Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/09/2002 RECORD OF PROCEEDlf'JGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INC" FORM NO 10148 December 9,2002 Held 20 Mayor McCash called the Dublin City Council meeting of December 9, 2002 to order at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers at the Dublin Municipal Building. Mrs. Boring led the Pledge of Allegiance. .~ Roll Call Council members present were: Mayor McCash, Vice Mayor Boring, Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, Mr. Kranstuber, Mr. Lecklider, Mr. Reiner and Ms. Salay. Staff members present were: Ms. Brautigaum, Ms. Grigsby, Mr. Smith, Mr. Ciarochi, Mr. McDaniel, Mr. Harding, Mr. Husenitza, Mr. Colby, Ms. Clarke, Mr. Gunderman, Ms. Crandall, Ms. Puskarcik, Mr. Hahn, Mr. Hammersmith, Ms. Uhl and Ms. Hoyle. Approval of Minutes of November 18, 2002 Regular Meeting Ms. Salay moved approval. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mayor McCash, yes. Correspondence The Clerk reported that no correspondence requiring Council action has been received. CITIZEN COMMENTS ScottDrinq, Executive Director of the Dublin Convention &Visitors Bureau and Mike Jenkins, Board Member and Council representative to the DCVBprovided an update to Council. The Bureau is currently working in partnership with the Dublin Arts Council. Cindy Hide represents the DAC on thE:! Bureau Board, and Kevin Denny represents the DCVB on the DAC Board. The packe't distributed to Council contains survey results ~ from 2002, indicating that the top two areas of improvement were in overall satisfaction and communication. The Bureau is rrjaking changes in the areas of sports marketing and has a new employee on board. Mr. Dring stated that they completed a lodging impact study one month ago. It is done annually and measures the current status of the lodging industry. In terms of occupancy, the 2002 occupancy percentages will be 61 percent; last year, the percentage at this time was 60 percent. The forecast for 2003 is that occupancy will drop to 60.2 percent before climbing to 62 percent in 2004. The average daily rate will be $81.03 per room this year - the lowest number ever experienced. Major factors are the economy and the hotel room oversupply in the northwest market area. They have launched a program called, "Invest in Your Own Back Yard" which targets Dublin-based organizations and businesses to encol,.Jrage overnight stays in one of the 14 Dublin hotels. On behalf of the DCVB and the Sports Committee, he thanked Council for the grant for the 2004 Holiday High School Basketball Tournament. Wallace Maurer, 7451 Dublin Road asked if he could speak for an additional two minutes, in view of the fact that he used only three of his five minutes the last time he spoke to Council. Mayor McCash stated that only five minutes are allowed per meeting. Mr. Maurer asked Mr. Ciarochi to come to the microphone. Ms. Brautigam declined to direct Mr. Ciarochi to do so. Mr. Maurer noted that he has obtained documentation from the City regarding the firing of Mr. Kindra. The document is titled, "Sample Communication Scripts." At the May 20 ~ Council meeting, the Bishop's Crossing plat was discussed and the subject of raised crosswalks was raised. A motion to table the plat for two weeks was carried, with the assumption that the parties would resolve the issues prior to the next hearing by Council. Mr. Kindra was not involved in the meetings which transpired during those two weeks. The firing of Mr. Kindra took place during that time period. An argument made in support of Mr. Kindra's firing was a difference in management philosophy and style. In his opinion, a difference of opinion in terms of what to do is not cause for firing. Mayor McCash noted that the five minutes has now expired. SPECIAL PRESENTATION Cardinal Health Brandinq Campaign Connie Woodburn. Cardinal Health Professional and Government Services, noted that a very visible change is underway at Cardinal Health at this time. Cardinal is a Fortune 23 company which distributes drugs, medical/surgical and lab supplies, manufactures medical/surgical supplies, and consults to the health care industry. Cardinal Health has I I: ; !' ii. i i i ; "c",;''''~''''n ',.TU'."l'.'.! nn,:. ~'NCJ..'>.l.U.'.ll1 -:~,r~1:' ': ."fYlll~':'.f'It"t,Wr,I,$,~.,<)".It;;'iMi",.~'~it. ~ .Ii I RECORD OF PROCEEOINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FORM NO 10148 Decernber 9, 2002 Page 2 Held 20 50,000 associates in 23 countries - 60 percent in the U.S. and 40 percent outside of the U.S. Revenues this year will be in excess of $44 billion. Their mission is to provide products and services that will improve the quality and the efficiency of health care to enable people to live longer and have a higher quality of life. Cardinal provides the -- products and services that enable hospitals, nursing homes, retail pharmacies and drug manufacturers to be the best in class that they can possibly be, and have the highest quality, patient safety, efficiency and effectiveness possible. She then described the growth of the company over the past 31 years under CEO Robert Walter. In the last 8 years, Cardinal has made 25-30 acquisitions, resulting in a plethora of different companies and logos under the Cardinal umbrella. They have four business segments: pharmaceutical distribution and services to health care providers; manufacturing and distribution of medical/surgical and lab supplies; automated inventory, dispensing and clinical information systems; and pharmacy technology and services group. Effective December 1 st, a new logo and name have been adopted for their corporation to be recognized as one company - Cardinal Health. The familiar bird has been replaced with an updated logo which demonstrates the partnership and integration with which they work with their customers. The new name will be introduced to various audiences over the next few months. They have hired a public relations firm to assist in this effort. The process of rebranding will take some time, but the hope is that the suppliers/vendors will find more value in working with them,.that analysts will recommend purchase of their stock, and that it will facilitate future growth opportunities for the corporation. Mr. Reiner asked for information about the earth moving currently taking place on the Cardinal site. ~s; W~o~~.~rn responded that landscaping improvel11ents are curr~ntly underway on the west carnpLis to improve the aesthetics along Emerald Parkway. They are in the process of development and planning for their next building, and they anticipate an - application being submitted to the Planning Commission in the next few months. Ms. Woodburn thanked Council for the opportunity to provide this update. LEGISLATION SECOND READING/PUBLIC HEARING - OROINANCI:$ . Ordinance 133-02 Adopting the Annual Operating Budget for 2003, and Declaring an Emergency. Ms. Grigsby stated that this document incorporates the changes made during the budget workshops, and the accompanying memo identifies the modifications made. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher noted that in the Division of Community Relations, funding of $35,000 was added for the Wendy's Championship for Children in accordance with Council's direction. However, there is. discussion scheduled later on the agenda about the specific items included in the sponsorship package. Her concern is with approving the funding in view of the fact that they have removed the most important item - the City of Dublin name on the promotional materials - from the sponsorship package. This is a substantial sponsorship, and this substantive amount of money should secure the City's name on the event. In her opinion, the ticket packages for the event are not the desirable element for a sponsorship at this level. Ms. Puskarcik noted that the City name would be removed from the locally placed advertising, but Dublin will be identified as the host city in media coverage. Mrs. Boring noted that she is also concerned aboufthe lack of the City's name in the promotional materials. For a donationof $35,000, this would be a key component. Ms. Chininici-Zuercher stated that identifying the tournament as located in Dublin, Ohio ~. does not include the City logo on materials. Ms. Puskarcik stated that the City will also have messages on the electronic leader board. The tournament officials are very willing to work with the City on tailoring the package to meet the City's needs/desires. Mayor McCash stated that he recalls that the City's name was included in promotional materials last year. The letter of November 27 indicates that the sponsorship package developed mirrors what was provided last year. Ms. Puskarcik emphasized that Mr. Erickson is available by cell phone to respond to any questions about the package. Mr. Kranstuber noted that it is common in the industry to tailor sponsorship packages to the individual contributor's desires. He likes the faCt that the LPGA is held here, but this is a substantial amount of money and Dublin should receive appropriate recognition. He would be willing to table this until later in therneeting, if necessary, or amend the budget to remove this. I i I I . II !<!HHI.!!ii+ Ii ! ! RECORD OFPROCEEDlf'JGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK. INC FORM NO 10148 December 9, 2002 Page 3 Held 20 Ms. Brautigam recommended that Council approve the budget and appropriation ordinances with the understanding that staff will not disburse any funds until Council has given specific approval after the sponsorship issues are resolved. Mr. Kranstuber suggested removing this from the budget until the issues are resolved. .--. Mayor McCash suggested that the other option is for staff to not disburse any funds until the issues are resolved, but to include this $35,000 in the budget as proposed. Mr. Lecklider noted that there is a drCimatic reduction in the numbers of tickets provided in the hospitality passes and skybox tickets. Ms. Puskarcik stated that if there is adesire for more tickets, that can be adjusted. It is a cost and a priority issue. Mayor McCash stated that the top priority would be the marketing of the City of Dublin. The tickets are less important. Mr. Lecklider added that the community support provided to the event is above and beyond the contribution provided - that may constitute the difference in the sponsorship levels of $35,000 versus $50,000. Ms. Puskarcik summarized that what she understands from the discussion is that Council is interested in the advertising/promotion and not so much in additional tickets. Ms. Salay suggested that the foursome in the Gordon Teter Memorial Pro-Am could be removed, as it is valued at $12,000. Mr. Kranstuber and Mr. Reiner agreed. Discussion followed about discrepancies between the materials provided by the Tournament and the cover memo from staff. Ms. Brautigam summarized that staff will return with a report regarding what was provided last year and what the Tournament is willing to offer this year. Following further discussion, Mr. Reiner suggested that Council proceed with the budget approval at this time, including this $35,000 sponsorship. Staff will provide more specifics on the revised package. ,-... Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher summarized that what she is requesting is the City name and logo be included on all materials - not just for some of the events. It was the consensus of Council to leave the funding in the budget, and that staff return with specifics on sponsorship offerings. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher moved for emergency passage. Mr. Kranstuber seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes. Vote on the Ordinance: Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. Ordinance 134-02 Accepting the Lowest/Best Bid for the Coffman Park Restrooms Project, and Declaring an Emergency. Ms. Brautigam stated that the Planning Commission approved the proposal for the new restrooms at their recent meeting. Staff is recommending award of the bid to the low bidder. Mr. Kranstuber moved for emergency passage. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. Vote on the Ordinance: Ms. Salay, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor McCash, yes. ,...... INTRODUCTION/FIRST READING - ORDINANCES Ordinance 137-02 Amending the Annual Appropriations Ordinance for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2002. Mr. Kranstuber introduced the ordinance. Ms. Brautigam stated that staff is requesting that Council dispense with the public hearing. Ms. Grigsby stated that this ordinance is a year-end housekeeping measure to amend the annual appropriations in order that the City is in compliance with the ORC. The memo outlines the specific appropriation amendments. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked about Section 4,specifically the salary/wages, overtime and other wages relating to Special Events. Ms. Grigsby stated that in the Community Relations division, the Administrative I j I -, II <I I'!' '!'"!U'll:'IUi&IIiH:I!I,, "",,,,,1 I nfF'tW'i'_r'lt:\'~:1r'i'l_ tl'l".~'11'!/:~1lJI1"/t:\~tt:1 t I RECORD OF PROCEEDlf'JGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INC" FORM NO, 10148 December 9, 2002 Page 4 Held 20 Secretary and Clerical Specialist positions are to be split 50/50 between the general fund and the hotel/motel tax fund. In the budget preparation, 100 percent of those funds were budgeted for these positions in the general fund. This action provides additional funding authority for the 50 percent share from the hotel/motel tax revenue fund. --- Ms. Salay asked in Section 7 - the parking lot betWeen Franklin' Street and Mill Lane - what the original budget for this project? Ms. Grigsby stated that the original estimate was $310,000 which was done prior to the completion of design work. The revisions are based on final design and bids. Construction is scheduled as soon as weather will permit. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher moved to dispense with the public hearing. Ms. Salay seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner,yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes;' Mr. Kranstuber, yes. Ordinance 138-02 Providing for a Change in Zoning for 8.603 Acres Locatedatthe Northwest Corner of Tuttle Crossing Boulevard and Frantz Road, From: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Tuttle Crossing Plan, Subarea C1) andPUD,Planned Unit Development District (Llewellyn Farms Plan), to: PUD, Planned Unit Development District. (Case No. 02-122Z - Tuttle Crossing Subarea C and Llewellyn Farms -Dominion Homes Offices - 4800 Tuttle Crossing Boulevard and 5501 Franti'Road). Ms. Salay introduced the ordinance. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher moved referral of the ordinance to the Planning & Zoning Commission. Ms. Salay seconded the motion. -- Vote on the motion: Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes. Ordinance 139-02 An Ordinance Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with the Franklin County Public Defender Commission for the Defense of Indigent Defendants, and Declaring An Emergency. Mr. Kranstuber introduced the ordinance. Ms. Brautigam stated that this is an annual contract - the cost has increased slightly over last year - from $61.75 to $67.00. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked about the total amount spent this year on this item. Mr. Colby responded that he believes it was less than $500. Ms. Salay moved to dispense with the public hearing and to treat this as emergency legislation. Mr. Lecklider seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor McCash, yes. Ordinance 140-02 Providing for a Change in Zoning for 10.529 Acres Located at the Northwest Corner of Parkcenter Circle and Paul Blazer Parkway from: PCD, Planned Commerce District to: PCD, Planned Commerce District (Case No. 02-131Z ~ Creating Tuttle Crossing Subarea AS .. BMW Financial Services -5515 Parkcenter Circle ). Ms. Salay introduced the ordinance. Mayor McCash requested a motion to refer this to Planning & Zoning Commission. Mr. Lecklider stated that his understanding is that Planning Commission has already heard this application. Mrs. Boring confirmed that it was heard by the Commission on Thursday. She is concerned that the policy in place regarding referral of rezonings is not being adhered to. Ms. Brautigam stated that this was an error on staff's part. She takes responsibility for this. When the request was originally brought forward, it was to be a revision to the development plan and staff worked to place this on the December 5 P&Z agenda. As staff was working with the applicant, it became clear that a rezoning was necessary and the determination was made to bring the rezoning to Council tonight for referral to P&Z and hearing by P&Z on December 12. This was communicated to the applicant, but not r""_'-",.~_""'_Tr"",""H""\W~P".T,","f~IT'_"_n'm'_': l j--'- ~!'lCjlIl'1,~-;II-:;-l'iflWI'JIJII'l-.'blf..:i;111l'1"c't'~~~ ~ 'Ii , RECORD OFPROCEEDTNGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting "f DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FORM NO 10148 December 9, 2002 Page 5 Held 20 appropriately communicated to the staff who scheduled this on December 5. Because notices were sent, staff felt it inappropriate to remove it from the December 5 agenda. Legal staff advised that this was a technicality and would not be problematic. Planning Commission did hear the application on December 5 and tabled it, directing staff to work ..--- with the applicant. She apologized fqr the error in this matter. Mayor McCash stated that, procedurally, this constitutes a formal referral to P&Z. Mr. Lecklider stated that, practically speaking, what kind of review would the Commission engage in, as it has already been heard? Discussion followed. Mrs. Boring stated that it is important to consistently follow policy guidelines and to determine how this happened. It should be noted for the record that this was extraordinary and that a mistake was made in communication. When staff became aware of this mistake, however, it should have been communicated to Council as a courtesy. Discussion continued. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher noted that this will be referred to P&Z with the understanding that it is being done at this time because of a communication error. Ms. Salay moved to refer the ordinance to Planning & Zoning Commission, with the understanding that it is now being referred due to a previous miscommunication in scheduling. It does not constitute a change in policy or methodology. Mr. Kranstuber seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes. Ordinance 141-02 Providing for a Change in Zoning for 211.1 Acres Located on the East Side of Hyland-Croy Road, Approximately 1,500 Feet South of McKitrick Road From: R, - Rural District, To: PUD, Planned UQitDevelopment District. (Case No. 02-126- Tartan West) Mr. Kranstuber introduced the ordinance. Mayor McCash moved referral to Planning & Zoning Commission. Ms. Salay seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. Ordinance 142-02 Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into an Agreement with the Delaware Municipal Prosecutor in the Delaware County Municipal Court, and Declaring an Emergency. Mr. Kranstuber introduced the ordinance and moved to dispense with the public hearing and to treat this as an emergency. Ms. Brautigam noted that Mr. Colby h9s successfully negotiated a new contract. The last contract was in 1991 and the City paid $1,850.00 per year. The proposed contract for 2003 is for $1,000. Mr. Reiner seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor McCash, yes. Vote on the Ordinance: Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes. Ordinance 143-02 - Amending Ordinance No. 14-96, Passed April 1, 1996, as Amended by Ordinance No. 138-99, Passed January 3, 2000~ to Supplement the Public Improvements to be Made to Benefit the Parcels Identified in Those Ordinances, and Declaring an Emergency. [Thomas/Kohler TIF] Ms. Salay introduced the ordinance. Ms. Brautigam stated that these changes relate to the AEP project discussed at the November 18 Council meeting. Ms. Grigsby stated that, as directed by Resolution 41-02, staff has been working with bond counsel to amend the existing legislation to provide for the additional infrastructure improvements, specifically related to the burial of underground cables and wires - including the AEP 138 KV transmission line. This legislation amends the description of the public infrastructure improvements. Staff is requesting adoption tonight. Mr. Reiner moved to dispense with the public hearing. Mr. Lecklider seconded the motion. I I I' it !,., . ",,"cF+:I!:.I'I.iilEm.!! : I i' "-";",-,,1:11'",ii' 1 r~e1It<fJFq1'--1ttin:]IF1'1'In~mllt'ntr.",f.W'"!1~:I::'t~1~;l:-1it. I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FORM NO 10148 December 9,2002 Page 6 Held 20 Ms. Grigsby stated that emergency action is required. Mr. Reiner amended his motion to treat this as emergency legislation. Mr. Lecklider seconded the amended motion. Vote on the motion: Ms. Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Lecklider, ~ yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Krclnstuber, yes. Vote on the Ordinance: Mayor McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes. Ordinance 144-02 Amending Ordinance No. 44-94, Passed May 16, 1994, to Supplement the Public Improvements to be Made to Benefit the Parcels Identified in that Ordinance and to Provide For Payment of a Portion of the Service Payments Received to the Dublin City School District, and Declaring an Emergency. [Duke TIF] Ms. Salay introduced the ordinance. Ms. Grigsby stated that this TIF district has not been amended previously. This amendment provides for the continuation of a non-school TIF once the City has received reimbursement from the original improvements installed. Staff estimates that the TIF agreement will be extended by approximately eight years. Notice to the school district has been provided for this and forthe previous ordinance. Ms. Salay moved to dispense with the public hearing and to treat this as emergency legislation. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes. Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes. Ordinance 145-02 ~ Establishing Appropriations Based on the 2003 Operating Budget of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31,2003. Ms. Salay introduced the ordinance. There were no questions from Council. Mr. Kranstuber moved to dispense with the public hearing. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor McCash, yes. Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes. Ordinance 146-02 An Ordinance Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Contract for Health Services with the Franklin County Board of Health for 2003, and Declaring an Emergency. Mr. Kranstuber introduced the ordinance. Mr. Kranstuber moved to dispense with the public hearing and to treat this as emergency legislation. Mr. Reiner seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. - INTRODUCTION/PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTIONS Resolution 42-02 Requesting the Delaware and Franklin County Auditors to Draw and the Delaware and Franklin County Treasurers to Issue a Draft to the Director of Finance of the City of Dublin for Any Money That May Be in the County Treasury to the Account of the City of Dublin. Mayor McCash introduced the resolution. Ms. Grigsby noted that this is an annual action which allows the City to receive property tax dollars earlier than the established county distribution date. Vote on the Resolution: Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes. i I T II i i Ii 1I1~"" I I : ; <~w "'l!""I'~,p'ri: ';r'PthUi"f' ~~,H'I1~I,iHi, ';BV'JII~i:,1!ll:,*,jl;r'rtW'n:4:dtFj\i&I1'i_~j!fill!& Ii + I RECORD OF PROCEEDIf'JGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INC" FORM NO, 10148 December 9, 2002 Page 7 Held 20 OTHER Presentation re Second Outdoor Pool Mr. Hahn stated that the design team is returning to Council for feedback before proceeding to final design and prepa(ation of construction.documents. He showed r- slides to Council of the materials included in the Council packet. The consultants are I also available to respond to questions. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked for clarification about the tube and flume slides - what is the justification for including these? Mr. Hahn responded that the slides are the most popular feature of the family pool and are highly desirable components. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked about the colors depicted - are they the actual colors to be used? Mr. Hahn responded that in terms of play components, they are not as depicted. In terms of the architecture, the color renderings reflect the general palette. The play components are not yet developed to that level of detail. They are seeking Council's direction regarding earth tones versus pastel components for those items. Most Dublin playgrounds and pools incorporate earth tones. Mr. Kranstuber asked how the projected cost for the existing pool was determined. Mr. Hahn responded that this was computed by taking the various elements and translating them into today's dollars. It does not include the land costs, but does include the parking lot. Mr. Lecklider asked about the shade structures - was there previous discussion about this? There are less than a third of the shade structures which currently exist at the - outdoor pool. Mr. Hahn stated that shade structures are more of a function of budget. At this stage, staff is being conservative with budget projections. As the estimates are refined, more components can be added, Le., additional shade structures. Mr. Lecklider noted that the in-water play structures consume half of the zero depth area - is that what was envisioned? Mr. Hahn responded that a major portion of the zero depth area is unprogrammed space. Mr. Kranstuber stated that 90 percentof the utilization of the existing pool is for play - not for swimming laps. By separating the pools, and taking up a large portion of the play pool with structures, is it envisioned that the older children will use the lap pool for play? Mr. Hahn stated that the lap pool is purposely kept at a minimal depth of four feetto encourage activities other than lap swimming. Mrs. Boring noted that two separate pools may allow for more programming, Le., swim lessons, swim team and general public use at thesarne time, if staffing is available to do so. Mr. Reiner asked about insurance costs related to the three-meter board. He has heard that some communities are phasing Oljt three-meter boards. Mr. Hahn stated that many problems related to the ship ladder to the board - not with the board itself. This design allows for a staircase-type access, similar to the water --- slide. The three-meter board is a popular recreation activity, and staff is comfortable with the staircase system design. In addition, as a public entity, the City has sovereign immunity which impacts insurance costs. The board provided will be of a safe design. Mrs. Boring asked if lunch is available at the facility to non-members. Mr. Hahn stated that he believes that a gate admission must be paid to eat lunch at the concession stand. The bump out on the concession stand as shown is to allow for bathrooms to be accessed from outside the fence to serve the remainder of the park. Mrs. Boring asked if the materials being considered are practical as well as low maintenance. Mr. Hahn stated that the materials include a wood shake roof, metal roofing and aluminum soffit. Mr. Meleca indicated that the wood shakes are similar to those used at Perimeter I:L~:'t:ji'fl""!I'i'Tl't;~t1l"lIrrfl'fill'>1'ft'flI';J:t'~_1IntlN!>;ltt'II:';~ntl~itr,m~',;g(~F;j:~l$t.I:k" ',I RECORD OF PROCEEDIf'JGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Mee~ DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INC" FORM NO, 10148 December 9, 2002 Page 8 Held 20 Center. They are looking at a stone base, brick above that, some wood detailing, and heavy timbers. They are maintenance free for the most part. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked about anestimated opening date. --- Mr. Hahn responded that the opening is scheduled for Memorial Day of 2004. Mr. Lecklider asked if the plan would be reviewed again by the Planning Commission. Have their issues been addressed? Mr. Hahn stated that P&Z would review the rezoning plan at their first January meeting. Assuming this is approved, staff will return to P&Z in February with a final development plan. Mr. Hahn noted that the Commission's concern was with the lack of detail; at this time, he believes they will be satisfied with the level of detail and the content. Mr. Kranstuber noted that Mr. Meleca is also serving on the Appearance Code Committee at this time. Ms. Salay asked if the design group would disband at this time. Mr. Hahn stated that the group will review more specifics of the play components and other discussion points in the future. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher suggested that in terms of color palettes for the play equipment, staff engage a group of community children pool users to participate in the process. Obviously, the palette and options shown to such a group should be those acceptable to the design team at the end of the process. Mr. Hahn noted that Ms. Uhl will follow up on this item. STAFF COMMENTS ~ Ohio Municipal LeaQue Bond Authority Ms. Grigsby stated that OML has developed a bond program - a cooperative pool which will allow members of OML to finance projects through the pool. Because of the volume, more favorable rates should be available through the pool. The OML has retained Seasongood & Mayer and Squire, Sal1ders to act as the financial advisors and bond counsel. The City is considering utilization of the program for the financing of the outdoor pool. Discussions have taken place with representatives of Seasongood & Mayer. The City will be one of the first entities to participate in the pool. Prior to the City's participation, enacting legislatior will be brought to Council for approval. Brief discussion followed. There was no objection to Council to pursuing this program. Cost Estimates for Brand & Dublin Road Roundabout Mr. Hammersmith Council had asked for further information about the cost of performing a feasibility study for a roundabout at the Dublin/Brand Road intersection versus the programmed signalization at the intersection. A consultant has been selected, and the amount of $22,000 is a not to exceed figure for this work. Mr. Reiner stated that roundabouts are common in Europe, but the cost of the study seems excessive. Mr. Hammersmith responded that an international expert on roundabouts will be retained as part of the proposal, and much of the work involves projecting traffic data for 2025 accurately, working on the geometricsand the right-of-way. Mr. Lecklider stated that he assumes fhat the results of this study can be applied to future projects. ~ Mr. Hammersmith agreed. It was the consensus of Council to proceed with the study. Proposal for Tara Hill Drive Comprehensive Traffic Study Mr. Hammersmith stated that at the Oaober 7th Council meeting, staff committed to commission a comprehensive traffic study of the Tara Hill neighborhood - specifically the area bounded by Post Road, Brand Road, Avery/Muirfield Drive and Coffman Road. The study would also include Sells Mill, Dublinshire, Earlil1gfon Parkway, Tara Hill Drive and would involve mechanical counts,projection of traffic, intersection movement counts, and several stakeholder meetings - both initially and as the study proceeds - once data is collected. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher noted that Ms. Brautigam sent a letter to the residents of Shannon Park which indicated that no decision would be made on Post Road until the study is "..,.., on. ",' .'~, ,'t"n'!"'W!(''fl~n}lftPH1 ",'~'iI'lJIl'l"li'n!,!i1I~~'1WV;t+'lti""!t~1"~" )~t,: t: I' J RECORD OF PROCEEDrf'JGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INC, FORM NO, 10148 December 9,2002 Page 9 Held 20 completed. However, she heard lastweekthat this is not true - that the Post Road recommendations will be brought to Council prior to that time. Ms. Brautigam responded that her understanding is that the Coffman Park Expansion Task Force is dealing with the issue of Post Road. In their discussions regarding a r-. closing, the Task Force has indicated that they would not recommend its closure unless a number of other traffic improvements, currently unfounded, were also approved. While the Task Force may make such a recommendation to Council, she does not believe Council will be prepared to make a decision to move forward with closure of Post Road in the very short term without knowing the costs of improving Perimeter Drive, the costs of adding a left turn lane at Avery/Muirfield onto Post, or before this traffic study is completed. The study will likely take six months. Council will not therefore be able to act upon recommendations regarding Post Road until the results of the study are available. Ms. Salay stated that the Task Force did make a commitment to Mr. Holman not to make decisions about Post Road and the road system in the Coffman Park area before the traffic study results were completed. She clarified that it is misleading to use the term "close" Post Road - the plan as proposed calls for Post Road in fact to carry more traffic than it does today. Post Road will be "redirected" and open to traffic under the proposal. Ms. Brautigam stated that she does understand the intent of the Task Force in this regard - but she felt it was important to reassure the residents of Shannon Park about the status of any pending action. Mr. Kranstuber added that the Task Force's work would likely be completed in early February. He would envision their reCommendations to Council would not be acted upon until the traffic study is completed. He is concerned about the length of time the study is estimated to require. ~ Mr. Hammersmith stated that six months is likely the worst-case scenario - he is hopeful that it will require less time. R.D. Zande is the consultant proposed for the study. They will incorporate the data obtained by Mr. Clear. Mr. Kranstuber asked why the study is not being done by Mr. Clear in view of the work he has already done in this regard. Mr. Hammersmith responded that Mr. Clear has merely done forecasting within the region - he has not taken mechanical counts within the entire neighborhood as outlined in the study area. Mrs. Boring asked how the City selects consultants - is this being done with an RFP? Many would prefer an independent consultant do this work to give an objective view. Mr. Hammersmith responded that the selection is based upon qualifications and experience, and considers both the study elements and potentially design elements. This study will stand on its own and be exclusive of the one done for Post Road. It focuses on traffic calming for the neighborhood. Ms. Salay added that assuming nothing changes with Post Road, the Tara Hill residents will continue to have issues with traffic volumes and speed. Mr. Hammersmith stated that retaining R.D. Zande does provide an opportunity to confirm the Parsons data with an independent viewpoint. Mr. Lecklider noted that he appreciates Ms. Brautigam's letter of response sent to the - Shannon Park residents. He wonders if there would be any economy of scale in extending the westward boundary of the study beyond Avery-Muirfield to Tullymore in view of the development impacting that area as well. While opening of the new high school may reduce traffic on Tara Hill, it may add to traffic on Tullymore and Avery Road. He is already receiving complaints about this traffic. He is not certain what this would add in terms of expense to the study. Mayor McCash stated that there is an immediate concern of responding to the Tara Hill petition which was already submitted. But perhaps the study area extends too far to the north in terms of impact on Tara Hill. Ms. Brautigam responded that Council requested a complete study of the Tara Hill area - the residents believe the relevant area is from Post to Brand, as the lack of a traffic signal at Brand encourages people to cut through Tara Hill to access the light at Avery- Muirfield and Tara Hill. Staff's expert opinion is that the relevant area extends to Brand ;,';J' 0\1;1'1 i5W~iH+j'~~.;jUr:;Ijjf''i fHlt~ 1.1 'Iltltl!il~:ti~'1HI'I"!'1)jrI'1~:"tXit~'11:j'1~I!t)}ji .1 I RECORD OF PROCEEOrf'JGS Minutes of Dublin Cit'i Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FORM NO 10148 December 9, 2002 Page 10 Held 20 Road as well. Mayor McCash asked if it would make sense to include the area west to Hyland Croy. Mr. Hammersmith responded that it is probably worthy of being a second phase, but -- there is not a petition in hand from the neighborhood at this time. It could be done as a later study, building upon the results of this study. If the study area is too large, the data becomes overwhelming and the time required is longer. Mr. Reiner stated that the new high school along Hyland Croy will greatly impact traffic. Is the widening of Hyland Croy anticipated or budgeted? Mr. Hammersmith stated that turn la~e improvements were done by the City as part of the Park Place development. The City has authorized some participation in high school related roadway improvements. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked about the responsibility of the schools versus the city where the schools choose a location which has an impact on an area larger than just the site where the building is located. I Mr. Hammersmith responded that the City is participating in the road improvements immediately adjoining the school site. Over the next 20 years, the schools will not be the only contributor to the growth in the area. Mr. Kranstuber noted that in terms of neighborhood traffic studies, the residents should be rn.ade aw.are of the YClrious sOILJtiOQs il1v()I"E3d il1 tri:lffic calming. The devices installed on Martin Road are particularly annoying and the aesthetics are poor. Do residents understand the ramifications of such traffic calming devices? Mr. Hammersmith stated that the Martin Road project is not completed - the devices will be stamped to improve the aesthetics. Residents do not always understand the type of ~ devices used to slow or discourage traffic. His understanding is thatthe Martin Road residents are satisfied with the speed humps. Ms. Salay added that they have effectively discouraged people from using the roadway. Mr. Reiner stated that both the Martin Road and Post Road areas are very open, with large setbacks and few houses. Is Post Road truly one that should be redirected or choked down? It is a major thoroughfare. The residents of Tara Hill are rightfully concerned about any such proposal. Mr. Kranstuber stated that the fact of the matter is that Post Road, with the left turn from Avery-Muirfield re-opened, will handle more traffic than it currently does. It is not being closed, but rather, redirected. Mr. Hammersmith added that redirecting Post Road or closing that portion alone will impact other areas. The study indicated that the appropriate improvements on Perimeter Drive, Avery Road, Perimeter Drive/Avery intersection, and left turn movement at Avery-Muirfield and Post Road will be necessary. Mr. Reiner asked why as a Council Member he would want to modify Post Road only to require all of these other road improvements? Mr. Hammersmith stated that with traffic projections, many of the traffic problems might exist in any case. Mr. Reiner noted that he would not want to accelerate these problems. -- Mr. Hammersmith stated that he is not certain that the problems will be accelerated with this road modification. In its current state, Post Road does not carry much traffic. Mr. Reiner responded that it could be modified, however, to carry more traffic as a major east/west thoroughfare. Ms. Salay stated that the Task Force has been reviewing over the past months the expansion of Coffman Park, an expressed value of the community. The major thoroughfare bisecting the park does not permit attaining the vision of a beautiful, expanded park. Council will ultimately have to decide if they want the park or the road, while balancing the concept of Post Road continuing to carly traffic, with the Perimeter area being developed. What does Council see as the future for the park? Mr. Reiner stated that he is also concE;lrned with investing that level of funds when there is land available at less expense along the back of the creek. A plan can be drawn a 1 : I I ii I"; m""",,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,'''''inH i , r """,.,,,-,,, ""'"iTrnnj'~'~!iI!'Fm:!"1:I:l'f'Frtj - ~_~n1'.fIj_m:Jiifl;i;t~ IIJ'HljW.M*tJ!;'''~~'ht :~i;i;ilt'_1i k -- I RECORD OF PROCEEDrf'Jc;S Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC FORM NO 10148 December 9,2002 Page 11 Held 20 number of ways, but cost is a consideration as well as the appropriate use of taxpayer dollars. He is concerned with the cost of all of these road improvements needed in conjunction with this plan. .....- Ms. Salay stated that the consultants have indicated that the road network will need improvements under any scenario - the redirection of Post Road improves traffic on Coffman and Post coming across 1-270. There is give and take needed with this plan. The growth of the community will necessitate many of these improvements. Mr. Lecklider stated in response to Mr. Hammersmith's comments about expanding the traffic study that the third high school will open a year from this fall. The boundaries for the school extend south of S.R. 161 ,and therefore, traffic will increase northbound on Avery-Muirfield. Some motorists may use Tullymore Drive en route. There is no traffic control the entire length of Tullymore, and Tullymore houses a school and neighborhood park. Adding high school traffic will exacerbate the traffic problems. Mayor McCash agreed that this should be kept on the forefront. The City should take a proactive approach. Mr. Reiner suggested that the consultant review the potential of roundabouts for other intersections in the City. Ms. Brautigam summarized that it is the consensus of Council to proceed with the traffic study as outlined by Mr. Hammersmith. Mrs. Boring asked about the status of the Wellington Place petition for traffic calming. Mr. Hammersmith stated that this is scheduled for the winter, beginning in January. ~ Ms. Salay noted that e-mails have been sent to the City web site from Tara Hill area residents about the speeding traffic to and from the high school. Chief Epperson has indicated that officers have observed that juveniles are not the offenders. There seems to be conflicting information. Will the traffic study review the traffic generated from the high school in terms of volume and speed? Mr. Hammersmith responded that the scope includes these items, both Dublin Coffman and Dublin Jerome and the percentage of traffic related to school activities. Discussion followed. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher commented that the Police officers, regardless of location in the City, do not generally ticket those driving slightly over the speed limit, e.g., 30 mph in a 25 mph zone. America is a country full of automobiles, and Dublin cannot solve all of these problems. Some of this results from natural living. Mrs. Boring agreed, stating that at some point, citizens must be accountable for their own actions. The City cannot solve all of these problems. Mayor McCash noted that those who petitioned for the traffic light at the Tara Hill/Avery- Muirfield intersection now have a traffic light, but as a result, the traffic has also increased on Tara Hill because of the signalization. Ms. Salay stated that she is less concerned with those who exceed the speed limit in - commercial areas versus those who speed in residential neighborhoods. Anyone in residential neighborhoods driving 30 to 35 mph in a25 mph zone should be ticketed. She is pleased that four more traffic enforcement officers will be added, as this will improve safety in the neighborhoods. This is a quality of life issue for residents and the City needs to make every effort to address the concerns. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher noted that she is concerned with speeding in other areas, such as along Dublin Road, as it is a dangerous road where many accidents have occurred. Proposal for Accomplishing Unified Development Code in Modified Form Ms. Brautigam stated that she has reviewed a large portion of the document, but has not completed her review as of this date. Her sense is that appointing a task force for this review will be a futile effort and will nof accomplish the goal within a reasonable timeframe. She has asked Ms. Clarke and Mr. Gunderman to work on a I I II . iHiiilHiHL .m ..IH'nliJ Hkt:li: i i !":. 1:.:.11'1 "_' 'l~4'ft~l!~(':1I'm~;.':HN~L+ l-,j ,. ~H;!lIN~iII('j'!M:'I;.!;Ji\t!lI-4'fti::~;lJlr.1-_'rfjtb: J+ . I RECORD OFPROCEED{NGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting December 9, 2002 Page 12 Held 20 recommendation to achieve key goals within a year. As outlined in the memo, staff is recommending that Council appoint a task force of 7 to 9 people to meet every third week beginning in February and continuing through June, and from September 2003 through February of 2004 to do the fOllowing: r- Review the process in the zoninq code and brinq it into conformity. Currently, there are several planned districts with different processes that are difficult to traverse for staff, for the developers and for the applicants. This task would be accomplished by the end of June. Over the summer, staff would continue to work on the subdivision regulations. The task force would begin meeting again in September to review the subdivision regulations. Hopefully, a recommendation would be made to Council by February of 2004. Historical District The recommendation is that the planner currently assigned to work with the Historic Dublin Association be assigned the task of working with them and that they report back to Council in the spring with a recommendation for the district. Industrial Zoning Staff would meet with the stakeholders of the area to determine an appropriate process for the industrial zoning. This area ofthe code involves the property rights of some parties and therefore a task force will not easily be able to resolve some of the issues. Staff would like to recommend a process to Council in April on this portion. If Council agrees with this course of action, staff will return with a resolution at the first January meeting to accomplish these items. In addition, tnere would be no further action on the Unifi.~9. Dev~lopment Code. It would betabl.e(j permanently, with the exception of the items which would be listed in the resolution. All of these recommendations should enable Council to be ready in 2004 to move forward on updating the Community Plan, if they choose to do so. She asked for feedback. ~ Ms. Salay thanked her for her work on this item. Mrs. Boring emphasized that it is important that the resolution establishing the task force clearly outlines the scope of their work to reduce the possibility of miscommunication at a later date. Mr. Lecklider stated that he agrees with the City Manager's recommendation. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher stated that she 'accepts the recommendation of staff. Mr. Reiner stated that he agrees, but added that he would fike Council to revisit the new ruralism concept in order to protect some future land uses. This type of legislation will help the City to meet the goals in the Community Plan while becoming more dynamic. Ms. Salay asked if he is considering tllis concept as an overlay for the remainder of land yet to be developed. Mr. Reiner responded that it would be a good overlay to protect areas and to encourage development in a conscientious manner, while preserving setbacks and green space. It has been done in other cities. Ms. Brautigam stated that staff will bring the resolution to Council in January. The draft will provide for seven members of the Task Force, but this can be modified if it is Council's desire. Evaluation of Alternate Meetinq Site (Justice Center) Ms. Brautigam stated that the AEP issue and the crowd it drew provided an opportunity to try out another venue for Council meetings. As outlined in the report, the Council Chambers accommodates 60 people - a lot less than the Justice Center. The Council "..... Chambers are dark and less conducive to a meeting atmosphere. Staff prepared a report analyzing the pros and cons of meeting at the Justice Center, together with the estimates of upgrading each of the facilities to accommodate future meetings. An important consideration is that Time Warner will be installing equipment in whichever site is chosen in order to broadcast Council meetings in the future. There are some lighting and sound issues associated with either of the meeting locations. Once the location is determined, the camera equipment will be installed and fiber connected in the room. It will therefore be cost prohibitive to change the location again until the new City Hall is constructed. Staff is not requesting a decision tonight, but will be looking to Council for a decision on this matter in January. Mr. Husenitza is available to respond to questions on the costs to upgrade the lighting and audio. RECORD OF PROCEEOlf'JGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK, INC" FORM NO, 10148 December 9, 2002 Page 13 Held 20 Mr. Kranstuber stated that the report indicates that $40,000 in lighting is needed at the Municipal Building, but no improvements in lighting are necessary at the Justice Center. This seems an extraordinary amount of money to accomplish the improvement. -- Ms. Brautigam added that the issue is not only abouf money - it is a matter of where Council feels most comfortable and where the public will be most comfortable. She has no personal preference about the location Council selects, but either meeting room will need some improvements and modifications. Mr. Husenitza stated that the lighting cost estimate is rather high - perhaps it could be negotiated and reduced somewhat. The cosf of the materials is $25,000 and the labor is $15,000. Mr. Kranstuber stated that, aside from lighting, the renovations are estimated at $11,000 at the Municipal Building and $17,000 at the Justice Center. He asked for clarification about the seating capacity. Ms. Brautigam responded that the Justice Center seats 130 per the fire code. She believes the fire code seating for Council Chambers is 76, although approximately 90 chairs can be accommodated. Ms. Brautigam summarized that she '1'ould like. Counci.1 to reflect on this issue - again, it is a matter of where Council and the public will be most comfortable for public meetings. Review of Employee Health Benefits Ms. Brautigam stated that during the budget process, in a discussion regarding the escalating cost of health benefits, Council recommended that the possibility of ....-. modifications to the plan be considered, i.e. employees paying a portion of the costs of the insurance. After research of the role of the Personnel Board and the scope of the Administrative Committee of Council, she recommends that Council direct staff to work with the Administrative Committee on review of these issues and that they report back to Council in June. This is in keeping with the responsibilities assigned to the standing committee, and Council will be the most familiar with the City operations in terms of the benefit program. Mayor McCash agreed with this course of action. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked how the timeframe relates to the union contract negotiations. It seems that the contract negotiations will be completed before a recommendation is brought forward from the Administrative Committee. Mr. Harding stated that staff is currently negotiating with the communication technicians. The current police officers and sergeants contract has two years remaining, and the Steel Workers has 1-1/2 years remaining in the current contract. Staff could go back and renegotiate certain provisions of those agreements. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher stated that any recommendations would then have to include an implementation date. Mr. Harding stated that he assumes that what would be considered is implementation with non-union personnel first, and then blending in and modifying labor agreements as they come due to include the same modifications. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher commented that she would be interested in pursuing at the Committee level the issue of how the City can legally and legitimately implement to non- union workers provisions of increased. costs for health care benefits. There are ....-. significant issues for consideration in any future implementation of such recommendations. Ms. Salay moved referral of the matter to the Administrative Committee. Mr. Lecklider seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes. Ms. Brautigam noted that the other items included on the agenda were for information only, and no Council direction is required at this time. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked about the WellWorks program - what type of nursing services are provided? Mr. Harding responded that a nurse spends time in City locations, doing blood pressure checks, and is available to respond to any wellness related issues. She has a ,,"'I"" "',, '*'~''''l':'ll'':f'~' ;W~~'1t~'l/.~:?it~4t~Jfll-',H" U*YI~'i:.f!IlA~1H'i!-~rIH':IIL'!HH,ii:'i~i1f;f 11 +, ,'I RECORD OF PROCEEDIf'JGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting DAYTON LEGAL BLANK INC" FORM NO, 10148 December 9, 2002 Page 14 Held 20 background in nutrition as well. It is contracted through WorkHealth. Some items in WellWorks are provided with the in-house staff at the DCRC, and others through WorkHealth. They are open to both union and non-union employees. r-- Council Committee Reports/Council Roundtable Mrs. Borino reported: 1) She brought back information regarding the Leadership Summit sponsored by NLC for Council's review. She has provided some other items to Council from the NLC conference, including a "stress-o-meter." 2) San Jose, California had an interesting concept regarding affordable housing and traffic education. She also attended a telecornrnunications seminar, and Dublin is ahead of the curve on these types of issues. 3) Thank you to Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher for representing Council at the recent MORPC meeting. 4) Thank you to Sgt. Hungler for his assistance with the StealthStats program implementation in her area. 5) Thanks to the City of Dublin for the opportunity to attend the National League of Cities conference in Salt Lake 9ity, Utah. 6) Happy Holidays to everyone! Mr. Lecklider: 1) ComplimentedMs.Bra~ti~qm ,andfv1r.Harding for their leadership in the Dublin United Way Campaign. ,It is gratifying to see the outcome. 2) Congratulations to Mr. McD'~niel and the Service Department for the provisional accreditation. He asked that Council be included in any future celebration of this milestone achievement. 3) Thanks to Council colleagues and staff for their assistance and patience -- during his first year of serving on Council. \ 4) Happy Holidays to all! Mr. Reiner thanked fellow Council Members for the gifts they brought tonight. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher: 1) Noted that while at the NLG meeting, she attended the Public Safety Policy Committee meeting and will provide materials to Council about their recommendations. The only controversy in their deliberations was related to a racial profiling question, and following a 45-minute debate, the language was amended. 2) The meeting Mrs. Boring referred to is the Central Ohio Planning Exchange (COPE) which she attended today. Mr. Hammersmith and Mr. Gunderman have been representing the city at these meetings. It is a regional group reviewing ways to communicate more effectively the decisions that have a regional impact. They are looking at a web-based communication program which would facilitate communication among various jurisdictions of public matters related to planning, infrastructure, development, etc. The group will likely come forward in 60-90 days with a resolution they will request jurisdictions approve - a non-binding resolution which will indicate the City's agreement with continued development of this project. There will be some costs involved, but estimates are not available at this time. Apparently, many jurisdictions don't have web sites, and MORPC would manage a central database of the information. She added that there is the possibility of ~ obtaining grant funding for this program. The concept is good, but cost is a consideration. 3) Read the coverage in the newspapers about Washington Township Fire Chief Woo's comments in regard to the Columbus plan to charge for EMS runs. Is there an update? Ms. Brautigam will check on this and report back. 4) Congratulated Mr. McDanieland staff on a job well done for the provisional accreditation. 5) Appreciated the follow-up from staff on the outstanding items from the cost study review, particularly the liability for inspection of gas lines. 6) Noted there is a memo fromMs. Puskarcik regarding pricing for festival tickets and suggested that Council review this for later reference. 7) Happy holidays to everyone! 'd, ,,,,,..,,~,,"r"'ml"n-MI!l-}Tr';n~np'I"1';'n:"l"1I";'UWI~itl1~'?~t1:j:(~liit:;, f I: .' I RECORD OF P~OCEEDrf'JGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting December 9, 2002 Page 15 Mr. Kranstuber reported: 1) The Appearance Code Committee continues to move forward very methodically. He estimates they have completed about 70 percent of the review. They have discussed garage doors, their configuration and ~, placement, and private and public landscaping. A major item remaining is the issue of materials. Legal counsel has indicated there may be some difficulty in regulating these. Other items that remain to be reviewed are the actual diversity of floor plans and four-sided architecture. 2) The Coffman Park Expansi'On Task Force continues to meet. He suggested that Council members review the minutes. One or two study sessions will likely be needed by Council to review the recommendations at a future date. He added that the papers have reported his alleged change of opinion on the issues, but this has been ar'l evolution and learning process. The goal of the committee was to meet with City officials and the residents to attempt again to reconcile the different viewpoints. The more he has walked the area and studied it, the more his opinions have evolved. The Post Road area from the creek to the north becomes more paramoOnt and the area south of the creek to Post Road becomes less. There are other financial factors as well. He encouraged Council to read the minutes and the studies being produced. Mayor McCash thanked Ms. Puskarcik and staff for their hard work and efforts on the Holly Days weekend events. Happy holidays to everyone! Mr. Smith stated that he has no pending legal matters to be considered this evening, and suggested that Council consider a future date for the land acquisition discussion. Ms. Salay suggested that a separate meeting night be established for the land ~ acquisition meeting It is difficult to be productive at a late hour. Mrs. Boring noted that the Police division provided a report on special duty officers which indicated that overtime wages are charged for the Dublin Arts Council events. Why can't special duty officers be used for these events which would result in a cost savings? Ms. Brautigam responded that there is some difficulty in securing officers to work overtime hours on a volunteer basis, but she will check with staff and report back. The meeting was adjourned at 10:20 p.m. ~ ~a~ Clerk of Council -