electric, rechargeable, very popular with kids [skateboards,
e-scooters] and adults [e-bikes]. I get lots of complaints about them
for their use on the narrower, twisted baths here in Muirfield, but have
bought a couple for grandkids in past years and we have a grandson
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 7 of 75
at Miami U. who uses an e-bike lots. We have a neighbor kid, now
14, who drives our street, a circle, in a 3-bench golf cart.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 01:18 PM
They can be used for leisure or as transportation. Certain forms are
able to be used across the city, while others are prohibited.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 01:43 PM
Kids and adults both seem to be using more and more of these, while
some use it responsibly others cause them and others in danger
Anonymous
12/19/2025 01:44 PM
I have researched eScooters, ebikes, and have a solid understanding
of the motors, speed, and safety devices on these devices.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 02:02 PM
They are an unregulated "market," and my husband was nearly killed
by one that was speeding.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 02:28 PM
familiar with bikes and use them. do not own an e bike
Anonymous
12/19/2025 03:44 PM
Modes of transportation not including cars, for one individual. More
frequently motorized
Anonymous
12/19/2025 05:05 PM
Battery powered transportation
Anonymous
12/19/2025 05:55 PM
I ride 2000 ,lies per year on my bike with many of the miles in and
around Dublin. Our family own e-bikes and scooters as well
Anonymous
12/19/2025 07:44 PM
E-bikes, electric scooters and electric dirt bikes
Anonymous
12/20/2025 03:48 AM
Electric transportation.
Anonymous
12/20/2025 04:55 AM
My son has an e-bike and so do many of his friends
Anonymous
12/20/2025 05:13 AM
Any small individual electric powered transportation vehicle
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 8 of 75
Anonymous
12/20/2025 08:27 AM
Small vehicles to use to get around
Anonymous
12/21/2025 05:05 AM
Small motorized transport devices
Anonymous
12/21/2025 07:14 AM
Devices used for transportation that are either human or battery
powered. Honestly nothing with a motor belongs on the sidewalk or
bike path period.
Anonymous
12/21/2025 07:31 AM
They are a wonderful tool that cut down on vehicle-emissions and
provide mobility to a wide array of people.
Anonymous
12/21/2025 07:53 AM
Micromobility devices include a wide range of personal transportation
technology, but can be summarized into three groups based on their
power source -- human, internal combustion engine (ICE), electric, or
hybrid. Human powered devices produce low noise, are generally
compact, and their speed is inherently limited proportional to their
range. ICE devices have high noise output, and much higher speed
capabilities across an extended range, and should thereby be
restricted to defined motorways and all applicable laws. Electric
devices are similar to ICE devices except for low noise output. These
similarly should be restricted to defined motorways. Hybrid devices,
such as e-bikes that can be human or electric-powered, present the
toughest regulatory challenge. I believe these should be grouped in
with human-powered devices, but perhaps a general speed limit
applied to bike paths would help mitigate the added risk.
Anonymous
12/21/2025 10:57 AM
Our family owns two e-scooters and I’ve also rented micro mobility
devices in the Columbus and Dublin areas.
Anonymous
12/22/2025 07:51 AM
Scooter go up to 19 mph and e-bikes are much faster. There are no
city regulations on these devices.
Anonymous
12/22/2025 11:16 AM
Any small vehicle with wheels used to get around. May be human
powered or powered with a small engine. Includes skateboards,
scooters, bikes, hoverboards.
Anonymous
12/22/2025 12:06 PM
scooters - ebikes - mopeds
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 9 of 75
Anonymous
12/22/2025 12:07 PM
scooters, seated scooters, etc.
Anonymous
12/22/2025 12:08 PM
Scooters and e-scooters
Anonymous
12/22/2025 12:09 PM
They are used to travel short distances. Some devices can be rented.
Anonymous
12/22/2025 07:53 PM
Scooters or bike rentals included p
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:08 PM
Their limits to location and speed but few follow them.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:10 PM
Anything smaller than a motorcycle, typically electric
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:14 PM
I see scooters all over downtown Columbus laying on the sidewalk as
a tripping hazard, or people driving them dangerously fast past
pedestrians. Motorized bikes on the street are ok with me. The
miniature motorcycles are too loud and I can hear them racing on I
270 just about every night through my windows in my house!
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:18 PM
They’re a great green alternative transit for those who are mature
enough to use them safely.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:19 PM
I understand how they work, and I own a my own versions
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:27 PM
Small non/auto, usually one person, devices and solutions to allow
users to freely move about a community or area.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:30 PM
Battery powered mobility devices
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:36 PM
Expert
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:42 PM
Micromobility devices are small, lightweight vehicles for short trips,
including manual and electric bikes, scooters, skateboards,
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 10 of 75
hoverboards, and Segways, offering an alternative to cars They are
typically human or electric-powered, weigh under 500 kg, and don't
exceed 45 km/h, filling gaps in public transit and providing flexible
urban mobility.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:47 PM
That they need to be operated in a safe way that does not put
pedestrians in danger. They appear to be fun.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:51 PM
E bikes have certain classes that indicate the speed of which they are
allowed on streets, bike paths etc. we ride 2 e-bikes regularity that we
own.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:54 PM
Anything motorized that is being used on pedestrian pathways
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:56 PM
Motorized devices like bikes, scooters, mopeds, etc.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:03 PM
These are typically electrically powered scooters and small bikes
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:17 PM
Small powered devices that take you to the final destination. Park
your car in a remote lot and use a scooter to get to the restaurant.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:17 PM
Injury risk from experience in healthcare field
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:28 PM
Have seen multiple kids in neighborhood and done some research for
a potential purchase for my child
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:29 PM
Understand the varied types of devices
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:31 PM
I know that they going zooming by me on the shared use paths. They
are battery powered
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:57 PM
Things used to commute that are smaller than cars
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 11 of 75
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:57 PM
They can be used as an alternative means to cars from getting from
one place to another.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 04:10 PM
I am a frequent bike rider on the paths.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 05:35 PM
transportation at an individual level for relatively short distances but
too long or inconvenient to walk to replace car or bus etc
Anonymous
12/23/2025 05:40 PM
Good understanding but view basic bicycle differently.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 05:57 PM
I understand that they need more regulation and children especially
need education on when and where they are “safe”. Personally I think
they are doing more harm than good.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 08:19 PM
They are unsafe because of careless users.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:00 AM
Powered individual transportation devices
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:03 AM
I think of any motorized recreational device.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:08 AM
They are not only driven on the street but also driven quickly on the
sidewalks and park paths.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:24 AM
Great for exercise, but NOT on main city streets or sidewalks
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:30 AM
Motor-powered machines, designed to bring maximum speed thrills to
riders and maximum fear to walkers and parents of small children
Anonymous
12/24/2025 06:05 AM
I have owned and rent electric scooters
Anonymous
12/24/2025 06:18 AM
They lay on the ground when not in use, typically at intersections.
People ride them on walking paths and over the bridge. They are fast
and quiet, so you don’t hear them coming up behind you. Pay as you
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 12 of 75
go.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 06:26 AM
I saw two almost get hit in a crosswalk last night. They were flying
and wearing all black in the dark.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 07:39 AM
Used to travel short distances to get from a parking garage, bus stop,
etc. and not need a car for those short distances.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 12:29 PM
Pedal assist e-bikes are very helpful for adults; especially older adults
or adults with physical limitations. Pedal assist should be able to be
used everywhere.
Anonymous
12/25/2025 04:57 AM
These are electric motorized conveyances that are used by kids and
adults alike, both for fum and for transport. These devices can
achieve dangerously high speeds (20-30 mph) when used outside
the confines of the motor vehicle laws (kids on sidewalk, no helmet,
etc.)
Anonymous
12/25/2025 11:34 AM
They have batteries and do not need manual assistance. They are
not easily controlled, have speed and use walk ways that people use
to walk, run, walk dogs and some manual bikes. Also very young
people are using them without training and rules.
Anonymous
12/26/2025 09:45 AM
they are devices that are typically slower than a motorcycle but faster
than using just your legs for bike, skateboards, scooters, etc.
Anonymous
12/26/2025 10:22 AM
Small electric or human powered vehicles that allow you to easy
travel around. Today we are seeing more electric powered devices
used especially by younger people resulting in speed, congestion,
and safety issues.
Anonymous
12/27/2025 05:38 AM
Anything that enables riders to ride a bike with the least amount of
effort because a motor assist you.
Anonymous
12/28/2025 04:20 AM
Many in my neighborhood. Have used some myself.
Optional question (121 response(s), 191 skipped)
Question type: Essay Question
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 13 of 75
Anonymous
12/12/2025 08:08 AM
The city's efforts to make areas more accessible with means other
than autos
Anonymous
12/12/2025 08:08 AM
There are levels of these devices based on motor size/speed
capability and each classification has different rules and requirements
of the driver.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 08:37 AM
Don’t use them but regularly encounter them . Intrigued by electric
bikes. Very much love the concept but safety for everyone is not yet
where I would like it
Anonymous
12/12/2025 09:09 AM
Na
Anonymous
12/12/2025 09:25 AM
They’re either fully or partially motorized. Some can achieve speed to
25 miles an hour. No license is required.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 09:30 AM
As a bicyclist, amateur urban planner and bridge park adjacent home
owner I'm familiar but but have never personally used one. I do see
them abandoned littering the olentangy trail.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 01:53 PM
Anything that allows you to move faster than walking/jogging speed
without exerting walking/jogging energy, e.g. e-bikes, electric
scooters, mini-motorcycles, etc.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 04:10 PM
I’ve done some research on e-bikes. I know there are 3 different
classes. Some are pedal assist; some are more motorized. Types 1 &
2 are maxed out at a slower speed than type 3.
Anonymous
12/13/2025 09:18 AM
Modes of transportation other than street vehicles
Anonymous
12/13/2025 10:30 AM
Small devices like scooters and e-bikes. Personal or available for
short term rent
Q3 If very or somewhat familiar, what is your understanding of "micromobility devices?"
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 14 of 75
Anonymous
12/13/2025 12:56 PM
See young kids all the time on e-bikes
Anonymous
12/13/2025 02:16 PM
They seem to be everywhere,
Anonymous
12/15/2025 08:38 AM
They are a cheap and easy way to get around
Anonymous
12/16/2025 07:20 PM
Anything that is artificially propelled.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:08 PM
I've used e scooters and I've seen the others listed around town.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:24 PM
Motorized small vehicles
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:33 PM
That they are battery driven, dangerously quiet and have little or no
licensing requirements
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:38 PM
Owners of e-bikes. Have watched the proliferation of all these
vehicles in Dublin and many other cities around the world.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:46 PM
What do you mean by "your understanding of micromobility devices?"
Do you mean "how do they work" or "how to use them" or "how to
manufacture them" or "how much they cost" or something else? I
don't know how to answer this question in a useful way.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:57 PM
Motorized scooters, ebikes
Anonymous
12/18/2025 01:46 PM
I see them on the walking paths often and have recently became
aware that the city is encouraging use to cut down on road traffic I
think.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 01:55 PM
Electric powered modes of personal transportation that traditionally
have been self powered (pedaled or pushed).
Anonymous Large spectrum of mobility devices not sufficiently accommodate in
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 15 of 75
12/18/2025 02:14 PM our infrastructure, particularly transportation.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 03:15 AM
Thinks like e-bikes, skateboards, scooters.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 05:02 AM
Battery powered devices that can go faster than human operated
devices.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 05:59 AM
There are devices that are fueled by gas, battery/electric, and
battery/electric assist. With Fuel powered moving the fastest.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 06:02 AM
Some are allowed and some aren't. E-bikes depends on the class,
which most residents (me included) have no idea what type of E-bike
just went flying by on the path. Min motorcycles and dirt bikes are not
allowed but it is not enforced and hard to enforce.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 07:51 AM
Nothing too deep. I've seen them on the sidewalks and bike paths.
I've never tried one.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 08:31 AM
Scooters. But kids are riding these mini-motorcycles that need to be
banned!
Anonymous
12/19/2025 09:31 AM
I have not ridden one, but I see them around all the time.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 09:59 AM
They’re a more cost effective way for lower income individuals and
the younger population to get around outside of a traditional bicycle
or public transit.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 12:23 PM
I've used the rentals a few times. I see them around, but don't know
much about the regulations or laws regarding them.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 12:27 PM
Those transportation units which run slower speeds for short
distances, typically electric
Anonymous
12/19/2025 12:51 PM
Self-propelled (usually electric) devices that are designed for one
person to travel a relatively shorter distance, but at faster speeds
than someone can walk or run
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 16 of 75
Anonymous
12/19/2025 01:27 PM
Motorized devices for transportation, such as an e-scooter, e-bike,
hoverboard, or seated scooter.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 01:43 PM
Small vehicles that are electric or manually powered
Anonymous
12/19/2025 02:27 PM
We have bikes and rollerblades.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 02:57 PM
They are quite fast. Some reaching speeds up to 28 miles per hour
for scooters and e bikes. Kids are not paying attention to traffic or
cars in parking lots.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 03:05 PM
Electric powered going speeds under 20 mph
Anonymous
12/19/2025 04:27 PM
Motorized scooters, bikes, etc.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 04:30 PM
Electronic devices sometimes operated by battery sometimes by
remote. Can go very fast and few regulations, not enforced.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 05:04 PM
I know what they are and know something of the different categories.
I appreciate the pros and cons.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 05:16 PM
They are extremely prevalent, have a wide range of speed abilities,
and can be a big nuisance/cause of serious injury when helmets are
not worn and operators are reckless
Anonymous
12/19/2025 06:13 PM
aware of them, have observed them
Anonymous
12/19/2025 07:30 PM
Motorized vehicles that kids use around the city
Anonymous
12/19/2025 07:48 PM
Methods of transportation powered by person or electric. Regular
bikes or e bikes. Skate boards. Scooters or e scooters. Electric
devices could maybe reach speeds up to 20 mph or more
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 17 of 75
Anonymous
12/20/2025 05:04 AM
List of mobility devices provided above - may or may not need riders
to wear helmets
Anonymous
12/20/2025 07:38 AM
Mini scooters than can carry the weight of a child/teen up to 100-150
lbs with speed up to 30-45 miles per hour
Anonymous
12/20/2025 08:41 AM
Ebikes and scooters on paths
Anonymous
12/20/2025 10:43 AM
A device (other than a motor vehicle) that lets you move faster than
you could with your own two feet, with or without a motor.
Anonymous
12/20/2025 12:24 PM
I am familiar with them on the multiuse trails in the city
Anonymous
12/21/2025 07:22 AM
Electric powered vehicles enabling less physical exertion and
traveling at potentially greater speeds. More often utilized by minors
Anonymous
12/21/2025 08:15 AM
As a member of a HOA and Board member we have addressed this
issue
Anonymous
12/21/2025 11:36 AM
Some are allowed on streets and others are not.
Anonymous
12/21/2025 12:38 PM
They appear to be very popular with younger people, especially those
who aren't old enough to drive but can jump on one of these devices
and ride around without an understanding of "rules of the road."
Anonymous
12/22/2025 07:17 AM
They are very popular with the young teens/tweens in my
neighborhood.
Anonymous
12/22/2025 11:52 AM
Ebikes of several classes and speeds. Those with throttles are hardly
bicycles. Hover boards and scooters are also getting faster.
Anonymous
12/22/2025 04:40 PM
motorized bikes and scooters that many kids are riding around
neighborhoods at high speeds
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 18 of 75
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:09 PM
They are self propelled (or can be) ways (for mostly young people) to
get around
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:10 PM
They are annoying
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:15 PM
Motorized, often silent vehicles with (usually) kids on them going way,
way too fast endangering the public.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:32 PM
They are skateboard like devices that can travel between 15 and 20
mph.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:33 PM
They go faster and are more loud than a manual device
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:43 PM
If not controlled or handled properly they can be dangerous to the
riders and people around them.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:43 PM
I am an avid biker and have seen micro mobility devices on my rides
around Dublin. Unfortunately, I’ve often seen motorized scooters on
the bike paths (which have signs saying no motorized vehicles) and
taking up spaces at bike racks. I have recently seen a few locations
specific for motorized scooter parking - thank you.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:47 PM
To mobilize without using a car
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:01 PM
They can be operated by young riders (age 12 or older). They can be
rented and left almost anywhere.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:11 PM
Small conveyors of people used to travel short distances around
town thus lessening the use of cars, buses, etc.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:15 PM
They are motorized forms of transportation
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:21 PM
People that operate these devices should follow the "rules of the
road"..
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 19 of 75
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:39 PM
Skateboards, scooters
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:57 PM
I see people of all ages riding them in the street and on the multi-use
trails.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:57 PM
personal transportation devices
Anonymous
12/23/2025 03:35 PM
Compact motorized vehicles like electric bikes or small motor bikes
and scooters.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 04:10 PM
Wheeled devices, motorized or not. Including regular scooters that
can go quite fast and run into walkers.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 04:51 PM
What you just said up above- scooters etc.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 05:05 PM
A wide category, also a broad group of users from 5 to 80 years old.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 05:18 PM
They are motorized modes of transport favored by those typically too
young to drive. I believe they are currently unregulated.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 05:51 PM
Wheeled devices with various speed limits used for recreation and
travel
Anonymous
12/23/2025 06:36 PM
I believe they are electric powered, low speed vehicles. I suppose
human powered vehicles like bikes and scooters would also count.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 09:16 PM
Seems like catch-all jargon for a large category of small, mostly
personal, transportation devices. From unicycles and skateboards, to
motorbikes and Segways. I feel it would be more useful to separate
into two categories: human-powered and motor-assisted.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 03:01 AM
I see people riding them on the streets and bike paths
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 20 of 75
Anonymous
12/24/2025 04:58 AM
I have ridden an E bike several times, neighbors have electric scooter
as well as dirt bikes that they ride up and down the street and
sidewalks.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:22 AM
Devices that share a path and are smaller than cars, trucks and
motorcycles.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:41 AM
Be cautious crossing in front of vehicles just like a bicycle. Wear
helmet. When on the sidewalk/ shared use paths, announce to
whoever’s in front of rider that one is passing them..
Anonymous
12/24/2025 06:06 AM
I've ridden bikes for 50+ years. I ride my traditional bike all around
Dublin on the paths pretty much year round for leisure. I also own an
e-bike which I rarely use. I never rent micromobilty devices because
they are poorly maintained and dangerous in the way I see them used
around motorists who are not used sharing the road, respecting
cross-walk right-of-way rules etc.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 06:09 AM
A micromobility device is a small, lightweight vehicle for personal,
short-distance urban travel, powered by humans or low-speed
electric motors, including e-scooters, e-bikes, manual bikes,
skateboards, and hoverboards, designed to fill gaps in transit and
offer efficient, last-mile solutions for city commuting.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 06:42 AM
Micromobility devices are plug in electric ways to annoy the
community.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 08:27 AM
Depending on speeds some are allowed to be used on sidewalks and
bike paths while others need to use the road.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 10:08 AM
The people using them, mostly kids, do what they want where they
want how they want. I have been shoved off a bike path or sidewalk
by five or six of them going past at Breakneck speeds. I use a
motorized wheelchair and I have been literally pushed off the
sidewalk. I've also been hit on a bike path. None of these kids have
helmets on and the sense of entitlement is so high. I think Dublin
needs to get a handle on this immediately or these behaviors are
going to become ingrained and normalized. I've also seen kids go
flying down a sidewalk and onto the road with motorized bikes and
either mopeds or mini motorcycles. Right in front of a car. I've also
been chased by these kids when I'm on the bike path with my
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 21 of 75
motorized wheelchair. Additionally I've seen them use the parking
garage next to the library as a playground. There needs to be a very
strong public education on these matters. Additionally if rules and
regulations are instituted I suggest posting of some of the rules in
heavily traffic (of these devices)areas. ]
Anonymous
12/24/2025 01:15 PM
They are modes of transportation that can cause headaches for
everyone because they don’t fit nicely into the streets or sidewalks,
especially when the riders have a disregard for any traffic rules.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 01:44 PM
They are electric motorized bikes, scooters, hoverboards, etc
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:14 PM
Scooters, mini trail bikes, electric bikes
Anonymous
12/25/2025 07:44 AM
They can potentially help decrease car traffic in an area. Dublin has
tried a few of them out in the past - eg. bike rentals and scooters -
however, they have certain drawbacks, as well.
Anonymous
12/25/2025 08:15 AM
In general each are motorized devices capable of speeds greater
than their non-motorized versions.
Anonymous
12/26/2025 04:23 AM
Anything that is motorized, but limited with speed.
Anonymous
12/27/2025 05:14 AM
These are electronic devices that can be used to help you get around.
They are not a car and often are used by kids.
Anonymous
12/27/2025 06:43 AM
Various vehicles, typically electric, that are rentable to move people
around cities or for enjoyment
Anonymous
12/27/2025 09:41 AM
My 11, 13, & 14 all have some sort of micromobility.
Anonymous
12/28/2025 08:25 AM
scooters and skateboards with electric motors ,e-bikes
Optional question (100 response(s), 212 skipped)
Question type: Essay Question
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 22 of 75
Q4 To increase safety for riders, pedestrians, and drivers, the the City is considering
creating additional rules such as implementing speed limits in certain areas and prohibiting
devices on certain streets or other areas (i.e. parking garages, etc.)...
269 (86.2%)
269 (86.2%)
29 (9.3%)
29 (9.3%)9 (2.9%)
9 (2.9%)5 (1.6%)
5 (1.6%)
Very supportive Somewhat supportive Somewhat not supportive Very not supportive
Question options
Mandatory Question (312 response(s))
Question type: Radio Button Question
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 23 of 75
Anonymous
12/12/2025 10:30 AM
Guidelines can be necessary but enforcement of them should not be
high priority.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 04:10 PM
I am supportive of restrictions. I have been very concerned for young
e-bike riders who I have witnessed riding on Tara Hill while walking
my dog. The young riders seem unaware of safety being on the street
where cars drive. The children are obviously out riding for fun (not
heading to a destination) because they repeatedly go up & down the
same street. However I can’t say I’m 100% supportive unless I know
specifically what rules/restrictions are being proposed.
Anonymous
12/15/2025 08:38 AM
It depends on how far these rescrictions go
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:24 PM
I think that if we were stricter about enforcing current laws they would
be sufficient
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:30 PM
Not all.of those devices have something that will help you know ylu
spead.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 01:39 PM
I’d need more details about the rules
Anonymous
12/18/2025 02:12 PM
These days I here some accidents and concern the safety.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 02:40 PM
I think age and safety issues are of utmost importance. I ride an eBike
since Covid times. And I witness kids on e-bikes and scooters
behaving dangerously in the neighborhood and the parks and paths.
Barely trained as riders, many not wearing protective helmets, often
not equipped with lights. They are low to the ground, not always
visible, and riding much too fast. I would eliminate rentals that do not
come with helmets. Helmets for all.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 03:15 AM
Sounds like it would be confusing.
Q5 If somewhat or very not supportive, please share why you do not support this authority:
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 24 of 75
Anonymous
12/19/2025 06:02 AM
I support it but I also think the enforcement on shared use paths it
being ignored.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 01:27 PM
I am in favor of safety. Just concerned that language could be overly
broad or restrictive.
Anonymous
12/21/2025 10:57 AM
I am supportive. Would just like to know the details.
Anonymous
12/22/2025 07:53 PM
I just don’t know all the restrictions but I do think motorized options
are good for our growing city.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:10 PM
We don't need to give police more responsibility, let them focus on
real problems
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:21 PM
To many rules could negate the adoption of using these alternate
modes of transportation.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:03 PM
We want to encourage our public to utilize the multipurpose trails in
Dublin. This, in my opinion is one of our greatest features. But
increasing speeds have made these devices more dangerous
Anonymous
12/23/2025 04:51 PM
You've listed two different things and my answer depends on what
exactly is being proposed. Is the speed limit for cars or the
micromobility items?
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:03 AM
I think the rules should focus on prohibiting the mini motorcycles
and/or better implementing existing policies. I have not noticed as
many problems with other devices. I have observed a couple kids
riding personal scooters to school on shared paths and they seem to
be operating them responsibly. I also have observed older adults
using electric bikes on shared paths and they also appear to be using
them responsibly. I think that perhaps there needs to be some
differentiation between the types of devices and/or focused on speed
limits.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:41 AM
When E bikes are purchased, they should be allowed to be used on
sidewalks or streets, depending on the comfort of the user. It is
acceptable to have speed limits suggested in some areas. I believe E
bike should be parked at regular bike stations and not in parking.
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 25 of 75
Garage is per se unless there’s a bike rack there.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 12:29 PM
We don’t need more rules for adults if that is a potential intent.
Definitely need more rules for youth IF we have any intention of
enforcing them.
Anonymous
12/25/2025 11:21 AM
Not enough details about what is planned to have an opinion
Anonymous
12/12/2025 12:15 PM
Too many rules
Anonymous
12/12/2025 01:33 PM
You do not need to micro mange the public.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:46 PM
Do we have specific evidence (accident reports, etc) of micromobility
accidents? If you send me that I'll give you a better answer as to what
we should do in response.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 02:07 PM
Unless there have been issues, I see no reason to regulate.
Optional question (21 response(s), 291 skipped)
Question type: Essay Question
Q6 If somewhat or very not supportive, please share why you do not support this authority:
Optional question (4 response(s), 308 skipped)
Question type: Essay Question
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 26 of 75
Q7 To increase safety for younger riders, do you support requiring riders under the age of 18
to wear helmets when operating bicycles, e -bikes, e -scooters, or other micromobility devices?
273 (87.5%)
273 (87.5%)
24 (7.7%)
24 (7.7%)8 (2.6%)
8 (2.6%)1 (0.3%)
1 (0.3%)6 (1.9%)
6 (1.9%)
Strongly support Support Neutral Oppose Strongly oppose
Question options
Mandatory Question (312 response(s))
Question type: Radio Button Question
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 27 of 75
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:10 PM
We don't need to give police more responsibility, let them focus on
real problems
Anonymous
12/12/2025 09:30 AM
Sounds like victim blaming. Better to change the culture of users,
drivers and society and the built environment than to impose
additional obligations. Look to Amsterdam, Copenhagen and Paris
where people of all ages safely ride all forms of ride all forms of micro
mobility. Turn the mobility period on its head and truly penalize
vehicle drivers who cause problems.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 01:33 PM
Not your place to force that requirement
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:46 PM
Again, do we have evidence/data/statistics/context of injuries from
bicycle/mobility device riding? If so please provide it. Until then I will
just say "strongly oppose."
Anonymous
12/19/2025 03:15 AM
This is a parent's choice, not the government's.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 05:40 PM
A bicycle is not the same as an e-bike or scooter.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 07:39 AM
It’s up to the parents. Keep local government out of parental
decisions, unless it impacts the community.
Q8 If oppose or strongly oppose, please share why you do not support a youth helmet
requirement:
Optional question (1 response(s), 311 skipped)
Question type: Essay Question
Q9 If oppose or strongly oppose, please share why you do not support a youth helmet
requirement:
Optional question (6 response(s), 306 skipped)
Question type: Essay Question
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 28 of 75
Q10 How supportive are you of holding parents/guardians responsible if they knowingly
allow minors to use devices in an unsafe manner or in prohibited areas?
242 (77.6%)
242 (77.6%)
48 (15.4%)
48 (15.4%)
12 (3.8%)
12 (3.8%)4 (1.3%)
4 (1.3%)6 (1.9%)
6 (1.9%)
Strongly support Support Neutral Oppose Strongly oppose
Question options
Mandatory Question (312 response(s))
Question type: Radio Button Question
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 29 of 75
Anonymous
12/19/2025 01:14 PM
I have mixed feelings. If a parent knowingly allows a kid to use a
device illegally, yes, hold them responsible. But if a kid is reckless, or
uses a device without parental knowledge, I would not hold the parent
to account for it. All of our kids disobey us at times, and it is not the
parents' fault.
Anonymous
12/22/2025 07:53 PM
Are they with them? Then yes they should be held responsible but my
oldest is 17 and I’m not always with him so I shouldn’t be held
responsible if I’m unaware.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:00 AM
Minors include teenagers. Holding parents accountable "knowingly
allowing" is too vague, how do you establish "knowingly". I just think
that would be unreasonable to enforce and expose the city to
unnecessary legal expense trying to enforce.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 07:39 AM
Prosecute the kids…it’s a good lesson in breaking rules have
consequences.
Q11 If Oppose/Strongly oppose, please share your concerns about this approach:
Optional question (4 response(s), 308 skipped)
Question type: Essay Question
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 30 of 75
Anonymous
12/12/2025 01:33 PM
See above answers
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:46 PM
By what method would we "hold parents responsible?" Send them to
jail? Take away their driver's license? Garnish their salaries? Electric
chair? I have absolutely no idea how to answer this.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 07:48 PM
How will it be determined that they are “knowingly” allowing this?
Anonymous
12/20/2025 03:48 AM
You can tell your children the rules, but they won’t always follow
them.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:56 PM
We should do this through education and not through punishment for
kids.
Q12 If Oppose/Strongly oppose, please share your concerns about this approach:
Optional question (5 response(s), 307 skipped)
Question type: Essay Question
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 31 of 75
Q13 Miniature motorcycles are currently banned from streets, sidewalks and shared-use
paths under the existing code. Do you support maintaining this restriction?
291 (93.3%)
291 (93.3%)
21 (6.7%)
21 (6.7%)
Yes No
Question options
Mandatory Question (312 response(s))
Question type: Radio Button Question
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 32 of 75
Anonymous
12/12/2025 08:08 AM
There needs to be somewhere safely that these can be driven. You
cannot reasonably expect these to at minimum not be driven safely in
a city street if they are street legal.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 10:01 AM
I support prohibiting these devises on sidewalks and streets but they
should be allowed on designated bike paths.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 10:30 AM
Allowing citizens to use these are very similar to operating a motor
vehicle on the roads. There can be courses and outreach to educate
others on safe use
Anonymous
12/15/2025 08:38 AM
For the most part these devices help travel. Can’t punish everyone
because of actions of a few
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:00 PM
If we’re talking about the battery powered ones, I’d rather see my kids
allowed on the shared bike path
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:46 PM
If there is some context or data about miniature motorcycles, please
provide it.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 02:07 PM
I don’t see then as being any different from e-scooters, e-bikes…
Anonymous
12/18/2025 03:11 PM
Question number five says that miniature motorcycles are banned
both from the streets and the sidewalks. That doesn't seem to make a
lot of sense. It feels like they need to be allowed somewhere.
Preferably on the street.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 02:06 PM
Is this pertaining to mini Razor electric dirt bikes? Bc where else is
my son suppose to ride it?
Anonymous
12/20/2025 03:48 AM
The little razor bikes do not go fast. My son loved riding his to the
park and around our home in elementary school.
Q14 If no, please explain your concerns about prohibiting miniature motorcycles in these
areas:
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 33 of 75
Anonymous
12/20/2025 04:55 AM
I think they should be allowed if driven safely.
Anonymous
12/21/2025 10:57 AM
I agree they should be prohibited on streets and sidewalks. I would
not mind them on shared use paths.
Anonymous
12/22/2025 03:52 AM
Na
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:21 PM
They should be permitted only on streets 25 mph or under and must
be inspected to ensure compliance with street legal vehicles. Fully
support prohibiting them on sidewalks and SUP.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:56 PM
Most of these are operated by kids. Putting kids on the street are a
large risk for them and drivers.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 05:51 PM
Where would they ride them? They should be allowed to share the
road with speed limitations
Anonymous
12/24/2025 04:58 AM
I don’t necessarily like them, but how can you ban those and allow e-
scooters, e-bikes, etc.?
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:00 AM
Where are people to ride these at? Is the implication that they can
only be ridden on private property then?
Anonymous
12/25/2025 11:21 AM
The question is all or nothing scenario. I support banning from
shared-use paths and sidewalks.
Anonymous
12/26/2025 04:23 AM
People are going to use them, let's determine how to use them safely.
Optional question (20 response(s), 292 skipped)
Question type: Essay Question
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 34 of 75
Q15 How supportive are you to make current regulations easier to understand and increase
safety for riders, pedestrians, and drivers in Dublin?
293 (93.9%)
293 (93.9%)
17 (5.4%)
17 (5.4%)2 (0.6%)
2 (0.6%)0 (0.0%)
0 (0.0%)
Very supportive Somewhat supportive Not supportive Somewhat not supportive
Question options
Mandatory Question (312 response(s))
Question type: Radio Button Question
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 35 of 75
Anonymous
12/12/2025 08:08 AM
Require Law enforcement to enforce those new guidelines
Anonymous
12/12/2025 08:08 AM
I really found the graphic you posted on Facebook useful. Much more
education needs to be done. Reaching out to HOAs, posting info at
the rec center. Asking the schools to send the info out. The public at
large is under informed on this matter.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 08:15 AM
We are avid cyclists. We are often on the bike trails in Dublin. The
awareness around mixed use needs to be raised. We see kids
without helmets, on bikes or other devices using their phones. They
have no situational awareness and are a danger to others on the
path. We also see groups of adults and kids taking up the entire path
- a danger when you come around a bend. We have discussed at our
house how we can help with education or awareness beyond ringing
our bells and saying heads up.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 08:37 AM
I think enforcement on shared use paths or landscape areas will be
super hard but also where I regularly encounter issues particularly
with young teens/older kids. Also they are kids and a bit concerned
about how this is enforced. Has to happen but also don’t want angry
adults chasing down kids. So perhaps transparency and clarity
around enforcement. Also I think these devices are a super tool in the
mobility sector and should absolutely be supported. But agree that
the current system is setting up potential for serious injury and
damage to parks
Anonymous
12/12/2025 08:48 AM
There needs to be a speed limit on the shared use path. Walkers,
joggers, kids etc are only going a few miles an hour and it's
dangerous for a teenager on a e bike or scooter to be going 20+
mph.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 08:50 AM
It’s the future. Get on board. Enforcement to stop it is a waste of Tax
money.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 09:09 AM
No
Q16 Do you have any additional comments or suggestions regarding micromobility devices,
miniature motorcycles, or shared-use path safety in Dublin?
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 36 of 75
Anonymous
12/12/2025 09:25 AM
Please act before spring.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 09:30 AM
As a cyclist when I'm on a SUP, i find the problem to be speed
differential. When I'm cycling at 12 mph and someone whizzes by at
20 mph, this is a problem. Throttle driven vehicles do not belong on
SUPs or in bike lanes.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 09:41 AM
Offer safety courses for kids. Possible signage in parks and by
schools.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 09:54 AM
I think people under the age of 16 need to be prohibited from
operating in the roadway. They cannot have a drivers license, so they
have not demonstrated that they know the laws of the road. It’s too
dangerous for them to be on the road with cars. I think these devices
should be prohibited from sidewalks for all operators. They can go
over 20+ mph in some cases. They should not be operated on the
sidewalk where small children are. Small children do not have the
awareness or understanding to avoid these fast moving vehicles. I
think the rentable companies need to be banned from deploying their
devices in our city. There is no area of Dublin where it pragmatic or
safe to use these devices, but I understand people will want to use
them to commute. The rentable scooters are unsightly and are only
used by bored, aimless youths. The rentable devices in Columbus
and on campus are abused, haphazardly parked in streets and
parking lots, thrown into rivers etc. People roam those areas at night
collecting the devices, charging them, and redeploying them. To have
vans driving around neighborhood at all hours collecting these
devices would distress people in this community.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 09:57 AM
Please ban them from bridge park sidewalks and the bridge itself.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 10:00 AM
They need to stay off sidewalks.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 10:01 AM
No
Anonymous
12/12/2025 10:30 AM
N/A
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 37 of 75
Anonymous
12/12/2025 12:15 PM
City may be growing too fast
Anonymous
12/12/2025 01:33 PM
Stop over policing and find better ways to improve the world.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 01:53 PM
I think parents/guardians should be responsible even if they are
unaware that their kid is out using these devices in an unsafe manner
or in prohibited areas.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 03:08 PM
I don’t know to do with this issue, and especially how it would be
monitored, and what the consequences would be if caught not
adhering to the new policy/regulations. But, there is definable a need.
I walk the paths daily and the amount of electric scooters and bikes
are growing. Being kids, many drive at an excessive speed with no
type of respect for others on the path. There are some kids that are
very well behaved and respectful. There will be accidents and there
will be injuries at those speeds along with others sharing the paths.
Anonymous
12/12/2025 03:37 PM
Please enforce the rules! The kids don’t care and the parents aren’t
enforcing. So live on a busy corner have seen so many close calls!!
Anonymous
12/12/2025 04:10 PM
Regarding helmets - it is my understanding that some helmets are
rated better & are safer for e-bike use. Simply requiring any helmet
might not actually protect a rider if they get the cheapest bike helmet.
As far as parents being responsible - I do agree, as long as it is truly
that the parents are actually aware of what their kids are doing.
Regulations should absolutely be clear to all residents / visitors -
otherwise it is unfair to hold people responsible for restrictions that
are specific to Dublin but not the state of Ohio.
Anonymous
12/13/2025 04:15 AM
Children should be banned from using these devices. They are at
high risk of injury and use has led to many serious injuries.
Anonymous
12/13/2025 04:37 AM
The dirt bikes or mini motorcycles, e scooters are so dangerous with
the kids whipping around on them on the paths. None of this is being
enforced that I can see. I don’t see signs posted that make it clear to
kids and parents what the rules are.
Anonymous
12/13/2025 05:40 AM
Please please please just ENFORCE the existing rules and/or laws in
place!!!! It is getting very dangerous
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 38 of 75
Anonymous
12/13/2025 06:24 AM
Ban them
Anonymous
12/13/2025 09:18 AM
Support for helmets required with motorized devices only. When used
appropriately I have nothing against these devices. Just want the kids
to be safe, more respectful and aware of their surroundings.
Anonymous
12/13/2025 10:30 AM
Speed limits on paths. Who would enforce though?
Anonymous
12/13/2025 10:55 AM
Thank you for addressing these concerns impacting our community!
Anonymous
12/13/2025 11:14 AM
Young kids are operating e-bike and e motorcycles in a reckless
manner, particularly on the multi-use paths. These devices are far too
heavy and fast to be used safely in the path. I’ve seen kids going 25
mph around blind corners with no concern for pedestrians.
Anonymous
12/13/2025 12:40 PM
Electric dirt bikes seem to be the biggest issue, kids are riding all over
with them and using them unsafely n both streets and bike paths.
These kind of vehicles would be totally unacceptable to use in this
way or by minors at all if they were gas powered. In practice the
electric versions are even more dangerous to pedestrians on bike
paths since they run silently. Scooters seem like much less of an
issue, but the motorcycles that we see running around everywhere
are ridiculous to tolerate.
Anonymous
12/13/2025 12:56 PM
We have witnessed young kids recklessly driving e-bikes and mini
motorcycles on streets and sidewalks. Last night we saw several kids
in historic Old Dublin weaving in and out of traffic in between cars. It’s
just a matter of time before someone gets killed. Where are the
parents of these kids and why are they out when it is dark in rush-
hour traffic? This issue definitely needs to be addressed by the city of
Dublin.
Anonymous
12/13/2025 02:16 PM
These modes of transportation come out of nowhere and dart across
streets and even sidewalks, such as in Bridge Park and Dublinshire
Drive.
Anonymous No
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 39 of 75
12/13/2025 02:21 PM
Anonymous
12/14/2025 09:48 AM
There should also be rules about safety/speeds on roads
Anonymous
12/15/2025 05:46 AM
The biggest issue I see is groups of children racing and it is just a
matter of time before injuries happen. I think a helmet requirement
and speed limit is necessary for safer use.
Anonymous
12/15/2025 07:47 AM
I really appreciate the work Dublin is taking on to make these new
devices more understandable for the general public and to put some
guardrails around their use in Dublin.
Anonymous
12/15/2025 08:38 AM
Micro mobility is a great way to reduce traffic and pollution. Should
figure out how to foster more use not restrict everyone back to cars.
Anonymous
12/15/2025 01:35 PM
In the 80s our equivalent was mopeds or motorized scooters 50cc.
These required some type of license. Their top speed was 25-30mph.
Compare that to the electric devices of today. I don’t believe in helmet
requirements for classic bicycles. That should be a parents decision.
Anonymous
12/15/2025 10:14 PM
Bikes and scooters should have dedicated, physically separated
lanes to travel on, separate from vehicle traffic.
Anonymous
12/16/2025 02:08 AM
No
Anonymous
12/16/2025 08:33 AM
There are hundreds of kids operating many high speed dirt bikes and
scooters very unsafely all over Dublin. Safety needs to be the priority.
Anonymous
12/16/2025 07:20 PM
Something must be done. In the neighborhood there are young men
that fly through stop signs at a high rate of speed..while wearing
noise cancelling headphones. I followed on of the delinquents for
almost a mile, he had no idea I was following him, when he saw me
he was so surprised he almost wrecked. No helmet, no awareness,
from sidewalk to street to walking path, quite reckless
Anonymous
12/16/2025 08:01 PM
Motorized vehicles Should be prohibited on bike paths and side
walks. I am just as concerned with others using the paths as the kids
on the vehicles. Wearing helmets should be required to protect them
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 40 of 75
but allowing kids to ride them on bike paths and side walks is a
hazard for others. There have been many near misses where kids
going too fast and/or riding in the middle of the path have almost run
over people and dogs. I should not have to wear a helmet to walk my
Dog for fear of being run over.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 06:30 AM
should have to be 16 to operate on a road
Anonymous
12/18/2025 11:54 AM
Kids (mostly boys ~age 12-15) zip around the shared use paths
between the Muirfield tunnel and Rec Center very unsafely on their e-
dirt bikes. They have also built a BMX track along the Indian Run
near the Indian Meadow. They tear up the hill between the Indian
Meadow pond and their BMX track like it's part of the track.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 11:57 AM
No
Anonymous
12/18/2025 11:59 AM
Please include golf carts. I see 10 year olds speeding down the street
in them. Thank you
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:00 PM
None
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:01 PM
I frequent the bike path from Scottish Corners Elementary to Wyandot
elementary and Wyandot public park and quite frequently see a minor
on a mini- bike on the paths and around the school playgrounds at an
unsafe speed. The path is used by families with young children
through senior citizens. Very dangerous situation.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:04 PM
It is reckless to use motorized vehicles or transportation of any form
that goes faster than non-motorized transportation in the same space
especially with no training or license required. Even with licensing a
pedestrian could easily he injured or killed. Technology carries with it
a responsibility and those using it need to be held liable for their
actions.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:08 PM
It's not just having laws on the books, but enforcing them which
requires police presence in neighborhoods. I know this is a challenge
where the number of neighborhoods and underage riders far
outnumbers the number of officers in Dublin. Parent accountability
and publication of such accountability will be essential to any
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 41 of 75
success.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:09 PM
I strongly support measures to make the use of said vehicles safe for
the riders and people on foot.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:10 PM
Anything to make operators of the devices would be welcome. Young
people are going to be killed as they don’t have the mental capacity
to operate them safely. Injuries and filling the ERs. Parents are
allowing kids to be reckless. Parents need to be held accountable
too.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:16 PM
As with all levels of powered vehicles, attitude is a key factor in
safety. Without education, operators are in danger of injuring
themselves and others. I would say that anyone riding any powered
vehicle on paths or roads should have proper training and protective
gear. Also, the testing should accompanied with testing to ensure
information was properly absorbed. The training for road operation
should include all information given to automobile drivers since the
operators should know what. to expect from automobiles.. Reckless
operation should be cause for suspension of privileges. This training
would carry over to when they are licensed for full sized vehicles. I
think Dublin should have signage on all trails defining the rules of the
road.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:16 PM
No
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:23 PM
I am happy these changes are being considered. Kids (and some
parents it seems) don’t fully understand the risks that come with
riding. Head injuries are all too common, and preventable if the right
regulations and education are in place.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:24 PM
They are extremely dangerous on the great paths we have in Dublin.
Those paths are for bikers, runners, and walkers, not electric devices.
I’ve witnessed too many close calls.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:24 PM
I’m all for age limits and top speed limits. I also support pedal assisted
e-bikes on roads and shared use paths.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:27 PM
Rider education is essential to ensure that everyone using
multi‑purpose paths treats one another with courtesy. For example,
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 42 of 75
while cycling I have often encountered groups of walkers three or four
abreast, leaving no room to pass safely. Likewise, whether walking or
biking, I have been overtaken by others traveling at high speeds
without any warning. Such education needs to be continuous to
ensure such education is continually on peoples' minds.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:30 PM
I think the ability to ride your bikes and skateboards etc. In these ares
are part of what makes these areas apeallomng and so full of people.
If yoi limit the ability to use these things in one area.you should take
steps to increase the ability in another area. For example if I could not
longer ride my skateboard on the sidewalk to go to the library you
should make a plce where I can ride my skateboard to the library. I
guess rather than take something away by making rules make a
better option.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:33 PM
They really need to warn walkers as they approach. This would also
include bicyclists…
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:33 PM
It’s a problem in Muirfield. The kids are going too fast and they’re
riding on paths (in Muirfield) that aren’t wide enough. My wife and I
were riding bikes this past summer and she came around a blind
corner and was almost taken out by a kid on a scooter. He was going
way too fast. If he had hit her it would have been disastrous.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:38 PM
We see 10, 12, 14 year olds ON THE STREETS and bike paths on
motorized vehicles with no licenses, and sometimes no helmets.
They haven’t had drivers’ training, don’t know (and sometimes don’t
obey) the laws, and are putting themselves and others at great risk.
They need to be taken off the roads and their parents need to be held
legally responsible. You should know when you buy your 10 year old
a motorbike that goes 20-40 mph and that has no license, that that kid
is at great risk of injuring himself and others.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:41 PM
Mini motorcycles are still used around Dublin even if they are
banned. They are a menace on the paths and are used off the paths
as though all of Dublin’s carefully planned landscaping is their
personal BMX course. I don’t know how the rules are being enforced,
but I haven’t witnessed any enforcement actions and I use the trails to
bike and walk regularly. The speed limit on the bike trails should be
15mph. After Christmas, we’re going to have another batch of
untrained riders out there causing chaos.
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 43 of 75
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:45 PM
I think none of these should be allowed on sidewalks or where
pedestrians are.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:46 PM
You are asking us to vote on countermeasures before you have
established: 1. What the actual problems are 2. Where they occur 3.
Whether they are common causes (systemic) or special causes
(isolated misuse) 4. Whether current rules are misunderstood,
unenforced, or contradictory Asking “Do you support X?” without first
establishing the nature of the problem guarantees arbitrary results.
Survey respondents will answer based on fear, anecdotes, or
personal inconvenience... not understanding. Further, the survey is
biased toward restriction, punishment, and fear. Nearly every question
is framed around: 1. New rules 2. Prohibitions 3. Enforcement 4.
Parental liability 5. Bans There are virtually no questions about: 1.
Infrastructure design 2. Clarity of existing rules 3. Education 4.
Predictability of behavior 5. Signage, markings, or path design 6.
Whether current problems are caused by confusion rather than
misconduct This reveals an implicit theory: that safety comes from
control and enforcement. Safety actually comes from designing
systems that make the right behavior the easiest behavior.
Enforcement is a weak, expensive substitute for proper design. You
repeatedly ask whether the City should have “authority” to do things.
People cannot responsibly answer abstract governance questions
without context, so they will answer emotionally based on personal
anecdotes and hearsay. Is that what our elected officials are using to
form public policy? We can do better. The questions about youth
behavior, parental responsibility, and bans are framed in a way that
invites fear rather than understanding. Fear distorts data. Wherever
there is fear, there will be wrong answers. You will get demands for
harsh rules that make people feel safer without actually improving
safety. What I recommend instead: 1. Identify the locations,
conditions, times of conflict, accident rates, current regulations, etc. 2.
Ask us about clarity and predictability of current rules. 3. Separate
design problems from behavior problems. 4. Capture the user
experience before proposing solutions.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 02:45 PM
I think the users under 18 should have to attend a class that
reviews/explains the regulations, they should have to sign a
statement stating they understand and will abide by the rules and
regulations. Once that is done they should receive a license or permit
that the have with them while riding these things.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:57 PM
I’ve seen children and young teens in my neighborhood unsafely
riding in packs down Tara Hill. Often they are speeding down the
center of the street, not staying to the right, cutting around cars and
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 44 of 75
not following traffic laws. Several ride around after dark in all dark
clothing.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 12:59 PM
Currently, kids are zipping around on these micro devices at unsafe
speeds, often without helmets or any training on road rules. They are
on the bike paths and crowding out pedestrians. It is dangerous. I
support all these regulations strongly and hope to see them in the
new year!
Anonymous
12/18/2025 01:24 PM
I have seen young riders of E bikes going up and down Glick Road
while looking at their cell phone, no helmet on, and no hands on the
handlebars, while going very fast. This is crazy. Something should be
done about it.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 01:31 PM
no
Anonymous
12/18/2025 01:33 PM
speed limits would be a good idea and an age restriction - bicyclists
often utilize the shared use paths at very dangerous speeds which is
incredibly dangerous. I wish helmets were required for bikes and
scooters. I see many young riders on escoooters and ebikes using
these in a safe and responsible manner. I also see a big portion who
are very unsafe. I hope that Dublin will use this opportunity to educate
and create guidelines, but then cite the offenders and not use a
sweeping ban approach.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 01:39 PM
No
Anonymous
12/18/2025 01:46 PM
Just to add that there should be more awareness to all the community
about usage, rules and increased safety and it looks like this survey is
putting us in the right direction. Well done.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 01:55 PM
I don't support stifling the use of these because they are good
alternatives to cars. But the speeds have increased beyond self-
powered vehicles, they pose a threat to the self-powered people.
They also are dangerous to the users as well as bystanders. I support
keeping it safe and welcoming for the self-powered bikers, walkers,
skaters, etc
Anonymous These devices aren’t going away. There are no separate paths for
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 45 of 75
12/18/2025 02:07 PM them to ride on. Pedestrian traffic and these devices will have to
share the space. Riders should be required to wear helmets, slow
down when approaching pedestrians and use horn if coming from
behind.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 02:12 PM
We need better regulations. It’s getting dangers for young teens.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 02:14 PM
PROHIBIT mingling.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 02:24 PM
No
Anonymous
12/18/2025 02:40 PM
Rules and restrictions are of little to no value without enforcement.
Re-establishing police on bikes, and/or bike ambassadors would a
first step. Kids are virtually unsupervised with very dangerous
vehicles.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 03:11 PM
Electric scooters going really fast are a concern on pedestrian paths.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 03:27 PM
The kids and some adults have no regard for the safety of
pedestrians. Something needs to be done.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 03:28 PM
I would like to see these micromobility devices banned as they are
unsafe for pedestrians, drivers, and the end users. These devices
should be off road, making it safer for all concerned. I dont think these
devices are used by a large number of different individuals (used by
repeat users) yet they inconvenience many more pedestrians and
drivers then the transportation benefit it provides to the community.
The business owners for these devices are pushing a false narrative
to our government leaders. This survey is skewed. I have to answer
all questions yet I dont have enough information to feel comfortable
answering all questions. In particular, questions 3 and 7 are not good
survey questions. The same was true if the diversity survey council
did awhile back. No place to add comments but questions were
skewed in a way to get a predictable outcome.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 03:45 PM
Make the rules clear and easy to understand. Enforcement will be a
challenge but shouldn’t deter the city from making expectations clear.
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 46 of 75
Anonymous
12/18/2025 04:01 PM
I am totally opposed to miniature motorcycles being ridden on our
paths, tearing up our parks, and becoming a genuine nuisance.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 05:09 PM
As a long time resident who lives along a shared-use path, I have
witnessed cars, trucks, golf carts, all terrain vehicles, miniature
motorcycles, e-scooters, e-bikes and skate boarders pass by in front
of my house. Car and truck sightings on the path are rare, but the
other devices are typically operated by young people who are too
young to drive legally on public roadways. Some of these motorized
vehicles have no place on shared-use paths (formerly called
sideWALKS). As a senior citizen who loves to walk, the prospect of
being run down by an out of control youngster driving a motorized
vehicle is real concern for me. If the unthinkable happened, I cannot
imagine who might be legally liable for injuries sustained by a
defenseless pedestrian. By the way, I have found that most non-
motorized bicyclists (both young and old) are usually courteous and
more in control of their rides. I think people who like to walk and
people who like to pedal can safely coexist on a shared-use path, but
powered devices of any kind are a potential danger to all.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 05:18 PM
Speed limits need to be set for micromobility devices - perhaps set to
match e-Bike class 2 limits.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 06:44 PM
I live in the Brandon subdivision. I walk the neighborhood frequently
and have noticed a huge increase in the prevalence of these devices,
both in the street and on the sidewalks and multipurpose paths. They
are usually piloted by children, often quite young, maybe younger
than they should be. They are often going faster than they should be,
not wearing helmets, using smartphones while in transit, and all
manner of irresponsible behavior. Helmet use is 50-50 at best. They
are quiet and often going somewhat recklessly around pedestrians
and other vehicles. I have even seen them with multiple people on
them when it's clearly a single-person device. E-bikes, scooters, and
miniature motorcycles are typically the worst offenders.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 08:04 PM
I think some type of driving class should be required for anyone that is
going to be using one of these if they do not have a driver's license. A
LOT of kids come through my neighborhood on these on the road
making unsafe choices, cutting in front of cars, not looking before
going into the road, etc Things that could get them hurt or killed.
Anonymous
12/18/2025 09:58 PM
Please ban these electric bikes, scooters, and related micromobility
devices. Please place signs on multi use paths making it clear they
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 47 of 75
are banned. Please hold parents responsible for fines if their children
are found to be driving such devices on paths, parks, and streets.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 03:15 AM
I didn't really know what you meant by several of the questions in this
survey so I'm not sure how useful the results will be.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 03:51 AM
Kids should be 16 and should have an operating license and need to
stay off the bike paths!
Anonymous
12/19/2025 04:46 AM
Anyone who is going to use these devices needs to register them and
take mandatory lessons, and have a license. It is just a question of
time when one or more of these kids are going to be killed. Parents
are not being responsible or accountable for these devices. They
cause accidents because of cars avoiding their dangerous skills. I
could go on....something needs to be drastically changed.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 04:47 AM
I think these should be banned on a shared path. I have walked on
paths and had someone whip by me on an electric scooter. I had no
warning someone was approaching me from behind. I walk on the
right side of the path and if I had stepped to the left more I could have
been hit by the scooter. There needs to be regulations and
accountability to where these get left. I have seen the rental ones left
at random corners.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 05:02 AM
That they should be registered. Signs posted on pathways. Perhaps
make them use the bike lane on streets.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 05:50 AM
Kids need to be made more aware of the rules and consequences for
breaking them.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 05:59 AM
We use the shared use path frequently and have been run off of them
by people using mini motorcycles, electric scooters, and even golf
carts! There have been groups up to 8 race by and these shared use
paths are not designed for this. Thank you for leading the way to
make our community safe for all.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 06:00 AM
I support strengthening any regulations around these devices and
holding parents accountable. I appreciate all that staff has done to
educate the community. That chart is great!
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 48 of 75
Anonymous
12/19/2025 06:02 AM
I have been almost hit by a mini motorcycle flying around the corner
on the shared use path by the Presbyterian church on Dublinshire. My
husband called the police to ask if they were allowed and the officer
wasn't sure so he said he would get back to him which he did. He
said he didn't find anything about this. This was in the spring of last
year when the weather was turning nice and the kids were out. I
understand that the police can't see everything everywhere but they
should know the rules. The parents of the kids should be responsible
and know the rules since they bought the toy/motorcycle. Most kids
are great on the path and announce they are passing but it is the few
that scare me. Lots of older adults walk the path and I am afraid
someone is going to get hit when a motorcycle/mini bike is coming
around the curve. I even took a video last year of two motorcycles
racing on the straight section next to our yard. They like to do
wheelys. I noticed the city has more information in the newsletters
regarding this and I very much appreciate this!! Smart letting parents
know the rules before Christmas and buying the electric vehicles. A
last thought, maybe post more about texting and riding a bike is no
different than driving a car. I was hit a couple of years ago by a boy
texting and riding his bike. I was also on my bike going toward him
and hollering at him and he was oblivious. I couldn't get out of his way
because his friends where on bikes to my left and a hill with a pond
was on my right. Thank you to the city or park district for putting up
the fence at Avery park. I fell off and hurt my tailbone but otherwise
ok. He did not fall off his bike. Thanks for listening!
Anonymous
12/19/2025 06:36 AM
The City of Dublin has done an outstanding job of educating residents
in relation to micromobility devices, our shared use path system is
wonderful and makes our city very bike and walker-friendly.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 06:54 AM
BAN THEM ALL!
Anonymous
12/19/2025 07:14 AM
Item #5 should not stipulate knowingly because parents will just say
that they didn't know. Just make them responsible regardless. Lazy
parenting is no excuse.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 07:31 AM
I have had to pull my dog off the path to let both miniature
motorcycles and golf carts pass in order to keep my dog and myself
safe. I have seen youth ignoring street laws when driving golf carts on
the street. And, I have seen multiple times 2 youths on the same bike,
neither with a helmet.
Anonymous It appears that they are here to stay. Anything that makes their use
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 49 of 75
12/19/2025 07:51 AM safer for both riders and pedestrians is a great idea. It would be nice
not to see so many of them abandoned/parked where they shouldn't
be, but that doesn't seem to be as bad as it used to be. Thanks for
the opportunity.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 08:31 AM
This code is great. We need to hold people accountable to keep
everyone safe!
Anonymous
12/19/2025 09:31 AM
These are super dangerous for pedestrians and riders, and should
not be allowed on shared used paths.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 09:31 AM
I really appreciate this initiative because there are too many kids and
adults using these sorts of devices in very unsafe ways.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 09:57 AM
no
Anonymous
12/19/2025 09:59 AM
These devices should have to adhere to the same regulations and
standards as golf carts being used for personal purposes. Outside of
the owner’s property they need to be required to carry liability
insurance and there needs to be an age limit. There are too many
very young children using them (without helmets) and not being
taught to follow proper safety precautions to help keep themselves
safe nor other drivers.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 10:41 AM
I have come very close to being hit by teenagers riding these devices
on the walking paths in Dublin they have no regard for any one else
on the path and they are going way too fast
Anonymous
12/19/2025 11:27 AM
I welcome more use of these devices to get people out of cars. We
shouldn't be scared to allow more of them, but they can be regulated
just like cars. I'm glad to be in Dublin where there are so many
shared use paths, so let's encourage their use!
Anonymous
12/19/2025 12:23 PM
I don't have a problem with them if the rules are followed; however, I
don't know how well it is enforced.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 12:27 PM
It will be difficulty enforcing as currently Youth are riding the higher
power bikes and skate boards at alarmingly high speeds on shared
walkways. It will help to have clear signs showing what is
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 50 of 75
allowed/disallowed
Anonymous
12/19/2025 12:46 PM
No
Anonymous
12/19/2025 12:51 PM
Usually the issues I have seen is with unsupervised teens rather than
adults
Anonymous
12/19/2025 01:14 PM
Driving north on Muirfield Drive near Scottish Corners school one day
about 20+ kids on minibikes wee heading the same direction, but
some kneeling on the seats, others swerving into my inner lane,
weaving, doing wheelies. It was so dangerous and frightened and
distracted me as a driver.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 01:17 PM
Kids are going too fast & without helmets. Please make helmet
mandatory. I’ve seen too many kids crash on these bikes.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 01:18 PM
I'd love to see mini motorcycles banned entirely. Kids don't seem to
pay attention to traffic or general safety rules, like helmets, while
riding.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 01:27 PM
I would be interested in speed limits adjusted for age of the rider than
just speed limits for certain pathways/roads. Some of the scooters
max out at 12-14mph, but I was surprised to learn how many kids'
scooters or bikes max out at 22 or 45 mph. This feels too unsafe for
kids under 14.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 01:33 PM
No
Anonymous
12/19/2025 01:43 PM
ban miniature motorcycles as they go fast have no controls and are
cause of danger for all using the roadways and bike paths, folks are
using them everywhere rule or no rule - must be blocked
Anonymous
12/19/2025 01:43 PM
Please make it safer for pedestrians using the pathways. And please
do not only target children, the biggest offenders I see on the
pathways with these vehicles and devices are older adults.
Anonymous E-bikes and scooters should have an extra low speed limit on
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 51 of 75
12/19/2025 01:44 PM sidewalks and shared use paths (even lower than bicycles) due to
their weight and accessibility. Bicyclists who can clear 15mph typically
have a lot of experience dealing with quick evasive maneuvers.
Powered micromobility devices can get riders (especially young
riders) to dangerous speeds before their riders learn adequate control
for safety. Higher speed vehicles should be required to have black
boxes tracking speed for criminal and civil evidence when their riders
cause an accident that injures others on the paths.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 01:44 PM
I strongly support the safe usage of most classes of micro mobility
devices including e-bikes and e-scooters, however I believe that
safety needs to be a priority and they should be licensed and minor
usage should be restricted to the safest manner possible without fully
restricting. One thing that needs to be fully banned is e-dirt bikes.
These mini-motorcycle like devices are unsafe on our roads and
paths and need to be restricted to off road usage.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 01:48 PM
No
Anonymous
12/19/2025 02:02 PM
I think there should be an age minimum, although I don't know if a city
is allowed to implement that.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 02:06 PM
No
Anonymous
12/19/2025 02:25 PM
More posted information about the rules
Anonymous
12/19/2025 02:27 PM
Would it be possible to limit the speed on shared paths, or have a
rule for riders to signal when passing? We were almost hit by an e-
bike while walking at the metro park. Thanks!
Anonymous
12/19/2025 02:28 PM
please no rental scooters in Dublin.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 02:41 PM
No
Anonymous
12/19/2025 02:54 PM
I would prefer NOT to have micromobility devices in our area. They
are a nuisance in every other place that we frequent that has them…
for many different reasons!
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 52 of 75
Anonymous
12/19/2025 02:57 PM
The kids are very irresponsible on them. No helmets on paths, even
riding with a younger sibling on a scooter with backpacks and
disregardin cross walk rules
Anonymous
12/19/2025 03:05 PM
Speed limits that are enforced would be wonderful
Anonymous
12/19/2025 03:18 PM
Ban them - young kids are driving these vehicles faster than cars on
Tara Hill. They are completely unnecessary and dangerous.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 03:44 PM
None
Anonymous
12/19/2025 04:27 PM
The minors on power scooters is my biggest concern. They drive all
over the neighborhood, running stop signs, and being generally
reckless at times. It’s concerning.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 04:30 PM
Need id as kids are not going to offer their names
Anonymous
12/19/2025 05:04 PM
They're very useful and help with kids' (and everyone's)
independence and mobility, but they need to be used safely, and
need to be regulated so safety can be enforced.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 05:05 PM
It’s not exercising, or helping health.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 05:16 PM
The helmet requirement should be for all, not just kids, and the speed
limits are very important on mixed use paths for the safety of
walkers/runners/regular cyclists
Anonymous
12/19/2025 05:55 PM
I would prefer to see an expanded area for no car use. The focus
tends to be that these devices are a danger on the paths but then
also in danger when on the street. Maybe the answer is instead of
building more roads build more shared use or dedicated device paths
to alienate these concerns. See Canmore AB where they have wide
paths with designation for pedestrians and and another for bikes,
scooters, etc.
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 53 of 75
Anonymous
12/19/2025 06:13 PM
Could benefit from them using bike lanes
Anonymous
12/19/2025 07:30 PM
Strongly against these motorized vehicles that kids use carelessly
around the city, they usually have no helmet or protective gears,
speed through side walks and a huge distraction to drivers making it
very unsafe for all.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 07:44 PM
Kids are riding electric dirt bikes on roads and sidewalks and it’s
dangerous for pedestrians. The vehicles are too fast for kids and also
allow for travel far from home letting them be unsupervised. Anything
motorized should be banned on streets for kids under 16 or under 18
without a drivers license. 14+ should be allowed to use electric
devices with a top speed of under 12mph. Violations should be met
with device confiscation and adult retrieval.
Anonymous
12/19/2025 07:48 PM
N/a
Anonymous
12/20/2025 03:48 AM
I’m ok with them being on the paths. My son does not get a bus to the
high school and it is very helpful to ride his electric scooter to and
from school and practice.
Anonymous
12/20/2025 04:11 AM
I think they are just very unsafe. I’ve seen so many kids riding around
recklessly
Anonymous
12/20/2025 04:30 AM
No additional comment
Anonymous
12/20/2025 04:46 AM
Micromobility devices are making paths and sidewalks less safe.
These devices are not going away so it’s important to put up
guardrails to protect all residents and visitors.
Anonymous
12/20/2025 04:55 AM
I just think the rules should be very clear and consistently enforced.
Anonymous
12/20/2025 05:04 AM
Use of helmets Users of micro mobility devices follow the same rules
at the crossings Stop , watch proceed at crossings
Anonymous None
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 54 of 75
12/20/2025 05:13 AM
Anonymous
12/20/2025 07:38 AM
No but please act fast, hopefully before Spring- Summer 2026. Too
many accidents waiting to happen (we witness many the past 3
months). Thank you for this important survey.
Anonymous
12/20/2025 08:27 AM
These things are a hazard and I witnessed a bunch of kids in a pack
cross the street in old Dublin not at a crosswalk into traffic which
fortunately cars stopped as the kids were messing around and
laughing and acting entitled.
Anonymous
12/20/2025 08:41 AM
Provide a riding park for the kids who ride dirt bikes.
Anonymous
12/20/2025 10:43 AM
I believe devices should be lit from the front and behind if they are
going to be used in the dark. Tremendously unsafe for the user and
all cars/pedestrians in the area if there are unlit micro mobility devices
zooming down the road/sidewalk. Huge safety risks even if they are
wearing helmets.
Anonymous
12/20/2025 11:31 AM
Lights should be required on either the device or on the helmet.
Especially while on Dublin’s shared use trails. So both the driver can
see where they are going at night and so that walkers can see the
lights coming and get out of the way.
Anonymous
12/20/2025 12:24 PM
Young kids without helmets should not be allowed to use these in any
form. When biking near Karrer on the wide sidewalk I was nearly run
over by 2 kids on the electric scooters. They were easily going >15-
20mph. A high school friend was biking (regular bike with a helmet)
and was run into by a young kids on one of these electric bikes. The
biker sustained a concussion and the accident knocked out several of
the older biker's teeth. Parents who do not use the paths are
purchasing these for children and are not implementing the necessary
safety precautions for other residents (walkers, runners, traditional
bikers). Parents should be held liable. Full support of the City
Anonymous
12/20/2025 12:54 PM
no
Anonymous
12/21/2025 05:05 AM
I would be grateful for a public service campaign about the use of
trails regarding pets, right of way, signaling to others, passing and
general path courtesy. I walk the Red Trabue trail daily along with
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 55 of 75
many seniors and am often shocked by the lack of consideration for
others.
Anonymous
12/21/2025 06:57 AM
there needs to be a speed maximum on these vehicles. PLUS - it
might be a good idea that any youth under the age of 18 are required
to take a safety course - and sign off acknowledging they have taken
the course - and fully understand the safety implications of driving
these vehicles.....there can be no "I didn't know" - particularly with the
danger of these vehicles for the riders.....and the people around
them.
Anonymous
12/21/2025 07:14 AM
Anything allowed on the paths needs to allow the safe passing and
opposite direction traffic of other riders and pedestrians. There is a
go-kart style vehicle with a rollover cage driven by a 10 year old (with
a younger passenger) that is as wide as the bike path and travels at
least 20 mph. This is an unlicensed driver operating a vehicle that is
taller than a pedestrian and leaves no space on the path for safe
passing or even approaching other path users. When I called to let
the city know this was happening, I was told those types of vehicles
are currently allowed even though it's unsafe -- so when updating the
regulations please include whatever is needed to address these types
of vehicles directly as this is unbelievably unsafe and really just
nerve-wracking when out walking or riding a traditional bike. Honestly
if a vehicle will cause more damage or injury to a pedestrian in the
case of a collision than a traditional bike, scooter, or e-scooter, it does
not belong on a pedestrian-centric "roadway" like a sidewalk or path.
Another issue is that many of these devices are allowed on the paths
but not the road or sidewalks (depending on the device), but the only
way to access the paths is via a road or sidewalk.... So you can see
the issue and it leads to unsafe stretches of the trip and a lack of
clarity. Nothing with a motor belongs on the sidewalk or bike paths
period.
Anonymous
12/21/2025 07:16 AM
I’d prefer none of the above being allowed, other than a good ol
bicycle. The idea of people scootering along RIGHT outside store
entrances where people walk is terrifying. Or people parking and
getting out of cars and opening doors. Or the pedestrian bridge.
Dublin is kid friendly with lots of clueless toddlers tottering around. I
witnessed a major wipeout with horrible injuries from a bike rider vs
walker in Central Park NYC and that’s all I can picture. I think it’s a
bad idea all around, so I hope Dublin sticks to safety being the TOP
priority, and ticketing violations of the rules.
Anonymous Many of the people on the shared use path already use AirPods or
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 56 of 75
12/21/2025 07:22 AM other headphones. Same with motorized device drivers. I have been
used them in cities before and I’m not opposed when adults manage
them properly. Children are going to get hurt.
Anonymous
12/21/2025 07:31 AM
We live in Indian Run Meadows and I often see young people riding
electric scooters and bikes in the street and/or crossing streets
without helmets and often without looking. They often ride along the
shared use path and when pulling out of streets, such as Earlington
Pkwy, there is no visibility of them coming at about 25mph. Even
creeping up to the stop sign is not enough when they don’t stop
before they cross. I have even had adults do this. Also, a common
occurrence is for them to enter the street from behind parked cars or
delivery trucks and it is impossible to see them before they suddenly
appear in front of you. I am extremely concerned for these riders’
safety. I would love to see strict rules around these devices, and
especially to see them enforced with minors. I think that these are
wonderful devices, but can be very dangerous unless people are
properly educated and wear safety equipment. An ad campaign
featuring dash cam videos of what it is like for drivers when someone
darts out in front of vehicles into the street would be particularly
effective. I have seen many examples from our area on Nextdoor and
have spoken with countless neighbors who have had close calls.
Also, golf carts do NOT belong on city streets. The behavior I have
seen on those is even more reckless.
Anonymous
12/21/2025 07:53 AM
Please don't forget to include go karts and golf carts as well!! Similar
to oversized loads driving on roads, which require a special permit
and additional safety precautions, go karts and golf carts are larger
than half the width of bike paths and sidewalks and present an
inherent danger to others because they cannot pass other
pedestrians, bicycles, or other micromobility devices without causing
them to alter their line of travel.
Anonymous
12/21/2025 08:15 AM
none
Anonymous
12/21/2025 10:57 AM
My kids have e-scooters and I love that they are outside more and it
allows them to visit friends and family close by. We require our kids to
wear helmets but I also know it is a risk. You are trusting and hoping
that your child is paying attention and the drivers are paying attention
also.
Anonymous
12/21/2025 11:36 AM
No
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 57 of 75
Anonymous
12/21/2025 11:37 AM
None
Anonymous
12/21/2025 12:38 PM
I know they're popular, but the people riding them are often oblivious
to common sense safety. It's heart-stopping when they weave in and
out of traffic to get where they want to go.
Anonymous
12/22/2025 03:52 AM
Na
Anonymous
12/22/2025 05:51 AM
No
Anonymous
12/22/2025 07:17 AM
I do not believe children under 16 should be permitted on the road
without training and license. I have watch my children's peers risk
their lives in the neighborhood streets (wheelies on mopeds without
helmet, etc.) There is likely to be a tragedy soon.
Anonymous
12/22/2025 07:51 AM
I’m just concerned for kids’ safety. They take risks and it is our job to
make sure they are safe.
Anonymous
12/22/2025 08:04 AM
These mini motorcycles have been frequently seen going through
park off road/path trails(Indian Run, in vicinity of Berry/Raymond Dr.).
They are creating a worn, dirt path through the park, damaging park
property.
Anonymous
12/22/2025 11:16 AM
The technology has gotten out ahead of safety guidelines. Safe
transportation relies on people being able to predict and use well-
established traffic patterns. For example, a driver must be able to
assess the speed and distance of an oncoming vehicle in order to
make safe and efficient turns. Families with small children rely on the
security of sidewalks not having fast vehicles, so if a child falls or
darts out, walkers following behind can easily adjust. E-transporters
operate at speeds that disrupt these patterns, making everyone less
safe. I have also read articles about increased critical injuries for
people on e-bikes, etc, due to the speeds. People don't realize the
impact that the increased speed and weight of the vehicles can have
in the case of a fall.
Anonymous It should be included whether they are allowed on City land off road
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 58 of 75
12/22/2025 11:52 AM or path, such as in the woods by the lake at Indian Run Meadows
where there is a "professional" trail with jumps and all.
Anonymous
12/22/2025 12:06 PM
i am glad Dublin is looking at this. But were can moped be ridden?
Anonymous
12/22/2025 12:07 PM
appreciate Dublin taking a leadership role in establishing standards in
Central Ohio for micromobility devices.
Anonymous
12/22/2025 12:08 PM
Dublin is such a wonderful community. So glad to be a part of it.
Anonymous
12/22/2025 12:09 PM
none
Anonymous
12/22/2025 12:22 PM
Slow Down Dublin
Anonymous
12/22/2025 12:24 PM
no
Anonymous
12/22/2025 04:32 PM
They have become a danger in our neighborhood (brandon). Too fast
and careless. Someone will get killed. Riding on road and too young.
Anonymous
12/22/2025 04:40 PM
Please enact stricter laws and enforce them before more kids get
injured!
Anonymous
12/22/2025 07:53 PM
No
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:08 PM
Motorized devices (except for wheelchairs) should not be allowed on
sidewalks or shared use walkways. It will be abused and someone
will get hurt.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:08 PM
No
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:09 PM
Thanks for the survey. We need to make it safer for all of Dublin
residents, especially those who DON'T use those methods of
transportation (i.e., pedestrians).
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 59 of 75
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:10 PM
Get them out of Dublin and please prohibit their use on the pedestrian
bridge to Bridge Park
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:10 PM
Need more shared used paths or bike lanes, this is key to increased
safety
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:10 PM
no
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:13 PM
I would like to see fines/consequences for children riding these
devices who purposely disregard rules, safety precautions, etc for
their own amusement.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:14 PM
Please crack down on those incessant motorcycles racing on I 270 all
the time at night. We hear it sooo often living 3/4 of a mile from I 270.
Its a real nuisance.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:15 PM
Ban them. Someone will be killed soon enough.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:18 PM
They were everywhere this summer and children are riding in the
streets without helmets with cars. Clearly regulation is needed
because the children have not been taught how to be safe and
parents are oblivious.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:18 PM
Anyone without a drivers license should not be able to ride these in
public areas. Kids 14 and older need to get a special license for
them. Helmets should be required.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:19 PM
These rentable scooters and bikes should be banned from
everywhere, they are an eyesore and only cause problems for
walkers and runners
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:21 PM
no
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:27 PM
Safety of all needs to be the top priority, as these mobile 1 person
devices, like motorcycles on the road, are difficult to see, hear and do
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 60 of 75
not require a license or proof of user knowledge as to how to operate
them. This in turn makes them very dangerous to all when they mix
with pedestrians or with other motor vehicle traffic.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:30 PM
I think there are too many kids driving these micromobility devices
without any knowledge of safety
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:32 PM
Yes, I would like to see some of the paths that are close to the road
ways. I can think of several areas along Dublin Road, had some
guard rails to protect the pedestrians/bicyclist/motorized vehicle users
safe. And have the police more aggressively enforce the speed limits
(25mph areas) . People disregard them and I’m scared to walk my
dogs and grandkids.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:32 PM
I feel that it is important that there are some enforceable guidelines to
keep everyone safe. On multiple occasions, kids on scooters in
particular are shooting down a sidewalk in my development then just
shoot out into the street. If I hadn't seen them and anticipated what
they were going to do, there would have been an accident. Of course,
it is rare if they wear helmets. My husband and I have been bicycle
riders for years so wearing helmets, always, and following the
established guidelines has been part of our outings. Dublin has a
great system of bike/walking trails that should be used appropriately.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:33 PM
.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:34 PM
No.. Often see motorized scooters, mini bikes etc on shared use
paths and they come out of nowhere. Code amendments are
appropriate with the challenge being communication to the users (and
probably to the parents who allow it to happen)
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:36 PM
Kids on these devices are a danger to themselves, pedestrians, and
motorists. It’s only a matter of before a tragic accident happens. In
the name of safety I support this cause.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:42 PM
Should be an age limit as well.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:43 PM
Personally, I'm not certain t h at they should be permitted on shared
paths by anyone under 18. Some of these kids, not all, have little or
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 61 of 75
no respect for others on the shared paths.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:43 PM
Navigating paths, streets and crosswalks should be safe without
being concerned that someone riding a micro mobility device will race
by or try to squeeze thru a crowd of people crossing the street. Also,
helmets save lives and help avoid injuries from accidents that can
cause disabilities.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:47 PM
My family and I (5) are daily walkers and often runners. Often we go
to glacier ridge to avoid all different kinds of micro mobility
unfortunately even at the park we have been almost hit by the electric
bikes . We love to walk in peace and enjoy our parks. We pay high
taxes to leave in a safe and peaceful area and would love to have it !
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:47 PM
I believe that all of these micromobility devices should stay off of all
sidewalks and walking paths...except for human powered bicycles.
Thank you, this is a very important topic.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:48 PM
No
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:51 PM
I believe we should also educate pedestrians on bike paths. Many
pedestrians wear ear buds at an high volume and are oblivious to.
Ike’s and e-bikes sharing the path. We are careful to ring our bells
and shout when we come upon pedestrians and some cannot hear us
at all as we are trying to pass. We all can share the path safely with
pets and pedestrians and bikes and e-scooters etc but we all need to
be aware. Ear buds should be banned on bikes, e-bikes and scooters.
Many young people cannot hear as they are riding. We need speed
limits for scooters also especially on the Link. Small groups of scooter
riders are blowing by and weaving in and out pedestrians on the
bridge, wearing ear buds, no helmets making it completely unsafe for
all. Hazardous. There is not enough visibility in the library garage on
the curves to see riders. It should be banned there. Speed limits and
helmets should be required and parents should not let children ride
scooters on bike paths under the age of driving a car.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:52 PM
No
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:54 PM
I am a runner and love the Dublin paths - they have felt increasingly
unsafe now that so many young people are using micro mobility
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 62 of 75
devices. They struggle to steer and maintain control, and I am very
fearful of a future accident. I also worry when I’m driving as they
move much faster along the trails and I’m concerned I could
accidentally strike one when they are crossing the road because there
is limited time to recognize their approach. My opinion is that these
should be banned from trails completely, but at a minimum should not
be used by minors. Please also address cellphone use while riding - I
have seen many instances where a child is staring at their phone
while flying down the trail. Thank you so much for addressing this
issue! I was glad to see New Albany set up more regulations here and
am very happy Dublin is also protecting our safety.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:56 PM
Ensure the rules are common sense approached and contemplate
that children mainly operate devices. Maybe separate rules for
children under 16 and those who can drive and follow rules of road
better.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 01:57 PM
I would ike if the city eliminated the scooters as they are just found
lying all around town and are an eye sore. There are way too many
intoxicated people being dangerous on them as well.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:01 PM
No additional comment
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:03 PM
Our shared-use- paths are important to our community. But micro
mobility has much more powerful drive systems and this jeapordizes
not only pedestrians but bicyclist as well
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:09 PM
I support making things safer for pedestrians. I have seen some very
young people driving mechanized vehicles and I am not sure what the
rules are but if people aren't old enough for a license, it doesn't seem
like they should be operating mechanized vehicles.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:11 PM
Please consider prohibiting the use of these in smaller parks. Many
folks are walking, some with animals. There’s not enough room on the
trails to have electric vehicles whizzing by.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:15 PM
We, like thousands of communities across the country, need to
implement rules around these to encourage the safety of both young
riders and pedestrians. I truly believe the minimum age of use should
be at least 16, just like cars.
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 63 of 75
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:16 PM
MAKE SURE ALL PATHS HAVE A STOP SIGN FOR ALL
MICROMOBILiTY AND REGULAR BIKE. Especially at roundabouts,
they must be seen before they enter street
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:17 PM
We moved to Dublin in large part because we wanted to walk and
bike on the fabulous trails. In the past year that’s become a lot less
enjoyable, and we often drive to a metro park rather than staying in
our town. My husband was knocked off his bike and injured on a
Dublin trail in August by a teenager using his phone on an e-bike. I’ve
read a lot about Dublin rules on this topic, but I haven’t yet seen any
signs of enforcement. I think enforcement is necessary.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:17 PM
This must go beyond a helmet requirement. Please consider banning
these devices for children under a certain age. So many of these
young kids do not have the maturity or frontal lobe development to
safely and responsibly control electric scooters. Irresponsible parents
and children put all individuals using the shared paths at risk in the
event of a collision. Please also consider extending these restrictions
to school district residential areas as these include some DCS
building property where we have already witnessed some near
misses between scooters and walkers on the shared paths
connecting neighborhoods to schools. Thank you so much for your
efforts to keep everyone safe!
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:20 PM
Rental scooters in Bridge Park ridden by teens unsafely between
pedestrians. This can't be legal now so enforce existing rules.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:21 PM
Parents should be responsible for the minors that operate the devices
mentioned!
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:28 PM
These measures are strongly needed, as I have witnessed multiple
children riding these kinds of scooters without helmets. They are not
only putting themselves at risk, but other kids and pedestrians as
well.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:29 PM
Children do not comprehend how dangerous these devices are to
themselves and others
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:31 PM
I have had close calls with young people operating mini motorcycles
and e scooters on shared use paths. I hate them. All of these boosted
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 64 of 75
vehicles should be banned in walking paths.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:39 PM
There should be no “doubling up” on riding the e-scooters! I’ve heard
of too many accidents this way and my granddaughter is guilty of
sharing her scooter and doubling up. There should be a scooter
safety class and a card they carry to show they have passed the
class.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:57 PM
Many of these devices are silent and the riders almost always fail to
make a proper multi-use path passing announcement such as,
“passing on the right” nor do they have an alert device such as a bell.
I have seen them riding on just their back wheel and racing each
other. Despite their small size, they a go far faster than bicycles,
walkers or joggers. My wife and I came around a corner on the path
at Sell’s Mill one evening to find ourselves surrounded by a very
young group of kids on the mini motercycles. And to comment on
question 5, I thought parents of kids under the age of 18 were
responsible for the irresponsible actions of their children. I am happy
to be part of the solution. Steven Himes 941-993-5987
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:57 PM
Speed limit on bike paths should be put into place and enforced. All
riders of electronic mobility items that go faster than 10 mph should
wear a helmet
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:57 PM
Under aged shouldn't be using them. I see many young bikers
around. AND helmets should be required for all of them
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:57 PM
All devices should be required to have warning bells and reflectors.
Users must yield to pedestrians and stop before crossing the street.
Bicycles should not be on streets where the speed limit is 35mph or
more and a bike path is available.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 02:58 PM
No
Anonymous
12/23/2025 03:24 PM
Helmets, reflective gear (so often see tween/teens in all black, no
lights and zipping in and iut of traffic...especially dangerous at
dusk/dark)
Anonymous
12/23/2025 03:26 PM
at the very least, paint speed limits (12mph) on paths. That should go
for all vehicles, motorized or not IMO
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 65 of 75
Anonymous
12/23/2025 03:35 PM
I see many young kids riding the small motorbikes in parks - not
necessarily paths - at speeds that are not safe. I am not sure if this
should be reported and who to?
Anonymous
12/23/2025 04:10 PM
Adults should be required to wear helmets while biking, e-biking,
riding a motorized scooter, or using a motorized vehicle such as a
motorcycle. Adults should be setting the example so this will be
normal behavior to kids. Safety first is not only for kids. It is ignorant
to allow motorcyclists to ride without a helmet. Shouldn’t we be
setting the example for appropriate behavior? Also, keeping
motorized vehicles off of walk paths would be appreciated. Especially
when driven by kids.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 04:10 PM
I see a lot of miniature motorcycles and other motorized scooters
riding on sidewalks, bike paths, and streets near Scottish Corners
and they are obviously under 18 and in some cases appear to be
elementary and middle school age. I think this is very dangerous for
the kids riding them and anyone else who is using the paths correctly
(walkers, runners, bicycle riders). I strongly am for eliminating the use
of these before someone gets seriously hurt or worse!
Anonymous
12/23/2025 04:19 PM
Please emphasize that we travel on the right side of the road,
whether driving a car, a motorcycle or riding a micromobility device.
And we park vehicles in the direction of traffic. Thank you.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 04:32 PM
Reduce the speed allowed for ebikes
Anonymous
12/23/2025 04:34 PM
I almost got run over by a motorized scooter driven by a young girl
who gave no warning she was coming behind me fast. They should
not be allowed in the walking and bike paths!!!
Anonymous
12/23/2025 04:37 PM
Golf carts on city streets are also a huge problem. I see children
unrestrained and driving while intoxicated all the time. Since these are
in a gray area between a typical motor vehicle and a micromobility
device, please expand your survey, laws, and enforcement to include
golf carts on neighborhood streets. I am a Dublin resident,
transportation safety professional, and OSU professor that
understands the challenges surrounding your goals and can assist
with further research or ideas. Please feel free to contact me for
further discussion: biomechinjury@gmail.com
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 66 of 75
Anonymous
12/23/2025 04:51 PM
That bridge park area is extremely congested- poor planning ( or
great lobbying) on somebody's part, and they are STILL building. You
need to encourage use of golf cars in that area instead of cars.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 04:55 PM
No
Anonymous
12/23/2025 05:05 PM
Motorized vehicles (e-bikes, e- scooters, mini bikes) should operate
under motor vehicles rules. Ie stop at stopsigns, but then, cars and
trucks are not enforced on this.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 05:18 PM
I'm happy that Dublin is taking up this important topic.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 05:35 PM
Right now it's a mess. For instance, multi-use paths in Muirfield
currently prohibit motorized vehicles but most kids and young adults
have electric bikes. I walk almost every day and have several very
close, and potentially catastrophic interactions with kids whizzing by
without so much as a warning. Dublin, Muirfield etc will be on the
hook when the inevitable collision happens sending someone to the
hospital. I think we need to think very carefully about what the rules
will be AND ENFORCE THEM. The speed differential is tremendous
and it's only a matter of time...
Anonymous
12/23/2025 05:40 PM
No
Anonymous
12/23/2025 05:51 PM
I am a school cross guard and a specific male on an electric
skateboard does not follow the “stop” sign that I am holding and
blows thru the crosswalk with students and parents crossing. He
endangers the safety of the students and their parents.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 05:57 PM
They should require some sort of license if they are over a certain
mph. Helmets a must.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 06:36 PM
I walk on the paths and sidewalks a lot. I see many motorized
vehicles on the road and sharing the path. I think helmets need to be
better than your standard bike helmet, and wheelies while on the
street should not be permitted.
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 67 of 75
Anonymous
12/23/2025 06:39 PM
Appreciate strict and enforced rules for safety.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 06:49 PM
They are hard to see and they don't obey the rules of the road.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 08:11 PM
Any sort of device is dangerous to pedestrians on trails - I’ve seen
some close calls. Please ensure enforcement of the bans of these on
sidewalks and shared use paths is enforced and that new regulations
don’t inadvertently encourage more of them onto shared use paths.
Thank you for this work!
Anonymous
12/23/2025 08:19 PM
Get rid of these. We want pedestrian areas that are safe.
Anonymous
12/23/2025 09:16 PM
I feel that no additional regulations are needed for traditional human-
powered devices, such as pedaled bicycles and skateboards.
However, all across the world, injuries and deaths from motorized
devices such as e-bikes and e-scooters are skyrocketing. I think that
the rentals of these motorized devices in urban areas are both difficult
to police, with untrained riders; and often an eyesore, with
abandoned scooter and bike “clutter”.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 03:01 AM
This is necessary asi use the bike paths to walk and may times the e
bikes are way to fast and it is scary
Anonymous
12/24/2025 04:30 AM
no
Anonymous
12/24/2025 04:58 AM
I think this is a tough one, and more conducive to in-person
discussions on the topic. I definitely think they need to be rules and
regulations for safety and sanity, but I don’t know enough about the
devices to take a hard stand one way or the other. Do you allow
motorized vehicles on the walking paths or make them go on the
street? Neither our ideal options. Perhaps requiring them to stay on
one side or using a bell or a horn and following a speed limit are
some ways to make things safer.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:00 AM
Riders should be required to slow and audibly warm pedestrian. I'm
not sure how enforcement would work, but at least ensuring parents
educate their kids on this might help
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 68 of 75
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:03 AM
My biggest concern is the mini motorcycles. There are a few in our
Dublin neighborhood. The young riders zoom down the bike paths
and on to the street without looking for cars/walkers. They also drive
through our park and rip up the grass on wet days. I am very worried
that they'll be hit by a car because they don't appear to pay attention
to their surroundings. They also appear to be quite young -- maybe
age 10. I think the current restrictions requiring mini motorcycles
needs to be enforced more vigorously. I don't have significant
concerns about the other motorized devices. I rarely encounter them
other than seeing some kids ride them to school on the shared paths.
I have always observed them to be used responsibly.. I think it is fine
for those types of devices to be on shared paths.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:08 AM
I have nothing against people using these devices. Many kids do
wear helmets. However, please do something about the speed they
can use. I do not know how easy it would be to enforce. I have almost
been hit while standing on a sidewalk and a young person whizzed
by.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:19 AM
keep motorized vehicles off shared paths
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:22 AM
Thank you fir being proactive in this important conversation.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:24 AM
Thank you for the survey! As seniors and 35 year residents of Dublin,
we try to stay away from Columbus and places where these devices
are not closely regulated.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:30 AM
I observe mini electric bikes (essentially electric dirt bikes) and
scooters zooming on sidewalks and streets almost daily. As a parent
to 3 children under 10 in Dublin, it’s frustrating. Kids meet up at the
North Pool/Wyndot and Asherton Apartments, among other places,
and jump the small hills, tearing up the grass and literally whizzing
inches by our kids on their little bikes. When I’m running on our
beautiful bike trails, the mini bikes or electric scooters will FLY past
me, and it’s common for me to see scooters and motorbikes zoom
down the street, no license plate of course, going WELL above the
speed limit of 25mph. It’s dangerous to cars, bikers, joggers, kids. I
don’t feel like there’s currently a recourse or way to report this
activity, and I honestly don’t know it it’s even legal (it technically might
be) so there’s some confusion on my end as well. Would love
clarification on the rules, and enforcement to follow. It’s not enough to
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 69 of 75
require helmets, I’d say 95%+ riders I see do wear helmets, so the
problem is that they are operating a high powered vehicle at high
speed with no license, training, awareness or rules. I think the
solution is rule simplification, followed by violation confiscation.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:41 AM
Support safety measures.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:41 AM
I have seen dirt bikes and mopeds used on city streets.i thought dirt
bikes were prohibited on city streets.These Dirt bike users are wild,
irrational drivers and zip in and out of traffic. Usually riding in groups. I
have seen single dirt bikes sometimes speeding down Dublin Rd.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 06:05 AM
The use of e-bikes by adults 21 and over should be supported. We
should be able to ride them everywhere (streets, bike paths, etc. but
kids should have restrictions. The use of the mini motorcycles should
be limited. In all cases if it has a motor you should need a license and
must follow rules. It on roads, follow all rules of the road, if on bike
path, follow those rules. There should be speed limits on bike paths.
And if on roads follow posted speed limits. Big penalties if you break
rules. Impound bike, skate boards.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 06:06 AM
After living in Boise, ID for several years where I saw the use
evolution of these micromolity devices, what worked and didn't work. I
prefer to see people on bikes and e-bikes as they can more easily be
controlled on roads and are more visible to motorists. I think all bikes
are inherently safer than scooters, skateboards etc. which can really
be misused (doubling-up without helmets on scooters is a good
example). It may be worth the money for a few employees from the
City of Dublin to visit a city like Boise and see what they do to learn
while riding the city before implementing any major changes in
Dublin.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 06:09 AM
Implementing and maintaining these rules helps protect both the
riders and the pedestrians around them.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 06:18 AM
Please limit their availability. Walking is great for your health and
much safer for other pedestrians. Also, I nearly hit a rider crosswalk
ng the road and not following the street laws. Roders are very hard to
see when I’m driving.
Anonymous It’s a real problem with kids flying around on these. Rhey go so fast
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 70 of 75
12/24/2025 06:25 AM and accidents are bound to happen. Seems like its currently a free for
all.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 06:26 AM
Very much needed since parents don't seem to care
Anonymous
12/24/2025 06:39 AM
nope
Anonymous
12/24/2025 06:42 AM
While I have a negative opinion of micromobility devices and their use
in our community, I understand that they are here to stay. Any and all
methods to get users to operate these devices safer and slower gets
my full support.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 06:53 AM
not at this time
Anonymous
12/24/2025 07:39 AM
E-bikes are regularly used on the shared-use paths. There are many
locations throughout the city, where sight distance is limited and pose
a risk to runners. Example…curves on the Dublin Rd. SUP, just south
of River Forest Rd. I’ve experienced or seen many close calls in this
area. Similarly through most of the tunnels with e-bikes traveling at
fast speeds.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 08:10 AM
We have a neighbor whose children who have been riding these
things for the last ten years. Every year they have something newer,
faster and more powerful. I have watched them do some of the most
stupid and dangerous things for a long time and I believe we are way
overdue for safety rules and enforcement.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 08:27 AM
I have been on bike paths and sidewalks numerous times and have
had scooters and minature motorcycles come from both behind and in
front of me at high speeds that I would consider unsafe. This can be
especially unsafe at night and when walking a dog. For them to slow
down and announcing their approach from behind would be
appreciated. My father in law has stopped walking on the paths as he
is hard of hearing and if the audible warning is not loud enough he
has been startled enough to fall out of the way. Many of these devices
are so quiet you do not know they are near you until they have
actually passed you when coming from behind. Based on this I do not
see teenagers complying with announcing their presence and the
only resolution may be having them used only on the roads which
has its own safety concern.
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 71 of 75
Anonymous
12/24/2025 08:29 AM
While many of the micromobility riders that I have encountered ride in
a safe and courteous manner, there are definitely those that do not
respect the safety of others and ride in an unsafe manner around
those on foot or traditional bicycles such as passing at high speed in
very close proximity. Also when approaching from behind,
micromobility devices can be nearly silent such that if the rider does
not somehow announce that they are intending to pass, there is
significant risk of collision from unexpected movements.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 09:49 AM
No
Anonymous
12/24/2025 10:08 AM
I know Dublin wants to " get things right" before instituting rules. But
they need to get a handle on this quickly. Otherwise behaviors will
become habits.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 12:24 PM
I have observed miniature motorcycles on walking paths. On one
occasion, I observed that the young person did not yield to
pedestrians and seemed to lack good balance. I have been driving on
a residential street, and 4 young people were riding micromobility
devices. The were in the middle of the street. They were weaving
onto side streets still in the middle of the street. None wore helmets.
Better safety measures need to be instituted. If the parents/adults are
going to allow a child to use the devices, they should be accountable
for safety, monitoring, and liable if an accident occurs. These devices
should not "take over" the walking paths! Thank you.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 12:29 PM
Start by enforcing what regulations we have; such as the mini
motorcycle rule cited above that I had no idea we had based on how
frequently I see them on shared use paths. Absolutely need to
physically separate the so-called bike lane on Muirfield Drive from the
driving lanes such as by high curb or small curbs and median before
a vulnerable road user is killed based on how frequently I see cars go
into the bike lane; especially when it is an inside curve. Cars use it as
a racetrack extension of the driving lane. Otherwise remove the bike
lane; it is completely disfunctional for venerable road users.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 01:15 PM
Please start enforcing any existing laws on the idiots who seem to
believe that they are above the law.
Anonymous To keep things simple, I think only nonmotorized vehicles should be
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 72 of 75
12/24/2025 01:44 PM allowed on bike paths (with the exception of wheelchairs and carts
needed for people with mobility issues).. this also encourages
exercise.
Anonymous
12/24/2025 05:14 PM
I think these micromobility devices are pushing out the Residents who
just want to take a calm, quiet walk without the fear of a device
coming up behind them and speeding past them. Do you have the
staff to enforce these new rules?
Anonymous
12/25/2025 04:57 AM
Regulations need to catch up to current realities. These devices are
everywhere and we are currently expecting our youth to police
themselves.
Anonymous
12/25/2025 07:44 AM
I believe all these micromobility devices are actually increasing the
risks of accidents, both on the road with cars and on the sidewalks
with pedestrians. Not sure that we want to encourage even more
devices, since Dublin is already a very congested area to begin with,
especailly with the narrow streets in the new Bridge Park area and
with the buildings so close to the road in the historic part. Enforcing
rules would be great.
Anonymous
12/25/2025 08:15 AM
ALL riders, regardless of age should wear a helmet. No one plans on
having a mishap yet bad things happen and brain injuries in
particular, can be life altering.
Anonymous
12/25/2025 11:21 AM
The current signs on shared use paths should be updated. They state
"no motorized vehicles" or "no motorized bicycles" which is too broad
as it covers anything with an electric motor or gasoline engine.
Anonymous
12/25/2025 11:34 AM
Some use the road and no helmets
Anonymous
12/25/2025 01:51 PM
Just glad City is considering.
Anonymous
12/25/2025 03:40 PM
No
Anonymous
12/26/2025 04:23 AM
Perhaps consider licenses and some safety courses that are required
for use.
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 73 of 75
Anonymous
12/26/2025 04:48 AM
No
Anonymous
12/26/2025 05:55 AM
Ban all motorized devices anywhere that pedestrians can walk. We
don’t need scooters and e-bikes anywhere in Dublin.
Anonymous
12/26/2025 09:45 AM
The miniature motorcycles are the only devices that really are
annoying because they are wider than an eBike and eScooter and
seem to go faster than both. Those I feel need regulated vs the other.
Anonymous
12/26/2025 10:22 AM
Certification classes required for all micro mobility users. It would be
mandatory for 16 and under driving electrics devices. . The class
would teach the laws, safety, proper driving, speed limit, and signs.
Upon passing you should get a picture license. The reason for this
need is that electric devices can travel at speeds > 20 mph.
Anonymous
12/27/2025 05:14 AM
I've seen kids get aggressive with these micromobility devices and
hurt other kids. This includes electic scooters which are some of the
more easy devices to see getting your head around on the paths.
Anonymous
12/27/2025 05:38 AM
I like the idea of holding parents responsible for their children
following the rules, but I also think it would be beneficial for the rec
center or safety dept provide safety classes kids need to take before
riding a motorized device. Similar to a drivers test or babysitting test.
My biggest concern is people not being considerate of pedestrians
and pets.
Anonymous
12/27/2025 06:43 AM
I do know that helmetless electric scooter riders, especially young
teens, who are either riding their own electric scooters, or renting
them have become an issue in neighboring cities.
Anonymous
12/27/2025 09:41 AM
We need to connect current shared-use paths to frequently traveled
locations for minors - Perimeter shopping plaza areas, Darree Fields,
etc.
Anonymous
12/27/2025 09:44 AM
no
Anonymous I would like to see an area where devices can be used safely. My
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 74 of 75
12/28/2025 04:20 AM concern is that a lot of children are using these devices without safety
features, understanding of “rules of the road”, parental supervision, or
the knowledge of the dangers posed when interacting with other
mobility devices.
Anonymous
12/28/2025 08:25 AM
limiting the speed of these motorized devices would be a good first
step
Mandatory Question (312 response(s))
Question type: Essay Question
Micromobility Proposed Code Amendments Survey : Survey Report for 12 December 2022 to 28 December 2025
Page 75 of 75
ORD 01-26
Amending Various Sections of Noise Ordinances:
§ 72.021 – Loud Noise from a Motor Vehicle,
§ 72.022 – No Engine Brakes Permitted,
§132.03 – Disorderly Conduct, and
§153.076 – Public Nuisance
Transportation & Mobility
February 9, 2026
Affected Code Sections
New and Updated Code Sections:
§72.021 – Loud Noise from a Motor Vehicle
§72.022 – No Engine Break Permitted
§132.03 – Disorderly Conduct
§153.076 – Public Nuisance
City Vehicle Noise
Engine
Brake
Prohibition
Disorderly
Conduct
Public Nuisance
Noise Notes
Dublin
(propos-
ed)
Speakers or
stereos: 80 dBA
Speed limit
>35mph: 90
dBA
Speed limit ≤35:
86 dBA
Yes 80 decibels for
15 minutes at
50-feet
80 decibels for
more than 15
minutes; and
prohibits
pervasive noise
below 80dBA
Provides for
quantitative noise
thresholds over all
three types of noise,
permits enforcement
for pervasive noise
issues.
New
Albany
No loud sound
system that can
be clearly heard
from 50 feet.
§331.44
Yes
§337.20
“Unreasonable
noise”; no
technical
measurements
§509.03
no technical noise
measurements;
noise clearly
heard from 50
feet. §521.14
No technical
measurements.
Wester-
ville No loud sound
systems that can
be heard from
50 feet. §337.30
No
“Unreasonable
noise”; no
technical
measurements
§517.03
Multi-tier, time-
based rules. §518
Uses technical
measurements and
multiple tiers.
Colum-
bus
No loud sound
systems that can
be heard from
50 feet.
§2137.27
No “Unreasonable
noise”; no
technical
measurements.
§2317.11
Sound measured
at distances
ranging from 25-
100 feet, uses 1-
hour average
sound for decibel
measurement.
§2329.11
Most-detailed system;
uses a longer time-
range for decibel
measurement; varying
distances as well.
Bexley No loud sound
systems that can
be heard from
50 feet. §432.42
No “Unreasonable
noise”; no
technical
measurements.
§648.04
Noise must be
“loud,
unnecessary,
unusual” and/or
“disturbing.”
§648.11
Uses qualitative criteria
only
Worth-
ington
Unnecessary
vehicle noises
(revving, racing
motor) are
prohibited.
§331.36
No
“Unreasonable
noise”; no
technical
measurements.
§509.03
Sets dBA levels
for certain
commercial and
industrial uses
§1175.03
Dublin sets dBA
thresholds, while
Worthington sets it for
Commercial and
Industrial districts only;
no dBA for vehicles
Upper
Arling-
ton
Unnecessary
vehicle noise
that disrupts the
community is
prohibited.
§359.22
No
“Unreasonable
noise”; no
technical
measurements.
§517.01
“Unreasonably
loud, disturbing,
and unnecessary
noise” that
disrupts the
community is
prohibited.
§517.14
No technical and/or
quantitative
measurements.
Hilliard
Limited vehicle-
specific rules.
§337.20
No
“Unreasonable
noise”; no
technical
measurements.
§509.03
Sets varying
thresholds per
district and time;
uses both dBA
and dBC. §531.03
Most-technical
approach.
Community
Benchmarking
Adoption at the second reading/public hearing on February 9, 2026.
Recommendation
Thank You
Micromobility Code (Redline)
§ 72.085 OPERATION OF ELECTRIC PERSONAL ASSISTIVE MOBILITY DEVICES.
(A) (1) Electric personal assistive mobility devices may be operated on the public streets, highways,
sidewalks, and paths and portions of roadways set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles in accordance
with this section.
(2) Except as otherwise provided in this section, those sections of this Trafflc Code that by their
nature are applicable to an electric personal assistive mobility device apply to the device and the person
operating it whenever it is operated upon any public street, highway, sidewalk, or path or upon any
portion of a roadway set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles.
(3) The municipality may regulate or prohibit the operation of electric personal assistive mobility
devices on public streets, highways, sidewalks, and paths, or portions of roadways set aside for the
exclusive use of bicycles, under its jurisdiction.
(B) No operator of an electric personal assistive mobility device shall do any of the following:
(1) Fail to yield the right-of-way to all pedestrians and human-powered vehicles at all times;
(2) Fail to give an audible signal before overtaking and passing a pedestrian;
(3) Operate the device at night unless the device or its operator is equipped with or wearing both of
the following:
(a) A lamp pointing to the front that emits a white light visible from a distance of not less than 500
feet;
(b) A red refiector facing the rear that is visible from all distances from 100 feet to 600 feet when
directly in front of lawful lower beams of head lamps on a motor vehicle;
(4) Operate the device on any portion of a street or highway that has an established speed limit of 55
miles per hour or more;
(5) Operate the device upon any path set aside for the exclusive use of pedestrians or other specialized
use when an appropriate sign giving notice of the specialized use is posted on the path;
(6) If under 18 years of age, operate the device unless wearing a protective helmet on the person’s
head with the chin strap properly fastened;
(7) If under 16 years of age, operate the device unless, during the operation, the person is under the
direct visual and audible supervision of another person who is 18 years of age or older and is responsible
for the immediate care of the person under 16 years of age.
(C) No person who is under 14 years of age shall operate an electric personal assistive mobility device.
(D) No person shall distribute or sell an electric personal assistive mobility device unless the device is
accompanied by a written statement that is substantially equivalent to the following: “WARNING: TO
REDUCE THE RISK OF SERIOUS INJURY, USE ONLY WHILE WEARING FULL PROTECTIVE
EQUIPMENT –
(E) Nothing in this section affects or shall be construed to affect any rule of the Director of Natural
Resources or a board of park district commissioners governing the operation of vehicles on lands under
the control of the Director or board, as applicable.
(F) Penalty.
(1) Whoever violates division (B) or (C) of this section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor and shall be
punished as follows:
(a) The offender shall be flned $10;
(b) If the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to a violation of division (B) or
(C) of this section or a substantially similar state law or municipal ordinance, the court, in addition to
imposing the flne required under division (F)(1)(a) of this section, shall do one of the following:
1. Order the impoundment for not less than one day but not more than 30 days of the electric
personal assistive mobility device that was involved in the current violation of that division. The court
shall order the device to be impounded at a safe indoor location designated by the court and may assess
storage fees of not more than $5 per day; provided the total storage, processing, and release fees assessed
against the offender or the device in connection with the device’s impoundment or subse quent release
shall not exceed $50.
2. If the court does not issue an impoundment order pursuant to division (F)(1)(b)1. of this section,
issue an order prohibiting the offender from operating any electric personal assistive mobility device on
the public streets, highways, sidewalks, and paths and portions of roadways set aside for the exclusive
use of bicycles for not less than one day but not more than 30 days.
(2) Whoever violates division (D) of this section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor.
(R.C. § 4511.512) Penalty, see § 70.99
CHAPTER 75: BICYCLES, ELECTRIC BICYCLES, MICROMOBILITY DEVICES,
MOTORCYCLES, MINIATURE MOTORCYCLES, MOTORIZED BICYCLES, ROLLER
SKATES, SKATEBOARDS, AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, SLEDS, SNOWMOBILES,
AND TOY VEHICLES
§ 75.01 CODE APPLICATION TO BICYCLES, ELECTRIC BICYCLES, AND
MICROMOBILITY DEVICES.
(A) The provisions of this Trafflc Code that are applicable to bicycles and, electric bicycles, motorized
bicycles, and micromobility devices apply whenever a bicycle or, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or
micromobility device is operated upon any street, shared-use path, sidewalk, or upon any path set aside
for the exclusive use of bicycles.
(B) Except as provided in division (D) of this section, a bicycle operator, or electric bicycle operator, or
micromobility device operator who violates any provisions of this title described in division (A) of this
section that is applicable to bicycles or, electric bicycles, or micromobility devices may be issued a ticket,
citation, or summons by a law enforcement offlcer for the violation in the same manner as the operator
of a motor vehicle would be cited for the same violation. A person who commits any such violation while
operating a bicycle, or electric bicycle, or micromobility device shall not have any points assessed against
the person’s driver’s license, commercial driver’s license, temporary instruction permit, or probationary
license under R.C. § 4510.036.
(C) Except as provided in division (D) of this section, in the case of a violation of any provision of this
title described in division (A) of this section by a bicycle operator, electric bicycle operator, micromobility
device operator, or motor vehicle operator when the trier of fact flnds that the violation by the motor
vehicle operator endangered the lives of bicycle riders, or electric bicycle riders, or micromobility device
riders at the time of the violation, the court, notwithstanding any provision of the Ohio Revised Code to
the contrary, may require the bicycle operator, electric bicycle operator, micromobility operator, or motor
vehicle operator to take and successfully complete a bicycling skills course approved by the court in
addition to or in lieu of any penalty otherwise prescribed by this Trafflc Code or the Ohio Revised Code
for that violation.
(D) Divisions (B) and (C) of this section do not apply to violations of R.C. § 4511.19, or a substantially
equivalent municipal ordinance.
(R.C. § 4511.52)
(E) The provisions of this Trafflc Code shall apply to bicycles, electric bicycles, and micromobility
devices, except those which by their nature are not applicable.
('80 Code, § 373.01)
§ 75.02 RULES FOR BICYCLES, ELECTRIC BICYCLES, MOTORIZED BICYCLES,
MICROMOBILITY DEVICES, MOTORCYCLES AND SNOWMOBILES.
(A) For purposes of this section SNOWMOBILE has the same meaning as given that term in R.C. §
4519.01.
(B) RULES FOR OPERATION
(1) No person operating a bicycle or electric bicycle shall ride other than upon or astride the
permanent and regular seat attached thereto or carry any other person upon such bicycle or electric
bicycle other than upon a flrmly attached and regular seat thereon, and no person shall ride upon a
bicycle or electric bicycle other than upon such a flrmly attached and regular seat.
(2) No person operating a micromobility device shall ride other than upon or astride the permanent
and regular platform attached thereto, and no person shall ride upon a micromobility device other than
upon such a flrmly attached and regular platform.
(23) No person operating a motorcycle shall ride other than upon or astride the permanent and
regular seat or saddle attached thereto, or carry any other person upon such motorcycle other than upon
a flrmly attached and regular seat or saddle thereon, and no person shall ride upon a motorcycle other
than upon such a flrmly attached and regular seat or saddle.
(34) No person shall ride upon a motorcycle that is equipped with a saddle other than while sitting
astride the saddle, facing forward, with one leg on each side of the motorcycle.
(45) No person shall ride upon a motorcycle that is equipped with a seat other than while sitting upon
the seat.
(56) No person operating a bicycle or electric bicycle shall carry any package, bundle or article that
prevents the driver from keeping at least one hand upon the handle bars.
(7) No person operating a micromobility device shall carry any package, bundle, or article that
prevents the user from utilizing both the handlebars and the standing platform.
(68) No bicycle, electric bicycle, micromobility device, motorized bicycle, or motorcycle shall be used
to carry more persons at one time than the number for which it is designed and equipped.
(9) No motorcycle shall be operated on a highway when the handlebars rise higher than the
shoulders of the operator when the operator is seated in the operator’s seat or saddle.
(C) (1) Except as provided in division (C)(3) of this section, no person shall operate or be a passenger on
a snowmobile or motorcycle without using safety glasses or other protective eye device. Except as
provided in division (C)(3) of this section, no person who is under the age of 18 years, or who holds a
motorcycle operator’s endorsement or license bearing a “novice” designation that is currently in effect as
provided in R.C. § 4507.13, shall operate a motorcycle on a highway, or be a passenger on a motorcycle,
unless wearing a protective helmet on the person’s head, and no other person shall be a passenger on a
motorcycle operated by such a person unless similarly wearing a protective helmet. The helmet, safety
glasses, or other protective eye device shall conform with rules adopted by the Ohio Director of Public
Safety. The provisions of this paragraph or a violation thereof shall not be used in the trial of any civil
action.
(2) (a) Except as provided in division (C)(3) of this section, no person shall operate a motorcycle with a
valid temporary instruction permit and temporary instruction permit identiflcation card issued by the
Registrar of Motor Vehicles pursuant to R.C. § 4507.05 unless the person, at the time of such operation, is
wearing on the person’s head a protective helmet that conforms with rules adopted by the Ohio Director
of Public Safety.
(b) No person shall operate a motorcycle with a valid temporary instruction permit and temporary
instruction permit identiflcation card issued by the Registrar of Motor Vehicles pursuant to R.C. § 4507.05
in any of the following circumstances:
1. At any time when lighted lights are required by R.C. § 4513.03(A)(1);
2. While carrying a passenger;
3. On any limited access highway or heavily congested roadway.
(3) Divisions (C)(1) and (C)(2)(a) of this section do not apply to a person who operates or is a passenger
in an autocycle or cab-enclosed motorcycle when the occupant compartment top is in place enclosing the
occupants.
(D) Nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting the carrying of a child in a seat or trailer
that is designed for carrying children and is flrmly attached to the bicycle or electric bicycle.
(E) Except as otherwise provided in this division, whoever violates division (B) or (C)(1) or (C)(2) of this
section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has
been convicted of or pleaded guilty to one predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offense, whoever violates
division (B) or (C)(1) or (C)(2) of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If, within one
year of the offense, the offender previously has been convicted of two or more predicate motor vehicle or
trafflc offenses, whoever violates division (B) or (C)(1) or (C)(2) of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor of
the third degree.
(R.C. § 4511.53) ('80 Code, § 373.02) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.03 ATTACHING MOTORCYCLE, MINIATURE MOTORCYCLE, BICYCLE,
ELECTRIC BICYCLE, MOTORIZED BICYCLE, MICROMOBILITY DEVICE, ROLLER
SKATES, OR SLED, SKATEBOARD, OR TOY VEHICLE TO VEHICLE.
(A) (1) No person riding upon any motorcycle, miniature motorcycle, bicycle, electric bicycle,
motorized bicycle, micromobility device, coaster, roller skates, sled, skateboard, or toy vehicle shall attach
the same or self to any vehicle upon a roadway.
(2) No operator shall knowingly permit any person riding upon any motorcycle, miniature
motorcycle, bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, micromobility device, coaster, roller skates, sled,
skateboard, or toy vehicle to attach the same or self to any vehicle while it is moving upon a roadway.
This section does not apply to the towing of a disabled vehicle.
(B) Except as otherwise provided in this division, whoever violates this section is guilty of a minor
misdemeanor. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded
guilty to one predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offense, whoever violates this section is guilty of a
misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been
convicted of two or more predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offenses, whoever violates this s ection is
guilty of a misdemeanor of the third degree.
(C) If the offender commits the offense while distracted and the distracting activity is a contributing
factor to the commission of the offense, the offender is subject to the additional flne established under
§ 70.99(B).
(R.C. § 4511.54) ('80 Code, § 373.03) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.04 RIDING BICYCLES, AND MICROMOBILITY DEVICES, MOTORIZED BICYCLES,
AND MOTORCYCLES ABREAST.
(A) Persons riding bicycles, electric bicycles, micromobility devices, motorized bicycles, or motorcycles
upon a roadway shall ride not more than two abreast in a single lane, except on paths or parts of
roadways set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles, electric bicycles, micromobility devices, motorized
bicycles, or motorcycles.
(B) This section does not require a person operating a bicycle or, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or
micromobility device to ride at the edge of the roadway when it is unreasonable or unsafe to do so.
Conditions that may require riding away from the edge of the roadway include when necessary to avoid
flxed or moving objects, parked or moving vehicles, surface hazards, or if it otherwise is unsafe or
impracticable to do so, including if the lane is too narrow for the bicycle or, electric bicycle, motorized
bicycle, or micromobility device and an overtaking vehicle to travel safely side by side within the lane.
(C) Except as otherwise provided in this division, whoever violates this section is guilty of a minor
misdemeanor. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded
guilty to one predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offense, whoever violates this section is guilty of a
misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been
convicted of two or more predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offenses, whoever violates this section is
guilty of a misdemeanor of the third degree.
(D) If the offender commits the offense while distracted and the distracting activity is a contributing
factor to the commission of the offense, the offender is subject to the additional flne established under
§ 70.99(B).
(R.C. § 4511.55(B), (C), (D)) ('80 Code, § 373.04) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.05 SIGNAL DEVICES ON BICYCLES, ELECTRIC BICYCLES, MOTORIZED
BICYCLES, AND MICROMOBILITY DEVICES.
(A) Every bicycle, or electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device when in use at the
times specifled in § 74.02, shall be equipped with the following:
(1) A lamp mounted on the front of either the bicycle or, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle,
micromobility device, or the operator that shall emit a white light visible from a distance of at least 500
feet to the front and 300 feet to the sides. A generator-powered lamp that emits light only when the
bicycle or, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device is moving may be used to meet this
requirement.
(2) A red refiector on the rear that shall be visible from all distances from 100 feet to 600 feet to the
rear when directly in front of lawful lower beams of head lamps on a motor vehicle;
(3) A lamp emitting either fiashing or steady red light visible from a distance of 500 feet to the rear
shall be used in addition to the red refiector. If the red lamp performs as a refiector in that it is visible as
specifled in division (A)(2) of this section, the red lamp may serve as the refiector and a separate refiector
is not required.
(B) Additional lamps and refiectors may be used in addition to those required under division (A) of this
section, except that red lamps and red refiectors shall not be used on the front of the bicycle or electric
bicycle and white lamps and white refiectors shall not be used on the rear of the bicycle or electric
bicycle.
(C) A bicycle or, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device may be equipped with a
device capable of giving an audible signal, except that a bicycle or, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or
micromobility device shall not be equipped with nor shall any person use upon a bicycle , or electric
bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device any siren or whistle.
(D) Every bicycle, and electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device shall be equipped
with an adequate brake when used on a shared-use path, sidewalk, street or highway.
(E) Except as otherwise provided in this division, whoever violates this section is guilty of a minor
misdemeanor. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded
guilty to one predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offense, whoever violates this section is guilty of a
misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been
convicted of two or more predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offenses, whoever violates this s ection is
guilty of a misdemeanor of the third degree.
(R.C. § 4511.56)
(F) Motorized bicycles shall be equipped with rearview mirrors.
(Ord. 36-84, passed 8-6-84)
('80 Code, § 373.06) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.06 RIDING ON ROADWAY, SHARED-USE PATHS, SIDEWALKS, TRAILS, AND
OTHER AREAS.
(A) Every person operating a bicycle, electric bicycle, or motorized bicycle, or micromobility device
upon a roadway shall ride as near to the right side of the roadway as practicable obeying all trafflc rules
applicable to vehicles and exercising due care when passing a standing vehicle or one proceeding in the
same direction.
(Ord. 53-82, passed 10-18-82)
(B) Every person operating a bicycle, or electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device
upon the roadway shall operate such vehicle within three feet of the right edge of the roadway.
(Ord. 36-84, passed 8-6-84)
('80 Code, § 373.07) Penalty, see § 70.99
(B) (1) The City Manager or his or her designee is authorized to designate where and at what speed
bicycles, electric bicycles, motorized bicycles, or micromobility devices may be operated based on trafflc
and pedestrian safety considerations, including prohibiting the operation of certain devices on certain
streets, sidewalks, paths, or trails and establishing maximum speed limits when operating a device on
certain streets, sidewalks, trails, and other related paths within the public right-of-way.
(2) The operation of bicycles, class 1 and class 2 electric bicycles, and micromobility devices is
permitted on sidewalks, shared-use paths, and paths set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles, unless the
City Manager or his or her designee prohibits or otherwise restricts the devices’ use on such a path.
(3) No person shall operate a bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device on a
path that is intended to be used primarily for mountain biking, hiking, equestrian use, or other similar
uses, or any other single track or natural surface trail that has historically been reserved for non -
motorized use, unless the City Manager or his or her designee authorizes the use on such a path.
(C) No person shall operate a miniature motorcycle on any public roadway, shared-use path, or
sidewalk, or in any public park. This prohibition applies to miniature motorcycles powered by any type
of engine or motor, including but not limited to gas-powered miniature motorcycles and electric-powered
miniature motorcycles.
(D) No person shall operate a micromobility device, bicycle, electric bicycle, or miniature motorcycle in
a parking garage.
(E) No person shall operate a motorized bicycle on any public sidewalk or shared-use path, unless
otherwise permitted by the City Manager or his or her designee.
(F) No person shall operate a micromobility device on a public roadway with a speed limit greater than
25 miles per hour.
§ 75.07 RECKLESS OPERATION.
No person shall operate a bicycle, electric bicycle, or motorized bicycle, micromobility device, or other
similar device:
(A) Without due regard for the safety and rights of pedestrians and drivers and occupants of all other
vehicles, and so as to endanger the life, limb or property of any person while in the lawful use of the
streets or sidewalks or any other public or private property;
(B) Without exercising reasonable and ordinary control over such bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized
bicycle, micromobility device, or similar device;
(C) In a weaving or zigzag course unless such irregular course is necessary for safe operation in
compliance with law;
(D) As applicable per bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, micromobility device, or other similar
device, Wwithout both hands upon the handle grips except when necessary to give the required hand
and aim signals, or as provided in § 75.02(D);
(E) At a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing.
('80 Code, § 373.08) (Ord. 53-82, passed 10-18-82) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.08 PARKING OF BICYCLE, ELECTRIC BICYCLE, OR MOTORIZED BICYCLE, OR
MICROMOBILITY DEVICE.
(A) No person shall park a bicycle, electric bicycle, or motorized bicycle, or micromobility device upon
a sidewalk in such a manner so as to unduly interfere with pedestrian trafflc or upon a roadway so as to
unduly interfere with vehicular trafflc.
(B) No bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device shall be parked along a
sidewalk such that it leaves an unobstructed path of less than four feet.
(C) When parking a bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device, the device
shall not block motor vehicle driving lanes, bicycle lanes, driveways and driveway approaches, loading
zones, pedestrian paths, shared-use paths, building entrances, curb ramps, crosswalks, or benches.
('80 Code, § 373.09) (Ord. 53-82, passed 10-18-82) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.09 MOTORIZED BICYCLE OPERATION, EQUIPMENT AND LICENSE.
(A) No person shall operate a motorized bicycle upon a highway or any public or private property used
by the public for purposes of vehicular travel or parking, unless all of the following conditions are met:
(1) The person is 14 or 15 years of age and holds a valid probationary motorized bicycle license issued
after the person has passed the test provided for in this section, or the person is 16 years of age or older
and holds either a valid commercial driver's license issued under R.C. Chapter 4506 or a driver's license
issued under R.C. Chapter 4507 or a valid motorized bicycle license issued after the person has passed the
test provided for in this section, except that if a person is 16 years of age, has a valid probationary
motorized bicycle license and desires a motorized bicycle license, he isthey are not required to comply
with the testing requirements provided for in this section;
(2) The motorized bicycle is equipped in accordance with the rules adopted under division (B) of this
section and is in proper working order.
(3) The person, if under 18 years of age, is wearing a protective helmet on the person's head with the
chin strap properly fastened and the motorized bicycle is equipped with a rear -view mirror.
(4) The person operates the motorized bicycle when practicable within 3 feet of the right edge of the
roadway obeying all trafflc rules applicable to vehicles.
(B) The Director of Public Safety, subject to R.C. §§ 119.01 through 119.13, shall adopt and promulgate
rules concerning protective helmets, the equipment of motorized bicycles, and the testing and
qualiflcations of persons who do not hold a valid driver's or commercial driver's license. The test shall be
as near as practicable to the examination required for a motorcycle operator's endorsement under R.C. §
4507.11. The test shall also require the operator to give an actual demonstration of the operator's ability
to operate and control a motorized bicycle by driving one under the supervision of an examining offlcer.
(C) Every motorized bicycle license expires on the birthday of the applicant in the fourth or eighth year
after the date it is issued, based on the period of renewal requested by the applicant. No motorized
bicycle license shall be issued for a period longer than eight years. A person who is 65 years of age or
older may only apply for a motorized bicycle license that expires on the birthday of the applicant in the
fourth year after the date it is issued.
(D) No person operating a motorized bicycle shall carry another person upon the motorized bicycle.
(E) The protective helmet and rear-view mirror required by division (A)(3) of this section shall, on and
after January 1, 1985, conform with rules adopted by the director under division (B) of this section.
(F) Whoever violates division (A), (D), or (E) of this section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor. (R.C. §
4511.521) ('80 Code, § 373.10)
(G) As used in this Code, ELECTRIC PERSONAL ASSISTIVE MOBILITY DEVICE means a self-
balancing two non-tandem wheeled device that is designed to transport only one person, has an electric
propulsion system of an average of 750 watts, and when ridden on a paved level surface by an operator
who weighs 170 pounds has a maximum speed of less than 20 miles per hour.
(R.C. § 4501.01(TT)) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.10 ELECTRIC BICYCLES.
(A) (1) On and after January 1, 2020, manufacturers and distributors of electric bicycles shall
permanently afflx a label, in a prominent location, to each electric bicycle. The label shall specify
whether the electric bicycle is a class 1, class 2, or class 3 electric bicycle, the top assisted speed that the
electric bicycle is capable of reaching, and the motor wattage of the electric bicycle.
(2) No person shall modify an electric bicycle in a manner that changes the top assisted speed that the
electric bicycle is capable of reaching unless the person also modifles the label required under division
(A)(1) of this section to refiect the modiflcation.
(B) (1) The manufacturer of an electric bicycle shall ensure that the electric bicycle complies with the
equipment and manufacturing requirements for bicycles established by the consumer product safety
commission under 16 C.F.R. §§ 1512 et seq.
(2) The manufacturer shall manufacture all class 1 electric bicycles and class 3 electric bicycles so that
when the rider ceases pedaling the electric motor ceases to provide assistance. The manufacturer shall
manufacture all class 2 electric bicycles so that when the rider applies the brakes or releases or activates a
switch or similar mechanism the electric motor ceases to provide assistance.
(3) All class 3 electric bicycles shall be equipped with a speedometer that displays the speed of the
electric bicycle in miles per hour.
(C) (1) The operation of a class 1 electric bicycle and a class 2 electric bicycle is permitted on a path set
aside for the exclusive use of bicycles or on a shared-use path, unless the county, township, municipal
corporation, other local authority, or state agency as deflned in R.C. § 1.60 with control over the path by
resolution, ordinance, or rule prohibits the use of a class 1 electric bicycle or class 2 electric bicycle on
such a path.
(2) No person shall operate a class 3 electric bicycle on a path set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles
or a shared-use path unless that path is within or adjacent to a highway or the county, township,
municipal corporation, or local authority, or state agency as deflned in R.C. § 1.60 with control over the
path by resolution, ordinance, or rule authorizes the use of a class 3 electric bicycle on such a path.
(3) No person shall operate a class 1 electric bicycle, a class 2 electric bicycle, or a class 3 electric
bicycle on a path that is intended to be used primarily for mountain biking, hiking, equestrian use, or
other similar uses, or any other single track or natural surface trail that has historically been reserved for
non- motorized use, unless the county, township, municipal corporation, other local authority, or state
agency as deflned in R.C. § 1.60 with control over the path by resolution, ordinance, or rule authorizes the
use of a class 1 electric bicycle, a class 2 electric bicycle, or a class 3 electric bicycle on such a path.
(4) Divisions (C)(2) and (C)(3) of this section do not apply to a law enforcement offlcer, or other person
sworn to enforce the criminal and trafflc laws of the state, using an electric bicycle while in the
performance of the offlcer's duties.
(D) (1) No person under 16 years of age shall operate a class 3 electric bicycle; however, a person under
16 years of age may ride as a passenger on a class 3 electric bicycle that is designed to accommodate
passengers.
(2) No person shall operate or be a passenger on a class 3 electric bicycle unless the person is wearing
a protective helmet that meets the standards established by the Consumer Product Safety Commission or
the American Society for Testing and Materials.
(E) (1) Except as otherwise provided in this division, whoever operates an electric bicycle in a manner
that is prohibited under division (C) of this section and whoever violates division (D) of this section is
guilty of a minor misdemeanor. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been
convicted of or pleaded guilty to one predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offense, whoever violates this
section is guilty of a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If, within one year of the offens e, the offender
previously has been convicted of two or more predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offenses, whoever
violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor of the third degree.
(2) The offenses established under division (E)(1) of this section are strict liability offenses and strict
liability is a culpable mental state for purposes of R.C. § 2901.20. The designation of these offenses as strict
liability offenses shall not be construed to imply that any other offense, for which there is no specifled
degree of culpability, is not a strict liability offense.
(R.C. § 4511.522)
§ 75.11 OPERATION OF ELECTRIC PERSONAL ASSISTIVE MOBILITY DEVICES.
(A) As used in this Code, ELECTRIC PERSONAL ASSISTIVE MOBILITY DEVICE means a self-
balancing two non-tandem wheeled device that is designed to transport only one person, has an electric
propulsion system of an average of 750 watts, and when ridden on a paved level surface by an operator
who weighs 170 pounds has a maximum speed of less than 20 miles per hour.
(B) (1) Electric personal assistive mobility devices may be operated on the public streets, highways,
sidewalks, and paths and portions of roadways set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles in accordance
with this section.
(2) Except as otherwise provided in this section, those sections of this Trafflc Code that by their
nature are applicable to an electric personal assistive mobility device apply to the device and the person
operating it whenever it is operated upon any public street, highway, sidewalk, or path or upon any
portion of a roadway set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles.
(3) The municipality may regulate or prohibit the operation of electric personal assistive mobility
devices on public streets, highways, sidewalks, and paths, or portions of roadways set aside for the
exclusive use of bicycles, under its jurisdiction.
(C) No operator of an electric personal assistive mobility device shall do any of the following:
(1) Fail to yield the right-of-way to all pedestrians and human-powered vehicles at all times;
(2) Fail to give an audible signal before overtaking and passing a pedestrian;
(3) Operate the device at night unless the device or its operator is equipped with or wearing both of
the following:
(a) A lamp pointing to the front that emits a white light visible from a distance of not less than 500
feet;
(b) A red refiector facing the rear that is visible from all distances from 100 feet to 600 feet when
directly in front of lawful lower beams of head lamps on a motor vehicle;
(4) Operate the device on any portion of a street or highway that has an established speed limit of 55
miles per hour or more;
(5) Operate the device upon any path set aside for the exclusive use of pedestrians or other specialized
use when an appropriate sign giving notice of the specialized use is posted on the path;
(6) If under 18 years of age, operate the device unless wearing a protective helmet on the person’s
head with the chin strap properly fastened;
(7) If under 16 years of age, operate the device unless, during the operation, the person is under the
direct visual and audible supervision of another person who is 18 years of age or older and is responsible
for the immediate care of the person under 16 years of age.
(D) No person who is under 14 years of age shall operate an electric personal assistive mobility device.
(E) No person shall distribute or sell an electric personal assistive mobility device unless the device is
accompanied by a written statement that is substantially equivalent to the following: “WARNING: TO
REDUCE THE RISK OF SERIOUS INJURY, USE ONLY WHILE WEARING FULL PROTECTIVE
EQUIPMENT –
(F) Nothing in this section affects or shall be construed to affect any rule of the Director of Natural
Resources or a board of park district commissioners governing the operation of vehicles on lands under
the control of the Director or board, as applicable.
(G) Penalty.
(1) Whoever violates division (B) or (C) of this section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor and shall be
punished as follows:
(a) The offender shall be flned $10;
(b) If the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to a violation of division (B) or
(C) of this section or a substantially similar state law or municipal ordinance, the court, in addition to
imposing the flne required under division (F)(1)(a) of this section, shall do one of the following:
1. Order the impoundment for not less than one day but not more than 30 days of the electric
personal assistive mobility device that was involved in the current violation of that division. The court
shall order the device to be impounded at a safe indoor location designated by the court and may assess
storage fees of not more than $5 per day; provided the total storage, processing, and release fees assessed
against the offender or the device in connection with the device’s impoundment or subse quent release
shall not exceed $50.
2. If the court does not issue an impoundment order pursuant to division (F)(1)(b)1. of this section,
issue an order prohibiting the offender from operating any electric personal assistive mobility device on
the public streets, highways, sidewalks, and paths and portions of roadways set aside for the exclusive
use of bicycles for not less than one day but not more than 30 days.
(2) Whoever violates division (D) of this section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor.
(R.C. § 4511.512) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.12 MICROMOBILITY DEVICES.
(A) “Micromobility device” means a device weighing less than 120 pounds, with one or two wheels, is
propelled by an electric motor or human power, and has an attainable speed on a paved level surface of
not more than 20 miles per hour when propelled by the electric motor. Electric skateboards are also
classifled as micromobility devices under this Code.
(B) A micromobility device does not include the following:
(1) Bicycle;
(2) Electric bicycle of any class;
(3) Electric powered wheelchair or other similar mobility devices regulated by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) or under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA);
(4) Miniature motorcycle or motorcycle;
(5) Motorized bicycle, moped, or scooter requiring an operator’s lienselicense or motorcycle
endorsement to operate on public roadways;
(6) Snowmobile;
(7) Any other device which can be deflned under a different name within this code, including Electric
Personal Assistive Mobility Devices as deflned in § 75.11 of this code and All-Purpose Vehicles as deflned
in § 75.20 of this code.
(C) No person shall operate a micromobility device unless:
(1) The operator yields the right-of-way to all pedestrians and human-powered vehicles;
(2) The operator gives an audible signal before overtaking and passing a pedestrian.
§ 75.13 Parental Responsibility.
(A) No parent or guardian of any child shall authorize or knowingly permit any such child to violate
any of the provisions of this chapter.
(B) Any person who violates this section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor for a flrst offense. If such
person commits a second offense within one year after the flrst offense, the person is guilty of a fourth-
degree misdemeanor. For each subsequent offense committed within one year of the flrst offense, the
person is guilty of a third-degree misdemeanor.
§ 75.14 MICROMOBILITY DEVICE FLEET COMPANY PERMITTING AND
OPERATION.
(A) “Micromobility Device Fleet Company” shall mean a company that manages a fieet of shared
micromobility devices and/or bicycles by deploying fieets within a designated service area under a
Memorandum of Understanding and with a permit.
(B) No Micromobility Device Fleet Company shall operate or be located in the public right of way
without entering into an agreement with the City.
(C) Micromobility Device Fleet Companies shall:
(1) not allow users to operate in public streets or the public right of way, unless authorized by the City
Manager or his or her designee;
(2) comply with all terms and conditions of the Micromobility Device Fleet Company’s permit or
other document providing privileges to operate in the public right of way; and
(3) comply with all applicable regulations promulgated by the City; and
(D) The City reserves the right to establish civil flnes or penalties for non-compliance with applicable
regulations. The City Manager is hereby authorized to establish such schedule of civil flnes or penalties,
which may include suspension of privileges to op erate a micromobility device fieet in the public right of
way.
§ 75.15 PENALTIES.
0127206.0607929 4914-8112-3966v8
(A) Unless a penalty has otherwise been prescribed in a section of Chapter 75, any person who violates
a provision in Chapter 75 is guilty of a minor misdemeanor for a flrst offense. If such person commits a
second offense within one year after the flrst offense, the person is guilty of a fourth-degree
misdemeanor. For each subsequent offense committed within one year of the flrst offense, the person is
guilty of a third-degree misdemeanor.
(B) In addition to the penalty prescribed in Section 75.15 (A), any person who violates a provision in
Chapter 75 while operating a bicycle, micromobility device, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, miniature
motorcycle, or other similar device may be subject to having such device impounded by the Dublin
Police Department.
Formatted: *LBFileStampAtCursor,FSC
Micromobility Code (Redline)
CHAPTER 75: BICYCLES, ELECTRIC BICYCLES, MICROMOBILITY DEVICES,
MOTORCYCLES, MINIATURE MOTORCYCLES, MOTORIZED BICYCLES, ROLLER
SKATES, SKATEBOARDS, RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, SLEDS, SNOWMOBILES, AND
TOY VEHICLES
§ 75.01 CODE APPLICATION TO BICYCLES, ELECTRIC BICYCLES, AND
MICROMOBILITY DEVICES.
(A) The provisions of this Trafflc Code that are applicable to bicycles, electric bicycles, motorized
bicycles, and micromobility devices apply whenever a bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or
micromobility device is operated upon any street, shared-use path, sidewalk, or upon any path set aside
for the exclusive use of bicycles.
(B) Except as provided in division (D) of this section, a bicycle operator, electric bicycle operator, or
micromobility device operator who violates any provisions of this title described in division (A) of this
section that is applicable to bicycles, electric bicycles, or micromobility devices may be issued a ticket,
citation, or summons by a law enforcement offlcer for the violation in the same manner as the operator
of a motor vehicle would be cited for the same violation. A person who commits any such violation while
operating a bicycle, electric bicycle, or micromobility device shall not have any points assessed against
the person’s driver’s license, commercial driver’s license, temporary instruction permit, or probationary
license under R.C. § 4510.036.
(C) Except as provided in division (D) of this section, in the case of a violation of any provision of this
title described in division (A) of this section by a bicycle operator, electric bicycle operator, micromobility
device operator, or motor vehicle operator when the trier of fact flnds that the violation by the motor
vehicle operator endangered the lives of bicycle riders, electric bicycle riders, or micromobility device
riders at the time of the violation, the court, notwithstanding any provision of the Ohio Revised Code to
the contrary, may require the bicycle operator, electric bicycle operator, micromobility operator, or motor
vehicle operator to take and successfully complete a bicycling skills course approved by the court in
addition to or in lieu of any penalty otherwise prescribed by this Trafflc Code or the Ohio Revised Code
for that violation.
(D) Divisions (B) and (C) of this section do not apply to violations of R.C. § 4511.19, or a substantially
equivalent municipal ordinance.
(R.C. § 4511.52)
(E) The provisions of this Trafflc Code shall apply to bicycles, electric bicycles, and micromobility
devices, except those which by their nature are not applicable.
('80 Code, § 373.01)
§ 75.02 RULES FOR BICYCLES, ELECTRIC BICYCLES, MOTORIZED BICYCLES,
MICROMOBILITY DEVICES, MOTORCYCLES AND SNOWMOBILES.
(A) For purposes of this section SNOWMOBILE has the same meaning as given that term in R.C. §
4519.01.
(B) RULES FOR OPERATION
(1) No person operating a bicycle or electric bicycle shall ride other than upon or astride the
permanent and regular seat attached thereto or carry any other person upon such bicycle or electric
bicycle other than upon a flrmly attached and regular seat thereon, and no person shall ride upon a
bicycle or electric bicycle other than upon such a flrmly attached and regular seat.
(2) No person operating a micromobility device shall ride other than upon or astride the permanent
and regular platform attached thereto, and no person shall ride upon a micromobility device other than
upon such a flrmly attached and regular platform.
(3) No person operating a motorcycle shall ride other than upon or astride the permanent and regular
seat or saddle attached thereto, or carry any other person upon such motorcycle other than upon a
flrmly attached and regular seat or saddle thereon, and no person shall ride upon a motorcycle other
than upon such a flrmly attached and regular seat or saddle.
(4) No person shall ride upon a motorcycle that is equipped with a saddle other than while sitting
astride the saddle, facing forward, with one leg on each side of the motorcycle.
(5) No person shall ride upon a motorcycle that is equipped with a seat other than while sitting upon
the seat.
(6) No person operating a bicycle or electric bicycle shall carry any package, bundle or article that
prevents the driver from keeping at least one hand upon the handle bars.
(7) No person operating a micromobility device shall carry any package, bundle, or article that
prevents the user from utilizing both the handlebars and the standing platform.
(8) No bicycle, electric bicycle, micromobility device, motorized bicycle, or motorcycle shall be used to
carry more persons at one time than the number for which it is designed and equipped.
(9) No motorcycle shall be operated on a highway when the handlebars rise higher than the
shoulders of the operator when the operator is seated in the operator’s seat or saddle.
(C) (1) Except as provided in division (C)(3) of this section, no person shall operate or be a passenger on
a snowmobile or motorcycle without using safety glasses or other protective eye device. Except as
provided in division (C)(3) of this section, no person who is under the age of 18 years, or who holds a
motorcycle operator’s endorsement or license bearing a “novice” designation that is currently in effect as
provided in R.C. § 4507.13, shall operate a motorcycle on a highway, or be a passenger on a motorcycle,
unless wearing a protective helmet on the person’s head, and no other person shall be a passenger on a
motorcycle operated by such a person unless similarly wearing a protective helmet. The helmet, safety
glasses, or other protective eye device shall conform with rules adopted by the Ohio Director of Public
Safety. The provisions of this paragraph or a violation thereof shall not be used in the trial of any civil
action.
(2) (a) Except as provided in division (C)(3) of this section, no person shall operate a motorcycle with a
valid temporary instruction permit and temporary instruction permit identiflcation card issued by the
Registrar of Motor Vehicles pursuant to R.C. § 4507.05 unless the person, at the time of such operation, is
wearing on the person’s head a protective helmet that conforms with rules adopted by the Ohio Director
of Public Safety.
(b) No person shall operate a motorcycle with a valid temporary instruction permit and temporary
instruction permit identiflcation card issued by the Registrar of Motor Vehicles pursuant to R.C. § 4507.05
in any of the following circumstances:
1. At any time when lighted lights are required by R.C. § 4513.03(A)(1);
2. While carrying a passenger;
3. On any limited access highway or heavily congested roadway.
(3) Divisions (C)(1) and (C)(2)(a) of this section do not apply to a person who operates or is a passenger
in an autocycle or cab-enclosed motorcycle when the occupant compartment top is in place enclosing the
occupants.
(D) Nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting the carrying of a child in a seat or trailer
that is designed for carrying children and is flrmly attached to the bicycle or electric bicycle.
(E) Except as otherwise provided in this division, whoever violates division (B) or (C)(1) or (C)(2) of this
section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has
been convicted of or pleaded guilty to one predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offense, whoever violates
division (B) or (C)(1) or (C)(2) of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If, within one
year of the offense, the offender previously has been convicted of two or more predicate motor vehicle or
trafflc offenses, whoever violates division (B) or (C)(1) or (C)(2) of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor of
the third degree.
(R.C. § 4511.53) ('80 Code, § 373.02) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.03 ATTACHING MOTORCYCLE, MINIATURE MOTORCYCLE, BICYCLE,
ELECTRIC BICYCLE, MOTORIZED BICYCLE, MICROMOBILITY DEVICE, ROLLER
SKATES, SLED, SKATEBOARD, OR TOY VEHICLE TO VEHICLE.
(A) (1) No person riding upon any motorcycle, miniature motorcycle, bicycle, electric bicycle,
motorized bicycle, micromobility device, coaster, roller skates, sled, skateboard, or toy vehicle shall attach
the same or self to any vehicle upon a roadway.
(2) No operator shall knowingly permit any person riding upon any motorcycle, miniature
motorcycle, bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, micromobility device, coaster, roller skates, sled,
skateboard, or toy vehicle to attach the same or self to any vehicle while it is moving upon a roadway.
This section does not apply to the towing of a disabled vehicle.
(B) Except as otherwise provided in this division, whoever violates this section is guilty of a minor
misdemeanor. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded
guilty to one predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offense, whoever violates this section is guilty of a
misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been
convicted of two or more predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offenses, whoever violates this s ection is
guilty of a misdemeanor of the third degree.
(C) If the offender commits the offense while distracted and the distracting activity is a contributing
factor to the commission of the offense, the offender is subject to the additional flne established under
§ 70.99(B).
(R.C. § 4511.54) ('80 Code, § 373.03) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.04 RIDING BICYCLES, MICROMOBILITY DEVICES, MOTORIZED BICYCLES, AND
MOTORCYCLES ABREAST.
(A) Persons riding bicycles, electric bicycles, micromobility devices, motorized bicycles, or motorcycles
upon a roadway shall ride not more than two abreast in a single lane, except on paths or parts of
roadways set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles, electric bicycles, micromobility devices, motorized
bicycles, or motorcycles.
(B) This section does not require a person operating a bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or
micromobility device to ride at the edge of the roadway when it is unreasonable or unsafe to do so.
Conditions that may require riding away from the edge of the roadway include when necessary to avoid
flxed or moving objects, parked or moving vehicles, surface hazards, or if it otherwise is unsafe or
impracticable to do so, including if the lane is too narrow for the bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized
bicycle, or micromobility device and an overtaking vehicle to travel safely side by side within the lane.
(C) Except as otherwise provided in this division, whoever violates this section is guilty of a minor
misdemeanor. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded
guilty to one predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offense, whoever violates this section is guilty of a
misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been
convicted of two or more predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offenses, whoever violates this s ection is
guilty of a misdemeanor of the third degree.
(D) If the offender commits the offense while distracted and the distracting activity is a contributing
factor to the commission of the offense, the offender is subject to the additional flne established under
§ 70.99(B).
(R.C. § 4511.55(B), (C), (D)) ('80 Code, § 373.04) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.05 SIGNAL DEVICES ON BICYCLES, ELECTRIC BICYCLES, MOTORIZED
BICYCLES, AND MICROMOBILITY DEVICES.
(A) Every bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device when in use at the times
specifled in § 74.02, shall be equipped with the following:
(1) A lamp mounted on the front of either the bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle,
micromobility device, or the operator that shall emit a white light visible from a distance of at least 500
feet to the front and 300 feet to the sides. A generator-powered lamp that emits light only when the
bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device is moving may be used to meet this
requirement.
(2) A red refiector on the rear that shall be visible from all distances from 100 feet to 600 feet to the
rear when directly in front of lawful lower beams of head lamps on a motor vehicle;
(3) A lamp emitting either fiashing or steady red light visible from a distance of 500 feet to the rear
shall be used in addition to the red refiector. If the red lamp performs as a refiector in that it is visible as
specifled in division (A)(2) of this section, the red lamp may serve as the refiector and a separate refiector
is not required.
(B) Additional lamps and refiectors may be used in addition to those required under division (A) of this
section, except that red lamps and red refiectors shall not be used on the front of the bicycle or electric
bicycle and white lamps and white refiectors shall not be used on the rear of the bicycle or electric
bicycle.
(C) A bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device may be equipped with a
device capable of giving an audible signal, except that a bicycle , electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or
micromobility device shall not be equipped with nor shall any person use upon a bicycle, electric bicycle,
motorized bicycle, or micromobility device any siren or whistle.
(D) Every bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device shall be equipped with an
adequate brake when used on a shared-use path, sidewalk, street or highway.
(E) Except as otherwise provided in this division, whoever violates this section is guilty of a minor
misdemeanor. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded
guilty to one predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offense, whoever violates this section is guilty of a
misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been
convicted of two or more predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offenses, whoever violates this s ection is
guilty of a misdemeanor of the third degree.
(R.C. § 4511.56)
(F) Motorized bicycles shall be equipped with rearview mirrors.
(Ord. 36-84, passed 8-6-84)
('80 Code, § 373.06) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.06 RIDING ON ROADWAY, SHARED-USE PATHS, SIDEWALKS, TRAILS, AND
OTHER AREAS.
(A) Every person operating a bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device upon
a roadway shall ride as near to the right side of the roadway as practicable obeying all trafflc rules
applicable to vehicles and exercising due care when passing a standing vehicle or one proceeding in the
same direction.
(Ord. 53-82, passed 10-18-82)
('80 Code, § 373.07) Penalty, see § 70.99
(B) (1) The City Manager or his or her designee is authorized to designate where and at what speed
bicycles, electric bicycles, motorized bicycles, or micromobility devices may be operated based on trafflc
and pedestrian safety considerations, including prohibiting the operation of certain devices on certain
streets, sidewalks, paths, or trails and establishing maximum speed limits when operating a device on
certain streets, sidewalks, trails, and other related paths within the public right-of-way.
(2) The operation of bicycles, class 1 and class 2 electric bicycles, and micromobility devices is
permitted on sidewalks, shared-use paths, and paths set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles, unless the
City Manager or his or her designee prohibits or otherwise restricts the devices’ use on such a path.
(3) No person shall operate a bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device on a
path that is intended to be used primarily for mountain biking, hiking, equestrian use, or other similar
uses, or any other single track or natural surface trail that has historically been reserved for non -
motorized use, unless the City Manager or his or her designee authorizes the use on such a path.
(C) No person shall operate a miniature motorcycle on any public roadway, shared -use path, or
sidewalk, or in any public park. This prohibition applies to miniature motorcycles powered by any type
of engine or motor, including but not limited to gas-powered miniature motorcycles and electric-powered
miniature motorcycles.
(D) No person shall operate a micromobility device, bicycle, electric bicycle, or miniature motorcycle in
a parking garage.
(E) No person shall operate a motorized bicycle on any public sidewalk or shared-use path, unless
otherwise permitted by the City Manager or his or her designee.
(F) No person shall operate a micromobility device on a public roadway with a speed limit greater than
25 miles per hour.
§ 75.07 RECKLESS OPERATION.
No person shall operate a bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, micromobility device, or other
similar device:
(A) Without due regard for the safety and rights of pedestrians and drivers and occupants of all other
vehicles, and so as to endanger the life, limb or property of any person while in the lawful use of the
streets or sidewalks or any other public or private property;
(B) Without exercising reasonable and ordinary control over such bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized
bicycle, micromobility device, or similar device;
(C) In a weaving or zigzag course unless such irregular course is necessary for safe operation in
compliance with law;
(D) As applicable per bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, micromobility device, or other similar
device, without both hands upon the handle grips except when necessary to give the required hand and
aim signals, or as provided in § 75.02(D);
(E) At a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing.
('80 Code, § 373.08) (Ord. 53-82, passed 10-18-82) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.08 PARKING OF BICYCLE, ELECTRIC BICYCLE, MOTORIZED BICYCLE, OR
MICROMOBILITY DEVICE.
(A) No person shall park a bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device upon a
sidewalk in such a manner so as to unduly interfere with pedestrian trafflc or upon a roadway so as to
unduly interfere with vehicular trafflc.
(B) No bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device shall be parked along a
sidewalk such that it leaves an unobstructed path of less than four feet.
(C) When parking a bicycle, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, or micromobility device, the device
shall not block motor vehicle driving lanes, bicycle lanes, driveways and driveway approaches, loading
zones, pedestrian paths, shared-use paths, building entrances, curb ramps, crosswalks, or benches.
('80 Code, § 373.09) (Ord. 53-82, passed 10-18-82) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.09 MOTORIZED BICYCLE OPERATION, EQUIPMENT AND LICENSE.
(A) No person shall operate a motorized bicycle upon a highway or any public or private property used
by the public for purposes of vehicular travel or parking, unless all of the following conditions are met:
(1) The person is 14 or 15 years of age and holds a valid probationary motorized bicycle license issued
after the person has passed the test provided for in this section, or the person is 16 years of age or older
and holds either a valid commercial driver's license issued under R.C. Chapter 4506 or a driver's license
issued under R.C. Chapter 4507 or a valid motorized bicycle license issued after the person has passed the
test provided for in this section, except that if a person is 16 years of age, has a valid probationary
motorized bicycle license and desires a motorized bicycle license, they are not required to comply with
the testing requirements provided for in this section;
(2) The motorized bicycle is equipped in accordance with the rules adopted under division (B) of this
section and is in proper working order.
(3) The person, if under 18 years of age, is wearing a protective helmet on the person's head with the
chin strap properly fastened and the motorized bicycle is equipped with a rear -view mirror.
(4) The person operates the motorized bicycle when practicable within 3 feet of the right edge of the
roadway obeying all trafflc rules applicable to vehicles.
(B) The Director of Public Safety, subject to R.C. §§ 119.01 through 119.13, shall adopt and promulgate
rules concerning protective helmets, the equipment of motorized bicycles, and the testing and
qualiflcations of persons who do not hold a valid driver's or commercial driver's license. The test shall be
as near as practicable to the examination required for a motorcycle operator's endorsement under R.C. §
4507.11. The test shall also require the operator to give an actual demonstration of the operator's ability
to operate and control a motorized bicycle by driving one under the supervision of an examining offlcer.
(C) Every motorized bicycle license expires on the birthday of the applicant in the fourth or eighth year
after the date it is issued, based on the period of renewal requested by the applicant. No motorized
bicycle license shall be issued for a period longer than eight years. A person who is 65 years of age or
older may only apply for a motorized bicycle license that expires on the birthday of the applicant in the
fourth year after the date it is issued.
(D) No person operating a motorized bicycle shall carry another person upon the motorized bicycle.
(E) The protective helmet and rear-view mirror required by division (A)(3) of this section shall, on and
after January 1, 1985, conform with rules adopted by the director under division (B) of this section.
(F) Whoever violates division (A), (D), or (E) of this section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor. (R.C. §
4511.521) ('80 Code, § 373.10)
(R.C. § 4501.01(TT)) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.10 ELECTRIC BICYCLES.
(A) (1) On and after January 1, 2020, manufacturers and distributors of electric bicycles shall
permanently afflx a label, in a prominent location, to each electric bicycle. The label shall specify
whether the electric bicycle is a class 1, class 2, or class 3 electric bicycle, the top assisted speed that the
electric bicycle is capable of reaching, and the motor wattage of the electric bicycle.
(2) No person shall modify an electric bicycle in a manner that changes the top assisted speed that the
electric bicycle is capable of reaching unless the person also modifles the label required under division
(A)(1) of this section to refiect the modiflcation.
(B) (1) The manufacturer of an electric bicycle shall ensure that the electric bicycle complies with the
equipment and manufacturing requirements for bicycles established by the consumer product safety
commission under 16 C.F.R. §§ 1512 et seq.
(2) The manufacturer shall manufacture all class 1 electric bicycles and class 3 electric bicycles so that
when the rider ceases pedaling the electric motor ceases to provide assistance. The manufacturer shall
manufacture all class 2 electric bicycles so that when the rider applies the brakes or releases or activates a
switch or similar mechanism the electric motor ceases to provide assistance.
(3) All class 3 electric bicycles shall be equipped with a speedometer that displays the speed of the
electric bicycle in miles per hour.
(C) (1) The operation of a class 1 electric bicycle and a class 2 electric bicycle is permitted on a path set
aside for the exclusive use of bicycles or on a shared-use path, unless the county, township, municipal
corporation, other local authority, or state agency as deflned in R.C. § 1.60 with control over the path by
resolution, ordinance, or rule prohibits the use of a class 1 electric bicycle or class 2 electric bicycle on
such a path.
(2) No person shall operate a class 3 electric bicycle on a path set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles
or a shared-use path unless that path is within or adjacent to a highway or the county, township,
municipal corporation, or local authority, or state agency as deflned in R.C. § 1.60 with control over the
path by resolution, ordinance, or rule authorizes the use of a class 3 electric bicycle on such a path.
(3) No person shall operate a class 1 electric bicycle, a class 2 electric bicycle, or a class 3 electric
bicycle on a path that is intended to be used primarily for mountain biking, hiking, equestrian use, or
other similar uses, or any other single track or natural surface trail that has historically been reserved for
non- motorized use, unless the county, township, municipal corporation, other local authority, or state
agency as deflned in R.C. § 1.60 with control over the path by resolution, ordinance, or rule authorizes the
use of a class 1 electric bicycle, a class 2 electric bicycle, or a class 3 electric bicycle on such a path.
(4) Divisions (C)(2) and (C)(3) of this section do not apply to a law enforcement offlcer, or other person
sworn to enforce the criminal and trafflc laws of the state, using an electric bicycle while in the
performance of the offlcer's duties.
(D) (1) No person under 16 years of age shall operate a class 3 electric bicycle; however, a person under
16 years of age may ride as a passenger on a class 3 electric bicycle that is designed to accommodate
passengers.
(2) No person shall operate or be a passenger on a class 3 electric bicycle unless the person is wearing
a protective helmet that meets the standards established by the Consumer Product Safety Commission or
the American Society for Testing and Materials.
(E) (1) Except as otherwise provided in this division, whoever operates an electric bicycle in a manner
that is prohibited under division (C) of this section and whoever violates division (D) of this section is
guilty of a minor misdemeanor. If, within one year of the offense, the offender previously has been
convicted of or pleaded guilty to one predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offense, whoever violates this
section is guilty of a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If, within one year of the offens e, the offender
previously has been convicted of two or more predicate motor vehicle or trafflc offenses, whoever
violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor of the third degree.
(2) The offenses established under division (E)(1) of this section are strict liability offenses and strict
liability is a culpable mental state for purposes of R.C. § 2901.20. The designation of these offenses as strict
liability offenses shall not be construed to imply that any other offense, for which there is no specifled
degree of culpability, is not a strict liability offense.
(R.C. § 4511.522)
§ 75.11 OPERATION OF ELECTRIC PERSONAL ASSISTIVE MOBILITY DEVICES.
(A) As used in this Code, ELECTRIC PERSONAL ASSISTIVE MOBILITY DEVICE means a self-
balancing two non-tandem wheeled device that is designed to transport only one person, has an electric
propulsion system of an average of 750 watts, and when ridden on a paved level surface by an operator
who weighs 170 pounds has a maximum speed of less than 20 miles per hour.
(B) (1) Electric personal assistive mobility devices may be operated on the public streets, highways,
sidewalks, and paths and portions of roadways set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles in accordance
with this section.
(2) Except as otherwise provided in this section, those sections of this Trafflc Code that by their
nature are applicable to an electric personal assistive mobility device apply to the device and the person
operating it whenever it is operated upon any public street, highway, sidewalk, or path or upon any
portion of a roadway set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles.
(3) The municipality may regulate or prohibit the operation of electric personal assistive mobility
devices on public streets, highways, sidewalks, and paths, or portions of roadways set aside for the
exclusive use of bicycles, under its jurisdiction.
(C) No operator of an electric personal assistive mobility device shall do any of the following:
(1) Fail to yield the right-of-way to all pedestrians and human-powered vehicles at all times;
(2) Fail to give an audible signal before overtaking and passing a pedestrian;
(3) Operate the device at night unless the device or its operator is equipped with or wearing both of
the following:
(a) A lamp pointing to the front that emits a white light visible from a distance of not less than 500
feet;
(b) A red refiector facing the rear that is visible from all distances from 100 feet to 600 feet when
directly in front of lawful lower beams of head lamps on a motor vehicle;
(4) Operate the device on any portion of a street or highway that has an established speed limit of 55
miles per hour or more;
(5) Operate the device upon any path set aside for the exclusive use of pedestrians or other specialized
use when an appropriate sign giving notice of the specialized use is posted on the path ;
(6) If under 18 years of age, operate the device unless wearing a protective helmet on the person’s
head with the chin strap properly fastened;
(7) If under 16 years of age, operate the device unless, during the operation, the person is under the
direct visual and audible supervision of another person who is 18 years of age or older and is responsible
for the immediate care of the person under 16 years of age.
(D) No person who is under 14 years of age shall operate an electric personal assistive mobility device.
(E) No person shall distribute or sell an electric personal assistive mobility device unless the device is
accompanied by a written statement that is substantially equivalent to the following: “WARNING: TO
REDUCE THE RISK OF SERIOUS INJURY, USE ONLY WHILE WEARING FULL PROTECTIVE
EQUIPMENT –
(F) Nothing in this section affects or shall be construed to affect any rule of the Director of Natural
Resources or a board of park district commissioners governing the operation of vehicles on lands under
the control of the Director or board, as applicable.
(G) Penalty.
(1) Whoever violates division (B) or (C) of this section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor and shall be
punished as follows:
(a) The offender shall be flned $10;
(b) If the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to a violation of division (B) or
(C) of this section or a substantially similar state law or municipal ordinance, the court, in addition to
imposing the flne required under division (F)(1)(a) of this section, shall do one of the following:
1. Order the impoundment for not less than one day but not more than 30 days of the electric
personal assistive mobility device that was involved in the current violation of that division. The court
shall order the device to be impounded at a safe indoor location designated by the court and may assess
storage fees of not more than $5 per day; provided the total storage, processing, and release fees assessed
against the offender or the device in connection with the device’s impoundment or subse quent release
shall not exceed $50.
2. If the court does not issue an impoundment order pursuant to division (F)(1)(b)1. of this section,
issue an order prohibiting the offender from operating any electric personal assistive mobility device on
the public streets, highways, sidewalks, and paths and portions of roadways set aside for the exclusive
use of bicycles for not less than one day but not more than 30 days.
(2) Whoever violates division (D) of this section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor.
(R.C. § 4511.512) Penalty, see § 70.99
§ 75.12 MICROMOBILITY DEVICES.
(A) “Micromobility device” means a device weighing less than 120 pounds, with one or two wheels, is
propelled by an electric motor or human power, and has an attainable speed on a paved level surface of
not more than 20 miles per hour when propelled by the electric motor. Electric skateboards are also
classifled as micromobility devices under this Code.
(B) A micromobility device does not include the following:
(1) Bicycle;
(2) Electric bicycle of any class;
(3) Electric powered wheelchair or other similar mobility devices regulated by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) or under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA);
(4) Miniature motorcycle or motorcycle;
(5) Motorized bicycle, moped, or scooter requiring an operator’s license or motorcycle endorsement to
operate on public roadways;
(6) Snowmobile;
(7) Any other device which can be deflned under a different name within this code, including Electric
Personal Assistive Mobility Devices as deflned in § 75.11 of this code and All-Purpose Vehicles as deflned
in § 75.20 of this code.
(C) No person shall operate a micromobility device unless:
(1) The operator yields the right-of-way to all pedestrians and human-powered vehicles;
(2) The operator gives an audible signal before overtaking and passing a pedestrian.
§ 75.13 Parental Responsibility.
(A) No parent or guardian of any child shall authorize or knowingly permit any such child to violate
any of the provisions of this chapter.
(B) Any person who violates this section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor for a flrst offense. If such
person commits a second offense within one year after the flrst offense, the person is guilty of a fourth -
degree misdemeanor. For each subsequent offense committed within one year of the flrst offense, the
person is guilty of a third-degree misdemeanor.
§ 75.14 MICROMOBILITY DEVICE FLEET COMPANY PERMITTING AND
OPERATION.
(A) “Micromobility Device Fleet Company” shall mean a company that manages a fieet of shared
micromobility devices and/or bicycles by deploying fieets within a designated service area under a
Memorandum of Understanding and with a permit.
0127206.0607929 4914-8112-3966v8
(B) No Micromobility Device Fleet Company shall operate or be located in the public right of way
without entering into an agreement with the City.
(C) Micromobility Device Fleet Companies shall:
(1) not allow users to operate in public streets or the public right of way, unless authorized by the City
Manager or his or her designee;
(2) comply with all terms and conditions of the Micromobility Device Fleet Company’s permit or
other document providing privileges to operate in the public right of way; and
(3) comply with all applicable regulations promulgated by the City; and
(D) The City reserves the right to establish civil flnes or penalties for non-compliance with applicable
regulations. The City Manager is hereby authorized to establish such schedule of civil flnes or penalties,
which may include suspension of privileges to op erate a micromobility device fieet in the public right of
way.
§ 75.15 PENALTIES.
(A) Unless a penalty has otherwise been prescribed in a section of Chapter 75, any person who violates
a provision in Chapter 75 is guilty of a minor misdemeanor for a flrst offense. If such person commits a
second offense within one year after the flrst offense, the person is guilty of a fourth-degree
misdemeanor. For each subsequent offense committed within one year of the flrst offense, the person is
guilty of a third-degree misdemeanor.
(B) In addition to the penalty prescribed in Section 75.15 (A), any person who violates a provision in
Chapter 75 while operating a bicycle, micromobility device, electric bicycle, motorized bicycle, miniature
motorcycle, or other similar device may be subject to having such device impounded by the Dublin
Police Department.
To: Members of Dublin City Council
From: Megan O’Callaghan, City Manager
Date: February 17, 2026
Initiated By: Michael E. Barker, Deputy City Manager
Jean-Ellen Willis, PE, Director of Transportation and Mobility
Thad Boggs, Assistant Law Director
Re: Golf Cart Use in Dublin
Background
The operation of golf carts on public streets within the City of Dublin has been the subject of
inquiry, specifically regarding the legality of resident use and any recent state or local legislative
changes affecting such use. The following provides a summary of the current legal framework and
a review of relevant legislative developments to clarify the regulatory parameters governing golf
cart operation in Dublin.
Summary
After a thorough review of existing code, the Law Department has determined that certain types of
golf carts can be legally driven on Dublin streets, while other golf carts are not legal.
1. Low-Speed Golf Carts are legal on Dublin streets if the following criteria are met:
a. The golf cart is capable of reaching a maximum speed of 25 miles per hour.
b. The golf cart is operated by a driver who is at least 16 years old and has a
driver’s license.
c. The golf cart is registered, insured, and inspected.
d. The golf cart is only driven on roads with a speed limit of 35 miles per hour or
lower.
2. Under-Speed Golf Carts cannot be legally operated on Dublin streets.
a. An Under-Speed Golf Cart, which is considered a traditional golf cart, is only
capable of reaching a maximum speed of 20 miles per hour.
3. Low-Speed Golf Carts are prohibited on sidewalks and shared use paths.
A comprehensive memo detailing this issue and providing legal support for the conclusions is
attached to this memo.
Recommendation
This information is provided as requested by Council.
Office of the City Manager
5555 Perimeter Drive • Dublin, OH 43017
Phone: 614.410.4400 Memo
To: Members of Dublin City Council
From: Megan O’Callaghan, City Manager
Date: February 17, 2026
Initiated By: Michael E. Barker, Deputy City Manager
Jean-Ellen Willis, PE, Director of Transportation and Mobility
Thad Boggs, Assistant Law Director
Re: Golf Cart Use in Dublin
Background
The operation of golf carts on public streets within the City of Dublin has been the subject of
inquiry, specifically regarding the legality of resident use and any recent state or local legislative
changes affecting such use. The following provides a summary of the current legal framework and
a review of relevant legislative developments to clarify the regulatory parameters governing golf
cart operation in Dublin.
Summary
After a thorough review of existing code, the Law Department has determined that certain types of
golf carts can be legally driven on Dublin streets, while other golf carts are not legal.
1. Low-Speed Golf Carts are legal on Dublin streets if the following criteria are met:
a. The golf cart is capable of reaching a maximum speed of 25 miles per hour.
b. The golf cart is operated by a driver who is at least 16 years old and has a
driver’s license.
c. The golf cart is registered, insured, and inspected.
d. The golf cart is only driven on roads with a speed limit of 35 miles per hour or
lower.
2. Under-Speed Golf Carts cannot be legally operated on Dublin streets.
a. An Under-Speed Golf Cart, which is considered a traditional golf cart, is only
capable of reaching a maximum speed of 20 miles per hour.
3. Low-Speed Golf Carts are prohibited on sidewalks and shared use paths.
A comprehensive memo detailing this issue and providing legal support for the conclusions is
attached to this memo.
Recommendation
This information is provided as requested by Council.
Office of the City Manager
5555 Perimeter Drive • Dublin, OH 43017
Phone: 614.410.4400 Memo
MEMORANDUM
To: Megan O'Callaghan, City Manager
CC: Mike Barker, Deputy City Manager
Jeannie Willis, Director of Transportation & Mobility
From: Thad Boggs
Joe Batchelor
Date: February 9, 2026
Re: Golf Cart Legality in Dublin
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
• Is it legal for a resident to drive golf carts on Dublin streets?
• Have there been any state or local legislative changes regarding this issue in
recent years?
BRIEF ANSWERS
• Golf carts with a maximum speed of 20 miles per hour are not legal on Dublin
streets.
• Golf carts with a maximum speed over 20 miles per hour are legal on Dublin
streets if they are certified as street legal.
• There have been no material state or local legislative changes regarding this
issue in recent years.
ANALYSIS
A. Golf carts with a maximum speed of 20 miles per hour or less are not legal
on Dublin streets.
Under Section 73.05(A)(2) of the Dublin City Code, the general rule is that “[n]o
person shall operate an under-speed … vehicle upon any street or highway.” “Under-
Megan O'Callaghan, City Manager
February 9, 2026
Page 2
speed vehicle” is not defined in the City Code, but state law defines an “under-speed
vehicle” as “a three- or four-wheeled vehicle, including a vehicle commonly known as
a golf cart, 1 with an attainable speed on a paved level surface of not more than
twenty miles per hour and with a gross vehicle weight rating less than three
thousand pounds.”2 R.C. 4501.01(XX).
There is an exception to the general rule if the City, “[b]y ordinance or
resolution, … authorize[s] the operation of under-speed … vehicles … on a public street
or highway” in Dublin, in addition to other requirements. Dublin Code §§ 73.05(2)(a);
73.05(E).
Using the above definitions, and unless the City pursues the exception
articulated above or Ohio law changes, golf carts with a maximum speed of 20 miles
per hour or less are “under-speed vehicles” that are not legal on Dublin streets.
B. Golf carts that are street legal and have a maximum speed of more than 20
miles per hour are legal on Dublin streets that have a speed limit of 35 miles
per hour or less.
Under Section 73.05(A)(1) of the Dublin City Code, it is legal for drivers to
operate “low-speed vehicle[s]” on City streets that have a speed limit of 35 miles per
hour or lower. The Ohio Revised Code defines a “low-speed vehicle” as “a three-or
four-wheeled motor vehicle with an attainable speed in one mile on a paved level
surface of more than twenty miles per hour but not more than twenty -five miles
per hour and with a gross vehicle weight rating less than three thousand pounds.”
R.C. 4501.01(WW).
To be legal, three elements must be met:
1. The golf cart must be capable of going faster than 20 miles per hour.3
1 While golf carts are expressly included in the definition of “under-speed vehicles,” this clause does
not categorically declare all golf carts to be under-speed vehicles. Instead, the Ohio Legislature’s use
of “commonly known as” demonstrates an intent to merely use golf carts as an example of a common
“under-speed vehicle,” with the ultimate test still being whether: (1) the vehicle can go faster than 20
miles per hour, and (2) whether the vehicle weighs less than 3,000 pounds.
2 Most golf carts weight about 1,000 pounds, so this element should rarely (if ever) make a difference.
Further, the “low-speed vehicle” definition also caps vehicles at 3,000 pounds.
3 It is our position that a golf cart capable of going faster than 25 miles per hour can be legally driven
on Dublin streets as well if the golf cart is otherwise street legal.
Megan O'Callaghan, City Manager
February 9, 2026
Page 3
2. The golf cart must be “street legal.”
a. To be street legal, the golf cart must be inspected, titled, registered, and
insured, as required under R.C. Chapters 4503, 4509, and 4513.4
b. The Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles has a helpful page for making a low-
speed vehicle street legal: Ohio BMV.
3. The golf cart must be driven on streets with a speed limit of 35 miles per
hour or lower.
C. There have not been any material changes to the golf cart statute in recent
years.
The only change to R.C. 4511.214 and R.C. 4511.215 since 2019 is the addition of
a subsection clarifying that the definitions of low-speed and under-speed vehicles
can be found in R.C. 4501.01. The definitions have not changed.
0127206.0607929 4920-1032-7156v4
4 Golf carts are considered vehicles for the purposes of those requirements and must comply with
them just as a traditional vehicle must comply. See 1990 Ohio Op. Att'y Gen. No. 90-043 (June 20,
1990) (holding that golf carts must comply with insurance, registration, and equipment regulations).