HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/01/2004
i 1 I'
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting
DATION LEGAL BLANK, INC.. FORM NO. 10148
March 1, 2004
Held 20
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher called the Regular Meeting of Dublin City Council to order at
7 p.m. on Monday, March 1, 2004 at the Dublin Municipal Building.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
r--. Mr. Lecklider led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Present were: Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, Vice Mayor Lecklider, Mrs. Boring, Mr. Keenan,
Mr. McCash, Mr. Reiner and Ms. Salay.
Staff members present were: Ms. Brautigam, Ms. Grigsby, Mr. Smith, Mr. McDaniel, Mr.
Ciarochi, Mr. Gunderman, Chief Epperson, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Hahn, Mr. Harding, Ms.
Crandall, Ms. Di Salvo, Ms. Hoyle, Ms. Willis and Ms. Ott.
SPECIAL RECOGNITION
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher presented a plaque to former Mayor McCash in recognition of
his service to the citizens of Dublin as Mayor during 2002 and 2003.
ADJOURNMENT TO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Mayor ChinniCi-Zuercher moved to adjourn to executive session at 7:05 p.m. for
discussion of land acquisition and legal matters.
Mr. Lecklider seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes;
Mr. McCash, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes.
The meeting was reconvened at 7:10 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
r- Ms. Salay moved approval of the minutes of the February 17, 2004 meeting.
Mr. Lecklider seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. McCash, abstain; Mrs. Boring,
yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, abstain.
CORRESPONDENCE
The Clerk reported that two notices have been sent to Council by the Ohio Division of
Liquor Control. The first relates to new C1 and C2 permits for a business located at 201
W. Bridge Street.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher noted that Council had objected to the issuance of permits at this
location previously due to its proximity to the school grounds. She would recommend
taking similar action in regard to these permits.
Mr. Lecklider asked for clarification - there are restaurants in Historic Dublin that are
located within 500 feet of a public institution -- the Dublin library. What is the distinction in
that location with regard to the liquor laws? He wants to ensure a consistent policy is
applied.
Mr. Smith stated that the location at 201 W. Bridge Street had a history of previous
violations of liquor laws. The City Council may want to object to the issuance of these
new permits as well, given the proximity to the school grounds. In regard to restaurants in
Historic Dublin and their proximity to public institutions, he is not certain of how this is
measured.
Mrs. Boring stated that she does not recall that City Council objected to the issuance of
permits for restaurants in Historic Dublin.
"......., Mr. McCash stated that the concern for him relates to carryout liquor licenses at a gas
i station versus permits at a restaurant for onsite consumption.
Discussion continued.
Mr. Lecklider suggested that a written policy be drafted regarding objections to liquor
permits.
Mr. Lecklider moved to authorize Mr. Smith to attend the hearing on behalf of Council to
object to the issuance of the permits due to the proximity to the school grounds and the
previous history of violations on the site.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes;
Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes.
The second notice relates to a transfer of D1, 02, 03, D3A and 06 permits at the Bogey
Inn, 65013 Glick Road.
I I t 1,1
RECORD OE' PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BlANK, INC" FORM NO, 10148 ,LOtJ4 Page 2
Held 20
prOvide addHional.informaHon'.onfhfsfransfer.
Mr. Smith stClted that. hE';,.\i\lould review the map of the property and provide information
,.....,-,..:.".><.....,...,.,.........'.',.:-.:...,.}<:,.'-:,':';, "",':-,',
about this at the next meeting. . It appears that the previous owners" Mr. Ryan and Mr.
,.--, Demmler are, in partnership and are reopening the Bogey Inn. He will report back to
Council on this.
Council will postpone any action on the notice until the March 15 meeting.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Wallace Maurer, 7451 Dublin Roadaskedwhy,at fhebeginnihg of each Council meeting
the Pledge of Allegiance is recited? Is 'fhisever done withciny reservation? The basis of
the Pledge is equalityof all human beings. He noted that he and Council disagree on the
Balbir Kindra issue. In view of 90 unci liS position, he believes that the Pledge is recited by
th~Il1.,^,ith reservation, particularly the portion, "with liberty and justice for aiL". He
Ciss Yrne~ that thernCitE';ri.CiI?~.eQt~c:> 9C:>YD2iJ, iDN()YE';rnPElrrnCiclE';,thE';2Ci~E';.thCit the. firing' of
Balbir KindralJl.i8sunjust. The way this'shouldbe handled is notwith external pressure,
butbyinternal pressureamong Coundlitself. He noted that he has not been as
aggressive as he might have been. He had the opportunity to speak with Council
candidate .Aaron Schrni.c1,I.i~ inthE';fal.l. CibdMr-8fbrnidtiQh,~cf ()ffere.d ~()Y?E'; t~E';rnCi~E';rial in
the election campaign. However, because Mr. Maurer had just sent it to Council, he
wanted themto have all opportunitytorespond. He had planned to provide the materials
to the candidate at the Council meeting, but Mr. Schmidlin did not attend. So the
opportunity was missed. Implementing the suggestions he has made would not be
practical, in view of the fact that a new engineer has been appointed by the City Manager.
Mr. Maurer emphasized that he has absolutely no reservations with the new engineer's
qualifications. But the issue remains that his predecessor was unjustly removed.
He will return to continue these comments at a later date.
-- LEGISLATION
SECOND READING/PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCES
REZONING
(Note: hearing postponed from February 17, upon request of applicant)
Ordinance 07-03
Providing for a Change in Zoning for 5 Acres Located on the West Side of Avery
Road, Approximately 200 Feet North of Belvedere Green Drive, from R-1, Restricted
Suburban Residential District, to: PUD, Planned Unit Development District. (Case
No. 02-138Z - Scenic Estates on Avery aka Hansel Subdivision)
Mr. Gunderman showed an aerial of the site that is bordered by the Belvedere subdivision
to the west and south, and Muirfield to the east across Avery Road. The site is currently
zoned R-1, and the request is to rezone to PUD for 6 lots of approximately 33,000 square
feet each. The Community Plan calls for a density of 1-2 units per acre, and this nets out
at 1.2 units per acre. The text is included in the packet. The project contains a
meandering bikepath, the frontage treatment will be similar to the Belvedere area, the
building materials are all natural, the units will contain side-loaded garages and will have a
unified mailbox arrangement. Upon final platting, the developer will pay a park fee of
$14,615. There are two curb cuts, each of which serves three lots. This item was
recommended by a 6-0 vote of P&Z on October 16 with 14 conditions appended.
Mr. Lecklider noted that there were some previous development proposals on this site
with various numbers of lots from four to eight. He asked for more explanation of why the
lot numbers have grown from the previously approved 4 to 6, and yet the proposal has
-. been recommended by P&Z.
Mr. Gunderman responded that the applicant convinced P&Z that the four lot project was
not financially feasible in terms of return. Several options were looked at, including a cui
de sac. A solution was sought to meet everyone's needs. This proposal includes a large
lot size, a large setback from Avery Road, and seems to meet most of the needs. This
has been a long, difficult process of review and P&Z finally made a decision and approved
this proposal.
Mr. Lecklider asked how this plan suits the neighbors in Belvedere.
Mr. Gunderman responded that they are happy not to have a cui de sac proposal and not
to have homes as close to the property lines. They would obviously have preferred four
lots, but are reasonably satisfied with this proposal.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher invited Mrs. Boring to comment regarding the discussion at the
Planning Commission hearing.
.
RECORD OE' PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INC., FORM NO, 10148 Mardrt;LClM
Held 20
There was much concern by the neighborhood that there not be any connection
whatsoever to the existing neighborhood. Another issue of prime concern was the
setback and the frontage treatment.
,..-.., Mr. Gunderman clarified that the front yard setbacks vary - he is not certain of the exact
, distances.
Mr. Lecklider recalled that the public utilities are to be buried,
Mr. Gunderman agreed.
Mr. McCash suggested that this development should be connected into the Belvedere
neighborhood. The cui de sac arrangement would fit better than having these houses
located along Avery.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher asked if it was designed in response to the concerns of the
Belvedere residents.
Mr. Gunderman responded that the design comes as a result of the cui de sac concerns.
Mr. McCash asked what was the overall problem with the cui de sac.
Mr. Gunderman stated that they tried to load lots on each side of the street, resulting in
short lots and small setbacks from Avery.
Mr. McCash asked why the cui de sac could not be single loaded versus double loaded.
Mr. Gunderman stated that the depth made it difficult to derive the number of lots desired.
Other options were explored, but they impacted the setbacks along Avery.
Mr. Lecklider commented that the setback from Avery was important in previous
submittals. The cui de sac iteration could not achieve the setback from Avery and
resulted in lots too close to the Belvedere homes.
Mr. Reiner stated that Mr. McCash's suggestions should be considered. It was not well
thought out to have curb cuts along Avery. Six lots could be achieved with a cui de sac,
..-., and it would be more attractive and viable, resulting in more greenspace along Avery.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that, apparently, the cui de sac design did not result in a
large enough setback. In any case, Council needs at this time to either approve it as
proposed and recommended by Planning Commission, or disapprove it.
Mr. Keenan moved for approval of the ordinance.
Mr. Lecklider seconded the motion.
Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Reiner, no; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor
Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Ms. Salay, no; Mr. McCash, no; Mr. Lecklider, yes.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher noted that Mr. Maurer has signed it to testify on the ordinance.
She apologized for overlooking this.
Wallace Maurer, 7451 Dublin Road noted that there was reference to a fee for parkland of
$14,615. He asked for confirmation that the developer pays the fee and whether those
are set aside in a designated fund.
Ms. Grigsby responded that the monies are paid by the developer and deposited into the
City's parkland acquisition fund that is set aside for purchase of open space.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS
Ordinance 06-04
Authorizing the Execution and Delivery of an Economic Development Agreement
Between the City of Dublin and CoreSource to Induce a Relocation of its Operations
--, to the City in Order to Increase Employment within the City.
Mr. Stevens reported that there have been no changes since the last reading. He noted
that Lloyd Sorrell of CoreSource is present tonight for the hearing.
There were no questions.
Vote on the Ordinance: Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan,
yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes.
Ordinance 08-04
Authorizing the Provision of Certain Incentives for Purposes of Encouraging the
Expansion by CC Technologies International, Inc. of Its Operations and Workforce
Within the City and Authorizing the Execution of an Economic Development
Agreement.
, ,. f,'n!!""'fr'.l'~':1ff~I"lMi'fl.'l!1*':'It'tf1I!:I'i!ttl:HI~;tIIN$<t';'I'!II::/ttlll:I' ' .Jlllt)'UY~'TI"t:'+ff:l
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INO" FORM NO, 10148 Marcll~ozt
witht~E3State of()hi<:>t<:>s~c:ure$1.3 Tnli()n. of ,lovv.,intE3restfinancing, He introduced Dr.
Neil Thompson,CEOof CC TechnoloQies who is present tonight.
Dr. Thompson noted that he moved the company to Dublin in 1996 and the company has
--. had significant groWth since that time. They have worked with Mr. Stevens on continuing
their growth in Dublin and appreciate the incentive offered to their company.
Vote on the Ordinance: Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. McCash,
abstain; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
Ordinance 09-04
Creating the Tartan West Incentive District, Declaring Improvements to Certain Real
Property within that Incentive District to be a Public Purpose, Describing the Public
Infrastructure Improvements to Be Made to Benefit that Parcel, Requiring the Owner
Thereof to Make Service Payments In Lieu of Taxes, Providing for the Union County
Treasurer to Distribute Service Payments to the Dublin City School District in the
Amount It Would Otherwise Receive, Absent the Exemption, Creating a Municipal
Public Improvement Tax Increment Equivalent Fund for the Deposit of the Balance of
Such Service Payments, and Authorizing the Execution of a Tax Increment Financing
Agreement and One or More Infrastructure Agreements, and Declaring an Emergency.
Ms. Brautigam noted that questions were raised at the last reading and staff has
responded in the report in the packet. Ms. Grigsby is available to respond to additional
questions.
Mr. Hale then handed out a map delineating the public and private parklands.
Mr. Keenan noted that the parkland is identified as private and public. Is any of that land
tax exempt?
Ms. Grigsby responded that for the public parkland dedicated to the City, the City would
file an exemption with the state to secure tax exempt status. This process takes
...--. approximately a year. The private parkland will be owned and maintained by the
homeowners association and will be subject to tax.
Mr. Keenan asked about the timeframe of the TIF of 30 years. Is that standard? It
seems a long timeframe.
Ms. Grigsby responded that state law provides up to 30 years for the term of service
payments. It is currently estimated, based upon the value of the homes being
constructed and the well ness/fitness center that payback will be achieved within 13
years, once service payments begin. Staff generally includes in the legislation the
maximum allowed under state law of 30 years to provide more flexibility in the case that
build out would not occur as anticipated, or if the values were less than estimated.
Mr. Keenan asked if the list of projects identified in the TIF are prioritized, and can the list
be added to or subtracted from.
Ms. Grigsby responded that several of the projects are currently programmed in the five-
year CIP and are therefore already prioritized, such as the construction on
Avery/Muirfield Brand this year and Hyland-Croy/Brand in 2005. The other
improvements have been identified in 2005 and 2006, and the Category B improvements
are in the timeframe of 2004-2006 as well.
Mr. Keenan asked if the list could be modified.
Ms. Grigsby responded that items could be eliminated by not proceeding with them. To
add a project would require amendment of the legislation to change the public
improvement descriptions.
~
Mr. Keenan noted that a pedestrian tunnel under Hyland-Croy is included, but it was not
mentioned in the tunnel study. Will this be a concern?
Ms. Grigsby stated that it was noted as a future tunnel need to provide access to the
Metro Parks.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher asked about the priority of this tunnel in terms of use of the City
dollars.
Ms. Grigsby stated that, currently, this tunnel it is not programmed in the five-year CIP. It
would only be funded as part of this development.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher added that this tunnel would be built within the project and
funded within the larger project. It is a separate issue from the tunnel priority list adopted
recently.
, I;
RECORD QF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council MeetinL_
DAYrON LEGAL BLANK, INC" FORM NO, 101411 Martll~
Held 20
e ca
Tartan LLC. It appears that they are providing an indemnification agreement holding the
City harmless. The certificates of insurance are coming back from the subcontractor, but
he doesn't see where it is cOTing back from Tartan.
,..-..... Mr. Smith responded that this is correct. Staff has reviewed this and is comfortable with
it.
Ms. Salay stated that the maps handed out have answered her questions. She assumes
that the bikepaths are public, even though they are located within the private parkland.
Mr. Hale agreed.
Mr. Reiner asked if the water tower location has been resolved.
Mr. Hale responded that it has not been resolved.
Steve Simonetti, 7778 Tillinqhast Drive noted that he met with Mr. Hammersmith this
week. They are re-engaging all of the parties they met with separately previously. They
are meeting with the Metro Parks staff and the area residents regarding locations. They
have had professional photography done on the two sites - one at the park and one at
the north - to superimpose the City-recommended size water tower on the photos while
continuing to negotiate with Metro Parks and other adjacent landowners. They have not
set a meeting with the residents of either Muirfield 43 or the immediate areas around the
potential water sites on their land, but intend to do that as soon as the super imposed
pictures are completed. They will schedule the floating of a balloon as required.
Mr. Reiner asked for clarification: there are two on site potential locations, and they are
continuing to negotiate with Metro Parks?
Mr. Simonetti confirmed this. They will go back to Metro Parks as well as some of the
other adjacent landowners who have indicated a willingness to talk with the City
- regarding locating the tank. However, they will now go "hand in hand" with staff to meet
with these parties, versus the developers trying to pursue this on their own.
Mr. R~iner added that there is a commitment regarding Muirfield-type fencing for the
area surrounding the Muirfield reserve.
Mr. Hale agreed, noting that this is contained in the zoning text.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher asked Mr. Hale to describe the map distributed this evening to
Council.
Mr. Hale noted that Mr. Lecklider asked for such a map at the last hearing. It shows the
parkland to be dedicated to the City in darker green. The bikepaths are either in those
areas or are accessible to the public. The only items not public are the smaller areas in
the cui de sacs. The other agreement stipulates that the maintenance for all parkland
will be done by the homeowners association.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that an issue has come up with other developments
where there were a limited number of homes or phasing issues which impacted the cost
the association bears in terms of dues and fees for such maintenance. At what point will
the land be turned over to the association for maintenance?
Tom Anderson, Tartan LLC responded that they target turning this over when 75 percent
is sold, which they predict will occur in 2-3 years. There is some difference in that it is
being sold in clusters for condo and patio style homes. They are working with those
builders to ensure that their homeowners associations will be adequately funded to
-, support the maintenance costs.
There was no public testimony offered.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher noted that there is a request that Council pass this as
emergency legislation.
Mrs. Boring stated that she would prefer to have additional time to consider this
legislation in view of the size of the project and the volume of materials provided.
She moved to postpone this item until March 15.
Ms. Salay seconded the motion.
Mr. Lecklider asked Mr. Hale for clarification regarding the parkland. Does the document
distributed to Council tonight effectively memorialize the change in the amount of
parkland that is public as opposed to what was included in the packet from staff?
Mr. Hale responded that this documentis consistent with the zoning. This is pretty much
I , , 1'."",." j" a;t'!I~"*!Il;Ji'1h1l'ij~;'l7~'II!~trJ:~lIt,,;i I., ~I 11 ,:JlIIJ[JiitM"lm;!"lJIWI"," IIII:jttt!Y1l:ic.rJ!l;:~, "I~:l
RECORD OF, PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meetin~_~
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK. !NO,. FORM NO, 10148 ch~-;LOO~
Held 20
documents.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that what is different is that the previous drawing had
71.3 acres of public open space and 33.2 acres of private. Obviously, the numbers
---- presented tonight are different and were submitted in response to the issue raised about
bikepaths being located in public open space versus private.
Mr. Anderson stated that he did not view this document until % hour prior to tonight's
meeting. They had asked their land planner to put it together. In terms of memorializing
the exact acreage, it is very close. The exhibit is intended to show what space is open to
all Dublin residents, and what is shown on this map is open to all Dublin residents.
Mr., Lecklider comme~t~d .that h~ \^Jas~()fI99~i~gf9r exacfacreage of commitment, but
rather wanted to ensure the location in'the record where it would clearly reflect the
commitment - if in concept only.
Mr. Anderson responded that in terms of why some land was private and some public,
the theory was that it was all open space that would be utilized.
Mr. Lecklider stated that this seems to resolve the concerns he expressed previously,
and he is appreciative.
Ms. Grigsby stated that staff would follow up on this, as the map provided in the packet
by staff was based upon the information in the documents presented at the rezoning.
The information staff distributed reflects 71 acres of public and 33 acres of private
parkland. Staff will resolve the differences.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that staff would then prOVide this updated information to
Council.
She asked if the applicant is agreeable to having this item postponed until March 15.
~ Mr. Hale indicated no objection to this.
Vote on the motion: Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes;
Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes.
BID
Ordinance 10-04
Accepting the Lowest and Best Bid for the Landscape Installation Right-of-Way
Project, and Declaring an Emergency.
Ms. Brautigam stated that Mr. Hahn is present to respond to any questions.
Ms. Salay asked if Miller Pavement has done landscaping work previously for the City.
Mr. Hahn responded that Miller Pavement acquired Zuber Landscaping a few years ago
and does do this kind of work.
Mr. McCash asked if they have done previous landscaping work for the City.
Mr. Hahn responded that they have done previous landscaping work for the City in a
satisfactory manner.
Mr. Lecklider moved for emergency passage.
Mr. Keenan seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mr. Keenan, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes;
Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes.
Vote on the Ordinance: Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes;
Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Salay, yes.
.......-- CODE AMENDMENTS
Ordinance 11-04
Amending Section 76.02(E) of the Dublin Codified Ordinances Regarding the
Posting of Handicapped Parking Fine Amount, and Declaring an Emergency.
Ms. Brautigam stated that this amendment is brought forward to reinstate a local provision
in the Code that was inadvertently omitted in the recent codification.
Mr. Lecklider moved to dispense with the public hearing and treat as emergency
legislation.
Ms. Salay seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr.
McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes.
Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr.
Reiner, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes.
! I
RECORD' OE' PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting
DAYrON LEGAL BLANK, INC" FORM NO, 10148 004
Held 20
Amending Sections 93.03 (20), 93.80 (Private Fire Hydrants) and 150.193 (Fire
Hydrant Permits) and Appendix .ft..,' of Chapter 35, Fee.,and Service. Charge
Rev~n~el<:()st Comparison System of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Dublin.
-. rv1s.>BrCl~tigam stated t~at an. arTle~9mentvvas,subrTlittedto the ordinance regarding the
fee schedulE') for inspection of private fire hydrants. Sections 3 and 4 were added to
impose a $50 fee for private fire hydrant inspection and a $350 refundable deposit for
hydrant backflow prevention devices.
Vote on the Ordinance: Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes;
Mr. Keenan, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. McCash, yes.
LAND PURCHASE
Ordinance 15-04 (Amended)
Authorizing the Purchase of a 33.1 Acre, More or Less, Tract of Land, Located North
of Hard Road and East of Riverside Drive, City of Dublin, County of Franklin, State
of Ohio, the Appropriation of $1,500,000 for Payment of Said Purchase, and
Declaring an Emergency.
Ms. Brautigam stated that staff is requesting emergency action tonight so that they can
move forward with the purchase of the property.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher commented that there have been some questions raised by
citizens regarding the proposed use of the land.
Ms. Brautigam responded that the proposal at this time is for passive park area. In the
future, staff would work with the Parks andRecreation Advisory Commission regarding
perhaps a very passive gathering area at the corner. The buildings would be torn down,
and paths added through the park area. There is no development of an active nature
proposed for this park area. The purpose is to preserve beautiful hardwood forest
woodlands that are rare in the City of Dublin.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher asked about the timeframe for taking down the buildings.
~ Ms. Brautigam responded that there is not a timeframe established at this time. Staff will
report back to Council on this matter.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher asked what type of elements a passive park would include.
Mr. Hahn responded that it would include picnic areas, a play area, and playground
equipment. They could utilize the existing cleared land for typical park-type development,
i.e., shelters and playground equipment. The intent of the purchase is preservation, and
the old growth woods should be left in their natural state with soft pedestrian trails added.
Mr. Lecklider asked if it is contemplated that there would be access to that area from
either Riverside or Hard Road.
Mr. Hahn responded affirmatively, but noted that there is no master plan established due
to the recent action to acquire this parcel. There has been no discussion at staff level of a
master plan. He could conceive that the existing developed area of the parcel could
house some limited parking and a shelter house after the buildings are removed.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that in view of the amount of investment and the size of
the land purchase, it would behoove Council in the next year to have a master plan
developed for the area. Residents are supportive of the parkland acquisition, but it is a
substantial amount of money.
Mr. Hahn agreed that it would be most appropriate to have master plans in the file. He
certainly is supportive of doing this.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher suggested that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
,~ as well as the area citizens should be involved in the process.
Mr. Keenan added that the land seems ideal for walking trails or pathways. Are there
security issues involved?
Mr. Hahn responded that there are existing trail systems in other wooded areas. Staff
views them as a means for people to access the area on pathways versus going into
areas that are more sensitive and subject to damage. From a security standpoint, there
have been no problems in the past. It is a pristine area and controlled access via the use
of pathways would be desirable.
Mack Parkhill. 7879 Riverside Drive stated that he is a 28-year resident and long-time
member and officer of the East Dublin Civic Association. This purchase will have a long
range positive benefit for the neighborhood and for the entire city. He walked this land
RECORD OE' PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INC.. FORM NO, 10148 arct,-t;LOo-~ Page
Held 20
,
for completing this purchase.
Mr. Lecklider moved for emergency passage.
Mr. Reiner seconded the motion.
,........ Vote on the motion: Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Chinnici-
, Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes.
Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor Chinnici-
Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes.
TRODUCTION/FIRST READING - ORDINANCES
BIDS
Ordinance 16-04
Accepting the Lowest/Best Bid for the City of Dublin Floor Maintenance And
Upholstery Cleaning Project.
Mr. Lecklider introduced the ordinance.
Mrs. Boring noted that there his a large discrepancy among the bids.
Mr. Hahn responded that the staff estimate of the value of the services is actually closer
to the low bid versus the high bid. References have been checked and the company
does understand the scope of the bid documents. Staff is recommending approval.
There will be a second reading/public hearing at the March 15 Council meeting.
Ordinance 17-04
Accepting the Lowest/Best Bid for the City ofDu6linFaciiities Painting Project.
Ms. Salay introduced the ordinance.
Ms. Brautigam stated that a good bid was received for this project as well.
There will be a second reading/public nearing at the March 15 Council meeting.
Ordinance 18-04
~ Accepting the Lowest/Best Bid for the 2004 Street Maintenance Program, and
Declaring an Emergency.
Mr. Reiner introduced the ordinance.
Mr. Hammersmith stated that seven bids were opened on February 25, and the
lowest/best bid was determined to be Strawser Paving. They also did this project in 2003
and performed well. Staff recommends award of the bid by emergency action tonight in
order to commence work on the project and complete it before the opening of the school
year.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher noted that staJf has a process in place for review of the streets in
which they are prioritized for maintenance.
Mr. .l-iammersn'lith(3greed thatinthe past, the entire docum,ent was presented to Council
\iVith the pavement condition ratings. Tnis can be shared along with thefive and ten year
projections and ratings, if Council desires. It will be updated as part of the CIP process.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher asked that Mr. Keenan be provided with the document
distributed last year for his reference. The remaining information can be distributed at the
time of the CIP.
Mr. Keenan asked if there are any issues with pavement compaction similar to that in
Columbus, which was outlined today in the newspaper. They have had similar problems
at the township.
Mr. Hammersmith stated that the City does asphalt testing as part of the program through
the geotech consultant. Some of these kinds of problems relate to sub base and
~ compaction, not to the asphalt surface itself.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher asked if there is an incentive for early completion of the work.
Mr. Hammersmith responded that there is not, as this is already an aggressive schedule
in order to complete the work before school. It also includes ADA ramp improvements,
including the installation of truncated domes on several ramps to comply with ADA
requirements.
Mrs. Boring commended staff for their very timely preparation of this program in advance
of the season.
Mr. Lecklider asked what type of notice is sent to residents.
I !
, il...'1 ,v ~'l'*i'1!';I\1tHlc;'I!~" ~'l.t'~ .1t!m-t:tti~~I:.J!LU'tlt",lIftH'~;rltl;':;filjlll,; ,', .lllht1tl':#~;'f.fflIl':rIJd
RECORD .6t~ipR()~:E€:bI'~GS
Minutes of Dublin City Council" ' :M:~e~ing
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INO" FORM NO, 10148 March 1, 2004
Held 20
oiYe
notification and they work closely with the Community Relations division. They explain the
process and give notice of the date anticipated for the work.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher recommended sending anotice to all of the associati()nsinthe
neighborhoods throughout the City, asking them to notify their members of the work being
done in their neighborhood.
Mr. Lecklider moved to dispense with the public hearihg and to treat this asemergericy
legislation.
Mr. McCash seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mr. LeckIider, yes;f\t1r.Keenan, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Chinnici-
Zuercher, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. McCash, yes.
STREET NAME CHANGE
Ordinance 19-04
Requesting Approval to Change the Name of MetatecBoulevard to Oiscovery
Boulevard in the City of Dublin, Ohio.
Mr. Lecklider introduced the ordinance.
Mr. Hammersmith stated that this ordinance comes as the result of a request from Mr.
Munro, President/CEO of Inoveris (formerly Metatec). Contact was made with the other
business located on Metatec Boulevard which would be impacted. A representative of
Inoveris is present tonight if there are questions regarding their request. Staff
recommends approval of the request. In addition, a street name change is being
contemplated for the portion of Wilcox Road between Perim,eterand Post Road. Some
suggested names have been provided for that. It would be brought forward at a later
date.
Mr. McCash noted that there is an existing Holt Road in Columbus - staff may want to
check on this prior to proposal of the name.
/r-: There were no further comments on the two names suggested.
There were no questions regarding Ordinance 19-04.
The second reading/public hearing of the ordinance will take place on March 15.
LAND PURCHASE
Ordinance 20-04
Authorizing the Purchase ofa1.32Acre,More~r Less, Ira?t ()f Land fro", Patrick
G. Costello and Valerie Bergdall-Costello Located at 5886 Post Road, City of Dublin,
County of Franklin, State of Ohio.
Mr. McCash introduced the ordinance.
Ms. Brautigam stated that this is the last property between the City Hall complex and the
white farmhouse that the City has yet to acquire. Negotiations have been completed with
the Costellos to purchase the property for $280,000, and a total appropriation of $285,000
is being requested to cover the closing costs as well.
There will be a second reading/public ~earing at the March 15 Council meeting.
OTHER
· Fee Waiver - Dublin Scioto High School - Work Study Appreciation Breakfast
Ms. Brautigam stated that this waiver has been previously granted by Council.
Mr. McCash noted that in view of the continued number of fee waivers requested, it is
important to point out that there are fees in place for not-for-profit and school districts
within the structure of fees alreadY established. Council needs to decide whetherto
charge the fees or simply eliminate them in the ordinance. Why have a fee ordinance in
place if it is not adhered to? '
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher notedthatsne agrees." She believes that this was assigriedto
a Committee last year for review.
Ms. Salay stated that Mr. Kranstuber,Ch~irof the Finance Committee felt that the new
Council should make this decision, and it was deferred until 2004.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher suggested that the'Finance Committee proceed with the review.
An important piece of information would be the type of waivers that have been approved,
i.e., school groups or other outside groups.
Mrs. Boring suggested that staff provide a list of groups who have paid the fees. Waiving
fees for all school groups could result in filling the Ree Center afall hours of the day.
Mr. Lecklider noted that the staff recommendation has been neLJtralon these in the past.
,
RECORD OE'PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INC.. FORM NO. 10148 ch~O~
Held 20
,
view of the number of waivers requested at this time of the year.
Mr. McCashasked if the school groups come to the Rec Center rooms versus the high
- school auditoriums or theaters because the schools are unwilling to waive the janitorial
fees related to school facility use. '
Ms. Salay stated that she would like c.Iarification about why these activities are not being
scheduled at the school facilities. Is it because of the fees charged by the schools?
There was a period of time that scouting groups were charged for use of school facilities.
She is interested in hearing from the school's perspective why these activities should be
held at a City facility versus a school facility.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher asked Ms. Heal about the reason given by the schools for using
the City buildings and for requesting that the fees be waived.
Ms. Heal responded that sometimes they desire a change of venue for meetings and
sometimes they experience booking problems at school facilities. Most of them do pay if
they are not granted the fee waiver. There are many different groups from the schools
and they request waivers separately. In many cases, they are not aware of others
requesting fee waivers.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher commented thaf mostfacilHies ch'arge a fee for maintenance
services at a minimum. This covers the costs of using the facility.
Discussion followed about a date for the Finance Committee to review this.
Mrs. Boring noted that not all Council Members have agreed on fee waiver approval in
the past.
Mr. Keenan stated that Council has spent a lot of time discussing this small fee waiver.
The process needs to be streamlined in some way to avoid this. Perhaps there should
be a charge for janitorial services only, with the remaining portion waived. A compromise
is probably an option.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated for the record that there are reduced fees in place for
non-profit organizations. But in regard to enforcement, there has been some
disagreement among Council. The history should be provided about past fee waiver
requests and whether they were denied or approved.
Mr. Lecklider commented that someone from the school community should be present at
the discussion for input.
Mr. Lecklider moved to waive the fees in accordance with the request made by Dublin
Scioto High School for the work study appreciation breakfast.
Ms. Salay seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. McCash, no;
Mrs. Boring, no; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, no; Mr. Lecklider, yes.
. Fee Waiver - Dublin Chamber of Commerce - Dublin Student Job Fair
Ms. Heal stated that she was approached by the Chamber who is trying to develop a
student job fair in cooperation with several businesses that need part-time help. They
would like to hold it in a central location and are asking for a fee waiver for use of the Rec
Center rooms.
Ms. Salay asked if the City provides financial support to the Chamber of Commerce,
I-'~ aside from the Leadership Dublin program.
Ms. Grigsby responded that no direct financial support is provided, however, the City
owns the building and leases it to the Chamber for $16,000 per year. The Chamber is
funded mainly by their membership fees.
Mrs. Boring suggested some discussion regarding other options for a job fair location,
such as corporations in Dublin.
Mr. Keenan asked who this program is designed to attract - Dublin high school students?
Ms. Heal responded that is her assumption.
Mr. Reiner asked why this event would not be held at the high school as it is scheduled
for a Saturday.
Mr. Keenan commented that the purpose of the Rec Center is for such community-
focused events.
"-'C'_', '."~.'., .'-', ,'. '''. "", ,.... ,',
'."-~~~
';Y' ;,di~itr$j''1l~;;'~)~',it;l&j;,i,j;;ilJi,l'.;tE.!~J'.'m H'I:tt~llm!I;,ti'/ij';;liHlife\:>>I~J~'; 'Ut;HH:^_i::;!,ijI;'~'tlni' 'I
RECORD OF' eROCEEQINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BlANK, INC.. FORM NO, 10148 -Marctrt;LOO~ -pa-gtr1T
Held 20
-even ,
the fee for the event.
Mr. Keenan responded that there is no charge for those participating in the event, and it
will help companies in the community obtain part-time employees.
~ Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that the question relates to paying the costs of using the
City facility, i.e., maintenance, utilities, etc.
Discussion continued.
Mrs. Boring commented that she would support this waiver because it will allow for a
service to the community youth.
Mr. Keenan suggested that the Finance Committee develop a policy. In the meantime,
he moved approval of the waiver for the Dublin Chamber of Commerce student job fair.
Ms. Salay seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Chinnici-
Zuercher, no; Mr. McCash, no; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes.
. Fee Waiver - Dublin Coffman Baseball staff
Ms. Brautigam stated that this waiver is for use of the fields for an annual baseball camp,
and it has been approved in the past. The value is approximately $1,000.
Ms. Heal responded that this is a long-standing event that predates her tenure with the
City.
Mr. Reiner noted that people pay registration fees for the camp, and they should be
adequate to cover the rental costs for the facilities, coaches and equipment.
The school group has indicated that they would like the fee waived in order to put more
monies back into the varsity baseball account.
Ms. Salay noted that the participants are Dublin children, by and large. She does not
recall waiving the fees previously.
Ms. Heal stated that these fees were handled previously under a "gentlemen's
agreement" with the schools and predate the fee ordinance.
~ Mr. McDaniel added that, as the DSL agreement is revisited, these types of programs
would be addressed. Permitting of camps and tournaments on parklands will be
restructured. The effort will seek to determine who are the users, who are the
beneficiaries, and where the monies are going when granting the use of City property.
Staff continues to work on these matters.
Ms. Salay asked if the recommendation on the DSL agreement would be ready prior to
the baseball camp event.
Mr. McDaniel stated that the draft recommendation has been circulated to the working
group and a follow-up meeting is scheduled on Wednesday.
Ms. Salay stated that her concern is with treating these groups fairly and equally, and if
changes are pending for the soccer groups, maybe a decision on this request should be
postponed.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that there would be maintenance issues for the fields to
be addressed for this type of use.
Mrs. Boring added that some groups do contribute to the maintenance of the fields.
Mr. McDaniel agreed that DSL and DY A do contribute at some level to the maintenance.
It is an issue of balance.
Ms. Salay stated that this appears to be part of the Dublin varsity baseball program
fundraising. There are related maintenance issues for using the fields.
Mr. McDaniel agreed that the City is left with the maintenance of the fields as a result of
~. these uses.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher noted that the memo indicates that a minimum of $5,000 is
deposited into the varsity baseball field fund and used to maintain and upgrade their
fields. For her, this waiver involves a lot of costs in terms of a week-long use by a large
group.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher summarized that Ms. Salay has recommended that Council
consider postponing a decision on this until the recommendation is received regarding
the DSL agreement.
Ms. Salay so moved.
The motion died for lack of second.
Mr. Reiner moved to deny the waiver.
Mr. McCash seconded the motion.
RECORD QE',.PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INC.. FORM NO. 10148 ~
Held 20
, , , , , , ,
yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan, no.
. Revised Traffic Calming Program
..--, Mr. Hammersmith stated the program has been updated, based on comments from
Council at the last discussion. The staff report details the responses to the Council
comments at the study session. He offered to respond to questions. He noted on page
2, regarding streets not yet completed, staff proposes 75 percent as a benchmark
guideline before traffic calming measures are considered.
Mr. Lecklider asked why this is 75 percent versus 90, 50 or 60.
Mr. Hammersmith responded that it was a point of discussion among staff. In reviewing
the majority of streets that fall in this category, there would be a significant number of
residents already established on the street. The remaining 25 percent of residents would
not necessarily be at the source of the impact, as the streets normally extend from
inward outward.
Mrs. Boring asked for further clarification regarding the definition of a loop street on page
5. The definition may be problematic in the case of a long loop street.
Ms. Willis noted that the closing paragraph under the pre-qualification of street section
addresses this by stating, "if the street does not meet all of these standards, the Division
of Engineering will further evaluate the street for its suitability for evaluation for traffic
calming measures."
Mrs. Boring stated that her concern is that someone may believe that they are not eligible
for this program.
Ms. Willis responded that staff would work to ensure that this does not happen, and will
work with the community to ensure that they understand how the process works.
Mr. Hammersmith stated that there was quite a bit of discussion about the level of
.~ participation required. Staff has modified the level for the second petition from 90
percent of residents on the affected street and 67 percent of those living in the affected
area to an 85 percent participation within the entire area - both those on the street and
those living on adjoining streets.
Mr. Lecklider commented that this seems to be an even higher standard than the
previous requirements.
Mr. Hammersmith responded that staff did review this and believes that making the
threshold too low would result in a large percentage not supportive of installation of traffic
calming. This is certainly Council's discretion, however, if they would like it to be
reduced. Much depends on the specific neighborhood.
Discussion followed.
Ms. Salay asked what percentage is necessary for the initial traffic calming petition.
Ms. Willis responded that those requirements have not changed. Only the second
petition requirements were modified in this process.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher noted that she agrees with the 85 percent level of participation
because implementing traffic calming measures impacts those who live in the
neighborhood. If a super majority is not supportive, the City's investment in such
measures is probably inappropriate.
Mr. Hammersmith responded that staff is suggesting this as a guideline. It could be
waived for a particular area, depending upon circumstances.
,...,..,...... Mr. McCash noted that Ms. Willis had responded to him directly regarding some of the
.
concerns expressed by him and by Mr. Lecklider previously.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher summarized that staff will bring forward a resolution adopting
the revised program for the March 15 meeting.
. Manley Road Speed Study
Mr. Hammersmith stated that staff is providing an informational report to Council
regarding the residents' request during the Tartan West discussion for a speed study for
Manley Road, in particular the portion within Delaware County. Staff secured the
services of R.D. Zande to perform the study and the results were submitted to the
Delaware County engineer who then forwarded it to ODOT. ODOT has jurisdiction for
speed limits on county and state roads. ODOT reviewed the speed study and they were
, , "
RECORD OE'. PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Duolin City Council Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INC.. FORM NO. 10148 ~4
Held 20
,
existing 45 mph to 35 mph. They raised four points:
1. Thereshould have been coordination with the Union County engineer since a portion
of Manley Road is in Union County. He has spoken with Steve Stolte who has no
,.......... issue with the recommendations.
2. ODOT does not believe a speed reduction for a roadway should be based upon
future improvements, but should be based upon existing traffic.
3. They were not in agreement with the accident history in terms of its relation to the
speed limit.
4. They felt that, based upon the calculated speed in the study of 43 mph, they wanted it
rounded up to 45 mph and as a result were inclined to have the existing limit retained.
Staff suggests responding to ODOT that while the City is not in agreement with their
point of view, the City recognizes their authority over the speed limit. Staff also would
recommend that the speed study be updated once Tartan West development
progresses.
. Issue 28 - Children Services Levy
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that she included in the packet a letter from Columbus
City Council President Habash requesting Dublin Council's support of the Children
Services Levy on the March 2 ballot. There have been dramatic increases in numbers of
children served in this program. She is not certain of the impact Council's endorsement
would have at this point, but asked for a motion from Council regarding this support.
Mr. McCash commented that in the past, Dublin Council has avoided taking positions on
various similar issues and levies.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that she felt an obligation to bring this forward to Council
as req uested.
There was no action taken by Council.
- CITY MANAGER/STAFF REPORTS
Ms. Brautigam indicated that there are no staff reports at this time.
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE
Mr. Reiner cited a report from Dublin City Schools Treasurer Chris Mohr regarding the
school system. Mr. Reiner found the statistics alarming in regard to the percentage of
residential versus commercial development, and the overall decline of the commercial tax
base and expansion of the residential development. It indicates that the residential ratio
has changed from 50 plus percent up to 67 percent. Council needs to be aware of this
situation, the resolution of which may be raising taxes for the schools. Perhaps Council
should consider limiting some residential growth or monitoring it. In Jerome and other
areas, which are already under land option by developers, the school system will be
greatly impacted. As Community Development Chair, he recommends that Council avoid
having such an imbalance that would lead to raising taxes. Monitoring and measuring the
land uses is Council and Planning Commission's role and needs to be the focus.
Ms. Brautigam responded that she discussed this with Mr. Reiner last week, and she
asked Ms. Grigsby to investigate the statistics that would support or refute this. Ms.
Grigsby found that since 1994, the com'mercial building activity has totaled over $992
million while residential activity has totaled $825 million, which would seem to indicate that
the percentages would head in the other direction. However, further information garnered
showed that the assessed valuation of the existing residential properties has increased
more than the existing commercial properties because of the market. It therefore did not
really relate to the City's land use decisions, but rather to the market conditions. Ms.
-- Grigsby has prepared a comprehensive report, which she will provide to Council in the
next packet.
Mr. McCash noted that Council has received applications for the Tara Hill Comprehensive
Traffic Task Force and for boards and commissions. He asked that Council identify
available dates for interviews.
Following discussion, interview dates for boards and commissions were scheduled on
Thursday, March 11 from 6:30 to 9:30 p.m. and the Tara Hill task force on Wednesday,
March 31 from 6:30 to 9:30 p.m.
Mrs. Boring suggested that Council at some point have discussion of the attendance
records for current board and commission members and establish a policy relating to this.
In addition, discussion of a policy regarding training would be helpful.
It was the consensus of Council to schedule this discussion during an executive session
regarding personnel matters.
, , I, 'I ,I l'mll'[':,e:\~U1r$'':'f'''l1Ji''':!n''!Jllt:1!V3:l:11Bl: ....:;fJ.'~nlcl'llp,1"7.~;'l"II~T'ml!. t"" .11r!!1.1.1'1". J):~;:"E7"1I'1'
RECORD OE' PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK. INC" FORM NO, 10148
Held 20
Mrs. Boring stated that tonight was a very significant meeting. The dream of acquiring the
hardwood forests at Riverside Drive anp Hard Road has now become a reality with
Council's action. She has had many calls from supportive residents and wished they had
~ been present tonight. She thanked staff for working on this negotiation, but more
importantly thanked Council for taking this opportunity to preserve this woods for all of
Dublin into the future.
Mr. Keenan noted that he attended the recent City sponsored meetings on future water
and sewer extensions. The meetings were well attended and staff did an excellent job in
presentation of the materials. The discussion was lively and the questions were similar at
each session. He thanked staff for hosting these informative meetings.
Ms. Salav:
1. Noted that she was contacted by a Heather Glen Civic Association member
who serves as garage sale coordinator. Currently, their association sends out
a notice and for those interested, the civic association paid the $2.00 per home
fee. The City fees for such permits were recently raised from $2.00 to $5.00
for each homeowner, and that substantially increases the association's
expense. She asked if Council would consider establishing a single fee for
civic associations who sponsor a mass community garage sale. It would serve
the purpose of preventing independent sales on many weekends and would
better control the number of such sales and the signage. She suggested a
neighborhood fee of $20 to $25 for such a permit for multiple homes to
participate on a single weekend.
Mrs. Boring suggested that staff could bring forward such a modification to the fee
schedule.
~ Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher responded that in her neighborhood, they have a one-time
neighborhood sale but each participant is charged. The association does not bear the
costs of the sale; the individual homeowner pays it. There are alternative ways that
neighborhoods can choose to approach the issue aside from paying it out of the
association dues.
Mrs. Boring stated that the intent is that the organization would sponsor it and would
therefore have a reduced fee.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher asked about the basis for the fee increase that Council
approved.
Ms. Grigsby stated that the fees have not been increased since the early 1980's. The
actual costs to process the permit were determined to be $10.00, and a fee increase was
recommended to offset some of the costs. The permits are issued for each individual
address, and most often a homeowners association brings in the list of participants in the
sale to secure permits. She can report back to Council about how the process is set up
at this time. Permits are also issued for safety reasons, due to the traffic generated from
such sales, so that the Police division is aware of their scheduling.
Staff will bring information back to Council for further review.
2. Ms. Salay noted that there was an article in the paper recently regarding the
transfer of jobs out of the Medex facility.
Mr. Stevens confirmed that in Friday's Columbus Dispatch it was announced that Medex
is moving 100 manufacturing jobs from Dublin to Monterey, Mexico.
-, 3. Asked if Council will have a float or individual cars for the parade on March 13.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher responded that a float will be provided for Council and forms
were provided in the packet for Council to fill out and submit to Community Relations.
Mr. Lecklider:
1. Asked about the Hayden Run stone wall where the veneer is crumbling again.
Mr. Hammersmith responded that there is a project underway this year either to repair or
replace the wall. The maintenance for the wall is the City's responsibility. This type of
stone collects water that leaks behind the veneer and causes the crumbling. It was
repaired several years ago, but the attempt did not solve the problem.
2. Reported that he has had several calls from residents regarding the tree cutting
recently done by AEP. What he is hearing from the residents is that AEP
proceeds with cutting down trees without regard to the residents' concerns. He
believes that they offer a very minimal compensation for the trees cut down.
I I I
RECORD OE' PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting
DAYrON LEGALBLANK,INC.. FORM NO, 10148 -Marctr-t~z+-- Page 1-0
Held 20
these issues to facilitate communication. However, this issue is somewhat of a "double-
edged sword." AEP does have the right to maintain the easement areas, including
trimming and removal of trees in the e,asement area. Secondly, any windstorm can
;..-.- impact the trees and the lines near them, which results in the risk of a large scale power
outage, similar to what occurred last summer. AEP has undertaken a higher level of
maintenance to ensure that such electrical outages do not occur again. Staff will
continue to facilitate discussion betwe~n AEP and the residents wherever possible.
There is a balance line between landscape aesthetics and maintenance of the
transmission lines.
3. Mr. Lecklider commented that he assumes that Mr. Smith is seeking further
direction from Council in response to the memo in the packet regarding campaign
finance disclosure. Does Council prefer to have discussion tonight or at another
time?
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher responded that a thorough discussion would be needed before
direction is provided by Council to staff on this matter.
Ms. Salay suggested that this item be scheduled on a future Council agenda for
discussion.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher:
1. Noted that she assumes Mr. McDaniel has received the document from the Dublin
Soccer League regarding the resolution they approved endorsing the concepts
identified in the proposed agreement. It appears that progress is being made.
2. Wished a "Happy Birthday" to Mr. Smith on March 4th!
3. Reminded everyone to vote in the primary election tomorrow.
ADJOURNMENT TO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher moved to adjourn to executive session at 9:40 p.m. for land
acquisition and personnel matters.
Mr. Lecklider seconded the motion.
Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher noted that the meeting would be reconvened only to formally
adjourn. No action will be taken.
Vote on the motion: Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes;
Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes.
The meeting was reconvened at 10:50 p.m. and formally adjourned.
(~-
Mayor - Presiding Officer
~(J ~
Clerk of Council
r--
\