HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/02/1984
. .
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
301
Minutes of
Meet illg
~
National Graphics Corp.. Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
Held
. Apri 12, 1984
19
,....
f
'-
The meeting of the Dublin Village Council was called to order by Mayor
Lewis at 7:30 P.M. on Monday, April 2, 1984. Council members present were:
Mr. Amorose, Mr. Close, Mrs. Headlee, Mr. Lewis, Ms. Maurer, Mr. Sutphen
and Mr. Thornton. Mr. Smith, Law Director, and Mr. Sheldon, Village
Manager, were also present as were Village Staff members Mr. Warner and
Mr. Bowman.
Mr. Amorose moved to accept the minutes of the March 19th meeting. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Sutphen. The vote to approve the minutes
was 6-0 with an abstention from Ms. Maurer.
Mrs. Headlee moved to accept the Bills; seconded by Mr. Thornton, with
the corrections (read by Mr. Sheldon) noted below:
Item
Incorrect:
Correct
Payroll Account
Smith and Gunner
$32,952.23
3,000.00
$30,384.78
2,482.50
TOTAL $100,899.78 $97,814.83
The vote was 7-0 for acceptance of the Bills with the changes as noted
above.
r-
Correspondence. A request was filed with the Ohio Department of Liquor
Control by the Bexley and Young Associates of the Women's Association of
the Columbus Symphony Orchestra for a one day special liquor permit for
Saturday, May 5, 1984 from 8:30 P.M. to 12:00 P.M. at the OCLC Building.
Mayor Lewis noted that the Columbus Symphony will be hosting a function
titled "A Night in Vienna" in the atrium of the OCLC Building. All
residents of Dublin are invited at a cost of $75/couple. The purpose
of the event is to call attention to the fund raising and funding of
the Columbus Symphony Orchestra and to promote interest in the Symphony
in the Dublin area. There were no objections.
....
Resolution 06-84 - Expression of Appreciation to the Dublin High School
Girls Gymnastics Team. Ms. Montenari and several team members were
present to accept the Resolution from the Council of the Village of Dublin.
Congratulations were added for winning the State Title. The Resolution
passed with a unanimous vote (7-0).
Ordinance 13-84 - Public Hearing - To Permit and Control Dish Antennas.
Second Reading. There we?~e no registered "Proponent" speakers. Mr. Charles
Cooper, a resident, signed the "opponent sheet". Mr. Cooper mentioned
that he was not "absolutely opposed" to the Ordinance but that he had
some questions regarding same. Mr. Cooper, a licensed radio engineer,
made the following points:
r
......
1. Mr. Cooper was not aware that the antennas were for the
transmission and reception of AM and FM as well as TV.
2. The antennas are to be placed at the rear of the property.
The dishes cannot be screened with shrubbery - they work
like a telescope; anything that would cast a shoadow from
the sun would block the signals coming into the antenna.
3. Mr. Cooper mentioned that he felt the open mesh idea was good;
the concrete base mounting is good. He also said that the
amount of stone in the ground in the Dublin area might present
some problems.
I.. ,'.<. .....R'>;ifO--r' ..."-".",,",,,~,#,,,, _. _ .f. .Ill.
'"
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
313
Minutes of Meetillg
~
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
Held
19
April 2, 1984
Page Two
f"'"
'--
4.
The height of the antenna (no greater than 12' above grade
height). The bottom of the dish would generally be about
3' above ground and some can be as great as 12' in diameter-
with these parameters the antenna would be some 15' high.
The limitation of 3' in diameter. Mr. Cooper would like to see
that measurement increased to 4'. As the Ordinance reads, if
the antenna is 3' in height or less, zoning clearance will
not be required before installation.
The front of the antenna cannot be screened; the "signal line"
cannot be interrupted. A motorized control is available which
swings the antenna from south to southwest, depending on the
origin of the signal which would be from approximately 230 to
150.
5.
6.
Resolution 04-84 - Specify Powers and Duties of the Boarn of Zoning
Appeals. Third Reading. The vote for passage was unanimous.
Resolution 95-84 - Authorize Preparation of Plans for Petitioned Water-
line (Shier-Rings Road). Third Reading. The vote was 7-0 for passage.
Ordinance No. 10-84 - Amendments to Code Re: Home Occupations, Blights,
Blemishes, etc. Third Reading. Noting errors on retyping, Mr. Sheldon
read the corrections to Councilmembers. The following points were
raised and discussed by Councilmembers and residents.
1. The matter of enforcement was again mentioned. Mr. Sheldon
said that he, as Village Manager, would see that the Ordinance
was enforced.
Storage buildings - for example, using garages, barns, etc. for
storing boats, motor homes, etc. Is this a home occupation?
It was noted that this is "passive income", and thus is not
covered under "home occupations".
Mr. Thornton expressed concern regarding the limitations on
home occupations; for example, the number of vehicles in
the driveway, etc. He felt that as long as those businesses
are not endangering the health and safety of neighboring
residents or encouraging pestilence they should be able to
operate without said restrictions.
Mr. Amorose mentioned that many neighborhoods have deed
restrictions which prohibit such activities in their areas,
including prohibiting the parking of recreational vehicles,
etc. in open view.
Mrs. Headlee mentioned
residents this month.
of propane tanks.
[
2.
3.
4.
5.
the dumpster available for use by Dublin
She also mentioned the dangerous nature
Mr. Thornton moved to table the Ordinance until the April 16 meeting.
He also said that he would provide amendments in writing by April 11.
Ms. Maurer seconded the motion.
[
Clarification was requested from the Law Director as to his interpreta-
tion of the intent of the Ordinance. Mr. Smith noted that he felt
~h~~ the Ordinance annli~~ .0 the blights and blemishes on residential
properties as well as home businesses. Ms. Maurer said that she felt
that there was a section which stood independent of the home occupation
portion of the Ordinance.
~.....
~.~""-'.'''p",''''",
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
3D5
M il!utes of
Meetillg
~
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
Held
Apri12, 1984
19
Page Three
r-
~
i.....
The vote on tabling the motion was as follows: Thornton, yes; Amorose, no;
Sutphen, no; Headlee, no; Maurer, no; Close, no; Lewis, no.
Mrs. Headlee moved that the amendments (as presented by F. Urban and S.
Sheldon in memoranda) and which are incorporated in an amended version
of the Ordinance be accepted with typographical omissions being corrected
according to the original version. The motion was seconded by Mr. Amorose.
The vote on the motion to accept the amendments was 7-0.
Mrs. Headlee moved to do away with the waiting period and treat Ordinance
No. 10-84 as an emergency. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. The vote
was as follows: Thornton, yes; Amorose, yes; Sutphen, yes; Headlee, yes;
Maurer, no; Close, yes; Lewis, yes. The vote on the Ordinance was
unanimous for passage.
Ordinance No. 11-84 - Vacate Portion of Right-of-Way on North Street.
Second Reading.
Ordinance No. 12-84 - Appointing Deputy Clerks of Mayor's Court. Second
Reading.
r-
:c{
.1
I
......
Resolution No. 07-84 - Village Participation in Dublin Arts Council.
First Reading. Mrs. Headlee introduced the Resolution. Mayor Lewis
mentioned an article in the monthly publication of the Ohio Municipal
League which indicated that it might be illegal to appoint a Council-
member as a member of a non-profit corporate board. This Resolution,
however, recommends the appointment of a citizen to represent Council.
Mayor Lewis requested Councilmembers consider the Resolution and submit
recommendations in time for the next Council meeting.
Accept Final Development Plan - Phase 22 - Part 1 - Muirfield.
Mr. Howard Adams spoke, representing Muirfield, Ltd. The water tower
issue was raised by Mrs. Headlee. Would development of this phase
preclude building a water tower in that area around the year 1990? Mr.
Adams said that the water tower was never discussed with regard to this
plot of land. He did mention the availability of other land in that
area; specifically, 14 acres (owned by Muirfield) west of Deer Run
Elementary School, a portion of which might be used to put in a water
tower. Mrs. Headlee suggested that Council work with the Village Planner,
Engineer, and Muirfield Ltd. to set aside a plot of land for a future
water tower so that persons buying in that area would be aware that a
water tower perhaps would be constructed in that location. Responding to
Ms. Maurer's question regarding the possibility of dedication of two
acres for a water tower site, Mr. Adams said he would check into it.
[
Mrs. Headlee moved to accept the plat; Mr. Close seconded the motion. The
vote for acceptance was 7-0.
Discussion of Proposed Avery Road Waterline. Discussion ensued regarding
the size of the waterline (12" or 16") - (Up Avery Road, across Brand
to Muirfield Drive to connect with the Muirfield waterline up Muirfield
Drive) as well as the future supply of water into that area of the
Village. Mayor Lewis recommended the Village go ahead with the design
that is under contract for the 12" waterline up Avery Road and ask the
~"''''~~llllltl.,'l-" 1 t>
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
315
M ill utes of
M eetillg
~
National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
Held
April 2,1984
19
Page Four
~
\...
design engineering firm that is doing the work provide an alternate
proposal for a 16" line. Mr. Sutphen continued his support of a 16"
line, noting that the Fire Department is also recommending a 16" main
if no water tower is constructed within the next two years. Mr. Close,
being in favor of a 12" line at this time, felt that he is committing
to what he understands to be a plan for development by Burgess and Niple
which includes two 12" mains and a water tower. Putting in a 16" line at
this time, with the additional expense, is unnecessary. Mayor Lewis
noted that a 16" line up Avery Road is of little value unless there is
a water tower. The rate of growth of the subdivisions in that area will
be an important factor - perhaps another line will be required within
one of those subdivisions. Mr. Sutphen suggested further study be
required regarding the water tower.
"...
~
,
Mayor Lewis moved that Council go ahead with the existing design for the
12" line, the 16" line as an alternate, and between now and when that
design is completed and cost estimated, go ahead with further studies
on the entire water system in the northwest quadrant and get more
information prior to going out for construction bids. Mr. Close seconded
the motion.
Responding to a question regarding the timing involved, Mr. Warner said
that the field work has been done and originally the bids were to have
gone out in May with construction beginning in June. Cost estimates
could probably be put together in four to five weeks. Responding to a
question, Mayor Lewis said that the primary concern at present is putting
in additional waterlines on the west side of the River so that the
Summitview waterline will then be available solely to those on the east
side of the River.
.....
The vote was 7-0 for passage.
,
Mr. Close requested, and was granted permission, to be excused from the
meeting.
Mayor Lewis, with the approval of Council, announced that the Council
meeting scheduled for May 21 would be rescheduled for Tuesday, May 22.
The papers will be so informed.
Mrs. Saylor (Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Committee) noted that
Councilmembers had received copies of the minutes of the last Parks and
Recreation Committee meeting. She also said that the Committee would be
studying the open space and recreation plan under the 1978 Master Plan.
The next Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting will be April 11, 1984.
[
Mayor Lewis reminded those present of the meeting to be held at 7:30 P.M.,
Wednesday, April 4 to consider the formation of a committee that will
devote its efforts toward defining some type of facility for the
community to serve the principal interests of the people within the
community. Noe deSign, no concept has been decided. This meeting will
be an organizational meeting to perhaps proceed with the building of a
Center. Some conversations will also be held regarding the possible
participation of this same group in the 175th birthday celebration of
Dublin which will occur in 1985. Also, consideration will be given to
the possibility of Dublin obtaining "official" city status at the same
time. Mayor Lewis encouraged Councilmembers and citizens to attend
the meeting.
Minutes of
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
317
Meetillg
National Graphics Corp.. Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~
Held
.....
tc
~
[
[
~
Apri 1 2,1984
19
Page Five
Council Roundtable Discussion
1. Mr. Thornton spoke regarding the passage of Ordinance No. 10-84
(Blights, Blemishes, etc.). He encouraged the residents in his
Ward to do the same as he; that is, to report to the Village Manager
those residents who are not complying with the Ordinance.
In discussion of the northeast quadrant of the Village, the issue of
utilities should be considered and addressed.
2. Mrs. Headlee moved that the Village Staff have the authority to pursu
the development of a Master Plan for the Village of Dublin (sewer,
water, parks, recreation, roads, ,etc.); this authority to include
the hiring of additional staff if necessary. The Staff will discuss
the issue and report back to Council at the next meeting. Mr.
Sutphen seconded the motion. The motion passed 6-0.
Mrs. Headlee asked if there was an Ordinance regarding the "dropping
of mud" on the streets and roadways by contractors and developers.
It was noted that such an Ordinance was proposed a number of years
ago but was tabled indefinitely.
Mrs. Headlee suggested looking for and setting aside a site for a
future water tower.
3.
Ms. Maurer mentioned the first edition of her report on the National
League of Cities Meeting which has been received by Councilmembers.
Additional reports will be forthcoming.
Ms. Maurer mentioned a meeting held on Friday, March 30, 1984
regarding a "revival" of the Estate and Benefits Gifts Committee.
Ms. Maurer, Mr. Pat Grabill; Beth Brooks and Mike Cleveland of the
Parks and Recreation Committee also attended. Mrs. Brooks will
probably represent the Parks and Recreation Committee. The number
of people who will serve on the Committee is seven; four additional
members will be appointed. The Gift Book concept will be adopted.
4.
Capital Improvements. When will the five year plan be adopted?
Mayor Lewis said that Council has not committed to the Capital
Improvements at this point. He noted that the Village has proceeded
with about three different engineering/design plans for items that
Council agreed carried a priority for those plans for 1984, so
that during the next quarter Council will have the information
necessary to consider them for contract. Under those circumstances
(most of the recommendations will be back in May) Council has
tentatively scheduled another meeting in June to review those design
recommendations and cost estimates with the remainder of the plan
and then proceed from that point. Ms. Maurer recommended that
prior to the June meeting an additional recommendation(s) be
received from Staff as to preliminary work other than merely the
years in which the money will be spent.
5.
Mr. Smith mentioned that OCLC will be paying the water and sewer
assessments.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:07 P.M.
VILLAGE OF DUBLIN
6665 COFFMAN RD.
P.O. BOX 206
DUBLIN, o.Hlo. 43017
~ ~
. . 1.1.' ~ "-4./ ,
'''fJ.t'',cf_ !:':~ 0. 'C'r~~({llounc I
C' i"~ ::i I:~C()i(JaiiCe with
~lj~
~ , ,. ~ ...
-Z&fh~._~~_ ~
Clerk. c f