Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/25/2001 , , "1!,llp.'t;!jr'.t:'F:1""",t!t),~jL\':I!II('I!NIUU:lL"j';'!'ltr!tltfl!,'lt,'I:UI'!.:llUi'n'i:m:,OOT,t"t-fji!-\~ l;.1 I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ,"m^m^"m""~m"~"~"""H'mm'm_,"'~~_m._mMinuteKmof^mm"'mm~_~'^-'^_'_~^H"^~'^~"'~""~"_"~m""m"~~^HQ^m~H~~~~m];:)y,1;}lm"Git-JL,G.Gtl~i1-~_'^"H'~m_'m^~'mm","~",""'^"m~m^m~'m^mmmm"~","""~mmmm._m~mm_~m~M"ee.tin~_mm~"^mQ_"" DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO 10148 Held June 25, 2001 , (YEAR) Vice Mayor Adamek called the Dublin City Council meeting of June 25,2001 to order at 7:00 p.m. Mrs. Boring led the Pledge of Allegiance. Roll Call Council members present were: Vice Mayor Adamek, Mrs. Boring, Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, Mr. McCash, and Mr. Peterson. Mr. Reiner arrived at 7:05 p.m. Vice Mayor Adamek indicated that Mayor Kranstuber had informed him that he would be arriving late. Staff members present were: Mr. Hansley, Ms. Grigsby, Mr. Ciarochi, Mr. Smith, Ms. Clarke, Mr. Kindra, Mr. Stevens, Ms. Puskarcik, Mr. Price, Ms. Hoyle, Mr. Husenitza, and Ms. Heal. Approval of Minutes of June 11. 2001 Council Meetin~ Mr. Peterson moved approval of the minutes as submitted. Mr. McCash seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mr. McCash, yes, Mr. Adamek, abstain. Correspondence The Clerk reported that Notices to Legislative Authority were sent regarding liquor permits for the following: (1) Stogies & Stix, 6788 Perimeter Loop Road; (2) Rajac, 72 N. High Street; and (3) Dublin Xpress, 7000 Perimeter Loop Road. There was no objection to the issuance of these permits. ~;' Citizen Comments Wallace Maurer. 7451 Dublin Road stated that the City of Dublin encompasses approximately 23 acres. Within that, the bicycle path extends approximately 29 miles for 30,000 residents. He noted that the Law Director has stated that the bikeway is a pedestrian and cyclist path, and that there has never been an accident on a City bikepath. He inquired if certain categories of cyclists would be excluded from use of the bikepath, such as those training for speed competition. Mr. Hansley responded that most bicycle racers do not use the path; rather, they use the streets. The bikepath would be a safer venue for practicing. Staffwill monitor the situation. If a conflict arises between fast-moving cyclists and the slower moving traffic, staff could consider implementing restrictions at that time. Staff Comments Mr. Smith: 1. Stated that he recently received a call from Mr. Reiner regarding a problem occurring in his ward with pit bulls. There is State legislation on this, but it is not covered in Dublin's Code. It is the Law Director's recommendation that the City legislation be modified to allow this problem to be addressed in Mayor's Court as a misdemeanor. !'f~ Mr. Reiner stated that the pit bull in question is being walked without a leash. Most laws require that pit bulls: (1) have shots; (2) be covered by an insurance bond; (3) be I contained by a fence of certain specifications; and (4) always be on a leash. This particular area of his ward is in Delaware County, and the County dog warden has been unable to respond in time to witness the violations when they occur. The home where the dog resides adjoins a bicycle trail, and residents are very concerned that a child will be injured before action is taken to prevent it. Mr. Reiner moved that the Law Director draft legislation to reflect the State law on this Issue. Mrs. Boring seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. i I ~ ',.1 i 111:1 ..' n,.,. 'i I iii: 'I 1 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ""'""'"~"'W'W'W"""~'W""""~"'~'"QMinutes_Qf,,"_,w""_"W""M"H~",""~'~H"","""'~H"~"""'"_""~HW'~."."J;)"OOJ,ill,.cit.,L-CGlJ.IlGil~"w'H""'"H~"W"-'-'",w",,-,~"-,"WHP~ge~2"~'""'Q,_,.Meeting.'~'H'""~"',""" DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FOHM NO 10148 Held June 25, 2001 , (YEAR) Mr. McCash requested that Mr. Smith determine ifthere is other legislation that may require revision as well, such as fencing requirements. 2. Stated that the final plans for the Galli Park in the new Ballentrae Golf Course Subdivision will be presented at the July 23rd Council meeting. The City has right-of- entry to the site, which is on Mr. Galli's property. Presently, infrastructure construction r-'! is occurring in that area. To allow that construction to continue on schedule, the ~i I developer requests authorization to deposit soil on that site, although final plans for the park have not yet been approved by City Council. He inquired if Council had any objection to that plan. There were no obj ections. Mr. Adamek thanked Ms. Heal for the memo updating Council on the outdoor pool status. LEGISLATION TABLED ORDINANCE SCHEDULED FOR HEARING Ordinance 34-01 - An Ordinance to Establish Dublin Zoning for Approximately 525 Parcels Comprising an Area of Approximately 833 Acres, as Annexed from Perry Township Prior to 1975, Bounded on the North by the Franklin/Delaware County Line, to the East by Sawmill Road, to the South by 1-270, and to the West by the Scioto River, as R-l, Restricted Suburban Residential District. (Northeast Township Rezoning - Case No. 01-006Z) (Applicant: City of Dublin, c/o Timothy Hansley, City Manager, 5200 Emerald Parkway, Dublin, Ohio 43017.) Ms. Clarke explained that this is essentially a housekeeping measure initiated by the Law Director. Most of the land on the east side of the river was annexed in two major ......... annexations, in 1972 and 1975. Dublin did not establish zoning except for those properties for which the landowner specifically requested it, e.g. the lnvemess development, the Northeast Quad, Campden Lakes, and Wyandotte Woods. During recent review, the Law Director's office discovered that a large portion of the land on the east side of the river, approximately 531 parcels or 833 acres, still had not been rezoned with Dublin zoning. This is a request to establish the zoning as R-l, Restrictive Suburban Residential District, although specific development proposals will continue to be processed through the system as usual. The application, which was sponsored by the City, was reviewed by the Planning Commission on April 19, 2001. The Commission recommends approval with the following two conditions: (1) that the legal descriptions of all affected properties be finalized prior to scheduling the public hearing with City Council; and (2) that the property owners be notified by certified mail of the future public hearing, as recommended by the Law Director. A public hearing was previously scheduled for the May 21st Council meeting but was tabled when it was discovered that an outdated list had been used for the notification. The public hearing was rescheduled for tonight's meeting, and a second notification made using a corrected list of property owners. She added that the upcoming zoning code revision will include a new zoning map. Wallace Maurer. 7451 Dublin Road inquired ifpart of this land is not presently zoned. Mr. Smith stated that the present zoning of the land is R-l township zoning. This action will establish City R-l zoning. .- r I Mr. Maurer inquired what drives the zoning pattern. I Mr. Smith stated that most land was originally zoned R-I, as farmland, under a township zoning. A city will typically rezone it the same -- R-I, unless the economy steers it another direction, via a Community Plan or a rezoning application. Sherman Liddell. 3838 Summit View Road, stated that at the time he purchased his land in 1971-1972, he pursued rezoning of one acre ofland on the corner. At that time, he discovered that the land was zoned Agricultural, not R-I. He noted that Bill Chambers was chairman of the Planning and Zoning Commission at that time. Mr. Smith asked that he furnish a copy of that paperwork to him. He noted that the difference in zoning would not have any effect on whatever zoning requests Mr. Liddell might wish to make. I' I .1,' i RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ",",~"",~".m~~#H~"""_"",~Q",mm"~""~"~"'"'~teSHQf",",...."","",'_m'_..~.."...."'~~".._",..~m"~.."",~m""",~Q"'",~"""H""~~~..m"~",..J;)"llb,lin."CitYm",CQll.n~L""-""'''''~",H""''"",""'m_..~"m_~"m''~''~''''Q~"",..E.age....l""""'.."'~""~"Me"eti.ng..,~".._"..".."'~".. DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148 Held June 25, 2001 , (YEAR) Mr. Liddell agreed to forward a copy ofthe materials to Mr. Smith. Muriel Liddell. 3838 Summit View, stated she is concerned about the R-l zoning specifications requiring an acre of land for one home. She and her husband originally purchased two full acres. They understood that they could have placed a home on each "..-. of the two acres. Now, her husband has retired, is also disabled, and they are living on a fixed income. Subsequent to their purchase several years ago, the City has taken some of their land in road widenings and easements. They had planned to sell one oftheir acres, but the new zoning that would require one acre per home would make that land worthless. Mr. Smith stated that if, through no fault of their own, but as a result of road expansion or takings, their property has been reduced, that would have no effect on the zoning. Mrs. Liddell asked to receive a written assurance of that. Mr. Smith indicated that Planning Director, Bobbie Clarke will forward documentation to the Liddell's. Ms. Liddell stated that a second concern relates to the construction of sewers in their area. A previous Council had made a commitment to the original landowners that when that area received City sewers, no tap-in fee would be charged to those landowners. She is concerned that, unless that also is carried forward in writing, no one will be aware of that commitment. There was no further discussion. Vote on the Ordinance: Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes. ...--. Ordinance 66-01 - An Ordinance Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Ground Lease With Craig R. Sonksen, on a 135' X 104' Tract of Land, Located South of Darby Street, City of Dublin, County of Franklin, State of Ohio, and Declaring an Emergency. Mr. Hansley stated that staff requests that this ordinance remain on the table due to the fact that discussion is continuing with the property owner. SECOND READING/PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCES Ordinance 74-01- An Ordinance Adopting the Proposed Tax Budget for Fiscal Year 2002, and Declaring an Emergency. Ms. Grigsby stated that this is an annual housekeeping item required by the Ohio Revised Code, authorizing the City to file with the County Auditor to continue to receive local government funding. Staff requests adoption tonight on an emergency basis. Mr. Adamek moved to dispense with the public hearing and treat this as emergency legislation. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. .McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes. V ote on the Ordinance: Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Ms. Chinnci-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes. - Ordinance 75-01- An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 21-95 (Amended) to Update the Arterial Traffic Plan for the City of Dublin. Mr. Hansley stated that this provides for the realignment of Tuttle Crossing to take a more northerly route. At the last Council meeting, staffwas requested to provide an amended exhibit, showing the construction stopping at A very Road. The amended exhibit was provided in the meeting packets. Staff recommends adoption. Christopher Cline. attorney. Blaugrund. Herbert & Martin. 5455 Rings Road, stated that he is present tonight to represent Ilij a ~nd Denise Karanfilov. He stated that they own approximately 23 acres on A very Road. Up to this point, the Thoroughfare Plan placed the Tuttle Crossing extension along the southern boundary of their property. That is also the bOlmdary line between Dublin and Columbus. The Karanfilovs were encouraged by ,.. ,. ,.....~-,,,.."!l>..w;.R'.,",.,,.,,.,,.""',". ... w- ,'~~T' ''''.' ':'m"'" r'l RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS WH'""","H""~'''"M~''""'m'"M'mmm'""'m"""._"mMin.uteS"MOf_m_"H""m_,"_"m_m""m""""~MWH"",~"""",_""~"~M~~MQ"'H""h_"m~"'m""JJubJin.".cit,L..cout1cil""~h",.~m~h~"~Q"~"H_"mM~M"_"","M~"~"ml?.age,".4~'","M,"""""""Me"eling'~',"""~""""""""H~' DAYTON LEGAL E:tLANK INC FORM NO 10148 Held June 25, 2001 , (YEAR) , staff to petition for annexation to Dublin, which they did and are now within Dublin's jurisdiction. Ordinance 75-01 would move the Tuttle Crossing alignment from the southern property line to bisect their property. This impact of this would be significant. Tuttle Crossing is a wide road, between 132 - 138 feet, and it has a 20-ft. utility easement on the north and on the south sides. Overall, they have 640 feet of depth and were ".-... assured of developable property up to this point. The Karanfilovs were aware that this process was under discussion, but they were not able to obtain any information or permitted to have discussion with City staffuntil after the ordinance was introduced. Nor have they yet received any scale drawings to facilitate discussion. As it is currently planned, the Karanfilov's property to the north of the roadway will be undevelopable with only 150 feet of depth. With Dublin's development standards, that is inadequate to allow development. On behalf of his clients, Mr. Cline requested that staff work with the landowners to modify the requirement for a precise alignment, to meet the City's development needs yet not require so significant a detriment to the Karanfilovs. He remarked that he has not previously observed an amendment move with such speed or high degree of confidentiality. Mr. Adamek noted that the confidentiality was due the fact that it was a land acquisition matter. It was solely a City-driven project, particularly as the roadway is proposed to be completely within the City's jurisdiction as opposed to a shared roadway with the City of Columbus. Mr. Hansley responded that the staffs objective in bringing this legislation forward at this time was to remove any perceived "cloud of secrecy" attached to the project. lfthis is approved as an amendment to the Arterial Plan, it will allow open discussion and negotiations with the property owners. It would not preclude minor adjustments to the ..-- plan in the future. Mr. Cline responded that this is unlike previous thoroughfare plan amendments. This is an alignment study, a very precise plan, and that is what Council is being asked to approve. Athough he has not seen scaled drawings, he feels certain they exist. Mr. Hansley noted that it is a conceptual plan. Mr. Cline requested that the language in the ordinance be amended to clarify that. Glen Dugger. attorney. 37 W. Broad Street, stated that he represents Bosan & Wilcox, owner of the land through which the west extension of Tuttle Crossing presently runs. He received notification of this proposed amendment this evening, so they do not have enough information on which to base a position in favor or opposed to the legislation. He stated that Bosan is acronym for the Sanbo family, the sister of Pete Edwards and her family. The Wilcox-Tuttle Ltd. Partnership property is comprised of a number of partners, owners and employees ofthe Edwards' land interests. This is a group which has a long-term relationship with the City, yet has not received any notification. He understands the need for confidentiality in land acquisition matters, but his clients request that Council table this for two weeks to allow them an opportunity to discuss this with City administration before any approval is given. They would like to study the impact on the affected property owners. Generally, anything significant in land use matters receives a public hearing process with time and opportunity for discussions to occur. --- Mr. Adamek inquired ifthere is any reason this legislation could not be tabled to the July 23rd Council meeting. Mr. Hansley indicated that there is not. Mrs. Boring inquired ifthis project is programmed in the CIP, and if so, for what year. Ms. Grigsby that design is planned for this year, acquisition next year, and construction in the following year. Mrs. Boring inquired about the timeframe for the design process. Mr. Kindra stated that the design process takes 10 to 12 months. A contract is currently in place with MS Consultants. I, 1'1 illl ~1i~:J':::T"t I': I I I i ;f..If ,.,-O,'.,"."'.:E''', ,l"" H"",,,,,~,~,,"1'g'"1" .:1.' ,- "n.lJ"~l",'~lt,l:'l"'''J''lr~''..' '.u,v."nJ'.",l.',"!lii:l,,". Ie I , RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS '~'~~H'~_"'~""~'~'"'~M"~"",._"_"~.Minu.t.eSM,Qf"",.,,,~"~""'~~M'"'""'""'""""~"'""~~~"HQ'_~'M~"_'_"_',D,"bljn.,Ci.ty",COllncil~'M~._cm"'~~'M"Qcm'","",""'H'"~'"""~,~,~,Eag.e,S,"",~,~",,,Me.e.t.ing'H"~'_""" Held June 25, 2001 , (YEAR) Mr. Hansley stated that if Council desires to consider other alignments, now would be the time to do so. At this point, Mayor Kranstuber arrived. ~ Mrs. Boring stated that there are reasons for the proposed amendment to the Thoroughfare Plan. However, property owners who have plans in place which reflect the present alignment of Tuttle Crossing ought to be fully aware of the proposed changes. It is true, that in land alignment issues, Council generally meets with the property owners that would be most effected by the changes. Often this discussion does result in changes being made to the original plan. Consequently, she encourages tabling of the legislation to allow time for that discussion. Mrs. Boring moved to table Ordinance 75-01 to the July 23rd Council agenda. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion. V ote on the motion: Mr. McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes, Mayor Kranstuber, no; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. INTRODUCTION & FIRST READING- ORDINANCES Ordinance 76-01 - An Ordinance Accepting the Annexation of 140+/- Acres from Jerome Township, Union County to the City of Dublin. (petitioner Norman L. Malik, et al.) Mayor Kranstuber introduced the ordinance. Mr. Hansley stated that this land is north of the third high school site. Staff requests that it be held for a second reading/public hearing at the July 23rd Council meeting. Mrs. Boring inquired ifthe site is in the Dublin Schools district. Mr. Hansley stated that it is, and is planned for residential development. .- Mr. McCash inquired about the relationship to the boundaries for the Metropark. Mr. Hansley stated that this land theoretically could be on the eastern boundary of the Metropark footprint, but he does not anticipate that the park will be extended to that point. Ordinance 77-01 - An Ordinance to Appropriate a 0.564 Acre, More or Less, Fee Simple Interest, From Warren W. Gorden, Located North of Post Road, Township of Jerome, County of Union, State of Ohio, and Declaring an Emergency. Mr. Adamek introduced the ordinance. Mr. Smith stated that a resolution related to this property was approved at the last meeting. Staff continues negotiations on the property and requests that it be held for a second reading/public hearing at the July 23r Council meeting. Mr. Adamek inquired why this was not the developer's responsibility. Mr. Smith stated that the developer cannot take the property; only the City can do so. There is an agreement in place for the City to be reimbursed for the cost of the appropriation and the attorney fees. Ordinance 78-01 - An Ordinance Designating National City Bank as an Additional Eligible Depository for Active Monies of the City of Dublin to Implement a Purchasing Card Program. Mr. Adamek introduced the ordinance. ,- Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher indicated that she has many concens about the legislation, and she will call Ms. Grigsby to discuss them. There will be a second reading/public hearing at the July 23,2001 Council meeting. Ordinance 79-01 - An Ordinance Al!thorizinga Cooperative Agreement with the Ohio Department of Transportation to Complete a Highway Improvement Project on a Portion of Interstate 270 within the City limits of Dublin at No Expense to the City of Dublin. Mr. Adamek introduced the ordinance. Mr. Hansley stated that this will allow ODOT to work within the City limits to pave a section ofI-270. There will be a second reading/public hearing at the July 23,2001 Council meeting. , , . < . I I' II 1': 'i !~:ii:L 'WilEii"ii' ,II "11.:" , .i' RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS WWW'W'~"W'W'N.wm~WW~W'WNWWN"_~.w.~wMinutelLofHW'~W~"WNW"W"W"W~"w"www,".wW",wwN"wNw'w.QNW~wWWW"_W_"N_".._"H"W"NmwN"D;u,blin..Ci.tY"NCou.Il.cilHww~,wwwww~WWWWW"N~"~N",~",wwWWQW~'"WHN_W"l?age~w'W'H'WH~W.M~eti.ng~H'WH_'~""~~W DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148 Held June 25, 2001 , (YEAR) Ordinance 80-01 - An Ordinance Directing the Law Director of the City of Dublin to Petition the County Commissioners of Franklin Comity, Ohio for Annexation of Approximately 1.640+/- Acres of Vacant Commercial Land, Located West of State Route 257 (Riverside Drive), and South of Tuller Road, to the City of Dublin. Mr. Adamek introduced the ordinance. rr""""'" Mr. Hansley stated Ordinances 80-01, 81-01 and 82-01 reflect an attempt to annex the islands of township, as Council has intended to do for some time. Mrs. Boring inquired if this land is currently zoned commercial. Mr. Smith stated it is. He added that this is roadway, and it is owned by the City. Mrs. Boring inquired if this parcel runs down to the river. Mr. Hansley stated that it does. Mrs. Boring requested that the zoning reference to this property be revised so as not to be commercial. Mr. Hansley stated that it may be possible to change the title to accomplish that. There will be a second reading/public hearing at the July 23,2001 Council meeting. Ordinance 81-01 - An Ordinance Directing the Law Director of the City of Dublin to Petition the County Commissioners of Franklin County, Ohio for Annexation of Approximately 1.03 Acres of Land, Located at the Intersection of Tuller Road and State Route 257, to the City of Dublin. Mr. Adamek introduced the ordinance. There will be a second reading/public hearing at the July 23,2001 Council meeting. Ordinance 82-01 - An Ordinance Directing the Law Director of the City of Dublin to Petition the County Commissioners of Franklin County, Ohio for Annexation of Approximately 1.79 Acres of Land, Located at 6950 Dublin Road, to the City of ~ Dublin. Mr. Adamek introduced the ordinance. Mr. Hansley noted that all three ofthese ordinances, 80-01, 81-01, and 82-01 are pockets of Perry Township. This will require alater boundary adjustment petition to include them in Washington Township. There will be a second reading/public hearing at the July 23,2001 Council meeting. Ordinance 83-01 - An Ordinance Amending the Effective Date of Ordinance No. 102-00, Which Provides for a Change in Zoning for 17.32 Acres on the North Side of Post Road, Bounded on the West by 1-270, and to the North and East by the South Fork of the Indian Run, and the South by Post Road, from: CC, Community Commercial District and LI, Limited Industrial District, To: SO, Suburban Office and Institutional District (Case No. 00-075 ADM - Council Initiated Post Road Rezoning), and Declaring an Emergency. Mr. Adamek introduced the ordinance. Mr. Smith stated that this legislation provides staff an additional 90 days to complete negotiations on the rezoning of this property. Mayor Kranstuber moved for passage by emergency and to dispense with the public hearing. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes. .- Vote on the Ordinance - Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. t I lJ Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes. OTHER Request by Kentigern Place residents for Median Cut on Muirfield Drive George Burris. 6016 Kentigem Court S., representing the residents of Kentigern Place, displayed a picture of the area in question. He pointed out that current access to Kentigern Place is to travel up Muirfield Drive past Kentigern Drive to Whittingham Drive, then, make a V-turn, and travel back down to Kentigern. To go north from Kentigern, it is necessary to first turn south out ofKentigern, go down to Tain, make a V- turn and, finally, to go back up Muirfield Drive. The Kentigern residents request a median cut at the Kentigern entrance to allow the residents to go either direction out of " '., RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS @_,"'H,"~~m"~"",""~"_~H~_~~~.~""Minutes~"oL~H@_"~~'_m~~,,~'''~"''",._.''_''~''"m''''~_~_HU"--"""""~"",,D,tlblil:~,,.Cit*m.cQtlllcjl,~~"",""-"-",""_"~m~"~H~,,",-",,,,,",~",,,,,,E.age,,,,7~,,",~,_,""""Meelingm""._m""~"~""" DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. fOHM NO 10148 Held June 25, 2001 , (YEAR) Kentigern. Mr. Burris noted that: l. A timeline of the residents' request was distributed to Council. It documents: the results ofthe initial survey ofthe residents in February; a letter of request from "....-. the residents to Mr. Kindra; a letter of response from Mr. Kindra indicating the ! ! current difficulties; a meeting with the City Manager; at which guidance was given by the City Manager, and subsequently carried out by the residents in April. This included collecting signatures of petition from the Kentigern Place residents, a meeting with Mr. Holbrook and the Board of the Muirfield Village Homeowners Association, and submission for Council consideration to Mr. Reiner. Two ofthe Association board members were receptive and asked for additional information, and Mr. Reiner gave direction on how to approach Council. They also followed up on a suggestion from Mr. Kindra to investigate the line of sight policy and the basic standard for geometric design for streets and highways, and sent a letter of findings to Mr. Kindra. A letter was subsequently received from Ms. Willis, civil engineer for the City of Dublin, indicting a difference in opinion. He met with Mr. Kindra in May concerning misinformation in Ms. Willis' letter. He later was concerned to learn that Ms. Willis' letter was also sent to Council, which he was unaware of and unable to respond to the misinformation in that letter. He carried out Mr. Kindra's suggestion to meet with the Planning Division. Mr. Gibson discussed his options, including submitting a request to Council to direct Planning to change the zoning restrictions to allow consideration of the median cut. 2. He stated that the major issue is one of safety. The fire station is located at the southeast corner of Brand Road and Muirfield Drive, and an emergency response --, involves the same trip described earlier - which means critical time is lost. ln addition, the U-turn at Whittingham Drive is more unsafe than others. The median cut at Kentigern would allow more room, 71 feet, for more than one car to cue for ingress/egress than a turn at Whittingham allows with only 28-30 feet. Adding additional difficulty to a U-turn at Whittingham is the number of cars turning out of the country club into the left lane. 3. Mr. Burris noted that there are 33 lots in Kentigern Place, yielding a property tax base of $9,400,000. Utility companies, service calls and guests make complaints about the difficulty accessing Kentigern Place; some end up in Tartan Fields before they realize they have missed the access point. 4. This could be accomplished with a minimal impact on the environment and 'aesthetics. The Muirfield Association expressed concern that if the City approved this, they would require a left-turn lane, and rip out 250 feet or more along both the north and south-bound lanes. However, the geometric design guidelines indicate that this type of intersection would be quite adequate in consideration of the frequency of vehicles entering or leaving Kentigern. If, however, the City should determine a left-turn lane is necessary, the intersection and left-turn lane recently installed just south past the Nicklaus statue on Muirfield Drive is an indication that this can be done nicely with minimal effect on the aesthetics of the immediate environment. 5. He added that the neighborhood recently received a letter from the Muirfield ..-. Association indicated that they have tabled action on the item pending further review before making a decision regarding endorsement. Mayor Kranstuber stated that Council has two options: (1) tabling the request, pending action by the Muirfield Association; or (2) referring the request to a Council subcommittee for study and recommendation. Mr. McCash stated that the first step would be referring this to Planning and Zoning to review the amendment ofthe plat. Mr. Smith stated that ultimately, a plat amendment would be required. lnitially, however, Council must make a policy decision on whether or not to support this request. I .'1 i ill "1 <I",.!! I I ii · '" RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ",mmm..~,","m","~~,"~,"_,"","_,"~,",","","~mm,"m"Minules_oi,",",",",~~"~,",,".,",",",","m",'~m',",".~H"",~,,".~,"~,"_,""m,"m",","'.,"m~,"._m,","Q,"_,"DuhliD,""City,","C.ouncil,"~,"~,,",".,","-,",",","".~~,"',","~mm",,",",".,","~,"_J?.age,"S,".~,",","~",",".,Meeling,","H~',","m'~~.,"", DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO, 10148 Held June 25, 2001 , (YEAR) Mayor Kranstuber asked if Council's decision would be affected by Muirfield Association's endorsement or non-endorsement of this change. Mr. Smith stated that the residents could proceed with an application to Planning and Zoning Association for a plat amendment. This request is unusual, due to the fact that this curb cut prohibition was included as part of the platting process. He confirmed that ,....-., Council could refer it to Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Burris further noted that: 1. The information forwarded from Mr. Kindra's office indicated that the City Engineer in 1988 made a note to the plat that there since there was no request for a curbcut, there would be no curbcuts. This area was originally zoned for offices, then for patio homes, and finally for residences. It is important to recognize that the existing conditions now are entirely different from those in 1988. Tartan Fields and other residential neighborhoods exist where there were fields. The traffic pattern and demands are much greater. 2. During the Llewellyn Farms South case recently heard by Council, it was indicated that in cases where it makes sense to change the zoning, that action is appropriate. He asks that Council consider that his proposal would provide a safer alternative than the present U-turn in a limited space at Whittingham; therefore, a request for consideration of a minor zoning or plat change would be appropriate in this case as well. Mr. Smith stated that he and the Planning Director would like the opportunity to study the legal procedure and make a recommendation to Council. He would also like the opportunity to study the original Muirfield documents. The Kentigern residents do not own the land on which they are requesting this curb cut. ........, Mayor Kranstuber asked if the Muirfield Association should have input if this is in fact a public right-of-way? Mr. Hansley responded that, although their endorsement was sought to facilitate the Kentigern residents' request, the Muirfield Association has no authority in this decision. The decision would be one made by Council based upon recommendation from the Planning Commission. Mayor Kranstuber inquired if a citizen can apply for the plat change or rezoning change for land they do not own, or must this be a Council initiated action? Mr. Hansley stated that the restriction on the plat involves the public right-of-way, so it would be appropriate for the City to initiate that change. Mayor Kranstuber inquired about the cost involved in making this potential change. Mr. Kindra responded that a median cut would cost no more than $10,000.00. But ifit involves a left-turn lane, it could cost $50,000 - $60,000. Mr. Adamek inquired how many other right-ins or right-outs exist along Muirfield Drive. Mr. Burris responded that the only other one is Gullane Court. The difference is that Gullane is on the east side of the road, and emergency vehicles would have no delay in access. He pointed out that the Muirfield Club maintenance facility also has difficulty - with access. He suggested that an additional point of access for the Club would allow them to have the advantage of the median cut for both right and left turns. Mayor Kranstuber inquired about the procedure, if Council should want to proceed. Mr. Hansley responded that referral to Planning and Zoning for their recommendation would be appropriate. Mr. McCash stated that approving a median cut in the City's right-of-way doesn't seem to be complicated. lf, however, it would also involve providing access to the Muirfield Club maintenance facility, then traffic studies would likely be necessary. The fact that in 1988 median cuts were specifically prohibited gives cause for caution. Mrs. Boring stated that the median cut was restricted initially because it was zoned for RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS .m"m",wH'H'~mm"",m"""'H'~m~~~~,","~"Minulesm,oi,m'm."~"~m'Hmm"",""Q,",Q""'H"~m~,~,,~.~"m~Q~"","m'Q",~"w"mH"mDu.bJin"C:itY.wCol1nciLm.~"m",~,""~,,~~"",,,~,~,,~,"~~~wm'ml?.agem,9~'m~"""~,,Me,e1ingm'","."'m~'~"' Held June 25, 2001 , (YEAR) commercial use. Mr. McCash asked why the curb cut restriction wasn't changed when the zoning for this area was revised to R-l. ~ Mr. Reiner pointed out that the Muirfield Association is exercising caution due to the line of sight issue and the impact ofthe curb cut. There are 2,300 other families that will be affected. Due to the line of sight issue, will it then be necessary to remove the mounds and the trees from that area? Also, would this action set a precedent, prompting other neighborhoods to request that the boulevard be taken apart to achieve similar access? Mr. Burris stated that the line of sight has been measured. The requirement is for 200 feet; there is 360 feet of clear line of sight. Although it is not necessary, if the closest tree were to be moved to the other end of the median, there would be 450 feet of clear line of sight. However, no trees will have to be removed. Mrs. Boring asked if emergency vehicles can travel on the wrong side of the road when responding in an emergency situation. Chief Bostic responded that they cannot travel in the opposite direction of traffic. They would be required to access Kentigern subdivision in the same manner as any other motorist. Mr. Peterson asked if the emergency access to this neighborhood is a significant issue. Chief Bostic stated that he would have to visit the site to assess the situation. Mr. Peterson stated that if there is a safety issue, that would make a significant difference. ...--. He inquired if the prohibition of curb cuts was in place before the homes were built, and, if so, were the homeowners aware ofthis limitation? t Mr. Burris stated that homebuyers seldom consider that until after the purchase. Unfortunately, the Kentigern residents now have a serious safety concern because of that limitation. Mr. Peterson stated that there may be several similar situations around Dublin, and it would be necessary for Council to distinguish this situation from those other situations in order to approve this request. Mr. Burris requested that Council consider the intersection at Whittington in the context of a safety issue. Mr. Peterson stated that he would like to hear Chief Bostic's assessment. lfthe emergency access is more of a safety issue in this area than in other neighborhoods, Council would then be obligated to authorize the access. Mayor Kranstuber moved to refer study of the request to staff. A response should be prepared for the July 23rd Council meeting. This report should briefly cover: (1) cost; (2) the planning history; (3) fire/emergency issues; (4) any refinements of the Muirfield Association position; and (5) legal procedures to address the situations. Mr. McCash seconded the motion. Mrs. Boring requested that the report also include an indication of the number of other - residential and commercial situations with a similar access problem in Dublin. V ote on the motion: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Boring, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes. Council Round Table/Committee Reports Mr. Peterson asked if ODOT requires the timing signals which are installed on the new SR 161 ramp, at the Avery-Muil'field interchange. Mr. Kindra responded that they were required as a condition of approval of the interchange modification study. The reason for the requirement is that SR 161/33 as it presently exists does not have sufficient capacity. ln the future, additional lanes will be added. Until that time, the metering will remain in place. New equipment has been ordered to help facilitate traffic movement. 11.,1 "~ ,;.,,1,.. H JI..'t ,IJ.....J~;,,:,l.'lM'.'i"illl"t'T'mtL:..:-I, ':"',:.i~"~mi"~'I11i!'!i1,jW'HH'ft,,,"m.,",~ij,r ,ie' .;jf'tt> t I I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS """~""""~"","_~H,"""_~~~m~"""~"~"m~,","~"Millll1e.s.~of"~~~'"'"H"_""_m~""~"'"~"",~~"'~"'~~"'""'~~"-~"~"~~",~H~~"Qm~D.ublin."Ci~~C,()unci1.'"~~,"~""~""~"""M,""",""',"M"~"","""~~""_""P..age,"",lD","M"~,""~"~li.ng_"H"'"~"~HM""" DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FOHM NO. 10148 Held June 25, 2001 , (YEAR) Mr. Reiner stated that on a recent trip, he passed through Bucyrus, Ohio. He observed their central park and mural, and suggested that it could serve as a model or point of reference when Dublin makes a decision regarding the parkland in Historic Dublin. This type of park makes a wonderful gathering place. He reminded Council that the vote .,--" regarding the next public art piece ended in a deadlock at the June 11 th Council meeting. Mayor Kranstuber commented that he spoke with Christy Rosenthal of the Dublin Arts Council subsequent to the last Council meeting. She indicated that the DAC discussed the proposal of the location of Bridge and High Streets for the next public art project and unanimously approved that site. He is uncertain if the approval is exclusive to this site only or inclusive of the original suggested site. Ms. Rosenthal was unable to attend the meeting tonight and requested that action be tabled to the July 23rd Council meeting. Mrs. Boring: 1. Stated that she attende~ the resent building dedication for RC Olmstead. Mr. Olll1stead complimented the CIty of Dublin on maintaining high standards for development within the City. 2. Referred to the Arterial Traffic Plan and asked for further consideration regarding the designation of a fourth bridge at the Tuttle Road location. Perhaps another location should be considered. Mr. Adamek stated that the Thoroughfare Plan was updated and thoroughly studied as part of the Community Plan. He noted that the recent rezoning in that area only added 34 homes. What other significant change has occurred in that area to warrant this review? Mrs. Boring stated that with the approval of the Llewellyn Farms South rezoning, Council made policy decisions to ensure that Tuttle Road and Dublin Road would retain - their residential neighborhood characteristics. The elimination of the left-turn lanes on those two roads, in addition to the speed bumps to slow traffic in the area ofthe elementary school and park, all reinforce the intent for the road to remain a residential road. It now would be contradictory to make plans for a major thoroughfare and fourth bridge in that location. In addition, because of the value of the riverfront properties, it would be a significant economic investment for the City. She suggested that it would be prudent to reevaluate the future bridge location. Mayor Kranstuber stated that he has heard comments that staff does not expect that bridge ever to be built, due to the fact that it would require funding from Columbus as well. lfthat is true, perhaps the plan should be amended to accurately reflect expectations. Mr. Hansley stated that it is staffs expectation that the bridge would not be built for perhaps 25-30 years. It is difficult because not all of that land is located within the city limits of Dublin. It is included in the Community Plan because, theoretically, it is a good location for a bridge. This is a policy decision for Council. It doesn't seem reasonable for Dublin to spend $15 to $20 million dollars to solve a Columbus traffic problem. Dublin could consider some type of cost sharing equally with Columbus. However, it is doubtful Columbus would agree to that. With the recent difficulty in negotiations for cost sharing of the SPUl interchange at Sawmill/I-270 - a Columbus bridge, in which Dublin had agreed to share a portion of the cost but was then asked to contribute more funding, Dublin would be hesitant to partner similarly again. He added that if there is another logical proposal for the bridge, it makes sense to evaluate it. --- Mrs. Boring moved to refer to the Community Development Committee the consideration of possible modification of the fourth bridge location at Tuttle Road as currently designated in the Arterial Traffic Plan.. Mayor Kranstuber seconded the motion. Mr. Hansley noted that the Committee could consider other options and make a recommendation to Council for any studies required. Vote on the motion: Mr. McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Adamek, no; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Reiner, no; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher: 1. Noted that in Council packets there was a recommendation from staff to modify the practice of painting City fire hydrants two colors, green with a white cap, to I I I ill ..... ...:1.1, I I <Ii ",11,'.1, 'H1J!I n"w\,;.,<t1 ,.>1' ~fl" -:1'("'1:" ''l':'.1~1l;~'''I:rHI1jlll . ,'. ~ \ 'r"'n'IlIII~W~.lI,C:f.'.Ii';"'TlI,:~.t.' 1I,,'.cIIn'I'''I'-''mII'':; 1'''1 , RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ww~w_,_~..,"~,"~"",~"_"..~...~.MiI1utesHH.oi.,".","_,"..,"..~".".~~.~"""'",,"',"H,"Q._H~,",""""."".H,".~~..,.,"~,,",D:u.hlin,-Ci.ty:,"..co.:u.ncil.,"-~'..H.~."w"'~,"....'~.'H,""",.,~",",".,".,"P~eH.ll,",,,,"~~"".Me,etin~_,..,"_,,_,",.. DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO 10148 Held June 25,2001 , (YEAR) all green. Mr. Hansley pointed out that fire hydrants have been painted with a white cap to make them more visible, particularly at night. The staff proposal for one color includes reflective beads on the fire hydrant caps. The Fire Department concurs that the reflective beading would accomplish the same purpose. He noted that the expense to be saved ,.-.., would be primarily in the amount of labor time involved, rather than in the cost of the paint. Due to the amount of time involved in painting the hydrants two colors, less than half of the hydrants are painted each season. Mr. McCash expressed concern that the all green color, even with the beading, would be less visible than the white cap. Chief Bostic stated that he concurs with the proposed change. The reflective beading works well and the hydrants painted as proposed should be more visible. It was the consensus of Council to support the staffs proposal to modify the painting of City fire hydrants to all green with reflective beading on the caps. 2. lnquired about Mr. Price's memo regarding a citizen request for a fee waiver for an appeal to the Building Construction Appeals Board. Mr. Price stated a Hopewell Court resident has submitted a plan for a basement finish with very low head room. The citizen is unable to comply with the current 7'6" basement height requirement and must receive approval from the BCAB. He is requesting waiver of the application fee of$180.00. Mr. McCash stated that his understanding was that the Code was modified so that a variance would not have to be requested on this issue. Mr. Price responded that various incremental changes have been made; however, this circumstance is not addressed by any of those modifications. Mayor Kranstuber moved to approve the fee waiver as requested. Mr. Peterson seconded the motion. ~ Vote on the motion: Mr. Adamek, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. McCash, yes. 3. Referred to letters from business owners and citizens regarding the Zoning Code revision in process. She asked when Council would be receiving a draft of the Zoning Code for review purposes. Mr. Reiner responded that the Community Development Committee has completed their review, and Planning and Zoning Commission will begin their review soon. The letters are in regard to the Community Plan's road right-of-way requirements that the City is considering integrating into the Zoning Code. The citizens are concerned about loss of some property and a subsequent reduction in property value. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher stated that she has received requests to discuss the issue, but she cannot discuss the issue without a copy of the working document. Presently, the citizens appear to have information that she does not have. Mr. Reiner stated that there is a developer who has expressed his concern, and Mr. Reiner has indicated to him that whenever the issue is resolved, he can request grandfathering for his property, or propose a buffering plan that will accommodate the corridor section ofthe Community Plan. Ms. Clarke pointed out that staff has been reviewing and incorporating recommendations made by the Community Development Committee and incorporating engineering changes recommended by the professional engineering consultant. All of those changes r- should be forwarded to Ratio Architects tomorrow. Ratio will generate a second draft which will be forwarded to the Planning Staff next week. At that time, copies will be distributed to Planning and Zoning Commission, City Council, and all other affected parties for their review. The introductory ordinance will be scheduled for the July 23rd Council agenda, and the first review of the document by Planning and Zoning Commission is scheduled for July 19th. She has proposed a meeting with the developers to provide an opportunity to air their issues. If staff is proposing any inappropriate standards, this will give an opportunity to hear the developers' view of how those standards would apply to the industrial properties. She is hopeful that these issues will be resolved before the first public hearing on July 19th. . I I, ,II .... "!hl",,!.,, i. I i ::: 'I ',1 :,t,W:i::'!t:!FlI'i1 i:.,':(!;;rHlr':'l' ~J!>'~I't1'Ul\'} 11,' :IU'lll!II'ih.l!::'F' 1I:"'IH1';~'i'It!'~'~~'k't~i'~it(i~ I:' I I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS W","w#,"w,"m~m~#'",##~H'~",Q~W~_,"#_#"MinuteS,"Hnf.#_#_H~~"",''',"',"_..m,".,"wm"_,"",_,,"-,",,"~w_,",,"~,~..w..._.._...._#ww~D.ubliu_Ci.t;c.c.ouuciLm",~,",""~","',"",~","~,","~_Qw,",~_w~_,"",","J~age.#12##H_,",,""#Me,elingH,","',","_,"w,"_,"~_ DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FORM NO 10148 Held . June 25, 2001 , (YEAR) Mr. McCash: 1. lnquired when Perimeter Drive will be re-open to the businesses. Mr. Kindra responded that it should re-open in two to three weeks. Mr. McCash stated that he had received several citizen inquiries about the date that the road would be re-opened to Pacer Logistics. Since receiving the inquiries, he has f' checked and learned that Pacer Logistics is the new name of what was formerly known as q ; RailVan. 2. Stated that the former Chief Building Official, Peter Lenz, lost his son due to a highway collision with a service vehicle. Recently, Mr. McCash nearly collided with a City service vehicle on Emerald Parkway where they were working on the east curb cut in front of Cardinal Health. Another citizen had a similar near accident, which he has made Mr. McCash aware of. There was a "men working" sign, but it was not placed to allow for sufficient warning. He requested that the crews be instructed to place the signs appropriately. Mr. Hansley will check into this and instruct staff accordingly. Mr. Adamek: 1. Pointed out that the June 4th Community Development Committee minutes should be corrected to read that it was he, not Mr. Reiner, who was excused. 2. lnquired about the repair work being done on the southern entrance onto S.R. 161 at the Avery Road/S.R. 161 interchange. Mr. Kindra responded that utility work performed by private utilities and contractors conflicted. Some of the utility lines invaded the sewer lines and corrections were necessary. Mr. Adamek stated that whenever there is a need for a re-patch on asphalt, it creates seams, which the City then has to repair. Does the City have a warranty that would r-""' require these companies to share the cost of future maintenance on these types of re-patch I seams? i Mr. Kindra responded that on each contract there is a one-year warranty after payment is made and the City accepts the project. Mr. Adamek stated that he understands that there are companies that work with cities in the effort to develop standards and provide improved warranties to protect the cities from future maintenance problems. Mr. Kindra responded that this is the industry standard. With the new telecommunication regulations, there are so many utility wires underground that it would be an impossible challenge to legally determine whose responsibility these problems are. The City could investigate new standards, but would incur significant cost in doing so. Mr. Hansley stated that the rights-of-way are the focus of current litigation at the state level, in which the state is in litigation with nearly every city, except Dublin and Upper Arlington. With a recent change in state law, cities do not control their own rights-of- way. Dublin has a very restrictive right-of-way ordinance which allows the City to control what is beneath the surface. lfthe cities prevail in the lawsuit, they will retain their right to control their own rights-of-way; however, if they do not prevail, the utility companies will exercise control over the cities in which they work. Mr. Adamek stated that, extraneous of the right-of-way issue, a serious problem is evident on Perimeter Drive where total deterioration is obvious in the area of the seams. This indicates very poor quality of work. He suggested that Dublin consider setting standards to address this problem. Perhaps there is a company with the technical ability -. to marry road seams more effectively, so that the City does not have major maintenance issues on a year-to-year basis. Mr. Hansley stated that staff would investigate that possibility. 3. lnquired if Ms. Grigsby is seeking any direction in response to Ms. Gibson's memo regarding tax refund policies. Mr. Hansley noted that if Council takes no action, the present ordinance and policies remain in place. No direction to staff was given. 4. Referred to the staffmemo regarding the Fourth of July parade arrangements. He inquired if all Council members have made their arrangements for private vehicles or if any still need vehicles provided by the City. I Ii ,il !:1"J':!IIITt, 'la, '" ,Ilil" III il j i i' ",;.iL"lHll~l!iW'i'W.!ll't'*lWlm.t!l#HimA "'-~fj!lllltFl'<tk~HI~;'~I+)i'H;,-, 1!Ii',,'~U~,t'Hth'~ 1'-1'" 1 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS "'"H"m"'''~~m''.~Q"m'.m~''.m"~.m~~~uteS.J)imw''.m,"m~'''mm'~"mw"~m'"m"",..mm"",."",.m".~mm~"m.~~H"'~.QH~m""'''mDll:glinH.cit,L,CoUllCiJm~m~m"m".w'","~'~m~~.~."m","~"~~'H."Eage,,"l3m'm"~"m.M.e~ling,,~"m~m."",~""~, UAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC. FORM NO. 10148 Held June 25,2001 , (YEAR) Council consensus was to use the vehicles which staff has reserved for Council's use. 5. Referred to the invitation from Martin Marietta Aggregates to attend their firework festivities. He suggested that if anyone plans to attend that they have the Clerk make their reservations. --. Mayor Kranstuber: 1. Inquired if any Council members plan to attend the Hilton Garden building dedication. Mrs. Boring indicated she plans to attend. 2. Requested Council feedback on the new "no outlet" street signs; personally, he does not like their appearance. Mr. Hansley agreed that the color scheme used, brown and yellow, was unattractive, but the choice was made in the interest of visibility of the "no outlet" designation. Mr. Adamek stated that he found the signs both unattractive and distracting. Council direction to staff was to consider a different color combination. Mayor Kranstuber moved to adjourn to executive session for discussion of legal and land acquisition matters. Mr. Adamek seconded the motion. V ote on the motion: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Peterson, yes; Mr. Adamek, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. Mayor K.ranstuber announced that the meeting would not be reconvened following the executive session. The III s adjourned to executive session at 9:20 p.m. -~ Mayor - Presiding Officer ~~~ Clerk of Council ~