Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/15/2004 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK.INC.. FORM NO. 10148 November 15, 2004 Held 20 Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher called the regular meeting of Dublin City Council to order at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, November 15, 2004 at the Dublin Municipal Building. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Sergeants Jason Arent and Leon Becker of the Ohio Army National Guard led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present were: Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, Vice Mayor Lecklider, Mrs. Boring, Mr. Keenan, Mr. McCash and Ms. Salay. Mr. Reiner arrived at 7: 1 0 p.m. Staff members present were: Ms. Brautigam, Mr. Smith, Ms. Grigsby, Mr. McDaniel, Mr. Ciarochi, Mr. Harding, Mr. Hahn, Ms. Puskarcik, Mr. Hammersmith, Mr. Bird, Stephen Smith, Jr., Ms. Hoyle, Lt. Hirschy, Mr. Villareale, Ms. Nardecchia and Ms. Lozier. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ms. Salay moved approval of the minutes of the November 1, 2004 Council meeting. Mr. Keenan seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. McCash, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes. CORRESPONDENCE There was no correspondence requiring action from Council. PROCLAMATION Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that Dublin participated for the first time in "Make a Difference Day" - a national service day sponsored by the Points of Light Foundation and USA Weekend. Ms. Nardecchia, Volunteer Administrator devised an excellent program to honor the families in Dublin whose loved ones are serving in the military. The program offered an opportunity to send letters and cards and to purchase gift cards to be sent to military families. The Ohio National Guard has assisted in this effort, and Sergeants Arent and Becker accepted the 1,152 cards and letters and $1,200 in gift cards on behalf of the Ohio National Guard. CITIZEN COMMENTS Wallace Maurer. 7451 Dublin Road commented that: 1. His feelings have been hurt by comments made by Mrs. Boring and Mr. Reiner. They expressed surprise upon seeing him on the Dublin bikeway in view of his months of commentary regarding the bikeway construction. 2. The smoking ordinance is on tonight's agenda, and he will make additional comments regarding that item at the appropriate time. 3. He attended the international exposition at Vets Memorial last Sunday for only an hour, but visited eight international presentations. He will take this up with Ms. Puskarcik at a later time. A commonality among all participants was the desire to talk, and he gained valuable insight into the countries. Given the experience with the Irish Festival and the fact that the machinery is in place to turn this City into an international city, he would suggest adding one additional festival once a month. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher suggested that he take these ideas to Ms. Puskarcik. Mrs. Boring clarified that she is actually delighted to see people using the bikepath - her comments were misinterpreted by Mr. Maurer. LEGISLATION SECOND READING/PUBLIC HEARING RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INC., FORM NO 10148 November 15, 2004 Page 2 Held 20 NO SMOKING LEGISLA TlON Ordinance 52-04 (Amended) Amending Chapter 94 (Health and Sanitation) of the Dublin City Code by Amending and Enacting New Sections Which Prohibit Smoking in Public Places and Places of Employment. Ms. Brautigam stated that Council has held two town meetings on this topic. At the last meeting, Council had substantial discussion regarding several changes which are now included in the amended legislation. Stephen Smith, Jr. is present to respond to any questions on the amendments. Brief discussion followed about the legislative process, and Ms. Brautigam confirmed that the legislation was actually postponed until a date certain - not tabled. It is therefore not necessary to remove the legislation from the table prior to acting upon it. Hearing no questions from Council about the legislation as amended, Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher invited public testimony. Kathy Mowery. 5835 Settlers Place. Dublin stated that she has two concerns - passage of the smoking ban and having effective enforcement following passage. She distributed documents from California - the first state to pass a statewide ban. California based its need for a smoking ban on the research findings set forth in the documents provided to Council. Smoking is the single most important source of preventable disease in premature death in California; more than 30 percent of coronary heart disease cases are attributable to cigarette smoking; more than 30 percent of all annual cancer deaths are attributable to smoking, with lung cancer now the leading cancer killer in women as well as men; smoking is responsible for - one quarter of all deaths caused by fire; involuntary smoking is a cause of disease. including lung cancer, in healthy non-smokers; more than 80 percent of chronic obstructive lung diseases, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis are attributable to smoking. Further, tobacco related disease places a tremendous financial burden upon persons with the disease, their families, health care systems and society as a whole. California had desired a statewide ban on smoking, but due to the lack of support they began with local area support. Several years later, they achieved a statewide ban. Some of the difficulties encountered by California with enforcement are outlined in the materials. They included lack of adequate funding, ineffective and illogical administration structure and low prioritization by law enforcement. Successful enforcement has included a combination of health, police and fire department personnel. Organized, well-funded and prompt enforcement worked well. Posting signs and warnings did not lead to compliance. They also found it necessary to fine both the owner and patrons of the establishment who were in violation. Owners did not enforce the ordinance unless they were penalized. They also found the need for undercover officers and unannounced inspections. Another effective method was citizen reporting, including a phone number tied to a full time inspection team. The City Council passed a citizens reporting ordinance so that this technique could be used. Finally, the state would sue business owners for non-compliance with the ban. They cited engaging in unfair business practices and creating a public nuisance. Toni Snedecor. 5699 C Briardale Court. Dublin thanked Council for their hard work and dedication to this issue. She is looking forward to the freedom of using Dublin's restaurants free from smoke. The question often asked is if smoking is a civil right worth fighting for? She does not believe it is a civil right, as it is not a right in the United States to hurt others. It is a reckless activity, which should be stopped in order that everyone can live a healthier life in Dublin. Wallace Maurer. 7451 Dublin Road. Dublin: 1. Noted that there is an exemption for candles - this may have some application to religious celebrations and it should be taken into account. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INC., FORM NO 10148 November 15, 2004 Page 3 Held 20 Mr. Keenan stated that the religious aspect is dealt with separately in the ordinance. 2. The amended ordinance includes a mental state, thus eliminating strict liability for the business subject in the ordinance. What is meant by a "mental state" as used in this ordinance? ',w<.., ..,,., Mr. Smith responded that under the Columbus ordinance, which Dublin used as a model, there is not a mental state for a violation of the ordinance. Any violation of the ordinance, regardless of the circumstances, would require punishing the business owner - even in an extreme situation where someone lit up a cigarette and the owner immediately extinguished it. The fact that a cigarette was lit would be considered a violation. Dublin has included a negligible mental state, which makes the ordinance fairer to the business owners. If they take reasonable means to prevent patrons from smoking, they would not be liable. 3. Regarding the private club exemption, no non-member will be allowed in these clubs. Why are non-members excluded? Mr. Smith stated that there is an exemption in the Code for private clubs, requiring that such a club have a D4 liquor permit and that there must be no non-members permitted to utilize the facility Therefore, if any non-member is permitted to utilize the facility, they would not meet the requirements for the exemption and smoking would be banned. 4. He asked about the inclusion of affirmative defenses and its definition. Mr. Smith responded that the Code currently punishes the smoker and the business owner. In order to address the fairness issues, if the prohibition is not posted on a sign in the business, the affirmative defense provision would prevent the patron from being held liable. This applies only in the circumstances when the proprietor does not take the action required by Code to post the signage. Mark Knowlton, 2637 Tucker Trail noted that he is the co-owner of Donerick's Pub at 6711 Dublin Center Drive. For 6 years, they have provided an agreeable environment for adults 21 and over to gather with business associates and friends to enjoy games, beverages, food and smoking. Four years ago, they installed a high-grade air cleaner out of respect for non-smoking patrons. The unit draws particulates from the air through a charged ionic system. They believe this has played a positive part in their business growth. Dublin has a history of innovation and foresight on legislation to set acceptable standards and to improve the community. However, the current proposed ban falls short of this by taking the Columbus boilerplate ban on smoking and adding harsher non-compliance penalties. Several adjacent communities have pushed one-sided legislation through recently with little regard to the economic impact these smoking bans will have on pub businesses. Dr. Crane has tried to wordsmith his way around this ban topic by calling this legislation something other than a ban. This type of verbal spin causes the lines to be drawn on smoking and makes it an all or nothing issue. He suggested that this be called a "ban," and that the real issues be addressed regarding the financial implications - not simply the ones that self serve the professional lobbyists. The Smoke Free Coalition asks citizens to believe that the smoking ban will not have a negative effect on business revenue. Recent history shows this assertion is false as it relates to the bar and pub business. He urged Council to consider compromises such as air cleaners or to adopt some of the recently passed Toledo ban revisions before adopting any final legislation for Dublin. He encouraged Council to consider the financial implications for pubs and not allow the paid lobbyists to force an all or nothing situation on Dublin residents as well as businesses. Brian Bender, 5762 Berkshire Court, Dublin stated that he is a co-owner of Donerick's Pub. He noted that he has an update on statistics he previously provided to Council. Citizens for Common Sense, a group of individuals and business owners recently received verification of the economic impact the Toledo RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK. INC" FORM NO. 10148 November 10, LUU4 I-'age 4 Held 20 smoking ban has had on small businesses. A review by Ron W. Kuhn, CPA reported that the smoking ban was directly responsible for a 25 percent decrease in sales for the first 6 months of 2003 through the first half of 2004. Kuhn also estimated the indirect economic impact of secondary costs resulted in a 24 percent decrease in dollars and the direct economic impact of labors costs resulted in an 18 percent decrease in sales and the loss of 691 full time and part time jobs. These are the same numbers they expect to see in Columbus times five, due to the larger population. To say there is not an economic impact is to ignore the facts. Due to the findings of this audit, Toledo has now proposed that bars/restaurants with less than 35 percent food sales can have 50 percent of the bar as smoking. Eric Silver. 6933 Ernest Way. Dublin stated that he hates the smell of cigarettes. In his business, he often meets clients in bars or restaurants and must have clothes cleaned to remove the smoke odors. All of that withstanding, he struggles with the idea that a business owner cannot make his own choices in regard to the smoking issue. As a non-smoker, he often patronizes restaurants with a non-smoking area. If his needs cannot be accommodated, he goes elsewhere. He does not understand why a business owner can't have an establishment, which accommodates both smoking and non-smoking. He would prefer a rule that requires business owners to take certain measures versus banning a legal substance. Claire Wolfe. M.D.. 5521 Indian Hill Road. Dublin stated that she is a physician, not a lobbyist. She supports Council voting for the smoking ban in its current form. One of government's most important jobs is to preserve and promote the general welfare and health of its citizens. Scotland has just passed a national ban on smoking in restaurants and pubs. Ireland has a national ban on smoking in its pubs. She does not see that they have experienced a major negative impact. The ill effects of smoking and costs of smoking have already been described to Council. The Surgeon General's recent report indicates that there is no organ system that is not affected by cigarette smoke, directly or passively. Even though there are systems to filter the air, Legionnaire's disease still occurs in hospitals. There is no absolute safe filter system. It is safer not to expose people to smoke, and the data supports this as well as the inadequacy of filter systems. She is hopeful that Council works for the public, works for the health of its citizens, works for the majority of its people and enacts this ban. Dr. Rob Crane. 5600 Dublin Road, Dublin thanked Council for all of their work on this issue. He clarified that he is not a paid lobbyist, but a volunteer. He noted that tonight in Centerville, Ohio the Council is debating and likely will vote on a clean indoor ordinance very similar to this. The City Council person working on this in Centerville is Dr. Gresham. In his due diligence efforts, he went to the major opponent of clean indoor air legislation - the Centerville bowling alley - and interviewed the management, the staff, and several bowlers. Dr. Gresham then went home and promptly experienced a heart attack. He is now recovering and is pushing very hard to pass the legislation in Centerville, Ohio. He thanked Council for their due diligence, their efforts and their receptiveness to lengthy testimony. He is hopeful that Council will take this important and somewhat courageous step forward. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher asked for comments from Council Members at this time. Mr. McCash noted that on page 4, paragraph 0, there is a typographical error at the end of the sentence that should be corrected. Mr. Keenan noted that there has been a great deal of rather heavy-handed lobbying and a number of insensitive comments made by the pro smoking ban advocates. He shared a portion of an editorial which is appropriate for this issue: "The word democracy does not appear in the Constitution because the founders RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INC., FORM NO 10148 November 15, 2004 Page 5 Held 20 didn't want a national government merely reflecting the passions and whims of 50.1 percent of those who voted. Government is meant to mediate, not mirror popular views. The national interest isn't defined by a push button poll." During the smoking ban process, he obviously had his mind changed on this matter. While he appreciates the process, he pointed out to those involved that there may be a . better way to deliver the message. Mrs. Boring noted that Council has heard testimony from some bar owners tonight. Why has Council given consideration to allowing a hotel to have smoking rooms and not given the same consideration to bars? The same arguments for exposing workers to smoke exist for both. Mr. Keenan stated that the smoking in the bar is more direct contact versus that in the hotel rooms. Mrs. Boring stated that the testimony has indicated that the second hand smoke exposure exists for hotel workers also. She continues to believe that there should be some exemption for a limited number of establishments. If a hotel can have such an exemption, there should be a way to do so. Mr. McCash stated that this came about from negotiation with the hotel/motel industry. Mrs. Boring stated that perhaps the hotel/motel representatives have a more effective negotiating team. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that this is not her viewpoint. The percentage of smoking rooms for hotels was previously 20 percent and they have agreed to 15 percent, based upon their business needs. She views the smoking in the hotel rooms as more segregated than that in the bars. Mr. Reiner suggested that this legislation be approved by emergency tonight, as it is a matter of health and welfare. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that the legislation as proposed includes an effective date of February 1, 2005 for implementation. Mr. McCash stated that Dublin was admonished at the outset for delaying the consideration of the legislation. Perhaps it should be effective at an earlier date. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that she is not opposed to passage by emergency, but she does believe time is needed for an educational process in order to be prepared for the start date on February 1. The February 1, 2005 effective date allows for this lead-time. Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Keenan, yes; Mrs. Boring, no; Mayor Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher thanked everyone who has participated in this process. It is Dublin's intent to be as inclusive as possible in studying issues prior to making a final decision. Council looks forward to working with everyone as the smoking ban is implemented. Mr. McCash suggested that Council and staff monitor this through the process and the impacts it mayor may not have in Dublin. If modifications are needed, Council can consider some of the revisions made in other cities. Mr. Keenan noted that the education process is tied to grant monies, and staff should pursue this as quickly as possible. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INC.. FORM NO 10148 November 15, 2004 Page 6 Held 20 Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that there is grant funding available for this educational process and staff will pursue this immediately. Ms. Salay added that Council should contact their state representatives and state ., senators regarding similar statewide legislation on this matter. This would level the playing field. BID ACCEPTANCE Ordinance 75-04 Accepting the Lowest and Best Bid for Solid Waste Collection Services with Rumpke of Ohio, Inc. and Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Contract for Procurement of Said Services. Ms. Brautigam stated that a presentation was given at the last meeting on this process. Ms. Lozier can respond to any further questions. Wallace Maurer. 7451 Dublin Road. Dublin asked why the Republic Waste Services bid was one-third to one-half higher than the Rumpke bid? Ms. Lozier stated that the Republic bid included automated collection only and the capitalized equipment and container costs were much higher. Mr. Maurer stated that, in his opinion, Rumpke has done an excellent job. Vote on the Ordinance: Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes. INTRODUCTION/FIRST READING - ORDINANCES COMPENSA nON PLAN CODE AMENDMENT Ordinance 78-04 Amending Section 4 of Ordinance 98-96 (Compensation Plan). Mr. Lecklider introduced the ordinance. Ms. Brautigam stated that this ordinance comes before Council at the request of staff. During the budget process, staff discussed the current compensation for the Mayor, Vice Mayor and Council in view of the increased number of Council meetings and the increased number of Mayor's Court sessions each month. The compensation was last changed in 1996, and staff felt it appropriate for Council salaries to be increased by 25 percent. Staff recommends that the ordinance be approved in conjunction with the operating budget in order that this change can be made in January of 2005. There will be a second reading/public hearing at the December 13 Council meeting. COST OF SERVICES UPDA TE Ordinance 79-04 Amending Chapter 35 of the Codified Ordinances to Revise the Fee and Service Charge RevenuelCost Comparison System and Establishing a Schedule of Fees and Service Charges for City of Dublin Services. Mr. Lecklider introduced the ordinance. Ms. Brautigam stated that this is a yearly update for fees for services. The Finance Committee will meet on December 1 at 5:30 p.m., and the second reading/public hearing will take place on December 13. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Ordinance 80-04 Authorizing the Provision of Certain Incentives for Purposes of Encouraging Frank Gates Corporation to Retain Its Workforce Within the City, and Authorizing the Execution of an Economic Development Agreement. Ms. Salay introduced the ordinance. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGALBLANK,INC.. FORM NO. 10148 November 15, 2004 Page 7 Held 20 Ms. Brautigam stated that the report indicates that the Frank Gates and Company has come to the end of its lease, and in order to encourage them to stay in the City, the City is offering an economic development incentive. Mrs. Boring asked that staff also provide details about the penalties the company is subject to if they do not meet the commitments contained in the agreement. There will be a second reading/public hearing at the December 13 Council meeting. OTHER . Adoption of Meeting Schedule for 2005 Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that a modified schedule has been provided to Council. She noted that she cannot attend goal setting on January 14 and she understands that Mrs. Boring is not available on that date. Ms. Brautigam stated that she has been in contact with the proposed facilitator. He is not available in February, but she has asked about his availability in March and will report back to Council. In reviewing the timing of goal setting over the past several years, it has often taken place in March. It was the consensus of Council to schedule goal setting on March 4, if the facilitator is available on that date. Following brief discussion about various alternatives, it was the consensus of Council to adopt the modified Alternative B. The goal setting date will be confirmed by Ms. Brautigam. CITY MANAGER/STAFF REPORTS . Recommendation from Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Regarding Accessible Playgrounds Ms. Brautigam stated that at the last two meetings of the Commission, the issue of accessible playgrounds has come up. The Commission is very passionate about this topic and asked staff to bring forward to Council a copy of a motion to direct staff to devise a playground accessibility plan by May of 2005. If Council concurs, they should approve a motion directing staff to bring this plan back by May. Mrs. Boring asked for more details and whether this is a reasonable timeframe in view of other staff priorities. Ms. Brautigam stated that PRAC is requesting a policy that would demonstrate that by a particular future date, the playgrounds would be generally accessible. A plan would include current playgrounds that would be amenable to accessibility and that when replacing equipment, a policy would require choosing accessible equipment Mrs. Boring asked if this is feasible for staff to do in view of the Community Plan update. Ms. Brautigam stated that she and Mr. Hahn discussed this and believe the date is feasible. Mr. Lecklider asked for clarification: the City has recently brought on line several parks. Does this in any way contemplate retrofitting those parks within the next 12 months? Ms. Brautigam stated that it would not. But when parks are updated, the accessible items could be added at that time. This goes beyond ADA requirements, e.g., eliminating mulch and having a flat surface that would be accessible to wheelchairs. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that she is in agreement with what PRAC is recommending. She had made the assumption that the staff would return through the budgeting process with a long-term plan for implementation of this. It is simply a matter of the costs of implementing these measures. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INC.. FORM NO 10148 November 15, 2004 Page 8 Held 20 Ms. Brautigam agreed, noting that in next year's capital budget, a phased-in approach will be included. PRAC wanted to make a strong statement and have this in place prior to the initiation of the CIP process for next year. Mr. McCash commented that the Leadership Dublin project focused on one park . for Special Needs; this initiative is for accessibility in general throughout all of the park system in Dublin. Mr. Keenan commented that he envisions this as a policy issue for future budget implementation. Mrs. Boring applauds PRAC for undertaking this. Having a written policy will provide guidance for future budgets. Ms. Brautigam stated that citizens in the PRAC audience were interested in the status of the special needs park. When they found it was not in the five-year CIP, there was concern expressed. PRAC then asked staff to return with general information about accessibility in parks, and PRAC asked that the policy be forwarded to Council for adoption. Mrs. Boring moved approval of the PRAC recommendation. Ms. Salay seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher invited Mr. Maurer to provide public testimony, apologizing for overlooking his request to testify on this matter. Wallace Maurer. 7451 Dublin Road. Dublin stated that his questions will likely be answered in the May report. The key phrase to him is true accessibility and he is curious to know the nature of the complaints and from where they have been generated. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE Ms. Salav invited everyone to attend the Tara Hill Area Traffic Task Force open house at 7 p.m. on Wednesday, November 17 at the Rec Center. Mrs. Boring commented: 1. Thanks to Ms. Lozier for her hard work on the solid waste contracts, which will be of great benefit to the citizens. 2. Congratulations to Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher on her recognition from the Dublin Chamber of Commerce. Council is very proud of her many achievements. 3. In regard to the budget discussion regarding staff attendance at the American Planning Association conference, is there a need to increase the division training budget to accommodate everyone who should attend? Ms. Brautigam stated that based upon the attendance in previous years, Ms. Grigsby has indicated that there is adequate funding in the 2005 budget. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher noted that Mr. Ciarochi or Mr. Bird had indicated at the budget hearing that there was a rotation system in place and that not everyone would attend. What Mrs. Boring has indicated is a desire for sufficient funding so that all of the staff can attend this important conference. Mr. Lecklider clarified that he wants to ensure that there is funding available to allow everyone to attend, if in Mr. Bird or Mr. Ciarochi's discretion everyone's attendance is warranted. That is a management decision. Ms. Brautigam stated that she understands that some staff members generally do not attend in order to provide coverage at the office. She will provide additional information in the budget report on December 13. Mavor Chinnici-Zuercher: RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INC.. FORM NO. 10148 November 15, 2004 Page 9 Held 20 1. Lifted up favorable comments sent to the City by a Clerk from Tennessee regarding Ms. Clarke's recent coordination of a regionalllMC conference in Dayton. 2. Noted that she is considering renewal of her membership at the DCRC in view of the revised opening time of 5:30 a.m.! ADJOURNMENT TO EXECUTIVE SESSION There being no further business, Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher moved to adjourn to executive session for discussion of legal, land acquisition and personnel matters. Mr. Keenan seconded the motion. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher announced that the meeting would be reconvened only to formally adjourn. No further action will be taken. Vote on the motion: Mr. McCash, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes. The meeting was adjourned to executive session at 8:10 p.m. cwas re~~vened and formally adjourned at 10:15 p.m. Mayor - Presiding Officer ~C!-~ Clerk of Council