Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/03/2006 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of____~___ publin City Council MeeJil1Z-. .- ---~ ---------- ----_._--~ - DAYTON LEGAL BLANK. INC" FORM NO. 101~--- rr-~-~--'" ----------- --------- April 3, 2006 Ii Held 20 Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher called the April 3, 2006 regular meeting of Dublin City Council to order at 7:00 p.m. at the Dublin Municipal Building. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mr. Keenan led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Present were: Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, Vice Mayor Lecklider, Mrs. Boring, Mr. Keenan, Mr. McCash, Mr. Reiner and Ms. Salay. Staff members present were: Ms. Brautigam, Ms. Grigsby, Ms. Readier, Mr. Ciarochi, Mr. Harding, Chief Epperson, Mr. Gunderman, Mr. Hahn, Mr. Hammersmith, Ms. Puskarcik, Ms, Ott, Mr. Earman, Mr. Burns and Ms. Husak. MOMENT OF SILENCE Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher requested a moment of silence in honor of former employee, Mary Newcomb, who died on Sunday of cancer. Mary began employment with the City in June of 1987 as a landscape architect, and later served as a Senior Planner. Most Council members have also served on the Planning and Zoning Commission and came to know Mary well as she worked with the Commission. Council extends its deepest condolences to her family and friends. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Reiner moved approval of the minutes of the March 6, 2006 Council meeting Mr. McCash seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes. Mr. Lecklider moved approval of the minutes of the March 20, 2006 Council meeting. Mr. Keenan seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes. CORRESPONDENCE The Clerk reported two notices to legislative authority from the Ohio Division of Liquor Control: (1) a C2 permit for a gift company, "More Time for You," 6631 Commerce Parkway; (2) a C1-C2 carry out permit for the new Kroger store on Sawmill Road There was no objection to the issuance of these permits. CITIZEN COMMENTS Wallace Maurer. 7451 Dublin Road, stated that he serves on the Dublin Irish Celebration Committee, which rotates meeting locations between City Hall and a pub located on South High Street. At a recent meeting at the pub, he witnessed what appeared to be laughter by a group at his expense. After the meeting, he confronted staff member Mr. Ciarochi and learned that Mr. Ciarochi had developed the entertaining ability to verbally impersonate Mr. Maurer. He suggested that Mr. Ciarochi present an example of his impersonation at a future meeting. LEGISLATION INTRODUCTION/FIRST READING - ORDINANCES Ordinance 19-06 Authorizing the Purchase of a 0.316 Acre, More or Less, Fee Simple Interest, and a 0.097 Acre, More or Less, Permanent Utility Easement, From Russell Duemmel and Carol Leah Duemmel, Located South of Tuttle Road and West of Emerald Parkway, City of Dublin, County of Franklin, State of Ohio, and Declaring an Emergency. Ms. Salay introduced the ordinance. Ms. Brautigam stated that this legislation provides authorization for land acquisition necessary for the Tuttle Crossing Boulevard widening. Staff requests authorization to dispense with the public hearing. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher inquired the reason for the emergency. Ms. Grigsby stated that the property owners have agreed with the purchase price. It is important to close as quickly as possible on the purchase. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of -- ~- ----- Dublin City Council Meeting___ --.-.- --~ DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INC.. FORM NO. 10148 Ir~ -r:eld ------------ April 3, 2006 Page 2 20 Mr. Reiner moved to dispense with the public hearing and to treat this as emergency legislation. Mr. McCash seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes. Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes. Ordinance 20-06 Repealing Ordinance 17-06 and Appropriating a 1.275 Acre, More or Less, Fee Simple Interest, and a 0.351 Acre, More or Less, Permanent Utility Easement from Robert G. Eickholt, Jane M. Eickholt and David Eickholt, Located South of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard, City of Dublin, County of Franklin, State of Ohio, and Declaring an Emergency. Mr. Keenan introduced the ordinance. Ms. Brautigam stated that in Ordinance 17-06 there was an error in the acreage amount, which is corrected in this legislation. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher inquired the reason for the emergency. Ms. Grigsby responded that this will enable immediate filing with the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas to begin the process to acquire the land. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher noted that Mr. Maurer has requested permission to speak on Ordinances 19-06 and 20-06. Mr. Maurer stated that the purchase amount provided in Ordinance 19-06 is $71,755 for approximately 1/3 acre, which would translate to a cost for an acre on Tuttle Crossing Boulevard of approximately $215,000. However, Ordinance 20-06 provides for a purchase price of $296,011 for an acre plus. Ms. Grigsby responded that there is a cost per acre for a 100 percent purchase of right-of- way. Included in the price is a portion for easements that are needed for utilities and for temporary construction, which is less than a 100 percent amount. The projects vary in appraised value. The specific location along Tuttle Crossing Boulevard has a significant impact on the cost per acre valuation of the property. Mr. Salay moved to dispense with the public hearing and to treat this as emergency legislation. Mr. Lecklider seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. McCash, yes. Vote on the Ordinance: Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes. INTRODUCTION/PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTIONS Resolution 27-06 Authorizing the Regulation of Traffic on Muirfield Drive and Other Roads in Muirfield Village and Waiving Certain Provisions of the Dublin Sign Code and Noise Ordinance in Conjunction with the Annual Memorial Tournament. Mr. Keenan introduced the resolution. Chief Epperson stated that legislation is passed annually to temporarily waive certain provisions of the Sign Code and Noise Code for the Memorial Tournament. Vote on the Resolution: Mr. Keenan, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes. Resolution 28-06 Appointing a Member to a Four-Year Term on the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Dublin. Vice Mayor Lecklider introduced the resolution. He noted that this and the following resolutions provide for appointments or reappointments to Council's various boards and commissions. There are two appointments that will be made at a later Council meeting. Vice Mayor Lecklider moved to reappoint Ted Saneholtz to a four-year term expiring March 31, 2010 on the Planning Zoning Commission. Mr. Keenan seconded the motion. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council - -- ------. .. .~ M~~tin~_ __ ---- ~-- DAYroNLEGAl~lANK,ltoIg~.F'o.flI.4_N(). 10148_m_ ------- --------- ~._-~ April 3, 2006 Page 3 Held 20 Vote on the Resolution: Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. Resolution 29-06 Appointing a Member to a Four-Year Term on the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Dublin. Vice Mayor Lecklider introduced the resolution and moved to appoint Warren Fishman to a four-year term expiring March 31, 2010 on the Planning Zoning Commission. Mr. Reiner seconded the motion. Vote on the Resolution: Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, no; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Salay, no; Vice Mayor Lecklider, no. Resolution 30-06 Appointing a Member to an Unexpired Term on the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Dublin. Vice Mayor Lecklider introduced the resolution and moved to appoint Kevin Walter to the unexpired term of John Messineo on the Planning Zoning Commission. The term will expire on March 31,2007. Ms. Salay seconded the motion. Vote on the Resolution: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that Mr. Walter was instrumental in bringing forth a concern of certain members of the community regarding play structures in back yards and, subsequently, a revision in the City's code pertaining to that matter. Council is pleased that Mr. Walter is being appointed to the City's Planning and Zoning Commission where he will be able to work diligently to ensure the City's code is upheld. He has shared that he moved his family to the Dublin community due to its stringent codes and regulations. Resolution 31-06 Appointing a Member to a Three-Year Term on the Architectural Review Board of the City of Dublin. Vice Mayor Lecklider introduced the resolution and moved to appoint Tom Holton to a three-year term expiring March 31, 2009 on the Architectural Review Board. Mr. McCash seconded the motion. Vote on the Resolution: Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes. Resolution 32-06 Appointing a Member to a Three-Year Term on the Architectural Review Board of the City of Dublin. Vice Mayor Lecklider introduced the resolution and moved to appoint Linda Kick to a three-year term expiring March 31,2009 on the Architectural Review Board. Ms. Salay seconded the motion. Vote on the Resolution: Ms. Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. Resolution 33-06 Appointing a Member to a Three-Year Term on the Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Dublin. Vice Mayor Lecklider introduced the resolution and moved to reappoint Drew Skillman to a three-year term expiring March 31,2009 on the Board of Zoning Appeals. Mr. McCash seconded the motion. Vote on the Resolution: Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. Resolution 34-06 Appointing a Member to a Three-Year Term on the Community Services Advisory Commission of the City of Dublin. Vice Mayor Lecklider introduced the resolution and moved to appoint Diane Seiple to a three-year term expiring March 31,2009 on the Community Services Advisory Commission. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FORM NO 10148 April 3, 2006 Page 4 Held 20 Ms. Salay seconded the motion. Vote on the Resolution: Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. McCash, yes. Resolution 35-06 Appointing a Member to a Three-Year Term on the Community Services Advisory Commission of the City of Dublin. Vice Mayor Lecklider introduced the resolution and moved to appoint Dona Givens to a three-year term expiring March 31, 2009 on the Architectural Review Board. Ms. Salay seconded the motion. Vote on the resolution: Ms. Salay, yes; Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes. Resolution 36-06 Appointing a Member to a Two-Year Term on the Board of the Dublin Arts Council. Vice Mayor Lecklider introduced the resolution and moved to appoint Rebecca Blatt to a two-year term expiring March 31, 2008 on the Board of the Dublin Arts Council. Mr. Keenan seconded the motion. Vote on the Resolution: Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes. Resolution 37-06 Appointing a Member to a Three-Year Term on the Board of the Dublin Convention and Visitors Bureau. Vice Mayor Lecklider introduced the resolution and moved to reappoint Duane Warns to a three-year term expiring March 31, 2009 on the Board of the Dublin Convention and Visitors Bureau. Ms. Salay seconded the motion. Vote on the Resolution: Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes. Resolution 38-06 Appointing a Member to a Three-Year Term on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission of the City of Dublin. Vice Mayor Lecklider introduced the resolution and moved to appoint David Cecutti to a three-year term expiring March 31, 2009 on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. Mr. Reiner seconded the motion. Vote on the resolution: Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes. Resolution 39-06 Appointing a Member to a Three-Year Term on the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission of the City of Dublin. Vice Mayor Lecklider introduced the resolution and moved to appoint Jamie Boft to a three-year term expiring March 31, 2009 on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. Ms. Salay seconded the motion. Vote on the Resolution: Ms. Salay, yes; Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes. OTHER . Fee Waiver Request for Washington Township Administration Building Ms. Brautigam stated that Chief Alan Woo, Washington Township has submitted a written request that the City waive certain fees related to water and sewer improvements associated with the construction of the new Washington Township administration building located at 6200 Eiterman Road. The City reviewed past history with Washington Township related to fee waivers. In 1997, at the time the Hard Road fire station was constructed, the City waived a portion of water and sewer fees. There was also a stipulation that a requirement for waterline installation and sidewalk construction that the Township was responsible for would be delayed, though not waived. The current waiver request is for $52,000 in fees. Consistent with past practice, it would be appropriate to waive $23,000 of the fee waiver requested. The City would be waiving the costs of a RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublill City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FORM NO 10148 April 3, 2006 Page 5 Held 20 waterline from the fire training facility, the City's capacity charges and some inspection fees. Staff's recommendation is that the $12,000 fee for construction of a domestic waterline not be waived. In 1997, Dublin paid $12,000 for the waterline construction - this would offset that amount. With this recommendation, the City would also remind Washington Township of their obligation to construct a sidewalk. Today, development exists in that area, so there are other sidewalks now existing to provide connection to -- there is park property just north of their site. The City would ask them to move forward with the sidewalk construction by September 2006. The City of Columbus sewer connection charges cannot be waived. Alan Woo, Fire Chief, Washinqton Township. stated that the agreement referred to was entered into prior to his time with the Fire Department. He will look into the matter. However, the current Township trustees would honor any previous agreements. The new administration building is nearing the completion stage. Hopefully, there will be a sewer line available to tap into. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher asked if a discussion occurred in 1999 about when and how the fee would be paid, considering that the City installed a 12-inch waterline at that time. Ms. Grigsby responded that when the Hard Road administration building was constructed in 1999, there were no other properties to provide connection to. Therefore, it was agreed that the construction would be delayed to a future point in time when there was need for the waterline extension. In the Hanna Hills area, the line was extended as part of that project. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher inquired if the City discussed payment with Washington Township at that time. Ms. Grigsby responded that it was not discussed. Ms. Salay inquired if the City has communicated with the Township about the pending request. Ms. Brautigam responded that one of the Township Trustees called to inquire, and she made him aware of the recommendation that would be made to Council at tonight's meeting. Mr. Keenan stated that he served as a Washington Township trustee at the time the agreement was executed. The Township did agree to provide the connections as described, including construction of the sidewalk/bikepath along Riverside Drive. Mr. Keenan inquired when the training tower would be functional. Chief Woo responded that the training tower is now complete, but an approval is needed from the State of Ohio prior to it becoming operational. . Mr. McCash inquired if there are additional capacity fees for the facility that are not included in this request. Is the fee for the four-inch waterline for the training tower a tap fee or a capacity fee? Mr. Woo responded that the four-inch waterline is for the sprinkler system. There is no waterline extension to the training tower. Mr. McCash responded that the cost of the waterline to provide for fire training is only $8,500. In addition to a tap fee, a capacity fee is typically charged, which is approximately half of the usual fee. Mr. Woo responded that the Columbus portion of the fees has already been paid. Mr. Keenan moved to waive $23,788.20 of the fees per staffs recommendation. Mr. Reiner seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Salay, yes. Mr. McCash noted that this request brings to mind a subject that he and Chief Woo have discussed in the past. Water service for a sprinkler system provides a greater level of protection during a fire than the building itself. Columbus charges a capacity fee for that service, although no water is ever used unless there is a fire. Dublin, in turn, adds on an additional capacity fee. Is it possible for Dublin to either (1) not add on the additional fee for supply lines that are for fire service only; or (2) allow the additional capacity fee to be paid over a three to four- year time period as part of an incentive to provide the sprinkler system? This would reduce the initial cost involved in constructing safer buildings. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FORM NO 10148 April 3, 2006 Page 6 Held 20 Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher inquired if this topic should be referred to the Public Services Committee for review. Mr. McCash agreed. Perhaps Ms. Grigsby could review this option in conjunction with the Building department. Ms. Grigsby stated that she could provide the information regarding the annual water revenue collected from these fees. Mr. McCash requested that the information needed would be specifically for commercial sprinkler/fire protection services. Mrs. Boring stated that she would also like to have the history on the service charge - how and why it was established, if a change is contemplated. Ms. Grigsby responded that the reason a fee is charged is to ensure that the City has sufficient capacity to provide the water pressure for those systems. Initially, the fee was established at 100 percent of the tap fee amount. When the tap fees were increased substantially back in 1992, the fire suppression fee was established at 20 percent of the tap fee amount. The data provided to Council will include the history. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that the consensus of Council is that consideration of this matter is assigned to the Public Services Committee of which Mr. Reiner is the chair. He will schedule a meeting and apprise Ms. Grigsby of the date by which the Committee will need the information. . Informal Review - Monterey Drive Tract Concepts Ms. Husak stated this is informal review of a concept for a proposed development of a townhouse or a townhouse/retail project to be located at the intersection of West Bridge Street and Monterey Drive. The site is just west of the Historic District and currently contains residential duplexes, a gas station and vacant parcels. It abuts the City-owned parcel to the north along West Bridge Street. Monterey Drive runs north-south through the site. The applicant has provided two concepts. . Concept A contains all parcels currently controlled by the applicant and proposes 59 townhouse-style residential units. The concept proposes diverting Monterey Drive at the southern portion of the site west to intersect with Corbins Mill Drive. Access to the units is proposed at five points along the relocated Monterey Drive. The units would be oriented internally and fronting onto internal greenspaces. . At staff's suggestion, the applicant has also developed Concept B, a mixed-use development that would include some parcels along W. Bridge Street that the applicant does not currently control. The plan proposes: 70 townhouse units, 20,000 square feet of retail within three buildings along W. Bridge Street, and 24 residential units above that commercial space. Monterey Drive would be diverted to Corbins Mill, and the townhouse units would have four access points along Monterey Drive. Access to the retail area would occur from the interior street system of the townhouse development at the east and west ends of the site, utilizing two curb cuts off W. Bridge Street. There would be pedestrian connections between the residential and retail portions of the site. The elevation drawings indicate three-story buildings with six units, garages on the first floor. Introducing townhouse units would add a residential component to this area; however, staff believes that a two or 2-1/2-story design would be more appropriate in scale. While the proposed land uses appear consistent with adopted plans, staff believes that modifications and additional details are needed. If the project progress, staff will work with the applicant to refine the plans for a formal application and hearing. The applicant is seeking input from City Council. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher inquired where the connection of Monterey Drive to Corbins Mill would occur. Linda Menerev. EMH& T, representinq Centex Homes, responded that the City's Engineering Department has suggested that Monterey Drive divert along the upper boundary of Monterey Park to connect with Corbins Mill. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher inquired if Monterey Drive would no longer connect with SR 161. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublill City COUllcil Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FORM NO 10148 April 3, 2006 Page 7 Held 20 Ms. Menerey responded that there would no longer be a direct connection. It would be possible to travel through the neighborhood to Bridge Street. Staff believed that diverting to Corbins Mill would bring traffic to a signal and a safer connection with SR 161. Mr. Keenan noted that Concept A appears to retain a stub from SR 161 to Monterey Drive. Ms. Menerey responded that although the Duke and Duchess building has been removed from the east corner, the Sunoco station remains on the west corner. The stub would be continued only for access to that site. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that the entrance to the City cemetery is not designed for extensive traffic movement, and closing off that access to Monterey Drive would force traffic to enter at the cemetery entrance. Because staff has made this recommendation, what changes have they proposed for the cemetery entrance? Ms. Husak stated that staff has not worked with the applicants on the details of those changes, but would do so before a formal application is made. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher noted that would be a key element when considering a road design change. Ms. Menerey responded that the aerial view of the site is misleading and is causing some confusion. What appears to be a street is not; it is a pedestrian path. The access point would not change. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that she visits the cemetery frequently. She travels south on Bridge Street and enters the cemetery directly from Monterey Drive. It would not be fair to the neighborhood or the cemetery visitors to expect them to use Corbins Mill to access the cemetery. Visitors would have to enter through the original entrance off of SR 161. The original entrance is not designed for the level of traffic today which uses that cemetery; there are too many site issues. Her question is, if staff is recommending the original entrance become the main entrance, what are the recommended changes and estimated costs of those changes that the City would be asked to make? Mr. Hammersmith responded that staff has not evaluated the issue to that extent. Engineering staff was primarily trying to create a safer intersection with Monterey at SR 161 and to eliminate the need for another traffic signal on SR 161 by combining Monterey Drive with Corbins Mills. Monterey Drive was also the first City street to receive traffic- calming measures. Consistent with that intent, it is important to restrict the traffic volume and traffic speed within the neighborhood. Staff will look at Council's concern regarding the cemetery access and determine how that could also be addressed. Mr. Keenan noted that the cemetery entrance would be only one block further south at the next traffic signal Mr. McCash stated that is true. With the realignment, a right turn would be made on Corbins Mill, then a left turn on Monterey to the cemetery entrance. The cemetery entrance itself would remain the same. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher inquired what residential would be in the area. Mr. McCash responded that there would be none, other than the new townhouses. Mr. Keenan noted that the park and tennis courts would be located between the existing residential and the proposed townhouses. This proposal appears advantageous from the aspect of eliminating current cut-through traffic. Ms. Salay stated that the Waterford Village residents with whom she has spoken have been supportive of a realignment, once they fully understood it. They did express concern that the cemetery would be used as a cut-through route. However, that seems unlikely. The concept of a traffic light at Monterey Drive is not favored by the residents, as it would increase traffic. Aaron Underhill. Smith and Hale. 37 W. Broad Street, stated that he represents the applicant, Centex Homes. The two conceptual plans are the result of ten months of meetings with staff. In their opinion, Option A is the more plausible of the two as the applicant already has the land within his control or under contract. At staffs urging, they included preliminary plans that would involve Bridge Street. Preliminary discussions with the present owners, however, indicate an average purchase price of $1 million per acre. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublill City COUllcil Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FORM NO 10148 April 3, 2006 Page 8 Held 20 To do that would require a private-public partnership with the City, perhaps in moving the road. He did want to clarify, however, that the applicant does not have any control of the properties at this time. As everyone is aware, the City does own one of those properties. He noted that in redeveloping a site, density is very critical. They are requesting 10-11 units per acre. There are existing buildings with businesses on Bridge Street at this time, and revenue-producing businesses drive the land costs up. Improved land with existing homes also increases the cost of the land. The traditional suburban model of development will not work here. A higher density is needed to make the development work and to produce a quality product. Centex Homes is a Fortune 250 company. They are in three dozen markets and have the ability to produce a quality development on this site. To make this fit in the Historic District of Dublin, some changes would be made regarding the types of materials. Garages will also be needed for the residents to have parking. The buildings are three-story units: one level is necessary to provide a garage for the resident; the other two levels provide living space, including bedrooms. This layout is necessary to provide the square footage for the buyer who would want a unit in the $300,000 range. In a redevelopment site, the typical rules do not apply; however, they have tried to incorporate courts of greenspace throughout the development. The intent is to attract a buyer and a community who would be interested in taking advantage of the Historic Dublin Business District. The realignment of Monterey Drive was done at the urging of the City's Engineering staff. The applicant is willing to discuss that further, if Council so desires. He offered to respond to questions and invited comments from Council about the concept. Mr. Reiner inquired if the units are all brick or brick facades. Mr. Underhill responded that the units would be brick on all four sides. Mr. Reiner stated that to be consistent with the "old town" look, would wood elements be included? Ms. Menerey stated that an inventory of architectural elements used on Bridge and High streets indicated the use of brick, stone and wood. The applicant is willing to work on alternate facades. In other locations, the applicant is using dormers, window treatments and door sidelights to add character to the fac;ade. The applicant is willing to add those treatments to the brick facades to make the units more reflective of the neighborhood. Mr. Reiner stated that the idea of adding three-story units to the section of the streetscape where there are ranch-style buildings is a concern. Ms. Menerey stated that the one-level ranch buildings would be gone. The cemetery would be on the east side and Monterey Park would be on the south. The closest residential would be south of the park. Mr. Reiner stated that a three-story structure has a huge amount of frontal elevation. What setbacks are proposed? Ms. Menerey responded that the concept provides for the units to be set back 25 feet from the right-of-way, They would prefer to make the units look more urban, but recognizing the elevation is more than what is there now, they are closer to the typical Dublin setback. Mr. Reiner expressed concern that the three-story structure would appear overpowering. Either there should be sufficient setback, or the height should be reduced. Ms. Menerey stated that the units were increased to 2,000-2,400 square feet due to market feedback. The client has indicated that the units must be three levels to achieve that square footage. Although there isn't anything that can be done with the roofline, there are architectural options for the fac;ade that can address the impact. Mr. Keenan inquired if the Georgetown units in New Albany across from the library are three stories. They were very attractive, yet did not appear to have a lot of setback. Ms. Menerey responded that the proposed units would be very comparable to those in New Albany. Mr. Reiner stated that he is not concerned with the internal effect, but of a potential tunnel effect on Corbins Mill due to their close proximity to the road. Mr. McCash noted that the grade along Corbins Mill drops from Frantz Road to that location. The difference in grade between that site and the former bank site, now a quilt shop, is approximately one story. Mr. Keenan stated that it would be useful to have a site analysis. Mr. Reiner stated that additional setback could be needed for the first set of units, at a minimum. Of the two concepts, he prefers Option B. He agrees with staff's attempt to RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Duulill City COUllcil Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FORM NO 10148 April 3, 2006 Page 9 Held 20 integrate the residential and commercial. However, the ability of the City to participate in a private-public partnership is uncertain. He would be interested in hearing more about the costs involved. The applicant is requesting an extraordinarily high zoning density. He does appreciate the effort to include courtyards of greenspace. Mr. McCash stated that this is an interesting concept. He disagrees with Mr. Reiner's selection because he prefers the courtyard greenspace idea. He does, however, agree with the concept of integrating Historic Dublin concepts along Bridge Street. He would actually prefer to see a hybrid of Concepts A and B. His concern with the present Concept B layout is that the two curb cuts along Bridge Street would create direct north- south cut-through opportunities through the development to Monterey Drive. The idea of realigning Monterey Drive to protect it from cut-through traffic has not succeeded, because Concept B puts it back in. A center main curb cut for the retail could resolve the situation. He does not believe the density is a problem. Combining Concepts A and B would achieve more of the density in A and more of the aesthetics of B. Mr. Keenan stated that he agrees with Mr. Reiner's preference of Option B. It is consistent with the City's intent for the development of the Historic Dublin area. He is concerned with the parking issues for commercial and residential. He has been working on a Veterans Monument project, and one of the potential sites is the former Duke and Duchess site. Perhaps that could be phased in here. He was impressed with the Georgetown row house development viewed on the New Albany tour. The layout and architectural features were very attractive. He could also support Mr. McCash's suggestion for a combination of Concepts A and B. Ms. Salay inquired why Concept B with mixed retail and residential would have more residential units than Concept A. Ms Menerey stated that the extra units are achieved with 20 flats located above the retail. To respond to Mr. Keenan's concern regarding parking in that area -- parking is located under and to the rear of these units, Parking is on the first level, commercial on the second level, and a resident flat on the third level. The parking on SR 161 would accommodate the retail clients. Ms. Salay inquired if they have any other experience with residential located above retail. Ms. Menerey responded that Centex is building several similar projects, one in Howell, Michigan. Both the commercial and residential are condominiums, not rentals. Ms. Salay stated that she likes the concept. Like Mr. Reiner, she is concerned about the visual impact of three stories with little setback, although the four-sided architecture is very appealing. She would be interested in different elevations. She also found the development in New Albany to be very attractive. This is an exciting concept next to the Historic District and it would improve that area. She is concerned about the lack of parkland. She had thought there would be an opportunity to expand Monterey Park and incorporate it with this new neighborhood, rather than separating the neighborhoods. The realignment of Monterey Drive is initially appealing, but it would be necessary to work with Engineering to ensure the related issues are dealt with. She finds the green courtyards in Concept A attractive. She is particularly interested in the concept of the residential units above the commercial component; this is something that Council has discussed frequently in regard to the Historic District. Incorporating this area of Dublin into the Historic District would be desirable - a goal to work toward. Whether the City can partner in the effort is another issue -- much more information would be needed to consider it. Mr. Lecklider inquired if staff preferred Concept B over Concept A. Ms. Husak responded that Concept B is staff's preference. Mr. Lecklider stated that he favors the lower density with Concept A, and he supports the green courtyards, which are not included with Concept B. Ms. Husak responded that she should clarify her response. It is staff's belief that a mixed use development that would encompass areas along West Bridge Street is a better use for the site. That does not necessarily mean that the proposed layout and design elements are favored. Mr. Lecklider responded that staffs objective was to include the retail parcels on Bridge Street -- not to endorse the site layout of Concept B. He would agree with that position. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FORM NO 10148 April 3, 2006 Page 10 Held 20 He referred to the earlier comment that the work/live units would be condominiums. Would the remainder of the residential units be fee simple and owner-occupied? Ms. Menerey affirmed this. Mr. Lecklider stated that he would also prefer a hybrid of the two plans, maintaining the green courtyards of Concept A with the live/work units on Bridge Street. Council has discussed such a concept for some time, but has not previously received a plan with that element. He does not have a concern with the three stories. He has seen examples of them previously in many places. The plan does separate them from the traditional suburban development in Waterford Village. The setbacks are an attempt to suburbanize what is otherwise an urban project. In his subjective view, it does not work. Similar units in New Albany were very appealing, yet they had very little setback. This would be a change for Dublin, but he believes that the City would support the concept. Although it does work in this area as an infill project, it would not be appropriate in many other areas. It will be necessary to work on the exterior materials and final architectural details. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that she prefers greenspace over park. If the developer is financially able to purchase the property in the front, it would be ideal to have the commercial component. She would prefer to have the parking located behind the commercial, however, not in the front. That is consistent with the pattern along SR 161 toward Historic Dublin. She encouraged them to pursue parking behind the commercial, rather than placing more cement in the front to be seen from the roadway. She asked for clarification about the density. In addition to the 24 flats over the retail, the number of townhouses increased from 59 to 70, providing 35 additional residential units in Concept B. Ms. Menerey stated that the plans are a little misleading. The north line on Concept A is not represented in the same location where the row houses end in Concept B. Concept B picks up more row houses along SR 161 plus the units over retail. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher responded that understands where the additional residential is gained, but the issue is that the plan eliminates more greenspace to achieve that. She encouraged them to re-work the retail parking in the plan. Ms. Menerey responded that they would work with the site plan to see if they can incorporate Council's suggestions. Tonight, they are seeking direction regarding which plan to move forward with. Mr. Reiner suggested that Concept A be overlaid on Concept B, which would address everyone's concerns. Ms. Menerey responded that the plan would actually need to be reworked, but they will attempt to do that. She thanked Council for their input. . City Council Goals Update Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that at Council's retreat, there was an update provided by staff on the status of the 2005-2006 goals. It is desirable to affirm those goals, which are long-term in nature. None have been completed to date. Ms. Brautigam stated that progress is being made on the goals. It is important to reaffirm the goals as stated, unless Council would prefer to modify them. Mr. Lecklider moved to reaffirm the 2005-2006 Council goals. Ms. Salay seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Salay, yes. STAFF COMMENTS . Community Plan Update Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that at the last Council meeting, Council requested a summary of the public comments that have been made at Community Plan public meetings and a copy of recent citizen surveys. Staff has provided that information along with additional material. Due to the recent spring break, some Council members have been out of town and not had sufficient time to review the materials to prepare for a discussion and resolution as to the next steps to be taken. She recommended rescheduling this topic for the next Council meeting. Ms. Brautigam agreed, but inquired if it would be possible to obtain Council direction regarding the scheduling of a field trip which will involve a total of 23 people. If Council does want to pursue the idea, which of the field trip alternatives provided in the Council RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FORM NO 10148 April 3, 2006 Page 11 Held 20 packet is most desirable - Charlotte, North Carolina area as identified or Frankfort, Tennessee? Discussion continued regarding field trip options. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher requested that appropriate planning for viewing the sites be done, so that Council is aware of the specific components they are viewing and what the relationship would be between those and the undeveloped land remaining in Dublin. Ms. Brautigam responded that before the trip would take place, a detailed itinerary would be established, helping Council to focus on the desirable elements to weave into Dublin's Community Plan. Following discussion, the consensus of Council was to have staff determine the field trip destination. Staff has a full understanding of Council's goals, and after discussing the options with NLC and the contacts at the various cities, they should be able to determine which site would be most beneficial to visit in mid-Mayor mid-June. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE Mr. Keenan: 1. Stated that he recently attended the March 28 US 33 Corridor Executive Committee meeting, which was hosted by Paris Township at the Union County Courthouse. A wide array of public officials attended. The group has been meeting for nearly two years and is close to recommending that a formal accord should be pursued and discussed, including its definition, its geographic boundaries, together with a vision and goal statement. He is pleased to report the meetings have been very productive. 2. The City of Upper Arlington was in the news today regarding its tree removal plan in response to the ash borer. What action is Dublin pursuing regarding this matter? Ms. Brautigam responded that staff would provide a report on what the City is doing for the next meeting. Mr. Reiner noted that he recently attended a conference at which the subject was discussed. There is concern about how quickly this disease could spread. He would appreciate additional information on this. Mr. Keenan stated that he is not suggesting that Dublin remove its ash trees, but would be interested in understanding the thought process involved in Upper Arlington's decision. Ms. Salay: 1. Noted that she was contacted by a potential business owner in the Historic District who had encountered some issues, including customer parking, in opening her business. City staff worked diligently to assist her and it appears she will be on schedule to open her business. She thanked staff for the excellent customer service extended to the business owner. 2. Thanked staff for the Council packet sent to her. She was out of town but was able to prepare for the meeting tonight, including the Community Plan discussion. She appreciated both the summaries and the detailed reports provided by staff. 3. Clarified that although she did not vote in favor of one board and commission appointment tonight, it was not related to the person being appointed. She believes that the incumbent member whose term is expiring is deserving of reappointment. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher stated that she received a note of thanks from retiring Building Standards Director Bob Price for the warm send-off last Wednesday. He expressed thanks for the rewarding experience of working with the City as director of that division. She noted that Council welcomed the opportunity at the reception to express their appreciation of the transformation Mr. Price made in the Building Standards Division. It is surprising to note that he has served with the City for only five years, as the positive impact he made in the development area was significant. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher moved to adjourn to executive session for discussion of personnel and land acquisition matters. Mr. Keenan seconded the motion. Mr. McCash noted that the meeting will be reconvened only to formally adjourn. Vote on the motion: Ms. Salay, yes; Vice Mayor Lecklider, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes. The meeting was adjourned to executive session at 8:42 p.m. The meeting was reconvened and formally adjourned at 9:30 p.m. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK. INC. FORM NO. 10148 April 3, 2006 Page 12 Held 20 ~ ~C!-~ Clerk of Council II