HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/24/2000
';"'"'''''I'''iJ,"1:V'>~[1''';'''?''''"''l':Jr~""1l1J'(iJll.:~u:ml-t. ':,:: I ! ~"IUmmrr!ll~i"'W"',IWf\'lI!~~Ut.";iUt!':jc.'i~l!I;;'."Ii"I;" 'I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
............._.........................w~....._.....Minu.tes...oi..................................................~w..~,~......,~......~~..~..~....._..._~..~..w..........~_..~_........~.~_.....,~....._......~.............m..~.........~..........~~..~_~..,......Me.eling.............._......
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 1
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148
Held Tnly ?4, ?OOO ,
(YEAR)
Mayor Kranstuber called the Dublin City Council meeting of July 24, 2000 to order at
7:00 p.m.
Vice Mayor Adamek led the Pledge of Allegiance.
-.
Roll Call
Council members present were: Mayor Kranstuber, Vice Mayor Adamek, Mrs. Boring,
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, Mr. McCash, Mr. Peterson and Mr. Reiner.
Staffmembers present were: Mr. Hansley, Mr. Smith, Mr. Kindra, Chief Geis, Ms.
Clarke, Mr. Stevens, Ms. Puskarcik, Mr. Husenitza, Ms. Heal, and Ms. Crandall.
Approval of Minutes of July 10. 2000 Meetint:
Mrs. Boring noted a correction to page 6 at the bottom, where the minutes should state,
"consideration given to having the landowners/residents donate right-of-way for these
improvements."
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher noted that on page 10, her inquiry to Mr. Cline should be
included in the record, where she questioned whether or not his client would take action
to execute the sale of the property, assuming that Council delays action tonight on this
rezomng.
Mayor Kranstuber moved approval of the minutes as amended.
Mr. Reiner seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes;
Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes.
Correspondence
The Clerk reported that two notices were sent to Council from the Ohio Division of
- Liquor Control regarding permits for Embassy Suites at 5100 Upper Metro Place and
Avery Road Florist at 5735 Avery Road.
There was no objection from Council to the issuance ofthese permits.
Citizen Comments
Joanne Crockett, 3840 Summitview Road stated that she has lived in Dublin twenty-two
years. She asked for an explanation of why City Council has approved the expenditure
of nearly $20 million over the next few years in the southwest area of Dublin, while $2
million for a promised park in the northeast area of Dublin has been deferred. She
pointed out that:
(1) Very little money has been spent on the northeast area of the City.
(2) The City's explanation that the parks must be developed where the population exists
is unsubstantiated. Seventeen years ago, there were no houses in the area adjacent to
A very Park which was developed as a soccer park. In the same way, there is little
population around the new Darree Fields, and this parkland was located outside of
Dublin's corporate limits at the time the land was purchased.
(3) She takes issue with the position that it would be unwise to spend money on a park
in the northeast for the reason that non-residents would use it. Many non-residents
use Avery Park and Darree Fields, and developing a park on Summitview would
alleviate some of the traffic problems on A very Road.
(4) Several years ago, she and area residents met with Mr. Hahn regarding the design for
-. an active park at this site. The plans have been completed, and it is time funds were
allocated for the northeast section of Dublin.
Randy Roth, 6987 Grandee Cliffs Drive, trustee of East Dublin Civic Association,
voiced support for Mrs. Crockett's comments. He noted that he is aware of Dublin's
competing priorities and is a supporter of the Southwest Area Plan. He pointed out that
when the northeast quad became part of Washington Township, the township welcomed
them by building a beautiful fire facility in that area. In contrast, Dublin has done
nothing to identify this area as part of Dublin. Even in the areas where population is
concentrated, there is open space that has never been developed as parkland. This
includes the three-acre parkland dedication for the apartment complex along Martin
Road and the seven acres of parkland dedication in the residential development at
Sycamore Ridge. He had offered to meet with Mr. Hahn to discuss the possibility of boy
scout volunteers, working under the direction of the City, providing the labor to install
I :If .:1 1 .. . 'i..'''''''''' L:,1~1:1 I , i rOO
"". ,. ; """_-'.q"a:;U.."."~',";.'.".ll",:ll'.'"",,,."'J,U"!i.I:' ,.:}' i'F UI,)J11W'i'm'''~lln'';Hl1~IR:1 .:If!: ',U.l'.". ~"-"'\1tltt:::: .~ '1:
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
.........,................,....,.......~.._...w...._..Minut.es.....Qf.......................~..............~..~..._......~,...........,~~..c..-~.7--:.--""C'.w.....":'....~.<,C"..c..r..;..........;~~~..~'~...._..~.~~......~......~-_...~~ .Meeting
Dublin City Council Meeting , Page i'- . -~--. . ... .........~.....
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148
Held TIlly 24,2000 ,
(YEAR)
:
some modest landscaping for these areas. Ten years after being assured ofthe project,
the residents hear this area referred to as a "transition area" between Dublin and
Columbus. All of the Dublin active parks draw people who are not from the City of
--- Dublin, including participants in the Dublin Soccer League and the Dublin Youth
Athletics. These parks are actually viewed as school district parks, and the park for the
Northeast Quad was consciously designed that way by the Council, staff and the civic
association. The original request by the east side community was for a passive, wooded
park, but the City denied that request and the community lost an original stand of
hardwood forest. He summarized that the inference that the area east of the river is a
transition area, or that it is actually a part of Columbus and should look to Columbus for
its parks, is totally unacceptable.
Greg Lee. Dublin Scioto High School Girls Cross Country and Track Coach explained
that he has been asked by some parents to address Council regarding their concerns. A
park in the northeast quadrant has been anticipated for several years because of the large
number of children who have a need for this. As a track coach, he has no place for his
track team to run other than along Sawmill Road or in the aide Sawmill neighborhoods.
This involves more risk to the students than running in a park. Currently, he has
approximately 30 to 40 children in each sport that would benefit greatly from a park in
their own neighborhood. Other coaches have indicated it would meet a real need for
them as well. He pointed out that Coffinan High School and schools west of the river
benefit from all of the development in that area, including parks.and bikepaths which
provide a suitable and safe place for the athletes to run.
Mrs. Boring stated that she has been frustrated recently because of the change in
"....- Council's view regarding a park in the Northeast Quad. She noted that:
(1) Fifteen years ago, following the unwelcome addition of the water tower to the
northeast, Council made a commitment to the residents to consider quality of life
in future decisions regarding the northeast. Council asked residents if they
would like a park developed similar to A very Park, and the residents responded
affirmatively.
(2) The City also made a commitment to the northeast area to provide a park in
conjunction with the Schottenstein zoning. Three to four years ago, Council
approved funding and the design was done for a community park - not a
neighborhood park. The design for the park was the product of a joint effort of
the residents and the City.
(3) She is now disturbed by the focus of Council task forces on quality oflife issues
for one neighborhood of Dublin, while denying this quality of life issue for
another. She questions the timing of the development of A very Park and Darree
Fields, if the population numbers are truly the key to this decision.
(4) At the time the funding for the northeast quad park development was initially
approved, it was contingent upon Columbus being requested to participate in the
funding as well. However, it was also made very clear that if Columbus refused
to participate, Dublin would fund the full amount. Now, the funding decision is
being reconsidered, but at an inadequate level and in a deferred timeframe.
(5) Where else in Dublin must the residents depend upon an outside entity to meet
,..--, their needs? The residents of an area rely upon the officials they elect to address
their needs. She urged Council members to reconsider their position and to fund
development of this park within the next year.
Mr. Adamek responded that he chaired the Finance Committee for the previous two
years, and the development ofthe northeast quad park was included in the five-year CIP
in 1999. Last Wednesday night, the Finance Committee ofthe Whole discussed this
project, and $300,000 was funded for 2003 and another $300,000 for year 2004.
Priorities have been set, the need in the northeast for this park has been recognized, and
progress is being made.
Mrs. Boring asked what specific items are included in the $600,000 of funding.
Mr. Adamek responded that this would fund development of a neighborhood park on
Summitview Road.
I I. i fT 'j!H'lil.. I i
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
,...........~.._..~..~.........._..........Minllle.s..waf...................w....~~.........~........w................._'~...."O~.......~:.~~_..,"Ow..""','~7~.~~...0._,~..__..............,---~...~~..~.......~~..~.w.._..~.....~~ ~.e.ting
Dublin City CounCil Meeting Page 3' ....,....,........ ,... '...,.........,........
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148
Held Iu ly 24, 2000 ,
(YEAR)
!
Mayor Kranstuber noted that the purpose of a neighborhood or tot lot is to support active
park features, so funding a tot lot while eliminating the funding for the remainder of the
~ park development does not make sense. The discussion at the ClP meeting involved not
only deferring development of the active parkland, including soccer and baseball fields,
but perhaps not developing the active parkland at all. He added that the population
numbers in the northeast quad are irrelevant in this case, because the park would be used
by DY A, DSL and by the schools. He supports reconsideration of this project.
Mr. Adamek clarified that Council's intent was to follow the plan that was devised by
the residents and staff. The only access to the parcel is :from Summitview, so it would
make sense to begin development at the north end and work to the south. His
suggestion at the Finance Committee meeting was to develop the soccer and ball fields
at the outset, but this was not what Council agreed upon at the end of the discussion.
Council's intent was to allocate funds to begin programming ofthe park, with the
anticipation that the project would be reviewed again next year.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that he believes that any additional development beyond the
neighborhood park was completely removed :from the timeline, not simply deferred.
Mr. Adamek noted that this matter remains open for discussion at the upcoming public
hearing of the CIP on August 14.
Sherman LiddelL 3838 Summitview Road, noted that he has been a resident/owner in
this area for 32 years. He supported Mrs. Boring's comments, except for her observation
---, that nowhere else in Dublin are the residents dependent upon an outside entity to take
care of conditions within. Ward 1 has been told that the City of Columbus cannot
provide adequate sewage for the community. Consequently, he submitted a petition in
November 1999 and spoke at a Council meeting. He has had no response to his petition
to date. The problem still exists. He pointed out that City sewers cannot be provided to
many areas of the city, yet $7.5 million is allocated for a golf course development.
Sewage service is a serious item. He suggested a future tax abatement for the residents
of the northeast area to allow them to purchase and install their own state-of-the-art
septic systems. Another unfulfilled commitment is for bikepaths for their area. He
suggested a review of past records of City Council to understand the history of these
issues. He noted that the benefit that Ward 1 has enjoyed since becoming part of Dublin
is the outstanding safety services.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that some of the history referred to tonight predates his service
on City CounciL The history of commitments made by Council is important in this
decision-making process. He requested that staff provide a brief summary of the history
of the proposed northeast park.
Mr. Hansley responded that staffwill do so.
Farid Masri. 7061 Cavalry Court and Trustee ofIndian Run Civic Association, noted
that the Association has received many complaints :from residents in their subdivision
~ regarding vehicles being parked on both sides of the streets. The streets were not
designed to accommodate this, and the resulting traffic problems are becoming very
troublesome. He requested that Council direct the Engineering staff to study the
problem and offer suggestions to remedy the situation. He suggested that posting "no
parking" signs on one side of the street or striping the pavement could be an effective
means to resolve the issues.
Mr. Hansley asked for verification that Mr. Masri is expressing the official position of
the civic association regarding these matters.
Mr. Masri responded that this is the official position of the civic association.
Mr. McCash commented that he has been aware of this situation which could result in an
access problem for emergency vehicles. He suggested that Chief Geis increase the patrol
I ilT 1FT,. I ;
1'''li'k'h''!!:,'ill' !tti\~:ii:i1~1~,'ti:'i:i!bU+l.llt:l ij, 'iIH$mi!'!iij'jpllhltlJHIIH'4~;'il1l+1:,:i1itb,L Ii" " I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
_....~.......................................~_...Minu.t.e.s....oi......._..,............_.....................................~..........~~................~.~....,..__.,-..~...,....~......_......~........_..~.~.......~~..~..~,~w.w.._..~.~.....~.~~.._.......Me.eJing...._.............~...
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 4
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FORM NO 10148
Held ]llly 24, 2000 ,
(YEAR)
in the area.
Mr. Kindra responded that the City's policy has been that ifthe neighborhood residents
--- submit a petition specifying on which side of the street and between what points they
desire no parking signage, the City will install it.
Mr. Hansley offered that the City would install the signs for a minimum period of one
year on a trial basis to gauge the residents' response. At the end of that time period, the
signage would either remain or be removed, per the residents' wishes.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that he does not favor proceeding without some prior polling of
the residents.
Mr. Hansley responded that in this situation, staff would prefer to have a signed petition
in hand.
Mr. Peterson stated that a consequence of prohibiting parking on some streets would be
that cars would move to the nearby cui de sac streets. He would prefer that staff
investigate this before proceeding.
Mr. Masri clarified that his request is that Engineering staff study this and recommend
changes where advisable.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher responded that this might be a deed restriction issue. As a first
step, the civic association should remind the residents oftheir deed restrictions. As a
follow-up, she suggested that postcards should be sent to the residents, alerting them of
,.--... the problem, with a warning that following a specified grace period, ticketing will begin.
Mr. Masri responded that the Police will not ticket unless there is posted signage
prohibiting parking. Further, even if the homeowner is aware of the deed restrictions,
visitors to the neighborhood are not. Only signage would adequately address both
situations.
Mr. McCash suggested that Engineering reviews the situation and develops some
recommendations.
Mayor Kranstuber requested that after the staff review, the residents are polled for their
OpInIOn.
Mr. Hansley added that the civic association newsletter could include a reminder to
residents ofthe dangers of blocking a fire hydrant. He noted that increased patrols are
not as effective as a phone call from a resident who observes a car parked in violation of
the Code.
Mr. Masri also inquired about the status of Ordinance 68-99 which is related to outdoor
seating. It was referred to Planning and Zoning Commission several months ago.
- Mr. Smith indicated that the legal staff reviewed this ordinance and it was then returned
to the Planning staff.
Ms. Clarke stated that the ordinance is scheduled to be heard by Planning and Zoning
Commission on August 10. Staff has broadened the definitions related to auto-oriented
commercial drive through uses.
Staff Comments
Mr. Kindra reported that:
1. He has recently received a notice from ODOT that Riverside Drive will be closed
under the 1-270 bridge while steel beams are installed beginning Monday, July
31. The closure will be for one week. On Wednesday of this week, Dublin Road
in the same area will narrow to one lane in each direction.
2. The information requested at the last CIP meeting regarding acceleration of the
I !dl, "1111 ,", , 'f'!~: ~ I I !
" "." ","""".~."', ", ..co."',,,,,",, ~'''''''''.'',_,,,,,,,,, '.'C 1-'1' ,.,'. "~"ll.'f""",lf"FII':"'i q!l!'~I"l',:nF,,,I!IT'.'iL"fHl!l'i ,".J~' 1'.-: I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
................,............~...........,................~Minllte,s....of..,.............w..........~..................-..-..~'~.........~...~...~~_,~~^'"....~m....~^'"'.._~_^'"_.-^"'...w~-~_.......--'~~_..............~_..~_~....w...w........--',......Me.e1i.ng..,.........."..........
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 5
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK. INC.. FORM NO 10148
Held July 24, 2000 ,
(YEAR)
intersection improvements at Wilcox and Innovation Drive has been provided to
Council tonight. The design engineer has informed him that a right-of-way
would need to be acquired, and the project will also require the relocation of two
~ power poles. The project cost is estimated at $264,000, which includes $5,000
for re-engineering to do this portion separately.
Mr. McCash stated that the concern at the CIP meeting was whether separating this
portion out was feasible from an engineering standpoint. The earlier estimate was
$204,000.
Mayor Kranstuber indicated that Ms. Grigsby could review the budget implications for
Council's further consideration.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked if the Riverside Drive portion under 1-270 would be re-
opened in time for the Irish Festival.
Mr. Kindra responded that he would contact ODOT about the City's desire to have this
open during the Festival.
Mr. Stevens reported that staff is in the process of identifying a third-party golf course
developer. Qualifications and proposals have been received and reviewed. Based upon
their ability to meet the qualifications in the City's RFP, the Tartan Golf Company was
interviewed on July 18. Participating in the interview were staff from Planning,
Engineering, Finance, Law, and the City's consultant from KPM&G. At this point, staff
is beginning to negotiate with the Tartan Golf Company regarding financing,
construction and operation of the proposed golf course. If an agreement is reached, it
will be brought to Council for review and approval on August 14.
...-..
Mr. Smith added that if an agreement is not reached, the alternative of a revenue bond
issue will be brought to Council. He noted that three proposals for private financing
were received, but Tartan Golf Company was the only one that met the City's
requirements of a company who was willing to finance, build and operate the course.
Mrs. Boring asked when the results ofthe fee study for the golf course would be
completed.
Mr. Smith responded that Ms. Grigsby is in receipt of two studies from KPM&G. She
will be providing information to Council on this shortly. The charges per round of golf
are part of the negotiations.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that he requests a better level of communication with Council
on these matters. Council would like more information about these matters prior to
reading about them in the newspaper.
Ms. Clarke stated that at the last Council meeting, a question was raised regarding the
content of the architectural diversity ordinance. There will be two or possibly three
separate ordinances to implement these standards. The first ordinance, an amendment to
the subdivision regulations, was referred to Planning Commission where it was tabled.
Staff is meeting with the BIA this week with the expectation that the legislation will be
,-, back to the Planning Commission in August or no later than the first meeting in
September. Council should then have this ordinance scheduled for public hearing in
September. The second ordinance relates to the building permit process in relation to
architectural standards. Ifit would facilitate the process, the second ordinance may be
separated into two ordinances. The entire process should be completed in 90 days.
Mr. Smith:
1. Noted that at Council's request, legal staff has provided the Beavercreek, Ohio
ordinance regarding impact fees and a memo with staff's review ofthe
ordinance. Council may want to refer this to a Committee of Council for further
study.
2. Asked about the status ofthe proposed tobacco legislation which was referred to
Committee for review. He has received a request from the American Heart
Association indicating they would like to be involved.
I Ii !!:I \ ,,' " .,.1:1 I
'~"""'''''~''''''''~1''''''''''1''n"'"lI'~m.l.,.".J1'l'!""T01'' ;'-nn"ml:iI'Il;'!l(11i,'1 ~RlJliil4t1':>!!jfl'xt!irtijih' -fj- I;' _ I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
"'......._............~......~.._......~..~Minut.es.J)i......._...........~.............~.._...ww..,~...~~......__._....~..~........~..__..__~,_."".""""'""_........____w..""'"'..._.........._.~........_.._.....~..~._.~~..~._..._..M~eting..............w~...
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 6
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK. INC.. fORM NO 10148
Held TlI ly ?4, ?OOO ,
(YEAR)
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher responded that no date has been set at this time for the Public
Services Committee review. Consideration has been given to scheduling this when
school is back in session, as the students want to participate in the process.
,.--, 3. Per Council's request, a draft of the extension of the Corridor Development
District was provided in the packet. There was some confusion about whether
the draft was to include architectural standards, or if that would be done at a later
time. In its present draft form, this can be placed on the agenda for August 14.
Mr. McCash noted that the regulations for the Corridor Development District primarily
address traffic flow, not architectural standards, although the standards are included in
the Planning and Zoning Commission review of Corridor Development District projects.
He had suggested that, with the extension of the District, there also be included enabling
legislation to allow review of architectural standards as part of the process.
Mayor Kranstuber asked Mr. Smith if that could be included.
Mr. Smith responded affirmatively, and noted that it will be ready for the August 14
Council meeting.
4. A memo was also provided to Council with an update on the Shoppes of Athenry
matter. He cannot discuss this, as there have been filings that will be heard at
Mayor's Court on August 8.
5. The public hearing for Ordinance 50-00 regarding the rezoning of the golf course
had been scheduled for the July 10th meeting, but the applicants are requesting
that this be rescheduled for the August 14 Council meeting. This will allow time
to prepare the final development agreement which must be approved in
conjunction with the rezoning. He requested a motion from Council to officially
reschedule the public hearing.
Ben Hale, attorney for applicant, requested that the public hearing of Ordinance 50-00 be
- rescheduled for August 14,2000.
Mayor Kranstuber moved to schedule the public hearing of Ordinance 50-00, regarding
the proposed golf course development, for the August 14,2000 meeting.
Mr. Adamek seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mr. Peterson, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, abstain;
Mr. Adamek, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes.
5. Ordinance 102-00, related to a rezoning along Post Road to Suburban Office was
tabled by Council at the July 10th meeting. He requested that Council by motion
schedule this Ordinance for action on August 14,2000.
Mayor Kranstuber moved that Ordinance 102-00 regarding a rezoning of property along
Post Road to Suburban Office be scheduled for action at the August 14 Council meeting.
Mr. Adamek seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mr. Adamek, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes;
Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes.
Mrs. Boring moved that the issue of impact fees be referred to the Community
Development Committee for review and recommendation to Council.
Mr. Adamek seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr.
Adamek, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. McCash, yes.
...--.
Mayor Kranstuber suggested that the Committee also consider impact fees within the
context of the burden placed on the school districts by new development.
7. Mr. Smith requested an executive session for land acquisition and litigation at the
end of tonight's meeting.
LEGISLATION
PUBLIC HEARING/SECOND READING - ORDINANCES
Ordinance 100-00 - An Ordinance Waiving Competitive Bidding Requirements,
Pursuant to Section 8.04 ("Contracting Procedures"), Paragraph C ("Waiver of
Competitive") for the Procurement of Odor Control Chemicals.
Mr. Hansley stated that, per Council's request at the July 10 meeting, the City of
I 'Ii .:11+'" H I , ,
"'''.n.'''''..."''',''''''-''''''''''",''~n~;n'.'f'1l;lJ.I'' ..)'; '. .Hnlllr'~ ~'1I:l:.'1!,ll."'Hli!I'R''l':U!i''fl*'b''~j;fi~: .~"Ii. '. I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
@....@.@~................@.....w..~...........Minule..s@Qi............@.............~..@....~..........~~............~....~......~..._~..,~~...'w..""....._.""'~__,~_............m..'_.......~._._~"-....~_.~.._ ...______... ~.. Meeling.
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 7' --~""'" ........w..,~~
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK. INC.. FORM NO. 10148
.
Held Jl]ly ?4, ?OOO ,
(YEAR)
Columbus was contacted and requested to assume responsibility for or participate in the
cost of the odor control chemicals. They have declined. Staff recommends that Council
proceed with the purchase ofthe chemicals by waiving the competitive bidding
~- requirements so that the chemicals can be purchased from the one vendor which has the
product available.
Mr. Adamek inquired about the language in the memo provided to Council, which
indicates that at this time, Columbus has no intention of purchasing odor control
chemicals until the construction is complete and they have the assurance that the odor
can be controlled. Further, Columbus states that they do not want to assume any of
Dublin's responsibility in this situation.
Mr. Hansley responded that Columbus is actually pointing out that a distinction could be
made between odors emanating as a result ofthe Upper West Branch Sewer project or an
odor control problem emanating from an area south of the old lift station.
Mr. Adamek responded that Dublin did not have a problem with odor prior to the time
that Columbus designed and built the Upper West Branch. He objects to the attempt to
make this Dublin's sole responsibility, and requests that staff retains the history and
information close at hand, in the event that Columbus should in the future try to defer
any of the costs ofthis project to Dublin.
Vote on the Ordinance - Mr. Adamek, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes;
Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes.
- Ordinance 103-00 - An Ordinance Authorizing the Execution of a Long-Term
Lease Agreement With the Dublin Arts Council for the Use of 7125 Riverside
Drive.
Mr. Hansley summarized the key points in the lease which was distributed to Council in
the packet on Thursday: (1) the major improvements contemplated will be done under a
joint agreement between the City and the Arts Council; (2) there is a twenty-five year
term with a ten-year renewal option; (3) the rent, as outlined in the schedule, will range
from $60,000 the first year to $110,000 the final year; (4) the City will be responsible for
mowing, snow removal, landscaping and major repairs to the property; (5) every five
years, the Arts Council will have the option to purchase the property at fair market value,
which is computed to include the City's cost, plus the interest and the cost of the
improvements. He added that this agreement was prepared over the last nine months by
the Administration in conjunction with the Law Director and the legal representative of
the Arts Council.
Mayor Kranstuber inquired if Schedule C specifies a cap on the City's financial
commitment.
Mr. Hansley responded that the estimated amounts in Schedule B state the maximum
amount of bed tax to be allocated to the Arts Council. Currently, the Arts Council
receives 25 percent of the entire bed tax funds - there is no cap. Any additional monies
over the amount specified in the schedule will be retained by the City and used in
.--.. conjunction with the rental payments to retire the debt on this project. As Council is
aware, the Arts Council previously received 25 percent of the total hotel/motel tax
revenues received; under the terms ofthis agreement, they will receive 25 percent, up to
the maximum amount identified in Schedule C of the lease as a direct grant, and will
have a facility for their operations.
Mayor Kranstuber noted that any additional bed tax dollars over and above the projected
amount, after the debt payment is covered, would be available for other purposes at the
discretion of City Council.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher clarified that the Art Council's rent for the building will come
out of their allocation.
Mrs. Boring inquired if provision had been made for anticipated growth in the Art
Council's programming.
Mr. Hansley responded that he assumes that the Arts Council has planned for this.
I :1 i HI , ki'!llii:l, I I ! :.' ,.
,." ..-'''' ",......,.., ,~.',,"'"",.',.,.X"".l:.'-..,,"'fl\I...'.t ".'NH'JlUffWIl"('~IIJ~':'.n.W-"''-'I41'':-;'~tl1<JI'.:.t!t~i1:.L...t''lf' I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
........................_.....~...............~......MinJJ.t.e..s..Qf...........................................~......................._..........~..........._-..~_.........~..w..~~.....w..~..~....._...._..._'"'""""~~..~.._~...,.""..._-~-_..~~~..~..._....Me.e.ting....,..........~,......
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 8
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC.. FORM NO' 10148 j".'.;'
Held Tnly ?4, ?OOO ,
(YEAR)
Mrs. Boring asked if a situation could occur where the amount of increase in bed tax
revenue would not offset the annual increase in the rent.
,,-..., Mr. Hansley responded that this is always possible, but with the lease of the new facility,
the Arts Council intends to seek other funding sources, including the private sector.
Mayor Kranstuber asked if there are safeguards in place, in the unlikely event that a
future Arts Council would make decisions that the City believes are not in the best
interests of the community.
Mr. Hansley responded that Section 5.02 addresses removal of the endowment.
Mrs. Boring referred to the section on page nine, "Specific Uses," and the reference to
outdoor concerts and receptions. She asked if the DAC is permitted to rent
the facility and/or grounds to other groups.
Mr. Hansley responded that they could, but it is limited to non-profit groups.
Mrs. Boring inquired about parking plans for the facility.
Mr. Hansley responded that this is a five-acre site which has previously been used for
symphony fundraisers and similarly sized events. Nearby parking areas could be used
for a large event if the cars could not be accommodated on site. There are no plans by
the City to expand the parking space at this time. If the Arts Council would desire a
parking lot expansion in the future, they would have to obtain approval from City
Council.
Mrs. Boring stated that the neighbors have requested screening of the parking at the rear
,.-.... of the building.
Mr. Smith responded that the neighbors have been contacted and all concerns and/or
problems have been addressed.
Mr. Hansley noted that there will be an additional 15-20 permanent parking spaces for
employees at the rear of the building, which will be well screened. Any other parking
issues which arise will be reviewed and addressed by Council.
Mr. McCash emphasized that the DAC will be subject to the City's noise ordinance,
unless those provisions are waived by Council.
Mack ParkhilL 7879 Riverside Drive, 24-year resident of Dublin stated that he is the past
president and a current trustee of the East Dublin Civic Association. They are looking
forward to the completion of this project, but are concerned about the traffic and the
parking, especially that generated by major events on the site. They asked that the City
limit the amount of available parking so that no event will result in exceeding the traffic
capacity on Riverside Drive. It is one ofthe most beautiful sites in the community and
has the potential of adding beauty and culture to the community, but it will require
special handling in terms of the traffic situation.
Mr. Hansley stated that an event of any magnitude would require a traffic control plan,
-. which the City would review and approve, and the costs would be assessed. It would
likely involve cones, police officers and/or street crew with the responsibility for the cost
decided on a case-by-case basis.
Mr. Parkhill expressed concern that blacktopping on the site would reduce the
greenspace around the building.
Mr. Hansley responded that a formal rezoning ofthe site would have required additional
blacktopped parking, and for this reason, staff recommended against undertaking a
rezoning action.
Mr. Parkhill complimented Chief Bostic on the manner in which they dealt with the
Association on the development of the firehouse in their area. He also expressed
appreciation to Engineering staff for the work that Mr. Cordial has done coordinating the
! :1 ! .HI" < '~ill'liI I I i
""...,.,"....,p".....")..../~;~.]!nll".,~'r!*"~.nJII1:.' n 1 ""lB'IJIlH'7'U"PIE;::f',n.;HI-i,df"",'nII:V.f.: '.:'i}t:. 'k.!'" I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
......~~..,......._..~...._~...........~,....MiDlJ1e,~...Qf..~...~..__......._......w....._.......................~.~........~......~..,.~~_....~~.~~..__~_~_~.....~~~..~_.~_.....~~......_..~...._..~~..~~.__,Me.e1i.ng...............~.......
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 9
i DAYTON lEGAL BLANK. INC.. FOHMNO. 10148 ..' .. .' , ".. .,,,..'...'.."- ">,,"-"';"
Held JlJly ?4, ?OOO ,
(YEAR)
Wyandotte Woods construction project. It is a massive project with many challenges,
and Mr. Cordial has maintained contact with the neighbors, responding to issues
promptly.
...---,
Mr. Reiner pointed out that the purchase of the Gelpi mansion is an example of a City
investment in the east side area for the benefit of the community. The Indian Mounds
located in the Bright Road/Riverside Drive area will likely be secured for future
greenspace. In addition, the City has deviated from their normal policy to fund $1.6
million for the installation of sanitary sewers to the east side area. All ofthese items
represent City investment in the northeast quadrant of Dublin.
Mrs. Boring commented that the comment regarding the Indian Mounds property is
premature, as this land purchase has not been funded in the CIP.
Vote on the Ordinance - Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms.
Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes.
INTRODUCTION & PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTIONS
Resolution 36-00 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Accept Sanitary
Sewer Easements in Muirfield Greene, Phase II.
Mr. Kranstuber introduced the Resolution.
Mr. Hansley stated that a cover memo was provided in the packet regarding this
legislation.
Vote on the Resolution - Mr. Peterson, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mayor
Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes.
,..--
At this point, Mr. Reiner was excused from the meeting to attend a funeral service.
OTHER
Discussion re Funding Request from Dublin Convention & Visitors Bureau
Mayor Kranstuber stated that Dublin currently allocates 25 percent of the hotel/motel tax
funds to the Dublin Convention and Visitors Bureau, as required by state law. However,
Council has received a formal request from the Dublin Convention and Visitors Bureau
for additional funding. He invited Ms. Schmucki to comment.
Pat Schmucki. Executive Director. Dublin Convention & Visitors Bureau introduced the
members of the Board of Directors who were present. She stated that the Bureau has
been seeking a new office location for over a year and a half, as they have outgrown
their space in the Chamber building in Old Dublin. The Bureau now has an opportunity
to relocate to the new Town Center in Old Dublin. The Board believes that this
relocation will meet the objective established a year ago in the Board's strategic
planning meetings, and will also meet the objective of City Council to revitalize Old
Dublin. The Dublin Convention and Visitors Bureau believes they can serve as a
gateway to the Old Dublin business community and provide improved access to visitors.
They are also seeking corporate support and grant money for photographs and displays
at a new Visitors Center, however this is not part of their request to the City. She
.....-. pointed out that a Visitors Center at this location will enhance projects the City is
already involved in, meets bed tax criteria, and can serve as a community and a new
resident resource center. The Board's request to Council is for a five to seven percent
increase in their bed tax funding. If Council prefers not to consider a percentage
increase, the Bureau has provided as an alternative a proposal for a specific dollar
amount, based on their bottom line costs to relocate. The additional dollars would pay
for the increased rent and maintenance costs. As Council is aware, the DCVB is
currently housed in a City-owned building and is therefore not paying market rent. The
new location would involve paying retail market rent. The funding request will also
provide additional staffing for the proposed Visitors Center, extending the hours over the
weekend, a one-time purchase of furniture for the center and construction of a visitor
restroom.
Mike Jenkins. Council's representative to the Dublin Convention and Visitors Bureau
I .1 ! H.I :.. .u.."",.,.., H I i : .
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
....................~.._..~..................._....Minutes...oi..._........~..........,......._.._.._.._..._.....~..~~..~..~~..~....~..,._...~~..,...~~'-..~..~..~~..~,~~..~~...._,....,........~~.....'-..~~~___....Me.eling.
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 10 ' .._~.. , "'~'.....,..........
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148
Held Tllly 24, 2000 ,
(YEAR)
Board stated that in his role, he actively works with the Board and keeps Council
apprised of their activities and needs. In the two years he has served in this capacity, he
has observed that the Bureau is a "workhorse" in the community. In partnership with the
"""-- hotels and the City, the Bureau is one of the prime revenue generators of the City's bed
tax. The Bureau has been fiscally responsible for the funding that has been provided
over the years, using those funds to generate additional funds. Additionally, the DCVB
has been an aggressive marketer in such areas as sports marketing, association
marketing, and more recently, partnerships with area corporations. In most corporate
organizations, a 30-40 percent overhead is expected. The DCVB has a 25 percent
overhead, and of that, only 40-50 percent is actual administrative overhead for the
organization. The Board believes that the increased funding is important in order to
continue building the Bureau's programs.
Kelly Gardner. President. Dublin Convention and Visitors Bureau Board stated that in
January of 1998, the DCVB had a budget of $264,000; in January 2001, they will have a
budget of$535,000. This represents a 103 percent increase in the budget which now
supports a 93 percent increase in hotel supply. By January 2001, Dublin will have five
new hotels which have opened in a three-year period, giving Dublin a total of2,000
hotels rooms in comparison to 2,700 in downtown Columbus. To support this 93
percent increase in rooms, two salespeople have been hired - one for sports marketing
and the other for business association marketing. A part-time receptionist and public
relations person were also hired. Ms. Gardner pointed out that the rent would
significantly increase; however, the location in the new Town Center will help to
revitalize Old Dublin, and the DCVB will be able to improve their service to both the
community and the hotels. She added that the requested increase in the allocation of
bed tax funds is not out of line. A chart in Council packets provides a comparison of
what other municipalities provide to their convention bureaus, and 25 percent is on the
lower end. From a budget standpoint, they believe their request for assistance with the
rent is in order.
Patrice Wuerster. General Manager. EmbassySuites Dublin stated that the hotels in the
area have experienced a 33 percent growth, but there are still many slow sales periods.
The Dublin Convention and Visitors Bureau has helped by marketing to the sports
groups. Hotels compete against one another, so collective marketing strategies for the
City of Dublin aren't possible. The DCVB has been effective in marketing Dublin
hotels to various groups. Nevertheless, with the added capacity in the City, there has
actually been a drop in the occupancy rate. Additional marketing is essential.
Mayor Kranstuber inquired about the projected opening date for the Embassy Suites in
Dub lin.
Ms. Wuerster stated it is anticipated to be the latter part of September or early October.
Carrie Richards. General Manager. Wyndham Hotel Dublin stated that they have been
warmly welcomed by the Dublin Convention and Visitors Bureau. It is the first market
she has been involved in where all of the hotels appear to work together in bringing
business to Dublin. The Embassy Suites will bring more bed tax to Dublin area, but also
more competition for the hotels. In addition, the Hilton Easton and a number of other
hotels in the Columbus market compete for the same business. The challenge is to
continue to market Dublin hotels in a competitive Central Ohio area.
Mayor Kranstuber noted that Ms. Grigsby, City Finance Director, was unable to be
present tonight, but she has prepared a recommendation.
Mr. Hansley stated that Ms. Grigsby recommends some level of support, but is opposed
to providing an increased percentage of bed tax. Her minimum recommendation is
$28,000 for relocation costs and $60,000/year for a period of three to five years.
Mr. Peterson asked for more information about the need for an additional public
restroom.
Ms. Schmucki responded that that they have an agreement with the State of Ohio for
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
....~......,~.........._......................,............M.inu.t.es....oi..................~........~.........~....._........~'~..~....~..........._.mw_m.~,..._.._..__.,......__.":,.._,..,-_.._~.....,~_.~,,",~.....-..-..----.._-~..~~..~-,;._,,"....,Mee1ing..~..~........
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 11
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK. INC. FOAM NC> 10148 < ,
Held Tllly ?4, ?OOO ,
(YEAR)
signage on the highway which identifies them as a local tourist information center. As
such, they are required to have a public restroom that is available for a certain number of
h911rs per ~eek Thec9sts to construct this unisex, handicapped accessible public
r~ restroom are included in their request.
In response to Mayor Kranstuber, Mr. Grabill stated that there are two bathrooms in the
space, one on each floor, available to the clients. The need is for a third bathroom,
secure from the rest ofthe building, which is available to the public after office hours.
The DCVB will be given an allowance to finish out the space, ifthey so choose. It will
cost in the range of $8,000-$9,000 to install the third restroom.
Mr. McCash asked if the Bureau has a restroom available 24 hours.
Ms. Schmucki responded that currently, May through September, the restroom in the
Chamber is open 24 hours. She is unsure how this will work in the new location, but
they would like to offer it.
Mr. Peterson asked if the hotels contribute any portion oftheir marketing budget to the
Dublin Convention and Visitors Bureau.
Ms. Schmucki explained that there is a 6 percent bed tax in Dublin, and of that, 25
percent is given to the Dublin Arts Council, 25 percent to the Convention Bureau, and
most of the remainder goes to the City's Community Relations division for special
events. There is also a 4 percent hotel/motel tax which goes to the Greater Columbus
Convention Facilities Authority. In addition to this 10 percent, sales tax is added to the
hotel bill for a total tax of 15.75 percent. In the past year, the Bureau has received
$40,000 from golf courses, hotels, restaurants, and meeting facilities that will help to
.~ fund a meeting facility guide and a golf guide.
Mr. Peterson asked if increased foot traffic to the DCVB would generate more hotel
business.
Ms. Schmucki responded that the Bureau could operate without a visitor's center. If
Council turns down this request for funding, the Bureau would likely set up an office in
a less expensive location. However, in their current Chamber building location, they are
visited by two to twelve groups daily directly from the highway who are looking for
hotels, community art locations, restaurants, shops, the zoo, and similar attractions.
Mr. Peterson inquired what would happen with the proposed Visitors Center if Council
does not approve the entire request?
Ms. Schmucki responded that there is a $40,000 difference between Ms. Grigsby's
recommendation and their request. If Council could close the gap somewhat, the Bureau
would then modify their budget to make the Visitors Center a reality.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher noted that in order to evaluate this request, she would like to
have a complete DCVB budget. She asked for clarification regarding the distinction
between services provided by the DCVB and those by the City's Community Relations
division.
Ms. Schmucki stated that the DCVB responds to inquiries, gives guidance to visitors to
~ Dublin, and provides services to Dublin hotels. The Bureau blocks 10,000 room nights
per year for 40 organizations, primarily Dublin organizations. The Bureau provides
~, information, materials, maps, and ambassadors to staff tournament registration tables.
Dublin Convention and Visitors Bureau is the only entity in Dublin that markets the
entire City as a package outside of Dublin. The City's Community Relations Division
markets City functions, such as the St. Patrick's Day festivities and the Irish Festival.
The Bureau works with groups such as the Vintage Wine group to handle details about
hotels, attractions, and area amenities.
The Bureau's web site is the only Dublin oriented web site with details about the hotels,
attractions, meeting planning, etc.
Mr. McCash asked, if the City were to approve the entire amount being requested by the
DCVB, from which City fund would that come?
I
t :t F HI,',' I Iii ,
["W' ,I
RECORD OF PROCEEOINGS
~................................._.._...........MillJ.l1.e,s...Qf..........~...................~.....................~.....w...~'_'~...____~._~~__.....~~~;H~~...._"""....~~_..~,~.~.,~....-..,..__._~......_~_.............Me.e1ing..~................
. Dublin City Council Meeting Page 12
! DAYTON LEGAL BLANK. INC.. FORM NO. 10148 ' ' ,", , ',,", - .,;" '-.- .., ,.;;."...<"",>,>,'.....,;,,;i1
Held July ?4 H ?OOO ,
(YEAR)
Mr. Hansley responded that the grant would come from bed tax funds, but if the
anticipated growth in the bed tax funds does not occur, the grant would come from the
general fund. Budgets for special events or other projects would then have to be cut.
Another option would have been to use the City's reserves in the hotel/motel tax fund,
but that has already been allocated to the Dublin Arts Council project.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that Council must evaluate a request for funding within the
context of all ofthe City's priorities. As the other bed tax requests have not been
submitted, it is premature to make commitments for those bed tax funds.
Ms. Schmucki pointed out that the DCVB's marketing of hotels brings in an increasing
amount of dollars to this bed tax fund, enabling the City to do all of these projects.
Mayor Kranstuber asked about the services the Bureau provides to Dublin citizens.
Ms. Schmucki responded that the Bureau works with primarily Dublin organizations,
such as CAB A, DSL, etc. The visitor center would be another amenity for the
community of Old Dublin.
Ms. Gardner added that the revenue generated by the Bureau is what funds projects such
as the CABA improvements at A very Park. The Bureau believes they are a "quality of
life" generator, as their marketing efforts for Dublin bring in more bed tax revenues to
improve the quality of life in Dublin.
Mr. Adamek pointed out that the Bureau already receives 25 percent of an ever-growing
amount of bed tax revenue.
Ms. Schmucki responded that two full service hotels have come on line in the last two
years. It is unlikely that Dublin will add another full service hotel in the next five years,
or ever. There will not be the huge growth in bed tax revenue that has been experienced
the last few years. If Council is uncomfortable in granting the full amount because the
amount of the bed tax revenue to the Bureau is an unknown, what about the option of
funding $60,000, and if the amount of bed tax actually received is higher, they would
receive an incremental increase?
Al Gleine. 5365 Adventure Drive stated that he is in support of the proposed relocation
ofthe Bureau to the Bridge and High Street development. For the last three years, his
shop has worked in partnership with the Dublin Convention and Visitors Bureau and it
has been very beneficial. There is a constant flow of visitors to Old Dublin because of
the Dublin Convention and Visitors Bureau's efforts. Old Dublin wants to retain the
Bureau offices in Old Dublin, especially in view ofthe Arts Council relocation.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher moved to approve staffs recommendation of funding for one
year, and to revisit this request at the end ofthat year. She noted that the new hotel
opening may make a significant difference in the bed tax revenues provided to the
Bureau, and a reassessment of the need would be appropriate.
Mr. McCash seconded the motion.
r-- Mr. Peterson inquired ifthere is any way to close the gap between what the Bureau is
requesting and what staff is recommending.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher stated that the recommendation is for $88,000 for the first year,
which includes relocation costs, so the gap is only $20,000. It may be possible for the
Bureau to seek other partners as well.
Mr. Hansley stated that his understanding was that a five-year funding commitment was
needed for the Bureau to enter into a lease agreement. Perhaps Council could consider
amending the motion to approve Ms. Grigsby's recommendation of $60,00 annually for
five years, with a provision that it could be revisited at the end of the first year.
Responding to Mr. Peterson's inquiry about closing the gap between the proposals, Mr.
Hansley suggested that Council use Ms. Schmucki's option for an incremental increase
related to the growth factor.
;C~'"'mIHn"f"!l:,.~lIfi'N1I1.\'~'r~1<nf,lJl'."-1 ',;.Ifffillff' JtIf~l'::llk[~j;Hiii;n:':.;B~+: h"b:l:J,;.l'I;;' I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
",....."."....,"..."'~"........._w_..~_..--Minules...Qi.............~........_.......................w....w~..~.........._......._~-w_,...w.._..~_..""""'.;..~...._~~..~......-w.~,~_.._-;...~.._..._......_...~.............0...~.......Meeling...~...._~......
. Dublin City Council Meeting Page 13
; DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC.. FORM NO 10148
Held Tllly ?4, ?OOO ,
(YEAR)
Mr. Peterson asked if Ms. Grigsby would be comfortable with this type of contingency
placed upon her recommendation.
.~
Mayor Kranstuber stated that this is more of a policy issue than a finance issue. The
concern would be in committing to future funding to the DCVB which could impact the
funds available for City events or special projects.
Discussion followed about the actual dollars which would be generated to the Bureau by
increasing their bed tax percentage.
Mayor Kranstuber stated he would endorse Ms. Grigsby's recommendation to fund a
specific amount for five years versus giving them a higher percentage of bed tax.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher amended her motion to approve staff's recommendation of a
grant of$88,000 for the first year, and $60,000 for the following four years.
Mr. McCash seconded the amended motion.
Mr. McCash suggested that if Council would still like to explore the possibility of a
contingency clause regarding an incremental increase, that the decision could be deferred
until August 7.
Mayor Kranstuber agreed that if the bed tax revenues are higher than anticipated, the
Bureau will not need as much grant money for this relocation.
..,--..... Mr. McCash clarified that the grant money could fluctuate according to the amount of
bed tax revenues received.
'0>;:
Mr. Hansley suggested a reduction factor to raise or reduce the grant, depending on the
actual amount received.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher stated she could not support a grant of more than staffhas
recommended because ofthe fact that bed tax revenues and the Bureau's share could
potentially exceed any projections.
Mayor Kranstuber clarified that the motion on the floor is not in keeping with Mr.
McCash's suggestion that the grant be tied in some way to the actual bed tax revenues
received.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher proposed as an alternative that Council consider her origirial
motion which provides that the grant be reconsidered after one year.
Mr. Hansley noted that the Bureau will likely not enter into a five-year lease agreement
without assured funding.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher responded that in her non-profit agency, she must work to secure
.-. funding year to year, yet must sign a five-year lease. It is necessary to work to ensure
that the funding continues or to identify other partnership opportunities.
Ms. Schmucki stated that they could not enter into a five-year lease if Council approves
only one year of funding.
Mrs. Boring noted that she supports having a cap on this funding, similar to that for the
Arts Council provided in the Gelpi property lease.
Ms. Schmucki clarified that perhaps staff's recommendation could be approved with an
added condition that each year, the actual revenues received are compared with the
projections, and the amount increased incrementally if the revenues are greater.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that he prefers Mr. McCash's suggestion to provide for a cap in
..
I 111.[ .:;!\;j;.:.:::. ihi.i~:.H I '1 li.1 i
., ., ',--,,- '"'~;~"'''''~'\W'1!'f'1:!~H''m''.n j'I~H1'JIltl'~!ltfil!!lH'1 ;,U'lijidii',!IH{.'Bif.'i-:E,: t: I' . I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
"-"'-'~""''''~Off_'''''''Off..,.._....w,..,......Minu1e.s...of.................._..~.....,~_'''''''~''''''~'_''--_''-''''''~'''w.~~=~~_..~_;"",+=...,=~...m=..~..._.........~..Off...~_.......~_.._-_....._......~_._....._Me.e.ting......._..~,...
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 14
I DAYTON LEGAL BLANK. INC.. FORM NO. 10148
Held Tllly ?4, ?OOO ,
. . (YEAR)
order to offset any windfall in the bed tax revenue. Dublin is very fortunate to have
income tax revenue and bed tax revenues increasing dramatically on an annual basis.
The Bureau's budget has doubled in five years, so the issue is how much additional
- funding over that is appropriate.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher withdrew her amended motion.
Mr. McCash withdrew his second.
Mr. McCash suggested a motion for an $80,000 grant per year for five years, subject to
an annual adjustment for unanticipated increases in bed tax funds that is credited toward
the grant. That grant would be reduced by the amount of "windfall."
Mayor Kranstuber suggested that the specific language for this conceptual motion be
worked out by staff and submitted for Council approval at the Special Meeting on
August 7th.
At this point, Mr. Reiner returned to the meeting.
Mr. McCash agreed, and asked for confirmation that the base number would be $80,000.
Mr. Hansley stated that with the windfall provision, the $80,000 would be acceptable to
staff Approval of this motion in concept would enable staff to work on the specific
language for Council's consideration at the August 7 meeting.
Mr. McCash moved to refer the conceptual motion to staff for development of specific
---- language in keeping with tonight's discussion.
Mr. Hansley clarified that the intent would be to provide a safeguard in the case of a
major windfall that would then be a deduction against the $80,000 minimum.
Staff's understanding is that the $28,000 would be paid to the Bureau up front for
moving expenses, and the annual grant would be paid in monthly increments.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher requested the following prior to the August 7th meeting: (1) from
staff, she would like projections on the bed tax for the next five to ten years; and (2)
from the Dublin Convention & Visitors Bureau, she would like a complete budget and a
three-year budget projection, if the Bureau has such a projection.
Mr. Hansley confirmed that the motion to be considered by Council on August 7 would
then be followed up with formal legislation at a later date.
Mr. Reiner seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mr. Peterson, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs.
Boring, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes.
Council Round Table/Committee Reports
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher:
..~ 1. Inquired about the update on the Historic Dublin Task Force recommendations
that Mr. McDaniel was to have provided in Council packets for this meeting.
.. Mr. Hansley responded that he believes Mr. McDaniel's intention was to provide this
prior to the August 7th Town Meeting. He noted that staffis currently assembling this
report from all of the various divisions who provided input.
Mr. Stevens noted that he spoke with Mr. Husenitza today about the report. He
confirmed that the goal is to provide it to Council prior to the Town Meeting.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher expressed disappointment that citizens are present tonight to hear
the update on the Task Force recommendations, and yet this information was not
provided by staff. She requested that the update from staffbe provided well ahead ofthe
Town Meeting so that distribution could be made to the Task Force members as well.
Mr. Adamek:
1. Referred to the Clerk's reminder about reservations for the National League of Cities
.. J..'........>
" .:il.l. ill , iii I I I.:iii i
""....,.,
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
................~..~.._..............~.._.......~.....Minu.tes....o.i........................~,.......,......._.................~'~,..~.........w~......_..~_...__.._~..~~_~m...-.._~....;.w_.~.~,........,_.....;........;...w..~....."""..........^"'....Me.e.ting......._..~~
Dublin City Council Meeting . Page 15
UAYTON LEGAL BLANK. INC.. FORM NO. 10148 '.' ............;....:.....,............ .,"'..-',
Held TlIly ?4, ?OOO ,
(YEAR)
conference and inquired who was planning to attend.
Mr. McCash, Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher and Mayor Kranstuber indicated they plan to
attend. Mayor Kranstuber directed the Clerk to make reservations for four City
r-- representatives.
Mr. Peterson:
1. Indicated the need to schedule an Administrative Committee meeting for two
purposes: to discuss the Clerk of Council's contract and to discuss the vacancy
on the Natural Resources Advisory Commission. He indicated that he has
received an additional application for NRAC to be added to the applications
already on file. He plans to schedule a Committee interview with this additional
applicant.
Following discussion, the Administrative Committee was scheduled for Monday, July
31, at 7:00 p.m. Mr. Peterson asked the Clerk to contact the NRAC candidate to
schedule the interview for that evening.
Mr. Reiner:
1. Referred to the memo received from Mr. McDaniel regarding information from
the Federal EP A on the use ofDursban for mosquito control. He indicated that
he is licensed from the State of the Ohio in this area, and supports Mr.
McDaniel's recommendation to follow the Franklin County Board of Health
recommendations. This will provide protection for the City from any future legal
actions. He added that the chemical is dangerous, and he expects to see it banned
in the near future.
Mr. Hansley stated that mosquito spraying is a policy decision of Council, and they can
~ direct staff to discontinue this program. Not every community has a mosquito control
program. However, there was a serious mosquito problem in the community prior to the
time the mosquito control program was implemented.
Mr. Kranstuber noted that, as an attorney, he has seen much litigation from
greenskeepers who are suffering health problems as a result of being around similar
chemicals. The City must continue to review and monitor this situation.
2. Inquired about the update provided by staff on landscaping inspections.
Mr. Hansley responded that a landscape inspector was hired a year ago and a program of
inspecting landscape installations has been implemented. This report relates to the ones
of interest to Council, based upon recent discussions.
Mr. Reiner inquired how effective the program has been. Is there pending litigation on
all of the violations? What is the policy for enforcement?
Mr. Hansley stated that the first step is to ensure that the dead landscaping is replaced.
Staff attempts to work with the property owners before citing them.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher echoed Mr. Reiner's concern, pointing out the time which has
elapsed from the date the violation is first reported until they were referred to Code
enforcement.
,~ Mr. Reiner stated that the Muirfield Association's policy is to send three notification
letters. A total time period of 60 days is allowed, and then it is referred to court. What
is the City's enforcement policy?
Mr. Hansley responded that staff's policy has been to obtain compliance in the
replacement of landscaping, but Council can give different policy direction in this
regard, if that is the desire.
Mr. Reiner suggested that staff develop a draft policy for Council's review.
Mr. Kranstuber agreed that a more stringent, written policy is desirable.
Council concurred.
...
: I ili ::11 ...'. ... I I .! ..
.,
'.u ;'"'......>J.."-'J.,.,.,'. -"'.il'r""""nrmr'01:,."m "".,.. "',' "iU'11111Ii .~iIH~~II",'{.i.H\rlll~".ft;-:.':,jjll'h'i!' ;.-l1jjh.;. t.,I:'. I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
"~..,,,......~..~........._..~.....,........._._....Mi.nules..Qf.........w.........................,........~............._.......~...~'w...........__~_.__.._~..~~._"'--~.._........_~...........~~..~.....~..~~~...........~..._.....~....~..~~.....Meeting....,..........._.......
Dubli~gity ~oul1~il I\1eeti~~ . . '" Page 16
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INO.. FORM NO. 10148
Held Jllly ?4, ?OOO ,
(YEAR)
Mr. Hansley noted that a more stringent policy may result in more cases coming to
Mayor's Court, but staffwill take this direction and revise the policy.
~~- 3. Stated that Council needs to schedule a Community Development Committee
meeting for discussion of the Beavercreek impact fees ordinance. He noted that
the Law Director would need to be present, and perhaps a Dublin Schools
representative.
Mr. Smith stated that the City could legally implement impact fees. However, it will
require certain studies as impact fees would likely be challenged in court. There would
be three school districts involved, so it may be premature at this stage to involve a
representative of one district. He will provide additional material regarding the
Beavercreek case at the Committee meeting.
The Community Development Committee was scheduled for Wednesday, August 2 at 7
p.m.
Mrs. Boring clarified that her motion was that the Committee considers implementation
of impact fees and forwards that recommendation to Council. It was not her intent for
them to develop specifics of an impact fee program.
Mrs. Boring:
1. Referred to legislation provided by Mr. Frimerman with the request that Council
review it closely. The proposed legislation removes the capability of individual
municipalities to govern the way religious or nonprofit groups build their
,..-... buildings. NLC initially opposed it, but supports this draft of the legislation.
Mr. Frimerman requests that Council contact their Senators to express support.
Since this Council favors local control of those types of issues, they would
probably advocate defeat of the bill.
2. Expressed thanks for City staff support regarding the truck traffic issue on
Summitview. The speed trailer was utilized, and the traffic problems have been
alleviated.
3. Noted that the Senior Citizens Female Challenge was held last Thursday, and one
of Dublin's drivers placed in t11e top ten. Mrs. Boring ranked second in the
Female VIP race, and she challenged Mr. Hansley to top that in the Male VIP
Challenge.
Mayor Kranstuber:
1. Referred to the earlier conversation regarding Dursban and mosquito spraying,
noting that his intent was not to question staffs program in this regard.
However, he is not comfortable with the Franklin County Board of Health's
approval of the chemical for this purpose. He expects it will be banned in the
near future.
Mr. Hansley stated that at Council's direction, staffwould discontinue the mosquito
spraying program, if that is the desire.
~.. 2. Inquired about the notification list for the Special Meeting on August 7 to discuss
staffs response to the Historic Dublin Task Force recommendations.
Ms. Clarke responded that the notice has been sent to the Task Force, to board and
commission members, and to all of the addresses in Old Dublin.
Mr. Kranstuber indicated that he spoke with Mr. King, Task Force Chair regarding the
meeting. They agreed that the meeting would be Council directed with the Task Force
present as a resource. Due to the size ofthe report, it may be a challenge to address all
of the issues in one evening.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher suggested they address it by categories.
Mr. Adamek suggested that staffs recommendation in each of those categories would
serve as a starting point for discussion.
" "
,,-..-.--.-- r .~I.. i, JI ........ ,'''u I Ii"! ,
"..,.. <,,"'f..',' ,..."......,." .., ,r Iff ''Il''11.'''1'''IP''rPll,,'.l''f'HII;1 "'lll""~!l<l";'l"-:"~'l+';,~ 'f.'1i: . '1
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
.~......._......~...~..~~........_...........~.Minu.tes....{)f,~~................w.~....................~~_.._.._......._............~~..~.~...,^"'...........~_.~.........~,.....,~.._.._~..,~-~......._..~...~................~..~.....~......w......~...~~.....Me.e1ing...,~....~...__.....
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 17
I DAYTON LEGAL BlANK. INC.. FORM NO. 10148
Held July 24, 2000 ,
(YEAR)
Mrs. Boring:
1. Stated that Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the ordinance amending
subdivision standards and felt it needed minor revisions. The suggestion was
,.-.... also made that the "Road to Wow" program should be integrated with these
architectural diversity ordinances. A question arose about where the "Wow"
program ranks in terms of Council's priorities.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher stated that she believes it would fall fourth in a sequence of the
three architectural diversity ordinances in process at this time.
Mr. Reiner stated that he believes that the BrA is using stalling tactics in regard to the
architectural diversity ordinance. He urged Council to move forward with this
ordinance.
Mayor Kranstuber noted that Council did not request a "Wow" program. At goal
setting, Council did request an appearance code within a certain timeframe, and staff is
now proposing that the appearance code be addressed in three separate ordinances. His
priority is clearly with the appearance code, not the "Wow" program.
Mr. McCash agreed that the "Wow" program is a lower priority item at this point.
Mrs. Boring explained that P&Z has reviewed several projects recently based on some
elements in the WOW program and it seems to have facilitated movement through the
process. The Commission considers the "Wow" program an important item.
Mr. Adamek suggested that enactment of the first three ordinances could result in
making adoption of the "Wow" program less complicated.
2. Stated that the "Sundays at Scioto" program sponsored by the Arts Council has
been a very enjoyable family event during the summer.
.~
Mr. Adamek moved to adjourn to executive session for the discussion ofland acquisition
and legal matters.
Mr. McCash seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mr. Peterson, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs.
Boring, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes.
The meeting was adjourned to executive session at 10:25 p.m.
Mayor Kranstuber announced that the meeting will not be reconvened following the
executive session.
~
~A; (l ~
Clerk of Council
~p