The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12/03/1984 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ Nt eeting National Graphics Corp" Cols., 0, Form No. 1097 ~ Held .pec~lBb~J:".3 L198lt 19. ~ The regularly scheduled meeting of the Dublin Village Council was called to order by Vice-Mayor, Michael Close, at 7:30 P.M. on Monday, December 3, 1984. '-'" Mr. Thornton led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance. Members of Council present were: Mr. Amorose, Mr. Close, Mrs. Headlee, Ms. Maurer, Mr. Sutphen, and Mr. Thornton. Mayor Lewis was absent. Mr. Smith, Law Director, and Mr. Sheldon, Village Manager, were also in attendance as were Mr. Warner, Village Engineer, and Ms. Prushing, Finance Director. Mr. Amorose made a motion to approve the minutes of the November 19, 1984 Council Meeting, with the following correction on page 5, under Council Roundtable Discussion (Mrs. Headlee). The words "Jaycees" should be inserted in place of "Dublin Area Chamber of Commerce". Mrs. Headlee seconded the motion. The vote was 6-0 (unanimous) for approval of the minutes. Mr. Amorose moved to approve payment of the bills. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous of those present to pay the bills. ,..... Resolution No. 19-84 - Inducement for Industrial Revenue Bonds - Manage- ment Horizons. Second Reading. Mr. Jack Levey, bond counsel from the law firm of Schwartz, Shapiro, Kelm and Warren was present at the meeting. Mr. Close said that because the dollar amount for the bonds had been increased from $2,500,000.00 to $2,700,000.00, another notice of public hearing has been published, as well as the third reading for the Resolution, to be heard at the Council Meeting of December 17, 1984. ""'" Ordinance No. 60-84 - Proposed 1985 Appropriations. Second Reading. Mr. Thornton moved to approve passage of the Ordinance as an emergency measure. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Mr. Close, responding to a question from Ms. Maurer, said that the only items included in the appropriations ordinance are the regular salary increases for staff that have been recommended by the Village Manager, and approved. Mr. Close also explained that the appropriations ordinance before Council contains nothing in the way of additional new expenditures, with the exception of the increases in salary to existing employees. He said that it is anticipated that at an executive session of Council in January discussion will be held regarding the requests for additional employees by department heads. The vote was unanimous of those present for treating Ordinance No. 60-84 as an emergency. The vote on the Ordinance was 6-0 (unanimous). ..... Ordinance No. 61-84 - Approve Inclusion of Ordinances in the Codified Ordinances. First Reading. The Ordinance was introduced by Ms. Maurer. There was no further action. ".... Other Action on Report of Assessment Equalization Board - Shier-Rings Waterline. Mr. Amorose moved to approve and accept the report of the Assessment Equalization Board. Mr. Thornton seconded the motion. Mr. Warner answered Mr. Thornton's question regarding the missing 300 feet of waterline by saying that by "word of mouth" he learned that the Village 11...,...',,,.......l. .in "'.. ..._T'>...'" .....- Bill Listing for December 3, 1984 Dublin Fire Extingui6her Union Oil Co. Bobby Layman Chevrolet Jack Conie & Sons "'" Central Communications David J. Koob Allied Roto Rooter Gingway Products Perry Township Softball Team Managers H. F. McClory B.O.C.A. Delaware Co. Materials Corroon & Black Blue Cross of Central Ohio O.B.O.A. Rick Strater Errole Rembert Gene Myers Jim Kremer Henry Cianflona Marianna Rennie William C. Covey Burgess & Niple Horne, King, & Rauh ....... ...-. Gledhill Road Machinery Presto Print Columbia Gas Clyde E. Williams The Columbus Dispatch Wasserman Uniform J. R. Trueman & Assoc. D & M Distributors Diehl Office Equipment Health One O.C.A. Business Equipment R.P.M.Maintenance Columbus City Prosecutor's Office Walter H. Drane Key Blueprints Capital City Air Conditioning Central Ohio Inspection Service AT&T Consumer Sales & Service AT&T Information Systems Geotechnical Consultants KWik-KOPY Boehm Stan~ & Printing Ohio Dept. of Transportation ~ , ...... ~~~~!lII".!III~tIl]I.',..n ~.~ .'Ut, ....~.."~.,...~"'._"".,.'., 8.50 600.25 31. 30 1,945.86 448.30 163.45 120.00 101.39 2,183.33 800.00 340.00 120.00 88.00 6,731.00 735.12 19.00 137.50 95.00 137.50 25.00 20.00 40.00 500.00 680.00 4,999.44 46.59 155.42 101.67 2,500.00 12.78 86.41 8,775.00 169.00 81.45 164.67 102.75 491.58 llO.OO 1,822.57 24.00 114.06 1,870.75 9.28 325.11 53.00 24.24 18.40 2,250.00 Recharge fire extinguisher for cruiser Repair brakes on three cruisers, repair master cylinder Repair sensor unit for engine in cruiser Extend sanitary sewer to home on Loch Leven Ct. Re~ir radios in two unmarked cars Tools for maintenance garage Clean storm sewer on Macewen ct. Repair snow plow Police Communications contract Refund Softball forfeit fees Pump Station Maintenance contract Membership 4 tons hot mix Umbrella insurance coverage Dental Insurance Membership, annual meeting Softball umpire fees Softball umpire fees Softball umpire feeb Softball umpire fees Softball umpire fees Senior Citizen's luncheon Update Atlas Maps Avery Park DEsign Architectural services for Municipal Building Expansion Hitch pin Log sheets Gas service at 129 S. High st. Traffic study at Frantz/Post/33 Ad for softball league opening Shirts & shoes for officer Refund overpayment of Water tap Fusees for police dept. Office supplies H~alth insurance for one employee Typewriter ribbons & daisy wheel Cleaning service Legal services for October Update Codified Ordinances Mylars & film for planning dept. Repair blower on furnace in Muni. Bldg. Electrical Inspections Rental of phone equipment Rental of phone equipment Site inspections at Hemingway Building Inspection tag9 Check endorsement stamp Resurface Bridge St. (Ord. #59-84) ^ 'H'..~_"_,","" .,' ~ILIltL,.JU_____, ~ J 1 L Page 2 ..-.. Bill Listing 12/3/84 smi th & Hill OWens Company The Dublin Villager C&SOE Ohio Bell Payroll for 11/30/84 TOrAL ~ .- .- 1~, .o~""".4J..._,A4. L~_-b,_ _,"~,_;:r [. __-I_!':U.,I)IlIF~!iI-"''"' 3,095.00 1,306.62 17.60 737.91 789.11 33,661.52 $79,986.43 -n<-'~--'>(',,,,,,,_,_!:",,~,..__p Legal services for November Expenses in King vs. Dublin case Ad for Board/Commission openings Electric bill for Municipal Bldg. Phone service to all depts. 1.\ 11":. ~_-_"~"'~_M'~~"'''''''''*W''''_~'''~~'''''''''","~C-''-''- RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ Meeting National Graphics Corp" Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ Held December 3, 1984 19_ Page Two r ~ ~ ",... staff made the decision that that section did not have to be built because the developer brought the waterline underneath the bypass. That 300' (feet) of waterline was deleted because of the cost to the developer of bringing the line underneath the bypass. Mr. Warner said that the decision was made during the construction of the waterline before the present agreement he found on the books was entered into. It was part of the approved plans for the waterline construction that the line be brought under the overpass and extended an additional 300 feet. Mr. Warner also said that there was additional expense in getting the line under the freeway because of the casing, and boring operation. He also said that the water payback agreement is with Mr. Irelan. It was noted that Equity Planning Corporation would be asssessed $9,595.00 for the waterline. Responding to a question from Mr. Close, Mr. Warner said that to the best of his knowledge there is not an agreement between Mr. Irelan and the present landowners. Ms. Maurer noted that the developer had indicated that he felt that he had paid for his share of the line in the purchase price of the property. Mr. Sheldon said that the cost to extend the line under 1-270 and across was $142,350.00. Mr. Warner said that the cost of construction of the 300 feet would be approximately $10,000.00. Mr. Smith said, by rejecting the report of the Assessment Equalization Board, the Village will not be able to divide the cost among the other property owners. If a newly appointed Assessment Equalization Board would also reject the report of the first Board, the Village would have to pay the cost of the line. The Village payback payments to Shamrock II were and are for what was actually constructed. Mr. Thornton said that he felt that the question was whether or not this particular property owner is being assessed twice for a waterline - whether he paid that assessment to the people he bought the property from and then is being asked to pay for it again. Is that not a matter of written record? Mr. Close said that the person who is negotiating to buy the property is in a better position to protect himself from having to pay twice than anyone else. Mr. Smith said that the Village has no way of knowing what went on in the negotiations when the property was purchased. All property owners are being assessed the same unit cost. '-' The vote was 6-0 to approve the report of the Assessment Equalization Board. ,.... Proposed Construction of Sewerline on Tuller Road. Mr. Amorose moved to approve the proposed Tuller Road sewerline agreement which Mr. Sheldon had issued in a memorandum dated November 27, 1984. mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Mr. Sheldon explained that what the motion is is an oral commission by Council, duly recorded, to commit to the project up to $120,000.00 which will be followed by a payback agreement which Mr. Sheldon will have written and prepared in which case they, Taggart, Marryott, Reardon would be repaid at 30% of all Dublin sewer tap fees paid on said sewer- line from Riverside Drive to their easterly property line for a period not to exceed 15 years. ...... li?iijl11jij,_1 J.OlIUJj~ ""'~ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ Meeting National Graphics Corp" Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ Held Oecerober3~ 1984 19 Page Two ,-... "... staff made the decision that that section did not have to be built because the developer brought the waterline underneath the bypass. That 300' (feet) of waterline was deleted because of the cost to the developer of bringing the line underneath the bypass. Mr. Warner said that the decision was made during the construction of the waterline before the present agreement he found on the books was entered into. It was part of the approved plans for the waterline construction that the line be brought under the overpass and extended an additional 300 feet. Mr. Warner also said that there was additional expense in getting the line under the freeway because of the casing, and boring operation. He also said that the water payback agreement is with Mr. Irelan. It was noted that Equity Planning Corporation would be assessed $9,595.00 for the waterline. Responding to a question from Mr. Close, Mr. Warner said that to the best of his knowledge there is not an agreement between Mr. Irelan and the present landowners. Ms. Maurer noted that the developer had indicated he felt that he had paid for his share of the line in the purchase price of the property. Mr. Sheldon said that the cost to extend the line under 1-270 and across is $142,350.00. Mr. Warner said that the cost of construction of the 300 feet would be approximately $10,000.00. Mr. Smith said, by rejecting the report of the Assessment Equalization Board, the Village will not be able to divide the cost among the other property owners. If a newly appointed Assessment Equalization Board would also reject the report of the first Board, the Village would have to pay the cost of the line. The Village payback payments to Shamrock II were and are for what was actually constructed. Mr. Thornton said that he felt that the question was whether or not this particular property owner is being assessed twice for a waterline- whether he paid that assessment to the people he bought the property from and then is being asked to pay for it again. Is that not a matter of written record? Mr. Close said that the person who is negotiating to buy the property is in a better position to protect himself from having to pay twice than anyone else. Mr. Smith said that the Village has no way of knowing what went on in the negotiations when the property was purchased. All property owners are being assessed the same unit cost. The vote was 6-0 to approve the report of the Assessment Equalization Board. -..... ...... ... Proposed Construction of Sewerline on Tuller Road. Mr. Amorose moved to approve the proposed Tuller Road sewerline agreement which Mr. Sheldon had issued in a memorandum dated November 27, 1984. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Mr. Sheldon explained that what the motion is is an oral commission by Council, duly recorded, to commit to the project up to $120,000.00 which will be followed by a payback agreement which Mr. Sheldon will have written and prepared in which case they, Taggart, Marryott, Reardon would be repaid at 30% of all Dublin sewer tap fees paid on said sewer- line from Riverside Drive to their easterly property line for a period not to exceed 15 years. ,.... RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ Meeting National Graphics Corp., Cols., 0, Form No. 1097..... Held DecelD1>e_r_3_L 198_4:_ 19 Page Three ,... No notes or bonds will need to be issued. The money will come from the sewer fund. The vote on the motion was 6-0 (unanimous). \...0 Council Roundtable Discussion B. Thornton Mr. Thornton mentioned the completion of Frantz Road (the Columbus section having been finished). He noted two items regarding same - the alignment of the road has been changed; the Columbus section has no curbs and some of the sod has al- ready been damaged. Mr. Thornton noted that there is to be an article in Business First on downtown Dublin, and also that camera crews from PM Magazine have been in downtown Dublin filming. He suggested that, with the increased exposure and interest in the Old Dublin area, the Administration move ahead with a program to provide facilities (rest rooms) for those visiting the Old Dublin downtown area. 1. Mr. A. 2. Mrs. Headlee Mrs. Headlee agreed with Mr. Thornton regarding the downtown area of Dublin. She also mentioned the limited parking available, suggesting encouragement of usage of the two public parking lots, noting that local employees should use the back lots of their businesses for parking. 3. Mr. Sutphen Avery Road Waterline Area - the paths into the fields are extremely narrow. Mr. Warner said that those "pull off" areas are for access to the hydrants. A couple of those areas will be extended in the spring. "The lanes for access to the farmers are a foot back in and are maintained right now." ,... '-" Mr. Sutphen also commented about the mud around construction areas. Mr. Warner told Mr. Sutphen that information regarding the Village's policy on mud is included when building permits are issued. 4. Ms. Maurer Ms. Maurer had a request to Mr. Sheldon regarding maintenance of the Old Muirfield Cemetery. Mr. Sheldon said that employees of the Village are mowing the Cemetery; a chain and two posts have been installed at the access point; nothing has been done regarding the fallen and/or broken tombstones. Representatives of the Dublin Historical Society have recommended leaving the area "as is" (with the option of a fence). .... Mr. Sheldon said that the Village would follow up with the City of Columbus regarding Frantz Road and curbing. He did indicate that the area from Tuttle Road to Hayden Run Road will be the center two lanes of the future road and curbs will be put in when the additional two lanes are completed. r- The meeting was adjourned by the Vice-Mayor, Mr. Close, at 8:00 P.M. ~~'fr;,~ lerk of Council Mayor -