HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/10/2000
, "
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
"m""'mm""mm'~"""'"'m"'mmmm"mmm~'m"'""mm""MinuleB"mQf""'mm'm'mm""m'mmMmmm",~"mm~mm,mm_,m'mM"~""~m~m'_mmmW_"~wm'm~"mW'~m"w'm"mmm"""W~m~"~'~,m'Wmwm_"_,~"m,,"m""Wm"~"m_mmm'"_"'mm'~""~mm"m~mm~mmm'mm"'~~mm~mm"m,~m~e..etingw'"mmm","'_~""
Dublin City Council Meeting Page I
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO, 10148
Held Il11y 10,2000 ,
(YEAR)
Mayor Kranstuber called the Dublin City Council meeting of July 10, 20bo to order at
7:00 p.m.
The scouts from Boy Scout Troop 356, Dublin led the Pledge of Allegiance.
--
Roll Call
Council members present were: Mayor Kranstuber, Vice Mayor Adamek, Mrs. Boring,
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, Mr. McCash, Mr. Peterson and Mr. Reiner.
Staff members present were: Ms. Grigsby, Mr. Smith, Mr. Kindra, Ms. Newcomb, Mr.
Gibson, Mr. Stevens, Ms. Puskarcik, Mr. Hahn, Ms. Heal, and Ms. Crandall.
Mr. Hansley arrived at 8 p.m.
Approval of Minutes of June 5 and June 19. 2000 Meetin~s
Mayor Kranstuber moved approval of the minutes of June 5, 2000.
Mr. Reiner seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion - Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mrs.
Boring, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes.
Mayor Kranstuber moved approval of the minutes of June 19,2000.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion- Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes;
Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes;
Correspondence
The Clerk reported there is no correspondence that requires Council action.
--. Citizen Comments
There were no comments from citizens.
Proclamations/Special Recoenition
The Mayor presented a Proclamation to Michael Hessenauer, Dublin resident and St.
Brigid ofKildare 6th grade student who placed fifth in the recent National Spelling Bee
in Washington, D.C.
City Council honored three Dublin Schools students who placed in the recent Invention
Convention, and presented them with Certificates of Recognition. The students were
Jason King, Deer Run Elementary; Laura Pierce, Olde Sawmill Elementary; and April
Warner, Bailey Elementary.
Staff Comments
Ms. Grigsby noted that the agenda for the Capital Improvements Program hearing
scheduled for Wednesday, July 12 will be faxed to Council tomorrow. The format will
be similar to last year's. The first hearing focuses on Transportation and Parks and
Recreation projects.
Mr. Smith noted that legal staff has now received information regarding the City of
Beavercreek case in the Supreme Court of Ohio regarding impact fees. Staff will be
-- forwarding this to Council after the analysis of the ordinance is completed.
He also publicly thanked the Washington Township Fire Department for the excellent
service he recently received during a medical emergency at his home.
LEGISLATION
PUBLIC HEARING/SECOND READING - ORDINANCES
Ordinance 49-00 - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 4.93 Acres
Located on the Southeast Corner of West Dublin-Granville Road (SR 161) and
Dublin Center Drive, from: PUD, Planned Unit Development District and SO,
Suburban Office District, to: PUD, Planned Unit Development District.
(Lexus/Griffith Property - 3849,3859 and 3885 West Dublin-Granville Road, Case File
No.OO-028Z) (Applicant: Donn W. Griffith, 3859 West Dublin-Granville Road,
Dublin, -Ohio 43017 and Germain Properties of Columbus, Inc., 4777 Scarborough
Boulevard, Columbus, Ohio 43232)
...... Hi '''.if'!'l ... !
,""" '!;""~':"F:'",'ll'.\',.'.:,"~'!"'T'r"''''''''''',I'')n p~r ",': "',,: 'H'Il"''''f'''l'I'~",~,'jl'r'UTW''''' :Ill,' 'i'!!;!,' ',"!!." ""'''F','' : f'
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
",,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,_,,,MM,,,,,,,,,M,,,,,,,@,,,,,,,,,,,,,_M,,,,.Minules,,,uf,,"""""',""'M"'''''''''''''"M''.M'M..''''.''''M.'''.''""M'''_'_"M"_'MM,,,,,,,_M.M''''M'_'~@.':_''_''''''''.^,'M'''_'^,,,'''M''__.M''''M''''_'.M'''m''''''''''.'''M''~'M'''_''''''''__M'.M.M.M''M"_"'M'MMM".MMe,elmg""""M'''''''M'''M,,_m
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 2
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO 10148
Held Tllly 10, )000 ,
(YEAR)
,
Mr. McCash left the Council Chambers, indicating that he would abstain on this matter.
Mr. Gibson, Planner presented the staff report. He stated that this is a rezoning
"..-., application to construct a 3,800-square foot, freestanding building on the existing
veterinary clinic site. The application was forwarded to Council from Planning and
Zoning Commission with no recommendation, based upon a 3-3 tie vote. The site,
which includes six parcels totaling 4.9 acres, is located on the southeast comer of Dublin
Center Drive and State Route 161. Currently existing on the site are the Lexus
dealership and a veterinary clinic. The auto dealership on the western half is currently
zoned PUD, Planned Unit District, and the clinic on the eastern half is zoned SO,
Suburban Office. This proposal would rezone the entire site as PUD, Planned Unit
Development, for the sale of automobiles. There are two existing structures on the SO
zoned parcel, a single-family dwelling and the vet clinic. These buildings will be razed
within one year dating from the approval of this case and a new building will then be
constructed. The proposal calls for three signs on the site, and reduces the number of
curbcuts to three. He added that the revised site plan does comply with all nine
conditions of Planning and Zoning Commission, which include:
1. That the total site area not exceed 70 percent lot coverage;
2. That the text be revised to limit the use ofthe site to an auto dealership;
3. That the text and plans be revised to eliminate the northern access point on
Dublin Center Drive, and that the cut align with the Gorden Foods access to the
west, subj ect to staff approval;
4. That the sign package submitted be revised to eliminate the fourth sign along
Marcy/Stoneridge Lane;
5. That the plans and text be revised to provi~e adequate screening on the eastern
,..-..., elevation of the existing dealership, subject to staff approval;
6. That the text be revised to eliminate "phase one" of the proposed development;
7. That a revised tree survey, tree preservation plan, and tree replacement plan be
submitted prior to scheduling for City Council, subject to staff approval;
8. That a revised landscape plan, including the dry laid stone wall as presented at
this meeting and the changes to the eastern wall screening plan, conforming to
Code and the comments contained in this staff report be submitted, subject to
staff approval; and
9. That a revised text and plans be submitted within 30 days, subject to staff
approval.
Mr. Adamek inquired about tree preservation of the wooded area between the two sites.
Mr. Gibson responded that the intent of the applicant is to maximize the area of the site
for the display and sale of automobiles, and it is difficult to preserve trees with that type
of plan. Consequently, the majority of the trees will be removed. The applicant does
have a tree preservation plan and is complying with the City's landscape code.
In response to Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher's inquiry, Mr. Gibson confirmed that the revised
site plan has a 70 percent lot coverage maximum. He added that this case will
subsequently be reviewed by Planning and Zoning Commission at the final development
,..-... plan stage. At that time, staffwill verify that the applicant's plan complies with the
zoning text.
Mrs. Boring stated that Planning and Zoning Commission voiced concern about the two
wall signs, one for the used-car building and one for the new building. They felt that the
ground sign would eliminate the need for a second wall sign.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that if this were a straight rezoning, the signage would
exceed what is allowed under the Code. Although the two sites will not be combined,
this is essentially one business. He inquired what staff's justification is for
recommending more signage than would normally be permitted.
Mr. Gibson noted that the original proposal included four signs. One was eliminated
: i I I 1:1 ., itlil .1 ii .i'i Li..J: '-,
'i I 1.'1
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
.'.mww"""~w",w,.w"'m",w~~'~"mw"MinnteswoL"""",,,,'wm""""""'_'_"'_""_"W"W'~'_W'W~~_"'_M_"'_"'"^",'m'''''''''_~~'mw,,'w_'_wm,._~_W''_'_M~''_'~_''_,~,wmw'w~wc_,_"._",w"",_~_."^"",_"_,_",w~mw,,,~,Me,elingw,,_,w,",w,m",m
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 3
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FOAM NO 10148
Held Jl1ly 10, ?OOO ,
(YEAR)
during staffreview, but the third was allowed to remain. Staffleft this for Planning and
Zoning Commission's discretion. The Commission's vote was 3-3, with the signage
noted as an issue for some who voted negatively.
,..--,
Mayor Kranstuber inquired why the City would want to allow expansion of a car
dealership in this location. This use will not bring in significant income tax revenue;
and there is considerable public concern about the level of congestion at the major
intersection of SR 161 and Sawmill, adj acent to this site. In addition, over the past 20
years, the City has strictly enforced the sign code, allowing no variations except under
extraordinary circumstances.
Mr. Gibson responded that traffic planning is a critical issue in Dublin. In consideration
ofthat, staff believes that office use would add significantly to peak hour traffic, while a
car dealership would not. In response to the signage issue, because the two sites will be
zoned PUD, the final discretion was left to the hearing process.
Mr. Reiner noted that the landscape screening does not appear to meet Code. He also
inquired ifthe redesigned plans for Dublin-Granville Road include a left-hand turn lane
to reduce congestion.
Mr. Gibson responded that the curb cut on SR 161 is restricted to a right in/right out
only. There is a median planned in that area, so a left turn would not be possible.
Mr. Reiner inquired if the designation for a 30-36 inch wall 42 inches above the parking
lot pavement assures that the grade will be continuous across the entire front ofthe
~ project. Is it 42 inches above the grade of State Route 161?
Mr. Gibson indicated he could not confirm this, but noted that the developer will be
required to meet the 3.5-foot screening requirement.
Mr. Reiner stated that it is important that the City's sign code and the tree preservation
ordinance are enforced on this site.
Mr. Gibson clarified that at the final development stage, planning staff works with the
developer to assure compliance with the City's landscape code.
Mrs. Boring inquired if the reasoning for allowing two wall signs is that the site has
more than one road frontage, and, if so, are the signs restricted to one on each road.
Mr. Gibson responded affirmatively that this is per Code.
Mrs. Boring inquired if the setbacks are in compliance. She also suggests that a
detention pond placed up front on the property would be desirable.
Mr. Gibson responded that an existing setback problem has been corrected. The existing
Lexus building was positioned incorrectly on the site, however the new building will
",..-... meet all parking and building setbacks.
J. Thomas Mason. Vorys. Sater. Seymour. and Pease. 52 East Gay Street. Columbus.
OH 43215 represented the applicant. He noted that Rick and Steve Germain of
Germain Lexus and Kelly Mitchell of Architectural Alliance are also present. He noted
that they have worked extensively with the City of Dublin Planning staff and the
Planning and Zoning Commission on this project. He stated that the commercial use
proposed by this application is in conformance with the commercial use predominant in
that area. This plan was reviewed in detail from a traffic needs perspective and all traffic
concerns were addressed. Many discussions were held with staff and numerous
requirements were met prior to the time Planning and Zoning Commission heard the
application. At that time, nine additional conditions were imposed by the Planning
Commission, all of which have now been met. He clarified the following:
1. The existing sign package for the dealership was approved by Council in 1997. The
! ' : ' i ii ,
't..-.,I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
W~~",~^W"'",WWV'^"'",~^'''",W",VW^,^"",vw,w,,",Minuleli~oi~'mw,~^",~"w,v,~vww,'~"'VW'~'~'V^",VW^~^","'m~",~v"W,~'^'W"V^'''_^w'w"_mW'W"'~',''vWm,m^^',,"^,~^m^'''^~mw~w^mw~m'vw",wv,w"~,,,m'~^~^~,,~W'~_~' Meeting
, Dublin City Council Meeting Page 4 ,~"w~~,wwmw"~ , " ,~W^WW'W"'wv
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148
,
Held July 10, )000 ,
(YEAR)
I
only addition to it is the wall graphic on the face ofthe automobile building that is
proposed to be built on the vet clinic property. Because the properties could be
separated and serve different functions, there was a need to preserve the ability to
~ have signage on each site.
2. In compliance with Code, a plan for tree preservation and replacement has been
submitted to the City. If it does not provide the detail desired, the applicant is
prepared to discuss further details with staff and resolve any issues. He pointed out
that commercial use of this site does require that most of the trees be removed.
3. A revised landscape plan was submitted. If it does not provide the specific detail
needed, they are committed to meet the City's Code.
4. A concern ofP&Z regarding the setback for the parking on the new site development
in front of the vet clinic building has been addressed.
5. Possible location of a stormwater detention pond at the front of the site was not
rejected by the applicant, but when the applicant discussed this with their engineer,
he was informed the site would not support that.
6. City Code is silent on the use of graphics. The property fronts on three rights-of-
way. There is precedent in this community for signage for buildings that front on
more than three rights-of-way, and there is precedent in this community for one of
those buildings to have graphics in excess of two.
7. Meetings with staff indicated that a straight zoning wouldn't be workable on this
site. Consequently, they were advised to bring this to Council as a PUD, to allow
some flexibility and recognition of the peculiarities of the site. There is not common
ownership - it is a common use, but part of the land is to be leased.
Dorm Griffith. property owner of3859 West Dublin Granville Road pointed out that
- eleven years ago, City staff advised him that the best location for his veterinary business
was not on that site, and he later was advised by City staff that his best option was to sell
the land to the Lexus dealership. After the City approved the roadway design for no left
hand turn in or out of his site, he knew his business would be impacted. Consequently,
he decided to lease his land to the Lexus dealership. He added that most of the trees on
that property were cut down by the City of Dublin when the lane was constructed at the
rear ofthe property. In reference to Mr. Reiner's question about grading, he stated that
the plans for the road indicate that it will drop considerably, i.e., 30 to 40 inches in front
of his property. He concluded that the general public has voiced no objection to these
expansion plans during the course ofthe hearings.
Mayor Kranstuber closed the public hearing.
Mr. Reiner inquired about the setback on Dublin Center Drive where it approaches
Stoneridge Lane - it appears very narrow on the plan.
Mr. Gibson responded that there is a minimum of 15 feet of setback along Dublin Center
Drive.
Mr. Reiner asked if the catch basin was at the curb outside the site.
Mr. Gibson said it is within the site. Although the setbacks along Dublin Center Drive
do not meet the City's current setback requirements, they were approved with the
,.-.... development ofthe original Lexus dealership.
Mayor Kranstuber inquired ifthere was a creative way to address the aesthetics of the
site along SR 161, such as placing the cars behind the building.
Mr. Gibson responded that there are ways to accomplish this, but in this case, that would
defeat the applicant's purpose. This is the area where they desire display oftheir
product. The Dublin Code does require a 3.5 foot screen along 75 percent of that
frontage.
Mr. Peterson inquired ifthe current landscaping at the existing Lexus dealership
conforms to Code.
Ms. Newcomb indicated that it did meet Code at the time of approval, but she will have
a landscape inspector check its current condition.
! I ,I i rHli'" tj~dill ii'I' n ! Iii'
1:1 ,
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
""~"'__'_m~,__""_"_",_,~__,,,,,,,,_.Minutes_,of,,,,,,,,,,_,,''''""_",__"""",,,,,,'''''''''''_m''~'''_''''''_''_,__,~,,_""'_""_"_"_'_"'"'''''_'__''"''''''''''_'__'_~'''''_''_'__,~,_",'''''__''''''''''_m'_",_"""_,_,"_"",,,_,,,~,,,,,,,_m_",_,,,,,,,,,",Me~1in~_,,",,,",~,,,,,,,
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 5
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO 10148
Held July 1 0, 2000 ,
(YEAR)
Mrs. Boring asked ifthe case could be sent back to P & Z for another review.
Mr. Smith indicated that the applicant has a right to a vote.
-
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked that the remaining issues be summarized.
Mr. Reiner stated that his major issues are that the plans should indicate the alignment of
the cars on the lot in relation to the wall and the grade when completed, and that the
screening on Dublin Center Drive meets Code requirements.
Mr. Gibson noted that those issues are resolved at the time of final development plan
reVIew.
Mr. Mason stated that the applicant is not asking for a variance to the site screening;
their intention is to comply with City Code: He pointed out that City records would
reflect that the narrow setback at the southwest comer of the site was previously
approved by the City. In order to accommodate the widening of Stoneridge into Dublin
Center Drive, the City took the right-of-way from this comer and most of the existing
greenspace. The applicant acquiesced to the City's request for the land to accommodate
the widening, and, therefore, should not be considered out of compliance. He added
that, while there is precedence for a similar graphics package at other automobile
dealerships in Dublin, the applicant is willing to give up the existing ground graphic at
the comer of Dublin Center Drive and SR 161 as part ofthis zoning approval.
Mrs. Boring inquired ifthe screening has been established between the two buildings
~ and if any of the mature trees will be preserved with this plan.
Mr. Mason responded that not only has the site plan been revised to provide
substantially more greenspace between the buildings, but a commitment has also been
made to attempt to save the row of existing crabapple trees. He added that it would be
helpful to achieve a balance in terms of the expectations of the applicant. On one hand,
staffwants to emphasize two separate sItes, and, hence, the importance of maintaining a
greenspace buffer; however, in other considerations, such as the graphics package, the
preference is to treat it as one site.
Mr. Gibson clarified that the plan does not provide that the mature trees at the back of
the lot will be preserved.
Mrs. Boring inquired if there has also been an attempt to upgrade the landscape along
Dublin Center Drive, in view of the fact that it will become one of the major collector
streets.
Mr. Gibson said that the current two curb cuts will be reduced to one, which will achieve
more greenspace. Also, the final development plan review will assure that the new
landscape is appropriate and coordinates with that which currently exists.
--- Mr. Reiner pointed out that greenspace along both Dublin Center Drive and SR 161 is
severely limited, and it is important to install appropriate landscape materials.
Landscape of a high-canopy nature, such as crabapples or locust, will not provide
screening. This is a very large car lot, and an unattractive use. The applicant has not
made any effort to meet the City's expectations for landscape screening.
Mr. Mason responded that the applicant remains committed to meeting the City's
expectations for screening, but it has been anticipated that those final details would be
worked out at the final development plan review.
Mrs. Boring inquired ifthe applicant would agree to conditions to: (1) upgrade the
screening and landscaping on Dublin Center Drive; and (2) that parking and unloading
on Stoneridge Drive and Dublin Center Drive be prohibited.
.'. '1:.;!~..I:1 , i. ii.' i
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
",,,,_,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,___,,_,,,,____,,,,,_,,,,,,,,,Minutes,,llf_,,,,,,,__,,,""""_"'_""""_"_"_""__"_""""'''''''''''''""""m"""""",_"_,,,m""""'_"_'_"'"m_"_,m,_'_''~_'''_''''''''m,__",,,.''''m''''''''''''_''''_'~'m__'''_'''m''''''''_'''m'''_''''m'''''''''m''''''m'''''''''',""""""""",Me.eting_""""""""""_,,,_,
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 6
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148
Held Jnly 10, )000 ,
(YEAR)
Mr. Mason stated that they would agree to these conditions.
Mr. Adamek moved to approve the application with the nine conditions recommended
~ by Planning and Zoning Commission and three additional conditions:
10. That the sign package submitted be revised to eliminate the ground monument
sign on SR 161;
11. That the applicant address additional screening along Dublin Center Drive and
Marcy Drive, subject to staff approval;
12. That parking and unloading of vehicles be strictly prohibited on Stoneridge,
Dublin Center Drive, and Marcy Drive.
Mr. Mason agreed to these additional conditions, on the applicant's behalf.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion.
Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes;
Mr. Peterson, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, abstained.
Ordinance 88-00 - An Ordinance Repealing Sections 95.20 Through 95.23 of the
Dublin Codified Ordinances, Adopting an Ordinance Regarding Abatement of
Noxious Weeds and Grass, and Declaring an Emergency.
Mr. Hansley noted that this amendment has been requested by the Code Enforcement
Officer for the purpose of easier administration of the existing weed ordinance. He
noted that although it was written and advertised as an emergency, the title does not
include that language. Consequently, it is necessary to amend the title to add the
emergency language.
Mayor Kranstuber moved for emergency passage.
- Mr. Adamek seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms.
Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes.
V ote on the Ordinance as amended: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Peterson,
yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mayor
Kranstuber, yes.
Ordinance 89-00 - An Ordinance Accepting the Lowest/Best Bid for the Donegal
Cliffs Park Phase II Development Project, and Declaring an Emergency.
Mr. Hansley stated that staff is recommending the low bidder.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher moved for emergency passage.
Mrs. Boring seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Adamek,
yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, no.
Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher,
yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, no; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes.
Ordinance 91-00 - An Ordinance Waiving the Competitive Bidding Requirements,
Pursuant to Section 8.04 ("Contracting Procedures"), Paragraph 'c' ("Waiver of
Competitive Bidding"), for the Procurement of Laptop Computers for the Division
of Police.
- Mr. Hansley stated that staff recommends waiving the bidding requirements to continue
to purchase laptop computers for the police cruisers from the same vendor in order to
ensure compatibility with existing equipment.
Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Peterson, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs.
Boring, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes.
Ordinance 92-00 - An Ordinance to Accept the Lowest/Best Bid for the Southwest
Area Traffic Calming Project for the City of Dublin, and Declaring an Emergency.
Mr. Hansley noted that this ordinance accepts the bid for the traffic calming measures
that Council previously approved for this location. Staff is recommending the low bid.
Mrs. Boring inquired if any consideration has been given to having the landowners or
residents donate right-of-way for these improvements.
"II il 1'~(II'ji'''fuifj!,~k'.fj.i3!1i!i;!!hJli!jlaHIff~JIE:jijr!tMlljl[U''t:>::hjjl'!~flllilFP.; I, Itb~ft'hf'i~~- I, :1, ,I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
""""'''"'''m''~'~"''"''''''m'''''_'''_''''_''m_''''""'''m.Minut.eSmJ)f"m''_"~'~_"""",_",,_m""m_,",m_""m"m_'''_""m""_"'"_'___m_''m_m"_"'''___''__'_''_m''~_'_''''_"____''_m'_''''m''m_''_''''m,,~'''_'''m''~mm''"''~_m'''m'~''"__~__''m_'''''__~"_"''''''''''''m,,Me,elingm_"m,,,,,,,,,_,,m,,,
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 7
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FOAM NO 10148
Held T1l1y 10, ?OOO ,
(YEAR)
Mr. Smith responded that there are two such resolutions on the agenda tonight.
Washington Township is donating one right-of-way to the City for the improvement.
Mr. Kindra added that several of the landowners in the area have already contributed to
- the project by donating the right-of-way to the City at no cost.
Mr. Reiner inquired about the possibility of using the design of traffic circles that
Columbus is currently constructing, consisting of 18-foot traffic circles with landscaping
in the center. The cost is estimated at $7,000 each and seems very reasonable.
Mr. Kindra responded that Council previously approved the design for these traffic
circles, including the addition of curbs and gutters to the roadway. Traffic circles such
as those in Columbus would not meet Dublin's expectations.
Mr. Adamek clarified that the bid being approved by Council tonight in the amount of
$290,000 is for road construction and improvements related to the installation of two
traffic circles.
Mayor Kranstuber moved for passage by emergency.
Mr. McCash seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes;
Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Adamek, no.
Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Peterson, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Ms. Chinnici-
Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Adamek, no; Mrs. Boring, yes.
INTRODUCTION & FIRST READING - ORDINANCES
Ordinance 97-00 - An Ordinance Amending the Annual Appropriations for the
- Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2000.
Mayor Kranstuber introduced the ordinance.
Ms. Grigsby noted that the request of $50,000 in additional appropriations includes: (1)
$25,000 for job vacancy advertisements; (2) $15,000 for professional services related to
rewriting the City's zoning code; and (3) $10,000 for legal advertising. She requested
that Council dispense with the public hearing.
Mayor Kranstuber moved to dispense with the public hearing.
Mr. Adamek seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr.
McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes.
Vote on the Ordinance: Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mayor
Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes.
Ordinance 98-00 - An Ordinance Adopting the 2001-2005 Five-Year Capital
Improvements Program.
Mr. Adamek introduced the ordinance.
Mr. Hansley noted that the staff budget committee has met over the last two months to
develop this package for Council's consideration at the hearings on July 12 and July 19.
The public hearing for adoption will follow the two Council committee review sessions,
and is anticipated on July 24.
There will be a second reading/public hearing of the ordinance following the
~ recommendation of the Finance Committee.
Ordinance 99-00 - An Ordinance to Accept the Lowest/Best Bid for the Paul Blazer
Parkway Lighting Improvement Project for the City of Dublin, and Declaring an
Emergency.
Mr. Adamek introduced the ordinance.
Mr. Hansley stated that this ordinance provides for lighting that was left out of the
previous improvement package. Staff asks for adoption by emergency to allow this to
be accomplished in this year's construction season.
Mr. Adamek stated that although $170,000 was budgeted for this project, the Engineer's
estimate is $265,000. He asked for further details.
Mr. Kindra stated that the original estimate did not allow for the fact that this portion of
! ! i I I! ,Ii, . ilAllt" ~liI! '.il I J ,ti.!: ilt! .
': 1 ;1'1
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
..._",..~.,"~,~....,._,,",...~,.'...~.m,.,~Minutes,",of.,.,,,.._,"..,.",",.wmm'm,"m,"N.'.~,"m'"_""mm"'m,"","',"'Wm""""_'m'W_'~W_'~',"m'""".m,,",m',"._.'..'~m~..m'_'""mm~'m,",._'~Wm'~'m,""',"m~'m,"",".m~"m"""m~..m.,"N..",","".,~,m","MeJ;~ling..,.w...,"'.mmmw,
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 8
DAYTON lEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148
Held J1lly 1 0, 2000 ,
(YEAR)
Blazer Parkway has a four-lane, divided median design, requiring twice the amount of
lights. The lighting planned for this road is consistent with lighting on other four-lane
roads throughout the City.
-.
Mayor Kranstuber moved for passage by emergency.
Mr. Adamek seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mr. Peterson, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Adamek,
yes; Mr. McCash, no; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes.
Vote on the Ordinance: Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr.
Peterson, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, no; Mr. Reiner, yes.
Ordinance 100-00 - An Ordinance Waiving Competitive Bidding Requirements,
Pursuant to Section 8.04 ("Contracting Procedures"), Paragraph C ("Waiver of
Competitive") for the Procurement of Odor Control Chemicals.
Mayor Kranstuber introduced the ordinance.
Mr. Hansley stated that staff requests that the ordinance be held over for public hearing
at the July 24 meeting. Staff also requests that the bidding requirements be waived for
the reason that there is one chemical that has been more successful than the others in the
treatment of odor problems in Old Dublin associated with the West Branch project. This
product is available through only one vendor.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked ifthe odor control in Old Dublin will be the responsibility
ofthe City of Columbus in keeping with Dublin's recently executed agreement with
Shawnee Hills for sewer services.
_. Mr. Hansley responded that the commitment made by Columbus was for the design,
engineering, and eventual construction of an odor control facility that will address the
problem in the Old Dublin area. In the meantime, odor control must be continued, as the
problem significantly increases during the late summer months. Although Columbus is
officially responsible for the odor control, the City of Dublin will receive the complaints.
Staffs anticipation is that Columbus will not provide a short-term resolution of the
problem with the provision of chemicals. However, this is a policy issue for Council to
decide.
Mr. Adamek suggested approving this expenditure and sending Columbus the invoice.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher suggested that staff contact the City of Columbus regarding their
obligation to provide this odor control during the short term prior to construction of the
facility which will provide a long-term resolution.
Mr. McCash inquired if Columbus has begun the design ofthe odor control facility, and
if there is a projected date of completion.
Mr. Hansley responded that they have, and the projected date of completion is May 31,
2001.
~ Council directed staff to contact the City of Columbus prior to the public hearing on July
24 and request that Columbus purchases the chemicals in lieu of the City of Dublin, and
that a written response from the City of Columbus be provided to Council.
Ordinance 101-00 - An Ordinance Amending Portions of the Subdivision
Regulations to Promote Diversity Within Single-Family Residential
Neighborhoods. (Case No. 00-071Z)
Mrs. Boring introduced the ordinance and moved referral to Planning and Zoning
Commission.
Mr. Adamek seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr.
Peterson, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes.
Mayor Kranstuber asked for clarification from staff of what prompted this ordinance.
.... .
I : I dl! iI I i'i'., H' t..IH ".'1,. "..,j,LH',h.i. ii.ll.. il/U' >
"""'''''''-,'>:;,:'".!"".,''''.,
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
."'m"'""m~'~""""""W_"ww""w"mw"""m""""Minute.s.."of""""_"""mwm_""""w_"""'m""""""ff_""_""""""_""""W"~"_""_"_"m"ff"_ff~""~mW~_"_WW"W~ff_""_""W"'"W_"ff~ff_"""ff_""_""""~"_"_""""_""mm"_Wff~"_"_"""""~"""__"mmff_"mff""_"MJ;~J;~ting,wm""mw"_ff"~ff""""
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 9
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148
Held Tllly 1 0, :WOO ,
(YEAR)
Mr. Smith responded that it was developed in response to Council's direction at goal'
setting for Planning staff to draft ordinances for submission to Council within 45 days
,--, regarding architectural diversity and setbacks as proposed in the Southwest Area Plan.
The earlier draft of this ordinance which was referred to P&Z has undergone revisions.
There will be a total of three ordinances necessary to accomplish Council's goal.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that he does not believe that the ordinance in its present form is
adequate to meet the purpose. The time frame established by Council has long passed,
even though Mr. Helwig assured Council that the timeframe could be met.
Mr. Hansley suggested that Council provide clarification to Holly Susong, Planner, who
is present tonight and is assigned to this project.
Mr. Reiner stated that the direction of CoUlicil was to legislate architectural material
standards and setbacks. The expectation was that staff would take the usable
information derived from the recent study on the Southwest and incorporate that into
draft legislation.
Ms. Susong explained that Planning staffs response to Council's direction was, as a first
step, to take what could be incorporated quickly into the subdivision regulations, such as
the varied setbacks and varied lot widths for different types of housing. The ordinance
before Council tonight reflects those, as well as policy issues that Planning Commission
typically incorporates during the planned unit development or platting process. The staff
report on this for Planning and Zoning Commission also includes comment on the
-. second item requested, specification of architectural materials, with the indication that
this is to be provided to Council within the next 90 days.
Mr. Reiner stated that Council is aware that the Planning Division is short-staffed and
suggested that this project be subcontracted. Council has attempted to establish these
standards for six years. In the absence of Code requirements, subdivisions continue to
be developed that do not meet Council's expectations.
Mr. McCash clarified that the guidelines should specify not only types of building
materials, but should include provisions for scale, proportion, assurance of diversity, and
directions for balancing of those elements.
Ordinance 102-00 - An Ordinance Providing For a Change in Zoning for 17.32
Acres of Land Bounded on the West by Interstate 270, the North and East By the
South Fork of the Indian Run, and the South by Post Road From: CC, Community
Commercial District and LI, Limited Industrial District, to: SO, Suburban Office
and Institutional District. (Council initiated rezoning)
Mr. Adamek introduced the ordinance.
Mr. Smith stated that this ordinance was prepared at the request of Council. However,
since preparation, staffhas been in discussion with representatives of both affected
".-... portions ofthe land, and has determined that it would be advisable not to refer it to
Planning and Zoning Commission at this time. Staff therefore recommends that any
action on this ordinance be postponed until the next meeting. It is expected that there
may be alternate proposals for those sites, including a possibility ofland acquisition. He
added that the owner is in contract for part of that land, and the referral process may
have a negative impact on that negotiation.
Chris Cline. Blaugrand. Herbert & Martin. 5455 Rings Road. Suite 500. Dublin. OH
43017 stated that he is present tonight with Tim Galli, the Chief Financial Operator of
MAG, Bill Porter ofVorys, Sater, Seymour, and Pease, and Mark Brentlinger, a
principal of MAG. He stated that MAG owns six ofthe acres involved in this rezoning
action, and if this ordinance is referred to Planning and Zoning Commission tonight, it
will result in significant consequences for MAG and may affect the City's interests, as
well.
I ! I 1 ;1 JL Hil::!II'!1 ' i !I: "'i ,11,1
, I 'I: '1:1
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
."""""""mW"'"'"W"'"""W"""_~"'"'""""""m"Minll1e.sMnf",,,"M"""W"'"_'_W"""'"M"""","",,,''''''''M'"_''"M''~''W'"_"_""'__~'Mw,mw,"wM""_'M"'~#_""'"""WW"_M'#~""W"'__U'"MUUW"_U'W'_MUM#'#WUMWM'"'M"_W'~"_WUMUU'~_U_U_U_#~,,~,eting,~""W'UM'~""_'
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 1 0
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148
Held T1l1y 10) ?OOO ,
(YEAR)
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked whether the owner will take action to execute the sale of
the property during the next two weeks, assuming that Council delays any action on the
~ ordinance for two weeks.
In response, Mr. Cline stated that no action will be taken within the next two weeks that
will vest the sale of the land.
Mayor Kranstuber moved to adjourn to executive session at 9:05 p.m. for the discussion
of a legal matter.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mr. Adamek, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mrs.
Boring, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes.
The meeting was reconvened at 9:30 p.m.
Mr. Adamek moved to postpone any referral ofthis ordinance for two weeks.
Mr. McCash seconded the motion.
V ote on the motion: Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes;
Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes, Mr. Peterson, yes.
Ordinance 103-00 - An Ordinance Authorizing the Execution of a Long-Term
Lease Agreement With the Dublin Arts Council for the Use of 7125 Riverside
Drive.
Mayor Kranstuber introduced the ordinance.
Mr. Hansley stated that following discussion with the staff ofthe Dublin Arts Council
and attorneys over the past few months, a lease has been drafted and will be finalized for
inclusion in the next Council packet. The lease is drafted for a term of 25 years, with a
ten-year renewal option.
--.
There will be a second reading/public hearing ofthe ordinance at the July 24 Council
meeting.
INTRODUCTION & PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTIONS
Resolution 33-00 - A Resolution Adopting a Statement of Services for a Proposed
Annexation of 41.78+/- Acres from Washington Township, Franklin County to the
City of Dublin. (Michael L. Close, agent for petitioners)
Mr. Adamek introduced the resolution.
Mr. Hansley stated that this annexation is in keeping with a Council goal to annex the areas
of unincorporated islands. It was initiated by the petitioners for the primary purpose of
obtaining water and/or sewer utility services for these unincorporated areas. Although the
petitioners share the attorney and engineering fees, there are a couple of properties that did
not participate in this petition. In order to include the remainder of the properties, Mr.
Close has requested that the City provide the engineering services necessary to add these
three properties to the annexation or fund the costs ofthe engineering/survey work needed.
It is anticipated those properties could then be included in the petition which would be
amended at the county commissioners' hearing. He added that it is in the City's interests
to cover the engineering and survey costs for the properties not presently included in the
petition because: (1) it meets the City's goal to annex all unincorporated islands; and (2)
- it will add to the customer base and generate more revenue from user fees, which will help
defer the cost of the total water and sewer project. He added that the fee for annexation
was previously waived by City Council for this area.
Vote on the Resolution: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr.
Peterson, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes.
Resolution 34-00 - A Resolution oflntent to Appropriate a 0.015 Acre, More or Less,
Permanent Storm Sewer Easement, From Tuttle Partners, Limited, Located on the
West Side of Wilcox Road, South of Rings Road and North of Tuttle Road, City of
Dublin, County of Franklin, State of Ohio.
Mr. Adamek introduced the Resolution.
Mr. Smith noted that Resolutions 34-00 and 35-00 are related to construction of the traffic
circles discussed earlier on the agenda. Washington Township has already agreed to give
the City right-of-entry.
! !
, I I! il I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
",~""w~",w",_"_,~",w"~w,w,_wMinutes".Qf""""",,,,,w",~,_"""_"_,,,_w,,,,,,,,w,,,,,,,,,,w,,w,,w",,'_,,'''''_''_~"ww_,_"~""w,,,w,,,w,,,,,_,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,_,,,,w~,w,,_"'''''W'''''''''',wMW'''''''W''''''_'''''W'ww"_""w"w,,,_,ww,w,~"_wMe,eting,_"""""""""w,,
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 11
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO 10148
Held Tnly 10, ?OOO ,
(YEAR)
Vote on the Resolution: Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes;
Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes.
-.... Resolution 35-00 - A Resolution of Intent to Appropriate a 0.519 Acre, More or
Less, Fee Simple Interest, From Washington Township Board of Trustees,
Located on the West Side of Wilcox Road, South of Rings Road and North of
Tuttle Road, City of Dublin, County of Franklin, State of Ohio.
Mr. Adamek introduced the Resolution.
Vote on the Resolution: Mr. Peterson, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes;
Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes.
Council Round Table/Committee Reports
Mr. Peterson inquired about the status of the Historic Dublin Revitalization Task Force
recommendations and date for the town meeting.
Mr. McDaniel reported that the town meeting has not been scheduled at this point. Staff
has updated the list of items presented to Council at the last meeting and is preparing a
report for Council.
Following discussion, Council scheduled a Special Meeting to be held on August 7 at 7
p.m. in Council Chambers for the purpose of discussing the recommendations of the
Historic Dublin Revitalization Task Force.
Mr. Reiner:
1. Inquired about the status of the Mary Kelley's situation.
- Mr. Smith reported that June 23rd was the deadline set for Mary Kelley's to resolve the
: violations. On that day, Mr. Smith forwarded a memo to Council specifying which
violations had been resolved and which remained outstanding. Following that, a
meeting was scheduled with the City's Code Enforcement Officer in order to draft
affidavits for the filing against Mary Kelley's. Mr. Jones was unable to attend that
meeting, and the Law Director's office has not been able to reschedule the meeting at
this point in time.
2. Inquired if Mary Kelley's secured City approval before installing their satellite
dish.
Mr. Smith will investigate and report back to Council.
Mr. Hansley stated that he will contact Mr. Jones regarding the required affidavits.
3. Inquired if the letter from a Dublin resident to Rockford Homes has been referred
to the Building Standards division for further investigation.
Mr. Hansley clarified that most of the issues raised are not related to City inspections.
They are civil matters between the owner and the construction company.
Mr. Reiner commented that the builder appears to have substandard construction
practices.
Mr. McCash noted that he and Mr. Peterson are planning to schedule a meeting with
Kathy Vanatta to review her list of building issues and then decide whether they are City
issues, maintenance issues, or warranty issues. The items listed on the letter to Rockford
Homes seem to be maintenance rather than construction issues.
- Mr. Reiner added that these problems result from the use of an inferior quality of
, building materials, leading to the need for maintenance at an accelerated rate.
Mr. McCash responded that ifthere is no provision in the City Code that prohibits a
certain material, it is then not a City issue. However, it would not be difficult to include
specification of a certain quality of building material in the City Code.
Mrs. Boring:
1. Inquired whether the Code Enforcement Officer is required to bring Code
violations to the Law Director for review.
Mr. Hansley stated that it is normal practice for the Code Enforcement Officer to attempt
to first resolve the issue with the offender. If it cannot be resolved, a citation is written
for Mayor's Court. The Code Enforcement Officer works with the Law Department to
assure that the affidavit for Mayor's Court is properly filled out.
2. Inquired if the conditional occupancy permit for Mary Kelley's was revoked,
I I' f I .; .:1 :I" vi,kklllHlliikLl111 'I 'I'.[".I!I" ,II, .~--
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
@"""~~"M"~WM~M"_"W"'_""'M""",w,MinJ.ltes",of",_"'''''''''''''''''''W'''''''''~''''''''''""m_''m'w',w'~'W,mw"'M""""mm"""_'_m'W'''~~~M''~_''W'_W_''''''''''W''''~'"""_W"'_W""_'_"W_'_""'W'~"W"WM""_'_'M"M'M~n'M'M_,M.eej;~""""'M"'~"M~
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 12
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148
Held July 10, 2000 ,
(YEAR)
since the violations were not corrected by the required deadline.
Mr. Hansley stated that the next step is to cite them into Mayor's Court.
Mr. McCash stated that the difficulty in revoking a Certificate of Occupancy permit is
,.-..., with the vesting issue. The tenant has already invested money. In order to get a
building permit, it is necessary to have a certificate of zoning approval and a certificate
of plan approval. The zoning approval is local, but the certificate of plan approval is
mandated by state law for a commercial permit. Therefore, ifthere are outstanding
zoning issues related to a property, a certificate of zoning approval cannot be issued by
the City for any new tenants. Consequently, no building permits will be issued. The
Public Services Committee has made a recommendation that the City's policy be revised
to effect that the City does not issue a certificate of zoning approval if there are any
outstanding zoning issues on the property.
Mr. Hansley stated that most commercial businesses have some minor building
requirement that has not been satisfied at the time they want to occupy. If the City
adopts such a policy, it could result in some businesses being unable to operate or not
being allowed to expand. He added that, as is the case with Mary Kelley's, many ofthe
problems the neighbors are dealing with are not issues that can be addressed by any
process the City controls.
Mayor Kranstuber confirmed that Mr. Hansley will have staff follow-up tomorrow to
ensure that the Code Enforcement Officer proceeds with the citation as discussed
previously.
Farid Masri. 7061 Cavalry Court. stated that tonight he received a copy of the letter Mr.
--. Smith forwarded to Council on June 23rd regarding the outstanding violations. He
referred to item #10 related to pick-ups, deliveries, and hauling activities, which are
restricted to between the hours of7 a.m. and 7 p.m. Staffs update states that the issue
appears to be addressed. Mr. Masri pointed out that this is incorrect. Although the trash
hauling has been reduced to a tolerable state, pizza deliveries continue until late at night.
He thanked Mr. Reiner for his assistance with problems over the weekend. He added
that the issues under discussion are actually Shoppes of Athenry issues, not solely Mary
Kelley's.
Mrs. Boring continued:
3. She commented that the Fourth of July celebration was wonderful. She stated
that there is no need to improve the fireworks next year - they are fabulous. The
concert was thoroughly enjoyable. She also thanked Ms. Puskarcik for the "extra
touches" for Council member's families during the parade.
4. Pointed out that Summitview is again being used as a cut-through for trucks. She
requested police enforcement to assure no-through truck traffic.
5. Inquired about a report to Council on citizen comment/complaint items referred
to Ms. Crandall for response. She requested that copies of the responses be
forwarded to Council, so that in subsequent conversations with the resident,
Council knows the status of the issue and is aware of staffs response.
Mr. Hansley agreed that it should be a matter of policy that Council receives a copy of
,......, staff s response, and his office will ensure that happens in the future.
6. Referred to the letter in Council packets from the Dublin Women's Club (DWC)
regarding their proposed donation of stained glass work to the Dublin
Community Recreation Center. She noted that DWC has been working on the
project for three years, and during that time, it has been necessary to revise the
proposal several times. She asked if Council is in agreement with what is now
being proposed.
Mr. Hansley stated that this letter was merely an FYI item - without further action from
Council, staff will proceed with implementation.
7. Displayed photos recently taken in Atlanta, Georgia, which depict Atlanta's
method of indicating "no outlet" streets. This seems to be an excellent safety
measure as motorists are aware of dead-end streets as depicted on the street sign
I" t'~! W!t'1ll>:~."'~~"'~"4irHIl'IfIM~1t11i111IUllV:,ml ::'1'1" 'I ;'~f';HfIIN"'!'~'m~1Y1'1'1'I!' r'.!'. I~i" ","!lII' ".." .':"11'.".' fl: ,I: " I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
","",""",."_.,""",,",ww,,,,,,,_,,w,,,,w~tes,,,.of,,,,,w,_"'w,'w",.""""'w"'w"'w"",,,,.,.,,'w,,,.'w_,,w"..""_"_"""_"",w,w",,,,w,,w,,,,,,,w,_,w,...,,_,"W"'_""_"_"_"""W',w,_"".""_,._",m,w",,,._",_"w_",~eting,...""."",.,_,
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 13
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148
Held July 10, 2000 ,
(YEAR)
prior to turning into the street.
Mrs. Boring moved to refer this matter to the Public Services Committee to
review the possibility of incorporating this into Dublin's traffic signage.
~
Mr. Hansley stated that Dublin has its own sign shop, so the cost would be negligible to
make signage revisions. However, he would advocate testing such signs at select sites to
gauge the public's opinion before making a commitment to the revision. He inquired if
the intention with this program would be to replace the current "no outlet" signage.
Mrs. Boring affirmed that it would.
Mayor Kranstuber pointed out that there are a significant number of cuI de sacs in
Dublin, and many ofthe street signs would have to be changed.
Following brief discussion, Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mr. Peterson, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes;
Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes, Mr. Reiner, yes.
8. Complimented staff on the excellent proposal developed in response to Council's
request for a memorial garden. Her expectation, however, was that such a
program would be located at Shawan Falls.
Mr. McCash agreed. He is concerned with the proposed placement at Coffinan Park, in
view of it being the center of significant community activity, including the Irish Festival
and Wine Festival. The memorial garden could be subject to abuse because of the large
number of people using the area. He envisioned this as a quiet, passive and reflective
area.
Mayor Kranstuber stated that such a remote location would limit exposure to the
memorials.
Mr. Reiner stated that if the intention were to consolidate the memorials into a wall or
- patio, it would not be as vulnerable as individual blocks or plaques on separate trees.
Mr. Hahn noted that one issue to consider is that the Memorial Garden would not be
possible at Shawan Falls for a number of years; Coffinan Park development is already
funded. Also, staff selected Coffinan Park for the proposal in recognition of the fact that
this area is the center of Dublin' s government. If the purpose is to recognize those who
have served this government, it would seem appropriate to place the memorials in this
location.
Ms. Puskarcik stated that staff considered the location at Shawan Falls as well as other
sites. They have proposed Coffman Park because of its visibility, and consequently, did
not focus on the possibility of over-exposure. She suggested that the wall should
protect the area somewhat, and events in the park would have to be set up in such a way
as to respect the integrity ofthis site.
Mrs. Boring thanked staff for devising a concept plan so quickly after receiving Council
direction. If no one is opposed, she suggested that Council give staff direction to
proceed.
Mrs. Boring moved to approve staff s concept plan for a Memorial Garden.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mrs.
Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes.
"..--.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher pointed out that staffs memo also requests Council's direction
on a proposal that a standardized plan be established and promoted to provide residents
the opportunity to dedicate trees in parks throughout Dublin.
Ms. Puskarcik pointed out that, currently, there is an informal process in place for
residents. However, in formalizing the memorial process for City Council, staffbelieves
that something more formal should be offered to residents as well.
Council consensus was that staff develops a proposal for a tree dedication process for
residents for Council's review.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher:
1. Reported that she and Mike Stevens recently attended the dinner hosted by
Nationwide to discuss local traffic congestion issues. COT A has approved
[ [ I '1 I liI:1 i< fl,IIIIIIi':JIli.l.IH .' I" ",j!!H!P ,1 it :1:[>'
11",--"""""'''..-'''''','-'''''
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
'"'''~~''''''~''~W~'N''WN~'''''~''W'''NW"Minutes'mQf,.w".,"'~m'_m"m.N'N"WW"N'~"'W'W'W""N'W.'''mw.m.,,,~,.~''''"NW'N'"mW.NWNW~~'WN'N"""~'WW'~N,w~"w'mw,w",w'm",m.wm,.NN,mW"'W"NW.'W"'~'~'~'W"W"~,~mw."W"W~'Nw'mw'w',,~wMeetin~,~,w,w~'~mw
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 14
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO, 10148
Held July 10, 2000 ,
(YEAR)
another study for light rail, and there was discussion on how to collectively
review it. Methods of travel related to job structure andjob expectation were
discussed. This country is based on auto transportation to access employment as
.,.--. opposed to the European communities, where job expectations are based upon
foot traffic.
2. Noted that following the opening of StarBucks and the Blu Canary at Bridge and
High, westbound traffic on State Route 161 has begun to turn left into the alley
between StarBucks and the old firehouse. There is no break in the eastbound
traffic, so traffic backs up at that light.
Council requested that Mr. Kindra investigate this problem.
3. Noted that Crestview Cadillac and Sunoco both came before Planning and
Zoning Commission two to three years ago. Both were expanding and requested
approval of proposed changes. Neither, however, had come into compliance on
landscaping approved when the businesses were originally built. When they
secured permission for expansion, that approval was also based upon the
assurance that they would come into compliance. To date, compliance has not
been met. This is a very unattractive site in an area where there is a significant
amount of traffic due to the amount of retail at that location.
Mayor Kranstuber added that Crestview Cadillac has opened their dealership carwash to
the public. They also have a large vinyl sign that is being used as a permanent sign for
this carwash.
Mr. McCash stated that their zoning likely does not allow a carwash open to the public
on their site.
Ms. Newcomb indicated that staffwill investigate the problem.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher added that this business has never been in compliance. She has
r--- concerns with the continuous practice by the City of granting approval without enforcing
the rules in place. If a business owner believes that he will not be held accountable at a
future date, he will likely agree to any condition in order to obtain approval for a project.
Mr. Hansley noted that it seems to be the consensus of Council that the City demand
strict compliance with City codes. Given that direction to staff, more citations will be
issued for Mayor's Court. He agrees with the philosophy that if rules are adopted,
compliance should be required. He added that the City recently hired a new landscape
inspector which will provide needed assistance with this function.
Mayor Kranstuber inquired what the requirements of the City Code are regarding
replacement of dead landscaping.
Ms. Newcomb responded that once landscaping is installed, it must be maintained
forever. A number of years ago, the landscape inspection program was initiated. At the
outset, summer interns handled the program. It then evolved to year-round interns, and
now a full-time person will operate the program with the assistance of an intern.
The City is divided into five areas with a five-year rotation of inspection schedule.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher continued:
4. Inquired of Mr. McDaniel when the report on the Historic Dublin Revitalization
-- Task Force recommendations will be made. She has received calls :from other
members of that committee regarding the status of City review of those
recommendations.
Mr. McDaniel stated that a report has been compiled which will be assembled and
provided in the next Council packet.
5. Asked if Council will take any action following the memo received :from Mr.
Smith regarding the proposed tobacco legislation.
Mr. Smith recommended that Council refer the proposal to a Council Committee for
review, and that the school children who presented it to Council be invited to the
meeting to participate in the process.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher moved that the request of the Dublin school children for
legislation prohibiting the juvenile possession and usage of tobacco products be referred
to the Public Services Committee.
i J t,'~it''lI.-"<it'fth 'iW)jiC~':i-otli:oji~U-ii!tf:h"d j-ii>l,la~lltlVt;'lid~11';"+ft'll,";,i'.lllh.1\fI:+,,0,1I<'lI-+;I
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
"'''_"",'''''''''''''_''''M'"",''''''''"",''_''M"",~'M''m.Minules""ol""""""","""",'"",'""m,m"'''''"mm''''''''''_''''''''''''''''"",M'''''"",''''"",_'''''""""'~~_'_"W,_"","~""'"",_~m""'~'""""""'W'W'W"''''m'_'''''"",'m~m_'_'"","m'''''__'_,_'''_'''_"_''''''''m,~"_""Me,eling"",,,,,""'_""_,,,,
Dublin City Council Meeting Page 15
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148
Held Tllly 10, ?OOO ,
(YEAR)
Mr. Adamek seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. McCash,
yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes.
,~ 6. Inquired if Council plans to discuss the information provided in the packet regarding
, swimming pools.
, Mayor Kranstuber responded that his expectation was that this would be reviewed at the
;
CIP meeting.
Mr. Hansley agreed.
Mr. McCash:
1. Stated that Byers Chevrolet frequently violates City Code by parking vehicles in
the greenspace along their parking lot.
Ms. Newcomb responded that Mr. Jones has spoken to them regarding this, and she will
advise him to contact them again.
Mayor Kranstuber suggested that Mr. Hansley communicate to the Code Enforcement
Officer that Council has directed "tougher" enforcement versus diplomacy and
negotiation.
Mr. Hansley stated that direction will be given for an overall tougher enforcement
philosophy, not limited to the three issues identified tonight. When these cases come to
Mayor's Court and a heavy fine is levied versus dismissal of a case, the message will be
sent that the City demands strict compliance with its Code.
2. Inquired about the SR 161 landscaping installed by the City and the fact that only
one business, the Daimler office building, seems to be maintaining their share of
it. That entire area was envisioned as an attractive gateway to the City.
Ms. Newcomb indicted that staff is working on this issue.
- 3. Noted that the same evening that a construction worker was killed at the Avery
Bridge project, he encountered another dangerous situation on Avery Road
involving a paint-striping worker stopping traffic for their project. He suggests
that, for safety reasons, the City either assign more off-duty officers to busy
intersections when construction is underway, or more competent contractors be
on site to direct traffic and minimize the likelihood of a serious injury.
Mr. Hansley stated that most City contracts include language addressing safety practices.
That contractor was clearly in violation of the contract.
4. Inquired about the status of the ordinance to be drafted regarding the
development of an overlay district for all ofthe land along SR 33 and SR 161,
similar to a corridor development district.
Mr. Smith stated that he will check with the Planning Director on the status of the
legislation when she returns from vacation.
Mr. Adamek:
1. Thanked Mr. Hansley for returning from vacation to attend a Nationwide
luncheon meeting on his behalf.
2. Noted that he appreciated all ofthe hard work on the southwest area traffic
issues. He explained that he voted against the ordinance tonight because of his
initial stand that the City has invested a significant amount of dollars in the
infrastructure in that area. Installation of traffic calming measures before the
~ road network is all in place is premature and does not allow for an assessment of
I the effectiveness of the road network at completion.
Mayor Kranstuber:
1. Referred to former Mayor Campbell's letter of June 22 regarding the provision of
water and sewer services to existing neighborhoods which do not presently have
servIce.
Mr. Hansley advised Council that a policy decision is needed on this request and future
requests. Extending water and sewer lines is very costly, and Council will have to
decide how to respond in view of recent actions taken in response to requests from other
areas without service.
Mayor Kranstuber asked that staff provide a cost estimate to Council before such a
determination is made.
<" ,., ""'I'".n~'rlI"~.I:~F.'m1tWT'11~~It:ilfmlllJ:I:I':''-:I t '1:,"lj.pllnM"~'1~11,,"'lill1flq,,,; :.t~"C1;!lt'::i:'~.':': 11'1
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
c"m"'_cc~"www_c~"w'm_ccmw'_""~mmMinu1es",,Qf,c_"'m''''''w_,,,m,,w,,,_,c,mwmm,,,,,,,c''''''''''''''''''''',,,,,mW,,'W,,m,,,m,,,mm_'m,",",MmM"'mM'MM'~'''_''_'mmC'~~M'_''_''_'m"m_'''m'~wwm",,"M'mmwmmc~cmw'_m__"'m'mm"'_"_"~'_mc~"M"m",M,eelingw'~"_W~'M',
. Dublin City Council Meeting Page 16
DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FOAM NO. 10148
Held July 1 0, 2000 ,
(YEAR)
Mr. Reiner asked if staff is suggesting that Council adopt a policy indicating that these
recent cases were the exception and not reflective of Council's general policy.
,...r""""'\ Mr. Hansley stated that after the cost estimate is provided to Council, he would expect
that Council would be prepared to formulate such a policy. He emphasized that, if the
City pays all of the co~ts to provide water and sewer lines to areas without service, the
rates will have to be increased in the future to fund the infrastructure.
2. Commented that it was a nice gesture that the City Manager hosted ex-Council
members at his table at the recent Fourth of July celebration. He suggested that,
informally, attempts be made to include ex-Council members in social events for
the City and utilize their expertise for task forces, etc. as appropriate.
3. Referred to a recent follow-up memo from Ms. Puskarcik regarding the Fourth of
July celebration. He asked if she expected the allocation of tables to be a major
issue next year.
Ms. Puskarcik responded that they have evaluated the situation. They are considering
limiting table purchases to one table, and adding two chairs to each of the tables.
4. Reported that he and Mr. Adamek recently met with a subcommittee ofthe
Dublin Schools Strategic Planning Group, on which Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher
serves. This subcommittee was investigating the potential of school-city
relationships or partnerships. He asked ifthere are additional opportunities
which exist for cooperation with the School district to achieve mutual goals. He
indicated that one way the City currently supports the Schools is in not allowing
tax abatements.
~ Mr. Hansley responded that the City has cooperated in any request the school has
brought forward. He regularly meets with the Superintendent, and the City staff enjoys a
~ good rapport with the administrative staff.
Mrs. Boring suggested caution in any discussion about development of parkland in order
to prevent any divisiveness that could result by favoring one school over another.
5. Complimented this year's outdoor pool management. Ms. Mueller relates very
well to the children and appears to be a skillful manager of all of the resources.
Staff Comments (additional)
Mr. McDaniel reported that the City has finalized a proposed contract for the swim
coach, and they will proceed with negotiation and execution of the contract unless
Council has an objection.
There was no objection from Council.
Mr. Hansley reported that the City has hired Frank Ciarochi as the new Assistant City
Manager/Director of Development. Mr. Ciarochi has experience as a Planner, City
Manager, and Development Director. Mr. Hansley added that Mr. Ciarochi possesses a
good blend of management skills for this position. He is expected to begin working for
the City in September.
,~
The meeting was adjourned at 11 :00 p.m.
/
/
I
L
~~ ~ (fJ~~
Clerk of Council
! !