No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 041-19RECORD OF RESOLUTIONS Dayton Legal Blank, Inc., Form No. 30045 Resolution No. 41-19 Passed A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE PLAT FOR THE AUTUMN ROSE WOODS, SECTION 2 SUBDIVISION ,20 WHEREAS, application for approval of the plat for the Autumn Rose Woods, Section 2 subdivision has been made under Chapter 152 of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Dublin; and WHEREAS, the plat application has been reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission, which has recommended approval and acceptance of the plat; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the reports of staff, and the subdivision requirements of Chapter 152 of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Dublin, and desires to approve said plat and accept all rights of way, easements, and other interests dedicated to the City therein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, of the elected members concurring that: Section 1. The City Council hereby approves and accepts the plat for the Autumn Rose Woods, Section 2 subdivision, attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit A. Section 2. The City Manager, Law Director, Clerk of Council, and any other required City employee or official are authorized to execute the plat on behalf of the City. Section 3. Pursuant to Section 4.04 of the Charter, this resolution shall take effect immediately upon passage. J 6 P sed this2q4-fday of 12019. -'41 If ayor —Presiding Offer ATTEST: Clerk of Council I Office of the City Manager 5200 Emerald Parkway* Dublin, OH 43017-1090 U1 City of I'J'ublin Phone: 614-410-4400 * Fax,-- 614-410-4490 L"Z= This is a request for approval of a Final Plat to subdivide 30.390 acres into 36 single-family lots, three rights-of-way, four reserves for open space, and easements for drainage and public utilities, As provided by the Law Director's Office, when City Council approves Preliminary and Final Plats,, the platting process is solely for the subdivision of the properties to identify property lines, establish easements, provide open space dedication, and create public rights-of-way. The site layout, architectural character, and open space designs for the development were previously approved by the required reviewing bodies. Memo - Final Plat - Autumn Rose Woods, Section 2 My 23, 2019 Page 2 of 2 On June 25, 2018, City Council approved Ordinance 39-18, which revised the previously Autumn Rose Woods development text to permit the retention of a portion of existing fence along the 0 north and east property boundaries. The Commission reviewed and recommended approval of t I " is proposal on May 17, 2018 and approved a final development plan application h * simultaneously, I Section 2 contains 36 single-family lots along the east side of Barrister Drive and west of Park Place. This Section includes the extension of Johnston Drive, Mill Springs Drive, and Oliver Way providing access to the second phase of the residential subdivision. There are four reserves of open space, which represent a total dedication in Section 2 of 17.238 acres. Reserve C is 16.533 acres of contiguous woods, Reserve D is a shared -use path connection to Park Place, Reservewetland, and Reserve F is a cul-de-sac landscape island. All reserves will be owned by the City of Dublin. Reserves C, D, and E will be maintained by the City, and Reserve F will be maintained by the Homeowners Association. The average lot size is approximately 1/4 -acre. These lot sizes are consistent with the development text and meet all applicable development standards. There is a single estate lot, Lot 8, which contains a pre-existing home on 1.567 acres with a 75 -foot tree preservation zone. The Commission reviewed and recommended approval to City Council of the final plat at the August 10, 2017 meeting with one condition: 1) That the applicant ensures that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to City Council submittal. Staff recommends approval of the Resolution for the Final Plat for Autumn Rose Woods, Section 2 at the July 29, 2019 City Council meeting. i 1 8 1 7 SITUATED IN THE STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF UNION, TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON (OF FRANKLIN COUNTY), CITY OF DUBLIN AND IN VIRGINIA MILITARY SURVEY NUMBER 3452, CONTAINING 30.390 ACRES OF LAND. 21.057 ACRES BEING PART OF THAT 32.328 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO PULTE HOMES OF OHIO LLC, OF RECORD IN INSTRUMENT NUMBER 201710060008369, AND 6.070 ACRES BEING PART OF THAT 9.3672 ACRES (PARCEL I) AND 3.262 ACRES BEING PART OF THAT 6.6328 ACRE (PARCEL II) TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO PULTE HOMES OF OHIO LLC, OF RECORD IN INSTRUMENT NUMBER 201801040000145, ALL REFERENCES BEING TO THOSE OF RECORD IN THE RECORDER'S OFFICE, UNION COUNTY, OHIO. THE UNDERSIGNED PULTE HOMES OF OHIO LLC, A MICHIGAN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, BY MATTHEW J. CALLAHAN, VICE PRESIDENT OF LAND ACQUISITION OF THE LANDS PLATTED HEREIN, DULY AUTHORIZED IN THE F PREMISES, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT CORRECTLY REPRESENTS AUTUMN ROSE WOODS SECTION 2, A SUBDIVISION CONTAINING LOTS 6 TO 32, INCLUSIVE, AND 65 TO 73, INCLUSIVE AND AREAS DESIGNATED AS RESERVES "C", "D", "E" AND "F", DOES HEREBY ACCEPT THIS PLAT OF SAME AND DEDICATES TO PUBLIC USE, AS SUCH, ALL OF JOHNSTON DRIVE, MILL SPRINGS DRIVE, OLIVER WAY, AND EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON AND NOT HERETOFORE DEDICATED. THE UNDERSIGNED FURTHER AGREES THAT ANY USE OR IMPROVEMENTS ON THIS LAND SHALL BE IN CONFORMITY WITH ALL EXISTING VALID ZONING, PLATTING, HEALTH OR OTHER LAWFUL RULES AND REGULATIONS, INCLUDING APPLICABLE OFF—STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO, FOR THE BENEFIT OF ITSELF AND ALL OTHER SUBSEQUENT OWNERS OR ASSIGNS TAKING TITLE FROM, UNDER OR THROUGH THE UNDERSIGNED. 0 5 II FINAL PLAT OF AUTUMN ROSE WOODS SECTION 2 STATE OF OHIO, COUNTY OF UNION, TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON (OF FRANKLIN COUNTY) CITY OF DUBLIN, VIRGINIA MILITARY SURVEY NO. 3452 3 APPROVED THIS DAY OF , DIRECTOR OF LAND USE AND LONG RANGE PLANNING DUBLIN, OHIO APPROVED THIS DAY OF CITY ENGINEER, DUBLIN OHIO APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY RESOLUTION THIS — DAY OF , 2019, BY VOTE OF COUNCIL WHEREIN JOHNSTON DRIVE, MILL SPRINGS DRIVE, OLIVER WAY, AND EASEMENTS IS HEREBY DEDICATED AND ACCEPTED AS SUCH BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN OHIO. IN WITNESS THEREOF I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND AND AFFIXED MY SEAL THIS DAY OF .2019 EASEMENTS ARE HEREBY RESERVED IN, OVER AND UNDER AREAS DESIGNATED ON THIS PLAT AS "STORM EASEMENT", "SIDEWALK/SHARED—USE PATH EASEMENT" "WATERMAIN EASEMENT" "SANITARY EASEMENT" OR "DRAINAGE EASEMENT." EACH OF THE AFOREMENTIONED DESIGNATED EASEMENTS PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL PUBLIC AND QUASI PUBLIC UTILITIES AND THE CABLE E TELEVISION INDUSTRY ABOVE, BENEATH, AND ON THE SURFACE OF THE GROUND AND, WHERE NECESSARY, ARE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO ALL ADJACENT LOTS AND LANDS AND FOR STORM WATER DRAINAGE. WITHIN THOSE AREAS DESIGNATED "DRAINAGE EASEMENT" ON THIS PLAT, AN ADDITIONAL EASEMENT IS HEREBY RESERVED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING, OPERATING AND MAINTAINING MAJOR STORM WATER DRAINAGE SWALES AND/OR OTHER ABOVE GROUND STORM WATER DRAINAGE FACILITIES. THOSE AREAS DESIGNATED AS "STORM EASEMENT" ON THIS PLAT IS HEREBY RESERVED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING, MAINTAINING, AND OPERATING STORM SEWER AND STRUCTURES. NO TRANSFERRED THIS ABOVE GRADE STRUCTURES, DAMS OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS TO THE FLOW OF STORM WATER RUNOFF ARE PERMITTED WITHIN DRAINAGE EASEMENT AREAS AS DELINEATED ON THIS PLAT UNLESS APPROVED BY THE DUBLIN CITY ENGINEER. THOSE AREAS DESIGNATED AS "WATERMAIN EASEMENT" ON THIS PLAT IS HEREBY RESERVED A NONEXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING, MAINTAINING, AND OPERATING WATERLINE AND ITS APPURTENACES. THOSE AREAS DESIGNATED AS "SANITARY EASEMENT" ON THIS PLAT IS HEREBY RESERVED A NONEXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING, MAINTAINING, AND OPERATING SANITARY SEWER AND STRUCTURES. THOSE AREAS DESIGNATED AS "SIDEWALK/SHARED—USE PATH EASEMENT" ON THIS PLAT IS HEREBY RESERVED A NONEXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF D CONSTRUCTING, MAINTAINING, AND OPERATING SIDEWALK AND SHARED USE PATH, ALONG WITH PEDESTRIAN INGRESS/EGRESS. THE EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON OUTSIDE OF THE PLATTED AREA WITHIN SAID TRACTS OF AND OWNED BY FILED FOR RECORD THIS PULTE HOMES OF OHIO LLC. ARE RESERVED FOR THE PURPOSES STATED IN THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, MATTHEW J. CALLAHAN, VICE PRESIDENT OF LAND ACQUISITION OF PULTE HOMES OF OHIO LLC, A MICHIGAN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, HAS HEREUNTO SET HIS HAND ��:IE,��7_YLi77 SIGNED AND ACKNOWLEDGED IN THE PRESENCE OF: BY: PRINT: C e m PRINT: a H STATE OF OHIO COUNTY OF UNION: 4 IN PULTE HOMES OF OHIO LLC A MICHIGAN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MATTHEW J. CALLAHAN VICE PRESIDENT OF LAND ACQUISITION BEFORE ME, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID PULTE HOMES OF OHIO LLC, PERSONALLY APPEARED MATTHEW J. CALLAHAN, VICE PRESIDENT OF LAND ACQUISITION OF PULTE HOMES OF OHIO LLC, A MICHIGAN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, WHO ACKNOWLEDGED THE SIGNING OF THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT TO BE HIS VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED AND THE VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED OF SAID PULTE HOMES OF OHIO LLC, A MICHIGAN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES EXPRESSED THEREIN. IN WITNESS THEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND AND AFFIXED MY OFFICIAL SEAL THIS DAY OF MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF OHIO DAY OF 2019 RECORDED THIS DAY OF PLAT BOOK . PAGE DAY OF CLERK OF COUNCIL, DUBLIN OHIO AUDITOR, UNION COUNTY, OHIO AT AM/PM AT AM/PM IN UNION COUNTY RECORDER PLAT BOOK . PAGE vt 1 BISHOPS CROSSING YMOR QR 0 C�fl A � O m A Gl a A { O I O A O { A O o PARK MILL © o m m NORTH VICINITY MAP SCALE IN FEET 0 1000 2000 SURVEY DATA: BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BEARINGS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON OBSERVATIONS, MEASUREMENTS, AND CALCULATIONS OF THE LOCATION OF THE BOUNDARY EVIDENCE, REFERENCED TO A GRID MERIDIAN OF NORTH 04'15'23" WEST FOR THE CENTERLINE OF HYLAND—CROY ROAD, AS DETERMINED BY STATIC OBSERVATIONS AND POST PROCESSED BY NGS OPUS SOLUTION. OHIO STATE PLANE, NORTH ZONE (2011 ADJUSTMENT). i 1 F SOURCE DATA: E THE SOURCES OF RECORDED SURVEY DATA REFERENCED IN THE PLAN AND TEXT OF THIS PLAT ARE THE RECORDS OF THE RECORDER'S OFFICE, UNION COUNTY, OHIO. iDnKI DIK10- ALL IRON PINS SET ARE %" SOLID REBAR, THIRTY INCHES IN LENGTH WITH A YELLOW PLASTIC CAP BEARING THE INITIALS "CEC INC". PERMANENT MARKERS: WHERE INDICATED HEREON UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ARE TO BE SET AND ARE SOLID IRON PINS, 1" IN DIAMETER, THIRTY INCHES IN LENGTH WITH A 2" DIAMETER ALUMINUM CAP BEARING THE STAMP "PERMANENT MARKER CEC". CERTIFICATION: WE DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT WE HAVE SURVEYED THE ATTACHED PREMISES, PREPARED THE ATTACHED PLAT, AND THAT SAID PLAT IS CORRECT. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN IN FEET AND DECIMAL PARTS THEREOF. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ALONG CURVES ARE CHORD MEASUREMENTS. MONUMENTS SHOWN SHALL BE SET UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND FINAL GRADING. MARK ALAN SMITH PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 8232 AV AV F r IA77 Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. 250 Old Wilson Bridge Road • Suite 250 • Worthington, OH 43085 Ph: 614.540.6633 • 888.598.6808 • Fax: 614.540.6638 www.cecinc.com AUTUMN ROSE WOODS SECTION 2 DRAWN BY: MAS CHECKED BY: MILE BY: MAS DATE: JULY 2018 DWG SCALE: 1 .=50' PROJECT NO: 150-620 DRAWING NO.: 1ig1►/e1111111 :1will I I ISHEET 1 OF 2 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 D e 0 1 F E D Me F. C M 9' IRON PIPE I I ENO HOY" LOT 54 LOT 53 LOT 52 BISHOP'S CROSSING P.B. 5, PG. 117-119 12' SIDEWALK/� EX. EASEMENT I I SHARED P.B. 5, PG. 117 1 USE PATH -- -- -----J LEASEMENT--, DRAINAGE J EASEMENT r ----- __L'_ L � �/' 15• TEE ( AnD zo�NE' ��/ X in I �i o _ _ �_ _NOTE �I ` II EX. STORM r i `� I m w LOT 5 r x' EASEMENT 3 20' DRAINAGE Lr) \w P.B. 6, PG. 451_ EASEMENT i N_ _ e�'S 6 1N 7 la N i a Q Z � � � - I 0.251 AC ;� 0.341 AC N W EX. SANITARY y m Rn EASEMENT W �_ ion P.B. 6, PG. 45 _ O 'i 20' BUILDING UNE �,y = -R/W - 8500----- __ -J } 80.00'- .-_ zg JOHNSTON DRIVE 0 I (50' RIGHT-OF-WAY) N � N N 85'44'37" E 157.75' S 85044'37" W� 0 JOHNSTON DRIVE No DARNING 57.25' (50' RIGHT-OF-WAY) SEE N 1" 107.75' R ----------- 79_941LDINq UNE___ ----- z ___ _ ' EX SIDEWALK/SHARED 2' SIDEWALK/ ` o USE PATH EASEMENT o SHARED 651 P.B. 6, PG 45 USE PATH 0.258 AC i o LOT 64 00 EASEMENT o EX. STORM EX. SANITARY ESMT ' � EASEMENT P.B. 6, PG. 45 0 i P B 6 PG 450 6 5 k1 3 LOT 51 \\\OT 35 LOT 34 I I LOT 33 LOT 32 LOT 37 LOT 30 LOT 29 LOT 28 \\\\ LOT 27 I I BISHOP'S CROSSING \ \ \ IRON9 PIPE I \ / I I P. B. 5, PG. 117-17,9 F VO \ \ \ \ \ \ -- \ ---------------- ------------I r-------------� r------------- EX. EASEMENT \ N 8501135" E 1334.29' P.B. 5, PG. 117 \ 1094.28' EX. WATERMAIN EASEMENT P.B. 6, PG. 45 EX. STORM EASEMENT P. B. 6, PG. 45 N 85.44'37" E 325.00' 8 N z X 0 0 o_ N w S 85 44 37 W 132.75 N � 1.567 AC a � i I N RESERVE "C" H � 1 1 � I (SEE NOTE ") 0 66 o Lu Ni 9v N 4 D' 16.533 AC. LOT 63 °o ^ 0.226 AC I q 2 a 1 i i i I 1DO I i S 85'44'37" W 132.75' Z F va z a 0 M U)- - j 0 67 I 01 I N 85'44'37" E 325.00' LOT s2 Q q 0.226 AC 1 ^ EX. DRAINAGE EASEMENT \ 1 N I i t I \ - - S 85'44'37" W 132.75'I P.B. 6, PG. 45 KE -X. STORM EASEMENT 1 I EX. STORM EASEMENT \ \ o P.B. 6, PG. 45 0 N P.B. 6, PG. 45 LOT 67 ORal 68 1 4 N N O I Of 0.226 AC I 11o EX. DRAINAGE EASEMENT -> w P.B. 6, PG. 45 - _ 3 S 85'44'37" W 132.75' '„� \ - N N I I LO I 6' SIDEWALK/SHARED 1 I t 1 USE PATH EASEMENT \ m o l 69 1 0 00 1 1 \ LOT 60 n 0.226 AC z L - EX. DRAINAGE EASEMENT S 85'44'37" W 132.75' N 85'44'37" E 130.00' P.B. 6, PG 45 \ 1� S 8>'48'091, E 111 EX. DRA/NAGE - - 1)a. 88' EASEMENT EX. STORM EASEMENT E P.B. 6, T 45 EX. STORM EASEMENT i P. B. 6, PG. 45 Z S 0 P.B. 6, PG. 45 I 0 NO o I N b L9 LOT 59 I 70 01 0 9 0 \ p0 0.221 AC 4 �' 0.226 AC I i I N DRAINAGE P oi- 1 I i Z4� �,� EASEMENT �ApS 85'44'37" W 132.75' Y 1 0 DRAINAGE �19 IN 85'44'37" E 130.00'z -J PULITE HOMES of OHIO LLC EASEMENT 0.419 AC2' SIDEWALK/SHAREDI o 6' SIDEWALK/SHARED 00 18 w 18.9600 32.328 ACRES USE PATH EASEMENTI z USE PATH EASEMENT lIN 201710050008369 0.403 AC oo 71 t o 0 yo 0- ---- _ 20' SANITARYLOT 58 ^0.226 AC I al i 0.221 AC0 N PULTE HOMES OF OHIO LLC EX. DRA/NAGE ?6' WATERMAIN �F 9.3672 ACRES (PARCEL l) EASEMENT EASEMENT C> �` �•y IN. 201807040000145 P.B. 6, PG. 45 1 N > 14, �' GCS 4 C1 S 85'44'37" W 132.75' I IN 85'44'37" E 130.00' ur \ �8 \ \ ;l \� <6 5 m i= - - DRAINAGE 1>' Io C16 lv �� 2' SIDEWALK/SHARED EX. STORM Iz I 11 I� EASEMENT `\ 12' RAD. C15 � USE PATH EASEMENT EASEMENT 0I = R EX. DRAINAGE I i P.B. 6, PG. 451 o 72 19 0 to I� 11 _0 - _ N 85'44'37" E 222.00' EASEMENT _ ro I 20' STORM I 11 0o I 20 LOT 57 n 0.226 AC m' ^ 1 ^ i� 0.221 AC ^ 74.00' 74.00' 74.00' P.B. 6, PG. 45 I EASEMENT � g� i 0.344 AC M IR ICO R m 17 RESERVE "F" - - - I ' 0.276 AC �1`, \ O \\gyp, ;, (SEE NOTE "D") S 85'44'37" W 132.75' I iN 85'44'37" E 130.00' 0 0 0 3 I n 0.010 AC. EY 51A EASEMENT EX EX STORM " � n 0 N S 85'44'37" W 141.52' �,� \ G S 6 CV LOT 56 I I P.B. 6, PG 45 1 ml 0 EASEMENT to y3 31 14 31 15 13 a1 USE IPATH EASEMENT it p 806 p9 \ m ro P.B. 6, PG 45 �I 73 I m1� 0.221 AC N1 0.221 AC M 0.221 AC z1 16 hCu G^ F M EX. STORM <° i 12 N 1 1 N `�' /3 N 0.273 AC 1 0? ,?.S EASEMENT rn I 0.267 AC `� '� ;� EX. DRAINAGE o 0.247 AC , _ / 8' O AATERMAIN ESMT I m EASEMENT ------------------ _- P.B._ 6, PG_ 45 _ ,_4:X , B. 6, PG 45 .' p �`. `� P.B. 6, PG 45 16.5' WATERMAIN /'^ / - - - - _ Z EME 20' BUILDING UNE z BUILD UNE- a RESERVE "E" W OL�RVWIVER WAY 0NO ARKI07.7NG � N07E 1" �h `,6 0 105_00'_ _ 74.00' _ -74 00` _- _--74,00--__- 04.86' --- ----------- /C, ^/ v R (SEE NOTE P) 0 628 AC. 1 '.61.43' o / $ N (50' RIGHT-OF-WAY) I ND PARKING 6 SIDEWALK/SHARED PULTE HOMES of OHIO LLC - - N N 85'44'37" E 157.75' SEE NOTE 9' USE PATH EASEMENT 6.6328 ACRES (PARCEL o) 20' ND PARKING iG1 SANITARY EASEMENT N • " - -I - _ 543.29' IN. 20180 1040000 7 45 SEE NOTE .1. N 85'44 37 E 0 EX. 3,4NlTARY EASEMENT OLIVER WAY N 85'44'37" E 701.04' 2' SIDEWALK/SHARED EX DRAINAGE EASEMENT R� 45.75' - P.B. 6, PG. 45 (50' RIGHT-OF-WAY) USE PATH EASEMENT P.B. 6, PG 45 L1 2.56' / N 70.00 70.00'- -70.00'. -70.00'- -70.00'- -70.00' 75.00' - -77.00' 72.00' 2 3' •-80 00'- C 42 E S' 892 10' S 31'41' ' --------0 --- ---- ____ 20' BUILDING LINE 13 43.30' --- -- EX. DRA/NA E EASEMENT y0' - --- - - _____�27�\ Of rl:P.B. 6, PG 45 ^ m "� rn 20' SANITARY n�i a 1 L3 g.. 2 M I� 2 ry 0 rn STORM 2' SIDEWALK/SHARED F " n n 0 M EASEMENT M EASEMENT n I USE PATH EASEMENT 90 79 3 32 wl 31 �I 3o Awl�I S 22.07'27" E 25.07' S 85' 1 RESERVE F-1 W 424.71 REPLAT OF LOT 73, PARK PLACE SECTION 3 AND RESERVE F, PARK PLACE SECTION 4 (UNION COUNTY) P.B. 5, PAGE 146 (FRANKLIN COUNTY) PLAT BOOK 706, PAGE 3 LOT 33 N LINE TABLE 10.222 AC w1 LINE # DIRECTION LENGTH L1 N 85'44'37" E 8.99' L2 S 71'25.33' E 66.19' L3 N 85'46'40" E 71.47' L4 N 23'08'17" E 171.74' L5 N 23'08'17" E 15.52' L6 S 66'51.43' E 20.00' L7 S 23'08'17" W 30.12' LB N 3645'01" E 96.93' L9 N 73'17'16" E 151.86' L10 S 58'27.30' E 120.51' L11 N 28'12'24" W 49.27' L12 S 61'47'36" W 20.52' L13 S 40'44'37" W 35.36' L14 S 49'15.23' E 35.36' FLE S40'44'37" RECEPTACLES, BIKE RACKS, SEATING, LANDSCAPING AND/OR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT W 35.36' 16 N 49 15'23" W 35.36' S 85' 1 RESERVE F-1 W 424.71 REPLAT OF LOT 73, PARK PLACE SECTION 3 AND RESERVE F, PARK PLACE SECTION 4 (UNION COUNTY) P.B. 5, PAGE 146 (FRANKLIN COUNTY) PLAT BOOK 706, PAGE 3 LOT 33 N 0.223 AC IN 10.222 AC w1 0.221 AC IN1 29 10.220 AC 1N 28 0.219 AC N1 27 0.218 AC 1 N1 26 0.233 AC 1 w 25 0.238 AC 1 w 24 0.221 1 1 w 23 w 1 I 22 -�" IRON PIPE ACCEPTANCE OF THIS PLAT, SHOULD BE REVIEWED TO DETERMINE THE THEN CURRENT r --- -------------I REQUIREMENTS. THIS NOTICE IS SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF NOTIFYING THE PUBLIC OF THE S 05'41.08' W EXISTENCE, AT THE TIME OF PLATTING, OF CERTAIN ZONING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THIS 11' IRON PIPE PROPERTY. THIS NOTICE SHALL NOT BE INTERPRETED AS CREATING PLAT OR SUBDIVISION FNO zANOE• RESTRICTIONS, PRIVATE USE RESTRICTIONS COVENANTS RUNNING THE LAND OR TITLE S 16'46.41' E ENCUMBRANCES OF ANY NATURE, AND IS FOR THE INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. LOT 107 "B" 44.42' 1N N S 08'56.23" E 1M N AC 1 1M 0.244 AC �l 0.247 AC wl 21 61.50' WE-96T7ssuED INFORMATION REQUIRED SO THAT EASEMENT AREAS, IN ADDITION TO THOSE LO SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THESE PROVIDERS FOR THE INSTALLATION N 70'49.05' W AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL OF THEIR MAIN UNE FACILITIES, COULD CONVENIENTLY BE SHOWN ON 61.50' 20 DRAINAG ,n PART THEREOF CAN BE ACQUIRED BY A COMPETENT EXAMINATION OF THE THEN CURRENT N 05'58'33' W PUBLIC RECORDS, INCLUDING THOSE IN THE UNION COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE. ;� NOTE "D" : RESERVES A, B. AND F SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. 37.92' rWMR STRUCTURES IN THESE RESERVES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DUBLIN: N 4733'41' E C10 N N RESERVES C. D. AND E SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY. STORM WATER STRUCTURES IN I N THESE RESERVES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DUBLIN. 0.633 AC C11 125.00' 1520'50" o I N z z STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES. EASEMENT RESERVE C: SOFT SURFACE SHARED -USE PATH, PLAYGROUNDS, TRASH AND RECYCLING m RECEPTACLES, BIKE RACKS, SEATING, LANDSCAPING AND/OR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT N 4428.30" E a 125.00' 2726'19" 59.86' r N a z LOT 104 RESERVES E AND F. LANDSCAPING 61.50' 26751'19" 20' N 87.08' Vo NOTE "E": ACREAGE BREAKDOWN -'si• O N 0= N ACREAGE IN LOTS 6-32 & 65-73 INCLUSIVE' 10.693 ACRES N ACREAGE IN RIGHTS-OF-WAY: 2.464 ACRES N - N ACREAGE OUT OF 16 ACRES (PID:3900290200000) (MAP NO:1470000008000) 9.333 ACRES P ACREAGE OUT OF 32.328 ACRES (PID:3900290110000) (MAP NO:1470000007000) 21.057 ACRES LOT 103 18'08'51" �1 NOTE "F": THE AREA OF LAND IN EACH OF LOTS 6-8 & 21-23, BOTH INCLUSIVE, DESIGNATED j N 8417'13" E HEREON AS "TREE PRESERVATION ZONE" IS SUBJECT TO AUTUMN ROSE WOODS DEVELOPMENT TEXT. DRAINAGE PROTECTED AGAINST INJURY OR DAMAGE TO BRANCHES, TRUNKS OR ROOTS FROM CONSTRUCTION AND EXCAVATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT TEXT. NOTE "H" - PARKING:THE CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO MAY RESTRICT OR ELIMINATE ON -STREET PARKING, WHERE INDICATED HEREON, WITHIN THE DRIVES AND WAYS DEDICATED HEREON. THE OWNERS OF THE FEE SIMPLE TITLES TO ALL OF THE LOTS IN AUTUMN ROSE WOODS, SECTION 2, THEIR HEIRS, o N SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, HEREBY WANE ANY AND ALL OBJECTIONS TO SAID PARKING RESTRICTION OR LOT 102 N 10' cn cn EASEMENT cn EASEMENT `t 0 o LOT 73-A N EX. SANITARY 10• 70.00' 70.00' 70.01' 70.00' 'n 70.00' 70.00' 75.00' P.B. 6, PG 45 � �' 0' `7 15' TREE PRESERVATION ZONE T/ co EX EASEMENT P.B. 5, PG. 65 77.00' 72.00' 20. 3' 80 00 80.12' (SEE NOTE "H7� 222.09' P.B. 102, PG 62 LOT 74 - - - - EX STORM EASEMENT S 85'1 '44" W 1046.45' LOT 45 LOT 46 LOT 47 Lor s7 Lor s8 LOT 69 LOT 17 P.B. 6, PG. 45 - - LOT 47 - - - LOT 42 -------- ------ LOT 43 ---- LOT 44 RESERVE"D" PARK PLACE SECTION 3 LOT 70 F" IRON PIPE FND '7ANOE' PARK PLACE SECTION 1 r \ PARK PLACE SECTION 2 FEX. 35' DRAINAGE EASEMENT SEE NOTE "D" (UNION CO.) P.B. 5, PG. 65 -I - P.B. 5, PAGES 33-3� EX. EASEMENT P.B. 5, PAGE 41 P.B. 5, PG. 41 I 0.062 AC. (FRA. CO.) P.B. 102, PG. 62 EX. EASEMENT P. 8./ 5, PG 65 \ AND P.B. 102, P 62 P.B. 5, PG 41 I � I � I ri' � 8 7 6 5 4 3 NORTH SCALE IN FEET 0 2 1 1 \ NOTE "A" - MINIMUM SETBACKS: ZONING REGULATIONS FOR AUTUMN ROSE WOODS SECTION 2 0 IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF PLATTING SPECIFY THE FOLLOWING DIMENSIONS FOR THE MINIMUM O FRONT, SIDE AND REAR YARD SETBACKS FOR EACH LOT: \ FRONT 20 FEET \ SIDE YARD 6 FEET EACH SIDE N 501131.14" E REAR YARD 25 FEET A HYLAND-CROY ROAD 150 FEET \ TREE PRESERVATION ZONE \ SAID ZONING REGULATIONS AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO PASSED SUBSEQUENT TO -�" IRON PIPE ACCEPTANCE OF THIS PLAT, SHOULD BE REVIEWED TO DETERMINE THE THEN CURRENT FND HOY" REQUIREMENTS. THIS NOTICE IS SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF NOTIFYING THE PUBLIC OF THE S 05'41.08' W EXISTENCE, AT THE TIME OF PLATTING, OF CERTAIN ZONING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THIS 11' IRON PIPE PROPERTY. THIS NOTICE SHALL NOT BE INTERPRETED AS CREATING PLAT OR SUBDIVISION FNO zANOE• RESTRICTIONS, PRIVATE USE RESTRICTIONS COVENANTS RUNNING THE LAND OR TITLE S 16'46.41' E ENCUMBRANCES OF ANY NATURE, AND IS FOR THE INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. LOT 107 "B" 44.42' NOTE - FEMA ZONE: AT THE TIME OF PLATTING, ALL OF AUTUMN ROSE WOODS SECTION 2 S 08'56.23" E IS WITHIN AN AREA NOT AVAILABLE THROUGH WWW.FEMA.GOV. "PANEL NOT PRINTED' IS GIVEN 61.50' FOR SUBJECT AREA, DUE TO BEING CLASSIFIED AS ZONE X AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD 68.12' IDENTIFIED, COMMUNITY PANEL 39159CO500D (DATED 12/06/2008). - NOTE "C" : AT THE TIME OF PLATTING, ELECTRIC, CABLE, AND TELEPHONE SERVICE PROVIDERS 61.50' WE-96T7ssuED INFORMATION REQUIRED SO THAT EASEMENT AREAS, IN ADDITION TO THOSE 72.92' SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THESE PROVIDERS FOR THE INSTALLATION N 70'49.05' W AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL OF THEIR MAIN UNE FACILITIES, COULD CONVENIENTLY BE SHOWN ON 61.50' THIS PLAT EXISTING RECORDED EASEMENT INFORMATION ABOUT AUTUMN ROSE WOODS OR ANY LOT 106 PART THEREOF CAN BE ACQUIRED BY A COMPETENT EXAMINATION OF THE THEN CURRENT N 05'58'33' W PUBLIC RECORDS, INCLUDING THOSE IN THE UNION COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE. - NOTE "D" : RESERVES A, B. AND F SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. 37.92' rWMR STRUCTURES IN THESE RESERVES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DUBLIN: N 4733'41' E C10 z z RESERVES C. D. AND E SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY. STORM WATER STRUCTURES IN o THESE RESERVES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF DUBLIN. z z LOT 105 C11 125.00' 1520'50" o RESERVES A AND B: SHARED -USE PATH, ENTRY FEATURES, SEATING, LANDSCAPING AND/OR z z STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES. 125.00' RESERVE C: SOFT SURFACE SHARED -USE PATH, PLAYGROUNDS, TRASH AND RECYCLING m RECEPTACLES, BIKE RACKS, SEATING, LANDSCAPING AND/OR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT N 4428.30" E FACILITIES. 125.00' 2726'19" 59.86' RESERVE D: SHARED -USE PATH N a z LOT 104 RESERVES E AND F. LANDSCAPING 61.50' 26751'19" 289.66' 87.08' Vo NOTE "E": ACREAGE BREAKDOWN W I TOTAL ACREAGE: 30.390 ACRES 0= N ACREAGE IN LOTS 6-32 & 65-73 INCLUSIVE' 10.693 ACRES N 2759'14" W ACREAGE IN RIGHTS-OF-WAY: 2.464 ACRES 61.50' ACREAGE IN RESERVES: 17.233 ACRES 5.91' ACREAGE OUT OF 16 ACRES (PID:3900290200000) (MAP NO:1470000008000) 9.333 ACRES P ACREAGE OUT OF 32.328 ACRES (PID:3900290110000) (MAP NO:1470000007000) 21.057 ACRES LOT 103 18'08'51" �1 NOTE "F": THE AREA OF LAND IN EACH OF LOTS 6-8 & 21-23, BOTH INCLUSIVE, DESIGNATED j N 8417'13" E HEREON AS "TREE PRESERVATION ZONE" IS SUBJECT TO AUTUMN ROSE WOODS DEVELOPMENT TEXT. NOTE "G" - TREE PRESERVATION ZONE: IN THE AREAS DELINEATED HEREON, TREES WILL BE PROTECTED AGAINST INJURY OR DAMAGE TO BRANCHES, TRUNKS OR ROOTS FROM CONSTRUCTION AND EXCAVATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT TEXT. NOTE "H" - PARKING:THE CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO MAY RESTRICT OR ELIMINATE ON -STREET PARKING, WHERE INDICATED HEREON, WITHIN THE DRIVES AND WAYS DEDICATED HEREON. THE OWNERS OF THE FEE SIMPLE TITLES TO ALL OF THE LOTS IN AUTUMN ROSE WOODS, SECTION 2, THEIR HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, HEREBY WANE ANY AND ALL OBJECTIONS TO SAID PARKING RESTRICTION OR LOT 102 ELIMINATION. NORTH SCALE IN FEET 0 60 120 LEGEND DELTA 0 I.P. FOUND O I.P. SET (SEE SURVEY DATA) pp PERMANENT MARKER SET 122.95' (SEE SURVEY DATA) N 501131.14" E MAG NAIL SET A MAG NAIL FOUND 92.21' TREE PRESERVATION ZONE L 1J (SEE NOTE "H") CURVE TABLE CURVE # RADIUS DELTA LENGTH CHL CHB C1 100.00' 70'26'45" 122.95' 115.35' N 501131.14" E C2 75.00' 70'26'45" 92.21' 86.51' S 50.31.14' W C3 63.50' 19'13'27" 21.31' 21.21' S 05'41.08' W C4 63.50' 25'42'13' 1 28.49' 28.25' S 16'46.41' E C5 61.50' 41'22'50" 44.42' 43.46' S 08'56.23" E C6 61.50' 63'27'45" 68.12' 64.69' S 43'28'55" W C7 61.50' 6756'16' 72.92' 68.73' N 70'49.05' W C8 61.50' 61'44'48" 66.28' 63.12' N 05'58'33' W C9 61.50' 3519'40" 37.92' 37.32' N 4733'41' E C10 63.50' 4455'39" 49.79' 48.53' N 3745'41' E C11 125.00' 1520'50" 33.48' 33.38' N 2758'17' E C12 125.00' 2739'36" 60.34' 59.76' N 4428.30" E C13 125.00' 2726'19" 59.86' 59.29' N 7701'28' E C14 61.50' 26751'19" 289.66' 87.08' S 74'42.08' E C15 61.50' 1743'25' 19.02' 18.95' N 2759'14" W C16 61.50' 5'30'09" 5.91' 5.90' N 39'36.01' W C17 61.50' 18'08'51" 19.48' 19.40' j N 8417'13" E AV ,- r A77 Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. 250 Old Wilson Bridge Road • Suite 250 • Worthington, OH 43085 Ph: 614.540.6633 • 888.598.6808 • Fax: 614.540.6638 www.cecinc.com AUTUMN ROSE WOODS SECTION 2 DRAWN BY: MAS CHECKED BY: RWM I APPROVED BY: MAS DATE: JULY 2018 DWG SCALE: 1"=60' PROJECT NO: 150-620 DRAWING NO.: B 1;g100N:jAelI SHEET 2 OF 2 1 1 F E D e 0 Um n�a agesMne_D-r v" VOh'ilk os—�Iltspri 3islioor 3'r - ssi 0 ° o �1 �P. rEl lace -`�-a Burnside Ln yo7ore�r elfo Lr D 0,FfFT_ 'ED 1-7-M%VW/5Q iA 0 6 2017 CITY OF DUBLIN �tl�l1 y_ PLANNING FILE COPY Planning 1 2017 Case #i&o PLANNING APPLICATION This is the general application form for Boards and Commissions. In addition, applicants should submit a checklist vVith i --he requirements for the application b/pe indicated below, Attach additional sheets if necessary. I. REVIEW REQUESTED -__7M REQUESTED-__7MII. PROPERTY INFORMATION: Provide information about the property including existing and proposed development. Administrative Appeal Administrative Departure Amended Final Development Plan Amended Final Development Plan - Sign Basic Development Plan Review Basic Site Plan Review Community Plan Amendment Concept Plan Conditional Use Development Plan Review - Bridge Street District + Development Plan Review - West Innovation District Demolition Final Development Plan Final Plat Informal Review Master Sign Plan Minor Modification I Minor Project Review - Minor Subdivision _ Non -Use (Area) Variance Preliminary Development Plan/PUD Rezoning - Preliminary Plat Site Plan Review - Bridge Street District - Site Plan Review - West Innovation District Special Permit Standard District Rezoning Use Variance Waiver Review Wireless Communications Facility Zoning Code Amendment Property Address(es): 7540 and 7660 Hyland Croy Road, Jerome Twp., Union County Tax ID/Parcel Number(s) Parcel Size(s) in Acres (List All): (List Each Separately): 7540 -Parcel 1700290200000 7540-16.0 ac 7660 -Parcel 1700290110000 7660-32.33 ac Existing Land Use/Development: Existing Zoning District: Agricultural with building Proposed Land Use/ Development: Proposed Zoning District: Planned single family residential SFPRD III. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER(S): Indicate the person(s) or organization(s) who own the property proposed for development. Name (Individual or Organization): See attached Mailing Address (Street, City, State, ZIP): Email/Phone Number: For questions or more information, please contact Planning at 514.410.4600 1 wvvw.dublinohioUSA.gov Id. S : Complete this section if the personjorganization representing theapplicant/ property owner is different from the licant. m Not Apphcabie F Name (Individual or Organization): Pulte Homes of Ohio, LLC Mailing Address (Street, City, State, ZIP): 4900 Tuttle Crossing, Dublin OH 43016 Phone Number: 614-376-1018/614-989-7687 Email: matthew.callahan@pulte.com Not Applicable Name (Individual or Organization): Thomas L. Hart, Attorney Mailing Address (Street, City, State, ZIP): Two Miranova Place, Ste. /00, Columbus, OH 43215 Phone Number: 614-340-7415 Email: thart@isaacwiles.com p Not Applicable 1, R. 011,ver & Deborah L Griffith, than grope. y wourn®r, hereby authorize Pulte Homes of .Ohio LLC and Thomas L. Hart. Attorney To act as my representative(s) in all matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application, including modification to the application. I agree to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated representative (listed in Sections III and/or IV). Original Signature of Property Owner (listed in Section II): 1/.-. U ' ii \ r...../, 2-0/ Subscribed and sworn before me this day of UYI'e 20 ��O �s State of O\rito 9l�S SUmpo swi f �` Jif R. Hayes County of fr rc. rd���r� Notary Public i Notary Publk, Shite of ft ft r W Cenvniiiiiition Emirs 17417-7 I, R. Oliver R, Deborah L Griffith , the property owner or authorized City representatives to enter, photograph and post a notice on the property cescrit�qd in theypppl�i Original Signature of Property Owner or Authorized Representative: hereby authorize Date: ,::or questions or more information, please contact Planning at 614.410.4600 i www.dubiinohioUSA.gov EVERYTHING MW (. '�{ GROWS Page 3 of 3 VI. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT OFACKNOWLEDGMENT: This section must be cornioleted with an original signature and notarized. Original Document Attached I, R. Oliver & Deborah L Griffith, the property owner or authorized representative, have read and understand the contents of this application. The information contained in this application, attached exhibits and other igfs�fmation,�u i ed is complete and in all respects true and correct to best of my knowledge and belief. i —T— Original Signature of Property Owner or Authorized Representative: �) Date: I1, Subscribed and sworn before me this i� day of �Ur� 20AI EOE r•41, State Of �"L\l7 tstamp or Sea, Hayo County of fi-c C\U-� Notary P R'= **Notary Public, Sfalle of Ohio►tdds Idv Convrrkeion F_xnres 12-07-2 Case Title: Po D , AV TU W� R0� e ODS Date Received: (01511-1 Case Number: �? o fa -;i, F•D ? P Amount Received: $ 5- q y$. �0 � Next Decision Due Date (If Applicable): Receipt Number: Reviewing Body (Circle One): ART ARB BZA CC C Final Date of Determination: Map Zone:., Determination or Action: Related Cases: Ordinance Number (If Applicable): For questions or more information, please contact Planning at 614.4110.4000 1 wrnnni.dublinohloUSA.gov IV. APPLICANT(S): Complete this section if the person/organization representing the applicant/ property owner is different from the applicant. Not Applicable Name (Individual or Organization): Pulte Homes of Ohio, LLC Mailing Address (Street, City, State, ZIP): 4900 Tuttle Crossing, Dublin OH 43016 Phone Number: 614-376-1018/614-989-7687 Email: matthew.callahan@pulte.com Not ApplkaMe Name (Individual or Organization): Thomas L. Hart, Attorney Mailing Address (Street, City, State, ZIP): Two Miranova Place, Ste. 700, Columbus, OH 43215 Phone Number: 614-340-7415 Email: thart@isaacwiles.com Not Applicable I, Johnston Means, the property owner, hereby authorize Pulte Homes of Ohio LLC and Thomas L Hart, Attorney To act as my representative(s) in all matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application, including modification to the application. I agree to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated representative (listed in Sections III and/or IV). Original Signature of Property Owner (listed in Section II); ;f" Date: Sd`wt`t'klA( o, Subscribed and sworn before me this day of �uY� e 20 t 7 (P S •,� State of 1'� r '9�'s Stamp or Seal County of 'Fc-r-nKl,r\ Notary Pubs L t JOU R. Hayes NOWY RA11r, SW Of OW I, Johnston Means, the property owner or authorized representative, hereby authorize City representatives to enter, photograph and post a notice on the property described in the application. Original Signature of Property Owner or(Authorized Representativ ,� . Date:l l For questions or more irformation, please contact Planning at 614.410.4600 1 www.dublinchioUSA.gov Planning 12Q17 Case #16-o86 PLANNING APPLICATION This is the general application form for Scards and Commissions. Tn addition, applicants should submit a checklist with the requirements for the application type indicated below. Attach additional sheets if necessary, I. REVIEW REQUEST Administrative Appeal Administrative Departure Amended Final Development Plan Amended Final Development Plan - Sign Basic Development Plan Review Basic Site Plan Review Community Plan Amendment Concept Plan Conditional Use Development Plan Review - Bridge Street District Development Plan Review - West Innovation District Demolition Final Development Plan Final Plat r Informal Review Master Sign Plan Minor Modification Minor Project Review Minor Subdivision Non -Use (Area) Variance Preliminary Development Plan/PUD Rezoning Preliminary Plat Site Plan Review - Bridge Street District Site Plan Review - West Innovation District C Special Permit AAL Standard District Rezoning C Use Variance L Waiver Review - Wireless Communications Facility - Zoning Code Amendment Property Address(es): 7540 and 7660 Hyland Croy Road, Jerome Twp., Union County Tax ID/Parcel Number(s) Parcel Size(s) in Acres (List All): (List Each Separately): 7Jv Pa, �i�mwm�umvavnwnnnn ticon 75n0.16 7660 -Parcel 1700290110000 7660-32.33 ac Existing Land Use/Development: Existing Zoning District: Agricultural with building Proposed Land Use/Development: Proposed Zoning District: Planned single family residential SFPRD Name (Individual or Organization): See attached Mailing Address (Street, City, State, ZIP): Email/Phone Number: ror questions or more information, please contact Planning at 614.4' 146CC 1 wwwq.dublinohioUSA.gcv i Page of ANT'S AFFIDAVIT OFACKNOWLEDGMENT: This section must be com leted with an ori 'nal si nature and notarized. Original Document I, Johnston Means, the property owner or authorized representative, have read and understand the contents of this application. The information contained in this application, attached exhibits and other information submitted is complete and in all respects true and correct to best of my knowledge and belief. Original Signature of Property Owner or Authorized Representative:e Date: Subscribed and sworn before me this 15*4' day of --Sint- 20A'j �y,� State of 01n !Q = til* "tI" County of 1; c <N 4 \ Notary Public — > ' * #_ NotaryRW St* Of Ohio �; Off: Mry CWrIilleW Expires 12-07-2020 Case Title: Date Received: Case Number: Amount Received: Next Decision Due Date (If Applicable): Receipt Number: Reviewing Body (Circle One): ART ARB BZA CC PZC Final Date of Determination: Map Zone: Determination or Action: Related Cases: Ordinance Number (If Applicable): For questions or more information, please contact Planning at 614.410.4600 1 www.dublinchiouSA.gov I City of RECORD OF ACTION Dublin Planning , Zoning Commission OHIO, USA Thursday, August 10, 2017_ 1 6:30 prn The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 3. PUD — Autumn Rose Woods 7150 & 7270 Hyland Croy Road 17-062FDP/FP Final Development Plan/Final Plat Proposal: The subdivision and development of 47 -acres for 73 single-family lots and 21 -acres of open space, and public rights-of-way. Location: East side of Hyland -Croy Road approximately 1,200 feet south of the intersection with Tullymore Drive. Request: Review and approval of a Final Development Plan under the provisions of Code Section 153.050, and review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a Final Plat under the provisions of the Subdivision Regulations. Applicant: Matt Callahan, Pulte Homes. Planning Contact: Nichole M. Martin, Planner I. Contact Information: (614) 410-4635, nmartin@dublin.oh.us Case Information:Up,8dublinohiousagov/Dzc/17-062 MOTION: Mr. Miller moved, Ms. Salay seconded, to approve this Final Development Plan because it is consistent with all of the applicable review criteria, with four conditions: 1) The applicant remove all hazardous trees and invasive species from Reserve C within proximity of private property and the proposed path; 2) That the plans be updated to include a note that ensures use of construction details that promote trees preservation techniques in the field location and construction of the shared use path; 3) The applicant work with the City's Landscape Inspector to make appropriate shrub selections along the southwest side of the stormwater basin; and 4) The developer request inspection of the tree protection fencing by the City's Landscape Inspector prior to the removal of any trees to ensure preserved trees will not be impacted. *Matt Callahan agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 4-0. RESULT: This Final Development Plan was approved. RECORDED VOTES: Victoria Newell Absent Amy Salay Yes Chris Brown Yes Cathy De Rosa Yes Robert Miller Yes Deborah Mitchell Absent Stephen Stidhem Absent Page 1 of 2 PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.4747 dublinohiousa.gov The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 3. PUD — Autumn Rose Woods 7150 & 7270 Hyland Croy Road 17-062FDP/FP Final Development Plan/Final Plat MOTION #2: Mr. Miller moved, Ms. Salay seconded, to approve this Final Plat because it is consistent with the Subdivision Regulations, with one condition: 1) That the applicant ensure that any minor technical adjustment to the plat are made prior to City Council submittal. *Matt Callahan agreed to the above condition. VOTE: 4-0. RESULT: This Final Plat will be forwarded to City Council with a recommendation of approval. RECORDED VOTES: Victoria Newell Absent Amy Salay Yes Chris Brown Yes Cathy De Rosa Yes Robert Miller Yes Deborah Mitchell Absent Stephen Stidhem Absent STAFF CERTIFICATION Nichole M. Martin Planner I Page 2 of 2 PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.4747 dublinohiousa.gov ® E RYO Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 10, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 19 of 31 u u u u _ ... _ -. a ■_ .. _ _ _ ... _. _ _ ,. _ .- _... .., _ _ u .._. � _ u _ __ u __ u ■- __ _ _ _ u ■- u u u u 3. PUD —Autumn Rose Woods 7150 & 7270 Hyland -Croy Road 17-O62FDP/FP Final Development Plan/Final Plat The Vice Chair, Chris Brown, said the following application is for the subdivision and development on 47 acres for 73 single-family lots, 21 acres of open space, and public rights-of-way. He said the site is on the east side of Hyland -Croy Road, approximately 1,200 feet south of the intersection with Tullymore Drive. He said this is a request for a review and approval of a Final Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050, and a review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a Final Plat under the provisions of the Subdivision Regulations. The Vice Chair swore in anyone intending on addressing the Commission in regard to this case. Nichole Martin went through the background and reviewed the process. Ms. Martin presented the Final Development Plan and explained it would be completed in two phases. The first phase, she said, is for 37 lots as well as utilities to extend into the second phase but completed with phase one, and for Reserves A and B. She said phase two is for 36 lots and for Reserves C — F, which she noted on the screen. Ms. Martin said staff relies on the Final Development Plan to provide final details for Open Space, Landscaping, and Stormwater Management. She said all of the reserves will be owned by the City of Dublin, however, Reserves A and B will maintained by the HOA as well as Reserve F. She presented the Open Space and Landscaping plan that contains the entry feature with incorporated sign. Ms. Martin said the applicant has proposed a formal entry feature at the intersection of Hyland -Croy Road and Johnston Drive. She said they are proposing limestone piers with modest entry feature signs with the text "Autumn Rose Woods" in a calligraphy font and accented with a split -rail fence, which will consist of unfinished pressure treated wood to enhance the rural roadway character. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 10, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 20 of 31 Ms. Martin said Reserve C represents 16 acres of contiguous woods that are preserved as part of this application. She said the existing split -rail fence around the entire perimeter of that open space was approved to be removed with the Rezoning. She pointed out that Reserve C will be publically accessible to all of the residents of Dublin and also include a future field located shared -use path to connect from the neighborhood to the south through Reserve D and Reserve C and terminating at Park Place Park. Ms. Martin said final details are also included for the stormwater basin, which the function will be managed by the City. She reported the applicant has worked with staff to refine the edges and soften the landscaping, specifically across the back of homes to provide a buffer. She noted one of the conditions is that the shrubs be determined in coordination with the City Landscape Inspector. The northeast side, she said, will be a "No Mow" area to minimize costs of maintenance and to transition to the more naturalized landscape. Ms. Martin stated Reserve E is a wetland that is proposed to be maintained as -is and maintained by the City. Reserve F, she noted, represents a landscape treatment in the terminus of the Oliver Way cul-de- sac bulb. Ms. Martin said the Final Development Plan is the point in the application where staff requires additional details to be provided on preservation protection and replacement of trees and presented an exhibit. She indicated the Developer has made a significant effort to meet the City's Conservation Design Resolution Principles so many trees were preserved; however, a number of sizeable trees will be removed with the construction of Oliver Way cul-de-sac. She reported a Tree Waiver was granted as part of the Rezoning request by City Council. She stated that Tree Waiver permits trees to be replaced per Code with the exception that trees 6 — 24 caliper inches will be replaced tree -for -tree and landmark trees will be replaced inch -for -inch. The applicant is required to replace 668.5 inches but the site will only accommodate 500 inches; therefore, the remainder will be paid as a Fee -in -Lieu of $16,100 to the City of Dublin Parks and Recreation Department. Ms. Martin presented the Road, Pedestrian, and Bike Network plan. She noted these are identical to what was reviewed at the Preliminary Development Plan stage with the exception of that additional shared path to be extended along Johnston Drive. Ms. Martin reported that Engineering has reviewed the proposed Utility Plan, which she presented. She explained a 12 -inch water line will be extended along Hyland -Croy Road and the existing home will be brought onto City water and sewer as part of phase one of this development. Ms. Martin said the Final Plat is the final step in delineating lot requirements. She presented the proposed Final Plat and said the lots are consistent with what was shown in the Preliminary Plat. She noted the plat delineates open spaces, dedicates public right-of-ways, delineates building lines, and delineates tree preservation zones. Ms. Martin reported that part of staffs review of this application has found that the criteria for a Final Development Plan are met with the four conditions as presented. With respect to the Final Plat, Ms. Martin said this is also met but with one condition that any minor technical adjustments be made prior to City Council review. Ms. Martin stated the Final Development Plan is recommended for approval for a determination by this body and the Final Plat is a recommendation of approval to City Council. The Vice Chair invited the applicant to speak Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 10, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 21 of 31 Matt Callahan, Pulte Homes, 4900 Tuttle Crossing Boulevard, Dublin, said he is joined this evening by Greg Chilog with the Edge Group. He said this has been a 2.5 year process starting with a Concept Review before the Commission. He offered to answer any questions. Cathy De Rosa said the Commission did not receive any architectural pictures or drawings - just information provided in the Development Text and it was pretty vanilla. She said one of the goals is to make sure this proposal fits within the character of the surrounding area. She said she is struggling with how the Commission is going to know that. Ms. Martin said single-family architecture is not a requirement so applicants in some cases choose to offer it; from a staff perspective, they have had a lot of challenges in administering plans when architecture is shown. Therefore, she said they suggest that the Preliminary Development Plan or the Development Text be substantially descriptive in order to stand in place of pictures because it is ultimately regulatory. She said they work with the applicant at the Preliminary Development Plan phase to ensure that they were being sensitive to the most visible lots, especially those with frontage along Hyland -Croy Road so those lots have additional standards as well as specific prohibited materials. Furthermore, she said the building permits will be reviewed against the Appearance Code. She said this issue was raised at City Council and architecture was shared with Council as part of the rezoning. Bob Miller asked if the Commission had seen any architectural drawings. Mr. Callahan said he did not recall presenting elevations to the Commission but when requested at City Council, he passed out some elevations and renderings. He said the homes in this series/collection are fairly new. He said the designs shared with Council were somewhat preliminary but have since been refined. He said the standards in the text are the same used for several neighborhoods in Dublin in recent years such as Riviera, Celtic Crossing, and Wellington Reserve. He added they are well aware of the architectural standards of Dublin Appearance Code and there are additional regulations in the text for the lots that face Hyland -Croy Road and those adjacent to open spaces. He said they added features like decorative garage doors and things of that nature. He indicated the appearance will be consistent with a lot of newer neighborhoods being developed. The Vice Chair invited the public to speak. Sandy Hite, 7505 Hyland -Croy Road, Plain City, said she lives right across from the existing horse farm and have been there for 11 years. She added their three children go to Dublin Schools and with the windows open they can hear the horses whinny. She said she cannot talk the owners into not selling their property. She asked if Dublin has a plan for Hyland -Croy Road. She stated it is a nightmare coming up and down this single, lane road, especially at peak hours. She said if another 73 houses are added, which could bring 150 more cars, we need to plan responsibly. She suggested the infrastructure be handled prior to the development of this proposal. Mr. Brown said some things are in the Commission's purview and some things are not. Amy Salay said that roadway is not Dublin's and the traffic generated from this development is going to be minimal compared to the 300+ multi -family homes that Jerome Township has approved. She noted the City of Dublin cannot take responsibility for the road when all that development is happening outside of Dublin's limits. She said the challenges going forward are at present the responsibility of Union County. She recalled the City did a Hyland -Croy Road character study a few years ago to design a beautiful area but implementation in not in the foreseeable future. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 10, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 22 of 31 Ms. Hite said even though she has a Plain City address, she has been in Dublin approximately 19 years on and off and she considers herself a Dublinite. She said when someone buys a Dublin home here and pays Dublin taxes, and yet the main thoroughfare coming in and out of their development is on Hyland - Croy Road she thought Dublin would be responsible. Ms. Martin said, as part of this application, an Infrastructure Agreement was approved by City Council on May 22, 2017, which detailed how the developer will contribute to off-site improvements and a number of those improvements are within Union County. She said the City will work with Union County to get those funds allocated to specific intersections that were identified in the Traffic Impact Study, which was required as part of the rezoning. Specifically out in front of the site, she noted there will be a right-hand turn lane and a left-hand turn lane built with the construction of phase one of this development. Ms. Hite said she found out through this whole process that apparently she actually owns half of Hyland - Croy land underneath the road and wonders what rights she has to that piece of land that now 150 more cars are going to go over 10 times a day. Mr. Brown said it is a right-of-way so every property almost always has utilities there. He understands her frustration with the City but they always try to get cooperation with Jerome Township. Ms. De Rosa clarified the turn lanes discussed will be implemented with phase one. Ms. Martin answered the turn lanes are with phase one but there is no timeline associated with the implementation of the other off-site contributions/improvements. Michael Hendershot clarified that in the Traffic Impact Study there were three intersections where they were about monetary contributions that would be made. For Hyland -Croy and Post Roads, he said, the contribution was made with the recording of the first phasing of the Plat and the other two intersections are due with the recording of the second Plat. Therefore, he said, there is timing associated with the monetary contributions. Andrew Hite, 7505 Hyland -Croy Road, said it is not Dublin's road, however, for the traffic evaluation, the City did a mock up of turn lanes to which Mr. Brown confirmed. Mr. Hite said he now understands he has to go to Jerome Township with concerns but asked what information he can gain from the Traffic Impact Study that Dublin conducted. Ms. Salay suggested our engineers provide Mr. Hite with information of which there is a significant amount. Mr. Hendershot said the City of Dublin worked with Union County because they are the owners of the roadways so they have reviewed it and are in agreement with the outcome of the Traffic Impact Study. Ms. Salay added there is a ton of information available to the public. Mr. Papsidero indicated that additionally, there should have been a traffic study conducted for the Jacquemin Farms development proposal but he is not certain if it had been completed and that would be under the County Engineers purview in Union County. The Vice Chair called for any final comments. [Hearing none.] He called for a motion for the Final Development Plan followed by a motion for the Final Plat. He asked the applicant is he was in agreement with the four conditions as presented. Matt Callahan agreed. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission August 10, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 23 of 31 Motion and Vote Mr. Miller moved, Ms. Salay seconded, to approve the Final Development Plan with four conditions: 1) That the applicant remove all hazardous trees and invasive species from Reserve C within proximity of private property and the proposed path; 2) That the plans be updated to include a note that ensures the use of construction details that promote tree preservation techniques in the field location and construction of the shared use path; 3) That the applicant work with the City's Landscape Inspector to make appropriate shrub selections along the southwest side of the stormwater basin; and 4) That the developer request inspection of the tree protection fencing by the City's Landscape Inspector, prior to the removal of any trees to ensure preserved trees will not be impacted. The vote was as follows: Mr. Brown, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; and Mr. Miller, yes. (Approved 4 — 0) Motion and Vote Mr. Miller moved, Ms. Salay seconded, to recommend approval to City Council for a Final Plat with the following condition: 1) That the applicant ensure that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to City Council submittal. The Vice Chair asked the applicant if he was in agreement with that one condition to which he answered affirmatively. The vote was as follows: Ms. De Rosa, yes; Mr. Brown, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; and Mr. Miller, yes. (Recommended for Approval 4 — 0) 4. -� ' ' . r H ■. .. . .. .... ...... . . .. ... . --------------- ■ .-. .- . City of rublin OHIO. usn Planning and Zoning Commission August 10, 2017 17-062FDP/FP— AUTMUMN ROSE WOODS PUD Reviewing Board Summary Planning and Zoning Commission The subdivision and development of 47 -acres for 73 single - Site Location family lots and 21 -acres of open space, and public rights -of - East side of Hyland -Croy Road, approximately 1,200 way. feet south of the intersection with Tullymore Drive. Zoning Map Proposal Final Development Plan/Final Plat (FDP/FP) Zoning Planned Unit Development, Autumn Rose Woods Property Owner R. Oliver & Deborah L. Griffith Applicant/Representative Matthew Callahan, Pulte Homes of Ohio, LLC Applicable Land Use Regulations Zoning Code Section 153.050. Staff Recommendation Approval to the Planning and Zoning Commission for a Final Development Plan; and, a recommendation of approval to City Council for a Final Plat. Contents A. Context Map.................................................2 B. Overview......................................................3 C. Final Development Plan.................................3 D. Final Plat......................................................4 E. Criteria Analysis............................................7 F. Recommendations........................................9 Case Managers Nichole Martin, Planner I (614) 410-4635 nmartinnc dublin.oh.us Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Senior Planner/Current Planning Manager (614) 410-4675 chusaknc dublin.oh.us Next Steps Planning and Zoning Commission has final authority on the Final Development Plan. Upon a recommendation of approval from the Commission on the Final Plat that portion of the application will be forwarded to City Council for review and approval. City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Case 17-062FDP/FP I Autumn Rose Woods PUD Thursday, August 10, 2017 1 Page 2 of 9 A. Context Map 1 P -FP Final Development Plan/Final Plat 0 300 600 Autumn Rose Woods PUD City of Dublin 7540,7660 Hyland -Croy Road Feet City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Case 17-062FDP/FP I Autumn Rose Woods PUD Thursday, August 10, 2017 1 Page 3 of 9 B. Overview 1. Case Summary The site is consists of two lots totaling ±47.37 acres with approximately 1,000 feet of frontage along Hyland -Croy Road. The approved Preliminary Development Plan is for 73 single-family lots with approximately 21 acres of open space and five public streets. The Final Development Plan is required to comply with all zoning regulations of the Planned District, and further refine Open Space, Landscaping, Tree Replacement, Street Network, Stormwater Mangament, and Utilities. 2. Background In March 2017, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and recommended approval to City Council for the Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat. Council subsequently reviewed the Annexation and Rezoning/Preliminary Development and Preliminary Plat, and Infrastructure Agreement concurrently as provided for in the Pre - Annexation Agreement entered into by the City of Dublin and Pulte Homes of Ohio via Ord. 28-16, and approved Ordinances 25-17, 26-17, and 27-17, respectively at the May 22, 2017 meeting. With the approval Annexation and Rezoning, the site was brought within the municipal boundary, and zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District — Autumn Rose Woods. The Preliminary Development Plan, which includes the approved Development Text, defines zoning standards for the development of the site. At the time of the Rezoning, Council approved a waiver to the Tree Replacement requirement defined in the City's Zoning Code due to the substantial preservation of nearly 16 contiguous acres of woods. C. Final Development Plan 1. Proposal The subdivision and development of 47 -acres for 73 single-family lots and 21 -acres of open space, and public rights-of-way. 2. Process The final development plan conforms with and provides a detailed refinement of the approved preliminary development plan. The final development plan includes all of the final details of the proposed development and is the final stage of the PUD process. 3. Details 1) Development Standards The Development Text defines standards for development including lot requirements, open space character and use standards, tree preservation and replacement, street network and pedestrian connections, stormwater management location, and provision of utilities. Lots are required to be a minimum of 9,100 square feet with a minimum width of 70 feet at the building line, and a minimum depth of 125 feet. Lot coverage is per Code, not to exceed 45 percent. Additionally, there is a building line setback 20 feet from the property line, a 25 -foot rear yard setback, and 6 -foot side yard setbacks required. City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Case 17-062FDP/FP I Autumn Rose Woods PUD Thursday, August 10, 2017 1 Page 4 of 9 The development text includes standards addressing building cladding, trim and roof materials; and, garage door, chimney and shutter details. The developer has indicated the homes will be predominately large ranches with lofts, and incorporate first floor owner's suites. 2) Open Space and Landscaping The Final Development Plan provides additional detail for each of the six reserves of open space or approximately 21 -acres approved as part of the Preliminary Development Plan. All open space will be owned by the City. Reserves A and B represent the Hyland -Croy Road frontage. The 4.15 acres will be maintained by the forced and funded HOA as the entry to community with a regional bike path connection. A formal entry feature is proposed at Johnston Drive with limestone columns and short sections of four foot tall pressure treated split -rail fence. The fence will have a natural finish consistent with the fence across Hyland -Croy Road. Flowering perennials, evergreen, and deciduous shrubs are planted in mass to highlight the entry against the rest of frontage. An entry feature sign meeting all Code requirements at four square feet is integrated into the six foot tall limestone columns. The remainder of the frontage is designed in a naturalized manner with no -mow grass and hardy deciduous and coniferous trees to be consistent with a shift in the design of the neighborhood frontages to the north and south. Reserve C contains approximately 16 acres of contiguous woods, a stormwater management basin, and asphalt shared use path providing a connection to Park Place Park. The path will be field located to preserve as many trees as possible. The existing split -rail fence will be removed around Reserve C to provide access for the entire community to the publicly dedicated open space. Maintenance details are included for the HOA for the portions of the split -rail fence to be maintained between abutting single family lots (not located within Reserve C). The applicant will remove hazardous trees and invasive species from Reserve C within proximity of private property and the proposed path, and the plans should be updated to include a note that ensures use of construction details that promote tree preservation techniques in the field location and construction of the shared use path. At Staff's request, the applicant has softened the edges of the stormwater basin to preserve an additional landmark swamp oak tree and 19 -inch oak tree. The applicant is proposing landscaping that enhances the naturalized look of the basin; specifically, no - mow grass along the northeast side of the basin against the existing trees. Mowed grass and shrubs are proposed on the southwest side of basin in more manicured style adjacent to single-family residences. The shrubs are not detailed in the plan. The applicant should work with the City's Landscape Inspector to make appropriate selections. Reserve D provides a bike path connection to Park Place to the south. The path will be lined with evergreen and columnar deciduous trees to provide a buffer to adjacent residences. Reserve E is a natural wetland. The wetland is proposed to be preserved, and will be maintained by the City. City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Case 17-062FDP/FP I Autumn Rose Woods PUD Thursday, August 10, 2017 1 Page 5 of 9 Reserve F is the landscape island located in the cul-de-sac bulb of Oliver Way. The island will be maintained by the HOA, and contain a Swamp White Oak tree with reed grasses, perennial roses, and Juniper shrubs. A mowed lawn is proposed around the interior edge of the island as a buffer. 3) Tree Preservation and Replacement The site was designed in a manner to conform to the principles and general intent of the City's Conservation Design Resolution. The development received approval of a tree waiver, included in the development text, from City Council with approval of the Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. The waiver require tree replacement per Code expect that trees 6 to 24 inches shall be replaced tree for tree, and trees 24 inches and greater shall be replaced inch for inch. The plan indicates removal of 208 healthy, Code protected trees, or approximately 2,000 inches. The replacement requirement is 668.5 inches (497.5 inches for tress 6 to 24 inches, and 171 inches for trees 24 inches and greater). The site accommodates 507.5 inches (203, 2.5 inch deciduous trees and 8 foot evergreens) of replacement trees. The developer will pay a fee in lieu of $16,100 for the remainder. The development text ensures tree protection and preservation during construction. Additionally, City inspections and approval of tree protection fencing are required prior to issuance of construction permits. The development text also indicates more detailed tree protection measures including metal fencing around landmark trees, and orange construction fencing around all other trees proposed to be preserved within close proximity of construction activity. 4) Road, Pedestrian and Bike Network All proposed streets are public and the names have been approved by the city. The main access point, Johnston Drive will provide site access from Hyland -Croy Road and ends terminates at Mill Springs Drive adjacent to the woods (Reserve C). Barrister Drive and Mill Springs Drive provide access to the south and north, respectively, and fulfill planned street stub connections. Debbie Run Drive provides access to Oliver Way, which terminate in a cul-de-sac in order to preserve the greatest number of trees in the wooded area. Pedestrian connections including sidewalks and shared -use path connections provide connectivity to the regional parks/open space network. A northbound right turn lane and southbound left turn lane on Hyland -Croy Road onto Johnston Drive are required as part of the off-site improvements agreed to as part of Infrastructure Agreement (Ord. 27-17) and will be constructed as part of Section 1 of the development. 5) Stormwater Management The proposed stormwater management for the site consists of a storm sewer network as well as a retention basin that outlets to an existing 48 -inch storm sewer between Lots 46 and 47 of the Park Place subdivision. The Park Place stormwater management facilities were sized to accommodate the Autumn Rose Woods development site release per the Master Plan. Calculations submitted have demonstrated compliance with the stormwater requirements as defined in Chapter 53. City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Case 17-062FDP/FP I Autumn Rose Woods PUD Thursday, August 10, 2017 1 Page 6 of 9 6) Utilities The project includes the extension of 12 -inch water line across the frontage of the site along the east side of Hyland -Croy Road in order to connect to the existing 12 -inch water line north and south of the site. Looping of the water line system within the development has been provided along any new streets as well as connecting to the existing 8 -inch water lines in adjacent subdivisions on Barrister Drive and Mill Springs Drive. The existing residence (proposed Lot 8) will connect to the proposed water line loop for connection to public water service during Section 1 of the development. Public sanitary sewer is proposed along the new streets within the development and connects to the existing 10 -inch public sanitary sewer that was constructed as part of the Park Place subdivision. The existing residence (proposed Lot 8) will connect to the proposed sanitary sewer for connection to public sanitary service during Section 1 of the development. All utilities have been designed and will be constructed in accordance with the City of Dublin Standards, which includes requirements of the City of Columbus. D. Final Plat 1. Process The purpose of the final plat is to assure conformance with the requirements set forth in Sections 152.085 through 152.095 of the Code, exclusive of other standards in the Code. 2. Details The proposed Final Plat subdivides 47.37 acres of land into 73 single-family lots and six reserves of open space. All streets are public and are a typical residential section with 50 foot rights-of-way. Bikepaths or sidewalks are included on each side of the street. Rights-of- way included in the plat are for: • Johnston Drive • Debbie Run Drive • Barrister Drive • Oliver Way • Mill Springs Drive The Final Plat shows existing conditions, proposed development sections and includes setback requirements, lot depths and widths as well as meets the appropriate development standards. Easements have been provided for all public sidewalks, shared use paths, and utilities that are outside of public right-of-way. The applicant will need to continue to work with Staff to ensure that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to City Council submittal. City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Case 17-062FDP/FP I Autumn Rose Woods PUD Thursday, August 10, 2017 1 Page 7 of 9 E. Criteria Analysis Final Development Plan [Section 153.055(6)] 1) The proposal is consistent with the approved preliminary development plan. Criteria met. This proposal is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable development standards of the Zoning Code requirements except as altered in the proposed as part of the Preliminary Development Plan. 2) Adequate provision is made for safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular circulation within the site and adjacent property. Criteria met. The plan includes safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular connections. Five public streets are proposed all providing either sidewalk or shared use path connections to adjacent residential neighborhoods or regional path networks and park systems. 3) The development has adequate public services and open space. Criteria met with Conditions. The site provides adequate public open space. The preservation of the woods within the City is a community asset. The open space landscape treatment, path locations, and other final design details as detailed in the plan enhance community and provide a character consistent with residential development to the north and south. The applicant should work the Staff to provide any outstanding details. 4) The development preserves and is sensitive to natural characteristics of the site while complying with applicable regulations. Criteria met with Conditions. The approved Preliminary Development Plan preserves nearly 16 acres of contiguous woods within Reserve C. The proposed Final Development Plan is consistent with the approved plan. Sensitivity will need to be ensured in locating the shared use path within Reserve C as well as with the removal of the fence around Reserve C. 5) The development provides adequate lighting for safe use of the site without emitting light onto adjacent properties. Not Applicable. 6) The proposed signs are consistent with the preliminary development plan. Criteria met. The proposed signs meet the development text and all Zoning Code requirements. 7) The development has appropriate landscaping to enhance, buffer, and soften the building and site. Criteria met. City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Case 17-062FDP/FP I Autumn Rose Woods PUD Thursday, August 10, 2017 1 Page 8 of 9 The heavily wooded site creates a sufficient buffer between adjacent properties both within and outside the site. The tree preservation zone, location of the reserves, and development pattern serve to preserve the natural environment to the greatest extent possible. 8) The development is compliant with stormwater management regulations. Criteria met. The applicant has provided a stormwater management report that meets all applicable standards. 9) If developed in multiple phases, all phases comply with the previous criteria. Criteria met. The site will be developed in two sections. Section 1 will include the development of 37 lots and Section 2 will include the development of 36 lots. The Final Development Plan has provided an adequate provision of services for the development of the subdivision in two sections. 10)The proposed development is compliant with other laws and regulations. Criteria met. The proposal meets all other applicable laws and regulations. Final Plat [Subdivision Regulations] 1) The plat document contains all applicable information and construction requirements. Criteria met with one Condition. The applicant has included all necessary information and construction requirements appropriately on the final plat. The applicant should ensure that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to City Council submittal. 2) Street, sidewalk, and bikepaths are in accordance with standards for improvement and maintenance. Criteria met. The plat includes a street section for the streets. Sidewalks and bike paths are provided throughout the development. 3) The proposal includes provisions for all utilities in accordance with approved standards. Criteria met. The plat makes appropriate provisions for utilities and the location of future utilities. City of Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Case 17-062FDP/FP I Autumn Rose Woods PUD Thursday, August 10, 2017 1 Page 9 of 9 4) The proposal complies with all applicable open space requirements. Criteria met. The Subdivision Regulations require the dedication of 3.14 acres of open space based on the size of the site and the maximum number of units proposed. The plat includes six reserves labeled A through F, which range from small open spaces in the cul-de-sac island to large wooded open space. The total open space amount provided is approximately 21 acres, all of which will be dedicated to the City. The provided open space exceeds Subdivision Regulation requirements by approximately 18 acres. F. Recommendations Final Development Plan The proposed Final Development Plan is consistent with all of the applicable review criteria. Approval is recommended with the following four conditions: 1) The applicant remove all hazardous trees and invasive species from Reserve C within proximity of private property and the proposed path; 2) That the plans be updated to include a note that ensures use of construction details that promote tree preservation techniques in the field location and construction of the shared use path; 3) The applicant work with the City's Landscape Inspector to make appropriate shrub selections along the southwest side of the stormwater basin; and, 4) The developer request inspection of the tree protection fencing by the City's Landscape Inspector prior to the removal of any trees to ensure preserved trees will not be impacted. Final Plat The proposed Final Plat is consistent with the Subdivision Regulations. Approval is recommended with the following condition: 1) That the applicant ensure that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to City Council submittal. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS May 22, 2017 Page 6 of 19 The (Jerk read the titles of Ordinances 26-17, 27-17 and 28-17 Into the record Ordinance 26-17 Accepting the Annexation of 47.366 Acres from Jerome Township, Union County to the City of Dublin. (Agent: Tom Hart, Attorney/Agent for Petitioners, Johnston H. Means, R. Oliver Griffith and Deborah L. Griffith) Ordinance 27-17 Rezoning Approximately 47 Acres from R, Rural District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District for the Development of the Site with 73 Single-family Lots and Approximately 21 Acres of Open Space on the East Side of Hyland - Croy Road, North of the Intersection with Park Mill Drive Under the Provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050; and a Preliminary Plat for 73 Single-family lots, Rights-of-way, and Open Space in Accordance with Chapter 152, the Subdivision Regulations. (Case #16-086Z/PDP/PP) Ordinance 28-17 Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into an Infrastructure Agreement with Pulte Homes of Ohio LLC for the Autumn Rose Woods Development Ms. Martin stated that Council has before them three ordinances related to the proposed Autumn Rose Woods development. This presentation will be provided jointly by the Law Director's office, the City Engineer and the Planning division. She will present the first two ordinances, and Mr. Hammersmith, City Engineer, will present the Infrastructure Agreement. Ordinance 26-17 - Annexation: This site is located on the east side of Hyland -Croy Road with approximately 1,000 feet of frontage. It is comprised of two parcels, both currently located within Jerome Township in Union County. The southern parcel is the existing Autumn Rose horse farts with single-family residences as well as paddocks. The site to the north contains a single- family residence, which is proposed to remain with this development. The annexation request is for 47.366 acres. This includes no public rights-of-way. The City entered into a pre -annexation agreement with Pulte Homes with Ordinance 28-16, which provided for the concurrent review of the annexation as well as the rezoning and preliminary development plan, which are before Council for review tonight. The infrastructure component has been included with these, as well. Ordinance 27-17— Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan, The Community Plan identifies land use recommendations for sites within the City. This site is designated Mixed Residential Rural Transition and recommends single-family homes on smaller lots at a density of 1.5 dwelling units (DU) per ave. The proposal is consistent with that at 1.54 DU/acre, and that Is with the intent of preserving the natural areas on the site. Additionally, the Thoroughfare Plan identifies recommended right-of- way widths. The City Engineer has worked with the Union County Engineer, as Hyland - Croy Road is not currently within the municipal boundaries of the City of Dublin, and the applicant has provided adequate right-of-way dedication to fulfill the future vision for the Hyland -Croy Road corridor. Mr. Lecklider asked for confirmation that no right-of-way is included with this annexation request. Ms. Martin responded that is correct. The annexation is only for the two parcels that compromise the 47.366 acre site. Mr. Lerklider requested additional Information. Ms. Readier stated that the improvements to the Hyland -Croy Road that are required as part of the development are addressed in the Infrastructure Agreement, which provides for Union County, the City of Dublin and the developer to provide the tum -ins that are required and some of the offsite contributions, which Pulte Homes will be required to make. The annexation petition itself is only for the parcel up to the right-of-way line. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS May 22, 2017 Page 7 of 19 Mr. Lecklider asked if it is through another mechanism that the needed right-of-way will be obtained to widen the road to four lanes In the future. Ms. Readier confirmed that is correct. The agreement includes provisions for right-of- way dedication, either the City of Dublin or Union County, as applicable when the rights- of-way are needed. Mr. Keenan inquired If the rights-of-way would be provided at no cost. Ms. Readier responded that is correct. Vice Mayor Reiner inquired if it would also include the corridor setback that has already been established on that roadway. Ms. Readier responded that is correct. Vice Mayor Reiner inquired if there is sufficient allowance for four lanes, the center median and the desired setback. Ms. Martin responded that is correct. The development text requirements fulfill the rural roadway character designation that the Community Plan identifies for Hyland -Croy Road, which is a variable setback of 100 — 200 feet. In this development, it will be 150 feet. The Community Plan also identifies Special Area Plans for sensitive sites within the City. These are simply conceptual depictions of how development could occur. The proposal before Council is fairly consistent with the Area Plan's vision for this site in that It does preserve a significant amount of woods, provides the required setback along Hyland -Croy Road, and also provides single-family residences adjacent to existing single-family residences. Proposed ProlimmaryDevelopment Plan: • This plan provides for 73 single-family lots, Including 72 new lots as well as the preservation of one existing home on the 73- lot. • The site will develop in two sections, with 37 lots in Phase 1 and 36 lots in Phase 2. Additionally, stub streets will be connected to the north and south, as well as five public streets created. • There will be 21 acres of open space across six reserves; 16 of those acres will be contiguous with Reserve C and the woods. • The proposed uses and development standards are consistent with recently approved single-family subdivisions throughout Dublin, which permit parks, open spaces, homes and also the uses within the R-1 section of the Zoning Cade. • The applicant has also provided 21.3 acres of open space, all to be dedicated to the City of Dublin. • Reserves A, B and F will be maintained by the homeowners association and will contain landscaping features, entry features, as well as bikepaths. Reserves C, D and E will be maintained by the City. These will contain natural features, wedands and stormwater management facilities. Proposed Preliminary Plat: • The proposed preliminary plat is included and delineates lines that are described within the development text. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this application on March 2 and recommended Council approval with seven conditions, as listed. The applicant has worked with staff to fulfill all the conditions. They have fulfilled the conditions of the preliminary plat as well. Ordinance 2li-17 - Infrastructure Aamement: Mr. Hammersmith stated that the executon of an Infrastructure agreement is a Condition of Approval recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission for the rezoning and the preliminary development plan. The most critical component of the infrastructure agreement is the traffic impact study, which establishes and determines the Impacts to the associated transportation network adjacent to the site. It also determines the mitigating measures for those Impacts. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS May 22, 2017 Page 8 of 19 T&J cStudv: The developer, Pulte Homes, commissioned the traffic impact study, which was completed in May 2016 and recently updated in February 2017. The study looked at the impacts over a 10 -year period, 2016 to 2026 -- the horizon years -- and determined that: • The developer would be required to construct at 100% of the cost a southbound, left -turn lane into the site on Hyland Croy Road and a northbound, right -tum lane on Hyland -Croy Into the site. • Further offsite contributions would be necessary at three critical Intersections: Hyland -Croy and Brand Road, where there is an existing roundabout; Hyland -Croy Road and Park Mill Drive, where future intersection control will be needed; and further to the south, Hyland -Croy Road and Post Road. That traffic impact study looked at the contributing traffic to those intersections, then an estimate was made of the future Improvements that would be necessary to mitigate the traffic impact at those intersections. • The cast estimates for the three intersection improvements, the amount of anticipated traffic contribution to that site and the developers corresponding contribution are: Hyland -Goy Road and Park Mill Drive - $1,000,000; contributed traffic -3%- $30,000 (prior to recording of final plat for second phase or 12/31/25, whichever is earlier) Hyland -Croy Road and Post Road - $2,500,000; contributed traffic — 1.7%- $42,500 (prior to recording of final plat for first phase) Hyland -Croy Road and Brand Road/Mitchell-DeWitt Road - $500,000; contributed traffic — 1.7% - $8,500 (prior to recording of final plat for second phase or 12/31/25, whichever is earlier) Total costs = $4,0130.000total developer contributions $81,0 (approximately 2.13%) He noted that the Hyland -Croy, Brand and Mitchell -DeWitt roundabout was constructed several years ago to be expandable, should it become necessary. The Improvements will be made in two phases as the project develops. The first phase will be 37 homes; the second phase will be 36 homes. Judsdicdonal Soundanes: Another Important component of the infrastructure agreement addresses the jurisdictional boundaries and who presently controls the intersections. The Intersections at Hyland -Croy, Park Mill Drive and Post Road are currently controlled by the Union County Engineer's Office. Therefore, those contributions will be paid to Union County. If those intersections should be annexed into the Cl in the future, those contributions would then be paid to Dublin. The infrastructure agreement is consistent with the findings of the traffic impact study and has been mutually agreed upon by the City of Dublin and Union County Engineer. Staff recommends approval of the infrastructure agreement. Vice Mayor Reiner inquired if the developer would pay for the shared -use path. Mr. Hammersmith responded that any of the shared -use paths, along both the frontage of Hyland -Croy Road and the connector to Park Place, would be the responsibility of the developer. Mr. Lecklider inquired about the homeowners association's responsibility to maintain Reserve A, the cul-de-sac and a third reserve. He believes the City has a formula that determines whether the maintenance responsibility would create too great a burden for the homeowners. In the past, some neighborhoods have been unable to sustain the open space at a reasonable cost. Was that formula applied in this case? Ms. Martin responded that the burden on the homeowners association (HOA) was taken Into consideration. In the past, this land has always been dedicated to the City, so the RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS May 22, 2017 Page 9 of 19 City will cover the tax burden of that property. Typically, the frontage where a private landscape feature or entry feature would be located is maintained by the HOA. Since the stonnwater management is not in that area, staff believes the HOA will be financially able to maintain that area. Mr. Lecklider Inquired if staff believes it is a reasonable burden, although shared by only 72 units. It is a significant open space In this location. Ms. Martin acknowledged that is true. Mr. Lecklider stated that to the south of this site, the Post Preserve and Park Place original landscaping plan Included many trees. A significant number have needed to be replaced, which the City has subsidized through its Beautify Your Neighborhood grant program. The City does not want to make that mistake again. Ms. Martin responded that staff has spoken with the developer about that Actually, there has been a change in the thinking. Many of the treatments along Hyland -Croy Road were a product of the "Road to Wow" plan. They were formalized bosque treatments. Unfortunately, they did not thrive in that more naturalized rural corridor, so the neighborhoods to the north and south have transitioned or are transitioning toward a more rural character. That is the direction that staff has given the applicant, which will be finalized with the Final Development Plan. Mr. Lecklider stated that with respect to that particular reserve, he hopes that a fence will not be included. In his experience, fences never are a long-term solution. One example is the fence along Brand Road, which had slats missing for a considerable amount of time. They have been replaced but remain unpainted. Even fences made of synthetic material do not hold up well over time. Ms. Martin responded that, with respect to the entry feature, she would defer to the applicant. The only fences that are proposed as part of this application are fences that already exist, and those will only be maintained between abutting single-family residential lots. Mr. Lecklider Inquired if language is induced to address when the maintenance responsibility shifts to the HOA. In the early years, the HOA cannot bear that burden, so there should be language specifying that the responsibility does not transfer to the HOA until a certain number of the units are sold. He requested the applicant to address that point in his presentation. Ms. Martin noted that prior to Mr. Hart's presentation, she will summarize the recommended Council actions. Staff recommends approval of the three ordinances before Council. As staff has worked through the infrastructure agreement with the applicant, it has become apparent that the discussion about tree preservation and a waiver of some of the requirements should occur concurrent with the requests for annexation, rezoning and infrastructure agreement. Because Ms. Husak is currently working on an update of the City's tree walver policy, she will address that recommendation. Ms. Husak stated that staff has been working on an update to the tree waiver policy, but the timing of this project precedes completion of that policy. At their last meeting, PZC reviewed a draft of the revised policy, and staff hopes to have a final daft of that policy prepared for considembon at the June 12 Council meeting. In the meantime, the applicant has requested a waiver from the current policy's tree replacement fees. Therefore, staff requests that Council also Include this consideration in their review of the preliminary development plan. This would be included in the development text. The shaded area [slide shown] depicts the wooded area that the applicant proposes to preserve. Approximately 10 percent of the wooded area is being removed to accommodate the cul de sac and the lots that are proposed within that roadway. The trees designated within the darker shaded area are landmark trees proposed for removal. Landmark trees are trees that are healthy or in fair condition and 24 inches or greater in diameter. Non -landmark trees are any healthy or fair condition trees that are six to 24 inches in diameter. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS May 22, 2017 Page 10 of 19 For this proposal: 173 non -landmark trees equaling 1,910 Inches in diameter are proposed for removal; and Six landmark trees equaling 169 inches are proposed for removal; The Code requires that these be replaced Inch for inch. Therefore, the applicant would be required to replace a total of 2,079 Inches, which means 832 2% -Inch diameter trees. The cost would be $207,900. Due to the open spaces being provided, and recognizing Council's concern about the maintenance of open spaces by HOAs, it is not reasonable to require the applicant to replace 832 trees on the site. If the applicant were to choose to pay a fee In lieu of the replacement of those inches, the fee would be $207,900. Typically, Council has allowed non -landmark trees to be replaced tree for tree, as opposed to inch for Inch. In this case, the applicant would be allowed to replace 241 trees of 2.5 inches in diameter each. The project has not reached the final development plan stage, but at the current stage, the applicant Is proposing to replace half of the required inches with trees, which would be 301 inches or 121 trees across all the reserves within the development. They would pay a fee in lieu of for the remainder of the trees or $30,000. Without the waiver, the required fee in lieu of would be $177,750. - A significant amount of the woodlands on the site will be preserved, saving 95 percent of the landmark trees, removing only five percent. Significant efforts have been made for preservation. It also is not wise to replant the site so heavily that it cannot be maintained by the City or the HOA. - Therefore, staff recommends that two conditions be added to the existing seven recommended conditions: 8. That the development text be modified to permit tree -for -tree replacement non -landmark trees with a minimum of 301.5 inches to be replaced on-site; 9. That the applicant work with staff to ensure that any additional inches provided are appropriately located on the site to ensure the long-term survival of replacement trees. Staff and the applicant are available to respond to any questions. Mayor Peterson noted that this rezoning is being considered concurrently with the annexation acceptance. Given the land is still within Jerome Township, is there anything that would prevent the applicant from cutting down whatever trees desired at this point? Ms. Claudia responded that there is not, aside from political will. Mr. Lecklider stated that six landmark trees in the cul de sac are proposed for removal. In general, where are the 173 non -landmark trees located? Ms. Husak responded that those are in the woods where the stormwater management pond has to be accommodated; the others would be in the cul de sac. These trees are of substantial size, but are not of landmark size. Mr. Lecklider asked for confirmation that no trees would be removed along the fencerow, but only to the north or south. Ms. Husak responded that area is Intended to be preserved. The applicant has been requested to move utilities south toward the lots to ensure the survival of the fencerow trees. Mr. Lecklider noted that the existing homeowners will likely be concerned with the preservation of the trees along the fencerow. He inquired if the developer has met with the neighborhood residents. Ms. Husak responded affirmatively. Planning, Engineering, and Parks and Rec staff walked the site with the applicant, as well, to verify the survey and where trees should be preserved. Mr. Keenan asked about the timing of Council's consideration of a revised tree waiver policy. Ms. Husak responded that the intent is to provide this to Council for consideration at their next meeting on June 12. Minutes RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS May 22, 2017 Page 11 of 19 Ms. Alutto noted that the developer is dedicating more than 35 percent of the property to open space, which is significantly greater than what is provided in other developments. Ms. Husak responded that it is more than the Code requirement, but there have been a few recent developments with dedications of 40 plus percent. Ms. Amomse Groomes stated that this is a woods with many large, beautiful trees, and R Is worth preserving to the greatest extent possible due to the quality of the plant material contained therein. Mayor Peterson invited the applicant's representative to present. Thomas L Hart, Isaac Mies, 2 Miranova Place. Columbus stated that with him tonight are Matt Callahan of Pulte Homes and Greg Chillog, landscape architect withThe Edge Group. • There were two neighborhood meetings and two Planning and Zoning Commission hearings, one of which was an early concept plan hearing. They also received Council member input, which was incorporated into this plan. • They believe the proposed plan balances the surging market demand for empty nester housing in Dublin along with Dublin's high development standards. The plan meets the Code; Dublin's architectural standards; and complies with the Community Plan in terms of density, woods preservation, multi -use path connections, open space requirements, and the required large setbacks along HylandCmy Road. They endeavored to respect the Community Man and Future Land Use Plan with the significant preservation on the site. • They listened to the neighborhood's concems and came up with the least impactful plan. A key moment in this process was when they made the decision to by to structure the site as an empty nester product, which the neighborhood strongly supported. • They will be providing 72 single-family, primarily first -floor living homes— large, ranch patio -style homes. They will have master bedrooms on the first floor; many with a second bedroom downstairs; the units are designed to have some flexible finished space on the second floor, but limited to only 50% of the first floor area. • The site will actually have 45 percent open space — 21 acres. • In regard to the tree waiver request: they will be preserving 90 percent of the woods overall —16.6 of the 18.5 acres. They will be providing a significant public benefit in protecting 16+ acres of very mature woods and also allowing access to those woods for the first time. Through their meetings, the neighbors recognized that their plan is essentially guaranteeing the preservation of the woods for their use for the first time. They do not have that use and that guarantee today, and this helped to gamer their support. The bottom line, though, is that when that much acreage is set aside on a development site and given the amount of setback off Hyland -Goy Road, the development envelope on this site is very compact. Application of the Code requirements as they read would result in a situation where, due to the amount of fee in lieu of, they could not create this quality development in addition to the desired regional road Improvements. • He appreciates that Engineering staff worked with them on the Infrastructure agreement to provide them some flexibility in terns of when the regional Improvement fees are due and when they must make their Improvements. This site will not have the same traffic impact as a traditional, single-family housing development with many mps per household. However, the traffic along this corridor will increase and they will be contributing per the findings of their traffic study. • The combination of those factors led them to request the tree waiver at the time of the rezoning. They are unable to determine the feasibility of this development without knowing what level of waiver would be supported. Mayor Peterson asked if approval of those additional conditions would be part of the Ordinance 27-17 approval. Ms. Readler responded affirmatively. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS May 22, 2017 Page 12 of 19 Mayor Peterson inquired if the developer is agreeable to the addition of those two conditions to the rezoning. Mr. Hart indicated that he would be agreeable. Mr. Lecklider stated that he would prefer not to have fencing Included in the entryway. He would prefer stone or brick, something other than a fence that would become a burden on the HOA to maintain. He would like something that is more sustainable long term. Mr. Hart stated that he assumes he is referencing the entry along Hyland -Goy. Mr. Lecklider responded affirmatively. Mr. Hart stated that they had not planned for that, but will definitely consider it with the final details. Mr. Lecklider stated that he has made this comment a number of times previously, although he is not certain of the extent to which that has been supported by staff. Mr. Hart responded that staff has Informed them that traditional landscaping used by other developments in their entryways In this area was unable to stand up to the wind and weather. They will attempt to provide something that is more natural to the prairie envirori which will be low impact and low maintenance. Mr. Lecklider stated that he was a member of the Planning and Zoning Commission at the time the "Road to Wow" attempt was made. Everyone's intentions were good, but he believes the City learned from this experience. Mr. Lecklider asked if any elevations have been presented to staff. Ms. Martin responded that elevations were provided to staff as a concept of their product type; however, elevations are not required with a rezoning or preliminary development plan. Only the materials were designated in the text. Mr. Lecklider asked at what point staff or PZC would see elevations. Ms. Martin responded that elevations would be reviewed at building permitting. They are not required in a planned unit development for single-family residential. They would be required for a condominium product. Mr. Lecklider asked if there would therefore not be any review of the elevations. Ms. Martin responded that elevations would be reviewed against the development text at permitting and must meet the Appearance Code as well as the additional standards that are provided in the text. There will be no Individual review of each elevation. Mr. Lecklider stated that he, and likely all of Council, would have a fairly high expectation for these elevations. What was shown at the conceptual level did not meet his expectations, although there may have been other Iterations since that time. Mr. Hart stated that he believes that what they showed is what the company is building for the first time In this market. Mr. Lecklider stated that he recalls seeing an example of something built in Indiana and other markets. Matt Callahan. Pulte Homes, 4900 Tuttle Crossing Boulevard Dublin stated that the elevations would be very consistent with the character and design of other newer communities. He has a sample set of elevations with him that he will share this evening. Mr. Lecklider Inquired if this is a new design, unique to Dublin. Mr. Callahan responded that it is a new series of homes for the company. They are offering something similar in Indianapolis, in the Carmel and Westfield communities. What will be offered in Dublin will be a style very similar to the renderings and photos in the packet that he has shared. Vice Mayor Reiner inquired if their past projects with this style of homes became senior - dominated projects. Mr. Callahan responded affirmatively. These homes are designed primarily for seniors who are ready to downsize, but not yet ready for condominium living. These homes cater to buyers seeking first -floor living options. Vire Mayor Reiner inquired what percentage of these homes would have three -car garages. Mr. Callahan responded that three -car garages are available for all the homes; it is the buyer's choice. There Is space for a three -car garage on every lot. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS May 22, 2017 Page 13 of 19 Vice Mayor Reiner stared that he and Mr. Lecklider may respectfully disagree on the fencing Issue, particularly if The Edge Group considers a fence to be a defining feature for this subdivision. His HOA has been installing more fences — probably about two or three miles of fencing. They are an interesting way to demark a special area. If it is considered an important aesthetic element for this project, he does not object. He does not have an issue with fencing, provided the homeowners maintain It. Mr. Keenan inquired about the price point of these homes. Mr. Callahan responded that they anticipate the homes to average around $500,000. Mr. Le Wider inquired If the three -car garages would be subject to regulations, as only a certain percentage of the front elevation can be comprised of garage. Ms. Martin responded that is correct, as the Appearance Code does regulate front -loaded or side -loaded garages. Mr. Keenan noted that he is surprised that with this $400-$500,000 price range, the elevations are finished as such. Is this process different? It was his Impression that PZC has always reviewed the elevations from an architectural and finishing perspective. Ms. Martin responded that applicants often volunteer to share their elevations, but this is not required. Any required architectural details are prescribed in the development text, as that will regulate the zoning. Mr. Keenan stated that when the materials are discussed for the development text, it is necessary to have examples of elevations to demonstrate what Is Intended; for Instance, whether it be stone or brick. Further in the process, they should share some elevations. Ms. Martin responded that is an option. Staff has certainly seen development texts that have character Images, but the text is the regulating component. This development text, in particular, does place additional regulations on homes fronting Hyland -Croy Road due to the Increased visibility of those lots. Some architectural details are required to be added or restricted. Ms. Amorose Groomes stated that in the development standards, it speaks of the cladding materials and percentages that are a little higher than what is found in the general Appearance Code. It also addresses the concern about the garage frontages and percentages. It is not unusual to have the development standards In text form versus pictorial form. Ms. Salay asked for confirmation that there will be a final development plan stage at PZC, where there are renderings and discussions regarding building materials and percentages, and where fine-tuning occurs. Ms. Husak responded that does not occur for single-family platted lots. There were many Images In the Riviera text for architectural purposes. However, as the final development plans were finalized, PZC approved landscaping, street sections and the final plats, but did not review or approve elevations for any of the individual homes. The Celtic Crossing text has no images. The image -heavy plans are for the newer developments —Tartan West, Tartan Ridge, and Riviera. However, it is not a requirement in Dublin's Zoning Code to have elevations approved for single-family platted lots. The percentage perspective is considered with condominiums. Mayor Peterson invited public testimony on Ordinances 26-17, 27-17 or 28-17. There was no public testimony. Mayor Peterson called for the vote on Ordinance 26-17. Vote on the Ordinance: Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Leckllder, yes; Ms. Amorose-Groames, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Mayor Petersen, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Nude, yes. Mayor Peterson moved to amend Ordinance 27-17 to Include the two additional conditions, as recommended by staff: 8) That the development text be modified to permit tree -for -tree replacement non -landmark trees with a minimum of 301.5 Inches to be replaced on-site; RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS May 22, 2017 Page 14 of 19 9) That the applicant work with staff to ensure that any additional inches provided are appropriately located on the site to ensure the long-term survival of replacement trees. Mr. Keenan seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Ms. Amoroso Groomes, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes. Vote on Ordinance 27-17 as amended: Mr. Keenan, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salary, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes. Mayor Peterson moved to approve the Preliminary Plat. Mr. Lecklider seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Amoroso Groomes, yes. Vote on Ordinance 28-17: Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes; Ms. Ammose Groomes, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes. Mayor Peterson moved to dispense with Council Rules of Order to address Ordinances 30-17, 31-17(Amended) and 32-17 together. Vice Mayor Reiner semnded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes. The Cl,rk r,,d the t ties of Ordinances 30 17, 31 17 and 12-17 into the Ordinance 30 17 record On Providing for the Amount of $1,395,000 Municipal Sewer Ord.�.:a 31 17 lissuance and for the System. Sale of Bonds the Max mum Pr ne pa Purpose of Paying the Costs of improving the :ce providing far the Amount of $6,800,000 (Amended) Issuance and for the Sale of Bends . n the Maximum Pirkne pal purpose of Pay no the Costs of i npm ovi ig the City's Facilities 0 dmanee 32 17 Providing for the Amount of $27,375,000 City's Velifficular Bridge Street District. issuance and for the and Pedestrian Sale of Bonds air ti e Max inurn P m ic pal Purpose of Paying the Costs of limpruvi ig the Transportation System within and Serving the Mr McDaniel ordinances At the first reading, amended to add the construction of two salt barns, with no change in the total amount of bonds. Originally, the CIP provided for the reconstruction of one salt barn and a second salt barn a couple years later. Due to a potential for savings in other projects, construction of the second barn could be accelerated. The efficiencies of doing so are currently being studied. The amendment of this ordinance would provide authorization, should the decision be made to do so. Ms. Amorose Groomes stated that, although Ms. Mumma was not able to be present tonight, she is hopeful that the discussion regarding debt Initiated at the previous Council meeting will be continued. She requested clarification regarding Ordinance 32-17 — have contractual mmmhments already been made for those funds? Mr. McDaniel responded affirmatively. Ms. Amorose Groomes inquired if passage of Ordinance 32-17 essentially ensures that those financial commitments are fulfilled. Mr. McDaniel responded affirmatively. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 24, 2017 Page 27 of 30 Ordinance 20.17 Establishing the Location and Amount of Cash on Hand for Change Funds. Mr. Stiffer stated that there were no changes since the first reading. This ordinance will establish change funds for the Events division and increases the amount of petty cash in Finance Administration. Council had no questions. Vote on the Ordinance: Ms. Autto, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salary, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes. Ordinance 21-17 Amending the Annual Appropriations Ordinance for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2017. Mr. Stiffer stated that this ordinance will amend the 2017 Appropriations, and details are outlined in the memo. There are no changes since the first reading on April 10. Vote on the Ordinance: Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms. Amomse Groomes, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes. Mayor Peterson moved to suspend Council's Rules of Order and address Ordinances 26- 17, 27-17 and 28-17 together. Mr. Lecklider seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Ms. Salary, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes. The Clerk read the following titles Into the record. Ordinance 26-17 Accepting the Annexation of 47.366 Acres, More or Less, in Jerome Township, Union County to the City of Dublin. (Agent: Tom Hart, Attorney/Agent for Petitioners, Johnston H. Means, R. Oliver Griffith and Deborah L. Griffith) Ordinance 27-17 Rezoning Approximately 47 Acres from R, Rural District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District for the Development of the Site with 73 Single-family Lots and Approximately 21 Acres of Open Space on the East Side of Hyland - Croy Road, North of the Intersection with Park Mill Drive Under the Provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050; and a Preliminary Plat for 73 Single-family lots, Rights-of-way, and Open Space in Accordance with Chapter 152, the Subdivision Regulations (Case #16-086Z/PDP/PP). Ordinance 28-17 Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into an Infrastructure Agreement with Pulte Homes of Ohio LLC for the Autumn Rose Woods Development. Ms. Salary introduced Ordinances 26-17, 27-17 and 28-17. Nicole Martin. Manner stated that this is a request for consideration of an annexation, rezoning and preliminary development, preliminary plat and infrastructure agreement. She inquired if Council would prefer to have the staff presentation at this meeting or the next hearing. Ms. Salay suggested that, due to the lateness of the hour, she would prefer to defer that to the next hearing. Council concurred. The presentation will be at the second reading/public hearing, which is scheduled on May 22, 2017. Mayor Peterson inquired if the applicant has any objection to deferral of the presentation to the second reading. The applicant indicated he has no objection. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS April 24, 2017 Page 28 of 30 There will be a second reading/public hearing at the May 22, 2017 Council meeting. INTRODUCTION PUBLICPUBUC HEARING — RE L NS Resolution 26-17 Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Collective Bargaining Agreement with the Fraternal Order of Police —Capital City Lodge No. 9 Regarding Wages, Hours, Terms and Conditions of Employment for Employees within the Police Officer, Corporal, and Sergeant Bargaining Units. Mayor Peterson introduced the resolution. Mr. McDaniel stated that the staff memo highlighted the changes from the previous agreement. The term of this agreement is for three years. The bargaining unit has ratified the agreement. Staff recommends approval. Vote on the Resolution: Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes. Resolution 27-17 Adopting a Statement of Services for a Proposed Regular Annexation of 44.0 Acres, More or Less, from Jerome Township, Union County to the City of Dublin. (Aaron L. Underhill, Esq. and/or David Hodge, Esq., Underhill & Hodge LLC, 8000 Walton Parkway, Suite 260, New Albany, OH 43054, Agent for Petitioners Roger Warren Gorden and Denise Ann Gorden, 7866 Harriott Road, Dublin, OH 43017) Vice Mayor Reiner introduced the resolution. Ms. Readier stated that the Union County Commissioners have scheduled a hearing for this matter on May 16, 2017. For a regular annexation petition, the City must adopt a statement of services and submit it at least 20 days prior to that hearing. The resolution provides the City's assessment of services that would be provided to the area upon annexation, as detailed in the packet Information. Staff recommends approval. Council had no questions. Vote on the Resolution: Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Ms. Amomse Groomes, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes. Resolution 28-17 Adopting a Statement of Services for a Proposed Regular Annexation of 72.1 Acres, More or Less, from Jerome Township, Union County to the City of Dublin. (Aaron L. Underhill, Esq. and/or David Hodge, Esq., Underhill & Hodge LLC, 8000 Walton Parkway, Suite 260, New Albany, OH 43054, Agent for Petitioners Arthur G. Wesner and Elizabeth I. Wesner, 7455 Hyland Croy Road, Plain City, OH 43064 and Paul Jacquemin and Mary Jacquemin, 7437 Hyland Croy Road, Plain City, OH 43064) Vice Mayor Reiner Introduced the resolution. Ms. Readier stated that the annexation petition hearing is scheduled for May 23, 2017. The statement of services detail is provided in Council's packet. Council had no questions. Vote on the Resolution: Ms. Ammose Groomes, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Leddider, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes. Mayor Peterson moved to suspend the Council Rules of Order to address Resolutions 29- 17 through 36-17 together. Vice Mayor Reiner seconded the motion. Vote an the motion: Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes. The Clerk read the property names and addresses of the following Resolutions into the record: RECORD OF ACTION city of Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission OHIO, USA Thursday, March 2, 2017 16:30 pm The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. PUD Autumn Rose Woods 7540/7660 Hyland -Croy Road 16-086CP/Z/PDP/PP Concept Plan Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Preliminary Plat Proposal: Rezoning of approximately 47 acres from R, Rural District, to PUD, Planned Unit Development District, for the future development of 73 single-family lots and approximately 21 acres of open space. The site is located on the east side of Hyland -Croy Road, north of the intersection with Park Mill Drive. Request: Request for review of a Concept Plan and for review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan under the provisions of the Zoning Code Section 153.050. This is also a request for review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a Preliminary Plat under the provisions of the Subdivision Regulations. Applicant: Matt Callahan, Pulte Homes of Ohio, LLC. Planning Contacts: Nichole Martin, Planner I and Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Senior Planner. Contact Information: (614) 410-4600; nmartin@dublin.oh.us or chusak@dublin.oh.us MOTION 1: Mr. Stidhem moved, Ms. De Rosa seconded, to forward a recommendation of approval to City Council for this Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan because this proposal complies with the applicable review criteria and the existing development standards within the area with seven conditions: 1) That the applicant enter into an infrastructure agreement with the City, prior to submitting the first final development plan; 2) That the applicant work with the City and Union County to provide the correct right-of-way dedication along Hyland -Croy Road to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the approval of a final plat; 3) That the developer update the traffic impact study, plans, and development text to show and reflect all required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior a City Council hearing of the rezoning; 4) That as part of the development of Section 1, the applicant provide a southbound left turn lane and northbound right turn lane on Hyland -Croy Road into the site; 5) That the applicant provide an east -west shared used path connection to connect Mill Springs Drive to Hyland -Croy Road and the larger regional network to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior a City Council hearing of the rezoning; 6) That the development text be updated to reflect the Preliminary Development Plans prior to a City Council hearing of the rezoning; and 7) In acoordance the Zoning Code, the development text be updated to reflect the Appearance Code Standards not be applicable to Lot 8 until such time redevelopment occurs. *Thomas Hart, agreed to the above conditions. Page 1 of 2 PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.474 dublinohiousa.gov RECORD OF ACTION CRY of Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission OHIO, USA Thursday, March 2, 2017 1 6:30 pm The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. PUD Autumn Rose Woods 7540/7660 Hyland -Croy Road 16-086CP/2/PDP/PP Concept Plan Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Preliminary Plat VOTE: 4-0. RESULT: This Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan will be forwarded to City Council with a recommendation of approval. RECORDED VOTES: Victoria Newell Absent Amy Salay Absent Chris Brown Yes Cathy De Rosa Yes Robert Miller Yes Deborah Mitchell Absent Stephen Stidhem Yes MOTION Oft: Mr. Stidhem motioned, Ms. De Rosa seconded to forward a recommendation of approval to City Council for this Preliminary Plat because this proposal complies with the applicable review criteria with one condition: 1) That the applicant ensure that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to City Council submittal. *Thomas Hart, agreed to the above condition. VOTE: 4-0. RESULT: This Preliminary Plat will be forwarded to City Council with a recommendation of approval. RECORDED VOTES: Victoria Newell Absent Amy Salay Absent Chris Brown Yes Cathy De Rosa Yes Robert Miller Yes Deborah Mitchell Absent Stephen Stidhem Yes STW CERTIFICATION N hole Martin Planner Page 2 of 2 PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.474 dublinohiousa.gov City J�f Dublin OHIO, USA MEETING MINUTES Planning & Zoning Commission Thursday, March 2, 2017 AGENDA 1. PUD Autumn Rose Woods 7540/7660 Hyland -Croy Road 16-086CP/Z/PDP/PP Concept Plan (Discussion Only) Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan (Recommendation of Approval 4 — 0) Preliminary Plat (Recommendation of Approval 4 — 0) The Vice Chair, Chris Brown, called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance. Other Commission members present were: Cathy De Rosa, Stephen Stidhem, Chris Brown, and Bob Miller. Victoria Newell, Amy Salay, and Deborah Mitchell were absent. City representatives present were: Phil Hartmann, Claudia Husak, Nichole Martin, Michael Hendershot, and Flora Rogers. Administrative Business Motion and Vote Mr. Stidhem moved, Ms. De Rosa seconded, to accept the documents into the record. The vote was as follows: Mr. Miller, yes; Mr. Brown, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; and Mr. Stidhem, yes. (Approved 4 - 0) Motion and Vote Mr. Stidhem moved, Ms. De Rosa seconded, to approve the January 19, 2017, meeting minutes. The vote was as follows: Mr. Miller, yes; Mr. Brown, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; and Mr. Stidhem, yes. (Approved 4 - 0) The Vice Chair briefly explained the rules and procedures of the Planning and Zoning Commission. 1. PUD Autumn Rose Woods 7540/7660 Hyland -Croy Road 16-086CP/Z/PDP/PP Concept Plan Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan Preliminary Plat The Vice Chair, Chris Brown, said the following application is for a rezoning of approximately 47 acres from R, Rural District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District for the future development of 73 single- family lots and approximately 21 acres of open space. He said the site is on the east side of Hyland -Croy Road, north of the intersection with Parkmill Drive. He stated this is a request for a review of a Concept Plan and for a review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan under the provisions of the Zoning Code §153.050. He added this is also a request for a review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a Preliminary Plat under the provisions of the Subdivision Regulations. PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.4747 dublinohiousa.gov Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission March 2, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 8 Nichole Martin reviewed the background for this case and presented an aerial view of the site comprised of two parcels currently within Jerome Township. She stated the southern parcel is the site of Autumn Rose Farms and both parcels have existing homes. She presented the existing conditions for the southern parcel as well as the residential development in Park Place to the south. She also presented a photograph of the residential development to the north as well as the split -rail fence. Ms. Martin explained the Community Plan is a policy document that guides development as well as natural resources within the City of Dublin and it contains land use recommendations, thoroughfare recommendations, and special considerations for pockets around and throughout the City. She presented the Future Land Use Map, which shows a recommendation for this site of Mixed -Residential - Rural Transition with a density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre and the plan encourages development to preserve open spaces. She said areas directly adjacent to the property on the north, east, and south are designated Suburban Residential — Low Density with 2 units per acre and the areas west are designated mainly Parks/Open Space but also Flex Office/Research & Development. Ms. Martin presented the Thoroughfare Plan that is part of the Community Plan including the Rural Roadway Character. She reported a traffic impact study was submitted as part of this application. She explained since Hyland -Croy Road is within the jurisdiction of Union County there was coordination between that county and the City of Dublin on this effort. She reported they have settled on a right-of- way request of 50 feet from the center line and the development text provides for the rural roadway character with large setbacks and naturalized landscaping. Ms. Martin presented the proposed Preliminary Development Plan that includes 73 single-family lots, a net density of 1.54 units per acre, 21 acres of Reserves/Open Space, and five public streets. She said this will contain 72 single-family homes plus the existing home to be preserved on Lot 8. She said development will occur in two sections, 37 new single-family lots in Section 1 as well as 2 Open Space Reserves and three public streets; Section 2 will contain 36 lots, the one existing Lot 8, four Open Space Reserves, as well as two public streets. Ms. Martin said the applicant has provided an illustrative plan of the proposal, which she presented to begin to depict the character of the site. She noted the large existing tree stand to be preserved as well as the Open Space along Hyland -Croy Road being consistent with the development to the north and south of this site. Ms. Martin said the proposal is consistent with the adjacent developments to the north and south of the site. She stated the proposed lots are 0.25 acres in size with the exception of Lot 8, which is 1.5 acres in size. Ms. Martin said the development text also includes architectural character and building material standards. She noted these are proposed to be consistent with recently approved developments in Dublin including Wellington Reserve and Celtic Crossing. The applicants provided a proposed circulation plan that was presented by Ms. Martin that includes both shared -use path and sidewalk connections, which connect to the neighborhoods to the north and south as well as providing regional path connections along Hyland -Croy Road north to the Glacier Ridge Nature Park. She stated that Engineering is requesting an additional shared -use path connection along Johnston Drive to provide an east/west connection. Chris Brown inquired about the shared -use paths. Ms. Martin explained a shared -use path is typically an asphalt bike path, which is wider than a sidewalk to be used by both pedestrians and cyclists. Ms. Martin indicated that the applicant is required to dedicate 3.14 acres of Open Space to the City of Dublin and the applicant is providing 21.38 acres, 16 of which are continuous within Reserve "C. She Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission March 2, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 8 said Reserves "A" and "B" are located on the Hyland -Croy Road frontage intended to be a naturalized landscape to be detailed at the Final Development Plan. She noted the stormwater basin, which is located in Reserve "C" that the City will both own and maintain. She said Reserve "D" provides the shared -use path connection and Reserve "E" is an existing wetland that will also be preserved — owned and maintained by the City as a natural habitat. Lastly, Reserve "F" is a small landscape island located at the terminus of Oliver Way. Additionally, she said the HOA will be required to maintain the existing split -rail fence abutting residential properties but the section of fence along Reserve "C" will be removed to provide public access to this open space. Ms. Martin said the Preliminary Plat is the final component to this application; the plat demarcates a number of standards that are described in the development text. She explained the plat memorializes five public roads, six open spaces, and 73 lots and demarcates several tree preservation zones and a front building line of 20 feet, which is consistent across all lots. Ms. Martin said approval is recommended for the Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan with seven conditions: 1) That the applicant enter into an infrastructure agreement with the City, prior to submitting the first Final Development Plan; 2) That the applicant work with the City and Union County to provide the correct right-of-way dedication along Hyland -Croy Road to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the approval of a Final Plat; 3) That the developer update the traffic impact study, plans, and development text to show and reflect all required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to a City Council hearing of the rezoning; 4) That as part of the development of Section 1, the applicant provides a southbound left -turn lane and northbound right -turn lane on Hyland -Croy Road into the site; 5) That the applicant provide an east -west shared -use path connection to connect Mill Springs Drive to Hyland -Croy Road and the larger regional network to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to a City Council hearing of the rezoning; 6) That the development text be updated to reflect the Preliminary Development Plan prior to a City Council hearing of the rezoning; and 7) That in accordance with the Zoning Code, the development text be updated to reflect the Appearance Code Standards not be applicable to Lot 8 until such time redevelopment occurs. *Thomas Hart, agreed to all 7 conditions. Ms. Martin said a recommendation of approval to City Council is recommended for a Preliminary Plat with the following condition: 1) That the applicant ensure that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to City Council submittal. Thomas Hart, agreed to the above condition. Bob Miller asked if the City received any feedback that can be shared from the Home Owner's Association meeting in November 2016. Ms. Martin explained the HOA meeting was sponsored by the applicant, however, staff was in attendance. She said the proposal at the November meeting was consistent with what was shown in May 2015, Concept B. She indicated there were some questions about the product type as well as maintenance and ownership of open spaces and treatments. Mr. Miller inquired about Reserve "A". Ms. Martin answered Reserve "A" is along the Hyland -Croy Road frontage and the character would be dictated by the existing residential development to the north and Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission March 2, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 8 the south as well as the Hyland -Croy Road character study, which is an update to the Community Plan that took place in 2011. She said it will be an open space with shared -use path connections so that a bike path will extend all the way up from Park Place through Autumn Rose Woods to Bishop's Crossing. Ms. Martin said stormwater management is not included in this proposal at this time for this subarea. Ms. De Rosa asked if the water retention is a pond or a dry basin. Ms. Martin answered it is a pond and will also serve as a visual amenity. Steve Stidhem asked if there will be a border, fence, or path around the pond. Ms. Martin said the closest path will be the one field located through Reserve "C" connecting to Park Place Park. She added there will not be space to accommodate a path behind the proposed residential lots. Ms. De Rosa recalled discussing this the last time and among the ideas she recalled a boardwalk proposed to make that a shared amenity. Mr. Brown indicated the boardwalk Ms. De Rosa is referring to might have been for the Avondale development. Mr. Stidhem said paths around ponds are a nice amenity. Claudia Husak referred to the engineering drawings and noted the significant grading around the pond to get this stormwater management into the space that is fairly close to the lots. In this area, she said there is a lot of sensitivity required to retain as many of the existing trees as possible and creating more paths there was discouraged in order to have more trees preserved. Mr. Miller recalled a pathway through the woods and asked staff to clarify if they eliminated those to preserve more trees. Ms. Husak said staff encouraged the applicant to provide a path through the woods. She said staff walked the woods with Parks and Recreation staff and there is a lot of concern with putting a path through there in terms of getting any kind of equipment into this area to clear and to pave to create any sort of path. She said this is not the final path location it is simply illustrating there will be a path through the woods and it ends at the playground of the adjacent neighborhood park. Tom Hart, Two Miranova Place, thanked staff for the excellent presentation and history of their journey. He introduced Matt Callahan, VP Land Acquisition, Pulte Homes; and Greg Chillog, Landscape Architect, principal of the Edge Group. He said Pulte's goal with this site is to maximize land and home values by building under Dublin's community standards. He said this property is surrounded on three sides by Dublin communities and there are utility and street stubs coming to the site from Dublin so it makes sense to follow Dublin's high standards. He said they meet the Code and Architectural requirements and comply with the Community Plan in terms of density and a recommendation of preserving the wooded acreage, the multi -use path connections, the open space requirements, and the large setbacks along Hyland -Croy Road. He said this is a careful balance with the number of homes they can build with significant preservation. He said the empty -nester product on this site comes with less impact on traffic and schools. Matt Callahan, 4900 Tuttle Crossing Boulevard, VP Pulte Homes, said they presented this plan informally two years ago but through the process, their plans have evolved. He said they have witnessed a surge and need for empty -nester, active adult style housing. He described the proposed units as upscale patio ranch homes with a master bedroom on the first floor along with all everyday living occurring on the first floor and the second floor features lofts and additional bedrooms. He added they were designed with modern features and range in size from 2,300 square feet to 3,400 square feet but there are options that increase the size. The development will have all natural materials he said, four-sided architecture, and decorated garage doors. He indicated the prices will range in the upper $400,000s into low $500,000s with an average price point of $500,000. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission March 2, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 8 Mr. Miller inquired about the patios and decks. Mr. Callahan said the choices will be consumer driven within the Zoning Code and there will be strict restrictions, reviewed by a Design Review Board. He said this will also be geared towards the empty -nester buyer — those that are still working and are active but may not have kids at home and not ready for a conventional retirement -style living in a condominium where everything is replicated and standardized. Mr. Miller clarified that a home could be built without a patio or deck during construction with the intent to be added after construction. Ms. De Rosa asked if the larger Lots 16 — 21 on the cul-de-sac will be the same size and flavor as the others. Mr. Callahan said the homes will all be from the same series and consistent in terms of design throughout the community. He added those lots are considered the more premium lots in the community so he would expect they would tend towards the higher range of homes. The Vice Chair invited public comment. Melissa Bogner, 6718 Monticello Lane, thanked the developers and staff for the community meeting held in November 2016. She confirmed the shared path on Johnston Road, Mill Springs, and Oliver Way will be the same width as ones found on Tullymore and Parkmill Drive and will be connected. She asked that a path around the pond be considered and trees could be removed here rather than around the cul-de-sac area to create usable space. She suggested a shelter or a bench to be incorporated. She said she was concerned about the product switching from the two-story home to a ranch home considering the size of the lots. She said the footprint from larger ranch homes will make the area feel denser. Senthia Balasubramanian, 7486 Barrister Drive, asked if any recreation area has been planned for this community because Park Place has one small park but if these houses are going to use the same park, they would prefer they had their own separate park. The Vice Chair confirmed that would be noted in the record and Parks and Recreation will review that consideration. Bob Clawson, 6735 Burnside Lane, asked why the fence is being removed around the woods where it backs up to the houses. Kan Zhao, 7525 Hyland -Croy Road, said his residence is on the opposite side of this area. He indicated the traffic will increase when all these houses are purchased. He asked if Hyland -Croy Road could be widened to improve the road conditions. The Vice Chair said that section is in Union County's jurisdiction, currently. Holly Olszewski, 7471 Wisdom Lane, inquired about the split -rail fence around the property. Ms. Martin clarified there are no new fences proposed as part of this development. She said the existing split -rail fence is proposed to be maintained by the HOA when there are residential lots abutting each other. She added the split -rail fence around Reserve "C" is proposed to be removed because the City would prefer that the publicly dedicated open space be accessible to all of the public. Ms. Olszewski asked if additional trees are planned for the existing tree line that runs between the existing subdivision and the proposed subdivision. Ms. Martin answered there will be additional plantings on the lots and there is a 15 -foot tree preservation zone delineated on the Preliminary Plat along the southern and northern property lines. Ms. Olszewski asked when Hyland -Croy Road is expanded if it will cut into Reserves "A" & "B". Ms. Martin reiterated that Hyland -Croy Road is maintained by Union County but there is constant coordination Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission March 2, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 8 between both the City Engineers and the Union County Engineer. She said the Thoroughfare Plan makes recommendations and that has been signed off on by the Union County Engineer as part of this application so the applicant is dedicating 50 feet of right-of-way from the center line, which is 10 additional feet to what already exists today. She added the applicant will be required to make improvements recommended as part of the traffic impact study that was submitted to both the City and the Union County Engineer, which include a southbound left -turn lane as well as a north -bound right -turn lane. Due to a future Hyland -Croy roadway character study to be conducted it will call for this to be a four -lane -divided, variable -width median road with a rural character but that is currently not programmed in the CIP. Ms. Olszewski indicated whether there will be a path around the pond or not, her family will still walk their dogs around this pond and several others, which is a nice community amenity. Lavanya Munaswamy, 6762 Park Mill Drive, said his home is right behind the new construction. He asked if there will be an impact to the homes that back up to the construction and if the construction would be completed in two phases, Sections 1 then Section 2. The Vice Chair indicated the Building Department usually helps govern that with the developer. He encouraged the homeowner to speak with the superintendent when the construction trailer shows up on site. Shen Guohong, 6811 Bishops Crossing Circle, inquired about the fence, to which Ms. Martin said she would address along with all the other questions. He also asked about the retention pond shown in the earlier proposal he is not seeing now. He confirmed there is only one opening for the community to Hyland -Croy Road and thought that also was different from the previous design. Ms. Martin explained all streets in this proposal are public streets and will be built and maintained by public standards; as such they will have curbs and gutters to direct stormwater. She said it is typical to consolidate an entrance to a single point in order to have separation between entrances. She reported there was just a single entrance proposed off of Hyland -Croy Road at the previous review. Ms. Martin stated the fence along the northern property line is proposed to remain between abutting residential developments and will be maintained by the Homeowner's Association. Ms. Martin restated the pond will be located within Reserve "C" and is intended to handle the stormwater management for the entire site. Ms. Husak reminded everyone that this is the Preliminary Development Plan stage so there is no final engineering, landscaping, or tree surveys available or required at this point and there will be a very similar plan coming back to the PZC for approval in the future should City Council sign off on this Preliminary Development Plan. Ms. De Rosa asked staff if the home on Lot 8 is sold in the future, if only one home could be built on that lot to which Ms. Martin answered affirmatively. Mr. Stidhem asked if the traffic study took into account the closing of the Park Place entries to which Ms. Martin also responded affirmatively. Ms. De Rosa inquired about house layout and density feel. Mr. Stidhem answered the Zoning Code limits lot coverage to 45%. Mr. Hart answered they expect the layout that is very similar to the neighborhood in terms of lot coverage and how the houses sit on the lot. He said most of these homes have more square footage on the first floor but the base footprint is going to look a lot like what is surrounding this development. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission March 2, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 8 Ms. Husak reported that staff requested lot layouts from the applicant for the smaller lots to ensure the houses, driveways, and outside amenities would fit within the buildable areas per Code. Mr. Stidhem said he understands this is for an older community but they are still going to have kids. He suggested between Lot 15 & 16 it would be an appropriate area for a park since there is a path going through there anyway. Mr. Hart referred to page 15 of the development text that breaks out which open spaces and reserves are to be maintained privately by the HOA and which is being dedicated to the City. He said the entire area of Reserve "C", mainly the woods, and pond are being dedicated to the City with the idea that Parks and Recreation will properly program the area. On that same page, he said it calls out the possible uses that could be there, including a playground. Mr. Brown said the pond that we are forcing into that spot he would much rather see in a natural state even if it means removing a few trees to make it a more fitting pond as opposed to a detention pond or retention area and be developed in a way the public and the neighbors could benefit. He indicated he is a tree hugger and there are a lot of trees there but at the same time there needs to be a balance between creating a more natural pond and blending it with the tree area, which would be his recommendation to Council. Ms. De Rosa echoed Mr. Brown's comment to Council adding she would like to see it as a walkable, wonderful amenity for the community. She said she really likes how the walking paths connect through there. Mr. Stidhem said in general, he likes the layout, it is a good mix of the land use incorporating open space but he is concerned about the traffic that will pull into Johnston Drive because of the closure of the Park Place entrance. Mr. Miller agreed. He said the developer listened very well and brought back almost exactly what the Commission had requested so he thanked the developer. He stated he likes it and is thrilled that the empty -nester concept is being addressed and it will look really good between those two existing developments. Mr. Brown said the City appreciates the amount of reserve land. Phil Hartmann said he wanted to remind the Commission before they go through the motions that there are only four members in attendance so the majority is voting and three affirmative votes are required to pass the application. Motion and Vote Mr. Stidhem motioned, Ms. De Rosa seconded, to recommend approval to City Council for a Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan with seven conditions: 1) That the applicant enter into an infrastructure agreement with the City, prior to submitting the first Final Development Plan; 2) That the applicant work with the City and Union County to provide the correct right-of-way dedication along Hyland -Croy Road to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the approval of a Final Plat; 3) That the developer update the traffic impact study, plans, and development text to show and reflect all required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to a City Council hearing of the rezoning; 4) That as part of the development of Section 1, the applicant provides a southbound left -turn lane and northbound right -turn lane on Hyland -Croy Road into the site; Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission March 2, 2017 — Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 8 5) That the applicant provide an east -west shared -use path connection to connect Mill Springs Drive to Hyland -Croy Road and the larger regional network to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to a City Council hearing of the rezoning; 6) That the development text be updated to reflect the Preliminary Development Plan prior to a City Council hearing of the rezoning; and 7) That in accordance with the Zoning Code, the development text be updated to reflect the Appearance Code Standards not be applicable to Lot 8 until such time redevelopment occurs. The vote was as follows: Mr. Miller, yes; Mr. Brown, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; and Mr. Stidhem, yes. (Recommendation of Approval 4 — 0) Motion and Vote Mr. Stidhem motioned, Ms. De Rosa seconded, to recommend approval to City Council for a Preliminary Plat with one condition: 1) That the applicant ensure that any minor technical adjustments to the plat are made prior to City Council submittal. The vote was as follows: Mr. Brown, yes; Mr. Miller, yes; Mr. Stidhem, yes; and Ms. De Rosa, yes. (Recommendation of Approval 4 — 0) Communications Claudia Husak said this will be processed through Council in April together with the Annexation so there will be notices sent to the adjacent residents. Ms. Husak said Council is having a Work Session on March 6"' for the library, which will be live -streamed. She said there is also a joint Work Session on April 171 with PZC and City Council. Cathy and Chris stated they would be attending the APA conference. The Vice Chair adjourned the meeting at 7:44 pm. As approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 6, 2017. City of Dublin Land Use and long Range Planning PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016-1236 phone 614.410.4600 RECORD OF DISCUSSION fax 614.410.4747 www.dublinohlousa.gov MAY 21, 2015 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. Means/Griffith Property 15-030INF 7540 and 7660 Hyland -Croy Road Informal Review Proposal: A potential residential development of a 48 -acre site on the east side of Hyland -Croy Road across from the Glacier Ridge Metro Park, south of Brand Road. The proposal includes two concepts for development for single-family lots of varying sizes with up to 70 lots and up to 21 acres of open space. Request: Informal review and feedback for a potential residential development prior to a future Concept Plan application. Applicant: Matt Callahan, Pulte Homes of Ohio, LLC. Representative: Thomas L. Hart, Esq. Isaac Wiles Burkholder & Teetor, LLC. Planning Contact: Marie Downie, Planner. Contact Information: (614) 410-4679, mdownie@dublin.oh.us RESULT: The Commission informally reviewed and provided feedback for two different site layouts for a potential residential development on a 48 -acre site on the east side of Hyland -Croy Road currently within Jerome Township across from Glacier Ridge Metro Park. The Commission supported the preservation of the existing trees and using the area as an added park amenity. The Commission had concerns regarding the dry basins/bio-swales as potential stormwater management methods and asked the applicant to provide additional information on how these would look and function. MEMBERS PRESENT: Victoria Newell Yes Amy Salay Yes Chris Brown Yes Cathy De Rosa Yes Robert Miller Yes Deborah Mitchell Absent Stephen Stidhem Yes STAFF CERWICATION 04. 1/-Y 1' 1 6 �' / I i I I Marie Downie, Planner Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission May 21, 2015 — Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 23 1. Means/Griffith Property 7540 and 7660 Hyland -Croy Road 15-O3OINF Informal Review The Chair, Ms. Newell, said the following application is a request for informal review and feedback for a potential residential development of a 48 -acre site on the east side of Hyland -Croy Road across from the Glacier Ridge Metro Park, south of Brand Road. She said the proposal includes two concepts for development for single-family lots and open space. Marie Downie reported there was a neighborhood meeting regarding the proposal and approximately 15 nearby residents attended who expressed concerns about the lot sizes, buffering between the subdivisions, retaining the existing fence surrounding the property, construction debris, and home values. Ms. Downie said the Community Plan identifies future land uses for areas of land that are not currently within the City for the event that they are annexed. She said future land uses have been identified for the parcels along Hyland -Croy Road and to the west, which are not part of the City of Dublin. She said the future land use for this site in particular is Mixed -Residential Rural Transition, which is intended to provide a density of 1.5 units per acre with a mix of housing types on smaller lots and significant open space. She noted the majority of the surrounding uses are residential. Ms. Downie said the Thoroughfare Plan identifies four major categories to define the visual experience for the major thoroughfare. She presented the characteristics for the rural category of which Hyland -Croy is classified. Ms. Downie said the site is included in the Northwest Glacier Ridge Special Area Plan, which provides concepts to guide future development of this area. She said it recommends the use of Conservation Design principles to preserve the existing wooded area and maximize views. She presented a sample layout that includes a mixture of housing types preserving the existing residential structure and the continuation of open space along Hyland -Croy Road. Amy Salay asked how many units are depicted in the rendering. Claudia Husak said this would correspond to the 1.5 units per acre future land use density assigned. Matt Callahan, 5782 Tarton Circle North, said he was here on behalf of the applicant — Pulte Homes. He said Pulte is relatively new to Central Ohio and is now located in Dublin. He said they are ready to launch the first all -Pulte Homes community at the Celtic Crossing Community to the west side of Hyland -Croy Road, across from Jerome High School. He described Pulte as a unique style of homes and floor designs new to Central Ohio. Mr. Callahan said the goals for this site are to: bring high quality housing; protect and enhance home values in the adjacent neighborhood; develop density comparable to the Community Plan; incorporate high standards; tie into the existing roadway and bike path connections; maintain a rural feel and character of Hyland -Croy Road; maintain generous setbacks, protect the wooded open space on the eastern portion of the site; and add to the existing Park Place Park. He said there are two concept plans to be presented this evening and neither have less than 40% open space. He said the goal is to obtain feedback from both the Commission and the residents. Greg Chillog, Edge Group, 330 W. Spring Street, Suite 350, Columbus, Ohio, 43215, said a couple of options were developed to present with a lot of similarities and a couple of major differences between the two. He said the applicant views the site as an infill site with many existing conditions that surround the property that dictate what can be done on the interior of the property. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission May 21, 2015 — Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 23 Mr. Chillog presented the site that includes two street connections and an extension of the bike path leading to the park area to the south. He said both concept plans have approximately 1.5 units per acre. He said Concept A represents 75 units of 70 to 80 -foot lots. He noted the connections and the main drive allowing for a grid system similar to what exists to the north and south of the site. He said the larger lots face Hyland -Croy Road and the perimeter of the site and the smaller lots are located at the site's interior. He said the idea of Concept A would be to extend a cul-de-sac into the woods to handle stormwater and drainage and allow for a larger green space as a focal point. He said Concept B is an alternative to handle the quantity and quality of stormwater. He said there are the same neighborhood connections as Concept A but the entrance would be midway into the project allowing a grid to the north and to the south, but staying out of the trees. He noted a smaller pond and bio-swales or dry retention areas to hold the water longer and clean it before it arrives at the pond. He said the big differences between the two plans deals with the stormwater. Victoria Newell asked how the bio-swales and bio -retention areas would be planted. Mr. Chillog responded that right now it is a "big idea" that needs development with a detailed planting plan. He said grass would not be planted to be mowed. He said it should be under drained. Typically, he said, there is a pipe with a catch basin in the rear of all the lots but the applicant is hoping for something different. Ms. Salay asked how deep the ones behind the lots need to be as well as the one up front Mr. Chillog said he did not know the exact depth but imagined it would be three to five feet maximum. He said the space drawn between the lots allows for a gradual depth. Bob Miller asked who would be responsible for the green space. Mr. Chillog said he thought all the green space would be dedicated to the City and most likely, the frontage would be maintained by the HOA. Ms. Husak said there have been some discussions about those areas between the lots since they are intended in this particular concept to be stormwater management areas, that there needs to be some care taken of delineating those so that residents know where the lots end and the possibility of dedicated City maintained reserves. Mr. Miller asked if the woods were pretty wet. Ms. Husak said the reason why woods usually exist is because the area is wet. She said there were discussions with the applicant early on about considering the area within the woods as stormwater management to be counted. She indicated the quality and quantity water standards had not been reviewed yet. She said this may cause more disturbance than desired so preserving the woods has been recommended as the preferable option. Cathy De Rosa asked if there were examples in the City of Dublin where this is successful. Ms. Husak responded there were not any good ones, yet. She said there is a landscape architect on staff who has a tremendous amount of knowledge of where this has worked successfully in other parts of the country. With this proposal, she said we will rely heavily on her to evaluate our past mistakes. Ms. Newell asked if that was achievable since bio-swales are difficult to have look nice and function well. Ms. Husak answered this is definitely something doable. She explained to get the density to work out with a single-family type product and tree preservation being a high priority, something different has to occur on this site. She said she is confident this can be successful; it will just take a different approach than what has been done in the past. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission May 21, 2015 — Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 23 Mr. Chillog said this is often done in parking lots where it is a lot easier and sees this as being closer in size to what is accomplished in a parking lot that might drain two or three bays to an area with a nice clean edge around it. Ms. Newell said these appear very rectilinear in that plan. She asked if there was ability within this plan for undulation or to soften the edges that might make them more naturalized in appearance and less ditch -like. Mr. Chillog answered affirmatively and explained that 40 or 50 feet would allow for softened edges and undulation. The Chair invited public comment. Ms. Downie posted the discussion questions up on the screen. Alysia Cassini, 7545 Marston Lane, said she attended the meeting hosted by the developer where they stated their development should be equal or better to Park Place and Bishop Crossing. She indicated their proposal was for single-family homes starting at $400,000 or more. She said she was thrown off to hear the term multi -family homes for this project tonight. She said the acreage for these lots span .20 - .23 acres per home. She requested that the lot sizes match Park Place and Bishop Crossing. She asked the Commission to focus on preserving the woods as part of Park Place Park and use the Conservation Design principles. She suggested to the developers that they invite the entire neighborhood to the neighborhood meetings instead of just the residents that border the property. Marian Vordemark, 6834 Stillhouse Lane, in Post Preserve, said she has been president of their HOA for over five years. She said she attended the meeting hosted by the Developer, even though she did not receive a letter. She indicated she understands there is a rule in place that Developers only need to notify residents within 150 feet. She said she is in favor of residential development, which mirrors Park Place. She said Post Preserve and Park Place are joint HOAs, consisting of 292 home sites joined together under one body. She stated Park Place lost 57 ornamental cherry trees at their entrance and it takes a long time to grow trees. She said the woods in this proposal have many mature trees, which she would like to see preserved. Mr. Brown said two concepts have been presented and asked Ms. Vordemark which plan she would prefer and she responded Concept B. Julia Turley, 6727 Burnside Lane, said her home backs up to the woods and prefers Concept B. She said she agreed with the comments made by Ms. Cassini. She inquired about the impact to the schools if this project were to move forward. She noted that nobody can turn left off of Hyland -Croy Road onto Post Road after 5:00 pm and wanted to know how the traffic flow issues were being addressed with the increased traffic that would be a result of this development. She indicated she appreciated the stormwater being addressed. The Chair said Staff may be able to address some of her concerns. Steve Langworthy said Planning does not have any control over the regular communication. He reported that maps and figures have been remaining developable land in the northwest area and the potential developed. He said this information allows the schools some advanced Ms. Turley said trailers are already being added to the high school. school issues but stated there is provided to the schools about the number of homes that could be planning. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission May 21, 2015 — Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 23 Mr. Langworthy confirmed there are some temporary measures being taken but will be some permanent building as well. Ms. Turley said that would translate into a need for more schools, more building, and increased property taxes. She asked why all the neighbors were not notified. The Chair stated there are some very specific regulations when an applicant files, they have to notify residents and businesses within a public distance around that property that does not necessarily require notification to an entire neighborhood. Ms. Husak pointed out that the applicant is not required to meet with neighborhoods; Planning asks applicants to do that, which this applicant agreed to do. She said they used the same notification requirements that staff followed for this public meeting. Additionally, she said the City has the policy to post a sign in front of a respective neighborhood alerting them of the public meeting as well as having a consistent presence on the internet. Amy Salay suggested contacting HOA presidents, who can then notify the neighbors. Ms. Husak said that is part of the rules as well. Ms. Salay said several of the City Council members meet with the school district on a monthly basis. She said the school district has been aware that we have developable land in the district and we are doing our best to plan that. Additionally, she said this area has been in the Community Plan since 2007. She indicated all of us would like to see this area remain a horse farm, but it is private property and they have the right to develop it. She said the applicant needs to meet the guidelines of our Community Plan, which is pretty low in terms of density. Tina Wawszkiewicz said the next case on the agenda this evening includes the possibility of an annexation of Hyland -Croy Road and particularly the intersection with Post Road. She said if that were to go forward, Staff would consider with Union County, how a transfer would happen. She reported the long-term interchange plan is well developed. Mr. Miller inquired about the SR161/US 33 plan as of today. Ms. Husak suggested getting into that discussion with the second case as it is more directly impacted. Joe Bogner, 6718 Monticello Lane, asked about the intended use for the large lots. He asked if the existing residential building will be kept intact. He asked if somebody would buy that to live in or if it is meant to be kept for historical preservation. Mr. Callahan said the intent is for the existing home on the property to remain in place and the existing owner could sell in the future. Mr. Bogner asked about the playgrounds. He said he thought all new developments require a playground or access to a playground and did not see it in this concept plan other than through a bike path. The Chair reminded the speakers that this is a Concept Plan for non-binding feedback so in most cases, all the details will not be available. Ms. Husak said it is not a requirement of have a playground or access to one. Mr. Bogner asked if sidewalks are intended for this development. Ms. Husak confirmed that sidewalks are a requirement. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission May 21, 2015 — Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 23 Melissa Bogner, 6718 Monticello Lane, asked that a playground be considered. She said the playgrounds in Park Place and Bishop Crossing are geared towards two through five-year old children and requests something appropriate for the next age group. She indicated she prefers paths that are double wide for when there is a parent with multiple children. Eileen Corson, 6717 Monticello Lane, said she does not see sidewalk connectivity to Jerome High School. She said there are a lot of children in middle school now in Park Place so safe access to the high school would become important. She reiterated that the current surrounding playgrounds are not large. She stated the woods are very important to her neighborhood. An unidentified resident said there were a lot of animals in the forest area. She said she was concerned about the number of children the additional houses would add to the schools and asked if another school would be needed which would then raise taxes. She said she wants to see the money allocated appropriately. The Chair closed the public comment portion of this case. Chris Brown said every time he sees a dry detention basin or any bio-swale in Dublin; they are unsightly and is not fond of them so far. He said he is not opposed, just does not like dry shallow areas that get muddy for five days after a rain. He said he liked the central corridor access of Concept B. He said he wants to save the trees but at the same time Concept A appeals to him with park -like nature of the retention ponds and the way it carves into the woods but still preserves a great deal of it. He indicated he would like to hear a bit more about the product difference that might be offered for sale between Concept A and Concept B. Mr. Callahan said Concept A would be geared towards the family buyer with the larger home. He said Concept B has smaller lots; the applicant has considered incorporating more of the active adult or empty - nester type housing. He said Pulte is a national company and there is a diverse product range. Steve Stidhem said he heard the residents say they prefer Concept B over A but he does not like Concept B with the dry basin and does not anticipate a good fit. He said the only thing he does not like about Concept A is the cul-de-sac that goes into the woods. He suggested Concept A stopping prior to the extension through the woods. He said he is concerned about parks. He said Park Place Park appears very small and asked how it would be addressed. He understands the kids in this area are getting older and having something more age appropriate would be fantastic. He said he is concerned with Lot 1; it does not line up with the houses to the north and feels it is too close to the road. Ms. De Rosa said she is also for preserving the trees. Instead of doing a dry basin, she asked if it is possible to reconfigure the plan or reduce the number of lots to put another small lake in there. She said in Concept B, the cul-de-sac is a little bit into the green and wondered if most of the green can be preserved. She asked if anything could be done to preserve the split -rail fences, farmhouse, and barns that are on there. She indicated she would also be happy to see front porches incorporated. She added that bike path connections should be kept and that school connections should be present. Mr. Miller said he is a fan of Concept B. He proposed bringing walking paths in from the existing park as well as from the neighborhoods. He said Concept B is taking a huge asset and protecting a few pieces. He said there are already some horse trails in the woods. He said he agrees with Mr. Brown on the dry basins and needs to see a good plan. He indicated it is interesting that the applicant has brought up empty -nester units but would like to see some architectural definition by way of pictures. Ms. Salay said she was interested in Concept B and saving the trees. She stated she does not want to see any houses going back into the woods. She indicated she likes walking paths or if it is wet back there, a Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission May 21, 2015 — Meeting Minutes Page 7 of 23 pond with a boardwalk. She said there are wet areas in her neighborhood and the boardwalks are wonderful. She stated she is intrigued by wet basins. She indicated she liked the idea of having the space between the homes and backyards with the addition of rain gardens. She requested a reconfiguration of Lots 52 — 56 that go back into the woods; she suggested a park or playground aspect with bike paths. She said empty -nester high-end style housing as stone cottages with front porch detail would take some pressure off of the school district as families would not be attracted to that type of housing. Victoria Newell said she was leaning towards Concept B rather than Concept A. She said there are some features on Concept A that she was hoping to have a marriage between the two. She asked if the barn is being preserved in Concept A as an amenity. She said she likes the idea of preserving the barn but has no idea what condition this barn is in. Mr. Chillog said they could explore the condition of the barn. Ms. Newell said she likes the larger pond feature in Concept A that appears as a nice park amenity. She said there is a difference between a dry basin and a bio-swale. She explained that bio-swales will in fact hold water and are intended to have a plant matrix in them. She said what is difficult is keeping up that plant matrix. She said bio-swales are not maintenance free and if not properly maintained, they become a ditch; her concern is long-term. She invited Engineering's comments as to whether they really filter water. Aaron Stanford said it is one of the approved measures for stormwater management and believes within reason, if properly maintained, can be successful. Ms. Newell asked what the City's requirements are for a bio-swale. Mr. Stanford said Engineering would want to have assurances that there were adequate outlets. He said they typically account for very heavy rain events and provide for flood volume through normal neighborhoods so it is not damaging to structures and would do that same analysis with this type of set up. Ms. Newell said she is not opposed to the bio-swales but has concerns regarding the aesthetics and maintenance. She indicated she likes the preservation of the woods more in Concept B. She said she would envision those woods to have some naturalized footpaths incorporated so it is an amenity for the neighborhood. She likes the water feature as it might be a little bit larger. Mr. Brown said in Brandon, there is an interesting pond in the woods that has a nice fishing pier and dock and asked if there was an opportunity here to make this a nice feature for the neighborhoods to go back and hang out at the pond and fish. He said that has really become an event for kids in Dublin; there is actually a fishing circuit. Mr. Stidhem inquired about the fence. Mr. Callahan said the fence was a topic at the meeting with the residents and it had not been reviewed up until that point. He said he believes the applicant can do a good job at preserving a lot of the fence on the northern side of the property. Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Plat - Development Text AUTUMN ROSE WOODS D u b l i n, O h i o Developer.• Pulte Homes of Ohio LLC 4900 Tuttle Crossing Blvd. Dublin, OH 43016 Phone: (614) 376-1018 Contact: Matt CaLLahan Legal. Isaac Wiles Burkholder & Teetor, LLC Two Miranova Place, Suite 700 Columbus, OH 43215 Phone: (614) 340-7415 Contact: Thomas L. Hart, Esq. Land Planning/ Landscape Architecture: The EDGE Group 330 West Spring Street, Suite 350 Columbus, OH 43215 Phone: (614) 486-3343 Contact: Greg ChiLLog Engineering: Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. 250 OLd Wilson Bridge Road, Suite 250 Worthington, OH 43085 Phone: (614) 540-6633 Contact: Michael C. Reeves Draft Submittal for Approval. -Dublin PlanninganclZoning Commission, October 3, 7016 Approved.Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission, March Z, 7017 Draft Submittal for Approval. -Dublin City Council, April 10, 7017 Approved.' Dublin City Council, May 77, 2017 AUTUMN ROSE WOODS Table of Contents SECTION I - Development Overview I. LOCATION AND SIZE II. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CHARACTER III. ANALYSIS OF NATURAL RESOURCES FOR CONSERVATION DESIGN IV. EXISTING LAND USE V. PROPOSED LAND USE M. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE VII. PROVISION OF UTILITIES VIII. ACCESS AND CIRCULATION V. PHASING SECTION II - Development Standards I. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS II. PERMITTED USES III. DENSITY IV. LOT STANDARDS V. STREET ACCESS AND/OR IMPROVEMENTS M. STREET STANDARDS VII. UTILITIES VIII. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT DC. TREE PRESERVATION, REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT X. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE XI. ARCHITECTURE XII. LANDSCAPING XIII. HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 7 8 10 10 10 10 11 12 13 13 14 14 15 19 21 SECTION I - Development Overview AUTUMN ROSE WOODS Development Overview I. Location and Size A. The site is located at 7660 and 7540 Hyland -Croy Road, within Jerome Township, Union County with a pending annexation to the City of Dublin. B. The site is located approximately 4,300' north of the intersection of Post Road and 3,400' south of Brand Road. C. There is approximately 1,075' of frontage along Hyland -Croy Road. D. The site measures approximately 2,125' east/west and 1,075' north/south and is generally rectangular in shape. E. The site is ±47.37 acres in area. II. Existing Conditions and Character A. The site is in the North Fork Indian Run Watershed. The site generally drains from the perimeter of the property to an area in the southeast corner of the site. B. The site is located entirely out of the 100 -year floodplain. C. Mature tree rows exist along the north and south property lines. A large wooded area, ±16.0 acres in size, exists on the eastern portion of the site. This wooded area is adjacent to the Park Place Park. A detailed tree survey was completed in March, 2016 for areas of the site where development will occur and within fifty (50) feet of proposed development areas. D. The western half of the site is agricultural land. E. A preliminary ecological investigation found existing wetlands on the site. The extents of the wetlands are pending verification. The study was performed by Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc. in January, 2016. F. The site is generally flat; sloping less than 1%. There are no steep slopes. Highpoints are located at the northwest corner (elevation 932), southwest corner (elevation 932) and northeast corner (elevation 930). A low point (elevation 926) is located along the southern boundary. G. Two single family homes exist on the site, near the edge of the large wooded area. Several barns, arenas and paddocks are located in the southern portion of the site, these are part of a horseback riding and equine facility. Several other smaller outbuildings and garages are associated with the single-family homes. H. The site is surrounded by single-family subdivisions to the north, south and east. AUTUMN ROSE WOODS III. Analysis of Natural Resources A. Primary Conservation Areas 1. Wetlands Development Overview a. Wetlands are identified on the site, per the Site Assessment Letter. The wetlands are in a wooded area in the southeast corner of the site and identified as "Reserve E." b. There are no naturally occurring ponds on the site. c. No jurisdictional streams exist on the site per the Site Assessment Letter. d. There is no river frontage on this site. 2. Floodplains a. 100 -year floodplain areas do not exist on the site. b. There are no Stream Corridor Protection Zones on the site. 3. Steep Slopes a. There are no steep slopes on the site. The site is generally sloping less than 1%. B. Secondary Conservation Areas 1. Soils a. Approximately 79.5% of the site is covered in Brookston silty clay loam, fine texture, 0 to 2 percent slopes. b. Approximately 20.5% of the site is covered in Crosby silt loam, Southern Ohio Till Plain, 0 to 2 percent slopes. c. On-site sewage disposal is not proposed for this development, eliminating the need to define areas for filtering effluent. 2. Woodlands a. A large wooded area, approximately sixteen (16) acres in size, occupies most of the eastern portion of the site. This wooded area is contiguous with the preserved woods in Park Place Park at the southeast corner of the site. 3 AUTUMN ROSE WOODS Development Overview b. A mature tree row exists along the northern property line. This tree row varies in quality and density. c. A detailed tree survey was completed in March, 2016 for areas of the site where development will occur and within fifty (50) feet of proposed development areas. 3. Farmland a. Agricultural land/farmland is present on most of the western portion of the site. 4. Views Into and Out from the Site a. Significant open space views exist from Hyland -Croy Road across the site. The existing woodlands provide a backdrop to the views on the east. b. View corridors exist along the east and west side of Hyland -Croy Road. Developed areas on the east side of Hyland -Croy Road provide views across a large scenic setback with rural character. 5. Significant Wildlife Habitats a. A preliminary investigation did not identify any significant wildlife habitats on site. 6. Historic, Archaeological and Cultural Features a. A preliminary investigation did not identify any buildings, ruins, earthworks, stone walls or other resources with historic, archaeological or cultural significance on the site. C. The primary and secondary conservation areas are generally located on the eastern half of the site and along the Hyland -Croy Road Corridor. With most of the natural resources located within these areas, a larger, contiguous development zone is defined east of the Hyland -Cory Road setback on the west to the wooded areas on the eastern portion of the site. IV. Existing Land Uses A. Existing uses are rural residential and agricultural. Autumn Rose Farm currently operates as a horseback riding and training facility. B. The site is currently zoned in Jerome Township as Agricultural. C. The site is bordered by the Bishop's Crossing Subdivision to the north and the Park Place Subdivision to the south and east. Glacier Ridge Metro Park is located west of the site, across Hyland -Croy Road. AUTUMN ROSE WOODS Development Overview D. Surrounding land uses include: suburban residential low density, rural residential/agricultural and parks/open space. E. Surrounding densities range from 2.00 du/ac. to 2.25 du/ac for residential uses. V. Proposed Land Uses A. Proposed uses are single family residential, parks, open space and permitted uses as outlined in the R-1, Restricted Suburban Residential District in the Dublin Zoning Code. B. The Northwest Glacier Ridge Special Area Plan identifies this site to be developed as "Infill Residential." C. The proposed zoning classification is PUD —Planned Unit Development. The proposal is to develop the tract with 72 new single-family lots, maintaining an existing single-family home, while preserving a significant wooded area and rural road corridor and complementing adjacent development. D. Fee simple single family lots in widths from seventy (70) to eighty (80) feet, with typical setbacks, will provide high quality homes on 9,100 square foot lots. One of the existing single family homes will remain on a larger wooded lot. E. This is an infill development site. Location and the type and style of development proposed for the site is dictated by bordering developments and natural features. The proposed uses are complementary to the adjacent uses. When compared to homes in adjacent neighborhoods, this development will provide homes having equal or higher quality and character. VI. Parks and Open Space A. A total of ±21.38 acres (±45.1%) of the development will be preserved for parks and open spaces. B. The parks and open space system within the proposed development will be developed around the existing wooded area and rural roadway setback. These areas will function as both passive and active green spaces and designated park areas. C. A prominent wooded area approximately sixteen (16) acres in size becomes the organizing element for the new community as well as the existing surrounding neighborhood. This park provides easy access and visibility to a preserved natural feature for the proposed development as well as surrounding neighborhoods. D. A shared -use path system, within the open space areas, will provide access to the greater citywide system. AUTUMN ROSE WOODS Development Overview E. Parks and open space areas within the development will be owned by the City of Dublin and maintained by the City of Dublin and the homeowner's association. VII. Provision of Utilities A. General 1. All utilities, including sanitary sewer, water, telephone, electric, and gas, are available at this site. 2. All utilities will be designed and constructed to meet the standards established by the City of Dublin Engineer, which includes the City of Columbus standards as required. 3. A comprehensive storm water management system will meet Ohio EPA and City of Dublin design criteria. 4. All utilities shall be placed in appropriate locations on the lots that will best preserve the existing trees, subject to engineering practices and standards of the City Engineer. B. Sanitary Sewer 1. Sanitary sewer service to Autumn Rose Woods is accessible from one location. 2. The majority of the proposed development will be serviced from an existing 10 -inch sanitary sewer line that is stubbed to the southern property line between lots 44 and 45 of Park Place Section 1 and was designed to accommodate approximately 48.3 acres of tributary area at 10 people per acre. 3. Offsite sanitary sewer improvements are not expected at this time. C. Water 1. An existing 12 -inch water main along the east side of Highland -Croy Road is extended to the site from the north and the south. The 12 -inch water main will be extended across the site as part of the development. 2. Public water mains will be constructed along the proposed roadways within the development. 3. The existing 8 -inch water mains stubbed at the end of Spring Mill Drive and Barrister Drive will be tied into the new public system which will aid in service to this site. D. Storm Water —Post Developed AUTUMN ROSE WOODS Development Overview In the post -development condition, the site drainage will be handled by an on-site retention basin that will accept drainage from impervious areas such as roadways, driveways, roofs and sidewalks and some rear yard drainage. The total developed tributary area to the basins includes approximately 38 acres with a composite runoff curve number of 81. An additional 47 acres of off-site drainage will pass through the site. The analysis was run using the allowable release rates from the Storm Water Master Plan. The outlet of the basin drains to the storm sewer stubbed to the site from the Park Place development. Water quality is provided using the wet basin per Ohio EPA and City of Dublin requirements. The outlet for the basin will be a two- stage outlet, with the first stage providing the required 24-hour water quality drawdown. The second stage controls the allowable release rates from the Storm Water Master Plan. 1. The City of Dublin will maintain all storm water management areas. VIII. Access, Circulation and Improvements A. Vehicular access to the site will be from a single access point on Hyland -Croy Road and from two (2) existing streets stubbed to the property, connecting to the surrounding neighborhoods. B. A full service, site access drive from Hyland -Croy Road will provide primary vehicular access. C. Mill Spring Drive extends from the Bishop's Crossing neighborhood to connect with the proposed street network. D. Barrister Drive extends from the Park Place neighborhood to connect with the proposed street network. E. Vehicular circulation through the development provides neighborhood connectivity while discouraging cut -through circulation. F. Pedestrian connections will provide access to the surrounding shared -use path network and regional parks/open space network. G. A southbound left turn lane shall be provided at the Hyland -Croy Road site access as detailed in the TIS. IX. Phasing A. Phasing will start with Section 1 as identified on the Preliminary Plat and will continue based on market conditions and housing absorption. B. Phase 1 includes removal of all or some of the existing equestrian buildings and residence on the southern property parcel, removal of fences, construction of a southbound Highland -Croy Road left AUTUMN ROSE WOODS Development Overview turn lane, the main site access drive, street connection to Barrister Drive, Reserves A, B and C, Basin A and 37 lots Section 1. C. Phase 2 will include Reserves D and E and 36 lots in Section 2. SECTION II - Development Standards AUTUMN ROSE WOODS I. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Development Standards Development standards are addressed in this PUD text regarding proposed density, general site issues, traffic, circulation, landscaping, and architecture. These component standards ensure consistency and quality throughout the development. Where submitted drawings or this text define or articulate a development or zoning standard the same shall be applicable and govern this PUD. Where the submitted drawings or this text do not define standards, Chapters 152 and 153 of the City of Dublin Code shall apply. II. PERMITTED USES A. Single-family detached homes. B. Parks and open spaces. C. Permitted uses as outlined in the R-1, Restricted Suburban Residential District in the Dublin Zoning Code. III. DENSITY A. A maximum of seventy-three (73) residential dwelling units shall be permitted in this PUD. B. A maximum gross density of 1.55 dwelling units per acre shall be permitted in this PUD. IV. LOT STANDARDS Single-family homes in this development will be constructed on traditional lots with fee simple ownership. Specific lot standards shall apply to each of these development types: A. Fee Simple Lots 1. Lot Size a. Lot Area: Nine thousand one hundred (9,100) square feet minimum. b. Lot Width: Seventy (70) feet minimum. c. Lot Depth: One hundred twenty-five (125) feet minimum. 2. Lot Setbacks a. Front yard: There shall be a minimum front yard setback of twenty (20) feet from the right-of-way line or as shown on the approved preliminary plat. The requirements of the 10 AUTUMN ROSE WOODS Development Standards Subdivision Regulations Chapter 152.019(C)(6) shall not be applicable to this development. b. Rear yard: Twenty-five (25) feet minimum. c. Side yard: Six (6) feet minimum. d. Hyland -Croy Road: There shall be a minimum building and pavement setback of one hundred fifty (150) feet from the proposed Hyland -Croy Road right-of-way. Streets, utilities, storm water management, landscaping, shared -use paths, open space, park amenities and entry features may be located within this setback to enhance the rural character of the Hyland -Croy Road corridor. V. STREET ACCESS AND/OR IMPROVEMENTS A. Access 1. Hyland -Croy Road: a. One full service access shall be provided as indicated on the Preliminary Plat. 2. Mill Springs Drive: a. Mill Springs Drive shall be extended from the Bishop's Crossing neighborhood to connect with the proposed street network as indicated on the Preliminary Plat. 3. Barrister Drive: a. Barrister Drive shall be extended from the Park Place neighborhood to connect with the proposed street network as indicated on the Preliminary Plat. 3. Pedestrian Access: a. A shared -use path shall be provided in the Hyland -Croy Road setback that connects existing shared -use pathways stubbed at the north and south boundaries. Final alignments shall be presented for approval as part of the Final Development Plan. b. An existing shared -use path shall be extended from the Park Place neighborhood, connecting to the proposed pedestrian circulation system along Oliver Way. c. An existing shared -use path shall be extended from the Bishop's Run neighborhood, along the east side of Mill Springs Drive, connecting to the proposed pedestrian circulation system. d. A shared use path, within Reserve C, shall provide a connection from the playground area in Park Place Park to the pedestrian circulation system along Oliver Way. This 11 AUTUMN ROSE WOODS Development Standards pathway shall be field located to minimize impacts to the existing trees. Final design details, including material, shall be presented for approval as part of the Final Development Plan. 5. Private Driveways a. Vehicular access shall be limited to one (1) driveway curb -cut per lot. B. Improvements 1. Hyland -Croy Road Site Access: a. A southbound left turn lane shall be provided at the Hyland -Croy Road site access, as detailed in the TIS, as part of Section 1. 2. Off -Site Traffic Improvements: a. Any required off-site traffic improvements based on the findings of the TIS, shall be identified and included in an infrastructure agreement between the developer and the City of Dublin, as approved by City Council, or as a condition of preliminary plat approval if no infrastructure agreement is completed. VI. STREET STANDARDS A. Public Streets 1. Right -of -Way Width: Fifty (50) feet minimum 2. Pavement Width: Twenty-eight (28) feet minimum for all public streets, as measured back -of -curb to back -of -curb 3. Drive Lanes: Two (2) 4. Parking Lanes: Parking shall be permitted on one side of public streets internal to the site opposite the waterline and fire hydrants. 5. Tree Lawn: May vary based on existing vegetation, but shall in no case be less than eight (8) feet in width. 6. Sidewalk: Four (4) feet wide minimum; sidewalks shall be concrete and located on both sides of the street except where a shared use path may be utilized in lieu of a sidewalk, as shown on the Pedestrian Circulation Plan. 7. Shared -use path: Eight (8) feet wide minimum; shared -use paths shall be constructed of asphalt, except when located in front of lots. When located in 12 AUTUMN ROSE WOODS VII. UTILITIES A. Design and Construction Development Standards front of lots, the path shall be constructed of concrete with saw cut joints. 1. All utilities shall be designed and constructed to meet the standards established by the City of Dublin Engineer, which includes City of Columbus standards as required. B. Location 1. All utilities shall be placed in appropriate locations on the individual home lots that will best preserve the existing trees in good or fair condition. VIII. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT A. Design and Construction 1. A comprehensive storm water management system shall be developed, following the Ohio EPA and City of Dublin storm water management policies. 2. In the post -development condition, the site drainage will be handled by an on-site retention basin that will accept drainage from impervious areas such as roadways, driveways, roofs and sidewalks and some rear yard drainage. The total developed tributary area to the basins includes approximately 38 acres with a composite runoff curve number of 81. An additional 47 acres of off-site drainage will pass through the site. The analysis was run using the allowable release rates from the Storm Water Master Plan. The outlet of the basin drains to the storm sewer stubbed to the site from the Park Place development. Water quality is provided using the wet basin per Ohio EPA and City of Dublin requirements. The outlet for the basin will be a two-stage outlet, with the first stage providing the required 24-hour water quality drawdown. The second stage controls the allowable release rates from the Storm Water Master Plan. 3. The City of Dublin will maintain all storm water management areas. B. Location 1. Storm water management facilities may be located in any reserve areas or easements. Final design and details will be provided in the Final Development Plan. C. Maintenance Responsibility 1. The City of Dublin shall maintain all storm water structures/areas. 13 AUTUMN ROSE WOODS IX. TREE PRESERVATION, REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT A. Tree Preservation/Removal Development Standards 1. It is the intent of the developer to preserve as many good and fair condition trees as possible on site. A good faith effort will be made to preserve existing trees in good and fair condition. The developer will work with staff at the final development plan stage to identify appropriate measures and best practices to ensure continued preservation. 2. A Tree Removal and Preservation Plan will be provided as part of the Final Development Plan. a. Tree protection fencing shall be shown on the Tree Removal and Preservation Plan at or beyond the critical root zone of all trees to be preserved. 3. City approval of tree protection fencing locations shall be required prior to the issuance of construction permits. 4. If critical root zones of preserved trees cannot be maintained during construction, those impacted trees shall be replaced in accordance with code. B. Tree Replacement Plan 1. Tree Replacement shall be per code, except that non -landmark trees (less than 24" DBI) shall be replaced at a rate of one tree for each removed and subject to replacement. 2. Replacement trees may be located in all open space reserve areas. 3. A minimum of three hundred one and one-half (301.5) caliper inches shall be replaced on site. 4. Replacement trees shall be appropriately located to ensure the long-term survival of the replacement trees, per staff approval. X. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE A. Dedication 1. The open space will meet that which is required under code. 2. All open space reserves shall be dedicated to the City. a. Prior to dedication of Reserve C to the City, the developer shall: 14 AUTUMN ROSE WOODS B. Maintenance Development Standards i. Fell all standing dead trees within fall/striking distance to private property (as determined by tree height). ii. Fell all standing dead trees within seventy-five (75) feet of all paths. iii. Remove all "Invasive Species" (to be identified in the Final Development Plan) within seventy-five (75) feet of all paths and property edges. 1. Reserves A, B and F shall be maintained by the homeowner's association. Storm water structures in these reserves shall be maintained by the City of Dublin. 2. Reserves C, D and E shall be maintained by the City. Storm water structures in these reserves shall be maintained by the City of Dublin. C. Programming 1. All reserves shall be programmed in conjunction with city staff as passive and active areas at the time of anticipated open space development. 2. Open space programming may include the following options and amenities: a. Reserves A and B: shared -use path, entry features, seating, landscaping and/or storm water management facilities. b. Reserve C: soft -surface shared -use path, playgrounds, trash and recycling receptacles, bike racks, seating, landscaping and/or storm water management facilities. c. Reserve D: shared -use path. d. Reserves E and F: landscaping. 3. Future design and development of parks and open spaces shall be permitted with administrative approval based on the above programming standards. XI. ARCHITECTURE A. Architectural Standards 1. Architectural standards are addressed in this text regarding plan approval, character, diversity, permitted materials and colors, configuration of materials and architectural elements. 15 AUTUMN ROSE WOODS Development Standards 2. Unless otherwise set forth herein, all structures shall meet the City of Dublin Zoning Code Residential Appearance Standards, except the existing home on lot 8 as identified on the preliminary plat. The existing home on lot 8 shall be exempt from the Residential Appearance Standards. Future additions or new builds on this lot shall meet the Residential Appearance Standards. B. Architectural Diversity 1. The same or similar front elevations shall not be repeated within: a. Two lots on either side of subject lot. b. Three lots directly across the street from subject lot. c. Any lot on a cul-de-sac bulb. 2. Corner lots apply to the street on which the home's front facade is situated. 3. Open Space areas may provide similar separation as lots within the influenced area. In this case, the open space area may be considered as influenced lot or lots. 4. A lot diversity matrix will be presented for approval at the final development plan phase. C. Plan Approval 1. The Master Developer shall retain the right of individual plan approval for all home designs within the PUD. D. Permitted Building Height 1. Maximum of thirty-five (35) feet, as measured per code. E. Permitted Exterior Materials 1. Cladding Materials a. The exterior cladding of all structures on all lots shall be finished using all natural materials, including brick, thin brick, stone, manufactured stone, wood, engineered wood, fiber -cement siding products, stucco or any combination thereof. b. Stucco shall be prohibited as a cladding material on Lots 1, 37 and 38-46 as indicated on the Preliminary Plat. 2. Trim Materials a. Wood, aluminum, urethane foam, EIFS, copper or fiber -cement products. fH AUTUMN ROSE WOODS Development Standards b. Shutters shall be considered as trim for the purpose of meeting the Residential Appearance Code requirements. 3. Roofing Materials a. All homes shall utilize dimensional asphalt shingles, wood, slate, concrete, or tile. Standing seam metal roofs are permitted on porches and secondary roofs. b. Roof penetrations shall be painted to match the color of the roof material. F. Permitted Exterior Colors 1. Cladding Colors a. Muted colors, natural earth tones, neutrals and whites are permitted. b. High-chroma colors are not permitted. 2. Trim Colors a. Muted colors, natural earth tones, neutrals and whites, complementary or contrasting to siding color, are permitted. b. High-chroma colors are not permitted. 3. Roofing Colors a. Natural earth tones and/or neutral colors, including black. b. High-chroma colors are not permitted. G. Configuration of Materials (for primary and accessory structures) 1. Four-sided architecture shall be required so that similar architectural design elements and details shall be consistent throughout all elevations of the structure. a. All sides of a house shall display a high level of quality and architectural interest. b. The majority of a building's architectural features and treatments shall not be restricted to a single facade. c. Blank facades are not permitted for any detached garages or accessory structures. d. All sides of a house should be articulated using bays, insets, balconies, porches or stoops related to entrances and windows. 17 AUTUMN ROSE WOODS Development Standards Watertables which extend the entire length of a side or rear elevation shall be considered a design element for the purposes of meeting four-sided architecture requirements. 2. Changes in cladding material shall occur at logical locations, typically at interior corners where one building mass meets another. Masonry transitions at exterior corners are permitted with a minimum 12" material return and trim detail. 3. The number of materials utilized on prominent facades, excluding fenestration, shall not exceed three (3) materials. H. Architectural Elements 1. Prominent Facades a. All street facing elevations must contain at least three design elements, in any combination, per Dublin Zoning Code 153.190. b. Lots 1, 9, 15, 20, 21 and 37, as indicated on the preliminary plat, present highly visible elevations to open space areas. Elevations facing these open space areas shall contain at least three (3) design elements, in any combination. 2. Roofs a. Primary roof pitches shall have a minimum slope of 6:12 rise overrun. b. Secondary roofs, such as minor gables, dormers and porch pediments shall be permitted to have minimum slope of 4:12 rise over run. When the primary roof pitch is a gable with the pediment end oriented towards the street a less roof pitch shall be permitted. c. Flat roofs are permitted, but must integrate strong cornice lines. 3. Chimneys a. "Cantilevered" or "through -the -wall" chimneys are not permitted. b. All chimneys shall be built on an integral foundation. c. All exterior portions of chimney shall be finished masonry, consisting of brick, stone, and/or manufactured stone. 4. Garages a. All single-family dwellings shall have an attached or detached garage of sufficient size to accommodate a minimum two (2) standard sized automobiles, side by side. Wl AUTUMN ROSE WOODS Development Standards b. All garage doors shall be decorative in appearance, such as "carriage -style" doors, and shall utilize detail features, such as decorative hinges, handles, locks, brackets and/or windows, as appropriate to the design character of the individual home. 5. Shutters a. Shutters shall be sized to fully cover the adjacent window. b. Shutters that are operable or appear as such shall utilize appropriate shutter hardware (s - clips and hinges). c. Shutters shall be constructed of wood, vinyl, synthetic, PVC or fiber -cement and shall be painted or have integral color. d. Raised Panel, flat panel, louvered and board -and -batten are permitted shutter styles. 6. Front Porches a. Front Porches, when utilized, shall be covered and open. Front porches enclosed by glass or screen enclosures are prohibited. XII. LANDSCAPING A. Entry Features 1. Entry features may include integrated project signage, landscaping, and irrigation. 2. Design shall contribute to and maintain the rural character of the corridor. 3. Final location, design, and standards for entry features and related landscaping and signage details shall be presented and approved during the Final Development Plan phase. 4. All entry features will be owned and maintained by the homeowner's association. 5. Necessary easements or reserves shall be provided on the final plat. B. Street Trees 1. Street trees shall be installed in accordance with the City of Dublin Code. The City Forester shall determine final type and location. C. Private Sidewalks 1. A minimum four (4) feet wide sidewalk shall be required for every residence. This private side walk shall extend from the front door to the driveway, where applicable, as the driveway may abut the front door when an auto courtyard is utilized. I&] AUTUMN ROSE WOODS D. Fencing Development Standards 1. Fences shall be prohibited on all lots, except for pool barriers and preserved perimeter paddock fencing. 2. To create publicly accessible open space, all existing fencing located in and along perimeters of Reserves A, B, C, D and E shall be removed as part of the initial phase of development. Removal of fencing shall be coordinated with city staff to ensure best practices. 3. Existing perimeter paddock fencing located on lots 1-7, 21-37 shall be preserved and maintained in a continual state of good repair by the HOA. Maintenance plans, defining the minimum standards for maintaining the fence in a good and workmanlike manner, shall be presented for approval as part of the Final Development Plan. E. Mailboxes 1. Mailboxes shall be consistent in design and style throughout the development. A mailbox design shall be submitted for review and approval at the final development plan phase. F. Cul -de -Sac Islands 1. Cul-de-sac islands shall be landscaped with lawn and/or plant material. A landscape plan shall be presented for approval as part of the Final Development Plan. 2. Any lawn and/or landscaping within an island shall be maintained by the HOA. G. Hyland -Croy Road Landscape Treatment 1. A landscape treatment shall be installed in the setback along Hyland -Croy Road to enhance the rural character of the corridor. Masonry piers, stone walls and/or fencing may be included as part of this landscape treatment. 2. Plantings shall create a natural effect that is consistent with the established character of the corridor. The treatment may consist of deciduous or evergreen trees and shrubs, ornamental trees, perennials or any combination thereof. This effect shall be installed across the Hyland - Croy Road frontage. 3. A sign and/or entry feature may be located within this setback. Details shall be provided for approval as part of the Final Development Plan. 4. Pedestrian pathways, shared -use paths, water features and pond access may be provided in this treatment. 5. Final design and details of the landscape treatment shall be provided for approval as part of the Final Development Plan. Pill AUTUMN ROSE WOODS H. Mid -Block Shared Use Path Access Development Standards 1. Shared use paths that are located mid -block between lots shall be landscaped to provide a barrier between the pathway and adjacent private yards. 2. Landscaping shall include lawn, deciduous shrubs, evergreen shrubs, deciduous trees, evergreen trees and fencing or any combination thereof, or shall match the design where connecting to existing paths. Design and details shall be provided and approved in the Final Development Plan phase. 3. The final locations of shared -use paths crossings along public streets will be evaluated by the City Engineer to minimize mid -block crossings and will be presented for approval as part of the Final Development Plan. XIII. HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION All residential property owners located within the Autumn Rose Woods PUD shall be required to join and maintain membership in a forced and funded homeowner's association, which will be formed prior to any lots being sold. Homeowners association responsibilities shall be detailed within Declarations of Covenants and Restrictions as approved by the City of Dublin before being duly recorded in the office of the appropriate County Recorder. These Declarations of Covenants and Restrictions shall run with the land and shall include, without limitation, the requirements imposed upon the homeowner's association in this text. 01