Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-17-2025 Council MinutesRECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 644-224-3338 FORM NO, 10146 Held 20 March 17, 2025 = CALL TO ORDER Mayor Amorose Groomes called the Monday, March 17, 2025 Regular Council Meeting of Dublin City Council to order at 5:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present were Vice Mayor Alutto, Mayor Amorose Groomes, Ms. De Rosa, Mr. Keeler, Ms. Kramb and Mr. Reiner. Ms. Fox arrived after the adjournment to executive session. Staff members present were Ms. O'Callaghan, Mr. Hartmann, Chief Paez, Ms. Weisenauer, Ms. Rauch, Ms. Singh, Mr. Hendershot, Mr. Gable, Ms. Wawszkiewicz, Ms. Willis, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Brown, Ms. Goliver, Ms. Hoffman, Mr. Krawetzki, Mr. Barker, Ms. LeRoy, Ms. Holt, Ms. Singh, Mr. Hounshell, Mr. Fleming, Mr. Hammersmith, Mr. Gracia and Ms. Miller. Others present were Tom Brown with Nelson/Nygaard and Scout Troop 111 from Wyandotte Elementary. ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Amorose Groomes moved to adjourn to executive session for the purposes of: e Personnel Matters: Considering the Employment of a Public Employee and the Appointment of a Public Official; e To consider Confidential Information related to a request for Economic Development Assistance that involves Public Infrastructure Improvements that are directly related to an Economic Development Project, and which Executive Session is necessary to Protect the Possible Investment or Expenditure of Public Funds to be made in connection with the Economic Development Project; e To consider the Purchase of Property for Public Purposes; and e Conferences with an Attorney for the Public Body concerning Disputes involving the Public Body that are the subject of Pending or Imminent Court Action. Vice Mayor Alutto seconded. Vote on the motion: Ms. De Rosa, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes; Mr. Keeler, yes; Vice Mayor Alutto, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Amorose Groomes, yes. RECONVENED: 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Amorose Groomes invited Cub Scout Pack 111 to come forward and lead the Pledge of Allegiance. SPECIAL PRESENTATION/RECOGNITION Mayor Amorose Groomes invited Larry Lester to come forward to present the 2024 Clyde “Butch” Seidle Public Works Servant Leader Award on behalf of the Ohio America Public Works Association to Paul Hammersmith. Mr. Lester stated that he was joined by Clark Rausch, Director of Engineering for the City of Hilliard, to present the award. He and Mr. Rausch had the privilege of serving under Butch’s leadership. They shared that he was a coach and mentor to so many public works professionals throughout Central Ohio. This award honors public servants who exemplify excellence, dedication and achievements. It also celebrates the creativity and skills of servant leaders in the field of public works. Paul Hammersmith has served the City of Dublin since 2000 and his contributions have significantly enhanced development and infrastructure throughout the City and surrounding region. Mr. Hammersmith stated that this was a surprise, and he is humbled RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 644-224-3308 FORM NO, 10146 Held March 17,2025 Page 2 of 23 20 by the recognition. He shared that he knew Butch for many years, and he was the epitome of public service. He added that this award is quite meaningful to him. He stated that he loves serving the City of Dublin. CITIZEN COMMENTS There were no citizen comments. CONSENT AGENDA ° Minutes of the February 24, 2025 Council Work Session e Minutes of the March 3, 2025 Regular Council Meeting e Notice to the Legislative Authority of a Transfer of Ownership of a D5I and D6 Liquor Permit from PPR Corazon LLC, dba Vita Fitness Corazon Patio Terrace & Pool, 7155 Corazon Drive, Dublin, Ohio 43017 to Corazon Country Club LLC Patio Terrace & Pool, 7155 Corazon Drive, Dublin, Ohio 43017 e Notice to Legislative Authority of a New D1 and D3 Liquor Permit for Alexava LLC, dba Sunny Street Cafe, 7042 Hospital Drive, Dublin, Ohio 43016 e Notice to the Legislative Authority of a new D3 Liquor Permit for ODAA Enterprises Dublin LLC, dba Hammer & Nails Grooming Shop for Guys, 5865 Frantz Road, Dublin, Ohio 43017 There was no request to remove an item from the Consent Agenda. Mayor Amorose Groomes moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Vice Mayor Alutto seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Keeler, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes; Vice Mayor Alutto, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Amorose Groomes, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; Ms. Fox, yes. SECOND READING/PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCES Ordinance 04-25 (Amended) Rezoning approximately 14.2 acres (PID 273-008618 and PID 273-011149) from R-1, Restricted Suburban Residential to PUD, Planned Unit Development District for development of 20 single-family lots with 5.8 acres of open space and associated site improvements under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050 (Case 24-135Z/PDP) Ms. Singh stated that the 14.2-acre site is comprised of two parcels and is zoned R-1 Restricted Suburban Residential. As presented at the first reading, the proposed Planned Unit Development consists of 20 single-family homes, two public streets and four reserves. At the first reading on March 3, 2025, Council provided feedback on the ownership and maintenance of Reserve A and Reserve B. Based on Council’s feedback, the maintenance responsibility of both reserves (A and B) will shift from the City to the homeowners association with the exception of the storm water basin maintenance and the waterways. Also at the first reading, staff requested Council feedback on the Reserve A connection, and Council expressed support for the naturalization of Reserve A without a shared use path connection. Council recommended that the shared use path, which is planned on the south side of Bright Road, is sufficient to meet the needs of pedestrians as well as cyclists. Council expressed the desire to ensure that the access drive can accommodate maintenance vehicles safely to access the stormwater maintenance basin. Staff recommended using compacted aggregate material that provides durability while minimizing the environmental impact. At the March 3 Council meeting, staff sought Council’s feedback on the proposed sidewalk location, which was proposed to be on only one side of the street. Staff sought this RECORD OF FROGEEDINGS Dublin ouncl Minutes of Meeting GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 644-224-0308 FORM NO. 10146 Held March 17, 2025 Page 3 of 23 20 feedback because the sidewalk does not meet the recently adopted standards and vision. The City of Dublin recommends six-foot sidewalks on both sides of the street, and the new standards are expected to be implemented with any new construction. Staff provided Council with examples of projects constructing sidewalks in existing neighborhoods after the fact and the costs associated. Council requested information on the size of neighborhoods where there are sidewalks on only one side for comparison that was provided to Council in advance of this second reading. On February 6, the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) voted to recommend approval to City Council with nine conditions. Based on Council's feedback, Staff recommended revising the first condition to ensure that the access is adequately designed. Staff also recommended approval of the Ordinance with three additional conditions. The conditions are as follows: 1) The applicant provide a compacted aggregate drive and concrete apron, designed to withstand loading of maintenance vehicles and accommodate safe and traversable access to the detention basin for maintenance from Bright Road to the detention basin within Reserve A to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2) The applicant make adjustments to Lot 2, Lot 5 and Lot 13 to provide a minimum lot width of 40 feet to achieve more flexibility in driveway location and provide landscaping opportunities for a cohesive residential appearance and revise the development text to require the minimum lot width of 40 feet, prior to City Council submittal. 3) The applicant provide a uniform tree lawn within the entire development without any discrepancies between the drawings prior to City Council submittal. 4) The applicant revise the development text to address the discrepancies between the rear yard setbacks, primary structure setback and minimum private open spaces on Lots 1- 10 prior to City Council submittal. 5) The applicant revise the development text to require minimum side yard dimension of 6 feet on one side and 14 feet total prior to City Council submittal. 6) The applicant revise the development text to provide minimum setbacks for the front-loaded and side-loaded garages, prior to City Council submittal. 7) The applicant revise the development text to address lots along Bright Road (Lots 1,2,13 and 20) to be given extra attention and maintain relationship with Bright Road, prior to City Council submittal. 8) The applicant show conceptual building envelopes with the submittal of the Final Development Plan. 9) The applicant remove redundant development requirements that match the requirements of the Zoning Code, prior to City Council submittal. 10) The applicant will need to continue to work with the Division of Engineering to demonstrate stormwater management compliance in accordance with Chapter 53 of the Dublin Code of Ordinances to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 11) The applicant correct any waterway deficiencies within Reserve B, identified by the City through inspections, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 12) The applicant update the Preliminary Development Plan and Development Text accordingly to ensure the documents are consistent. John Rahm, 4273 Hanna Hills Dr., Dublin, came forward to thank Council and PZC for taking the time to pay attention to this project and give it the consideration and time it deserves. He expressed appreciation for the Bright Road area and the desire to keep things the same as much as possible. Ms. De Rosa stated that she was appreciative of the work to find a solution to the access path. She also appreciated the additional information provided regarding sidewalks. She stated at the first reading that it is important to follow the Envision Dublin plan for safety reasons and consistency. The City has been consistent in other neighborhoods. She advocated for staying consistent with our design guidelines and standards and keeping the sidewalk on both sides of the street. With that one change, she stated she would be supportive of this Ordinance. RECORD OF FROGEEDINGS ublin ounc Minutes of Meeting GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 644-224-3338 FORM NO. 10148 Held March 17, 2025 Page 4 of 2320 Ms. Fox stated that she appreciated the compromise on the aggregate access drive. The sidewalk is one of the things that this particular development is doing to create a unique look which is encouraged in the Envision Dublin plan. A suburban sidewalk on both sides interrupts the ability for these unique and creative spaces to develop. This particular development has given five acres of natural space. She stated her appreciation that the vision can bend enough to allow the entire picture of this character to take place. She also noted that the Envision Dublin plan originally planned for a shared use path on both sides of Bright Road, but the City decided that, because of the character of the area, one side was enough. She stated that she is supportive of sidewalk on only one side. Ms. Kramb stated that she agreed with the way the report is written and is supportive of sidewalks on one side. She added that this is what PZC recommended as well. Mr. Reiner stated that he agrees that sidewalks on one side is enough. He added that he would feel differently if this were a long, linear development, but it is compact. Mayor Amorose Groomes stated that she supports sidewalks on both sides of the street. She noted that the shared use path on one side is something that is done everywhere, and she cited Dublin Road as an example. She stated that she understands the viewpoint of the residents in the area, but no one has bought a house in this development yet. The sidewalks could already be there when the lot is sold so people will see sidewalks present and make their own informed decision. She stated that the history provided concerning the millions of dollars that have been spent trying to retrofit sidewalks into areas indicates that it is appropriate to stay consistent. In order to be consistent across the community and adhere to the Envision Dublin process, she is supportive of sidewalks on both sides of the street. Vice Mayor Alutto asked about the past projects that were listed in the materials where sidewalks had to be retrofitted. She asked if they were all constructed after the subdivision was developed. Ms. O'Callaghan stated that these projects were initiated when residents came to staff and Council requesting that sidewalks be added and used consistency across the community as justification. Vice Mayor Alutto expressed appreciation for the additional context. She added that she recalled at least one of these past discussions, and it was far more difficult adding sidewalks after the development is built. Mr. Keeler stated that he is appreciative of the agreement on implementing the aggregate versus paved access drive. With regard to sidewalks, he expressed a safety concern for kids without sidewalks. He also shared that he has friends in other communities that don’t have sidewalks and wish they had them. He is supportive of staying consistent with respect to Envision Dublin moving forward. He stated he was supportive of sidewalks on both sides of the street. Mayor Amorose Groomes moved to add an additional condition regarding sidewalks to require sidewalks on both sides of the street. 13) The applicant revise the Preliminary Development Plan and Development Text to show conformance with City street cross section standards, including sidewalk on both sides of the street. Applicant further will make corresponding Preliminary Development Plan and Development Text revisions as necessitated by the aforementioned revisions and approved by staff. Vice Mayor Alutto seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Ms. Fox, no; Mr. Reiner, no; Ms. De Rosa, yes; Vice Mayor Alutto, yes; Ms. Kramb, no; Mayor Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Keeler, yes. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Windteset Dublin City Counci ‘Meating GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 644-224-3338 FORM NO, 1012 Held March 17,2025 Page 5 of 23 20 Vote on the Ordinance as amended: Mayor Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Fox, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; Mr. Keeler, yes; Vice Mayor Alutto, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes. Ordinance 05-25 Amending the Annual Appropriations for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2025 (Q1) Ms. Hoffman stated that there were no changes to this Ordinance from the first reading and staff recommended approval. There were no public comments. Vote on the Ordinance: Ms. Fox, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes; Mr. Keeler, yes; Mayor Amorose Groomes, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; Vice Mayor Alutto, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes. INTRODUCTION/FIRST READING — ORDINANCES Ordinance 06-25 Rezoning of Nine Parcels (PID 272- 000195, 272-000086, 274 -001259, 274 - 001260, 274-001261, 274-001419, 274-001420, 274-001313, and 274- 001421) from R, Rural District to ID-2, Research Flex District and ID-3, Research Assembly District (Case 25-0082) Vice Mayor Alutto introduced the Ordinance. Mr. Hounshell stated that this Ordinance is rezoning nine parcels that are approximately 370 acres in size. This includes two parcels that are owned by the City at the intersection of Shier Rings Road and Cosgray Road. The remaining parcels are privately owned but the owners have determined that they want to be part of this rezoning application. Last summer, the City engaged in the Envision Dublin community Plan update which included revisions and updates to the Future Land Use Plan and the Special Area Plans. The sites are highlighted in yellow and fit within two categories: Flex Innovation and Industrial. The first category is the Flex Innovation District which is shown above in the lighter purple color. The intent for the Flex Innovation District is to be a vibrant, modern development RECORD OF PROGEEDINGS Minutes of ublin City Counc! Meeting GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 644-224-3308 FORM NO, 10148 Held March 17, 2025 Page 6 of 23 20 that incorporates a variety of uses, including: innovation, office, art and collaboration. These uses are to be integrated into the existing natural and built environment. The remainder of the properties are located within the Industrial designation. The intent of the Industrial District is to consist of medium to heavy, large-format industrial uses in close proximity to major arterials for ease of access to accommodate the unique site and operational needs. The West Innovation District Special Area Plan continues this recommendation and further refines it. These properties are included in the West Innovation District Special Area Plan for economic development purposes. The goals of this plan are to establish a world-class innovation and research district and to serve as an economic engine for Dublin. Mr. Hounshell stated that as discussed at a recent work session, staff is currently working on the West Innovation District Integrated Implementation Strategy which will incorporate the economic development strategy and the Community Plan update to bring the district vision to life. These sites are currently zoned R, Rural District. The proposed rezonings reflect what is recommended in the Future Land Use Plan, but also the West Innovation District Special Area Plan. The two districts are ID-2, Research Flex and ED-3, Research Assembly. ID-2, Research Flex ID-3, Research + Conference Centers Assembly Data Centers* + Data Centers Indoor Entertainment + Office and Recreation * — Gvic, Public, and * — Exercise and Fitness Institutional Uses * Office * — Industrial Uses Civic, Public, and Institutional Uses * — Industrial Uses * Manufacturing and Assembly* = Se a * Warehousing and Seeks Rings ROY oe : Distribution (CU) R + Live-Work Dwelling (CU) B Mr. Hounshell stated that this application does accompany a code amendment, which addresses some permitted and conditional uses. Those amendments are on Council’s agenda this meeting. Applications and development within this area would be required to receive approval by the Administrative Review Team (ART). If they should not meet the requirements of the zoning districts, they would be required to get approval from PZC. He added that when staff reviews standard district rezonings, staff will use the future land use recommendations and Thoroughfare Plan as the basis for rezonings. Staff found that this application meets the criteria. PZC recommended approval of this proposed rezoning at their February meeting. Staff recommended approval. Lynn Roose, 5830 Houchard Road, Dublin, stated that they are adjacent property owners to this site. They have lived there for 34 years. He asked if there had been an environmental impact study. There have been some requests for residential development from established developers that were rejected. He is concerned about the native habitat and the corridors that connect the native habitat. The residences are part of the environment. There is an Amazon data center north of his property. Amazon is not fully online yet but produces a noise called very low frequency (VLF) and Extreme Low Frequency (ELF) that carries six to 60 miles at VLF and 600 to 60,000 miles at ELF. He stated that the World Health Organization has determined that exposure to these things cause insomnia, hypertension, may be carcinogenic and cause hormonal irregularities. A 200 foot buffer is insignificant to project against the environmental hazard and the damaging effects of this noise. He asked that Council not approve this rezoning due to the effect on the neighbors. He thanked the Council for their time. Linda Porter, Ballantrae Resident, Dublin, came forward and affirmed what Mr. Roose was saying. She stated that she can hear the noise, and her neighbors have mentioned it as RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Néetine GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 644-224-3338 FORM NO. 10148 Held March 17, 2025 Page 7 of 23 20 well. She doesn’t want another Amazon type facility built in the area. She stated that Amazon lights up like the “4" of July”. Mayor Amorose Groomes invited Mr. Hounshell to explain the next steps in the process. Mr. Hounshell stated that there will be a second reading/public hearing on April 7, 2025 for this Ordinance. Regarding any development on these properties, each individual development would have to go through the planning process and align with those requirements. He stated, referring to noise concerns, that noise is not considered in terms of zoning, but it is considered under the requirements that safeguard against nuisance concerns. Mr. Hounshell stated that staff would talk through the handling of noise nuisances with the residents. He reiterated that any potential development would be required to be reviewed by ART and potentially PZC if requirements are not met. This Ordinance is setting the zoning to allow for development to align with the future vision of the City. Mayor Amorose Groomes inquired if an environmental impact study is required if some materials would be housed on the site. Mr. Hounshell responded affirmatively. Mayor Amorose Groomes suggested staff provide the residents who are present with their contact information so further questions can be answered and concerns addressed prior to the second reading. Ms. Fox stated that she researched the noise coming from data centers after reading about that concern in the PZC minutes. She stated that the noise is not coming from the data center from the computers, it is coming from the fans on the roof. She stated that she found that Amazon is aware that the noise scatters to the surrounding neighborhoods, so they are trying to retrofit their data centers to mitigate the noise. They have created taller columns above the fans to direct the noise upward and away from neighbors. The Amazon facility the neighbors are speaking of is an older facility, so this mitigation has not been deployed yet. She would like this issue to be addressed with this rezoning, since it is not being addressed through environmental channels. Ms. Fox stated that regarding the bright lighting, our Code has safeguards in place to make sure it does not create an issue for anyone else in the neighborhood. She suggested staff look into that and make sure it is meeting the Code. She added that this is a necessary economic development move for the City, but it does not need to be a burden to the residential areas around it. Ms. Kramb requested confirmation that data centers are now a conditional use in the code amendment that follows this Ordinance (07-25). Mr. Hounshell responded affirmatively. She inquired if another data center would have to go through PZC and would potentially discuss noise and lighting. Mr. Hounshell stated that was correct. Ms. Kramb requested that Ordinance 07-25 be heard first at the next meeting because she would like to know the Code is in place that impacts this rezoning. Mayor Amorose Groomes agreed to flip the two Ordinances on the next agenda. Ms. De Rosa stated that she wants to make sure that residents receive notification of the hearing on April 7 so they have the opportunity to participate. She also stated that, relating to the noise and nuisances, the Code is being updated now, and she wanted to make sure that new technologies are being considered. She reiterated that this is a conditional use situation, so that provides another buffer of a PZC review. Mayor Amorose Groomes stated that they will look forward to the outcome of the meeting with the residents and suggested that staff review any code violations regarding the lighting. She asked that this information be provided in their second reading materials. Second reading/public hearing is scheduled for April 7, 2025. Ordinance 07-25 Amendments to Zoning Code Section 153.002, 153.004, 153.037-153.042 and 153.236 regarding the West Innovation District, 153.002, 153.048, RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Vestine GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 844-224-G538 FORM NO, 1014S Held March 17,2025 Page 8 of 23 20 153.066, 153.176 regarding the Concept Plan review process, 153.158 regarding temporary signs for special events, and 153.076 regarding Property Nuisance regulations (25-O05ADMC) Vice Mayor Alutto introduced the Ordinance. Ms. Rauch stated that this Ordinance is a series of code amendments pertaining to the Concept Plan review process, the West Innovation District Uses, sign regulations and the public nuisance section. Last October, Council had a joint work session with members of PZC, ARB and BZA where staff talked through an initiative regarding the development review process to find opportunities to make that process more predictable and transparent. This initiative was born out of collaborative conversation that staff held with a number of stakeholders to explore what we do right and where the opportunities for improvement may exist. Six themes emerged from the conversations that were held which were: e Project Management Approach; Central Intelligence; Tiers of Service; Technology Use; Requirements and Review Process; and Staff Reports. Concept Plan Amendment The discussion at this meeting is focused on the requirements and review process. An area identified for improvement was related to concept plans. The concept plan process exists within Planned Unit Developments, the Bridge Street District, the Historic District and our mixed-use regional districts. The concept plan is the first step in a three-step process that varies depending on the district. Within the Planned Unit Development, currently concept plans are discussion only. With the other three districts, it is a determination. A concept plan in the Bridge Street or Historic District with a development agreement also requires City Council approval. The goals of this amendment are to: e Provide consistency in the City’s review processes; e Allow an applicant to gain feedback; and e Streamline the number of approval steps. With the proposed amendment, the concept plan remains a required first step. It then moves from a determination step to a non-binding feedback step. A development agreement remains a separate City Council action. This does not require a recommendation from ARB or PZC for a concept plan; therefore, it does not require Council to make a separate determination on a concept plan. The informal review option remains as well. West Innovation District (WID) As staff was evaluating the Code for any additional opportunities for improvement, the West Innovation District was identified for potential amendments. The West Innovation District Special Area Plan really looks at the regional competitiveness, future growth and how future land use designations align. The current West Innovation District has five zoning districts; the intent and use permitted within those zoning districts varies. The goals of this amendment are to: e Improve the development review process e Remove barriers to allow the development of small-scale flex research users and e Align future land use designation with the Zoning Code. The WID amendment proposed two changes which would revise assembly and manufacturing from a conditional use to a permitted use within ID-2, and data centers would be revised from a permitted use to a conditional use. These uses require more scrutiny due to the potential impacts. The outdated language within the code will be addressed during these amendments as well, such as, the former name of the district that was the Economic Advancement Zone will be replaced with West Innovation District. This proposed amendment also modifies the boundary language with updated WID Special Area Plan to align with the zoning district assignment upon annexation. She added that as RECORD OF F OGEEDINGS , ublin City Counci ' Minutes of y Meeting "GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 844-225-3338 FORM NO. 101s Held March 17, 2025 Page 9 of 2320 staff progresses through the West Innovation Integrated Implementation Plan, there could be potential code amendments that need to be brought forward as part of that process. Temporary Signs Ms. Rauch stated that there was a previous update to temporary sign regulations in 2021. Community activities and Special Event sign allowances were identified for updates to align with current practices. The goals of this proposed amendment are to: e Align with current practices; e Follow the City’s event permitting process; and e Approve sign allowances with the individual event needs. Public Nuisance Ms. Rauch stated that this section of Code is largely used by the Code Enforcement team on an everyday basis. Nuisance regulations protect public health and safety, maintain property values and ensure that properties are used consistent with the law. Many of these Code sections have not been modified in quite some time, so this was an opportunity to ensure that the Code matches the evolving needs of the community. The goals of this amendment are to: e Provide clarity in language to ensure there are no gaps; e Provide consistency in enforcement; and e Address evolving community needs. The proposed amendment broadens the application of property maintenance to the entire premises. It also provides clarifying requirements for premise conditions including additional screening options for residential trash/recycling containers. The language also addresses vehicle storage and screening. PZC, as part of their review, recommended additional language regarding firewood storage. ARB and PZC completed their reviews of the amendments, and any recommendations were incorporated into what is before Council at this meeting. Staff recommended approval at the second reading/public hearing. There were no public comments. Ms. Fox asked about the public nuisance portion of the amendments. She asked about vacant structures and the requirement to keep them looking like any other house on the street and not be obvious that they are vacant. She has noticed that there are a few places in the Historic District where that is not happening. Her concern is regarding enforcement and how enforceable this is on properties where there are obvious issues. Ms. Rauch stated that the vacant property ordinance was created a few years ago. If there are issues, she can check in with the Code Enforcement team. She noted that it is the Code Enforcement team that brought forward the amendments to this section. These were changes that they felt were important and appropriate. Ms. Rauch added that they have had several vacant properties where staff has used the vacant property ordinance to ensure compliance, and it has been very effective. Ms. Fox asked what the reasonable standard is for a vacant property that should be expected. Mr. Hartmann stated that the legal team will research what is a reasonable standard and provide Council with a memo. Ms. Kramb asked why data centers are a conditional use in the WID ID-2, but not ID-3 (still a permitted use, not conditional). Ms. Rauch stated that these amendments attempt to align the Code with Envision Dublin, wherein the ID-3 district is industrial, which is where we would want the data centers to be. She stated that staff is trying to balance what the future land use designation recommends and the existing Code. The current property owners, some which are included in the WID rezoning application (Ordinance 06- 25), have the expectation that data centers are permitted. Ms. Kramb noted that these ID- 3 areas are around residential areas as well. Ms. Kramb asked about the buffers and setback language. The language does not currently refer to Cosgray Road specifically. She would like to see the setback on Cosgray Road or adjacent residential. Her concern is the requirements may place the development RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council Minutes of Meeting GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 644-224-0558 FORM NO. 1074 Held March 17,2025 Page 10 of 23 20 even closer to the residential areas. Ms. Kramb read the following portion of the proposed Code: ; for properties that are immediately adjacent to single family residential districts, the required front yard setback for both building and pavement shall be 150 feet. She stated that this is the language she would like to see amended. She would not want to see the front yard defined by this new entrance street, which would push the development closer to the residential area. She would like to make sure that the language ensures the greatest distance and the lowest heights adjacent to the residents. Ms. De Rosa asked about lighting requirements. Ms. Rauch stated that there is a separate ordinance for site lighting requirements. She added that staff is currently working through an amendment to lighting requirements. Ms. De Rosa inquired if those amendments would come before Council. Ms. Rauch responded affirmatively. Ms. De Rosa asked about enforcement and the language included in the amendment. She asked if it is the City’s discretion on how long the owner has to fix the issue. She would like to know how the time frames are determined since this covers all issues from a trash can to a roof. Ms. Rauch stated that she can provide more detail. There is a City policy and Administrative Order that define the process and general timeframes for compliance, how many steps there are and how they will be initiated. Ms. Rauch noted that Code Enforcement developed a door hanger to provide a one-on-one initial contact to let property owners know how to comply. If immediate compliance is not possible, then there are associated timeframes. Ms. Rauch stated that the goal is compliance not enforcement. Ms. De Rosa suggested making the language very clear for residents so they can comply. Ms. De Rosa suggested looking at 153.067 (A)(1) in light of the discussion regarding noise. She suggested more consideration of that language. She agreed with Ms. Kramb’s comments regarding setback and switching the order for second reading. Ms. Kramb added that on page 28 of the West Innovation District section, there is a reference to the buffering of residential areas including the mounding required and the front yard setbacks. She suggested that the mounding needs to be on the residential side regardless, so it should be a separate topic from the setback. She also stated that it needs to be clarified if the setback is from the mounding or if it includes the mounding. Ms. Fox stated that she would like to add evergreen to the trees. She stated that if there are noise concerns, evergreen can help protect during the winter months to buffer sound. She agreed with Ms. Kramb’s comments regarding the setback requirements. Mayor Amorose Groomes stated that she would anticipate when improvements happen on these large parcels that an economic development agreement may be necessary for infrastructure improvements. She is hopeful that the City has some leverage when these big projects come in. She added that the City has done a lot of work on the utilities available. What percentage of the utilities would anyone be permitted to consume? She stated that available utilities will impact what the City is able to do in the totality of this site. She asked if that was a conversation happening with the West Innovation Integrated Implementation Plan. Ms. Rauch responded affirmatively and added that how to serve these properties is a significant portion of the conversation. Second reading/public hearing is scheduled for April 7, 2025. Ordinance 08-25 Authorizing the Provision of Certain Incentives to Whalen and Company, CPAs, Inc. to Induce it to locate and expand its Office and its Associated Operations and Workforce within the City; and Authorizing the Execution of an Economic Development Agreement Vice Mayor Alutto introduced the Ordinance. Mr. Fleming stated that the City has been working with Whalen CPAs. Whalen CPAs isa tax, accounting, auditing and business advisory firm based in Central Ohio focused on high Minutes of RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council Meeting GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 844-224-3338 FORM NO. 10745" Held March 17,2025 Page 11 of 23. 20 quality financial solutions for businesses of all sizes. The City of Dublin has proposed an economic development agreement to Whalen that includes a one-time grant of $20,000. The agreement requires that they sign a lease agreement for a minimum of five years and also obtain a proof of occupancy by August 1, 2025. Whalen comes to Dublin after an exhaustive search within their current community. They decided to invest their future in Dublin, which reflects our City’s strong commitment to our business-friendly environment. Staff recommended approval. There were no public comments. Second reading/public hearing is scheduled for April 7, 2025. INTRODUCTION/PUBLIC HEARING/ VOTE — RESOLUTIONS Resolution 19-25 Accepting the Lowest and Best Bid for the South High Street Utility Burial - Phase 2 Project (22-018-CIP) Vice Mayor Alutto introduced the Resolution. Mr. Gable stated that staff conducted a competitive bid for the South High Street utility burial phase two project, which will perform the burial of existing overhead, primary electric lines underground and relocate the existing overhead electric and telecommunication utility lines along Blacksmith Lane, South High Street and intersecting streets to underground. At the completion of the project, all overhead utility lines and poles in the project area will be removed from West Bridge Street to Short Street. The 2025-2029 Capital Improvements Program provides $2,320,000 for this project. On February 27, two bids were publicly opened. CST Utilities LLC submitted the lowest and best bid of $2,499,652.72 for the project, which was 10.93% under the engineer's estimate of $2,800,000. Mr. Gable stated that the additional project costs will be covered using other unencumbered funds budgeted within the CIP. Construction is expected to begin and be substantially complete by the end of 2025 with final restoration completed by April of 2026. The overhead utility lines and poles along South High Street are planned to be removed during winter of 2025 into 2026. Staff recommended approval. There were no public comments. Ms. Fox asked what construction will look like along High Street, so she can share what to expect with residents. Mr. Gable stated that the project was designed with a very minimal impact to High Street itself. Mr. Gable explained that staff tried to build all the crossings in phase one of High Street; unfortunately, AEP needed one more crossing closer to Spring Hill. That crossing is planned to be bored underground with minimal impact to High Street itself. He added that the line from Short Street to Pinney Hill Lane through the back lots, is meant to be a rock bore through the properties to partially avoid tree impacts and historic wall impacts. Certain sections of Blacksmith Lane will be closed as work progresses to the north. The plan is to close no more than one intersection at a time. He stated that once the utilities have all their work done, the City will begin restoration work. Mayor Amorose Groomes asked about the status of the west side along the alley to the west of High Street. She has noticed a lot of materials laying around there and would like to know when restoration work will begin there. Mr. Gable stated that the work Fishel is doing there is nearing completion, and they will have that cleaned up within the next few weeks. Mayor Amorose Groomes suggested having someone look through the area, because the catch basin inlets may be in need of attention. Vote on the Resolution: Ms. Kramb, yes; Vice Mayor Alutto, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Fox, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; Mayor Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Keeler, yes. RECORD OF PROGEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Counc! Meeting GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 644-224-3508 FORM NO. 10148 Held March 17, 2025 Page 12 of 23 20 Resolution 20-25 Accepting the Lowest and Best Bid for the Outdoor Community North and South Pools Resurfacing Project Vice Mayor Alutto introduced the Resolution. Ms. Miller stated that on Friday, February 28, two bids were open for the Outdoor Community North and South Pools resurfacing project. This project includes repairs to the following amenities: e Dublin Community Pool South Leisure Pool: Resurfacing the Diamond Brite surface, tile replacement, caulking, and all related finishes that were identified from recent sub-base testing results. e Dublin Community Pool North: Light concrete repairs and repainting the pool shell surfaces. The pool paint surfaces are an epoxy paint with a lifespan of approximately three years. The pool is now heading into its fourth operating season in 2025. The work for both pools will begin immediately this spring as weather permits and is planned to be completed prior to the 2025 pool season. After reviewing the bid responses, staff determined that the lowest and best bid was received from Aqua Pools N’ Concrete, in the amount of $147,300, which is approximately 1.8% below the budgeted amount of $150,000. Staff has thoroughly reviewed the bid received from the Aqua Pools N’ Concrete bid and determined it to be the lowest and best bid for this project. Staff recommended approval. There were no public comments. Vote on the Resolution: Mr. Keeler, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; Vice Mayor Alutto, yes; Ms. Fox, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor Amorose Groomes, yes. Resolution 21-25 Accepting the Lowest and Best Bid for the Shier Rings Park Wall Renovations Project Vice Mayor Alutto introduced the Resolution. Mr. Krawetzki stated that on February 20, 2025, three bids were received for the Shier Rings Park Stone Wall Renovations Project. This project is the first phase of renovations at the park, which includes the replacement of several stone wall sections around the pond area, replacement of the concrete slab, installation of a scupper to the gazebo area to enhance drainage and the replacement of the iron railing adjacent to the pond. Additional park renovations are planned for 2025 to include repairs to the gazebo, gutter system and landscaping. These items will be included in the next phase of renovations at the park following the completion of the first phase of renovations. Staff has reviewed the bids and has determined the lowest and best bid received is from Quality Masonry Company, Inc. in the amount of $351,050.00, which is (4%) higher than the Engineer's Estimate of $338,106.00. There were no public comments. Mayor Amorose Groomes stated that this was a relatively quick failure of these stone walls. She asked if there was any re-engineering done to improve the durability. Mr. Krawetzki stated that the contractor will be repairing the ledge that the stone sits on and setting it to the water table level so there is less interaction between the stone and mortar bed. This will help keep the stone from deteriorating. In response to Mayor Amorose Groomes’ question regarding whether this will be more durable than what was existing, Mr. Krawetzki responded affirmatively. He added that capstones will be placed on the top versus small stones, so it will prevent some of the water infiltration between the concrete backing wall and the mortar. In response to Mayor Dublin City Counci RECORD OF PROGEEDINGS Minutes of Meeting OVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 644-224-3508 FORM NO, 10146 Held March 17,2025 Page 13 of 23 20 Amorose Groomes’ question regarding whether it is real stone, Mr. Krawetzki stated that it is real stone that is being used. Vote on the Resolution: Mayor Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Keeler, yes; Vice Mayor Alutto, yes; Ms. Fox, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes. Resolution 22-25 Adopting the Holiday Market Feasibility Study Final Report Vice Mayor Alutto introduced the resolution. Ms. Goliver stated that Council reviewed the draft feasibility study at the March 3 Council meeting and in response to Council’s feedback, three amendments have been made to the final report. The amendments are: e Clarifying that the $50,000 initial investment toward décor is in addition to the existing decorations that the City funds annually; e The Operator Scope of Service was updated to include “demonstrated experience in developing a distinctive and engaging identity tailored specifically to Dublin for the Market;” and e Minor grammatical edits to the final report. Staff recommended approval. There were no public comments. Vote on the Resolution: Vice Mayor Alutto, yes; Mayor Amorose Groomes, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; Ms. Fox, yes; Mr. Keeler, yes; Ms. Kramb, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes. OTHER BUSINESS e Downtown Dublin Curbside Management Parking Report Ms. Wawszkiewicz introduced Tom Brown from Nelson/Nygaard to present the progress on the Downtown Curbside Management Plan. Mr. Brown stated that this is a multi-year study. He spoke to the origin of the study and the increased competition for curbside spaces within downtown districts as well as an increase in the amount of UPS, FedEx and Amazon trucks. There has also been an increase in other uses that were not there 20 years ago, such as scooters and shared bikes. Many cities are seeing an expanding and more diversified demand for curbside spaces. Parking is critical to downtown economic development and growth. The best practices for curbside management, when looking at the downtown district as a whole, include: e On-street parking along primary streets for quick visits; e Side streets for up to 2 hours; and e Parking garages for longer stays. The system works better if most parking activity can be absorbed off-street to reduce the pressure on those curbs and particularly to reduce pressure on the primary streets. Mr. Brown shared an illustration of the existing conditions including an inventory of curbside spaces by regulation. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS blin City Council Minutes of Meeting GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 844-224-3338 FORM NO. 10148 Held March 17, 2025 Page 14 of 23 20 (A) Publ Parkins Lot or Gerace Parking On Existing ===" oe Conditions =~"... Historic ggg 1,265 — Mowxceyde Only Dublin Review cai Bridge G99 841 3,540 en Par) sum 793 3,912 4,705 Existing x 4 Parking Regulations = $ Sustainable | Connected | Resilient Q| After identifying the existing inventory of curbside spaces, the study shifted to how people use the resources. He stated that by 10:00 a.m., streets are already filling up. The garages are underutilized and show under 70% full toward midday. This tends to be the period of a typical week when most downtowns see the most parking activity. This reveals the hierarchy of preference of those looking for a parking space. Availability remains at all times in these parking structures. The key findings in reviewing the existing conditions were: e Availability remains during all times of the day; e Uneven balance results in high demand areas; e Sets up a management opportunity; Recent return of Historic Dublin valet service; and Increased interest in curbside vendors. Mr. Brown stated that data analysis was completed to enable stakeholders, users of the parking, residents, businesses, etc., to gain perspective on the parking conditions. The outreach was a multi-step process including a survey of residents, business owners and property owners. Focus groups were also used to have short discussions with business owners, mobility providers and other stakeholders. Increasingly, cities are not only adopting curbside management plans but are interested in adopting technology as well. These technologies help the City understand what is going on at their curbs in these areas. This was a core aspect of the study that was designed by the City. The study team decided to conduct pilots that did two key things: provide data and information on curbside activity and capture the availability that is in the parking garages and communicate that availability to the public. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council Minutes of Meeting —__________ GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 844-224-3568 FORM NO. 10748 Held March 17,2025 Page 15 of 23 20 Initial Technology Pilots Company Tech Pros Cons : VADE Automotus Hard-wired + Counts by mode, - Power : @parknav * cameras including non- requirements | i ee motorized + Tree occlusion cs el" \ Vade Solar + Easy install + Out of No Ee cameras business 3 Park Nav Predictive + No infrastructure + Not accurate No Oot tl 3 model + Not intuitive : Park Pow Vehicle + Existing +Long Yes Ap evaluation Count infrastructure fa DU ne period »Vade a ———— falco’ - ~ — —Atomots Sustainable | Connected | Resilient Ta Park Nav ParkPow emerged as the most successful pilot. It used cameras that were place in or already in the Rock Cress Garage to capture entrance and exit activity and keep a running tally of the number of cars in the garage at any given time. Today, the City is looking at three new vendors, one of which uses sensors that are embedded in the pavement of the roadway and sense vehicle activity above them and provide data points to the City. Next steps regarding these technology pilots include: e Promote parking availability through mobile technology and dynamic signs (informing the public of spaces available within the parking garages); e Additional tech pilots and initiatives, including safety monitoring; e Micromobility program and service provider data; and e Noise monitoring (UpCity Technology has the capacity to capture noise levels and alert the City when noise levels are getting high). Mr. Brown shared the Curbside Management Plan with a five typologies that define the different types of streets based on the people, how they use the streets and their optimal functions for a cohesive set of curbs within the district. Curbside Management Plan Curb Typology ee Primary Secondary Flats , 7 ° Comm/Passenger =, Public Space/ a ee 2 5 o. C i Pa: Comm/Passenger "im. Ss is % =m ~S } scenes . ° = r Comm/Passenger & comm Se # g, é Zone “Public Space/ & Active Mobility Buffer: a) Activation — Sustainable | Connected | Resilient (J He stated that there is a limited amount of curbside spaces, so the goal is to get to a point where each block is focusing on a specialty that it does best to provide a cohesive and effective system. He reviewed the first three of the five types: Minutes of RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin Ci ublin City Council iceding GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 844-224-3338 FORM NO. 10148 Held March 17,2025 Page 16 of 23 20 e Main Street: The primary use of these streets are for commercial and passenger loading. The secondary use of these streets would be for public space and activation. e Off Main Street: The primary use should be prioritizing parking. Since it is right off the main street, it is not far and is easy to direct drivers toward. e Transition is a unique street type as they are side streets that provide parking, but drivers are looking for closer options. They need to be directed to a garage to ease the pressure on the street parking. Mr. Brown stated that the City has already begun to act upon many of the recommendations in the plan, but one high priority recommendation that has not been implemented yet is the standard time limits. He explained that right now there is two-hour parking at the curb in Bridge Park and three-hour parking at the curb in Historic Dublin. The recommendation is to move toward either a one-hour or two-hour parking limit. Three-hour parking gives employees and businesses owners too much opportunity to take up the parking spaces all day long. He added that in places where there is one-hour parking or an active loading zone, two-hour parking can be found right around the corner. Another high priority recommendation relates to the Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG), which were updated during this study. The study explored where the City would be deficient in ADA parking spaces according to the PROWAG. If spaces are added now, there will be more flexibility than if the City waits until it is mandated. The City has already started to identify the needed spaces and is implementing accordingly. The City has also already implemented the shift toward active loading only on certain main streets. Business owners have responded favorably to those changes. The signage has been successful because it says “Active Loading Only” and is not confusing or overly prescriptive. Mr. Brown shared the 5-Year Action Plan: 5-Year Action Plan Overview Year Historic Dublin Bridge Park e Standardize Time Limits: o 1 Hour (8 am - 8 pm) © 2 Hour (10 am - 8 pm) 1 |e Developing a formal program to regulate curbside vendors ¢ Promote garages to free up curb space Active Loading Only zones on Longshore St Add accessible parking spaces on blocks as opportunities arise Continue implementation along Longshore St and Riverside Dr 3 |e Focus implementation on Off Main and |* Bridge Park Ave time variable restrictions 4 | Transition curbs e Bridge Park Ave valet, if needed Active Loading Only zones on N High St ui Shift to evaluation and monitoring to inform future decisions Mr. Brown noted that the items in green have been at least partially implemented. The action plan is complemented by a series of maps where the City can track what this will look like as these items are implemented. Mr. Brown stated that the next steps for this plan are to continue with current technology pilots, explore and pursue new parking solutions and advancements, develop a formalized curbside vendor policy and a resolution to approve the Curbside Management Plan at a future Council meeting. Ms. Kramb asked whether the City is being charged for the pilots. Ms. Wawszkiewicz stated that they have been funding them through the Smart Parking Minutes of RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council Meeting GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 844-224-3338 FORM NO, 10148 Held March 17,2025 Page 17 of 23 20 Project in the Operating Budget. She added that ParkPow worked with the City for a long time without charging during implementation of the pilot. Ms. Kramb asked that costs be provided to Council for any pilot that is recommended to be extended. She stated that she would like clarification on the ultimate goal, as well. Ms. Kramb referred to the ADA map and inquired the reason that there are no ADA parking spaces south of Bridge Park Avenue in the recommendations. She expressed that there did not seem to be enough ADA parking. She suggested that it would be helpful to know how these numbers and spaces were decided upon. Ms. Kramb stated that enforcement is not mentioned in the proposed plan. She asked how enforcement would work and what would be the cost of enforcement. Mr. Brown stated that the camera-based technologies are providing information on non-compliance activity. This data allows staff to inform parking enforcement officers where there are typically problems so they can focus their enforcement efforts rather than broadly ticketing. He added that as part of the development of this plan, they did meet with the Police Department to discuss the use of this technology. In some states, a ticket can be issued with camera evidence. Ohio is not one of those states. It involves a multi-step process requiring that the Police Department be informed of the problematic activity first and then they can take action. Ms. Wawszkiewicz stated that the Business District Police Unit has available resources and has been great to work with. Vice Mayor Alutto asked about the spaces being counted in the garages and whether or not that included the spaces reserved for residents. Ms. Wawszkiewicz stated that the Rock Cress Garage does not have reserved residential parking. The garages that do have parking reserved for residents would not count those spaces in the available parking numbers. Vice Mayor Alutto agreed with Ms. Kramb’s comments regarding enforcement and its importance. Regarding ADA spaces, she would like to see the additional spaces implemented in year one and not wait until year two. She stated that the number of spaces still feels low in the plan. She expressed her support for the use of the technology pilots. Mr. Keeler shared that this is impressive work. He expressed his support for the plan and agreed that three hours is too long for anybody to park. He stated that the City needs a food truck policy and he would like to move that forward. Regarding the 5-Year Action Plan, Mr. Keeler stated that he would like to see evaluation and monitoring moved to the beginning and be able to evaluate what is working from the beginning. He stated that Longshore Street is designated on at least one side of it as an active loading zone. He advocated for exploring ways to allow Longshore Street, or at least sections of it, to be a woonerf street. Ms. De Rosa stated that the City does not have a parking problem, it has a walking problem. The garages are never full, so parking is available. People do not want to walk very far. She asked Mr. Brown how other communities mitigate that issue. Mr. Brown stated that it is happening organically in Bridge Park. He stated part of the reason is people are getting used to the garage being a part of that place, that destination. He added that this is where the signage displaying the number of spaces available would become helpful. She stated that she would like to see more information on how electric vehicle charging would fit into this plan. She added that one of the challenges that we are already seeing is cars come to EV charging stations and do not leave. Ms. Wawszkiewicz stated that staff is working with the study team on the EV Comprehensive Plan as well. Ms. De Rosa agreed with Mr. Keeler that the City needs to advance a food truck policy and maybe advancing some pilots to see what works best. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 844-224-3338 FORM NO, 10148. Held March 17 2025 Page 18 of 23 20 Mr. Reiner stated that during COVID, one of the streets was blocked off and became a pedestrian zone. He commented on the garages being loaded from the back. Mr. Reiner sought clarification on the loading zones. Mr. Brown clarified that Longshore Street in particular is a classic main street. The graphic Mr. Reiner was referring to showed the primary and secondary priorities for the area, but Mr. Brown clarified that this does not mean that these are the only things that can be accommodated on those blocks. Mr. Brown noted Mr. Keeler’s comments regarding Longshore and that he would like to see not just an active loading zone, but opportunities for public gathering space and activation uses. Mr. Reiner expressed support for the technology and signage informing the drivers of available parking spaces in the garages. Ms. Fox sought clarification regarding the active loading zones on North High Street. In response to Ms. Fox’s question regarding short-term parking in front of retail still being there, Mr. Brown responded affirmatively. MS. Fox expressed her support for the idea of buffer zones and public activated spaces. She suggested adding a buffer on Eberly at South High Street because it is a quiet little alley street. She suggested the land behind Trevor Furbay Bespoke could be leased for additional parking. Ms. Fox asked about the activation space that was suggested at North High and Bridge Street. She expressed concern that the congestion at that location could make it difficult to have any kind of activation space. Mr. Brown stated that in that area the only opportunity to do something would be on the sidewalk, not the street. Ms. Fox stated that during the conversations about the valet parking, discussion was held about the difficulty getting from one place to another. She suggested a micro-transit connector to help move people from one place to another within these districts. Valet parking is needed in Bridge Park and Riverview Village. Ms. Fox asked about improving the pedestrian crossing from Riverside Crossing Park to Bridge Park. She stated that it seems that no one wants to park there because of the distance to get to the crosswalk. She asked if there were opportunities to improve that or add a crosswalk along Riverside Drive. Mr. Brown stated that the west side of Riverside Drive needs to be used for parking by park visitors. He added that the recommendation is to ease restrictions on that parking to accommodate park goers. He stated it should be attractive to those who wish to visit the park but not to those who have to cross Riverside Drive. Mayor Amorose Groomes stated that, regarding enforcement and on-street parking, one of the best ways to get compliance on time limitations is to pay for the on-street parking. She recalled the conversations that were held in the development of these areas, when questions were asked about the loading and unloading needs. At that time, the thought was that the buildings did not need loading zones. She explained that now these public spaces are being reverted back to loading zones. She shared that she was in the Bridge Park area earlier today (3/17) and there were cars parked in the active loading areas. They were not active loading zones only. It is not efficient for the Police to spend their time going up and down these streets monitoring the parking. She stated that she is not supportive of active loading zones because it promotes bad behavior. She stated that allowances could be managed for Uber and Lyft services. She does not know how these parking limits could be enforced. She stated that the City of Columbus uses a QR code system of payment to park. This could be an Minutes of RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ity Council Meeting OVERNME! ITEORMS & SUPPLIES 844.224.3338 FORMNO.10148. Held March 17, 2025 Page 19 of 23 20 “and” solution rather than an “or.” The best way to manage our on-street parking is to have there be a very nominal fee and have a camera technology monitor that alerts the proper people when there are abuses of the rules. She agreed that a food truck policy is necessary and would like to see one that could provide some revenue if possible. She thanked staff for working on the EV charging aspect and what the limits should be on those services. She is supportive of the Curbside Management Plan and feels that more work needs to be done sooner rather than later. She expressed her concern that a Five-Year Action Plan seems like a long time to manage parking. She asked if it could be condensed to a two-year plan. She reiterated that she would not be supportive of all the active loading zones. She asked when a follow-up conversation would be scheduled on this topic. Ms. Wawszkiewicz stated that staff could be prepared to come back in a month or so. Ms. O'Callaghan stated that the plan depends on the feedback. Staff would bring this back for adoption, but if Council would like a work session or another discussion first, that also could be scheduled. Ms. O'Callaghan stated that charging for parking was not part of the scope of this project. Ms. Wawszkiewicz stated that the intent of this study was to organize the curb and manage the space. Mayor Amorose Groomes stated that it pushes people to park in the garages. Ms. Fox stated that the survey indicated that most residents and businesses did not want to see paid parking. She stated that these spaces and the convenience and ease of being able to park on the street is important. She was in favor of additional conversation about what could be done to maybe ease the loading and unloading without changing too much. Ms. De Rosa stated that she typically has not been in favor of paid parking, but the problem has to be solved for enforcement purposes. She stated that the intent is to get people to move after an hour, not keep paying to stay there. Enforcement of that movement is the goal, so the fine would have to be significant for not moving after a certain amount of time. She encouraged staff to take the time necessary to incorporate enforcement into the plan. Ms. Wawszkiewicz stated that there are multiple ways to address the issue; staff will summarize those and bring back a recommendation. Ms. Kramb stated that she did see the options in the supporting documents, but she would like to see what Dublin’s plan is for enforcement. Quarterly Innovation & Technology Briefing Mr. Brown stated that this briefing will provide an overview of the current activities in Innovation and Technology. Innovation and Technology focus areas include: e Customer Focus e Driving Value & Impact e Security e Foundational Infrastructure and e Innovation. Mr. Brown stated that Customer Focus refers not only to citizens, but on a day-to- day basis, it is more internally focused on ensuring that the team has proper tools to do their jobs. For the external customer, the “Receptionist” lobby solution will be deployed allowing visitors to sign in, create name badges and notify the appropriate staff member of their arrival. He added that they are modernizing some of the meeting rooms with indicators of the room schedule. This allows staff to reserve a room on the fly. Mr. Brown highlighted the Security focus and stated that a first draft of a policy was reviewed recently with the Administrative Committee. He mentioned the Minutes of RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council Mestine GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 844-224-3338 FORM NO. 10148 Held March 17,2025 Page 20 of 23 20 STAFF COMMENTS Ms. O'Callaghan shared the following: Virtual Chief Information Security Officer (VCISO) services that have been contracted for the purposes of conducting assessments and tabletop exercises. VCISO is a firm that has expertise in strategy and planning. The first quarterly security training has been completed. Scores remain above the industry average. The IT team has been working on some tactical tools to increase the defensive posture for the City’s foundational infrastructure. Regarding the Foundational Infrastructure focus area, Mr. Brown shared that altafiber is continuing construction and will begin the next two phases in the coming week. They anticipate being finished with residential single-family rollout by the end of this year. Camera analytics will be used not only for traffic and parking, but also for pickleball courts. This will be used to assess the demand on the pickleball courts. The Driving Value & Impact focus area uses analytics to ensure that we are maximizing the use of the tools we already have. Automation is being explored in processes in an effort to be more efficient. This work has a direct impact on the IT budget requests as they evaluate the lifecycle of some of the solutions that the City uses. Another critical component is education to make sure that staff stays up-to- date on changing technology. Finally, Mr. Brown shared a few highlights in the Innovation focus area. He stated that a Dublin Innovation Program is being developed. This program brings people together that have interest in finding and experimenting or piloting new technologies as they are coming out. Examples of the technology experimentation include the Apple Vision Pro Test Program and developing an Advance Air Mobility strategic framework. Mr. Keeler asked if the AI tools could be used at SportsOhio to inform the use of the fields. Mr. Brown responded affirmatively. Ms. De Rosa thanked Mr. Brown for the update and stated that Council is interested in the advancement and upgrades of the GoDublin App and what that could mean to our residents. Vice Mayor Alutto thanked Mr. Brown for the draft policy that was reviewed at the Administrative Committee and stated that she looks forward to seeing the final product. She expressed appreciation for the thoughtful approach that is being taken regarding AI usage. She added that there needs to be a good balance of using that technology. She thanked members of Council, federal and state representatives, leaders from neighboring communities, and our community members who attended the State of the City on March 13". The event provided a chance to connect with residents and other stakeholders and highlight how Dublin is Leading the Way in innovation, sustainability, and economic growth. For those unable to attend, the program is available on the City’s website. On Saturday, Dublin hosted the Greenest, Grandest St. Patrick’s Day Parade. Despite less-than-ideal weather conditions, thousands lined the streets. Events like this require extensive planning and dedication from our staff, whose hard work ensures a seamless and memorable experience for all. They take great pride in making Dublin’s traditions special, and we know the community appreciates it. Thank you to everyone who participated, volunteered, and braved the elements to celebrate with us! The Dublin Irish Festival has been named the best cultural festival in the country, earning first place in the USA TODAY 10 Best 2025 Readers’ Choice Awards. While the Festival had previously been recognized in the top ten, this is the first time it has earned the top spot. This national recognition is a testament to the dedication of the staff, volunteers and community partners who make the world’s largest three-day Irish celebration an unforgettable experience year after year. She RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Counci Meeting GOVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 844-224-3338 FORM NO. 10148 Held March 17, 2025 Page 21 of 23 20 thanked everyone who voted and continues to support this incredible event. We look forward to making the 2025 Dublin Irish Festival our best yet. e The City is partnering with ODOT to install a High-Intensity Activated Crosswalk (HAWK) at Muirfield Drive and Sells Mill Drive/Mojave Street near Scottish Corners Elementary. The HAWK signal will give pedestrians the right-of-way when activated. ODOT is fully funding construction and construction administration with no local match required. Following ODOT requirements for the project, notification letters must be sent to residents and key officials. Due to long material lead times, construction is expected to begin this summer and finish in 2026. COUNCIL REPORTS e Committee Reports o Administrative Committee: Ms. De Rosa stated that the Committee met on March 4 with two items on the agenda. The first item, as was discussed earlier, the Committee reviewed the first draft of an Information Security Policy. Feedback was provided and the revised draft will come back to the Committee for another review before moving on to Council. The second item for discussion was the anticipated vacancies for the Board and Commission process. Reviewing this information allows the Committee to do more targeted recruitment to fill some of these vacancies. The application deadline is April 18 and as always, she encouraged residents to apply. e Liaison Reports o Ms. De Rosa stated that there is no report for the US 33 Corridor Group. The Planning and Zoning Commission saw the first round of concepts for the next vision of the Bogey Inn. She stated that they also reviewed the Code amendments that were brought forward at this meeting. She expressed appreciation for their work on those and noted that it was a heavy lift. o Ms. Fox stated that she, like Ms. De Rosa, had no report for the US 33 Corridor Group and she deferred to Mr. Keeler for the Board of Education report. o Mr. Keeler stated that the Board of Education and City liaisons met on February 19. Dr. Marchhausen shared their advocacy efforts for broader access to the Columbus Promise. The Columbus Promise grants college financial assistance to Columbus City School students, which puts Dublin City School students at a financial disadvantage. The schools also launched the Happiness Project which is a lecture series in an effort to improve the mental health of students. He stated that this lecture series aligns with one of the objectives of the Community Health Needs Assessment. The superintendent also shared that the Scioto High School addition will eliminate the need for a fourth high school until 2033 or 2034. Regarding the Logan/Union/Champaign Regional Planning Commission, Mr. Keeler stated that the Del Webb Jerome subdivision from Pulte Homes was reviewed at the last meeting. This project consists of 673 single-family lots in the Dublin City School District. o Mr. Reiner shared that the Dublin Arts Council is featuring the Icelandic Exhibit, and their search for a new Executive Director is continuing. o Ms. Kramb welcomed Chief Donahue whose first official day was Saturday (March 15) as the Chief of the Fire Department. She noted that ARB canceled their March meeting. o Mayor Amorose Groomes provided an update regarding MORPC. She shared that one of the biggest topics coming out of the last meeting was the passage of the attributable funding, which totaled about $27 million dollars. $4.5 million has been identified for the Emerald Connector Bridge. It will be great to have additional funding to pursue that important connection in our community. Minutes of RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council Mactne OVERNMENT FORMS & SUPPLIES 844-224-3338 FORM NO. 10148 Held March 17, 2025 Page 22 of 23 20 COUNCIL ROUNDTABLE ° Ms. Kramb thanked the residents who came to the State of the City and joined in on the fun at the parade. She thanked David Guion for his service on the Arts Council. She wished him well in retirement and expressed her apologies for not being in town for his party. Ms. Fox stated that the parade was fun; she was amazed at how wonderfully happy all the Dublin folks were even in the rain. She thanked David Guion for lifting the Arts Council into an extremely immersive experience in understanding and appreciation. She added that he brought cultures together. He has helped children understand that their art will be appreciated. He has allowed the community to feel that art is something that can be enjoyed without being afraid of it. He has made an enormous impact, and people will continue to be fulfilled and enriched by his work. She wished him a great retirement. Mr. Reiner congratulated Mr. Hammersmith on his award. He thanked the Events staff on a wonderful St. Patrick's Day parade. Mr. Reiner thanked David Guion for serving the City for 20 years with outstanding leadership. He was always working to bring in revenue for the arts. He stated that Mr. Guion is a natural leader who created a first-class organization, which brought Dublin into the spotlight with the River Box Program. He combined arts with physical outdoor activities. Mr. Keeler stated that our residents proved that they were the most resilient and connected after joining the parade on Saturday where it was raining buckets. He thanked Michael Darling for organizing a tour of Rumpke’s state-of-the-art recycling facility recently. These tours are informative. It costs more to dump waste at the landfill than it does to recycle. Rumpke processes materials for recycling such as paper, plastic, aluminum, glass etc., and they sell it to manufacturers. It makes them money and saves us money in the long run. Mr. Keeler thanked Mr. Guion for his service, his vision and his passion. Public Art makes us happy, and we need more of it. He congratulated Mr. Hammersmith on his award. Mr. Reiner shared photos of green turf roofs and asked for the topic to be shared with CSAC to see if it could be incorporated into the Code. He advocated for Council to refer this topic to CSAC for consideration and exploration. Ms. De Rosa suggested having staff put a little work into the topic, because she was unsure what the request of CSAC would be at this time. Mr. Reiner agreed. Ms. De Rosa thanked staff for the work during a very busy last week. She congratulated Mr. Hammersmith on his award. She stated it is very well deserved. She thanked Mr. Guion and stated that he has a unique, wonderful talent that has shown what art can be. She stated that she would sum up his career by simply saying “masterpiece.” She wished him the best in his retirement. Vice Mayor Alutto congratulated Mr. Hammersmith on his award. She thanked staff for a wonderful St. Patrick’s Day parade despite the rain. She stated that David Guion is a very special man, and she expressed appreciation for his making the arts accessible to everyone. She wished Mayor Amorose Groomes a happy birthday on March 13! Mayor Amorose Groomes shared the following updates: o She thanked SAIL (Safe Alliance of Interfaith Leaders) for having a wonderful Iftar Dinner on March 4. o She attended the COMMA meeting at the Columbus Zoo on March 7. The meeting's topics included an update from Powell on what is happening in their community, and short-term rentals were discussed. o She attended the National League of Cities conference in Washington DC on March 9 through 12. While there, she attended the ITC Committee meeting where they spent time setting the federal advocacy agenda. Also, while in Washington, she met with local congressional members Troy Balderson and Mike Carey, and significant conversations were held regarding the tax- exempt status of municipal bonds. She stated that due to the impact this would have on the City of Dublin, it is important that we advocate our position on that issue. She stated that there was a request to determine RECORD OF FROCEEDINGS n City Council Minutes of Meeting OVERNMENT FORM: UPPLIES 844-224-2338 FORM NO. 10148 Held March 17, 2025 Page 23 of 23 20 what the cost of projects would be if the municipal bonds were not tax exempt and how much funding would be requested of the federal government. She stated that calculating that across the country would show the impact. She also participated in interesting discussions regarding rail safety and brought back materials that she will pass along to staff. She met with Mariah Morales, who is the Government Affairs Director at Amtrak, to try to understand what phase two is going to look like and what federal matches might be possible for local communities. She expressed a high level of confidence that there would be federal funding matches. It is a 90% federal funds and 10% state and local funds for the cost of phase two. She also met with Christine Serrano Glassner, the Deputy Director of the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs. Those discussions centered around the federal funding earmarked in the member-directed spending ($6 million) that we were granted in the last budget. Those dollars are going to have to be reapplied for again, but Ms. Glassner indicated that her job was to assist us with that process. o She attended the Birthday Celebration in Detroit for his majesty the Emperor of Japan's 65" birthday. She had the opportunity to meet the new Consul General of Japan in Detroit, Hajime “Jimmy” Kishimori. She stated the topic of tariffs came up in conversation, and she is hopeful that the City can help communicate some level of confidence regarding what things might look like moving forward. o She congratulated Mr. Hammersmith. She stated that it was nice to see how much that award meant to him. o She congratulated David Guion on his retirement and stated that his joy for the arts and his job of delivering the arts to the community will always be remembered. She thanked him for all he has done on behalf of the community. © She thanked the public for coming out to the St. Patrick’s Day parade. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:08 p.m. Ve Ae 2B Mayor — Presiding Officer