HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-14-13 Finance Committee Minutes (2)DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING
Monday, October 14, 2013
Council Chambers
Minutes of Meeting
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Finance Committee members present: Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher and Mr. Gerber. Mr. Keenan was
absent.
Council members present: Mayor Lecklider, Vice Mayor Salay, Mrs. Boring and Mr. Reiner.
Staff present: Ms. Grigsby, Ms. Mumma, Mr. McDaniel, Mr. Smith, Mr. Sova, Mr. Thurman, Ms.
Ott, Ms. Crandall, Mr. Hammersmith, Mr. Wagner, Mr. Hahn.
Consent Agenda
• Finance Committee Minutes of August 12, 2013
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher moved approval of the minutes of the August 12, 2013 Finance
Committee meeting.
Mr. Gerber seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher noted that an item from the last agenda – Council compensation
comparison with other municipalities – will not be discussed tonight. This topic is better suited
for discussion after the election.
• Third Quarter 2013 - Financial Update
Ms. Mumma, Director of Finance reported:
General Fund Revenue
The City’s financial status remains healthy, with a General Fund balance totaling $54.3 million,
which is 91 percent of the General Fund expenditures for the year. This exceeds the target
balance of 50 percent.
Income Tax Revenue
1. The main driver of that healthy balance is the income tax revenue. Through the third
quarter, the total receipts were up 8.5 percent over 2012. There were some previous
concerns about withholdings not meeting expected growth levels, but at the end of the
second quarter, they were even with last year. Through the third quarter, the
withholdings were up 3.1 percent. That is important, given the reduction in employment
that occurred with two of the City’s top employers. However, the remaining top
employers more than compensated for the decline in revenue from the other two
employers.
2. Net profits were up 43.4 percent. This is likely an anomaly and is not expected year to
year.
3. The Individual category is up 13.1 percent.
4. In breaking down the top 10, top 50, top 100, top 250 and top 500 employers’
withholdings, the top 10 were up 1.16 percent; the top 50 went up 3.5 percent; and the
top 100 showed a .7 percent increase. For the top 100 and 250, the withholdings are
Finance Committee of Dublin City Council
October 14, 2013
Page 2
up 1.4 percent; for the top 500, the withholdings are up 2 percent. Overall, the
withholdings were up 3.1 percent.
5. At the last quarterly review, the Committee asked for more information specific to
income tax returns. The W2s remitted by employers within the City of Dublin through
2012 reflect over 94,000 W2s. This number is generally even with last year. October is
a key filing deadline for those who filed for an extension. Once the reconciliation
process is completed, the number of W2s is expected to increase. In 2008, the W2s
numbered 96,900; 2009 W2s - 89,100; 2010 W2s - 91,600; 2011 – 94,400 W2s; and
2012 to date – 94,000 W2s. At this point, we are on pace to meet or exceed last year’s
W2s. Those W2s are comprised of approximately 4,000 withholding accounts from City
businesses.
6. Electronic Filings - From an individual preparer standpoint, the City encourages
electronic filing. For tax year 2012, the City added the Thompson software. That
doubled the number of electronic filers the City had. Last year, we had approximately
3,600 preparers or individuals file electronically, while this year, it was approximately
6,500 preparers. We will continue to encourage businesses and residents to file
electronically.
Vice Mayor Salay inquired how much money that saves the City.
Ms. Mumma indicated she would determine that amount and forward it to Council.
7. Active accounts, excluding any business withholding accounts, have grown from 21,600
in 2011 accounts to 23,800 active accounts in 2012.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher inquired if the numbers for the top employer categories is obtained by job
category or is it an aggregate number. It would be interesting to know if there are certain job
classifications experiencing more increase than others. That information could be beneficial to
economic development, as it could influence the kinds of employment the City encourages.
Ms. Mumma responded that she would inquire, and if that information is available, she will
forward it to Council members.
Other Revenue
Property Tax Revenue increased two percent over 2012, which was driven by commercial
property valuations within Delaware County. As we indicated previously, there have been
certain State Department of Taxation Board of Revision decisions that have resulted in less TIF
revenue, and, in 2012, there was a 6.2% reduction in TIF revenue for the City.
Revenues, over all, were up six percent over 2012, which was driven by the income tax
revenue. In addition, Licenses, Fines and Permits revenue were up 24%. That is not necessarily
due to the number of permits issued, but the size of the permits. There were some large
commercial building permits, including the Nestle expansion and the Vrable skilled nursing
facility.
General Fund Expenditures
Overall, Expenditures were up 13.8%. However, when extraordinary expenses are excluded –
transfers and advances to other funds and the Eiterman Road land acquisition, Expenditures
were up approximately four percent over the same period last year.
Finance Committee of Dublin City Council
October 14, 2013
Page 3
In summary, the revenues are healthy and the expenditures are in-line with projections.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher inquired if the Hotel-Motel Tax Revenue for August 2013 is accurate, and
if so, why was the revenue $30,000 less than last year. The Irish Festival event is in August,
and hotels are full during that timeframe. Is there a specific reason that revenue is down?
Ms. Mumma responded that she would follow up with the Dublin Convention and Visitors
Bureau to see if they have information related to this. When she saw the decline, she checked
to see if there was a timing difference, but that did not seem to be the case. Nine of the 14
hotels experienced increases over last year, but the others did not bring in the revenue they
had the year before. She will provide a follow-up memo to Council within the next two weeks.
Mr. Gerber stated that he believes that from 2009 – 2013, August hotel-motel revenue has
been lower than July revenue.
Mrs. Boring stated that it may be because the hotels are offering special rates during that time
frame.
Ms. Mumma c that factor has impacted revenue numbers before.
2012 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and Audit
Mr. Sova stated that the City submits its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report to the
Government Finance Officers Association to enable it to be awarded a Certificate of Excellence.
The City has done this for 23 consecutive years. We anticipate this year’s report will also receive
that award and anticipate notice to that effect before the end of the calendar year. This is the
only financial report that the City prepares on a GAP basis. This is required for the City to
receive an audit opinion. The auditors did opine that this report was in compliance with their
standards. The audit was also submitted to the State Auditor, which they reviewed and signed
off on. If Council approves the report tonight, it will be posted online for the public’s review.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher inquired about the management letter included with the CAFR packet
material, which noted that appropriations exceeded estimated resources. The City’s original
appropriations exceeded the estimated resources, which the City had recognized and corrected.
Mr. Sova responded that the Ohio Revised Code requires that whenever the City appropriates
monies to be spent from any given fund, there must be adequate resources in that fund to
appropriate. In this case, the issue is related to the timing of some internal fund transfers. The
money was being transferred into the fund for the expenditure, but the expenditure was
approved before the transfer was approved. This was strictly a timing issue. Every year, the City
submits a certificate of estimated resources to the County for approval. At the beginning of
every year, we demonstrate that the resources we anticipate receiving throughout the year are
sufficient to meet all of the expected appropriations.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher stated that the statement of estimated appropriations to the County is
not timed with the budget approval. She had believed that those were estimates only, not hard
numbers. It seems that it is necessary to move the money before approval of the appropriation
of it is requested.
Finance Committee of Dublin City Council
October 14, 2013
Page 4
Mr. Sova stated that is essentially what occurred. However, the revenues are estimated. We
have the ability to amend that official certificate with the County at any point during the year to
reflect any additional revenue that is anticipated, which would then support additional
appropriations.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher inquired if there is an expectation that by the end of the year there would
be a reconciliation to ensure that the numbers match.
Mr. Sova responded that it isn’t necessary to match dollar for dollar, but there is the expectation
that the total resources will equal or exceed the total appropriations at the end of the year.
Mr. Gerber inquired if this is relative to the collection of last year’s income taxes.
Mr. Sova responded affirmatively.
Mr. Gerber inquired how the City collects past-due taxes.
Ms. Mumma responded that the City does stay “on top” of past-due collections. They are sent
to a collection agency for collection and actively monitored.
Mr. Gerber inquired if most of the past-due items are individual or business filings.
Mr. Sova responded that he does not know the breakdown, but he would expect that it would
be in the same proportion as the regular revenue stream – 80% business withholdings.
Ms. Grigsby noted that the City’s rate of income tax delinquencies is probably one of the best in
the state of Ohio. This is primarily because a significant proportion of our revenue does come
from withholdings, and those are typically paid. Dublin’s delinquency rate is very low,
particularly when comparing outstanding dollars versus dollars collected.
Mr. Gerber noted that he would expect that for individuals, it would be those extra items that
are not reflected on their W2s – they must handle those on a different payment plan.
Ms. Mumma stated that the City works with any residents who are experiencing this type of
challenge, setting up payment plans to help them achieve compliance.
Mayor Lecklider noted that the Attorney General’s office handles that type of collection work for
entities, as well.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher inquired how this report would be impacted if HB 5 were to pass as
currently conceived.
Ms. Mumma responded that the impact would probably would be in the area of net profits – the
time period a loss can be carried forward. Ms. Gibson has been involved in this process and has
evaluated it from both the City of Dublin’s standpoint and the overall perspective. She is not
sure what the final reconciliation is, but Ms. Gibson has not indicated significant concern about
its potential impact.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher inquired about the provision concerning a certain number of days an
individual is required to work within a city before they must pay income tax to the city.
Ms. Mumma responded that the debate is whether at Day 20, the collection begins from that
point forward, or if it then reverts to Day one. We are starting to see many more individuals
reporting days worked outside the City. Although there are entities that are tracking hours of
work performed within their corporation limits, this probably will not have much impact on
Dublin. For example, we are not concerned about the florist who enters Dublin corporation
limits and delivers flowers to the hospital.
Finance Committee of Dublin City Council
October 14, 2013
Page 5
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher stated that her interest concerns the amount of revenue Dublin now
receives that could be impacted by the eventual result of this debate. What is the current law’s
provision concerning number of days worked within the City?
Ms. Mumma responded that the current provision is 12 days.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher noted that wouldn’t affect the golf tournament participants, then.
Ms. Grigsby responded that, actually, they are an exception. We do receive tax revenue in their
case.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher stated that if the law changes to 20 days, Dublin could potentially lose
100% of that revenue.
Ms. Mumma responded that when HB 5 has reached a final form, she would ask Ms. Gibson to
provide an update for the Finance Committee.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher stated because some Council members are involved in various groups
where this discussion is referenced, it would be beneficial to have a report on the final
resolution.
Investment Policy
Ms. Mumma stated that she has been working with the City’s investment advisor, Mr. Dennis
Yacabozzi, the last two weeks to evaluate the City’s investment policy. They meet quarterly to
discuss the City’s overall portfolio, investment strategies, and the current market. He will
describe the proposed changes.
Dennis Yacabozzi, United American Capital Corporation (UACC), stated that the changes they
are proposing for the City’s investment policy are based upon the past financial crisis, the fact
that the City’s bond policy has not been changed in many years, and the fact that the bond
market is different today. The primary policy changes they propose are:
• A language update to provide flexibility for the City’s Finance Director, in conjunction
with the investment advisor, to make changes when market conditions prevail. For
example, in the case of certificates of deposit -- the existing language provides for two
methods of collateralization – the pooling method and the individual assignment
method. They believe the City should have the ultimate right to determine which
collateralization process they will have, based upon current market conditions. Their
recommended changes are consistent with the Ohio Revised Code sections that govern
the investments of political subdivisions.
• Re-purchase agreements be permitted as an option. The Federal Reserve has indicated
intent to taper their accommodations. Although that has not yet occurred, it is
anticipated. Interest rates are higher now than they were in the spring. If, in the future,
inflation occurs and the Fed’s rates increase, the City may elect to engage in a re-
purchase agreement. That should only be done with a primary U.S. government
securities dealer, as recognized by the Federal Reserve. This could be a specific
flexibility for the Finance Director in conjunction with recommendations of the City’s
investment advisor regarding the types of collateral that would be pledged. The
collateral must be transmitted to a third-party custodian. There is also flexibility to
require the counter party to pledge more excess market value over the re-purchase
agreement.
• The ratings criteria proposed years ago for corporate obligations should remain intact.
The longer the maturity, the higher the required credit rating to buy those corporate
securities. To date, they have not purchased any corporate securities, although they
Finance Committee of Dublin City Council
October 14, 2013
Page 6
recently purchased commercial paper. We have not purchased corporate obligations,
because we did not believe that, for the added credit risk, there was sufficient yield
spread over and above what we were receiving on federal agency securities to warrant
the purchase of corporate obligations. None the less, the ratings criteria we proposed
years ago, we still believe are appropriate, should we choose to recommend this
purchase in the future.
• In accordance with other changes in law in the State of Ohio, they have also suggested
that the City of Dublin be permitted to buy obligations of other political subdivisions
throughout the State, if they are rated sufficiently, which would be detailed in the policy.
If the City should ever choose to do so, it would probably be an entity within the
County. Franklin County is one of their investment accounts, and they have recently
purchased the subdivision debt of other issuers, such as the Columbus Metropolitan
Library. They certainly would consider purchasing City of Dublin debt, given the high
credit rating of Dublin. There is also precedent to allow cities such as Dublin to purchase
their own debt. That is a way in which to save interest costs. This would be done with
as an “arm’s length” transaction. It would have to be delivered to your third party
custodian versus payment, reported to Council, listed in the City’s portfolio and priced
every month.
• Safekeeping and custody – For years the City has required that there be a third party
custodian bank, so that their investment advisor or broker dealer would not be
permitted to engage in investment activity at the same time they had custodial
responsibilities over the City’s assets. UCC has never had, nor believed they should
have, that responsibility. Their sole responsibility is to make investment decisions on a
fully discretionary basis, and bonds must be delivered to the City’s custodian versus
payment. Therefore, their final recommendation is that any assets purchased and owned
by the City must be held in entirety by the City’s current custodian bank. No broker
dealer shall be permitted to act as a broker dealer and, at the same time, safe keep the
City’s assets.
Mr. Gerber inquired, in regard to the purchasing of political subdivision debt, would this item
come to Council first for approval, or simply be reported to Council after it has occurred.
Mr. Yacabozzi responded that they would make a recommendation for the City’s investment in a
political subdivision debt -- other than the City of Dublin’s, to the City Manager and Finance
Director. If they had no objection, they would proceed with the purchase, which would
subsequently be reported to the Finance Committee and City Council as another asset added to
the City’s inventory of securities.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher noted that if the Finance Committee approves these investment
recommendations, an ordinance adopting the amended investment policy will be scheduled for
a first reading of Council on October 28 and a vote on November 4.
Committee Discussion:
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher inquired what would be their recommendation for frequency for review of
the investment policy.
Mr. Yacabozzi responded that he would recommend the policy be reviewed more frequently.
However, the recommendations that have been incorporated in this modification are very
extensive and should remain intact for a period of time unless something significant happens in
Finance Committee of Dublin City Council
October 14, 2013
Page 7
the market. That is probably what initiated this modification. The last five to six years have
been very different for the market.
Mr. Gerber noted that it would be appropriate to review the policy annually, but not necessarily
make any changes.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher responded that it would be necessary to allow a sufficiently long period of
time to see what is occurring, although not so long that it would hinder consideration of issues
in a timely manner. She would suggest that staff annually report market trends to the Finance
Committee.
Ms. Mumma responded that they have been meeting quarterly with the City’s investment
advisor and his team. That not only provides the opportunity to discuss the City’s portfolio but
any changes in the overall market. If they were to see something that would necessitate
bringing something forward to Council, they would do so. At a minimum, they will provide an
annual report to Council.
Mr. Gerber stated that if they are meeting quarterly with the investment advisor, the Finance
Committee also meets quarterly. Perhaps staff could provide a short paragraph in that quarterly
update.
Ms. Mumma agreed to do so.
Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher thanked Mr. Yacabozzi and staff for the report.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:42 p.m.
____________________________________
Clerk of Council