Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-06-17 Work Session MinutesDublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Minutes of Meeting Mayor Peterson called the Monday, March 6, 2017 Work Session of Dublin City Council to order at 6:00 p.m. at Dublin City Hall. Members present were: Mr. Keenan, Mr. Lecklider, Ms. Amorose Groomes, Mayor Peterson, and Ms. Alutto. Ms. Salay arrived at 6:50 p.m. Vice Mayor Reiner was absent [excused]. Staff members present: Mr. McDaniel, Mr. Foegler, Ms. Goss, Mr. Papsidero, Ms. Readler, Ms. Crandall, Ms. Mumma, Ms. Rauch, Ms. Burness, Ms. Richison and Mr. Plouck. Mr. McDaniel stated that an aggressive agenda has been planned for tonight's work session, which will begin with the Planning Division. Mr. Papsidero, Planning Director, provided the order for the discussion: 1. Background on project and site, including context and history 2. Library proposal 3. Garage proposal There have been modifications to the proposals since their previous presentations to Council, partly in response to ARB's review. 4. Grounds of Remembrance Plans and goals BACKGROUND Mr. Papsidero provided a presentation on the site background and the site proposal. Location: • The Library site is located within the northern edge of the Architectural Review District boundaries. It serves as a gateway into the District and Historic Dublin. • The National Register District is south of Bridge Street and south of the Library site. It is part of Historic Dublin and contains the core of the City's historic residential neighborhood. • The School District's holdings are to the left of the current Library site, from which some future right-of-way for this project is needed to improve circulation within Historic Dublin. • The historic cemetery and the Grounds of Remembrance are to the north of the site. • The current library site is approximately 3.5 acres. As a result of this project, the Library will occupy in excess of one acre. • The City -owned garage will occupy 1.25 acres, just to the west of the Library. • Approximately .6 acres will become right-of-way for Rock Cress. • A remaining amount of .3 acres will become part of the Grounds of Remembrance Veterans Park and buffer along the north edge of Rock Cress. Street Network • The Rock Cress alignment will provide linkage from Post Road to the west all the way to Sawmill Road to the east, and follows the pedestrian bike bridge, which connects the two sides of this corridor, east -west, through the entire District. • Rock Cress also serves a secondary purpose — the cycle track, which will provide another mode of transportation that will connect the entire District along the same alignment. Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 2 of 22 Existing Zoning • In the context of the existing zoning in the Architectural Review District, the current Library site is zoned Bridge Street District (BSD) — Public. As part of the development agreement with the Library, it will be rezoned to BSD — Historic Transition District, which is also located to the east of North High Street, as part of the Bridge Park development. History The current Library site is located in one of the blocks in the original village plat (1872). The first Dublin High School building, a two and three-story structure, was built in 1870 on this North High Street site. Context • To the north of the site is the Grounds of Remembrance Loggia, which is a contemporary structure. • To the east of the Library will be: Building Z to the left of Bridge Park West; Building Z2, is to the right (88 N. High Street); and the west plaza, which provides the landing of the pedestrian/bicycle bridge. • To the south is Oscars (72-84 North High Street). • Further to the south is Brazenhead (85 North High Street). This is a National Register property. • Directly to the south of the Library is a one and a half story commercial building (53 N. High Street). Mr. Lecklider inquired if Brazenhead and the other buildings have any special designation. Mr. Papsidero stated that both Brazenhead and 53 N. High are National Register listed properties. • To the southwest is Indian Run Elementary (80 W. Bridge Street). • The school garage is located directly west of the Library site. Proiect History • 2008+2011 Visioning Workshops occurred between the City and CML. • 2012 The site selection process was initiated • 2014 Site selection occurred; community input meeting, survey • 2014 CML, Dublin Administration and City Council meetings • 2015-2016 Development and real estate agreement, area planning • 2016 Site design began, DSC agreement was approved • 2017 City Council presentation, the development agreement was approved, and ARB conducted Informal Review of the proposal Council Direction received • In 2010, Council goals for the new Library were defined: (1) Have a 21st century learning environment, and (2) Make the Library project a consistent goal for five years (2010-2015). At Council's 2011 Retreat, site selection was discussed; the opportunity for joint uses; and the desire for a building with architectural significance, with a "Wow" factor, innovative and sustainable. 2013 Citizen Survev Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 3 of 22 • Fifty percent of the respondents identified improvements to the Library as a high priority; forty percent as a medium priority. • The survey identified four priority categories: equipment, materials, size/facilities, and services. • 69% of the respondents stated they would be likely to consider financial contributions for library improvements. In a July 2014 presentation to ARB, "Infill and Redevelopment in a Historic District" Jonathan Barnes, AIA identified ten principles to consider when trying to review and approve such development, with the priorities of creating, not re-creating, history, being honest/authentic, and using contrast to create a visual dialog between old and new. Current Proposal Proposed is a 41,000 square foot new library with: a public plaza, open space, 549 -space parking garage on three levels plus roof level, and a book drop within the garage. Summary of Reviews • Bridge Street Code The site is currently in BSD Public Sub -District, to be rezoned to the BSD Historic Transition Sub - District with: o BSD Historic Transition Neighborhood Standards - Strong grid to create a pedestrian and street network - Extension of historic core on larger parcels - Complementary relationship to surrounding districts - Connections to Indian Run o Building Type Requirements - Civic Buildings (Library) - Parking Structure (Parking Garage) • Architectural Review Board Standards o Should not discourage contemporary design o Design compatible in size, scale, color, material and character o New construction should be a product of its own time o Designs that create an earlier appearance should be discouraged An analysis of these standards as they relate to this proposal will be in a staff report for the March 20 Council meeting. • Historic Dublin Design Guidelines o Most successful designs are contemporary in character o New buildings and infill should: - Be designed to fit in their context - Not try to look old or take an historic character - Integrate successfully with the character of the district - Take design cues from what exists around them • National Trust for Historic Preservation - Regulating New Construction in Historic Districts, published in 2009, states that: Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 4 of 22 "Proposed new construction does not have to replicate the existing style of the surrounding architecture, but it should be compatible." The document provides detail related to criteria and how that criteria should be considered and implemented in the review process -- criteria such as: o Site placement, consistent setbacks with the surrounding area, height massing, proportion and scale. If there is consistent height in the block, the building should also be consistent with that. If not, then the proposed height should govern. o Materials should be consistent with common materials in the District o The building should be consistent with development patterns in the District, i.e. are corner buildings taller? This relates to this project in terms of its northeast corner. o Is the proposal consistent with overall zoning and massing envelopes and block size? The proposed block size is consistent. o Is the proposal consistent with the common architectural characteristics in the District? "The style to be used is not dictated by the review board." Summary of Architectural Review Board (ARB) Informal Review on January 25, 2107 o ARB expressed concerns and comments regarding the following: - The proposed contemporary design - Requested that the design be more sensitive relative to architectural design, scale and materials - The proposal provides contrast to historic structures - The proposal should increase the connectivity to the Grounds of Remembrance - The scale and size of the garage should be reduced Public Comments expressed included: - The Historic District is a treasure and needs to be preserved - The proposal does not fit within the Historic District and would fit better on the east side of the river (Bridge Park) - The design is not sensitive to the surrounding architectural character - The contemporary design is incompatible with the Historic District DesignGroup, the Columbus architecture firm under contract to provide third party critiques, conducted a critique of the Library and Garage. o They applied the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings, Standard 9 — New Construction in regard to: - Site placement - Height, massing, proportion, scale - Materials - Development patterns - Architectural elements and details They noted that Standard 9 "makes no mention of design or style, which allows for an open interpretation for any design that meets the broad criteria." DesignGroup's comments and questions focused on quality not style. Mayor Peterson inquired the reason that the City asked them to apply the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and not any of the City of Dublin's standards. Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 5 of 22 Mr. Papsidero responded that DesignGroup made that decision; the City did not direct them to do so. He believes that they were trying to look at this from a broader, national perspective. The ARB standards and guidelines are reflective of and incorporate this, as well; so there is a good amount of consistency. Their letter of critique provides significant detail. Both firms have responded to those comments and made changes to the projects in response. DesignGroup — Comments re. Library o There is sensitivity to the surrounding context that is not readily apparent at first glance, more documentation/analysis would be helpful o Landscape draws the pedestrian to the building, reduces apparent height of the building; taller trees helpful o Consider using natural stone to face the building foundation and walls within the landscaping to better connect with the District o Conduct a sun study to understand impact of reflective metal panels on High Street fagade DesignGroup — Comments re. Garage o Consider "quieting down" the major gestures and materials o Simplify the two elevation treatments (use only metal fins), consider spacing out the metal fins, consider breaking up the fagade elevations o Reduce number of architectural elements, simplify stair towers o Emphasize pedestrian entrance adjacent to library Mr. Lecklider inquired what DesignGroup's role is in this process. Mr. Papsidero responded that it is purely a third -party critique. They provided a similar independent review for the AC Hotel, which influenced the final design of the hotel. In prior projects, the City has acquired this, as well. They are under contract with the City to provide independent reviews and recommendations without prior communication with the architectural team, the City or the Library. Ms. Amorose Groomes stated that the City has hired DesignGroup previously. Has the Library, as well? Is the Library an existing client for DesignGroup? Mr. Papsidero responded that they might be. Ms. Amorose Groomes inquired in what capacity. Mr. Papsidero responded that he does not know, but the Library could respond to that question. Mr. McDaniel noted that approximately four years ago, there was discussion about there being no architects on staff. This was a way in which to obtain that skill from an outside source for many projects. Process: Zoning Approval — Next Steps: March 6 — Council Work Session March 13 — Council Meeting: Opportunity for public comment March 20 — Council Meeting: Library and Garage Basic Plan review/action TBD — Rezoning and Preliminary and Final Plats Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 6 of 22 LIBRARY PROPOSAL Pat Losinski, Columbus Metropolitan Library (CML), stated that although this project is referred to as the Library project, most people have an appreciation that it is a major civic project for the City of Dublin. Background: • The project began with about 3.4 acres dedicated to the Library. It now has about 1.25 acres dedicated to the actual Library location. • The parking garage will be twice the size of the footprint for the Library. They are interested in learning what the parking garage means for the Library, in terms of dedicated parking during Library hours, as well as additional parking for City residents and Bridge Street residents or visitors during afterhours. • The current Dublin library branch was built in 1980 with an addition in 1990. It has a current square footage of just over 20,000 square feet with 119 current parking spaces. The new building will have approximately 41,000 square feet, and will become one of the largest branches in the 23 -branch CML system. • The current CML Board president is Tim Frommeyer, a long-time Dublin resident, who is also Senior VP and CFO of Nationwide Financial; the current vice president is Mike Duffy, who is also president of Hospital Solutions and Global Supply Chain for Cardinal Health. • There are approximately 600,000 CML card holders throughout the entire system, 45,000 of which are issued to Dublin residents. • This is one of ten projects CML is involved with at this time. The new Northside branch facility will open in June. The three remaining new building projects are Hilliard, Martin Luther King and Dublin. Vision: The same building design principles were given to all five of the architectural firms who have worked on their 10 buildings: o Transparency — internally and externally, to enhance visibility and to make people aware that this is an important civic building. o Flexibility — the buildings must be able to change/adapt over time. o Iconic design — to command attention and be a source of pride to the community. o Technology — will remain a significant part of what we do and will for a long time, so must be incorporated into the buildings. o Sustainability - All of the principles that govern sustainability are incorporated into the design by NBBJ. o Customer experience — Since the first of the year, CML customers have downloaded over a half million ebooks from CML's website; on pace to have two and a half ebooks downloaded out of a circulation of 16 million. The library model is changing, and there is a challenge to stay out in front of it. o Young minds — Their top organizational strategy has been the services that they provide to children. To provide extra care to that segment of the population, include preschool areas, homework help centers, summer reading club. o Showcase our collection of printed materials. City of Dublin involvement since 2008, including: 2008 — Strategic Visioning Workshop with City of Dublin 2008 — 2020 Community feedback session at Dublin branch Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 7 of 22 2011 — 2020 Visioning workshop with City of Dublin and OCL for 21't century learning environment 2012 — Site selection meeting with City of Dublin 2013-14 — Joint participation in architect selection, including site visit to NYC. 2014 — Project kickoff meeting with City of Dublin 2014 — Customer survey of three things desired in a new branch 2014 — Community input meeting. 2014 — Ten meetings with Dublin administration and City Council 2015-16 — Ongoing meetings with City administration; engaged NBBJ architects. • CML has conducted a number of surveys. o Advocates for the Historic District are not happy with the design. o They received some positive comments on Facebook and Twitter. A continuum of opinion exists about the Library design. o They asked the architect to present the design at Dublin Coffman High School to obtain their perspective, as well. The students' comments were generally positive. In one of their visits to City Council, they observed the City's seal, which states: "Where yesterday meets tomorrow." They believe the Library design represents that expression, as well. CML respects the historical nature of the Historic District and the history of this community, but they also believe they are building something for the future, as well. Tracy Perry, NBBJ Proiect architect and manager, continued the Library presentation. • Evolution of Libraries 1. History Through the years, Libraries have shifted from physical assets to that of community assets — a shift from books to a space for people to gather, understand and share information. Libraries have moved from being a place for sole researchers, to an access of materials, to a place to gather and look at information together. 2. Architecture. The shift also been from an inward focus with books occupying the boundaries, both inside and outside, and the reading rooms in the center. With a shift from Asset to Community Space, Libraries have become more transparent with assets occupying the center often on low bookshelves, and the edges of the Library becoming transparent and reaching out to the community. • Context of the new Library in Dublin. They began speaking to Dublin representatives in 2014 and these visioning principles or tenets were identified for the new Library: - have an iconic, contemporary design - be sustainable - contribute to Bridge Street - be contextually relevant - reinforce walkability - be community centric Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 8 of 22 The Dublin branch as it exists now hold a discreet profile in its relationship to the City. The exterior and interior experiences are insular and unconnected. Their goal with the project was that the new Library should hold a differentiated appearance and take advantage of site grades that are part of Dublin's context and create a connection from the interior of the Library to the exterior — the community. o Site Proposal Tony Murray, NBBJ Landscape Architect -Senior Associate, presented the site proposal. As urban designers, they look at the activity happening around an area. o In this area will be the end of Rock Cress Parkway, which will align with High Street and accept the pedestrian bridge as it extends from Bridge Park. Much energy is anticipated there, which is one of the reasons they have located the Library building at the north edge of Rock Cress Parkway — to take advantage of but also contribute to the energy that will be happening on that corner. o Additionally, the building will be located as far east — towards the street — as is possible. This will take advantage of the Historic District's sense of walkability. Much of that comes from good streetscape design, as well as the buildings having an activated edge along that corridor. o A plaza will be located at the south side of the site in the space that remains after the Library and Garage are located on the site. The plaza will be an attractive amenity for the Library and the community. o Three major spaces will be on the site: - Civic space — eastern edge along North High Street; a large, arrival space. - Plaza — to the south; a flexible, open space to gather. - Garden — to the west, between the Library and Garage; a reflective, respite area. o Comments that resulted from reviews: Requests to introduce smaller scale site spaces; more interesting landscape patterning, increasing the visual aesthetic; reduced hardscape; provision of a terminal vista — the site does complete much of the urban design grid; materiality of the site -- revision of site walls to brick instead of concrete, embracing the local and historical context of the District. o Entrances to the Library include: a large civic stair and a ramp from North High Street; from the parking garage a walkway east to the Library, passing an event lawn and the larger plaza space and seating area. The plaza space will be open and inviting for pedestrians with lush plantings. At the top of the stairs will be a large, communal seating space. The plaza will provide tree canopies. o Significant Transparency. The goal is to create a connection between the interior reading area to the outside plaza area; users are invited to come into the Library and out to the plaza. o Plaza event lawn will be a large, flexible flat space that could be used for movie nights, several food trucks and tents — community events could be held here. o To the west of the Library, they have addressed the requests for some smaller scale gardens. The Muirfield Women's Garden has been emphasized next to the plaza; there will also be tree canopies, different types of groundcover treatments; pathways and hedges — trying to create a space that relates more to Historic Dublin. Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 9 of 22 o Sensitivity to the neighboring Veterans Memorial Park. Rock Cress Parkway will be designed as a corridor, with lush, understory plantings and upright trees to create a pedestrian environment and to help screen and distance the project from the quiet area of the Veterans Memorial Park. o Streetscape Environment — Along North High Street will be a convenient drop-off/entry area with a nice sidewalk and open space environment. Some of the work that is happening is part of the High Street improvements. A unique, comfortable, pedestrian - friendly envelope between the street and the Library will be provided. o The Library is seeking alternative fundraising for the Plaza project on the south side of the site. • Library Exterior o Adjustments to Design. Ms. Perry stated that since their previous presentation, they have made some adjustments in design based on community input, including: - The building height has been reduced - Increased transparency on the corner of Rock Cress Parkway and High Street - Revised the loading area along Rock Cress Parkway to increase screening and provide more contextual materials, such as brick. - Revised the brick texture along the base of the building, both on level 1 and level 0. - In addition to the plaza entry, there is an entry on High Street that connects to the lower grade at Rock Cress and High Street. [Showed rendering of the added transparency, material changes and the elevated porch that will overlook the landing for the pedestrian bridge and Veterans Memorial.] o Building materials Ms. Perry reviewed the incorporation of existing material influences in the District into the exterior materials used on the Library, including: patina roofs, textured facades, reflectivity, glazing, recessing, wild green and brick. o Building facades - The facades have been updated to provide more transparency at the base, allowing a better engagement between the meeting rooms that occupy that space and the corner of Rock Cress and High Street. - The building has been perceived as very tall, based on the rendering that was provided. Along the plaza side, it is very much in line with the existing buildings on the corner of High Street. They also are providing a very similar in scale story, which is consistent with the development on the corner of High and Bridge Street. [Showed renderings of the elevations.] • Library Interior o Plans include: - Increasing area from 20,000 SF to 41,000 SF. - Increasing parking from 115 to approximately 200 spaces - Sustainable building design - Library is maintaining a robust collection of materials - There will be 3 meeting rooms and 7 study rooms Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 10 of 22 - Will have a children's area and programming space - Will have a teen area and homework help center - Will have a public computing area and a cafe The sustainability component will be focused on: water reduction; reducing energy; use of sustainable materials, improving environmental quality through views and daylighting. [Reviewed the plans for each of the levels.] o Interior design concepts are early but will incorporate history into the design. In past branches, the history has been incorporated into the art program — pictures on the wall, on the floor and in names of spaces. At the main Library, the cafe has been named after Carnegie. Specific to Dublin — perhaps there is a way in which the outline of the original three-story school structure could be incorporated. GARAGE PROPOSAL Mr. Foegler stated that when options were explored early on with the Library, one of the goals of Council was to increase the supply of parking to serve the Historic District, the need for which has been demonstrated over the years. When the Library initially looked at sites and options for this 3- 1/2 acre site, they produced a rendering that depicted an ability to self -park on the site. However, to do that, there would be a two-story building, 20,000 square feet per floor — to produce the desired 40,000 square feet — on a half acre. The remainder of the site — 3 acres, would be surface parking of 250 parking spaces. Surface parking is land consuming. As the demand for parking in the District has grown, the Darby Street parking lot was added. The solution is to have a structured parking facility to meet the 200 parking space needs of the Library, but also conceivably add another 350 parking spaces to serve the area — all on 1-1/4 acres. The fact that it would be more urban in character but preserve the grid aspect of the historical plat for this area was the impetus for this concept. The Library would build and own the Library building; the City would build and own the Parking Garage. There is a proposed lease agreement that Council has approved that would provide the 200 spaces to the Library, but it would be a City facility, operated and managed by the City. In off-peak Library hours, those 200 spaces would become available to general public as well. Mr. Lecklider inquired how the calculation was arrived at for 350 additional spaces. Mr. Foegler responded that since the initial assessment of massing, this has been looked at as a four -level garage. Technically, to the west, it becomes a three-level garage. As the circulation flow of the layouts has been evaluated, the concept has gone through several iterations. They have looked for ways to maximize the efficiency of the spaces. The most recent version accommodates the drive-through for the Library, provides the appropriate spaces and places the elevators in places to best serve the public. The count that can occur on this four -level structure is 549 well- designed, good size spaces, and that is the configuration presented tonight. Ms. Amorose Groomes inquired if the initial concept for a two-story, 20,000 -square -feet per floor building with the balance of the site covered in surface parking would have met City Code. Mr. Foegler responded that it would not have. Ms. Amorose Groomes responded that there was no possibility that concept could have been built. Mr. Foegler stated that concept was part of the Library's independent capacity studies, but from the Bridge Street perspective, that is not possible. That was their determination of what was needed, which under a conventional suburban zoning, might be considered. Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 11 of 22 Miguel Gonzalez, Moody Nolan, presented the Parking Garage proposal. The structure will occupy the western portion of the site; flank Franklin Street to the west and Rock Cress Parkway to the north; from the south -- entries to the garage from North Street; an entry and exit from Franklin Street to the second floor; and an exit only from the book drop onto Rock Cress. Modifications in the design were made in response to the ARB review and public comments. Maior design changes were: • Angle parking was changed to 90 -degree parking stalls for the entire garage • Consolidated the fagade designs, eliminating the precast • Eliminated the overhang and the monumental stair on the east fagade • Added glass elevators on the east and west, which breaks the facades into a smaller scale. • Added green screen to the west and north facades along the base • The first floor now gains back a five-foot swath for the Garage, enabling the 90 -degree parking configuration, increasing the number of parking spaces and providing a better buffer zone at the book drop. • On the second floor, there is the entry to Franklin Street and a bike hub, providing a connection to the Grounds of Remembrance. There will be pedestrian entries from the north and south. • The third and fourth floors will be very similar Mr. Lecklider inquired how the circulation for the book drop area would function. Mr. Gonzalez stated the book drop is on the first floor, so the entry would be from the south. There is room for three cars to stack in the book drop lane. There are four book drops, serviced by the Library through an access point adjacent to the courtyard between the two buildings. Exiting traffic will turn right only onto Rock Cress. The building is approximately 36 feet in height to the parapet, which is the top of the metal fins, and approximately 46 feet from the stair element. They have looked at the materials in the context of the neighborhood, not replicating but re -conceptualizing them, re -thinking how new materials, like the metal fin, for example, may create a texture fagade along the elevations. The same is true with the green screen and the Roman brick at the base, which is also being used to clad the stairs. Ms. Amorose Groomes inquired if they have existing installations of the green screen in central Ohio. Mr. Gonzalez responded that they have used them in the past. He could bring back some examples. That element could be used on the north side of the garage to soften the base of the elevation. There is an installation of Virginia Creeper on the north side of the Grange Garage in downtown Columbus. o The first floor has been pulled forward to bring the Garage more in line on the east elevation, which allows for a more efficient parking scheme and provides more sun for the green screen along the base. Mr. Gonzalez showed slides of the previous iteration and the revised iteration and described the changes. Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 12 of 22 Mr. Lecklider stated that the critique of DesignGroup seemed critical in a number of areas. Do they believe the majority of those concerns have been addressed by the changes that have been made? Mr. Gonzalez responded that they believe that the majority of the relevant points and the ones that really affect quality have been addressed. Some of those included consolidating and simplifying. The Garage should not "steal the thunder' of the Library. It should be a background building but at the same time, have its own expression. Items such as the spacing of the fins need to be investigated as they proceed. There is a concern with how much is seen between the fins. Mr. Lecklider stated that he believes that it is significant that the precast panels have been eliminated. Comment on #2 of DesignGroup's analysis, which states: "the general comment to the overall design is to quiet it down to a few major gestures and fewer materials." Do they believe the elimination of the precast panels addresses that comment? Mr. Gonzalez responded that they have addressed the comment not only by doing that but also by simplifying the base design, which is the green screen. They have also eliminated the monumental stair. The elevators are now used as an expression on the exterior, helping to break down the fin design. Mr. Lecklider referred to #10: "the Garage fagade in general feels far too assertive for the use of the building." Has that been addressed, or is it a matter of "reasonable minds can disagree?" Mr. Gonzalez responded that he believes that is an opinion. They considered that comment, but the design has been simplified and they believe it is sufficiently quietened. Mayor Peterson referred to the slide depicting the six different building materials to be used. Other than one, the patina roof, none of the others remind him of any building materials found in the Historic District — not the textured fagade or the thin bricks proposed for the Garage. Mr. Gonzalez responded that the images can be interpreted differently; for instance, the textured fagade is an example of how that could be implemented. When they look at textured facades, they were looking at siding. Different kinds of lapboard siding are seen in a more traditional application. What they were trying to convey that was in order to achieve that kind of texturing, they have looked at some of that context and reinterpreted into something more representative of this time and technology, such as the Garage fins. Although they are not a traditional material or applied in a traditional way, they are a way in which to texture and add liveliness to a fagade today. As far as the brick to which he refers, it is actually a regular height but a double length. The wild green is a direct expression, of course. Mayor Peterson responded that he understood the use of the green element. Mr. Gonzalez stated that although the brick is not the same scale of brick, it is a much more textured brick that would be used in these areas, as are the bricks in the District which have been subject to much weathering over the years. The scale is secondary. Mayor Peterson stated that he understands the architecture focus is on openness to the community, but as far as the materials -- it doesn't seem to him that those materials are found anywhere else in the entire Historic District. Mr. Gonzalez responded that the specific type of materials were used but a re -interpretation of the traditional materials found in the District. They were attempting to apply a new interpretation of those materials. Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 13 of 22 Ms. Amorose Groomes stated that when she looks at the proposed materials, she sees new and newer. Dublin's Historic Registry buildings are primarily stone buildings. Dublin was founded on stone, on the banks of the river, and there are stone walls throughout the community. Looking back over the buildings in the Historic Registry, she cannot recall much brick used on any of those buildings. There is brick on some of the City's newer buildings. If we are trying to bridge back only to 2007, then brick would be a material to use, but we are really trying to create a bridge between old and new, it would be necessary to use stone. Council concluded comments on the building materials. GROUNDS OF REMEMBRANCE Darren Meyer, MKSK, provided an update. The context around the Veterans Memorial is changing with the Library, Parking Garage, public roads and public open space. Through the planning process, they have been working with staff and an advisory committee with respect to the Veterans Memorial site itself and the area surrounding it to make sure that the important qualities are preserved and protected, both for its passive use and for the events and activities that take place there. o Original intent of the Grounds and current condition As this area is transformed with the new Dublin Library, Bridge Park West, the pedestrian landing and the Parking Garage, there will be an increase in activity and traffic, but there will also be the opportunity for increased visibility of the Grounds of Remembrance. The goal is to capture the best qualities, which they propose doing with a landscape solution. To the north of the Veterans park and Indian Run Cemetery is existing mature vegetation of the Indian Run tributary and a surrounding wooded area. They would like to take that edge and extend it around the Veterans Memorial Park with what would in effect be a landscape buffer, leaving the park as an opening within the forest. The intent is not to wall it off but to protect the quality of a quiet space for honor, memory and reflection. They do not want to create something that is opaque, but provide a buffer that is fairly open. That builds upon the original intent of the Veterans Park. They have included in their process discussions with the original advisory committee for creation of the Veterans Park. In addition to working with the committee, they will also be obtaining input from the artists and architects involved in the creation of the memorial park. They want to ensure protection of the original intent of that design team. Some of the key words are "porous perimeter' with the idea that the area around the memorial and cemetery has visual accessibility. o Goals of the expanded design o Landscape Buffer. The greenspace or buffer that exists between the north side of the existing Library building and the Grounds of Remembrance is approximately the same distance that will be preserved from the pavement of Rock Cress to the memorial park. There can be a seven foot distance, depending at which projecting point of the Library a measurement is made, but, generally speaking, the roadway and the north side of the Library correspond. The landscape buffer will consist of two types of plant materials, or formula: (1) Deciduous trees that are planted densely, but limbed up to permit views. (2) A ground plain — an ankle height, no mow mix that will provide differentiation Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 14 of 22 from the mowed turf within the memorial area. That formula could be combined with some spring bulbs and fall color. On Day 1 the plant material will not be mature. It will take 8-10 years for the trees to grow to maturity, after which, the desired effects will be seen. All the components of the existing Grounds of Remembrance site will be preserved, including the Patron Sycamore Grove. [Reviewed details of the proposed layout of the landscape buffer.] Ms. Alutto inquired the distance between the proposed crushed limestone curb and the Rock Cress Parkway. Mr. Meyer responded that it would be 89-90 feet at one point and approximately 15 feet at another. Ms. Alutto noted that is a fairly large variance. Mr. Meyer responded that it is because the curb line of Rock Cress changes. It widens out as it approaches High Street to accommodate a turn lane, then tapers in. Ms. Amorose Groomes inquired what the measurement of 36 — 44 feet in the middle of the rendering depicts. Mr. Meyer responded that is the measurement between the stone walls and the end of said section, the buffer above the grade change. Ms. Amorose Groomes inquired if the measurement of 12-60 inches indicates that the wall in some places will be one foot high and in other places 5 feet high. Mr. Meyer responded that is correct. It addresses the grade change of Rock Cress Parkway from High Street (beginning at 5 feet high and diminishing) as Rock Cress climbs to the west towards Franklin Street; midway, a grade change disappears. Mr. Meyer continued [showed views of the site from different perspectives]: o While they want to preserve the intent of the artist's vision and the Veterans Memorial Committee, they also want to take advantage of the opportunity to create some presence and visibility of the Veterans Memorial. Whatever architectural form it may ultimately take, there is support for providing identification and visibility of the memorial site from both Rock Cress and High Street. Ms. Amorose Groomes inquired if the existing memorial park sign would remain intact at its present location. Mr. Meyer confirmed that it would. [continued description of different views.] Their intent is to have conversations with the Veterans Memorial Committee and the artist to identify the right mix to ensure that the improvements are compatible with the original intent, yet not replicate items that should remain only as they were created. They are working through some architectural issues. The bedrock condition is a quality that is difficult to preserve and enhance. The current thinking is that this is a condition that is difficult to make look cared for and well kempt. The concrete sidewalk would be replaced with an asphalt multi -use along High Street that ultimately comes up to Rock Cress and becomes a cycle track. Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 15 of 22 Ms. Amorose Groomes inquired if all the utilities along N. High would be buried north of Rock Cress. Mr. Meyer responded affirmatively. Ms. Amorose Groomes inquired how far to the north would that be. Mr. Foegler responded that he would need to verify, but he believes that is extended to Indian Run Drive — essentially the length of this roadway project. Ms. Amorose Groomes noted that, in and of itself, is a significant enhancement. Mr. Meyer continued: o As Rock Cress slopes, it moves from Franklin Street and the school site down to the river. They are looking at options for how the wall may be treated, either following the slope or as a stepped wall. They are continuing to refine these details as they work with staff, the committee, Council and receive public comments. Mr. Meyer concluded the Grounds of Remembrance Proposal. Mr. McDaniel thanked the members of the original members of Veterans Memorial advisory committee, the committee which worked on the creation of the Grounds of Remembrance. They provided very thoughtful input in two meetings to review this proposal. (A summary of those meetings was provided in Council's packet.) That committee appreciated the additional buffer and seemed satisfied with this concept. He served on that committee, as well, and recalls earlier concerns the committee had about how removed the memorial park should be. Committee members recalled that when considering that project it would accentuate the park. The Committee also looked at the hand railing along the entrance into the park. They wanted the choice to be differentiated to either enter the Grounds of Remembrance site or to go back to the park ravine area. Mayor Peterson inquired if that group seemed generally supportive of the plan. Mr. McDaniel responded that there were mixed opinions. However, after four hours of discussion, he believes the general consensus was positive. Mr. Papsidero stated that staff had proposed the following questions for Council's input: • Do the programmatic elements of the library meet the needs of the community? • Does the design of the library and garage meet the direction provided by Council? • Does the library plaza design offer the community an acceptable public amenity? • Are the design ideas for connecting the history of the site and Dublin appropriate and sufficient? • What is the appropriateness of the design approach for an expanded Grounds of Remembrance? Council responses: Ms. Salav: 0 Do the programmatic elements of the /ibrary meet the needs of the community? Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 16 of 22 Stated that she believes the elements do meet the needs of the community. She has faith in the Library leadership to figure that out, as it is their area of expertise. With the level of thoughtfulness that has gone into it, she is very satisfied. • Does the design of the library and garage meet the direction provided by Council? Previously, Council said they wanted an iconic building. She was never looking for a building that was absolutely historical. She always understood that the scale and design of this building would be something different, and the goal was not to replicate the historical buildings within the District. Therefore, she wasn't shocked with the proposed design. • Does the library plaza design offer the community an acceptable public amenity? She believes the plaza design is very exciting, and she is looking forward to more discussion and more refinement of that idea. It will be a wonderful community amenity with the possibility of including different things, such as public art and interactive spaces for people to gather. It will take advantage of the "coming together" that happens in libraries and offers them an attractive, inviting public space outside. • Are the design ideas for connecting the history of the site and Dublin appropriate and sufficient? 1. She is at a disadvantage as she was not present for the Library presentation, and with the online packet, she was unable to determine what the response was to the feedback from the community and the ARB. 2. In regard to the proposed building materials, the patina of aged metal is in the Historic District, as is water — the river. The only material in the materials list that she does not see in the Historic District is glass in great mass. Generally in a Historic District, the windows are very small with the ability for an individual to open. That is the type of existing window glass. To her, one of the existing features of this design is the addition of a lot of glass. The downtown library building has used glass to great advantage. In her home, she gravitates to where sun and light is. 3. She is in agreement with the earlier comments about use of more stone. Incorporating more stone rather than Roman brick. That type of brick is neither historic nor modern, but somewhere between. Perhaps incorporating the typical Dublin limestone would help marry this building to what exists in the District without trying to make it a historic building. Trying to do that would result in missing the mark on both ends and not be what anyone desires. • What is the appropriateness of the design approach for an expanded Grounds of Remembrance? This will add more prominence to the Veterans Memorial Park and the Grounds of Remembrance than is there at present; that is an exciting opportunity. She is not sure that much signage should be used, but there are ways to highlight that this is a special place in the community. Her neighborhood is effectively buffered from an office development by a 75 -foot greenspace buffer. If, as was indicated, the Veterans Committee members were satisfied and appreciative of the proposed project, then she is comfortable that the distance between Rock Cress and the new Library will be adequate. Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 17 of 22 Mr. Lecklider: • Do the programmatic elements of the library meet the needs of the community? He believes the Library has accomplished that. He defers to their surveys and meetings with patrons, including input from Dublin Coffman High School students. He is no expert so defers to the Library on that matter. • Does the design of the /ibrary and garage meet the direction provided by Council? o As noted by Council member Keenan at a recent Council meeting, originally, this site was not necessarily the then City Council's preferred site for a new Library. Council suggested some other sites that were not in the Historic District. However, he completely understands why the Library wants to re -develop on this site for the reasons they have stated. o For the benefit of the public -- he does not have a recollection that during the 2011 Goal Setting Session, Council gave specific direction with respect to design or architecture. He did not give direction with respect to this particular design or anything similar. Council was shown many images, and, as he recalls it, Council's response was more generalized. There may have been positive reactions to the images, although he did not exhibit a positive reaction himself, but to suggest that City Council encouraged this design — he does not think that is the case. He commented on this design when Council was first shown the design. Perhaps the term "iconic" is being over -used to some degree. He is trying to imagine this design 25 years down the road and beyond, and how it will be used by its patrons. o He is struck by Mr. Losinski's reference to the input from Dublin Coffman students during a charrette. The students are not only existing patrons but also future patrons. This Library is primarily for the benefit of future generations. It is important to respect the integrity of the Historic District, and City Council has tried to do so for many years. He finds it difficult to imagine a traditional or historic architectural skin on the uses in the interior of this building. He believes the natural light and transparency is an important element. o With respect to the Garage, he appreciates the changes that were made in response to DesignGroup's comments and the public comments. Eliminating the pre -cast concrete panels is certainly a positive step, as are some of the other changes. He is struggling with the fins — that is not a design that he has seen before; that does not mean it is a bad design. The reality is that this is a parking garage -- a large structure with the needed 200 parking spaces, but it isn't necessary to construct a 350 -space garage. It makes sense to maximize the opportunity, but within certain limitations. This is a large structure with design limitations. He respects those who have a different opinion with respect to the exterior treatment, including the fins. In summary, he is neutral on the garage design. • Does the library plaza design offer the community an acceptable public amenity? He believes this is a great, fantastic feature. • Are the design ideas for connecting the history of the site and Dublin appropriate and sufficient? Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 18 of 22 o He agrees with the suggestion to trade the brick for stone, if that would work. That is a material seen within the Historic District, and it would be a good way in which to tie the new building into the Historic District. o Landscaping will be important, and he likes the proposed changes; more is better. o The glass is unquestionably a distinction, but a positive one. • What is the appropriateness of the design approach for an expanded Grounds of Remembrance? He really likes what was shown tonight. It provides an opportunity to accentuate the fact that the memorial park exists there, and it will provide more accessibility. He likes the additional signage proposed at the corner of Rock Cress and High Street. Overall, this is a positive feature and he anticipates future refinement. Mayor Peterson: • Do the programmatic elements of the library meet the needs of the community? o Location — He understands the Library had an asset with the existing property the current Library building is on, and he does not have a problem with them re -configuring their building there. It has evolved more into a community -type center, and he believes the programmatic element will provide the needed programming. • Does the design of the /ibrary and garage meet the direction provided by Council? o The mass and height of the buildings initially concerned him. However, as he has assimilated the design better, he believes the proposed buildings are lower than the original three-story school building on this site. Height is not necessarily inconsistent with the Historic District. The Garage is much more massive than the Library, and will have a greater visual impact on the Historic District — keeping in mind that the Garage is the City's. o He understands the transparency of the building, but the glass concerns him. His entire hesitation with this proposal is the materials, more so the materials on the bottom half of the Library building and how that is incorporated into the District than the glass, as he understands that glass provides visibility and transparency. The words that were used in the pertinent slides were complementary relationship to surroundings; compatibility; within context; integrated; consistent — all with the idea of continuing the evolution of development in Dublin. For him, the materials are not consistent with that. There are stone walls all over Dublin; even the City's printed materials include the idea of stone existing within Dublin. Is there a way to incorporate that variable into this project? If existing materials could be integrated into this project, it would look more like an evolution of the history of Dublin, and that would help. • Are the design ideas for connecting the history of the site and Dublin appropriate and sufficient? He likes Ms. Perry's idea of incorporating a nod back to the original school on this site. It would provide an emotional connection to the people who once attended school on this property. It would be good to hearken back to that and also a need to move on and embrace the future; on the other side of the river, that is exactly what the City is doing. At the pedestrian bridge, there will be this incredible building, which presents a fantastic opportunity to marry the two — the past and embrace the future. He believes it is important to capture people's imagination about the Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 19 of 22 historical significance of that land and this community and blend it into the new building. That transition would be almost magical. • What is the appropriateness of the design approach for an expanded Grounds of Remembrance? The images shown of Rock Cress were helpful. Previously, he couldn't fully appreciate the fact that the building is moving to the south, and the road will be where the building now is. With the building moving to the south, there will be more space. There are many veterans in this community who care very much about the Veterans Memorial site. If that contingency can be satisfied with a proposed plan, he certainly would be. What was presented tonight shows there is an opportunity to do that in the right way. Mr. Keenan: • Does the design of the library and garage meet the direction provided by Council? He concurs with his colleagues' comments. He believes the materials are key to achieving what is needed, and including some stone in the design would be important to the project. The minutes provided in Council's packet go back to 2007 — ten years ago Council talked about this project, including in several goal -setting sessions. Council did talk about a WOW factor for this Library. He recalls when Council saw the first iterations here, a month or two ago, nearly everyone embraced it. We have the same Library today that we had when there was one high school. Today, we have three high schools. It is clear that expansion of the Library is needed. This project is consistent with many other new library branches. In the Dispatch today, there was an iteration of the Martin Luther King branch, which also has a very contemporary look. • Are the design ideas for connecting the history of the site and Dublin appropriate and sufficient? He believes it is a reasonable transition on the current site. Across the street is a huge, new, modern mixed-use development of condo, retail and restaurants, and a very iconic pedestrian bridge that will connect the old with the new. He believes the proposed building provides a reasonable transition; however, the materials may need to be tweaked. • What is the appropriateness of the design approach for an expanded Grounds of Remembrance? Originally, many members on the Veterans Committee expressed a desire to have the memorial site in a very visible, open space — at one time, considering the Duke and Duchess site across from the current Sunoco site. The Committee's discussions transitioned into a desire for a thoughtful, reflective space, as well. The proposed changes at the Grounds of Remembrance would nearly achieve a compromise of the two viewpoints. The proposed changes will serve that site well, perhaps improving the overall experience. Ms. Alutto: • Do the programmatic elements of the library meet the needs of the community? She defers to the Library's expertise on this issue. They indicate that they have conducted a thorough study, and have identified the needed programmatic elements. 0 Does the design of the library and garage meet the direction provided by Council? Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 20 of 22 She has read through the history on the project and, generally speaking, the design does reflect what previous Councils have asked for. She did not find any specific direction that was given, however, that stated the building needed to be very contemporary; nor did it seem to rule it out. Ms. Salay noted that the Library showed many pictures, different images; that was impossible to capture in minutes. Ms. Alutto stated that there was no specific direction, however, to build something contemporary — that message was not found in these minutes. However, it seemed to indicate an openness to a possibility of surprise with the design. As Ms. Salay noted, she wasn't surprised to see a more contemporary design. Therefore, it seems to her that the proposal is consistent with Council's direction. • Does the library plaza design offer the community an acceptable public amenity? The plaza design does offer that, as long as the funding can be achieved. If the funding is not achieved, she is concerned that the site will be left with a very large greenspace that isn't as useful as intended. If the plaza is not built out, it would provide less of the buffer and transition into the Historic District. She appreciates that there are plans to achieve the funding. • Are the design ideas for connecting the history of the site and Dublin appropriate and sufficient? o She concurs with her colleagues' comments that the addition of stone is needed. She is not a proponent of the brick material. She likes the longer brick, but it does not seem fitting in this area. Incorporating stone would be helpful. She likes glass, but finds it difficult to envision the appearance and possibilities of reflection and glare. The glass looking toward the Grounds of Remembrance is concerning. Trees will block that view in time, but initially, that view will not be broken. The glass elevators on the sides of the garage will improve the appearance. She appreciates that the height has been reduced, and in the context of the original three-story school on the site, the height concerns her less. o Some concerns remain about the edge of Rock Cress and the Grounds of Remembrance. It seems sufficient, but the existing building edge will be replaced with traffic and people; it is important to continue to discuss how to mitigate that impact as much as possible. o A building that gives an appropriate nod to the surrounding District and provides an appropriate transition from the Historic District to the new — not a historic building, nor uber contemporary. • What is the appropriateness of the design approach for an expanded Grounds of Remembrance? She will defer to the Veterans Committee that worked on the Grounds of Remembrance and those who are familiar with that historical context. If they support the proposal, she does, as well. It is a beautiful, yet understated area, so she appreciates the opportunity to provide better visibility of that area. Ms. Amorose Groomes: • Do the programmatic elements of the library meet the needs of the community? She is a horticulturist, not a librarian. She has far more concerns about the outside of the building than the inside — that is where the Library does what it does best. Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 21 of 22 • Does the design of the library and garage meet the direction provided by Council? She reviewed these documents and found no direction given by Council. She understands that there were images shown, but she cannot attest to those. She has been in this elected office for nearly 1-1/2 years and has never provided any direction. When this design was shown to Council a few months ago that was the first time she had seen or heard anything about the design. However, many contemporary buildings have built in this community lately. There is a very contemporary, glass -glazing hotel; a very contemporary convention center with angled roofs and walls is under construction; a footbridge with a huge, stainless steel, eye -of -the needle design, that lends itself in color, texture and presentation as being contemporary is in design; and a contemporary back side of a condominium building is being constructed on the west side of the river. She does not believe that there is a real need for another strongly contemporary building in the community -- the City has dedicated significant resources to that at present. The parking garages, in terms of brick color and metal panels also present more of a contemporary feel than a traditional feel. Because a significant amount of contemporary development is occurring within this community, that would not set this building apart; in fact, as far as new construction goes, it would blend in. • Does the library plaza design offer the community an acceptable public amenity? The proposed plaza is lovely. Her only concern is that the City is building a lot of public spaces of similar size. The usable portion of our park along the river is an acre+. The usable portion of the plaza across the street is .3 acre, and a similar size here for the Library plaza. It would be good if the City would not have to close City streets for a community festival. Dublin does not have a public plaza that is sufficient in size to hold the kinds of events that the community demands — the art fairs, craft fairs, etc. This plaza is lovely, but all the plazas are becoming similar. Perhaps the City should set aside and congeal areas into one area to create a plaza more significant in size. • Are the design ideas for connecting the history of the site and Dublin appropriate and sufficient? What would the goal be to reflect to, other than to the City's National Registry buildings? Dublin is a very young community. She strongly agrees with Mayor Peterson that this building should be a sensitive evolution. It isn't possible to build old, but this building is skipping from "D" to "Q," rather than progressing through the alphabet and providing an evolution of the community. She is concerned about the reflectiveness of the glass. • What is the appropriateness of the design approach for an expanded Grounds of Remembrance? o She recalls when the Veterans Committee work was occurring — they were working on a shoestring budget. There was an effort to sell another 50 bricks to get another 8 -foot panel of rail. It was a contentious matter, because funds were very tight. The artist was sent back to the drawing board, because the project came in over budget. The City now seems very willing to spend "whatever it takes" for the Grounds of Remembrance buffering. We are creating a problem by building Rock Cress Parkway and a three-story building adjacent to the Veterans Park and simultaneously trying to solve the problem that is created by adding screening and buffering. o The City has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars constructing stone walls south of SR 161, and they are lovely. Her concern is that the community is not being consistent -- Dublin City Council Work Session Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 22 of 22 using this material here, that material there, another material here, another down here. The City needs to ensure there is a level of consistency, predictability and cohesion throughout. o She has heard the concern expressed by the public that it must be this Library proposal, or no Library. She does not think that's the case; she has not received that indication. Her hope is that the parties continue to work together and the result is a fantastic library. Although the result may not please everyone, we can be more inclusive and sensitive. o She has concerns about the treatments for the Grounds of Remembrance. Is it expanded? That is open to interpretation. o She does want the building to be authentic. She does not believe that authenticity, creativity and forward -thinking equal contemporary. To her, that is not an equation that is absolute. For some reason, that is a result that has been applied, but she does not ascribe to that logic. She believes it is possible to be creative, innovative, sensitive and forward - thinking without having to be so contrary to the bounds of our District. She does not want the situation to be "this or nothing." She wants people to work together and achieve a fantastic building that all, if not in agreement, at least understand. She is committed to the process of working on this, however many meetings that might take, to get to a place where we are assured that people have been heard or at least had the opportunity to participate. She thanks staff and the consultants for the presentation tonight. Mayor Peterson thanked CML, NBBJ, Moody Nolan, and MKSK representatives for their presentations. The Library item will be on Council's March13 and 20 meeting agendas, at which time public comments will be taken. Ms. Alutto stated that there were some updated renderings in the presentation tonight that were not provided in the packet materials. Could those be forwarded to Council? Mr. McDaniel responded that those would be forwarded to Council. Mayor Peterson stated that tonight's meeting is being live streamed at the City's website. The meeting was adjourned at 8:37 p.m. Deputy Clerk of Council