No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/18/2000 I 1.;1 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS "~"",,,__,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~,,,,,,,,,,_,,,,,,~nutes"HQf'''H'''''''''''''''''''H''''~H"""""~~H"""'''~''H~H''H''M''~'~'''''Hn_''__'''~''H''''~'''''''~~''~''''H"~"~"~"~"'~"""""""'~"~"""HnH"~~'''''''~'~~''M'~''''H~~'~~''~Hn"H_""mMe,eling""_""_,,,,~,,_,, Dublin City Council Meeting Page 1 DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FORM NO 10148 Held ~p.rt~mhp.r 18, JOOO , (YEAR) Vice Mayor Adamek called the Dublin City Council meeting of September 18, 2000 to order at 7:00 p.m. Mr. Peterson led the Pledge of Allegiance. r Roll Call I Council members present were: Vice Mayor Adamek, Mrs. Boring, Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, Mr. McCash, Mr. Peterson and Mr. Reiner. Mayor Kranstuber arrived at 7: 10 p.m. Staff members present were: Ms. Grigsby, Mr. Smith, Mr. Kindra, Ms. Clarke, Chief Geis, Mr. Husenitza, Ms. Puskarcik, Mr. Hahn, Ms. Susong and Ms. Heal. Approval of Minutes of Aueust 2. 2000 Special Meetin~ Vice Mayor Adamek moved approval of the minutes as submitted. Mr. Reiner seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes. Approval of Minutes of September 5. 2000 Meetine Mrs. Boring noted a correction to a discussion with Mr. Smith, on page 6, in the second full paragraph. The last sentence should read, "... an amendment requires a simple majority of those voting." On page 7, it should state, "Mrs. Boring noted that she has had conversations with Mr. Gray." The following phrase, "regarding this issue" should be eliminated. Vice Mayor Adamek moved approval of the minutes as amended. Mrs. Boring seconded the motion. -. Vote on the motion - Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; i i Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Reiner, abstain; Mrs. Boring, yes. Correspondence The Clerk reported that a Notice to Legislative Authority was sent by the Division of Liquor Control in regard to a new C2 permit being issued for a gift basket company located at 6631 Q Commerce Parkway. There was no objection to the issuance ofthis permit. Special Recoenition/Presentations COT A Presentation Vice Mayor Adamek noted that Mr. Crockett and Mr. Barnes of the Central Ohio Transit Authority, Bill Habig ofMORPC, and Margie Amorose, Dublin Chamber of Commerce Executive Director and COTA Board Member are present this evening. They would like to address Council regarding traffic congestion in the region. Margie Amorose introduced Bill Habig ofMORPC who provided information about MORPC's growth projections for the region and for Dublin in particular, and its impact on traffic congestion. Mr. Habig noted that factors affecting traffic congestion are low unemployment, a booming economy, and development spillover from other counties. Building more roads is not the solution, in view of the $1 billion projected deficit in funds for highway ~ construction and because of neighborhood, environmental and air quality concerns. A tool kit of alternatives is being proposed to address these problems, including new methods of neighborhood development, such as neotraditional design; environmentally sensitive development, with consideration of natural river areas or environmental features; intelligent transportation systems to remove obstacles on freeways and eliminate bottlenecks in traffic; county-wide trails for bicycle, walking and other modes; and carpooling, van pooling, and staggered work hours to help relieve peaking oftraffic. Lastly, public transit can be improved. He introduced Ron Barnes, President/CEO of Central Ohio Transit Authority to address this topic. Mr. Barnes stated that COTA is currently reviewing their system with a program called, "Operation Excellence." The goal is to better manage all of their available resources. COTA is visiting all communities to share this growth data and to discuss the unique aspects of each community they serve. They are looking at diversifying their services to tailor them to the needs of each community. Long-term options being considered : .' ...... < '. .. 1,,,.,. . IIIL.'IH i;".,J" lit :'ie.;I:':',i'! .,' !'. ". RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ,","~~"_,"'_""H_'''H''''''H_''m_"""_",Minule.B"j}I_"""",_,,,~,,~,,,_,,"'_'"'''''''_'M'''''_'''''~_''''~''''~H_~~''M'''''''''''''''~'''''_''''''''M'''''''~"""~'~'~'~~_"_"'_""""_"'~""_M_m"H_"HH_~_'_~"H""~'~H~""~_"~~H~H~'''H"_"",,M.e..eting.,H''''''''H''''~~m Dublin City Council Meeting Page 2 DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FORM NO. 10148 Held Sf'rt~mher 18j )000 , (YEAR) include passenger rail service. Seventy-six percent of their survey group indicated they would support passenger rail as a way to reduce traffic congestion. Although sixty-four percent responded that they would like more highways, there are drawbacks to building - more highways, as Mr. Habig has described. Implementing a passenger rail system i would take at least 7 to 10 years ifit were begun today. In the meantime, COTA is developing a tool kit to explore alternatives to address traffic congestion. He described transit systems developed in other cities such as Portland and St. Louis, and the impact they have had on traffic congestion. He discussed the rail corridors which would be a priority for development in the future. He described the intra-neighborhood circulator services currently being implemented and those in the planning stages. As part of the 2020 Vision, regional transit centers would be developed. He concluded by stating that COTA's focus for the future is on a regional approach and partnerships to address the traffic congestion problems. In response to Vice Mayor Adamek's question regarding what is needed from Dublin, Mr. Barnes asked that in future planning efforts, Dublin take into consideration the transportation infrastructure needs of the community. COTA would also be interested in sharing their long-term plan with Dublin officials and learning of the City's long-range plans so that COT A can develop an overlay to ensure transportation infrastructure needs are addressed. Vice Mayor Adamek responded that staff would schedule this meeting in the near future. Special Recognition - Leadership Dublin Vice Mayor Adamek then invited the Leadership Dublin Community Service Day proiect leaders to come forward, as well as Margie Amorose, Leadership Dublin Board ~ Member and Teri Hagen, Leadership Dublin Board President. Ms. Amorose provided brief history on the development of the Leadership Dublin program, and Ms. Hagen provided details about the programming and projects of Leadership Dublin, particularly the Community Service Day. Vice Mayor Adamek presented Proclamations to each of the six leaders of the Community Service Day project, who included: Jim Hanneman, Wanda Kamler, Jody Noreen, Trish McDaniel, Chris Quinn, and J.W. Wilson. Council Members thanked the Leadership Dublin group for their efforts in coordinating the very successful Community Service Day. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher noted that the date of next year's Community Service program is Saturday, May 5. At this point, Mayor Kranstuber arrived. Citizen Comments Amy Salay. representing the Griffith Thomas Elementary School community presented a petition to Council requesting a raised crosswalk be installed on Tuttle Crossing in front of Thomas Elementary. There are safety concerns about the speeds ofthe traffic, and the cut-through traffic from motorists who want to avoid the congestion on Frantz Road. A raised crosswalk will make their school crossing much safer by providing a visual and physical barrier to speeding in the school crossing zone. The petition has been signed by 67 members of the school community who support this request, including the school r-- principal. Discussion followed about the safety issues related to crosswalks at all of the elementary schools in Dublin, especially those where the majority of students are walkers, i.e. Following discussion, Mr. McCash moved to direct staff to review incorporating a raised crosswalk or double speed humps at Thomas Elementary School and report back to Council regarding the costs and a recommendation. As a follow-up, staff should assess the crosswalk situation at other schools and report back to Council. Mr. Peterson seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes. Chris Cline. attorney. 5455 Rings Road. Dublin noted that he represents the Wadsworths who own a lot at 6000 Post Road. Mr. Cline indicated that he sent a detailed letter to Council regarding the situation. They purchased a lot in June 1998 and have not been ! : I r- Iii,. ,d ",:[:ij+:,. ,kwj'lilli iUlitih.!' , JAii:i! Ii tiL,TIH, Ilhlll ;,,:iL Ii.! . '. I 'I"'T "'.^ ,.,~, ~'~ '~I\':.l:r"f'\IYt'"",)rl!~.~~'~Z~~'l1tlH':1*I:--.;,l.\ .-r,' 'IU!\Jt!\r:k'll:~:!~ !r.'> ,.r,I'II' n. T "m,...':tlJI.'f".;{: ";~Iilfo" .l!' 1'.'., 1 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS "",_""""""""",,,,,,,,,,,,~,,,,,,,,~~,,,,,,,Minules'MQf,,,,"m"'''~'''''''''''''"H""''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''H''''''''''''''''''~'''''''''H'''''M'''_''~'''_''''''~''~~~_""~"~"""'''''~'''''''''''''~'_''''''''''~H'''~~''m'''''''''''''''''''__m",,,"~"H"M"~"M"''''''''~H.,~"~~,,,,,Meeting,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~,,,,,, Dublin City Council Meeting Page 3 DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148 Held S~pt~mh~r 1 R, )000 , (YEAR) able to develop it. The efforts to date to resolve this with staff have not been successful. Apparently, there is a policy matter involved in their request for access along Post Road. He asked for assistance from Council. - Mr. Smith responded that Mr. Cline contacted him today on this matter, and he has ,........., offered to meet with Mr. Cline to determine if there is a legal issue involved. He can r , then follow-up with a written opinion to Council within 30 days. Mr. Cline indicated that this is acceptable to him. Mr. McCash added that he has met with staff and the residents of Post Road on this matter, and there are some additional issues involved. Perhaps a solution would be to grant them an easement across City property in order to give them access. Mr. Smith agreed to have a report back to Council on this matter within 30 days. Wallace Maurer. 7451 Dublin Road noted that at the next Council meeting, he plans to update Council on the Dublin Road bikeway "standoff." He asked that Council members take a close look at his property and the areas between Emerald Parkway and 161. All of these areas were developed long ago when bikepaths were not mandated. He concluded by requesting that Council allow him to use his remaining time at a later date. Jennifer Brunner. candidate for Franklin County Common Pleas Court indicated that she is running for the unexpired term of Judge James O'Grady. She has practiced law for 17 years in the area and resides in Clintonville with her husband and children. She described what she believes are the characteristics of a good judge - fairness and organizational skills - and noted that she possesses these qualities. She urged those present to vote for the best candidate in the November election. ~ Staff Comments Ms. Grigsby noted that Mr. Hansley, Mr. Ciarochi, Mr. McDaniel, Mr. Harding, Mr. Stevens, and Ms. Crandall are attending the ICMA conference in Cincinnati this week. She added that the revised CIP document was included in the Council packet. Mr. Smith noted that the annexation bill would be brought out of Committee to the State Senate floor tomorrow. The City of Dublin and other entities have lobbyists working on their behalf in this matter. The bill may not be voted upon this term, but may be up for a vote in December. He has provided information to Council on the ramifications of this legislation for Dublin. Mr. Kindra stated that, as City Council has requested, the Southwest area public information regarding the traffic calming program is set for Monday, September 25 at 7 p.m. at the Village at Tuttle Crossing Community Center. Secondly, there are several items in the packet related to progress being made in Old Dublin. Chief Geis noted that the Police division has received several requests from citizens that the AverylPerimeter area traffic signals be left in operation later than 10 p.m. Currently, the signals cycle to "flashing" sequence at 10 p.m. There are safety issues related to the amount of traffic at these intersections. ----.-~- Following discussion, Mayor Kranstuber moved to extend the traffic signal cycling in ,,--, the Avery RoadlPerimeter LooplPerimeter Drive area to midnight on Friday and Saturday nights. Mr. Adamek seconded the motion. Following discussion about whether this would be for Friday and Saturday only, or for the entire week, Mayor Kranstuber amended his motion to extend the traffic signal cycling in the Avery RoadlPerimeter DrivelPerimeter Loop area to midnight, 7 days per week. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the amended motion. Vote on the motion - Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes. Mayor Kranstuber clarified that the lights will then go to flashing sequence after midnight. Staff agreed to review the Coffman Road/Tara Hill intersection for signalization Lc= ~~-- _.-- II :1 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 'M"""'''M'''H''''''''~''H"_"""_"",,,,,,,,Minutes,,j}f''H''''''~''_'''~''''''''_"''''''''''''~'~''''''''''''~'''M''''''_'''_''''''''''''_''~~''''''~''"""~,,,,,,,,,,,"''''''~'_'~''~~'''H~''''''''''''H'''''''H''H''_'~_''~'~H''''~~''~''_H~~''~_M,~",M,e.eting""""""""",,~ Dublin City Council Meeting Page 4 UAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FOAM NO. 10148 Held September 18, ?OOO , (YEAR) adjustment as well. Ms. Puskarcik reported that: -. 1. The Avery- Muirfield/33 interchange is expected to open in November, and staffis seeking Council direction regarding their preference for any type of celebration. It was the consensus of Council that there not be any formal public event to celebrate the openmg. Ms. Puskarcik noted that the City would recognize this milestone in an informational campaign, highlighting its benefits, etc. 2. She is currently preparing the Council Communications Plan and hopes to have that ready for distribution shortly. She asked whether this should be submitted to the Administrative Committee for review or to the entire Council. Mayor Kranstuber indicated his preference for an off-Monday Committee of the Whole meeting for this review. It was the consensus of Council to do so. The meeting was set for Monday, October 9 at 7 p.m. in Council Chambers. Ms. Puskarcik stated that she would have the plan submitted to City Council the week prior to this meeting. 3. Regarding the Dublin history book, staff is moving ahead with two researcher/writers on proposals and hopes to submit this as part ofthe 2001 budget for Council's review. LEGISLATION TABLED ORDINANCE SCHEDULED FOR HEARING Ordinance 107-00 - An Ordinance Authorizing an Employment Contract for the - Clerk of Council. Mr. Peterson moved to adjourn to executive session at 8:15 p.m. for discussion of personnel matters. Mr. Adamek seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes. The meeting was reconvened at 8:35 p.m. Mr. Peterson moved to table this ordinance until the October 2 Council meeting. Mr. Adamek seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes. PUBLIC HEARING/SECOND READING - ORDINANCES Mayor Kranstuber suggested modifying the agenda to hear Ordinance 109-00 prior to Ordinance 101-00. There was no objection from Council. Ordinance 109-00 - An Ordinance Authorizing Distribution to the Dublin Convention and Visitors Bureau (DCVB) in Excess ofthe Twenty-Five Percent Allocated in Accordance with Section 35.32 of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Dublin to Provide Assistance for the Relocation of the DCVB's Operations, and Declaring an Emergency. ~ Mr. McCash, Finance Chair stated that the Committee met with the Bureau representatives and explored various options. Based upon those discussions and review ~ by staff, the language in the ordinance has been drafted. Funding of $80,000 to the DCVB is provided, plus relocation costs, and language has been added to address the windfall issue. Mrs. Boring asked if the DCVB has looked at other available office rental space in Old Dublin, such as the one outlined in a fax sent today by J.A. Guy. Kelly Gardner. DCVB Board President stated that they reviewed with the Finance Committee several alternative locations. The Board's strategic plan focused on the need to locate near the intersection of Bridge and High to provide easy access from 1-270. Mr. McCash noted that the 2,000 square feet of office space identified in the fax today would not be adequate to house the offices. Ms. Gardner agreed to respond to J.A. Guy regarding the DCVB's need for more space than they are offering. t ' I Ii 11:'1: ::L :l,t iLI:~,!tl :1 I "', 1 ii 1'1 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS """"H"~""",~"""""_"""",~""",,,~,,_,,..Minules,,,Qf,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"""~""~"H_~"''''''_'''_''_~_H_''~_.'''~H''''''''''''''~''~'''~'''~'~'''''''__''.''~'~~~~-'~~~~"~'__~"""H~_."H_H".~H~~~~_~H""~H""__""Me,e.ting,,,_""""~'~'" Dublin City Council Meeting Page 5 DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO 1 0148 Held S~pt~mh~r 1 R, 1.000 , (YEAR) Mayor Kranstuber moved for emergency passage. Mr. McCash seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Boring, -. yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes. Vote on the Ordinance - Mr. Peterson, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes. Ordinance lOl-OO(Amended) - An' Ordinance Amending Portions of the Subdivision Regulations to Promote Architectural Diversity Within Single-Family Residential Neighborhoods. Ms. Susong stated that City Council and Planning Commission have requested residential design standards and promotion of architectural diversity throughout Dublin residential neighborhoods. Staff has approached this task with several components: tonight's is the first which addresses the subdivision regulations and deals with varied setbacks, varied lot widths, the layout of the subdivision, and the design of the house. The design of the house is related to the building permit process, and therefore the design portion for the house is split into two ordinances. . Section 1 with definitions to provide clarity in the ordinance. . Section 2 deals with sidewalks and bikepaths, establishing four-foot sidewalks on all streets; on through streets, five-foot sidewalks are required. Bikepaths are required in accordance with the Community Plan to provide connectivity from neighborhoods to schools, parks, and other public areas. . The ordinance also calls for concrete bikepaths in front of houses instead of asphalt ones, and larger setbacks along bikepaths. . Section 3 addresses utility boxes, requiring that they be located at the rear of the - property, unless not practical as determined by the City Engineer. . Section 4 addresses staggered setbacks, requiring that no more than two adjacent lots have the same building setback line, and a third would require a minimum variation of 10 feet in setback. This would not be required on lots fronting the bulb of a cul- de-sac. . Section 5 deals with the minimum buildable depth of 65 feet. . Section 6 deals with varied lot widths and requires that no more than two lots in a row may have the same lot width - there must be a minimum variation of 10 feet. No more than 50 percent of the lots in the preliminary plat shall be of the minimum width. . To promote architectural diversity, there is a provision in Section 7 that the same model or a substantially similar model may be presented not more than once in every three lots on the same side of the street, and may not be repeated on the three closest lots across the street. Mayor Kranstuber proposed that Council proceed with review of the ordinance section by section versus having a long discussion about the ordinance as a whole. The BIA has representatives here to testify, and there are several audience members who have also indicated their desire to testify. Mr. McCash suggested that this item be scheduled for a Committee of the Whole meeting so that the entire evening can be dedicated to this ordinance. - Mr. Reiner suggested that Council proceed with a public hearing tonight, as he believes the issues are not complicated and because Council has been anxious to implement these standards. Mr. McCash objected, noting that the street layout issue and related traffic calming are not included and should be part of this legislation. Discussion followed. It was the consensus of Council to proceed with the public hearing. Section 1 - Definitions Michael Close. Attorney representing the Building Industry Association stated in regard to the definition of "no build zones" that if the goal is to encourage sideloaded garages, then this item should be eliminated. Ms. Susong stated that no-build zones are typically in the back of the lot - not on the ! i I I -1'1 " ,,,,,;;!)wid! " <iNr'lll I I ";" 'IWlll;ll,r'w~'mlF'jnl'~llf'l'lno:';'ll)'I'::X',rY]IIP':'kr" I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS "'~"H~~"""'~~"'~~~~'''~'''''H~",,~~,,~nule,s.~Qf''''_''''''''M''''~'~~"""~'~'''''M''~''''_~_~'''~~M'''''''''~''~_M~'''''''''~~''''H''''~~''H~'~'''M'M'''7'HM~''_''H_'~~'''~''~''~'~_''''''~~''~~~''''.''''''~,~~",~~"~M~H~'_"'~'''''''HMe..etingM''''~'''mm''''''H~ Dublin City Council Meeting Page 6 Held Sf'pt~mh~r 1 R, )000 , (YEAR) I side. Ifthey do run down the side of the lot where a driveway would be located, there is likely a significant reason that there is a no-build zone there which would warrant changing the placement of the house on the lot. Staff does not foresee a problem with - this portion of the ordinance. Mr. Close responded that the BIA does not understand why there would ever be justification for a no-build zone on the side of a lot. Ms. Clarke responded that in a case where the residential lot is adjacent to a park, there could be a no-build zone on the side of the lot. The no-build zone in this case would typically be the width of the side yard, generally 7 feet on a single family lot. Following further discussion, it was the consensus of Council to leave this definition as drafted in view of the fact that the no-build zone is generally located in the back of the lot. Section 2 - Sidewalks and bikepaths Mr. McCash noted that ifthe ADA requires 60-inch accessible routes, why does this ordinance not require the same for sidewalks? Ms. Susong stated that the City has always implemented four-foot sidewalks. Mr. Close stated that if the ADA requirement is for five feet, the ADA will prevail on this issue. There was no motion from Council to revise this. Mr. McCash stated that Mr. Eastep of the Planning Commission had suggested that the concrete bikepaths at the front of the lot should be sawcut and not tooled. However, this is not addressed. Ms. Susong responded that the installation of sidewalks would be addressed in the City's engineering standards - not in this ordinance which addresses their layout. - Mr. McCash noted that the bikepath between houses was to be located in a 20-foot wide dedicated lot, and now it appears that the bikepath is back in an easement. Ms. Susong clarified that it would be located 10 feet from the easement or from the bikepath if there is no easement. Mr. McCash stated that it would be preferable to have the required sideyard setback provisions for the lot and have a separate lot for the bikepath of 20 feet wide. Discussion continued. Ms. Clarke noted that staff can include any number that Council is comfortable with, but gettingbikepaths platted between lots is difficult to negotiate with developers, especially if the side yard setback were to be increased to 20 feet from 10 feet. The issue relates to yield and how many lots can be platted from a piece of land. Section 3 - Utility box placement Charlie Driscoll. Edwards Land stated that he would like clarification - if electric boxes are to be located in the back yard, but there are also "no disturb" zones in the back yard- where are they to go? Placing them between houses and adding screening has worked well for them. Mr. Reiner stated that the City receives many complaints about utility boxes being located at the front ofthe property, even if they are screened. Mr. Driscoll stated that they would prefer to locate them in the "no disturb" zones versus locating them halfway back. If the property is unwooded, the builder generally places - them in the back. Ms. Susong clarified that they can be placed in the "no build" zones, but not in the "no disturb" zones. Section 4 - Setbacks Mr. Close noted that he has sent a letter to Council with the BIA's suggestions for modifications. They suggest that the language state that at least one third of the lots in a subdivision not have the same setback. Mayor Kranstuber agreed, stating that this provides flexibility for the builders yet meets the City's goals of varied setbacks. Following discussion, Mr. Close proposed that the language instead include, "reasonably dispersed." This would suffice. Mayor Kranstuber agreed with this proposal. Mr. McCash noted that Donegal Cliffs has deed restrictions relating to varied setbacks. 1 I i ii ! ;,11:,1 ;11&1:1 i I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS "'"""'~"~"_"~"'''H'''''''m''''Hm~'m,"Minules~of__"__''''''''''''''<M'''MH""'''M''''''H~'''_''''_'''''''''''''m''mm"~~m,,m_'~''__~H''~''~''M~n<~'"''~''m~~"_'''m''_HH'''~''''~'''''''''''_''~m~'_m~''m~~'''H__m''m",~,~"_,,,,,,Me"e~",,_,""'''"_m'''' Dublin City Council Meeting Page 7 UAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148 Held Septemh~r 1 R, :WOO , (YEAR) Mrs. Boring noted that none of this would apply to a PUD in any case. Mr. Close stated that their issue is with the discretion of the Planning Commission to waive or modify this requirement in PUD zoned areas. -- Mr. Peterson stated that by stipulating a number, Council is actually putting themselves into a corner - the reasonably dispersed language is preferable. Mayor Kranstuber proposed using the substitute language for Section 4 as proposed by the BIA, with the addition that setback variations should be reasonably dispersed. Ms. Susong suggested including that, "no more than two lots can have the same setback." Discussion continued. Mayor Kranstuber moved to substitute the following language for Section 4: "Within all residential subdivisions, including those within planned unit development districts, the minimum front setback will be determined for each street by the. zoning district in which the development is located. The setback should be varied among adjacent lots by at least five feet (5'). No more than one-third (113) of the lots may employ the minimum setback line. Setback variations shall be reasonably dispersed." The second paragraph regarding P&Z discretion would remain as drafted. Mr. McCash stated that it seems redundant to include PUD's in this restriction, as the development text submitted as part of the PUD would address this matter. Ms. Susong noted that the PUD language was added just for clarification. P&Z still has the ability to waive this requirement. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion. V ote on the motion - Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, no; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes. Section 5 - Buildable width and depth Mr. Close stated that if it is the intent to encourage sideloaded garages, depth restrictions may impact this policy. The BIA proposes that the following language be inserted before the second to last sentence: "... except that the minimum buildable width restriction shall operate to accommodate sideloaded garages, driveways, and parking areas." Ms. Susong indicated that staff does not foresee a problem with this amendment. Mayor Kranstuber moved to insert the language before the second to last sentence, " ... except that the minimum buildable width restriction shall operate to accommodate sideloaded garages, driveways, and parking areas." Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes. Section 6 - Variation in lot width Mr. Close indicated that interpretation of the language in this section is extremely difficult. The BIA is proposing alternative language calling for 15 percent ofthe lots to be 100 feet in width in all subdivisions. Ms. Susong stated that the intent was to have different types of houses which would fit on different types oflots throughout the subdivision. With the proposed amendment, it would likely result in all 80 and 100 foot lots with less variation in widths. Mr. McCash suggested that ifthe goal is for diverse lot sizes in neighborhoods, it would ~ make more sense to cluster them in different areas, similar to what was done in Muirfield. Ms. Clarke stated that staff would have no issue with the language proposed by the BIA, if a sentence is included which requires that they be reasonably dispersed. The intent is to have variety, and that the widths be varied. In a recent review by the Planning Commission of the golf course development, they were very opposed to having a section with smaller lots because it could create a "low rent" and "high rent" district. Against that backdrop, they reviewed this legislation. Mayor Kranstuber stated that a developer can submit a PUD if the desire is to do something different. Discussion followed. Mayor Kranstuber moved to amend the language in sentence 2 of Section 6 to read: No more than six lots in a row may have the same lot width." Mr. Reiner seconded the motion. ; , I I I.; i );j~' I i 1"1 'I' }',I!i'i'iHI: ~i:'!I~,Hi~i1'If:fjiAil,Hh'H'_': i,I'F,lIit.Jiml't-i~;:iiHk!lit;lHn'l, 1I!'~;jlJir;N{1i1h E.I I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ''''''''~''''''''''H~''~''''''''H~",,,,,,,,,,,~,,,Minut,es,,,,oi'''''M''''''''''''''''''''''~"""''''''''_''''''''''''''''''H_'''''''''''_''''''~'~'''''''''H''''''''''~'~~'''''~''H"'''''''~'''''''H''''H''~'~''_~_''_~~~H'''~'~H~",_,~"""""~,,,~,,~~~Meeting Dublin City Council Meeting Page '8"_H" ~"H""'" , H"""''',,,,,,,,,~ DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO 10148 Held S~pt~mh~r 1 R, )000 , (YEAR) : Vote on the motion - Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes. r--. Section 7 - Diversity of elevations Mr. Close stated that at the P&Z review, the language was modified and should be adjusted. Mayor Kranstuber moved to take the language which begins with, "A subdivision shall otherwise comply with this regulation unless it meets all of the following conditions" and the following four items listed as (a) through (d) and insert this language above the paragraph which addresses the discretion of the Planning Commission. Mr. Reiner seconded the motion. V ote on the motion - Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes. Mayor Kranstuber clarified that the intent of this section is that a subdivision shall comply with the diversity of elevations unless it meets all of the following conditions: contains 150 lots or less, there are four or more builders constructing within the subdivision; no one builder constructs on more than 35 percent of the lots within the subdivision; and the lots to be used by the different builders are reasonably dispersed throughout the subdivision, as determined by staff. Mr. Close stated that the problem that the BIA foresees is one of defining what is similar . The second issue relates to the fact that staff is not required to make a decision within a certain timeframe. The third issue relates to the costs and time associated with an appeal to BZA about a staff decision. The BIA proposes the following: that staffbe required to ,..-.., act on an application within a timely manner or it is deemed approved; that diversity criteria are established in order to define the term "similar"; that a fair appeal process be - established that requires the party who loses to pay the costs associated with the appeal. To hear an appeal, the City should maintain a list oflicensed design professionals who, on a random basis, will compose the panels to hear such appeals. Ms. Susong stated that the timeframe for staff action is not included because this ordinance addresses only the subdivision regulations. Staff has a provision in the second part of the architectural diversity program that is tied to the building permit process and addresses the turnaround time. This second part ofthe diversity program is scheduled to be reviewed by P&Z on Thursday ofthis week. Staff believes that an item tied to the building permit process cannot be enforced through the subdivision regulations. This ordinance simply requires a developer to submit a table indicating which lots will not have the same elevation - it does not address the timeframe or process for staffs determination on this. Discussion followed about the difficulty this section will impose on builders because of the delays resulting from the diversity requirements. Ms. Clarke clarified that the building permitting related items will be addressed in the second ordinance, not in the ordinance which addresses the subdivision ofland. --- The goal is to tie the housing types to the platting process in order to assure diversity. If a plat is recorded without including those restrictions, the individual lot buyer will have difficulty learning what type of house he can build on his lot, based on what is already planned for the other lots. This ordinance indicates that there are relationships between the lots in a subdivision based on diversity. Mr. Close stated that the easiest solution is to eliminate Section 7 in its entirety and address the issue at the second ordinance stage. Mr. Smith agreed that there is a problem with the lack of definition of the term "similar." He also pointed out that Council needs to consider the consequences of eliminating Section 7 from this ordinance if the second ordinance is never approved. Mayor Kranstuber summarized that staffhas indicated that there is no method to notify a I i I I ~ ,;I!!J.iJli! "I';1I'1I!1:ln YU~HI I Ii. .:' , I {I .:: ,ill :'".t'tl''''d'tt""Ii"1&;l1lWI!~iil;1{nHtI.".i ,. JH:l'lmi~tl.IWWtiIHfl1iij!H'!;IIt'~~'"'i'nlilll''' I!" I REColRD OF PROCEEDINGS ","''''''_H''H""__""__"",,,,,,,~,,,,,_,,,,,,,,_,,,Minules,,,,of,,_,,,,,,,,,_,"_"'''''''''''''~__H_'''''''''''''''''''''~''_''''''''''''_~_'''_'''''_~'''':'''~H~"""__"_"'__""H""~'~_"~""""~""'''_~'''''''~H''~H~_''''''_''''~M~__"'''~H~_~'~~''H~"~",,M.e,e.ting'_~''M''''_''__ Dublin City Council Meeting Page 9 DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO 10148 Held S~pt~mh~r 1 R, )000 , (YEAR) future buyer of a diversity requirement unless it is done at the platting stage. Mr. Close advised that Council provide a definition ofthe term "similar" and address r- this at the next ordinance stage. Mayor Kranstuber noted that six of the sections of this ordinance address land issues, not building issues. Only Section 7 seems to address building issues. There will be later discussion about the effective date ofthis legislation and how it will affect land already platted. His opinion is that tonight's action should not affect the golf course being platted tonight, or a subdivision such as Amberleigh which was platted two years ago. These land issues should not affect approved subdivisions, but the building code related items would apply based on the date of building permit issuance. He would therefore concur with eliminating Section 7. Ms. Clarke noted that if there is a problem as pointed out tonight by the Law Director, the ordinance should be tabled for two weeks to resolve this. Mayor Kranstuber emphasized that Section 7 is the most important part ofthis ordinance, and he would prefer to see this addressed at the next stage along with materials and architectural diversity matters. Mr. Smith pointed out that the Planning Division has worked with developers at the platting stage to secure that there is diversity. But it is important to establish a clear, definable standard ifit is done by ordinance. He suggested that Council approve the ordinance with the elimination of Section 7. It can be amended at a later date, if that is - the desire of Council. 't Mrs. Boring stated that she would support passage with the recommendation that the diversity portion be addressed at a later date. Mr. Cline stated that submission of a matrix at the platting stage is not complicated. The challenge is in the application of the diversity requirement as the lots are sold to individual buyers. The real issue is whether houses are the same or similar, and how that is applied. He is not concerned about including these regulations in either the subdivision regulations ordinance or the building code, but rather in defining the terms and establishing a process for review. He views tonight's action as providing half ofthe remedy. Ms. Clarke stated that the architecture of the housing will be addressed in later regulations to be brought to Council, however one member ofP&Z felt it was important to see the entire program at one time. She is not opposed to eliminating Section 7 and incorporating this in the next ordinance. Due to the legal issues raised tonight, she would support delaying any action related to the items in Section 7. Mayor Kranstuber asked if Section 7 is more or less defensible if included in this ordinance or in the next one. 'r-- Mr. Smith responded that it is more defensible if a clear definition and remedy are included. Mayor Kranstuber stated that the issue is whether government can legislate aesthetics. Mr. Smith added that there is a distinction between regulating aesthetics and creating aesthetic standards to the point where many people are excluded from the process. Mrs. Boring moved to eliminate Section 7 with the expectation that it will be addressed at a later date, at which time it will be determined whether this ordinance should be amended or whether the diversity of elevations issue should be addressed in a separate ordinance. Mr. Reiner seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. i I ! II Ii tiLiFi+liimUI ii, '.Lf~ Ii I I i "<0""''''':'''''''''' Ii'/.:' "'"'pT.,..'c.""'",......:'""..;W,., ,,,., RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS "M""""'''W'M''''''''''''''H''~''''''~'''''''~~""Minutes"J:)f,''MW''''''''''W~'''''''''w'w"'',,,,'''''''''WH'''''MW''w''''''~,_'''w,,'',,~w_'''__,,'''''',,'~~,~"~~'~"H"'_"~H~W.'~~'_'~"H'W""~_""H"~.~~~""""M"H."~_"~~_"~'~"''''''H_H.H"Me.eling"",,,ww,,,,,,,,,,,~ Dublin City Council Meeting Page 10 DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148 Held Septemher 1 R, ?OOO , (YEAR) Ms. Clarke pointed out that Section 8 relates to the same issues. Mayor Kranstuber moved to eliminate Section 8 and that it be addressed by amending the ordinance at a later date or by a separate ordinance. -, Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion. , Vote on the motion - Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mrs. I f Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes. .' Chris Cline. Blaugrund. Herbert & Martin. 5455 Rings Road stated that he represents Dominion Homes. On September 7, the Post Preserve project was approved by Planning & Zoning Commission, but it has not been through the platting process. It has strong staff support and addresses many of the items discussed with this ordinance. In terms of the effective date of this ordinance, he suggested that rezonings which have been reviewed by Planning Commission be exempt from these regulations. The Post Preserve project is a PLDR district with a specific layout and lot sizes, yet it may not meet the specific provisions being enacted tonight. Mayor Kranstuber asked how many projects in the development process will be affected by this change of requirements. Ms. Clarke stated that she is not certmn. Staff s expectation would be that if the subdivision code is amended, any project without an approved plat would be subject to the new regulation. Staff can assemble a list of affected projects and give this information to Council in two weeks. Mr. Smith stated that Council can make the effective date of the ordinance a later date if they desire. The practical consideration in this application is that when a rezoning is approved, the sale of the land is often effected. ..~i Mr. Adamek stated that if there are in fact 10 rezonings without preliminary plat '. " approval, it would be important not to be exclusionary in exempting some and not others from the new regulations. Mr. Smith pointed out that there may also be vesting issues involved with zoning approval for some developments. Mr. McCash stated that some of the older PUD rezonings may not have addressed diversity issues such as recent rezonings. It was the consensus of Council to have staff bring a recommendation back to Council in two weeks in regard to affected projects. Mayor Kranstuber summarized that staff will bring this list to Council in the next two weeks and Council can then amend the ordinance if necessary in two weeks, prior to its effective date. Mr. Smith concurred. Discussion continued about the status ofprojects approved by P&Z or Council which do not have plat approval. It was the consensus of Council to make a determination in two weeks regarding the ~ effective date of these regulations for projects in the development review process. Vote on the Ordinance as amended - Mr. Peterson, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. McCash, no; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes. Mayor Kranstuber stated that the second ordinance related to architectural diversity will be brought to Council within the next month following the P&Z review. Mr. McCash asked if street design in neighborhoods will be considered within the second ordinance. It should be an integrated package, and would eliminate future requests for traffic calming in neighborhoods. Ms. Susong stated that the next ordinance relates to building materials, four-sided i ! Ii I I' 'II ' Iii ,ii t"j: iliifHliil 1~1,1 I I' :;' RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ww"""""",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,www"""'~m,,,,,w,_,,,,,,,,Minule.s,,,,Qf,,,,,~,,w,,,,,,~w,,,,,w,,,,,,,,,,W''''''''''''''''''H~w~''~''''''''W~''''''''~HmW''''''''''''''~'~WW'''''M''~''_~''''HH""Ww~"~,~w~~"~~'''''HH'~''~'''~WH~_~~H_~_''''H~,~,__,_~w"",,,Me.e,tingmW""WW""M"~ww Dublin City Council Meeting Page 11 DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FORM NO 10148 Held ~~pt~mh~r 1 R, )000 , (YEAR) architecture and elevations. It does not address street layout or traffic calming. The review is already scheduled for P&Z on Thursday, so in order to keep this moving through the process, she would suggest addressing traffic calming separately. ,.-. Ms. Clarke stated that street layout would be addressed in the subdivision regulations at a later date. Mr. McCash stated that his concern remains that the street layout was not addressed in the ordinance presented to Council tonight. Mr. Adamek asked if the ordinance passed tonight could be amended. Ms. Clarke responded that staff has incorporated the standards being articulated by the Planning Commission and other ways to make the lots more diverse. This does not include traffic calming which will be looked at separately and which would likely be initiated by the City Engineer. Mayor Kranstuber stated that this direction was not previously given to staff, and he does not want to sidetrack what is already in process. This does not preclude a motion at this time directing staff to draft such an amendment. Mr. McCash moved to direct staff to draft a new ordinance to address street layout and traffic calming measures. Mrs. Boring seconded the motion. Mayor Kranstuber noted he would support this motion, with the understanding that it would not delay the three ordinances already in the process. ~- Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher inquired about the content of the third ordinance. Ms. Susong stated that the third ordinance was proposed to a Planning and Zoning Commission subcommittee. It focuses on scale and proportion factors in architectural diversity and would require establishment of a board or commission for the review process. Further direction will be needed from Council on this. Mr. McCash asked if this is not already addressed in the current Planning and Zoning review process for architectural standards and materials. Ms. Susong responded that, currently, this is part of the building permit process and is reviewed by a staff member. Presently, there is no board or commission which reviews architectural standards for the entire City. It is difficult to include subjective items such as scale and proportion in a process that is performed by a staff person. Mr. McCash responded that the City's review process is beginning to involve entirely too much "red tape." Mayor Kranstuber stated that the primary ordinance which will have a major impact is the second one, which is forthcoming. It is being developed in response to Council's ~ request for an architectural diversity program and has been anticipated for some time. This third one will be proposed to Council and will require further Council direction. Vote on the motion - Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes. INTRODUCTION & FIRST READING - ORDINANCES Ordinance 113-00 - An Ordinance Accepting the Lowest/Best Bid for the Dublin Parks Fence Installation Project, and Declaring an Emergency. Mr. Adamek introduced the ordinance. There will he a second reading/public hearing at the October 2nd Council meeting. ! ! i I I 1.1 ill! I:ifl : """"'.,;; lIUfI I; IFii: iii " ,i! RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ~"~'"H""~"m"'_"'M"'''H~,~___-Minute,KHQL"",,,,,,,,,_,,,,,,,,,____",,,,""-""--""'''Mm'''''DubrmT:ltY'counC1n\1e'etmg-'_#"'''''~--~"''~''M''~"_'~_-pmageT2~m_~~"H"'''#~H~_Mee1ing'''~_H'''M~'' DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO 10148 Held Septemher 18, 2000 , (YEAR) Ordinance 114-00 - An Ordinance Extending the Designation Period of Eligible Financial Institutions as Public Depositories an Additional Two Years, to October 31,2002. Mr. Adamek introduced the ordinance. .....-. There will be a second reading/public hearing at the October 2nd Council meeting. Ordinance 115-00 - An Ordinance Amending the Annual Appropriations for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2000. Mr. Adamek introduced the ordinance. Ms. Grigsby requested waiver of a public hearing. Mayor Kranstuber moved to dispense with the public hearing. Mr. Adamek seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. McCash, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes. V ote on the Ordinance - Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes. Ordinance 116-00 - An Ordinance to Establish Section 53.071 of the Dublin Code of Ordinances with Respect to Chapter 53, Stormwater Management, Within Historic (Old) Dublin. Mr. Adamek introduced the ordinance. Mrs. Boring asked if this requires referral to the Planning and Zoning Commission for reVIew. Ms. Clarke responded that it relates to stormwater regulations in Historic Dublin, but upon closer review, she noted that it amends the zoning code and must therefore be - referred to Planning Commission. Mr. McCash pointed out that this ordinance relaxes the current regulations and will allow the creation of parking areas of3 to 4 four spaces or less in Old Dublin by exempting them from stormwater regulations. Does staff believe this will address the parking problems? Mr. Kindra responded that this legislation is not meant to allow for parking expansions in excess of four spaces Even though the ordinance does not state that, it is intended for a one-time request only - not four at a time for a larger number of spaces in total. Mrs. Boring moved to refer the ordinance to Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Peterson seconded the motion. V ote on the motion - Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes. Ordinance 117-00 - An Ordinance Declaring the Procurement of Mobile and Portable Radio Equipment for the Division of Police, Division of Streets and Utilities and the Division of Grounds and Facilities as a "Single Source" Purchase and Waiving Competitive Bidding Requirements. Mr. Adamek introduced the ordinance. There will be a second reading/public hearing at the October 2nd Council meeting ........ : Ordinance 118-00 - An Ordinance Authorizing the Creation of a New Position (Web Site Designer) Within the Division of Community Relations. Mr. Adamek introduced the ordinance. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked why this would not be presented in November as part of the operating budget for 2001. Ms. Puskarcik responded that this position was discussed at last year's budget presentation, but at that time, a determination could not be made regarding specifics for the position. A subsequent review has resolved that. If it were not proposed until the next budget year, the position would be subject to the Human Resource's prioritization ofthe new positions, which could defer filling of the position until later in the year. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher inquired ifthis position will be the only web site designer for the entire City. 1 "I '1,1 , iT ;~itill ,I ii H 'T RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 'M"~"'M"'''M''H''''H'''M'''''M",_"",~"~,,,,,Minule.s,,,j}f'''~''''''''M'''''''''''M"''''''''''''M'''M'''~''~''M''''''HM'''~'''''''_'''M'''~''''''''mH~~'''''_~_H~''_H_~_~M~'M"'''_''~M''H''~H''~''~~''HM'''_''''_'''~~MM''_''~'~M'''''~~'~'_'~~mMm"""Mee.ting""M"~_"'M""" Dublin City Council Meeting Page 13 Held Sf"pt~mh~r 1 R, )000 , (YEAR) I Ms. Puskarcik responded affirmatively. There will be technical support from the IT division. She explained that because the City's web site is considered a communication tool, it was determined it would function better within the Community Relations - division. The specific requirements for the position include skills in communication, graphics, writing, and content. Mr. Adamek asked if the job description would include updating the information pages on the public access channels. They have not been consistently updated recently, and it is important to have the most current information on this channel. He would also like to have the graphics enhanced if possible. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher agreed. Ms. Puskarcik stated that she would take that as direction. Mrs. Boring inquired if they considered outsourcing this service. Ms. Puskarcik responded that this was considered, but there is a need to keep this constantly updated. There is even a proposal to make the web site interactive; they are presently considering E-Commerce. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher noted that the issue with outsourcing is that an internal staff person is required to provide the information to the outside service; not having the person in-house adds an extra step to a time sensitive communication tool. There will be a second reading/public hearing at the October 2nd Council meeting INTRODUCTION & PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTIONS - Resolution 44-00 - A Resolution Accepting the Amounts and Rates as Determined by the Budget Commission, Authorizing the Necessary Tax Levies and Certifying them to the County Auditor. Mayor Kranstuber introduced the resolution. Ms. Grigsby noted that this is required annually by the Ohio Revised Code. Vote on the Resolution - Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. OTHER Prelilllinary Plat - Dublin Golf Cour~~9011111111nity(CaseNo. 00-090 PP) Mr. Reiner indicated he would abstain and left Council Chambers. Mayor Kranstuber requested if Council required any additional information or presentation prior to voting on this plat. All of the materials were provided in the packet. Council required no additional information. Mayor Kranstuber invited public comment. Wallace Maurer. 7451 Dublin Road raised a question in regard to the commitment ofthe Edwards Land Company and the City to restore water service to the residents whose wells might be damaged by the construction process. Additionally, if their water becomes contaminated or they experience diminished flow, would the City and Edwards address these problems? """"'- Mr. Smith responded that, according to the final development agreement which was (' executed today, ifit is determined by the City, Edwards Company, or the property owner that the water supply has been diminished either due to flow restrictions or contamination, the parties agree to cooperate to restore it. Mr. Maurer noted that on page 22 of the staff report, it indicates that the City is working with Dr. Hurdzan on the golf course. What type of doctoral degree does he hold? Mr. Smith responded that his degree relates to his industry and he can provide that information to Mr. Maurer. Mr. Maurer noted that in view of Tiger Woods achievements, golf course design may have to change in the future. This would be an important consideration in the design process, and he is hopeful that the design architect is capable of meeting this challenge. Mr. Maurer asked for clarification about the freeholder parcels in the agreement. I I II '11'1', III I " , '" "",",,,,,,,,"'w ""","",",C,",""'"",."'.l RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS W'_"'''~''''''M~''~''~M''~'~''~__''M,,,Minut,es,,~Q[_'''''''~'~''''''~''''''M''H""'''''''~H'''''~''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''H"",,,~MM''''''_H_''H''M''''~"~,,,,_~,,_~,,""H""~H_"'_M_'M_'~'~~_""""~H~,"_"'~'~"'''H~''''"""'_~'~"_H_'''~'~~~'~~H_,M.eeting''''''''''M''''''~''m Dublin City Council Meeting Page 14 DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148 Held September 18,2000 , (YEAR) Mr. Smith responded that this Council previously agreed that the property owners on the south side of Woerner- Temple would not be forced to sell their land for parkland. Based upon this direction, the City will not use eminent domain to take their properties. ~ Mayor Kranstuber moved approval of the plat. Mr. Adamek seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Adamek, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. Council Round Table/Council Committee Reports Mr. Peterson noted that: 1. He appreciates staffs efforts in Old Dublin and believes that progress is being made. 2. He enjoyed a trip to Montgomery County last week and spoke with several people who had visited Dublin and made positive comments about the City. He felt proud to be from Dublin. He plans to visit five similar places in the next couple of weeks and expects he will hear similarly positive comments. Mrs. Boring noted that at the last meeting, Mayor Kranstuber had raised concerns about the speeding traffic on Tara Hill and staff promptly responded with an increased level of patrol. She thanked staff for the report on street signage which was forwarded to Council. She is looking forward to reviewing this in the near future at the Public Services Committee. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher: ~ 1. Noted that she would like to set a meeting for the Public Services Committee to review the tobacco legislation and street signage issues. She suggested that the Committee members bring their calendars to the next Council meeting. 2. Commented that staff member Mike Stevens gave a presentation on economic development at the Dublin AM Rotary on Friday and did an excellent job of representing the City. 3. Moved to direct staff to include in the budget for 2001, which is currently being prepared, funding for the Leadership Dublin program in the amount of $1 0,000. Leadership Dublin has benefited the community tremendously and will continue to do so. This would be similar funding as is done by the City for the Dublin Counseling Center each year. Suburban leadership programs are typically funded by the City in which they reside, by tuition paid by participants and from corporate support. Mr. McCash seconded the motion. Mrs. Boring asked for clarification of what kind of financial support the program is receiving from the City at this time. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher responded that they are currently receiving funds in the form of a hotel/motel tax grant, and she is proposing that this be funded from the operating budget funds next year. V ote on the motion - Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. ~ 4. She noted that the United Way campaign is underway in Franklin County and urged everyone to support the campaign. Mr. McCash noted that he has received several complaints about speeding motorists passing stopped school buses on Rings Road. Ms. Grigsby responded that staff will follow-up on this issue. Mr. Adamek noted: 1. Tomorrow evening there is a televised Ohio News Network town meeting from 7:30 to 9 p.m. in regard to Ohio School Funding. He encouraged Councilor staff to attend or to view this presentation. 2. There is a ribbon-cutting at the new McDonald's on Tuttle Crossing scheduled on Wednesday evening, and Council members have been invited to attend. Mayor Kranstuber indicated that he will attend on Council's behalf. I ., ,I I 'Ii I,' .",IIi" "'iJE! u. i!~JI I ;,..! . Ii :: r .:: L!;~: !ii "" ""... ,......."..", '>""","- ""',,,,,,,.,..,,,.,,~.....,' ".J RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS '---"'-"'~H_"~",,,_,,,,,,__~,,~,~,,Minu.te.s,,,,,oi'"'''''''''_''_''M'''''''"''"'._''-'"'''~~_''_~''_'''~~'''.''~_''''''_'~''~''~H''''~H_''__~~_''''""'~~"~"~~'~-"-~H~"~'~"HH"~""'~_',"",~"~_"'_'~H~,_,~,,-Me,eling"""''''''H_'''''''''' Dublin City Council Meeting Page 15 DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148 Held S~pt~mh~r 1 R~ )000 , (YEAR) 3. An invitation was sent to Council by Susan Smiley for a reception prior to the Emerald City Players new production. Mayor Kranstuber indicated that he will represent Council at this event. --- 4. A memo was forwarded from staff noting that the City of Columbus has taken bids for the odor control facility. 5. There have been two deaths recently in Dublin - one was Gerald Macklin, former Council and P&Z member, and the second was the daughter of employee Don Stishok. Council sends condolences to their families and friends. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked if there is an update on the condition of the high school student who was seriously injured in an accident on Avery-Muirfie1d Drive. Mayor Kranstuber responded that he remains in a coma. Mr. McCash noted that there was a serious accident recently along Dublin Road where there is limited sight distance and a sinkhole exists. He asked that staff investigate this location for installation of a guard rail. 6. He recently encountered an associate from New Jersey who works in his industry. He noted that he was very impressed with Dublin, and that there was a noticeable difference in land use and aesthetics upon crossing into Dublin from other areas. Mayor Kranstuber stated that: 1. There was a memo in the packet regarding a recent court case involving political yard signs. He asked staff to comment. Mr. Smith responded that he has provided a memo to Council tonight on this matter. 2. A list of former Council members was provided to Council, and he noted that the list includes several people who have not attended any recent City events. He ~ recently spoke with the City Manager regarding ways to involve former Council members with City activities. These were community leaders in the past, and keeping them involved in the future would be desirable. Ms. Puskarcik responded that several former Council members attended the reception for Frank Ciarochi and they expressed their pleasure with the invitation from the City. 3. There is a memo from Mr. Kindra regarding cost estimates for requested improvements in Old Dublin, including a pedestrian crossing at North High and North Street for $100,000. Mrs. Boring asked if all of the ground signs would be necessary with this pedestrian crossing installation. Mr. Kindra responded that they are required by Ohio statute. He noted that there will be more information coming to Council addressing such issues as curb and gutter on North and South High Street, sidewalks, lighting, drainage, alleyways, etc. He recommends that staff assemble a proposal for the improvements needed in Old Dublin, including costs and a proposed timeline. He will have this for CounciF s review at an upcoming meeting. - ~CL~ Clerk of Council