Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Ordinance 15-24
RECORD OF ORDINANCES BARRETT BROTHERS - DAYTON, OHIO Form 6220S Ordinance No, __15-24 Passed AMENDING THE CITY OF DUBLIN COMMUNITY PLAN (CASE 24-019ADMO) WHEREAS, the City of Dublin strives to preserve and enhance the unique high quality of life, community character and fiscal well-being offered to those who live or work in the community; and, WHEREAS, the City of Dublin seeks to manage growth and adapt to changes that result from the demand for offices, high technology industries, a variety of housing options, and mixed use development; and, WHEREAS, the City of Dublin seeks to preserve the public health, safety and welfare by managing the City’s growth and change and ensuring that additional development and redevelopment does not adversely affect the community; and, WHEREAS, the City of Dublin strives to promote good governance through innovation, efficiency, transparency, and public involvement in all aspects of its community planning efforts; and, WHEREAS, the Community Plan is a planning document that is meant to guide the City in planning and development decisions; and, WHEREAS, the Community Plan should be updated from time to time to respond to changes in the community and to maintain its accuracy, relevancy and usefulness as a decision-making tool. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, (+ of its elected members concurring, that: Section 1. ©The Dublin Community Plan is hereby amended and shall henceforth be Officially titled as, “The Envision Dublin Community Plan.” A copy of the Community Plan is on file with the Clerk of Council’s office, as of the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 2. The primary format of the Dublin Community Plan shall be a publicly- accessible and allow for future amendments to be efficiently incorporated. Section 3. The City Manager shall be authorized to implement an official policy regarding the continual maintenance and periodic technical update of the Community Plan to adjust such items as facts, figures, inventories and descriptions or graphic depictions of existing conditions. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest period allowed by law. e 4 Passed this_ / _—s day of =: , 2074. NO. Fos Mayor - Presiding Officer ATTEST: Clepifof Coyncil Memo To: Members of Dublin City Council From: Megan D. O’Callaghan, City Manager Date: June 11, 2024 Initiated By: Re: Jennifer M. Rauch, AICP, Director of Community Planning & Development Paul Hammersmith, Director of Engineering Jean-Ellen Willis, P.E., Director of Transportation & Mobility Jeremiah Gracia, CEcD, Director of Economic Development Tina Wawszkiewicz, P.E., Deputy Director of Transportation & Mobility Michael B. Hendershot, Director of Utilities and Stormwater Tammy Noble, Senior Planner Christopher Will, AICP, Senior Planner Ordinance 15-24 Amending the City of Dublin Community Plan – Envision Dublin Summary The Community Plan guides responsible and sustainable growth policies for future development and was last updated in 2013. The Community Plan includes land use recommendations, roadway improvements, infrastructure needs, economic growth, and parks and open space recommendations. The Envision Dublin Community Plan Update was an extensive process spanning eighteen months with a focus on community engagement, coordination with other plans and policies, collaboration with surrounding jurisdictions, and updates to six Special Area Plans. The draft Plan was reviewed by the Envision Dublin Steering Committee, and the Planning and Zoning Commission provided a recommendation of approval to City Council for adoption. The draft Plan presented to City Council with Ordinance 15-24 is a request for review and adoption. Background The Envision Dublin Community Plan Update began at the end of 2022 and is nearing completion with a draft Plan shared with City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission, Architectural Review Board, Envision Dublin Steering Committee and the public in April 2024. City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission received updates on the Plan’s progress throughout the process with the last updates in May 2024. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and recommended approval to City Council at their May 23, 2024 meeting. Modifications have been made to the Envision Dublin Community Plan Update based on the feedback received throughout the review process. Office of the City Manager 5555 Perimeter Drive • Dublin, OH 43017-1090 Phone: 614-410-4400 • Fax: 614-410-4490 Memo re. Ord 15-24 Amending the City of Dublin Community Plan June 11, 2024 Page 2 of 7 Engagement and Coordination Steering Committee The Envision Dublin Community Plan Update was guided by a Steering Committee, which oversaw the Plan's development and provided direction and recommendations at key planning milestones. The 20-member Committee was a diverse and well-represented group from our community, including City officials, board and commission members, township and school representatives, development and business community members, advocacy leaders, active community leaders, and youth representatives. The Committee met nine times throughout the update process to provide feedback and direction to ensure the Plan aligns with the community’s direction with the last meeting held April 30, 2024. Public Engagement Public engagement has been a cornerstone of the planning process and an essential part of Envision Dublin. The City shared a wide range of opportunities with our community members, business owners, developers, service providers, local officials, and surrounding jurisdictions on what the next two decades should look like for Dublin. Our efforts reached stakeholders through a variety of formats, including public meetings, open houses, workshops, surveys, events, and interviews. The Dublin community has been engaged and active throughout the process and provided feedback in various forms to ensure the policies and objectives are aligned with the community. Chapter two provides a detailed breakdown of the public engagement metrics conducted as part of the Plan update. Plan and Policy Coordination The Envision Dublin Community Plan Update includes future land use recommendations and outlines necessary infrastructure needs for future development including transportation and mobility, utility and infrastructure, parks and open space, and community facilities. Throughout the update process staff and the consultant teams for each of these components have been working together to ensure the Plan is integrated between the various disciplines. In addition to the transportation and mobility, utility and fiscal coordination, staff and the consultant teams have worked with other divisions of the City to ensure the integration of other studies, plans and policies. These include the Sustainability Framework, Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Dublin Area Housing Study and Strategy, Economic Development Strategic Plan, Metro Center Implementation, West Dublin Passenger Rail Station Area Planning Study and East Bridge Street Corridor Study. Envision Dublin Highlights The following outlines the key highlights and opportunities captured within the Envision Dublin Community Plan Update. • Integrates the vast public engagement opportunities into the Plan. • Integrates with the City’s Strategic Framework, including sustainability recommendations throughout the Plan. • Establishes a significant connection to the Economic Development Strategy, as well as other key City plans and policies. • Continues forward-thinking land use recommendations and planning principles. • Creates detailed land use categories with character-defining descriptions and details. • Plans for the western growth area with land use, mobility/transportation and utility recommendations. Memo re. Ord 15-24 Amending the City of Dublin Community Plan June 11, 2024 Page 3 of 7 • Diversifies economic land uses to remain competitive. • Intensifies and diversifies desired residential uses in key areas. • Provides tools to support the City’s housing and development goals. • Creates specific mixed-use categories to define the variety and character desired based on location. • Outlines strategic growth approach. • Shifts in mobility and transportation prioritization focusing on vulnerable users. • Creates Multimodal Thoroughfare Plan. • Creates street typologies to outline desired street character. • Modifies Special Area Plan to align with the City Council’s goals and objectives, address changing development patterns, and align with the community’s vision. Historic District o Follows the recommendations established by the Historic District Task Force o Continues to recommend compatible scale and character of development within the District o Contemplates the potential redevelopment opportunities of the existing school site, stressed the importance of the Indian Run o Highlights a future east/west signature mobility corridor o Establishes the contextual relationships for properties along the edges of the District, including Monterey Drive redevelopment Southwest o Outlines recommendations to address the Village of Amlin o Identifies the area as a prime location for additional residential development to meet the recommendations outlined in the City’s Housing Study and Strategy o Focuses on the opportunity for mixed residential development types o Specifies the desired corridor character of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard with a curvilinear design, variable width medians, landscaping, and increased setbacks o Provides recommendations along the rail corridor for increased setbacks, landscaping and berms o Highlights the need to ensure appropriate transitions and integration with existing residential neighborhoods when considering new development o Incorporates recommendations to specify existing natural features should be integrated into new development as focal points o Includes mixed-use nodes in key locations to support new and existing development West Innovation District o Modifies area plan boundaries to capture additional area o Focuses on recommendations that support the City’s Economic Development Strategy o Highlights the potential future rail site o Recommends a mixed-use neighborhood around the potential rail station area. o Recommends a mixed-use center adjacent to Ohio University’s Dublin Campus o Incorporates increased flex, innovation uses to promote additional employment opportunities o Provides uses that transition from a higher intensity of development within the Ohio Memo re. Ord 15-24 Amending the City of Dublin Community Plan June 11, 2024 Page 4 of 7 University/US 33 corridor down to Shier Rings and Ballantrae Emerald Corridor o Consolidates land use and development recommendations along the entire Emerald Parkway corridor o Provides for employment-focused development recommendations, particularly along the I-270 corridor o Provides mixed-use development examples for the Parkwood site showing a mix of uses that transition between small-scale development along Emerald Parkway and larger development character along I-270 o Recommends appropriate transition between existing single-family and I-270 development within the Bright Road and Coffman Road areas o Provides key vehicular and greenway connections along the corridor Bridge Street District o Provides for employment-focused development recommendations, particularly along the I-270 corridor o Includes recommendations for the East Bridge Street Corridor and future implementation of the BRT, which reimagines the streetscape for the corridor o Maintains recommendations for unique neighborhood character types that provide for the different mixes of uses o Recognizes the importance of the greenway connections within the District Dublin Corporate Area o Provides for employment-focused development recommendations, particularly along the I-270 corridor o Focuses on the implementation of the Economic Development Strategy o Includes recommendations regarding the Metro Center redevelopment implementation project o Recommends sensitive transitions between existing and future development, particularly adjacent residential uses o Provides future mobility and transportation connections in the corridor o Outlines the need for a mix of uses both vertically and horizontally, prioritizing activation of ground floor uses in key locations o Includes a large-scale plan with key focus area examples at Rings and Frantz Roads and Blazer Parkway Draft Document Overview The Steering Committee, as well as the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, reviewed the draft Plan in detail with the consultant team. This introduction to the Plan included the review of each chapter: Introduction, Community Profile, Visions and Goals, Land Use and Development, Housing and Neighborhoods, Economic Development, Transportation and Mobility, Community Facilities and Services, Utility, Natural Resources and Environment, Special Area Plans, and Implementation. Members of City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission provided recommendations to expand several key topics within the Plan to address missing middle housing, placemaking, and residential development, including conservation design. Members also provided comments on Memo re. Ord 15-24 Amending the City of Dublin Community Plan June 11, 2024 Page 5 of 7 mapping details and graphics and future land use classifications. The Steering Committee provided recommendations regarding further definition of mixed-use development, revising the order of the Mobility and Transportation chapter to follow the shift in paradigm, and more detailed information regarding the Signature Trail. Staff received written comments and met with City Council and Planning and Zoning Commission members one-on-one as desired to discuss the Plan and provide clarifying information. Planning and Zoning Commission provided feedback at the May 23, 2024 meeting. Staff and the consultant teams identified additional revisions and clarifications that have been incorporated in the revised draft Plan, including modified graphics, photographs, clarity in recommendations and objectives, and updated text changes. The final draft Plan is summarized below and includes comments provided through the update process. A brief description of each chapter contained in the Plan is listed below with an overview of the changes that were incorporated into the Plan. Introduction The introduction provides an overview of the Envision Dublin planning process, its relationship to the City’s Strategic Framework and planning area. It provides a description of what a Community Plan is and how to use it, along with a general overview of its creation and the resources used. It also highlights the public engagement process and summarizes the feedback received. This chapter was revised to offer a more detailed description of the relationship with external jurisdictions and entities, as well as an expanded explanation of the Steering Committee and its role in the plan. Additionally, the Planning Commission requested that additional information be provided under the Land Use Principles to address how Dublin strategically plans for all types of land uses in strategic parts of the City to make us Distinctly Dublin. Community Profile The purpose of this chapter is to lay the groundwork for planning in Dublin by examining relevant existing conditions, demographics, market conditions, regional context, current regulations, and past plans and studies. This chapter was updated to include more specific information on the City’s fiscal sustainability practices, emphasize the need for a balance of uses, and address remote working trends. Vision and Goals This chapter articulates the Plan’s vision, goals and objectives that were developed based on extensive community engagement, setting the foundation for more detailed recommendations for each plan element. This chapter was modified to highlight environmental efforts including the Rapid 5 initiative, reallocate content about the parks and recreation to the Community Facilities section and update any goals and objectives based on the direction of the Plan. Land Use and Development This chapter provides the framework for land use, development character and growth for the City and its planning area. The chapter highlights the land use scenario planning that was undertaken to help develop the Plan, as well as provide the future land use map and growth strategy necessary to accommodate the projected population increase while maintaining the desired community character. This chapter was revised to provide more explanation between the four mixed-use land use classifications, more information about the character descriptions within each land use classifications and provide more clarity in the graphics. The Planning Commission requested additional information be provided for the alternative land use scenarios so the users are clear that the analysis resulted in a singular recommendation for the Future Land Use Memo re. Ord 15-24 Amending the City of Dublin Community Plan June 11, 2024 Page 6 of 7 Recommendation plan. The Commission also requested revised naming conventions for the residential land use classifications and commented that the language should be more generalized regarding the location of future development projects in relation to existing infrastructure. Housing and Neighborhoods The purpose of this chapter is to provide guidance on key issues impacting residential areas of the City. The Housing and Neighborhoods chapter strives to preserve and enhance Dublin’s established residential neighborhoods while promoting opportunities for higher density, unique, and variety of housing options within and on the periphery of the city. The chapter delves into supporting amenity-rich neighborhoods and investing in infrastructure to ensure continued high- quality living, as well as identifying opportunities for aging in place. This chapter was revised to enhance clarity regarding the City Council's vision for placemaking, community aesthetics, streetscape design, and the identification of critical viewsheds. In response to feedback from the Planning Commission, the chapter was expanded to include a broader concept of connected neighborhoods, encompassing connected cities as well, emphasizing the integration of living, working, and recreational spaces. The Commission emphasized the significance of this theme in creating appealing neighborhoods, which was reiterated throughout the planning process. Economic Development This chapter seeks to strengthen the City’s robust economy and commercial centers and major corridors. It provides key priorities and recommendations that can improve the overall business climate and encourage new investment in Dublin’s growth areas. It focuses on approaches to invigorating the City’s aging business parks with more contemporary neighborhoods that offer diverse employment opportunities. The chapter explores workforce development as a strategy to strengthen Dublin’s employment base. Transportation and Mobility The purpose of the chapter is to provide details about Dublin’s complex transportation system, with recommended investments in active transportation, transit and roadways to support existing and future development and regional connections. The chapter includes the Active Transportation Plan and Thoroughfare Plan, culminating in the new Multimodal Thoroughfare Plan and the introduction of street typologies. The structure of this chapter was revised to accurately reflect the paradigm shift and place greater emphasis on the continued prioritization of vehicular movement in specific areas of the City. Community Facilities and Services This chapter focuses on how facilities and services impact the overall quality of life for residents, businesses and visitors. Facilities and services related to education, emergency services, parks and recreation, and much more are addressed, including City-managing facilities and services provided by other public entities. This chapter was modified to highlight efforts for sustainable practices in City buildings, update the Community Facilities map to include all recent projects, discuss capacity studies that are currently being conducted by school districts, and emphasize the importance of preserving stone walls. Utility and Infrastructure This chapter explores and makes recommendations related to existing and proposed utility services in Dublin. Strategies cover water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer services and broadband infrastructure. These strategies will be particularly relevant to the Special Area Plans Memo re. Ord 15-24 Amending the City of Dublin Community Plan June 11, 2024 Page 7 of 7 and development efforts in the city’s western and southwestern growth areas. Sustainable green infrastructure improvements are also an important part of the chapter. Natural Resources and Environment This chapter reinforces the importance of being good stewards of the natural environment and offers strategies for environmental sustainability best practices to ensure natural resources and environmental features remain valued community assets. This chapter was modified to emphasize the importance of limiting pervious pavement based on environmental impacts and recommendations regarding citywide tree canopy. Special Area Plans This chapter provides detailed planning concepts and recommendations for six areas within the City, which include the Historic District, Southwest Area, West Innovation District, Emerald Corridor, Bridge Street District and Dublin Corporate Area. Each Area Plan includes an overview of the area, planning context, area recommendations, key development sites, and an illustrative plan with design recommendations. This section was revised to include illustrative plan refinements, more concise wording, and additional graphics. The Dublin Corporate Area and Emerald Corridor Area Plans have been updated to incorporate an area-wide plan. The Planning Commission requested that all the symbols included in the maps be captured in the legend for clarity. Additionally, they asked for more detailed information within the Emerald Corridor Plan, particularly in the area adjacent to the Parkwood Place development. Furthermore, the Commission requested additional description of the western area of the Bridge Street District to accurately characterize this area and its connection to future LinkUS efforts. Implementation This chapter is a critical resource to guide future planning efforts and decision making processes. It lays the groundwork for implementing the goals, objectives, and recommendations for the plan. This chapter has been completed upon final review of all previous chapters and no modifications have been made to this chapter to date. Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and recommended approval to City Council on May 23, 2024. The Commission provided strong support for the Plan, stating the Plan outlines a clear path to meet the City’s Strategic Framework to be the most sustainable, connected, and resilient global city of choice. The Commission stated the document provides a strong basis for decision-making and will be an asset for future development review and guidance. The Commission acknowledged the hard work to create the Envision Dublin Community Plan Update and recognized the Plan as a fundamental resource for the Planning and Zoning Commission. Recommendation Adoption of the Envision Dublin Community Plan Update at the second reading/public hearing on July 1, 2024. ENVISION DUBLIN Sustainable, Connected & Resilient Community Plan WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS City Council Chris Amorose Groomes, Mayor Christina Alutto, Vice Mayor Cathy DeRosa Jane Fox Andy Keeler Amy Kramb John Reiner Steering Committee Gary Alexander Chris Amorose Groomes Vivek Arunachalam Abby Barnes Rebecca Call Diane Cartolano Pranitha Chillara Cathy DeRosa Bob Fathman Paul Ghidotti Rebecca McGrath Megan O’Callaghan Stacie Raterman Julie Rinaldi Jan Rozanski Jen Schwanke Jules Seel Renaud Isao Shoji Matt Starr Keeli Stith Kim Way Kristy Venne Planning and Zoning Commission Rebecca Call, Chair Mark Supelak, Vice Chair (former) Jamey Chinnock Warren Fishman (former) Kathy Harter Lance Schneier (former) Kim Way Architectural Review Board Gary Alexander, Chair Sean Cotter, Vice Chair Martha Cooper Hillary Damaser Michael Jewell City Staff Megan O’Callaghan, City Manager Jenny Rauch, Director of Community Planning and Development Tammy Noble, Senior Planner Chris Will, Senior Planner Jeannie Willis, PE, Director of Transportation and Mobility Tina Wawszkiewicz, PE, Deputy Director of Transportation and Mobility Paul A. Hammersmith, PE, Director of Engineering/City Engineer Michael Hendershot, PE, Director of Utilities and Stormwater Management Jeremiah Gracia, Director of Economic Development Matt Earman, Director of Parks and Recreation Justin Paez, Chief of Police Matt Stiffler, Chief Finance Officer Lindsay R. Weisenauer, Director of Communications and Marketing Aisling Babbitt, Communications and Marketing Bruce Edwards, Digital and Brand Manager Richard T. Frantz, Data and Analytics Manager Brandon Brown, Director of Innovation and Analytics Langdon Sanders, Senior Data Analyst Bassem Bitar, Deputy Director of Planning Sarah Holt, Senior Planner Zachary C. Hounshell, Planner II Taylor Mullinax, Planner I Rati Singh, Planner I Madison Richard, Planning Technician Javon Henderson, Planning Technician Daniel Klein, Planning Assistant Jane Peuser, Planning Assistant Mitchell Ament, Management Analyst Emily Goliver, Management Analyst Kendel Blake, Management Analyst Advisory Committees Chief’s Advisory Committee Community Inclusion Advisory Committee Veterans Committee Community Services Advisory Committee Jurisdictional Partners City of Marysville Jerome Township Logan Union and Champaign County Regional Planning Commission Madison County Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission (MORPC) Village of Plain City Union County Consultant Teams Houseal Lavigne, Lead Asakura Robinson, Dublin Sustainability Plan Consultant EMH&T, Utility Kimley Horn, Transportation and Mobility MS consultants, Utility Pros Consulting, Parks and Recreation Master Plan Consultant Tischler Bise, Fiscal Toole Design, Transportation and Mobility WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 COMMUNITY PROFILE 13 3 VISION AND GOALS 25 4 LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT 33 5 HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOODS 57 6 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 71 7 MOBILITY AND TRANSPORTATION 85 8 COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES 119 9 UTILITIES 133 10 NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT 163 11 SPECIAL AREA PLANS 175 12 IMPLEMENTATION 239 13 APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT TEAM WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 01Purpose This chapter provides an overview of the Envision Dublin planning process, its relationship to the City Strategic Framework, and describes the planning area. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 1 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Introduction Dublin is an innovative City that draws on its roots to shape its future. Planning, investment, and government commit- ment built upon stable economic foundations make Dublin a thriving, vibrant, attractive, and amenity-rich community to live, work, and visit. Dublin has experienced changes over the past two decades which create both opportunities and challenges. Resi- dential and commercial growth have established robust, stable economic conditions for the community, increasing its desirability as a place to call home and do business. Meeting the needs of a changing and growing population will require a housing inventory that effectively meets the needs of current and future populations and residents at all economic levels and stages of life. Looking Forward Dublin has a strong history of generating a mix of residen- tial, commercial, and employment land uses alongside community facilities, open spaces, and recreational ameni- ties. Additionally, Dublin recognizes its role in the region and the importance of cooperation and coordination with neighboring communities, including working with MORPC and surrounding jurisdictions. The 2013 City of Dublin Community Plan helped guide the decision-makers about Dublin’s built and natural envi- ronment. Now, a decade later, it’s time to revisit the 2013 Community Plan with Envision Dublin. This new plan offers guidance to address evolving demographics and develop- ment trends, ensuring the City remains adaptable and inno- vative. Drawing on Dublin’s energy and pride, it provides the vision, tools, focus, and strategies for the City to reach its full potential amidst future changes and challenges. The Plan continues the City’s commitment to ensuring it remains sustainable, connected, and resilient. Effectively addressing these community themes requires asking some key questions. How will the City meet its housing needs and where can new housing be developed? What is the future of the City’s commercial and mixed-use areas and how do these areas remain competitive and desirable locations for commerce? How should the City respond to shifting office trends, including remote working and its impact on traditional office development? How can the City best accommodate change while maintaining its high quality of life and sense of place? 01 INTRODUCTION WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Introduction 2 WHAT IS THE COMMUNITY PLAN? Envision Dublin (The Plan) is the official comprehensive plan for the City of Dublin. It creates a long-term vision for the City and serves as the roadmap for the community as it grows and evolves over the next 10-20 years. The Plan recommends strategies and policies that should guide municipal regulations and annual budgeting to ensure that future growth and development in the City aligns with the community’s priorities. The Plan integrates previous planning efforts, existing policies, local, regional, and national data, and, most essentially, community input. It builds upon Dublin’s Strategic Framework, adopted in 2022, to be the “Most Sustainable, Connected, and Resilient Global City of Choice.” With the Strategic Framework, the Plan articu- lates a cohesive vision representative of Dublin’s residents, business community, and community stakeholders. Further, the City Strategic Framework also established three themes - Most Sustainable, Most Connected, and Most Resilient, to guide various goals established in the Strategic Framework. Envision Dublin adheres to these key themes, providing related discussions to these themes interspersed throughout the Plan. Envision Dublin is a living document that reflects dynamic, interdependent elements that make up the City of Dublin and it is intended to respond to changing conditions over time. The Plan is comprehensive but cannot foresee every issue in sufficient detail to prescribe appropriate action for every eventuality. It is not regulatory and is not an ordinance, but it identifies key areas of focus, defines a vision for future growth and development, and guides city actions and investments over the next two decades. Envision Dublin will guide the adoption of land use regulations and policies, and prioriti- zation and budgeting to make improvements to community facilities and infrastructure. HOW TO USE THE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan serves the following key functions: Communicating the City’s Vision – The Plan is a statement of the community’s vision for how it grows and changes over the coming years. The Plan identifies the City’s priorities and charts a path for long-term growth. Inform Development Proposals – The Plan is a long-term guide by which to measure and evaluate public and private proposals that affect the physical and economic environ- ment of the community. The Plan assists in the evaluation of development proposals and helps ensure that proposed devel opment supports the City’s long-term objectives. Provide Direction – The Plan is a guide for zoning and subdi- vision regulations, the official zoning map, and decisions influenced by these regulations. The City should consider amendments to regulations in order to support the long-term goals of the Plan. Coordinate Initiatives – The Plan informs planning initiatives that affect the City at the local, county, and regional levels. The Plan may aid and inform efforts related to housing, transportation, transit, trails, natural resources, economic development, and recreation. Future Studies – The Plan establishes a path forward but cannot address every issue faced by the City in sufficient detail. It should help identify additional studies and future action steps to address specific needs. Decision Maker – The Plan is a valuable source of informa- tion for the City Council, Planning & Zoning Commission, Architectural Review Board, Board of Zoning Appeals, City Staff, as well as local organizations, businesses, developers, and residents. CIP and Budgeting – The Plan informs the devel opment of the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and budgeting which establishes priority expen ditures and the sequence of capital improvement programming. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 3 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Introduction HOW WAS THIS PLAN CREATED? The City initiated the planning process for Envision Dublin in August 2022 as an update to its 2013 Community Plan, also incorporating the themes and priorities identified in the City’s 2022 Strategic Framework. The planning process was organized around the objectives of accurately capturing and reflecting community hopes and values, being comprehen- sive, and being innovative and future-oriented, while being practical to implement and grounded in market realities. The process applied industry-leading geospatial analytical tools to examine and assess the outcomes of different growth and development scenarios over time. From insights gained through this process, land use recommenda- tions were developed that best accommodated projected community growth while preserving Dublin’s sense of place and anticipating impacts on infrastructure. The approach used to create Envision Dublin included these major components: Engagement – A core part of the process was identifying and developing consensus around key areas of interest, priorities, and strategies for moving forward. To ensure the process was inclusive and reflected the perspectives of the entire community, both online and in-person activities were undertaken, including online surveys and mapping tools, in-person interviews and focus group discussions, work- shops, multiple Steering Committee meetings and working sessions, open houses, and more. Inventorying and Assessing – Before planning could proceed, the process required a comprehensive inventory and assessment of existing conditions, regulations, current and past plans, and the physical attributes of the commu- nity to establish a thorough understanding of the community’s context. Data Analysis – To ensure the formulation of realistic land use planning recommendations, the process required extensive research of demographic and market data including population trends and market conditions. Establishing a Vision – All input received through the extensive community engagement and outreach was analyzed to identify shared community aspirations, values, and priorities. These were shaped into a vision—a strong statement of the kind of community Dublin is and can be in the future. Scenario Testing – Based on data collected about existing conditions, population and market trends, together with input from the community, multiple scenarios were devel- oped using geospatial analytical tools. These scenarios, once determined to be consistent with the community’s vision, were then tested to help identify and determine the preferred approach forward that best reflected the values and priorities of Dublin. Developing Plans – From the insights gained from scenario testing and community and stakeholder feedback, the Plan and special-area plans were developed. They include innovative but practical recommendations to help the City achieve its vision, goals, and objectives. Implementation Strategies – Finally, once the core elements of the Plan were developed, an implementation strategy was established to help put the Plan into action. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Special Area Plans Update Community Visioning Public Engagement Preliminary Framework Plans Land Use Scenarios Existing Conditions Analysis Project Initiation Where do we want to go?Where are we now?How do we get there? Adoption and Implementation ENVISION DUBLIN PROCESS WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Introduction | Envision Dublin Community Plan 4 PAST PLANS AND STUDIES It is important that the Envision Dublin Community Plan respects relevant past planning efforts that have shaped the City into what it is today. The review of Dublin’s past plans and studies ensures existing community policies and goals are carried forward within the Plan where relevant. For a more detailed description of each plan/study and its relevance to this planning activity, see the Existing Conditions Memorandum. Below is a list of the plans and studies that were reviewed and consulted in the processes of creating Envision Dublin. ■Sustainability Plan (underway) (2023) & (2018) ■Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2023) ■Historic Dublin Revitalization Plan (2023) ■Dublin Area Housing Study and Strategy (2023) ■Economic Development Strategic Plan Update (2023) ■Strategic Framework (2022) ■Historic District Task Force (2021) ■Dublin Corporate Area Plan (2018) & (2022) ■West Innovation District Area Plan (2017) ■Shier Rings Road Corridor Study (2016) ■Strategic Action Plan: Central Ohio Greenways (2016)* ■Bright Road Area Plan Update (2015) ■Crossroads Area Plan (2015)* ■Dublin Community Plan Update (2013) ■Southwest Area Plan and Bright Road Area Plan as part of the Community Plan Update (2013) ■Bridge Street District Street Corridor Study (2010) ■RAPID 5 (2021)* Note*: Studies that the City of Dublin were a part of. 2024 DUBLIN SUSTAINABILIT Y P L A N February 2024 DRAFT WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 5 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Introduction LAND USE PRINCIPLES In June 2023, based upon extensive public input, discus- sion with the City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission, and evaluation of community expectations and future needs, the City developed land use principles to serve as the basis for evaluating future development proposals. City Council adopted Resolution 52-23 to set common design objectives and direction for land use policy in Dublin. The land use principles are as follows: ■Think comprehensively. Plan for the Bigger Picture Ensure that each individual development contributes in a complementary manner to the larger district vision and plan by using a guiding framework and vision for land use patterns, activity nodes, open spaces, parking and connectivity. ■Start with the Public Realm Ensure development incorporates thoughtful and purposeful public spaces for all people to gather, socialize and recreate that reinforce the public realm. ■Balance the Mix of Uses Create neighborhoods and districts which provide a balanced and integrated mix of land uses to support the daily needs for both the residents and business community. Maintain the City’s long-standing policy of an overall land use mix of 60% residential and 40% non-residential development. ■Provide a Variety of Housing and Neighborhood Choices Create well-planned, livable neighborhoods with a variety of housing choices for all ages and ways of life, as well as supporting the evolving needs of existing neighborhoods. Residential development should be appropriately scaled and sited to contextually fit with each neighborhoods’ fabric. ■Focus Growth Utilize and leverage existing infrastructure and assets to guide future growth to areas best equipped to accommodate change. Infill, redevelopment, reinvest- ment, and re-use of underutilized areas can reimagine and strengthen existing districts. ■Reserve Strategic Economic Assets Protect long-term economic development interests and the fiscal health of the City by reserving high visibility corridors, such as freeways and railways for develop- ment that supports economic vitality and restricting residential development from fronting these corridors. ■Protect Natural Resources and Ecological Systems Protect and enhance environmentally important and sensitive areas, including large tree stands and land- mark trees, wildlife habitat and corridors, waterways and watersheds. ■Protect and Enhance Our Historic and Cultural Resources Celebrate the character that makes Historic Dublin an authentic place to live, work, and visit. Respect and celebrate our cultural and archaeological sites and landscapes. ■Integrate Sustainable Design Integrate best practices and innovative approaches to sustainability into site and building design to limit the environmental footprint of development. ■Create a Connected Transportation Network Create a transportation network of streets and streets- capes to provide safe and efficient mobility choices for all users and which contextually fits with surrounding neighborhood character and natural features. Provide linkages to create local and regional connectivity. ■Encourage Walkability Encourage human centric design that makes it easier to walk and bike in our community, provide routes for pedestrians and cyclists and destinations along routes. ■Be Distinctly Dublin Continue to express our distinct Dublin identity and sense of place through a diversity of uses, including recreational parks, high-density housing, and more. Emphasize the use of high-quality building materials, exceptional architecture, well-designed landscapes, and captivating public art. Encourage thoughtful and innovative design that distinguishes Dublin as a global City of choice. The land use principles have since provided guidance to Dublin’s decision-makers and ensured that future policies and developments align with the community’s vision and desires. These principles still hold and have guided the Envision Dublin Community Plan. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Introduction | Envision Dublin Community Plan 6 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Community outreach and engagement is the foundation of the comprehensive planning process. In Dublin, residents, business owners, officials, and community stakeholders provided feedback and insight into community values, interests, concerns, priorities, opportunities, and aspirations for the future. Public engagement included a website-based survey and interactive mapping tool, public meetings, community and special area workshops, open houses, engagement at the farmers market, Do-it-Yourself workshops, key stakeholder interviews, and focus group discussions. The feedback gathered helped shaped Envision Dublin. A comprehensive plan Steering Committee was established to guide the planning process to review and discuss every aspect of the plan as it was being developed. The Steering Committee served as a sounding board for the commu- nity and included stakeholders representing wide ranging perspectives and insights, including residents, business owners, not-for-profits, elected and appointed officials, school districts, and more. In total, the planning process had more than 5,300 points of engagement through a combination of in-person and online community outreach tools and exercises. Throughout, community members provided thousands of comments, insights, and ideas for consideration. A detailed description of the Community Outreach process is provided in the Existing Conditions Report, on file with the City. Outreach efforts undertaken in this planning process included: ■Public Engagement events including the State of the Community event, Community Visioning workshop, Do-it-Yourself Kit Meet- ings, and Community Open House ■Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee meetings and workshops ■Key Stakeholder interviews ■Business Community Visioning workshop ■City Department Leaders Workshop ■Joint Work Session of the City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission, and the Architectural Review Board ■Dublin Farmers Market and Mobility Concierge market information booth ■Sandwich board signs placed in key areas ■An interactive project website that included an online survey for residents and businesses and an online community mapping tool ■Social media posts ■Direct emails ■HOA and Civic Association engagement WHAT WORD, PHRASE OR PLACE(S) DO YOU IDENTIFY MOST WITH D U B L I N ? Use dots to select up to 3 options THE DUBLIN LINK COMMUNITY EVENTSHISTORIC STONE WALLS BRIDGE STREET DISTRICT PARKS & RECREATIONHISTORIC DUBLIN ARTS & CULTURE NEIGHBORHOODS SCHOOLS GOLF CORPORATE CITIZENSNATURAL FEATURES Workshop Ques t i o n n a i r e Envision Dublin C o m m u n i t y Plan Group: _______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date: _________ _ _ _ _ _ 1) Identify five (5) iss u e s o r c o n c e r n s f a c i n g Dublin. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 2) List, in order of i m p o r t a n c e , t h e t h r e e ( 3 ) m o s t i m p o r t a n t i s s u e s d i s c u s s e d t h u s f a r . 1) 2) 3) 3) Identify three (3) s p e c i f i c p r o j e c t s or actions that y o u w o u l d l i k e t o s e e u n d e r t a k e n . 1) 2) 3) 4) What are the pri m a r y s t r e n g t h s a n d a s s e t s o f Dublin? Envisio n D u b l i n C o m m u n i t y P l a n U p d a t e Page 11 of 66 envisi o n d u b l i n . o r g Comm u n i t y V i s i o n i n g W o r k s h o p DDuubblliinn CCoommmmuunniittyy PPllaann TThhuurrssddaayy,, JJuunnee 2211,, 22002233 || 66::0000--88::0000 ppmm OOhhiioo UUnniivveerrssiittyy DDuubblliinn CCaammppuuss -- DDuubblliinn IInntteeggrraatteedd EEdduuccaattiioonn CCeenntteerr RRoooomm 221122,, 66880055 BBoobbccaatt WWaayy The n e w DDuubblliinn CCoommmmuunniittyy PPllaann will guide t h e City for the n e x t 2 0 y e a r s , resulting in a se t o f p o l i c i e s t h a t direct f u t u r e g r o w t h a n d d e v e l o p m e n t . The cre a t i o n o f the Plan will lead to p o t e n t i a l s t r a t e g i e s t h a t w i l l h e l p effecti v e l y g u i d e C i t y l e a d e r s a s t h e y m a k e s u b s t a n t i v e a n d t h o u g h t f u l decis i o n s f o r t h e c o m m u n i t y . It is im p o r t a n t t h a t Dublin g reside n t s , b u s i n e s s e s , a n d o t h e r s t a k e h o l d e r s partic i p a t e i n the de v e l o p m e n t o f t h e CCoommmmuunniittyy PPllaann to craft a c o m m u n i t y -based vision f o r Dubli n . Mappi n g E x e r c i s e Agend a • Break i n t o s m a l l g r o u p s f o r vision m a p p i n g e x e r c i s e • Write y o u r G r o u p # o n t h e m a p a n d o n t h e p a c k e t • Work o n the mapp i n g e x e r c i s e with y o u r g r o u p (45-60 minut e s ) • Based o n y o u r m a p , work a s a group to summ a r i z e t h e “ b i g i d e a s ” that best s u m m a r i z e your envisi o n e d f u t u r e f o r Dubli n (5 min u t e s ) • Small g r o u p s p r e s e n t each vision a n d m a p t o t h e r o o m (15-20 mi n u t e s ) GET INVOLVED! Community QuestionnaireMap.Social The City of Dublin Commu n i t y P l a n will serve as a blueprint for o u r future. It will provide a foun d a t i o n for decision-making, direct f u t u r e growth and development, a n d h e l p guide the City as it works t o implement the community’s v i s i o n . For more information, visit www.envisiondublin.org About the PlanAbout the Plan Scan the QR code to make your map Scan the QR code to visit the project website Scan the QR code to take the survey The Dublin Community Pla n p r o c e s s i s b e g i n n i n g and we need your help! Jo i n t h e c o n v e r s a t i o n t o d a y and get involved in shaping y o u r c o m m u n i t y ’ s f u t u r e . Map.Social is a fun and enga g i n g online tool where you can m a p i s s u e s and opportunities in Dublin ! J u s t d r o p a point and enter your comm e n t . map.social allows points of in t e r e s t t o be identified, categorized, an d mapped, bringing together ide a s f r o m the whole community. The Community Questionn a i r e a s k s you questions about impor t a n t i s s u e s and opportunities facing Dub l i n t h a t t h e Community Plan should add r e s s . Your feedback is essential to c r e a t i n g a successful plan for our comm u n i t y ! WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 7 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Introduction 460 15 183 8 210 23 8 134 13 156 579 MAP.SOCIAL POINTS CREATED MAP.SOCIAL PARTICIPANTS 60 POP-UP/POP-IN ENGAGEMENT PARTICIPANTS KEY PERSONS INTERVIEWED COMMON RESPONSES TO SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS TOTAL WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS TOTAL WORKSHOPS POSTED ADVERTISEMENT METHODS AND LOCATIONS MAP.SOCIAL INTERACTION STEERING COMMITTEE MEETINGS TOTAL MEETINGS TOTAL POINTS OF ENGAGEMENT COUNCIL, BOARD AND COMMISSION MEETINGS TOTAL MEETINGS TOTAL POINTS OF ENGAGEMENT REC CENTER NEWSLETTER DUBLIN CHAMBER 4TH OF JULY PARADE A-FRAME SIGNS COMMUNITY SURVEY RESPONSES 900 FLYERS 200 MAGNETS 1000 BUSINESS CARDS 100 T-SHIRTS 36+ TOTAL MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS CONDUCTED (ALL FORMATS) 5,345 TOTAL POINTS OF OVERALL ENGAGEMENT (ALL FORMATS) 2,200 TOTAL ADVERTISING POINTS OF CONTACT 538 TOTAL SOCIAL MEDIA POINTS OF CONTACT 1,275 IN-PERSON ENGAGEMENT PARTICIPANTS 462 PRESENTATIONS PARTICIPATES 432 PUBLIC MEETING PARTICIPATES COMMUNITY KICK-OFF EVENT PARTICIPANTS COMMUNITY OUTREACH BY NUMBERS The Envision Dublin Community Plan is founded on an inclu- sive and engaging community outreach process. This process gathered input from a wide range of community members, including residents, business owners and operators, developers and property owners, and service providers. Through collecting input and facilitating discussion, outreach helped to identify issues, opportunities, potential actions, strengths and assets, and overall public opinion and a vision for what the Plan should address. There were more than 5,300 “points of engagement” across all forms of virtual, in-person, and pop-up outreach. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Introduction | Envision Dublin Community Plan 8 SciotoRiverCOSGRAY RDBRANDRDCONCORD RDAVERYRDWOERNER TEMPL E RD TA R A HILLDR SEL L S M IL L DRINNOVA T IO NDR S H I ER R I N G S RD R I N G S R D MARTIN RD D U B LIN SHIRE D R RIVERSIDED R DUBLINCENTERDRM O NTEREYDRCOFFMANRDDALEDRCARNOU STIEDRBAL L A N T RAEPL GLICK R D E M ER A L D PKWY POST RD SWICKARD CT DUBLI NRDDUBLINRDBRIGHT R D S HIGH STT UL L Y MOREDR M E M O RIAL D R W Y NFOR D DR H A Y D E N RU N B L V D WILCOX RDBRA N DO N WAYDR RINGS R D W B R I D G E STEARLINGT ON PKWYJEROME RD VILLAGEP K WYPRIMROSE CT P E R I METER D R TULLER RD MUIRFIEL DDRF RANTZRD WELDON R D TONT I DRMCKITRICK RD M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDBLA ZER PKW Y C H U R C H M A N R DHYLAND-CROYRDCOSGRAY RDEI T ERMANRDT U T T L E R DHERITAGE DR B R IT T ONPKWYME TRO PL N HARDRDRAUSCHDR E STATESCTA S H F ORD R D BROCK RD 745 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 270 North F ork India n Run S ou th ForkIndia nRun PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS Context Layers City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River Online Community Questionnaire Where Does Respondent Live? ONLINE COMMUNITY QUESTIONNAIRE The Online Community Questionnaire featured multiple-choice questions in nine sections focused on housing and residential areas, commercial and industrial land uses, community facilities and services, transportation, parks and recreation, image and identity, and top strengths and weaknesses. The map showcases the number of people who took the surveys. The survey helped capture a variety of feedback from residents and business owners across the City and in the unincorporated areas and helped formulate plan recommendations. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 9 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Introduction SciotoRiverCOSGRAY RDBRANDRDCONCORD RDAVERYRDWOERNER TEMPL E RD TA R A HILLDR SEL L S M IL L DRINNOVA T IO NDR S H I ER R I N G S RD R I N G S R D MARTIN RD D U B LIN SHIRE D R RIVERSIDED R DUBLINCENTERDRM O NTEREYDRCOFFMANRDDALEDRCARNOU STIEDRBAL L A N T RAEPL GLICK R D E M ER A L D PKWY POST RD SWICKARD CT DUBLI NRDDUBLINRDBRIGHT R D S HIGH STT UL L Y MOREDR M E M O RIAL D R W Y NFOR D DR H A Y D E N RU N B L V D WILCOX RDBRA N DO N WAYDR RINGS R D W B R I D G E STEARLINGT ON PKWYJEROME RD VILLAGEP K WYPRIMROSE CT P E R I METER D R TULLER RD MUIRFIEL DDRF RANTZRD WELDON R D TONT I DRMCKITRICK RD M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDBLA ZER PKW Y C H U R C H M A N R DHYLAND-CROYRDCOSGRAY RDEI T ERMANRDT U T T L E R DHERITAGE DR B R IT T ONPKWYME TRO PL N HARDRDRAUSCHDR E STATESCTA S H F ORD R D BROCK RD 745 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 270 North F ork India n Run S ou th ForkIndia nRun PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS Context Layers City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River Map Features Community Asset Problematic Intersection Public Safety Concern Undesirable Use Key Transit Destination Desired Use/Development Poor Appearance Other Bike Paths / Trails Development Priority Site MAP.SOCIAL map.social, an online mapping tool, was used to allow participants pinpoint issues and opportunities within Dublin on their own personalized map. Over 210 points identifying Dublin’s assets and opportunities, such as community assets, priority development sites, new bike routes and paths, and desired uses and developments were collected through this outreach exercise. Participants also identified issues in Dublin, such as problematic intersections where traffic leads to unsafe conditions. Participant feedback from such online surveys were helpful to formulate plan recommendations. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Introduction | Envision Dublin Community Plan 10 COMMUNITY PRIORITIES FROM COMMUNITY OUTREACH PROCESS Envision Dublin is the product of an extensive public outreach and engagement process that supported a community-led approach to the development of the Plan. Community feedback and input were valuable and the engagement process gave community members a chance to be heard and take part in determining Dublin’s future. Throughout the outreach process, the community identified their top priorities and concerns. These issues represented areas of focus for the Plan as well as future initiatives across Dublin. The community priorities identi- fied include the following: Strategically Plan for Growth Throughout the outreach process, residents and stake- holders repeatedly emphasized the need to address population growth and its impact on infrastructure, traffic, housing, and schools, and the need to plan for growth so Dublin can continue to welcome new residents while main- taining an exceptional quality of life for all residents. Parks, Open Space, and Recreation Dublin residents consistently ranked the City’s parks, open space, and recreation as one of the most desirable aspects of living in the community. They stressed the importance of connecting parks to existing and new housing, noted that there is too little park land in the Dublin Corporate Area around I-270 south of Bridge Street and in the West Innova- tion District. Residents emphasized that park land and open space needs to be protected as Dublin grows and new areas are developed. Ensure Housing Variety and Right- Sized for the Community As Dublin continues to grow and attract new residents demand for housing will increase. Residents felt that the City needs to explore strategies to increase housing supply while also making sure that new housing includes a diver- sity of housing options to better accommodate the needs of current and future residents, including for those looking to downsize or age in place. Improve Active Transportation Residents and stakeholders indicated a desire for expanded transportation options, especially enhanced walkability, bikability, and transit service, including commuter rail and bus service. They specifically noted the need for better-con- nected bike routes and trail networks to improve resident access to job centers and other local destinations. Alleviate Traffic Congestion Community outreach revealed that congestion was a major transportation-related concern to be considered, particularly in Downtown Dublin and the Bridge Street District. Sustainability and Resilience Outreach feedback revealed a clear community priority for environmental stewardship and responsibility, including the preservation of the natural environment, supporting environmental sustainability best practices, and focusing on resiliency. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 11 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Introduction WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Introduction 12 02Purpose This chapter sets the stage for planning in Dublin by examining pertinent existing conditions, demographic and market conditions, existing fiscal condition, regional setting, existing regulations, past plans and studies. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 13 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Community Profile Dublin is a city on the move. The City evolved from a small farming and stone quarrying village to an increasingly significant national and global commerce node, while maintaining its historic charm and unique character. Several Native American cultures lived in the region before European settlers made their way to the Scioto River. Modern roots can be traced back to around 1803 when Ludwig Sells and his sons chose the site along the Scioto River for its high ground, abundant resources, and farming potential. Although the area was originally named after Dublin, Ireland, its early settlers were predominantly German and other European descent. Its economy initially revolved around water-powered mills and quarrying, paving the way for Dublin to become an agricultural hub on U.S. Route 161. While Dublin was a quiet farming town for much of the twentieth century, it transformed into a suburban busi- ness center in the 1970s. A facility for Ashland Chemical Company, I-270, and Muirfield Village Golf Club put Dublin on the map. The location, proximity to the City of Columbus, infrastructure, and attractive historic downtown helped Dublin attract hundreds of businesses during this period of growth. Dublin’s success today can be attributed to its ability to blend its history with a continuous look towards the future. The historic downtown remains the City’s cultural center, while the Bridge Street District represents a newer mixed-use activity hub for the community. Attractive residential neighborhoods define many areas of Dublin and significantly contribute to the overall character of the community. The city is abundant with parks and open spaces, trails and paths, and public art and cultural offer- ings. Tree lined thoroughfares connect all areas of Dublin, providing a network for access to neighborhoods, employ- ment areas, recreation, and commerce. Dublin is well-positioned to capitalize on new growth and opportunities as an established city. Several parcels of unde- veloped land within the city limits and large vacant parcels in the extraterritorial planning area are available for new development to meet the needs of this growing community. Its proximity to Columbus, a leading research university, and connections to significant transportation infrastructure make Dublin attractive to national corporations and businesses with global reach. As it looks confidently towards the future, Dublin embraces its heritage while evolving into an important national and international community. 02 COMMUNITY PROFILE WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Community Profile 14 UPPER ARLINGTON MARYSVILLE GAHANNA WESTERVILLE FRANKLIN COUNTY MADISON COUNTY DELAWARE COUNTY UNION COUNTY 23 23 40 33 33 23 40 70 70 670 71 71 270 Ohio StateUniversity Airport City of DUBLIN COLUMBUS Planning Area John Glenn International Airport 33 62 Lake Erie 71 71 75 75 70 70 REYNOLDSBURG UPPER ARLINGTON MARYSVILLE DELAWARE GAHANNA COLUMBUS WESTERVILLE 23 23 40 33 33 23 40 70 70 670 71 71 270 Ohio State University Airport DUBLIN John Glenn International Airport Rickenbacker International Airport 33 62 COLUMBUS CINCINNATI DAYTON CLEVELAND AKRON City of DUBLIN REGIONAL SETTING Dublin is located in Central Ohio 11 miles northwest of Columbus on the I-270 loop highway. The City has a population of approximately 50,000 and straddles parts of Franklin, Delaware, and Union Counties. Dublin is part of the Columbus Metropolitan Area, a 10-county region with a population of approximately 2.1 million and one of the fastest-growing metropolitan areas in the Midwest. The City is bordered to the West by Plain City, to the north by Jerome Township and Shawnee Hills, to the northeast by Powell, and to the east and southeast by Columbus. The I-270 loop highway curves through the southeast corner of the City and state highways 33 and 161 traverse the City east to west. The community’s growing population and economic importance are elevating its role in Central Ohio. PLANNING AREA The planning boundary depicted in the map below indi- cates the area under the planning jurisdiction of the City of Dublin. Building off the 2013 Community Plan with updates to the western extent, the planning area extends beyond the existing City of Dublin boundaries and into adjacent unin- corporated areas in order to inform compatible land uses, growth boundaries, and the provision of infrastructure. The planning area primarily consists of the existing munic- ipal boundary and smaller unincorporated areas, as well as the large potential western growth area that extends into portions of Jerome Township in Union County, the unincor- porated portions of Madison County and Franklin County north of Dublin’s boundary with the City of Columbus, and west to the Heritage Rail Trail corridor. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 15 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Community Profile SciotoRiverCOSGRAY RDBRANDRDCONCORD RDAVERYRDWOERNER TEMPL E RD TA R A HILLDR SEL L S M IL L DRINNOVA T IO NDR S H I ER R I N G S RD MARTIN RD D U B LIN SHIRE D R RIVERSIDED R DUBLINCENTERDRM O NTEREYDRCOFFMANRDDALEDRCARNOU STIEDRBAL L A N T RAEPL GLICK R D E M ER A L D PKWY POST RD SWICKARD CT DUBLI NRDDUBLINRDBRIGHT R D S HIGH STT UL L Y MOREDR M E M O RIAL D R W Y NFOR D DR H A Y D E N RU N B L V D WILCOX RDBRA N DO N WAYDR RINGS R D W B R I D G E STEARLINGT ON PKWYJEROME RD VILLAGEP K WYPRIMROSE CT P E R I METER D R R I N G S R D TULLER RD BRIT T ONPKWYMUIRFIEL DDRF RANTZRD WELDON R D TONT I DRMCKITRICK RD M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDBLA ZER PKW Y C H U R C H M A N R DHYLAND-CROYRDCOSGRAY RDEI T ERMANRDT U T T L E R DHERITAGE DRME TRO PL N HARDRDRAUSCHDR E STATESCTA S H F ORD R D BROCK RD 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 North F ork India n Run S ou th ForkIndia nRun PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS Context Layers City of Dublin River Planning Area Boundary Land Use Categories Agriculture Single-Family Detached Single-Family Attached Multifamily Mixed-Use Commercial Hotel and Lodging Office Industrial Public and Semi-Public Parks and Open Space Transportation and Utilities Undeveloped EXISTING LAND USE All parcels within the City of Dublin and its planning area were categorized into one of 13 land use types. The existing land use inventory is based on data the City collected and verified through a reconnaissance survey conducted in 2023 and a digital aerial review. The existing land use inventory helped identify growth patterns and analyze existing condi- tions based on current market and demographic conditions. Detailed analysis of existing conditions can be found in the Existing Conditions Memorandum (ECM); meanwhile, the findings and key takeaways from the ECM have informed the development of Envision Dublin. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Community Profile | Envision Dublin Community Plan 16 55-64 65+ 35-54 20-34 5-19 Under 5 13.6%13.6% 3.1% 8.1%8.1% -8.6% 24.5%24.5% 19.2% 15.4%15.4% 15.2% 113.4% 65.4% 37.1% 109.5% 2000-2010 2010-2021 Source: U.S. Decennial Census Source: 2000, 2010, and 2021 ACS 5-Year Estimates 16,366 1990 39,245 2010 31,478 2000 48,613 2021 AGE CHANGE OVER TIME DUBLIN (2000-2021) Between 2010-2021, ages 55-64 increased by 37% Between 2000-2010, ages 55-64 increased by 109.5% Dublin’s population has almost tripled since 1990 and has grown by over 9,000 people from 2010-2021 Population increase from 2010-2021 Population increase from 2010-2021 23.9%23.9% POPULATION GROWTH DEMOGRAPHIC SNAPSHOT The Demographic Snapshot assesses the existing demo- graphic characteristics of Dublin. The snapshot helped guide the planning process to ensure Envision Dublin reflects accurate demographic data and addresses existing trends, issues, and opportunities. POPULATION The current population of Dublin is approximately 48,613 people—up 60% from 2000. In recent years, the City’s growth has outpaced that of Franklin County and the Columbus metropolitan area. From 2000 to 2010, Dublin’s population grew by 24.7% or 7,767 whereas Franklin County grew by 6.7% and the Columbus metropolitan area grew by 11.5%. From 2010 to 2021, Dublin’s population increased by 23.9% or by over 9,000 people, again outpacing Franklin County and the Columbus metropolitan area. Dublin is one of the faster growing communities in one of the fastest growing metropolitan areas in the Midwest. AGE Dublin’s senior population is growing faster than surrounding communities and national trends. The Dublin community is growing older. Based on U.S. Census data, the City experienced a substantial 113% increase in seniors (people aged 65 years and older) since 2010 and a 37% increase in residents aged 55-64. Franklin County and the Columbus metropolitan area show a similar though less rapid growth of residents aged 55 and older. The 35 to 54 age group is the largest in Dublin, making up 33% of the population. This represents a larger proportion of Dublin’s population than in Franklin County or the Columbus metropolitan area. The second largest age group in Dublin are residents aged 5 to 19 which makes up 24.5% of the City’s population—a proportion larger than in Franklin County or the Columbus metropolitan area. These patterns reflect the aging baby-boomer population and attraction of seniors to the area but also the arrival of new younger residents and both will influence housing and health and senior care infrastructure in the future. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 17 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Community Profile Columbus, OH Franklin County Dublin Hispanic or Latino (of any race) Dublin: 3.8% White alone (Non-Hispanic) Dublin: 72.9% Black (Non-Hispanic) Dublin: 2.3% Asian and Pacific Islander (Non-Hispanic) Dublin: 19.6% Two or More Races (Non-Hispanic) Dublin: 3.6% Other Dublin: 0.6% Dublin Franklin County Columbus, OH MSA $91,162 $113,788 $145,828 $42,734 $49,087 $65,999 $44,782 $52,910 $71,020 $- $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 2000 2010 2021 Household Income Source: 2021 ACS 5-Year Estimates Source: 2000, 2010, and 2021 ACS 5-Year Estimates 19.6% 72.9% Majority of Dublin residents identify as White, followed by Asian and Pacific Islander MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOMES (2010-2021) RACIAL AND ETHNIC COMPOSITION (2021) RACE AND ETHNICITY Dublin, like its neighboring communities, is predom- inantly White but Asian and Pacific Islanders are an increasingly prominent segment of the City’s population. According to the U.S. Census bureau, 72.9% of Dublin residents identify as White, higher than Franklin County but similar to the Columbus metropolitan area. The second largest racial or ethnic group in Dublin are residents who identify as Asian and Pacific Islanders which comprise 19.6% of the City’s population, a much higher proportion than in Franklin County or in the Columbus metropolitan area. Conversely, the Dublin’s Black and Latino populations comprise smaller portions of the City’s population compared to Franklin County and the Columbus Metropolitan area though the City’s Latino population has increased by 158.9% since 2010. INCOME The median household income in Dublin is more than double that of the region and is growing. The median household income for Dublin residents is $145,828. This income group grew by 24.8% between 2000 and 2010 and by 28.8% between 2010 and 2021. The single largest income group are households who earn $150,000 or more, which makes up just under 50% of the City’s households. This group has grown by 38.2% since 2010. As such, Dublin’s median household income is currently double that of Franklin County and the Columbus MSA. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Community Profile | Envision Dublin Community Plan 18 City of Dublin Planning Area boundary is Dublin’s current Unemployment Rate is Dublin’s current Unemployment Rate2.2%2.2% The Health Care and Social Industry sector grew rapidly between 2010 and 2020 The Health Care and Social Industry sector grew rapidly between 2010 and 2020 Most residents work within the professional, scientific and technical services industries Most residents work within the professional, scientific and technical services industries Average Multifamily RentAverage Multifamily Rent Average Retail RentAverage Retail Rent Average Office RentAverage Office Rent Average Industrial RentAverage Industrial Rent Source: CoStar, Houseal Lavigne 10.6%10.6%$1,485$1,485 2.5%2.5%$19$19 16.5%16.5%$21$21 0.8%0.8%$10$10 MARKET SNAPSHOT (2023) JOB EMPLOYMENT CENTERS (JOBS/SQ.MILE) CONTEXT LAYERS Occupied Vacant 5 - 500 501 - 2,000 2,001 - 4,400 4,401 - 7,800 7,801 - 12,300 Cosgr ayRdWestbur yDr BrandRdConcord RdWyandotte WoodsBlvd Avery RdWoernerTemple Rd Tara Hill Dr Sells M illD rIn n o vationDr S hi er R in gs Rd Ring s R d Martin Rd D u blinshireDr RiversideDr DublinCenterDrM o ntereyDrCoffman RdDaleDr Carnousti e DrBallantrae Pl Glick Rd Emerald Pkwy E me rald Pkwy Post Rd Lakehurst CtSwickard Ct Dubl i nRdDublinRdBright Rd S High StTu lly moreDr M e m orialD r Wy nfo rd D rH a y d e n Run B l v d Bra n d onway D r Rings Rd W Bridge StEarl i ngtonPkwy WilcoxRdJeromeRd VillagePkwyPrimrose Ct Emmet Row Ln Per i m e t e r Dr Tuller Rd Kile RdBlazerPkwyMuirfieldDrFrantzRd WeldonRd Tonti D rMckitrick Rd Main S t Summit View RdAvery Rd Ch u r c h m a n R dCosgray RdTu t t l e R dHeritage DrMuirfieldD rM etroPlN HardRdHyland-croyRdBrittonPkwyEi t er manRdRauschDrE statesCtA s h f o rd Rd Brock Rd 745 161 257 257 745 161 33 33 270 270 Context Layers City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary Job Employment Centers PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS EMPLOYMENT The number of primary jobs in Dublin grew by more than 3,600 from 2010 to 2020, or by 8.9%--lower than the 19.9% increase experienced by Franklin County and 17.8% experienced in the Columbus metropolitan area. Of those living in Dublin, 18,651 work outside the City and 3,238 work in the City. 41,492 workers commute into Dublin to work from outside the City. REAL ESTATE MARKET TRENDS Dublin’s real estate market is strong for retail, office, and industrial but weaker for multifamily rentals. Dublin’s multifamily rents and vacancy rates are high compared to the region. Retail rents are slightly above the regional average but their vacancy rate is lower than the regional average suggesting a strong retail real estate market. Office rental rates are stable, near the regional market average but Dublin faces the same office space vacancy challenges as the rest of the region indicating a need to possibly reimagine new uses or functionality for the City’s underutilized offices spaces. Industrial rents are rising and vacancy rates declining indicating an area of potential growth. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 19 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Community Profile Traditional Families 2010: 38.6%, 2021: 38.1% Non-Traditional Families with Children 2010: 4.7%, 2021: 5.9% Childless Couples 2010: 30.8%, 2021: 36.4% Living Alone 2010: 19.5%, 2021: 17.8% Non-Traditional Families with No Children 2010: 6.5%, 2021: 1.8%Source: 2021, ACS 5-Year Estimates 2021 2010 HOUSEHOLD MAKEUP DUBLIN (2010-2021) HOUSING TYPE FOR OCCUPIED UNITS Single-Family Detached 70.9%70.9% Single-Family Attached 12.2%12.2% 2-4 Units 3.4%3.4% 5-9 Units 4.4%4.4% 8.5%8.5% 10+ Units Traditional Families 2010: 38.6%, 2021: 38.1% Non-Traditional Families with Children 2010: 4.7%, 2021: 5.9% Childless Couples 2010: 30.8%, 2021: 36.4% Living Alone 2010: 19.5%, 2021: 17.8% Non-Traditional Families with No Children 2010: 6.5%, 2021: 1.8%Source: 2021, ACS 5-Year Estimates 2021 2010 HOUSEHOLD MAKEUP DUBLIN (2010-2021) HOUSING TYPE FOR OCCUPIED UNITS Single-Family Detached 70.9%70.9% Single-Family Attached 12.2%12.2% 2-4 Units 3.4%3.4% 5-9 Units 4.4%4.4% 8.5%8.5% 10+ Units Traditional Families 2010: 38.6%, 2021: 38.1% Non-Traditional Families with Children 2010: 4.7%, 2021: 5.9% Childless Couples 2010: 30.8%, 2021: 36.4% Living Alone 2010: 19.5%, 2021: 17.8% Non-Traditional Families with No Children 2010: 6.5%, 2021: 1.8%Source: 2021, ACS 5-Year Estimates 2021 2010 HOUSEHOLD MAKEUP DUBLIN (2010-2021) HOUSING TYPE FOR OCCUPIED UNITS Single-Family Detached 70.9%70.9% Single-Family Attached 12.2%12.2% 2-4 Units 3.4%3.4% 5-9 Units 4.4%4.4% 8.5%8.5% 10+ UnitsCosgrayRdWestburyDrBrandRdConcord RdWyandotte WoodsBlvd Avery RdWoernerTempleRd TaraHillDr SellsMillDr InnovationDr ShierRingsRd RingsRd MartinRd DublinshireDr RiversideDr DublinCenterDrMontereyDrCoffman RdDaleDr CarnoustieDr BallantraePl Glick Rd Emerald Pkwy EmeraldPkwy PostRd Lakehurst CtSwickard CtDubl i nRdDublinRdBrightRd S High StTullymoreDr MemorialDr WynfordDr HaydenRunBlvd BrandonwayDr RingsRd WBridgeStEarl i ngtonPkwy WilcoxRdJeromeRd VillagePkwyPrimrose Ct Emmet Row Ln PerimeterDr Tuller Rd Kile RdBlazerPkwyMuirfieldDrFrantzRd WeldonRd TontiDrMckitrick Rd Main S t Summit View RdAvery Rd Ch u r c h m a n R dCosgray RdTuttleRdHeritage DrMuirfieldDr MetroPlN HardRdHyland-croyRdBrittonPkwyEi t er manRdRauschDrEstatesCtAshfordRd Brock Rd745 161 257 257 745 161 33 33 270 270 Context Layers City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary Job Employment Centers PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS HOUSING Most homes in Dublin are owner-occupied, single-family detached units; the City has higher home values and rents and lower vacancies than Franklin County and the Columbus metropolitan area but fewer households experi- encing cost burden. The average household size in Dublin is 2.8 persons, higher than both Franklin County (2.39) and the Columbus metropolitan area (2.49). However, the last decade expe- rienced an increase in the portion of households made up by childless couples from 30.8% in 2010 to 36.4% in 2021. This tracks with national trends. Between Dublin’s increasing senior population and this increase in childless couples, there may be a growing disconnect between the existing housing stock and the needs and desires of existing and new residents. The vast majority of homes in Dublin are single-family detached (70.9%), significantly greater than Franklin County (55.3%) and the Columbus metropolitan area (63.4%). Though much smaller, Dublin’s share of single- family attached units is also higher than the region. Conversely, Dublin has a lower share of multifamily units than Franklin County and the Columbus metropolitan area. While household sizes has remained steady at 2.8, growth in Dublin’s housing stock has been concentrated in larger homes. Between 2010 and 2021, the number of five-bed- room housing units grew by nearly 63% and accounted for 20.5% of new housing. Four-bedroom units accounted for a third of new housing during the same period. This growth in larger units appears to be shifting Dublin’s housing stock out of alignment with potential future housing needs. Single-family detached housing will continue to be the predominant housing type in the City however data indicate a need for smaller two- and three-bedroom housing units to right-size housing to household needs. Housing Study and Strategy The analysis contained within this section was compared and contrasted with the City’s recently completed Housing Study and Strategy. That study examined trends within a broader study area that included the City of Dublin as well as surrounding Census Tracts. As a result of differing geographies, basic data points such as total population or number of households and related growth, differ from the data presented in this memorandum. Overall, the data presented in this Community Plan analysis support the findings of the Housing Study and Strategy. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Community Profile 20 FISCAL HEALTH In addition to the current demographic snapshot and inven- tory of existing land uses, it is also important to understand how Dublin provides quality services and maintains key infrastructures across the City. It helps identify strategies to maximize land uses, preserve the quality of place, and ensure future development provides the necessary investment in and provision of public infrastructure and services for transportation, utilities, parks, recreational facilities, water systems, and public safety. The analysis of factors affecting fiscal health will help evaluate and inform the fiscal impacts of future development and growth, and policies in Dublin. The subsequent chapters in the Envision Dublin Community Plan presents how the various factors affecting the fiscal health of the City, and a fiscal impact analysis of various land use scenarios helped informed Dublin’s future land use plan, future transportation network and utility planning. The City of Dublin has a strong history of incorporating fiscal analysis as part of citywide land use planning efforts, as well as for specific areas (e.g., Bridge Street Corridor). As a result of these analyses, Dublin has long understood the need to plan for the appropriate mix of land uses and understand the City’s competitive position in the local and regional market for targeted industries. The Envision Dublin Community Plan continues this tradition. FACTORS INFLUENCING THE FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY OF LAND USES Numerous factors influence the fiscal results for different land uses. These factors include, but are not limited to: ■Local revenue structure, ■Services provided, ■Local levels of service, ■Capacity of existing infrastructure, and ■Demographic and market characteristics of new growth. It is important to understand that every community has contributors and recipients from a fiscal perspective, and which land uses contribute more in revenue than expenditures will vary from state to state based largely on local revenue structure and the other factors presented in this section. For example, retail space needs customers, office and industrial uses need a supply of workers living nearby, and residential uses need employment opportunities and the ability to obtain goods and services. The key to achieving fiscal sustainability is understanding which land uses provide fiscal benefits, providing an adequate supply of appropriately zoned land, and making sure the adopted land use plan has the appropriate balance of land uses. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 21 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Community Profile Local Revenue Structure The local revenue structure, a key factor in calculating net fiscal results from new development, significantly impacts fiscal findings through its composition and revenue distribu- tion/collection formulas. Each community relies on at least one revenue source and, in some cases, multiple. These sources, such as property tax, local sales tax, and state- shared revenues, form the backbone of the local revenue structure. A key aspect of this structure is the distribution and collection methods for these sources, which can vary significantly from state to state, except for property tax. For example, in states where sales tax is collected, some allow communities to impose a local option sales tax, typi- cally collected at the point of sale. Others collect sales tax at the state level and distribute the revenue to communities using a formula based on population. A similar situation arises with income tax, where some states permit a local income, or “piggyback” tax on top of the state income tax. In certain states, tax is collected based on place of residence. In others, such as Ohio, it is collected based on place of employment. To illustrate the impact of how a jurisdiction’s revenue struc- ture influences the fiscal results, examples were compared from two cost-of-land-use studies for nonresidential land uses in Scottsdale, AZ, and Dublin, OH. The graphs below show net surpluses and deficits for nonresidential devel- opment per 1,000 square feet of floor area. Because the primary municipal revenue for Arizona municipalities is sales tax collected at point-of-sale, retail development performs the best from a fiscal perspective in the City of Scottsdale. Example of Fiscal Impact Results: Locality with “Point of Sale” Sales Tax Example of Fiscal Impact Results: Locality with Local Income Tax by Place of Employment Source: TischlerBise Source: TischlerBise $(777) $2,621 $1,412 $(1,000) $- $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 Retail Office Industrial City of Dublin Prototype Analysis Annual Net Fiscal Results Per 1,000 Squre Feet Compare the results from the City of Scottsdale to a previous cost of land uses fiscal analysis prepared for the City of Dublin in the early 2000s. The primary revenue source for cities in Ohio is local income tax, which is based primarily on place of work rather than place of residence. Because of the differences between Arizona and Ohio municipal revenue structures, the fiscal hierarchy of nonresidential land uses are opposite of one another. In Ohio, office and industrial land uses perform much better fiscally than retail. Services Provided Another important factor in the fiscal equation is the services provided by a jurisdiction. Jurisdictions offer different services, and this is taken into account when performing a fiscal impact analysis. For example, parks and natural resources are separate entities with their tax rates in many states, including Ohio. In other states, parks and natural resource services get their local funds from General Fund taxes. The City’s fiscal performance depends on such services and existing funding mechanisms. Levels of Service Another factor in fiscal impact analysis is understanding the levels of service currently being provided in a community. Existing service levels are defined as the facility or service standard presently being funded through the budget. Example service standards include pupil-teacher ratios (i.e., one teacher per 24 students), and parkland per capita. This is an essential factor since level of service generally varies from community to community. $887 $2,083 $75 $14 $- $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 Resort Retail Office Industrial City of Scottsdale General Fund Net Revenues Per 1,000 Squre Feet WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Community Profile | Envision Dublin Community Plan 22 Capacity of Existing Infrastructure The capacity of existing infrastructure in a community also has a bearing on the fiscal sustainability of new development. For example, a community may be able to absorb many additional vehicle trips on its existing road network or may be significantly under capacity regarding high school enrollment. In either of these situations, using a case study-marginal cost approach that accounts for existing facilities and levels of usage to assess fiscal impacts, a community with excess capacity could absorb substantially higher growth over time without making additional infrastructure investments than a community without these capacities. This excess capacity results in lower capital costs over time. This is an important factor in the fiscal equation since the largest cost associated with capital facilities are the ongoing annual operating costs, which typically account for approximately 80 percent of a community’s budget. Demographic and Market Characteristics of New Growth Next to a community’s revenue structure, no other factor has as great an impact on the net fiscal results as the demographic and market characteristics of different land uses. Demographic and market variables for residential development include average household sizes, pupil generation rates, market value of housing units, trip generation rates, density per acre, and average household income. Important demographic and market characteristics for nonresidential development include square feet per employee, trip generation rates, market values per square foot, sales per square foot (retail), and floor area ratio. EXISTING FINANCIAL CONDITION The balance of revenue to expenditures is a complex process, the details of which are best reviewed in the City’s annual budget or Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). The budget process for the City is generally balanced from year to year; however, some expenditures and investments in infrastructure can occur over several years. The framework established to distribute these revenues towards the various costs to serve development consists of several Funds. These Funds include: the General Fund; Special Revenue Funds; Capital Projects Funds; Debt Service Funds; and Enterprise Funds. The City has several funds/revenue sources in place to contribute to and address the cost of development. Below is a description of some of the revenue sources the City has established to fund infrastructure. Enterprise Funds: These are funds where user fees are set to recover the cost of providing services and facilities such as water distribution and wastewater collection to the City’s utility customer base. These revenues cover operating costs and capital items such as debt service. The City augments these revenues with capacity fees designed to recoup new growth’s share of needed infrastructure. Capital Improvement Funds: Other funding for improve- ments includes pay-as-you-go funding out of current revenues for lower-cost improvements. Grants are used to bridge funding gaps and leverage additional funds. Bonds also provide a relatively inexpensive way to finance large-scale projects. The City transfers bond sale proceeds to Debt Service Funds, which account for principal and interest payments on major, debt-financed infrastructure projects such as roadway construction. Tax Increment Financing Funds: TIF funds account for the tax increment financing real estate tax payments received related to some or specific new development. The TIF funds are used to construct the infrastructure required to serve the latest development and sometimes to reimburse the developer for onsite improvements. TIF proceeds are remitted to the developer as received. New Community Authority Funds: NCA funds are financed by additional real estate tax millage on new development within the City. The revenues from such millage are similar to tax increment financing to pay for infrastructure improve- ments attributed to new development. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 23 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Community Profile Revenues Like all Ohio cities, the City of Dublin’s primary source of discretionary funding is its local income tax. Income tax represents almost 90% ($70.5 million) of total General Fund revenue ($78.2 million) in FY2023 (shown in City of Dublin FY2023 General Fund Revenue Table). The discretionary portion of the income tax is accounted for in the General Fund. The City’s current income tax rate is 2%, lower than that of many surrounding communities. As shown in City of Dublin Income Tax Collections Table, the City has seen steady and significant growth in income tax collections since 2014 and projects this growth to continue. A majority of income tax revenue is made up of withholding taxes. Dublin also assesses a property tax. However, the vast majority of property taxes paid by City residents is to the School District, Children’s Services, MRDD, Senior Options, and other entities. The City of Dublin only receives about 2% of property tax. The City’s property tax is allocated to the Safety Fund, in order to fund the City’s police department, and towards parkland acquisition and capital improvements. The City also receives revenue from engineering fees, building permits, and other fines, licenses, and permits. While these fees keep the City budget balanced, they must be continually assessed as expenses change over time due to growth and other factors. Expenditures The City provides a range of services to residents and workers, including police services, public works facilities development and maintenance, solid waste collection, parks and recreation maintenance, and community devel- opment services. However, the City is not responsible for funding school costs or fire protection. General Fund expenditures by department are presented in the figure below. An additional $25,700,000 is budgeted for capital invest- ments necessary to accommodate growth and to provide a consistent level of service to residential and nonresiden- tial development. 25% of the City’s income tax revenue is dedicated to the capital improvement fund. Of this amount, 60% is allocated to fund long-term debt, while the remaining 40% funds short-term capital projects. These expenditures include investments in general government, public safety, water and sewer, streets, and parks and recreation. City of Dublin FY2023 General Fund Revenue City of Dublin FY2023 General Fund Expenditures City of Dublin Income Tax Collections 2014 $55,000,000 $60,000,000 $65,000,000 $70,000,000 $75,000,000 $80,000,000 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Source: City of Dublin FY2023 Budget Source: City of Dublin FY2023 Budget Source: City of Dublin FY2023 Budget Revenue Type FY 2023 Amount Percent Income Taxes $70,500,000 90% Intergovernmental Revenue $625,760 1% Charges for Services $1,008,500 1% Fines, Licenses, and Permits $3,035,500 4% Interest Income $1,000,000 1% Miscellaneious $590,350 1% Other Financing Sources $1,448,800 2% Total $78,208,910 100% Expenditure Type FY 2023 Amount Percent City Manager $10,669,845 12% City Council $860,090 1% Admin. Services $15,564,705 17% Deputy City Manager $21,948,320 24% Commercial Development $7,626,175 8% Finance $35,276,740 38% Total $92,022,875 100% WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Community Profile | Envision Dublin Community Plan 24 03Purpose This chapter articulates the vision, goals, and objectives for the Plan that were developed based on extensive community engagement, setting the foundation for more detailed recommendations for each plan element. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 25 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Vision and Goals Building upon feedback, input, and discussion from engaged Dublin residents and stakeholders, the Vision, Goals, and Objectives were developed that reflect the aspirations and priorities of the community. Maintaining and enhancing Dublin’s unique character and sense of place, including its beautiful open spaces, environmental features, attractively landscaped corridors, and engaging third places, remain essential to the community’s vision moving forward. Themes that emerged during community engage- ment helped shape the vision, including the notions of planning for growth, prioritizing parks and open space, ensuring the right mix of housing, being more walk and bike friendly, and being a more resilient and sustainable community. Guided by community input and reflecting the city’s Strategic Framework and Land Use Principles, the Steering Committee worked with the project team to develop and evolve the vision, goals, and objectives as the planning process unfolded, ensuring they reflect the values and voice of Dublin. Vision, goals and objectives are essential components of the Plan and critical to guiding development of Dublin’s future. These elements define the desired plan outcomes and provide a framework for decision-making, resource allocation, and policy development. The Vision, Goals, and Objectives presented in this chapter were used to guide the development of each chapter of Envision Dublin, ensuring that each and every element of the Plan is aligned and working together to collectively deliver the vision for the community. Goals and Objectives The Goals and Objectives section is organized by key planning topics. This section outlines planning topics that the Envision Dublin Community Plan addresses and is orga- nized based on the core chapters with recommendations under each related goal. 03 VISION AND GOALS WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Vision and Goals 26 CITY STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK THEMES Framework to Plan Sustainability, Connectivity, and Resiliency were iden- tified as key themes in the City of Dublin’s Strategic Framework. As such, the Goals and Objectives of the Envision Dublin Plan strive to meet these themes and continue the vision established by the commu- nity. Each chapter page will feature each of the three colored callouts and indicate how the contents of said chapter relates with each theme and help link the Strategic Framework with the Plan. CONNECTION TO COMMUNITY PLAN PROCESS The Vision, Goals, and Objectives are informed by extensive community engagement undertaken in the planning process along with an analysis of existing conditions which is summa- rized in the Existing Conditions Memorandum. The Vision, Goals, and Objectives were continually refined throughout the planning process and will guide the development of specific recommendations and implementable actions. COMPLEMENT TO CITY STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK The City of Dublin Strategic Framework was accepted on July 25, 2022. The Strategic Framework brings strategic alignment and focus to a wide range of municipal functions and serves as the long-term, central guide for each City department’s supporting plans, measures, metrics, initiatives, and projects. The Envision Dublin Community Plan addresses long-term land use and development in alignment with the broader vision established in the City’s Strategic Framework. The Strategic Framework vision statement is as follows: Dublin, Ohio is the Most SUSTAINABLE, CONNECTED, and RESILIENT Global City of Choice. The Envision Dublin Community Plan Vision, Goals, and Objectives will serve as a complement to the City Strategic Framework. They do not replace or update the Strategic Framework adopted by City Council. The Community Plan will guide land use and development policy decisions in alignment with the broader Strategic Framework. Most Sustainable. Through exemplary economic, fiscal and environmental stew- ardship, we provide world-class, innovative services and amenities that make Dublin the most desirable and sustainable community. Most Connected. We are one of the world’s most connected communities. Through state- of-the-art infrastructure, convenient transporta- tion and expansive broadband access, Dublin is a model democracy for businesses, residents and visitors. Most Resilient. We are a safe, resilient and inclusive city with the best quality of life and environment for all to thrive – physically, mentally, socially and emotionally. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 27 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Vision and Goals ENVISION DUBLIN VISION STATEMENT In the coming decades, the City of Dublin will continue to be known as welcoming and prosperous to all and one of the most highly regarded cities across the country. Residents will be proud to call Dublin home, because of its inviting neighborhoods, robust local economy, abundant open spaces, seamless bike and trail networks, and exceptional array of services and amenities. Dublin will be a magnet for individuals across all life stages, backgrounds, and abilities. Dublin will serve as a hub for commerce and opportunity with a lively business environment that ignites innovation and investment. A steadfast dedication to enhancing mobility and connectivity will translate into an expansive network of greenways, complete streets, and quality public trans- portation, ensuring that every resident can commute, complete daily tasks, and have recreational opportunities without reliance on a car. By upholding its positive reputation and expanding on its exceptional services, Dublin will continue to draw residents, invite visitors, and create new opportunities to enjoy the community. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Vision and Goals | Envision Dublin Community Plan 28 LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT Goal Guide growth through targeted infill and strategic expansion that balances residential and commercial development needs with environmental preservation, increased economic vitality, placemaking, and enhanced quality of life. Objectives ■Ensure that each individual development contributes in a complementary manner to the larger community and plan by using a guiding framework and vision for land use patterns, activity nodes, open spaces, parking and connectivity. ■Create neighborhoods and districts with a unique sense of place, which provide a balanced and inte- grated mix of land uses (where retailers, restaurants, employers, and housing are located in close proximity to one another) to support the daily needs for both the residents and business community. ■Coordinate with neighboring communities to plan and manage growth. ■Emphasize infill, redevelopment, reinvestment, and re-use in existing and underutilized areas to make efficient use of existing infrastructure. ■Ensure development starts with the public realm and provides sufficient open space and purposeful public spaces for all people to gather, socialize and recreate. ■Foster transit-supportive development in targeted areas to create the critical mass of potential ridership needed to sustain high-quality public transportation. ■Encourage development with human centric design that prioritizes the well-being and experiences of people. ■Encourage sustainable and energy-efficient building practices and low impact design to promote environ- mental responsibility, better manage stormwater, and reduce utility costs. ■Protect and enhance environmentally sensitive areas, including large tree stands and landmark trees, wildlife habitat and corridors, waterways and watersheds. ■Continue to express our distinct Dublin identity and sense of place through: high quality building materials, architecture, landscape and public art. Encourage thoughtful and innovative design that distinguishes Dublin as a global city of choice. ■Preserve the character of existing established neigh- borhoods. ■Reinforce existing and establish new community focal points, gathering places, and gateways. ■Leverage and expand upon the community’s greenway network to serve as a unique amenity that anchors future development and connects residents to activity and employment centers. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 29 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Vision and Goals HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOODS Goal Create well-planned, livable neighborhoods with a variety of housing choices for all ages and ways of life, as well as supporting the evolving needs of existing neighborhoods. Objectives ■Preserve and strengthen Dublin’s existing neighborhoods. ■Continue to require high-quality building materials and open space to uphold community image and create long- term neighborhood value. ■Provide a variety of housing and neighborhood choices to gently expand the housing stock. ■Create thoughtful, well-planned, livable neighborhoods which encourage social interaction, physical health, recreation, and amenities. ■Plan for the needs of an aging population. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Goal Foster an innovative and sustainable economy that supports a strong, resilient tax base. Objectives ■Retain and support existing businesses. ■Reposition aging business parks as premier employ- ment destinations for the future, with an emphasis on high-quality design while maintaining flexibility regarding use mix. ■Maintain Dublin’s regional/national position as an employment hub for corporate, technology, and health and medical sectors. ■Uphold the City’s long-standing policy of an overall land use mix of 60% residential and 40% non-residen- tial development. ■Promote entrepreneurship and small business growth. ■Increase local tourism. ■Increase workforce job readiness. ■Protect long-term economic development resources and opportunities and proactively plan for the use of undevel- oped land in targeted economic development areas. ■Prioritize the importance of the overall character, appearance, and sense of place of the City’s commer- cial areas, activity centers, and third places. ■Diversify the City’s economic base. ■Continue to provide quality access to broadband to ensure residents and businesses have high-speed internet and the information and technology they need to thrive. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Vision and Goals | Envision Dublin Community Plan 30 MOBILITY AND TRANSPORTATION Goal Make the community more connected and accessible to all by investing in vehicular and active transportation infrastructure. Objectives ■Promote bicycle and pedestrian mobility throughout Dublin including education and safety improvements. ■Plan for innovative mobility and transportation tech- nologies. ■Promote alternatives to single occupant vehicle travel. ■Prioritize the maintenance and level of services of City owned streets while improving safety for all modes of transportation. ■Implement the Multimodal Thoroughfare Plan to plan for future connections and improvements. ■Minimize adverse roadway impacts in sensitive areas and balance roadway design with community char- acter and aesthetics. ■Maintain an acceptable balance between public and private sector responsibilities for street improvements. ■Work cooperatively with surrounding jurisdictions to coordinate regional transportation planning and programming. COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES Goal Ensure all areas of the community have access to quality community facilities and services that enrich the quality of life and account for future growth objectives. Objectives ■Maintain a high level of standard for Dublin’s services. ■Provide needed facilities and enhance access to serve the population and to promote a high quality of life. ■Provide a variety of recreational and open space facilities for all residents. ■Consider Dublin’s place within the region for parkland and open space. ■Building on the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, expand the parks system as development occurs, and coordinate with regional partners, to ensure future neigh- borhoods have access to high-quality parks. ■Ensure greenways and public open space are estab- lished and preserved as the City grows. ■Coordinate with school districts to maintain excellence in the public education system. ■Continue to maintain neighborhood safety through community policing and a proactive and engaged police force. ■Coordinate with Washington Township to ensure emergency services and facilities continue to meet the community’s needs. ■Support culture and public art. ■Preserve the Historic District and protect other historic resources in outlying areas in and beyond Dublin’s corporate boundaries. ■Ensure the preservation of archeological resources. ■Identify and protect valuable viewsheds and vistas as an important part of Dublin’s overall aesthetic. ■Incorporate sustainability best practices in community facilities and services where appropriate. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 31 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Vision and Goals UTILITIES Goal To provide high quality utility services in a safe, efficient, and fiscally responsible manner. Objectives ■Provide for the safe and efficient delivery of high quality potable water to the community for consump- tion and fire protection. ■Implement waterline extensions to growth areas consistent with the Community Plan. ■Provide for the safe and efficient collection of waste- water generated by the community. ■Continue efforts to remove infiltration and inflow sources within the existing sanitary sewer collection system. ■Implement sanitary sewer extensions to growth areas consistent with the Community Plan. ■Provide for the safe and efficient collection of storm- water and continue to maintain and improve the water quality of the City of Dublin’s tributaries and the Scioto River corridor. ■Continue implementation of the Dublin Stormwater Master Plan to provide adequate stormwater manage- ment in tributary areas consistent with the recommen- dations of the Community Plan. ■Design stormwater management facilities to blend with surrounding development as an attractive amenity and landscape feature. NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT Goal Protect and enhance the integrity of natural systems through environmental stewardship. Objectives ■Grow the local tree canopy. ■Encourage the preservation and restoration of existing native plants and landscapes. ■Protect topsoil resources from erosion. ■Preserve and enhance watershed management and natural hydrological systems. ■Protect streams and their buffers and provide public access, particularly along the Scioto River. ■Enhance public awareness and involvement in envi- ronmental stewardship. ■Connect people with nature. ■Reduce urban heat-island effects. ■Prioritize the appropriate application of conservation design principles for all new development. ■Support the Rapid 5 Plan to help transform regional waterways and green spaces. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Vision and Goals | Envision Dublin Community Plan 32 04Purpose This chapter provides the framework for land use, development character, and growth for the City and its planning area. The chapter highlights the land use scenario planning that was undertaken to help develop the plan, as well as provide the future land use map and growth strategy necessary to accommodate population increase while maintaining desired commu- nity character. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 33 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Land Use and Development 04 LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT The Land Use and Development chapter is the core compo- nent of the Envision Dublin Community Plan, representing the primary building block upon which other plan compo- nents are structured. The chapter identifies future land uses for all areas of the City and surrounding growth areas. The chapter will provides a framework for planning decisions that build upon the desired characteristics of Dublin’s resi- dential neighborhoods, commercial districts, and employ- ment areas. It is also mindful of growth pressures and seeks to lay the groundwork for responsible development growth that accommodates demand, while retaining the commu- nity’s well-established character. The chapter explains the Plan’s overall growth strategy and the iterative scenario- planning process that was central to developing the Future Land Use Plan. It describes Dublin’s community identity and vision including growth pressures, changing demographics, and development opportunities and considers several land use options the City can pursue to meet its housing needs, sustain economic growth, and be resilient to change. From these alternatives, the Future Land Use Plan is identified to guide Dublin for the coming decades. The Land Use and Development chapter, and accompanying Future Land Use Plan clearly identify established areas that should remain relatively unchanged moving forward, and areas where new growth and development should be supported. Building on the community’s existing land use and devel- opment pattern, the Future Land Use Plan seeks to ensure Dublin can accommodate future growth responsibly and sustainably. This approach to land use retains and bolsters established neighborhoods, identifies opportunities for growth through infill development, targets certain areas for develop- ment intensification, and plans for responsible expansion. Several important considerations and desires of the commu- nity are discussed in this section to lay the groundwork for some of the central topics to be addressed in the Envision Dublin Land Use and Development chapter. The previous Community Plan, adopted in 2013, was an update to the 2007 Community Plan. It guided the devel- opment and progress of the built and natural environment over the last decade. Given the changing demographic and development trends within the City and the Central Ohio region since then, it is necessary to understand how the City wants to grow, develop, and improve to remain a desirable and sustainable community. Extensive public and stakeholder engagement, coupled with a comprehensive analysis of current demographics, development trends, and opportunities, were crucial to the process. Meanwhile, in-depth land use scenario planning, with transportation and utility modeling were key to developing a Future Land Use Plan that meets the community’s vision in a fiscally responsible manner. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Land Use and Development 34 COMMUNITY IDENTITY AND VISION The City of Dublin has made significant strides in recent decades as it has evolved from a rural town to a robust and diverse City. It is of the utmost importance that the community, with its diverse perspectives and voices, establish a unified vision. This vision should be built on a strong foundation of community engagement and feedback. Based on the extensive community outreach conducted throughout the planning process, it is clear that some residents prefer to maintain a more suburban character similar to Muirfield Village, while others embrace Bridge Street as a model for the future of Dublin. Most participants felt the community should balance both visions by emphasizing growth while maintaining Dublin’s historic community identity. ADOPTED SPECIAL AREA PLANS To further reinforce the vision and identity of the Dublin community, the 2013 Community Plan included nine adopted Special Area Plans with detailed analysis and recommendations for specific geographical areas within the City and its planning area. The special area plans provided a framework to establish a sense of place and community identity in key locations, and provide more focused recom- mendations relating to establishing a unique sense of place. These Special Area Plans have been updated over time as necessary to reflect current trends and opportunities, and help keep alignment with the City’s overall vision. As part of this Envision Dublin Community Plan Update, the previous nine special area plans were evaluated, assessed, updated, and revised to reflect current condi- tions, planning priorities, and reinforce Dublin’s unique identity, sense of place, and vision. As a result, six special area have been identified, planned, and incorporated into the Envision Dublin Community Plan Update. These six special areas include previous special area plans, with some previous planning areas merged and incorporated to create new special area planning boundaries. These planning areas continue the City’s legacy and commitment to planning that strengthens community identity and vision. The six special area plans in Envision Dublin include: the Historic District, Bridge Street District, West Innovation District, Dublin Corporate Area, Southwest Area, and a new expanded area, the Emerald Corridor. Please see Chapter 11 Special Area Plans (pg.185) for further details. Special Area Adopted/Updated Historic Dublin Revitalization Plan 2005 Historic District Area Plan 2007 Bridge Street Corridor Study Vision Report 2010 Bridge Road Area Plan Update 2016 Crossroads Area Plan 2016 Shier Rings Road Corridor Study 2016 West Innovation District 2017 Dublin Corporate Area Plan 2018 / 2022 Historic District Task Force Final Recommendations 2021 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 35 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Land Use and Development GROWTH PRESSURES Dublin and the Central Ohio region are growing rapidly. Between 1990 and 2020, the population has nearly tripled from approximately 16,400 residents to 48,613 residents in Dublin. The recent growth in the region places Central Ohio among the fastest-growing large metropolitan areas in the country, with an estimated annual growth rate of 0.89 percent. The region’s strong population growth can be attributed, in part, to continued strong economic growth. According to the 2023 Housing Study and Strategy, Dublin’s population is projected grow to 60,500 by 2040 per data provided by the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission (MORPC). As part of initial stakeholder workshops, City leadership, department heads, and the Steering Committee, growth pressure was a top concern. As more people seek to move into the community, residents have increasing concerns regarding growing pressure on infrastructure, housing, school districts, and other services. As the City grows, residents said it will be important to ensure the community is prepared to handle growth while retaining neighborhood identity, ensuring housing variety, accom- modating school capacity needs, handling traffic, and maintaining infrastructure. CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS With the City experiencing rapid growth, meeting the demands of the changing demographic is crucial. The demographic characteristics of a community influence the needs of residents, particularly regarding housing and demand for services. As the community’s demographics change, the City must respond accordingly to provide for the residents’ needs. Age. Per the US Census, between 2000 and 2021, the median age within the City of Dublin increased by nearly five years to 40.5. This is partly due to a 150% increase in the population aged 55+. The aging nature of Dublin’s population, particularly when compared to the larger region, may indicate an increased need for health care services and facilities, senior care facilities, and housing that is appealing to older households looking for lower mainte- nance and more diverse housing options. Household Characteristics and Size. Between 2010 and 2021, the number of childless couples (as defined by the US Census) has grown by nearly 2,000 households. This reflects a broader national trend with a growing share of aging population and empty nesters, households with no children. Despite this trend, Dublin has continued to attract family households, and the share of those households has outpaced other categories. As a result, the average house- hold size in Dublin has remained steady at 2.8 since 2000. However, the expanded development of four- and five-bed- room units appears to be shifting Dublin’s housing stock out of alignment. Single-family detached housing will continue to be the predominant housing type in Dublin to accom- modate a steady base of family households. However, data indicates a need for smaller two- and three-bedroom housing units to meet changing family needs. This would also potentially help reduce housing costs. Further, initial stakeholder workshops identified changing community needs and related shifts in housing as critical topics of concern for the Community Plan. City leadership, staff, and the Steering Committee consistently discussed Dublin’s residential environment, specifically concerning the rapid growth occurring in Dublin and increased interest in more diverse housing options. Participants also emphasized the importance of ensuring housing options for everyone, from young professionals to growing families to retirees. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Land Use and Development | Envision Dublin Community Plan 36 DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES Currently, there are nearly 1,600 acres of vacant, undevel- oped, and agricultural land within the City of Dublin and its planning area that could accommodate potential develop- ment opportunities. Such agricultural and undeveloped properties are primarily zoned for residential, commercial, or industrial uses. An analysis was done to determine the number of new residential households and additional non-residential development that could be developed on these properties based on the City’s current zoning stan- dards and regulations. Residential. Within the planning area, there are 1,250 acres of land zoned for residential use or unincorporated agricultural land. Based on the current zoning code and regulations, Dublin can accommodate approximately 1,456 new units. Non-residential. The amount of land zoned for commer- cial, industrial, or innovative uses is 340 acres. With an estimated development of 10,000 square feet per acre (0.23 acres) of developable land, Dublin can accommo- date approximately 3.39 million square feet of additional non-residential space. WESTERN GROWTH AREA AND ANNEXATION After decades of growth and expansion, the City of Dublin is now reaching the borders of adjacent communities which are also growing and developing. The most recent growth between 2010 and 2020, added approximately 0.3 square miles of area and a population increase of an additional 9,000 residents. Currently, Dublin has a population of 48,613 with an area of approximately 25 square miles. The Community Plan analyzed both the current City boundaries as well as areas west of Dublin that are outside the City. The western growth area is anticipated to expe- rience significant commercial development, housing development and population growth in the coming years and decades. With U.S. 33 as the primary arterial of the area, multiple warehouses, technology, and entertainment venues have developed in and around the City in recent years. The western growth area has also experienced extensive commercial development including big box and national retailers, shopping centers, smaller local businesses. Additionally, multiple residential subdivisions have been platted and built in recent years with many more expected. Infrastructure will need to be extended to this area to facilitate development, but utilities are already present in some areas having been provided by the City of Marysville in an agreement with Jerome Township. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 37 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Land Use and Development SciotoRiverCOSGRAY RDWESTBU R YDRRINGS R D BRAND RD AVERY RDWOERNER TEMPLE RD TAR A HILL DR SEL L S M IL LDRINNOVA T IO N DR S H I ER R I N G S R D MARTIN RD D U B LIN SHIRED R RIVERSIDED R M O NTEREYDRCOFFMANRDDALEDRCARNOU S TIEDRBA L L A N T RAEPL GLICK R D E M ER A LD PKWY POST RD SWICKARD CT DUBLI NRDDUBLINRDBRIGH T R D S HIGH STT U L L YMOREDR M E M O RIALD R W YNFO R D DRH A Y D E NRU N B L V D WILCOX RDB RA N D ONWAY D R RINGS RD W B R I DGE S TEARLINGTONPKWYJEROME RD VILLAGEP K WYPRIMROSE CT EMMET ROW LN P ERIMET ER DR R I N G S R D TULLER RD BRITT ONPKWYMUIRFIELDDRFRANTZRD WELDON R D MCKITRICK RD TONTI DR M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDW Y A N D O TT E WOOD SBLVD C H U R C H M A N R D BLAZERPKWYCOSGRAY RDT U T T L E R DHERITAGE DRMUIRFIELDDRM ETRO PL N HARD RDHYLAND-CROYRDEIT E R M A N RDRAUSC H D R E STA TESCTA S H F O R D RD BROCK R D 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Context Layers City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River City of Columbus Corporate Area Year of Annexation 1881 1951 - 1980 1981 - 2000 2001 - 2010 2011 - 2021 Unincorporated Area Unincorporated Pockets within City Limits Western Growth Area PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Land Use and Development | Envision Dublin Community Plan 38 LAND USE DEVELOPMENT Based on the growth pressures experienced and devel- opment opportunities, exploring alternate land use scenarios was necessary to ensure future growth aligns with the community’s vision. Scenario planning helps decision-makers understand the impacts of current land use trends and evaluate alternate “what-if” scenarios and how they can affect the community in future years. By understanding the pros and cons of various scenarios, decision-makers can adjust short-term and long-term plans for the community. The planning process analyzed the current land use plan based on adopted plans and policies to establish current and future metrics, including population, housing, and employment growth across the planning area. Alternate scenarios were then developed through an iterative process and extensive engagement with the Steering Committee, City Council, and the community feedback. This helped establish the baseline for the entire planning area and facilitated discussions among the alter- nate scenarios. The land use scenario process, including a fiscal impact analysis that included transportation and utility assessment, was a critical step in the Envision Dublin Community Plan Update. Based on the feedback received and parallel modeling efforts to identify potential impacts to the infra- structure, including water, sewer, and transportation that will serve future development, the alternates were revised to develop a preferred Future Land Use Plan that contributes positively to the City’s fiscal health. By leading with land use policy first, related modeling efforts for mobility and transportation, fiscal health, and utilities can be driven by the community’s desired vision for the future rather than having that vision react to constraints. Please see the Economic Development, Mobility and Trans- portation, and Utilities chapters for additional details. TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL Forecast to Reality Local governments, metropolitan planning organiza- tions (MPOs), and the Ohio Department of Trans- portation (DOT) conduct 20 to 30-year long-range transportation demand modeling to plan for future growth and address deficiencies in the transportation system. TDMs help identify areas in need of roadway improvements and help plan for public transpor- tation and improvements. Such models are based on proposed land use, demographics, and travel patterns unique to the region. A 2050 travel demand model (TDM) was completed by the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission and Central Ohio Rural Planning Organization (MORPC) with input from the City of Dublin. It projected population to grow by more than 11,000 to 60,500 by 2040 with over 22,300 households. Looking out to 2050, the Envision Dublin Community Plan Update used the TDM by MORPC to analyze land use scenarios and transportation models with Dublin specific assumptions and metrics. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 39 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Land Use and Development PREFERRED FUTURELAND USE PLAN 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Context Layers City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River Agriculture/Rural Residential Low Density Residential Suburban Density Residential Mixed Density Residential Medium Density Mixed Use Neighborhood Mixed Use Village Mixed Use Center Mixed Use Urban Suburban Commercial Neighborhood Office Suburban Office Flex Innovation Industrial Civic/Community Park/Open Space PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS PROCESS The City of Dublin had previously adopted 27 different future land use categories, including several specific to the special areas in the City. The City’s 2013 Community land use plan and current adopted plans for multiple special areas were amalgamated to plan for future growth and development. This created a single land use map, assigning a desired future land use to all parcels in the City and its planning area. Land use designation was determined by considering compatibility, suitability, context of existing uses and development, consistency with the community’s vision, and consideration of previously adopted plans and policy. Land use scenarios were then developed following input from an iterative transportation and utility modeling, fiscal impact analysis, and extensive engagement and feedback from the Steering Committee, staff, and key stakeholders. Along with defining desired land use, desired development scale, intensity assumptions, and key metrics were also defined to model and evaluate the different scenarios. Assumptions included: ■The number of building square feet to be developed. ■The area dedicated to residential and employ- ment-generating uses within the development. ■The number of people and employees per square foot of the potential development. Key metrics included the floor-to-air ratio (FAR), land use mix for different land uses and population per household. The Importance of Mixed Use A key component of developing the Land Use Plan was the incorporation of several “mixed use” land use categories. With the ability to accommodate a combination of commer- cial, retail, restaurant, office, residential, and other uses, mixed-use development can more easily and creatively provide a flexible and viable response to changing market conditions while better supporting the goals and objectives of the Community Plan. Four mixed use categories of varying intensities and characteristics are provided in more detail in the Future Land Use Plan section of this chapter. Areas of Change To accurately assess the impacts of future land use recommendations and related transportation and infra- structure impacts, it was essential to account for the existing conditions accurately. Areas that could accom- modate future development were distinguished from built-out neighborhoods and employment districts that will experience little to no change. The additional poten- tial number of people, households, and jobs that could be accommodated within each scenario were based on these areas of change. For example, existing agricultural land planned for future development would be an area of change, whereas established residential neighborhoods within the City limits would not change. Development Area Propensity The Housing Study and Strategy also identified devel- opable land in the City to accommodate future growth. The report identified undeveloped sites with limited or no existing infrastructure, areas served by streets and general infrastructure suitable for infill, and potential redevelopment areas based on the Adopted Special Area Plans. The report also identified active sites with an approved development or those under construction during the study period. Sites that were still development opportunities were incorporated into the land use modeling process. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Land Use and Development | Envision Dublin Community Plan 40 1 61 257 745 1 61 33 270 Agriculture/Rural Residential - Low Residential - Suburban Residential - Mixed Residential - Medium Mixed Use - Neighborhood Mixed Use - Village Mixed Use - Center Mixed Use - Urban Suburban Commercial Neighborhood Office Suburban Office Flex Innovation Industrial Civic/Community Park/Open Space Previously Adopted Land Use Scenario The scenario reflects development trends envisioned by the Dublin community across several special areas within the City’s planning area limits. It is based on the adopted land use plans, supplemented by current land use. The scenario demonstrates ample long-term growth potential. While most of the current residential areas and parts of the planning area will not change, the growth in household and popula- tion is primarily driven by a more targeted approach in the special areas, including Bridge Street, Southwest Area, and Western Innovation District, with current trends. The scenario can accommodate nearly 40,000 households across the entire planning area, with a population of over 92,000 and almost 90,000 jobs. While the increase is significant, the projected population-to-employment ratio is consistent with the current population-to-employment ratio in the City. Steering Committee feedback on the Current Land Use Scenario included the need for more sustainable neighbor- hoods that prioritizes walkability and mixed-use develop- ment, maintaining premier office uses along key corridors throughout the City, and ensuring open space is integrated as new areas are developed. The need to maintain the identity of special areas, revitalize local businesses, and encouraging a variety of housing options and densities in new growth areas were also discussed. Current Numbers Projected Population 49,085 92,862 Households 17,700 38,589 Employment 49,000 90,930 more people across the entire planning area more people across the entire planning area 44,00044,000 more jobs across the entire planning area more jobs across the entire planning area 42,00042,000 more people across the entire planning area more people across the entire planning area 44,00044,000 more jobs across the entire planning area more jobs across the entire planning area 42,00042,000WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 41 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Land Use and Development 1 61 257 745 1 61 33 270 Agriculture/Rural Residential - Low Residential - Suburban Residential - Mixed Residential - Medium Mixed Use - Neighborhood Mixed Use - Village Mixed Use - Center Mixed Use - Urban Suburban Commercial Neighborhood Office Suburban Office Flex Innovation Industrial Civic/Community Park/Open Space Land Use Scenario 2 Based on the feedback received, Scenario 2 provides for growth and development in Dublin’s commercial and employment areas while making targeted changes to the community’s established residential neighborhoods. It promotes the development of the unincorporated areas that are currently surrounded by the City of Dublin and also defines desired land use for Dublin’s west and southwest growth areas, ensuring that future develop- ment in those areas reflects the character of the commu- nity while addressing the needs for new jobs and greater housing choice. As the unincorporated areas west of the City limits are also planned for in Scenario 2, it can accommodate almost 130,000 people and 120,000 jobs, over 35,000 more people and 20,000 jobs than Scenario 1. Scenario 2 repositions targeted areas as mixed-use centers, including portions of the Dublin Corporate Area, Bridge Street districts, and the northern area of the Western Innovation District. The scenario also reflects the City’s ongoing Transportation – Thoroughfare Plans, including the potential future Tuttle Crossing Boulevard extension and S.R. 161 corridor. Steering Committee workshop feedback on the alternate land use scenario 2 centered around identifying opportuni- ties for neighborhood-serving uses, providing a wider range of housing options, increasing research and development areas to meet the needs of the diverse economic base, and the location of mixed-use developments and nodes. Current Numbers Projected Population 49,085 127,769 Households 17,700 52,194 Employment 49,000 118,428 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Land Use and Development | Envision Dublin Community Plan 42 1 61 257 745 1 61 33 270 Land Use Scenario 3 Scenario 3 builds off of Scenario 2 and explores concen- trated industrial and employment opportunities in the western growth areas around the Southwest and West Innovation District special areas extending up to S.R. 161. The scenario also reflects a revised future mobility network emphasizing stronger east-west connections across the planning area and neighboring communities. The scenario incorporates updates to Alternate Land Use Scenario 2 based on the feedback received, including detailed land use, urban design, transportation, and utility and infrastructure-related input on the special areas. The scenario balances various residential and employment-gen- erating uses and opportunities for mixed-use development across the planning area. Scenario 3 can accommodate over 25,000 people and 32,000 jobs more than Scenario 1. While there’s poten- tial for slightly fewer people than Scenario 2, Scenario 3 supports more jobs than any other scenario, over 2.5 times the current jobs in the City. The scenario incorporates updates to Alternate Land Use Scenario 2 based on the feedback received, including detailed land use, urban design, transportation, and utility and infrastructure-related input on the special areas. The scenario balances various residential and employment-gen- erating uses and opportunities for mixed-use development across the planning area. more people across the entire planning area more people across the entire planning area 69,00069,000 more jobs across the entire planning area more jobs across the entire planning area 74,00074,000 more people across the entire planning area more people across the entire planning area 69,00069,000 more jobs across the entire planning area more jobs across the entire planning area 74,00074,000 Current Numbers Projected Population 49,085 118,423 Households 17,700 48,826 Employment 49,000 123,011 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 43 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Land Use and Development FISCAL IMPACT BY LAND USE TYPE Given the revenue structure and capital demands of land uses in the City, the best means to maintain fiscal sustain- ability is to diversify and intensify the land uses, empha- sizing nonresidential and mixed uses. As the City relies heavily on income tax from workers employed within the municipality, it is fiscally beneficial to prioritize mixed-use and nonresidential land uses and target high-income indus- tries, in particular. While residential development types place significant demands on City services and infrastructure, they do not generate substantial revenue for the City, resulting in a lack of positive fiscal benefits. However, the growing trend of working from home presents an opportunity. Residen- tial units with a work-at-home situation could potentially produce a fiscal surplus for the City. Similarly, mixed-use developments, with their increased densities and income tax from nonresidential uses, offer a promising avenue for generating fiscal benefits. Office and industrial/flex/innovation employment pay higher wages and salaries than retail/commercial development, generating much greater fiscal benefits to the City. Addition- ally, retail/commercial development tends to generate signif- icant public safety and transportation costs to a community and generate a low fiscal benefit to the City. Future Land Uses Tax Revenue Demand for Service Demand for Infrastructure Fiscal BenefitDevelopment Type Property Income Residential (per Unit) Low Residential Low Low High High Negative Suburban Residential Low Low High High Negative Mixed Residential Low Low Medium Medium Negative Medium Residential Low Low High High Negative Mixed Use Mixed Use Neighborhood Low Medium Medium Medium Medium Mixed Use Village Medium Medium Medium Medium Medium Mixed Use Center Medium High Medium Medium High Mixed Use Urban Medium High Medium Medium High Nonresidential Agricultural/Rural Low Medium Low Low Medium Suburban Commercial High Low High High Low Neighborhood Office High High Medium Medium High Sububurban Office High High Medium Medium High Flex Innovation High High Low Low High Industrial Low High Low Low High Civic/Community Low Low Low Low Low Parks/ Open Space Low Low Low Low Low WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Land Use and Development | Envision Dublin Community Plan 44 FUTURE LAND USE PLAN With a combination of the different scenarios, a preferred Future Land Use Plan was developed that helps achieve the community’s vision. While the anticipated growth will take time, the Future Land Use Plan has been carefully designed to have little impact on the City’s existing mobility and transportation network. It is fiscally responsible, supporting future investment to meet utility demand, new transportation infrastructure needs, and to maintain the quality of services that are important to the community. The Future Land Use Plan is a dynamic tool that supports the full potential of vacant and undeveloped properties. It provides users, including the development community, a flexible framework for future growth. The creation of vibrant places not only depends on land uses, but also on their specific design, functionality, access to infrastructure and services, and overall character. Detailed land use classifications provide a framework for organizing how land is used within a community. Each classification has specific intents, characteristics, and guidelines that define the types of development and land use activities that are suitable for particular areas. PURPOSE OF THE MAP The Future Land Use Plan is a tool to guide future devel- opment within Dublin. It will be applied through day-to-day decision-making to help implement the Envision Dublin Community Plan for the physical growth of the community. USE OF THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN The Future Land Use Plan should be part of the review and decision-making process for elected officials, boards and commissions as they review development proposals and plan for the future. It should also be used by City staff when reviewing development projects and providing recommendations. The map should guide the development and implementation of neighborhood, special area, and capital improvement plans for investment in systems, such as parks, sewer, transportation, and other infrastructure and services. By using the Future Land Use map as a guide, elected and appointed officials and staff can help ensure that decisions align with the Community’s vision for future growth. The map should also be readily available to the development community and the public for review. For the Future Land Use map to continue to be a relevant tool in guiding decision making, development projects and trends should be consistently monitored and a process for regular review and update of this map should be established. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Key Finding The results indicate that the City’s revenue structure, with its heavy reliance on income taxes, is sufficient to cover the costs to serve the development projected in the Preferred Scenario. Because this source is based on at place employment, the amount of office and industrial development is the main determinant of the results. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 45 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Land Use and Development COSGRAYRDW ES TBU RYDRBRAND RD AVERY RDWOERNER TEMPLE RD TAR A HIL L DR SEL L S M ILLDRINNOVA T IO N DR S H I E R R I N G S R D R I N G S R D MARTIN RD D U B LIN S HIRED R RIVERSIDED R M O N TEREYDRCOFFMANRDCARNOU S TIEDRB A L L A N T R AEPL GLICK R D EM ER A L D PKWY POST RD SWICKARD CT DUBLI NRDDUBLINRDBRIGHT R D S HIGH STT U LLYMORE DR M E M O RIALD R W Y NFO R D DRH A Y D E N RU N B L V D WILCOX RDB RAN D ONWAY D R RINGS R D W BRIDG E S TEARLING TON PKWYJEROM E RD VILLAGEP K WYPRIMROSE CT EMMET ROW LN P E RIMET ER DR TULLER RD BRIT T O NPKWYMUIRFIELDDRF RANTZRD WELDON R D MCKITRICK RD TONTI DR M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDW Y A N D O T T E WOO DSBLVD C H U R C H M A N R D BLAZERPKWYCOSGRAY RDT U T T L E R DHERITAGE DRMUIRFIELDDRM ETROPL N HARD RDHYLAND-CROYRDEIT E R M A N R DRAUSCH D R E STA TESCTA SH F O R D RD BROCK R D 745 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 270SciotoRiverNort hFork In d ianRun TU T T LE CRO S S ING B L VD NEW STREET 3 N EW S T R E E T 1 ADVANCEMENT AVENUENEW STREET 6NEW ST R E ET 2 N E W STREET 4 NEW STREET 5 CONVERSE RD IAMS RDHOUCH A RD RD FUTURELAND USE PLAN 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Context Layers City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River Agriculture/Rural Residential Low Density Residential Suburban Density Residential Mixed Density Residential Medium Density Mixed Use Neighborhood Mixed Use Village Mixed Use Center Mixed Use Urban Suburban Commercial Neighborhood Office Suburban Office Flex Innovation Industrial Civic/Community Park/Open Space PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Land Use and Development | Envision Dublin Community Plan 46 RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY INTENT Large-lot residential development that is responsive to environmentally sensitive areas and sites incorporated by existing natural features, and transitions from rural residen- tial to suburban single-family residential. CHARACTERISTICS Principal Uses Single-family residential Supporting Uses Home occupations, parks and open space, schools, places of worship Density 0.5 to 2 du/ac; minimum 0.50-acre lot Building Form and Orientation 1 to 2 stories; a range of housing sizes and styles with single-family scale and appearance, detached, integrated into natural setting, buildings set back from the road Open Space Preserved open space, natural features, maintained private lots, passive open space Sustainability Building-mounted solar, geothermal, rain gardens Streetscape Two-lane rural roadways often without curbs, limited pedestrian provisions, front yards and residential landscaping, bike and vehicular traffic on roads Parking Private off-street parking, individual driveways and garages, no on-street parking CHARACTER IMAGES RL RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN DENSITY CHARACTER IMAGES RS INTENT Traditional single-family neighborhoods with consistent housing types and lower densi- ties located together. CHARACTERISTICS Principal Uses Single-family residential Supporting Uses Home occupations, parks and open space, residential clubhouses and amenities, schools Density 1 to 4 du/ac; minimum 0.20-acre lot Building Form and Orientation 1 to 2 stories; a range of housing sizes and styles with single-family scale and appearance, consistent throughout each neighborhood, uniform setbacks, detached, four-sided architecture Open Space Formalized, active and passive open space connected by shared use path systems and sidewalks, maintained private lots, play fields, preserved open space Sustainability Building-mounted solar, rain gardens Streetscape Curvilinear streets, street trees, sidewalks, shared-use paths, tree lawns Parking On-street and private off-street parking, individual driveways and garages *Supporting Uses are only appropriate when combined with principal uses on a site. Some uses that do not significantly alter the intent of the district, such as parks, schools, and civic, may be located on sites without a listed particular use. This shall apply to each future land use category. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 47 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Land Use and Development RESIDENTIAL MIXED DENSITY INTENT Walkable neighborhood that is marketable to all age groups with a variety of housing types and styles integrated with adjacent entertainment, employment, and appropriate services. CHARACTERISTICS Principal Uses Single-family and multi-family residential Supporting Uses Senior living and assisted-living, schools, parks and open space, residential clubhouse and amenities, small-scale neighborhood commercial Density 3-12 du/ac Building Form and Orientation 1-3 stories; variety of building types and sizes oriented towards the street or open space, uniform building setbacks, detached and attached homes, cottages, townhomes, duplexes, triplexes, rear-loaded homes, breezeway and garden apartments Open Space Formalized, active and passive open space connected by shared use path systems and sidewalks, centralized open spaces, maintained small private lots, neighborhood greens Sustainability Building-mounted solar, alternative building materials, bioswales, permeable pavement, rain gardens Streetscape A higher degree of street connectivity with short walkable blocks, street trees, sidewalks, shared-use paths, tree lawns Parking On-street and private off-street parking, individual garages and carports, tuck-under parking CHARACTER IMAGES RMX RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY CHARACTER IMAGES RM INTENT Neighborhoods with a variety of housing products that are defined by consistent archi- tecture, large open and green spaces, and walkable streets and blocks. CHARACTERISTICS Principal Uses Single-family residential, multi-family residential Supporting Uses Parks and open space; residential clubhouse and amenities, schools, senior housing and assisted living Density 2-12 du/ac Building Form and Orientation 1-3 stories; variety of housing types that coordinate in massing and architectural details, uniform building setbacks, townhomes, duplexes, triplexes, quadplex, garden and breezeway apartment buildings Open Space Integrated around open space, shared-use paths, small maintained lots, large open space reserves Sustainability Building-mounted solar, alternative building materials, bioswales, rain gardens Streetscape A higher degree of street connectivity with short walkable blocks, street trees, sidewalks, shared-use paths, tree lawns Parking Shared surface lots, private individual and shared garages, on-street parking, tuck-under parking WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Land Use and Development | Envision Dublin Community Plan 48 MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOOD INTENT Neighborhood services located near existing and future residential neighborhoods that are walkable, auto-accessible, and scaled to neighborhoods. CHARACTERISTICS Principal Uses Office, personal services, commercial, retail, and eating and drinking Supporting Uses Single-family residential, multi-family residential Density 0.33 - 1 FAR Building Form and Orientation 1-3 stories; residentially-scaled buildings along the street, storefronts and entrances along sidewalk, horizontal and vertical mix of uses Open Space Small open spaces such as plazas and pocket parks integrated with buildings Sustainability Building-mounted solar, green roofs, alternative building materials, permeable pavement, bioswales Streetscape Buildings along the street, sidewalks, street trees, patios and seating areas Parking Surface parking lots located behind buildings, on-street parking CHARACTER IMAGES MXN MIXED USE VILLAGE CHARACTER IMAGES MXV INTENT Small-scale, pedestrian-oriented district preserved and developed with respect to historic building context and character. CHARACTERISTICS Principal Uses Office, retail, commercial, civic buildings, single-family residential Supporting Uses Multi-family residential Density 1 - 1.5 FAR Building Form and Orientation 1-3 stories; historic and complementary buildings compatible in scale and massing, entrances and storefronts along the sidewalk, horizontal and vertical mix of uses Open Space Small open spaces such as plazas and pocket parks Sustainability Building-mounted solar, green roofs, permeable pavement, adaptive reuse Streetscape Narrow streets, buildings along the sidewalk, pedestrian activity with smaller blocks and sidewalks, patios and seating areas, street trees, mobility hubs Parking Shared public parking lots located off service streets, parking garages, on-street parking WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 49 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Land Use and Development MIXED USE CENTER INTENT Vibrant mixed-use district organized around open space with live-work opportunities, supporting services, and amenities positioned in key locations around high-volume thoroughfares and ground-floor activation. CHARACTERISTICS Principal Uses Office, hospitality, multi-family residential, laboratory, R&D Supporting Uses Civic, parks and open space, commercial, retail Density 1.5 - 3 FAR Building Form and Orientation 2-8 stories; low to mid-rise buildings with an emphasis on pedestrian accessibility and scale, vertical mixed-use in key locations, organized around green space, horizontal mix of uses Open Space Urban open space concepts, including plazas, greens, pocket parks, and public squares, linear green spaces, neighborhood greens Sustainability Building-mounted solar, green roofs, LEED buildings, permeable pavement, rain gardens, bioswales, adaptive reuse, alternative building materials Streetscape Buildings close to the street, blend of patio and open space between buildings, mobility hubs, sidewalks, shared-use paths Parking Above or below ground structured parking, on-street parking at key locations, shared surface parking lots CHARACTER IMAGES MXC MIXED USE URBAN CHARACTER IMAGES MXU INTENT Strong mix of uses in an active, highly walkable environment. CHARACTERISTICS Principal Uses Commercial, office, hospitality, multi-family residential, eating and drinking Supporting Uses Civic, parks and open space Density 3+ FAR Building Form and Orientation 3-6 stories; low to mid-rise buildings located along public streetscapes with ground-floor activation and entrances and storefronts oriented toward the street, vertical mixed-use, horizontal mixed-use, buildings above 6 stories may be appropriate in key locations Open Space Urban open space concepts, including plazas, greens, pocket parks, and public squares, de-emphasized green space Sustainability Building-mounted solar, green roofs, LEED buildings, permeable pavement, alternative building materials, and adaptive reuse. Streetscape Dense, gridded street network, limited green space, building walls wide sidewalks, patios and seating areas Parking Above or below ground structured parking, on-street parking, garages screened from major corridors with liner buildings WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Land Use and Development | Envision Dublin Community Plan 50 NEIGHBORHOOD OFFICE INTENT Small-scale office development with frontage along major collectors and necessary for transitioning to existing residential neighborhoods. CHARACTERISTICS Principal Uses Office, medical office, institutional office Supporting Uses Civic and institutional (including assisted living) Density Generally not to exceed 9,500 SF / ac. Building Form and Orientation 1-2 stories; small-scale clustered buildings with a residential character, buffered from residential, set back from the street, architectural design cues from adjacent neighborhoods, low lot coverage Open Space Landscaped setbacks from streets with sidewalk and multi-use paths Sustainability Building-mounted solar, green roofs, permeable pavement, alternative building materials, rain gardens, bioswales Streetscape Street trees, extensive landscape buffer within setback, shared-use paths Parking Small, shared surface parking landscaped and screened from the street CHARACTER IMAGES NO SUBURBAN OFFICE CHARACTER IMAGES SO INTENT Major employment and institutional centers with high visibility along highway corridors. CHARACTERISTICS Principal Uses Office, medical office, hospital, institutional and educational campuses Supporting Uses Ancillary commercial support uses such as restaurants, day cares or business services that are encouraged to be integrated into the interior of office buildings Density Generally not to exceed 12,500 SF / ac. (not to exceed 16,500 SF / ac. when fronting highways) Building Form and Orientation 2-6 stories; low to mid-rise buildings with significant prominence along highway corridors, significant building setbacks (minimum 100 feet) Open Space Landscaped setbacks from streets with sidewalk and multi-use paths, formalized landscape design Sustainability Building-mounted solar, LEED buildings, green roofs, rain gardens, permeable pavement, alternative building materials, bioswales Streetscape Curvilinear streets, shared-use paths, street trees, tree lawns Parking On-site surface parking lots landscaped and screened from the street, structured parking WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 51 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Land Use and Development FLEX INNOVATION INTENT Vibrant, modern development incorporating a variety of uses, including innovation, office, art and collaboration, that are integrated into existing natural and built environ- ment. CHARACTERISTICS Principal Uses Office, R&D, flex office - warehouse, clean manufacturing Supporting Uses Commercial, neighborhood services Density 8,700 - 16,500 SF / ac. Building Form and Orientation 1-3 stories; variety of building types and sizes, office in the front / warehouse functions to the rear, loading bays to rear, large building setbacks (minimum 50 feet) Open Space Small open spaces, such as plazas and pocket parks, as amenities for employees, campus setting Sustainability Rooftop solar, geothermal, LEED buildings, green infrastructure, smart parking Streetscape Curvilinear streets, manicured landscaping within setback, shared-use paths Parking On-site surface parking landscaped and screened from street CHARACTER IMAGES FXI INDUSTRIAL CHARACTER IMAGES IND INTENT Medium to heavy, large-format industrial uses in close proximity to major arterials for ease of access to accommodate unique site and operational needs. CHARACTERISTICS Principal Uses Warehousing, light industrial, R&D, distribution, assembly, office, advanaced manufacturing, data centers Supporting Uses Eating and drinking, neighborhood services Density Generally not to exceed 18,000 SF / ac. Building Form and Orientation 1-3 stories; large footprint buildings designed for flexible interior layout, high-bay/ceilings, loading docks located to rear, set back from the street (minimum 100 feet) Open Space Small open spaces, such as plazas and pocket parks, as amenities for employees, berming and landscaping along the perimeter Sustainability Building-mounted solar, ground-mounted solar for parking, geothermal, LEED buildings, green infrastructure, smart parking, alternative building materials, water reuse Streetscape Buildings sited to accommodate ease of vehicular access, extensive landscape buffers and berming within setback Parking On-site surface parking landscaped and screened from the street WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Land Use and Development | Envision Dublin Community Plan 52 CIVIC / COMMUNITY INTENT Public buildings and institutions owned and operated by governmental or other public agencies. CHARACTERISTICS Principal Uses Government buildings, recreational facilities, institutional and educational campuses Supporting Uses Parks and open space Key Considerations These areas serve a range of roles depending on their location, characteristics, sensitivity, and management. CHARACTER IMAGES CSUBURBAN COMMERCIAL INTENT Key service areas intended to provide a variety of retail and commercial uses, such as grocery stores, for the community through anchor-driven shopping centers, outparcels with drive-thrus, and ease of vehicular access. CHARACTERISTICS Principal Uses Commercial, office, retail, eating and drinking Supporting Uses Drive-thru facilities, civic, institutional Density 6,500 - 8,700 SF / ac. Building Form and Orientation 1-2 stories; medium to large building footprints set back from the street, big box stores, in-line retail, out-parcel buildings along street Open Space Landscaped setbacks from streets with sidewalk and multi-use paths Sustainability Building-mounted solar, alternative building materials, green roofs, permeable pavement Streetscape Landscaped setbacks from streets with sidewalk and multi-use paths, mobility hubs Parking On-site surface parking landscaped and screened from the street, shared parking CHARACTER IMAGES SC WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 53 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Land Use and Development PARKS / OPEN SPACE CHARACTER IMAGES P INTENT Public or privately owned parks and recreational uses, or lands that are to be preserved in a natural state. CHARACTERISTICS Principal Uses Parks, recreation, stormwater facilities, natural areas Supporting Uses Civic buildings Key Consideration These areas serve a range of roles depending on their location, characteristics, sensitivity, and management. Opportunities to expand and connect existing parks is encouraged. AGRICULTURAL / RURAL CHARACTER IMAGES AG INTENT Large, undeveloped land sparcely occupied and used primary for agriculture. CHARACTERISTICS Principal Uses Agricultural, single-family residential Supporting Uses Home occupations, places of worship, civic, parks and open space Density 0 - 0.5 du/ac; minimum 2-acre lot Building Form and Orientation 1-2 stories; detached, rural single-family building forms, buildings set back from the road Open Space Preserved naturalized features, farmland, tree stands, large green space Sustainability Building-mounted solar, geothermal, rain gardens Streetscape Two-lane rural roadways often without curbs, limited pedestrian facilities, bike and vehicular traffic on roads Parking Private off-street, individual driveways and garages WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Land Use and Development | Envision Dublin Community Plan 54 SciotoRiverCOSGRAYRDBRANDRD F RANTZRDCONCORD RDAVERYRDWOERNERTEMPLE RD TAR A HILL DR SELL S M IL L DRINNOVA T IO NDR SH I ER R INGS RD MARTIN RD D U B LIN SHIRE D R RIVERSIDEDR DUBLINCENTERDRM O NTEREYDRCOFFMANRDDALEDRCARNOU S TIEDRBAL L ANTRAEP L GLICK RD EM ER A L D PKWYPOST RD SWICKARD CT DUBLI NRDBRIGHT RD S HIGH STTULLY MOR E DR M E M O RIA L D R W Y NFOR D DR H A Y D E N RU N B L V D WILCOX RDBRA N DO N WAYDR RI N G S R D W BRIDGE STEARLINGT ONPKWYJEROME R D VILLAGE P KWYPRIMROSE CT P E R IMETER DR R I NG S R D TULLER RD DUBLINRDBR IT TONPKWYMUIRFIEL D DRWELDON RD TONTI DRMCKITRICK RD MA I N S T SUMMIT VIEW R DAVERY RDBLA ZER PKW YC H U R C H M A N R DHYLAND-CROYRDCOSGRAY RDEITERMANRDT U T T L E R DHERITAGE DRME TROPL N HARD RDRAUSCHDR E S T A T ESCTA S H F ORD R D BROCK RD 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 North F ork India n Run Sou th ForkIndia nRun PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS Context Layers City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River Growth Framework Development Intensification Minimal Change / Maintain Character New Growth Areas Unincorporated Areas GROWTH FRAMEWORK A thorough examination of market trends, land values, existing land uses, and infrastructure illustrates that Dublin can accommodate the needs of its growing population and changing commercial and industrial land use needs in the coming decades within the planning area. Doing so will help the City achieve its objectives of encouraging infill, reuse, and redevelopment of existing and underutilized areas, making efficient use and leveraging existing infrastructure, maintaining community character, and ensuring consistency between new development with existing adjacent develop- ment and the Community Plan. The Growth Framework identifies four area classifications that should be prioritized in the following order when encouraging development: Development Intensification Areas, Minimal Change Areas, New Growth Areas, and Unincorporated Areas. In all areas, as new development is proposed, consideration must be given to appropriately transitioning between existing devel- oped areas and future growth and development. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 55 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Land Use and Development DEVELOPMENT INTENSIFICATION The areas identified for intensification are already developed but have varying degrees of potential for more intense devel- opment, conversion of existing structures to new uses (e.g., large office buildings or complexes into mixed-use areas), or redevelopment to meet future needs or opportunities. These areas contain undeveloped land, vacant buildings, and an abundance of surface parking space, meaning these underutilized areas should be prioritized for redevelopment. Development intensification in these areas will help Dublin accommodate its growing population and increase jobs, and it will be consistent with the Special Area Plans and improve- ments (see Chapter “Special Area Plans”, pg 175). Conclusions and Recommendations ■Appropriate density increases in residential devel- opment, including townhouses, multi-family, and mixed-use housing, that enables developers to offset high property costs through market-driven means. ■Incentivize the development of underutilized land or the redevelopment or reuse of existing development through the creation of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) districts. ■Identify opportunities for specific projects involving the development of underutilized land or redevelopment or reuse of existing development that include key infrastructure improvements, achieve other established community objectives, transform otherwise challenging development sites, or act as a catalyst for the develop- ment of surrounding properties. MAINTAIN CHARACTER Helping Dublin maintain the balance of accommodating growth and change while retaining its character will result in minimal change in these areas. They are established areas within city limits served by existing infrastructure and services. Where vacant properties exist in these areas, they should be developed in alignment with the Community Plan to maintain Dublin’s character. Conclusions and Recommendations ■Identify vacant properties in these areas. ■Ensure that zoning regulations and design standards align with the Comprehensive Plan’s goals, objectives, and recommendations so that any new development maintains the character of existing neighborhoods and developments. Update zoning and design standards if necessary to maintain community character. NEW GROWTH AREAS The new growth area is mostly undeveloped land and pres- ents tremendous opportunity for new development as the City expands to the west. Before development occurs, these areas require establishing development regulations to ensure that development is consistent with the Community Plan and compatible with existing adjacent development. The City should prioritize managed growth in these areas in alignment with a coordinated extension of services and infrastructure with neighboring communities. Conclusions and Recommendations ■Work closely with surrounding jurisdictions to avoid prematurely developing unincorporated areas that are not served by existing infrastructure or the reasonable extension of existing infrastructure. ■Encourage new development located within proximity of existing infrastructure. ■Identify sensitive and essential conservation areas and require that any approved developments consider and preserve them to the greatest extent possible. ■Encourage the incorporation of natural features into new development design. UNINCORPORATED AREAS (WITHIN CITY LIMITS) Unincorporated areas within Dublin’s city limits should be prioritized for annexations. Development within these areas should be consistent with adjacent development and the Community Plan. SciotoRiverCOSGRA Y R D BRAND R DF RANTZR DCONCORD RDAVERYRDWOE R N ER TEMPLE RD TA R A HIL L DRSEL L S M I L L DRINNOVA T I O N D R SH I ER R I NG S RD R I N G S R D MARTIN RD D U B LIN SHIRE D R RIVERSIDEDR DUBLIN CENTERDR M O NTEREYDRCOFFMANRDDALEDRCARNOUSTIEDRBALLANTRAEPL GLICK RD EM ER A L D PKWYPOST RD SWICKARD CT DUBLINRD BRIGHT R D S HIGH STT ULL YMOR E D R M E M O RIA L D R W Y NFOR D DR H A Y D E N RU N B L VD WILCOX RDBR AN DO N WAY DR RING S R D W BRIDGE STEARLINGTONPKWYJEROMERD VILLAGEP KWYPRIMROSE CT P E R IMETER DR TULLER RD DUBLIN RDMUIRFI E LDDR WELDON R D TONTI DRMCKITRICK RD MA I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDBL A ZER PKW Y CHURCHMAN RDHYLAND-CROYRDCOSGRAY RDEI TE R MA NRDT U T T L E R DHERITAGE DR BRITT ONPKWYMETROPLN HARD R D RAUSC H D R E S T A T ESCT A S H FORD R D BROCK RD 745 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 270 N or thF o rk I nd i an R un Sou th F ork I n dianRun PLAIN CITY SHAWNEEHILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS Context Layers City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River Growth Framework Development Intensification Minimal Change / Maintain Character New Growth Areas Unincorporated Areas WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Land Use and Development | Envision Dublin Community Plan 56 05Purpose The Housing and Neighborhoods chapter provides guidance on key issues impacting residential areas of the City. The Housing and Neighborhoods chapter strives to preserve and enhance Dublin’s established residential neighborhoods while promoting opportunities for higher density, unique, and affordable housing options within and on the periphery of the City. The chapter delves into supporting amenity-rich neighborhoods based on placemaking, overall livability, community aesthetics, and investing in infrastructure to ensure continued high-quality living, as well as identify opportunities to allow for “aging in place.” WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 57 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Housing and Neighborhoods Over the past several decades, Dublin’s residential land- scape has undergone rapid change. Higher-density urban housing has increased dramatically in the Bridge Park area and new clusters of suburban-style single-family homes have developed on the City’s periphery. Meanwhile, legacy neighborhoods have retained their appeal with their mature tree canopies and quality architecture. As the community has grown, it has adapted to the shifting preferences and needs of its residents and market dynamics. With Dublin’s population on the rise, neighborhoods will continue to change to meet the growing demand for diverse types of housing and neighborhoods to accommodate smaller household sizes, young professionals and families, and aging residents who hope to age in place, all while upholding Dublin’s high standard of living. The Housing and Neighborhoods chapter acknowledges the distinct trends unfolding in the City and provides recom- mendations for how Dublin can help ensure the availability of residential options that meet the needs and preferences of its residents in the decades to come. The Housing and Neigh- borhoods chapter provides guidance on key issues impacting residential areas of the City. The Housing and Neighborhoods chapter strives to preserve and enhance Dublin’s established residential neighborhoods while promoting opportunities for higher density, unique, and affordable housing options within and on the periphery of the City. This chapter recommends incremental strategies to help the City achieve its goal of creating well-planned, attractive and neighborhoods with a mix of housing choices to meet the needs of residents of all ages and ways of life, while supporting the changing needs of existing neighborhoods. It culminates in a Housing and Neighborhoods Framework to guide future action and meet its housing and neighborhood goals. We need more housing options to house all levels of our workforce and allowing young adults to stay in the community they grew up in. 05 HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOODS WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Housing and Neighborhoods 58 Goal and Objectives for Housing and Neighborhoods CREATE WELL-PLANNED, LIVABLE NEIGHBORHOODS WITH A VARIETY OF HOUSING CHOICES FOR ALL AGES AND WAYS OF LIFE, AS WELL AS SUPPORTING THE EVOLVING NEEDS OF EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS. ■Preserve and strengthen Dublin’s existing neighborhoods. ■Continue to require high-quality building materials and open space to uphold community image and create long-term neighborhood value. ■Provide a variety of housing and neighborhood choices to gently expand the housing stock. ■Create thoughtful, well-planned, livable neighborhoods which encourage social interaction, physical health, recreation, and amenities. ■Plan for the needs of an aging population. The goal and objectives for Dublin’s housing and neighborhoods are further expanded in this chapter through community-wide poli- cies and key recommendations. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 59 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Housing and Neighborhoods Most Sustainable. Through encouraging complete neighborhoods and diverse housing options Dublin can achieve its goal of being the most sustainable City. A diversity of housing options helps guarantee housing attainability and a diverse population that will keep Dublin a dynamic and economically sustainable community for generations to come. Complete neighborhoods with improved walkability and access to amenities, reduce reliance on motorized transportation, further advancing the City’s environmental sustainability goals, while also improving public health. Most Connected. Through the expansion of opportunities for safe, active trans- portation, complemented by the creation of commercial and service nodes in complete neighborhoods, Dublin can realize its goal of being the most connected City. Enhancing the ability of children to walk and bike to school, seniors to maintain an active lifestyle, and neighbors to easily and spontaneously interact, Dublin will succeed in connecting the community in ways that add to its already high quality of life. Most Resilient. Diversifying housing options to make housing more flexible to changing demands, and better connected and well-designed neighborhoods that encourage active transportation, will advance Dublin’s goal of being the most resilient City. Targeting development in certain areas will decrease the impact on watersheds that provide clean water and absorb stormwater runoff, a diverse housing stock will enable the City to adapt to changes in the economy and residential housing market, and conservation design and green infrastructure will help neighborhoods mitigate the impacts of natural hazards and detrimental impacts on ecosystems. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Housing and Neighborhoods 60 QUESTIONNAIRE FEEDBACK QUALITY NEIGHBORHOODS Dublin is known for its high quality single-family residen- tial neighborhoods and housing stock. As described in the Land Use Plan, Dublin is, and will remain, primarily a community of single-family homes and neighborhoods. This is especially true in established neighborhoods that will experience minimal change. Preserving and strengthening Dublin’s existing neigh- borhoods is key to maintaining the City’s unique identity and bolstering the sense of community. Emphasizing the maintenance of high-quality shared public spaces ensures that residents have access to well-kept parks, trails, and gathering areas, promoting social interaction and a strong sense of belonging. Community-driven beautification projects not only enhance the aesthetic appeal of neigh- borhoods but also empower residents to take ownership of their surroundings, fostering a deeper connection to their community. Additionally, it will be important to continue fostering a cohesive architectural character that builds upon the existing vernacular, preserving the charm and character of Dublin’s neighborhoods while allowing for thoughtful evolution that reflects the City’s growth and vitality. Housing is only one part of what makes a neighborhood livable. Access to amenities and infrastructure allows for active transportation and provides convenience, promotes a sense of connection and community, and enhances resident well-being. In addition to amenities such as grocery stores, pharmacies, health care facilities, and restaurants, “complete neighborhoods” include shared quality public spaces such as parks, plazas, community gardens, that provide places for neighbors to gather and interact and recreate. Lastly, livable, amenities-rich neighborhoods are connected with amenities and public spaces located within close enough proximity to encourage and better accommodate enhanced walkability and bikability. Below are actions the City can take to preserve the character and quality of its neighborhoods. PRESERVE DUBLIN’S CHARACTER To preserve and enhance the unique charm and identity of Dublin’s neighborhoods, the City should encourage a cohesive architectural character that builds on the existing vernacular. This involves supporting policies that safeguard the architectural character of new and existing neighbor- hoods, while accommodating a wide variety of architectural styles, from Muirfield Village to Ballantrae. By implementing our Neighborhood Design Guidelines and preservation programs, Dublin can protect and enhance the distinctive features that contribute to the appeal of its neighborhoods. This approach not only maintains the visual harmony and integrity of the built environment but also honors the history and heritage of the community, ensuring that future development complements and enriches the existing architectural fabric. Ultimately, by prioritizing the preserva- tion of architectural character, Dublin can create enduring neighborhoods that reflect the City’s character and values, fostering a sense of pride and belonging among residents for generations to come. decrease of respondents who see themselves living in a Large Single Family home increase of respondents who see themselves in a missing middle type residence 30% 180% 57% 29% 3% 11% Good ExcellentFair Poor What is the quality of Dublin’s housing stock? What type of home do you see yourself living in 10 years from now? WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 61 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Housing and Neighborhoods ENCOURAGE CONTEXT SENSITIVE DENSITY To meet projected housing needs and preferences of new and existing residents, the City can plan to incremen- tally and appropriately increase density by encouraging context-sensitive infill housing and requiring high quality design and construction. Through increasing density in specific areas, with consideration for existing neighborhood character, and adding multi-family, mixed-use and smaller- and medium-sized homes, Dublin can meet its goals of providing a variety of housing choices to accommodate a diverse mix of resident age, life-stage, and income-level while retaining community character and enhancing overall quality of life. CONTINUE TO PLAN FOR MAINTENANCE AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Dublin has a long and commendable record of main- taining its parks, public spaces, and facilities and planning for and making capital improvements to ensure the high quality, livability, and attractiveness of its residential neigh- borhoods.. These continued practices are essential for successful complete neighborhoods. This includes prior- itizing initiatives such as tree planting and replacement programs, integrating green space into neighborhoods, trail connectivity, responsive and adequate stormwater systems, which can significantly contribute to the preser- vation of natural ecosystems while promoting a healthier urban environment. Maintaining and enhancing neighborhoods can also involve residents themselves. Collaborating with neighbor- hood groups in community-driven beautification projects, supported by initiatives like the Beautify Your Neighborhood grant program, can beautify neighborhoods while inspiring an even stronger sense of connection and pride among residents. By initiating activities such as neighborhood clean-up events and landscaping projects, residents are encouraged to actively contribute to the improvement and beautification of their surroundings. Through unified efforts and with support from the City, groups can make Dublin’s shared spaces even more vibrant and welcoming, culti- vating a greater sense of community cohesion and pride while creating lasting positive impacts for residents and visi- tors alike. Lastly, the City can identify aging housing stock and initiate programs to support the upgrade and renova- tion of older properties to ensure these homes can continue to provide needed housing while contributing positively to Dublin’s character and sense of community. FOCUS ON PLACEMAKING Placemaking focuses on strengthening the connections between people and where they live. Placemaking aims to create change that benefits an entire neighborhood by better integrating gathering places, social interaction, sense of place, connected neighborhoods, walkability, and commu- nity character and identity. By thinking holistically about enhancing a sense of place in its neighborhoods, Dublin will more effectively improve quality of life for its residents. In line with the strategic goal of becoming the “Most Connected City,” the City should prioritize creating seamless connec- tions across all facets of life, including robust infrastructure, enhanced public transportation, and promoting walkable and bike-friendly environments. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Housing and Neighborhoods 62 ENCOURAGE COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOODS To increase livability for residents and increase the desir- ability of Dublin’s neighborhoods, the City should encourage the development of complete neighborhoods. A complete neighborhood is one where access to housing, jobs, education, essential needs, services, and amenities are all organized around the human scale. Supporting the integra- tion of essential amenities within and near neighborhoods enhances residents’ quality of daily life, encourages walking and biking, and fosters a more vibrant community supportive of best practices regarding sustainability, equity, and health. Prioritizing the development of essential amenities within neighborhoods enhances the livability and vitality of the community by creating environments where residents can thrive and connect with their surroundings and each other. Complete neighborhoods do not just happen - they require intention and maintenance. As Dublin considers increasing and diversifying its housing supply to better meet the needs and preferences of a growing and changing population, it should also consider how to encourage the development of neighborhood commercial and service nodes and design standards that accommodate enhanced mobility and more convenient and safe active transportation. In existing neighborhoods, this may prove to be more challenging as infrastructure, right-of-way, and development patterns are already established. In these existing areas, infill redevelop- ment and capital improvement projects represent the best opportunities for mobility enhancement. In areas of devel- opment intensification and new growth, new mixed-use developments and land use arrangements can more easily accommodate improved mobility and access between residential dwellings, services, and amenities. In these new development areas, the City can work with developers to create neighborhoods where residents, thereby creating neighborhoods where residents can better satisfy many of their daily immediate needs, attend schools, possibly work, and interact with their neighbors within a short drive, walk, or bike from their homes. APPLY CONSERVATION DESIGN PRINCIPLES Conservation design is an approach to development that prioritizes the natural landscape, environmental features, and ecological systems of a development site. Water features, wetlands, riparian corridors, trees and vegetation, wildlife habitat, valued open space, and steep slopes are just some examples of the site features that should be identified and protected as residential development is considered. Conserva- tion design principles encourage a more flexible approach to development in order to better accommodate the protection and incorporation of environmental features and ecological systems into new neighborhoods. When applied correctly, this approach to residential development not only safeguards the environment, but it represents a sustainable best practice that will result in a more livable, healthy, resilient, and beautiful community where appropriate. Conservation design principles should be applied to all new residential development. COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOODS FOCUS ON PROVIDING ESSENTIAL AMENITIES, ENHANCING THE LIVABILITY AND VITALITY OF THE COMMUNITY Road HierarchyResidential Commercial School or Public Facility Park or Open Space Tree Canopy/Natural Area Sidewalk Trail System Arterial Road Collector Road Local Road Complete Neighborhood Elements WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 63 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Housing and Neighborhoods CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ■For established neighborhoods, identify areas of poten- tial infill and opportunities for appropriate increases in density with single-family homes that complement the existing homes and neighborhood character. ■Continue to maintain high-quality public spaces to improve residents’ quality of life and attract new homeowners. ■Collaborate with neighborhood groups to undertake community-driven beautification projects, enhancing local pride and sense of ownership and stewardship. ■Safeguard the architectural character of Dublin’s neigh- borhoods through robust preservation policies, neighbor- hood design guidelines, and development standards. ■Continue to promote the use of native plants when reviewing Beautify Your Neighborhood Grant applications. ■Encourage sustainable building and energy conservation practices for all types of residential development. ■Encourage development of commercial/service nodes and public facilities near established neighborhoods to encourage and better support the complete neighbor- hoods concept. ■Emphasize shared public spaces by encouraging plazas, gardens, and gathering areas to foster social interaction and community events. ■Support citywide landscaping by continuing to priori- tize tree planting and community gardens for environ- mental sustainability and resident well-being. ■Ensure the design of neighborhoods, parks, and public space promote socializing and encourage community gathering. ■Develop accessible recreation spaces by creating and maintaining more parks and trails for residents of all ages and abilities. ■Integrate essential amenities into existing and new neighborhoods by supporting grocery stores, health- care facilities, and local businesses within neighbor- hoods for convenience and community cohesion. ■Look for ways to improve connectivity through improving infrastructure to encourage active trans- portation. This may include the addition of sidewalks, shared use paths, protected bike lanes, and dedicated non-motorized paths. EMBRACE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION Connecting neighborhoods to provide residents options for convenient and safe active transportation such as walking and bicycling is an important component of encouraging complete neighborhoods. As outlined in more detail in the Mobility and Transportation chapter, it requires an understanding existing land use and infrastructure and barriers to active transportation (e.g. lack of sidewalks, dedicated bike lanes, amenities/service too far away) and intentional planning to reduce or remove those barriers. A logical place to start is by analyzing Dublin’s existing network for any potential gaps and determining where residents are most likely to walk or bike. For example, looking at neighbor- hoods adjacent to schools to provide safe routes for children to walk or bike is an obvious place to focus. Considering projected populations, demographics, and recommendation in the Land Use Plan, Dublin can identify which routes to prioritize for infrastructure upgrades such as new or improved sidewalks and bike lanes. This can also help to inform where new school facilities plan to locate to ensure they are within a walkable/bikeable distance of neighborhoods. The next places to examine are parks and retail/commercial neighborhood nodes. Ensuring new development prioritizes sidewalks, shared use paths, and protected bike lanes that connect amenities and services to neighborhoods and existing non-motorized transportation routes, and requiring the instal- lation of bike racks and other facilities to support active trans- portation in new developments and recreation destinations can reduce impediments to walking and biking and make shared micromobility and transit more attractive. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Housing and Neighborhoods | Envision Dublin Community Plan 64 HOUSING SUPPLY AND MIX Available housing options and the cost of housing are typi- cally intertwined as the more diverse a residential housing market is the more achievable it is for current and future residents. A variety of housing options makes a community more attractive, stable, and resilient for those looking to relocate to Dublin as well as for those who have lived there their whole life. To achieve its housing goal, Dublin should pursue the actions described below. PLAN FOR ANTICIPATED HOUSING NEED The City of Dublin recently completed a Housing Study which provide insight into the City’s housing needs within its munic- ipal boundaries and the Study Area. Factoring in variety of household trends and forecasts, the Housing Study concluded that the City can anticipate a growth of 3,260 homeowners and 1,000 renters by 2040. The total anticipated demand increased to 8,410 additional homeowners and 5,280 new renter households when referring to the plan’s Study Area. ADDRESS HOUSING DIVERSITY Dublin is a desirable place to live and a welcoming community that offers an exceptional quality of life. However, for many existing residents and those wanting to make the City their home, housing is increasingly unattainable. For Dublin to continue to be a vibrant, dynamic place where people of all ages, income-levels, and life-stages can live, the City will need to ensure housing diversity. An essential component will be prioritizing housing choices for various income-levels including quality multi-family, mixed used, single-family starter homes, mid-level housing, and luxury residences. A commitment to housing diversity strengthens the community, promotes social cohesion, and enhances quality of life for residents. ENCOURAGE A VARIETY OF HOUSING OPTIONS To achieve the mix of housing necessary to meet the needs of residents in the future, the Plan recommends the develop- ment of a range of housing types appropriate to specific areas - existing established neighborhoods, areas of development intensification, and new growth areas. Community feedback and past studies undertaken by the City reveal support for and need to diversify Dublin’s housing options, including more smaller- and medium-sized single-family homes, multi-family and mixed-use units, and senior-oriented housing. Dublin can meet its future housing needs while retaining its character by requiring new development to conform to design and devel- opment standards that reflect and complement the existing architectural character of the community. The development of new housing options will ensure Dublin’s ability to attract and retain a diverse population of different ages, life-stages, and income-levels and strengthen the City’s resilience to market adversities and challenges in the future. ADDRESS THE “MISSING MIDDLE” One strategy to achieve the appropriate housing mix is by embracing the concept of the “Missing Middle.” Focusing on Missing Middle housing involves bridging the gap between traditional large single-family homes and large apartment complexes to cultivate a more varied housing stock. This approach advocates for incremental increases in housing options such as smaller- and medium-sized single-family homes, duplexes, triplexes, and small-scale apartments. By supporting the development of Missing Middle Housing, Dublin can address the diverse housing needs of its resi dents while fostering a balanced and inclu- sive residential environment. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 65 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Housing and Neighborhoods EMBRACE MIXED-USE AND MULTIFAMILY WHERE APPROPRIATE In the areas identified in the Land Use Plan for develop- ment intensification and new growth, mixed-use and multi- family development can provide diverse housing options for young professionals, empty nesters, and others who desire to live near amenities, in a vibrant, walkable neighborhood. Mixed-use and multifamily development can also signifi- cantly enhance the supply of diverse housing options, as they can typically accommodate smaller and more afford- able units than typical single-family units. Supporting mixed-use development that enhances street activity is also an essential strategy for creating vibrant and pedestrian-friendly community spaces. By supporting proj- ects that blend residential and commercial spaces, including a mix of retail and dining options alongside housing, the City can better provide dynamic neighborhood environments where people can live, work, and socialize. Such efforts foster a more engaging and bustling atmosphere and support economic growth, creating vibrant pedestrian-friendly hubs of activity that attract residents and visitors. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ■Prioritize adaptive reuse of existing structures for mixed-use and residential purposes in areas identified in the Land Use Plan for development intensification. ■Ensure development follows neighborhoods design standards and regulations to uphold and enhance the existing character of the City while supporting the complete neighborhood concept. ■Support incremental increases in “Missing Middle” housing such as duplexes, triplexes, and small-scale multifamily development to address the need for diverse housing options. ■Maintain housing diversity by supporting the construc- tion of housing options for various income levels, ranging from entry-level apartments to large single- family residences. ■Preserve existing income-restricted rental housing stock. ■Extend existing sustainability and development incen- tives to additional zoning districts that are appropriately suited for intended density bonuses consistent with the 2024 Dublin Sustainability Plan. ■Participate in regular discussions with local industry employers, City staff, and housing professionals to better understand and respond to the housing needs to support major employers and their employees. ■Work with developers to encourage building a variety of housing types close to transportation and employ- ment centers. ■Provide resources to the public about programs and incentives to assist first-time homebuyers with down payment assistance, low-interest loans, and other financial assistance. ■Identify opportunities where infill development or rede- velopment of underutilized office or commercial areas would benefit from residential development. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Housing and Neighborhoods | Envision Dublin Community Plan 66 AGING IN PLACE While just over half (51%) of Envision Dublin Community Plan survey respondents indicated that they currently live in large single-family homes, only 35% expressed that they expected to live in those homes a decade from now, indicating that they expected to downsize to smaller single- family homes, condos, or senior living facilities. Addition- ally, the recent Housing Study noted that while growth is anticipated in all age groups, the most dramatic changes are in the 65+ population with a 41% increase in the plan’s study area and a 38% increase within the City of Dublin. This increase in senior population translates to a need for 840 new senior-oriented homeownership units and 305 senior-oriented rental units. Planning for the needs of an aging population requires a multifaceted approach to ensure the well-being of aging residents. This involves developing age-friendly infrastruc- ture to facilitate mobility and independence, including accessible transportation and safe pedestrian pathways. Additionally, providing diverse housing options, such as low-maintenance apartments and senior living commu- nities, is essential to accommodate varying needs and preferences. Through the Forever Dublin program and its support of the Dublin Connector shuttle, the City has been proactively supporting seniors. The actions described below further these efforts to achieve its housing goal for all in Dublin. ENCOURAGE SENIOR- ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT The Housing Study identified a number of housing construction requirements that should be considered to meet the projected demand. The study identified the need for quality senior owner-occupied housing that includes single-level floor plans that can adapt to potential phys- ical constraint on the owners’ mobility, low maintenance requirements, and outdoor and community amenities. It was noted that these needs are most effectively met by age-restricted and age-targeted residential developments. Addressing housing options for the aging population involves encouraging the development of diverse and accessible housing solutions that cater to their specific needs. Building on the complete neighborhoods concept, senior-oriented housing should be located near public transit and close to retail and service areas including health care providers. Diverse housing options connected to public gathering spaces, retail and health care services via safe active transportation routes help facilitate meaningful community engagement and participation in social activities and civic life. The community should collaborate with local developers and organizations to ensure the availability of a wide range of housing choices that accommodate the diverse needs and preferences of seniors. By prioritizing the development of such housing options, the community can better support aging residents in maintaining their indepen- dence and quality of life as they age. CONSIDER ADUS Accessory dwelling units (ADUs) present an opportunity for more flexible and affordable housing options, especially for multigenerational households who may be interested in building “mother-in-law” suites. ADUs are also one of the best approaches to increasing the number of residential units within existing single-family residential neighborhoods, while having a minimal impact on established neighborhood character. By considering ADUs, Dublin can address the growing need for housing while accommodating changing family dynamics, also providing additional income oppor- tunities for homeowners. ADUs offer a practical solution for increasing housing supply in a cost-effective and sustainable manner, contributing to the overall attainability and vibrancy of the community. By exploring the potential of ADUs, Dublin can further enhance its housing options and support the diverse needs of its residents, without any major alterations to the current community character and full advantage of the relatively large percentage of land dedicated to single-family detached residential neighborhoods. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 67 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Housing and Neighborhoods EMBRACE UNIVERSAL DESIGN To meet the needs of Dublin’s senior residents and ensure resilience of its housing stock to adapt to changing preferences and demands, the City should promote universal design principles in new construction, especially in age-friendly housing. By supporting universal design, Dublin can advance inclusivity and accessibility for all resi- dents, regardless of age, ability, or background. Universal design emphasizes creating homes that enable residents of all abilities to navigate their homes comfortably as they age, even when experiencing mobility issues. Home designers should incorporate universal design concepts when considering layout, features, and materials, for example designing doorways that can accommodate wheelchairs and incorporating zero-step entrances/exits. By prioritizing and formalizing regulations for universal design principles, Dublin can create more homes that are welcoming and accessible to seniors and allow them the opportunity to more easily age in place. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ■Encourage more diverse housing options by supporting the development of age-appropriate housing solutions, such as accessible apartments and aging-in-place features, to meet the diverse needs of the aging population. ■Explore accessory dwelling units (ADUs) to support flexible housing options in single-family neighbor- hoods, including to better accommodate multigenera- tional households. ■Support elderly-friendly infrastructure by updating rights-of-way to enhance accessibility and safety for seniors, including improving sidewalk width, public transportation, and public spaces. ■Promote universal design principles that incorporate accessibility features into home design through new policies and code updates. ■Support healthcare and social services accessibility, including home healthcare and geriatric care, to support the health and well-being of seniors. ■Promote connection and combat social isolation among older adults by establishing programs and initiatives that facilitate community participation and intergenerational activities. ■Continue to provide educational resources and programs for seniors that address aging-related issues, empowering seniors, and their families to make informed decisions and plan for their future. ■Incorporate recommendations for innovative site design recommended in the Neighborhood Design Guidelines, as well as work with developers to integrate sensitive design for senior housing projects high- lighting walkability, social interaction, and necessary structural accommodations. ■Work with Forever Dublin and other local and regional partners to identify senior home modification programs that offer grants, low-interest loans, and/or volunteer labor for a variety of items to help mobility-challenged seniors live safely in their current home. ■Work with housing providers to build new homes for seniors with fixed incomes and retain the supply of such units. Prioritize areas serviced by public transit, social services, and medical facilities. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Housing and Neighborhoods | Envision Dublin Community Plan 68 Sciot oRiverHOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOODS FRAMEWORK The Housing and Neighborhoods Framework builds on the analysis of existing conditions, projected housing demands, what we heard from residents, and land use and development best practices to guide Dublin in meeting it’s present and future housing needs while enhancing the City’s character and overall quality of life. Following the recommendations of the Land Use Plan, Dublin can accomplish its housing objec- tives with minimal change to established residential neighbor- hoods, largely within the existing developed footprint of the City. This can be achieved through incremental, context-sen- sitive increases in density and neighborhood reinvestment and development of small- and medium-sized single-family homes and mixed-use and multifamily housing in areas identified for development intensification and new growth, intentional design of complete neighborhoods that encourage active transportation, and development of senior-oriented housing options and neighborhoods. DEVELOPMENT INTENSIFICATION Prioritize development opportunity. Areas identified in the Land Use Plan for development intensification should be prioritized for infill mixed-use and multi-family develop- ments and the adaptive reuse of existing structures for mixed-use and residential purposes. These areas will likely experience the greatest change, but appropriate and effec- tive design standards and development regulations can ensure that new development upholds and enhances the existing character and charm of the City, while fulfilling the complete neighborhood concept and active transportation needs and preferences of residents that may desire to live in a more lively, urbanized setting. MAINTAIN NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER Preserve the character of established neighborhoods. Many of Dublin’s established neighborhoods should experience minimal change. The focus in these areas should be to identify areas of potential infill and then to gently and appropriately increase density with single-family homes that complement the existing homes and neighborhood char- acter, possibly including ADUs. In addition, the City should look for ways to improve connectivity throughout these neighborhoods by making infrastructure improvements that enhance walkability and bikability. This may include the addition of sidewalks, bike lanes, and dedicated non-motor- ized paths. Lastly, the City should look for opportunities to develop commercial/service nodes and public facilities near established neighborhoods where appropriate to encourage the complete neighborhoods concept. NEW GROWTH AREA Diversify housing for all and encourage complete neighborhoods and conservation design. Where residential development in new growth areas is identified in the Land Use Plan, it should provide a diversity of housing options to satisfy the needs and preferences of residents of all ages, life-stages, and household incomes. New complete neighborhoods should be developed that promote active transportation. While this may include a mix of different sized single-family homes, multi-family housing, and mixed-use developments, Dublin should continue to be intentional in requiring new construction and development to meet design standards that ensure that new growth complements the existing quality of the City’s existing neighborhoods. Where appropriate, conservation design principles should be applied to all new residential development. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 69 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Housing and Neighborhoods $04(3":3%8 &45#6 3:%3#3"/%3%"7&3: 3% 8 0&3/&3 5&.1-&3% 5"3 ")*--%3 4&--4 .*--%3*//07"5 *0 /%3 4 )*&3 3 */(4 3 % 3 */(4 3 % ."35*/3% %6 #-*/4 )*3&%3 3*7&34*%&% 3 .0 /5&3&:%3$0''."/3%$"3/06 4 5*&%3#"--"/5 3 "&1- (-*$, 3 % &.&3 "-%1,8: 1045 3 % 48*$,"3% $ 5 %6#-*/3%%6#-*/3%#3*()5 3 %4 )*() 45 5 6 --:.03&%3 .&.0 3*"-%3 8 :/'0 3 %%3)":%&/36 /#-7 %8*-$09 3% # 3"/%0/8":%3 3*/(4 3 % 8 #3 *%(&4 5&"3-*/( 50/1,8:+&30. & 3%7*--"(&1 ,8:13*.304& $ 5 &..&5 3 0 8 - / 1 &3*.&5 &3 %3 56--&3 3 %#3*5 5 0 /1,8:.6*3'*&-%%3' 3"/5;3% 8&-%0/3 % .$,*53*$, 3 % 50/5*%3 . " * / 4 5 46..*5 7 * & 8 3 %"7&3: 3% 8 :"/%0 5 5 &800 %4#-7% $ ) 6 3 $ ) . " / 3 %#-";&31,8:$04(3": 3% 5 6 5 5 -&3 %)&3*5"(& %3.6*3'*&-%%3.&5301-/ )"3%3%):-"/%$30:3%&*5 & 3 ." /3%3"64$)%3 &45"5&4$5"4)'0 3 %3% #30$,3 % 6FLRWR5LYHU/PSU I'PSL *O E JBO3VO 56 5 5 -& $30 4 4 */( # - 7% /&8 453&&5 / &8 4 5 3 & & 5 "%7"/$&.&/5 "7&/6&/&8 453&&5 /&8 45 3&&5 /&8 45 3&&5 /&8 4 5 3 & & 5 $0/7&34& 3 % *".4 3 %)06$) " 3% 3% )064*/("/%/&*()#03)00%4'3".&803, .JMFT $POUFYU-BZFST 3JWFS 1BSLTBOE0QFO4QBDF $JUZPG%VCMJO 1MBOOJOH"SFB#PVOEBSZ 'VUVSF-BOE6TF 3FTJEFOUJBM -PX 3FTJEFOUJBM4VCVSCBO 3FTJEFOUJBM.JYFE 3FTJEFOUJBM.FEJVN .JYFE 6TF /FJHICPSIPPE .JYFE6TF7JMMBHF .JYFE 6TF $FOUFS .JYFE6TF6SCBO 1-"*/ $*5: 4)"8/&& )*--4 108&-- $0-6.#64 $0-6.#64 (-"$*&33*%(& .&5301"3, "7&3: 1"3, %"33&& '*&-%4 )&3*5"(& 53"*- 1"3, NORTH FORK CROSSING BRIDGE PARK DUBLIN VILLAGEWEST BRIDGE METRO CENTER HISTORIC DISTRICT THE CORNERS AMLIN OU CAMPUS MUIRFIELD SQUARE SHOPS AT MUIRFIELD PARKWOOD SHAWNEE HILLS SUMMITVIEW KILEVILLE AVERY CROSSING WILCOX CROSSING WOERNER TEMPLE SUGAR RUN CROSSING JACQUEMIN FARMS TARTAN WEST ASHERTON PERIMETER CENTER COSGRAY FIELDS The map recommends where Dublin can best employ suggested residential land uses to achieve its housing goals in addition to the Growth Framework. This map indicates residential land use in relation to key activity centers across the Planning Area. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Housing and Neighborhoods | Envision Dublin Community Plan 70 06Purpose The Economic Development chapter will seek to strengthen the City’s robust economy, and commercial centers and major corridors. It will provide key priorities and recommendations that can improve the overall business climate and encourage new investment in Dublin’s burgeoning growth areas. It focuses on approaches to invigorating the City’s aging business parks with more contemporary neighborhood areas that offer diverse employment opportunities. The chapter also explores workforce development as a strategy to strengthen Dublin’s employment base. The Economic Development chapter identifies Dublin’s goal of sustaining and growing its economy and tax base and offers recommendations for how the City can achieve that goal. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 71 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Economic Development Dublin has a thriving economy that, paired with its excep- tional quality of life, lures investment, innovation, and a skilled workforce. A historically healthy real estate market, connection to major transportation infrastructure, and prox- imity to Columbus have laid the foundation for a strong local economy and future prosperity. Community members repeat- edly associated Dublin with innovation in face-to-face meet- ings, stakeholder interviews, and through the online survey and mapping exercise. They emphasized the importance of the City’s economic stability and fiscal sustainability. However, changes in how people work presents an opportu- nity to rethink the corporate office segment of Dublin’s real estate market - to capitalize on underutilized properties and adapt policies that ensure a prosperous future. Key stake- holders, and the resident community stressed the need to utilize available properties strategically. They expressed a desire to see efforts to use existing vacant commercial and office spaces and to encourage infill development before new development. Looking forward, Dublin’s potential for growth and pros- perity is not just a vision, but a tangible reality that can be achieved. By ensuring a workforce that can meet the labor demands of the regional, national, and global corporations that are attracted to the City, Dublin can encourage sustain- able economic development in the years ahead. The City’s commitment to maintaining a welcoming and supportive business climate, while adapting to take advantage of changes in the corporate office real estate market, will continue to enhance its appeal as a place to start or grow businesses, innovate, and make a career. The Economic Development chapter builds on the proven record of Dublin’s entrepreneurial ecosystem and recom- mends strategies to align future growth and policies best with repositioning the existing business districts, fostering a business-friendly environment that helps build a skilled workforce, and leveraging events and the hospitality industry to invigorate the City’s economy further. Additionally, this chapter builds on the recommendations set forth in the 2022 Economic Development Strategy Plan Update to align seam- lessly with the goals of the City. The planning area is catego- rized into three growth areas in an economic development framework that should be used to guide future commercial and industrial land uses and development. In addition to the Economic Development chapter, please see Chapter 11 - Special Area Plans for detailed recommendations for commercial and industrial areas encompassed within the six special areas in the community. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT06 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Economic Development 72 Goal and Objectives for Economic Development FOSTER AN INNOVATIVE AND SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY THAT SUPPORTS A STRONG, RESILIENT TAX BASE. To achieve this goal, Dublin can pursue the following objectives: ■Retain and support existing businesses. ■Reposition aging business parks as premier employment destinations for the future. ■Maintain Dublin’s regional/national position as an employment hub for corporate, technology, and health and medical sectors. ■Uphold the City’s long-standing policy of an overall land use mix of 60% residential and 40% non-residential development. ■Promote entrepreneurship and small business growth. ■Increase local tourism. ■Increase workforce job readiness. ■Protect long-term economic development resources and opportunities. ■Diversify the City’s economic base. ■Continue to provide quality access to broadband to ensure residents and businesses have high- speed internet and the information and technology they need to thrive. The goal and objectives of the Economic Development Chapter were developed in response to what we heard from the community, an analysis of existing conditions, and a review of relevant past planning efforts and align with the objectives and strategies in Dublin’s 2023 Economic Development Strategic Plan. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 73 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Economic Development Most Sustainable. Through cultivating a welcoming business climate, being dynamic to respond to innovation and the needs of diverse industries and businesses, supporting a skilled workforce, diversifying its economic base, and prudent fiscal planning, Dublin can ensure the sustainability of its economy. Most Connected. By supporting reliable high-speed internet and planning for and improving transportation infrastructure, Dublin can continue to be one of the most connected cities attracting regional, national, and global corporations to the City and ensuring a skilled workforce to meet their labor demands. Most Resilient. Encouraging diverse housing options and the development of complete neighborhoods, supporting the development of quality corridors and business nodes, and supporting adaptation of underutilized and vacant business parks will make Dublin’s economy the most resilient to changes in the economy, how people work, and will enable the City to adjust to the changing preferences and requirements of the corpora- tions that call Dublin home or will in the future. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Economic Development 74 REPOSITION BUSINESS DISTRICTS Dublin’s business districts constitute the core of its economic development. The districts are home to a long list of successful local, regional, national, and international businesses. According to the Dublin Economic Develop- ment, the total economic activity from Dublin companies is in excess of $8 billion per year, representing 7.4 percent of the $108 billion worth of goods and services produced in the Columbus MSA. The business districts in Dublin encompass a variety of development potentials ranging from urban mixed-use opportunities to high-tech offices to light and clean manu- facturing uses. Dublin business districts include: ■Bridge Street District ■Emerald Corporate District ■Blazer Research District ■Metro Office District ■Perimeter Commerce District ■Shier Rings Techflex District ■West Innovation District However, technology today has changed the way we work, the COVID-19 pandemic and technology today have disrupted the way we work, resulting in more employees working either entirely remotely or in a hybrid fashion and a rising expectation for flexibility in where and when people work. This has increased vacancies in Dublin’s business parks and is a challenge to the City’s commercial real estate market. Still, it also presents an opportunity for Dublin to reimagine the corporate workspace of the future. The following recommendations can help Dublin reposition its business parks to encourage sustainable and resilient economic development. Dublin target industries include: 1. IT 2. Medical Biosciences & Healthcare 3. Corporate HQs & Managing Offices 4. Business Services 5. Automotive R&D & Logistics FIBER TO EVERY HOME PROJECT To support this effort and City’s goal of “Becoming the Most Connected Community in the US”, the City entered into a public/private partnership with Altafiber to initiate and execute the Fiber to Every Home project. This project will ensure residents have access to a variety of internet service providers in a competitive landscape that will drive higher internet speeds, lower costs and better customer service. Fiber connectivity is critical not just for communication, online services, entertainment, education and healthcare, but also for home-based businesses and remote workers. As an economic driver for businesses and their workforces, fiber connectivity is becoming a key criterion for site selec- tion and investment. THE BETA DISTRICT The Beta District concept was initiated in 2014 through collaborative efforts among public, private, and academic entities situated along the 33 Smart Mobility Corridor. The Beta District is located in the Columbus Region and is formed by City of Dublin, City of Marysville, Union County, and City of Columbus. This cooperative venture aims to attract innovative businesses to the area , with a focus on sectors such as ag-tech, healthcare, automotive manufacturing, logistics & distribution, transportation, insurance, tech- nology, finance, smart cities, and aerospace. It offers a smart infrastructure ecosystem and living labs, facilitating cross-industry resource access and collaboration for pioneering projects. DUBLINK TRANSPORT Dublink Transport, sponsored by the City of Dublin, is a broadband connection initiative facil- itating data transportation from office buildings to local carrier-neutral data centers at no expense. Operating across Dublin, OH, and nearby communities, Dublink is not an internet service provider but provides a connection to the user’s chosen service provider. With various locations serviced by Dublink Transport, businesses along the 125+ mile network can access critical broad- band internet providers from the get-go. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 75 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Economic Development ADAPTIVE REUSE The core of Dublin’s commercial building stock dates back to the 1980s and 90s. Despite the City’s legacy of success in attracting large employment and single-site company destinations, traditional office parks are not aligned with the demand for dense, live-work-play environments, presenting a need for diversity through new development. Reduced demand for office space may present an oppor- tunity to put office buildings to new uses. Adaptive reuse is the most sustainable way to utilize an existing building to meet a community’s needs. Converting office buildings to residential, retail, and other mixed-uses can be an effective strategy to accommodate employees’ desires to balance work, health, and well-being by living closer to work, ameni- ties, and services. Adaptive reuse of office buildings can also help Dublin add more diversity to its housing stock. By embracing adaptive reuse, Dublin can not only meet the evolving needs of its community but also make significant strides towards achieving carbon neutrality and fostering a more sustainable built environment. CAPITALIZE ON UNDERUTILIZED PROPERTIES In addition to adaptive re-use of existing office buildings, Dublin can encourage the construction of mixed-use and multifamily development on undeveloped sites and in underutilized parking lots in the districts. Residential and mixed-use infill development would provide a variety of housing options for professional close to their jobs and increase the customer base for local businesses in and around the district. This will help the City achieve its goal of increasing housing diversity while maintaining and even enhancing the character of its existing neighborhoods. Requirements for high-quality design and support for mixed-use development can result in attractive, walkable, complete neighborhoods close to employment centers. METRO CENTER REDEVELOPMENT Metro Center in the Dublin Corporate Area is ripe for repositioning from a 20th century business park to a 21st century center of employment and active living. The City’s Metro Place visioning processes, completed in 2021, recommended that the Metro Center be redeveloped to provide more diverse office options mixed with restaurants, retail, and residential uses set in a walkable environment. With the help of a team of urban design and landscape architecture consultants, the City is completing a plan for transforming the area into a desirable and active community and employ- ment center. The plan for this ambitious and exciting repositioning project is expected to be completed in September 2024. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Economic Development | Envision Dublin Community Plan 76 FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Key Findings The results indicate the City’s current residential development base is not paying its own way, which is not surprising given the municipal revenue structure for Ohio cities, which favors at place employment (meaning withholding tax stays in the jurisdiction a person is employed). As the long-term effects of the COVID 19 pandemic on nonresidential space needs and the ability of employees to work at home become better known, these may have an effect on the City’s revenue raising abilities. That being said, the City of Dublin has done an excellent job developing a framework for funding growth through its economic development poli- cies and use of various Tax Increment Finance Districts. It is clear that the City of Dublin does not have many of the budgetary constraints that most of our clients nationwide grapple with on an annual basis. QUALITY CORRIDORS A significant portion of Dublin’s existing economic activity and employment continues to thrive along its major corridors, including U.S. Route 33, State Route 161, and Interstate 270. These corridors are characterized by a mix of premium offices, businesses, and institutions that support the City’s economic vitality. Dublin should build upon the success of the 33 Smart Mobility Corridor initiative to expand the value of the City’s corridors for innovative mobility development while encouraging the development of quality corridors that will further attract investment, retain and create jobs, and contribute to the City’s sense of place and quality of life. Dublin’s high-visibility corridors along U.S. 33, S.R. 161, and I-270 support vital employment clusters in various retail- and service-sector activities ranging from healthcare institutions to local businesses. The architecture along these corridors has also established a sense of identity that sets Dublin apart from surrounding communities. Devel- opment opportunities along such highly visible corridors should be reserved to ensure the City protect its long-term economic and fiscal health. Quality architecture, well-land- scaped areas, and streetscapes will continue to reinforce the standards for which the City is widely known. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ■Adopt policies that allow for the flexible development and redevelopment of business parks, including the development of a mix of multifamily housing, retail, and services and office space that adapts to changes in how people work. ■Require that redeveloped business parks include gathering places and facilitate active transportation including pedestrian and bicycling amenities. ■Build on the example of the Metro Center Redevel- opment to reposition business parks to continue to provide productive business locations that enable workers to achieve work-life balance better. ■Consider tax incentives or financing mechanisms to encourage adaptive reuse of vacant properties along high-visibility corridors. ■Ensure any redevelopment meets the high-quality and standard in Dublin. ■Continue to collaborate with the Chamber of Commerce to support the business districts in Dublin. ■Continue to provide incentives to businesses that want to locate in Dublin. ■Use buffers to mitigate exposure of incompatible land uses. ■Adopt requirements that ensure quality design for any new development, repositioning, and redevelopment that complements and maintains Dublin’s character. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 77 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Economic Development CREATE DISTINCT DEVELOPMENT NODES Building from the 2023 Economic Development Strategic Plan Update, Dublin can energize economic development by creating distinctive development nodes. This can enable the City to meet 21st century industrial demand for vibrant physical space while maintaining Dublin’s high-quality built environment. The Economic Development Strategic Plan Update anticipates that Dublin’s headquarters companies and concentration of information and business services industries will feel a disproportionate impact of any long- term shifts to decentralized operations or remote work but that the City also stands to gain from an increase in remote workers thanks to its quality neighborhoods and strong residential market. Distinct development nodes will attract high-paying industries and the skilled labor force they require through creating modern, flexible spaces. Efforts to develop distinct development nodes should build on the momentum in the Bridge Street, West Innovation District, and Dublin Corporate Area. BRIDGE STREET The Bridge Park/Bridge Street District, with its high-quality, dense mixed-use design, and connection to major trans- portation networks, is already a distinct development node. Building on the 2010 Bridge Street Corridor Study, it will continue to develop as Dublin’s centerpiece, connecting the City’s cultural and historical centers across the Scioto River. Though some components of the district have yet to be developed, it already contains more than 600,000 square feet of office space and 231,000 square feet of retail, 728 housing units for rent, 248 units for sale and more than 400 hotel rooms. DUBLIN CORPORATE AREA The Dublin Corporate Area offers an opportunity to use existing infrastructure and reposition its business parks to create a distinct development node. Building upon the 2017 Dublin Corporate Area Plan, which laid the ground- work for an active, walkable, residential, commercial, and recreational area, the Dublin Corporate Area can be re-imagined to accommodate residents’ changing work and lifestyle preferences and meet the needs of the busi- nesses, regional headquarters, technology firms, health- care organizations, financial institutions, and professional service providers. Its existing road network, internet and energy infrastructure, built environment, and proximity to City shopping centers, hotels, recreational facilities, and residential neighborhoods make it an ideal location for this transformation. MAKING STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS IN PLACE-BASED DEVELOPMENT NOW CAN HELP DUBLIN REMAIN COMPETITIVE IN THE CURRENT GROWTH CYCLE, BUT ALSO PREPARE IT TO WEATHER THE NEXT ECONOMIC DOWNTURN. - Dublin Economic Development Strategic Plan 2023 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Economic Development 78 WEST INNOVATION DISTRICT The West Innovation District (WID) is a key growth area. Described by the 2017 West Innovation District Area Plan, it encompasses approximately 1,100 acres, bound by US 33 on the east, Post Road on the north, Houchard Road on the west, and Shier Pings Road on the south, mostly consists of undeveloped land. The 2017 WID Area Plan envisioned the area as a world-class innovation and research district. It provides opportunities for mixed-use, walkable development focused on research and innovation, accessible to the US 33 Smart Corridor. It has the potential to accommodate 3.9 million square feet of development and is a prime location to be cultivated as a distinct development node. The City recognizes this potential and has guided its development to establish premier innovation and research district centered around Ohio University’s recent development of an advanced academic research campus in Dublin and the new medical campus for Ohio State University. These developments could create 10,500 jobs and include a future passenger rail station. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ■Conduct economic impact analyses of new or rede- veloped nodes to capture the broader impacts of live, work, and play environments ■Build on the momentum of Bridge Park/Bridge Street District ■Continue to prioritize the redevelopment of Dublin Corporate Area and provide additional points of connection to alternative living/retail space. ■Continue to market development-ready sites and streamline approval, permitting and construction processes. ■Ensure development nodes align with the Land Use Plan and the Special Area Plan recommendations. ■Connect development nodes through deployment of mobility technologies. ■Consult and coordinate with surrounding jurisdictions for development review, transportation infrastructure planning, and physical design standards for develop- ments that abut municipal boundaries. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 79 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Economic Development BUSINESS FRIENDLY ENVIRONMENT DIVERSIFY EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES Dublin’s economy, while robust, is heavily reliant on a few sectors such as corporate headquarters, business services, and information technology. However, by stra- tegically supporting the diversification of its employment opportunities, Dublin will remain resilient to economic shifts and attract cutting-edge industries. This shift will provide employment for residents of varying educational back- grounds and experience, contributing significantly to the economic and social stability of the community. TARGET INDUSTRIES As Dublin’s updated Economic Development Strategic Plan outlines, the City should concentrate on key industries that can enhance its existing business ecosystem while diversifying its employment opportunities. These industries include information technology and computer services, medical and biosciences, healthcare services, and research and development. Leveraging its strength as a corporate headquarters and its well-developed business park infra- structure, the City should focus on activities that have not been as affected by remote work, such as light manufac- turing (especially technical applications like electronics and advanced materials) and bioscience lab space (building on the development of new medical facilities complexes and momentum created by the recent arrival of several bioscience firms). SUPPORT FOR SMALL BUSINESSES Locally owned businesses are critical to advance economic growth and opportunities in Dublin. In addition to providing essential services to the surrounding communities, small businesses are key to a robust local economy, creating jobs and stronger social community ties. As Dublin progresses, supporting small and local businesses across the City is essential. In addition to encouraging residents to buy and shop locally, the City should engage the local business community and remediate barriers to ensure they have the space to grow and thrive in the future. INCUBATOR AND ACCELERATOR PROGRAMS To help spur innovation and create opportunities for residents, the City can support business start-up incubators and accelerators. Incubators and accelerators can offer physical space, collaborative work environments, networking, mentorship, and educational opportunities for residents with business ideas that they are trying to grow into viable ventures or businesses working to gain traction. Business incubator and accelerator programs can attract venture capital investment from partners such as Rev1Ventures and help cultivate an innovation ecosystem that can benefit established targeted industries and start-ups by attracting skilled workers and providing training and education to workers to meet employers’ needs. Incubators and accelerators can help diversify Dublin’s economy and make it more dynamic. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Economic Development | Envision Dublin Community Plan 80 WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT Workforce development is crucial in encouraging resilient and sustainable economic growth in Dublin. Cultivating a diverse and multi-talented economy that is friendly to new and existing businesses is critical to ensuring Dublin continues to grow and thrive. There are several areas where the business community can attract new businesses, and improve access to jobs, wages, and the economy. The City should continue to encourage an entrepreneurial ecosystem, encourage partnerships between businesses and schools or higher education institutions, and promote the local workforce. An innovative and entrepreneurial community requires active involvement from deci- sion-makers, economic development partners, and stake- holders from businesses, large and small. Education and Employer Connections Supporting the development of a skilled workforce to meet the needs of targeted industries and provide attractive career opportunities for residents begins with young people. By encouraging connections between employers and the City’s high schools and the region’s many colleges and universities including Ohio University’s Dublin Integration Center, Columbus State Community College, and Ohio State University’s Outpatient Care Clinic, Dublin can leverage its high-quality education system and proximity to major employers to help facilitate the creation of training and career paths into targeted industries including technology and health care. They also allow high school students to begin to network opening career opportunities when they finish their degree. Connection programs can enable college students to gain skills and experience. At the same time, they pursue their degree maximizing the value of their higher education expe- rience and preparing skilled workers to meet employers’ needs. Internships and Training, and Certifications Programs Internships and training, and certificate programs are two of the most effective ways to create career opportunities for residents. Both can bridge the experience and training gaps between a college degree and the needs of targeted indus- tries or assist residents as they transition careers to take advantage of rewarding, high-paying jobs. Dublin should support internship, training and certification programs to make career opportunities available to residents and meet employers’ needs. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ■Consider the needs of target industries in crafting land use policies to enhance the City’s ability to attract these industries and create technology and computer services and bioscience as well as healthcare ecosystems. ■Collaborate with partners such as Rev1Ventures to rein- force an entrepreneurial-friendly business environment. ■Continue to build on the success of Riverview Village and the Dublin Entrepreneurial Center to provide space and infrastructure for remote-workers, and local and start-up businesses. ■Adopt policies that encourage the creation of business incubators and accelerators. ■Encourage and promote the use of community facili- ties to support training and certification programs. ■Foster partnerships between schools, colleges and universities, and employers to increase access to and awareness of internships, vocational training, and education in skilled trades in alignment with economic opportunities. ■Set aside space for local businesses in new developments. ■Provide economic development incentives and resources to small businesses. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 81 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Economic Development TOURISM Dublin has excellent potential to expand its tourism sector to diversify its economy further. Its appealing built environ- ment, public art, recreational amenities, community facili- ties, parks and natural areas, and retail and dining options make it an ideal regional tourism location. By leveraging its existing tourism assets and proactive planning, the City can grow tourism as a durable and sustainable economic driver. EVENTS AND MEETING FACILITIES Dublin hosts many successful and well-attended confer- ences, meetings, and events. The Conference Center and OCLC, Ohio University Dubin Integrated Education Center, the Exchange at Bridge Park, and the Club at Tartan Fields host many large regional and national conferences. Dublin’s many hotels have meeting spaces capable of hosting business and professional association meetings. The City can build upon this component of its tourism industry by continuing to provide quality community facilities, ensuring sufficient hotel accommodations, supporting active trans- portation, including well-connected public transportation, and planning for the development of quality dining, retail, and other tourism-oriented experiences to make Dublin the obvious choice to host conferences, events and meetings. SPORTS With Muirfield Village, Dublin is an established premier golf location, but it is also a first-class destination for hosting other sporting events. Its high-quality athletic facilities provide venues for soccer, football, ice hockey, swimming, cycling, and other sporting tournaments, from small, local events to large-scale international competitions. Further, its hotels and other amenities make it a true sports location. The City can leverage this identity to expand its tourism sector. FESTIVALS Dublin is well known for its reputation as a place to visit, celebrate, and be enriched. The City is well-known for the Dublin Irish Festival, the St. Patrick’s Day celebration, and the Memorial Tournament. Still, it is also popular for its other festivals, including Independence Day and Fore! Fest. Further, the lively weekly Dublin Market attracts residents and visitors throughout the summer. Dublin can lean into the popularity of these events and cement its identity as the go-to location for festivals by continuing to maintain and develop quality community facilities and an active transpor- tation network, including accessible public transportation. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ■Support the maintenance, improvement, and develop- ment of quality community facilities to host large meet- ings, events, sports tournaments, and festivals. ■Support the development of retail, dining, and other tourist-oriented businesses close to lodging and event venues. ■Plan for active transportation, including public transit near hospitality uses that visitors can access easily. ■Promote Dublin’s identity as a tourism location through the City’s website, branding, and partnerships with tour- ism-oriented businesses. ■Collaborate with businesses on strategies to support housing and transportation for the low skill service industry workforce EMERGING TRENDS Based on the 2021 Update of Dublin’s Cluster-based Economic Development Data Analysis report, major declines in Dublin’s occupational employment mix during the pandemic were concentrated in low-skilled jobs in service industries, particularly sales and food services. Rebuilding these labor bases may prove chal- lenging since much of this workforce relies on non-res- ident commuters whose preferences and opportunities have shifted as a result of the pandemic. Rising housing prices in Dublin continue to make it even more difficult for these workers to live near where they work. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Economic Development | Envision Dublin Community Plan 82 Sciot oRiverECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Dublin’s commercial and industrial landscape covers a broad geographic area and responds to several markets. As such, a more localized look at commercial and industrial areas is necessary to understand how places differ and what improve- ments are appropriate in the different growth areas. This section looks at the three growth areas within the Planning Area and presents recommendations aimed at improving local land use, functionality, and character. The framework should be used in conjunction with the Special Area Plan recommendations in Chapter ##. DEVELOPMENT INTENSIFICATION Prioritize adaptive reuse, infill, and mixed-use development. Areas identified in the Land Use Plan for development opportunity should be prioritized for a shift from suburban office model to a broader mixed-use development format. These areas will accommodate land uses including employ- ment, hotel, retail, and potentially residential uses. The area presents opportunities to guide development toward creating a distinct development node and further solidifies its sense of identity and value. The City should continue to encourage a walkable and pedestrian friendly development that resonates with modern workforce looking to live close to their jobs and around urban amenities Dublin has to offer. MAINTAIN NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER Encourage commercial nodes that maintain the neighborhood character. The established neighborhoods and suburban offices along key corridors should experience minimal change. Within established neighborhoods, the City should identify opportunities to create a small-scale neighborhood commercial node that is easy to walk to and provides a mix of uses and amenities, making the neighborhoods complete. The mix of uses can include: ■small-scale and pedestrian-oriented retail, ■office, ■commercial uses integrated into the existing community. Such nodes help establish a focal point of vibrancy and activity conveniently located in residential neighborhoods. In established suburban offices and business parks, the City should adopt design standards that encourage multimodal transportation and complement Dublin’s built environment. NEW GROWTH AREA Diversify employment opportunities. Where commercial and industrial development in new growth areas is identified in the Land Use Plan, it should encourage a variety of employment opportunities that align with the City’s economic development goals and aspirations. Industrial land uses in the area is appropriate for facilities that involve manufacturing, processing, storage, and distribution of goods and materials, including resource production, processing, and/or extraction. Meanwhile, the Flex Innovation use caters to a mix of non-residential employment, including administrative, engineering, research, and development, offices, wholesaling, and business incubator space. As development gains traction in the area, coordination with adjoining jurisdictions would be required. As the area supports a variety of housing options that allow people to live closer to jobs, the City should consider including natural space and extending the public park systems to enhance outdoor recreational opportunities and walkability. In addition to pockets of mixed-use developments that serve the adjacent community, the area provides flexibility necessary to attract targeted industries and fosters a diverse economic base for Dublin. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 83 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Economic Development COSGRAYRDW ESTBU RYDRBRAND RD AVERY RDW OERNER TEMPL E RD TAR A HIL L DR SEL L S M ILLDRINNOVAT IO N DR S H I E R R I N G S R D R I N G S R D MARTIN RD D U B LIN S HIRED R RIVERSIDED R M O N TEREYDRCOFFMANRDCARNOU S TIEDRB A L L A N T R AEPL GLICK R D EM ER A L D PKWY POST RD SWICKARD CT DUBLI NRDDUBLINRDBRIGHT R D S HIGH STT U LLYMORE DR M EM O RIALD R W Y NFO R D DRH A Y D E N RU N B L V D WILCOX RDB RAN D ONWAY D R RINGS R D W BR I DGE S TEARLING TON PKWYJEROM E RD VILLAGEP K WYPRIMROSE CT EMMET ROW LN P E RIMET ER DR TULLER RD BRIT T O NPKWYMUIRFIELDDRF RANTZRD WELDON R D MCKITRICK RD TONTI DR M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDW Y A N D O T T E WOO DSBLVD C H U R C H M A N R D BLAZERPKWYCOSGRAY RDT U T T L E R DHERITAGE DRMUIRFIELDDRM ETROPL N HARD RDHYLAND-CROYRDEIT E R MA N RDRAUSCH D R E STA TESCTA SH F O R D RD BROCK R D 745 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 270SciotoRiverNort hFork In d ianRun TU T T LE CRO S S ING B L VD NEW STREET 3 N EW S T R E E T 1 ADVANCEMENT AVENUENEW STREET 6NEW ST REET 2 N E W ST REET 4 NEW STREET 5 CONVERSE RD IAMS RDHOUCH A RD RD COMMERCIAL ANDINDUSTRIAL AREASFRAMEWORK 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Context Layers River Parks and Open Space City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary Future Land Use Mixed Use - Neighborhood Mixed Use - Village Mixed Use - Center Mixed Use - Urban Suburban Commercial Neighborhood Office Suburban Office Flex Innovation Industrial PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS GLACIER RIDGE METRO PARK AVERY PARK DARREE FIELDS HERITAGE TRAIL PARK PREFERRED FUTURELAND USE PLAN 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Context Layers City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River Agriculture/Rural Residential Low Density Residential Suburban Density Residential Mixed Density Residential Medium Density Mixed Use Neighborhood Mixed Use Village Mixed Use Center Mixed Use Urban Suburban Commercial Neighborhood Office Suburban Office Flex Innovation Industrial Civic/Community Park/Open Space PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS The map recommends where Dublin can best employ suggested commercial and industrial land uses to achieve its economic development goals in addition to the Econmic Development Framework. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Economic Development | Envision Dublin Community Plan 84 07Purpose The Mobility and Transportation chapter will focus on building on Dublin’s high quality and well- connected transportation network for all modes of transportation. A comprehensive overview of different transportation modes is provided alongside strategic investment recommendations in active transportation, resilient public transit systems, and upgraded road networks. The Chapter will identify recommendations regarding the City’s transportation networks, proposed roadway and multimodal infrastructure improvements and regional connections to culminate into the first Active Transportation Plan and Multimodal Thoroughfare Plan. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 85 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation The Community Plan Update process culminated in future land use recommendations that include all necessary infra- structure needs for future development including roadways improvements, utility extensions, parks and open space, and community facilities. Envision Dublin has worked hand- in-hand with other planning initiatives to ensure plans and policies related to infrastructure needs are incorporated in the Update. This includes the Active Transportation Plan and Multimodal Thoroughfare Plan, Economic Develop- ment Strategic Plan Update, Parks and Recreation Master Plan, Dublin Area Housing Study and Strategy, Sustain- ability Framework, and Metro Center Implementation Plan. This ensures that the City of Dublin will succeed in meeting the goals and objectives of the next two decades. As part of the Envision Dublin process, the Multimodal Thoroughfare Plan was created to re-shape our growth, development, land use, and recreational spaces. Mobility is a common thread throughout these efforts, has been incorporated throughout the process, and for the first time, an Active Transportation Plan has been integrated into the Community Plan. 07 MOBILITY AND TRANSPORTATION WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation 86 Goal and Objectives for Mobility and Transportation MAKE THE COMMUNITY MORE CONNECTED AND ACCESSIBLE TO ALL BY INVESTING IN VEHICULAR AND ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE. ■Promote bicycle and pedestrian mobility throughout Dublin including education and safety improvements. ■Promote alternatives to the single occupant vehicle travel. ■Plan for innovative mobility and transportation technologies. ■Minimize adverse roadway impacts in sensitive areas and balance roadway design with community character and aesthetics. ■Work cooperatively with surrounding jurisdictions to coordinate regional transportation planning and programming. ■Maintain an acceptable balance between public and private sector responsibilities for street improvements. ■Create the Active Transportation and Multimodal Thoroughfare Plans to plan for future connections and improvements. ■Prioritize the maintenance and high-quality services of City rights-of-way while improving safety for all modes of transportation. The goal and objectives for Dublin’s mobility and transportation are further expanded in this chapter through community-wide policies and key recommendations. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 87 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation Most Sustainable. Sustainable transportation systems aim to improve public health, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and improve quality of life. They also aim to reduce emissions and improve transportation energy efficiency through community design and planning, traffic operations, and roadway design. Most Connected. Connecting more people to more places through improved access to multimodal transportation, this area defines goals to support economic development, advance multimodal transpor- tation options, promote equity, and focus on future growth. Most Resilient. Transportation resilience is about systems working together to provide flexible and resilient infrastructure that helps people move safely through changing conditions. It means planning ahead and being thoughtful about our long-term infrastructure, maintenance strategies, and investments. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation 88 PARADIGM SHIFT Historically, thoroughfare plans define a hierarchy of functional classifications for streets based on the need to accommodate future vehicular traffic volumes. This process was based on an evaluation of roadway capacity and level- of-service (LOS) for vehicles to determine the number of travel lanes needed for a roadway and an associated right- of-way width. Traditional thoroughfare plans have generally led to transportation networks that are auto centric with more vehicular lanes, wider intersections, and higher travel speeds, but can be difficult to use and less safe for vulner- able road users (VRU), such as pedestrians and bicyclists. Previous Community Plans relied on the traditional philos- ophy regarding how the transportation network has been prioritized, including measuring and designing for the peak traffic period of the day, while the remaining 23 hours have excess capacity. In recent public engagement processes, however, Dublin residents have emphasized safer streets, slower traffic, and more mobility options are needed. Based on this feedback, rethinking what success looks like for Dublin’s transportation network means a holistic evaluation of the public rights-of-ways to better balance safe travel within the City. As a result, a new paradigm was developed by the Envision Dublin process, which changes the order of priority of users on the roadway. In the new paradigm, the selected Key Performance Indicator to be used when evaluating the transportation network is the Demand-to-Capacity (d/c) ratio, assessing whether the demand exceeds capacity at any time during the day, or across an entire 24-hour period. By focusing on the d/c ratio, slower travel speeds and reduced intersection sizes that are safer and more comfortable for pedestrians and bicyclists will result. Consequently, some drivers may adapt to these changing conditions by changing modes of transportation, the time of day during which they make the trip or taking a different route. In addition to adopting the d/c ratio, and consistent with previous Community Plans, the maximum roadway footprint for arterial type roadways remains a four-lane divided roadway with turn lanes and medians. For lower classifica- tion streets, however, changing the paradigm means eval- uating the adequacy of pedestrian and bicycle facilities as the primary criteria before evaluating vehicle capacity. For instance, using sidewalk and/or shared use path locations and crossing lengths to determine the number of lanes at intersections. To ensure the safest and most efficient type of traffic control is considered first, a single lane roundabout will be evaluated for intersection improvements on minor arterials and collectors before other types of traffic control. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 89 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ■Promote the safety of all users, including those walking and rolling, through speed management techniques and the study and design of transporta- tion improvements. ■Replace using the traditional vehicular LOS as the transportation Key Performance Indicator with the 24-hour Demand-to-Capacity (d/c) ratio when evalu- ating the transportation network. ■Use a four-lane divided roadway with turn lanes and medians as the maximum roadway footprint for arterial type roadways. ■Evaluate the adequacy of pedestrian and bicycle facilities as the primary criteria before evaluating vehicle capacity for all non-arterial roadways. ■Evaluate a single lane roundabout first for intersection control for all non-arterial roadways. ■Support LinkUS and the implementation of transit supportive infrastructure to encourage mode shift and enhance first mile and last mile safety and connectivity. Traditional Transportation ParadigmNew Transportation Paradigm PEDESTRIANS TRANSIT BICYCLES AUTOMOBILES RIDESHARE FREIGHT AUTOMOBILES FREIGHT RIDESHARE TRANSIT BICYCLES PEDESTRIANS WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation 90 MOBILITY Today, transportation planning efforts recognizes the para- digm shift that prioritizes active transportation, particularly the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists, followed by the analysis of roadway connectivity and travel demand. In this plan, the roadway network is analyzed for connectivity and travel demand modeling based on the Future Land Use Plan. This effort, however, was preceded by a thorough exam- ination of the active transportation network, which not only identified gaps in the network, but now includes a functional classification hierarchy of active transportation features and defines the space allocated within the rights-of-way. Several other modes and/or aspects of mobility, such as pedestrian, bikes, micro-mobility, mobility hubs, transit, and passenger rail are included in this chapter. There are several micro-mobility options currently provided in Dublin, which could be expanded and/or upgraded in the future. CoGo Bike Share and e-scooters are either planned or already available in Dublin. In addition, several Mobility Hub locations have been identified throughout Dublin. Mobility Hubs improve access, provide space to co-locate at least two modes of transportation, and facilities convenient to transition between modes. Transit not only includes COTA fixed route service in Dublin, but also Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), also known as LinkUS here in Central Ohio. BRT will be a premium transit service from downtown Columbus to Dublin and extending to the West Innovation District. Dublin is also preparing for a potential passenger rail station on Amtrak’s Midwest Connect route, connecting Chicago, Columbus and Pittsburgh via Fort Wayne, Indiana, by advancing plans for a passenger rail station loca- tion near S.R. 161 and Houchard Road. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ■Encourage mode shift by enhancing the existing and future active transportation network by prioritizing that infrastructure along mobility corridors, particularly along transit routes. ■Embrace other modes and/or aspects of mobility, such as pedestrian, bikes, micro-mobility, mobility hubs, transit, and passenger rail. ■Encourage piloting and partnering with major employers and hotels on exploring other means for meeting daily travel needs. ■Collaborate with neighboring communities and MORPC to create regional connections with Central Ohio Greenways and other trails of significance, and specifically, promote efforts to achieve trail connectivity with the Heritage Trail, Quarry Trails Metro Park, Olen- tangy Trail/Antrim Park, and the Columbus Zoo. ■Promote Scioto River recreational opportunities in cooperation with MORPC, the Urban Land Institute of Columbus, Columbus and Franklin County Metro Parks, and many other public and private partners throughout Central Ohio’s Rapid 5 initiative. ■Continue to consistently require street and multi- modal connectivity between adjacent developments, to improve residential mobility options, as well as improved access for delivery, maintenance, and emer- gency vehicles. ■Add or weave in the health/equity/sustainable/resilient benefits of pedestrian infrastructure (sidewalks are social justice) WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 91 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation PEDESTRIANS Walking is a natural extension of our daily travel and provides benefits to personal health, environmental sustain- ability, and social interaction. The first and last mile of every trip should be safe, comfortable, and inviting as a pedes- trian. A safe environment is the foundation of a walkable city, with complete sidewalks and safe crossings to accom- modate all ages and abilities. Sidewalks are also a social justice issue and should be available near all housing types and varieties. Improving the walkability in Dublin means focusing on filling sidewalk and shared use path gaps and providing wider facilities within one-half mile of critical areas such as activity centers, schools, community parks, bus stops, future BRT stations, and Mobility Hubs. Shared use paths that are eleven-feet wide are the preferred facility type. Wider paths encourage students walking and biking to/from school. While it is acceptable to ride bicycles on streets where vehicle volumes and speeds are low, this becomes challenging on other roadways when wide shared use paths are not avialable near schools. In addition to the construction and expansion of shared use paths, sidewalks are an integral part of Dublin’s pedestrian network. To ensure safe and comfortable walking spaces, all new sidewalks should be at least six-feet wide to allow multiple pedestrians to walk side-by-side or pass each other. Existing sidewalks should be widened on a case-by- case basis as constraints and conditions allow. Conclusions and Recommendations ■Invest in a comprehensive active transportation network that provides sidewalks, shared use paths, and on-street protected bike lanes. □Use eleven-feet as the preferred shared use path width for areas of new construction and development. □Use six-feet as the preferred sidewalk width for areas of new construction and development to ensure safe and comfortable walking spaces. □Evaluate providing wider shared use path and side- walk facilities within one-half mile of critical areas such as activity centers, schools, community parks, bus stops, future BRT stations, and Mobility Hubs. □Evaluate widening existing shared use paths to eleven-feet wide and existing sidewalks to six-feet wide on a case-by-case basis as constraints and conditions allow. ■Promote safe walking and biking to schools and other destinations. □Prioritize constructing missing sidewalks and shared use paths in locations that are within ½-mile of schools, mobility hubs, parks, commercial areas, and other community gathering locations. Currently there are 5.3 miles of roads without shared use paths within one-half mile of schools. Additionally, the existing 19.6 miles of SUPs within one-half mile of schools are not wide enough as shown on the following Missing Sidewalks and SUPs map. □Prioritize adding pedestrian-related facilities on roads that do not have facilities prior to adding facili- ties on roads that already infrastructure on one side. □Construct missing sidewalk and shared use path links so that there are sidewalks or shared use path on both sides of all roads. ■Create shared use path signing and striping standards to ensure the safe travel of all users on the active transportation system. □Install signs and striping, or special treatments, to indicate directionality or warning of special circumstances on shared use paths to improve safety based on the conditions and the volume of pedestrians, bicycles, and other modes of traffic. “WALKING IS THE RHYTHM OF LIFE.” -Gary Snyder WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Mobility and Transportation | Envision Dublin Community Plan 92 SciotoRiverCOSGRAY RDWESTBU R YDRRINGS R D BRAND RD AVERY RDWOERNER TEMPLE RD TAR A HILL DR SEL L S M IL LDRINNOVA T IO N DR S H I ER R I N G S R D MARTIN RD D U B LIN SHIRED R RIVERSIDED R M O NTEREYDRCOFFMANRDDALEDRCARNOU S TIEDRBA L L A N T RAEPL GLICK R D E M ER A LD PKWY POST RD SWICKARD CT DUBLI NRDDUBLINRDBRIGH T R D S HIGH STT U L L YMOREDR M E M O RIALD R W YNFO R D DRH A Y D E NRU N B L V D WILCOX RDB RA N D ONWAY D R RINGS RD W B R I DGE S TEARLINGTONPKWYJEROME RD VILLAGEP K WYPRIMROSE CT EMMET ROW LN P ERIMET ER DR R I N G S R D TULLER RD BRITT ONPKWYMUIRFIELDDRFRANTZRD WELDON R D MCKITRICK RD TONTI DR M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDW Y A N D O TT E WOOD SBLVD C H U R C H M A N R D BLAZERPKWYCOSGRAY RDT U T T L E R DHERITAGE DRMUIRFIELDDRM ETRO PL N HARD RDHYLAND-CROYRDEIT E R M A N RDRAUSC H D R E STA TESCTA S H F O R D RD BROCK R D 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Context Layers Railroad City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River COTA Stops Planned Mobility Hubs Public Schools Private Schools Missing SUP or Sidewalk COTA Bus Stop (0.5 Mile Buffer) Planned Mobility Hubs (0.5 Mile Buffer Elementary/Intermediate Schools (0.5 Mile Buffer) High Schools (1 Mile Buffer) PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS MISSING SIDEWALKS AND SUPS AROUND SCHOOLS, COTA BUS STOPS, AND MOBILITY HUBS WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 93 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation SciotoRiverCOSGRAY RDWESTBURYDR RINGSRD BRANDRD AVERY RDWOERNERTEMPLERD TARAHILLDR SELLSMILLDR INNOVATIONDR SHIERRINGSRD MARTINRD DUBLINSHIREDR RIVERSIDED R MONTEREYDRCOFFMANRDDALEDRCARNOUSTIEDR BALLANTRAEPL GLICK R D EMERALDPKWY POST RD SWICKARD CTDUBLINRDDUBLINRDBRIGHTRDS HIGH STTULLYMOREDR MEMORIALDR WYNFORDDR HAYDENRUNBLVDWILCOX RDB RANDONWAYDR RINGSRD WBRIDGESTEARLINGTONPKWYJEROME RD VILLAGEP K WYPRIMROSE CT EMMET ROW LN PERIMETERDR RINGSRD TULLER RD BRITT ONPKWYMUIRFIELDDRFRANTZRD WELDONRD MCKITRICK RD TONTIDR M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDWYANDOTTEWOODSBLVD C H U R C H M A N R D BLAZERPKWYCOSGRAY RDTUTTLERDHERITAGE DRMUIRFIELDDRMETROPLN HARDRDHYLAND-CROYRDEIT E R M A N RDRAUSCHDR ESTATESCTASHFORDRD BROCKRD 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 00.510.25Miles Context Layers Railroad City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River COTA Stops Planned Mobility Hubs Public Schools Private Schools Missing SUP or Sidewalk COTA Bus Stop (0.5 Mile Buffer) Planned Mobility Hubs (0.5 Mile Buffer Elementary/Intermediate Schools (0.5 Mile Buffer) High Schools (1 Mile Buffer) PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS MISSING SIDEWALKS AND SUPS AROUND SCHOOLS, COTA BUS STOPS, AND MOBILITY HUBS BICYCLES Dublin has a more extensive bicycle network than many communities in the region. While there is tremendous support and fondness for this network among Dublin’s residents, the desire for a more robust active transportation network has also been articulated. There are 150+ miles of shared use paths in Dublin, which in part awarded the prestigious League of American Bicyclists “Silver Bicycle Friendly Community” designation. As the first community in Ohio to achieve this status, Dublin must not stop here, but rather continue in the quest for even higher awards of gold or platinum. If the vision is for the City of Dublin to have a premier active transportation network, the mobility plan should go well beyond simply filling gaps and expanding the bicycle network. To reimagine the active transportation network in Dublin, this plan proposes a functional classifi- cation hierarchy of active transportation features, similar to the manner in which roadways were previously classified. By defining such a functional classification hierarchy, Dublin is purposefully prioritizing and elevating the focus of the active transportation network as a safe, healthy, sustain- able, and resilient mode of transportation. Prioritization begins with the Signature Trail, incorporating natural elements in its own alignment and using a wider path section than is typically seen on shared use paths in Dublin. Commuter Routes either incorporate on-street bike facilities physically separated from vehicular traffic for safety or are part of a wider shared use path parallel to the road. Connector Routes are characterized as a shared use paths adjacent to minor roadways. Local Routes are either sepa- rated shared use paths or on-street facilities where it is safe and comfortable to ride with mixed traffic on low-volume, low-speed residential neighborhoods. Dublin’s first Active Transportation Plan is shown on page 98. Dublin has several named and themed bike routes. The Emerald Trail is designated as a MORPC Central Ohio Greenway trail running northwest to southeast through Dublin. The Glacier Ridge - Coffman Park signed route connects users to the named destinations. The Celtic Cocktail, Fishing, Ice Cream, Irish Fairy Door, Public Art, Recreation, and Waterfalls & Natural Features Loops are all bike loops under development. These routes are aimed to encourage and promote recreation, sustainability, and adventure throughout the community. GREENWAY COMMUTER CONNECTOR SIGNATURE TRAIL LOCAL Representative Bike Hierarchy “THINK OF BICYCLES AS RIDEABLE ART THAT CAN JUST ABOUT SAVE THE WORLD.” -Grant Petersen WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Mobility and Transportation | Envision Dublin Community Plan 94 Signature Trail A Signature Trail in Dublin will represent the centerpiece of the active transportation network. Dublin dreams big and has a history of developing projects that are transfor- mational. The Signature Trail will provide the opportunity for outdoor recreation and physical exercise in a natural setting, linking people with destinations. While the exact alignment is yet to be determined, the Signature Trail will run generally east-west through Dublin, strategically elim- inate major transportation barriers with grade separations, and provide alternative connection options and trailheads at strategic locations along the corridor. Specifically, the Signature Trail will be wider than a typical shared use path to accommodate the volume of users it attracts, and will include wayfinding, lighting, and areas of respite with amenities such as benches, shelters, tire pump stations, bike parking, and trash/recycling receptacles. A Signature Trail incorporates community character, cultural history, and placemaking - all serving to establish enduring memories across generations. Dublin’s Signature Trail will serve as a catalyst for enhancing neighborhood unity, fostering regional ecotourism, enhancing air quality, helping mitigate climate change, providing natural habitat throughout our urban fabric, and stimulating economic growth. Conclusions and Recommendations ■Enhance the bicycle network to provide routes for commuting, connecting, and local trips. □Continue to develop the bicycle network to allow non-vehicular trips to be made by encouraging development to install covered and secure bicycle parking, and shower and changing facilities for cycling commuters. □Incorporate on-street bike facilities physically separated from vehicular traffic for safety or are part of a wider shared use path parallel to the road on Commuter Routes. □Select the appropriate facility type for Local Routes, either separated shared use paths or on-street facil- ities, based on safety and comfort in mixed traffic, using volume and speed as the criteria. ■Promote and enhance biking in Dublin by using various forms of wayfinding and branding. □Increase awareness and promote the Emerald Trail, which is designated as a Central Ohio Greenway Trail. □Maintain the Glacier Ridge-Coffman Park signed route. □Provide secondary wayfinding for the named Bike Loops shown on the following map. ■Develop a Signature Trail through Dublin as the center- piece of the active transportation network providing outdoor recreating in a natural setting, similar to the Monon Trail in Indianapolis. □Prioritize the Signature Trail, incorporating natural elements in its own alignment, using a wider path section than is typically seen on shared use paths in Dublin. □Invest in the development of a Signature Trail that connects east-west across the city. □The Signature Trail should feature natural elements and cultural placemaking, while incorporating multiple trailheads, wayfinding, and lighting in order to provide a safe and convenient environment for users. □The Signature Trail alignment and amenities should involve robust planning and public engagement but should be a minimum 15-feet wide and incorporate safe crossing at major transportation barriers. Visual Examples of the Signature Trails WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 95 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation MICRO-MOBILITY The new mobility and transportation paradigm prioritizes non-vehicular modes of transportation by focusing on shared use paths, protected bike lanes, and safety of VRUs at crossings and intersections. This includes wider shared use paths and sidewalks. With the increased emphasis on mobility in this new plan, the promotion of scooters, bikeshare, and e-bikes is consistent with this paradigm and improving first mile and last mile connectivity. Dublin supports micro-mobility modes such as scooters and bikeshare programs. The e-scooter pilot program began with 50 motorized scooters in within the I-270 outer belt, which was expanded to 125 scooters distributed across the entire City based on the success of the initial project. Dublin also has nine strategically located bikeshare stations planned using CoGo that will eventually be part of the mobility hubs shown in the Signed and Named Bike Loops and Mobility Hubs map. In order to allow micro-mo- bility devices like scooters to continue to operate in Dublin, Dublin policies and code would need to be modified to allow electric scooters and other micro-mobility devices on shared use paths and continue to use scooter slow zones in areas of high activity. Conclusions and Recommendations ■Promote and enhance the use of e-scooter, bikeshare, e-bike and other modes of transportation. □Plan for wider shared use paths and sidewalks to accommodate various modes of transportation safely and comfortably. □Update Dublin Code to allow electric scooters and other micro-mobility devices on shared use paths. □Continue to use e-scooter slow zones in areas of high activity. □Compliment transit options such as BRT and passenger rail for first mile and last mile connections. ■Coordinate with other Central Ohio municipalities and organizations to leverage the power of the region to bring the best mobility options to Dublin. MOBILITY HUBS Mobility Hubs provide seamless transfer points between transportation modes and mobility services, providing choices for various modes of transportation. As mobility options expand and diversify, Mobility Hubs will play a pivotal role in enhancing the quality, convenience, and experience of multimodal travel in Dublin. Mobility Hubs are to be strategically located along key mobility corridors including BRT, bus, bike, and greenways for maximum impact. Dublin has identified the Phase 1 and Phase 2 locations, and future potential locations, as shown in the Signed and Named Bike Loops and Mobility Hubs map. Mobility Hubs should be aesthetically attractive, contem- porary, have internet connectivity, power, lighting, equitable access, expandable options, incorporate placemaking components, and improve public health. As mobility options expand and diversify, Mobility Hubs will play a pivotal role in enhancing the quality, convenience, and experience of multimodal travel in Dublin. Conclusions and Recommendations ■Strategically locate Mobility Hubs along key mobility corridors including BRT, bus, bike, and greenways for maximum impact. ■Improve mobility options by advancing plans for Mobility Hubs, co-locating at least two modes of transportation in each hub, and providing convenient facilities to transition between modes. ■Construct attractive, contemporary, connected with Smart Technology, and well-lit mobility hubs that are expandable and incorporate place-making compo- nents that improve public health. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Mobility and Transportation | Envision Dublin Community Plan 96 CHURCH M A N R D EME R A L D P K W YSHAMROCK BLVDWESTB U R YDRBRANDRDCONCORD RDAVERYRDWOERNER TEMPL E RD TAR A HILL DR SELLS M IL L D R I N N O V A TIONDR SHI ER RINGS RD R I N G S R D MARTIN RDHYLAND-CROY RDD U B L I N S HIR E DR DUBLINCENTERDR M O NTEREYDRCOFFMAN RDCARNOUSTIED R RINGS RDB A L L A NT R A E PL GLICK R D EMERAL D PKWY COSGRAY RDPOST RD POSTR D POSTRDAVERY RDSWICKARD CT DUBLI NRDDUBLINRDBRIGHT R D S HIGH STT U LLYMOREDR M EM O R I A L D R WYN F O RDDR H A Y D EN R U N B LV D WILCOX RDB R A N DONWAY D R RINGS RD W BRIDGE ST E A RLINGTON PKWYJEROM E RD VILLAGEP K WYEMMET ROW LN PERIMETER DR RI N GS RD TULLER RD BRIT T ONPKWYMUIRFIELD D R FRANTZRD WELDON R D MCKITRICK RD TONTI DR M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RD WYA N D O T TE W O ODS BLVD BLAZERPKWYCOSGRAY RDEI TER MA NRDTUTTLE RDHERITAGE DRMUIRFIELDDRMETROPL S HARD RDHYLAND-CROYRDRAU SC H D R SH IER R I NGS RD E S TA TE S CTA S H FORD RD BR OCK RD 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270SciotoRiver 4 2 1 3 1 4 8 7 5 6 1 22 3 9 3 4 SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS Bikeway Signed Routes Emerald Trail Fishing Loop Recreation Loop Waterfalls & Natural Features Irish Fairy Door Loop Glacier Ridge - Coffman Park Celtic Cocktail Loop Ice Cream Loop Public Art Loop COSGRAY RDBRANDRDCONCORD RDAVERYRDWOERNER TEMPLE RD TARAHILLDR SELL S M IL L DRINNOVA T IO NDR S H I E R R I N G S RD R I N G S R D MARTIN RD D U B LIN SHIRE D R DUBLINCENTERDRM O NTEREYDRCOFFMANRDCARNOU STIEDRBAL L A N TRAEPL GLICK R D EM E R A L D PKWY POST RD SWICKARD CT DUBLI NRDDUBLINRDBRIGHT RD S HIGH STT UL L Y MOREDR M E M O RIAL D R W Y NFOR D DR H A Y D E N RU N B L V D WILCOX RDBRA N DO N WAYDR RINGS RD W BRIDGE STEARLINGT ON PKWYJEROME RD VILLAGEP K WYPRIMROSE CT PER I M E T ERDR RIVERSIDEDRTULLER RD MUIRFIEL DDRF RANTZRD WELDON R D TONT I DRMCKITRICK RD M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDBLAZER PKWY CH U R C H M A N R DHYLAND-CROYRDCOSGRAY RDEI T E RMANRDT U T T L E R DHERITAGE DR B R IT T ONPKWYME TRO PL N HARDRDRAUSCHDR E STA TESCTA S H F ORD R D BROCK RD 745 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 270SciotoRiver 4 2 1 3 1 4 8 7 5 6 1 22 3 9 3 4 SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS Phase 1 Phase 2 Future Phases COSGRAY RDBRANDRDCONCORD RDAVERYRDWOERNER TEMPLE RD TARAHILLDR SELL S M IL L DRINNOVA T IO NDR S H I ER R I N G S RD R I N G S R D MARTIN RD D U B LIN SHIRE D R DUBLINCENTERDRM O NTEREYDRCOFFMANRDCARNOU STIEDRBAL L A N T RAEPL GLICK R D EM ER A L D PKWY POST RD SWICKARD CT DUBLI NRDDUBLINRDBRIGHT RD S HIGH STTUL L Y MOREDR M E M O RIA L D R W Y NFOR D DR H A Y D E N RU N B L V D WILCOX RDBRA N DO N WAYDR RINGS RD W B R I DGE STEARLINGT ON PKWYJEROME RD VILLAGEP K WYPRIMROSE CT PER I M E T ERDR RIVERSIDEDRTULLER RD MUIRFIEL D DRF RANTZRD WELDON R D TONTI DRMCKITRICK RD M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDBLAZERPKWY C H U R C H M A N R DHYLAND-CROYRDCOSGRAY RDEI T E RMANRDT U T T L E R DHERITAGE DR B R IT T ONPKWYME TROPL N HARDRDRAUSCHDR E S TATESCTA S H F ORD R D BROCK RD 745 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 270SciotoRiver 4 2 1 3 1 4 8 7 5 6 1 22 3 9 3 4 SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS Phase 1 Phase 2 Future Phases COSGRAY RDBRANDRDCONCORD RDAVERYRDWOERNER TEMPLE RD TARAHILLDR SELL S M IL L DRINNOVA T IO NDR S H I E R R I N G S RD R I N G S R D MARTIN RD D U B LIN SHIRE D R DUBLINCENTERDRM O NTEREYDRCOFFMANRDCARNOU STIEDRBAL L A N TRAEPL GLICK R D EM E R A L D PKWY POST RD SWICKARD CT DUBLI NRDDUBLINRDBRIGHT RD S HIGH STTUL L Y MOREDR M E M O RIAL D R W Y NFOR D DR H A Y D E N RU N B L V D WILCOX RDBRA N DO N WAYDR RINGS RD W BRIDGE STEARLINGT ON PKWYJEROME RD VILLAGEP K WYPRIMROSE CT PER I M E T ERDR RIVERSIDEDRTULLER RD MUIRFIEL D DRF RANTZRD WELDON R D TONT I DRMCKITRICK RD M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDBLAZER PKWY C H U R C H M A N R DHYLAND-CROYRDCOSGRAY RDEI T E RMANRDT U T T L E R DHERITAGE DR B R IT T ONPKWYME TRO PL N HARDRDRAUSCHDR E STA TESCTA S H F ORD R D BROCK RD 745 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 270SciotoRiver 4 2 1 3 1 4 8 7 5 6 1 22 3 9 3 4 SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS Phase 1 Phase 2 Future Phases Mobility Hub Locations by Phase SIGNED AND NAMED BIKE LOOPS AND MOBILITY HUBS Phase 1 Future Phases Phase 2 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 97 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Context Layers Planned Mobility Hubs Heritage Rail Trail Emerald Trail Railroad Bikeways and Sidewalks BRT/Rail/Transit City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary Planned Signature Trail Multimodal Street Classification Arterial Commuter Boulevard Planned Commuter Boulevard Connector Boulevard Planned Connector Boulevard Neighborhood Boulevard Planned Neighborhood Boulevard Corridor Connector Planned Corridor Connector District Connector Planned District Connector Shared Use Path (12ft) SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 42 D U B LIN S HIRED R GLICK R D MEM O R IALD R TULLY MOREDRW BRIDGE S T MONTEREYDRTARAHILLDR WOERNERTEMPL E RD HARDRD EARLINGTON PKY RINGS RD FR A NTZRD BRAND RD MUIRFIELDDRDUBLIN RDCOFFMAN RDRIVERSIDE DRSAWMILL RDPOST RD WILCOX RDV IL LAGEPKYTUTTLE RD B R I TTONPKYSUMMIT VIEW RD P E R IMETERDR IN D U S T R I A L P K Y EI TERMA NRDJEROMERDDALE DREMERAL D P KW Y NEWSTREET1NEW STREET 6HYLAND-CROYRDTULLER RD S HI ER -R I NGS RDAVERY RDR E S E A R C HPARKWAY N E W ST REET 3COSGRAY RDNEW S T REET 4 NEW STREET 5 CEMET E RY P K BLAZE R PKWY NEW ST R EET 2 H AYD EN R U N RD I AM S RD HOUCHARDRDAMITY PIKE WARNE R R D T UT T L ECROSS I NGB LVD SciotoRiverU S 3 3 W 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Mobility and Transportation | Envision Dublin Community Plan 98 TRANSIT Public transportation service in the Dublin area is provided by the Central Ohio Transit Authority (COTA). As the regional public transit provider for greater Columbus and Central Ohio, COTA serves over 1.1 million residents with over 9 million trips annually. Currently, there are two fixed routes that serve the City of Dublin, Route 33 and Route 73, primarily serving the southeast portion of the City. COTA also operates a park-and-ride in Bridge Park, one of the busiest in the region, and a Zoo Bus in the peak season. COTA’s plans include the goal of increasing frequency of buses on existing routes in Dublin as well as adding two additional fixed routes: Lines 32 and 35. In addition, The Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) and COTA are studying the East-West Workforce Connector transit service on I-270 in light of Intel’s effect on the region and was recently added to the COTA LinkUS Plan. The City of Dublin also operates a micro-transit service for eligible residents and commuters. The Dublin Connector is currently a fare-free, on-demand service for residents aged 55 or older, residents with disabilities, or member of the Dublin workforce. Another option for this service is a new COTA//Plus zone in Dublin. Similar to the Dublin Connector, COTA//Plus is a door-to-door, on-demand service. COTA’s Short Range Transit Plan 2023-2027 includes a future COTA//Plus zone in Dublin. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ■Support COTA’s 2023-2027 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) goal of increasing frequency of buses on existing routes in Dublin. □Encourage COTA to implement the extension of two additional fixed routes to Dublin: Lines 32 and 35 identified in their SRTP. □Participate in the joint Ohio Department of Transpor- tation (ODOT)/COTA East-West Workforce Connector Study, analyzing transit service along I-270, connecting Dublin to New Albany in light of Intel’s effect on the region. ■Review and analyze service options for the Dublin Connector micro-transit service for eligible residents and commuters, such as a new COTA//Plus zone in Dublin as included in the COTA SRTP. “LIFE IS SIMILAR TO A BUS RIDE. THE JOURNEY BEGINS WHEN WE BOARD THE BUS. WE MEET PEOPLE ALONG OUR WAY, OF WHICH SOME ARE STRANGERS, SOME FRIENDS, AND SOME STRANGERS YET TO BE FRIENDS.”” -Chirag Tulsiani WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 99 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation SciotoRiverMAP TITLE 00.510.25Miles 270 270 TO INTEL TO INTEL Proposed realignment of COTA Route 35, Dublin to New Albany Proposed realignment of COTA Route 32, Dublin to Easton Proposed ODOT East-West Workforce Connector Standard COTA Line (30-60 min frequency) Rush Hour COTA Line 35 32 33 72 N 33 33 21 74 72 73 ZOO 32 35 EXISTING COTA LINES + COTA SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Mobility and Transportation | Envision Dublin Community Plan 100 LINKUS BUS RAPID TRANSIT Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) is an advanced high-quality transit system that delivers fast and efficient service that may include dedicated lanes, busways, traffic signal priority, off-board fare collection, elevated platforms and enhanced stations. The LinkUS Northwest Corridor links Dublin with Downtown Columbus and points of interest in between. Phase 1 of the Northwest Corridor extends from downtown Columbus to Bethel Road. Phase 2 extends the corridor north on Sawmill Road and west on S.R. 161 to Bridge Park, and Phase 3 reaches to the Ohio University Branch Campus in the West Innovation District, with the possibility of extending to the future passenger rail site. While COTA as an agency is responsible for implementing BRT corridors in greater Columbus, Dublin has the ability to enhance the experience for riders and residents along the corridor in Dublin. This includes intentionally planning for transit-supportive density, scale, and last-mile connectivity along the Northwest Corridor in Dublin. Connecting transit stops with existing bicycle and pedes- trian facilities helps create a more vibrant, sustainable mode share and reduces car dependency. First and last mile investments help get people to and from transit stops safely. Sidewalk and pedestrian investments within one-half mile of transit corridors will enhance accessibility, conve- nience, and comfort. Additionally, signs, maps, and other wayfinding methods will encourage more people to access transit via a variety of modes, create a more safe and efficient system, as well as provide more travel options for the community. Conclusions and Recommendations ■Continue to partner with COTA, MORPC, City of Columbus and Franklin County to promote and imple- ment the Northwest Corridor BRT through Dublin. ■Enhance rider and resident experience of BRT in Dublin through safe and convenient stops and techno- logically connected stations. ■Intentionally plan for transit-supportive density, scale, and last-mile connectivity along the Northwest Corridor in Dublin. ■Connect transit stops with existing bicycle and pedes- trian facilities to create more vibrant, sustainable mode share and reduce car dependency. □Leverage LinkUS Transit Supportive Infrastructure (TSI) funds to promote the use of transit on the Northwest Corridor BRT route and other existing and planned transit routes. □Continue to develop and implement the secondary wayfinding system to inform riders/walkers how to use the bike/pedestrian system to access other parts of the community. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 101 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation PHASE 1 - DOWNTOWN COLUMBUS TO BETHEL ROAD Phase 1 Phase 1 Stations PHASE 2 - BETHEL ROAD TO BRIDGE PARK Phase 2 Phase 2 StationsBRIDGE PARKSHAMROCK BLVDMARTIN RD KRIER DR / TULLER PKWY WEST CASE RD RESLER DR PICKFORDE DRDIERKER RDREED RDGODOWN RDOLENTANGY PLAZABETHEL PARK & RIDE JASONWAY AVE THOMAS LN UNION CEMETERY HARLEY DR LANE AVE / WOODY HAYES DR JOHN H HERRICK DR KING AVE 3RD AVENUE GOODALE BLVD FRONT ST Rail line Proposed Dublin Rail Station Proposed Columbus Rail Station - Downtown Proposed Hilliard Rail Station NEIL AVEC S X N D D PHASE 3 - BRIDGE PARK TO DUBLIN RAIL STATION Phase 3 Further analysis is needed to identify potential LinkUS stations between Bridge Park and the proposed passenger rail station in Dublin, which would serve as the terminus of the LinkUS Northwest Corridor. LINKUS NORTHWEST CORRIDOR ALIGNMENT WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Mobility and Transportation | Envision Dublin Community Plan 102 PASSENGER RAIL Intercity passenger rail represents a sustainable and resilient form of mass transit connecting people with jobs and opportunities, particularly when access to rail transit is supported by multimodal connectivity providing first mile and last mile connectivity. The Midwest Connect rail corridor represents a potential passenger rail route that is in the Federal Rail Administration (FRA) Corridor Identification Program. The Midwest Connect route extends from Chicago to Fort Wayne to Columbus to Pittsburgh, which then can take passengers further east to Philadelphia, Washington, D.C, and New York City. Stops will be located in named cities along the Midwest Connect route, such as Chicago, Fort Wayne and Columbus. Since the route passes through Dublin on its way to Columbus, Dublin is positioning itself to be ready for a state-of-the-art, multimodal passenger rail station in northwest Dublin near S.R. 161 and Houchard Road. Supporting land uses are included in the Future Land Use Plan and the West Innovation District Special Area Plan. Trans- portation and mobility connections are also included in the Active Transportation and Multimodal Thoroughfare Plans. Conclusions and Recommendations ■Continue leading regional efforts in support of the Midwest Connect route with multimodal connectivity and supporting land uses. ■Lead strategic planning efforts to promote Dublin as the location of a vibrant state-of-the-art passenger rail station along S.R. 161 by advancing studies and other efforts to leverage investments to create a more sustainable and resilient mobility option for Dublin and the region. ■Include transit supportive land uses in the Future Land Use Plan and West Innovation District Special Area Plan to encourage the appropriate type of develop- ment near the rail station. ■Include needed transportation and mobility connections in the Active Transportation and Multimodal Thorough- fare Plans to support a passenger rail station in Dublin. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 103 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation Proposed Planning AreaCity of Dublin Area outside of Corporate Boundary UNION MADISON FRANKLIN DELAWARE DUBLIN W arner Rd 33 161 270 He r t i a g e Trai l Hayden Run Rd Brock Rd Glacier Ridge Metro Park Cemetery Pike I am s R d Sawmill RdGlick Rd T uttle Crossing B l v d Martin Rd Cosgray RdScioto R iverScioto River Summit View Rd Avery RdPLAIN CITY POWELL COLUMBUS Hilliard 33 Darree Fields ParkBig Da rby R ive r Sugar RunSHAWNEE HILLSO’Shaughnessy Reservoir42 42 Mitchell-Dewitt R d In d u s t r i a l P k w y NEW CALIFORNIA Wells Rd Ravenhill Pkwy N 1 mile Dublin-Pl ai n Cit y R d Houchard RdC S X R A I L R O A D K i l e -W a r n e r R d City of Dublin Planning Area Site Location 1-mile Passenger Rail Station Study Area PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Mobility and Transportation | Envision Dublin Community Plan 104 SciotoRiverEMERALDPKWYCOSGRAY RDWESTBU R Y D R BRAN D R DCONCORD RDAVERYRDWOERNER TEMPLERD TARA HILLDR SE L L S M ILLDRINNOVATION DR MARTIN RD D U B L IN S H IRE DR RIVERSIDEDRMONTEREYDRCOFFMANRDDALEDRCARNOUSTIEDRBALLANTRAE PL GLICK R D E M E R A L D PKWY POST RD POST RDSWICKARD CT DUBLIN RDDUBLINRDBRIGHT RD S HIGH STTULLYMOREDR M E M O R IA L D R WYNFO R D D R WILCOX RDBRANDONWAYDR RINGS RD W BRIDGE STEARL I N GTON PKW YJEROME RDVILLAGE PKWY PRIMROSE CT P E R I M ETER DR RINGS RD TULLER RD KILE RD B R I TTONPKWYMUIRFIELD DRFRANTZRDWELDON RD M C K I T R I C K R D M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERYRD WYANDOTTE WO O D S B L V D C H U R C H M A N R DHYLAND-CROYRDBLAZERPKWYCOSGRAY RDTUTTLE RDHERITAGE DRMUIRFIELD DR M ETRO PL N HARD RD HAYDEN RUN BLVD EIT E R MA N R D SHIER RINGS RD ESTATE S C T A S H F O R D RD BROCK RD 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 Interstate and Freeway Interstate and Freeway Ramps Major Arterial Road Minor Arterial Road Collector Road Corridor Connector District Connector City of Dublin Planning Area River Railroad SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS ROADWAY NETWORK EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK The Existing Roadway Network has developed over time using the previous Community Plan as the guide for where and how to grow the network. The network has grown based on the Future Land Use Plan and the City has leveraged development opportunities to construct key improvements. This model has served Dublin well over time, resulting in very good traffic oper- ations in most areas of Dublin, even when analyzing the proposed Future Land Use Plan on the existing network. Based on this work, key areas for needed improvements are the West Innovation District and the Southwest Area, which was expected as these areas include large tracts of open space and rural roads which will experience the most dramatic change. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 105 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation SciotoRiverEMERALDPKWYCOSGRAY RDWESTBU R Y D R BRAN D R DCONCORD RDAVERYRDWOERNERTEMPLERD TARAHILLDR SELLSMILLDR INNOVATION DR MARTINRD DUBLINSHIREDR RIVERSIDEDRMONTEREYDRCOFFMANRDDALEDRCARNOUSTIEDRBALLANTRAEPL GLICK R D EMERALDPKWY POST RD POST RDSWICKARD CTDUBLIN RDDUBLINRDBRIGHT RD S HIGH STTULLYMOREDR MEMORIALDR WYNFO R D D R WILCOX RDBRANDONWAYDR RINGS RD W BRIDGE STEARL I N GTONPKWYJEROME RDVILLAGE PKWY PRIMROSE CT PERIMETERDR RINGS RD TULLER RD KILE RD B R I TTONPKWYMUIRFIELD DRFRANTZRDWELDON RD MCKITRICKRD M A I N S T SUMMITVIEWRDAVERYRD WYANDOTTE WO O D S B L V D C H U R C H M A N R DHYLAND-CROYRDBLAZERPKWYCOSGRAY RDTUTTLE RDHERITAGE DRMUIRFIELD DR METROPLN HARDRD HAYDEN RUN BLVD EIT E R MA N R D SHIER RINGS RD ESTATE S C T ASHFORDRD BROCK RD 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 Interstate and Freeway Interstate and Freeway Ramps Major Arterial Road Minor Arterial Road Collector Road Corridor Connector District Connector City of Dublin Planning Area River Railroad SHAWNEE HILLSPOWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS FUTURE ROADWAY NETWORK 42 D U B LIN S HIRED R GLICK R D MEM O R IALD R TULLY MOREDRW BRIDGE S T MONTEREYDRTARAHILLDR WOERNERTEMPL E RD HARDRD EARLINGTON PKY RINGS RD FR A NTZRD BRAND RD MUIRFIELDDRDUBLIN RDCOFFMAN RDRIVERSIDE DRSAWMILL RDPOST RD WILCOX RDV IL LAGEPKYTUTTLE RD B R I TTONPKYSUMMIT VIEW RD P E R IMETERDR IN D U S T R I A L P K Y EI TERMA NRDJEROMERDDALE DREMERAL D P KW Y NEWSTREET1NEW STREET 6HYLAND-CROYRDTULLER RD SH I ER-R I N GS RDAVERY RDU NIV E R SITYBLVD N E W ST REET 3COSGRAY RDNEW S T REET 4 NEW STREET 5 CEMET A RY P K BLAZE R PKWY NEW ST R EET 2 H AYD EN R U N RD I AM S RD HOUCHARDRDAMITY PIKE WARNE R R D T UT T L ECROSS I NGB LVD SciotoRiver257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS Freeway Planned Freeway Major Arterial Planned Major Arterial Collector Planned Collector Minor Arterial Planned Minor Arterial Corridor Connector Planned Corridor Connector District Connector Planned District Connector FUTURE ROADWAY NETWORK The travel demand modeling (TDM) process projects future traffic volumes using several data sets and represents an important tool in planning for future roadway needs and network improvements. These data sets include the existing roadway network, programmed roadway improvements with associated attributes such as number of lanes, speed limit, etc. and has been updated for the Dublin TDM to project future traffic volumes. This is consistent with regional data and modeling efforts. This analysis of future traffic volumes exposed stressed links along the existing and committed roadway network. The roadway network has been updated with new roadway connections to better distribute future traffic and provide better performance and demand-to-capacity ratios (d/c). Nearly every roadway is projected to function at less than its capacity. With the exception of the corridors that will provide access to key innovation areas from the freeways, most of the proposed roadway segments are recommended to be two lanes or two lanes with a median. The future roadway network represents a balanced, connected multimodal system that supports walking, biking, transit, and autos. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Mobility and Transportation | Envision Dublin Community Plan 106 MULTIMODAL STREET CLASSIFICATIONS Street classifications are essential components as they provide a systematic way to organize and manage the trans- portation network in Dublin. By categorizing corridors based on their function, resources can be allocated, infrastructure investments can be prioritized, and a well-balanced trans- portation network results. With the shift in transportation priorities, there is also an opportunity for a new system of functional classification more inclusive of all modes, namely the Arterial, Commuter Boulevard, Connector Boulevard, Neighborhood Boulevard, and Shared Street. With the exception of the Arterial, the new lexicon is more reflective of the shift to prioritizing the safety of VRUs more than vehicle level of service. The new system reflects a more holistic and integrated multimodal use of the rights-of-way in Dublin. Conclusions and Recommendations Establish a new system of multimodal street classifications to include Arterials, Commuter Boulevards, Connector Boulevards, Neighborhood Boulevards, and Shared Streets. Definitions of these proposed facilities and design consider- ations detailed below and followed by representative illustra- tions of typical sections. ■Arterial—combines the traditional major arterial with separated bicycle/pedestrian facilities on both sides. Arterials serve to move vehicular traffic to and from freeways, such as I-270 and US 33 in Dublin. Arterials represent the one street classification where efficient vehicle travel remains prioritized, recognizing that the private automobile continues to be a key component of travel in and around Dublin. Separated bicycle and pedestrian facilities support VRUs, and to keep reasonable crossing lengths, arterials are recom- mended to be a maximum of four lanes wide, with turn lanes as needed. ■Commuter Boulevard—combines the traditional minor arterial with commuter bike routes. Commuter boule- vards accommodate trips of moderate length with a focus on user safety regardless of mode. Compared to an arterial, there is typically less vehicle traffic and more potential for pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Active transportation facilities can be shared use path (SUP) on both sides or protected bike lanes (PBL) and side- walk (SW) on new or retrofitted facilities. Commuter Boulevards are normally two to four lane facilities and provide more access points to destinations than Arte- rials. These facilities provide a link between Arterials and Connector Boulevards. ■Connector Boulevard—combines the traditional minor arterial with connector routes. Connector Boulevards provide connectivity between the more heavily traveled Commuter Boulevards and smaller streets associ- ated with more residential areas. Active transporta- tion facilities on Connector Boulevards are typically characterized by an SUP on both sides of the roadway though some areas may use one SUP and one SW. The number of vehicle lanes vary from two to four and vehicle parking may be provided on Connector Boule- vards in an urban context. ■Neighborhood Boulevard—combines traditional collector streets with SUP and SW. Neighborhood Boulevards are located within residential areas and collect and distribute traffic to and from the residential streets (Shared Streets). The Neighborhood Boule- vard functions as a neighborhood thoroughfare for all modes and typically includes one SUP and one SW depending on Corridor Character. These streets are characterized by two vehicle lanes, on-street parking, stop controlled intersections, and may or may not have residential driveways. ■Shared Street—allows for a mix of modes within a traditional local street environment. Shared Streets mainly occur in residential neighborhoods and connect directly to Neighborhood Boulevards or other Shared Streets. Shared Streets are typically lined with single-family homes, residential driveways, on-street parking, and sidewalks on both sides of the street. Vehicles and bicyclists share the street given the low traffic volumes and vehicle speeds. Due to their nature, Shared Streets are not individually designated on the Multimodal Thoroughfare Plan, but they exist throughout the network. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 107 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation MULTIMODAL STREET TYPOLOGIES Dublin’s system of streets and dedication to high design standards have made possible not only the accommoda- tion of growth but the safe use of streets by pedestrians, bicyclists, automobiles, and trucks. These street typologies are intended to refresh the inventory of street sections most likely to be referenced in the upgrading of existing corridors as development and budgets permit. The street sections organize the existing and future transportation network into an integrated, multimodal system, detailing how to use the space within rights-of-way for all users. While the previous section explains the context and functional classification of multimodal streets, the definitions of these typologies are proposed below. These definitions serve to provide guid- ance on design criteria while allowing flexibility given the network is composed of existing and future infrastructure, available rights-of-way, and rural versus urban contexts. In order to use these sections to the best extent possible, flexibility is recommended for certain street categories to provide variability in how the rights-of-way are used and/ or how much right-of-way is required. The sections below are descriptions, illustrations, and guidance on the new multimodal street classifications. Conclusion and Recommendations Use the following sections to provide guidance on design criteria while allowing for flexibility given the network is composed of existing and future streets, available right- of-way, and rural versus urban contexts. Four-Lane Divided (4D) Arterial, Commuter Boulevard, Connector Boulevard *Widths for right-of-way, median, and tree lawn will vary for Corridors of Significance. See the Streetscape Facilities Table for details on facility standards. Two-Lane Divided (2D) Commuter Boulevard with Protected Bike Lane And Connector Boulevard Streetscape Standards Active Transportation SUP: 11-13 feet Tree Lawn 8-feet min Number of Lanes 4/5 Lane Width 11-feet Median/Turn Lane 14-feet min Speed Limit (mph)35-50 Total R/W 102-110 feet* Active Transportation SW: 6-feet min SUP: 11-feet min PBL: 6-feet min Tree Lawn/Bike Lane Buffer 8-foot min Number of Lanes 2/3 Lane Width Min 10-11 feet Speed Limit (mph)35-40 Total R/W 80-90 feet WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Mobility and Transportation | Envision Dublin Community Plan 108 Two-Lane (2D) Commuter Boulevard Or Connector Boulevard Retrofit From A Four-Lane Divided (4D) See the Streetscape Facilities Table for details on facility standards. Neighborhood Boulevard Shared Street Streetscape Standards Active Transportation SW: 6-feet min PBL: 6-feet Bike Lane Buffer 5-foot min Tree Lawn 8-foot min Number of Lanes 2/3 Lane Width Min 10-11 feet Speed Limit (mph)35-40 Total R/W 100 feet Streetscape Standards Active Transportation SUP: 11-foot min SW: 6-foot min Tree Lawn 8-foot min Number of Lanes 2 Lane Width 11-12 feet On Street Parking Likely Speed Limit (mph)25-35 Total R/W 65 feet Streetscape Standards Active Transportation SW: 6-foot min Tree Lawn 8-foot min Number of Lanes 1 to 2 Lane Width 11-12 feet On Street Parking One or Both Sides Speed Limit (mph)25 Total R/W 50-60 feet WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 109 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation Two-Lane Rural Commuter Boulevard or Connector Boulevard See the Streetscape Facilities Table for details on facility standards. Public Service Street See the Streetscape Facilities Table for details on facility standards. Streetscape Standards Active Transportation SUP: 11-foot min Shoulder 4-foot unpaved Number of Lanes 2 Lane Widths 11 feet Open Drainage (Ditch)Variable Speed Limit (mph)24-45 Total R/W 80-100 feet Streetscape Standards Active Transportation Shared Space On Street Parking Not Required Number of Lanes No Markings Lane Widths N/A Utility Easement Variable Speed Limit (mph)15 Total R/W 24 feet WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Mobility and Transportation | Envision Dublin Community Plan 110 Off-Street Facilities STREET TYPES ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION TREE LAWN STREET TREES ON-STREET PARKING # OF LANES LANE WIDTH (FT)MEDIAN /TURN LANE RIGHT-OF-WAY (FT) Arterial Shared use path: 11' to 13’Required, 8’ Required with 8' tree lawn; low vegetative buffer with narrow tree lawn Not required, 9-feet min where used 4-5 11-12 Median width can vary when used; turn lane width: 10-11 feet 102-110 Commuter Boulevard Bike facilities on both sides. Two 11’ to 13’ shared use paths or 6’ protected bike lanes with 6' sidewalks, if protected bike lanes are acceptable Required, 8’ Required with 8' tree lawn; low vegetative buffer with narrow tree lawn Not required, 9’ min where used 2 to 4/5 10-11 Medians not required, but width can vary; turn lane width: 10-11 feet 80-100 Connector Boulevard Bike facilities on both sides. Two 11’ to 13’ shared use paths Required, 8’ Required with 8' tree lawn; low vegetative buffer with narrow tree lawn Not required, 9’ min where used 2 to 4/5 10-11 Medians not required, but width can vary; turn lane width: 10-11 feet 80-100 Neighborhood Boulevard Bike facility on minimum one side. Shared use paths 11' and sidewalks 6' wide Required, 8’Required with 8' tree lawn; low vegetative buffer with narrow tree lawn Not required 2 10-12 N/A 65 Shared Streets Maximum vehicle speeds 25 mph. Bikes share the street. Sidewalks 6’ on both side of the street Required, 8’ Required with 8' tree lawn; low vegetative buffer with narrow tree lawn One side min No markings N/A N/A 60 Streetscape Facilities Streetscape Facilities are summarized below except for streets in the OU Framework Plan, Historic District Design Guidelines, Bridge Street District Streetscape Character Guidelines, or the future Metro Place Revitalization guidelines. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 111 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation CORRIDOR CHARACTER One of the distinguishing qualities of Dublin is the visual experience created by physical elements that establish or reinforce the character of the surrounding environment. Previous transportation plans defined four Roadway Char- acters for major thoroughfares throughout Dublin. As the term Roadway Character evokes the auto-centric paradigm of the past, the term has been changed to Corridor Char- acter to better represent the holistic view inherent in the new transportation paradigm. The four Corridor Character categories are: Rural Character, River Character, Urban/ Village Character, and Traditional Dublin Character. These are defined below. Corridor Character is defined by the overall visual experience created by physical elements adjacent to the roadway. Character types vary greatly and can evoke a variety of responses that create an immediate psycholog- ical effect on motorists. These effects can persist to create long-lasting impressions for residents and visitors about the City and Dublin’s community values. Components that contribute to the definition of roadway character include: road design and construction standards; setbacks and buffering between adjacent uses; building types and architectural styles; landscaping within the right-of-way and adjacent areas, and the basic underlying geographic qualities of the area. As a development tool, the Community Plan identifies the desired roadway character of major thoroughfares throughout Dublin and the surrounding planning area. These designations assist in the preservation of existing character and guide future development and the long-term improvement of Dublin’s roadways. Some road corridors are particularly scenic and should be protected during zoning and development requests, while others should be targeted for enhancement as growth occurs. Preserving and creating road character begins by defining a vision for how a particular road should look and feel and continues by determining what elements are needed to carry out the vision. Dublin’s major thoroughfares generally include visual quality that falls within four major categories: Rural Character, River Character, Urban/Village Character and Traditional Dublin Character. Each category includes a description of the elements commonly present that contribute to specific roadway character type. Conclusions and Recommendations ■Consider visual impacts to the area as part of the design process. Corridor design should be sensitive to surrounding character and environment and should balance both community character and mobility. ■Allow lower travel efficiency to create a balance between many competing needs by recognizing that community character, sense of place, surrounding land uses, as well as the efficient movement of traffic are all important elements. This may result in slightly lower levels of service on certain roadways during peak periods but upholds the community value of preserving visual character. ■Consider alternative roadway design for unique site constraints. Wherever possible and practical, retain wooded areas in or near roadways and design road- ways to fit the surrounding topography. ■Assess and mitigate potential impacts of future trans- portation improvements and/or new construction on historic and environmentally-sensitive areas, as well as the visual appearance of the corridor. ■Provide adequate buffering and setbacks between improvements and historic or environmental areas to maintain their visual and physical integrity. ■Provide adequate landscaping such as planting areas, mounding, wall treatments or other design techniques to integrate transportation improvements into sensitive areas. ■Sensitively integrate stormwater management from transportation improvements and consider alternative techniques, where possible, to ensure the integrity of historic sites and environmentally sensitive areas are not compromised. ■Establish the Rural, River, Urban/Village, Traditional Dublin and Signature Corridor Character types with the definitions and design considerations detailed below. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation 112 Rural Character This character results from the cultural and historic use of the region for agricultural purposes. The roadways are typical of unincorporated areas or old township roads and are informal, evoking a sense of the past prior to develop- ment and include the following: ■Application of generous setbacks ranging from 100 to 200 feet. ■Integration of open views and vistas into adjacent development perhaps greater than 200 feet in some areas to increase the sense of openness. ■Provision of informal landscaping that focuses on native plant species and naturalized forms (meadows, wildflowers, grasses, wetland areas etc.). ■Use of trees, fencerows and woodland plantings to provide additional screening and sense of enclosure. ■Preservation of historic farmsteads, barns or outbuild- ings that emphasize the agrarian history of the area. ■Design of naturalized ponds with aquatic plants and informal edges. ■Integration of “rural” road design that may include berms, swales and/or variable medians. ■Provision of shared entrances to minimize curb cuts and maintain openness. River Character This character is primarily the result of natural processes on the land over the course of many years. The river corridor possesses dramatic topographical changes, is heavily wooded and includes the Scioto River and its tributaries. ■Use of modest setbacks ranging from 60 to 100 feet. ■Creation of roadway width and alignment to follow stream corridors or respond to existing natural features. ■Use of woodland plantings and incorporation of land- forms to create topographic change and shape views. ■Integration of stone walls and stone outcrops to provide ties to surrounding topography ■Use of stone walls and split rail fences that are tradi- tionally used in the countryside. ■Design of informal water features to blend with the surrounding character of the river corridor. ■Use of swales and berms instead of constructed curb and gutter for informal feel. ■Installation of informal landscape designs to enhance the natural appearance along the river corridor. ■Designs should be consistent with the Rapid 5 regional planning initiative. Traditional Dublin Character This character exemplifies the high-quality standards by which Dublin’s primary roadways have been designed, built and landscaped over the past several decades to provide a very formalized and maintained roadway. ■Use of 100-foot setbacks or equivalent to blend with surrounding developments. ■Design of curvilinear roads with landscaped medians and bike paths. ■Installation of formal, maintained landscape treat- ments. ■Focus on ponds and water features with maintained and/or hardscaped edges. ■Use of variable mounding with landscaping to screen uses along roadways. ■Primarily curb and gutter design but may include swales and berms. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 113 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation Urban/Village Character Streets are a community’s “front porch.” They are the city’s most common form of open space, providing important opportunities for entertainment, recreation, and gathering. In Historic Dublin, the Bridge Street District, and more densely developed areas, streets serve as public gathering places and venues for commercial activity. Streets charac- terized as urban safely accommodate bicyclists and pedes- trians to encourage non-motorized forms of travel; the scale is highly pedestrian with cars and people sharing limited space. The urban street character is based on traditional village and modern mixed use development patterns that include grid street networks with regularly spaced blocks framed by richly detailed architecture. ■Apply street designs that are sensitive to the surrounding land uses and development context. ■Creation of grid-like street pattern to enhance ability to walk to destinations using multiple routes. ■Include on-street parking to provide a physical and psychological buffer between travel lanes and sidewalks reducing the perceived travel lane widths for vehicles and making pedestrians feel safer on the sidewalks. ■Are designed with off-street parking to the side and rear of building. ■Integration of service alleys and rear garage access to improve pedestrian character of streets. ■Provide transit facilities and sidewalk curb extensions at bus stops. ■Provide smaller building setbacks ranging from 0-25 feet to enhance the relationship between buildings and the streetscape; setback areas may be designed as an extension of the streetscape, landscape areas, or patios, as appropriate to the development. ■Are framed by buildings designed with ground story transparency (i.e., windows), main entrances connected to sidewalks, and a high degree of architec- tural detailing to create an inviting, pedestrian-friendly experience. ■Contain pedestrian-scaled street lighting in addition to roadway lighting. ■Includes street trees and planting zones to buffer pedestrians from traffic, provide shade and visually soften hardscape areas. ■Use small parks, plazas, patios, and public spaces to provide character along the streetscape and reinforce the street’s role as a gathering space as well as a trans- portation route. ■Provide pedestrian amenities such as seating, news racks, recycling bins, water fountains, outdoor cafes, retail displays, appropriately scaled signs and public art. ■Integrate sustainable stormwater management within the streetscape using curb inlets, bioretention swales, tree and planter boxes, and permeable pavements, and ■Are framed by low masonry ‘street walls,’ wrought iron fences, hedges, picket fences and gates, arbors or similar elements as appropriate to the village or urban setting, to add detailing and to help define the street’s public realm where buildings are not immediately adjacent to the sidewalk (such as along parking areas). Corridors of Significance In addition to a primary character designations, select corridors are designated as Corridors of Significance to accentuate the corridor’s unique characteristics. The Corridors of Significance are Commuter Boulevards and arterials, represented by certain visual enhancements, or other significant characteristics, to signify the corridor is unique amplifying the identified character to visitors and residents. The Corridor Character map identifies recom- mended Corridors of Significance in Dublin. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Mobility and Transportation | Envision Dublin Community Plan 114 ] [] [] [ ] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [SciotoRiverEMERALDPKWYWESTBU R Y D R BRAND RDCONCORD RDAVERY RDWOERNER TEMPLE R D TARA HILL DR S E L L S M ILLDRINNOVATION DR S H I E R R I N G S R D BRAND RD R I N G S R D MARTIN RD D U B L I N S HIRE DR RIVERSIDE DRDUBLINCENTERDRMONTEREYDRCOFFMANRDDALEDRCARNOU STIEDRBALLANTRAE PL GLICK R D E M ER A L D P KW Y COSGRAY RDP O ST RD POST RDSWICKARD CT DUBLIN RDDUBLINRDBRIGHT RD S HIGH STTULLYMORE DRM E M O R IA LD R W YN F O R D D R WILCOX RDBRANDONWAY DR RINGS RD BROCK RD W B RIDG E ST E A R LINGTON PK W YJEROME RDPRIMROSE CT EMMET ROW LN PERIMETER DR TULLER RD B R I T TONPKWYMUIRFIELDDRFRANTZRDHAYDEN R U N BL V D WELDON RDMCKITRICK RD TONTI D R M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERYRD W Y A N D O T T E WOOD SBLVD C H U R C H M A N R D BLAZERPKWYCOSGRAY RDTUTTLE RDHERITAGE DRMUIRFIELD DR METRO PL N HARD RDHYLAND-CROYRDEIT E R M A N R D RAUS C H D R ESTAT E S C T A S H F O R D RDBROCKRD 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Context Layers Railroad City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River Character River Character Rural Character Traditional Dublin Character Urban/Village Character Corridor of Significance PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS CORRIDOR CHARACTER WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 115 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation MULTIMODAL THOROUGHFARE PLAN A multimodal thoroughfare plan is critical for a commu- nity as it ensures efficient and sustainable transportation options for its residents. By incorporating various modes of transportation such as walking, cycling, public transit, and private vehicles, this plan addresses the diverse needs of the community while reducing traffic congestion and environmental impacts. This includes proper mainte- nance and preservation of existing facilities to protect and promote Dublin’s current transportation assets. Additionally, a well-designed multimodal plan promotes accessibility, safety, and equity by providing alternative routes and transportation choices for people of all ages and abilities. This approach not only enhances mobility but also fosters economic development by improving connectivity between residential areas, commercial centers, and recreational spaces, ultimately creating a more livable and vibrant community for everyone. These results are magnified when transportation choices connect with regional networks beyond Dublin’s borders. For thoroughfare planning and design purposes, roads are generally classified by function and have two purposes: to provide mobility and to provide access to property. Near I-270 and US 33, the context of the roadway is the efficient movement of vehicles to and from the freeway. In other areas of Dublin, however, flipping the paradigm means the number of vehicle lanes should be more influenced by the safety of VRUs and the context of the street, meaning adja- cent land use and vehicle speed limits. In the Bridge Street District, a slightly different functional classification system has been defined, recognizing families of streets that share common characteristics versus mobility and access to properties. While the map below presents functional classifications for existing and proposed future multimodal corridors, a comprehensive table including attributes of every street in Dublin may be found in the Appendix along with cost estimates for future transportation improvements as outlined in this plan. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Mobility and Transportation | Envision Dublin Community Plan 116 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ■Prioritize the safety of Vulnerable Road Users (VRUs) using context sensitive design approach to improve how vehicles interact with all roadway users. □Minimize intersection widths to reduce crossing distances for VRUs. The preferred solution for intersec- tion control on Commuter Boulevards, Connector Boulevards, and Neighborhood Boulevards is a single lane roundabout. □The maximum desirable roadway footprint for Dublin is a four/five lane divided roadway with smaller radius returns and shorter crossings at intersections to benefit safety of VRUs. □Minimize adverse roadway impacts in sensitive areas by balancing roadway design with community char- acter, setting, and aesthetics. □Preserve existing facilities with proper maintenance and minor upgrades where appropriate, before building new facilities. ■Build upon the US 33 Smart Mobility Corridor by planning for additional innovative mobility options and transportation technologies. ■Work cooperatively with surrounding jurisdictions to coordinate regional transportation planning and programming. □Continue modeling efforts into the future to monitor land use and transportation needs and evaluate the impact of potential changes to the adopted Future Land Use Map and Multimodal Thoroughfare Plan. ■Coordinate with development to obtain transportation improvements that mitigate associated transporta- tion and fiscal impacts through established funding methods in the capital budget process. □Require multiple connection points within new devel- opments and to the surrounding area by providing multiple links to adjacent roadways to establish greater travel options for residents. □Require internal connections through cross-access easements between residential and non-residential developments to minimize traffic on adjacent corridors. □Discourage cul-de-sacs when loop streets and other site layouts or configurations can be provided to enhance street connections and route choices to evenly disperse traffic on the transportation network. □Extend existing street stubs in conjunction with adja- cent development to benefit the larger transportation system by providing better access and walkability for residents within those neighborhoods. □Address existing deficiencies and future needs and ensure that private developments address trans- portation impacts by contributing their fair share of transportation costs, according to the Multimodal Thoroughfare Plan, particularly for major transporta- tion improvements such as bridges and underpasses. Proportional costs should be based on studies acceptable to the City. □Consider City participation in transportation improve- ments when the project or development contributes to greater community-wide objectives across all modes. □Require Traffic Impact Studies for all developments to identify the impacts and improvements associated with the proposed development relative to the Multimodal Thoroughfare Plan. Studies will align with the City’s transportation priorities and determine the magnitude of transportation improvements required to accommo- date the proposed development. □Studies for proposed development will include an evaluation of connectivity for active and multimodal transportation and transit facilities, comparison of the planned development with the land-uses and trip generation included within the Dublin Travel Demand Model, as well as the portion of the Multimodal Thoroughfare Plan for which the proposed develop- ment is to be responsible, including, but not limited to adjacent corridor improvements, shared use path and sidewalk connections, transit amenities, turn lanes, driveway spacing and locations, etc. For vehic- ular traffic, a study will outline the number of hours per day that a demand to capacity ratio exceeds the roadway capacity (d/c > 1.0). WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 117 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Mobility and Transportation SciotoRiverBROCK RD 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 160160160160112 80 60116 116 125 60 11211211211260 8060112 100 70606060 80808080808060 60 60100100707080808080 80 180 180 606080100 7560 1008012012012060102 120120124100100120120100 112 10060 60 100100 100124100 60 100 80 72 65 7010 0 10 0 1 0 0 100100100110150100100100 100100 102102 1026030 70100 100 10080 100100140 10060 60 80 80 7080 8080 100 13680110 1028065100100124 70608080808080 120120180 180180 65 3018080 80100 10080656510080808080 808080 80 80 42 D U BLIN SHIRED R GLICK R D DUBLIN RDEARLINGTON PKY ME M ORIA L D R TARAHILLDR MONTEREYDRTULLY MOREDRW BRIDGE S T WOERNER TEMPLE RD HARDRD FRANTZRD BRAND RD MUIRFIELDDRCOFFMAN RDRIVERSIDE DRPE R I M ETERDR SAWMILL RDPOST RD WILCOX RDVI LLAG EPKYTUTTLE RD B R I TTONPKYSUMMIT VIEW RD IN D U S T R I A L P K Y EI TERMANRDJEROMERDDALE DRRINGS RD EMERAL D P K W Y NEWSTREET1NEW STREET 6HYLAND-CROYRDTULLER RD TUTTLE CROSSING BLVD S H I ER -R I NGS RDAVERY RDU NIV ERSITYBLVD N E W STREET 3COSGRAY RDNEW S T REET 4 NEW STREET 5 WARNE R R D CEMET E RY P K BLAZER PKWY NEW ST R EET 2 I AM S RD HOUCHA RDRDAMITY PIKE HAYD E N R U N R D 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Context Layers Heritage Rail Trail Railroad City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary Planned Signature Trail Multimodal Street Classification Arterial Commuter Boulevard Planned Commuter Boulevard Connector Boulevard Planned Connector Boulevard Neighborhood Boulevard Planned Neighborhood Boulevard Corridor Connector Planned Corridor Connector District Connector Planned District Connector Shared Use Path (Wider) MULTIMODAL THOROUGHFARE PLAN SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS 100 = Planned Right-of-Way Width (feet) 80 100 100 8 0 80 80 808 0 70 606060601008080 60 70 80100 60100 8080 80 80 70 80 60 8 0 Note: See Multimodal Thoroughfare Plan Table in Appendix for Details WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Mobility and Transportation | Envision Dublin Community Plan 118 08Purpose The Community Facilities and Services chapter focuses on how facilities and services impact the overall quality of life for residents, businesses, and visitors. Facilities and services related to education, emergency services, parks and recreation, and much more are addressed, including City-managed facilities and facilities and services provided by other public entities. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 119 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Community Facilities and Services As Dublin continues to attract new residents, the demand for high-quality community services and facilities will continue to grow. While excellent municipal services support a predictable operating environment for busi- nesses, municipal infrastructure such as public art, parks, community gateways, public gathering spaces, and street design help shape how residents experience their commu- nity. As the needs and desires of residents change over time, the City should plan for increases in service demands as well as the community’s expectation for the provision of new amenities. The Community Facilities and Services chapter recognizes the importance of community amenities and City services. It provides recommendations for practical actions the City can take to ensure that all parts of Dublin have access to quality facilities and services that sustain and enhance quality of life and support future development aims. As Dublin changes, it is vital that facilities and services keep up with demand to provide a quality living environment for all residents. COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES08 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Community Facilities and Services 120 Goal and Objectives for Community Facilities and Services ENSURE ALL AREAS OF THE COMMUNITY HAVE ACCESS TO QUALITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES THAT ENRICH THE QUALITY OF LIFE AND ACCOUNT FOR FUTURE GROWTH OBJECTIVES. ■Maintain a high level of standard for Dublin’s services. ■Provide needed facilities and enhance access to serve the population and to promote a high quality of life. ■Provide a variety of recreational and open space facilities for all residents. ■Consider Dublin’s place within the region for parkland and open space. ■Building on the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, expand the parks system as development occurs, and coordinate with regional partners, to ensure future neighborhoods have access to high-quality parks. ■Ensure greenways and public open space are established and preserved as the City grows. ■Coordinate with school districts to maintain excellence in the public education system. ■Continue to maintain neighborhood safety through community policing and a proactive and engaged police force. ■Coordinate with Washington Township to ensure emergency services and facilities continue to meet the community’s needs. ■Support culture and public art. ■Preserve the Historic District and protect other historic resources in outlying areas in and beyond Dublin’s corporate boundaries. ■Ensure the preservation of archeological resources. ■Identify and protect valuable viewsheds and vistas as an important part of Dublin’s overall aesthetic. ■Incorporate sustainability best practices in community facilities and services where appropriate. The goal and objective of the Community Facilities and Services Chapter were developed in response to what we heard from the community, an analysis of existing conditions, and a review of relevant past planning efforts. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 121 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Community Facilities and Services Most Sustainable. By anticipating growth in the years to come and planning accordingly with respective service providers, Dublin is continuing its commitment to being a leader in sustainability. Ensuring the efficient and equitable distribution of new and expanded facilities and services upholds Dublin’s reputation as a city that delivers world class and efficient services to its residents, business, and visitors. Most Connected. Through innovation, conscientiousness, and forward thinking, Dublin is preparing to address the current and future needs of the community in terms of education, culture, recreation, and health services. The increased exposure to arts, parks, and culture can create a more cohesive community where residents can feel more connected and engaged. Most Resilient. Planning for increased municipal and support services aids in creating a community that prides itself as the safest place to live and is prepared to withstand and quickly recover from any crisis. Additionally, robust, reliable, and responsive facilities and services provide the foundation for a stable local envi- ronment for business and residents to thrive and be better prepared for any future uncertainty. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Community Facilities and Services | Envision Dublin Community Plan 122 PUBLIC SERVICES Public services enhance the quality of life and contribute to the overall well-being of both residents and businesses. These include government services such as public works, police and fire, and utilities. It also includes services provided by outside agencies such as education services and access to healthcare. Maintaining and improving these services is vital to sustaining and enriching the lives of those in the community, demonstrating the City’s commitment to progress and prosperity. Dublin can take the following action to achieve its objective of providing excellent, reliable public services. CONTINUE TO PROVIDE HIGH- QUALITY SERVICES The City is committed to delivering high-quality, up-to-date public services to its residents to enhance efficiency and safety. Dublin provides many public services including roadway maintenance, parks and recreation, water and sewer utilities, and public safety. Collectively, these services ensure a well-maintained, safe community. As the City grows, meeting the standards of public services is crucial, guaranteeing that growth does not undermine the community’s security and appeal. Through long-term planning and close coordination with providers, Dublin can facilitate efficient and equitable distribution of quality facilities and services. Space Needs and Facility Programming Dublin operates seven major public buildings that house City staff and services. The principal administrative location is City Hall. Other include the Justice Center, Development Building, Dublin Community Recreation Center, Fleet Main- tenance Center, Dublin Service Center, and Dublin Arts Center. The City maintains other smaller facilities in addition to those described above. The City also owns the Dublin Chamber of Commerce and a variety of historic barns and small storage facilities throughout the City to enhance preservation efforts and to provide more efficient service to Dublin’s neighborhoods. In 2006, the City of Dublin conducted a Space Needs/ Facility Programming Analysis to evaluate the office space needs of its departments and the architectural integrity of City buildings. Though this study was intended to identify short-term recommendations to house City employees until a future municipal building could be constructed and is now past its useful life, it is detailed and provided an in-depth analysis of City facilities. Although the analysis was updated in 2013, the City should continue to monitor the needs of its facilities and consider conducting a similar study, should the need arise. Commitment to Sustainability Dublin has taken significant strides towards sustainability, exemplified by the City’s adoption of a Green Fleet policy aimed at reducing fuel consumption and vehicle emissions. This policy not only underscores the City’s dedication to preserving and enhancing the local environment but also positions Dublin as a leader in mitigating vehicle emissions. Such efforts have earned Dublin recognition as a Top 50 US Government Green Fleet, a testament to the City’s commit- ment to sustainability across various parameters including fleet composition, fuel efficiency, and policy implementation. Additionally, sustainability initiatives like retrofitting City facilities with energy-efficient materials and LED fixtures, as outlined in the 2018-2020 Dublin Strategic Framework, showcase the City’s proactive approach towards environ- mental stewardship. Building upon these achievements, the City should continue to set the standard among munic- ipalities within the region by demonstrating its ongoing commitment to sustainability. ENSURE ACCESS TO HEALTH FACILITIES Dublin has a robust healthcare system. Residents enjoy access to a range of medical services and facilities. The City is home to several hospitals including The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, OhioHealth Dublin Methodist Hospital, and Mount Carmel Dublin. Additionally, there are medical centers, clinics, and specialty practices, providing comprehensive healthcare services to residents and surrounding communities. As the City grows, there will be additional need for health services. There will also be an additional need to create awareness of available services, as programs are often underutilized. In the future, the City and private organi- zations should work to coordinate efforts to inform and educate the community and ensure equitable access for Dublin’s residents. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 123 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Community Facilities and Services COSGRAYRDW ESTBU RYDRBRAND RD AVERY RDW OERNER TEMPL E RD TAR A HIL L DR SEL L S M ILLDRINNOVAT IO N DR S H I E R R I N G S R D R I N G S R D MARTIN RD D U B LIN S HIRED R RIVERSIDED R M O N TEREYDRCOFFMANRDCARNOU S TIEDRB A L L A N T R AEPL GLICK R D EM ER A L D PKWY POST RD SWICKARD CT DUBLI NRDDUBLINRDBRIGHT R D S HIGH STT U LLYMORE DR M EM O RIALD R W Y NFO R D DRH A Y D E N RU N B L V D WILCOX RDB RAN D ONWAY D R RINGS R D W BR I DGE S TEARLING TON PKWYJEROM E RD VILLAGEP K WYPRIMROSE CT EMMET ROW LN P E RIMET ER DR TULLER RD BRIT T O NPKWYMUIRFIELDDRF RANTZRD WELDON R D MCKITRICK RD TONTI DR M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDW Y A N D O T T E WOO DSBLVD C H U R C H M A N R D BLAZERPKWYCOSGRAY RDT U T T L E R DHERITAGE DRMUIRFIELDDRM ETROPL N HARD RDHYLAND-CROYRDEIT E R MA N RDRAUSCH D R E STA TESCTA SH F O R D RD BROCK R D 745 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 270SciotoRiverN orthFork I n dianRun S o uth ForkIn dian Run COMMUNITY FACILITIES 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Context Layers River Parks and Open Space City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary Fire Services Police Government Library School (K-12) Higher Education Hospital or Medical GLACIER RIDGE METRO PARK AVERY PARK DARREE FIELDS HERITAGE TRAIL PARK PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Community Facilities and Services | Envision Dublin Community Plan 124 MONITOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS NEEDS School districts can have a significant impact on where resi- dents choose to live, spurring development potential, and the desirability of different locales within a community. Addi- tionally, providing quality education is critical for professional preparedness, economic mobility, and self-efficiency. Dublin has become a destination, in part due to the quality of its school systems. Currently, a majority of the City is served by the Dublin City Schools, while a significant part of southwest Dublin lies within the Hilliard School District. There are also portions of the planning area within the Jonathan Alder District, and Columbus School District. In addition to public schools, Dublin-area residents have additional private and public education alternatives. The City is host to a wide variety of non-religious and religious-affil- iated facilities and institutions ranging from preschool and early learning to middle school ages. The City also has a library, the Columbus Metropolitan Library, which operates a branch in Historic Dublin. As Dublin’s population grows, the City should collaborate and plan with the library and school districts to ensure that facilities and services can meet the educational needs of the community and accommodated new residents. New Development and School Capacity Throughout the engagement process, many residents discussed the school system and how it will continue to be integral to the City prosperity in the future. The quality of Dublin’s schools is well known throughout the Columbus region, and participation in public engagement activities emphasized that the quality education system is a top priority for residents and a crucial element of Dublin’s identity. As the housing stock has grown to accommodate demand, the pressure on the school systems has also grown. With existing schools at capacity and plans to build new ones, the need for proactive coordination between the City and school districts is a key consideration to position the community for long-term growth and success. Additionally, Dublin and Hillard City Schools are conducting a capacity needs assessment to ensure that future planning and development align. By continuing a coordinated approach, new neighborhoods can be developed alongside new educational facilities as needed, thereby sustaining a high quality of life and educational standards. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 125 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Community Facilities and Services SciotoRiverS ou th ForkIndia nRun CHURCH M A N R D EMERALDP K W YCONCORD RDAVERYRDWOERNER TEMPLER D TARA HILLDR INNO V A T IONDR S H I E R R I N G S RD BRAND RD MARTIN RDRIVERSIDEDR DUBLINCENTERDRM O N T EREYDRDALEDRCARN O USTIEDRBALL ANTRAEPLPOST RD POSTRDDUBLI NRDDUBLINRDBRIGHT R D S HIGH STTU LLY M OREDR ME M O RIA L D R WYNFO RDD R H A Y D E NR U N B L V D WILCOX RDBRANDON WAY D R RINGS RD EARLINGTON PKWYJEROMERD VILLAGE PKWYPE R I M ETER D R R I N G S R D TULLER RD BRIT T ONPKWYBRAND RD M UIRFIEL D DRF RANTZR D WELDO N R D TO NTIDRMCKITRICK RD M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDBLAZERPKWYCOSGRAYRDEITERMANRDHERITAGE DRMETRO PL N HARD RDHYLAND-CROYRDRAUS C H D R E S T A T ESCTA S H F ORD R D B R O C K R D 161 257 257 745 161 33 33 270 EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES 0 0.5 10.25 Miles PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS Context Layers City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River School Type PreSchool Elementary School Middle School High School School District Jonathan Alder Local School District Hilliard City School District Dublin City School District Columbus City School District WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Community Facilities and Services | Envision Dublin Community Plan 126 FIBER TO RESIDENTIAL HOMES This project will ensure residents have access to a variety of internet service providers in a competitive landscape that will drive higher internet speeds, lower costs and better customer service. Fiber connectivity is critical not just for communication, online services, entertainment, education and healthcare, but also for home-based businesses and remote workers. As an economic driver for businesses and their workforces, fiber connectivity is becoming a key criterion for site selection and investment. As an economic driver for businesses and their workforces, fiber connectivity is a key criterion for site selection and investment. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS To maintain the quality of government and administra- tive services within Dublin, the City should consider the following recommendations. ■Identify desirable sites for facilities as the City grows and develops, to ensure that municipal buildings and facilities can be established in suitable locations that will best serve the community’s future needs. ■Reevaluate existing facilities functionally and spatially to ensure that public facilities meet the intended need. ■Acknowledge population changes and ensure that Dublin’s facilities and programs reflect changing demographics and needs as the City’s population ages, grows, and diversifies. ■Adopt financing plans and funding for community facil- ities that will accommodate the construction of future municipal facilities in a timely and efficient manner. ■Use space effectively to provide the greatest level of service from existing and future public facilities, including the combination of multiple services in one area to provide the most convenient public access and greatest community benefit. ■Continue to maintain and update the City’s Emergency Operations Plan as necessary. ■Ensure the placement and construction of future facilities is adequately coordinated and planned in a manner that will ensure future needs are met. ■Continue to maintain and update the City’s Green Fleet Plan as necessary. ■Continue to assess the anticipated workload of the Dublin Police Department in relation to population trends and update the Department’s 2018 Multi-Year Strategic Plan as necessary. To increase the efficiency and effectiveness of feedback between Dublin and educational institutions, the City should consider the following recommendations. ■Collaborate with community members to address the evolving needs of the population, creating an inclusive and responsive educational system. ■Make necessary infrastructure improvements to ensure schools and other facilities are highly accessible by transit, walking, and biking from all neighborhoods. ■Continue to work with school districts and other educational entities to provide support as they seek new facility locations or expansion. ■Encourage school partnerships with the business community to provide opportunities for education and training. ■Consider cooperative partnerships between the City, the library district, and other strategic partners as a means to enhance service to Dublin residents. Explore opportunities to co-locate other civic and institutional uses with library facilities. To maintain residents access to healthcare facilities, the City should consider the following recommendations. ■Collaborate with regional healthcare organizations and agencies to monitor health issues and develop policies, services, and environmental improvements to address them. ■Invest in healthcare workforce development by supporting medical education programs, facilitating training opportunities, and offering scholarships within the community. ■Enhance wayfinding to medical treatment centers and urgent care facilities in a manner that will provide for the safe and consistent treatment of all Dublin residents and visitors. ■Foster better communication between Dublin’s various organizations and the general public to enhance awareness and utilization of available services. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 127 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Community Facilities and Services HISTORIC AND CULTURAL ASSETS Dublin’s historic resources make the City distinct and contribute significantly to its character. They enhance the community’s sense of place, stimulate the local economy, and create opportunities for civic activities. Additionally, arts and culture bring life to the City, promote its rich heritage, and contribute to community vibrancy, acting as an engine for economic activity and development. The following section provides recommendations on how Dublin should continue to promote its historic assets, public art, and cultural amenities. PROTECT HISTORIC SITES Historic resources provide important insight into the lives of earlier generations and helps residents and visitors under- stand the Dublin of today. Historic structures still standing in Dublin present evidence of daily life, as well as preserve information about construction techniques and architec- tural styles spanning several periods of history – the oldest dating back to the early 1820s. One of Dublin beautiful attractions, Historic Dublin, is a well-preserved designated historic area that reflects Dublin’s rich history and cultural significance. The many physical remnants present in Dublin, dating back over two centuries, provide a sense of the community’s agricultural history and the typical Ohio village character of the 19th and early 20th centuries. Ongoing preservation efforts, spearheaded by the Archi- tectural Review Board since 1970, have been guided by a 2016 Historic and Cultural Assessment identifying over 900 relevant historical and cultural resources in Dublin. Notably, the award-winning updates to the Historic District Code and Guidelines in 2022 further enhance preservation initiatives. Redevelopment and revitalization will continue to occur in Historic Dublin, and pressure from development will begin to encroach on outlying historic farmsteads. It will be important to ensure that the quality of Historic Dublin and the rich historic character of the Dublin area be maintained and enhanced for future generations as new growth and development is considered. SUPPORT COMMUNITY ART AND CULTURE Public art throughout Dublin adds significantly to the community’s character, identity, and sense of place, enhancing community life for residents and visitors. The City should continue its commitment to public art and seek opportunities for new installations. The City should work with key stakeholders to identify potential locations for local public art, and work with partners to fund the development and installation of vetted pieces. Dublin has a history of embracing and celebrating its heritage and culture, and public art is a key part of that identity. The City should continue to work with local cultural institutions that promote public art, local artists, exhibitions, and the overall arts culture. Cultural institutions working cooperatively with the City and other stakeholders, provide positive economic impact and reinforce a rich cultural environment that attracts visitors and enriches the daily lives of residents. These institutions help maintain and define the City’s heritage and identity by supporting the community’s commitment to arts and culture. Dublin Arts Council The Dublin Art Council’s (DAC) mission statement is to engage the community, cultivate creativity, and foster life- long learning through the arts. The Council was founded in 1983 and has continued to champion the arts in Dublin over the decades. The Council has established several programs including the Art in Public Spaces projects, Visual Arts series, and DAC Sundays at Scioto concert series. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ■Encourage appropriate development practices that are sensitive to known areas and sites of historic impor- tance and significance. ■Acquire properties or options for known sites to preserve and maintain the quality of significant histor- ical locations. ■Consider additional study of sites that could warrant nomination to the National Register of Historic Places. ■Explore federal and state grants and other assistance for property owners to create a better balance between preservation and the feasible utilization of structures. ■Provide municipal support for the Dublin Historical Society as an important public institution through finan- cial and promotional support or other available means. ■Encourage public and private art within Historic Dublin to provide information and to create ties to the past that will improve the public value of preservation efforts. ■Continue to preserve historic stone walls to safeguard Dublin’s agricultural past. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Community Facilities and Services | Envision Dublin Community Plan 128 PARKS AND RECREATION At an Envision Dublin public event in April of 2023, partici- pants were asked to describe what word, phase, or place(s) they most identify with Dublin. “Parks and Green Space” was the most selected choice by a significant margin. Results from the Envision Dublin Community Survey also showed “Parks and Open Space” ranked in the top five of Dublin’s most desirable attributes. Also, within the survey, respondents were prompted to select “currently strong”, “needs improvement”, or “neutral” when considering Dublin’s existing parks and recreation. “Currently strong” was the most selected answer for areas which included: ■Neighborhood parks ■Community parks ■Playgrounds ■Sports fields and courts ■Recreation programs ■Accessibility of parks and recreation ■Open space and natural areas ■Environmental features such as rivers, forests, or unique topography ■Proximity and access to regional open space such as preserves and state parks ■The amount of trees in the City ■The community’s efforts toward sustainability It is clear that Dublin’s parks and recreation amenities are a source of immense pride and a great sense of identity for the community. The access to parks and recreation play a crucial role in enhancing the quality of life in the community by promoting environmental sustainability, supporting physical and mental well-being, and contrib- uting to the community’s overall livability. To meet the demand of the growing community, it is vital to actively plan to enhance the level of service and accessibility to parks and recreation amenities. IMPLEMENT PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN Dublin has 64 parks encompassing 1,522 acres of green space. These parks include 49 fishing ponds, 57 play- grounds, eight pickleball courts, and two outdoor aquatic facilities. In 2023, the City adopted the Parks and Recre- ation Master Plan (PRMP) that serves as a framework for the planning, development, and rehabilitation and mainte- nance of Dublin’s parks, open spaces, recreation facilities and programming. The PRMP provides detailed recom- mendation related to the improvement of City’s parks and recreation amenities. Recommendations found within the PRMP that are tied to future growth and development with the City have been highlighted within this chapter to provide consistency and convey a unified vision for parks and recreation improvements across planning efforts. The City should continue to use the PRMP as a guiding document and implement recommendations found within the Plan. EXPAND PARKS, RECREATION, AND OPEN SPACE OPTIONS Parks and open spaces play a crucial role in enhancing the quality of life in a community by providing a counter- balance to the built environment, promoting environmental sustainability, supporting physical and mental well-being, and contributing to the overall livability of a place. Dublin has garnered a reputation for its recreational options, often being cited as vital to the City’s core identity. As part of the PRMP, a level of service analysis was conducted based on National Recreation and Parks Associ- ation (NRPA) standards. The analysis identified a need for additional neighborhood parks, community parks, basket- ball courts, pickle ball courts, dog parks, and splash pads based on the current population as well as the projected 2032 population. Additionally, the analysis marked outdoor pools, indoor creation and aquatic space, and special use facilities as high priorities. The City should continue existing efforts to expand access to parks, recreation, and open space amenities and programs. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 129 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Community Facilities and Services SciotoRiverNort h Fork In d ianRun South Fork IndianRun CHU R C H M A N R D BRANDRDCONCORD RDAVERYRDWOERNERTEMPLE RD TARAHILLDR INNOVA T IO NDR S H I E R R I N G S RD R I N G S R D MARTIN RDRIVERSIDEDR DUBLINCENTERDRM ONTEREYDRCOFFMANRDDALEDRCAR N OUSTIEDRBALLA N T RAEPL GLICK RD E M E R A LD PKWY COSGRAYRDPOST RD POSTRDDUBLINRDDUBLINRDBRIGHT R D S HIGH STTULLYM OREDR ME M O RIAL D R WY NFOR D DR H A Y D ENR U N B LV D WILCOX RDBRA N DO N WAYDR RINGS RD W BRID G E S TEARLINGTONPKWYJEROMERD VILLAGE PKWYP E R I METER DR TULLER RD BLAZERPKWYM UIRFIEL D DRF RANTZ RD WELDO N R D TONTI DR MCKITRICK RD M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDCOSGRAY RDEI T ERMANRDT U T T L E R DHERITAGE DRB R I T T ONPKWYMETRO PL N HARD RDHYLAND-CROYRDRAUSCH D R E S T A TESCTA S H F ORD R D B R O C K R D 745 161 257 257 745 161 33 33 270 270 PARKS AND RECREATION 0 0.5 10.25 Miles PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS Context Layers City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River Parks and Open Space Parks and Open Space Recreation Facility (Public or Private); Golf Course Existing Parks Residential Service Area 10-Minute Walkshed from Park Outside a Park Walkshed WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Community Facilities and Services | Envision Dublin Community Plan 130 IMPROVE GREENWAYS AND TRAILS Like sidewalks and shareed use paths, bikeways, green- ways, and trails contribute significantly towards mobility for active transportation within Dublin. According to the Parks and Recreation Master Plan, green- ways and trails are recognized for their ability to connect people and place and often include either paved or natural trails, and can include looped trails within parks. Linking neighborhoods, parks, recreation facilities, attractions, and natural areas with a multi-use trail can help protect natural areas along a river and/or open space areas and provide people with a way to access and enjoy the natural areas. Shared use trails also offer a safe, alternative form of trans- portation, and provide substantial health benefits, habitat enhancements for plants and wildlife, and unique opportu- nities for outdoor education and cultural interpretation. Dublin is home to a high-quality trail system with more than 150 miles of trails, 98% of which are paved. This means there are 3.08 miles of trails per 1000 residents, far surpassing peer communities in the Columbus area. In coordination with the CIP, the City should continue to expand its bikeway, greenway, and trail network across the community. This may require future acquisition of land or easements to construct publicly accessible routes. The expanded network should also be marketed as a tourism asset to draw visitors to the community. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ■Review the PRMP’s Priority Investment Rating Analysis to inform updates to existing parks and facilities, making spaces as multifunctional in design, as possible. ■Explore opportunities to provide recreational amenities in commercial districts to serve employees. These amenities could provide alternate space for meetings and remote work, areas for rest or fitness breaks and mental health benefits, and at-work window sightlines to nature. ■Continue to connect parks through non-motorized infrastructure to ensure all residents can access parks. ■Utilize parkland to counter urban heat as well as improve citywide stormwater management. ■Prioritize strategic land acquisition to facilitate future park development. This includes identifying areas with growing parks and recreation needs, as well as compiling an inventory of potential properties capable of accommodating these requirements. ■Identify new dedicated funding options for develop- ment or enhancement of parks, recreation facilities and program services. ■Prioritize neighborhoods that lack trail access for future infrastructure investments. Greater priority should be given to low-income neighborhoods. ■Implement traffic calming design strategies around parks through design elements such as raised cross- walks, speed tables, and proper signage. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 131 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Community Facilities and Services EMERALDP K W YCOSGRAYRDWESTBURYDRBRANDRD AVERY RDWOERNER TEMPL E RD TAR A HILL DR SE L L S M IL LDRINNOVA T IO N DR S H I E R R I N G S R D R I N G S R D MARTIN RD D U B LIN SHIRED R RIVERSIDED R M O NTEREYDRCOFFMANRDDALEDRCARNOU S TIEDRBA L L A N T RAEPL GLICK R D E M E R A L D PKWY POST RD SWICKARD CT DUBLI NRDDUBLINRDBRIGHT R D S HIGH STT U L L YMOREDR M E M O RIALD R W Y NFOR D DRH A Y D E NRU N B L V D WILCOX RDB RA N D ONWAY D R RINGS RD W B RIDGE STEARLING TON PKWYJEROME RD VILLAGEP K WYPRIMROSE CT EMMET ROW LN P E RIMET E R DR TULLER RD BRITT ONPKWYMUIRFIELDDRF RANTZRD WELDON R D MCKITRICK RD TONTI DR M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDW Y A N D O TT E WOOD SBLVD C H U R C H M A N R D BLAZERPKWYCOSGRAY RDT U T T L E R DHERITAGE DRMUIRFIELDDRM ETRO PL N HAR D RDHYLAND-CROYRDEIT E R M A N R DRAUSC H D R E S TA TESCTA S H F O R D RD BROCK R D 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270SciotoRiverNorth Fork India n Run S ou th ForkIndia nRun TRAILS AND GREENWAYS 0 0.5 10.25 Miles PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS Context Layers City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River Pedestrian Trails Bike Path Other Bikeway Parks and Open Space Planned Signature Trail Heritage Rail Trail Emerald Trail WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Community Facilities and Services | Envision Dublin Community Plan 132 09Purpose The Utilities chapter details Dublin water and sanitary sewer utility infra- structure and describes water and sanitary sewer utility infrastructure capacity analysis efforts. This chapter also provides recommendations for how Dublin can guarantee the safe and efficient delivery of high quality potable water and sound management and treatment of wastewater and stormwater to ensure public health and safety and support its other devel- opment objectives. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 133 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities Principles relating to utilities established as part of previous Community Plan updates are still valid today. The City of Dublin models and analyzes existing utility infrastructure to determine available capacity and capacity limitations. The City strives to provide services in a safe, efficient, and fiscally responsible manner. As the City continues to age, infrastructure installed in the early stages of Dublin’s growth will require more preven- tative maintenance and improvements. Funding will be necessary for this maintenance effort to uphold the level of services currently provided. UTILITIES09 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities 134 Goal and Objectives for Utilities TO PROVIDE HIGH QUALITY UTILITY SERVICES IN A SAFE, EFFICIENT, AND FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE MANNER. ■Provide for the safe and efficient delivery of high quality potable water to the community for consumption and fire protection. ■Implement waterline extensions to growth areas consistent with the Community Plan. ■Provide for the safe and efficient collection of wastewater generated by the community. ■Continue efforts to remove infiltration and inflow sources within the existing sanitary sewer collection system. ■Implement sanitary sewer extensions to growth areas consistent with the Community Plan. ■Provide for the safe and efficient collection of stormwater and continue to maintain and improve the water quality of the City of Dublin’s tributaries and the Scioto River corridor. ■Continue implementation of the Dublin Stormwater Master Plan to provide adequate stormwater management in tributary areas consistent with the recommendations of the Community Plan. ■Design stormwater management facilities to blend with surrounding development as an attractive amenity and landscape feature. The goal and objectives for Dublin’s utilities are further expanded in this chapter through community-wide conclusions and recom- mendations. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 135 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities Most Sustainable. By ensuring the continued safe and efficient delivery of public utility services and preservation of natural watercourses through effective stormwater management, Dublin can advance its goal of being the most sustainable City. Most Connected. With strategic and fiscally responsible capital improvements planning and programming, Dublin can extend utility infra- structure to new growth areas in support of its goal of being the most connected City. Most Resilient. Through continued maintenance of public water distribution, wastewater collection and stormwater management infra- structure, Dublin can be a community resilient to change and growth. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Utilities | Envision Dublin Community Plan 136 COSGRAY RDBRANDRDCONCORD RDAVERYRDWOERNER TEMPL E RD TARA H ILLDR SEL L S M IL L DRINNOVA T IO NDR S H I ER R I N G S RD R I N G S R D MARTIN RD D U B LIN SHIRE D R RIVERSIDED R DUBLINCENTERDRM O NTEREYDRCOFFMANRDDALEDRCARNOU STIEDRBAL L A N T RAEPL GLICK R D E M ER A L D PKWY POST RD SWICKARD CT DUBLI NRDDUBLINRDBRIGHT R D S HIGH STT UL L Y MOREDR M E M O RIAL D R W Y NFOR D DR H A Y D E N RU N B L V D WILCOX RDBRA N DO N WAYDR RINGS R D W B R I D G E STEARLINGT ON PKWYJEROME RD VILLAGEP K WYPRIMROSE CT P E R I METER D R TULLER RD MUIRFIEL DDRF RANTZRD WELDON R D TONT I DRMCKITRICK RD M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDBLA ZER PKW Y C H U R C H M A N R DHYLAND-CROYRDCOSGRAY RDEI T ERMANRDT U T T L E R DHERITAGE DR B R IT T ONPKWYME TRO PL N HARDRDRAUSCHDR E STATESCTA S H F ORD R D BROCK RD 745 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 270SciotoRiverPLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS Dublin Water and Sewer Service Area Dublin Water and Sewer Service Area Revenue Sharing Area City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary Dublin Expansion Area County Boundaries MUNICIPAL SERVICE AGREEMENTS The City of Dublin does not own or operate water or wastewater treatment facilities, instead supplying these basic public services through arrangements with other jurisdictions. The City of Dublin provides water and sanitary sewer service primarily through contracts with the City of Columbus, as Central Ohio’s regional service provider. These agreements are comprehensive in nature and ensure that the City of Dublin has the ability to provide water and sanitary sewer service as the community grows. Limited areas of the City of Dublin are also provided with sanitary sewer service through agreements with Delaware County, and Dublin has an additional agreement regarding convey- ance of wastewater for the Village of Shawnee Hills. The City of Marysville also provides water and wastewater utility service within portions of Dublin’s planning area. The water and sanitary sewer service area for the City of Dublin has been delineated, as indicated on the Dublin Water and Sewer Service Area map, defining specific geographic areas in which service is provided by the City of Columbus. The Dublin water and sanitary sewer service area includes expansion areas that may be annexed and served by Dublin. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 137 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities CITY OF COLUMBUS 208 FACILITIES PLAN BOUNDARY The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) oversees the State Water Quality Management Plan (208 Plan) as required by Section 303 of the Clean Water Act. As part of the 208 Plan, the City of Columbus was required to develop a facilities plan for their systems to be included in the overall state plan. The plan includes definition of the existing water and sanitary sewer service area and a 20-year projection of service area. As part of the 208 Plan, the City of Columbus agrees to provide service within the indicated 208 Plan boundary. The Ohio EPA requires an agreement between governmental jurisdictions if service involves more than one jurisdiction. Under the Clean Water Act and Ohio Revised Code, the Ohio EPA cannot issue a Permit-to-Install (PTI), National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, or Water Pollution Control Loan Fund (WPCLF) monies for wastewater projects in conflict with a 208 Plan. Revisions to this boundary are required to be submitted and approved by the Ohio EPA for inclusion in the 208 Plan. This plan is a collaborative effort between Ohio’s Water Quality Management Planning (WQMP) Agencies and the Ohio EPA to provide guidance to those having the authority to develop and implement waste- water treatment projects within Ohio’s communities. EXISTING AGREEMENTS City of Columbus – Water Service Agreement The City of Dublin and City of Columbus entered into a new water service agreement on November 27, 2023, which replaces the previous agreement that was approved on April 13, 1993, supplemented on January 16, 2007, and modified on November 13, 2009. The water service agreement provides the City of Dublin access to drinking water for the area delineated on the Dublin Water and Sewer Service Area map through the City of Columbus water treatment and distribution system until the contract’s expiration in 2048. Dublin is permitted to construct water distribution infrastructure and connect to City of Columbus infrastructure for the purpose of providing or improving water supply to Dublin. The City of Columbus is responsible for routine maintenance and operation of the water distri- bution system within Dublin. The cost related to excessive maintenance, as defined by a formula within the contract, is the responsibility of the City of Dublin. The maintenance of fire hydrants, booster stations, water storage facilities and vault structures for pressure reducing valves are also the responsibility of the City of Dublin. The water service agree- ment effectively provides the City of Dublin with a reliable source of drinking water. City of Columbus – Sanitary Sewer Service Agreement The City of Dublin and City of Columbus entered into a new sanitary sewer service agreement on November 27, 2023, which replaces the previous agreement that was approved on April 13, 1993, and modified on November 13, 2009. The sanitary sewer service agreement provides the City of Dublin the ability to dispose of wastewater from the area delineated on the Dublin Water and Sewer Service Area map through the City of Columbus wastewater collection and treatment system until the contract’s expiration in 2048. Similar to water distribution provisions, the agree- ment between the City of Dublin and the City of Columbus allows Dublin to construct sanitary sewers necessary to serve developing areas of the City. The operation and maintenance of the sanitary sewer collection system within the City of Dublin is the responsibility of the City of Dublin. The sanitary sewer service agreement effectively provides for reliable wastewater disposal. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Utilities | Envision Dublin Community Plan 138 City of Columbus – Economic Development Agreement The City of Dublin and City of Columbus entered into a new economic development agreement on November 27, 2023, which replaces the previous agreement that was approved on August 20, 2009. The economic development agreement establishes the terms and conditions under which the 5,575-acre area located to the west of Dublin’s existing corporate boundary will become exclusive Dublin Expansion Area. The terms and conditions relate largely to the sharing of the net income tax revenues that may result from the development of this area. The 5,575-acre area is delineated as Revenue Sharing Area as depicted on the Dublin Water and Sewer Service Area map. The economic development agreement facilitates the orderly development of this area by: ■Allowing the annexation of properties adjacent to, and part of, areas planned for substantial economic devel- opment investments. ■Providing the opportunity for greater influence over the development of properties not previously within Dublin’s influence. ■Leveraging other investments in Dublin’s infrastructure adjacent to the area. The key components of the economic development agree- ment are as follows: ■If annexation is requested by a property owner, the land will be annexed into Dublin. ■Dublin will pay to Columbus an Equity Share for each annexation. ■Dublin and Columbus will share in the net income tax revenues. ■Dublin will provide utility services to the area. ■Dublin will fund the necessary capital investments and other governmental services in the area. ■Non-compete clause. The initial term of the economic development agreement termi- nates in 2073, unless otherwise terminated prior to that date. City of Marysville Portions of Dublin’s Expansion Area as defined in the Columbus water and sanitary sewer agreements currently obtain water and sanitary sewer service through the City of Marysville. The area served is primarily located along the Industrial Parkway corridor through infrastructure originally installed under the jurisdiction of Union County. Union County and the City of Marysville entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement on December 19, 2005, that trans- ferred the operation and maintenance of the systems to the City of Marysville with defined areas of future municipal growth and additional areas of exclusive service provision within surrounding townships. The closing date in accor- dance with the Agreement was January 31, 2006, and thereafter the Agreement became effective. While the City of Marysville is obligated to maintain service to existing county and Marysville customers, coordination of services outside Marysville’s expected growth area and aging infrastructure provides opportunity for regional dialogue and cooperation as development progresses in the Dublin Expansion Area. Shawnee Hills – Sanitary Sewer Agreement On April 24, 2000, the City of Dublin entered into an agreement with the Village of Shawnee Hills located north of Dublin along the Scioto River to provide Village access to sanitary sewer service (approximately 284-acres). Today, Dublin provides access to the City’s sanitary sewer system in order to transport sewage and other wastes from Shawnee Hills to the City of Columbus system for treatment and disposal. As part of that agreement, the Village made a one-time payment for access to transport up to 120,000 gallons per day (gpd). Excess flows will result in additional payments based upon the level of flow. The Shawnee Hills agreement will last until 2040, unless written notice is provided by either party at least five years in advance of the termina- tion date. If notification does not occur, the agreement will remain in effect for successive three-year periods. The Shawnee Hills agreement was amended on November 14, 2003 to consider sanitary sewer provision to the South Heidelberg Property (Bogey Inn site). As part of the approved contract amendments, the site is served by Shawnee Hills and is subject to Village regulations regarding sanitary sewer services. Flows from this site are not included in the 120,000 gpd contract cap, and the site has been annexed to the City and is subject to Dublin zoning regulations. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 139 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities Delaware County – Sanitary Sewer Agreement On August 22, 1994, the City of Dublin entered into an agreement with Delaware County to provide sanitary sewer treatment for approximately 210-acres located along Summit View Road. For designated areas north of Summit View Road, the City collects wastewater and discharges it to Delaware County for treatment and disposition. The fully developed contracted area includes the Wedgewood Hills, Campden Lakes and Wedgewood Glen subdivisions. These projects were developed in accordance with the agree- ment at prescribed densities of 1.25 units per acre. Dublin performed inspections on the installation of the sanitary sewer system and is required to maintain infrastructure. Capacity fees and use charges are paid to Delaware County. This agreement included service agreements for Shawnee Hills with Delaware County; however, a subsequent 2000 agreement with the Village of Shawnee Hills and Columbus fulfills the requirements to provide the safe transportation of sanitary sewer flows as prescribed in the 1994 agreement. Delaware County is responsible to inspect and maintain the sanitary sewer collection system in these areas, and capacity fees and use charges in Shawnee Hills are paid to the City of Columbus. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency – Director’s Final Findings and Orders On November 17, 2008, City Council approved Resolution 83-08, which authorized the City Manager to enter into an agreement with the Ohio EPA regarding the Director’s Final Findings and Orders (DFFO) related to sanitary sewer system discharge and clear water infiltration and inflow. The Ohio EPA issued the final version of the DFFO on February 11, 2009. The DFFO requires the communities that discharge their wastewater into the Columbus system plan and implement practices to assist in minimizing illegal discharges and mitigating excessive clear water infiltration and inflow from the Columbus system. The required implementation includes: ■Public Notification Program ■Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) Emergency Response Plan ■Sewer System Evaluation Study (SSES) ■Capacity, Management, Operations and Maintenance (CMOM) Program All of the requirements listed above have been met. The SSES is an on-going project and is on an approved 15-year schedule. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS As a governmental agency, the City of Dublin strives to provide its residents and businesses with the safe and efficient distribution of potable water for consumption and fire protection and adequate collection of wastewater. Dublin’s existing service agreements help provide a high quality of life and level of service within the community. As Dublin continues to grow and further development occurs in the U.S. 33 Corridor Area and Northwest/Glacier Ridge Area, the presence of overlapping service areas provides an opportunity for coordinated water and sanitary sewer provision that can result in greater efficiency and benefit to the entire region. All potential options for water and sanitary sewer provision should be considered as growing devel- opment affects the capacities and operational function of the planning area; policies relating to these growth issues should be examined with future development. While the City has traditionally provided water and sanitary sewer service to areas only within municipal boundaries, the consideration for extending services outside the City should also be evaluated as a means to achieve economic devel- opment goals and other quality of life objectives. Existing or future service agreements should be considered within the context of long-term maintenance and infrastructure viability for all remaining portions within the service area. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Utilities | Envision Dublin Community Plan 140 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE EXISTING CONDITIONS The City of Columbus water supply is supported by both surface and ground water sources, and is the primary source of drinking water for the City of Dublin. The City of Columbus currently maintains three in-stream reservoirs; the Griggs, O’Shaughnessy, and Hoover Reservoirs have a combined storage capacity of 27 billion gallons, providing water for much of Franklin County. Several up-ground water reservoirs were constructed in Delaware County which provide an additional 9 billion gallons of raw water storage capacity. The City of Columbus maintains three water plants, with plans for a fourth underway; the Dublin Road, Hap Cremean, and Parsons Avenue Water Plants draw from various raw water sources to provide an average of 145 million gallons of clean water per day to the greater Columbus area. The Fourth Water Plant is planned to be constructed by 2028, and will be located along the Scioto River in southern Delaware County, on the southeast corner of Home and Dublin Roads. The new plant will provide an additional 50 million gallons of treated water per day to the Columbus system. The continued efforts to maintain adequate sources of drinking water will enable the City of Dublin to support additional growth. The City of Dublin’s current corporate area is approximately 22,000-acres, or 34.1 square miles, in size. In 2022, the water distribution system supplying the City of Dublin provided an average of nearly 4.3 million gallons of water per day. The distribution system consists of over 260 miles of water pipes ranging in size from 2-inch to 24-inch in diameter, with over 3,500 public fire hydrants, and over 6,000 water valves. The City of Dublin water distribution system includes six water storage towers that control system hydraulics, and provide necessary pressure and fire flow during times of peak demand. The existing storage towers and their capacities are as follows: ■Avery Road Storage Tower (2 million gallons) ■Darree Fields Storage Tower (2 million gallons) ■Dublin Road Storage Tower (½ million gallons) ■Rings Road Storage Tower (2 million gallons) ■Summit View Storage Tower (2 million gallons) ■Tartan West Storage Tower (½ million gallons) The system has a combined storage capacity of over 9 million gallons. Four booster stations (Brand Road, Hyland-Croy Road, Post Road, and Rings Road) supply the system’s water storage, and control hydraulics across four pressure districts (Henderson, Hyland-Croy, Post, and Smoky Row). As part of the 2013 City of Dublin Community Plan, a dynamic water model was developed that provided insight into the operations of the system at that time. The model evaluated the water distribution system and its response to varying demand levels throughout daily and seasonal changes. Performance of the water system was measured by both the operating pressures in the system during differing demand events and the potential fire flows available in the system. In general, the system is desired to maintain an operating pressure of 35 psi during normal daily demands and a minimum of 20 psi during fire-flow scenarios. A minimum of 1,000 gpm of fire flows are required in the system with a target set to 2,500 gpm as the preferred system performance at 20 psi during maximum daily demand conditions. During the 2013 analysis, several existing performance deficiencies from the defined minimums and goals were noted. Recommended improve- ments to mitigate those deficiencies were also identified. The Findings and Recommendations from 2013 Analysis table identifies the denoted deficiencies, recommended improvements, and current status of the improvements, as many have been implemented since 2013: Findings and Recommendations from 2013 Analysis Existing Deficiency Recommended Improvement Improvement Status Muirfield Villages and areas generally bounded by Avery Road to the west and Brandon Park to the south experience fire flows less than 2,500 gpm at a residual pressure of 20 psi under existing conditions. Construction of new 0.5 MG elevated water storage tank along Dublin Road. Completed in 2013 12-inch water main from the Hyland-Croy Tank to Manly Road. Completed in 2010 Other smaller areas not capable of delivering desired fire flows can also be found in the areas of Ballantrae Loop near the Southwest Area and Tuller Ridge Drive in the Sawmill/ State Route 161 Area. Construct a new 2 MG elevated water tank in Darree Fields Park, construction of new transmission mains along Cosgray Road to Ballantrae. Tank constructed in 2010 and waterlines constructed in 2011. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 141 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities In addition to identifying the existing deficiencies in the system, the hydraulic model was used to predict future deficiencies that may arise through implementation of the 2013 Community Plan. Predicted deficiencies that should be monitored as the demands increase include: ■The Muirfield Area in the location of Rothesay Drive and Gairloch Court will gradually develop pressures that are below the required 20 psi standard. The larger Muirfield area will develop pressures that are below the desired minimum pressure of 35 psi. Portions of the Muirfield area affected by lower than desired available fire flows under existing conditions will also gradually increase in size. Modeling shows that this lower than desired pres- sure will remain confined to the Muirfield area. ■Portions of the Southwest Area near the Ballantrae subdivision, particularly near Ballantrae Loop, will also exhibit signs of lower than desired pressure. Without additional improvements, this identified area will also eventually experience pressures lower than the required 20 psi. This area of lower pressure will gradually expand to include much of the Southwest Area, including south to Rings Road and Tuttle Crossing Boulevard. Other portions of the region along State Route 161, Post Road and Emerald Parkway will also develop pressures that are less than the desired minimum pressure of 35 psi. ■Areas east of the Scioto River, particularly those bounded by Riverside Drive to the west, Hard Road to the north and Bright Road to the south that currently exhibit lower than desired pressures will remain the same. However, the total available fire flow will continue to decrease in the area. The initial review and assessment of the water system’s ability to support the land uses defined through the Envi- sion Dublin effort did not utilize the previously developed hydraulic model but rather focused on a review of current system usage and future demand projections. This simple approach would allow for a determination of the potential overall impact on the system and provide insight as to where more detailed analysis of the infrastructure would be needed. For example, should overall demand projections be similar to those previously defined, then subsequent analyses will not need to focus on supply from the City of Columbus system, but rather focus more on localized improvements in the City’s distribution network. Conversely, should the projections show a significant increase in demands, discussions with Columbus regarding supply availability should be prioritized over localized infrastructure review. Ultimately, after finalization of the Envision Dublin Plan, the City’s model should be updated to reflect the changes in system operation that have occurred in the last decade and be utilized as a tool for continued assessment of the system. During this evaluation, billing data for all water users in the City of Dublin was obtained from the City of Columbus for the years 2003 through 2022. This was requested to verify how demands have grown since the prior 2013 evaluation. This data shows that the total Average Daily Demand for the City of Dublin has remained generally flat for the last two decades, despite development and expansion having continued to occur. This phenomenon has been observed in other locations and is typically attributed to increased water conservation education and measures being in place. This data is limited to the Average Daily Demand, and may not be reflective of current Maximum Daily Demand volumes, which is the critical event for supply and distribution, which may have increased over the same time period. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Utilities | Envision Dublin Community Plan 142 ANALYSIS OF FUTURE PROJECTIONS A high-level spreadsheet analysis was performed to eval- uate City-wide water demands, project future demands, and compare them to previous future projections. This effort was conducted to ascertain the potential increase in water demand that could be realized were the City to adopt either of the land use scenarios. The land use scenarios propose varying residential and employment populations throughout different areas of the City. Corresponding popu- lation densities were derived from the land use scenarios, and regional standard water usage assumptions were applied to determine water demands across the City. The analysis projects the Average Daily Demand (ADD) and Maximum Daily Demand (MDD) for each land use scenario. The ADD represents the average total water usage per day over the course of a year. The MDD is the water volume representing the one day a year with the highest total demand. Both of these values are presented in units of million gallons per day (MGD). Water distribution systems are typically designed around the Maximum Daily Demand. Higher, short-term peak hourly flows can influence the design of local infrastructure; however, peak flows are typi- cally offset by localized storage. Peak hourly flows were not projected or considered in this analysis. Projected Water Demand Summary table below summa- rizes the results of the analysis for the Current Land Use Scenario and the Future Land Use Plan. It is recognized that the Current Land Use Scenario is intended to be consistent with the future full-build scenario considered with the 2013 analysis. However, as indicated by the table, water demand projections with the Current Land Use Scenario are slightly below the 2013 projections (decreased by 19%). This is likely due to differing methodology and assumptions between the two analyses, but generally confirms the consistency between the two efforts. The Future Land Use Plan indicates an increase of 19% of the total system demands. Projected Water Demand Summary Projected Demand Description Average Daily Demand (MGD)Max. Daily Demand (MGD)*% Change from 2013 Model Actual Columbus Billing Data (2022)4.3 6.2 - Future Full-Build Water Model (2013)14.0 20.4 - 2050 Current Land Use Scenario (2023)11.4 16.6 -19% 2050 Future Land Use Plan (2023)16.7 24.4 +19% *Max. Daily Demand calculated based on previously determined Avg. to Max. Multiplier of 1.46. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 143 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities 745 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS Columbus Water Pressure Districts Marysville Service Area Columbus 208 % Change 100% 0% 745 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS Columbus Water Pressure Districts Marysville Service Area Columbus 208 % Change 100% 0% The Future Land Use Plan reflects a moderate increase in projected water demands when compared to the 2013 projections, suggesting the most recent master planning may still be sufficient for the City of Dublin moving forward in regards to citywide water demands. While total demands of the system when comparing the Current Land Use Scenario to the 2013 analysis reflect a reduction, the spatial allocation of the demands are critical to understand as it relates to the ability of local infrastructure to support the future land use. Likewise, though the Preferred Future Land Use Plan may reflect a modest increase in expected demands across the overall system, specific locations would experience a greater concentration of these demands. The Current Land Use Water Demand % Change map and Future Land Use Water Demand % Change map show that these projected demands are concentrated in the central and western/southwestern portions of the City, where existing local infrastructure may not be able to support them. The Future Land Use Water Demand % Change map displays the intensity of the projected changes in demand around the City, based on the Future Land Use Plan, with areas in green representing areas of low change, and those in yellow, orange, and red representing areas of higher change. The areas of change are framed by City of Columbus water pressure district boundaries. CURRENT LAND USE WATER DEMAND % CHANGE FUTURE LAND USE WATER DEMAND % CHANGE WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Utilities | Envision Dublin Community Plan 144 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Future Land Use Plan will generate a modest increase in overall water demands with localized areas of more intense demands, as compared to the 2013 projections and the Current Land Use Scenario. Compared to present day demands, however, both scenarios represent significant growth in demands that the existing water infrastructure may not be suited to handle. There are several observations that can be made: ■The demands in the Post pressure district, north of State Route 161, do not reflect much change. ■The demands in the Post pressure district, south of State Route 161, reflect significant increases in demand under the Future Land Use Plan. As such, critical infrastructure serving the Post pressure district should be a priority focus of future evaluations. ■The Future Land Use Plan reflects demand increases inside of I-270, impacting areas in both the Henderson and Cleveland pressure districts. These areas, while smaller and more condensed, should also be subject to further evaluation. ■There appears to be limited demand increases in the Hyland-Croy and Smoky Row pressure districts suggesting these areas be lower priorities for future evaluations. ■The Future Land Use Plan reflects a significant expansion in area and increase in demand in the area between Cosgray Road and extending West to Iams Road. Development of this area would require signifi- cant expansion of the Post pressure district. These observations should help direct focus on the next, more detailed step, which would be evaluation of specific infrastructure (booster stations, storage tanks, piping, etc.) to support the Future Land Use Plan. It is recommended that the City update their water model to evaluate current and future system operations. An update to the City’s 2013 water model and further anal- ysis would be required to confirm that the implemented improvements from the last decade have had the desired results or to ascertain if new operational challenges have arisen. An updated model reflecting existing conditions would be necessary to identify present-day deficiencies and to recommend potential future improvements. The City of Dublin will also need to ascertain the ability of the City of Columbus system to meet any increases in demand associated with the Future Land Use Plan. This determina- tion will need to be made by the City of Columbus and thus coordination should occur as soon as feasible. Technology Industry and Large-Water Users Current development trends in central Ohio have given rise to a significant number of technology-based facilities. These range from data and web services centers to technolo- gy-based manufacturing plants. Water supply is often a key consideration in attracting and facilitating these develop- ments. It is understood that areas of future development in Dublin may focus on the technology sector. Planning for these facilities from a water supply perspective on a land use basis has limited value since their demands can vary so widely dependent upon the technology they employ and the overall size of the site. Specific considerations include: ■Seasons - Data centers typically fluctuate in water demand seasonally, as the changing temperatures impact the amount of water needed to provide adequate cooling. ■Technology - Data centers are evolving to be more water-efficient, either through less heat-intensive processes, or through the use of alternative means of cooling, such as air cooling or closed loop systems. Future development of large water users may end up needing less water than anticipated. ■Collaboration - Opportunities may be present when large water users are next to other large water users, as they are able to collaborate on and share the infrastructure needed to serve them, possibly utilizing progressive solutions such as “purple,” or recycled/ reclaimed, water infrastructure. ■Storage - Some technology developments use large amounts of water, based on their usage patterns, over short time periods, which can be very impactful to system operation. However, if their usage could be spread over longer time periods, the impact becomes much less. Water providers can help meet the needs of the developments without significant impacts to the overall system by mitigating these short, intense usage periods by utilizing water storage. ■Size - Often technology developments require large land footprints and thus the corresponding demand of water on a per acre basis may not be greater than traditional land uses. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 145 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022Avg. Daily Demand (MGD)Year If large water users, such as data centers or technology industries, are developing in the City of Dublin, then special planning beyond general land use projections is required to determine if these users will have access to the necessary water supply. There is no succinct or readily available answer as to where, what kind, or how many large water users the City is capable of supporting. Zoning by itself is not indicative of the local water infrastructure being sufficient for future development, nor is the presence of existing large water users. Such determinations should be studied thoroughly on a case-by- case basis and will need to consider specific infrastructure in proximity to the site as well as supply limitations. Billing Data and Existing Conditions As mentioned previously, City of Columbus billing data for the City of Dublin water users reflect no long-term change in annual average daily water demand over the last two decades. This data indicates that water demand projections following current standards are likely conservative. Improve- ments to the water distribution system will likely be necessary to meet future demands, especially in areas of intense, concentrated growth; however, overall demands may not be changing as quickly as previously projected. As such, the City should continue to track and monitor water consumption on an annual basis to best balance economic growth with responsible management of the domestic water supply. City of Dublin Average Daily Water Use table below shows the Average Daily Demand from City of Columbus billing data for the City of Dublin for each year from 2003 to 2022.City of Dublin Average Daily Water Use WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities 146 SANITARY SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE EXISTING CONDITIONS The City of Dublin’s current corporate area is approximately 22,000-acres, or 34.1 square miles, in size. The City of Dublin’s wastewater (sanitary sewer) service is provided through municipal service agreements with surrounding communities. The City of Columbus is the primary provider of wastewater service, while Delaware County provides wastewater service for approximately 210-acres located north of Summit View Road. The City of Dublin sanitary sewer collection system consists of more than 230 miles of sanitary sewers and over 5,500 sanitary manholes. This sanitary sewer collection system is owned, operated, and maintained by the City of Dublin. All of the wastewater from the City of Dublin drains to the City of Columbus sanitary sewer collection system for treatment and disposal except for that which goes to Delaware County. The sanitary sewer collection system for the City of Dublin consists of nine major sanitary trunk sewers. The nine major trunk sewers divide the system into nine sanitary sewer tribu- tary areas. The major trunk sewers are as follows: ■Cosgray Sanitary Trunk Sewer ■Cramer North Sanitary Trunk Sewer ■Cramer South Sanitary Trunk Sewer ■Deer Run Sanitary Trunk Sewer ■Hayden Run Sanitary Trunk Sewer ■Llewellyn Farms Sanitary Trunk Sewer ■North Fork Indian Run Sanitary Trunk Sewer ■Riverside Sanitary Trunk Sewer ■South Fork Indian Run Sanitary Trunk Sewer The Riverside Sanitary Trunk Sewer serves those areas of Dublin on the east side of the Scioto River and drains into the City of Columbus sanitary sewer collection system through the Upper Scioto East Interceptor Sewer. The remaining eight trunk sewers serve those areas of Dublin on the west side of the Scioto River and drain into the City of Columbus sanitary sewer collection system through the Upper Scioto West Interceptor Sewer. The Wyandotte Woods sanitary sewer pump station along with approxi- mately 3,500-feet of sanitary sewer force main complement the system to provide service to areas in the Riverside Sanitary Sewer Tributary Areas where gravity sewer is not feasible. This pump station is located along the east side of Riverside Drive between Wyandotte Woods Boulevard and Summit View Road. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 147 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities ANALYSIS OF FUTURE PROJECTIONS Two land use scenarios were evaluated as part of this analysis: the Current Land Use Scenario, and the Future Land Use Plan. The scenarios present two varying degrees of projected population growth and city expansion. These scenarios were used as the basis for developing the sanitary sewer flow projections. Each scenario was analyzed using City of Columbus design criteria to determine the peak sanitary sewer flows that would be expected from each development scenario. For each sanitary tributary area, a spreadsheet was created and populated with sanitary sewer information and the future populations as proposed by the land use scenarios. The scenarios were developed to project the future popula- tions of different areas throughout the City. These proposed populations were then used to estimate future sanitary sewer flows. Population densities were derived from the land use scenarios and applied to the planning areas to determine projected sanitary sewer flows. Population densities varied depending on land use type such as suburban, mixed-use, commercial, industrial, etc. Population densities are presented in units of people per acre, or “ppa”. The sani- tary sewer flows can be estimated using a standard average daily sanitary flow value. For the City of Columbus sanitary sewer design criteria, a standard value of 130 gallons per day per capita was used. The average sanitary flow by itself is not used in the design of sanitary sewer infrastructure. A peak sanitary sewer flow is used and is a short-term high flow event in the sewers that occurs based on time of day, season, and other system factors. The City of Columbus Sanitary Sewer Design Manual states a peaking factor of 3.5 should be used for the design of new sanitary sewer infrastructure. Lastly, infiltration and inflow, referred to as I/I, must be considered when designing sanitary sewer infrastructure and projecting future flows. I/I represents sources of clean water that enter the system through cracks, leaks, defi- ciencies, or other direct connections to the sanitary sewer collection system. Infiltration and inflow typically occurs during periods of wet weather. City of Columbus sanitary sewer design criteria use an I/I value of 0.003 cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre. Thus, the larger the tributary area, the more I/I that must be included in the sanitary sewer flow calculations. It is important to note this analysis is preliminary in nature, based on a high-level analysis of the region, and thus does not suggest sanitary sewer availability at any specific location. Further studies would be required to determine local sanitary sewer availability and to identify necessary improvements. The evaluation is limited to the City of Dublin sanitary sewer collection system and does not evaluate the downstream impacts of the estimated projected flows. For this analysis, in order to remain within capacity throughout each section of the City of Dublin’s sanitary trunk sewers, an iterative approach was taken in which areas were removed until the percent full value at any point was lowered to or below 100% full when possible. If capacity was found to be over 100% and an area could not be removed, alternatives were recommended. The proposed development may cause capacity issues downstream in the Columbus system that are not evaluated by this analysis. To service remaining planning areas that were unable to be serviced by the existing sewer infrastruc- ture, sanitary sewer improvements would be necessary; improvements may include pump station and force mains, discharging downstream where capacity is available, or improving sanitary sewer capacity by pipe upsizing existing pipes or constructing parallel sanitary sewer lines. Eval- uation and approval from the City of Columbus would be required for any proposed sanitary sewer extension. The following map delineates the overall sanitary sewer- sheds corresponding to the sanitary sewer infrastructure capacity analysis of the Future Land Use Plan. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Utilities | Envision Dublin Community Plan 148 CHURCH M A N R D EMERALDPK W Y WESTBUR Y DRBRANDRD FRANTZRDCONCORD RDAVERYRDWOERNER TEMPLE RD TARA HIL L DR SELL S M IL L D R IN N OVAT IONDR SH IER RINGS RD R I N G S R D MARTIN RDHYLAND-CROYRDD UBLINSHIRE D R RIVERSI DED R DUBLINCENTERDRM O N TEREYDRDALEDRCARNOUSTIE D R B A L L A N T R A E PL GLICK R D EMERALD PKWY COSGRAY RDPOST R D P O ST RD POSTRDAVERY RDSHAMROCK BLVDSWICKARD CT DUBLI NRDDUBLINRDBRIGHT RD S HIGH STTULLYMOREDR M EM O R I A L D R W Y N FORD DR H A Y DENR U N B L VD WILCOX RDB RANDONWAY D R RINGS R D W BRIDGE ST EARLINGTON PKWY J ERO MERD VILLAGEP K WY PRIMROSE CT EMM ET ROW LN PERIM ETE R D R R I NG S R D TULLER RD E S T A T E S P K WY PERIMETER D RKILE RD BRAND RD B RITT O NPKWYBRAND RD MUIRFIELDDR FRANTZRD WELDON R D M CKI T R I C K R D TONTI DR OLDE DUBLIN WOOD S D R BRIDGE PARK AVE M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RD WYA N D O TTEW O ODS BLVD BLAZERPKWYCOSGRAYRDEI TER MA NRDCOFFMAN RDTUTTLE RD RINGS RDHERITAGE DR M UIRFIELDDRMETROPL N HARD RDHYLAND-CROYRDRAU SC H D R SH I ER R I NG S R D E S TA T E S C TA S H FORD RD BROCK RD 745 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 270SciotoRiver CRAMER SOUTH CRAMER NORTH HAYDEN RUN LLEWELLYN FARMS COSGRAY RIVERSIDE NORTH FORK INDIAN RUN DEER RUN SOUTH FORK INDIAN RUN 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Context Layers City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River Columbus 208 Marysville Service Area Proposed Sewershed Existing Sewershed Dublin Planning Growth Analysis Areas Base A B C D E F G H I PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS OVERALL SEWERSHEDS WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 149 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities CHURCH M A N R DEMERALDPKWY WESTBURYDR BRANDRD FRANTZRDCONCORD RDAVERYRDWOERNERTEMPLERD TARAHILLDR SELLSMILLDR INNOVATIONDR SHIERRINGSRD RINGSRD MARTIN RDHYLAND-CROYRDDUBLINSHIREDR RIVERSI DED R DUBLINCENTERDRMONTEREYDRDALEDRCARNOUSTIEDR BALLANTRAEPL GLICK R D EMERALDPKWY COSGRAY RDPOSTRD POSTRD POSTRDAVERY RDSHAMROCK BLVDSWICKARD CTDUBLINRDDUBLINRDBRIGHTRDS HIGH STTULLYMOREDR MEMORIALDR WYNFORDDR HAYDENRUNBLVDWILCOX RDBRANDONWAYDR RINGSRD WBRIDGEST EARLINGTONPKWY J ERO MERD VILLAGEP K WY PRIMROSE CT EMMETROWLN PERIMETERDR RINGSRD TULLER RD E S T A T E S P K WY PERIMETER D RKILE RD BRANDRD B RITT O NPKWYBRANDRD MUIRFIELDDR FRANTZRD WELDONRD MCKITRICKRD TONTI DR OLDE DUBLIN WOOD S D R BRIDGE PARK AVE M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RD WYANDOTTEWOODSBLVD BLAZERPKWYCOSGRAYRDEI TER MA NRDCOFFMAN RDTUTTLE RD RINGS RDHERITAGE DR MUIRFIELDDR METROPLN HARDRDHYLAND-CROYRDRAUSCHDR SHIERRINGSRD ESTATESCTASHFORDRD BROCKRD 745 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 270SciotoRiver CRAMER SOUTH CRAMER NORTH HAYDEN RUN LLEWELLYN FARMS COSGRAY RIVERSIDE NORTH FORK INDIAN RUN DEER RUN SOUTH FORK INDIAN RUN 00.510.25Miles Context Layers City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River Columbus 208 Marysville Service Area Proposed Sewershed Existing Sewershed Dublin Planning Growth Analysis Areas Base A B C D E F G H I PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS OVERALL SEWERSHEDS Deer Run Sanitary Sewershed The Deer Run sewershed currently serves approximately 3,350-acres of developed land within the City of Dublin. The existing development within Deer Run produces a peak flow of approximately 18.3 MGD. The main trunk sewer is currently experiencing capacity issues. A previous study was completed titled, “Final OEPA Summary of the Deer Run Sewer Shed: Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Survey Find- ings and Implementation Schedule,” dated January 23, 2017. Several infrastructure improvements were identified to relieve capacity restrictions in the Deer Run sewershed. These improvements are summarized in the Deer Run Sanitary Sewer Improvements table below. For the purpose of this study, no additional tributary area was added to this sewer. Post-improvement flow monitoring and modeling evaluation efforts should be completed to determine if additional area can be serviced by this sewer. See Deer Run Sewershed map for a visual of the proposed tributary area. Deer Run Sanitary Sewer Improvements Priority Recommended Improvement Description Project Status 1 Deer Run Wet Weather Relief Pump Station Design flow for existing conditions with the Deer Run Relief Sewer is 5.25 cfs (2,360 gpm). Pump station is wet weather relief only. After all future improvements and build-out conditions, design flow increases to 6.25 cfs (2,800 gpm). Under construction. Completion in Spring 2024. 2 Glick Road Relief Sewer Relief sewer from Carnoustie Dr/Glick Rd (MH#2219) to the Proposed Deer Run Pump Station. Pipe to be oversized for storage capacity with a 6" outlet and overflow weir structure. Estimated diameter is 30", but dependent on detailed design alignment and depths. Under design. Per the adopted 2024-2028 Capital Improvements Program, construction is programmed for 2025, pending site acquisitions if necessary. 3 Riverview Relief Sewer Increase capacity for 36" trunk sewer along Riverview Dr by constructing a 30" parallel relief sewer. Under design. Per the adopted 2024-2028 Capital Improvements Program, construction of the N. Riverview Street relief sewer is programmed for 2025, pending site acquisitions if necessary. Construction of the S. Riverview Street relief sewer is programmed for 2028, pending site acquisitions if necessary. 4 Avery Rd Relief Sewer Relief sewer from Avery Rd (MH#1656) to the new relief sewer for MacEwan Ct. Pipe to be oversized for storage capacity with a 6" outlet and overflow weir structure. Estimated diameter is 36", but dependent on detailed design alignment and depths. Per the adopted 2024-2028 Capital Improvements Program, design is programmed for 2025, with construction programmed for 2026, pending site acquisitions if necessary. 5 Muirfield GC Relief Sewer Parallel 12” Relief sewer from MH#2216 to the Proposed Deer Run Pump Station.Not programmed in the adopted 2024-2028 Capital Improvements Program. DEER RUN WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Utilities | Envision Dublin Community Plan 150 North Fork Indian Run Sanitary Sewershed The North Fork Indian Run sewershed currently serves approximately 3,468-acres of developed land within the City of Dublin. The existing development within North Fork produces a peak flow of approximately 10.8 MGD. The main trunk sewer is currently experiencing capacity issues. A previous study was completed titled, “Sanitary Sewer Capacity Study for North & South Fork Indian Run Sewer- shed,” dated September 30, 2019. Several project infra- structure improvements were identified to relieve capacity restrictions in the North Fork Indian Run sewershed. These improvements are summarized in the North Fork Indian Run Sanitary Sewer Improvements table below. For the purpose of this study, no additional tributary area was proposed for this sanitary sewer. Post-improvement flow monitoring and modeling evaluation efforts should be completed to determine if additional area can be serviced by this sanitary sewer. See following Sewersheds map for a visual of the tributary area. South Fork Indian Run Sanitary Sewershed The South Fork Indian Run sewershed is located between the North Fork Indian Run and Cosgray sewersheds, consisting of residential and commercial development, as well as technology and innovation-based land uses. The west end remains undeveloped. A previous study was completed titled, “Sanitary Sewer Capacity Study for North & South Fork Indian Run Sewershed,” dated September 30, 2019. Based on this study, approximately 540-acres within the South Fork Indian Run sewershed could be developed with the existing available capacity. A portion of the South Fork Indian Run sewershed overlaps with the City of Marysville service area. The existing South Fork Indian Run sewershed is 4,342-acres in size, of which 1,112- acres overlaps with the City of Marysville service area. For this evaluation, five development scenarios were evaluated: the Current and Future Land Use Plans with and without the Marysville service area, and a fifth reduced area based on the Future Land Use Plan. The results show the South Fork Indian Run sanitary trunk sewer only has sufficient capacity to service the existing tributary area under the Current Land Use Scenario when excluding the Marysville service area. As such, a fifth develop- ment scenario was evaluated based on the Future Land Use Plan, wherein the Marysville service area and about 361-acres of currently unserved land were removed from the western end of the existing tributary area until capacity was met per the model at a peak flow of 13.6 MGD. The Cosgray and Hayden Run Sewersheds were adjusted to capture the removed area (not including the Marysville service area). The South Fork Indian Run trunk sewer can service the proposed area under the Future Land Use Plan if the previ- ously recommended improvements are made. See South Fork Indian Run Sanitary Sewer Improvements table and the Sewershed map for a visual of the proposed tributary area and the Marysville service area boundary. Recommended Improvement Project Status Increase System Capacity – Install 5,000 LF of 18” Pipe from MH#2151 to MH#2492 Not programmed in the adopted 2024-2028 Capital Improvements Program. Increase System Capacity with Storage Utilization – Install 2,000 LF of 18” Pipe and 3,000 LF of 36” Pipe with Outlet Control Structure from MH#2151 to MH#2492 Not programmed in the adopted 2024-2028 Capital Improvements Program. Implement Private Property I/I Reduction Program – Achieve 40% I/I Reduction in area tributary to MH #900 and MH #2843 Not programmed in the adopted 2024-2028 Capital Improvements Program. North Fork Indian Run Sanitary Sewer Improvements Recommended Improvement Project Status Increase System Capacity – Install 8,400 LF of 12” Pipe from MH#1029 to MH#547, 2,500 LF of 15” Pipe from MH#2564 to MH#3792, 2,600 LF of 18” Pipe from MH#2554 to MH#2978 Not programmed in the adopted 2024-2028 Capital Improvements Program. South Fork Indian Run Sanitary Sewer Improvements NORTH FORK INDIAN RUN SOUTH FORK INDIAN RUN City of Marysville Service Area WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 151 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities Cosgray Sanitary Sewershed The Cosgray sewershed currently serves approximately 1,469-acres of developed land within the City of Dublin. The Cosgray sewershed is located between the South Fork Indian Run and Cramer North sewersheds, consisting of mostly residential and commercial development. The City previously completed a sanitary sewer capacity analysis using a calibrated hydraulic model for the Cosgray sewer- shed in 2022. Results of that analysis showed that the Cosgray sanitary sewer system had a maximum allowable additional flow of 4.2 cfs, or 2.7 MGD. The results show the Cosgray sanitary trunk sewer has sufficient capacity to service the proposed tributary area under the Future Land Use Plan. An additional 563-acres of undeveloped land currently within the proposed tributary area can be developed at an average population density of 6.4 ppa before the current terminus reaches the previously determined maximum allowable additional flow. The tributary boundary was adjusted to take in area from the South Fork Indian Run sewershed. The proposed Cosgray tributary area would produce a total peak sanitary flow of 9.8 MGD. The sewershed extends beyond the Columbus 208 planning boundary, which would require a boundary revision and approval by the City of Columbus and OEPA. See Sewersheds map for a visual of the proposed tributary area. Cramer North Sanitary Sewershed The Cramer North sewershed currently serves approx- imately 1,716-acres of developed land within the City of Dublin. Cramer North is located south of the Cosgray sewershed, which discharges into Cramer South. The area consists of mostly residential and commercial development. The Future Land Use Plan proposes significant devel- opment to the west, with some redevelopment proposed within and around I-270. The results show the Cramer North sanitary trunk sewer has sufficient capacity to service the existing tributary area under the Future Land Use Plan. An additional 34-acres of undeveloped land currently within the existing tributary area can be developed at an average population density of 9.0 ppa before the trunk sewer reaches 93% full pipe capacity. No additional service area outside of the existing tributary area was proposed. The proposed Cramer North tributary area would produce a peak sanitary flow of 8.4 MGD. The sewershed tributary area remained largely unchanged besides minor border adjustments to better match existing sewer infrastructure. While the North Cramer trunk sewer may have capacity, the downstream South Cramer trunk sewer does not; as such, capacity improvements for the Cramer South trunk sewer are necessary, as discussed in the following section. See the following Sewersheds map for a visual of the proposed tributary area. CRAMER NORTH COSGRAY WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Utilities | Envision Dublin Community Plan 152 Cramer South Sanitary Sewershed The Cramer South sewershed currently serves approx- imately 607-acres of developed land within the City of Dublin, not including the areas served by Cramer North. Cramer South is located between Cramer North and Hayden Run, consisting of mostly residential and commer- cial development. The Future Land Use Plan proposes significant development to the west end of the sewershed, as well as areas of redevelopment throughout. The results show the Cramer South sanitary trunk sewer does not have sufficient capacity to service the existing trib- utary area under either land use scenario. The point where Cramer North discharges into Cramer South may experi- ence capacity issues at full-build. The 2,275-foot stretch of 21-inch sanitary sewer following where Cramer North and Cramer South meet would need capacity improvements up to the existing 36-inch sewer to ensure system operability; improvements could include upsizing the existing pipe or installing a parallel sanitary sewer line. Assuming the capacity improvement is in place, the proposed Cramer South tributary area would produce a peak sanitary flow of 14.1 MGD; this includes the flows produced by Cramer North. An additional 273-acres of undeveloped land currently within the existing tributary area can be developed at an average population density of 15.8 ppa, or higher depending on the impact of the capacity improvement. The sewershed tributary area remained largely unchanged besides minor border adjustments to better match existing sanitary sewer infrastructure. See Sewersheds map for a visual of the proposed tributary area. Hayden Run Sanitary Sewershed The Hayden Run sewershed currently serves approximately 2,243-acres of developed land within the City of Dublin. The Hayden Run sewershed is located between the cities of Dublin and Hilliard, currently consisting of mostly residen- tial and commercial development. The Future Land Use Plan proposes significant western expansion into the rural areas beyond the Columbus 208 planning boundary. The results show the Hayden Run sanitary trunk sewer has sufficient capacity to service the proposed tributary area under the Future Land Use Plan. The proposed Hayden Run tributary area would produce a peak sanitary flow of 22.0 MGD. An additional 1,714-acres of undeveloped land within the proposed tributary area can be developed at an average population density of 8.7 ppa before the existing sanitary sewer infrastructure reaches 91% full pipe capacity. The sewershed tributary area was adjusted to match existing sanitary sewer infrastructure, and to take in land that the Cosgray sewershed was unable to service. About 500-acres south of Hayden Run Road, outside of the City of Dublin planning area, were removed from the sewershed as they were already being serviced by a City of Hilliard trunk sewer. See the Sewersheds map below for a visual of the proposed tributary area. CRAMER SOUTH HAYDEN RUN WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 153 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities Llewellyn Farms Sanitary Sewershed The Llewellyn Farms sewershed currently serves approxi- mately 464-acres of developed land within the City of Dublin. Llewellyn Farms is nestled between Hayden Run and Cramer South, along the Scioto River. The sewershed consists of about half commercial and half residential development. Under the Future Land Use Plan, not much change is proposed, as the area is already mostly developed. The results show the Llewellyn Farms sanitary sewer system has sufficient capacity to service the Future Land Use Plan. The proposed Llewellyn Farms tributary area would produce a peak sanitary flow of 2.3 MGD. There are no additional expansion areas to service, so the sewershed tributary area has remained largely unchanged. See Sewer- sheds map for a visual of the proposed tributary area. Riverside Sanitary Sewershed The Riverside sewershed currently serves approximately 1,945-acres of developed land within the City of Dublin. The Riverside sewershed is between the cities of Dublin and Worthington, along the east side of the Scioto River, across from the Deer Run sewershed. The sewershed is comprised of mostly residential and commercial devel- opment. The sewershed also captures flows from the Columbus Zoo via an 8-inch force main. The Future Land Use Plan proposes some redevelopment to the south and provides service to undeveloped areas to the north. Approximately 210-acres within the City of Dublin planning area are already being served by Delaware County, so those areas were excluded from the analysis. The results show the Riverside sanitary trunk sewer currently only has sufficient capacity to service the proposed tributary area under the Current Land Use Scenario. The existing 12-inch terminus sanitary sewer does not have sufficient capacity to service the remaining 270-acres of undeveloped area at the population densities proposed by the Future Land Use Plan. Sanitary Sewer improvements would be necessary to either increase the capacity of the existing 2,270-feet of 12-inch sani- tary sewer, or otherwise divert flows downstream where capacity is available. Then, the undeveloped area can be developed at an average population density of 5.6 ppa or higher depending on the impact of the improvements. The proposed Riverside tributary area would produce a peak sanitary flow of 14.7 MGD. See the Sewersheds map for a visual of the proposed tributary area. LLEWELLYN FARMS RIVERSIDE WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities 154 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that more concentrated studies be completed on specific areas of interest in order to better determine the localized performance of the sanitary sewer collection system. Any sanitary sewer extension or proposed change in flows must be evaluated and approved by the City of Columbus on a case-by-case basis. Expansion of the Columbus 208 boundary will require boundary revision and approval from the City of Columbus and OEPA. The Sanitary Sewer Flow Projection Summary table below summarizes the results of the completed analyses. In general, the Future Land Use Plan will generate a more intense increase in city-wide flows. Under the Future Land Use Plan, the system can service up to and slightly beyond the Columbus 208 planning boundary at the proposed population densities, excluding the City of Marysville service area overlap with the City of Dublin Expansion Area, as seen in the Overall Sewersheds map. Capacity improvements are required within the Cramer South, Deer Run, North Fork Indian Run, South Fork Indian Run, and Riverside sewer- sheds. Post-improvement evaluations of Deer Run and North Fork Indian Run are recommended to determine if additional area can be served. Further evaluation of land use impacts on existing sanitary infrastructure is recommended. Dublin Expansion Area The Dublin expansion area to the north and west is currently not within City of Dublin corporation limits as defined by the water and sanitary sewer service agreements with the City of Columbus. Additionally, the City of Dublin planning boundary extends beyond the City of Columbus 208 boundary. The water and sanitary sewer infrastructure capacity analysis evaluated the feasibility of serving areas within existing Dublin corporation limits, the identified expansion area, and the remaining areas within the City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary. The results of the water and sanitary sewer infrastructure capacity analysis show the sanitary sewer capacity is the limiting factor in expanding beyond the City of Columbus 208 boundary and cannot serve the full extents of the City of Dublin Planning boundary. Overall, the majority of the conclusions from the sanitary sewer capacity analysis are consistent with the conclusions from previous Community Plan utility analysis efforts. This includes: ■There are no significant capacity limitations within six of the nine City of Dublin sanitary sewersheds (Cosgray, Cramer North, Cramer South, Hayden Run, Llewellyn Farms, and Riverside). ■The Deer Run and North Fork Indian Run trunk sewers are at capacity, and in some locations exceeding capacity, under existing conditions. Capacity improvements have been previously identi- fied and programmed in the City’s Capital Improve- ments Program, in which post-improvement evaluation should occur to see if additional land can be included within these two sewersheds. ■The South Fork Indian Run trunk sewer has limited capacity under existing conditions. ■The downstream City of Columbus trunk sewers have been designed to accommodate 10 people per acre density, in which the average population density per the Future Land Use Plan is not exceeding. ■The City of Columbus has committed to serving the extents of the 208 boundary. ■Service for area outside the 208 boundary requires further coordination and approval from the City of Columbus. Sanitary Sewer Flow Projection Summary Sewershed Proposed Tributary Area (Acres)Total Peak Flow(MGD) Deer Run 3,350 18.3 North Fork 3,468 10.8 South Fork 2,869 29.6 Cosgray 2,031 9.8 Cramer North 1,750 8.4 Cramer South 2,630 14.1 Hayden Run 4,119 22.0 Llewellyn Farms 464 2.3 Riverside 2,215 14.7 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 155 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities The following are differences compared to previous Community Plan utility analysis efforts: ■Per the updated water and sanitary sewer service agreement with the City of Columbus in 2023, the City of Dublin has committed to serving the area generally bounded to the north by the Union County line, to the south by approximately 1,500 feet south of Rings Road, to the west by the Madison County line, and to the east by Houchard Road. ■The Future Land Use Plan represents a slightly higher increase in population density compared to the Current Land Use Scenario. ■The Hayden Run and Cosgray sanitary sewershed boundaries were revised in order to serve more land within the existing South Fork Indian Run sewershed. Given the identified sanitary sewer infrastructure capacity limitations in select areas and the presence of overlapping service boundaries, the City should explore the feasibility of alternative sanitary sewer improvements to address capacity limitations in the City of Dublin’s sanitary sewer collection system. The City should also continue to work with adjoining jurisdictions to explore the feasibility of coordinated water and sanitary sewer provisions that can result in greater efficiency and benefit to the entire region. It is important to note that, consistent with previous City of Dublin Community Plans, the results of the analysis provides the City with a plan along with recommendations to further explore as development occurs over time in order to achieve the goals of the Community Plan. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities 156 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Stormwater runoff is generated when rain or melted snow flows over land or impervious surfaces, such as paved streets, parking lots and building rooftops, and does not soak into the ground. As the runoff flows over the surfaces, it accumulates debris, chemicals, sediment or other pollutants that could adversely affect water quality if the runoff is untreated. In natural areas, stormwater runoff is absorbed by the ground. It is filtered and ultimately replenishes under- ground water deposits or flows into waterways. In developed areas, impervious surfaces prevent stormwater runoff from naturally soaking into the ground. Instead, the stormwater runoff rapidly enters storm drains, storm sewer systems and drainage ditches. This can cause: ■Downstream flooding ■Contaminated waterways ■Stream bank erosion ■Increased sediment in the waterways from erosion ■Habitat destruction ■Changes in the stream flow ■Infrastructure damage Stormwater management is the practice of controlling stormwater runoff in order to mitigate these negative impacts to the environment. EXISTING CONDITIONS Stormwater Management Program The City of Dublin has implemented a comprehensive Stormwater Management Program in order to effectively manage stormwater. The Stormwater Management Program consists of the following six main components: ■Stormwater Master Plan ■National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Compliance ■Capital Improvement Projects ■Maintenance ■Chapter 53 – Stormwater Management and Stream Protection ■Chapter 151 – Flood Control Stormwater Master Plan Unlike the sanitary sewer collection system, stormwater flow naturally occurs by way of swales, creeks, and rivers, each of which contributes to a larger drainage area called water- sheds. This means that the City needs to proactively main- tain the integrity and capacity of these naturally occurring features. While stormwater management will not limit the intensity of development, the allowance for appropriately sized facilities on each development is important. The City of Dublin’s Stormwater Master Plan gives the City a strong base for managing stormwater. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 157 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities 745 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 270 Northwest Unconsolidated Hard Road North East Unconsolidated Southwest Unconsolidated Thornhill Creek Hirth-Woolpert Creek Cramer Creek Cosgray Creek Brown/Horch Creek Monterey Creek South Fork Indian Run Tonti Creek Billingsley Creek Trails End CreekNorth Fork Indian Run Deer Run SciotoRiverNorth F ork India n Run S ou th ForkIndia nRun PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS Context Layers City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River City Watersheds 7,600 9.7 The Stormwater Master Plan is a document that was established in 1999 and updated in 2009. The purpose of the Stormwater Master Plan is to minimize impacts from development by establishing limits on stormwater discharges through modeling of City watersheds. The Stormwater Master Plan contains prescribed release rates per acre for all City watersheds that a developed site is not permitted by code to exceed. The sizing and design of stormwater management control measures are largely based on the prescribed release rates that are defined in the Stormwater Master Plan. The development and use of the prescribed release rates help mitigate flooding problems and improve the overall appear- ance and environmental quality of streams. The Stormwater Master Plan also effectively developed a drainage system map and database as well as identified capital improvement projects associated with stormwater management, many of which have been constructed. The 2009 Stormwater Master Plan updated analysis confirmed that the City’s current stormwater release rate requirements provide consistent and accepted criteria throughout the City and has minimized effects of develop- ment to the receiving streams. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Utilities | Envision Dublin Community Plan 158 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Compliance The City of Dublin is required by the United States Envi- ronmental Protection Agency to comply with its NPDES Phase II Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Program. This program requires local governments with fewer than 100,000 people to develop a plan to reduce stormwater pollution in order to protect and improve water- ways. The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency manages the compliance of the local jurisdictions with their NPDES Phase II MS4 permits. The program is comprised of six minimum control measures that, when implemented, should result in a significant reduction of pollutants discharged into receiving waters. The minimum control measures are: ■Public Education and Outreach: distribution of mate- rials and performing outreach to inform citizens about the impacts of polluted stormwater runoff. ■Public Participation and Involvement: programs and events that involve people in stormwater management ■Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination: detection and elimination of illegal discharges to the storm sewer system and improper disposal of waste. ■Construction Site Runoff Control: management of sediment, excessive runoff and pollution from construction sites. ■Post-Construction Runoff Control: management of stormwater runoff and pollution from development projects that are permanent facilities. ■Pollution Prevention and Good House- keeping: management of municipal facilities and operations to reduce pollution. The City has developed an updated Stormwater Manage- ment Program Plan that outlines how the City will meet the minimum control measures during the current permit term. The City is required to submit an annual report that demon- strates how the City addressed each of these minimum control measures. Capital Improvement Projects and Maintenance The City owns and maintains a stormwater management system consisting of drainage structures, pipes, waterways, and stormwater management basins that are designed to convey stormwater runoff away from streets and buildings. The maintenance of the stormwater management system is vital in the protection of public health and safety. The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is a five-year outlook for anticipated capital projects and is reviewed annually by City Council, and adopted by Ordinance. The CIP provides funding for capital projects related to various City infrastructure, which includes the stormwater manage- ment system. The projects consist of both new stormwater management system infrastructure as well as the mainte- nance of the existing stormwater management system assets. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 159 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities Chapter 53 – Stormwater Management and Stream Protection Chapter 53 of the City of Dublin Code of Ordinances was established in 1998 and revised in 2005. Chapter 53 regulates stormwater from areas of new development and redevelopment for the purpose of protecting public health and safety and provides provisions for stream protection. Chapter 53 is the legal backing to enforce the Storm- water Master Plan, and also established the City of Dublin Stormwater Management Design Manual. The Stormwater Management Design Manual is a document that sets forth the City standards for stormwater management and provides guidance for engineers in developing plans and stormwater management calculations. The Stormwater Management Design Manual includes control for peak release rates of stormwater runoff (water quantity), water quality, and erosion and sediment on construction sites. The Stormwater Management Design Manual also provides guidelines for control measures, such as retention and detention basins. Also codified in Chapter 53, Stream Corridor Protection Zones have added a layer of protection for stream corri- dors that may have otherwise been adversely effected by development and where no other regulations provided for the preservation of the riparian buffers. These zones apply to streams within Dublin that do not have federally desig- nated floodways or floodplains. These zones will also aid to protect residents from the impacts of flooding and land loss through erosion. Chapter 53 regulates activities within the Stream Corridor Protection Zone. Chapter 151 – Flood Control Dublin has participated in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) since 1980, administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), through the adoption of Chapter 151 of the City of Dublin Code of Ordinances by Ordinance 27-80. The NFIP makes flood insurance available to property owners in communities that agree to adopt an ordinance regulating development in flood prone areas. The floodplain regulations required by NFIP are designed to accomplish three basic objectives related to flood damage protection: ■To prevent new developments from unduly increasing flood damages to others; ■To ensure that new buildings will be free from flood damage; and ■To ensure that existing buildings, when substantially damaged or improved, will be brought up to current floodplain regulations so they will be flood protected. Dublin’s code exceeds these minimum require- ments. Chapter 151 requires the necessary controls and provisions, but also includes a 20 foot buffer zone to flood- ways. No fill shall be placed between the floodway and the base flood elevation (flood fringe) or between the floodway and 20 feet from the floodway, whichever is less. Under NFIP, the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), otherwise known as the floodplain or 1-percent chance of a flood, is the area of land that would be inundated by the base flood. This floodplain is the area regulated by Dublin for compliance with the NFIP. In addition, the floodplain limits that are shown on the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), FEMA publishes Flood Insurance Studies (FISs) that identify floodplain limits on many streams within the City. The limits of the floodplain are identified through engineering analysis that provides a flooding elevation at a particular location that can be compared to the ground elevations. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Utilities | Envision Dublin Community Plan 160 FUTURE PROJECTIONS The future of stormwater management regulations will evolve over time and may include more prescriptive requirements for specific watersheds, numeric effluent limits, minimum control measures, encouragement of low-impact development design, and retrofits to restore urban hydrology. Each state is required by Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1313), to submit a prioritized list of impaired waters to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for approval. The list indicates the waters of Ohio that are currently impaired and may require total maximum daily load (TMDL) development in order to meet water quality standards. TMDL reports identify and evaluate water quality problems in impaired water bodies and propose solutions to bring those waters to attain water quality standards. TMDLs are estab- lished for phosphorus, sediment, fecal coliform bacteria, dissolved oxygen, ammonia, floodplain capacity, bed load, and habitat. Some of the recommended solutions to address the impairments include storm water controls, point source controls, manure management, and habitat improvements. As part of the federal Clean Water Act, the U.S. EPA must review and approve each TMDL. The TMDL report for the Scioto River is under development as of early 2024. The Ohio EPA issues the General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater Associated with Construction Activity and the Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems Permit that the City is required to comply with. The permits are updated every 5 years and were most recently issued in 2023 and 2021 respectively. The two permits complement one another, and contain provisions that require the City to maintain a stormwater management program. Bridge Street District The Bridge Street District is a highly walkable, urban envi- ronment within the City of Dublin. An integrated approach for stormwater management within sites in this District includes alternatives to traditional ponding of stormwater, such as the use of green roofs, permeable pavement, bio-retention facilities, rain barrels, planter boxes, etc. These practices optimize the land for creating the urban and walkable community desired. This stormwater manage- ment approach is described in the City of Dublin Storm- water Management Design Manual. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Stormwater management continues to be an important part of the City’s infrastructure system. The City’s regula- tions regarding water quality, the management of storm- water, and the preservation of the natural stream corridors should be periodically reviewed and updated to comply with state and federal regulations as well as best manage- ment practices. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 161 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Utilities WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Utilities | Envision Dublin Community Plan 162 0Purpose This chapter reinforces the importance of being good stewards of the natural environment and offers strategies for environmental sustainability best practices to ensure natural resources and environmental features remain valued community assets. 1 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 163 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Natural Resources and Environment Dublin is an exceptional place to live, in large part, due to its complementary mix of intact and functioning natural ecosystems and a high-quality built environment. Its natural resources and environment ground the community in place and provide a foundation for its future. Residents and visi- tors alike cherish these elements and rank the City’s parks, natural areas, and open space as some of the most desir- able and valued features in Dublin. During the community outreach process, residents also identified sustainability and resilience as strong values and high priorities for the community. Incorporating practices that improve the City’s stormwater management, protect and sustainably manage wetlands and trees, and preserve topsoil, including clean drinking water, clean air, and biodiversity, which will make the City more resilient to growth and a changing climate. The pages ahead identify Dublin’s goal for maintaining and improving its environment and provides practical recom- mendations for how the City can achieve its aims. Dublin enjoys a relatively temperate climate, receiving more than 40 inches of precipitation annually and ranging in average temperature from an average low of 21 degrees in January, ito an average high of 84 degrees in July. The plan- ning area includes open plains in its western half and rolling terrain and steeply sloping edges and limestone outcroppings along the Scioto River. The central and southwestern parts of the City are relatively flat and contain Miamian-Kokomo-El- dean soils prone to flooding and ponding. Before Euro-Amer- ican settlement, the land was forests and tall grass prairie. Native forests have been replaced with an urban forest, maintained and managed by municipal staff and private property owners. Though neighborhoods, golf courses, office parks and other developments have changed the environ- ment, natural processes are still at work in Dublin. They must be considered and managed to protect residents, wildlife, property and the City’s quality of life. The chapter identifies Dublin’s goal for maintaining and improving its environment and provides practical recommendations for how the City can achieve its goals. I’ll always veer to more green areas, large trees and open spaces. That is a large part of what I consider to set Dublin apart and above other communities. NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT10 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Natural Resources and Environment 164 Goal and Objectives for Natural Resources and Environment PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE INTEGRITY OF NATURAL SYSTEMS THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP. ■Grow the local tree canopy. ■Encourage the preservation and restoration of existing native plants and landscapes. ■Protect topsoil resources from erosion. ■Preserve and enhance watershed management and natural hydrological systems. ■Protect streams and their buffers and provide public access, particularly along the Scioto River. ■Enhance public awareness and involvement in environmental stewardship. ■Connect people with nature. ■Reduce urban heat-island effects. The goal and objectives for the Natural Resources and Environment Chapter were developed in response to what we heard from the public, an analysis of existing conditions, and a review of past studies. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 165 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Natural Resources and Environment Most Sustainable. Identifying ecologically sensitive and important areas including soils and watersheds, planning for wildlife management, and the maintenance and expansion of the City’s tree canopy are all essential elements of Dublin’s stewardship of its natural resources and environment. Through these activities Dublin can advance its goal of being the most sustainable community. Most Connected. With its abundant parks, open space, trails and natural areas - distributed equitably throughout the City - Dublin has the ability to be one of the most connected communities in terms of providing opportunities for residents to connect to nature. Through stewardship of its natural resources and environment and forward-thinking investment in parks, open space, and trails, Dublin can protect natural ecosystems while making Dublin an even more desirable place to live. Most Resilient. Planning to protect and improve Dublin’s biodiversity, manage its watersheds to absorb extreme precipitation events, maintain and supporting healthy ecosystems, and planning to mitigate the heat island effect through green infrastructure are all meaningful measures to make the City the most resil- ient. These measures prepare Dublin for shocks associated with a changing climate and enable it to recover quickly when crises occur. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Natural Resources and Environment 166 PROTECTING AND ENHANCING NATURAL SYSTEMS THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP Dublin’s verdant landscape and trees, fertile soil, ample rainfall, and rivers and streams have attracted people to the area for centuries. Its temperate climate and natural resources continue to contribute to its appeal as a place to live, work, play and invest. Survey respondents indicated that most Dublin residents want to protect current natural resources and ensure that future development proceeds in a sustainable manner. As the City grows, a key objective is the preservation of existing resources to sustain a high quality of life for current and future residents. This includes identifying critical resources, habitat, and natural areas and planning for their protection and enhancement or for mitigation when necessary. If done well, future development and environmental sustainability can form two pillars of a resilient Dublin. As Dublin’s population expands, demand for new housing will put pressure on open space and wetlands. New devel- opment will push out into undeveloped land permanently altering ecosystems and removing the essential services they provide the community including clean water, clean air, shade and moderation of the heat island effect, wildlife habitat and biodiversity, and the aesthetic and psycholog- ical benefits residents receive from connecting with nature. To meet the challenge of sustainably accommodating growth and maintaining and enhancing the natural systems that support Dublin’s high quality of life and make it resilient to change, the City will need to focus on three objectives: watershed management, preserving its tree canopy and soils, and creating a livable environment. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT Protecting and managing Dublin’s watershed is a primary consideration in making the City sustainable and resilient. Watersheds—the land areas that water moves down and across into streams and rivers—are the foundations of the ecological systems that provide water for drinking and irri- gation. They also play a key role in absorbing precipitation, mitigating the effects of extreme weather events. Lastly, they contain most of the biological diversity and wildlife habitat in the Dublin area. Planning for their protection and management is vital to achieving the City’s sustainability and resilience goals. Streams, rivers, wetlands and riparian areas provide clean drinking water, biodiversity, and wildlife habitat and are some of the most changed and endangered ecosystems in North America—85 percent of Ohio’s wetlands have been destroyed or are no longer considered ecologically functional after more than two centuries of settlement and agriculture. Protecting Dublin’s watershed and restoring its ability to provide essential ecosystems services is critical to the livability and resilience of the community. The City recognized watershed management as a central compo- nent of its the 2018-2020 Dublin Sustainability Frame- work. Further, watershed protection and management is a positive effect of the plans for an inter-connected regional greenway system along central Ohio’s rivers planned in by the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission’s (MORPC) RAPID 5 initiative. The recommendations provided in the pages that follow can add to these efforts and help the City achieve the objective of managing its watershed for sustain- ability and resilience. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 167 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Natural Resources and Environment SUSTAINABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT By encouraging sustainable land development and low impact design (LID), in addition to implementing the City’s established stormwater management requirements, appro- priately located developments informed by an integrated approach that considers natural processes, Dublin can decrease the negative impacts of growth on watersheds. Current GIS data can be used to identify sensitive water- shed areas and hydrological considerations in deciding where development should be prohibited or required to incorporate conservation design. Design elements including green roofs that absorb and slow stormwater and decrease heat retention and reduce heating/cooling costs, perme- able driveways and exterior decking, planting native plants landscape features such as rain gardens and bioswales, and planting trees can further protect watersheds. Dublin is already implementing some of these elements in its zoning and development codes. As growth continues, it will be important to consider increasing sustainable land develop- ment and LID requirements. Conservation Design Conservation design is an essential component of sustainable land development for new residential proj- ects. It describes an integrated process that considers the topography, hydrology, vegetation, wildlife as well as resident well-being and sense of place in designing and constructing a new residential development. It emphasizes identifying and inventorying ecologically important areas (such as wetlands, mature woodlands, open space), and then selecting housing locations to complement the location of open space while maintaining density. Home values often increase with proximity to open space and clustering homes around open space ensures that each property has access to common open areas. Conservation design can significantly decrease the impacts of new residential development on watersheds. Dublin currently encourages that all new development proposals in areas that include woods, streams, river frontage, steep slopes, and other natural features or that include significant open space, and specifically those along the River Corridor and near Glacier Ridge Metro Park, incorporate conservation design. In these areas, the City recommends that at least 50% of proposed developed land be preserved as open space. STREAM BUFFERS A practical solution to protecting and managing Dublin’s watersheds are stream buffers. Stream buffers, or riparian buffers, are areas along a watercourse that is protected from development through designated setbacks to preserve riparian ecosystems and the ecosystem services they provide including reducing flood hazards, slowing storm- water runoff and erosion and increasing aquifer recharge, cleaning water, providing wildlife habitat and biodiversity both on the land and by providing shade to and cooling stream or river water, and reducing noise. Typically, buffers involve specified setbacks from a watercourse where devel- opment is prohibited. Dublin currently provides educational to property owners for incorporating stream buffers into landscaping on their property and the City’s stormwater code requires setbacks in designated Stream Corridor Protection Zones and near pocket wetlands. Buffers should be considered as an essential component of sustainable land development for new residential developments in areas that include streams and wetlands. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Natural Resources and Environment | Envision Dublin Community Plan 168 PRESERVING DUBLIN’S TREE CANOPY AND SOILS Despite more than two centuries of change, Dublin is home to a thriving, diverse tree canopy - an urban forest planted and cared for by residents and the City mixed with native trees preserved intentionally or by fortune of their locations. Dublin also retains productive topsoil, a legacy of ancient processes that provided the foundation for the community’s agricultural beginnings and now nurtures the community’s verdant landscapes and biodiverse ecosystems. An urban tree canopy provides a multitude of essential benefits including: improved air quality; a cooling effect that moderates the “heat islands” created by concentrations of pavement, buildings and other surfaces that absorb and retain heat; reduced energy consumption; effective storm- water management and erosion control; enhanced biodi- versity by creating habitat for wildlife; promotion of mental and physical well-being for residents through green spaces and shade; aesthetic enhancement of urban landscapes; noise reduction; and increased property values. Dublin’s soils help manage stormwater runoff and floods, support urban agriculture, and moderate the heat island effect, an essential component for supporting a robust and healthy tree canopy. Protecting and improving both the City’s tree canopy and soils will ensure that Dublin’s environment will continue to provide essential ecosystem services as it grows and adapts to change. Dublin takes pride in its trees and has a long history of cultivating and caring for them. For 34 years, it has held the designation of Tree City USA by the National Arbor Day Foun- dation and remains committed to maintaining that status. For the past eight years, it has received the Growth Award. To monitor and track improvements in the tree canopy coverage, the City maintains a sophisticated GIS database that includes geo-located points for individual trees. It also analyses coverage using LIDAR and infrared imagery. By understanding the existing tree canopy, the City is able to identify where it needs to be improved or increased and also how it will be effected by proposed developments. This can inform decisions about how many trees to plant, when, and where and whether tree loss needs to be mitigated to account to loss from development and where that mitigation will have the greatest impact. The City’s geo-located data can also be laid over environmental data to guide natural resource management with implications for the kinds of trees that may be planted and their impact on soil erosion and health, stormwater runoff and flooding, wildlife habitat, and moderating the heat island effect. In addition to protecting existing tree canopy, a key focus will be to ensure that as the western growth area develops, the commitment to providing tree plantings/tree cover reflects the character of the estab- lished areas of the City. All of this data supports a general objective of growing the tree canopy which is especially vital to counter the impacts of development which include more impervious pavement and buildings which increase stormwater runoff and retains more heat, more cars with their noise and emissions, and more people which put pressure on existing wildlife habitat and biodiversity. SUPPORT TREE PRESERVATION AND PLANTINGS Mindful of the value of its trees, in 2001, Dublin adopted a tree preservation ordinance that restricts the removal of healthy trees with a diameter of six inches at breast height or greater for evergreens and two-and-a-half inches for deciduous. If removed, these “protected” trees must be replaced “inch-for-inch” within one year of the removal or the City may charge a fee in lieu of replacement. In the years since, the City has amended the ordinance to grant waivers in certain situations such as when a proposed development plans to incorporate a percentage of lost trees into the development. The City also maintains and makes available to its residents a Landscape and Tree Preservation Manual which provides guidance on the preferred kinds of trees to plan, which are prohibited due to their incom- patibility with the City’s ecosystems, and which stand up best to deer and pests. The manual also provides direction of obtaining a permit to remove a tree—a program that provides a vital check to unplanned, unregulated changes to the City’s tree canopy. Dublin also has an active tree replacement program that removes diseased trees and replaces them with hardier species and a “legacy tree program” in which residents pay to can leave a lasting memorial to a loved one in the form a tree and plaque, cared for by the City. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 169 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Natural Resources and Environment Scioto River N o rthFork In dianRun South F ork India n Run CHURCH M A N R DCOSGRAY RDBRANDR D FRANTZRDAVERYRDWOERNER TEMPLER D TA RAHILLDR INNO V A T IONDR S H I E R R I N G S RD R I N G S R D D U B L INS HIRE D R RIVERSIDEDR M O NTEREYDRCOFFMANRDDALEDRCARNOUST IEDRBALL A N T RAEP L E M E R A L D PKWY POST RD DUBLINRDPOSTRD BRIGHT R D S HIGH STTU LLY MOREDR ME M O RIA L D R WYNFO RDD R BRA N DO N WAYDR RINGS RD W BRIDGE STEARLINGTONPKWY VILLAGE PKWYPE R I M ETER D R TULLER RD M UIRFIEL D DRMARTIN RD WELDO N R D TO NTIDRMCKITRICK RD M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDBLAZER PKW YEITERMA NRDTUTTLE RDHERITAGE DRMETRO PL N HARDRDHYLAND-CROYRDRAUS C H D R E S T A T ESCTA S H F ORD R D 161 257 745 161 33 270 TREE CANOPY COVERAGE 0 0.5 10.25 Miles PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS Context Layers City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River 1-25% 25-50% 50-75% > 75% WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Natural Resources and Environment | Envision Dublin Community Plan 170 PROTECT TOPSOIL RESOURCES FROM EROSION Dublin collaborates with the Franklin Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) to locate, understand, and protect critical topsoil in and around the City. Program- ming includes educational materials for teachers to use in the classroom on the importance of soil and conser- vation and the “Backyard Conservation” program which helps residents reduce pollution from their homes from lawn fertilizers, pesticides, and vehicle fluids and employ common sense practices such as rain gardens, rain barrels or cisterns, native plants, drip irrigation, and pervious surfaces to reduce stormwater runoff. The Franklin SWCD also provides GIS services and natural resource evaluations to aid Dublin in protecting topsoil. Through a variety of programs and the actions of the City and private property owners, Dublin can protect its topsoil at the same time as it addresses other environmental considerations (e.g. wetlands, tree canopy, urban heat island effect) in ways that are mutually beneficial. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ■Continue and expand the City’s rain barrel reimburse- ment program to reduce storm runoff and soil erosion. ■Examine local development regulations for opportuni- ties to minimize impervious surfaces for new devel- opment and explore code amendments that better accommodate permeable surface alternatives. ■Consider low impact design and conservation design elements in all new residential developments. ■Strengthen open space requirements to specify higher percentages of native and/or adapted plantings and to prioritize non-turf green space. ■Incorporate stream buffers as a component of low impact and conservation design. ■Work with local land trusts to conserve undeveloped lands that are critical to watershed protection. ■Work with local non-profits and utilities to create incen- tives for planting trees on private property in line with the Landscape and Tree Preservation Manual. ■Prioritize tree replacement, increasing the tree canopy, mitigation for tree loss, and incorporation of existing trees into any zoning, planned unit development, or subdivision regulation updates with the goal of no net loss of trees. ■Utilize new development and capital improvement projects as opportunities in the western growth area to provide a level of tree plantings and tree canopy that is more reflective of the tree canopy in the established areas of Dublin. ■Prioritize soil protection and mitigation for soil loss in any zoning, planned unit development, or subdivision regulation updates with the goal of no net soil loss. ■Consider requiring design elements that reduce soil erosion from stormwater runoff including impervious driveways, rain gardens, and bioswales in new devel- opments. ■Strengthen the partnership with Franklin Soil and Water Conservation District and the Ohio Department of Agriculture Soil and Water Conservation Division to provide educational programs and incentives to protect topsoil. ■Work with local land trusts to conserve undeveloped land containing critical soils and intact woodland ecosystems. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 171 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Natural Resources and Environment CREATING A LIVABLE ENVIRONMENT Dublin’s environment must be livable - for both its resi- dents and wildlife. Three areas of concern that require specific attention are the heat island effect, managing wildlife and residents’ interactions with their wildlife neighbors, and ensuring all residents can connect with nature. The City’s efforts to ensure resilience benefits and reinforces other efforts. To mitigate the heat island effect, it can draw on conservation design principles and utilize green infrastructure to provide shade and cool local temperatures which has the added effects of creating habitat for birds, small mammals, and insects and cooling the water in streams and the Scioto River which bene- fits fish. Likewise, these tools are useful for watershed management. The last component of making Dublin’s environment livable is leveraging its wealth of parks, open space, trails, blueways and greenways to create oppor- tunities for residents to connect with the natural environ- ment. The following actions can help the City achieve the objective of creating a livable environment. MITIGATE THE HEAT ISLAND EFFECT “Heat islands” are areas of the built environment that retain heat during the day and radiate it back magnifying daytime temperatures and increasing nighttime tempera- tures where they exist. Typically, heat islands are found where the landscape is characterized predominantly by pavement and buildings which absorb and re-emit the sun’s heat more than natural landscapes such as forests and grasslands. The effect can be stifling with localized daytime temperatures being up to seven degrees hotter than outlying areas and nighttime temperatures being up to five degrees hotter. Seven and five degrees may not sound like a lot, but it means that residents will have to run their air conditioners longer, increasing their power bills and putting added strain on service providers. Combine this with projected growth and a warming climate and the effect can become a significant concern. Fortunately, Dublin’s environmental protection measures, as previously discussed, are effective in combating the heat island effect. Conservation Design and Low Impact Design, for instance, promote development that prioritizes open green space and minimizes pavement, reducing heat absorption. The City’s focus on maintaining and expanding the tree canopy not only provides shade but also helps cool surface temperatures, ultimately lowering home cooling costs. Additionally, the integration of green roofs into building design insulates structures and absorbs less heat than traditional roofing materials, resulting in cooler homes and reduced energy bills. Moreover, the incorporation of pervious driveways offers a cooler alternative to asphalt while also decreasing stormwater runoff, contributing to environmental sustain- ability. By maximizing open space through conservation design, Dublin further mitigates the impact of the heat island effect. As the City continues to grow and develop, addressing the heat island effect will remain a crucial consideration in future urban planning and design efforts. By prioritizing measures that limit impervious surfaces and promote green infrastructure, Dublin can foster a more sustainable and resilient environment for its residents. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Natural Resources and Environment | Envision Dublin Community Plan 172 MANAGING WILDLIFE As development encroaches into open space and wildlife habitat, and as green infrastructure creates new habitats for wildlife living in close proximity to humans, Dublin will need to actively manage wild animals to prevent negative interactions with humans, the spread of disease among and between species, and overpopulation of some species to the detriment of others. Without a significant predator population, coyotes, skunks, racoons, squirrels, mice, and other rodents will continue to thrive in proximity to residen- tial developments. Deer will also flourish on the endless range of residential grass and gardens, destroying flowers and threatening human health with Lyme disease, spread by the ticks they carry, and by walking into traffic. They City’s plentiful open space, riparian areas, and tree canopy is home to and attracts many species of birds including hawks and other raptors. Dublin recognizes that with its great natural assets come responsibilities. The 2018-2020 Dublin Sustainability Framework emphasizes coexistence with wildlife and public education to reduce confrontations with wild animals. The City also passed an Outdoor Feeding Ordinance to prohibit feeding any wild animals (excluding birds) and provides educational resources to residents about driving with deer, and preventing deer damage to private property through hazing, use of protective fencing, and by planting deer-resistant plants. CONNECTING TO NATURE Dublin residents are incredibly fortunate to have access to more than 1,500 acres of green space and more than 130 miles of trails. Parks and open space are natural loca- tions for residents to connect with nature, observe natural ecosystems and processes and learn about the environ- ment. Connecting to nature has positive psychological and physical benefits that add greatly to residents’ quality of life and well-being. Fortunately, much of the City’s green space is evenly distributed throughout the community and accessible to residents from all income levels and back- grounds. Thirty-six percent of Dublin’s population is within a 5-minute walk of a park or open space and 64% is within a 10-minute walk. There are gaps, however, and they tend to correlate with commercial districts. The Dublin Parks and Recreation Master Plan recommends considering adding parks in business and commercial districts. Regional recreational plans such as the Strategic Action Plan: Central Ohio Greenways, and MORPC’s RAPID 5 further support the expansion and connection of greenways and trails to enhance resident’s connection to nature. Dublin can enhance residents’ connection to nature by continuing to offer educational programming that helps residents under- stand where they live, the natural processes at work around them, how to co-exist with wildlife, and how to improve and restore the community’s natural assets. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ■Consider requiring low impact design and conservation design elements in all new residential developments to reduce the heat island effect. ■Work with local land trusts to conserve undeveloped lands that will reduce the heat island effect, protect wildlife habitat, and maintain open space to foster residents’ connection to nature. ■Continue and expand education programs about co-existing with wildlife including environmentally-safe ways to minimize negative interactions (e.g. deer-resis- tance plants, deer fencing). ■Consider measures to reduce wildlife-automobile colli- sions (e.g. deer crossing sensors and lights, wildlife over/underpasses in high traffic corridors frequented by wildlife). ■Consider incentive programs to reduce negative wild- life interactions (e.g. animal proof trash/compost/recy- cling receptacles, keeping house cats indoors, etc.). ■Support the recommendations of the Sustainability Framework Initiative to create resilient built environ- ments and protect natural resources. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 173 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Natural Resources and Environment COSGRAYRDWESTBU R YDRBRAND RD AVERY RDWOERNER TEMPL E RD TAR A H ILLDR SE L L S M IL LDRINNOVA T IO N DR S H I E R R I N G S R D R I N G S R D MARTIN RD D U B LIN SHIRED R RIVERSIDED R M O NTEREYDRCOFFMANRDDALEDRCARNOU S TIEDRBA L L A N T RAEPL GLICK R D E M E R A L D PKWY POST RD SWICKARD CT DUBLI NRDDUBLINRDBRIGHT R D S HIGH STT U L L YMOREDR M E M O RIALD R W Y NFOR D DRH A Y D E NRU N B L V D WILCOX RDB RA N D ONWAY D R RINGS RD W B RIDGE STEARLING TON PKWYJEROME RD VILLAGEP K WYPRIMROSE CT EMMET ROW LN P E RIMET E R DR TULLER RD BRITT ONPKWYMUIRFIELDDRF RANTZRD WELDON R D MCKITRICK RD TONTI DR M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDW Y A N D O TT E WOOD SBLVD C H U R C H M A N R D BLAZERPKWYCOSGRAY RDT U T T L E R DHERITAGE DRMUIRFIELDDRM ETRO PL N HAR D RDHYLAND-CROYRDEIT E R M A N R DRAUSC H D R E S TA TESCTA S H F O R D RD BROCK R D 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270SciotoRiverNor t hForkIndi a nRun S ou th F orkIndian Ru n ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES 0 0.5 10.25 Miles PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS Context Layers City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary Blueway Access Location River Wetland Parks and Open Space Watersheds Flood Hazard 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Regulatory Floodway WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Natural Resources and Environment | Envision Dublin Community Plan 174 1Purpose Provides detailed planning concepts for six evolving areas of Dublin.1 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 175 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans In addition to the preferred land use scenario for Dublin, the Community Plan identifies six special areas within the community that outline more detailed planning. These areas include parts of Dublin that may be experiencing rapid change, need more specific guidance to better direct development and investment, and/or desire to maintain an established community identity and sense of place. These areas represent significant opportunities for improve- ment and growth. The Special Area Plans are intended to guide investment in these areas in a coordinated manner. Public and private stakeholders located within these areas should consult these Special Area Plans to ensure consis- tency with the overall objectives of the Community Plan. Rather than directing development, the Special Area Plans demonstrate the potential of an area to allow for coordi- nated action by multiple stakeholders, including property owners, developers, the City, and local institutions. Each Special Area Plan includes specialized recommendations related to land use and development, urban design, and infrastructure improvements. The Special Area Plans are separated into six distinct areas that each provide an overview of the site, a summary of planning considerations, context specific planning goals, and a detailed framework map. Recommendations shown on the framework maps illustrate potential new develop- ment and redevelopment activity appropriate for each site. Area plan concepts are general guides to indicate potential development options. Plans are schematic only, and the actual mix of land uses, locations, and configurations of buildings, parking areas, and access points will be deter- mined through the public review process. Properties retain all existing rights. SPECIAL AREA PLANS11 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans 176 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 177 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS West Innovation District (WID) Southwest Area (SWA) Emerald Corridor (EC) Dublin Corporate Area (DCA) Bridge Street District (BSD) Historic District (HD) WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 178 WID SWA DCA BSD EC HD Establishing Dublin’s original early-1800s village as a valued place for today’s residents and visitors is important to provide a sense of history that grounds the community. Historic Dublin is a unique and charming mixed-use area that is characterized by residential-scale architecture and the distinctive use of limestone in its buildings and signature walls. Historic Dublin is centrally located within the City, adjacent to the Scioto River and includes public and commercial uses along two main streets: High Street and Bridge Street. These main commercial thoroughfares are surrounded by neighborhoods of single-family homes and civic uses. The area is bordered by the Scioto River to the east, Indian Run to the north, Cosgray Ditch to the south, and Corbins Mill Drive to the west. DISTRICT INTENT The central focus of the Historic District is to ensure the historic character is preserved while ensuring opportunity for investment and redevelopment at the appropriate scale and location. HD HISTORIC DISTRICT AREA PLAN PLANNING CONTEXT The City’s Historic District includes properties outlined on Appendices F and G within the Zoning Code, which are under the purview of the Architecture Review Board. Within the Historic District, there are properties that are individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and a series of properties that make up a National Register Historic District called the Dublin High Street Historic District. The National Register Historic District and the City’s local historic district designation are two important tools used to support a community’s historic resources. To further support this, properties within the Historic District were evaluated to identify those that should have a higher burden of consideration from a historic perspective. An era of significance was established based on the overall time period of 1830-1920, which includes the properties within the NRHP – Dublin High Street Historic District and the individually listed NRHP properties. Those structures constructed during the era of significance, as well as other structures identified as integral to the District are considered Landmark and those constructed outside the timeframe are considered Background. The designations provide greater clarity for property owners, staff, and the Architectural Review Board for development review and are reflected in the Zoning Code and Guidelines. HISTORIC DISTRICT TASK FORCE The Historic District Task Force established in October 2019 recommended updates to the previous Historic District Area Plan based on community-wide visioning and stakeholder engagement. Prior to this effort, the Historic District Area Plan was incorporated in the Bridge Street District, which resulted in development that threatened to the historic character and scale. The Task Force’s recommendations focused on the character of the District, historic preservation, housing needs, economic vitality and mixed-use opportunities, district gateways and wayfinding, streetscape and open space/gathering spaces, and public art and events, and define the area recommendations included within the Historic District Area Plan. HISTORIC DISTRICT CODE AND GUIDELINES The Historic District Code and Design Guidelines provide zoning regulations and character recommendations solely focused on the Historic District. The overarching policy guid- ance within these documents focus on preservation of historic resources first, while also allowing for infill and redevelopment that fits within the character of the Historic Character. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 179 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans AREA RECOMMENDATIONS S. HIGH STREET VITALITY South High Street is experiencing a quiet resurgence with new projects locating in original buildings. This coupled with the recent streetscape improvements creates an opportunity for increased revitalization of South High Street, which could include: ■Promote more event venues for the core district (i.e. uses that encourage foot traffic, such as farmers/seasonal markets, holiday festivals, ethnic festivals, small movie theater, outdoor theater, or performing arts, etc.). ■Allow promotional opportunities that announce events such as banners, displays, street/sidewalk art, etc. ■Investigate the opportunity for more family-oriented activities. ■Explore the idea of reclaiming select on-street parking areas to create unique parklets or areas for outdoor seating and gathering areas that support adjacent businesses. ■Identify opportunities for additional public art and public open space, or leveraging existing area such as the Karrer Barn to draw visitors to the southern end of the District. PRESERVATION The overarching goal of the District is to preserve and main- tain the historic fabric within the era of significance. This ranges from preserving entire buildings to preserving indi- vidual elements, such as original windows, stone hitching posts, and the iconic stone walls. The recent designation of the Landmark and Background structures within the Code and Guidelines identifies the existing character that should be preserved and provides guidance to achieve this. For Landmark structures, demolition should only be considered when health, safety, and welfare are at stake. The recogni- tion and protection of these Landmark structures should be supported through the provision of education, resources, and support for building owners. This could include the City’s Commercial Façade Improvement Grant, and proac- tive compliance and enforcement efforts. “The scale of the district needs to re- main small, dense and urban.” “Preservation of Dublin’s historic charm is key within the district.” PROPER SCALE OF DEVELOPMENT The Historic District Code and Guidelines address the appropriate height, scale and massing of buildings with the Historic District to ensure the quaint nature of the area is maintained. As development continues within the District, adherence to the design standards that reinforce the estab- lished character of the Historic District including building height, scale, massing and materials should be followed. This is particularly applicable for Landmark structures. Flex- ibility in the application of the standards should be allowed for Background structures while ensuring they maintain their unique character. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 180 STREETSCAPES The Historic District streetscape character should focus on pedestrian-friendly design, which includes: ■Wider sidewalks to allow adequate pedestrian move- ment that are well kept, well maintained and surfaces are level and do not create tripping hazards. ■Amenities for various modes of transportation including biking (i.e. bike racks, bike service/repair stations, etc.). ■Streetlights that are compatible and appropriately designed and scaled for the District. ■Benches, trash receptacles, and other amenities that are in character with the District. ■Street tree selections should be species native to central Ohio and have a growth rate and scale that is appropriate for the District. ■Street trees should be planted with underground space and soil conditions that will support healthy growth (Silva Cell System, etc.). DISTRICT CONNECTIONS Connections throughout the Historic District, as well as between the District and the surrounding areas, including the Bridge Street District are important to ensuring access is available to the amenities each of these areas has to offer. Connects should focus on the following: ■Identify opportunities for synergy throughout the District, connecting and leveraging the development patterns and activities between the northern and southern end of the District. ■Encourage pedestrian connections and movements crossing Bridge Street. ■Focus on opportunities to provide an anchor in the southern portion of the District to strengthen the connections. ■Explore opportunities for a continuous riverfront open space connection and along existing north/south streets. ■Strengthen connection to the Bridge Street District, Metro Center, and adjacent residential neighborhoods. MICROMOBILITY AND MOBILITY CORRIDORS The City is focused on how to safely incorporate different modes of travel to, and throughout, the District, allowing the area to be a destination for all walkers and rollers. Support this recommendation should include: ■Provide bike and e-bike travel adjacent to High Street on safer, less auto-oriented secondary streets. ■Incorporate micromobility stations within the District that offer charging and parking options. ■Provide bike racks at key intersections, which may also function as public art. ■Identify opportunities for the Dublin to be a major point of interest along a future city-wide east-west mobility corridor. PARKING OPPORTUNITIES Vibrant, mixed-use areas such as the Historic District provide an opportunity to park once and use another mobility option to move around within the District and get to other destina- tions in the area. A number of existing public and private parking areas and on-street parking provide a variety of options to meet the needs of visitors to the District. Oppor- tunities to support development through existing parking options can be achieved through a variety of strategies: ■Investigate alternative parking standards to allow for easier consolidation of parking lots and parking lot upgrades. ■Use material and landscape that is compatible with the Historic District. ■Promote the approval of parking plans, where public lots and garages can be used instead of on-site, private parking. ■Investigate the potential elimination of on-site parking requirements. ■Encourage shared parking. ■Investigate app-based technology to assist in parking management. ■Investigate methods to ensure private parking lots are well-maintained and incorporate necessary screening and landscaping.WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 181 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans The preservation and celebration of the distinctive number of public and private open spaces and greenway connec- tions within the District are an important objective and should include: ■Greenway connections throughout the District should be identified for preservation with future development, especially around Dublin Springs Park and Indian Run. ■Proper identification, demarcation and physical connection are needed for the existing parks and open space network that connects to and through the Historic District including Indian Run Falls Park, the Dublin Veterans Park/Grounds of Remembrance, West Pedestrian Bridge Plaza, Library Plaza, BriHi Plaza, Visit Dublin Plaza, Karrer Barn Park, Dublin Springs Park, Kiwanis Riverway Park and the Riverside Crossing Park. ■Additional designated physical access points to the Scioto River and Riverside Crossing Park should be considered. ■Continued coordination and collaboration with Dublin Parks and Recreation Department on all open and park space is also a key component. ■Identification of additional space or park areas south of SR 161 and opportunities for a southern anchor and river access on underutilized properties (i.e. Karrer Barn and McDowell property) should be considered. ■A new public park or plaza with appropriately scaled development should be considered with the future redevelopment of 55 S. High Street. INDIAN RUN CORRIDOR The Indian Run is an important natural corridor within the City, but also a character defining feature within the Historic District. Recommendations for the preservation of the Indian Run and the adjacent greenway corridor, include: ■Ensure the character of future development minimizes impacts on the corridor (limiting building heights, ensuring building setbacks, etc.). ■Maintain a significant natural buffer along Indian Run Falls and the adjacent corridor to ensure a natural corridor, which could become a city owned linear park/open space. Consider a permanent easement or agreement (conservation easements). ■Investigate the inclusion of a multi-use paths and ravine overlook areas along the southern boundary of the Indian Run corridor to provide an east-west connection. “The district needs more event space and green areas for gatherings.” “We need to respect our natural corri- dors with emphasis on Indian Run.” WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 182 GATEWAYS Create an opportunity for the incorporation of gateway features at key transition points into the District that provide an arrival experience for visitors, help to slow traffic, and identify the area as special. A gateway would differen- tiate the District from other parts of the city and include columns, archways, monumental signage, walls, or land- scaping. Specific focus and improvements should be made to the east gateway, across the SR161 vehicular bridge to High Street, minimize or eliminate curb cuts, and screen parking areas, (i.e., low screen walls, landscape screening, street trees, etc.). SUPPORT OF THE DISTRICT Continued collaboration and support of the Historic District by the City, as well as Visit Dublin, Dublin Chamber of Commerce, Dublin Historical Society, Downtown Alliance, Architectural Review Board, and the Historic District Business Association will benefit all within the District. The City’s Commercial Façade Improvement Grant, which allows for matching grants for projects that preserve and maintain buildings and sites should continue to be promoted as a resource to support businesses in the District. WAYFINDING Pedestrian and vehicular movements should be easily accessible throughout the District and supported by appropriate signage and wayfinding. App-based tech- nology could be explored to enhance wayfinding and provide historic and cultural information, as well as infor- mation about on-going events. ARTS AND CULTURE The Historic District has a unique opportunity to bring history-related displays, and art and culture activities that promote visitor attendance and vitality within the area, which could include: ■Provide art and cultural artifacts that represent the history of the District. ■Art and cultural displays that celebrate the Historic District, the history and culture of Dublin and the creative resources and talents of the community. ■Continued collaboration with the Dublin Arts Council, Dublin Historic Society and the school district to provide opportunities for coordinated efforts. Daily Chores Sculpture at BriHi Square Existing Historic Dublin gateway on Dublin Road Public art as backdrop to pocket plaza WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 183 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans KEY SITES & OPPORTUNITIES NORTH RIVERVIEW STREET The area along North Riverview Street provides a unique opportunity for investment and revitalization through preservation and redevelopment. The area has high visi- bility from the Dublin Link Bridge and is a pivotal location within the District along the Riverside Crossing Park West. Reinvestment for this area should focus on the preservation of neighborhood-scaled development with opportunities for appropriate infill and expansion. Preservation of the existing Landmark structures should be a priority. Roadway and intersection improvements for North Riverview Street, Blacksmith Lane and North Street should complement the pedestrian friendly nature of the Historic District and incorporate a unique streetscape design to enhance the experience. The opportunity to create pedestrian-only areas should also be explored. Key connections and interaction points with the Scioto River and Riverside Crossing Park should be coordinated with the City. DARBY LOT The existing surface parking lot is owned by the City and provides convenient parking for patrons of the District. The lot consumes an entire Historic District block and provides an opportunity to use the portion of the lot along Franklin Street for infill development. The Library garage is located north across North Street and should be leveraged with new development. MCDOWELL PROPERTY/DUBLIN QUARRY This property at the southeast corner of the District along the Scioto River provides an opportunity for neighbor- hood-scaled residential infill and potential access points to the Scioto River. Development should be sensitively sited to buffer from existing residences on Karrer Place. 55 SOUTH HIGH With any future redevelopment of 55 S. High Street (L-Shaped Building), a new public park or plaza with a new, appropriately scaled building or buildings should be considered. RIVERSIDE CROSSING PARK WEST The western portion of Riverside Crossing Park is intended to complement the more urban design of the eastern portion of the park by providing a naturalistic experience within the existing tree canopy and riparian areas. These opportunities include: ■Kayak launches, fishing platforms and direct interac- tion with the river. ■Trails, walks and canopy experiences. ■Celebration of natural and cultural features (i.e. mill, tannery, and quarry sites, Dublin Springs). ■Interpretive information, geo-caching, and bird watching. JOHN SELLS AND INDIAN RUN SCHOOLS The existing school sites located north of Bridge Street provides the long-term potential for redevelopment of a mixed-use development that complements Historic Dublin’s existing core. Any new development on this site should be treated sensitively and avoid creating negative impacts to the surrounding neighborhoods and natural areas, including the Indian Run located along the northern boundary. The historic 1919 Building should be preserved and incorporated within a larger redevelopment strategy for this site. Future development should presrve existing trees along the Indian Run corridor and provide expanded open space along Indian Run. For more information on Dublin’s history, please see Dublin’s Journey, written by the City of Dublin with Peter D. Franklin and Elaine Kehoe. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 184 Riverview Village Concept Pedestrian scaled commercial development. Infill development example. Infill townhome residential example. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Preservation of the 1919 Building Karrer Barn preservation and neighboor park amenity Potential cemetery expansion Infill development opportunity Connect Rock Cress Pkwy to Monterey Dr, Rock Cress Pkwy should not extend across the Indian Run Signalized intersection with crosswalks New street connection between Monterey Dr and Corbin Mills Dr Riverside Crossing Park improvements Pedestrian improvements to Scioto Bridge Preserve Indian Run Falls Park and expand adjacent open spaces. Future infill develop should be atleast 150 feet from the stream corridor, existing tree stands should be preserved District gateway location Improve access to riverfront Look for opporunities to improve pedestrian safety and comfort at intersection Incorporate mature trees into future development to preserve existing character Extend neighborhood fabric of District by aligning new infill development with existing street network, open spaces, and character of existing development Located new parking to the rear of building, outside the public realm buildings Foster public art and placemaking The Indian Run greenspace provides a corridor for new east-west signature trail, the corridor should provide unique experience through the District Align architecture or landscape features with terminal vistas 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 13 9 10 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 185 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans HISTORIC DISTRICT ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN LEGEND Community Landmark Building Existing Building Conceptual Infill Building Mixed Use Residential Area zoned Bridge Street District - Historic Transition Neighborhood WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 186 1 8 9 4 4 4 4 14 4 10 3 12 12 11 6 2 16 13 High Street Historic District17 18 11 11S High StS High StW Bridge StW Bridge St Riverside DrRiverside DrMonterey DrMonterey DrCorbin Mills DrCorbin Mills DrFranklin StFranklin StS RiverviewS RiverviewWaterford DrWaterford Dr Indian Run DrIndian Run Dr Bridge Park AveBridge Park Ave Dublin Cemetery Monterey Park Indian Run Cemetery Karrer Barn Scioto RiverIndian Run Falls Park Riverside Crossing Park Dublin Library Dublin Community Church Rock Cress PkwyRock Cress PkwyIndian R u nShawan Falls DrShawan Falls Dr7 5 Scioto BridgeThe Dublin Link15 19 The Southwest Area comprises nearly 1,500 acres of mostly undeveloped land stretching from Emerald Parkway to Houchard Road and bordering the City of Columbus to the south. The future extension of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard will open much of this area to development, although some development may occur in advance of the Tuttle Crossing Boulevard extension where access from existing roadways and utilities is already available. AREA INTENT The Southwest Area provides opportunities to support a variety of housing choices to meet the projected demands of the community within areas that are orga- nized around walkable neighborhoods centers with services and amenities, while also preserving the rural character of the area. SWA SOUTHWEST AREA PLAN PLANNING CONTEXT The Southwest Area contains the most available acreage for new residential development within the City, which has been a focus of discussion throughout the Envision Dublin process. The city continues to see interest from the devel- opment community for new residential development within the Southwest Area. The balance of residential and nonres- idential uses play an important role in the city’s overall success. As outlined in the West Innovation District Area Plan, the Southwest and WID areas are two major areas where potential future growth exists. The focus within the WID is economic growth and employment, while the South- west focuses on residential growth. In order to more clearly define these boundaries and ensure appropriate transitions are established, the area plan boundaries between WID and the Southwest have been modified. DUBLIN HOUSING STRATEGY AND STUDY The 2023 Dublin Housing Study and Strategy outlined a number of recommendations to address the projected housing demands within the community. These recommen- dations included the need for: ■Mixed-use, walkable communities that provide public space for social gathering and open space that enhance quality of life. ■Consistent, high-quality development that is indicative within the City of Dublin. ■Creation of “nodes” of activity throughout the community. ■Address how growth occurs, not just where it occurs. ■Ensure that residential land uses are sensitively placed in areas that do not compete with high-tax-value corri- dors (including interstates), environmentally sensitive areas, or other competing interests. The Southwest Area includes four distinct subareas with unique land use and transportation recommendations to fit the desired development character. NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN GUIDELINES The Neighborhood Design Guidelines provide a series of design solutions for evaluation of future residential develop- ment to ensure the City’s desired design goals are met. The creation of the Neighborhood Design Guidelines focus on recommendations that promote more creative and sustainable residential neighborhoods in Dublin, such as community character, open spaces, amenities, setbacks, and lot coverage. The Guidelines are organized into a hierarchy of three levels from the broad macro public realm of open spaces and preservation areas, to the micro level public realm of streets- capes as outdoor rooms, to the private realm of individual lots and the functions of various areas within the lots and lot types. The Guidelines play an important role in the creation of new neighborhoods within the Southwest area. CONSERVATION DESIGN Conservation design is an essential component of sustain- able land development for new residential projects, which describes an integrated process that considers the topog- raphy, hydrology, vegetation, wildlife as well as resident well-being and sense of place in designing and constructing a new residential development. It emphasizes identifying and inventorying ecologically important areas (such as wetlands, mature woodlands, open space), and then selecting housing locations to complement the location of open space while maintaining density. The City encourages new development proposals that include woods, streams, river frontage, steep slopes, and other natural features or that include significant open space to provide a conservation design study. This continued practice will be an important consideration for new residential development proposals in the Southwest Area. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 187 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans SUB-DISTRICTS The Southwest Area Plan can be divided into three distinct sub-districts with unique land use and transportation recommendations to fit the desired development character. Emerald to Avery The portion of the Southwest Area located between Avery Road and Emerald Parkway can be best characterized as a transition area awaiting local road improvements. Existing single-family and multi-family neighborhoods are located to the north, and residential and commercial development within the City of Columbus is located to the east and will require thoughtful transition with new development. Olde Dublin Woods at the southeastern corner of the Southwest Area and will be impacted by future development to the north within the City of Dublin, but also adjacent areas outside Dublin. Access to the area is provided via the Tuttle Crossing/I-270 interchange, and the corridor includes existing commercial uses, hotels and residences. Commercial zoning is in place for many parcels along Tuttle Crossing, but development has lagged despite the widening of Tuttle Crossing from Emerald Parkway to Wilcox Road in 2009. Future exten- sion of Tuttle Crossing westward to Avery Road will provide regional interstate access making Tuttle Crossing a major arterial. The need to plan for future impacts of the Tuttle Crossing extension is important to establishing proper land use and access management. Avery to Cosgray This portion of the Southwest Area is generally flat and includes few notable natural features; however, a significant woodland is centrally located and provides opportunity as a focal point for preservation of open space. The area contains a number of adjacent existing residential develop- ments, including the Ballantrae, Avondale Woods, National Church Residences, Ponderosa, as well as existing large lot, single-family homes along Rings Road. Most of the area remains agriculture, awaiting the future extension of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard. The Southwest Area lies largely within the Hilliard School District and includes Washington Elementary School, Hilliard’s first school facility in Dublin at the northwest corner of Rings Road and Eiterman Road. Transportation and development pressure define this portion of the Southwest Area. To the south lies devel- oping land within the City of Columbus that has resulted in higher density development and impacts to the larger road network. The extension of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard through this area facilitates future connectivity to Cosgray Road, which will provide direct interchange access for significant portions of residential development along the Hayden Run Corridor. Impacts on land uses and the ability to adequately transition uses will need to be mitigated with the alignment of the extension of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard and along the CSX railroad. Cosgray to Madison County This portion of the Southwest Area consists of undeveloped land west of the Village of Amlin. A number of single-family homes are located within the township along Cosgray and Houchard Roads and face the greatest potential impact from future development and expected road improvements. A significant portion of the land in the southwest corner of the study area includes the Hayden Run corridor, which flows from its headwaters near Dublin’s extreme southwest border east to Hayden Run Falls at the confluence with the Scioto River. A high-tension power line bisects the area, and the Heritage Trail Metro Park is located to the southwest. This area will be impacted by the future extension of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard and its connection to Houchard Road, opening the area for development. The Hayden Run Corridor and its associated floodplain significantly impacts road alignments and limits development options. The area is also located at the fringe of sewersheds, and capacities should be evaluated in conjunction with development. Amlin existing character along Rings Road. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 188 Existing character of the Southwest Area, view to south from Rings Road and Churchman roundabout WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 189 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 190 AREA RECOMMENDATIONS TUTTLE CROSSING BOULEVARD (TCB) EXTENSION The existing rural roadway network will not be sufficient to meet future needs of the area. Tuttle Crossing Boulevard is an important corridor intended to provide vehicular and utility access to most of the Southwest Area. In planning for the future, regional and local connectivity must be provided that maintains Dublin’s standards for quality, but also consider visual character. The character of the future Tuttle Crossing Boulevard extension is intended to be built with the design character of Muirfield Drive with a curvi- linear design allowing for key view sheds and vistas to be highlighted in the corridor and a significant green edge to support the rural character of the area. Variable medians, variable right-of-way widths creating increased setbacks, landscape treatments, mounding, shared use facilities, and other techniques should be implemented where possible to maximize aesthetic benefit. RINGS ROAD Rings Road is the northern boundary of the central portion of the area, separating the area from existing single-family residential development and institutional uses. The existing rural character of Rings Road should be preserved with new development to the south, mimicking the established character along the north side of the road. RAILROAD CORRIDOR The CSX Railroad bisects the center of the Southwest Area creating challenges for properties immediately adjacent to the railroad within the area. Properties adjacent to the rail- road should provide a significant vegetative buffer between development and the railroad, and limit residential uses within 200 feet of the railroad. Structures to alleviate noise from the railroad are not encouraged WALKING AND BIKING ROUTES TO SCHOOL Washington Elementary School located on Rings Road to the north of the area serves new residential developments that occur in the area. Developments should make an effort to provide safe, efficient, and effective pedestrian facilities providing direct access to Washington Elementary. GATEWAY OPPORTUNITIES Gateways act as key points of identification and present themselves as critical entrances into an area, or around key development opportunities, such as Amlin Village. Gate- ways should be designed to capture the rural character of the area with new development through building design, landscape features, and open space integration. Muirfield Drive north of Avery Road provides an example for the rural and green character of Tuttle Boulevard extension west of Avery Road Existing rural character of Rings Road. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 191 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans NATURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES The area largely features farmland, but does include areas of mature vegetation, small streams, and wetlands. These natural features should be preserved and enhanced to be community assets through new development. Stream Corridor Protection Zone requirements and appropriate buffering will limit potential areas for development within the corridor, and the use of existing natural buffers and tree cover should be integrated as amenities within development. Major stands of trees at the corner of Hirth Road should be preserved to their greatest potential by integrating them into neighborhood open spaces as residential development occurs on adjacent land. Existing tree rows should be maintained as ready-made screening and buffering for new development. GREENWAY CONNECTIONS As development occurs, natural features, tree rows and woodlots should be integrated into the design of a larger systems of connected open spaces. These greenway connections preserve nature features, act as a buffer for residents, and provide connectivity throughout the area and into adjacent jurisdictions for maximum pedestrian and recreational benefit. The Heritage Trail located southwest of Dublin stretching 6.1 miles from the City of Hilliard to the Village of Plain City, as well as the future Dublin Signature Trail are two examples of larger greenway connection opportunities. WOODED RESERVE AT AVONDALE WOODS This reserve is dedicated as open space with the Avondale Woods development, and is approximately 29 acres. This natural open space should remain naturalized, and adja- cent development should include preservation of natural vegetation, with appropriate buffers to the open space. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 192 Examples of existing tree stand incoporated into design home neighborhood. HOUSING VARIETY This area offers opportunities for an expansion of residential development in many different forms. Future residential developments should consider the incorpo- ration of traditional single-family, attached single-family, duplex, triplex, and other ‘Missing Middle’ housing stock to provide diversity to the Dublin housing market. Additionally, where consistent with the Future Land Use recommendations, integration of multiple styles of housing within each development should be encouraged to create connected and diverse neighborhoods. PONDEROSA Ponderosa is an existing protected neighborhood located southwest of the intersection of Rings and Avery Road. Development adjacent to Ponderosa should be integrated with the existing street network, provide an adequate natural buffer to the neighborhood, and provide residen- tial lots that transition appropriately from Ponderosa to the rest of the Southwest area. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 193 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans TRANSITIONS Integration of local services and coordination with surrounding residential areas will be a component for future planning success in the corridor. Land uses should be provided that carefully transition and provide a sense of integration with clearly defined open space and pedestrian connections and opportunities. Internal road development should be sensitively designed to limit impacts to existing neighborhoods. WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOODS AND NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS Residential development in the area should be designed to conserve open space and natural features such as existing woodlots and tree rows, and regional transportation connectivity is extremely important. Neighborhoods should be designed with robust pedestrian facilities, including integrated sidewalks and shared-use paths connecting each development. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 194 KEY SITES & OPPORTUNITIES VILLAGE OF AMLIN Amlin is a rural community with a unique and quaint char- acter that should be protected as adjacent development occurs. Future residential development in the area should provide adequate separation with open space to visually define a clear transition between traditional neighborhood design and the surrounding area. Construction of the Rings Road bypass will also facilitate an opportunity to create clear gateway features that will further signify the impor- tance of the village area. SW HIRTH AND TUTTLE CROSSING This property features a major stand of trees and a protected stream corridor located along the southern edge of the tree stand. The tree stand should be preserved to the greatest potential by integrating into the neighborhood open spaces as residential development occurs on adjacent land. Hirth Road is a low traffic corridor that primarily serves single-family residential properties on Olde Dublin Woods Drive. To maintain the character of Hirth Road, development should primarily be residential. Development should include a mix of residential, varying from traditional single-family homes to townhomes, and utilize the stream as a primary open space feature. WILCOX AND TUTTLE CROSSING BOULEVARD INTERSECTION These undeveloped properties are located at an important future gateway intersection of the cities of Columbus and Dublin. The properties are adjacent to existing residential development and are intended for neighborhood-scale mixed use development. The development of these sites should include primary orientation along Tuttle Crossing Boulevard with a minimum 50 setback to preserve the character of the corridor. Uses should be oriented towards retail/commercial and office, with opportunities for multi- family as a secondary use of the site. AVERY ROAD TO RAILROAD (EXCLUDING AMLIN) Future land uses within the area include neighbor- hood-scale mixed use development along Avery Road, transitioning to mixed residential uses to the west along the extension of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard. Development along the Tuttle Crossing Boulevard Extension should provide landscaping, buffering and setbacks that support the rural character intended for the roadway. Substantial care must be taken to properly manage area develop- ment and minimize traffic impacts to existing residential development within the areas. Future development should provide thoughtful transition and buffering between existing and future land uses. As development occurs, tree rows and woodlots should be integrated into the design of open space systems. A minimum 100-foot setback, substantial landscaping and mounding is required for residential devel- opment located adjacent to the railroad RAILROAD TO COSGRAY (EXCLUDING AMLIN) This portion of the Southwest Area provides a key oppor- tunity to transition from small-lot single-family housing in Columbus to the south, to the anticipated village center character of Amlin. South of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard, development should consist of single-family residen- tial, provide significant setbacks from the railroad and Tuttle Crossing Boulevard, and utilize retention basins and landscape features to occupy the setback area. The area north of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard should create the southern edge of the Amlin area, providing several opportunities for single-family, multi-family, and mixed residential neighborhoods. The density of development should continue to increase as development gets closer to Amlin, but now exceed 3 stories (2 stories adjacent to Tuttle Crossing Boulevard and Hayden Run). Open space should be provided through both existing naturalized areas, like the wetlands along the railroad, and new green and open spaces connecting each development. COSGRAY TO MADISON COUNTY (EXCLUDING AMLIN) This portion of the Southwest Area includes large, open farmlands, the meandering headwaters of Hayden Run, a transition to Heritage Trail Park in Hilliard, and the future extension of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard. This area is expected to include a suburban residential character moving southwest from Amlin, but creating opportunities for single-family, multi-family, and mixed residential neigh- borhoods adjacent to Amlin. The density of development should continue to increase as development gets closer to Amlin, but now exceed 3 stories (2 stories adjacent to Tuttle Crossing Boulevard). Protecting the headwaters and riparian corridor of Amlin with appropriate buffering and low impact land uses that manage runoff is important for the overall quality of the stream corridor. This requires a balance between the envi- ronment and development to adequately protect features that will serve as an important amenity to future residents. Future development should provide for the opportunity to connect to the Heritage Trail via sidewalks, greenways, and shared-use paths. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 195 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans CASE STUDY: WESTHAVEN Westhaven | Franklin, TN Westhaven is a 1,500 acre greenfield development in Franklin, TN, a suburb of Nashville. It is a traditional neighborhood development that is pedestrian friendly with narrower than usual streets with sidewalks. There is a Town Center with various shops, restaurants and services. The development applies conservation design principles, preserving large amounts of woods and natural features throughout and surrounding the neighborhood. This development utilizes a wide variety of housing types to create unique neighborhoods. 14 different lot types are built throughout the development, ranging from townhomes on 20-foot wide lots to grand manors on 105-foot lots. Each lot type is strategically integrated with each other, creating multiple housing types in each block of the development, which is visualized by the map (top right). This development also features several different types of architecture and massing, utilizing the architectural styles of Georgian, Craftsman, and other traditional building types. Homes in this neighborhood range between 1 and 3 stories in height. This development offers an example of a successful mixed residential development that is desired for the Southwest Growth Area. With approximately 2,700 housing units in the development, Westhaven offers housing for young professionals, families, and retired individuals to create a multi-generational neighborhood. Service streets with landscaping Mix of neighborhood commercial and residential uses within two and three stories Homes organized to address focal open space Homes with front porches Missing middle residential Open space for community gathering space and activities WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 196 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Preserve rural character along Rings Road Generous setbacks, landscaping and berming should be provided along the extension of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard west of Avery Road Tuttle Crossing Boulevard extension rail overpass Large existing woods stand, community park and trailhead opportunity Protect and integrate Hayden Run into future developement Existing high-voltage power corridor Make connection to the Heritage Trail Metro Park Create walking and biking connections to Washington Elementary Preserve and enhance Ponderosa Mobile Home Estates Protect and intergrate watercourse and tree stand into future development Intergrate existing street connections into future development Create a walkable neighborhood Center in Amlin Intergrate tree stands and other natural features into the design of future development Focus non-residential uses along rail corridor, buffer rail corridor with setbacks, landscaping, and mounding; residential dwellings should be at least 200-feet from active rail line 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 9 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 197 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans SOUTHWEST AREA ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN LEGEND Residential Mix 1 to 3 units/acre Up to 12 units/acre 13 Neighborhood Mixed Use Commercial Office/Employment Area Civic, Faith, and Cultural Area within the City of Columbus WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 198 45 1 8 2 3 7 14 6 11 9 10 122 Heritage Trail Park Washington Elementary Tuttle Crossing BlvdTuttle Crossing Blvd Emerald PkwyEmerald PkwyHayden Run RdHayden Run Rd Cosgray RdCosgray RdAvery RdAvery RdWilcox RdWilcox RdI am s R d I am s R d Houchard RdHouchard RdRings RdRings Rd Hirth RdHirth RdEiterman RdEiterman RdHyaden RunFuture Columbus Police Substation Electrical SubstationTuttle Crossing BlvdTuttle Crossing BlvdAmlin Church City of Columbus City of Columbus City of Columbus PLANNING CONTEXT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY The WID plays an important role in the City’s economic development strategy that was updated in 2023, which outlines a series of strategies and actions to continue Dublin’s economic success and competitiveness within the region. Similar to the Bridge Street District and the Dublin Corporate Area Plan, Strategy 1 within the Plan focuses on Creating Distinctive Mixed-Use Development Nodes to Meet 21st Century Industrial Demand for Vibrant Physical Space while Maintaining Dublin’s High Quality of Place Standards. The Plan calls out action steps within this Strategy to move the West Innovation District forward by setting the condi- tions for development attractive to the targeted industry clusters. The Plan highlights that Dublin has provided considerable focus within the West Innovation District and it is critical the city continue to support this key area and help set the conditions for future growth and development. REGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS The WID vision is also important for Dublin to stay compet- itive relative to regional and national trends. From gener- ational behaviors to economic climate, the workplace is changing and there are many factors contributing to the shift. For the District to thrive it must respond as industries and companies change their approach to business trends and focus on agile and efficient practices to support this environment. The outcome of these influences is a work- force that is very independent but also values collaboration as the key to success. LIVE-WORK-PLAY BALANCE Another important element to the emerging workforce is communities that provide a balance of live-work-play to attract this generation of workers and compete with the urban areas that provide these offerings. This includes providing compact and walkable environments, the ability to attract a labor force, provide advancements in tech- nology, provide public and private partnerships, provide interdisciplinary research models, encourage entrepre- neurship in areas focusing on innovation and development, encourage businesses that are faster, cheaper, and more efficient, encourage companies to adapt quicker in order to compete and include technological advancements in the automotive industry. The West Innovation District (WID) Area Plan outlines the future growth potential of the far western corridor of the City with approximately 2,250 acres of land between Avery Road, Houchard Road, Shier Rings Road, and State Route 161/Post Road. The goal of the plan is to establish a world-class innovation and research district that serves as an economic engine for Dublin, with the broader goal of creating a self-sustaining cycle of innovation that works together with the educational institutions and companies in the district to constantly provide talent and oppor- tunities for collaboration within the region. This will allow Dublin to attract innovative companies, create a dynamic district that is “alive” 24/7, provide opportu- nities for companies to collaborate, support emerging entrepreneurs and provide varied options for different industries. DISTRICT INTENT Economic development is the principal focus of the district, while residential and commercial uses serve as amenities to support employers and employees. WID WEST INNOVATION DISTRICT PLAN WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 199 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES Since the update to the WID in 2019, several important development projects have occurred including the construction of The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, as well as additions to Ohio University’s Dublin Campus. These developments highlight the continued efforts to expand research and development within the West Innovation District, as well as collaboration with surrounding uses. Opportunities remain to continue to support the West Innovation District as a key business neighborhood within Dublin, which include: ■Expansion of Ohio University’s Dublin campus based on the goals of the OU Framework Plan. ■Future expansion of The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. ■Continued opportunities for uses that support economic development. ■Modification to the City’s utility service boundaries allowing for additional land to be served. ■Incorporation of a mix of uses that include service related uses that provide amenities to the existing and future workforce. ■Exploration of new transportation opportunities that provide greater connectivity to the area. ■Positioning Dublin for a potential passenger rail system along Houchard Road. ■Expansion of uses that are appropriate for the north- west portion of the community. ■Provision of architectural design that is innovative and unique. ■Continued expedited review processes that encourage business development. ■Exploration of opportunities for greenways connections that promote the natural resources in the northwest region of our community. BOUNDARY EXTENSION The WID and the Southwest Area Plans are both areas where potential growth opportunities exist; however, WID is more focus on economic growth opportunities and employment. As part of the Envision Dublin Update, the boundaries of the WID were modified to include additional land to the south, previously defined in the Southwest Area Plan. Additionally, land formerly outside the City’s utility service boundary to the west has been incorporated in the WID. These modifications were based on goals and objec- tives identified throughout the Envision Dublin Community Plan Update that emphasized land uses that assisted in economic vitality and fiscal sustainability. EXPEDITED REGULATORY PROCESS The City is known for its planning, high-quality develop- ment and ability to act with speed to capture economic opportunity. Dublin recognizes the need to remain regionally competitive and drive future growth and the West Innovation District plays an integral role in this effort. With a focus on clear regulations and fast turnaround, this portion of Dublin’s business core emphasizes a “speed-to- build” philosophy intended to foster construction activity. The ability to address the needs of the private market, particularly those focused on research and time-sensitive grant funding, make the West Innovation District a unique component of the City’s economic development options. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 200 AREA RECOMMENDATIONS CONTINUED PARTNERSHIPS The development of the District benefits from partnerships, which include educational and medical institutions and companies that reside within or nearby the district. Future collaboration and partnerships will provide invaluable opportunities to expand upon existing uses and create a district that supports the changing workforce needs. This should include continued partnership between Ohio Univer- sity and the City to execute the vision outlined in the OU Framework, as well as The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center future phases. Additional partnerships should be sought to further development the District and in support of the City’s Economic Development Strategy. ADVANCING TECHNOLOGY DubLink is located throughout the City’s key business neighborhoods providing innovative services to corporate residents and instant access to the global marketplace with the largest broadband and WiFi system in Central Ohio. Development in the West Innovation District includes the comprehensive extension of DubLink facilities along with identified road improvements. Interchange enhancements are underway at the SR 161 / Post Road entrance to the West Innovation District, and primary extensions of the broadband network have been extended through that area. System extensions should continue to be prioritized along arterials and collectors or as expedited by particular devel- opment proposals. PROVIDE AMENITIES AND BALANCE OF USES Land use recommendations are vital to the success of an area and a balance of uses is key. The long-term viability of Dublin, especially in WID, is maintaining the City as an important employment center. These uses are key to our economic viability but need supportive uses that provide amenities to the existing workforce in this area. To further this goal, a mix of uses within the West Innovation District should be provided to ensure a well-balance, vibrate area. CHARACTER AND DESIGN Establishing a definable “place” is an important element for the success of the West Innovation District. The Plan’s intent is to encourage a style of architecture that visually emphasizes or evokes the qualities of innovation, tech- nology and progress as a key focus for the area setting it apart from other business neighborhoods in the city. Architectural design within the WID should focus on the implementation of contemporary style to ensure a cohesive “feel” at all levels of architectural complexity from high-pro- file offices to manufacturing facilities. With a focus toward technology, progress, change and innovation, the following key elements should include: ■Emphasis on the use of glass, architectural metal, cut stone, wood and brick. ■Avoid the use of limestone in more traditional applica- tions to avoid historic appearances or mimicking other areas of the city, ■Design buildings with varying shapes and forms, integrating geometric shapes and the varied use of building planes, incorporating non-rectangular shapes that distort the structure and create jutting elements for additional space, ■Use of angles and pitches to evoke movement and contrast. Integrating organic design with curves to characterize flow and movement; and emphasizing natural light and sustain- able building techniques to better visually or physically connect indoor and outdoor spaces. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 201 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans PRESERVING NATURAL FEATURES AND ENVIRONMENT The WID includes important natural features such as woodlands, tree rows and stream corridors that should be preserved and integrated as valuable amenities. Environ- mental quality should be emphasized, and a key element of future development should include the integration of regional greenway connectivity and a framework of open space upon which all development is linked. Focus should be placed on the natural context of the area through creative layout, quality landscape design and the main- tenance of unobstructed views to natural amenities. The integration of LEED-certified buildings or environmentally friendly design techniques should be highly encouraged as part of a cutting-edge technology center. Portions of the South Fork Indian Run and Cosgray Creek flow through the West Innovation District and serve an important func- tion for the area’s drainage. The natural green corridor provides the opportunity to create a shared use paths to connect destinations in the WID with neighborhoods to the east of US-33. Portions of the South Fork Indian Run and Cosgray Creek flow through the West Innovation District. These streams seem insignificant in appearance and may be periodically dry, but they serve an important function for the area’s drainage. The natural greeen corridor provides the opportu- nity to create a shared use paths to connect destinations in the WID with neighborhoods to the east of US-33. STREETSCAPE AND PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENTS The West Innovation District is a large employment center and must include an integrated system of pedestrian connections and spaces with unique character. Archi- tecture should be appropriately placed close to the street edge and configured to provide courtyards and spaces, and screen parking. Other amenities such as water features, formal open spaces, landscape focal points, sculpture, courtyards, green malls or broad boulevards should also be encouraged where buildings do not relate to the public street. Pedestrian connections should be included between employment, transit locations, service uses, open space systems and housing throughout the West Innovation District. EXPAND TRANSPORTATION NETWORK AND CONNECTIVITY The future growth and expansion within the District provide opportunities to expand all modes of mobility and transportation, which can included: ■Future options for transit (bus and/or rail) should be implemented to provide long-term convenience and flexibility. ■Plan internal road improvements to most efficiently provide access to sites and maximize business access to interchange; ■Create a road network that provides multiple travel options while separating through traffic from surrounding residential areas. ■Create a parallel route for US 33 to enhance access for commuters and to better separate through-traffic from area neighborhoods; ■Implement a new entrance to Darree Fields to down- play residential portions of Shier Rings Road between Eiterman and Cosgray Roads; ■Partner with private development to construct new roadways and improve intersections; ■Establish a more defined entry point into residential areas along Cosgray Road south of the West Innovation District; and ■Create an east-west connection paralleling SR 161 that will provide additional options to access the inter- change and link with transit along the railroad. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 202 KEY SITES & OPPORTUNITIES OHIO UNIVERSITY Dublin is home to the extension of the Ohio University Campus and includes the College of Osteopathic Medicine located in the northwest corner of the West Innovation District with prominent visibility to US 33. The campus has enhanced educational uses and contributed positively to the dynamics of the district. The City and OU should continue to work together to implement the OU Framework Plan. WEST OF OU CAMPUS This property is located southwest of the intersection of Post Road and University Boulevard, west of the Ohio University Campus. This site provides the opportunity to expand the campus environment in a mixed-use setting. SPORTS OHIO Sports Ohio is a 100-acre sports complex that features unique indoor and outdoor recreational services located within the central portion of the West Innovation District and provide a unique opportunity for the community. Based on the size of the complex and the location of Sports Ohio, this provides an invaluable opportunity to activate the West Innovation District and potentially transform the district to an engaging, active environment. DARREE FIELDS Darree Fields is one of the largest parks in Dublin with over 150 acres of recreational space. The park includes baseball diamonds, soccer fields, a dog park, a commu- nity garden, a playground and most notably the Miracle League Fields providing recreational space for children with mental and physical challenges. This park exemplifies the City’s commitment to provide exceptional opportunities for amenities to the public. The City has been looking for opportunities to expand the park and as part of this update, expansion opportunities should be explored. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 203 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD The city-owned parcels around The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Care facility provide the opportunity to expand health and wellness employment and services within the community NW OF SHIER-RINGS AND AVERY This area should provide services and amenities needed by the WID employees, as well as nearby neighborhoods and the greater Dublin community. This area should build upon an existing commercial character along Avery-Muir- field and provide improved connection to the interchange. Appropriate development types include neighborhood retail, commercial and business service center, and hotels. Large format retail is not appropriate. SE OF US-33/POST INTERCHANGE This site benefits from high visibility from a prominent interchange which Dublin and regional partners have made significant investment to improve. Future development on this site should prioritize a signature office or employer with a building oriented to capture highway visibility. Future development should preserve greenspace to the south along the South Fork Indian Run. NE AND NW OF THE SHIER- RINGS AND EITERMAN Future development on these properties should be scaled and setback from public streets to provide buffer from existing residential neighborhoods to the south. NE OF SHIER-RINGS AND COSGRARY The area is intended to provide opportunities for a limited mix of neighborhood supporting uses in close proximity to employment, recreational amenities and existing neighbor- hoods. Further east along Shier Rings is intended to provide housing choices for employees within the District within easy walking or biking distance. NORTH JEWETT PROPERTY The city-owned property located northwest of Cosgray and Shier-Rings Road provides the opportunity to expand flex innovation uses in the District to support economic development. Future development should be setback and screened from Cosgray Road. A branch of the South Fork flows along the west property boundary, future development should respect the stream corridor area. Located adjacent to Darree Fields, this property also provides an opportunity to expand park and recreation facilities that may align with the Parks & Recreation Master Plan. SOUTH JEWETT PROPERTY The city-owned property located southeast of Cosgray and Shier-Rings Road provides the opportunity to expand flex innovation uses in the District to support economic development. Future development should be setback and screened from Cosgray Road. A historic farmstead located on Cosgray Road should be preserved and integrated into landscaped setbacks to preserve the rural character of the roadway and buffer new development from existing residen- tial neighborhoods to the east. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 204 The existing campus has four buildings that total 194,000 GSF. The campus is also home to the Osteopathic Heri- tage Medical College, the College of Health Sciences and Professions, the Physician’s Assistance Program, a Tantrum Theater, the Columbus State Community College, the Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs, and the College of Business. When OU acquired the property in 2012 the campus consisted of three office buildings, clustered around ponds and open space and ringed with surface parking. The buildings were renovated to classrooms, learning labs, a learning resource renter, clinical training and assessment center and offices for the Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine In 2015 the 86,000-square-foot Integrated Education Center was completed. The building accommodates several programs by the College of Health Sciences and Professions and academic partnerships with Columbus State Community College. The future of the building is envisioned to house other OU programs from various schools and accommodate new partnerships with Central Ohio colleges, universities and high schools. OU also has a presence within the community of Dublin. According to the Framework Plan, OU’s Dublin campus represents an unprecedented opportunity for growth and innovation. The OU Dublin campus is a national model for how the university can fulfill its mission of teaching future generations of Ohio students, conducting innova- tive research, and delivering essential services in a cost effective way, while providing the state of Ohio and its citizens with a very positive return on its higher education investment. The City of Dublin has worked collaboratively with the University to review the OU Framework Plan. The Framework Plan guides the development of a cohesive campus while allowing flexibility to accommodate a variety of programs, partnerships and uses. The plan incorpo- rates a unified vision that guides decisions on the types of program elements that are approved for the campus. This includes new initiatives and programs sited at Dublin should have high impact, be complementary to the central Ohio community, advance Ohio University interests, and have attributes such that they cannot be accomplished in Athens. It further states that activities at Dublin should advance “OHIO for Ohio” opportunities to build and strengthen regional partnerships with industry, government, and non-profit organizations to foster innovation. Initiatives and programs sited at Dublin should be innovative and uniquely situated for central Ohio, consist of selective investments in support of activities at Dublin that establish financial feasibility and be sustainable, and have initiatives and programs at Dublin that align with the University and College’s strategic plan and enhance smart growth. The Dublin Framework plan is a “vision” plan intended to offer a comprehensive view for how the campus may evolve over time and is intended to guide future develop- ment. This plan is designed to allow the City to review the campus in context of the West Innovation District, making approvals of future projects easier. The plan is designed to be a valuable tool to the University to facilitate decisions on future expansion within the context of the bigger picture. The Framework Plan aims to establish a vibrant commu- nity that provides opportunities for high-impact initiatives and programs that are complementary to the central Ohio community, advance Ohio University interests, and cannot be accomplished in Athens. It contemplates a mixed-use environment that supports a vibrant knowledge community. It is centered on creating a pedestrian-friendly, walkable campus district that can be implemented in a phased approach over time. In 2012, the Ohio University (of Athens) acquired property in the City of Dublin to establish a new loca- tion with the Heritage College of Medicine (HCOM) as the primary academic unit. Shortly thereafter, OHIO entered into an economic development agreement with the City of Dublin to acquire property surrounding the site. The agreement divided approximately 96.5 acres of land into three subareas. The University acquired Subarea 1 (45 acres) with the original purchase and is intended to grow. Working with the university to ensure this growth occurs is a priority of the City of Dublin and a recommendation of this update process. The guiding principles of the plan is to create a vibrant, walkable place that supports a variety of initia- tive. Six physical planning principles were developed to guide development at the Dublin Campus: ■Establish a vibrant community ■Encourage proximity and walkability ■Create connections ■Enable the development of a mixed-use environment ■Foster innovation ■Accommodate varying initiatives OHIO UNIVERSITY FRAMEWORK PLAN WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 205 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans FRAMEWORK PLAN Main Street Formal Green Informal/Rec Green Existing Building Signature Building Campus Gateway 1 2 4 5 3 1 1 4 44 4 6 6 6 6 5 5 2 2 3 6 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 206 MULTI-MODAL AND REGIONAL APPROACH A passenger rail station on this site highlights the opportunity to develop a broader mobility strategy, while connecting the station to the rest of Dublin and surrounding communities. The LinkUS Northwest corridor is planned to extend to the Ohio University campus on SR- 161. This Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line could extend west to connect to the passenger rail station. Combined with the Dublin Connector service, this site establishes a multi- modal transportation hub in the center of a growing area, and on a major regional east-west transportation corridor. luctus venenatis lectus. STATION PLANNING Preliminary configuration concepts indicate that the passenger rail station area can be accommodated within approximately four acres that is approximately 1,600- feet along the rail corridor. The site has approximately 2,600-feet of rail frontage TRANSIT ORIENTED PLACEMAKING In all land use options, the roadway and open space framework are fairly consistent. The open space proposed at the center of the site is intended to provide the placemaking element of the West Dublin Passenger Rail Station site. Its east-west orientation creates a setting for the passenger rail station; a sense of arrival; a place for health, wellness and recreation and an attractive setting for the multi-family residential uses proposed in options C and D. This open space could also serve as part of the site’s stormwater management strategy, reduce heat island affect and increase tree cover, all in support of human comfort. LAND USE CONCEPTS Land use planning needs to consider short and long- term development opportunities. The passenger rail station may be a longer-term consideration, and while land must be preserved to accommodate the passenger rail service, near-term development should be planned to occur in a complimentary manner. Additionally, land use planning should consider the surrounding context and that the current site context may change as the region continues to change and grow. Four conceptual land use options were developed to explore potential opportunities. Concept A – Flex Space, Low-Medium Density: This option contemplates an expansion of land use patterns present to the east of the site (Crosby Court and VA Data) which could include larger format flex buildings accommodating office, warehouse/logistics, and advanced manufacturing space. This option leverages the large scale and physical (flat) character of the 100- acre site and adjacency to SR-161 and connection to the regional highway network. Concept B – Flex Space/R&D, Medium Density: This option also contemplates flex space but at a variety of building scales. This option would both leverage visibility from SR-161 for flex office space while also accommodating larger format flex buildings deeper into the site. Concept C – Mixed Use, Medium-High Density: This option contemplates a mix of uses, including residential at a medium to high intensity. This may include “horizontal mixed use,” meaning a mix of buildings with different land uses across the site versus a mix of uses in each building. This development pattern would likely be accommodated by surface parking lots. Concept D – Mixed Use, High Density: This option also contemplates mixed use and residential but at a higher intensity which could reflect that of Bridge Park. This development pattern would likely require structured parking. The City is in the process of developing a study to create a vision for the location of the West Dublin Passenger Rail Station, a state-of-the-art, multi-modal passenger rail station located within an approximately 100-acre, City-owned property. In addition to the site, the study includes assessing land use and transpor- tation implications of the station in what is today the periphery of west Dublin. The Chicago-Columbus-Pitts- burgh (Midwest Connect) passenger rail route would re-establish intercity passenger service along existing rail lines, currently owned and operated by freight railroad companies such as CSX and Norfolk Southern. Intercity passenger service operates primarily on freight rail tracks and provides longer-distance connections versus commuter rail which primarily operates within a metropolitan area, connecting commuters to a central city from adjacent suburbs. The purpose of the study is to ensure that a passenger rail station located in Dublin is identified and included in the regional planning studies. This will support positioning Dublin as a potential and feasible station location within the conversation around developing new intercity passenger rail transportation for Central Ohio. The approximately 100-acre, City-owned property is located southwest of the intersection of SR-161 and Houchard Road. This site is presently outside the city and is located in parts of both Franklin and Madison counties. Adjacent to the site sits; the VA Data data centers, the recently completed Crosby Court flex warehouse building, and Darree Fields. The unincorpo- rated community of Kileville is located opposite SR-161 in Madison County. The study area encompasses a one-mile radius around the site. WEST DUBLIN PASSENGER RAIL STATION STUDY WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 207 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans Concept D – Mixed Use, High Density Concept A - Flex Space, Low-Medium Intensity Concept B - Flex Space/R&D, Medium Intensity Concept C – Mixed Use, Medium-High Density WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 208 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Future West Passenger Rail Station Activated open space on axis with future rail station and providing transitional development density from mixed-use developments to flex uses. Activated commercial mixed-use developments facing St. Rt. 161 Multi-family residential fronting onto central open space Future roundabouts Trail connection to existing trail system Station parking - Park and Ride Future hotel Major gateway into the passenger rail station Preserved open space for public amenity and stormwater management Generous right-of-way to promote pedestrian-scaled streetscape Enhanced pedestrian crosswalk Parking facing away from street 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 13 9 10 11 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 209 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 210 LEGEND Flex Office Commercial Multi-Family Residential Hotel Parking Green / Open Space 1 7 10 9 8 3 11 1313 12 2 5 4 5 5 5 5 6 10 WEST DUBLIN PASSENGER RAIL STATION ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Indian Run greenway and open spaces Signature architecture at key view points and intersection University Boulevard extension Amtrak station and station area development SR-161-rail grade seperation Landscaped buffers with mounding, minimum 200-feet setback Preservation of 1900s farmstead as a new community garden and trail head New east-west road connection with grade seperated crossings of US-33 and CSX rail line Potential expansion of recreation facilities at Darree Fields Tuttle Crossing Boulevard extension New neighborhood scaled commercial services Leverage economic development potential of power corridors New road connection between SR-161 and Tuttle Crossing Blvd west of CSX rail line Enhance Cosgray Run corridor as a greenway Maintain rural character along Shier-Rings Rd between University Blvd and Cosgray Rd Create a green edge along the south side of Post Rd 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 13 9 10 11 14 15 16 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 211 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans WEST INNOVATION DISTRICT ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN LEGEND Neighborhood Commercial & Services Neighborhood Office Suburban Office Flex Innovation Industrial Mixed Use Center Neighborhood Mixed Use Mixed Residential 8 3 14 4 1 9 6 12 6 10 6 2 11 8 5 8 7 2 13 15 16 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 212 Univers i t y B l v d Univers i t y B l v d Ohio University Campus Darree Fields Sports Ohio Shier Rings BlvdShier Rings Blvd Post RdPost Rd Cosgray RdCosgray RdHouchard RdHouchard RdTuttle Crossing BlvdTuttle Crossing BlvdNew R o adNew R o ad New RoadNew Road PLANNING CONTEXT The Emerald Corridor is defined by three distinct subareas each with unique planning opportunities and challenges. BRIGHT/EAST EMERALD The Bright Road focus area is bordered by Hard Road and I-270, and stretches west from Sawmill Road to Riverside Drive, comprising the northeast portion of the Emerald Corporate District. Defined by the extension of Emerald Parkway and the new Mount Carmel Hospital which began construction in 2023. Physical features vary significantly throughout the area, and portions along Riverside Drive are of scenic and historic significance. The area is characterized by the remnants of three geometric earth works (known locally as the Ferris- Wright Earthworks) constructed between 300 B.C. and 500 A.D. by the Hopewell culture. The ceremonial earthworks consist of a large rectangular enclosure approximately 390 feet by 220 feet in size and two circular bank-and-ditch enclosures located nearby. Archaeologists interpret the earthen enclosures as symbolic forms used as a locus for periodic mortuary or other ritual activity. The area also contains scenic portions of Wright’s Run (also known as Billingsley Creek), providing substantial wooded areas, waterfalls and ravines. This western portion of the study area includes terrain that slopes significantly up the River bluff to Grandee Cliffs Drive, while portions south of the earthworks and ravine provide the opportunity to cluster development among significant tree stands along Emerald Parkway. The City acquired 19 acres of land in 2010, including portions of the Ferris-Wright Earthworks and Wright’s Run, improvements outlined in the master plan for this area have been completed. Bright Road and surrounding neighborhoods are charac- terized by modest, low-density residential homes in a rural setting that is typical of older homes constructed within the township prior to annexation. Residential develop- ments within the area include Grandee Cliffs, Glenbrier and Kiplinger Estates. Wright’s Run and its surrounding woodlands create a distinctive backdrop for the area, and Kiplinger Pond created by a spillway is located just east of MacBeth Drive. The completion of Emerald Parkway unites the area and provide major access for infill development along I-270. Planning efforts focus on the ability to maintain and protect neighborhoods in a balanced manner with future growth along Emerald Parkway. PERIMETER/CENTRAL EMERALD The Emerald/Perimeter area is centrally located within the Emerald Corporate Business District along the Emerald Parkway corridor. This area plan was originally referred to as the Coffman Park Area Plan in previous versions of the Community Plan. In 2010, the City entered into an Economic Development Agreement to facilitate corporate office development at the southwest corner of Emerald Parkway and Perimeter Drive, now home to City Hall and Council Chambers. Continued park improvements have occurred in line with the Coffman Park Plan. The remainder of this area includes approximately 24 acres of relatively flat, unde- veloped land located between Emerald Parkway and the I-270/U.S. 33 Interchange, providing significant development opportunity in a high-visibility portion of the City. SOUTH EMERALD The subarea is located south of Innovation Drive with key sites along I-270 and benefits from relatively recent devel- opment. Existing office buildings incorporate a typical devel- opment pattern with large individual buildings surrounded by surface parking lots. The area has limited amenities and services at the Emerald Town Center. The Emerald Corridor, which includes the areas along Emerald Parkway from Sawmill Road to Tuttle Crossing Boulevard, play a significant role within the city. The Corridor serves as a vital artery for transporta- tion, economic development, and community connec- tivity, facilitating efficient travel between residential areas, commercial and office areas, and recreational spaces, and fostering accessibility and convenience for residents and businesses alike. The Emerald Corridor not only enhances mobility within the city, but it also plays a pivotal role in attracting businesses and investment to the region, bolstering Dublin’s economic vitality. The streetscape character of the Emerald Corridor is one of the signature elements that defines Emerald Parkway making it a cornerstone for all users. DISTRICT INTENT To encourage appropriately-sited, high quality office development along the I-270/U.S. 33 interchange area that maximizes development potential, protect existing adjacent residential neighborhoods, and to preserve key natural features and historic sites. EC EMERALD CORRIDOR PLAN WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 213 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans Rendering of Mount Carmel hospital currently under construction. BRIGHT/EAST EMERALD SUBAREA RECOMMENDATIONS PROTECT AND BUFFER EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AREAS Bright Road incorporates a very distinctive rural residential character that has been established over time by many factors such as housing stock, lot sizes, building setbacks and natural surroundings. All efforts should be made to maintain the quaint character of the area’s neighborhoods, and road access for residents should be improved while discouraging through traffic. ENCOURAGE GREATER OPEN SPACE AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS Due to the era in which development took place along Bright Road, the area lacks sidewalks and pedestrian infrastructure common to today’s residential subdivisions. Every effort should be made to improve pedestrian connec- tivity and movement throughout the area, while sensitively considering the visual character and impacts of pedestrian infrastructure. Incorporation of additional open space near existing neighborhoods should be provided to facilitate pedestrian connections and park opportunities. IMPROVE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION, ACCESS AND MOVEMENT The completion of Emerald Parkway from Wright’s Run to Riverside Drive was a significant milestone for Dublin. Providing relief to I-270, the parkway provides full access from Tuttle Crossing to the south to Sawmill Road on the north. Completion of this last phase provided greater trans- portation network options east of the Scioto River, while facilitating a balance of greater access to area neighbor- hoods and a reduction in through traffic on local roads. Significant multi-jurisdictional efforts have been made to improve traffic and access management along the Sawmill Corridor to the benefit of area businesses and residents. With the completion of Emerald Parkway, Bright Road was converted to a cul-de-sac at Riverside Drive to improve motorist safety at this problematic intersection. With a significant amount of office development planned along Emerald Parkway, options for an overpass connection to the Bridge Street District south of I-270 are being explored to connect these important economic development areas while providing an alternative to Sawmill Road. PRESERVE IMPORTANT ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND NATURAL FEATURES The Bright Road Area contains invaluable natural and man-made features for which every effort should be made to protect. The Ferris-Wright Earthworks is an ancient man-made landform that has critical archaeological impor- tance, and the adjacent Wright’s Run ravine is a location of importance for its scenic and natural beauty. Nearby historic cemeteries that are poorly surveyed and studied also have importance to the area’s heritage. ESTABLISH A HIGH QUALITY, VISIBLE GATEWAY INTO DUBLIN Located adjacent to the Sawmill/I-270 interchange, the area is Dublin’s major entry point from the northeast. Mount Carmel Hospital began construction in 2023 at this interchange, and will establish the areas as a high quality gateway for the Emerald Corridor. Continuing high quality visible architecture, site planning and landscaping is important to represent Dublin’s image and quality of life. Buildings fronting the interchange should be of a larger scale and establish an architectural statement that contrasts them from adjacent suburban retail and big box developments. MAINTAIN EXPECTATIONS FOR APPROPRIATE, HIGH QUALITY DEVELOPMENT As Dublin’s premier business address, locations along Emerald Parkway should include high quality office devel- opment that respects the area’s context. Higher profile offices should be preferred in areas where freeway and interchange visibility can be maximized, while appropriate scale and architectural style is provided near residential areas. Throughout the Bright Road Area retail is limited to service uses associated with office development that will reduce arterial trips by employees; integration of such support uses within the ground floors of offices is highly encouraged. Redevelopment proposals between Sawmill Road and Emerald Parkway should also be carefully considered to ensure that residential areas are fully inte- grated across Emerald Parkway and Bright Road. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 214 PERIMETER/CENTRAL EMERALD SUBAREA RECOMMENDATIONS ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY DEVELOPMENT High quality office uses should be sought that will provide street-oriented architecture, and parking that is adequately screened from Emerald Parkway. MANAGE ACCESS AND INTERNAL CIRCULATION The majority of the land between Emerald Parkway and I-270 is under single ownership with established access points from Emerald Parkway. Three additional parcels of land located along Post Road and comprising approximately 3.5 acres offer additional development opportunity, but with significant access challenges due to traffic volumes on Post Road, topographic change related to the nearby I-270 overpass, and proximity to the intersection of Emerald Parkway and Post Road. Direct vehicular access from Post Road should be discouraged to minimize traffic conflicts and maximize the street-orientation of new architecture. Opportunities for coordinated development and shared access with adjacent properties should be explored. IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE CONNECTIVITY The close proximity of Coffman Park requires special attention to pedestrian and bicycle mobility in this area. In 2010, Dublin’s first bicycle sharrow markings were added to Emerald Parkway in this portion of the corridor to enhance the traveling conditions for on-road cyclists. This improvement should be continually monitored to ensure safety and efficiency for cyclists and motor- ists alike. Off-street shared use paths along Emerald Parkway and Perimeter Drive offer additional options for a wider range of users and provide direct access to Coffman Park. As the center- piece of Dublin’s larger greenway system, additional shared use path connections to and from Coffman Park should be explored to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle travel throughout the City. An existing portion of shared use path runs along the South Fork of the Indian Run beneath I-270; although currently disconnected from the larger path network, this segment provides an excep- tional opportunity to integrate new greenways planned within the Bridge Street District into the City’s larger open space system. Opportunities to extend this path to Coffman Park should be explored, with sensitivity to the stream corridor and the nearby Willow Grove neighborhood. SOUTH EMERALD SUBAREA RECOMMENDATIONS While limited in amenities and services, appropriate uses will continue to be freeway-oriented office development. Between Emerald Parkway and Parkwood Place, office uses are appropriate at a density of no greater than 20,000 sf/ac. Supporting uses to office development such as hospitality and retail/restaurant can be introduce, as well as residential uses as outlined for the Parkwood/Emerald Site. Commercial uses include restaurant, retail, and personal services limited to a maximum of 10,000 square feet and should be located at the south end of the property in order to create a retail cluster at the Emerald/ Woerner-Temple intersection. The Plan continues to support existing office development toward the southern end of the District. The primary uses within this area include office, office campus, supporting retail services, restaurant and limited residential infill. Building heights within the area include 1 to 3 stories along Emerald Parkway frontage transitioning east to 4 to 8 stories along I-270 frontage. KEY SITE & OPPORTUNITIES WRIGHT WAY PROPERTY Future buildings should be buffered from Wright Run and oriented toward Emerald Parkway. Parking and circulation should be organized in an efficient manner with shared parking. Access should be from Wright Way, no new vehic- ular access should be granted to Emerald Parkway. EMERALD AND BRIGHT NORTHEAST QUADRANT The site has unique natural features; including high tree coverage, topographic change, and a waterway. These feature create site constraints and opportunities. Create publicly accessible greenway along south side of waterway between Emerald Parkway and Sawmill. Create a green edge along Sawmill Road with minimum 50-feet setback. Preserve large existing tree stands along Emerald Parkway to buffer future development from existing residential neighborhoods. Align access with existing driveways and curb cuts. The site provides an opportunity to provide complimentary uses to the new Mount Carmel hospital opposite Bright Road. EMERALD AND BRIGHT SOUTHWEST QUADRANT This site benefits from prominent Emerald Parkway visibility. This site provides an opportunity to provide complimentary uses to the new Mount Carmel hospital opposite Emerald Parkway. Berming and landscaping should be used to buffer and screen future development from existing resi- dential neighborhoods along Bright Road. A high quality landscaped treatment should follow the edge of Emerald Parkway with a minimum 50-feet setback. Parking and circulation should be shared to the extent possible.WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 215 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans MIXED USE EXAMPLE: PARKWOOD Create new, active open spaces. Preserve and intergrate existing tree stand into side design, leverage as existing screening to buffer taller buildings along Parkwood Place from Emerald Parkway. Preserve existing tree stands. Maintain green character along Emerald Pkwy Highway frontage should continue to be reserved for office, parking, and open space. Existing stacked stone gateway. Potential to continue mixed use infill of existing surface parking lots along Parkwood Pl. Gateway landscape and building features address intersection. High visbility office along I-270 frontage. Active Parkwood Place. 1 2 4 5 3 The land uses for this site located along Emerald Parkway should concentrate on a mix of uses to include neigh- borhood scale office, residential uses and supporting commercial uses. Commercial uses include restaurant, retail, and personal services limited to a maximum of 10,000 square feet and should be located at the south end of the property in order to create a retail cluster at the Emerald/ Woerner-Temple intersection. The site design should including buildings fronting roadways with shared parking areas consolidated to the rear. Stormwater and landscape features should be integrated on the site. Perimeter screening and landscaping should still be the primary component of the landscape design. Heights should range from one and two-story along Emerald Parkway to a maximum of four stories along Parkwood Place. Four to six-story buildings area appropriate between Parkwood Place and I-270. 6 7 8 9 10 10 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 216 1 24 5 3 6 8 7 5 9 9 9 270 LEGEND Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood Office Suburban Office Mixed Use - Residential Emerald PkwyEmerald PkwyIGS Engergy Inn o v a t i o n D r Inn o v a t i o n D r W o e r n e r T e m p l e R d W o e r n e r T e m p l e R d Emerald Town Center Camden Professional Center Parkwood PlParkwood PlCosgray Run Cramer Run George Gea r y R u n 5900 Parkwood 6000 Parkwood Existing Surface Lot Existing Surface Lot Existing Surface Lot DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Preserve green character along Emerald Parkway Maintain high quality architectural and landscape presence along I-270 corporate, reserving frontage for job producing uses Potential new I-270 crossing connecting Shier Rings Rd and Metro Center Greenway connection across I-270 Transition office use to single family residential neighborhoods Preserve Ferris-Wright Earthworks (Hopewell Mounds) with option for potential park space Preserve and intergrate existing tree stand into side design, leverage as existing screening to buffer taller buildings along Parkwood Place from Emerald Parkway Protect stream corridor, ravine and existing woodland areas Future development should be setback minimum 50-ft from Emerald Pkwy with parking to the rear or side New mixed use area with neighborhood services and amenities New I-270 crossing connecting Emerald Pkwy and Tuller Rd 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 7 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 217 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans EMERALD CORRIDOR ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN LEGEND Suburban Office Neighborhood Office Flex Innovation Single Family Residential Multi Family Residential Mixed Use Commercial 11 3 4 4 4 10 6 5 8 1 1 9 2 2 2 7 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 218 270 Inno v a t i o n D r Inno v a t i o n D r Scioto RiverEmerald PkwyEmerald PkwyRings RdRings Rd Tuller RdTuller RdRiverside DrRiverside DrBright RdBright Rd Metro Pl NMetro Pl N Post R d Post R d Tuttle Crossing BlvdTuttle Crossing BlvdCoffman RdCoffman RdShier Rings RdShier Rings Rd 33 Sawmill RdSawmill Rd270 N o r t h F o r k So u t h F o r k Cosg r a y R u n Ha r d R d Ha r d R d 33 Woerner-Temple R d Woerner-Temple R d Emerald PkwyEmerald PkwyFerris-Wright Park Coffman Park Heather Glen Park Dublin RdDublin RdCoffman High School Perimet e r D r Perimet e r D r PLANNING CONTEXT In 2009 Dublin began a visioning process to reimagine the Bridge Street corridor. The multi-year planning process engaged stakeholders and the community, and crafted a vision for a vibrant and walkable center of the city, with a dynamic mix of land uses and housing. The goal of the Bridge Street District Plan was to ensure Dublin took full advantage of the area’s assets, established a more sustain- able pattern for development, and capitalized on emerging market opportunities. Since the inception of that vision, the Bridge Street District has undergone significant areas of redevelopment. BRIDGE STREET DISTRICT CODE To implement this vision and guide future development, Dublin created a hybrid form-based development code for the Bridge Street District (BSD), which was initially adopted in 2012. The BSD Code included Neighborhood Districts where special attention was paid to location and character of buildings, streets, and open spaces to achieve a coordinated mix of uses within each area. Since its initial adoption, the Code has been revised a number of times to address the needs of the community. This includes the removal and re-establishment of the Historic District sepa- rate from the Bridge Street District to signify the important difference in development scale and character. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY The 2023 updated Economic Development Strategy outlines a series of strategies and actions to continue Dublin’s economic success and competitiveness within the region. Strategy 1 within the Plan focuses on Creating Distinctive Mixed-Use Development Nodes to Meet 21st Century Industrial Demand for Vibrant Physical Space while Maintaining Dublin’s High Quality of Place Standards. This strategy is based on changing economic trends that focus on how residents interact within the community, changes in lifestyles, proximity to services, emergence of coworking space, increased housing needs, and opportunities for sustainability. The Plan calls out action steps within this Strategy to continue to build on the momentum of Bridge Park/Bridge Street District by supporting the development of additional live/work/play physical spaces. The Plan high- lights that Dublin’s success within the Bridge Street District has contributed positively to the community’s economic success by providing choices for residents, employees, employers and visitors, and it is critical the city continue to build upon these successes. The Bridge Street District Plan outlines a vision that rein- forces the City’s long-term fiscal health and sustainability, and promotes competitiveness and market adaptability by creating new living environments and amenities to attract and retain the next generation of employees, businesses and residents to Dublin. The Plan envisions a vibrant and walkable center of the city, with a dynamic mix of land uses and housing that is integrated with the natural spaces that tie the district together. DISTRICT INTENT The Bridge Street District Special Area Plan is a vision for a vibrant and walkable center of the city, with a dynamic mix of land uses and housing organized around an urban street network. BSD BRIDGE STREET DISTRICT PLAN “Bridge Street should be our urban down- town, density should be focused here.” WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 219 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans SUBAREA RECOMMENDATIONS The Bridge Street District includes a number of unique districts with distinct characteristics and development opportunities. WEST BRIDGE STREET Centered on the intersection of Bridge Street with Frantz Road and Post Road, this sub-district is an important gateway to Dublin from I-270 and U.S. 33 and the Bridge Street Corridor and should send a strong, positive message about the community’s identity. It should signal a distinct shift from a highway setting to the walkable, mixed-use environ- ment embodied in nearby Historic Dublin and throughout the Bridge Street District. This sub-district should also be a prime target for high-value development seeking a prominent address—such as office, lodging and retail uses—owing to the high visibility, excellent road access, established presence of major employers, and significant opportunities to improve walkability within the district and adjacent areas. Principal challenges include reconciling vital pedestrian and access improvements with high traffic volumes, and making the transition (over place and time) from a highly auto-ori- ented development context to a pedestrian-oriented one. INDIAN RUN NEIGHBORHOOD This sub-district consists largely of the OCLC campus and adjacent parcels, and holds substantial potential for new walk- able mixed-use development that takes advantage of excellent highway access and visibility, walking proximity to Historic Dublin, and adjacency to the Indian Run and its associated greenways. Access improvements will play a critical role in realizing the district’s development potential. In particular, better auto and pedestrian access to and from the Bridge Street Gateway District and the Historic Dublin District via the Bridge Street/Frantz Road/U.S. 33/Post Road intersection and Shawan Falls Drive would ease existing congestion and limita- tions on traffic movement where Kilgour Place intersects Post Road. Direct pedestrian access and possibly new vehicular connections—but only if designed with extreme sensitivity— across Indian Run to Historic Dublin, independent of Bridge Street, would significantly enhance potential development value and character. Development potential in this subdistrict will be substantially improved by a more comprehensive road network that reinforces connections among the other districts and the City’s larger road system, allowing a greater degree of traffic distribution. The Indian Run sub-district has important relationships with West Bridge Street area and Historic Dublin, which provide critical access routes and amenities. The sensitive edges it shares with those districts will require care, both to protect the environmental value of the Indian Run and to introduce two to four corridors of continuous pedestrian-ori- ented access and development character. SCIOTO RIVER NEIGHBORHOOD The Scioto River and improved view shed and park access set the theme for this district, particularly along its east bank across from Riverside Crossing Park. The develop- ment of Bridge Park was catalytic in the establishment of walkable mixed-use neighborhood within this area, along with the realignment of Riverside Drive and the construction of Riverside Crossing Park and the Dublin Link Bridge. These improvements captured the untapped potential of making the Scioto River even more of a community amenity and centerpiece for high-quality mixed-use development. The introduction of a John Shields Parkway greenway and Riverside Crossing Park substantially raised the river’s profile as an asset in Dublin’s park and greenway network, help bring residents from both sides of the river together around shared activities and places, and anchor a unique new neighborhood. Market opportunities favor an emphasis on housing development in the Riverside District, with a range of unit types and residents, including seniors. Complementary medical and office development toward Tuller Road, and office and neighborhood-retail develop- ment near Dublin-Granville Road, are also appropriate as part of a mixed-use neighborhood setting. Historic Dublin is a key nearby amenity and with a Dublin Link Bridge for walking and biking a key connection was established. EAST BRIDGE STREET This corridor represents great development potential through its access, visibility, consolidated land ownership, and oppor- tunities to connect with adjacent walkable districts. Reflecting a classic pattern of automobile-oriented development, this corridor along Dublin-Granville Road presents some of the greatest challenges and opportunities for high-density, walk- able development in the study area. Despite the presence of a recreational path and planted median for some of its length, Dublin- Granville Road does not present an ideal pedestrian environment today. It lacks pedestrian-oriented destinations and presents uncomfortable pedestrian conditions alongside fast-moving traffic. At the same time, high traffic volumes make the corridor a natural place for development that bene- fits from visibility—particularly hotel and small- and mid-size offices. Office or retail development on several large parcels flanking the road may face market pressure for replacement by uses earning higher development returns over the mid- to long-term. This creates an opportunity over time for pedestri- an-oriented office and hotel development–as well as comple- mentary housing and retail—to foster walkable districts on both sides of Dublin-Granville Road while gaining value from excellent visibility and access. This redevelopment pattern would best succeed with a focus on creating critical mass at one or two intersections at a time, rather than spreading new development among numerous locations along the corridor. A continuous pedestrian-oriented environment along the corridor will arise gradually over time in pace with market demand and aggregation of smaller parcels. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 220 The north edge of the district offers one of two major routes for a potential greenway, street, and transit connection linking the Riverside and Sawmill districts. A potential high-capacity transit corridor—linking east and south to Columbus and west to Historic Dublin, Perimeter Road and West Innovation District —could substantially increase development opportunity and value in the district and throughout the Bridge Street Corridor and beyond. TULLER/GREENWAY DISTRICT This district offers opportunities for important connec- tions: a greenway connecting the Scioto River to Sawmill and Dublin-Granville Roads, an expanded street network that integrates existing housing developments into larger walkable neighborhoods, and improves access to Emerald Parkway taking traffic pressure off Historic Dublin. The Tuller/Greenway District plays three important supporting roles for mixed-use development in the study area east of the Scioto River. First, it contains existing residential developments that can contribute a valuable “critical mass” to support new residential development nearby. These developments are poised to benefit from the added ameni- ties and access improvements that adjacent development will bring as it contributes to the creation of a true neigh- borhood. Second, the Tuller/ Greenway District offers two potential opportunities for important east-west greenway, street and transit links between the Riverside and Sawmill districts. The east-west connections also improve regional access to Emerald Parkway as an alternative to Bridge Street and Dublin-Granville Road. Third, this district can deliver substantial additional development capacity, with opportunities to take advantage of visibility from I-270 as well as connections to emerging neighborhoods and districts to create higher-value development than exists in the district today. Land ownership and access patterns in the Tuller/Greenway District offer significant flexibility for providing an optimal response to these opportunities. While this is the study area’s one district not directly accessible from a major arterial—and thus not likely to be a core location for mixed-use development—it will play a very important role as a complement to surrounding districts through the direct street linkages, green space amenities and additional development opportunities it offers. SAWMILL CENTER NEIGHBORHOOD The large Dublin Village Center site and adjacent parcels hold great potential to become a destination mixed-use district with great visibility and access from I-270 and strong connections to adjacent neighborhoods and green spaces. The Sawmill District is a prime location to establish a major walkable mixed-use district, owing to its proximity to the I-270 interchange at Sawmill Road and the consol- idated ownership of more than 50 acres of land on the current Dublin Village Center site. This district concept depends on the incorporation of enough complementary activities into a dense, pedestrian-oriented network of mixed-use buildings and blocks to form a critical mass that is active weekdays, evenings and weekends alike. The land-use mix should include regional-destination retail, dining, entertainment, offices, and housing. Small-floorplate multitenant office buildings are a prime market opportunity and fit well into blocks that include ground-floor retail and multifamily housing. High density is essential to providing enough people and activities in walking distance to keep the district vibrant and full of choices 18 hours a day, seven days a week. High density also plays a key role in creating sufficient development value to fund structured parking, another essential ingredient to a compact and walkable district. Density and walkability are the foundations of the market opportunity in this district; without them, the market will only support the lower-value, auto-oriented develop- ment pattern that exists—and has struggled to remain economically viable—today. New development in the district also depends on estab- lishing direct access and visibility from Sawmill Road through additional property aggregation and road improve- ments. Potential greenway and street linkages west to the Riverside Drive, Historic Dublin, and beyond would open access to critical amenities that support additional develop- ment and improve regional traffic circulation. SCIOTO RIVER OVERLAY This overlay district celebrates the Scioto River as a unique natural asset and links areas of Dublin on either side to the river through enhanced view corridors, recreational connec- tions, and neighborhoods with destination parks and restau- rants. This overlay district focuses on celebrating and drawing benefit from the Scioto River in adjoining portions of the Indian Run, Historic Dublin and Riverside Drive. A mixture of private- and publicly-owned land parcels is present along both banks of the river. The recommendations of this overlay typically would not be applied directly to smaller private parcels. Rather, they should be focused on larger private parcels where significant redevelopment is proposed, and to public parcels that have potential for park and recreation improvements. The overlay addresses natural resource protection, visual access, physical access, and land use. Actions in the overlay should first aim to preserve the sustained quality of the Scioto River corridor as a natural asset. Special attention should be paid to avoiding any negative impacts on the sensitive ecology and topography of the river and its tributaries. Public visual and recreational access to the river corridor should be improved through the implementation of Riverside Crossing Park. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 221 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans AREA RECOMMENDATIONS SR 161 CORRIDOR CHARACTER State Route 161 consists of sections of W. Dublin-Granville Road and Bridge Street in Dublin. This corridor currently lacks an ideal pedestrian environment, and presents an uncomfortable pedestrian condition due to the wide right- of-way and fast-moving traffic. Major improvements are anticipated along W. Dublin-Granville Road to adapt a more pedestrian-friendly streetscape with the adoption of a 161 Corridor Study. This corridor should prioritize development that benefits from high visibility, while accommodating the streetscape recommendations of the study. Future transit options linking Dublin to Columbus are being considered as part of the LinkUS initiative. RIVERSIDE DRIVE CHARACTER Riverside Drive is flanked by Riverside Crossing Park and portions the Bridge Park development, which both contribute to create urban and natural amenities for the City. Development along the east side of Riverside Drive should continue to provide a variety of building massing and architecture that engages the pedestrian streetscape of the road. I-270 FRONTAGE The Bridge Street District benefits from a continuous boundary shared with I-270, offering viewsheds and expo- sure of businesses to the interstate. Development along I-270 should prioritize employment-driven development. Residential uses are not recommended along the frontage, but could be appropriate if buffered from the corridor. FRANTZ ROAD / W. BRIDGE STREET GATEWAY This western gateway to the Bridge Street Corridor as well as a major regional gateway to Dublin as a whole from I-270 and U.S. 33 should send a strong, positive message about the community’s identity. It should signal to drivers a distinct shift from a highway setting to the walkable, mixed-use environment embodied in nearby Historic Dublin and throughout the Bridge Street Corridor. It should also make the statement that prosperity and high-quality people-oriented environments go hand-in-hand in Dublin. This district should also be a prime target for high-value development seeking a prominent address such as office, lodging and retail uses owing to the high visibility, excellent road access, established presence of major employers, and significant opportunities to improve walkability within the district and adjacent areas. DUBLIN ROAD CHARACTER With the exclusion of the Historic District from the Bridge Street District, a small portion of Dublin Road is located within the district. This section of road currently services single-family lots and establishes a naturalized character, lined with mature trees and stark topography. However, Dublin Road will be critical when the redevelopment of the Indian Run Neighborhood District occurs. While Dublin Road is anticipated to be significantly improved to accom- modate new development and a potential new John Shields Parkway bridge, the streetscape character of Dublin Road should be preserved. SAWMILL ROAD CHARACTER Sawmill Road is a critical thoroughfare that separates Dublin and Columbus. The character of the road is distinctly different between the east and west sides of the road. The west side is characterized by large shopping centers and parking lots, limited pedestrian facilities, and limited vegetation. The character along the Dublin portion of the road should feature a green, landscaped streetscape with sufficient pedestrian facilities setback from the road. JOHN SHIELDS PARKWAY GREENWAY John Shields Parkway Greenway connects Riverside Crossing Park to Sawmill Road. Sections that are currently constructed feature residential buildings with front entrances along the streetscape and greenway, and wide sidewalks and shared-use paths. Future extension of Josh Shields Parkway east of Tuller Road should continue the greenway system and provide opportunities for pedestrian interaction and open space amenities. SCIOTO RIVER FRONTAGE New development on either side of the Scioto River should include a mix of land uses that benefits from the river’s presence and contributes to the quality of public space. For instance, restaurants with views to the river and outdoor seating are encouraged. Multiple- family housing and office buildings are also strongly encouraged according to market opportunity. Building and site design should maximize opportunities to capitalize on river views as value assets. Recommendations for accomplishing this objective with multiple-family housing, for example, include creating river-facing courtyards and terracing building heights so that as many dwelling units as possible enjoy river views. The success of public open spaces around the Scioto River should be judged more on their quality than quantity, since a balance that includes high-value mixed-use development can help provide the funding and presence of people that can draw greatest public benefit from the river corridor. . WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 222 TRANSITIONAL EDGES As the Bridge Street District develops over time, with incremental improvements to the street network, devel- opment around the edges of each district may take on a mix of development characters depending on actual street alignments, greenway connections, market demand, and development opportunities. In all cases, a vibrant mix of uses and architectural character is desired. ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS A few pockets of single-family residential neighborhoods are embedded in the Bridge Street District or immediately adjacent to it. These established residential neighbor- hoods include Indian Run Estates, Waterford Village, properties along Martin Road and Lily Mar Court, and properties along Dublin Road and High Street north of the Historic District (respectively). These properties should be preserved and buffered from adjacent development, although carefully sited pedestrian connections will be made in appropriate locations. GREENWAY CONNECTIONS One of the central elements of the Bridge Street Corridor Vision Plan is a greenway network to connect each character neighborhood. While smaller networks may be found throughout the District, a District wide connection is envisioned along the North and South Forks of the Indian Run to protect and preserve this exceptional natural amenity, eventually providing a dedicated pedestrian connection across the Scioto River through the Dublin Link Bridge, and extending further east until reaching the Sawmill Center Neighborhood, where it takes on a more an urban character. The greenway network will ultimately extend beyond the boundaries of the Bridge Street District to provide important pedestrian and bicycle connections to the rest of the city. INDIAN RUN AND GREENWAY The Indian Run and its associated greenway are a signature element identified in the Historic District Area Plan. Any development located along the Indian Run should be sensi- tively treated to ensure impacts to the natural features and the greenway are significantly minimized. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 223 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans KEY SITE & OPPORTUNITIES MONTEREY DRIVE SITE This site is located at the intersection of W. Bridge Street and Monterey Drive. Adjacent to Waterford Village to the south, these properties offer an opportunity to transition from the activity along West Bridge Street to the quaintness of the neighborhood. Development on these sites should include vertical mixed-use buildings along W. Bridge Street at a height of 2 to 3 stories. South of the frontage, multi- family residential uses, such as townhomes, are appropriate transitional uses to Monterey Park and the neighborhood. Additional street connections should be contemplated for future development along Corbins Mill Drive. INDIAN RUN NEIGHBORHOOD (OCLC AND CARDINAL SOUTH) The OCLC and Cardinal South properties represent some of Dublin’s most important opportunities to accommodate significant new mixed-use development, owing to its highly consolidated ownership, large developable parcels, excel- lent visibility from Interstate 270, potential for improved road access, and proximity to the amenities of Indian Run Falls Park and Historic Dublin. One of the greatest oppor- tunities associated with the Bridge Street District is the potential for new development to have significant visibility from regional roadways, making a strong statement about Dublin and its urban core. Redevelopment of these sites should ensure that the Interstate 270 frontage is developed with high-profile buildings that set the tone for development within the Bridge Street District as an area with a strong character and an energetic economic environment. The desired character is for buildings ranging from three to seven stories with contemporary architecture framing the highway spaced to allow views into the interior of the Bridge Street District. The predominant land use is expected to be a mix of office, hotel, and other commercial uses, although some residential may be appropriately and sensitively placed within this area. BRIDGE PARK Bridge Park is a successful, urban development that capi- talizes on entertainment and eating and drinking facilities, while offering desirable multi-family and office locations. Future phases of development adjacent to Bridge Park should aim to mimic the size and scale of the buildings, while providing a variety of heights between buildings. Pedestrian engagement is critical in and around this devel- opment, and future buildings should also focus on ground- floor activation, and purposeful open spaces. SHOPPES AT RIVER RIDGE This shopping center sits along an important southern boundary of the District. Adjacent properties to the south feature single-family residential and small-scale office, while to the north is Bridge Park, consisting of several low to mid-rise development. Redevelopment of the site is expected, with an extension of Bridge Park at the southeast corner of W. Dublin-Granville Road and Riverside Drive. Similar to the AC Hotel, this development should frame the roundabout and create a distinctive character as a landmark of the district. The desired character is for buildings ranging between 3-8 stories at the intersection with contemporary architecture. The remainder of the site should begin a transition from the intensity of the district to the existing small-scale office and residential to the south. The desired character is for buildings ranging from 2 to 5 stories, with smaller buildings along the southern boundary of the site. Additional street connections should be accommodated for Dale Drive and Stoneridge Lane. DUBLIN VILLAGE Dublin Village is a shopping center located in the northeast corner of the district, with primary access from Village Parkway and Sawmill Road. This development has been a staple of the community for decades, but is primed for reju- venation and redevelopment. This opportunity allows for a special mixed use activity area that will serve as the center of the Sawmill Center Neighborhood, one of the Bridge Street District’s two “bookends” expected to maintain more of a regional shopping and entertainment focus based on the market opportunities for this area. The idea of a walkable core is desired at the center of this neighborhood district to serve as a community focal point with the highest concentration of mixed uses and walkable development that emphasizes pedestrian connectivity over vehicular movement. Buildings are expected to be highly pedestri- an-oriented and suited to an active streetscape, ranging in height from two to five stories. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 224 Clearly delineated crosswalks Indianapolis Cultural Trail – Bike & Ped Paths East Bridge Street (SR-161) is a key east-west connec- tion for Dublin to the rest of the central Ohio region. The segment of SR-161 between Riverside Drive and Sawmill Road was improved to its current form in the late 1990s in response to the suburban development pattern preva- lent along the corridor during that time. Today, the corridor is primed for redevelopment as the energy and urban development pattern of the Bridge Street District continues east along SR-161. As property is rede- veloped, the Bridge Street District zoning district mandates urban development forms, and with that, the City is evaluating the future needs of the corridor to best serve the community and future development. Elements evaluated for SR-161 include enhanced pedestrian mobility, multimodal options including micro-mobility, and future LinkUS service. The City is undertaking a study of East Bridge Street (SR-161) to imagine a mobility-focused urban street typology that is consistent with the City’s Bridge Street District vision.Several goals and objectives were identified for this corridor visioning exercise: ■Affirm and update schematic alignments for the future street grid in the corridor. ■Improve crosswalks by minimizing crossing lengths, evaluate intersection and mid-block treatments, and explore pedestrian crossing devices. ■Develop concepts for the Emerald Trail, a designated Central Ohio Greenway. ■Plan for the future implementation of LinkUS Bus Rapid Transit facilities and associated micromobility devices along the corridor. ■Evaluate changes in speed limits and associated impacts to mobility along the corridor. EAST BRIDGE STREET CORRIDOR STUDY ALTERNATIVES STUDIED Multiple configurations are being analyzed as part of the corridor visioning exercise. This includes analyzing various layouts for pedestrian & bicycle facilities, vehicular lanes, intersection conditions, on-street parking, and how redevel- opment along the corridor will help to frame and highlight the mobility options. These alternatives expand the Emerald Trail and provide dedicated sidewalks adjacent to future building frontages. The alternatives study balanced access, pedestrian circulation, and a new block network that follows a traditional urban grid. DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS The development pattern along SR-161 is changing from generally suburban typologies to an urban typology with buildings that address the street. As redevelopment occurs, a welcoming streetscape with generous pedestrian facilities will create a vibrant, active environment along a key corridor within the community. Considering the potential form of future development when planning for a pedestrian-friendly public roadway corridor ensures that public investment in mobility infrastructure supports the type of development required by the City’s adopted regulations. PEDESTRIAN INFRASTRUCTURE A focus of this effort is to shift priority from automobiles to a balanced approach to include infrastructure for all roadway users within the corridor. Improvements being considered include clearly delineated crosswalks, leading pedestrian intervals, pedestrian-only crossing phases, protected and buffered Emerald Trail, wide sidewalks (8’-12’), and plentiful landscape elements are all elements that create a vibrant environment for pedestrians while supporting LinkUS operations and automobiles. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 225 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans Concept 4 - two lane intersection with left turns Concept 1 - single lane intersection with left turns Concept 3 - single lane roundabout Concept 2 - single lane intersection with no left turns WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 226 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Preserve the Indian Run North and South Forks and use as an organizing feature for future development Expand public open space along the Scioto River New bridge connecting Dublin Road and Riverside Drive Preserve and frame view corridors into key site from I-270 and other significant corridors Promote transit oriented design for development along future Bus Rapid Transit corridor Preserve existing tree rows and screens to buffer new development from existing single family neighborhoods New connection between Tuller Road and Emerald Parkway Create green edge along the west side of Sawmill Road Create new linear park in Sharp Lane right-of-way with implementation of street network improvements Reserve I-270 frontage for office/ employment, parking, and open spaces Preserve open space/rural gatenway into Historic District along Dublin Rd Utilize I-270 bridge over the South Fork to create a greenway connection Strategically locate new public open spaces along District Connector Streets in areas proposed for high activity as the organizational framework for the Sawmill Center Neighborhood Capitalize on the existing cinematic entertainment available in the Sawmill Center Neighborhood with other entertainment options and unique, experiential retail, eating and drinking options with residential/office above. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Potential road diet and streetscape improvements Infill development north of Wendy’s campus should be complementary in character and scale to adjacent existing residential neighborhoods West Bridge Street east of Frantz Road transitions from highway-oriented development at the interchange to the walkable, mixed-use Historic Transition Subarea through infill development of commercial uses complementary to the existing shopping center fronting West Bridge Street. Reserve West Bridge Street frontage west of Frantz Road (limited access ROW) frontage for office/employment and hospitality uses which benefit from high visibility. 13 14 15 16 17 18 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 227 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans BRIDGE STREET DISTRICT ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN 36 7 1 LEGEND East Bridge Street West Bridge Street Indian Run Neighborhood Scioto River Neighborhood Sawmill Center Neighborhood Historic Transition Tuller Road Mixed Use Tuller/Greenway District 9 2 4 6 1 8 1 4 4 5 10 10 10 6 11 12 1314 15 15 15 16 1718 BRT Corridor/Stations Prioritize Building Edge Prioritize Ground-floor Activation Reserve I-270 Frontage for Commercial/Employment Uses Signature Architecture/Focal Point Placemaking Opportunity Electrical Substation WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 228 270 Sawmill RdSawmill RdScioto RiverE Bridge StE Bridge St Rivers ide DrRivers ide DrFrantz RdFrantz RdJohn Shields PkwyJohn Shields Pkwy Tuller RdTuller Rd Bridge Park AveBridge Park Ave Dublin Center DrDublin Center DrStoneridge LnStoneridge Ln Post R d Post R d Emerald PkwyEmerald Pkwy Dublin RdDublin RdW Bridge StW Bridge St PLANNING CONTEXT The planning area is bound by West Bridge Street on the north, I-270 on the west, Frantz Road on the east, and Tuttle Crossing Boulevard on the south. The area primarily consists of large office campuses developed during the 1970s to 1990s, which at that time were considered a premium location for suburban office development because of its high visibility along I-270 and the focus on vehicular access. The sites within the DCA are auto-oriented in design, with segregated land uses, limited roadway connec- tivity or public open space. The planning area is largely developed, but also contains some significant vacant sites. In addition, the current development pattern provides some redevelopment and infill opportunities. MARKET CHANGES Several major changes have occurred nationally in the past decade that present a challenge to the standard suburban office model in both the quantity and quality of the office experience. The shift to remote work as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic has had impact on traditional office areas, like those found in theDCA, as these spaces are grounded in large office buildings that rely on employees working on campus each day. The shift to remote work altered how and where employees work, causing a decrease in the demand for companies and their need for office space. This trend continues to shift as more employees come back to work in the office, but the complete picture of how remote work will impact the workplace continues to evolve as employees have more choices about where they can work. Another shift is the consistent increase in employee desires for nearby convenience and entertainment uses, as well as other amenities. National studies show that today’s employees expect to be able to walk to lunch, fitness centers and other services from their workplaces. At the same time, integrated housing within office parks has become a growing trend around the country with the goal of creating a true mixed use, walkable environment that sustains businesses. The challenge for older office parks is to find the space for all of these uses, as well as the facilities that support walking, biking and transit connectivity. MAINTENANCE OF ECONOMIC BASE The DCA has cultivated the City’s workforce, serving as one of the first premier office districts. Dublin recognizes that office uses serve as the economic backbone of the city, particularly a diverse range of businesses. The presence of thriving office environments fosters job creation, attracts skilled professionals, and encourages innovation and economic growth. The oppor- tunity to support existing and future office users with the DCA play a pivotal role in Dublin’s continued success. Repositioning our legacy office areas, like the DCA and infusing a variety of uses and amenities will improve office competitiveness, reduce vehicle trips and increase productivity. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY The WID plays an important role in the City’s economic devel- opment strategy that was updated in 2023, which outlines a series of strategies and actions to continue Dublin’s economic success and competitiveness within the region. Similar to the Bridge Street District and the West Innovation District Area Plans, Strategy 1 within the Plan focuses on Creating Distinctive Mixed-Use Development Nodes to Meet 21st Century Industrial Demand for Vibrant Physical Space while Maintaining Dublin’s High Quality of Place Standards. The Plan calls out action steps within this Strategy to focus efforts to redevelop the Dublin Corporate Area/legacy office parks and provide additional points of connection to alternative living/ retail space. The Plan highlights the need to encourage and facilitate new investment and redevelopment of in the Dublin Corporate Area to maintain a strong economic base. Dublin’s office space has been considered some of the best in Central Ohio for the past 40 years. Like many suburbs, Dublin fostered a Class-A office model offering freeway visibility, easy automotive access, an abundance of free parking and idyllic office “parks” with manicured landscaping and large stormwater ponds. As our office areas have aged, this develop- ment model is having an increasingly difficult time competing with office space in more vibrant, ameni- ty-rich environments. The Dublin Corporate Area (DCA) builds upon a study of Dublin’s legacy office parks – including Metro Center and the businesses along Frantz Road and Blazer Parkway – and presents a long range vision that seeks to determine ways to improve these areas for businesses, employees and residents, as well as encourage additional private investment that benefits the entire community. DISTRICT INTENT The intent of DCAP is to help the district maintain its competitive edge as a regional employment center by introducing updated land use strategies within the district. The following goals will guide future develop- ment and redevelopment. DCA DUBLIN CORPORATE AREA PLAN WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 229 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans Existing Metro Center office building SUBAREA RECOMMENDATIONS The Dublin Corporate Area recommendations developed in 2018 divided the planning area into sub-districts based on the existing development patterns. Each sub-district included land uses recommendations, preferred develop- ment outcomes, and recommended building heights, which were based on significant public engagement. LLEWELLYN FARMS OFFICE SUB-DISTRICT The Llewellyn Farms Office Sub- District differs in character given its proximity to existing residential neighborhoods. The appropriate land use is lower density office, which should remain its focus into the future for area south of Rings Road. Office uses should be supported for vacant sites and any site that is proposed for redevelopment. Building heights should be limited to two stories. When new development occurs adjacent to a residential neighborhood, setbacks and buffers should be augmented using appropriate landscaping. The Llewellyn Farms Office Sub-District provides lower density, office space for smaller and growing companies. Uses other than office are not appropriate in this sub-district south of Rings Road. The recently adopted MUR-4 (Mixed Use Regional District) zoning district outlines development standards for this particular sub-district that align with the recommendations outlined within the Dublin Corporate Area. METRO/BLAZER SUB-DISTRICT The Metro/Blazer Sub-District exemplifies the challenges of the “legacy” office development pattern. Once a premier office district in all of central Ohio, this district now has a competitive disadvantage compared to more newly developed office areas, due to a lack of amenities, low walkability, and an outdated appearance. In addition, there are practical difficulties for site access, inefficient parking and site design that must be remedied. This sub-district is in an excellent location with a significant amount of Frantz Road frontage. The introduction of a mix of uses, additional roadway connections, and strategic phased redevelopment will reposition this sub-district to succeed for future generations. Appropriate uses include office, residential infill on key sites and mixed-use devel- opment along Frantz Road. Road extensions should be explored, linking Metro Place South and Blazer Parkway, as well as Metro Place North with Shier Rings Road. The Metro/Blazer Sub-District is an office employment center for the City as well as provides an opportunity to introduce uses to support offices, hotel visitors, and nearby residents. Uses to include within this sub-district are office, research and development, personal services, retail, restaurant/bar, entertainment, hotel, and multi-family residential (Discour- aged along I-270 frontage). Building heights within this sub-district include one to 6 stories along Frantz Road, providing a transition between adjacent neighborhoods and office or mixed use districts, and four to eight stories along I-270 frontage for more exten- sive office development. Varying building heights for adjacent structures along Frantz Road should be incorporated to provide visual interest and prevent uniform massing. Iden- tical building heights for structure located directly adjacent to one another is discouraged throughout all districts. TUTTLE/RINGS (NORTH AND SOUTH) SUB-DISTRICT The Tuttle/Rings Sub-District has distinct characteristics north and south of Rings Road. North of Rings Road the Tuttle/ Rings Sub-District contains the largest opportunity for new investment given the amount of undeveloped land. Appropriate uses include additional corpo- rate office within the interior of the sub-district with supporting retail services (coffee shops), however a limited amount of multi-story residential development is supported (density not to exceed 30 du/ac) as a secondary use to office. South of Rings Road, the Tuttle/ Rings Sub-District contains a mix of office, hospitality and limited retail/ restaurant uses. This sub-district benefits from immediate interstate access, as well as close proximity to the Mall at Tuttle Crossing. There are limited opportunities for infill development; redevelopment of existing buildings is not expected. Residential development is not appropriate in this portion of the sub-district. The Tuttle/Rings Sub-District serves as a transition from the Tuttle Crossing area into the greater office campus area. Uses to include within the Tuttle/Rings North sub-district are office, office campus, retail, restaurant/bar, entertainment, multi-family residential. Uses to include within the Tuttle/ Rings South sub-district are office, office campus, retail, restaurant/bar, and entertainment. Building heights within this sub-district include one to six stories along Frantz Road, providing a transition between adja- cent neighborhoods and office or mixed use districts, and four to eight stories along I-270 frontage for more extensive office development. Varying building heights for adjacent structures along Frantz Road should be incorporated to provide visual interest and prevent uniform massing. Identical building heights for structure located directly adjacent to one another is discouraged throughout all districts. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 230 AREA RECOMMENDATIONS INTRODUCTION OF MIX OF USES AND AMENITIES Within the DCA, much of the existing development is single-use office space that is under-served by proximate food and beverage establishments. The land use philosophy for the DCA focuses on the transition from the development patterns of the past to better serve workforce and residents of the future. Allowing flexibility in land uses will facilitate this transition as market forces continue to shift. The goal of DCA is to create a walkable, mixed use environment with the commensurate amenities, while recommending places for infill and new development. Encouraging a variety of land uses, focusing on needed amenities to serve workers, nearby hotel visitors, and residents is key to the success of the DCA. This includes support for integrated infill residential development at key locations in support of office development. CONNECTIVITY Changes in the planning area will both require and provide the opportunity for connectivity of many types and scales. Improved office occupancy combined with a newly developed mix of uses will happen in conjunction with increased connectivity. Current access to the plan- ning area is predominantly vehicular, with reliance on a roadway network that has a limited number of connections to the citywide roadway network, as well as internally. Opportunities exist for additional vehicular linkages and alternative transportation methods to be considered as the DCA redevelops. Improvements to the pedestrian and bicycle connections and facilities will create vibrant street edges and provide key linkages in the area for all users. Positioning the planning area as a well-connected district with service and recreational and open space amenities will facilitate opportunities for greater community interaction. TRANSITION/ADJACENCY As a transition from the true urban character of the emerging Bridge Street District to typical suburban style development, the DCA should merge the development principles of walkability and placemaking found in BSD with the development style of suburban office districts. The DCA will require a targeted shift in future land use strategies to complement a renewed approach to site design and redevelopment while being mindful of adjacent neighborhoods. Infill and redevelopment within the DCA should ensure adversely impacts are mitigated for adjacent neighborhoods, particularly along the Frantz Road corridor. PLACEMAKING The City is committed to developing a walkable, pedestrian friendly environment that augments the placemaking strategies of the DCA. While some placemaking occurs due to commu- nity programing, such as a festival or a sculpture installation, or as the serendipity as a place evolves, the Plan recommends retrofitting and re-organizing existing development to increase opportunities for community to interaction. New development should include spaces designed to facilitate interaction and public gathering. These spaces should be inviting and rich in details that encourage collaboration and social interaction. Spaces should be adaptive, unique, accessible, and safe with opportunity for community activities. OPEN SPACE Open space should be used an organizational and focal element with usable open space in close proximity to all uses. Open space should include multi-use paths, seating, and other passive and limited active recreation uses. Stormwater features can be integrated into open space to provide park amenities. SUSTAINABILITY With the opportunity for new infill and redevelopment in the planning area, there are a variety of sustainable practices that can be incorporated to enhance the existing environ- ment and link development to the existing greenspaces and ensure coordinated infrastructure. More sustainable approaches to parking facilities and site design should be encouraged, such as pervious pavement and biocells, to improve the quality and decrease the quantity of storm- water runoff. The DCA planning area utilizes a regional stormwater management system, which should be reeval- uate with new development or redevelopment of the area. The area as a unique opportunity to incorporate alternative energy sources and green building practices within new development, such as energy efficient and LEED certified design, renewable energy equipment, and sustainable and alternative building materials. Alternative transportation and microtransit options should also be considered with new and redevelopment within the area. SITE DEVELOPMENT Site development details within the DCA establish a framework for the overall site design and character of the area. Buildings should be located adjacent to the public rights-of-way, locating parking primarily to the rear where possible. Parking decks and garages should be integrated with site design where economically feasible. Service func- tions should be strategically placed to minimize negative impacts on the public rights-of-way and other public spaces. Pedestrian access should be accommodated from parking areas to building entrances and between adja- cent buildings and uses, creating linkages within and to adjacent sites. Bicycle access should be accommodated and encouraged in site design. Negative impacts of site lighting on adjacent areas should be reduced, particularly adjacent to residential neighborhoods. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 231 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans Green roof on office building. Architectural design character. Amenitzing outdoor space. Small scale food and beverage. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN The City prides itself on high-quality architecture and design, and the DCA should be a reflection to Dublin’s standards. In order to achieve this, building designs should accommodate changes in use and emerging work styles such as hybrid or remote working. Buildings should be compatible with adjacent neighborhoods and sub-districts relative to architectural character, massing, placement, height, and landscaping. A variety of architectural styles and design are an important component in establishing the character of the area. The massing of the buildings should be dynamic with a high degree of transparency to ensure an active streetscape. The heights of building should vary from adjacent structures to prevent uniform massing, scale, and form. New construction along the Frantz Road corridor should transition and connect with adjacent building form. Building entrances should be located along the public rights-of way and in areas most easily accessed by parking areas to ensure visual and physical connectivity to the public realm. Natural materials are encouraged, as well as sustainable materials to ensure high-quality design and character are upheld. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 232 KEY SITE & OPPORTUNITIES FRANTZ ROAD AT METRO PLACE The properties located along Frantz Road act as a gateway to the Metro Center and have significant redevelopment potential that would provide a catalyst for the implementa- tion of the Metro Center vision. The redevelopment of these sites would set the precedent for realizing the recommen- dations of the plan by stimulating development along the Frantz Road corridor and establishing an identity through the incorporation of new amenities, housing, open space features, and architectural design. Key considerations for this site include: ■Redevelopment of Frantz Road frontage, encouraging buildings closer to the corridor to activate the public realm. ■Mixed-use development that provides diverse spaces for restaurants, retail, and services. ■Housing options for the local workforce that are thoughtfully designed and located. ■Quality, higher-density development providing unique architectural interest that establishes a new identity for Metro Center. ■Increased building height along Frantz Road that varies between structures (preventing uniform heights) and transitions in scale to surrounding neighborhoods. ■Consolidation of parking areas to encourage sharing between complementary uses. ■Reshaping the stormwater basin into a natural stream amenity for people to experience. ■Public art integration and placemaking features that integrate into public spaces. ■Infrastructure supporting electric vehicles and alterna- tive transportation options. ■Establish a strategy to “refresh” the Frantz Road streetscape that better reflects the gateway nature of this important corridor. UPPER METRO The remaining vacant site located along Upper Metro Place provide a development opportunity to link the Bridge Street District and Metro Center. Development along the Frantz Road frontage is encouraged to provide a mix of uses incor- porating residential, office, retail and restaurant. The uses would draw on the vitality of the Bridge Street District and support the redevelopment of the Metro Center. Building heights should be a minimum of 4 stories and a maximum of 6 stories, as permitted under the zoning district. CRAMER CREEK - LLEWELLYN FARMS The single lot located at the end of Cramer Creek Court is adjacent to existing residential uses and lower intensity office development. It has limited access and visibility, and is constrained by Stream Corridor Protection Zone, as well as shallow lot depth. The only appropriate use for this site is office, with building heights not to exceed 2 stories with a flat roof and 1.5 stories with a sloped roof. As part of a proposed new development, this and other sites adjacent to residential uses should include additional buffering require- ments to minimize potential impacts of new development. RINGS ROAD PROPERTY The remaining vacant parcel located along the south side of Rings Road across from The Corners development. The site should incorporate office/tech uses that complement the existing office and flex uses adjacent to the site. Heights should range from 2 to 3 stories provided natural areas are preserved and the parking requirements are met. The site contains significant woodlands and a Stream Corridor Protection Zone, which will need to be preserved with any new development. RINGS ROAD – UNINCORPORATED AREA The unincorporated site located at the corner of Frantz and Rings Roads is currently located in Washington Township and require annexation to gain access to central utilities (water and sewer) to accommodate any new development. If the site were to annex to City of Dublin, the plan supports neighborhood-oriented retail and office uses along the Frantz Road frontage limited to a total of 10,000 square feet and two stories in height as transition and buffer from Frantz Road. The remainder of the site should be devel- oped as single-family residential uses and designed around connected and integrated public open space. The new development should provide pedestrian connections to adjacent neighborhoods. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 233 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans BACKGROUND The construction of Interstate 270 (the Outerbelt) in the early 1970s opened up land for development, helped attract major corporate employers to Dublin and set the foundation for our identity today as a premier employment center. The City’s emphasis on jobs, particularly higher-wage office jobs, is the foundation of our economic health and enables the City to provide high-quality public services and recreation opportu- nities to our residents. Metro Center, located southeast of the I-270 and US-33 interchange, offers freeway visibility, easy access by car, an abundance of free parking and is home to some of Dublin’s largest, oldest, and most visible multi-tenant office buildings. This area has been successful for decades but a half century later, as suburban office areas have aged, this office model is having an increasingly difficult time competing with office space in more vibrant, amenity-rich environments. Many employers and employees now desire housing and office space in walkable, mixed-use environments that include restaurants, retail, entertainment, and recreation amenities. Prior community involvement and planning provided guid- ance on important elements for the successful revitalization of Metro Center that accent the district’s history as an important employment hub and capitalize on the opportu- nity to position it as a new focal point of the community. ■Support existing office tenants with complementary uses, amenities, and services ■Embrace walkability and transportation options that link the district to the citywide network ■Foster a sense of place and identity unique to Metro Center ■Consolidate underutilized surface parking to create new opportunities for a mix of uses ■Provide a variety of new housing types for workers and residents ■Establish a unique natural open space amenity and connect the district with greenspace Dublin recognizes the importance of repositioning Metro Center for continued success. Community engagement and planning through the Dublin Corpo- rate Area Plan (2022) established a vision to revi- talize the district. To advance the vision, the City has engaged a team of consultants led by Sasaki, a design firm with global expertise in urban design, landscape architecture, ecology and civil engineering to develop a design and implementation framework that creates a distinctive identity, encourages dynamic reinvestment, provides a vibrant mix of uses in a walkable environ- ment and promotes sustainable design principles. As a commitment to realizing the community’s vision, an important part of this project will be to identify oppor- tunities for public and private partnerships for catalytic projects that transform the Metro Center. STUDY OBJECTIVES ■Build upon the community’s vision for Metro Center and the Dublin Corporate Area. ■Define a distinct identity and sense of place for the district which replicates the success of Bridge Park but does not duplicate its character. ■Identify public infrastructure improvements which contribute to unlocking opportunities. ■Collaborate with stakeholders and identify poten- tial strategic implementation partnerships. ■Identify sites best positioned to establish a devel- opment “beach head’ and develop projects for catalytic change. ■Build consensus in the approach to actionable strategies for implementable change from both public and private actions. METRO CENTER REVITALIZATION Metro Center Revitalization inspiration images WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 234 MIXED USE EXAMPLE: WEST BLAZER LEGEND Office Flex Office Mixed Use Residential 2 1 3 64 7 7 270 Rings RdRings Rd Bla z e r P k w y Bla z e r P k w y Atrium PkwyAtrium Pkwy Quantum Health Cosgray R u n Cramer Run Existing Open Space George Gea r y R u n 4 Existing Surface Lot Existing Surface Lot 8 Address the Cosgray Run as a new greenway corridor, orient new development toward the greenspace, amenitize and activate Create a connection between Metro Center and Blazer, reimagine the existing character Orient new residential development toward streets and open spaces Preserve view corridors to existing office buildings, align as terminal vistas where appropriate Create new, formal open spaces Incorporate existing mature trees into open space and site design Focus mixed use and ground-floor activation at desired activity nodes Existing landscaped mounding and tree stand New, north-south street with street activation Residential buildings with key ground-floor activation 2 4 5 6 The parcels located in the western portion of the DCA along I-270 provide an opportunity for development with a focus on office or technology uses along the freeway frontage. Minimum building heights in this area should be 4 stories with a maximum height of 8 stories. Residential use subordinate to office are appropriate and should be located on the site interior to the DCA and not along the I-270 frontage. This interior site should have a minimum height of 4 stories and a maximum height of 6 stories. The consideration of a future north-south connector to link Metro Center to Blazer Parkway would create improved connectivity and provide relief to the traffic on Frantz Road. These sites contain portions of or are adjacent to stream protection areas, which provide an opportunity for a greenway connection throughout the area. 3 7 8 9 1 10 9 1010 10 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 235 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans 5 The original development site was purchased as part of an economic retention strategy to encourage relocation and expansion of a large office use in the adjacent corporate office building to the west. The City constructed a “smart” off-street parking lot with solar covered parking and other sustainable amenities on a portion of the parcel. The remaining parcel became part of a public-private partnership and was approved for neighborhood-oriented retail, restaurant, and office uses within what is called The Corners. The redevelopment of The Corners site initi- ated a first step of activating the Frantz Road corridor and filling a void within an area that was underserved for restaurant and retail uses to support the office users and adjacent neighborhoods. MIXED USE EXAMPLE: 5100 RINGS & THE CORNERS LEGEND Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood Office Office/Mixed Use Mixed Use Residential Rings R d Rings R d Frantz RdFrantz RdBlazer PkwyBlazer Pkwy Stonehenge PkwyStonehenge PkwyField of Corn 5100 Rings Expand upon the Corner’s open space, create purposeful open spaces Preserve view corridors to existing 5100 Rings office building Maintain existing green/landscaped edge along Rings Rd Prioritize groundfloor activation in buildings adjacent to active areas Create new interior street network with pedestrian facilities and attractive streetscapes to introduce neighborhood fabric Reimagine Chief Ave with streetscape improvements Consolidate and create shared parking for infill development 2 3 1 1 3 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 Chief Av e Chief Av e 7 2 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 236 2 7 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Maintain high quality architectural and landscape presence along I-270 corporate, reserving frontage for job producing uses Potential new I-270 crossing connecting Emerald Pkwy and Metro Center Greenway connection across I-270 Maintain a green edge along west side of Frantz Rd to transition and buffer future redevelopment in Metro Center Create new, active open spaces Potential road diet and streetscape improvements Preserve view corridors to existing office buildings Create new connections between Metro Center and Blazer Preserve traditional Dublin throughfare character of Frantz and Rings Rd Create new interior street network with pedestrian facilities and attractive streetscapes to introduce neighborhood fabric Strengthen Cosgray Run greenway Buffer and transition new office from existing and future residential areas 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 7 8 12 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 237 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Special Area Plans DUBLIN CORPORATE AREA ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN 2 LEGEND Suburban Office Neighborhood Office Mixed Use Center Neighborhood Mixed Use Suburban Commercial Office or Flex Uses Senior Living 6 8 5 4 7 7 1 9 10 11 6 6 6 9 3 1 10 5 12 12 5 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Special Area Plans | Envision Dublin Community Plan 238 270 Rings RdRings Rd Cosgray Run Parkcenter AveParkcenter Ave Frantz RdFrantz RdUpper Metro PlUpper Metro Pl Bridge Park AveBridge Park Ave Metro Pl SMetro Pl S Frantz RdFrantz RdBlazer PkwyBlazer PkwyCra m e r R u n Tuttle Crossing BlvdTuttle Crossing Blvd Rings RdRings Rd Blazer PkwyBlazer Pkwy 33 Metro Pl NMetro Pl N Purpose The Implementation Chapter will position the Plan as a central resource guiding future planning endeavors and policy decisions across the City of Dublin. Additionally, the Implementation Chapter will lay the ground work for realizing the goals, objectives, and recommendations set forth in the Plan. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 239 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Implementation 12 IMPLEMENTATION Envision Dublin is a foundation for future decision-making related to land use, development, and community improve- ment. The Plan is intended to direct action within Dublin that supports the community’s established vision and core community principles. Implementation will be critical to this effort, ensuring that the goals and recommendations of the Plan foster positive momentum within the commu- nity. Plan implementation will require the cooperation of a diverse range of organizations and stakeholders, including City staff, elected and appointed officials, public agencies, the local business community, property owners, developers, and residents. Together, these groups will be essential in realizing the City’s vision for its future. The Plan identifies strategies to help realize the commu- nity’s vision and aspirations while addressing priorities moving forward. Chapter 3, “Vision and Goals,” articu- lates the vision, goals, and objectives developed through extensive community outreach and engagement. Each of the Plan’s core chapters provides detailed conclusions and recommendations, presenting actionable steps for deci- sion-makers and key stakeholders to achieve the broader goals and work toward the shared vision. Implementation of the goals, objectives, and key recommendations will be critical to successfully guide land use and development policy decisions and realize the community’s vision. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Implementation 240 REGULAR USE OF ENVISION DUBLIN To ensure routine use of the Plan, the City should: ■Make an “Executive Summary” in a digital format available to the public StoryMaps. This will allow the content of the plan to utilize visual aids such as maps, graphs, and other illustrative tools to communicate the objectives of the plan. ■Provide all board and commission members a copy of the Envision Dublin Community Plan and provide an overview of the final document and how to utilize the plan. ■Meet with department directors to provide an overview of the final plan and how to utilize the plan in their review of projects, capital improvement planning, and prioritization of projects. ■Provide a plan “orientation” for new staff, officials, and board members that highlights key takeaways and goals of the Plan that are essential to local policy and initiatives. ■Reference the plan when reviewing applications including the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. IMPLEMENTATION ROLES Envision Dublin addresses a wide variety of topics and issue areas, and City departments are equipped to address many of these topics. While City staff include numerous knowl- edge experts who can directly assist with plan implementa- tion, successful implementation will require a coordinated effort between City officials, neighboring municipalities, Franklin, Delaware, and Union Counties, partner organi- zations, stakeholders, and residents. This includes City Officials who will highlight the importance of the plan, city staff who will direct the development community to utilize the plan and board and commission members who will implement the plan. IMPLEMENTATION PARTNERS The City should coordinate administrative actions, reviewing and approving land development applications, and public improvement projects as identified within the Plan. Successful implementation will rely on developing and maintaining partnerships with the numerous stakeholders throughout the community, including public agencies, community groups, the local business community, founda- tions, and the private sector. Given the breadth and scope of the Plan, these organizations will be essential to assist the community in reaching the established goals and vision for the future of Dublin. Per the strategies of the Plan, the City should identify specific organizations and agencies to assist with imple- mentation and explore opportunities for potential partner- ships and collaborations. Discussions should continue to occur following the adoption of the Plan regarding how the implementation of the goals and strategies can be jointly accomplished with partner agencies. Further, the City should ensure that property owners and developers plan for and construct improvements that are consistent with the directives of the Plan. Some vital partners to the City of Dublin will be agencies and local officials in surrounding communities including Franklin, Delaware and Union Counties. Municipalities including Marysville, Plain City, West Jefferson, Hilliard and Columbus. Other regional partners including MORPC, LUC, and COTA. These partnerships also include more local groups such as Visit Dublin Ohio, Dublin Arts Council, City of Dublin Chamber of Commerce, and Hilliard and Dublin City Schools. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 241 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Implementation DEVELOPMENT DECISION-MAKING City officials should encourage carefully planned growth by utilizing the Future Land Use Plan and associated policies as part of the community’s land use decision-making process. This should include requests to City Council and the City’s Boards and Commissions. As part of Envision Dublin imple- mentation, City staff will regular monitor the use of the plan and identify opportunities to implement the plan in regular decision making processes for the City of Dublin. IMPLEMENTATION THROUGH REGULATION Envision Dublin is a policy guide that outlines the neces- sary actions for the community to achieve its vision. It is designed to serve as a foundation for decision-making for staff, elected and appointed officials, developers, residents, and other stakeholders. The Plan uses thorough content and complementary imaginary to ensure concepts are relayed in an effective manner and outline the City’s vision for future growth and development. To ensure that new development and redevelopment are consistent with the Future Land Use Plan and with the vision and goals of this plan, the City should consider conducting a zoning alignment and proactively rezoning key areas to ensure that the type of development that is envisioned for those areas is accommodated. ALIGNMENT WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN The Future Land Use Plan identifies the preferred land uses and illustrates how the City envisions development and growth transitioning in the coming decades. Although the Future Land Use Plan is not regulatory, it should be used to guide the City when considering development proposals or rezoning requests. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL PROCESSES The development approval process is as much a factor in attracting local investment as actual development regula- tions. The Community Planning and Development Depart- ment should review current procedures and identify barriers that create time delays or unpredictability in the process. UPDATE THE PLAN REGULARLY Noting the City’s dedication to thoughtful planning, the Community Plan should not exist as a static document, rather it should be the center of a continuous planning process. Following the adoption of Envision Dublin, the community will continue to move forward, change, and evolve. As such, the Plan should be reviewed and updated regularly to respond to these changes, addressing shifts in community aspirations, increasing growth pressures, changing market and demographic conditions, as well as new and unexpected issues as they arise. It is important to emphasize that the Community Plan is not a static docu- ment. If community attitudes change or new issues arise which are beyond the scope of the current plan, the Plan should be revised and updated accordingly. Envision Dublin should be considered in the preparation of the annual budget and capital improvement program. In this manner, strategies or changes relating to capital improvements or other programs can be considered as part of the upcoming commitments for the fiscal year. In turn, development regulations may need to be amended to reflect the intent of any modifications most accurately to the Plan. Routine examination of the Plan will help ensure that the planning program remains relevant to community needs and aspirations. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Implementation | Envision Dublin Community Plan 242 MAINTAIN PUBLIC COMMUNICATION Envision Dublin was supported by an outreach process intended to gather public input and foster a sense of stewardship and excitement for the Plan. Through outreach events, public workshops, the project website, online surveys, interactive mapping tools, public meetings, and other media, residents, and stakeholders were able to get involved and stay informed of the Plan’s development. This public participation throughout the process helped communicate the importance of long-range planning and provide individuals with a better understanding of ongoing efforts to improve their community and the overall quality of life in Dublin. The outreach process served as a foundation for continued communication with members of the public throughout the process. The community should continue to ensure that strategies and the overall vision for Dublin, as defined within the Plan, are conveyed to the entire commu- nity. The City should maintain avenues by which residents and stakeholders can communicate with staff and receive information about planning and development efforts. EXPLORE FUNDING SOURCES AND IMPLEMENTATION TECHNIQUES Many of the projects and improvements called for in the Plan can be implemented through administrative and policy decisions or traditionally funded state or local programs. However, other projects may require special technical and/ or financial assistance. The City should continue to explore and consider the wide range of local, state, and federal resources and programs that may be available to assist in the implementation of planning strategies. For example, initiatives related to economic development, neighborhood stabilization and housing, or sustainability and environment can receive assistance from grant programs established for specific categories of actions or projects. STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE AND MAINTAIN FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY The City of Dublin currently enjoys a strong fiscal position as a result of local and regional economic growth and the implementation of thoughtful fiscal and land use policies. Envision Dublin has identified strategies that maximize the benefits of projected growth by balancing fiscal and economic priorities with quality-of-life improvements. The planning process reveals a planned approach to potential increased density mixed use and infill development as well as a desire to see the targeted redevelopment of areas that are considered underutilized from a land use perspective. Land Use Decisions Dublin has a long history of utilizing fiscal impact analysis in its land use planning processes. This includes evalu- ating land use scenarios as part of three comprehensive planning processes, as well as for Special Area Plans. This use of fiscal impact analysis has certainly contributed to the City’s healthy fiscal situation. The City should consider developing a “fiscal tool” for evaluating specific develop- ment proposals for the fiscal impacts. This tool can assist in the negotiation of development agreements, desired densities, and land use mixes. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 243 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Implementation Annexations The Land Use Chapter has identified several areas the City could potentially annex in the coming years. Although there is existing residential development the City will have to service, there is significant existing nonresidential develop- ment, as well as the potential for additional nonresidential space. Because the City is heavily reliant on income tax generated from employment within the City, annexation of certain areas may be desirable from a revenue enhance- ment perspective. Particularly given many residents and businesses are already utilizing City services and infrastruc- ture (particularly parks and recreation, transportation and public safety) without contributing to the City’s tax base. The City should review current annexation policies and continue to utilize fiscal impact analysis as a tool to evaluate the fiscal viability of potential annexations. Understand Current and Future Market Positions There have been many changes to housing and office markets as a result of the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Since the City is so heavily reliant on income tax from high-paying jobs in the office, health care, and industrial/ flex sectors, it is imperative that the City understand its current and likely future positions in the region as it relates to attracting additional nonresidential development. Dublin has been extremely successful in attracting employment uses in the past, and will face increased competition from other communities in the region. Depending on the findings of this analysis, it may be necessary for the City to pursue a variety of intervention strategies to “force the market” to realize the Preferred Scenario in the Plan. It is important that the City understand the cost associated with any inter- vention relative to the return on the investment . The successful implementation of Envision Dublin relies on the collaborative efforts of decision-makers, various stakeholders, continuous public engagement, and strategic planning. By leveraging partnerships, exploring diverse funding sources, and regularly updating the Plan to reflect changing community needs and aspirations, Dublin can ensure the Plan remains a dynamic and integral guide for future development. The City’s unwav- ering commitment to planned growth, fiscal responsibility, and collaboration with neighboring jurisdictions will foster a resilient and vibrant community. As Dublin evolves, Envision Dublin will serve as a cornerstone, ensuring the community’s collective vision is realized. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Implementation | Envision Dublin Community Plan 244 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 265 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Appendix A APPENDIX A: FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Appendix A 266 INTRODUCTION TischlerBise, as a subconsultant to Houseal Lavigne, prepared this Fiscal Impact Analysis of the Envision Dublin Preferred Scenario. The Future Land Use Plan reflects the Preferred Scenario. This document provides the results of the Fiscal Impact Analysis, which includes the City’s major tax-supported Funds. A fiscal impact evaluation analyzes revenue generation and operating and capital costs to the City associated with the provision of public services and facilities under a set of assumptions. The fiscal impact for the City of Dublin models direct revenues and costs from new development only and does not include revenues or costs generated from existing development. The growth scenarios evaluated in the analysis are represented by numerical projections of population, housing units, employment, and nonresidential building area through the year 2047. The first step in the fiscal impact analysis is to determine current service levels and capacities and associated revenues and costs. This was done through departmental interviews and follow-up discussions and correspondence as well as a review of applicable budgets and other relevant documents. The level of service/capacity analysis forms the foundation of the fiscal impact model used to evaluate the fiscal impact of the Preferred Scenario. As noted above, a fiscal impact analysis determines whether revenues generated by development are suffi- cient to cover the resulting costs from that development for service and facility demands placed on the City under current levels of service. It is intended to be used to help guide policy decisions related to land use, levels of service, and revenue enhancements. It should not be viewed as a budget-forecasting model or document. A fiscal analysis essentially looks at revenues and expenditures separately. It does not project expenditures based on revenues avail- able—unlike the annual budget process where a budget is balanced with the resources available. It should also be noted that the level of capital expendi- tures assumed in the analysis and the resulting costs are projected independent of policy-making decision points such as capital improvement plans, debt capacity guide- lines, or expectations for levels of service. Rather, the costs projected in this analysis reflect the costs to serve new growth, regardless of whether the resources are available to cover the costs. APPROACH AND MAJOR ASSUMPTIONS A fiscal impact analysis determines whether revenues generated by new growth are sufficient to cover the resulting costs for service and facility demands placed on a jurisdiction. The fiscal impact analysis conducted by TischlerBise incorporates the case study-marginal cost approach wherever possible. The case study-marginal methodology is the most realistic method for evaluating fiscal impacts. This methodology takes site or geograph- ic-specific information into consideration. Therefore, any unique demographic or locational characteristics of new development are accounted for, as well as the extent to which a particular infrastructure or service operates under, over or close to capacity. Available facility capacity determines the need for additional capital facilities and associated operating costs. Other costs such as non-salary operating costs generally are projected using an average cost approach. The service level, revenue, and cost assumptions are based on TischlerBise’s departmental interviews and follow-up discussions with City of Dublin staff, a detailed analysis of the Fiscal Year 2023 Operating and Capital Budget, previous year budgets, and other relevant documents. Fiscal Year 2023 level of service standards are utilized along with the growth projections developed specifically for this analysis to determine the fiscal impact on the City over a 27-year projec- tion period. Calculations are performed using a customized fiscal impact model designed by TischlerBise specifically for this assignment. The following major assumptions regarding the fiscal impact methodology should be noted. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 267 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Appendix A MARGINAL, GROWTH-RELATED COSTS AND REVENUES For this analysis, all costs and revenues directly attrib- utable to new development—by type of development— are included. Personnel and other operating costs are projected, as are expenditures for capital improvements. The General Fund, Special Revenue Funds (Street Mainte- nance & Repair, Recreation, Safety/Police, and Swimming Pool), and Capital Projects Funds are included in this analysis. Enterprise funds (e.g., utilities) are not included in this analysis as they are assumed to be self-sufficient. Some costs and revenues are not expected to be impacted by demographic changes and are therefore considered “fixed” in this analysis. To determine costs and revenues that should be considered fixed, TischlerBise reviewed the FY2023 Budget and available supporting documentation as well as consulted with staff. LEVEL OF SERVICE Cost projections are based on a “snapshot approach” in which it is assumed the current level of service, as funded in the City budget and as provided in current capital facilities, will continue through the analysis period. Current demand base data was used to calculate unit costs and service level thresholds. Examples of demand base data include population, employment by type, vehicle trips, etc. In summary, the “snapshot” approach does not attempt to speculate about how levels of service, costs, revenues and other factors will change over time nor whether the City will correct existing deficiencies. Instead, it evaluates the fiscal impact of new growth to the City as conducted under the budget used in this analysis. REVENUE STRUCTURE Revenues are projected assuming that the current revenue structure and tax and fee rates, as defined by the FY2023 budget, will not change during the analysis period. See the discussion on inflation rate assumptions for further explanation. INFLATION RATE The rate of inflation is assumed to be zero throughout the projection period, and cost and revenue projections are in constant 2024 dollars. This assumption is in accord with budget data and avoids the difficulty of speculating on inflation rates and their effect on cost and revenue categories—including property tax rate adjustments. It also avoids the problem of interpreting results expressed in inflated dollars over an extended period of time. In general, including inflation is complicated and unpredictable. This is particularly the case given that some costs, such as salaries, increase at different rates than other operating and capital costs such as contractual and building construction costs. And these costs, in turn, almost always increase in variation to the appreciation of real estate, thus affecting the revenue side of the equation. Using constant dollars avoids these issues. NON-FISCAL EVALUATIONS It should be noted that while a fiscal impact analysis is an important consideration in planning decisions, it is only one of several components that should be considered. Environmental and social issues, for example, should also be considered when making planning and policy decisions. The above notwithstanding, this analysis will enable inter- ested parties to understand the fiscal implications of future development. WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Appendix A | Envision Dublin Community Plan 268 SUMMARY OF FISCAL IMPACT RESULTS CUMULATIVE RESULTS Fiscal impacts are modeled over a 27-year period with revenues and expenditures projected from growth in each year. The overall finding is that the Preferred Scenario generates sufficient revenues to cover total operating and capital impacts. Cumulative results are summarized below in Figure 1 reflecting total revenues generated minus operating and capital expenditures over the 27-year development timeframe. Figures are shown in $1,000s. The results indicate that the City’s revenue structure, with substantial revenue from nonresidential growth (income tax), is sufficient to cover the costs to serve growth projected in the Preferred Scenario. Revenue from income taxes represent approximately 79 percent of the projected total operating and capital revenue. Because this source is based on at place employment, the amount of office and industrial development is the main determinant of the results. ANNUAL RESULTS Figure 2 shows the annual (year to year) net results to the City for each of the Preferred Scenario over the 27-year development timeframe. Each year reflects total revenues generated minus total expenditures incurred in the same year. Both capital and operating costs are included. By showing the results annually, the magnitude, rate of change, and timeline of deficits and revenues can be observed over time. The “bumpy” nature of the annual results during particular years represents the opening of capital facilities and/or major operating costs being incurred. On the following figure, data points above the $0 line repre- sent annual surpluses; points below the $0 line represent annual deficits. Each year’s surplus or deficit is not carried forward into the next year. This enables a comparison from year-to-year of the net results without distorting the revenue or cost side of the equation. In reality, those surpluses would be carried forward or deficits would be funded through other revenue sources or means, such as debt financing for capital improvements, or levels of service would decrease. Figures are shown in $1,000s. As shown above in Figure 2, the Preferred Scenario produces annual net surpluses to the City over the first thirteen years of the analysis period. Annual net deficits are incurred in eleven of the next fourteen years to the compounding nature of debt service payments. The net defi- cits range from a low of $256,000 to a high of $2.2 million. 1 $0 ($10,000) $10,000 $20,000 $30,000(x 1,000)$40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000 $80,000 $90,000 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Revenue Expenditure Net Fiscal Impact 24 25 26 27 28 $1,921,841 $1,514,962 $406,879 $- $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 Revenue Expenditure Surplus / Deficit Figure 1. Cumulative Net Fiscal Impacts (x$1,000) 2024-2050 Figure 2. Annual Net Fiscal Results (x$1,000), 2024-2050 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 269 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Appendix A OPERATING AND CAPITAL RESULTS Analyzing operating and capital results separately reveals net surpluses for operating results and net deficits for capital. Cumulative revenues and expenditures for oper- ating and capital are summarized in Figure 3. Analyzing operating and capital results separately reveals net surpluses for operating results and net deficits for capital impacts. However, when viewed in total, combined operating and capital revenue exceeds combined oper- ating and capital expenditures. The cumulative net surplus is $18.3 million over the 27-year analysis period. When viewed on an average annual basis, the net surpluses are approximately $678,000. KEY FINDINGS ■The results indicate that the City’s revenue structure, with is heavy reliance on income taxes, is sufficient to cover the costs to serve the development projected in the Preferred Scenario. Because this source is based on at place employment, the amount of office and industrial development is the main determinant of the results. ■Transportation capital costs assumed for the Preferred Scenario are significant, totaling over $450 million. These costs are based on an analysis conducted by Kimley-Horn as part of the Envision Dublin planning process. It is likely these transportation costs exceed the cost necessitated by new development and a portion is correcting existing deficiencies within the City’s current transportation network. Further, the costs modeled reflect City funding 100% of the transpor- tation improvements (as opposed to including state and federal dollars). Therefore, it is very likely the growth-related transportation costs are overstated, which would significantly improve the fiscal results for the Preferred Scenario. ■When looking at fiscal results for operating and capital separately, surpluses are generated on the operating side with net deficits generated for capital. Earmarked revenues for capital expenditures (e.g., property tax and income tax) are insufficient to cover growth-re- lated infrastructure costs. Surpluses on the operating side—from general revenues that can be used for capital needs—generate sufficient revenues to cover the remaining capital shortfalls. ■Results include both operating and capital expendi- tures from new development over the 27-year period. Operating expenditures generated from the growth scenarios represent approximately 61 percent of total expenditures in each scenario, and capital expendi- tures account for the remaining 39 percent. ■The results illustrate the City’s reliance on withholding and individual income taxes to fund its operations. These taxes comprise approximately 79% of cumula- tive revenue for the Preferred Scenario. ■The results indicate the City’s current residential development base is not paying its own way, which is not surprising given the municipal revenue structure for Ohio cities, which favors at place employment (meaning withholding tax stays in the jurisdiction a person is employed). As the long-term effects of the COVID 19 pandemic on nonresidential space needs and the ability of employees to work at home become better known, these may have an effect on the City’s revenue raising abilities. ■That being said, the City of Dublin has done an excel- lent job developing a framework for funding growth through its economic development policies and use of various Tax Increment Finance Districts. It is clear that the City of Dublin does not have many of the budgetary constraints that most of our clients nation- wide grapple with on an annual basis. ■It is important to acknowledge that fiscal issues are one aspect in evaluating development and growth trends. Environmental, land use, housing, jobs/housing balance, transportation, and other issues should also be taken into consideration when determining policy direction for the City. Fund Preferred Scenario Operative Revenue General Fund $ 701,007 Special Revenue Funds $ 118,339 Total Operating Revenue $ 819,345 Operating Expenditures General Fund $ 412,507 Special Revenue Funds $ 282,775 Total Operating Expenditures $ 695,282 Operating Net Fiscal Impact $ 124,063 Capital Fund Revenue $ 322,332 Expenditure $ 428,086 Capital Net Fiscal Impact ($ 105,754) Grand Total Total Revenue $ 1,141,677 Total Expenditures $ 1,123,368 Grand Total Net Fiscal Impact $ 18,309 Average Annual Net Fiscal Result $ 678 Figure 3. Cumulative Net Fiscal Impacts Operating and Capital Summary (x$1,000) 2024-2050 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Appendix A | Envision Dublin Community Plan 270 WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 271 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Appendix B APPENDIX B: MOBILITY AND TRANSPORTATION WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Appendix B 272 Road Segment From To Number of Lanes (Existing) Number of Lanes (Planned) Right-of-WayWidth (ft) (Existing) Right- of-WayWidth (ft) (Planned) Recommended Cor- ridor Classification Bike Clas- sification Character Avery Road Woerner Temple Road US 33 Interchange 4D 4D 124 124 Arterial Commuter Route Traditional Dublin Avery Road Tuttle Crossing Boulevard Woerner Temple Road 2 4D 124 124 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin Avery Road Muirfield Drive Glick Road 2/3 2/3 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Avery-Muirfield Drive Post Road Avery Road 4D 4D 100 100 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin Avery-Muirfield Drive US 33 Interchange Post Road 4D 4D 150 150 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin Blazer Memorial Parkway Rings Road Tuttle Crossing Boulevard 4D 4D 100 100 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Blazer Memorial Parkway Rings Road Frantz Road 2/3 2/3 60 60 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Blazer to Metro Pl Connector Blazer Parkway Metro Place South NA 2D NA 80 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Brand Road Avery Road Hyland-Croy Road 2 2 80 80 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Brand Road Avery Road Dublin Road 2 2 80 80 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Brandonway Drive Brand Road Dublin Road 2 2 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Bridge Park Avenue Village Parkway Sawmill Road 4/5 4/5 100 100 District Connector Urban/Village Bridge Park Avenue Riverside Drive Village Parkway 2/3 2/3 75 - 80 75 - 80 District Connector Urban/Village Bridge Street (US 33/SR 161)Frantz Road Riverside Drive 4/5 4/5 112 112 Corridor Connector Connector Route Urban/Village Bright Road Emerald Parkway Sawmill Road 2 4D 60 100 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Campus Drive University Blvd Cosgray Road NA 2D NA 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Campus Drive SR 161 University Blvd 2D 100 - 112 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Carnoustie Drive Muirfield Drive Glick Road 2 2 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Churchman Road Cosgray Road Rings Road 2D 2D 70 70 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Churchman Road Extension (South) Rings Road Tuttle Crossing Blvd Extension NA 2D NA 72 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Coffman Road Emerald Parkway North High School Drive 4/5 4/5 100 100 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Coffman Road North High School Drive Brand Road 2/3 2/3 80 80 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Commerce Pkwy Post Road Perimeter Drive 2 2 70 70 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Corazon Drive Hyland-Croy Road Manley Road 2D 2D 60-80 60-80 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Cosgray Road Dublin South Corp. Limit Tuttle Crossing Boulevard (Proposed) 2 4D 100 120 Arterial Connector Route Cosgray Road Churchman Road SR 161 2 4D 100 102 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Traditional Dublin Cosgray Road Tuttle Crossing Boulevard (Proposed) Churchman Road 2 2D 60 80 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Urban/Village Dale Drive SR 161 (West Dublin-Granville Road) Tuller Road 2/3 2/3 60-80 60-80 District Connector Urban/Village Dublin Center Drive Sawmill Road Martin Road 2/3 2/3 60 60 District Connector Urban/Village Dublin Methodist Lane Avery-Muirfield Drive at Hospital Drive 1 2 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route MULTIMODAL THOROUGHFARE PLAN TABLE WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 273 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Appendix B Road Segment From To Number of Lanes (Existing) Number of Lanes (Planned) Right-of-WayWidth (ft) (Existing) Right- of-WayWidth (ft) (Planned) Recommended Cor- ridor Classification Bike Clas- sification Character Dublin Road (SR 745)Dublin North Corp. Limit Emerald Parkway 2/3 2/3 80 80 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route River Dublin Road (SR 745)Emerald Parkway Bridge Street (SR 161)2/3 2/3 80-100 80-100 Corridor Connector Urban/Village Dublin Road (SR 745)Bridge Street (SR 161)Karrer Place 2/3 2/3 80 80 Corridor Connector Urban/Village Dublin Road (SR 745)Karrer Place Frantz Road 2/3 2/3 80 80 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route River Dublinshire Drive Earlington Parkway Wynford Drive 2 2 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Earlington Pkwy Brand Road Coffman Road 2 2 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route East Bridge Street Riverside Drive Sawmill Road 4D 2D 115 136 Corridor Connector Connector Route Urban/Village Eiterman Road Shier Rings Road Rings Road 2D 2D 70 70 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Rural Eiterman Road Shier Rings Road University Blvd 2 2D 70 70 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Eiterman Road University Blvd Campus Drive 2 2 VARIES 70 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Rural Emerald Parkway South Corporation Limit Riverside Drive 4D 4D 100 100 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin Emerald Parkway Riverside Drive Hard Road 4D 4D 100 100 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin Emerald Parkway Hard Road Sawmill Road 4D 4D 100 100 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin Frantz Road Southern Bridge Street District Limit Tuttle Crossing Boulevard 4D 4D 100 100 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin Frantz Road Bridge Street (SR 161)Southern Bridge Street District Limit 4D 4D 110 110 Corridor Connector Urban/Village Glick Road Dublin Road Riverside Drive 2/3 2/3 80 100 Connector Boulevard Connector Route River Glick Road Avery Road Dublin Road 2 2 80 80 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Rural Hard Road Claddaugh Lane Sawmill Road 4/5 4/5 100 100 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin Hard Road Riverside Drive Claddaugh Lane 2/3 2/3 80 80 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin Hospital Drive Perimeter Drive Hospital Drive 2/3 2/3 80-100 80-100 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Traditional Dublin Hospital Drive Hospital Drive Avery-Muirfield Drive 2/3 2/3 80-100 80-100 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Houchard Road Rings Road New Road1 2 2D 55 80 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Traditional Dublin Houchard Road New Road1 Shier Rings Road Extension 2 2D 55 80 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Rural Houchard Road Railroad SR-161 2 2D 55 80 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Urban/Village Houchard Road Extension (North) SR-161 US-42 NA 2D NA 80 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Houchard Road Extension (South) Cosgray Road Rings Road/Tuttle Crossing Extension NA 2D NA 80 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Rural Hyland-Croy Road Post Road Brock Road 2 2D 80 100 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Rural Hyland-Croy Road Brock Road Wells Road 2 2 80 80 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Appendix B | Envision Dublin Community Plan 274 Road Segment From To Number of Lanes (Existing) Number of Lanes (Planned) Right-of-WayWidth (ft) (Existing) Right- of-WayWidth (ft) (Planned) Recommended Cor- ridor Classification Bike Clas- sification Character Iams Road Rings Road Tuttle Crossing Blvd Extension 2 2 50 80 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Rural Iams Road Extension Rings Road Tuttle Crossing Blvd Extension NA 2 NA 80 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Rural Industrial Parkway US 42 Memorial Drive 2 4D 60-100 100 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Rural Industrial Parkway Memorial Drive SR 161 4D 4D 100 100 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Innovation Drive Wilcox Road Emerald Parkway 2/3 2/3 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Jerome Road Manley Road Brock Road 2 2 80 80 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Rural John Shields Parkway Riverside Drive Village Parkway 2 2 75 75 District Connector John Shields Parkway SR 161 Dublin Road 2/3 2/3 80 80 District Connector Connector Route Urban/Village John Shields Parkway (Bridge)Dublin Road Riverside Drive -4/5 100 District Connector Connector Route Urban/Village Krier Drive South Dublin Corp. Limit Martin Road 2 2 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Manley Road Jerome Road Avery Road 2 2 80 80 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Rural McKitrick Road Hyland-Croy Road Jerome Road 2/3 2/3 80 80 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Rural McKitrick Road US 33 Hyland-Croy Road 2 2 80 80 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Rural Memorial Drive Avery Road Dublin Road 2 2 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route River Mitchell-Dewitt Road Warner Road Houchard Road Extension (North) 2 2 80 80 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Mitchell-Dewitt Road (Relocated) Industrial Parkway Houchard Road Extension (North) NA 2 NA 80 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Muirfield Drive Avery-Muirfield Drive Glick Road 4D 4D 100 100 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin New Ramp University Blvd Avery Road NA 3 NA 80 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Traditional Dublin New Street1 Houchard Road Warner Road NA 2/3 NA 80 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Traditional Dublin New Street2 Shier Rings Road Extension New Road1 NA 2 NA 65 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route New Street3 Shier Rings Road Extension Houchard Road NA 2 NA 65 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route New Street4 University Blvd Cosgray Road NA 4D NA 102 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Rural New Street4 Hospital Drive University Blvd NA 4D NA 102 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin New Street5 Iams Road Houchard Road NA 2 NA 65 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route New Street6 Tuttle Crossing Boulevard (Proposed) Rings Road NA 2 NA 65 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Perimeter Drive Holt Rd./Perimeter Loop Drive Avery-Muirfield Drive 4/5 4/5 100 100 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Traditional Dublin Perimeter Drive Commerce Parkway Emerald Parkway 4/5 4/5 100 100 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Traditional Dublin Perimeter Drive Holt Rd./Perimeter Loop Drive Commerce Parkway 2/3 2/3 100 100 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Traditional Dublin WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 275 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Appendix B Road Segment From To Number of Lanes (Existing) Number of Lanes (Planned) Right-of-WayWidth (ft) (Existing) Right- of-WayWidth (ft) (Planned) Recommended Cor- ridor Classification Bike Clas- sification Character Perimeter Drive (West of Avery- Muirfield) Avery-Muirfield Drive Post Road 4/5 4/5 100 100 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Traditional Dublin Perimeter Loop Road Avery-Muirfield Drive Perimeter Drive 2/3 2/3 60-80 60-100 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Post Road Emerald Parkway SR 161/Frantz Road 4/5 4/5 100 100 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Urban/Village Post Road Avery-Muirfield Drive Commerce Pwky 2 2 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route River Post Road (West)US 33/Post Road Interchange Hyland-Croy Road 2/3 4D 100 125 Arterial Commuter Route Traditional Dublin Post Road (West)Hyland-Croy Road Perimeter Drive 4/5 4/5 100 100 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Traditional Dublin Post Road (West)Perimeter Drive Avery-Muirfield Drive 2 2 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Rural Rings Road Frantz Road Emerald Parkway 4/5 2D 100 100 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Traditional Dublin Rings Road Dublin Road Frantz Road 2 2 60 60 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Rings Road Avery Road Cosgray Road 2 2 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Rings Road Cosgray Road Tuttle Crossing Boulevard (Proposed) 2 2 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Urban/Village Riverside Drive (SR 257)Emerald Parkway Glick Road 4 4 112 112 Arterial Connector Route River Riverside Drive (SR 257)SR 161 (West Dublin-Granville Road) Emerald Parkway 4D 4D 112 112 Corridor Connector Connector Route Urban/Village Riverside Drive (US 33)Dublin South Corp. Limit SR 161 2 2 120 120 Arterial Connector Route River Sawmill Road I-270 Interchange Franklin-Delaware County Line 6 6 105-120 120 Arterial Sawmill Road SR 161 (West Dublin-Granville Road) I-270 Interchange 4D 4D 160 160 Arterial Sells Mill Drive Muirfield Drive Earlington Parkway 2 2 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Shamrock Boulevard Banker Drive Stoneridge Lane 4D 4D 100 100 District Connector Local Route Urban/Village Shamrock Boulevard Bridge Park Avenue Banker Drive 2 2/3 100 100 District Connector Local Route Urban/Village Shier Rings Road Cosgray Road Avery Road 2 2 100 100 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Traditional Dublin Shier Rings Road Avery Road Emerald Parkway 2 2 70 70 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Traditional Dublin Shier Rings Road (Overpass)Emerald Parkway Metro Place North NA 2D NA 100 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin Shier Rings Road Extension Shier Rings Road New Road1 NA 4D NA 102 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin Shier Rings Road Extension New Road1 Cemetery Pike NA 2 NA 80 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin SR 161 Tuttle Crossing Boulevard (Proposed) Cosgray Road 2 4D 60 100 Arterial Commuter Route Rural SR 161 Cosgray Road Industrial Parkway 4D 4D 140 140 Arterial Commuter Route Rural SR 161 (Post Road)Industrial Parkway US 33/Post Road Interchange 6D 6D 150 150 Arterial Commuter Route Rural WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Appendix B | Envision Dublin Community Plan 276 Road Segment From To Number of Lanes (Existing) Number of Lanes (Planned) Right-of-WayWidth (ft) (Existing) Right- of-WayWidth (ft) (Planned) Recommended Cor- ridor Classification Bike Clas- sification Character Tuller Road Riverside Drive Village Parkway 2/3 2/3 80 80 District Connector Connector Route Urban/Village Tullymore Drive Hyland-Croy Road Avery-Muirfield Drive 2 2 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Tuttle Crossing Boulevard (Proposed) SR 161 US 42 NA 2D NA 100 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin Tuttle Crossing Boulevard (Proposed) Avery Road Cosgray Road NA 4D NA 180 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin Tuttle Crossing Boulevard (Proposed) Cosgray Road SR 161 NA 4DX NA 180 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin Tuttle Crossing Boulevard (Proposed) Wilcox Road Avery Road NA 4D NA 116 Arterial Commuter Route Traditional Dublin Tuttle Road Frantz Road Dublin Road 2 2 80 80 Connector Boulevard Connector Route University Blvd Shier Rings Road Eiterman Road 4D 4D 100 - 110 100 - 110 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin University Blvd Eiterman Road SR 161 NA 4D NA 100 - 110 Commuter Boulevard Commuter Route Traditional Dublin Village Parkway Tuller Road Bridge Park Avenue 2 2 80 80 District Connector Connector Route Urban/Village Village Parkway/Emerald Connector Tuller Road Emerald Parkway NA 2/3 NA Varies District Connector Connector Route Wareham Drive Tullymore Drive Westbury Drive 2 2 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Warner Road Iams Road Industrial Parkway 2 2 80 80 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Westbury Drive Wareham Drive Brand Road 2 2 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Wexford Woods Drive Avery Road Tullymore Drive 2 2 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Wilcox Road Woerner Temple Road Shier Rings Road 2 2 70 70 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Wilcox Road Tuttle Crossing Boulevard Dublin South Corp. Limit 2 2 100 100 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Windwood Drive Brandonway Drive Dublin Road 2 2 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Woerner Temple Road Avery Road Emerald Parkway 4D 2D 100 100 Connector Boulevard Connector Route Traditional Dublin Woerner Temple Road Eiterman Road Avery Road 2D 2D 100 100 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Wyandotte Woods Boulevard Riverside Drive Emerald Parkway 2 2 80 80 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route Wynford Drive Dublinshire Drive Tullymore Drive 2 2 60 60 Neighborhood Boulevard Local Route * - 2 Westbound Lanes/1 Eastbound Lane WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 277 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Appendix B D U BLIN S HIRED R GLICK R D MEM ORIALD R TULLY MOREDRW BRI DGE S T MONTEREYDRTARAHILLDR WOERNERTEMPL E RD HARDR D EARLINGTON PKY RINGS RD FRA NTZRD BRAND RD MUI RFI E LDDRDUBLIN RDCOFFMAN RDRIVERSIDE DRPOST RD WILCOX RDV I L LAGEPKYTUTTLE RD BRI TTONPKYSUMMIT VIEW RD P E R I METERDR INDUSTR IAL PKYEI TERMANRDJEROMERDDALE DREMERAL D P K W Y NEWSTREET1NEW STREET 6HYLAND-CROYRDTUL L ER RD S H I E R -R I N GS RDAVERY RDR E S E A R C HPARKWAY NEWSTREET 3COSGRAY RDNEWS T R EET 4 NEW STREET 5CEMETERY PKBLAZ ERP KWYNEW STREET 2 IAMS RDHOUCHARDRDAMITY PIKE WARNE R R D TUTTL ECROSSI NGBLVD SciotoRiverEMERALDPKWYWESTBU R Y D R CONCORD RDAVERY RDT A RAHILL DR S E L L S M ILLDRINNOVATION DR BRAND RD R I N G S R D MARTIN RDHYLAND-CROY RDRIVERSIDE DRDALE DRCARNOU STIEDRBALL A NTRAE P L GLICK R D E M E R A L D P KW Y COSGRAY RDPOST RD POS T R D EITERMAN RDSWICKARD CT MEMORIAL DR DUBLIN RDDUBLINRDBRIGHT RD S HIGH STTULLYMORE DRWILCOX RDBRANDONWAY DR RINGS RD BROCK RD E A R L I N G T O N P K W YJEROME RDPRIMROSE CT EMMET ROW LN PERIMETER DR KILE RDBRITTONPKWYBRAND RD FRANTZ RDWELDON RDMCKITRICK RD TONTI DR M A I N S T SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERYRD W Y A N D O T T E WOOD SBLVD HAYDEN RUN RD MUIRFIELDDRC H U R C H M A N R D BLAZERPKWYCOSGRAY RDHERITAGE DRMUIRFIELDDRMETRO PL N HARDRDHYLAND-CROY RDHAYDEN RUN BLVD SHIER RINGS RD T U L LERR DA S H F OR D RD B R O C K R D 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Context Layers Railroad City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary River 2 Lanes 4 Lanes 6 Lanes PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS RECOMMENDED NUMBER OF LANES WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Appendix B | Envision Dublin Community Plan 278 ] [] [] [ ] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [ ] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [SciotoRiverCOSGRAY RDWESTBU R YDRBRAND RD AVERY RDWOERNER TEMPLE RD TAR A HILL DR SEL L S M IL LDRINNOVA T IO N DR S H I ER R I N G S R D R I N G S R D MARTIN RD D U B LIN SHIRED R RIVERSIDED R M O NTEREYDRCOFFMANRDDALEDRCARNOU S TIEDRBA L L A N T RAEPL GLICK R D E M ER A LD PKWY POST RD SWICKARD CT DUBLI NRDDUBLINRDBRIGH T R D S HIGH STT U L L YMOREDR M E M O RIALD R W YNFO R D DRH A Y D E NRU N B L V D WILCOX RDB RA N D ONWAY D R RINGS RD W B R I DGE S TEARLINGTONPKWYJEROME RD VILLAGE PKWYPRIMROSE CT EMMET ROW LN P ERIMET ER DR TULLER RD BRITT ONPKWYMUIRFIELDDRFRANTZRD WELDON R D MCKITRICK RD TONTI DR SUMMIT VIEW RDAVERY RDW Y A N D O TT E WOOD SBLVD C H U R C H M A N R D BLAZERPKWYCOSGRAY RDT U T T L E R DHERITAGE DRMUIRFIELDDRM ETRO PL N HARD RDHYLAND-CROYRDEIT E R M A N RDRAUSC H D R E STA TESCTA S H F O R D RD BROCK R D 1 61 257 257 745 1 61 33 33 270 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Context Layers Railroad BRT/Rail/Transit City of Dublin Planning Area Boundary Construction Year 2025-30 2030-35 2035-40 2040-45 2045-50 Construction Year (Planned) 2025-30 Planned 2030-35 Planned 2035-40 Planned 2040-45 Planned 2045-50 Planned Signature Trail PLAIN CITY SHAWNEE HILLS POWELL COLUMBUS COLUMBUS ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 279 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Appendix B Road Segment From To Total Costs Period (Years)Area Funding Bright Road Emerald Parkway Sawmill Road 7,400,000 2025-30 Existing Public Campus Drive SR-161 University Blvd 5,400,000 2025-30 West Innovation Public Dublin Memorial Hospital Avery-Muirfield Drive at Dublin Memorial Hospital 6,200,000 2025-30 West Innovation Public Eiterman Road SR-161 Eiterman Road 7,800,000 2025-30 West Innovation Public Eiterman Road University Blvd Campus Drive 6,500,000 2025-30 West Innovation Public Eiterman Road Shier Rings Road University Blvd 4,600,000 2025-30 West Innovation Public Emerald Connector John Shields Parkway Emerald Parkway 23,000,000 2025-30 Bridge Street District Public John Shields Parkway East Extension Village Parkway Sawmill Road 7,500,000 2025-30 Bridge Street District Private/Public Signature Trail Daree Fields Sawmill Road 23,900,000 2025-30 Active Transportation Public SUP Network Gaps near Schools and Mobility Hubs Varies Varies 24,200,000 2025-30 Active Transportation Public University Boulevard Eiterman Road Campus Drive 14,700,000 2025-30 West Innovation Public Woerner Temple Road/Rings Road (Protected Bike Lanes)Avery Road Frantz Road 7,000,000 2025-30 Active Transportation Public Blazer to Metro Pl Connector Blazer Parkway Metro Place South 3,300,000 2030-35 Metro Private Campus Drive University Blvd Cosgray Road 3,700,000 2030-35 West Innovation Public Churchman Road Extension (South)Rings Road Tuttle Crossing Blvd Extension 4,900,000 2030-35 Southwest Area Private East Bridge Street Riverside Drive Sawmill Road 12,600,000 2030-35 Bridge Street District Public John Shields Parkway West Extension Kilgour Place Dublin Road 7,400,000 2030-35 Bridge Street District Private/Public Kilgour Place Post Road Relocation West Bridge Street 2,200,000 2030-35 Bridge Street District Private/Public Kilgour Place Post Road Relocation Shawan Falls Drive 4,300,000 2030-35 Bridge Street District Private/Public New Street4 Hospital Drive University Blvd 24,100,000 2030-35 West Innovation Private/Public New Street4 University Blvd Cosgray Road 13,400,000 2030-35 West Innovation Private/Public New Street6 Tuttle Crossing Blvd Extension Rings Road 5,100,000 2030-35 Southwest Area Private Post Road Extension Kilgour Place Shawan Falls Drive 2,600,000 2030-35 Bridge Street District Private/Public Post Road Relocation Post Road Kilgour Place 3,900,000 2030-35 Bridge Street District Private/Public Shawan Falls Drive Extension Post Road Extension Kilgour Place 2,700,000 2030-35 Bridge Street District Private/Public PROJECTS LIST WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Appendix B | Envision Dublin Community Plan 280 Road Segment From To Total Costs Period (Years)Area Funding Shier Rings Road (Overpass)Emerald Parkway Metro Place North 25,200,000 2030-35 Metro Private Stoneridge Lane Extension Riverside Drive Existing Stoneridge Lane 6,500,000 2030-35 Bridge Street District Public SUP Network Gaps near Parks and Attractions Varies Varies 24,200,000 2030-35 Active Transportation Public Tuttle Crossing Boulevard Extension Avery Road Cosgray Road 29,000,000 2030-35 Southwest Area Public Tuttle Crossing Boulevard Extension Avery Road Wilcox Road 7,500,000 2030-35 Southwest Area Public Village Parkway Bridge Park Ave SR-161 2,900,000 2030-35 Bridge Street District Private/Public Cosgray Road Churchman Road SR-161 9,500,000 2035-40 Southwest Area Public Final SUP Network Gaps Varies Varies 24,200,000 2035-40 Active Transportation Public Houchard Road Railroad SR-161 11,900,000 2035-40 West Rail Station Public John Shields Bridge Dublin Road Riverside Drive 55,000,000 2035-40 Bridge Street District Public New Ramp University Blvd Avery Road 6,500,000 2035-40 West Innovation Public New Street3 Shier Rings Road Extension Houchard Road 8,000,000 2035-40 West Innovation Private/Public Shier Rings Road Extension Cosgray Road Tuttle Crossing Blvd Extension 15,100,000 2035-40 Southwest Area Private/Public Avery Road Tuttle Crossing Boulevard Woerner Temple Road 10,500,000 2040-45 Southwest Area Public Cosgray Road Tuttle Crossing Boulevard (Proposed) Churchman Road 7,800,000 2040-45 Southwest Area Public Cosgray Road Dublin South Corp. Limit Tuttle Crossing Boulevard (Proposed) 4,700,000 2040-45 Southwest Area Private/Public SR-161 Tuttle Crossing Blvd Extension Cosgray Road 32,400,000 2040-45 West Rail Station Public Tuttle Crossing Boulevard Extension Cosgray Road SR-161 63,100,000 2040-45 Southwest Area Private/Public Iams Road Rings Road Tuttle Crossing Blvd Extension 21,500,000 2045-50 Southwest Area Private/Public Iams Road Extension Rings Road Tuttle Crossing Blvd Extension 10,400,000 2045-50 Southwest Area Private/Public New Street1 Houchard Road Warner Road 34,000,000 2045-50 Southwest Area Private/Public New Street2 Shier Rings Road Extension New Road1 14,300,000 2045-50 Southwest Area Private/Public New Street5 Iams Road Houchard Road 10,400,000 2045-50 Southwest Area Private/Public Shier Rings Road Extension Tuttle Crossing Blvd Extension Cemetery Pike 27,200,000 2045-50 West Innovation Public WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY 281 Envision Dublin Community Plan | Appendix B WORKING DRAFT FOR STAFF REVIEW ONLY Envision Dublin Community Plan | Appendix B 282