Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout21-88 ResolutionRECORD OF RESOLUTIONS National Graphics Corp., Cols., O.~"-'3 nati rre~aal 9~P!~ia Resoltction l'~'O. 21-88 CAmended) A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE ELECTION OF A COMMISSION TO STUDY THE CONDITIONS OF MERGING THE POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN AND WASHINGTON TOWN- SHIP WHEREAS, on February 10, 1988, petitions were filed with the Franklin County Board of Elections requesting that the Board place the names of five representatives from each jurisdiction on the November 8, 1988, ballot for the purpose of creating a Merger Commission; and, WHEREAS, if the voters in both the Township and the City approve the creation of this joint commission, the Commission will fully study this issue and will attempt to reach agreement on all conditions of the merger which will then be submitted to the voters in November, 1989, for approval, with the full effective date to be January, 1990; and, WHEREAS, the concept of a merger of these two neighboring jurisdictions evolved from a study group of City and Township officials which was con- vened in 1987 to review Dublin's options as this community approached City status; and, WHEREAS, the Washington Township Trustees have reviewed the various options available to their constituents concerning this issue and since Dublin and the Township share a fire department, and there are three areas of the Township surrounded by Dublin, and school boundaries remain unchanged after a merger, and other similar reasons, they concluded that allowing for the study of a possible merger with Dublin permitted their residents to decide what was in their best interest; and, WHEREAS, the Dublin City Council has fully reviewed this issue and have decided that the further study of a merger of these two neighboring juris- dictions which share services, territory, and common heritage certainly merits the attention of voters in both communities and should receive the strong support of voters in both the City of Dublin and the unincorporated portions of Washington Township. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, 7 of the elected members concurring, that we urge all citizens of Dublin and Washington Township to fully review this matter and to vote Yes on Issue 8 within the City and Yes on Issue 33 within the Township to enable a Commission to be formed to further study the possibility of joining together these two neighboring communities. Passed this 24th day of October 1988. Ma or - Presidin Officer y g I hereby certify that copies of this Ordinance/Resoiution were posted in ae City of Dublin in accordance with Section 7°,1.25 of the ~iio Revised Code. Attest: ~1~~~~ ~ ~.~.~~-~ 4 Clerk of Council, Dublin, Ohio ..~~~ ~~. Clerk of Council Form No. 6233-A Passed ------------- ---------19-------- October, 1988 RE: Formation of Washington Township-Dublin Merger Commission Dear Citizen On February 10, 1988, the Washington Township -Dublin Merger Study Group filed petitions with the Franklin County Board of Elections requesting that the Board place the names of five people from each of the Township and City on the November, 1988, ballot forthe purpose of creating a Merger Commission. If the voters in both the Township and City approve the creation of the Merger Commission, the Commission will attempt to reach agreement on all conditions of the merger to be submitted to the voters in November, 1989. If the voters in both the Township and City approve the merger agreement, then the merger ~wiil be effective. To help the voters make their decisions, the merger study group has assembled the attached i normation. ff you have any additional questions, please contact any of the members of the merger study group individually, or reach the merger study group through the office of the Dublin Chamber of Commerce. Funding for distribution of this newsletter is provided by: Dublin Area Community Improvement Corpora- tion, City of Dublin and Washington Township. Sincerely, Washington Township-Dublin Merger Study Group WASHINGTON ^ TOWNSHIP ® DUBLIN COLUMBUS ©HILLIARD ALL OTHER SCHOOL B DISTRICT OFFICIAL QUESTION AND ISSUES BALLOT SPECIAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 1988 FRANKLIN, DELAWARE and UNION COUNTIES, OHIO $ CITY OF DUBLIN/ WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP MERGER COMMISSION A Majority Affirmative Vote is Necessary for Passage. Shall a commission be chosen to draw up a statement of conditions for merger of the political subdivisions of the City of Dublin and Washington Township? Said commission shall consist of the following electors of said City of Dublin: James W. Manus, Joel R. Campbell, Jan Rozanski, Elaine M. Wall and George F. Bell. YES NO OFFICIAL QUESTION AND ISSUES BALLOT SPECIAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 1988 FRANKLIN, DELAWARE and UNION COUNTIES, OHIO 33 CITY OF DUBLIN/ WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP MERGER COMMISSION A Majority Affirmative Vote is Necessary for Passage. VOTE BALLOT WITH AN "X" Shall a commission be chosen to draw up a statement of conditions for mergerof the political su bdivisions of the City of Dublin and Washington Township? Said commission shall consist of the following electors of the unincorporated area of said Washington Township: Charles Buck, Chi Weber, Kurt C. Proegler, Kermit Grener and Margaret Haney. YES NO WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP -DUBLIN MERGER STUDY GROUP Reoresentirg City of ublin Be!!, George F. 8913 Turin Hill Ct. N., Dublin, OH 4301' Dublin resider; for 3 tJ2 years. Occupation: Branch Manager, Fruehauf Corporation. Civic activities include Muiriield Grounds CommHtee: AAuirflei; Assmatioc Trustee; and Member, Dublin Future Schools Committee. Married (Carolyn); five children, one of which is at home and attends Dubhr High School. Camgbe!l. Joel R. 5915 Brand Rd., Dublin. OH 43Cn Dubf^ resider, since September, 1982. Occupation: Attorney with Britt, Campbell and Nagel. Formerly Assistant Franklin County Presecut~oc A".orney. Civic activites include member of Board of Zoning Appeals; formerly Vice-Chairman Dublin Parks and.Recreation Committee. Coach !r. Dublin SOCrPr League and Dublin Youth Athletics. Married (Robin); two children. h1a:us. James W. 7350 Dublin Rd., Dublio, OH 430? Dublin resident since 1965.Occupation:President of Phillip's Restaurants, Inc. Civic acivties include Direcia, Franklintor, Board of Trade (tormer'y Secretary); Assistant Scoufmaster, Dublin Troop 299; and Member, Dublin Chamber of Commerce. Married (Marlaine); two children. Rozanski, Jan 183 Franklin St., Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin resident since 1978. Occupation: Plant Manager, Advance Thermal Systems. Civic activities include Ward Councilman, Dubin Cdy Ceunc:.. and Vice-Mayor. Ciry of Dublin. Formerly Coach and Trustee of Hilliard Soccer Association. Married (Pamela); three children. V/ali. Elaine M. 6222 Arapahoe Place, Dublin, OH 430" i Dublin resident for 3 years. Occupation: Personnel Services Officer, Ohio State University. Civic activities include Indian Run Neighbgnc~cc Association; and The Administrative-Professional Association. Married (Mike); two children. Representing Washington Township Buck. Charles W. 5153 Cosgray Rd., Amiin, OH E3CC2 Lifetime Township resident. Family has lived on Cosgray Road forover six generations. Occupation: Chairman Buck & Sons Landscape Service:O!':Ic Certified Nurseryman and Installer. Civic Activitiestnclude Member, Hilliard City Board of Education and Tolles Joint Vocational School Board: Kiwans and American Legion. Married (Mary;: two children, age 11 and 8. Groner, Kermit 6223 Hayden Run Rd., Hilliard, OH C302E Township resident since 1946. Occupation: Semi-retired farmer (180 acres) at above address. Civic activities include Franklin County Farm Bureau (former Board Member). Married (Dorothy); six adult children. Hanev, Margaret W. 7590 Rings Rd., Amlin, OH 430C2 Township resident for 40 years. Occupation: Madison County Curriculum Director in Jonathan Alder Schools. Married (Jim, a farmer); one adult daughter. Proecler, Kurt 6817 Woerner Temple Rd., Amlin, OH 43002 Township resident since 1984; area residentsince 1977.Occupation: Managerof Database Planning and Development, Chemical Abstracts Services. Civic activities include Assistant Zoning Enforcement Officer for Washington Township. Married (Carol); three children. Weber. Chi 7630 Bellaire Ave., Dublin, OH 43C17 Lifetime resident of Dublin area. Retired. Formerly Executive Vice President, Mid-America Federal Savings. Civic activities include Member, Dublin Area Community Improvement Corporation; former Member of Dublin School Board; active in Masonic and Shrine affairs. Married (Betty); four adu!; children. FORMATION QF WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP -DUBLIN MERGER COMMISSION QUESTION A,`~P ANSWERS NOTEBOOK MERGER PROCEDURE 1. tfthemergerCOmmissioniscreatedintheNovember,1988,election,canthe merger effort be terminated by the mergermmmissiondColumbus. Dublin, Hilliard, and Washington Township are able to reach an agreement as to the allocation of territory and services? ANSWER: Yes, the merger commission can agree that it is unable to reach a merger agreement which would end the process. 2. Who decides whether a merger will take place? ANSWER: The majority of the voters in both the city of Dublin and the unincorporated areas of Washington Township must approve the merger. 3. Can the southern portion of the Washington Township go to Hilliard? ANSWER: The only way that the southem portion of the township could be incorporated into the City of Hilliard would be'rf the cities of Hilliard and Dublin reached an agreement to change the boundaries afterthe mergertakes place. Each city will have the right to approve any transf er after the merger. However,'rf the merger effort failed, annexation petitions affecting the southern portion can be filed. 4. ff the proposed merger with Dublin fails, can a merger with Hilliard be proposed? ANSWER: Yes. It can be tiled after cert'rfication of the election'rf the merger fails. 5. Why should I vote "yes" in the November, 1988, election when there still seem to be several unknowns? ANSWER: The election in November, 1988, is merely to establish a merger commission to answer the questions and reach agreement as to the merger issues. The final election of the merger agreement is November, 1989. 6. How was the input of the people gathered before someone decided to start this process going? ANSWER: The Township Trustees and Dublin Council members had informal discussions with each other and with some of the voters. 7. What is to keep either Dublin or the township from seeing that the conditions are written to favor them? ANSWER: The negotiation process to arrive at the merger conditions provides both parties whh the opportunhy to proteC,their interest. The voters will have the final decision in Dublin and Washington Township. 8. What are the sections of the Ohio Revised Code that apply to this process? How can I get a copy? ANSWER: Ohio Revised Code Section 709.43-709.48. Both the township and the crty will have copies o' the sections available and you also may obtain acopy atthe Franklin County Law Library located onthe 1 Oth floor atthe County Courthouse and at the Dublin or Hilliard libraries. 9. I hear a merger happened before in Ohio. Can I get some information on that? ANSWER: You could contact the city of Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, or one of the merger study group members. LAND USE 10. What would be the zoning after the merger? ANSWER: The zoning applicable to the unincorporated area of Washington Township would be the subject of a portion of the merger agree- ment. Therefore, the initial land use can be defined by the merger commission in the merger agreement to be submitted to the voters. i i. Will the Washington Township unincorporated areas become the "dumping ground for Dublin"? ANSWER: No. After the merger takes place, the residents of these areas would become voting residents of the Chy of Dublin who would have some control over the land use in their area by virue of their appointed and elected officials. The risk of becoming a "dumping ground" exists regardless of whether Columbus, Dublin, Hilliard, or any other municipality becomes involved in the area. Much of the currently unincorporated area of Washington Township wili become the geographical center of the City of Dublin after a merger takes place. 12. Can the status quo be maintained? ANSWER: Not for long, h is very likely that change will take place in the unincorporated areas of Washington Township resulting in annexation of the area to a city. 13. Doesn't the refusal of the Borror Plan by planning and zoning show that the area will be a dumping ground? ANSWER: No. The area is zoned residential R-1 and the pending application is for more dense residential use. NOTE: Dublin City Council approved the Borror Plan 10-3-88. 14. What do the long range plans of Dublin, Hilliard, and Columbus show for this area? What about MORPC plans? ANSWER: The interchange at Tuttle Road is expected to create growth in the area. No MORPC plans exist for the area and no city has formally adopted a plan for the area. 15. The township has three trailer parks in it. Will these come under any drfferent restriction with a merger with Dublin? ANSWER: The three existing trailer parks could continue as pre-existing condtions, but expansion of these trailer parks or additional trailer packs is very unlikely. This should be an element for the merger agreement. CHOO ISSUES 16. What is the effect of the merger upon school boundaries? ANSWER: None. 17. How does the merger differ from annexation due to the win/win agreement? ANSWER: Any terrtory annexed to Columbus after the win/win agreement would result in the transfer of the territory to the Columbus School District. 18. With most of the Washington Township land in Hilliard Schools, why not merge with Hilliard instead? ANSWER: The township trustees recommended Dublin probably based upon the existence of the water and sewer contract between Colum- bus and Dublin. See also 10 and 13. 19. I understand that school boundaries donY automatically change whh the merger. However, is there any precedent for State Board unilate ally to "line up'school boundaries with chy boundaries? ANSWER: No, but the school boards must vote to petition the State Board to realign boundaries after the merger in a complex procedure. PROPERTY VALUE 20. What are the benefits of the merger to Dublin? ANSWER: The merger would provide greater land use control in the area of the city and expansion of land area and potential tax base. 21. What are the possible detriments or risks of the merger to Dublin? ANSWER: The merger could cause delay on pending projects. The future access of water and sewer to the city could be in jeopardy by at- tempted cancellation of the water and sewer contract by Columbus. The city could experience d'rfficuhy in management of the rapid I land growth. The expansion of land area will resuh in increased expenses of operation for the city. 22. What are the possible benefits of the merger to Washington Township? ANSWER: The merger will provide protection against random annexation. It will enable land use, police, road maintenance and parks and recreation to continue to be controlled locally. h will also provide for strict zoning and building requirements. The merger should provide water and sewer availability as a resuR of the existing water and sewer contract between Dublin and Columbus. Although water and sewer services do not now appear to be major issues to the Washington Township residents, development could adversely affect wells in the area and this issue could be more important in the future. The potential tax base would be retained for bcal school districts. 23. What are the possible detriments or risks to Washington Township? ANSWER: The residents are concerned about the possibility of having to pay for water and sewer. An increase in taxes, particularly income tax, is possible. The residents are also concerned about possible adverse effects on fire protection, police protection, and snow removal. Changes in zoning, particularly from agricultural to commercial, may take place. 24. I have heard that we should merge with Dublin because our property values will go up. However, this just costs me more money because then my taxes go up. Why is this a benefit to a long term resident? ANSWER: Enhanced value of property is a benefit even for a long term resident due to preservation or enhancement of assets. TAXES 25. What would be the tax consequences of the merger? ANSWER: The residents of the unincorporated areas of Washington Township area would become subject to the Dublin City two percent income tax. However, any such residents who work in Columbus or Dublin or any other city in the area having a two percent income tax are already subject to tax. The only residents who would be affected are those who currently five and work in Washing- ton Township or those who work in a municipality having an income tax of less than two percent, such as Worthington or Wester- ville. The property taxes are not likely to realize a sign'rficant change because a substantial portion of the property tax is for the support of schools and this portion of the tax would not change wRh the merger. Therefore, a substantial majority of the Washing- ton Township residents would be virtually unaffected by the merger. GOVERNMENT 26. Will the unincorporated areas of Washington Township be represented on the boards, commissions, and council of the City of Dublir. after the merger takes place? ANSWER: Yes. The appointment of residents from the previously unincorporated areas of Washington Township to the boards and commis- sions and cBy council of the City of Dublin can be a condition of the merger. 27. What would be the reason that the Washington Township Trustees would desire a merger with Dublin as opposed to Hilliard? ANSWER: On September 24, 1988, the Washington Township Trustees said, "[he Washington Township Trustees initiated the merger process in response to their and residents' concerns about future growth in the area. Some of the concerns involved (1) an increasing number of annexations to Columbus with questionable resultant zoning and tire, police, medic, and road services, (2j the impact of Dublin becoming a city (3) a need to maintain existing school district boundaries, (4) a further need to provide water and sewer services to support future growth, and (5) a desire to insure continued planned growth and provision of services to area residents. Dublin was chosen, (as opposed to Columbus or Hilliard) as the most likely merger combination to satisfy the majorty of Township needs. Dublin is part of Washington Township today. Washington Township provides fire service to Dublin. Dublin has the right to provide water and sewer service to the Washington Township area. There are many areas of Washington Township partially or fully surrounded by Dublin. Recognizing this, as well as the facts that school boundaries are unaffected by a merger and that detailed merger conditions will be reviewed and voted upon by the Township residents, the Trustees felt that pursuing a merger with Dublin permitted the residents to decide what is in the best interests of the Township." 28. Could Amlin become a village? ANSWER: No, because Amlin does not have large enough population and is too close to existing municipalRies. 29. What happens to Amlin in mailing addresses? Will it or the zip code change? ANSWER: The mailing addresses or zip code for Amlin are very unlikety to change as a resuR of the merger, but the post office makes that decision. 30. Can someone be required to tap into water and sewer? ANSWER: Yes, but historically Dublin has never done this. 31. 1 am a fire fighter with the township. What will happen to my job with a merger? ANSWER: Continuation of township empbyees on the City of Dublin payroll can be a condition of the merger. 32. I take advantage of the open burning allowed in the township, which is not allowed in Dublin. Will this go away with the merger? ANSWER: Probably. The requirement is a state statute administered by the Fire Chief. 33. I hunt on my land. H R is in the City of Dublin, can 1 still do that and shoot a gun, for instance? ANSWER: Possibly, depending upon the particular circumstances. MISCELLANEOUS 34. Assuming a merger with Dublin goes through, when can we expect water and sewer, and what determines this? ANSWER: Development determines the water and sewer availability in the area. 35. Does Dublin provide water/sewer to areas not in the cdy? Couldn't this be arranged for the township? ANSWER: No. No. 36. Hilliard is growing and must feel it can support that growth with water, sewer and fire services. The papers say Columbus is giving it a larger water and sewer service contract. Why is Dublin a lesser risk, especially since Columbus and Dublin don't seem to be getting along? ANSWER: The unincorporated area is presently wdhin the service area under contract to Dublin at least through 1994. The contrail with Hilliard does not affect the Washington Township service area at this time. 37. I would no! be as comfortable in Dublin as I would be in the township or Hilliard. How do the demographics "occupation, education, income, lot size, house value, family size, age, etc." compare among these three areas? ANSWER: Exceptfcr:vtuirfield, the demographics of Dublin are comparabletothose existing or expected in Hilliard or Washington Township.There is a great diversity of I'rfe styles in all these areas. 38. What do the residents of Dublin feel about a merger? I get the feeling they think the township folks are from the "wrong side of the tracks". ANSWER: This question has not been raised in Dublin. No positive or negative feelings appear to exist in Dublin towards the township. h shout be remembered that both communities must approve the merger . 39. I am for the merger. What can I do to help? ANSWER: Send a contribution to the merger effort, volunteer to distribute Iderature in support of the merger, and encourage your friends and neighbors to vote for the merger. 40. I want to donate money to publicize the merger. How can I do that? ANSWER: Please send your wntribution to the Dublin Chamber of Commerce Political Action Committee, 129 South High Street, Dublin, Ohio, 43017, designated for the merger commission. P,a~m 1'n..~ri LvJ Ly Ih~~ IRi r~~vu .,f lusv'rlimi :n„{ U,A1'"I'UN Lh:I L11. Hl.rANK Cu_ uum s~n,,.,.~.:..,,a ,.r r,aan~ o~r,~~„. iw.... ~~.~ni Resolution 22-88 1 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE AMOUNTS AND RATES AS DETERMINED BY THE BUDUET COMMISSION AND AUTHORIZING THE NECESSARY TAX LEVIES AND CERTIFYING THEM TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR (CIT'Y COUNCIL) Rev. Code, Sece. 5705.34, 5705.35 The Council of the City of.........._...Pubin _., .Franklin County, Olzio, n2et in....._Regular.__., _sessi.on ozz the....7[h...__._.....daz o xosember J f ......... , (Regular oz Special) 19._$$..., at the ~~roac~kCouncil Chambers of the _Dubin.____.____._.._._zCLt17, the followins members ....................................................... Municipal Building preSe72t: __David...Amorose........_.._......_........._....__.._...._ - -._._ ................_.. Michael L. Close Joseph Jankowski, Jr. Barbara A. Maurer Jan Rozanski A. C. Strip Daniel Sutphen ~71pc__s....__Barbara..Mauarer ......, mo7;ed the adoption of the following Resolution: TVHERE.lZS, This Council in accordance witTz tTze provisions of law has previously adopted a Tax Bud~'et for t3ze next suceeedin~' fiscal year eommenein~' January 1st, 19.__$9..; and TT~'HERE.fIS, TTae BudSet Cozrimission of. Franklin County, Ohio, Tzas certified its action thereon to this Cozczzcil toyetheT° witTi an estimate by the County .,4uditor of tlae rate of each tax necessary to be levied by this Council, and what part thereof is without, and what part within tlae ten mill ta.v limitation; therefore be it RESOLVED, By the Council of the City of _.._.....Anblin. _..__., ___.....Franklin.................. County, OTiio, tTzat the amounts and rates, as determined by the Bud~'et Commissiozz in its eez°tification, be and the same are Tzereby accepted; and be it further RESOLVED, That there be and is Izereby levied on th.e tax duplicate of said City the rate of eacTi tax necessary to be levied within and without tTze ten mill limitation as follows: _ ___ , i „ _ , i SCHEDULE A ~ _ ' I SUMMARY OF AMOUNTS REQUIRED FROM GENERAL PROPERTY TAX APPROVED BY BUDGET COMMISSION, AND L COUNTY AUDITOR'S ESTIMATED TAX RATES ~ i i ~~ III Amount ~ County Auditci s ja Amount to Be Gstimate of Tax i Dezived from ~ Approved by Rate-io-~be-Leuied~ j g o i FUND ', Levies Outside mrwsi o v Ins de ji 10 Mill Inside Outside - jl 10 Mill ~ io m;u io Mui i Limitation I Limitation li Limit I Limit ii . ~ t - - ~ { Colvmn II i~ Column IV li V VI I ~ ~ :eneral Fund ;I ~~~f~33 i ~~ I ~•~0~ I i I ~ General Bond Retirement Fund .l~ is //p 30 -. /o ~ 098. ~ i I .. I ~i , 50 ~ , i{SOO i ~ 0700 I I I li I '~, i Park Fund i~i ~ I i i ~ II Recreation Fund I i i j. i II j ji I I. i jj I i I ! j / i+.wri ~~~~~~~ Fund jl 01~~~~/•I /n/I oa~lor /9/1 I 000 i j; j j ~~ ~~ ..SOGYJ i ~.Z000 ( l ~ i ~ ~ Fund 'i, i I j~ I ji i I ! ii i, ~~~~,I ~ ' ' ~ ! u ~ I ~ .j , li ~ ' ~ f I I i ii '~ it ~ I ij i j i , ~ ii ~ '~ ij II ii I it Ii I i jl I I Ij II i I i I i - - I, it ..-.--.-~1_ _ .- - ---___.__ li I I I - - ---- -- TOTAL I~ oY.J~ ~/P3 ~t g~~ ~ SL ~~ ~ 00 ~ 7500 ~ I ---- -_:_ .---,-- . ./ .. . t• SCHEDULE B LEVIES OUTSIDE 10 MILL LIMITATION, EXCLUSIVE OF DEBT LEVIES I ----- -- i ) County Auditoi e Ma i R t -- FUND I x mum a e Estimate of Authorized ~ Yield of Levy to Be Levied ~ (Carry to Schedule __ A, Colvmn Iq ___ General Fund: Current expense levy authorized by voters on 19 ' it II ! ( j for not to exceed years. i Current expense levy authorized by voters on 19 ~ ~' for not to exceed years. ) I Total General Fund outside 10 m. Limitation. it Park Fund: Levy authorized by voters on 19 j i i i i I for not to exceed years. I i i'I i Recreation Fund: Levy authorized by voters on 19 ~ I i I! 'i I I for not to exceed years. ii it I ~ ii I ~ i Fund: Levy authorized by voters on 19 ~i u i ~ j ~I i j for not to exceed years. I ~I ~ , I IY lur uuL Lu c~cccd yca rs. Fund: Levy authorized by voters on 19 ,for not to exceed years. and be it further RESOLVED, TTiat the Clerk of this Council be, and he is hereby directed to certify a copy of tT~is Resolution to the Coaanty .Fluditor of said County. Afl°...._...sutphen _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _..seconded the Resolution and the roll being' called upon its adoption the vote resulted as follows: ...... }, a s .............. .A'Ir -Jankowski ...._._......__ ..................._.._..._...__-_.__._....._..__...................__.....-__..._._......., ......yes._..._.__.. .Mr}c-s......_Maurer -......._....._......_..- ...._..._ .............._..-................_.....__................---- ......_, .._....Y..eS.....--_... .Mr. .._.Rozamsk9... -- ..... -- ................__........ _.......... -- ..._...._.................., .. -yes..._....__. .Mr......_.Amsezasa....-..._ ..................._....._.....__._........_..._.....- .......__._..._._..__..........................., ..._...XeS............ .gdopted the..........7ch .................day of .Rttest: ...Xe S .............. President of Council . ~nlulr~~r,?~..:...~.h.~1 ...................................................... Cterk of Council CERTIFICATE TO COPY ORIGINAL ON FILE and Union The State of OhioF=anklint Delaware County ~, I .Frances ,M. Urban .. ................... Dublin, Ohio Cleric o f th,e Council o f tke City o f within and for said County, and in wTzose ^zastody the Files a7ad Records o f said Council are required by the Laws o f tTze State o f 7hio to beTcept, do Izereby certify tTiat the fore~oin6 is taTcen and copied from tTze ori6inal zaow on file, that the foresoin6 has been ems2pared by me zvitlz said orisinal document, and tTzat tTze saz2ze is a true and correct copy thereof. Td~ITNESS zny si~'nature, this....._ly~r........day of..._----`'u~~.--..--_...__.-, 19.-.~. Clerk of Council I horoby cer?'fy t!tnt rr'^~ ~` ~"~ 0:~`.nance,~Peschdkon viere posted in i'~= City of Dublin in o::c>ja~ce rr:s5 Sea:en 73L25 of tha ~:~io Revised Carlo. Clerk of Council, Dublin 0 .r, . I. A copy of this Resolution must be certified fo ehe County Auditor before the first day of October in each yenr, or et auch later date as may be approved by the Boerd of Tax Appeals. 2 o ~zxw ~ i O r a~ao ~ ~ ~ w O Vf $ V o ~ H U Q t li. is~ H ~ !1: p U zz°oZ _ ~~, W ' ' ` O 4=~z ~ 'u ~:~ ,L , V ~ -' „ m (- Y' ~ ~xz ~ v ~ w ad ~F~UO ~ '~ U a F ¢~.a ~ ~ w .. w SZ a ~ ~ vV Q7 ~ Fw7 r VZQrn F. ~ ~ Q» ~ ~ ~4~ . ~~ ~ ~ awz wo . . a OF .dU o d 0 0 U R. a a MEMORANDUM TO: Members of Dublin City Council FROM: Timothy C. Hansley and Patrik G Bowman/~ ~~ DATE: September 6, 1988 SUBJECT: Community Plan The Community Plan has undergone its last renovation and is now ready for Council action. Staff will follow CounciZ's lead at this point. To aid Council in determining when and how the plan may be adoped we offer the following: - Attached is a copy of a draft resolution adopting the plan. The resolution may take any form desired by Council. - We are prepared to print as many as 160 copies of the document within two weeks of Council's direction to proceed. - Workshop participants and community leaders could then be sent a letter from Council or the Mayor informing them that the plan is available if they care to pick up a cope. The letter would also address Council's perceived status of the plan ("our plan"; "worked hard to get here"; "intend to pass this document"). The letter could invite direct citizen comment to Council Members or staff ("Please give us a call"). The letter would also set a date for adoption. - If during this period Council Members perceive that the Plan would require substantial change to be adopted the review process would be so tailored to resolve problems. - All, some, none of the above. Please give us a call to discuss the matter.