HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/07/2000RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
a.4,t
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 1 Mxp
Held Au¢4ust 71 ?,000
Mayor Kranstuber called the Dublin City Council Special Meeting of August 7, 2000 to
order at 7:00 p.m.
Mrs. Boring led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll Call
Council members present were: Mayor Kranstuber, Vice Mayor Adamek, Mrs. Boring,
Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, Mr. McCash, Mr. Peterson and Mr. Reiner.
Staff members present were: Ms. Grigsby, Ms. Crandall, Ms. Readler, Mr. Kindra, Mr.
McDaniel, Ms. Susong, and Mr. Combs.
Mayor Kranstuber noted that the purpose of this Special Meeting of Dublin City Council
is for the discussion of two items: (1) An additional funding request from the Dublin
Convention and Visitors Bureau; and (2) the Historic Dublin Revitalization Task Force
recommendations.
Funding Request From Dublin Convention and Visitors Bureau
Mayor Kranstuber noted that there was a public hearing on the DCVB's request, and
general direction was given to staff to work out the specifics of a recommended motion
for Council approval.
Ms. Grigsby stated that she and Mr. McCash developed draft language for a motion,
which was faxed earlier today to Council and to Ms. Schmucki, the Executive Director
of the Bureau. Since then, Ms. Schmucki has requested that Council table action on her
request to allow time for further study of the proposal.
Mayor Kranstuber suggested that, simultaneous with tabling the request, Council also
refer the item to the Finance Committee for review with the Bureau representatives.
Mr. McCash agreed, noting that it would be necessary to schedule and advertise the
meeting prior to the next Council meeting. He explained that the DCVB's fiscal year is
different from the City's calendar year, and therefore Ms. Schmucki would like more
time to understand what is being proposed by the City.
Ms. Schmucki noted that the City's hotel/motel tax revenue projections are lower than
the Bureau's projections, which could mean the funding would be significantly less than
what they anticipate.
Mr. McCash, Finance Committee chair, stated that he will schedule a Committee
meeting prior to the September 5th Council meeting.
Mayor Kranstuber moved to refer the DCVB's request for supplemental funding to
Finance Committee.
Mr. Adamek seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr.
Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes.
,.-.. Discussion of Recommendations of the Historic Dublin Revitalization Task Force
Mayor Kranstuber noted that the report is a comprehensive document developed by the
Task Force over a period of several months. Three Council members served on this
Task Force: Mr. Peterson, Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, and Mr. McCash. Council will
attempt to complete review of the report tonight. To meet this goal, public testimony
will be limited to two minutes per person on each item. As each item in the report is
discussed, Council will try to bring closure on that item before moving on to the next.
BRIDGE & HIGH
Establish a safe and comfortable pedestrian connection between North and South
High Streets at Bridge Street.
Mayor Kranstuber requested that Mr. McDaniel report staff's action to date.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 2
Held August 7, 9,000 ,
Mr. McDaniel stated that staff reviewed the recommendations of the Task Force and
developed a response sheet. It breaks down the information into categories of actions
needed or not needed, actions taken to date, time -frames for implementation, budget
implications, and which department /division should be responsible.
Recommendations
• Reduce speed limit to 25 mph which might coincide with new loop road
implementation.
Mr. Kindra reported that reduction of speed on Bridge Street is in process and he
anticipates having a report for Council at their next meeting.
Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher stated that the earlier Staff Response Sheet indicated the action
needed is an outside study or ODOT input. Does Mr. Kindra's statement mean that staff
has initiated a study in this regard and a report will be made about the results at the next
Council meeting, along with specific recommendations?
Mr. Kindra affirmed that this is correct.
Larry Frimerman, 63 South Riverview Street, pointed out that the reduction in speed
limit to 25 mph need not be tied to any consideration of a loop road. The speed limit
could be lowered tomorrow.
Mr. Kindra responded that the Task Force recommendation came to Council with those
items considered as one. Staff will respond to each separately.
Mr. Frimerman stated that in most cities with historic districts, the speed limit on the
main thoroughfare through the district is 25 mph.
Mayor Kranstuber noted that, unless there is an objection from Council, the assumption
will be that the recommendation is accepted, and staff will implement according to
budget.
• Time the signal pattern to slow traffic.
Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher explained that this focuses on the traffic flow and the limited
opportunity for pedestrian movement.
Mr. McCash stated that this could be effected with a sign indicating, "No turn on red."
Mr. Kindra agreed that it could, but they are evaluating all options.
Craig Barnum, Owner, Oscars, Brazenhead and Tucci's stated that this recommendation
relates more to North High and South High Street. Recently, when he drove through the
historic district of Alexandria, Virginia, he was stopped at all 15 traffic lights.
Obviously, the intent was to eliminate opportunity to travel 35 -45 mph by installing
obstacles all the way through. In the historic district of Dublin, that obstacle does not
exist, and traffic moves very quickly.
• Add pedestrian crossing signage.
This has been done.
• Provide directly applied police traffic management at congested driving times.
That has been completed.
• Investigate brick crosswalks at intersections and key locations that will also
help to identify district "entrances."
Mr. McDaniel noted that this has not been addressed, as it would require a policy
decision by Council due to the cost implications.
Mayor Kranstuber asked for estimated costs.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
ty Council
Held August 7, 2000 ,
Mr. Kindra stated that the costs would be determined based on whether the brick would
be limited to the crosswalks only or whether other areas would be included. Another
decision would relate to the overall look —18th century or 21S` century.
Mr. McCash responded that the historic character of the area and the historical
significance of the buildings dictate an 18' century look for this project. In addition,
there are already brick sidewalks installed, and brick pedestrian crossings would
complement them.
Mr. McDaniel responded that Engineering is studying the implications for drainage,
which impacts road construction, curb reconstruction, and the aprons. All of this must
be studied before any decision could be made to install brick crosswalks.
David King, 7219 Sawmill Road, Task Force Chair stated that the recommendation was
based on the following factors: image - building; identifying the key entrances, so there
would be more than one location; and safety. Grove City implemented these a few
years ago,
Mayor Kranstuber inquired about the recommended locations.
Mr. King responded: (1) at the intersection with New Road, if that concept is approved;
(2) at High School Road at the western boundary of the middle school; and (3) at the
north and south entrances to the historic district.
Mayor Kranstuber inquired about a cost estimate.
Mr. King responded that none was prepared. There are several projects in the report for
which the Task Force recommends studying their feasibility.
Mr. Reiner inquired if brick was the material of choice or if alternative materials were
discussed.
Mr. King responded that an alternative material could be considered.
Mayor Kranstuber inquired if Council wants to move the items which need cost
estimates to a next level of study for that purpose.
Mr. Peterson stated that even if a study were to indicate that the cost is prohibitive, he
would suggest that staff recommend an alternative remedy, rather than leaving this
unaddressed.
Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher suggested that the items to be investigated are prioritized at the
end of the meeting, and the top five referred to staff to evaluate. There is not enough
staff time available to provide this information for all the projects.
Mrs. Boring agreed, noting that related items could be combined for cost estimate
purposes.
Mr. Reiner stated that the in -house landscape architect would be able to provide those
figures.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that the Old Dublin projects may need to be reviewed in the
context of other CIP projects.
Mr. McCash noted that at Big Bear at Perimeter, the heavier cobble -style paver is
effective in slowing the traffic.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that those used in downtown Columbus are attractive and seem
to have a longer life than the blacktop.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 4,
Held August 7, 2000 ,
_.... _.. _.(YEAR)
Mayor Kranstuber inquired if the brick sidewalks and lamp posts in Old Dublin were
funded by a bed tax grant.
Ms. Grigsby affirmed that they were.
Mayor Kranstuber suggested that use of bed tax for this item would be a possibility.
• Investigate the potential for relocating the State Route 33 and 161 designations
to Emerald Parkway between the new bridge at Riverside Drive and the
planned bridge at the Justice Center, if such action would facilitate other
recommendations.
Mr. King explained that this suggestion is made only if it would help to facilitate other
recommendations.
Mr. Peterson pointed out that it is easier to control the speed on City streets than to
obtain approval from ODOT to reduce speeds for roads under their control.
Mr. McCash clarified that SR 161 would then loop up and around Dublin on Emerald
Parkway rather than going through Dublin.
The consensus of Council was that this is of very low priority.
Mayor Kranstuber moved to eliminate this recommendation from the list.
Mr. Peterson seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mr. Peterson, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes;
Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes.
• Investigate and consider fully brick streets for special streets.
Mr. King explained that the purpose would be to create a feeling that one has arrived in a
special place, the Historic District. This would extend that sense from the intersections
to special streets as well. This may include North and South High Street.
Mayor Kranstuber asked Mr. Kindra about the expense of such a project.
Mr. Kindra responded that the cost would be approximately four times that of asphalt.
Mr. McCash noted that an asphalt street, however, requires more maintenance than a
brick street, so there may be a long -term savings in this area.
Mr. Kindra stated that staff has not estimated maintenance costs over the life of the
pavement type.
Mrs. Boring inquired about the effect of salt and plowing on brick in comparison to
asphalt.
Mr. McDaniel responded that the salt and plowing do have a destructive impact on
bricks. The City of Westerville has a full -time crew to address yearly replacement of
portions of the brick streets.
Mr. Adamek moved to eliminate this recommendation of fully brick streets from the
plan.
Mrs. Boring seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Peterson,
yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, no; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes.
Mr. Frimerman commented that he is concerned with Council's removal of items so
quickly on the basis of cost, prior to having an estimate.
Mayor Kranstuber responded that in view of staffing and budget limitations, it is
possible only to do a portion of these items. Those with lesser priority will be removed
at this point. Nothing that Council is doing tonight will preclude further consideration of
them in the future. Tonight's focus is to narrow the list to the high priority items.
� awaHUUaeaQi,r wry usiw I 49i 4U 46 A I5
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 5
Held Auunct 71 9000 ,
(YEAR)
STREETSCAPE
Establish a pedestrian comfortable walking system throughout Historic Dublin
Enhance the Historic District Streetscape.
Recommendations:
• Repair walkways and curbs except as may be postponed due to other
infrastructure work.
Mr. McDaniel reported that emergency repairs have been completed.
Mr. Barnum stated that the City did a good job of repairing the curbs, except for two
immediately outside Oscar's that are sunken and still present a danger to the public.
Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher asked that Mr. Barnum provide the specific locations in writing
and fax them to Mr. McDaniel. She also noted for the fixture that working on a
preventative maintenance plan is more effective long -term than simply repairing the
damaged curbs and walkways.
Mr. McDaniel stated that his department has made a commitment to pay careful
attention to these areas. He and Mr. Johnson view the area routinely to identify any
possible problems. He encouraged the public to contact them if they become aware of
any problem so that staff can address them.
• Clean up and maintain public land and facilities.
Mr. McDaniel stated that staff is currently conducting a review of the publicly owned
properties. Staff is meeting with the Dublin Kiwanis to discuss the issues raised
regarding the Kiwanis Park. The public parking area on the south side of SR 161 is
being cleaned up, now that construction on the corner is completed.
• Investigate best combination of hard and soft surfaces within walkways.
Mr. McDaniel stated this is being handled.
• Hold a public meeting with residents and business property owners and tenants
to discuss the responsibilities of both the private and public sector in the
maintenance of the public ROW. Clearly define who has the responsibility for
repairs, snow removal, trash removal, cleaning, material installation,
landscaping, etc.
Mr. McDaniel stated that he has met with Mr. Barnum, Mr. Jones, and Mr. Frimerman
on this matter. There is a need to reaffirm the areas of City responsibility. His intention
also is to attend the future meetings of the Old Dublin Association to keep this
communication line open.
• Investigate Riverside Drive and Bridge Street intersection in regard to SR 161
redevelopment to ensure comfortable and safe pedestrian and bike crossing to
the bridge.
Mr. Kindra noted that this is underway and a report will be completed by the next
Council meeting.
• Reconsider and determine the most efficient and appropriate means to handle
stormwater management.
Mr. Kindra stated that staff will formulate the guidelines. This also involves
consideration of the parking expansion in Old Dublin which will affect drainage. The
Legal Department and the Planning and Engineering divisions are working together on
legislation for Council's consideration. He noted that street drainage, however, is a
complex issue. There is no economical way to handle stormwater management in Old
Dublin. No substantial drainage problem has been identified, but the drainage in Old
Dublin is not handled in the same way as the other areas of Dublin. Staff is continuing
to evaluate this issue.
Mayor Kranstuber inquired about the recommendations for Old Dublin in the
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council
Held AuWist 71 2-000 ,
stormwater study completed a couple of years ago.
Mr. Kindra responded that the study did not make recommendations in regard to Old
Dublin.
Mr. McCash stated that a stormwater plan for Old Dublin could not comply with regular
stormwater regulations. Alternative plans would be necessary.
Mr. Kindra responded that staff is assessing it in that context.
Joan Eggspuehler, Old Dublin Association stated that the issues of stormwater and
streets and parking as they are affected by stormwater must be brought to a logical
conclusion. This has been under discussion for ten years, and the residents are very
anxious that a plan be developed.
Mr. Kindra stated that the ordinance will enable the district property owners to expand
parking and will provide guidelines for protecting abutting or downstream properties.
At this time, staff is not looking at individual issues. Those will be addressed at a later
date.
Herb Jones 19 S. Riverview Street stated that many years ago, on the west side of
Blacksmith Lane, there was a natural drainage ditch that carried the water away. As the
businesses grew, the Village of Dublin removed the drainage ditch, but no tile was
installed. As parking lots developed with tremendous stormwater runoff, the City added
a curb system. This system is not very effective, however, particularly on Blacksmith
Lane. If the City is considering relaxing standards to allow parking areas to be expanded
in Old Dublin, measures will have to be implemented to handle the tremendous amount
of runoff from the hill and across Blacksmith Lane.
Mr. Reiner inquired if part of the solution will be a U- curve, precast system with a
gradeover.
Mr. Kindra said that he assessed that curb last week, and it is in good condition. There
may be a need to add a curve such as that at other locations. They will continue to
monitor the situation.
Kathy Brooks, 16 N. High Street stated that their business is located in an office adjacent
to Domino's Pizza. The building was built in 1824 and never flooded until the parking
lot was paved across the street. On a rainy day, the runoff flows down into their offices.
They have contacted the City numerous times and were told that they should install a
French drain in front of the office. They have done that, but it does not address the
problem. The offices have been flooded several times this summer, with mulch from the
flower beds ending up under their desks.
Mr. McDaniel stated that he has observed that situation which is a sheet runoff from the
parking lot. The City is planning to sod in front of the parking lot to capture the water in
order to divert it into the curbline.
• Investigate amenities to be provided within streetscape work, including lamps,
benches, receptacles and signage; provide as deemed appropriate.
Mr. McDaniel stated all fixtures have been cleaned, repainted, trash cans situated on
pads, and benches leveled and straightened. Additional receptacles have been ordered.
• Continue sidewalks and convert concrete to brick along both sides of South
High Street to Karrer Place and Marion Street.
Herb Lo2oski, 181 S. High Street stated that the brick sidewalk ends at the Karrer
residence driveway with no logical termini. He has observed numerous pedestrians with
small children walking out into the street in that area. He suggests that the sidewalk be
continued to the south.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
v... �..... �...; �... �. ��....w.m�..� „�,.�.�,..i.�a�tes . �.. �.., �_ �.. �.. �4, ��.. �. �.. M._ ��,._.., W. —�,. .v-,-o..Me�.g���...�.�as.�_....
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 7
My- 51 111
Mr. King pointed out that safety, identification and image issues are intertwined with
many of the recommendations. This is one example. Not only will it create an identity
for the district, it will address a safety issue.
Mr. McDaniel stated that staff has in fact look at extending this portion. It is an
extensive area and would have cost implications.
Mr. Reiner stated that the cost could be anywhere between $8 to $15 per square foot,
depending on the base.
Mayor Kranstuber summarized that this portion could cost between $80,000 to $120,000
to complete.
Mr. Logoski stated that in evaluating the cost, it is necessary to note that the storm sewer
in that area is right at the surface, a tile pipe that is exposed from Karrer Drive South.
That would have to be buried or incorporated into the design.
Mayor Kranstuber said that, separate from this plan, the extension could be justified as
part of the City's annual addition to the bikepath, as it would facilitate pedestrian traffic
from Waterford Village to Old Dublin.
Mrs. Boring suggested a transition from the brick sidewalks to the bikepath.
Mr. King said that would be acceptable, assuming that the material identifies arrival at a
particular place.
Mr. Peterson stated that it would be useful to know how many missing links in the
bikepath there are within the district; the cost of installing /replacing bricks; and outside
the district, the cost of linking the district to the south with concrete sidewalks. If the
numbers were available, Council could make a decision.
Mrs. Boring stated that she supports this, but timing would be an issue.
Mayor Kranstuber requested that staff provide estimates on the entire project.
Mr. Frimerman pointed out that the purpose of this would be not only to move
pedestrians from one place in the district to another, but to facilitate pedestrian and
bicycle entrance from other parts of Dublin to Old Dublin, so that this becomes the hub,
as the Community Plan outlined.
• Continue brick sidewalks and convert concrete to brick along the west side of
North High Street to Emerald Parkway
• Continue brick sidewalks and convert concrete to brick along both sides of
Bridge Street to Post and Frantz Roads intersection.
Mrs. Boring stated that connections are needed, but it may not necessarily have to be
brick.
Mayor Kranstuber inquired if there is a link missing in the route from Bridge and High
to the Post Road intersection.
Mr. McDaniel stated that the north side is complete, but the south side is not.
Wallace Maurer, 7351 Dublin Road asked if walkways and bikeways are
interchangeable terms. He would have concerns about bikers sharing a sidewalk with
pedestrians.
Mr. Kindra responded that sidewalks are typically 4 to 5 feet wide, and bikepaths 8 to 10
feet wide. These areas under discussion would be sidewalk connections, not bikepaths.
A4ivautes RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
w�a���w�ti ��m�. �o.. �. ���.. P. �.. ����u.. �wti � ,.�m�,�aw „m.A,a,.,,�..�w,�, -4�,M1�ta.�gb_��M�._.µ�..
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 8
Staff will provide information on the costs associated with these connections.
• Investigate additional streets to receive Streetscape approach. Provide as
deemed appropriate and including Overlook and Quarry Parks.
Mr. King explained that the Quarry Park is being suggested, as does the Community
Plan, for development as a park. The Overlook Park is a misnomer — it actually denotes
that the Task Force agrees with the Community Plan's recommendation that a point
along S. Riverview Drive be established for an overlook to take advantage of the vista.
The Task Force is suggesting that Council look at how S. Riverview might be treated
with a Streetscape approach, brick or other amenities, to make a visual tie from Bridge
and High south to Quarry Park.
In response to Mayor Kranstuber, Mr. King noted that the Task Force did not attempt to
prioritize the items on their list; their goal is to see that some action is taken and that a
plan is put into process.
Mr. McDaniel stated that some funding for this year has been budgeted to study the
feasibility of pedestrian pathways from the north fork of Indian Run down to the
riverfront. Some preliminary discussion has taken place with the schools in this regard
as well.
Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher asked if the study has begun.
Mr. McDaniel was not certain about its status.
Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher stated that if this is something Council is not interested in
pursuing, there would be no point in having it studied.
It was the consensus of Council to proceed with the feasibility study in order to obtain an
estimate of the costs of such a connection.
• Investigate potential for overhead utilities to be relocated underground.
Mr. King clarified that this would be for the Historic District, along Bridge and High
Streets.
Mr. McCash stated that the City's experience has shown that this is very expensive, and
the bedrock in Old Dublin would likely make it more cost prohibitive.
Mr. King stated that this was included because it is an important item in the context of
aesthetics.
Mayor Kranstuber explained that only AEP does this work, and the rates are prohibitive
in order to discourage it.
Ms. Grigsby stated that there has been an ongoing City goal to bury utilities as
opportunities arise, and staff will proceed with this per the budget each year.
Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher moved to eliminate this from the endorsed list of
recommendations, due to the fact that this will be handled separately by the City in the
utility burial program as currently budgeted.
Mayor Kranstuber seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion — Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr.
Peterson, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes.
PARK AND PATH SYSTEM
Establish the Historic District as the hub of the community bike and pedestrian
paths sum particularly in regard to the Town Square and the natural features
Enhance the opportunities for a relationship between pedestrian activi , in the
Historic District and unique natural features.
Recommendations:
• Investigate other potential locations for parkland, especially that connect the
district with the river and path systems.
Mayor Kranstuber indicated that this is an ongoing goal of Council and staff has been
given previous direction to bring opportunities for parkland purchase to Council.
Mr. McDaniel agreed.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that a major commitment toward this effort has been made in
recent years, e.g., purchase of the two gas stations in Old Dublin.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 9
• Review and take into consideration recommendations from the Natural
Resources Advisory Commission and other similar boards or commissions.
Mr. McDaniel stated that staff views this as related to the previous one regarding
parkland acquisition.
Mayor Kranstuber recommended that this be combined with the previous
recommendation, "Investigate other potential locations for parkland especially that
connect the district with the river and path systems, taking into consideration
recommendations from the Natural Resources Advisory Commission and other similar
boards or commission."
It was the consensus of Council to do so.
• Complete the Kiwanis Club "Riverwalk." Investigate feasibility of pedestrian
bridges to Arts Council property and Kiwanis Park.
Mr. King explained that anything the City could do to help the Kiwanis complete the
system would be beneficial. If there is an opportunity for a pedestrian crossing of the
river on the north side to the Arts Council property, the Scioto Park, and to the Kiwanis
Park on the south side, they recommend it be pursued. He added that approximately 30
percent of the system is complete.
Mr. McDaniel stated that staff has made a commitment to work with the Kiwanis on
this item on an ongoing basis.
Mayor Kranstuber suggested then that this be moved to a staff item for continued study.
• Provide pathways along the Scioto River and the Indian Run Creek as
indicated by Map 12 of the Community Plan Old Dublin Area Plan. Connect
Indian Run Falls, Pioneer Cemetery, the Confluence, Riverway Park, Overlook
Park (via South Riverview Street), Quarry Park, Town Square, Dublin
Cemetery, and school facilities and with the community at large.
Mr. King explained that this provides for pedestrian connections and agrees with the
Community Plan's assessment of the suggested path system. For those who live south
of the bridge along S. Riverview to the proposed Overlook Park location, the Task
Force recognizes that it is not likely physically feasible. However, the portion north of
the bridge should have pathways, if feasible.
Mr. McDaniel confirmed that a study is underway for this project.
• Investigate potential for access across SR 161 that maintains a constant
separation from vehicular traffic.
Mr. King explained that some on the Task Force felt that there needed to be a way for
pedestrians to cross Bridge Street without using the signal, i.e., a tunnel or overpass.
Mr. Reiner added that there was previous discussion about constructing a pedestrian
walkway under the existing bridge, but the slope and topography may not permit it.
Mr. King stated that that a pedestrian tunnel or overpass at Bridge and High was
determined not to be feasible.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that Council had seen merit in having such a pedestrian
crossing somewhere along Bridge Street, as discussed previously, but it was not feasible
as it would be extraordinarily expensive.
Mayor Kranstuber moved to eliminate this from consideration.
Mr. Adamek seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes;
Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes.
TOWN SQUARE
Establish Town Square at the northwest corner of Bridge & North High Street
Create a strong sense of place that reinforces the role of Historic Dublin as the
historic town center and the community's "heart" adding to the quality of life for
Dublin's residents.
Recommendations:
• Begin design work for Town Square. Planning design should incorporate a
significant three dimensional focal point.
i f I I r:u. .i.t:u t[ a ltkl =i dIdNA LJk,ir .t ,fi i
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 10,�����ing�.���,,..,a�
Held August 7, 2000 ,
• Vacate Mill Lane and Wings Hill alleys and reallocate to private development.
• Enclose the Town Square with architecturally compatible and consistent
buildings providing desirable pedestrian oriented uses.
Mr. McDaniel stated that this is a policy decision for Council, and direction to staff will
be needed. Staff can propose some concepts for Council's consideration.
Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher noted that there is some interest by private entities to do this.
Mr. Frimerman commented that an option to consider would be moving one or two of
the log structures the City has obtained to be set back from the corner, still allowing for
some plaza area. This would serve as an historical gateway to Old Dublin as well as
redeveloped sites in the northwest quadrant of Old Dublin.
Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher asked if Council is recommending that a focus group be
commissioned to work on this.
Mr. Adamek summarized that Council previously had the area seeded and minimally
landscaped, with some parking addition, until further review is done.
Mr. Jones stated that the Dublin Historical Society has been in discussion with Mr.
Hahn regarding the second log cabin. No decision has been made at this time about
where to locate it.
Mayor Kranstuber asked what staff would do in the immediate future, if Council
approves this recommendation. His concern would be with spending a lot of money on
this effort, when a private entity may be interested in developing it. Has a decision been
made that this will be a City park?
Mr. Adamek summarized that his belief is that this decision has not yet been made.
It was the consensus of Council to leave this item on the "back burner" in view of the
potential for private activity at this location.
Tom Holton 296 Odessa Lane Waterford area stated that in view of the discussion
about bringing foot traffic into Old Dublin, his concern is that there is nothing to do
when people arrive in Old Dublin. In the 15 years he has lived here, other suburbs have
redeveloped their downtown areas, but Dublin has not undertaken a comprehensive
effort. There must be attractions which will bring people to Old Dublin. A log cabin is
not going to attract people to Old Dublin.
Mr. Peterson stated that the City is trying to step up to encourage the private sector to
come in, and remove barriers so that the private sector will step in. His belief is that
government should not be an obstacle to those who want to invest in Old Dublin.
Council is not satisfied with the status quo in Old Dublin and is working to change it.
Mayor Kranstuber commented that a group from Old Dublin came to the City and
requested Council's support in this effort. The Historic Dublin Revitalization Task
Force was established to provide some recommendations to Council about ways to
facilitate development.
Jane Fox, Old Dublin Road stated that she is familiar with the area as she often walks it.
It is important that a focal point in the area be owned by the people — whether it is a
parkland, a structure, or an activity center. She encouraged Council to seek private
development for this area, but to retain public ownership of the focal point.
Mr. King stated that an important part of their recommendation is that a Dublin
Authority be formed, consisting of those who work, live, and own property in Old
Dublin — so they can manage what occurs. This is to serve as a gathering space.
Council should also consider vacating the alleys that border that space now and turn it
over to private development with a goal of interactive public environment. The Task
Force recommends that this space not be enclosed with paved parking.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
.a4...4 ..a..... ... ......
NO. 10148
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 11
Held August 7, 2000 ,
Mr. Reiner agreed that the area should be enclosed with structures, not with parking.
Mr. Maurer suggested that the Dublin Arts Council be involved in future discussion
about concepts for this corner.
Tim Picciano, Dublin Village Tavern, 27 S. High Street stated that this is a critical
corner for Old Dublin. An idea would be an amphitheater, flexible enough to
accommodate different events. Perhaps suggestions from citizens could be solicited via
the media. It is important to develop this property in the right way.
Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher stated that in Grove City, one corner has space for people
playing instruments, etc.
Mr. King stated that he has spoken to the Arts Council in past years about development
of this corner. Ms. Rosenthal indicated that this corner would be a logical location for
another public art piece.
Mr. Adamek stated that perhaps a plaza with a fountain, incorporating the retail
dimension would be desirable.
Mr. Reiner suggested that he envisions this as an "L" shaped development, with
commercial development in the back, gathering space in the front, with design by a
landscape architect — keeping the space open. Or perhaps a combination of an
entrepreneur to build the back buildings, and the City developing the gathering space.
Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher stated that Council should make it known to those interested in
this property that it would be important to be inclusive in their discussions with those
who live or own businesses there. Council envisions a community- engaging area, being
open on the corner in some way. It would be a partnership effort between the City and a
private entity.
Mr. Adamek suggested that Council refer to the Community Development Committee
for further discussion the concepts for the Town Square development.
Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher so moved.
Mr. McCash seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr.
McCash, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes.
Mrs. Boring asked if any of Council's advisory committees should be involved in this
process.
It was the consensus of Council that this be a Council -driven process.
TRAFFIC & PARKING MANAGEMENT
Ease Vehicular traffic movement through and within Historic Dublin while
minimizing the number of auto /pedestrian conflicts Increase the parking
resources within the Historic District while minimizing the visual impact
Consider narking availability as a development tool an incentive to help attract
and maintain desirable uses.
Develop sense that narking and traffic management is a district community issue
and that solutions can be achieved with a cooperative spirit and mechanism
Recommendations:
• Investigate current parking spaces quantity, locations, and utilization.
Establish a desired parking allocation scheme.
Mr. McDaniel stated that this effort is ongoing.
Mr. Kindra stated that the Planning division has a study underway. Staff is also working
with residents and property owners to help expand the private parking available in Old
Dublin.
Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher asked if this includes working with the resident owners to gain
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 12
Held August 7 2000 , _
permission to use their spaces during certain hours for business parking.
Mr. Kindra stated that this is part of it, but things are not finalized at this point. Planning
staff is doing an inventory of public and private parking, and looking at what can be
done under current regulations. A new ordinance to relax standards for this purpose will
be brought to Council in approximately six weeks.
Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher summarized that an inventory is being done of what public
parking is available, and the Planning division will then bring that information to
Council, along with a recommendation regarding increased parking, given the current
regulations.
Mr. Kindra responded that once the regulations are relaxed, there can be an assessment
of what additional parking is desired by businesses.
Mr. Adamek stated that Council will now move to the last strategy in this area:
• Develop a Parking Authority with a board of directors with inclusive
representation and diverse backgrounds. Board should retain some members
of the Task Force who would help communicate the idea for an Authority.
Consideration should be given to the feasibility of paid staff.
Mr. Adamek summarized that this commission would oversee how and where parking is
done in Old Dublin, how it is controlled, whether mutually, privately, or by the City.
Mr. King stated that with the understanding that Council would make a final determination
in this matter, the Task Force felt that having an Authority would provide a more inclusive
means to bring those who work, live and own property there into the discussion. They can
better solve that issue with the City's assistance.
Mr. Reiner agrees with this approach. There seems to be a lot of parking space which is not
well utilized in Old Dublin, because it is not organized. Community input from the
residents and businesses is needed to solve this problem.
Mr. King stated that the Task Force felt that this would bring better buy -in on issues such
as employees not parking on the street right at their front door. There is a funding issue of
building surface lots and their maintenance, and that could be a City role.
Mayor Kranstuber asked if this organization would have legal authority — could the
authority determine what parking would be shared? Is it similar to a mandatory
homeowners association? Would a business or property owner have the right not to
participate?
Mr. King stated that he is not certain about these issues.
Mr. Reiner stated that he believes Columbus has done this in the downtown area. His
understanding is that if 80 percent of the property owners agree to it, everyone is then bound
by it.
Mr. King stated that the Task Force does not have the expertise to address these issues, but
is suggesting that they be investigated along with Special Improvements Districts.
Ms. Readler stated that Dublin's Charter provides Council with the power to create new
boards and commissions, but she would need to further investigate a parking authority.
Mr. McDaniel recommended that perhaps a Task Force such as that already in place could
work to secure cooperation and organize an approach to the parking situation. Staff could
in the meantime look at models in other cities.
Mayor Kranstuber asked Mr. King if the Task Force would be willing to address this
specific issue, with support from staff.
Mr. King stated that he believes the Task Force would be willing to do this.
Joe Marsalka, property owner of 76 S High Street Biddie's Coach House stated that when
they looked at purchasing their property, parking was an important consideration. On the
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 13
Held August 1, 2000 ,
(YEAR)
other hand, all businesses should question whether they should establish a business in a
location where parking is not at a premium. They would be totally opposed to someone
coming in and taking over their parking lot which is used by their customers. In fact, he
would like to build a sidewalk along the side of the alley to relieve the stress of the incline
up to the street. The Dublin area has parking which is not being used, but businesses that
use their parking lots effectively should not have to be part of such an organization.
Vickie L den stated that she and her husband, Tom Bassett own four properties in Old
Dublin and three having parking located behind them. The parking availability is a real
sales point when leasing these properties. There are 9 spots behind 41 W. Bridge, 16 spots
behind 75 S. High Street, and 35 and 39 S. High having parking as well. She is concerned
about the verbiage of creating a parking authority with a board of directors with inclusive
representation and diverse backgrounds. She and her husband have applied for numerous
boards and commissions in the City and have yet to be selected, so she is not certain they
would be included in this one. She is uncomfortable with a parking authority and the level
of power they would have. Private owners should not be forced to allow their parking spots
to be used by the public. She wants to ensure that their parking spots are available for their
businesses. As of yet, they have not been contacted by anyone in the City in regard to
assistance with relieving parking problems in Old Dublin.
Mr. Picciano stated that the parking situation is one of "haves" and "have- nots ". Incentives
must be offered to encourage some to give up parking to those who need parking. Fees can
also be imposed for parking. Parking is an important aspect for consideration in a decision
for business development.
Mr. Adamek summarized that Council's goal is to develop a partnership to create a
better situation for everyone involved, to look for ways that everyone can win, and
create a better district. The goal is not to take over private property for parking, but to
work together to address this problem.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that his assumption is that the Task Force felt the issue of
parking was a significant problem.
Mr. King agreed, adding that they envision a partnership effort — not any kind of takings
of private property.
Mr. Peterson suggested that the legal department provide information on the creation of
such a parking authority and its implications.
Allen Staub, co -owner of 114 S. High Street and member of ARB stated that
establishing a parking authority would be a mistake. There is much conflict already
existing in the downtown district. The incentives to share parking would be a good
starting point, a voluntary system with signage provided by the City which could
include advertising of the business that is providing the parking. He would not want a
system which involves exchange of dollars, but advertising in exchange for providing
parking.
Discussion followed about who would initiate this discussion with the property owners.
Mr. King stated that the Task Force felt that the dialogue should not be initiated by the
City — the best way to arrive at a solution is to involve the people who live, work, or
own property there. This would be more effective than having a consultant do it.
Mrs. Boring clarified that Council is currently discussing the mechanics of establishing
a parking authority. That decision to actually establish one has not been made at this
point.
Jack Eagspuehler, property owner on the north side of the historic district commends
the concept of a parking authority. He does not see this as a threat — the people in the
district want to help, want to share, want to contribute toward the common goal. It
would be a consensus group to bring the best for the historic district.
I I` 1i 1 ' tfl!! t.b� #1 J! �����_�,fij +lk'(J i };hl�. � � it rl�V, �� ��N� g 11, 1 __ _F7
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Special Meeting of Dublin City --'C --- o —un'-c-i-I -'-'-Page 14— Aleeting-
U-1- LEG-5-j-, -- 101g
Held August 7, 2000
(YEAR)
Mr. Marsalka stated that a parking authority connotes a legal body to implement laws
and see them enforced. He questions Council's right to invoke this power. If someone
wants to rent their spaces, they have declined as they need it for their business. There
are no eminent domain issues here, and the City cannot order private property owners to
allow use of their property. If incentives were to be offered, that is a separate issue and
could be legally done. The City could also buy land in Old Dublin for parking
purposes. But to mandate and take away property from business owners is not legal.
Mr. Peterson stated that, assuming there is a parking problem in the district, wouldn't
everyone agree that the City is stepping up to its obligation by establishing a task force
to address the problem? And wouldn't they agree that empowering a group who is
familiar with the issues in Old Dublin would be a more effective group to handle the
issues than City Council? Wouldn't they also agree that the solution is not to pave all
of Old Dublin to create parking, but to identify available parking already existing?
Mr. Marsalka agreed that a task force with no legal authority to govern is fine, but
mandating solutions creates a real concern for him.
Mr. Picciano suggested that in terms of creating incentives, that three inventories be
done: existing private spaces, public spaces, and required spaces per business per
Dublin Code. Then a comparison can be done of who has extra spots and who needs
more space, they could pay into a pool, and parking spaces would then be allocated to
those who need them and are willing to pay for it.
Mr. McCash stated that the entire historic Dublin area is requesting a solution, but some
do not want to be part of any proposed solution.
Mr. Barnum stated that customers who come to Dublin restaurants do not know where
parking is available. Maybe the local folks would know where to find parking, but he
believes that if the district is going to flourish in the future, a parking garage or structure
will allow for future businesses to come to Old Dublin. The loop road, if it were
approved, would allow more parallel parking in the area.
Mr. Frimerman stated that there are some impediments which need to be addressed:
access, visibility and identification for parking. There is a problem with lighting,
visibility and access from the alleys. The alleys are narrow and not well maintained,
and are poorly lit. Most of those lots are not paved because of the potential impact on
stormwater problems. That becomes an issue as well. The Task Force looked at this
entire issue as a package — all are interrelated.
Clay Bryan, 84 S. Riverview Street stated that a task force exists which could study all
of these to bring forth some more recommendations. That would be the most practical
way to handle this.
Mr. Adamek suggested that Council have the Task Force handle this particular issue,
with information from the staff about planning and legal aspects for the area, and to
explore creation of some type of commission to handle parking.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that he believes this commission would need some legal
authority. An advisory commission may not be effective in this endeavor.
Mayor Kranstuber moved to request that the Task Force investigate creation of a
parking commission or authority, that the City staff provide them with the resources
needed to investigate the options, and that the Task Force bring this back to Council in
final form
for Council's review and approval.
Mr. Adamek seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion — Mr. Peterson, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes;
Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 15
Held August 71 7000 ,
• Investigate feasibility of providing a parking structure. Investigation should
include feasibility of incorporating grade level private commercial uses. Design
and construction should follow as soon as practical if the study recommends
development.
Mr. King stated that the Task Force is cognizant of the time and expense involved in
this. It should clearly be investigated, and as part of a comprehensive solution to
parking problems. The goal is to determine whether it is part of the solution, in addition
to more surface lots, better organization of existing lots, etc.
Mayor Kranstuber asked about the cost.
Mr. King stated that the cost is approximately $12,000 to $16,000 per car.
Mr. McCash stated that the cost would approach $20,000 per car in view of the City's
architectural standards.
Mayor Kranstuber asked if discussion took place about a possible location.
Mr. King responded that they loosely identified areas without identifying specific
parcels. They looked at key zones which are associated with the Bridge and High
corner. Considerations were proximity, minimizing walking distances, and finding it
easily.
Mr. Adamek asked staff to comment.
-" Mr. Kindra stated that in the CIP, a dollar amount has been identified for year 2005 for
this purpose. Obviously, a surface parking lot is less expensive than a parking structure.
A large amount of work needs to be done before any programming of funds.
Mr. Maurer stated that he views this as a multi- tiered parking structure, and the optimal
place may be in the dip behind Oscar's restaurant which would make it less visible and
obtrusive. The alley just east of High Street could become a loop, which would be
much less controversial than the area west of High Street. He noted that there is an
illusion about the amount of traffic at Bridge and High and Frantz Road and 161. The
traffic relates to those traveling through the areas, not associated with a concentration of
commercial uses in the specific areas,
Mr. Barnum stated that he researched areas outside of Columbus several months ago,
and many historic districts have parking structures. While the structure is expensive,
the costs can be recovered by charging fees for parking. He is hopeful that the City can
look at the big picture and the lasting benefits of a parking structure.
Mr. Picciano stated that a town square facility would require more public parking to
accommodate the visitors. A parking structure in the area would benefit the residents,
assuming the structure was aesthetically pleasing.
Mr. Reiner stated that the people in the area need to help determine what the future of
this area will be, including the parking. It is premature to determine that a parking
structure is needed. First, he would like to hear from the residents of the district.
Mr. Adamek stated that the expense of constructing a parking facility is enormous, and
there are many concerns to be addressed in conjunction with it. He would suggest that
this recommendation be left on the table until further study is completed by staff. This
project is currently not funded in the CIP. He would suggest Council not take any
further action at this time.
• Redevelop Mill Lane south of Bridge Street and North and South Blacksmith
Lanes as two -lane drives with head -in parking with appropriate screening and
maintained private access.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
n
._vM
Special Veeting
of Dublin City Council Page 16
Held August 7, 2000 ,
Mr. Adamek stated that perhaps Council should wait for some direction from staff about
how the alleyways can be enhanced. The comprehensive plan underway may
recommend this.
Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher stated that her understanding is that this is not part of that
investigation.
Mr. Kindra stated that it is not included; if Council wants to proceed with this concept,
staff would retain a consultant for this purpose.
Mr. Reiner asked if there is enough room available to do this.
Mr. Kindra stated that he does not know at this point.
Mr. Adamek clarified that this item is not part of the parking structure discussion.
Ms. Grigsby stated that if this is determined to be a priority, it can be incorporated into
the operating budget for next year.
Mr. Adamek stated that this would be premature, as he is not certain how it would
impact what is currently underway. There is no information on which to base this
decision.
Mr. King stated that Mill Lane is the road that runs north/south behind the Chamber and
up to Old Dublin Town Center. This concept would require acquisition of property to
increase the right -of -way to accommodate two lanes with head -in parking on the west
side. The Task Force here is recommending what was suggested in the Community
Plan regarding this system — that a number of spaces could be provided, but parking
needs to be disbursed to other areas. It could provide parking for employees of
businesses along South High, as well as parking for the restaurants. There is great value
to developing Mill Lane in this way.
Mrs. Boring stated that this would require taking property from the residential
landowners nearby.
Mr. King agreed, but added that the zoning code requires screening.
Mrs. Boring stated that the headlights and noise would be invasive to the neighbors.
Mr. King stated that the screening would address the headlight issue.
A Franklin Street resident testified that several years ago, the Village started to survey
the right -of -way in the alleys referred to, and the project was cancelled. Blacksmith
Lane was never really a street until the brick was completed in 1935. The properties
butted up against each other. He urged Council to give this matter serious consideration
before taking any action.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that at this time, it is unknown how much land would be
needed.
Mrs. Boring moved to eliminate this recommendation for reasons that it would
encourage too much traffic in the back yards of the residents and would impact the
residents by taking their yards.
,... Mr. McCash seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion — Mr. Peterson, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes;
Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes.
• Engineer and construct the northwest quadrant loop road connecting Bridge
and North High Streets. Assume road will be placed north of the Library. The
road should be thought of as both a northbound and southbound shortcut.
The MS Study should reconsider the feasibility of the new loop High School
Road (Figure 2.4) if elementary school property is made available due to
significant safety, linkage, parking, and commercial development
opportunities.
Mr. Adamek asked Mr. King to provide background.
Mr. King stated that the study was initiated by the City; the Task Force did review it as
I ;I 9,�'�I,1, 11111 iEJili' ^11 1;1 .16k1A d k °a �1, 1 �,
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
..,.w.....,.._r_........w .__., _Minus vu.. ..... ... .,__-- -----
. ._ ..-�a .., w,µ v. ��_�a��� . �.�. �.. _�.�_.�.��.
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 17
DAYTON L NO. 10148
Held Aug ist 7, 200() ,
(YEAR)
part of their deliberations. The Task Force agreed with the concept because it helped to
take pressure off of traffic in the North High area from the library to Bridge Street; it
would help make the area more pedestrian friendly; and would open up the potential of
and a more efficient means of providing surface or structured parking in that northwest
quadrant by using the system of Darby and the alleyway systems, with the cooperation
of property owners. The north intersection of this road with High Street would be
immediately north of the library on the west side of High; it would then angle in a curve
between the north face of the library and the south face of the cemetery. It is shown in
the MS Study as terminating at its south entrance point at Bridge Street where a daycare
center is presently located. That building would be removed. The intersection would
line up with Franklin Street. In deliberations, the Task Force discussed whether there
was a better way to create that intersection so that it did not have a direct alignment with
Franklin. However, no studies have been conducted by the City exploring other
options. The key with a loop road is to provide the opportunity to maximize the
efficiency of a parking system, by removing rush hour traffic off of the Bridge and High
intersection and getting the traffic into parking systems. The loop provides a way to go
southbound from north of the historic district, and to go northbound through the district
without engaging the primary intersection of Bridge and High. It has a pedestrian
value for North High Street and a linkage value for getting into a parking system that
would be developed over time. He believes the road would generally be a three -lane
road, with left turn capability and both ends signalized.
Mayor Kranstuber asked what would happen if the road were taken farther west of the
old school administration building so that it would not align with Franklin Street.
Mr. King responded that the building could be saved with this adjustment, assuming
that the schools would cooperate. It would be optimal not to align the roads at Franklin
Street in order to reduce through traffic on Franklin. The Task Force felt that trying to
work around where the schools actually are located would be inappropriate; their
playgrounds and athletic fields should not be impacted.
Mr. Kindra confirmed that the proposed road is approximately 1700 feet in length. The
school administration, however, had an objection with each alignment proposed. The
schools felt that the City would need to purchase the entire site, including the
elementary school, as any roadway would interrupt their operations.
Mayor Kranstuber asked about the estimated cost of this road.
Mike Johnston MS Consultants stated that they were commissioned to study this
concept which was part of the Community Plan. In this undertaking, they first looked at
the possibility of medians along Bridge Street from the river out to Frantz Road. They
were also asked to look at this bypass or loop road as a function of installing the
medians. The left turns, eastbound to northbound would be eliminated at Bridge and
High, as there would no longer be room for this. Therefore, another location looked at in
the preliminary plan was this route which was aligned opposite Franklin Street. They
considered traffic factors and traffic growth along the route. The road needed to be
sufficiently short to provide a practical location for a left turn, as the Bridge and High
left turn was being eliminated. They studied alternatives that went through the school,
and those were not as attractive as what was recommended. The costs include the right -
of -way, utilities, purchase of the old school administration building, adding signals on
both ends, and some work along High Street to make the intersection possible. The cost
is estimated at $3.182 million, which includes $585,000 for the land value, and purchase
of the old school administration building valued at $900,000.
Mr. Kindra added that the entire property owned by the schools, including the
elementary school, was valued by the schools at $12 million.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that taking the entire site is not feasible. The road would need
to be aligned around the old administration building. It would enhance the school's
land for future development.
Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher stated that she is opposed to this concept. It is invasive in the
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 18
Held A u Rmt -7, 9,000
(YEA
education area, too close to the children, would draw an enormous amount of traffic,
would impact the businesses as well as the long -term expansion of the library, and
would impact the aesthetics of the library. She is not convinced about what is being
gained with this proposed road. If the goal is to have viable businesses in the historic
district, why move traffic away from those businesses? It involves an enormous
investment of public funds and results in tremendous impact on people and business
entities. She does not view this on the horizon for the future.
Mrs. Boring stated that she shares this opinion and believes that traffic problems in the
Old Dublin area will decrease when all of the planned roadways are completed. She
would not be opposed to revisiting this concept in the future, but it is premature at this
point to consider it.
Mr. Kindra noted that the contract for the road widening of 161 from Sawmill to
Riverside Drive has been awarded. The project includes curb and gutter, landscaped
medians, sidewalk and bikepath. There are some things that can be done to this section
of 33 to enhance it as well, i.e., removal of ditches, adding landscaping, at little
additional cost. Staff can explore this and provide more information if that is the desire
of Council.
Mr. Adamek expressed interest in exploring this. There was no objection from Council.
Craig Barnum indicated that he supports this new road due to the safety issues in Old
Dublin. The southbound traffic on Dublin Road comes into the area at high speed and
creates a dangerous situation for pedestrians. The Emerald Parkway bridge has helped
to alleviate some of the traffic congestion at rush hour. The problem now between 5 and
7 p.m. is the speed of the southbound traffic and its potential impact on pedestrian
crossing. His businesses attract 2 to 3,000 people each week and there is no crosswalk
to accommodate them. The issues are safety and parking for patrons of the district. He
supports the bypass road.
Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher stated that she agrees with Mr. Barnum regarding the safety
issue. Rumble strips could be added near the Brazenhead to remind traffic to travel
slowly through this congested area. There must be other options which could be
explored to improve safety. The crosswalk situation does need to be addressed. She is
not convinced that this new loop road is the only viable solution.
Marvin Modine 139 Waterford Drive stated that his house is at the point where Franklin
Street dead ends into Waterford. He is concerned about any type of new street which
would facilitate traffic turning off Dublin Road onto Waterford, then onto Franklin and
to Bridge Street. They already have severe traffic problems during rush hour. He
contacted the City and requested additional speed bumps on Waterford Drive, but was
told that there would be no more speed bumps in Dublin. To put a bypass across High
which would facilitate traffic from Dublin Road and would be extremely objectionable.
There are no sidewalks or street lights on Waterford and there are children who play and
ride bikes in the street. Routing traffic through the school area and putting a traffic load
into an area where there are children is not sensible. The impact of traffic improvements
already completed or underway is not yet understood. The traffic at Bridge and High
will eventually be reduced, and will open up other possibilities for parking solutions in
Old Dublin. The $3 million price tag for this short bypass makes no sense. The City
should sit back and wait to address this issue at a future date.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that the speed bump experiment on Monterey Drive in
Waterford has been considered a success - Council believes the conclusion was that the
traffic calming policy adopted by Council was effective.
Discussion followed.
Mayor Kranstuber clarified that if there is interest in Waterford Village for additional
speed bumps, they should contact staff. He has also asked the City Manager about the
NUU11 ii lldflll lit
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
�� �
_..m4...._H..mv....o., .., tinm..m..o te
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 19
111
plans for a sidewalk along Monterey Drive, as it ties into Old Dublin and helps to
facilitate pedestrian traffic. Mayor Kranstuber suggested that the resident contact him in
a couple of weeks to find out about the status of this item.
Adam Reinhart 155 Waterford Drive stated that there is a hill along Waterford which
reduces visibility for drivers at the bottom of the hill where there is no sidewalk. After
parades, when traffic from the parade is moving from Old Dublin, the pedestrians have
no designated area within which to walk. He would support Council addressing the
Waterford sidewalk as a missing link.
Claudia Vance 95 Franklin Street stated that she is opposed to the bypass road which
will bring traffic onto their street. This is a safety issue for their children who don't have
sidewalks. The elderly residents of her street could not attend tonight and asked her to
express their opposition to making their street a cut - through from Dublin Road. When
they first moved to the neighborhood, they asked for sidewalks but were told that the
City would have to assess the property owners for this project.
A young resident of the Franklin Street area testified that there are speeding cars in their
neighborhood and no sidewalks for the children. She urged Council to address this
issue.
Bill Lebbing, 94 Franklin Street stated that there are 23 households on their street of
diverse age groups. Descendants of five of the oldest families in Dublin live on their
street and own lots in the Dublin cemetery. It is a mistake to open Franklin Street to
through traffic with this new loop road.
Vickie Lyden, Glenverbie Court stated that they own property in Old Dublin. If the
focus tonight is to make Dublin more pedestrian friendly, there is no pedestrian crossing
on North High Street from west to east. Why is there not a light at North Street where
pedestrians could cross? Especially at night, this is a very dangerous situation. She has
never seen this on a Council agenda for discussion. What is the true cost of this in the
big scheme of things?
Mr. Kindra stated that at the North Street intersection, several things have been done,
including painted crosswalks and higher wattage. There are two intersections along
Bridge Street that do not have mast arms. Once they are upgraded, different items would
be possible.
Mr. Adamek asked about the possibility of a crosswalk at the turn from North High to
the library, similar to the one in Worthington on St. Route 23 where a stop light or
flashing light indicates a pedestrian is in the crosswalk and the auto traffic is required to
stop.
Mr. Kindra replied that this could be done, but there are other variations of this which
would likely fit better in the neighborhood. However, it has not been studied to date.
Mr. McCash stated that Council had considered crosswalks or streetlights in this area of
Old Dublin previously, and thought that staff had indicated that they were not feasible.
He asked that the minutes from those meetings be copied for him.
Further discussion followed about the dangers of this intersection.
John Straver, 60 Franklin Street stated that he is not as opposed to some kind of street
going in for development as he is with the possibility of it running into Franklin Street
and cross traffic. There was a meeting in the spring about this plan and no one from
Franklin Street spoke in favor of a loop road.
Mr. Barnum stated that he has begged for a traffic light at Darby and North High Street
in view of all of the accidents. He was promised by the then Assistant City Manager that
once Emerald Parkway bridge opened, the City would build a traffic signal at that
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
a ...... M���o. w.o.. ...�Maiunl�i .,, , ..� „....., o w. w A,m a. ea .o.. NAr
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 20
Held August 7, 2Q00 e (YEAR
intersection. He has since heard from City staff that the City does not want a crosswalk
there for liability reasons, and because of the fact that it is a state route. He is puzzled
with these responses if the City is truly trying to create a pedestrian friendly area. Other
.. cities have done this. The City did take a positive step by prohibiting right or left hand
turns at rush hour, but more needs to be done immediately.
Stephen Prater. Director of Facilities. Columbus and Franklin Countv Metrobolitan
Library and a resident of Dublin stated that the library serves as a community destination
point as well as a retreat area for residents from the hustle and bustle. Implementation of
a loop road would result in the library losing their scenic view, and the library would
become an island surrounded by traffic. Safety measures would have to be taken to
ensure safe access to the library. The library is not in favor of the loop road, but is trying
to stay neutral. The library hopes to partner with the community and with Council to
address these issues.
Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher moved to eliminate the loop road from consideration.
Mr. Peterson seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr.
Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes.
Mr. Adamek moved that staff revisit the possibility of some type of pedestrian crosswalk
identification or signal at the intersection of High Street and North Street.
Mr. Peterson seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion — Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mrs.
Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes.
Mayor Kranstuber made some comments regarding the different priorities which must be
weighed when Council makes a decision to signalize or not to signalize an intersection.
It is an expensive proposition, and there are often those opposed as well as supportive of
such projects.
• Investigate and consider in the planning of the new loop road opportunity for
an under -road pedestrian and bike crossing between Library and Pioneer
Cemetery area.
• North High Street between Franklin Street extension and Bridge Street should
be redeveloped as a neighborhood street perhaps even without a southbound
left turn (east) unto Bridge Street at designated times.
• Delete the North High Street turning lane and provide parallel parking along
the west side of North High Street.
Mr. Adamek summarized that these three can be eliminated in view of Council's
previous motion.
• Provide parallel or angled parking spaces along roads wherever possible to
increase customer parking.
Mr. Adamek stated that eliminating the loop road precludes some of this, but staff will
look at the possibilities.
^^ Mr. King added that the Task Force was recommending for South High Street angled
parking on the west side of High, and eliminating the parking on the east side. This may
y be worth further investigation, as it would provide more parking spaces if feasible.
Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher moved to direct staff to investigate angled parking on the west
side of South High Street and eliminating parking on the east side in order to gain more
spaces.
Mr. McCash seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion — Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr.
Adamek, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes.
• Engineer and construct a Bridge Street boulevard except between High Street
and Franklin Street. Left turn (north) onto North High Street should be
deleted and this lane reallocated to parallel parking along the south lane of
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 21
Held August 79 2000
Bridge Street. This action would also increase pedestrian comfort and safety
for crossing Bridge Street.
Mr. King stated that the middle part of this would probably not be applicable, now that
Council has eliminated the loop road from consideration. What this essentially said was
that with construction of the loop road, eliminate the left turn going northbound. This
lane width could then have been transferred to the south curb line across from Old
Dublin Town Center L The Task Force supported the boulevard concept as contained in
the MS Study, with the exception of where the town square is. They felt that
boulevarding in this location, particularly if the boulevarding used trees, would provide
an inappropriate boundary for the town square. The town square enclosure should be the
buildings.
Mr. Adamek stated that elimination of the loop street and accepting the recommending
for not boulevarding in front of the town square eliminates most of this concept.
Mr. King stated that if boulevarding is done at the town square, the City would have to
encroach on the north right-of-way of Bridge Street, and the Task Force does not support
this.
Mr. Reiner stated that he views the trees as a traffic-calming element in the center of
town.
Mr. King stated that regardless of the traffic calming benefit, the Task Force felt that the
best enclosure of the public space is the structures bordering its four sides.
Discussion followed.
Mr. Frimerman stated that the problem is that even if a median is placed at Bridge and
High, the access for left turns to businesses or to the library is reduced, creating more of
a bottleneck. Most of the time, his experience is that a boulevarded road feels like a
divided highway and motorists feel comfortable at higher speeds. Waiting in the median
area for the light change is also very uncomfortable for pedestrians.
Dr. Ron Montgomery, veterinarian, Bridge Street stated that moving the vet clinic
building would essentially put him out of business. Eliminating Darby Street is the only
access to his facility, so if that is the plan, the City should just purchase his property.
His understanding of this effort was to enhance the businesses downtown, not to
eliminate them.
Mr. King stated that if the alleys are in fact vacated and reallocated, access would still
need to be provided to Tucci's and to the vet business. This would be an important
consideration.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that the only issue with the boulevarding is whether it is done
in the High Street/Bridge Street intersection area.
Mr. Peterson stated that he likes the concept of a boulevard, but moving a building is
very expensive. The concept does not seem to fit in this space. He would support taking
this as far as feasible.
Mrs. Boring stated that cutting the boulevard off might serve as a line of demarcation for
the historic district.
Mr. Adamek stated that he supports the Task Force recommendation regarding the
boulevarding, "Engineer and construct a Bridge Street boulevard except between High
Street and Franklin Street." The rest of this item will be eliminated.
Mr. Kindra stated that with installation of a median, access is limited to abutting
properties, resulting in significant damages.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 22
Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher stated that she questions the staff recommendation of
boulevarding of SR 161 in view of Mr. Kindra's comments about damages to the
properties. Why was this not included as a consideration in the staff recommendation?
Perhaps Council should rethink boulevarding if it negatively impacts existing
businesses.
Dr. Montgomery noted that years ago, the City removed the boulevards, and now,
discussion is taking place about reinstalling them.
Mr. Adamek moved to direct staff to review the possibility of constructing a boulevard
along Bridge Street except between High and Franklin Streets.
Mrs. Boring seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion — Mr. Reiner, no; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Peterson,
yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, no; Mrs. Boring, yes.
• North and South Riverview Streets should not be redeveloped to provide open
business parking. Permit passes and signage might be provided by the Parking
Authority as a means to control use of these streets.
Mr. Adamek stated that he views this as a Task Force consideration.
It was the consensus of Council to have the Task Force consider this item.
• Franklin Street should be maintained as a through street, but "redesigned" to
perceptually discourage non- resident use. Permit passes and signage might be
provided by the Parking Authority as a means to control use of these streets.
Mr. Adamek stated that this item would be reviewed by the Task Force.
HISTORIC DISTRICT ORGANIZATION
Promote appropriate pedestrian oriented future development in the District as a
gathering place where businesses and residential opportunities thrive and reinforce
the District's role as a destination. Develop marketing strategies to encourage
development of identified desirable uses, especially those that encourage
pedestrian movement throughout the shopping area of the District Establish an
identification system outside and within the Historic District as a means to enhance
visibility and design continuity. Develop sense that a community based effort can
most effectively accommodate a variety of needs and interests Develop an
organizational system that instills a sense of responsibility and commitment to
Authority plans and rules.
Recommendations:
• Investigate existing uses and determine desirable additional or replacement uses
especially oriented to the arts and dining and to encourage evening as well as
daytime use. Investigate viability and develop as appropriate incentives (value)
that may encourage desirable uses.
Mr. King stated that the Task Force's recommendation is to form an historic district
authority or whatever term is appropriate to help bring together the opinions of those
who live and work there, dealing with interests of common need — the proper mix of
businesses, how to encourage those that ought to be there, events to be scheduled to
enhance the area, etc. This could be a subgroup of the parking authority. It has been
done in other cities. One way to think of it is a mall type of association, where they all
share space.
Mrs. Boring stated that she recalls a cooperative effort being undertaken with the
Chamber in regard to a grant program for the historic area.
Mr. King stated that one vehicle looked at was Downtown Ohio, Inc. The suggestion
here is to bring all of the parties together and determine what the best type of umbrella
organization would be.
Mrs. Boring suggested that an outside consultant might have a fresh approach to what
the needs of the district are.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Mi u.v,�, Mew
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 23 g�voww,_ ,,
Held August 7, 2000 ,
• Continue and develop additional cross marketing opportunities and events that
are beneficial to all.
• Investigate grant program to encourage replacement of inappropriate and non-
effective signs. Utilize as appropriate.
• Incorporation invitation and directional signage into an overall effort.
• Investigate and utilize funding methods that might fund district improvements
such as Bed Tax grants, Special Improvement District (SID) assessments, TIFs,
Block Grants, City contributions, business contributions, and resident
contributions.
• Develop a Historic District Authority with a board of directors with inclusive
representation and with diverse backgrounds. Board should retain some
members of the Task Force who would help communicate the idea for an
Authority. The Authority should include representatives from all local
organizations including Dublin Schools and Dublin Library. Consideration
should be given to paid staff.
Mr. Adamek noted that all of these dovetail into the items being referred to the Task
Force. The invitation and directional signage is being recommended by staff to be
referred to the Public Services Committee.
Jack Eggspuehler, property owner in Old Dublin stated that they appreciate all that
Council is doing. He has a letter addressed to City Council to be incorporated into the
record of tonight's meeting. (Attached)
Mayor Kranstuber thanked the Task Force for all of their hard work on this project,
especially Chair Dave King. Most of the recommendations of the Task Force have been
endorsed by Council, although some items such as the parking structure and loop road
were not. If there is anything that has been missed, he invited comment.
Mr. King stated that no one expected that solutions could be arrived upon in one Council
meeting. Much progress has been made tonight, however.
Mayor Kranstuber asked if there are any other areas available where the City could
purchase land to be used for parking.
Mr. King suggested that Council seriously consider an enhancement of the present
circulation system to allow people to find parking as efficiently as possible and not have
to rely upon valet parking. He suggested that Council meet with school officials to
identify opportunities for land in the area. Perhaps there could be serious investigation
of eliminating the storage field and redoing those lots.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that the City enjoys many partnerships with the schools. Some
of the land in this area is not well kept, and perhaps the City could take care of it in
exchange for allowing it to be used at certain times of day for parking.
Mr. King agreed that there is a lot of underutilized land in this area. If the road system
could be enhanced to access that land, it would help to provide parking opportunity.
An audience member stated that the schools do use the northeast side of Indian Run for
playground area, and this would need to be protected.
Mr. McCash stated that he has reviewed Mr. Eggspuehler's letter, and it points to the
need for the ordinance that Mr. McCash introduced over two years ago involving
creation of an historic development district. The Planning staff has not moved this
legislation forward. There are other pieces of legislation that were referred to Planning
staff as well which have not been processed. He suggested that Council direct staff to
research the status of the historic development district ordinance. Much of the text in
Mr. Grabill's development is similar to what is included in the ordinance proposed two
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Special Meeting of Dublin
DAYTON L AL BLANK, INC.. FORM
4 t Council Page 24
Held August 7, 2000 ,
..(YEAR)
years ago. The outdoor seating legislation is also lost in the process. He will bring this
up at the next Council meeting. The key problem with trying to do development in Old
Dublin is that lots of money is spent on permit and variance fees and nothing moves
forward.
Discussion followed.
Mayor Kranstuber summarized that staff should bring legislation forward when directed
to do so by Council.
In terms of prioritizing, he suggested that staff attach price tags to the items on the list
compiled tonight for further consideration by Council.
Other
Mr. McCash stated that as part of the golf course development agreement, there has been
discussion about the estimated costs of the roadway. He spoke with Ms. Grigsby about
this today. The differences in the developer's engineer's estimates and the City's
engineering estimates for Woerner - Temple extension relate to lighting and irrigation.
When the City did the Woerner - Temple extension between Heather Glen and Trinity
Park, the lighting was reduced to the intersections only. A decision by Council is
needed in regard to the level of irrigation systems and lighting levels for the portion
related to the golf course development.
Ms. Grigsby stated that design will soon be underway for the project, and it makes sense
to design what Council wants in regard to these items.
Mr. Kindra explained that in this project, a traffic circle would be located at the
intersection of Eiterman and the new Woerner- Temple, and at the club house, the road
dead ends. The lighting is designed to complement the clubhouse. In terms of
irrigation, the wells will be dug to accommodate the golf course irrigation and in view of
the landscaping at the entrance and at the park, staff has recommended a full irrigation
system.
Mayor Kranstuber asked what the cost of these would be.
Mr. Kindra stated that Burgess & Niple's numbers were consistent with staff's estimates,
but the EMHT numbers appeared low at the outset. He does not have the estimates with
him tonight.
Mr. McCash expressed concern about the level of lighting proposed for a residential
area.
Mr. Adamek stated that he does not believe lighting is needed outside of the
intersections. There does not seem to be a need to irrigate the entire roadway in view of
the cost. Emerald Parkway does not have an irrigation system included.
Mr. Reiner suggested putting sleeves under the roadway to accommodate future
irrigation.
Mrs. Boring stated that she appreciates the level of lighting along Emerald Parkway for
night travel. She does not want to go back and retrofit for future lighting.
Mr. McCash moved to install the sleeves under the roadway, that the circle area be
irrigated, and that the lighting be restricted to the intersections and the traffic circle.
Mr. Adamek seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion — Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes;
Mr. McCash, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Boring, no; Mr. Reiner, yes.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Meig.
Special Meeting of Dublin City Council Page 25
The me5liRV was adjourned at midnight.
— Presiding Officer
Clerk of Council
C-7 (57
20 North Street
Dublin, Ohio 43017
August 7, 2000
City Council
City of Dublin
5200 Emerald Parkway
Dublin, OH 43016
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Recently, I represented Barbara King of Louise's Needlework in an effort to enlarge her
parking area next to Tucci's restaurant in the Historic District. This matter was discussed
at length at the Architectural Review Board and both Barbara and I felt, after the meeting,
that there was little more to do than provide a planting scheme and proceed to get the job
done. Upon my return about a month later, I learned from the attached board order that
city staff is now imposing additional requirements on our request including an application
to the Board of Zoning Appeals. To be honest with you all, this one broke the back. That
is to say, they have now placed a sufficient number of obstacles in front of all of us in the
historic district to the point where we simply cannot help the city in solving the parking
problem any longer. Perhaps, under the circumstances, and given the yesteryear,
antiquated standards imposed in the historic district, it is better that the city solve these
problems.
As most of you know, I recently circulated a petition in the business community of the
Historic District to determine how most everyone felt about the Architectural Review
Board. Without exception, one hundred percent of those that I requested to sign this
petition did so with great hope that something, just anything, might be accomplished. As
I have repeatedly told the Architectural Review Board and city staff, there is a seething
resentment of the manner in which applications within the district are processed.
For the longest time, I have been dwelling with the idea that it was the ARB that was the
problem. I jumped to the conclusion that my peer group was holding to unrealistic
standards, ignoring the fact that property owners and /or businesses must make a profit in
the Historic District or they will not survive. It appeared to me that this unique thought
had never occurred to those on the board. While my suspicions may now be partially true,
my most recent experience in working with city staff has now caused me to think
otherwise.
There seems to be a mindset on the part of the planning department that we, the citizens
and taxpayers, are obligated to make our applications to the ARB and then sit back and
wait until city staff finds 101 things wrong with the application. In the process,
-, application rejection proceeds until the applicant blunders in to a correct mold or
alternatively wears down city staff to the point where they get specific and tell the
applicant exactly what they want. A review of these procedures would undoubtedly
reveal that Dublin has one of the most inefficient, ineffective and wasteful application
processes existing, If the rewards were a first class historic district of which everyone
could be proud, one just might be willing to partially endure some of this mindless
application process. But to everyone's obvious recognition, we point sadly to our historic
district as one that is in disrepair, unkempt and hardly a matter of pride for the residents,
the business owners or the property owners.
Most recently, our Dublin planning department has asked Barbara King to face the
potential of an application to the Board of Zoning Appeals, which will cost $1610.00, to
provide a variety of other costly documents and then, after dwelling on it, may or may not
allow her to achieve her objective. Like many others in the historic district, Barbara has
concluded that we've already wasted too much time and money on this application. With
the prospects of an additional $2000 to $2500, the possibility of getting three more
parking spaces is absolutely insane. Her restrained words, "Thank you, but no thank
you. Since Barbara recognized that the bulk of expenses involved would not enhance the
value of her property, she has withdrawn her request to enlarge her parking lot. This at a
time when I thought we were supposed to be encouraging the private sector to increase
parking.
As a taxpayer, I am offended at the laborious and time - consuming process which our city
staff seems to relish. I am offended because I see the waste of time and personnel
resources while dithering over insignificant and purposeless endeavors. As an example,
an initial application for a sign for our Irish pub, The Brazenhead, was made in December
1998 with final staff approval in July 2000. As you can determine, this time frame was
twenty months. During this period, many people coming to Dublin from out of town to
see the pub would wander around aimlessly because there was no clear identification of
this establishment. Our efforts to give identity to the restaurants by placing white
decorative lights at each facility, was met with a very harsh directive to appear in
Mayor's Court for this most serious offense. In the meantime, city staff continues with
their extractions before approval will be considered. We wonder how much business has
been lost.
Today our city council will take up the issues and recommendations brought forth by the
Historic District Task Force in order to improve and hopefully bring pride to this area. As
you consider the recommendations of this task force, I truly hope you will give serious
consideration to doing away with the Architectural Review Board and taking it out of the
hands of city staff. The merchants and businesses of the Historic District are really weary
and disgusted with the current process. With the formation of an Historic District
Authority to make decisions, merchants in the district can expect timely responses to their
applications and allow them to focus on their respective businesses. Currently, my sense
of the business community is that there is great distrust, tremendous anxiety and a
guarded unwillingness to work harmoniously with our city staff on matters to improve
>� the Historic District. This is a very sad state of affairs.
While certainly not a long time resident of Dublin, I can claim 23 years of ownership of
property in the Historic District. I can honestly say that it has been 23 years of frustration
with the constant hassling and bureaucratic approach to efforts to improve this
community. To the members of city council, I beg your consideration to break this chain
of ineffectiveness and launch us on a new day where property owners, merchants,
business people and residents of the Historic District will bond together with the city
administration in making all of us proud to be a part of a beautifully revitalized area. We
can do this together. This city council and our mayor have the power to break the chain of
a do nothing attitude with regard to the Historic District. We don't need any more
planning — what we need is a city council that is willing to commit to getting something
accomplished.
Respectfully yours,
Jack J. Eggspuehler
JJE /lc
Attachment
P. S. Just two hours ago I learned that serious work has been done on the Historic District
ordinance. While I am comforted by this development, I hold little hope that this
ordinance will be in effect soon. I therefore conclude that the best course of action for the
Historic District is very serious consideration by our governing body for an Historic
District Authority which will be responsible for maintaining standards in this unique area.
Sri F, it lk I Wi _1
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
BOARD ORDER
June 28, 2000
t:ll'1 ttl� 1411;L1�
Division of Planning
5800 Shier -Rings Road
Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236
Phone/1DD:614 -161 -6550
Fax: 614- 161.6566The Architectural Review Board took the following action at this meeting:
Web Site: www.dublin.oh.us
3.
Architectural Review Board 00- 069ARB — Louise's Needlework — 45 North
High Street
Location: 0.25 acre located on the west side of North High Street,
approximately 100 feet south of North Street,
Existing Zoning: CB, Central Business District.
Request: Review and approval for the expansion of an existing gravel parking
lot.
Proposed Use: Parking lot for 16 cars behind an existing retail craft store.
Applicant: K -2 Family L.P., 1741 Paula Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43220;
represented by Jack J. Eggspuehler, 20 North Street, Dublin, Ohio 43017.
Staff Contact: Carson Combs, Planner*
MOTION #1: To approve this application with ten conditions:
1)
That all necessary variances be obtained from the Board of Zoning Appeals or
that the request be brought back to the_ARB for reconsideration;
2)
That the applicant receive a stormwater detention waiver from City Council;
3)
That this site participate in future public - private parking initiatives for Old
Dublin;
4)
That the applicant replace 16 caliper inches per the Tree Preservation
Ordinance and submit a tree replacement plan, subject to staff approval;
5)
That protective tree fencing be installed around the remaining tree to the
satisfaction of staff,
6)
That a tree removal permit be filed with the Division of Planning;
7)
That concrete sidewalks be replaced with accent lighting and an additional
connector to Tucci's;
8)
That parking signage indicating hours of usage be installed;
9)
That wheel stops be included and the parking lot be striped; and
10)
That landscape screening be installed near the north property line to enhance
the visual appearance of the parking lot, while not adversely affecting
stormwater runoff, subject to staff approval.
*Jack Eggspuehler accepted the above conditions.
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
BOARD ORDER
June 28, 2000
The Architectural Review Board took the following action at this meeting:
3. Architectural Review Board 00- 069ARB — Louise's Needlework — 45 North
High Street (Continued)
VOTE: 5 -0
RESULT: The application was approved. The Architectural Review Board sends a
positive recommendation to the Board of Zoning Appeals regarding variances for the
parking lot expansion. The ARB also sends a positive recommendation to City
Council in support of the required stormwater detention waiver for the expansion.
RECORDED VOTES:
Janet Axene Yes
Allan Staub Yes
G. Lynn McCurdy Yes
Richard Termeer Yes
David Larson Yes
STAFF CERTIFICATION
Carson Combs
Planner