The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOrdinance 044-17Dayton Legal Blank, Inc. Ordinance No. RECORD OF ORDINANCES Form No. 30043 44 -17 passed , 20 AN ORDINANCE REZONING (10.71 ACRES FROM PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (MCKITRICK, SUBAREA 1) TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (MCKITRICK, SUBAREA lA) FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT TEXT TO PERMIT ADDITIONAL OFFICE AND EDUCATIONAL USES (CASE 17- 0592 /PDP /FDP) WHEREAS, the proposal is consistent with the Dublin Community Plan and the Zoning Code. NOW, T EREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, 1 of its elected members concurring, that: Section 1. The following described real estate, (see attached legal description), situated in the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, is hereby rezoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District, and shall be subject to regulations and procedures contained in Ordinance No. 21 -70 (Chapter 153 of the Codified Ordinances), the City of Dublin Zoning Code and amendments thereto as well as the approved development text. Section 2. The application, including the list of contiguous and affected property owners, and the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission, are all incorporated into and made an official part of this Ordinance and said real estate shall be developed and used in accordance there within. Section 3. This Ordinancq shall take effect upon the earliest date permitted by law. Clerk of Council 2017. Office of the City Manager 5200 Emerald Parkway * Dublin, OH 43017-1090 ity of Dubl in Phone: 614.410.4400 * Fax: 614.410.4490 7cit To: Members of Dublin City Council From: Dana L. McDaniel, City Mana Date,: July 27, 2017 Initiated By: Vince A. Papsidero, FAICP, Planning Directo Logan M. Stang,, Planner I I Re: Ordinance 44-17 — Rezoning ±10.71 Acres from PUD, Planned Unil Development District (McKitrick, Subarea 1) to PUD, Planned Unil Development District (McKitrick, Subarea 1a) for an Amendment to the Approved Development Text to Permit Additional Office and Educational Uses (Case 17-059Z/PDP/FDP) (Dublin City Schools) Ordinance 44-14 is a request for an amendment to the approved development text of a Planned District to be revised to add to the current list of permitted uses to allow for the operation of an alternative high school within an existing, vacant office building. The Community Plan shows the future land use for this site as Premium Office and Institutional, described as applicable to sites with high visibility, a greater number of employees and requiring access to major arterials and proximity to interchanges. Areas are intended to serve as major employment centers within the City. Institutional uses in this classification are intended for large- scale facilities such as major hospitals and universities serving a regional market. Ord. 44-17 — Rezoning — McKitrick, Subarea 1 July 27, 2017 Page 2 of 2 The existing infrastructure meets the Thoroughfare Plan and no improvements are anticipated with this proposal. The proposed development text retains the existing development standards for density, building height, architecture landscaping and lighting. A decrease in pavement setback from 50 to 20 feet is required on the south property line, as right-of-way takes have occurred for the 1-270/33 interchange project that brought the existing parking lot out of compliance with the text. The proposal uses the existing public and private infrastructure to provide access to the site. No changes are proposed to any of the public rights-of-way with this application. The City has received a Traffic Impact study along with operational details with the anticipated use of the site as an alternative high school and school administration function. J= The Commission reviewed and recommended approval to City Council of this rezoning at their july 13, 2017 meeting with no conditions. The Commission simultaneously approved a final development plan to accept the existing development of the site and the building, V lit-1p.4-fro Planning recommends City Council approval of Ordinance 44-17 at the second reading/public hearing on August 14, 2017. 17 -an /Rezoning/ FDP Concept Plan /Rezoning /Preliminary 0 250 500 1, Development Plan /Final Development Plan City Ol 1 Dublin McKitrick, Subarea 1A Rezoning Feet 5175 Emerald Parkway PUD S 4 r u ■■ ■� •: un nv�. 0 0 0 0 C UD BSD -IRN BUJ 17- 059CP- Z- PDP -FDP Concept Plan /Rezoning /Preliminary 0 250 500 Development Plan /Final Development Plan City Of Dublin McKitrick, Subarea 1A Rezoning Feet 5175 Emerald Parkway CITY OF DUBLIN. Land use and lone Ranee Planning M 5Ner *Rings Road Dublin. Oho 4W 161216 Phone /= 614- 410-4600 Fax 614a164747 web Ste: W WWAobtin.On US February 2009 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPLICATION (Code Section 153.232) I. PLEASE CHECK THE TYPE OF APPLICATION: ❑ Informal Review ❑ Final Plat (Section 152.085) ® Concept Plan ❑ Conditional Use (Section 153.056(A)(1)) (Section 153.236) Preliminary Development Plan / Rezoning ❑ Corridor Development District (CDD) (Section 153.053) (Section 153.115) Final Development Plan (Section 153.053(E)) ❑ Amended Final Development Plan (Section 153.053(E)) ❑ Standard District Rezoning (Section 153.018) ❑ Preliminary Plat (Section 152.015) ❑ Corridor Development District (CDD) Sign (Section 153.115) ❑ Minor Subdivision ❑ Right -of -Way Encroachment ❑ Other (Please Specify): Please utilize the applicable Supplemental Application Requirements sheet for additional submittal requirements that will need to accompany this application form. IL PROPERTY INFORMATION: This section must be completed. Property Address(es): 5175 Emerald Parkway Mailing Address: 7030 Coffman Road Tax ID /Parcel Number(s): Daytime Telephone: Parcel Size(s) (Acres): 273- 007487 0.7423 acres 273- 007531 9.976 acres Existing Land Use /Development: Office building and ancillary parking IF APPLICABLE, PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: Proposed Land Use/Development: Educational /school related activities and office use Total acres affected by application: 10.7183 acres III. CURRENT PROPERTY OWNERlSk Please attach additional sheets if needed- Name (individual orOrganizallon); Dublin City School District Board of Education Mailing Address: 7030 Coffman Road (street, City, State, zip code) Dublin, OH 43017 Daytime Telephone: 1 Fax: 614 - 760 -4323 [Email Alternate Contact Information: Jeff Stark— Director of Business Operations Page 1 of 3 IV. APPLICANT(S): This is the person(s) who is submitting the application if different than the property owner(s) listed in part III. Please complete if applicable. Name: Applicant Is also property owner: yes ® no[ Organization (Owner, Developer, Contractor, etc.): Mailing Address: (Street, City, State, Zip Code) Daytime Telephone: Fax: Email or Alternate Contact Information: V. REPRESENTATIVE(S) OF APPLICANT / PROPERTY OWNER: This Is the person(s) who is submitting the application on behalf of the applicant listed in part IV or property owner listed in part III. Please complete If applicable. Name: Jackson B. Reynolds III c/o Smith & Hale LLC Organization (Owner, Developer, Contractor, etc.): Attorney Melling Address' (Street, City, State, Zip Code) 37 W. Broad Street, 11460, Columbus, OH 43215 Daytime Telephone: 614- 221 -4255 Fax: 614 - 221 -4409 Email or Alternate Contact Information: ireynolds@smithandhale.com VI. AUTHORIZATION FOR OWNER'S APPLICANT or REPRESENTATIVE(S): If the applicant is not the property owner, this section must be completed and notarized. I Jeff Stark . the owner, hereby authorize Jackson B. Reynolds III to act as my applicant or representative(s) in all matters pertaining to the processing and approval of this application, Including modifying the project. I agree to be bound by all representations and agreements made by the designated representative. Signature of Current Property Owner: 1 _ i 1 I Date: 5h I 1 -1 U Check this box if the Authorization for Owner's Applicant or Representative(s) Is attached as a separate document Subscribed and sworn before me this day of '20 Stale of County of [ Lcl,�_ Notary Public VII. AUTHORIZATION TO VISIT THE PROPERTY: Site visas to the property by City representatives are essential to process this application. The OwnedApplicant as noted below, hereby authorizes City representatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the property described in this application. I Jackson B. Reynolds, III the owner or authorized representative, hereby authorize City representatives to visit, photograph and post a notice on the property described in this application. I Signature of applicant or authorized representative: L��' y , Ir� Date: Page 2 of 3 VIII. UTILITY DISCLAIMER: The Owner /Applicant acknowledges the approval of this request for review by the Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission and/or Dublin City Council does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Owner /Applicant. I JjLck50t! Z. gWolds. III owner or authorized representative, acknowledge that approval of this request does not constitute a guarantee or binding commitment that the City of Dublin will be able to provide essential services such as water and sewer facilities when needed by said Owner /Applicant. Signature of applicant or authorized representative 'L �t✓'% ILip IIf A I Date: %,s,! IX. APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT, This section Mt'ist be completed and notarized. I Ttirlrmnn �nnlris r 117 , the owner or authorized representative, have read and understand the contents of this application. The Information contained in this application, attached exhibits and other Information submitted Is complete and In all respects q W3—nt; correct, to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signature of applicant or authorized representative /LI� Date: Jl�� Subscribed and sworn to before me this Stale of Um r. y County of .. �1 Qgy11 r1 day of U)34— �' 20 Y1 Notary Public Natalie C. Tmwns NotsfyPllbk, StMeofOldo My Calmnission Expires 0&44-2020 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Amount Received: Application No: P&Z Date(s): P&Z Action: Receipt No: Map Zone: Date Received: Received By: City Council (First Reading): City Council (Second Reading): City Council Action: Ordinance Number: Type of Request: N. S, E, W (Circle) Side of: N. S, E, W (Circle) Side of Nearest Intersection: Distance from Nearest Intersection: Existing Zoning District: Requested Zoning District: Page 3 of 3 APPLICANT /PROPERTY OWNER CONDO. ASSOCIATION Dublin Board of Education Willow Grove Condo Association Dublin City School District Oo Christopher Conrad 62 West Bridge Street 5239 Willow Grove Place Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 273- 000325 273- 000425 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS City of Dublin 970 High Ridge Associates LLC Louella J Reynolds 5200 Emerald Parkway 30100 Telegraph Road, Suite 403 5208 Willow Grove Place North Dublin, OH 43017 Bingham Farms, MI 48025 Dublin, OH 43017 273- 000425 273 - 001687 273- 001853 Lavon L Baker Christine Richter Susan L Montgomery 5212 North Willow Grove Place 6690 Willow Grove Lane 6694 Willow Grove Lane Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, 014 43017 273 - 001854 273- 001950 273- 001951 Tydvil Thomas Renee M Pisa Wesley T Kelsey 6698 Willow Grove Lane 6702 Willow Grove Lane 6763 East Willow Grove Place Dublin, 01-143017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 273 - 001952 273 - 001953 273 - 002136 Maureen H Engel Michael Studebaker Lindsey N Wilhelm 6759 East Willow Grove Place 8918 Monifieth Court 6751 East Willow Grove Place Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 273 - 002137 273- 002138 273 - 002139 Dana A Burtanger Matthew K Stewart Amy 1 Gerhart 6747 East Willow Grove Place 6743 East Willow Grove Place 6764 East Willow Grove Place Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 273 - 002140 273 - 002141 273- 002157 Allison Schuller Judith K Hardin T -S Ruck Limited Partnership 6760 Willow Grove Lane 6756 Willow Grove Place East 4342 Dublin Road Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Columbus, OH 43221 273 - 002158 273 - 002159 273 - 002160 Michele K Croce Jeannie G Fleming Yoshihisa & Noko Yoshida 6748 East Willow Grove Place 6735 East Willow Grove Place 6731 East Willow Grove Place Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, 014 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 273- 002161 273- 002162 273- 002163 Julie M Dilenschneider Gail E Morgan Pamela A & Derek A Lea 6727 East Willow Grove Place 6723 East Willow Grove Place 6719 East Willow Grove Place Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 273 - 002164 273 - 002165 273 - 002166 Donald Rivers 6707 WGPE LLC Elaine L Dentler 6715 East Willow Grove Place 6706 East Willow Grove Place 6703 East Willow Grove Place Dublin, Oil 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 273 - 002167 273- 002227 273- 002228 Arthur L Mynes Carla M Thompson Elizabeth Gehle 6699 Willow Grove Place 6695 East Willow Grove Place 6691 East Willow Grove Place Dublin, Oil 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 273- 002229 273- 002230 273- 002231 Trisha Heinfeldt Consulting Rentals LLC Pamela J Oswalt 6687 Willow Grove Place East 6681 East Willow Grove Place 6677 Willow Grove Place East Dublin, 01- 143017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, 01- 143017 273- 002232 273 - 002433 273- 002434 William Tyler Michael lirabcak Julie R Yesnick 6673 East Willow Grove Place 6669 Willow Grove Place Last 5168 Willow Grove Place South Dublin, 01-143017 Dublin, 0I- 143017 Dublin, Oil 43017 273- 002435 273- 002436 273- 002477 Anna M Lash Constance S Howard Karen 1 Sabo 5172 South Willow Grove Place 6995 Limerick Lane 5180 Willow Grove Place South Dublin, 01-143017 Troy, M148098 Dublin, OH 43017 273- 002478 273- 002479 273- 002480 Julia Rhoads Deborah S Miller Erin Gasper 5184 South Willow Grove Place Linda A Faber 5185 North Willow Grove Place Dublin, 01143017 5188 South Willow Grove Place Dublin, 01-143017 273- 002481 Dublin, OH 43017 273- 002580 273- 002482 Paula M Ryan Lucia C Ortiz Donna J Heavener 5189 North Willow Grove Place 5193 Willow Grove Place North 5197 North Willow Grove Place Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 273 - 002581 273- 002582 273- 002583 Jaimie L McQuirt Kelly Morse David L & Shirley Bendau 5181 South Willow Grove Place 5177 South Willow Grove Place 5173 Willow Grove Place South Dublin, 01143017 Dublin, 01-143017 Dublin, OH 43017 273- 003133 273 - 003134 273- 003135 Christopher Winch Karen P Shively Justin Riccobene 5169 South Willow Grove Place 5165 South Willow Grove Place 5161 South Willow Grove Place Dublin, 01-143017 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, 01143017 273- 003136 273- 003137 273- 003138 Laurie L Winans Jennifer A Green Garcia Gregory M & Stacia R Groom 310 Spring Street 5202 North Willow Grove Place 5198 North Willow Grove Place Piqua, OH 45356 Dublin, OH 43017 Dublin, OH 43017 273- 003144 273 - 003152 273- 003153 Nick Colasante 5194 North Willow Grove Place Dublin, 01-143017 273- 003154 dublinschools- emeraldparkway.lbl (net) 513117 S:Docs /s &hlabels120l7 William Jones 5190 North Willow Grove Place Dublin, OH 43017 273- 003155 FRANKLIN COUNTY, OH Recorded: 04/0712017 04:16:00 PM Exhibit "A" Instrument # 201704070047384 Page: 4 of 9 Situated in the City of Dublin, County of Franklin, State of Ohio, described as follows: PARCEL ONE: Description of 0.7423 acre tract on the south side of the proposed Coffman - Sawmill Connector, the north side of Interstate 270 north and being 1 104 feet east of Coffman Road. FOR PLANNED COMMUNITIES Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, Virginia Military Survey number 2542, and being 0.6681 acres out of an 18.473 acre tract conveyed to Bethel Road Investment Company Inc. by deed of record in Official Record 15002, Page D13, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio, and also being 0.0742 acres out of an original 34.453 acre tract conveyed to The Board of Education of The Washington (now known as Dublin) Local School District by deed of record in Deed Book 2855, Page 68, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio, said 0.6681 acre tract and 0.0742 acre tract being more particularly described as an 0.7423 acre tract as follows: Beginning for reference at a set iron pin in a curve in the northerly right of way line of FRA 1- 270 -7.47 North being the southeasterly corner of the Willow Grove of Dublin Condominium Homes Complex of Record in Official Record 00550, Page E06, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio and being the southwesterly comer of the said 18.473 acre tract; thence along the northerly right of way line of said FRA 1- 270 -7.47 North, the Southerly line of the said 18.473 acre tract and along a curve to the right having a radius of 7623.36 feet, the chord of which bears North 49 050'26" East a chord distance of 988.87 feet to a point being the southwesterly corner of the herein described 0.7423 acre tract and the TRUE PLACE OF BEGINNING; thence leaving the northerly right of way line of said FRA 1- 270 -7.47 North and the southerly line of the said 18.473 acre tract. North 37 °55'01" West a distance of 545.50 feet (passing the northerly line oftlte said 18.473 acre tract at a distance of 487.39 feet) to a point in the southerly right of way line of the proposed Coffman- Sawmill Connector Road having a proposed total right of way width of 100 feet, said point being located 50.00 feet south of and perpendicular to the centerline of said Coffman- Page I of 6 FRANKLIN COUNTY, OH Recorded: 04/07/2017 04:16:00 PM Instrument# 201704070047384 Sawmill Connector right of way; thence along the southerly right of way line of the said Coffman- Sawmill Connector. North 52 °04'59" East a distance of 59.19 feet to a point; thence leaving the southerly right of way line of the said Coffman - Sawmill Connector. South 37 °55'01" Fast a distance of 547.26 feet (passing the northerly line of the said 18.473 acre tract at a distance of 50.43 feet) to a point on a curve in the northerly right of way line of said FRA 1 -270 -7.47 North and the southerly line of the said 18.473 acre tract; thence along the southerly, line of the said 18.473 acre tract, the northerly right of way line of said FRA 1- 270 -7.47 North and said curve to the left, having a radius of 7623.36 feet, the chord of which bears South 53 °46'55" West a chord distance of 59.21 feet to the place of beginning. containing 0.7423 acres of land, subject however, to all legal rights of way and easements. Bearings based on a survey tie to FRA 1- 270 -7.47 North centerline monuments at stations 746 +60.63 and 761 +95.58, centerline bearing being North 81006'28" East. This description is based upon a field survey made by Dodson - Lindblom Associates, Inc. in March of 1995 and from centerline geometry data for the Coffinan- Sawmill Connector furnished by Burgess and Niple. PARCEL TWO: Description of a 10.2144 acre tract on the north side of the proposed Coffman - Sawmill Connector, the north side of Interstate 270 and being 590 feet cast of Coffman Road. FOR PLANNED COMNIUNI'1'IES Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, Virginia Military Survey number 2542, and being 9.6108 acres out of an 18.473 acre tract conveyed to Bethel Road Investment Company, Inc. by deed of record in Official Record 15002, Page D13 Recorders Office, Franklin County, Ohio and also being 0.6036 acres out of an original 34.453 acre tract conveyed to The Board of Education of The Washington (now known as Dublin) Local School District by deed of record in Deed Book 2855, Page 68, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio, said 9.6108 acre tract and 0.6036 acre tract being more particularly described as a 10.2144 acre tract as follows: Beginning at a set iron pin in the northerly right of way line of FRA 1- 270 -7.47 North being a southwesterly corner of the said 18.473 acre tract, the southeasterly corner of the Willow Grove of Dublin Condominium I lomes Complex of record in Official Record 00550, Page E06, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio, and being the southwesterly corner of the herein described 10.2144 acre tract; thence North 02 °59'36" West a distance of 813.02 feet along the easterly line of said Willow Grove Condominium Complex and a westerly line of the said 18.473 acre tract (passing a set iron pin at the northeasterly tooter of the said Willow Grove Condominium Complex and a comer of the Page 2 of 6 Page: 5 of 9 1?AUAV- au6 Q-1Q8 -C Af,[ or &73� 007531 FRANKLIN COUNTY, OH Recorded: 04/07/2017 04:16:00 PM Instrument # 201704070047384 Page: 6 of 9 said 18.473 acre tract at a distance of 808.30 feet) to a point on a curve in the southerly right of way line of the proposed Coffman - Sawmill Connector Road having a proposed total right of way width of 100 feet, said point being located radially 50.00 feet south from the centerline of said Coffnan- Sawmill Connector right of way; thence crossing said 34.453 acre tract and along the southerly right of way line of the said Coffman - Sawmill Connector and along a curve to the left having a radius of 1687.02 feet, the chord of which bears North 61 °04'28" East a chord distance of 527.32 feet to the point of tangent of said curve; thence continuing along the southerly right of way line of the said Coffinan- Sawmill Connector North 52 004'59" East a distance of 1.83 feet to a point; thence leaving the southerly right of way line of the said Coffman - Sawmill Connector and crossing a part of the said original 34.453 acre tract and the said 18.473 acre tract South 37 °55'01" East a distance of 545.50 feet to a point on a curve in the northerly right of way line of said FRA 1- 270 -7.47 North and the southerly line of the said 18.473 acre tract, passing the northerly line of the said 18.473 acre tract at a distance of 58.11 feet; thence along the northerly right of way line of said FRA 1- 270 -7.47 North, the southerly line of said 18.473 acre tract and along said curve to the left having a radius of 7,623.36 feet, the chord of which bears South 49 °5026" West a chord distance of 988.87 feet to the place of beginning, containing 10.2144 acres of land and being subject to a storm sewer easement of record in Official Record 06416, Page FI4, a sanitary sewer easement of record in Deed Book 3531, Page 632, a retention basin easement of record in Official Record 00655, Page 111 and all other legal rights of way and easements. The above mentioned easement records being of record in the Recorder's Otlice, Franklin County, Ohio. Bearings based on a survey tie to FRA 1- 270 -7.47 North centerline monuments at stations 746 +60.63 and 76 +95.58. This description is based upon a field survey made by Dodson - Lindblom Associates, Inc., in March of 1995 and from centerline geometry data for the Coffman - Sawmil Connector furnished by Burgess and Niple. LESS AND EXCFP'I'ING therefrom a 0.238 acre tract conveyed to the State of Ohio, Department of Transportation by Instrument No. 201411170153463 and more particularly described as follows: Situated in the State of Ohio, Franklin County, City of Dublin, Virginia Military Survey Number 2542, being part of parcel of land conveyed to Dublin United, LLC, an Ohio Limited Liability Company in Instrument Number 200003210055243, lying on the left side of the centerline of survey of Interstate Route 270 and more particularly described as follows: Commencing in the southwesterly corner of Lot I of Post Road Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 62, 1'age 16 (witness a 1 -1/4 inch pipe found North 35° 22'36" West a distance of 0.32 feet), also being in the southeasterly corner ofa parcel of land conveyed to Buckeye Lodging, LL.C, an Ohio Limited Liability Company in Instrument Number 201304290070262, in the existing northerly right of way line of US -33 (SR -161, Columbus - Marysville Road, right of way varies), and in the northerly line of a 9.98 acre parcel of land conveyed to the State of Ohio in Page 3 of 6 FRANKLIN COUNTY, OH Recorded: 04/07/2017 04:16:00 PM Instrument # 201704070047384 Page: 7 of 9 Common Pleas Case Number 231728, said point being 120.00 feet left of Station 198 +38.70 of US -33; Thence, in the existing northerly right of way line of said US -33, a northerly line of said 9.98 acre State of Ohio parcel and a southerly line of said Buckeye Lodging parcel, South 89° 04' 04" West a distance of 237.62 feet to a point 120.00 feet left of Station 196 +00.01 of US -33; Thence, in the existing northerly right of way line of said US -33, a northerly line of said 9.98 acre State of Ohio parcel, a southerly line of said Buckeye Lodging parcel and a southerly line of a parcel of land conveyed to SLMC, Ltd., an Ohio Limited Liability Company in Instrument Number 200603210051986, North 860 38'35" West a distance of 200.56 feet to a point 135.00 feet left of Station 194 +00.01 of US -33; 'thence, in the existing northerly right of way line of said US -33, a northerly line of said 9.98 acre State of Ohio parcel, a southerly line of said SLMC parcel, and a southwesterly line of a parcel of land conveyed to Courtyard by Marriott Limited Partnership as recorded in Instrument Number 201206250090405, North 720 51' 15" West a distance of 203.02 feet to a point 198.00 feet left of Station 192 +07.01 of US -33 (witness an iron pin capped "BIRD & BULL INC.' lbund South 440 22'57" West a distance of 0.18 feet); Thence, in the existing northerly right of way line of said US -33, a northerly line of said 9.98 acre State of Ohio parcel, a northeasterly line of a 19.30 acre parcel of land conveyed to the Stale of Ohio in Common Pleas Case Number 224026, and a southwesterly line of said Courtyard by Marriott parcel, North 530 29'5 1 11 West a distance of 182.61 feet to a point 309.00 feet left of Station 190 +62.01 of US -33 (witness a 1 -1/4 inch pipe found North 65° 21' 18" West a distance. of 0.07 feet); Thence, in the existing easterly right of way line of Interstate Route 270 (right of way varies), an easterly line of said 19.30 acre State of Ohio parcel and a southwesterly line of said Courtyard by Marriott parcel, North 341 42'35" West a distance of 181.66 feet to a point 486.06 feet right of Station 692 +68.24 of IR -270; Thence, in the existing easterly right of way line of said IR -270, an easterly line of said 19.30 acre State of Ohio parcel and a westerly line of said Courtyard by Marriott parcel, North 80 50' 52" West a distance of 181.33 feet to a point 349.00 feet right of Station 693 +94.00 of IR -270; Thence, in the existing easterly right of way line of said IR -270, an easterly line of said 19.30 acre State of Ohio parcel and westerly line of said Courtyard by Marriott parcel, North 70 36' 30" East a distance of 173.03 feet to a point 253.00 feet right of Station 695 +44.00 of IR -270 (witness a I -inch pipe found North 84° 12'40" East a distance of 0.11 feet); Thence, crossing said 19.30 acre State of Ohio parcel, North 48° 07' 11" West a distance of 253.00 feet to a point in the existing centerline of said IR -270. said point being Station 695+44.00 of IR -270; Page 4 of 6 FRANKI-IN COUJJT`(, OH Recorded: 0410712017 04:16:00 PM Instrument # 201704070047384 Page: 8 of 9 Thence, crossing said 19.30 acre State of Ohio parcel, a 1.41 acre parcel of land conveyed to the State of Ohio in Deed Book 2669, Page 402, and a 21.00 acre parcel of land conveyed to the State of Ohio in Common Pleas Case Number 225012, in the centerline of said IR -270 and the arc of a non - tangent curve to the right, said curve having an arc length of 552.79 feet, a radius of 7473.36 feet, a delta of V 14' 17 ", a chord bearing of North 43° 59' 58" East, and a chord length of 552.66 feet to a point at Station 700+96.79 of IR -270; Thence, crossing said 21.00 acre State of Ohio parcel, North 43° 52'54" West a distance of 150.00 feet to the existing westerly right of way line of said IR -270, the northwesterly comer of said 21.00 acre State of Ohio parcel, the northeasterly corner of a 0.01 acre parcel of land conveyed to the State of Ohio in Deed Book 2672, Page 684, the southwesterly corner of said Dublin United parcel, and a southerly corner of a parcel of land (designated as Phase 217) conveyed to Willow Grove of Dublin Condominium Homes Unit Owners' Association, Inc., an Ohio Non - profit Corporation in Official Record 4758, Page B19, said point being 150.00 feet left of Station 700 +96.79 of IR -270, and being the POINT OF BEGINNING for the parcel of land herein described: Thence, in the westerly line of said Dublin United parcel and an easterly line of said Willow Grove parcel, North 2° 58'05" West a distance of 23.80 feet to an iron pin set 168.00 feet left of Station 701 +12.03 of IR -270; Thence, crossing said Dublin United parcel, in the arc of a non - tangent curve to the right, said curve having an arc length of 294.44 feet, a radius of 7641.36 feet, a delta of 2° 12'28", a chord bearing of North 47° 20'21 " East, and a chord length of 294.42 feet, to an iron pin set 168.00 feet left of Station 704 +00.00 of IR -270; Thence, crossing said Dublin United parcel, North 35° 48'20" East a distance of 55.41 feet to an iron pin set 180.31 feet left of Station 704 +57.59 of IR -270; Thence, crossing said Dublin United parcel, North 56° 41'21 " East a distance of252.20 feet to an iron pin set in the existing westerly right of way line of said IR -270, the westerly line of 21.00 acre parcel conveyed to the State of Ohio in Deed Book 3020, Page 180 and the southeasterly line of said Dublin United parcel, said iron pin being 150.00 feet left of Station 706 +97.76 of IR- 270; Thence, in the existing westerly right of way line of said IR -270, the westerly line of said 21.00. acre State of Ohio parcel and the southeasterly line of said Dublin United parcel, in the arc of a non- tangent curve to the left, said curve having an arc length of 613.04 feet, a radius if 7623.36 feet, a delta of V 36'27", a chord bearing of South 48° 25' 19" West, and a chord length of 612.87 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 0.238 acre of land, more or less, none of which falls within present roadway occupied. The above described parcel is located within Franklin County Auditor's Parcel Number 273- 007487 -00. The Basis of Bearings is Grid North of the Ohio State Plane Coordinate System, South Zone, NAD83 (2011) as determined from GPS observations. Alum Creek OH2O06 (DL6453), Union County (D11686) and Madison County (D12237) base stations were used in determining the grid Page 5 of 6 FRANKLIN COUNTY, OH Recorded: 04/07/2017 04:16:00 PM Instrument # 201704070047384 Page: 9 of 9 bearing and establishing South 89° 15'20" East for the centerline of US -33 (SR -161, Columbus - Marysville Road). All stations referred to herein are from the Centerline of Existing Right of Way of Interstate Route 270 or US -33, as indicated and as shown on ODOT Right of Way plan FRA- 270 - 17.28, recorded at the Franklin County Recorders Office in Plat Book _, Page _. TAorF, " T100 All iron pins set are 5/8 -inch rebar, 30 inches long. with a cap stamped "BARR & PREVOS'f" This description was prepared by any Amy Bemicken (Ohio Professional Surveyor Number 857 1) of Barr & Prevost and is based on survey field work performed under her direction from May, 2013 through October, 2013. PARCEL THREE: Together with right to the use of a certain retention basin as contained in the Easement and Maintenance Agreement, recorded in O.R. Volume 655, Page II 1 of Franklin County Records. PARCEL FOUR: Together with the rights in and to that certain Reciprocal Easement Agreement by and between Midwest Holding Corp. #8, Inc. and National Build to Suit Dublin II, L.I..C., recorded as Franklin County Recorder's Document No. 199808190210860. P.P.N. 273 - 007531 and 273- 007487 Page 6 of 6 0-/08-c QLL o,C7 CZ73 o 0741 B7 p IS CLARENCE E MINGO II FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR MAP ID: jbr DATE: 5/1/17 [�1`:: rd I ��►oe,i�w'� ''1 0 �� ..�� Mwf �r irr: y I MR ` � Disclaimer Scale =600 Grid This map is prepared for the real property inventory within this county. It is compiled from recorded deeds, .North survey plats, and other public records and data. Users of this map are notified that the public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information contained on this map. The county and the mapping companies assume no legal responsibilities for the information contained on this map. Please notify the Franklin County GIS Division of any discrepancies. Real Estate / GIS Department f !►= i MAP ID: jbr ouu.w o / 1� / DATE: 5/1/17 � 1 10 � /• �o > \\ 11 � C Q\\ 1 k Disclaimer Scale =200 J This map is prepared for the real property inventory within this county. It is compiled from recorded deeds, t survey plats, and other public records and data. Users of this map are notified that the public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information contained on this map. The county and the mapping companies assume no legal responsibilities for the information contained on this map. Please notify the Franklin County GIS Division of any discrepancies. Real Estate / GIS J • ' I FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR r � � 1 I V "L 1 � I I IMLLOW GROPE OF DUB4N CANDO HOME PH 2O 27 n] J W21W 0021 W R V DATE: 5/1/17 1 O u V V I 3019 8 UNRED LLL VMS 254 � J� 5 0 J J Jr r 0 Disclaimer e� Scale 100 This map is prepared for the real property inventory within this county. It is compiled from recorded deeds, survey plats, and other public records and data. Users of this map are notified that the public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information contained on this map. The county and the mapping companies assume no legal responsibilities for the information contained on this map. Please notify the Franklin County GIS Division of any discrepancies. Real Estate / GIS |�� } | |� |[ � � |� $ | OE! % § |` [• ►| DUBLIN CITY SCHOOLS ma Emerald Parkway, Dub K _ _n oueL�i � SCHOOLS /� \§ FRANKLIN COUNTY, OH Recorded: 04/0712017 04:16:00 PM Exhibit "A" Instrument # 201704070047384 Page: 4 of 9 Situated in the City of Dublin, County of Franklin, State of Ohio, described as follows: PARCEL ONE: Description of 0.7423 acre tract on the south side of the proposed Coffman - Sawmill Connector, the north side of Interstate 270 north and being 1 104 feet east of Coffman Road. FOR PLANNED COMMUNITIES Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, Virginia Military Survey number 2542, and being 0.6681 acres out of an 18.473 acre tract conveyed to Bethel Road Investment Company Inc. by deed of record in Official Record 15002, Page D13, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio, and also being 0.0742 acres out of an original 34.453 acre tract conveyed to The Board of Education of The Washington (now known as Dublin) Local School District by deed of record in Deed Book 2855, Page 68, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio, said 0.6681 acre tract and 0.0742 acre tract being more particularly described as an 0.7423 acre tract as follows: Beginning for reference at a set iron pin in a curve in the northerly right of way line of FRA 1- 270 -7.47 North being the southeasterly corner of the Willow Grove of Dublin Condominium Homes Complex of Record in Official Record 00550, Page E06, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio and being the southwesterly comer of the said 18.473 acre tract; thence along the northerly right of way line of said FRA 1- 270 -7.47 North, the Southerly line of the said 18.473 acre tract and along a curve to the right having a radius of 7623.36 feet, the chord of which bears North 49 050'26" East a chord distance of 988.87 feet to a point being the southwesterly corner of the herein described 0.7423 acre tract and the TRUE PLACE OF BEGINNING; thence leaving the northerly right of way line of said FRA 1- 270 -7.47 North and the southerly line of the said 18.473 acre tract. North 37 °55'01" West a distance of 545.50 feet (passing the northerly line oftlte said 18.473 acre tract at a distance of 487.39 feet) to a point in the southerly right of way line of the proposed Coffman- Sawmill Connector Road having a proposed total right of way width of 100 feet, said point being located 50.00 feet south of and perpendicular to the centerline of said Coffman- Page I of 6 FRANKLIN COUNTY, OH Recorded: 04/07/2017 04:16:00 PM Instrument# 201704070047384 Sawmill Connector right of way; thence along the southerly right of way line of the said Coffman- Sawmill Connector. North 52 °04'59" East a distance of 59.19 feet to a point; thence leaving the southerly right of way line of the said Coffman - Sawmill Connector. South 37 °55'01" Fast a distance of 547.26 feet (passing the northerly line of the said 18.473 acre tract at a distance of 50.43 feet) to a point on a curve in the northerly right of way line of said FRA 1 -270 -7.47 North and the southerly line of the said 18.473 acre tract; thence along the southerly, line of the said 18.473 acre tract, the northerly right of way line of said FRA 1- 270 -7.47 North and said curve to the left, having a radius of 7623.36 feet, the chord of which bears South 53 °46'55" West a chord distance of 59.21 feet to the place of beginning. containing 0.7423 acres of land, subject however, to all legal rights of way and easements. Bearings based on a survey tie to FRA 1- 270 -7.47 North centerline monuments at stations 746 +60.63 and 761 +95.58, centerline bearing being North 81006'28" East. This description is based upon a field survey made by Dodson - Lindblom Associates, Inc. in March of 1995 and from centerline geometry data for the Coffinan- Sawmill Connector furnished by Burgess and Niple. PARCEL TWO: Description of a 10.2144 acre tract on the north side of the proposed Coffman - Sawmill Connector, the north side of Interstate 270 and being 590 feet cast of Coffman Road. FOR PLANNED COMNIUNI'1'IES Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, Virginia Military Survey number 2542, and being 9.6108 acres out of an 18.473 acre tract conveyed to Bethel Road Investment Company, Inc. by deed of record in Official Record 15002, Page D13 Recorders Office, Franklin County, Ohio and also being 0.6036 acres out of an original 34.453 acre tract conveyed to The Board of Education of The Washington (now known as Dublin) Local School District by deed of record in Deed Book 2855, Page 68, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio, said 9.6108 acre tract and 0.6036 acre tract being more particularly described as a 10.2144 acre tract as follows: Beginning at a set iron pin in the northerly right of way line of FRA 1- 270 -7.47 North being a southwesterly corner of the said 18.473 acre tract, the southeasterly corner of the Willow Grove of Dublin Condominium I lomes Complex of record in Official Record 00550, Page E06, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio, and being the southwesterly corner of the herein described 10.2144 acre tract; thence North 02 °59'36" West a distance of 813.02 feet along the easterly line of said Willow Grove Condominium Complex and a westerly line of the said 18.473 acre tract (passing a set iron pin at the northeasterly tooter of the said Willow Grove Condominium Complex and a comer of the Page 2 of 6 Page: 5 of 9 1?AUAV- au6 Q-1Q8 -C Af,[ or &73� 007531 FRANKLIN COUNTY, OH Recorded: 04/07/2017 04:16:00 PM Instrument # 201704070047384 Page: 6 of 9 said 18.473 acre tract at a distance of 808.30 feet) to a point on a curve in the southerly right of way line of the proposed Coffman - Sawmill Connector Road having a proposed total right of way width of 100 feet, said point being located radially 50.00 feet south from the centerline of said Coffnan- Sawmill Connector right of way; thence crossing said 34.453 acre tract and along the southerly right of way line of the said Coffman - Sawmill Connector and along a curve to the left having a radius of 1687.02 feet, the chord of which bears North 61 °04'28" East a chord distance of 527.32 feet to the point of tangent of said curve; thence continuing along the southerly right of way line of the said Coffinan- Sawmill Connector North 52 004'59" East a distance of 1.83 feet to a point; thence leaving the southerly right of way line of the said Coffman - Sawmill Connector and crossing a part of the said original 34.453 acre tract and the said 18.473 acre tract South 37 °55'01" East a distance of 545.50 feet to a point on a curve in the northerly right of way line of said FRA 1- 270 -7.47 North and the southerly line of the said 18.473 acre tract, passing the northerly line of the said 18.473 acre tract at a distance of 58.11 feet; thence along the northerly right of way line of said FRA 1- 270 -7.47 North, the southerly line of said 18.473 acre tract and along said curve to the left having a radius of 7,623.36 feet, the chord of which bears South 49 °5026" West a chord distance of 988.87 feet to the place of beginning, containing 10.2144 acres of land and being subject to a storm sewer easement of record in Official Record 06416, Page FI4, a sanitary sewer easement of record in Deed Book 3531, Page 632, a retention basin easement of record in Official Record 00655, Page 111 and all other legal rights of way and easements. The above mentioned easement records being of record in the Recorder's Otlice, Franklin County, Ohio. Bearings based on a survey tie to FRA 1- 270 -7.47 North centerline monuments at stations 746 +60.63 and 76 +95.58. This description is based upon a field survey made by Dodson - Lindblom Associates, Inc., in March of 1995 and from centerline geometry data for the Coffman - Sawmil Connector furnished by Burgess and Niple. LESS AND EXCFP'I'ING therefrom a 0.238 acre tract conveyed to the State of Ohio, Department of Transportation by Instrument No. 201411170153463 and more particularly described as follows: Situated in the State of Ohio, Franklin County, City of Dublin, Virginia Military Survey Number 2542, being part of parcel of land conveyed to Dublin United, LLC, an Ohio Limited Liability Company in Instrument Number 200003210055243, lying on the left side of the centerline of survey of Interstate Route 270 and more particularly described as follows: Commencing in the southwesterly corner of Lot I of Post Road Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 62, 1'age 16 (witness a 1 -1/4 inch pipe found North 35° 22'36" West a distance of 0.32 feet), also being in the southeasterly corner ofa parcel of land conveyed to Buckeye Lodging, LL.C, an Ohio Limited Liability Company in Instrument Number 201304290070262, in the existing northerly right of way line of US -33 (SR -161, Columbus - Marysville Road, right of way varies), and in the northerly line of a 9.98 acre parcel of land conveyed to the State of Ohio in Page 3 of 6 FRANKLIN COUNTY, OH Recorded: 04/07/2017 04:16:00 PM Instrument # 201704070047384 Page: 7 of 9 Common Pleas Case Number 231728, said point being 120.00 feet left of Station 198 +38.70 of US -33; Thence, in the existing northerly right of way line of said US -33, a northerly line of said 9.98 acre State of Ohio parcel and a southerly line of said Buckeye Lodging parcel, South 89° 04' 04" West a distance of 237.62 feet to a point 120.00 feet left of Station 196 +00.01 of US -33; Thence, in the existing northerly right of way line of said US -33, a northerly line of said 9.98 acre State of Ohio parcel, a southerly line of said Buckeye Lodging parcel and a southerly line of a parcel of land conveyed to SLMC, Ltd., an Ohio Limited Liability Company in Instrument Number 200603210051986, North 860 38'35" West a distance of 200.56 feet to a point 135.00 feet left of Station 194 +00.01 of US -33; 'thence, in the existing northerly right of way line of said US -33, a northerly line of said 9.98 acre State of Ohio parcel, a southerly line of said SLMC parcel, and a southwesterly line of a parcel of land conveyed to Courtyard by Marriott Limited Partnership as recorded in Instrument Number 201206250090405, North 720 51' 15" West a distance of 203.02 feet to a point 198.00 feet left of Station 192 +07.01 of US -33 (witness an iron pin capped "BIRD & BULL INC.' lbund South 440 22'57" West a distance of 0.18 feet); Thence, in the existing northerly right of way line of said US -33, a northerly line of said 9.98 acre State of Ohio parcel, a northeasterly line of a 19.30 acre parcel of land conveyed to the Stale of Ohio in Common Pleas Case Number 224026, and a southwesterly line of said Courtyard by Marriott parcel, North 530 29'5 1 11 West a distance of 182.61 feet to a point 309.00 feet left of Station 190 +62.01 of US -33 (witness a 1 -1/4 inch pipe found North 65° 21' 18" West a distance. of 0.07 feet); Thence, in the existing easterly right of way line of Interstate Route 270 (right of way varies), an easterly line of said 19.30 acre State of Ohio parcel and a southwesterly line of said Courtyard by Marriott parcel, North 341 42'35" West a distance of 181.66 feet to a point 486.06 feet right of Station 692 +68.24 of IR -270; Thence, in the existing easterly right of way line of said IR -270, an easterly line of said 19.30 acre State of Ohio parcel and a westerly line of said Courtyard by Marriott parcel, North 80 50' 52" West a distance of 181.33 feet to a point 349.00 feet right of Station 693 +94.00 of IR -270; Thence, in the existing easterly right of way line of said IR -270, an easterly line of said 19.30 acre State of Ohio parcel and westerly line of said Courtyard by Marriott parcel, North 70 36' 30" East a distance of 173.03 feet to a point 253.00 feet right of Station 695 +44.00 of IR -270 (witness a I -inch pipe found North 84° 12'40" East a distance of 0.11 feet); Thence, crossing said 19.30 acre State of Ohio parcel, North 48° 07' 11" West a distance of 253.00 feet to a point in the existing centerline of said IR -270. said point being Station 695+44.00 of IR -270; Page 4 of 6 FRANKI-IN COUJJT`(, OH Recorded: 0410712017 04:16:00 PM Instrument # 201704070047384 Page: 8 of 9 Thence, crossing said 19.30 acre State of Ohio parcel, a 1.41 acre parcel of land conveyed to the State of Ohio in Deed Book 2669, Page 402, and a 21.00 acre parcel of land conveyed to the State of Ohio in Common Pleas Case Number 225012, in the centerline of said IR -270 and the arc of a non - tangent curve to the right, said curve having an arc length of 552.79 feet, a radius of 7473.36 feet, a delta of V 14' 17 ", a chord bearing of North 43° 59' 58" East, and a chord length of 552.66 feet to a point at Station 700+96.79 of IR -270; Thence, crossing said 21.00 acre State of Ohio parcel, North 43° 52'54" West a distance of 150.00 feet to the existing westerly right of way line of said IR -270, the northwesterly comer of said 21.00 acre State of Ohio parcel, the northeasterly corner of a 0.01 acre parcel of land conveyed to the State of Ohio in Deed Book 2672, Page 684, the southwesterly corner of said Dublin United parcel, and a southerly corner of a parcel of land (designated as Phase 217) conveyed to Willow Grove of Dublin Condominium Homes Unit Owners' Association, Inc., an Ohio Non - profit Corporation in Official Record 4758, Page B19, said point being 150.00 feet left of Station 700 +96.79 of IR -270, and being the POINT OF BEGINNING for the parcel of land herein described: Thence, in the westerly line of said Dublin United parcel and an easterly line of said Willow Grove parcel, North 2° 58'05" West a distance of 23.80 feet to an iron pin set 168.00 feet left of Station 701 +12.03 of IR -270; Thence, crossing said Dublin United parcel, in the arc of a non - tangent curve to the right, said curve having an arc length of 294.44 feet, a radius of 7641.36 feet, a delta of 2° 12'28", a chord bearing of North 47° 20'21 " East, and a chord length of 294.42 feet, to an iron pin set 168.00 feet left of Station 704 +00.00 of IR -270; Thence, crossing said Dublin United parcel, North 35° 48'20" East a distance of 55.41 feet to an iron pin set 180.31 feet left of Station 704 +57.59 of IR -270; Thence, crossing said Dublin United parcel, North 56° 41'21 " East a distance of252.20 feet to an iron pin set in the existing westerly right of way line of said IR -270, the westerly line of 21.00 acre parcel conveyed to the State of Ohio in Deed Book 3020, Page 180 and the southeasterly line of said Dublin United parcel, said iron pin being 150.00 feet left of Station 706 +97.76 of IR- 270; Thence, in the existing westerly right of way line of said IR -270, the westerly line of said 21.00. acre State of Ohio parcel and the southeasterly line of said Dublin United parcel, in the arc of a non- tangent curve to the left, said curve having an arc length of 613.04 feet, a radius if 7623.36 feet, a delta of V 36'27", a chord bearing of South 48° 25' 19" West, and a chord length of 612.87 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 0.238 acre of land, more or less, none of which falls within present roadway occupied. The above described parcel is located within Franklin County Auditor's Parcel Number 273- 007487 -00. The Basis of Bearings is Grid North of the Ohio State Plane Coordinate System, South Zone, NAD83 (2011) as determined from GPS observations. Alum Creek OH2O06 (DL6453), Union County (D11686) and Madison County (D12237) base stations were used in determining the grid Page 5 of 6 FRANKLIN COUNTY, OH Recorded: 04/07/2017 04:16:00 PM Instrument # 201704070047384 Page: 9 of 9 bearing and establishing South 89° 15'20" East for the centerline of US -33 (SR -161, Columbus - Marysville Road). All stations referred to herein are from the Centerline of Existing Right of Way of Interstate Route 270 or US -33, as indicated and as shown on ODOT Right of Way plan FRA- 270 - 17.28, recorded at the Franklin County Recorders Office in Plat Book _, Page _. TAorF, " T100 All iron pins set are 5/8 -inch rebar, 30 inches long. with a cap stamped "BARR & PREVOS'f" This description was prepared by any Amy Bemicken (Ohio Professional Surveyor Number 857 1) of Barr & Prevost and is based on survey field work performed under her direction from May, 2013 through October, 2013. PARCEL THREE: Together with right to the use of a certain retention basin as contained in the Easement and Maintenance Agreement, recorded in O.R. Volume 655, Page II 1 of Franklin County Records. PARCEL FOUR: Together with the rights in and to that certain Reciprocal Easement Agreement by and between Midwest Holding Corp. #8, Inc. and National Build to Suit Dublin II, L.I..C., recorded as Franklin County Recorder's Document No. 199808190210860. P.P.N. 273 - 007531 and 273- 007487 Page 6 of 6 0-/08-c QLL o,C7 CZ73 o 0741 B7 p *DUBLIN BOARD OF 17- 059CP /Z /PDP /FDP: PUD - EDUCATION *JACK REYNOLDS DUBLIN CITY SCHOOLS - DUBLIN CITY SCHOOL DIST. 37 W. BROAD ST., #460 REZONING 62 W. BRIDGE ST. COLUMBUS, OH 43215 DUBLIN, OH 43017 CHRISTOPHER CONRAD 970 HIGH RIDGE ASSOC. LOUELLA J. REYNOLDS 5239 WILLOW GROVE PL. 30100 TELEGRAPH RD., STE. 403 5208 WILLOW GROVE PL. N. DUBLIN, OH 43017 BRINGHAM FARMS, MI 48025 DUBLIN, OH 43017 LAVON L. BAKER CHRISTINE RICHTER SUSAN L. MONTGOMERY 5212 WILLOW GROVE PL. N. 6690 WILLOW GROVE LN. 6694 WILLOW GROVE LN. DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 TYDVIL THOMAS RENEE M. PISA 6698 WILLOW GROVE LN. 6702 WILLOW GROVE LN. 6763 WILLOW TOW nnnvE UT E DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 P4;BT rn� 30-T MAUREEN H. ENGEL MICHAEL STUDEBAKER LINDSEY N. WILHELM 6759 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. 8918 MONIFIETH CT. 6751 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DANA A. BURTANGER MATTHEW K. STEWART AMY J. GERHART 6747 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. 6743 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. 6764 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 ALLISON SCHULLER JUDITH K. HARDIN T -S RUCK LIMITED PART. 6760 WILLOW GROVE LN. 6756 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. 4342 DUBLIN RD. DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 MICHELE K. CROCE JEANNIE G. FLEMING YOSHIHISA & NOKO YOSHIDA 6748 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. 6735 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. 6731 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 JULIE M. DILENSCHNEIDER GAIL E. MORGAN PAMELA & DEREK LEA 6727 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. 6723 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. 6719 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 6:70:7 lT 1C ELAINE L. DENTLER 6; 15 WILLOW OW G OVT: UT E 6 ;06 WILLOW OW nnnvr UT 6703 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. P4;BT � TN nlu Z 444401:7 P4;BT � TN nSu Z 43 DUBLIN, OH 43017 ARTHUR L. MYNES CARLA M. THOMPSON ELIZABETH GEHLE 6699 WILLOW GROVE PL. 6695 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. 6691 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 TRISHA HEINFELDT CONSULTING RENTALS LLC PAMELA J. OSWALT 6687 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. 6681 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. 6677 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 WILLIAM TYLER MICHAEL HRABCAK JULIE R. YESNICK 6673 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. 6669 WILLOW GROVE PL. E. 5168 WILLOW GROVE PL. S. DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 ANNA M. LASH CONSTANCE S. HOWARD KAREN J. SABO 5172 WILLOW GROVE PL. S. 6995 LIMERICK LN. 5180 WILLOW GROVE. PL. S. DUBLIN, OH 43017 TROY, MI 48098 DUBLIN, OH 43017 JULIA RHOADS DEBORAH MILLER ERIN GASPER 5184 WILLOW GROVE PL. S. 5188 WILLOW GROVE PL. S. 5185 WILLOW GROVE PL. N. DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 PAULA M. RYAN LUCIA C. ORTIZ DONNA J. HEAVENER 5189 WILLOW GROVE PL. N. 5193 WILLOW GROVE PL. N. 5197 WILLOW GROVE PL. N. DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 JAMIE L. MCQUIRT KELLY MORSE DAVID L. & SHIRLEY BENDAU 5181 WILLOW GROVE PL. S. 5177 WILLOW GROVE PL. S. 5173 WILLOW GROVE PL. S. DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 CHRISTOPHER WINCH KAREN P. SHIVELY JUSTIN REICCOBENE 5169 WILLOW GROVE PL. S. 5165 WILLOW GROVE PL. S. 5161 WILLOW GROVE PL. S. DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 LAURIE L. WINANS JENNIFER A. GREEN GARCIA GREG M. & STACIA R. GROOM 310 SPRING ST. 5202 WILLOW GROVE PL. N. 5198 WILLOW GROVE PL. N. PIQUA, OH 45356 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DUBLIN, OH 43017 NICK COLASANTE 111.111-1-1-4 ;p;S142, o 5194 WILLOW GROVE PL. N. 5190 WILLOW nnnvE UT NT DUBLIN, OH 43017 P4;Bf TNT 401T City of Dublin Schools 5175 Emerald Parkway 5/30/17 Development Text — Subarea 1 -A 2.01 Description and Acreage: The site was a part of a 150 acre PUD approved in 1995 for an office building development. The subject site was developed with a four (4) story office building with ancillary parking lot. The site contains two (2) parcel with a total acreage of 10.7183 acres. The request is to amend the PUD to include a variety of educational activities as permitted uses as well as the existing permitted offices use. 2.02 Permitted Uses: 1. Subarea 1 -A shall permit general office uses as designated in the SOI district (Section 153.026) and the following uses (excepting the conditional uses found in 153.026 that are not specifically identified below as permitted uses): • Vocational Schools ( #8242) • School and educational services not elsewhere classified ( #829) • Non - profit educational and scientific research agencies ( #892) • Daycare facilities • Tutoring Services • Child and adult daycare (including requirement found in 156.026(A)(6)(a -c) • Outdoor play • Research, development and testing laboratories ( #7391) 2.03 Permitted Density. Height and Setback Requirements: 1. Subarea 1 -A: Office /Educational /Institutional • Subarea 1 -A shall be permitted 12,000 square feet of building per gross acre and a maximum of four stories in height above grade. • Pavement setbacks shall be as follows: 30 feet from Emerald Parkway 20 feet from I -270 right -of -way 75 feet from the west property line adjacent to Willow Grove Condominiums Building setbacks shall be as follows: 100 feet from both Emerald Parkway and I -270 right -of -way 200 feet minimum from the west property line shared with Willow Grove for buildings three stories or less above grade, and 280 feet from the west property line shared with Willow Grove for buildings for stories and/or 56' in height above grade. Buildings exceeding the 56' height requirement must be setback 2' from the 280' building setback line for every l' of height in excess of the 56' height restriction. But in no case shall any building exceed four stories and a maximum of 66' in height. • Setbacks shall be determined as described above, where a setback is not designated. The required setback shall be 25 feet for pavement and buildings. 2. Maximum lot coverage shall not exceed 70 percent. 3. Percent setbacks within Subarea 1 -A and 2 will not apply along internal lot lines of combined coordinated developments with cross access easements and common or connected parking lots /circulation areas. 4. Limitations on the number of stories do not include any HVAC or other mechanical equipment and any parapet surrounding it installed on the roof of said structures. 2.04 Traffic and Circulation: 1. Ingres and egress to the parcel shall be provided along Emerald Parkway. 2. Curbcuts on Emerald Parkway shall be approved per the discretion of the city. 2.05 Parkins and Loading: 1. Size, ratio and type of parking and loading facilities shall be regulated by the City of Dublin Zoning Code. 2. Exceptions from strict application of the code standards maybe granted at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Commission. 3. Loading areas shall be screened according to the City of Dublin Code. 2.06 Waste and Refuse: All waste and refuse shall be containerized and fully screened from view by a solid brick wall or wood fence to a height of one foot above the height of the item being screened. 2.07 Storage and Equipment: 1. No materials, supplies, equipment or products shall be stored or permitted to remain on any portion of the parcel outside the permitted structure. 2. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground, or buildings shall be screened from public view with landscape materials or materials harmonious with the building. 3. Mechanical equipment not on or attached to any building must be screened with either landscape materials or a structure constructed of materials harmonious with the building. 2.08 Landscaping, Open Space, Parks and Pedestrian Paths: 1. All landscaping shall be according to City of Dublin Zoning Code. 2. Any portion of a lot upon which a building or parking areas is not constructed shall be landscaped with a lawn at a minimum. 3. The developer of Subarea 1 -A agrees that earth mounding and /or other landscape /buffer treatment shall be installed parallel to the entire length of the western property line in Subarea 1 -A (common to the east property line of Willow Grove Condominiums). Where the detention facility is not adjacent to Willow Grove an earthen mound shall be installed not less than 6 feet in elevation above the elevation within 33 feet of the west edge of the parking or driving pavement to which it is adjacent or to which it is closest. If earthmounding is not feasible along the expanded detention facility, then an initial screening of six feet in height shall be provided between the western edge of Subarea 1 -A and the western edge of the parking or driving pavement in Subarea 1 -A. 4. The developer of Subarea 1 -A is encouraged to develop a creative alternative buffer treatment along I -270 in lieu of the six -foot buffer currently required by code. This alternative buffer treatment shall be submitted for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. In all cases, parking lots will be screened as per the Landscape Code. 5. An 8 -foot bike path shall be installed by the City along the north side of Emerald Parkway within the right of way. 2.09 Fences/Walls: 1. No chain link or wire fencing shall be permitted in Subarea 1 -A. 2.10 Sienaee and Graphics: 1. All signage and graphics shall conform to the City of Dublin Zoning Code. 2. All signage shall be subject to applicable signage setbacks in the City of Dublin Zoning Code. 3. No signs shall be applied to windows for the purpose of outdoor or exterior advertising. 4. No roof signs shall be permitted, nor should a sign extend higher than the building. 5. No flashing, traveling, animated, or intermittently illuminated signs may be used. 6. No billboards, or electrical or other advertising signs shall be allowed, other than a sign carrying the name of the business occupying the site. 2.11 Lighting: Except as otherwise herein stated, all lighting must conform to the City of Dublin Lighting Guidelines. 1. External lighting within all subareas shall be cut -off type fixtures. 2. All types of parking, pedestrian, and other exterior lighting shall be on poles or wall mounted cut -off fixtures, and shall be of the same type and style. 3. All lights poles and standards shall be dark in color and shall either be a dark brown or bronze metal. 4. Parking lot lighting shall be no higher than 28 feet. 5. Cut-off type landscaping and building uplighting shall be permitted. 6. All lights shall be arranged to reflect light away from any street or adjacent property. 7. All building illumination shall be from concealed sources. 8. No colored lights shall be used to light the exterior of buildings. 9. Landscape lighting along Emerald Parkway shall be ground mounted with a low level of illumination. 10. All lighting or parking/driving areas and buildings in Subarea 1 -A and Emerald Parkway will be designed and constructed so that it will be directed away from Willow Grove Condominiums and other adjacent residential subdivisions. 11. A lighting plan conforming to the City's Lighting Guidelines must be submitted to the City as part of the Final Development Plan. 2.12 Architectural Standards: Standards for Subarea 1 -A 1. All buildings and associated structures shall be harmonious in character, and reflect 4 an upscale, high quality, signature, office park development. Final architectural drawings shall be presented for approval according to the process identified by the Final Development Plan. 2. All buildings shall have the same degree of exterior finish on all sides. The preferred building material shall be a blended brick in the red - beige -gray range. Stone, metal panels or decorative precast concrete panels shall be acceptable alternative materials, as long as they are harmonious with and do not detract from the overall unified theme. 3. Stucco may be used as an accent building material, but shall be limited to a maximum of 25 percent of the total of all solid areas on building facades. 4. Fagade colors and materials on individual buildings shall be coordinated to complement each other. Fagade colors of excessively high chroma or intensity are not permitted. 5. High reflective glass is discouraged. If reflective glass is used it may not exceed 20 percent reflectively and 60 percent of the total of all building facades. 6. Glass and curtain wall color should be coordinated to complement each other and the color palette of the building. Outdoor play areas and play structures associated with a daycare facility must be constructed of natural materials or painted with natural earth -tone colors that are harmonious with the building. 8. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on the roof shall be screened to the height of the equipment. Screening of equipment must be harmonious with the building materials /colors. 2.13 Maintenance: All buildings, structures, fences, paved areas, landscaped areas, and other improvements shall at all times be kept in good condition and repair and with a clean and slightly appearance. Landscape areas shall be maintained with materials specified in the Plan and in a healthy living state, mowed, pruned, watered, and otherwise maintained as appropriate. There shall be provided and kept in good working order, trash compactors, and /or depositories at approved locations which shall be emptied prior to becoming full, and a pest and rodent program shall be provided if necessary. Tenants will be required to deposit trash only in said compactors or depositories. Said properties shall be kept free of litter under all reasonable conditions, and parking and paved areas shall be power swept where necessary. All signage shall be kept in good repair. Lighting, painting, and associated materials on signage shall be kept in a continuously upgraded condition. dublinschools.txt (net) 5/24/17 S:Docs /s &htexts/2017 RECORD OF ACTION City of Dublin Planning & Zoning Commission OHIO, USA Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 6:30 pm The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 4. PUD - McKitrick, Subarea 1A - Dublin City Schools 5175 Emerald Parkway 17- 059Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan Proposal: A rezoning of 10.71 acres from PUD (McKitrick, Subarea 1) to PUD (McKitrick, Subarea 1A) to permit educational uses. The site is on the south side of Emerald Parkway, approximately 600 feet east of the intersection with Coffman Road. Request: Review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050 and review and approval of a Final Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. Applicant: Jeff Stark, Dublin City Schools represented by Jack Reynolds, Smith and Hale. Planning Contact: Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Senior Planner /Current Planning Manager. Contact Information: (614) 410 -4675, chusak @dublin.oh.us MOTION #1: Mr. Stidhem moved, Ms. Mitchell seconded to approve this Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan because it meets the Community Plan along with all the applicable review criteria. VOTE: 5-0. RESULT: This Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan will be forwarded to City Council with a recommendation of approval. RECORDED VOTES: Victoria Newell Recused Amy Salay Recused Chris Brown Yes Cathy De Rosa Yes Robert Miller Yes Deborah Mitchell Yes Stephen Stidhem Yes MOTION #2: Mr. Stidhem moved, Ms. Mitchell seconded to approve this Final Development Plan because it meets all the applicable review criteria and existing development standards. VOTE: 5-0. RESULT: This Final Development Plan was approved. RECORDED VOTES: Victoria Newell Recused Amy Salay Recused Chris Brown Yes Cathy De Rosa Yes Robert Miller Yes Deborah Mitchell Yes Stephen Stidhem Yes STAFF CERTIFICATION Claudia D. Husak, AICP Senior Planner PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.474 dublinohiousa.gov City of Dublin OHIO, USA MEETING MINUTES Planning & Zoning Commission Thursday, July 13, 2017 3. PUD - McKitrick, Subarea 1A - Dublin City Schools 5175 Emerald Parkway 17- 059Z /PDP /FDP Rezoning/ Preliminary Development Plan Final Development Plan [The Chair Victoria Newell and the Council Representative Amy Salay recused themselves from hearing this case due to a conflict of interest and left the room.] The Vice Chair, Chris Brown, said the following application is a rezoning of 10.71 acres from PUD (McKitrick, Subarea 1) to PUD (McKitrick, Subarea 1A) to permit educational uses. He said the site is on the south side of Emerald Parkway, approximately 600 feet east of the intersection with Coffman Road. He said this is a request for a review and recommendation of approval to City Council for a Rezoning with a Preliminary Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050 and also a request for review and approval of a Final Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. He stated anyone intending on addressing the Commission for the Final Development Plan portion of this application will need to be swom in. The Vice Chair said this case was on the Consent Agenda and asked for objections. Both Bob Miller and Cathy De Rosa asked to pull this case from the Consent Agenda so they could hear the entire case. The Vice Chair swore in anyone intending to address the Commission with regard to this case. Claudia Husak noted the procedural issues of this case stem from the fact that in the 90s, the McKitrick PUD was zoned and the subareas allowed office use. Ms. Husak presented an aerial view of the site and noted it consists of two parcels totaling 10.7 acres. She said Dublin City Schools has purchased this property for the use of an Atemative High School, primarily. She said the proposal is to open this up to allow uses within the Zoning Code that includes: premium office and institutional uses; schools, libraries, vocational training, and a lot of different uses that are currently within the Code but were not contemplated at the time when this area was originally zoned. Ms. Husak presented the proposed zoning and noted the existing McKitrick PUD in Subarea 1 - known as Verizon and Subarea 2 as Cardinal Health. She said the name McKitrick stems from the landowner at the time of the zoning. She explained the City wants to amend the site as Subarea 1A and include the uses mentioned above — educational uses primarily for the High School but also allow for the potential of the library to locate there temporarily while the library site is under construction. Ms. Husak presented the Future Land Use Map included in the Community Plan. She said the site is within the Premium Office/Institutional District, which includes sites along the highway that have a lot of visibility that serve as employment centers and are intended for large -scale facilities such as hospitals and PLANNING 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 phone 614.410.4600 fax 614.410.474 dublinohiousa.gov Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 13, 2017 — DRAFT Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3 universities. Within the school's vision for this Alternative High School, she indicated, there is a collaboration and vision with universities with large businesses within the City that would provide education that is not currently available within the school system, as it exists today. Ms. Husak presented the proposed site plan. Within the development text, she said nothing is intended to change with this site. She stated that one of the things staff asked the school to address, as part of this rezoning, is the ODOT acquisition of the Right -of -Way piece that had to deal with interchange at US 33 and I -270. She said the application today includes reduced setbacks for pavement, which is impacted by the take on the south side due to ODOT's acquisition. Ms. Husak said the schools have provided staff with operational details, which essentially help in terms of traffic flow and busing required for the two schools that are farther away from this area. She indicated the intent is to have students attend half a day and be home - schooled for half a day for students that qualify for this service. She reported there was a lot of discussion about how the students would be transported and how traffic would be impacted. She indicated the schools feel they can make it work with the current infrastructure. Ms. Husak noted other changes for zoning allowances that have occurred: a sign on the highway would be permitted for a school; and a sign for the library would be permitted so there is way- finding within the site. She said there is an existing sign on Emerald Parkway and it could be used however the applicants see fit, based on what is in the Zoning Code and Development Text. Ms. Husak reported the City asked the schools to include a Final Development Plan that would not be in effect until City Council approves the Rezoning but the FDP is basically to accept what is on the site today. Ms. Husak reported there were 16 criteria this were weighed against from a staff recommendation perspective. She stated all the criteria have been met, therefore, approval is recommended to City Council. She said the intent is for this to be forwarded to City Council for their meeting on July 31 and then their first meeting in August. Ms. Husak reiterated that since nothing is changing on the site, approval is recommended for the Final Development Plan. The Vice Chair invited the applicant to speak. Steve Stidhem asked how the busses plan to maneuver around that little circle. Ms. Husak answered the City asked the schools to do an Auto -Turn exhibit to ensure the busses could maneuver within the site. Mr. Miller inquired about pedestrian safety. He said he does not see this as a problem but asked if the City considered the fact that Coffman High School has a substantial parking issue and this could be seen as a natural overflow for students and that would allow for students to be crossing Emerald Parkway. Ms. Husak said this was discussed and the safest pedestrian crossing is at Emerald Parkway and Coffman where students are intended to cross. She said there is no traffic lights anywhere in front of the site to provide egress /ingress and engineering determined it is not a safe place to add a crossing. Mr. Miller asked if the building in its current state, can handle educational uses — vocational on all floors. Ms. Husak answered it is not permitted on all floors. From a Building Code standpoint, she said the fourth floor is exempt from educational uses and from a zoning standpoint, staff does not want to limit uses to floors because it would be difficult to enforce. She said the school is fully aware of those issues and intend to use the fourth floor for offices, conference rooms, and meeting rooms. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission July 13, 2017 — DRAFT Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3 Jeffrey L. Brown said he is an attorney with the firm of Smith and Hale, representing the Dublin School System. He said this location, in terms of being across the street from Coffman High School is a good place to have a new Alternative High School. He said they have worked diligently with staff to address traffic issues and engineers have run a computer simulation on both driveways that showed buses can come in either driveway, make the turn around the circle, and come back out. He said they also did a traffic study in terms of their use, which the City reviewed and accepted the findings that require no improvements. He said they anticipate the traffic generated by this school will be less than if the building was occupied with all office uses. In terms of the Building Code and limiting student uses to the first three floors, he reiterated the top floor will be used for Administrative Offices and the library will be on the first floor during the construction period of the library. Ms. De Rosa asked if the building has been named yet. Jeff Stark, Dublin City Schools, said there is a whole naming process including public participation, anticipated to begin next month. Ms. De Rosa if there will be any outdoor activity planned. Mr. Stark said no outdoor activity is being planned. He added the school will not allow for this parking lot to be used for overflow parking from Coffman High School until there is a thorough plan in place. Ms. De Rosa asked if there will be a book drop available or traffic flow for the library when it occupies the space. Mr. Stark indicated it is going to be a bare -bones site for the library's use. Ms. De Rosa inquired further about permitted uses, specifically about research, development, and testing laboratories. Ms. Husak explained the City encouraged the applicant to add those uses because in terms of an Alternative High School, and in terms of the types of education that might happen there, the City thought this particular language within the Code might actually catch something that the SO District would not. Mr. Miller asked if the use of this building is intended primarily for gifted or advanced students. Mr. Stark said the demographics of the types of students that will use this facility has not been fully decided yet. He explained that for an Alternative High School, there are two factors for it: 1) something cutting edge and different; and 2) save taxpayers' money by not building a fourth high school. Mr. Miller asked if this site's PUD is only being opened up to a zoning change, asking if any other site along that corridor will have to come to the Commission. Ms. Husak answered affirmatively. She restated the 10 acres that this application pertains to is for creating the Subarea 1A. The Vice Chair asked if there was anyone from the public that would like to address the Commission with regard to this application. [Hearing none.] Ms. Husak said there are no conditions requested for either motion. Motion and Vote Mr. Stidhem moved, Ms. Mitchell seconded, to recommend approval to City Council for Rezoning. Ms. De Rosa, yes; Mr. Brown, yes; Mr. Miller, yes; Ms. Mitchell, yes; and Mr. Stidhem, yes. (Approved 5 — 0) Motion and Vote Mr. Stidhem moved, Ms. Mitchell seconded, to approve the Final Development Plan with no conditions. The vote was as follows: Mr. Miller, yes; Ms. De Rosa, yes; Mr. Brown, yes; Ms. Mitchell, yes; and Mr. Stidhem, yes. (Approved 5 — 0) City of Dublin OHIO, U5A »_1010110"0 41el A I Planning & Zoning Commission Thursday, July 13, 2017 McKitrick PUD, Subarea Al — Dublin City Schools REZONING WITH PRELMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Agenda Item 4 Case Number 17- 059Z /PDP /FDP Proposal A rezoning of 10.71 acres from PUD (McKitrick, Subarea 1) to PUD (McKitrick, Subarea 1A) to permit educational uses. Request Review and recommendation of approval to City Council of a Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan and review and approval of a Final Development Plan under the provisions of Zoning Code Section 153.050. Location 5175 Emerald Parkway On the south side of Emerald Parkway, approximately 600 feet east of the intersection with Coffman Road. Applicant Jeff Stark, Dublin City Schools represented by Jack Reynolds, Smith and Hale. Case Manager Claudia D. Husak, AICP, Senior Planner /Current Planning Manager (614) 410 -4675 1 chusak @dublin.oh.us Recommendation Approval of a Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan to City Council The proposed rezoning meets the Community Plan along with the preliminary development plan criteria of the Zoning Code. Planning recommends approval of this request. Approval of a Final Development Plan In Planning's analysis, the proposal complies with the final development plan criteria and existing development standards. Planning recommends approval of this request. City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 059Z /PDP /FDP I McKitrick PUD, Subarea 1A— Dublin City Schools Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 2 of 11 17- 059CP- FDP Concept Plan/Rezoning/Preliminary Preliminary 0 250 500 Development Plan /Final Development Plan City of Dublin McKitrick, Subarea 1A Rezoning Feet 5175 Emerald Parkway City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 059Z /PDP /FDP I McKitrick PUD, Subarea 1A — Dublin City Schools Site Area ±10.7 acres Zoning Existing: PUD, Planned Unit Development District (McKitrick, Subarea 1) Proposed: PUD, Planned Unit Development District (McKitrick, Subarea 1A) Surrounding Zoning North: R, Rural District (Dublin Coffman High School) and Uses East: PUD, McKitrick, Subarea 1 (XPO Logistics office building) South: BSD -IRN, Indian Run Neighborhood District, across I -270 (OCLC) West: PUD, Condominiums of Willow Grove Site Features 2 parcels (0.7 -acre to the east and 10.21 acres to the west) ±122,000- square -foot, vacant building oriented toward I -270 to the south Parking area to the north and west of the building5 -foot sidewalk along Emerald Parkway. Mounding and landscaping along Emerald Parkway frontage and along I -270. One full access point located in the center of the property on Emerald Parkway, a secondary right -in /right -out access is located on the west side of the site, and cross access exists to the office building to the east. J Case Background eta i Is Proposal Community Plan The Planning and Zoning Commission approved a final development plan for the site and the adjacent parcel in June 1995 for a four -story, 121,900- square -foot office building. This property was Phase I of an approved office complex, which includes the adjoining property to the east. In 1999, both properties were included as part of a revised final development plan to add a single -story building connector between the two office buildings. The application was tabled in October and later withdrawn by the applicant. Until last year, both properties were occupied by Verizon Wireless and have remained vacant since lease expiration. ezoning witWftminary Development PIM A rezoning to a Planned Unit Development District (PUD) requires approval of a development text to serve as the zoning regulation; the Zoning Code covers all requirements not addressed in the development text. A preliminary development plan is also required. A rezoning is required in a district already zoned PUD when permitted uses, development standards, or geographic area are unable to be met through other provisions (minor text modifications or administrative approvals). I he proposal is for the development text to be revised to add to the current list of permitted uses to allow for the operation of an alternative high school within the existing building. The Community Plan shows the future land use for this site as Premium Office and Institutional, described as applicable to sites with high visibility, a greater numbers of employees and requiring access to major arterials and proximity to interchanges. Areas are intended to serve as major employment centers within the City. Institutional uses in this classification are intended for large scale facilities such as major hospitals and universities serving a regional market. Use Development Standards Traffic and City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 059Z /PDP /FDP I McKitrick PUD, Subarea 1A — Dublin City Schools Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 4 of 11 Rezoning with Preliminary The proposal continues to permit office as a use and the applicant has indicated the fourth floor of the building will house the School Administration function. The institutional land use is intend to allows for an alternative high school to serve School District residents and offer alternative education courses with the help of local companies and universities. The Columbus Metropolitan Library- Dublin Branch has also expressed interest in temporarily operating from this location during the construction of their new building. The existing infrastructure meets the Thoroughfare Plan and no improvements are anticipated with this proposal. I The approved development text for the McKitrick PUD permits office as the only use in Subarea 1. The proposal is to permit a variety of educational uses to allow for the operation of a non - traditional high school by the Dublin City Schools District. The text also permits the office and institutional uses as listed in the SO, Suburban Office and Institutional District of the Zonina Code. No site chances are Dr000sed. The proposed development text retains the existing development standards for density, building height, architecture landscaping and lighting. A decrease in pavement setback from 50 to 20 feet is required on the south property line as right -of -way takes have occurred for the I- 270/33 interchange project that brought the existing parking lot out of compliance with the text. The proposal uses the existing public and private infrastructure to provide access to the site. No changes are proposed to any of the public rights -of -way with this application. The City has received a Traffic Impact study along with operational details with the anticipated use of the site as an alternative high school and school administration function. A traffic access study was performed that analyzed the traffic operations anticipated with the proposed use. The study demonstrates that the proposed use is expected to generate similar or less traffic trips than the office use that was previously in place on this site. It was also noted that the peak traffic generation for this use should occur during mid -day, when the east -west through volumes on Emerald Parkway are much less than the AM and PM peak volumes. The applicant will work with Engineering to finalize details of the study prior to submitting building permits. Utilities and E s are proposed or required as part of this proposal. Stormwater Signs The proposed text permits a permanent door sign to aid in wayfinding on -site, primarily to aid library customers during the temporary operation of the library out of this building. The text allows a maximum size of 10 square feet to be approved administratively. The text also permits the building owner to allocate an Interstate State as regulated by the Zoning Code for a tenant of the building. The Planning and Zoning Commission is required to approve such sign within a Planned Unit Development District. Process 1J Consistency wit Dub /in Zoning Code 2) Conformance with adopted Plans 3) Advancement of general welfare and orderly development 4) Effects on adjacent uses 5) Adequacy of open space for residential development City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 059Z /PDP /FDP I McKitrick PUD, Subarea 1A — Dublin City Schools Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 5 of 11 Rezoning liminary D I 'm Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a rezoning /preliminary development Following is an analysis by Planning based plan (full text of criteria attached). on those criteria. Criterion met: This proposal is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable development standards of the Zoning Code requirements except as altered in the proposed development text. The proposed use, intensity and development standards are similar to the existing standards and are appropriately altered to Criterion met: The proposal is consistent with the Community Plan recommendations. Criterion met: This proposal is compatible and consistent with the surrounding area and will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding areas. Criterion met: The development is a compatible with existing development. N /A: No open space is required for this commercial /institutional use. 6) Protection of N /A: The are no site changes proposed as part of this application. natural features W.ind resources 7)Adequate Criterion met: The proposal utilizes existing infrastructure will have minimal impact on the site. 8) Traffic and I Criterion met: The City has received a Traffic Impact Study and no negative pedestrian safety impacts are anticipated as part of this application and the operational details include bus transportation for students. City and is infrastructure including utilities and 9) Coordination & Criterion met: The proposal does not alter the site or building. integration of building & site relationships Development 901 Criterion met: This proposal will not layout and within the city. intensity City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 059Z /PDP /FDP I McKitrick PUD, Subarea 1A — Dublin City Schools Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 6 of 11 LAnaly LLezonir 11JStormwater Criterion met: Adequate provision exists for stormwater management, storm management drainage within and through the site. 12) Community Criterion met: The proposal will provide for an additional educational use for benefit school district residents, an opportunity for companies and universities to create partnerships and educational opportunities for students. 13)Design and N /A: No changes are proposed to the design or appearance of the building. appearance 14)Deveiopment N /A: The site, building and associated infrastructure are all existing. phasing 15)Adequacy of Criterion met: There are adequate services proposed for the development. No pub /icservice additional public improvements will be required. 16JInfrastructure Criterion met: No contributions to infrastructure are required as part of this contributions M proposal. FRecommendatlon ezoning with Preliminary Development Pla Approval In Planning's analysis, this proposal complies with the rezoning /preliminary development plan criteria and the existing development standards within the area. Approval of this application is recommended to City Council. City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 059Z /PDP /FDP I McKitrick PUD, Subarea 1A — Dublin City Schools Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 7 of 11 Details Final Development Plan Process The final development plan conforms with and provides a detailed refinement of the approved preliminary development plan. The final development plan includes all of the final details of the proposed development and is the final stage of the PUD process. The proposal is for the potential, temporary operation of the Columbus Metropolitan Library on the first floor of the existing office building. The remainder of the building will accommodate school administration functions and educational use. No changes to the exterior of the building, the architecture or site are proposed at this time. Development The existing site and building meet the standards outlined in the development Standards text. venicular/ t'eaestrian Access /Parking The application includes no sign details. The applicant is permitted to reface the existing ground sign along the Emerald Parkway frontage after administrative approval and the issuance of a sign permit. The development text permits an Interstate Sign, which will require review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission in the future. A permanent window sign of up to 10 square feet is permitted upon administrative approval. The proposal uses the existing infrastructure developed with the site and no additional vehicular or pedestrian connections are required at this time. Parking is required to meet Code. As discussed above, a traffic access study was performed that analyzed the traffic operations anticipated with the proposed use demonstrating that the proposed use is expected to generate similar or less traffic trips than the office use that was previously in place on this site. The applicant will work with Engineering to finalize details of the study prior to submitting building permits. - Final Development Plan Process Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for an amended final development plan. Following is an analysis by Planning based on those criteria. 1) Consistency with Criterion met with: The proposal is consistent with the requirements of the approved preliminary development plan, development text, and zoning code. pre liminary development plan 2) Traffic and Criterion met: The proposal is not anticipated to require any changes to pedestrian safety pedestrian or vehicular circulation systems. City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 059Z /PDP /FDP I McKitrick PUD, Subarea 1A — Dublin City Schools Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 8 of 11 ent Plata 3) Adequate public Criterion met: As an existing site proposed for changes in use, the site has services and open adequate public services. No open space dedication is required with this space application. 4) Protection of Not applicab le. natural features and resources 5) Adequacy of Criterion met: Proposed site lighting is appropriate and meets all Code lighting requirements. 5) Signs consistent Criterion met: A new Interstate Sign will have to be approved by the with preliminary Commission if requested and the exiting sign cabinet meets Code, which is developmentplan permitted to be resurfaced. 7) Appropriate 1 N /A: No changes in landscaping are required or proposed. landscaping to enhance, buffer, & soften the building and site 8J Comoliant Criterion met: The proposal has demonstrated compliance with stormwater Stormwater management requirements as defined in Chapter 53. management 9J All phases comply Not Applicable. with the previous criteria 10J Compliance with Criterion met: The proposal appears to comply with all other known other laws & applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations. regulations Recommendation 11111Final Development Pla� Approval In Planning's analysis, the proposal complies with the final development plan criteri and the existing development standards. Planning recommends approval of this --j re nest. City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 059Z /PDP /FDP I McKitrick PUD, Subarea 1A — Dublin City Schools Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 9 of 11 REZONING/ PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN CRITERIA The purpose of the PUD process is to encourage imaginative architectural design and proper site planning in a coordinated and comprehensive manner, consistent with accepted land planning, landscape architecture, and engineering principles. The PUD process can consist of up to three basic stages: 1) Concept Plan (Staff, Commission, and /or City Council review and comment); 2) Zoning Amendment Request (Preliminary Development Plan; Commission recommends and City Council approves /denies); and 3) Final Development Plan (Commission approves /denies). The general intent of the preliminary development plan (rezoning) stage is to determine the general layout and specific zoning standards that will guide development. The Planning and Zoning Commission must review and make a recommendation on this preliminary development plan (rezoning) request. The application will then be forwarded to City Council for a first reading /introduction and a second reading /public hearing for a final vote. A two- thirds vote of City Council is required to override a negative recommendation by the Commission. If approved, the rezoning will become effective 30 days following the Council vote. Additionally, all portions of the development will require final development plan approval by the Commission prior to construction. Review Criteria Section 153.050 of the Zoning Code identifies criteria for the review and approval for a Rezoning /Preliminary Development Plan. In accordance with Section 153.055(A) Plan Approval Criteria, Code sets out the following criteria of approval for a preliminary development plan (rezoning): 1) The proposed development is consistent with the purpose, intent and applicable standards of the Dublin Zoning Code; 2) The proposed development is in conformity with the Community Plan, Thoroughfare Plan, Bikeway Plan and other adopted plans or portions thereof as they may apply and will not unreasonably burden the existing street network; 3) The proposed development advances the general welfare of the City and immediate vicinity and will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding areas; 4) The proposed uses are appropriately located in the City so that the use and value of property within and adjacent to the area will be safeguarded; 5) Proposed residential development will have sufficient open space areas that meet the objectives of the Community Plan; 6) The proposed development respects the unique characteristic of the natural features and protects the natural resources of the site; 7) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, retention and /or necessary facilities have been or are being provided; City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 059Z /PDP /FDP I McKitrick PUD, Subarea 1A — Dublin City Schools Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 10 of 11 8) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress designed to minimize traffic congestion on the surrounding public streets and to maximize public safety and to accommodate adequate pedestrian and bike circulation systems so that the proposed development provides for a safe, convenient and non - conflicting circulation system for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians; 9) The relationship of buildings and structures to each other and to such other facilities provides for the coordination and integration of this development within the PD and the larger community and maintains the image of Dublin as a quality community; 10) The density, building gross floor area, building heights, setbacks, distances between buildings and structures, yard space, design and layout of open space systems and parking areas, traffic accessibility and other elements having a bearing on the overall acceptability of the development plan's contribution to the orderly development of land within the City; 11) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site so as to maintain, as far as practicable, usual and normal swales, water courses and drainage areas; 12) The design, site arrangement, and anticipated benefits of the proposed development justify any deviation from the standard development regulations included in the Dublin Zoning Code or Subdivision Regulation, and that any such deviations are consistent with the intent of the Planned Development District regulations; 13) The proposed building design meets or exceeds the quality of the building designs in the surrounding area and all applicable appearance standards of the City; 14) The proposed phasing of development is appropriate for the existing and proposed infrastructure and is sufficiently coordinated among the various phases to ultimately yield the intended overall development; 15) The proposed development can be adequately serviced by existing or planned public improvements and not impair the existing public service system for the area; and 16) The applicant's contributions to the public infrastructure are consistent with the Thoroughfare Plan and are sufficient to service the new development. City of Dublin I Planning & Zoning Commission Case 17- 059Z /PDP /FDP I McKitrick PUD, Subarea 1A — Dublin City Schools Thursday, July 13, 2017 1 Page 11 of 11 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Review Criteria In accordance with Section 153.055(6) Plan Approval Criteria, the Code sets out the following criteria of approval for a final development plan: 1) The plan conforms in all pertinent respects to the approved preliminary development plan provided, however, that the Planning and Zoning Commission may authorize plans as specified in §153.053(E)(4); 2) Adequate provision is made for safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular circulation within the site and to adjacent property; 3) The development has adequate public services and open spaces; 4) The development preserves and is sensitive to the natural characteristics of the site in a manner that complies with the applicable regulations set forth in this Code; 5) The development provides adequate lighting for safe and convenient use of the streets, walkways, driveways, and parking areas without unnecessarily spilling or emitting light onto adjacent properties or the general vicinity; 6) The proposed signs, as indicated on the submitted sign plan, will be coordinated within the Planned Unit Development and with adjacent development; are of an appropriate size, scale, and design in relationship with the principal building, site, and surroundings; and are located so as to maintain safe and orderly pedestrian and vehicular circulation; 7) The landscape plan will adequately enhance the principal building and site; maintain existing trees to the extent possible; buffer adjacent incompatible uses; break up large expanses of pavement with natural material; and provide appropriate plant materials for the buildings, site, and climate; 8) Adequate provision is made for storm drainage within and through the site feeding into regional stormwater basin which complies with the applicable regulations in this Code and any other design criteria established by the City or any other governmental entity which may have jurisdiction over such matters; 9) If the project is to be carried out in progressive stages, each stage shall be so planned that the foregoing conditions are complied with at the completion of each stage; and 10) The Commission believes the project to be in compliance with all other local, state, and federal laws and regulations. PUD S 4 r u ■■ ■� •: un nv�. 0 0 0 0 C UD BSD -IRN BUJ 17- 059CP- Z- PDP -FDP Concept Plan /Rezoning /Preliminary 0 250 500 Development Plan /Final Development Plan City Of Dublin McKitrick, Subarea 1A Rezoning Feet 5175 Emerald Parkway PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION JULY 7, 2005 CITY OF DUBLIN— land Use and Long Range Planning 5800 Shier -Rings Rood Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236 Phone: 614 -410 -4600 Fax: 614-410-4747 Web Site: www.dublin.oh.us The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 2. Amended Final Development Plan — 05- 080AFDP — McKitrick PUD, Subarea 1 — Verizon Smoking Shelters — 5165 and 5175 Emerald Parkway Location: 10.244 acres and 10.1736 acres located between Coffman Road and Dublin road on Emerald Parkway Existing Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development for Office Space (McKitrick PUD) Request: Review and approval of an amended final development plan under the provisions of Section 153.5 3. Proposed Use: Two 108- square -foot (approximate) outdoor smoking shelters and other minor site modifications for two existing office buildings. Applicant: 970 High Ridge Associates LLC and Dublin United LLC, 7777 Glades Road. Boca Raton, FL 33433, represented by Viox Services, Inc 15 W. Voorhees Street, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45215, c/o James Morio. Staff Contact: Gary P. Gunderman, AICP, Assistant Director. Contact Information: (614) 410- 4682/Email: gunderman@dublin.oh.us. MOTION: To approve this Amended Final Development Plan because the shelters provide a necessary amenity for the existing tenant, coordinate with the existing architecture and building color, and are consistent with and complementary to the existing high quality office development along I -270, without conditions. James Morio, Viox Services, Inc., was present representing the applicant.. VOTE: 7 -0 RESULT: This Amended Final Development Plan was approved. STAFF CER IFICA ION Gary . Gunderman Assistant Director Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — July 7, 2005 Page 4 The Commissioners all agreeedu�th th e tahlinng of this case_ TVTr Gerber said based -on the fart that -a new document had been press he MQ ;zad fir -a tabling of is case_ a Vim Jones- secaadgd Vpe• � motion c 4Este was asY follows- -,4s- Reiss- yes: Ads Boring, Ves� � -Tn� yes; �r � yes: � � yes: Zimmerman_ y" and My Gler�y es_ (Tahled 7 -0.1 ye gry eCl 1 1 C n il az- ur°°' respec n ■ aA c°°z YesiectO and staff. He said -the 12=os wa for sta -W digest, anaLyze,,-md hnpe-fiffly ;vor-k *14th t applicant.. Ue said' the Co u a •.- •- sta repo -on Friday evening in . de- Ao gh ca-, before th Thursday night meeting, - said the Coml�ission • • • 1 applyin the nil • Ue ja* racalled • • • exception was 11.1 - ■ • there 1 1 u • - 11 . - - ! somethin do with asi -w mwchine- He said there had -to he Piles He Raid h wa s= it had ILe hop-cd 4a-at staff would review th ine information an ;!e:hjm -the cas 4o the- Commiggion ygry quickly- PLVA FWLVA F=106 I. Z• FO . 1.1"1 •_ •- •- •r •. • • •• -�- . / 1 • 1 2. Amended Final Development Plan — 05- 080AFDP — McKitrick PUD, Subarea 1 — Verizon Smoking Shelters — 5165 and 5175 Emerald Parkway Chairman Rick Gerber said this was a request for review and approval of an Amended Final Development Plan for two 100 - square -foot outdoor smoking shelters and other minor site modifications to two existing office buildings. Mr. Gerber swore in those who wished to testify in regards to this case. The Commissioners agreed that Mr. Gunderman's staff presentation was not necessary. James Morio, Viox Services, Inc. was present, representing the applicant. Cathy Boring said the key sentence in the staff report was: The applicants had revised their proposal to improve the basic appearance of the structures in accordance with staff's suggestions. She said that indicated that the applicants had worked with staff and that the plan had been modified so there were no conditions recommended. Ms. Reiss asked how many openings would there be in the smoking shelters. Mr. Morio said there would be two openings for each shelter. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes — July 7, 2005 Page 5 Ms. Reiss asked if the white benches would match the structure. Mr. Morio said the white benches would match the structure. Mr. Zimmerman moved to approve this Amended Final Development plan because the shelters provide a necessary amenity for the existing tenant, coordinate with the existing architecture and building color, and are consistent with and complementary to the existing high quality office development along I -270, without any conditions. Ms. Boring seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Mr. Messineo, yes; Mr. Saneholtz, yes; Ms. Jones, yes; Mr. Gerber, yes; Ms. Reiss, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; and Mr. Zimmerman, yes. (Approved 7 -0.) ._ 111i 1111 '�W WN WO CITY OF W RLIN Division of Flaming 5800 Shier -M* Road Dublin, Ohio 43016 -1236 Mm/11)D: 614- 161 -6550 Fax: 614 - 161 -6566 Web Site: www.dubbn.oh us 0-4 IN DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION October 21, 1999 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 4. Revised Final Development Plan 99- 095RFDP - McKitrick PUD, Subarea 1 - Air Touch - 5175 and 5165 Emerald Parkway Location: 22 acres located on the south side of Emerald Parkway, approximately 1,200 feet east of Ceffinan Road. Existing Zoning: PUD, .Planned Unit Development District (McKitrick- Plan). Request: Review and approval of a revised final development plan under the PUD provisions of Section 153.056. Proposed lise: A single- story, enclosed building connector between two existing office buildings.. Applic w.t /Owner: Midwest Realty Holding, c/o Alter Asset Management, 1980 Springer Drive, Lombard, Illinois 60148; and 970 High Ridge Associates,. LLC; .c /o Walnut Services, Inc., 30100 Telegraph, Suite 403, Bingham Farms, Michigan 48025; repFesented by A. Mike Burkey, AIA, URS Greiner, Inc., 33 North High Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215. MOTION: To table this application as requested by Mr. Burkey. VOTE: 7 -0. RESULT: After much discussion, this application was tabled. The Commission wanted a better integrated connection, for the mechanicals to be completely screened, and for the landscaping for both buildings to be upgraded to double the Code requirement. STAFF CERTIFICATION Chad Gibson Planner Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - October 21, 1999 Page 13 5 s .. NIMMONS ~1- 4. Revised Final Development Plan 99- 095RFDP - McKitrick PUD - Air Touch - 5175, 5165 Emerald Parkway Chad Gibson presented this revised final development plan for a one -story building connector. The 22 -acre site is located on Emerald Parkway, and abutting I -270 in Subarea 1 of the McKitrick PUD. He said offices are permitted uses, and the maximum building height is four stories. There are two existing buildings owned by different parties. One tenant occupies both buildings, and the proposal is a connection between the two buildings. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - October 21, 1999 Page 14 Mr. Gibson showed a variety of slides. He noted the application lacks the owner's authorization for the Building 1, and no building permits can be approved until the letter is received. Mr. Gibson said the Building 1 parking lot is not fully screened from I -270, and the applicant has agreed to augment the existing landscaping per staff requests. He said there is a sign issue to consider. Each building is currently entitled to one wall sign and one ground sign. Currently, there are two wall signs and one ground sign along Emerald Parkway. The connector technically makes the two buildings "one" for zoning code purposes, permitting only one wall sign for the whole structure. He said staff can support the two existing signs, but this is subject to the Commission's discretion in the PUD zone. Mr. Fishman and Mr. McCash thought this might set up inequities. Ms. Clarke said by connecting the two buildings, under the Zoning Code, they become one building. When staff examines this 20 acres, there is no sign clutter created. One sign oriented toward the freeway per 10 acres seems to be reasonable. She said in the case of the Duke informal request, the buildings are zoned PCD, and this would not be discretionary. A text change would be needed, and none has been formally requested. Mr. Eastep asked why the mechanicals are not fully screened. Mr. Gibson said there are trees, but they are not doing the job 100 percent. Mr. Gibson said staff feels it will be amenity to the existing tenant. He said they are recommending approval with 16 conditions, (11 of the conditions with asterisks are held over from previous approvals of both buildings): 1) That the applicant submit an agreement/cross - access easement between the two adjacent property owners addressing the use of the connector, in the event different tenants occupy part or all, of one or both buildings; 2) That the site lighting plan conform to the Dublin Lighting Guidelines and utilize matching fixtures; 3) That the proposed landscaping modifications provide substantial screening of the existing parking lots, subject to staff approval; 4) That the stormwater plan conforms to Engineering requirements; 5) That signage conforms with the Dublin sign regulations and conforms to the development text, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission; 6) That the full access curb cut be relocated to the east, subject to agreement between the applicant and staff, or that its placement be resolved by the Planning Commission at a later date if an agreement is not reached;* 7) That the stormwater plan conform to engineering requirements;* 8) That the site conform with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines;* 9) That the landscape treatment along the west property line be subject to acceptance by the Willow Grove Civic Association as outlined in Section 1.08(10) of the zoning text;* 10) That the I -270 landscape treatment be subject to approval by the Planning Commission at a w later date along with the connector road [Emerald Parkway];* Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - October 21, 1999 Page 15 11) That the landscape treatment along the north border of the subject site, adjacent to the connector road [Emerald Parkway], be in conformance with the landscape plan for the entire roadway landscape /buffer treatment plan;* 12) That the stormwater plan conforms with engineering requirements; 13) That the site lighting plan conforms with the Dublin Lighting Guidelines; ** 14) That the applicant submit an agreement with the adjacent property owner allowing joint use of the driveway linking the Air Touch Cellular property and the full service curb cut to the east;** 15) That the proposed landscaping complies with the revised Landscape Code and fully incorporates the Emerald Parkway design, as prepared by James Burkart Associates, subject to staff approval; ** and 16) That signage conforms with the Dublin sign regulations and conforms with the development text. ** Mr. Gibson said staff feels the connection matches the existing building materials and detailing. They are carrying forward the symmetrical design of the building, and the connector will help screen the service area. Mr. Lecklider was troubled to learn they are using the connector as a screening device. This does not seem to be a legitimate basis for approval. Mr. Harian noticed that the screening does not work. He asked if anyone checks landscaping. Mr. Gibson said there are landscape inspections, and to his knowledge, they have met the approved plan. The landscape inspector has inspected the site, and will be moving forward with the augmentation of the existing landscaping. Mr. Harian doubted this site complies with the Code. Mr. Gibson said the applicant has been cooperative with staff. They agreed to proceed with recommendations from Ms. Newcomb. Mr. Fishman said there should be a standard condition regarding screening the mechanicals and the needed opacity for screening cars. Mr. Fishman asked when there are two separate owners, is there a setback requirement. Mr. Gibson said there will be a zero setback on a interior property line. Since this is a PUD, the Commission can approve it without any setback. Ms. Clarke said in a PUD, there is no hardship finding necessary. One needs to show compliance as judged by the Commission with the preliminary development plan or the plan intent at the time of zoning. Mr. Fishman hopes the applicant is agreeable to eliminating one sign. Mr. Gibson there are two separate sites. The Sign Code as currently written would permit each building to have one wall and one ground sign. Currently, there are two wall signs, one on each building and one ground sign. There could be an additional ground sign installed. w Ms. Clarke noted in the future, there might be two separate tenants. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - October 21, 1999 Page 16 Mr. Harian said they are asking for a variance for no side yard setbacks. Ms. Clarke agreed. The Commission wanted a condition that it does not apply to future construction. Mr. Harian asked if today all they were approving is a connector. Mr. Sprague asked about a similar Duke building with a connector. Mr. Gibson said it is entitled to only one sign. Ms. Clarke said under the Zoning Code if the buildings or building spaces are completely separated with no connecting doors, they are separate buildings and entitled to their own signs. She said currently they have two independent buildings. Once they build a connector between them, under the Zoning Code, they become one building. Mr. Sprague said theoretically, this building could be held to the same standard (one sign) as the Duke building. Ms. Clarke agreed. Mr. Peplow noted this site was promised to have unique landscaping features along I 2770. He wanted more information regarding substantial screening. Ms. Newcomb said the site has existing evergreens that have not filled in yet. An evergreen hedge at the edge of the parking lot is proposed to fill in the lower level. Mr. Eastep said the connector is shown to be a combination of spandrel and visual glass similar to the rest of the building. The mechanical units should be screened. Since the connector is see - through, the mechanicals still will not be screened. Mr. Gibson said they are proposing to install evergreen shrubs along that connector to break up the mass and the views. Mr. Gibson said the connector would be sprinkled. Mr. Gibson said the site would have to meet the Dublin storm water regulations. Mr. Lecklider noted in addition to the connector, there are plans for benches and tables. Mr. Gibson said the applicant is not going to add additional external lighting fixtures to the connector. Michael Burkey, URS Greiner, architect for Air Touch, said there was considerable discussion about the signage. The connector does make them one building. The two office buildings are of such mass, compared to the connector, that he feels certain that they will be perceived as two separate buildings. He said they wanted to make the smallest connection between the two buildings. He said structurally and aesthetically it separates this connector from the two existing two buildings and proves light into the offices of the first floor of the existing buildings. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - October 21, 1999 Page 17 Mr. McCash said the expansion joints could occur right along the wall of the existing building. Mr. Burkey agreed and said there would be a lot of disassembling of the existing wall in order to provide the structural supports. He said they studied other locations. Mr. Burkey feels in materials, architecture and shape mimic the existing buildings. As a by- product, it does screen the units between the two buildings. Mr. Burkey said the existing buildings have a curved portion and this connector mimics it and matches the architecture. Mr. Lecklider asked if they considered an underground connection. Mr. Burkey said no. Mr. McCash said this does seem to be in the right proportion to the rest of the horizontal lines of the building. Mr. Burkey said he believes the spandrel and glass proportions are identical to the curved portion of the existing building. Mr. Eastep suggested precast columns to break up the connector. Mr. Burkey said they were not the architects on the existing buildings. He said they knew that there were some deficiencies in the landscaping, particularly on the first building. They have met with the City and have corrected them. He said the connector is an opaque spandrel wall. Mr. Burkey said it is 14 feet to the top of the connector and matches the floor to floor height from the first floor to the second floor of the existing buildings. 04W Mr. McCash said the horizontal lines are seen from I -270 and all the lines have been shifted by a foot, now they are connecting with horizontal lines, unless all the connector lines are at the slope. They are not going to line up on either side. Drawing A4 -1 shows them both at the same base pad elevation. Mr. Burkey said there is an element that imitates one of the columns on the two buildings. The intent is that element is enough of a transition between the buildings so that the difference in elevation, which would be about six inches at that point, would not be perceptible. Mr. McCash questioned how much light there would be between the separation with a 14 -foot high wall. Mr. Burkey said there will be some light, but will not be right against an office window. Mr. McCash thought it might create the appearance of a dark cavernous tunnel which would collect debris. He suggested connecting it against the building and dealing with the transition elements. Mr. Burkey said the area between the connector and the existing buildings would be a washed gravel. He said the tunnel faces south and there should be some light coming in there. Mr. Burkey said the area was for window washing. They wanted the two buildings perceived individually, not as two buildings with the connector jammed up against them. Mr. McCash said the issue was how this would look from I -270. N Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - October 21, 1999 Page 18 Mr. Fishman opposed two wall signs after the building was connected because it would set a dangerous precedent. He asked Mr. Burkey to remove one of the signs if the connector was approved. Mr. Lecklider pointed out that this is a consent agenda item and the assumption was that the applicant agreed to all the conditions. Agreement with the sign conditions was not clear. Mr. Harian said the condition needed to be changed to reflect the agreement to one sign. Ms. Clarke said as the staff report was written, it would require removal of one of the signs. Staff assumed that it would be okay to leave them both. She said if it is the determination of the Commission that one of those signs should be removed, then another condition is necessary. This condition was discussed further Mr. Fishman assumed trash would be controlled between the buildings. He was concerned that the mechanicals were visible from I -270. He wanted a condition that the nearby trees and Landscaping be doubled so as to fully screen the area from the mechanicals to the parking lot. Mr. Burkey agreed to double the landscaping. Mr. Eastep suggested that "...and complete screening of all mechanical units" be added to Condition 3. Mr. Fishman wanted a tree added in addition for each tree required. Mr. Burkey agreed to work with Mary Newcomb to screen the mechanicals. f'' Mr. Sprague asked if adding precast features would visually connect the building. He thought it might enhance the building. Mr. McCash said he would not have imitated the curved wall on the other side, but tied it in with some kind of colonnade instead. Mr. Lecklider was opposed to this connection because this is a very prominent site. A one- story connection such as this, does not suggest "signature" office architecture. Mr. Peplow said he remembered discussing at the time of rezoning that this prominent site was one of the last remaining sites along I -270. It was to be a signature office building. He remembered that the landscaping was to be special and "spectacular ". He said this looks very plain. This connector seems to be missing something and it looks strictly utilitarian. Mr. Peplow said he wanted architectural detailing, perhaps columns added. Mr. Harian agreed. Mr. Harian said AirTouch is a good corporate tenant. He said it is important to allow them to connect the buildings, but the connector needed something more in the design. It needed to look more substantial. He thought it would work as a 14 -foot connector, but it needed columns. An atrium was not necessary. Mr. Eastep said if this is the cost of keeping AirTouch in Dublin, he was in favor of a connector. However, he was concerned with future tenant changes. He thought columns were necessary. He could support this connector if the landscape complies with Code and columns were added to make the connector appear more integrated. He wanted, as a condition, one sign to be removed. Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - October 21, 1999 Page 19 Mr. Sprague said these were two of the most attractive buildings in Dublin. He expected a special, unique connector. The proposal looked like an afterthought and industrial, and an underground connection would be better. He said he was in favor of the connector if it could be modified to match the buildings and look appropriate. The precedent of going with two signs under these circumstances is problematic. He favored only one sign. Mr. Fishman asked why the connector could not be built underground. Mr. Burkey said the mechanicals and utility lines between the two buildings would make it extremely difficult and costly. Mr. Fishman said the landscaping should be "special," as previously agreed. One sign should be eliminated, and the building should be repainted /cleaned to remove any shadow left by the signage. Mr. McCash said he always had a problem with the two signs saying "Air Touch" so close together. He suggested replacing both signs with a two -sided ground sign. He was uncomfortable with the appearance, particularly along I -270 in the corporate environment. Mr. Lecklider was opposed to the connection of the buildings. He said there was a likelihood that in the future there may be different users who may not want the connector. He did not think this connector would have been approved with the original building. Mr. Harian said the applicant had heard the Commission concerns. Mr. Burkey requested that the Commission table this application to a future date. Mr. Harian made a motion to table this application and Mr. Eastep seconded. The vote was as follows: Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. McCash, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Mr. Eastep, yes; and Mr. Harian, yes. (Tabled 7 -0.) I r. 7 W-1 I 1. i h j, 11 �. IN I r. 7 W-1 I 1. i h j, 11 �. 71 C11'Y ON' DUBLIN 5800 Shier Rings Road Dublin, OH 43016.1236 Phone/TDD: 614/161 -6550 Fax: 614/161 -6506 DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING CONaMSION RECORD OF ACTION JULY 69 1995 The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at its regular meeting: 3. Final Development Plan - CellularOne Location 10.95 acres located on the south side of the proposed Coffman- Sawmill Road connector, approximately 600 feet east of Coffman Road, north of I -270. Existing Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Revised McKitrick Office PUD Plan, effective date, July 19, 1995.) Request: Approval of a final development plan under the provisions of Section 1181.07 of the Planning and Zoning Code. Proposed Use: A 121,955 square foot, four -story office building. Applicant: The Alter Group, Ltd., c/o Stephen M. Park, 3000 Glenview Road, Wilmette, Illinois 60091. MOTION: To approve Final Development Plan because it is in conformance with the Preliminary Development Plan, is consistent with the high quality office development along I -270, and exceeds the minimum setback requirement adjacent to Willow Grove, with the following six conditions: 1) That the full access curb cut be relocated to the east, subject to agreement between the applicant and Staff, or that its placement be resolved by the Planning Commission at a later date if agreement is not reached; 2) That the stormwater plan conform with engineering requirements; 3) That site lighting conform with Dublin Lighting Guidelines; 4) That the landscape treatment along the west property line be subject to acceptance by the Willow Grove Civic Association as outlined in Section 1.08(10) of the zoning text; 5) That the I -270 landscape treatment be subject to approval by the Planning Commission at a later date along with connector road; and 6) That the landscape treatment along the north border of the subject site, adjacent to the connector road, be in conformance with the landscape plan for the entire roadway landscape/buffer treatment plan. Stephen M. Park agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 5 -0. RESULT: This Final Development Plan was approved. STAFF CERTIFICATION — 97- 084FDP 411 5165 Emerald Parkway Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - July 6, 1995 Page 5 3. Final Development Plan - McKitrick Office Park - CellularOne Tom Rubey said this 10.95 acres is the first phase of the Cellular One construction and the first building in the McKitrick Office Park. The new PUD rezoning will go into effect on July 19. The overall office park is 152 acres with a mix of different intensity office and single - family residential uses. The site abuts Willow Grove condominiums and is across the new road from Dublin Coffman High School. He presented slides of the site and surrounding area. He said the site is in Subarea 1. The total subarea contains 20 acres. The first building is to contain 121,000 square feet with over 660 parking spaces. He said the building exterior is to be scored concrete panels with mirrored glass as an accent. It is to be a four -story building with convex elements on the north and south elevations. Along Willow Grove is a 75 -foot wide landscape area, and the landscaping requirements are to be acceptable to the Willow Grove Condominium Association. If agreement cannot be reached on a landscape plan it will be decided by the Commission. A 6-foot screen along I -270 or a consistent alternative along the entire McKitrick frontage will be installed. Development within this subarea is to complement both Willow Grove and the higher density offices proposed to the east. Mr. Ruby said staff recommends approval of this final development plan with the following six conditions: 1) That the curb cut be moved to the east in conformance with the Burgess and Niple traffic study; 2) That the Stormwater plan conform with engineering requirements; 3) That site lighting conforms with Dublin Lighting Guidelines; 4) That the landscape treatment along west property line be agreeable to the Willow Grove Civic Association as outlined in zoning text; 5) That the I -270 landscape treatment return for Planning Commission review along with connector road; and 6) That the landscape treatment along the north border of the subject site, adjacent to the connector road, be in conformance with the landscape plan for the entire roadway landscape/buffer treatment plan. Dan Sutphen asked if the signage was schematic and if it complies with code. Mr. Rubey did not know but said the applicant was familiar with Dublin's sign code. Marilee Chinnici - Zuercher asked for an explanation of conditions #5 and 6. Mr. Rubey said the applicant had originally proposed a unifying landscape treatment on I -270, and the specifics are still undefined. It should be presented to the Commission. The landscape treatment along the north border of the subject site, adjacent to the connection road is to be reviewed with the connector road. A bridge over the Indian Run and landscaping treatment for the east -west road still need to be approved. Steve Park, the applicant, said they were close to resolving this project and getting it under way 97- 084FDP 5165 Emerald Parkway Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - July 6, 1995 Page 6 quickly. He said they had a four -story building in conformance with the Planned Unit Development District. The Willow Grove setback was an absolute minimum and increased with the height of the building. This building is set back 100 -120 feet further than required. Mr. Ruby said they had met with the Willow Grove representatives regarding the landscaping in the buffer area and the berm area. He said landscaping along I -270 and on the Coffman/Sawmill connector have not been resolved. A concept of the entire length of the Coffman/Sawmill connector has not been proposed. Along I -270, a unified concept may be proposed, and Cardinal Health and Dublin must agree with it. The applicant has an option to acquire additional acreage in Subarea 1. There could be a companion building with a mirror image of this building. Marilee Chinnici - Zuercher asked if Mr. Park agreed with the six conditions listed above. He only disagreed with item #1. He said the Burgess and Niple study proposed a single full access point on the common property boundary, between their phases one and two. They did not feel that met the needs of their project. They want a right in/right out near the west property line and a full access point just west of the structure Phase Z should also have a full- service access. If the full access point is shifted, it is not a problem. They do not own the second phase. The access suggested brings the traffic into the loading /unloading and trash enclosure area, not to the front of the building as a corporate campus should be. Mr. Park understood the reasons for the access was to minimize curb cuts and to allow for the potential of a signalized access point. The traffic along the Coffman/Sawmill connector has a traffic volume equal to that expected for Coffman Road. There are more access issues along Coffman Road than the connector. He did not think a traffic signal would ever be needed because of the opposite side will have high school and their practice fields. Jim Gabriel, Civil Engineering Associates, said site utilities and grading on the site were standard. Water service will come from the Coffman/Sawmill connector and sanitary sewer service presently exists in a private sewer that goes north/south to serve the high school. It will become public and be extended to serve this building and the potential buildings to the east. The stormwater detention in the southwest corner of the site serves Willow Grove and the high school, and they are proposing enlarging it to make it a small regional detention basin to serve all three facilities. Jim Burkart, James Burkart Associates, handed out a letter to the Commission regarding the corridor landscaping he proposed. He said a six-foot high berm along the corridor was not appropriate. The existing corridor on the north side undulated up and down below the current highway pavement. If a six -foot high mound was put in front of CellularOne, it would be effective because the roadway is currently approximately eight to ten feet lower and so a six-foot high mound would not be effective in terms of screening. Conversely, to the east near the Indian Run the area drops and undulates back up and so a six-foot high mound would not work for screening. Instead, he proposed that any parking areas be screened with staggered evergreen material which will ultimately become very dominant and will create a very interesting backdrop panorama when driving down the highway. He proposed a simple lawn panel that slopes up from I -270 to the building where it is dropped down. The building would be set three feet lower 97- 084FDP 5165 Emerald Parkway Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - July 6, 1995 Page 7 than the top of the berm fitting with the higher tech image of the building. He suggested using flowering trees. Steve Weiss, Soloman Cordwell Buenz and Associates, Inc., the architects for the project, reiterated what Mr. Park's desire that the building fit into a corporate park. The materials used along I -270 such as precast concrete with a lot of glass have been chosen for this building. About 40 to 45 percent of the building is a warm -tone precast infilled with green tinted and reflective glass. The floor plan has 30,000 square feet per floor. The four -story box look was changed by moving one part forward from the other and then connecting them with a curved glass section appearing on both sides of the building. The entrance is along one edge and one side of the building at the curved glass drum. Shading and screening of transformers, generators, and trash enclosures will be done with a single enclosure of precast concrete to match the building. The mechanical equipment on the roof will be screened so that it will look as though it is part of the building with a metal screening that is the same look and texture of the precast concrete which is a curving element on both sides of the building, completely enclosed all around the building. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher asked Staff to address the curbcut issues. Terry Foegler requested a short recess to discuss the curbcut issues with the applicant. He said one of the major benefits of designing a boulevard was the ability to effectively manage access onto the adjacent roadway system. Concerns of limiting the curbcuts relate to traffic safety and preserving the capacity of the roadway. It is extremely important for this roadway, given its future importance to the City. For every full left-turn cut through the boulevard, there is a associated left-turn stacking lane on the boulevard for cars stacking making a left turn which significantly reduces the width of the median and therefore the amount of landscaping. Mr. Foegler said he thought an agreement could be reached between staff and the applicant regarding curbcuts if the Commission would permit a short recess for discussion. Mr. Peplow said there was no intention to have a wall along I -270 and that it should look like across the street at OCLC, etc. He liked the landscape proposed. Mr. Zawaly said condition #4 should specifically say "That the landscape treatment along the west property line be subject to acceptance by the Willow Grove Civic Association as outlined in Section 1.08(10) of the zoning text." Mr. Fishman said the landscaping along the freeway should be consistent. Barry Hanks, representing Willow Grove Civic Association, thanked the Alter Group for their consideration and cooperation in the landscaping design. He said Willow Grove had not had the opportunity to respond to the landscaping design and supported Mr. Zawaly's suggestion to modify condition #4. He was not aware that the sanitary sewer was to be replaced and said that the landscaping should be timed correctly. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher called a recess at 8:05 p.m. The meeting resumed at 8:30 p.m. 97- 084FDP 5165 Emerald Parkway Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - July 6, 1995 Page 8 Mr. Foegler said Burgess and Niple is preparing the plan for the new road which includes a full boulevard, with a landscaped median, and full turning movements at three locations. One would align the Cardinal Health site to the west of Indian Run with the proposed entrance to the single - family area, one for Cardinal to the east of the Indian Run, and one to be shared between this ten -acre site and the ten acres to its east. There is significant left turn storage for each. If curb cuts are added or relocated, the left turn storage areas will eliminate some landscaped median, and access control and roadway carrying capacity will suffer. He said access easements, etc. have been discussed with the applicant without resolution. He said there are possible solutions that meet their design needs and still preserve the integrity of this critical roadway. Mr. Park agreed with Mr. Foegler's statement. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher said the applicant agreed to conditions #2 -6, but not condition #1. Mr. Fishman asked if this could be approved with condition #1 intact. Mr. Banchefsky responded that this is the final review. He said. their discretion was somewhat limited in the this phase, and he did not recommend imposing conditions without the applicant's acceptance. Mr. Fishman was concerned with safety and the integrity of the road. He described it as a showplace for Dublin. He felt in Muirfield, the roadway's integrity was sacrificed when additional curbcuts were added. The boulevard will be lost without following the guidelines. Mr. Zawaly asked if it was a matter of moving the full access curbcut eastward. Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher responded that it was. Mr. Zawaly agreed with Staff regarding the maintenance of the integrity of the boulevard in this major corporate campus. He was disappointed it could not be worked out with staff. Mr. Sutphen said that the full access curb cut should be moved east for safety reasons. He said Blue Ash and Kettering, Ohio; Lexington, Kentucky; and Stanton and Harrisonburg, Virginia all had boulevards of various widths with appropriate plantings. He saw no problem. Mr. Peplow liked the idea of maintaining three full access curbcuts. It would bring traffic into the campus at the loading side of the building. He preferred to minimize the number of full access curbcuts on the road. He said all the left-turn stacking lanes on Frantz Road were reducing the landscaped boulevard. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher said if the driveway was relocated to the east, it would not need to be extended to the service and dumpster area. She said the safety aspect should be considered, especially next door to the high school and a large group of less experienced drivers. Mr. Banchefsky said there was no language in the Code allowing the Commission to impose a provision in the final development plan, as could be done in a conditional use case. He said if a consensus could not be met with the applicant's consent, tabling would be appropriate. Mr. Fishman said the problem seemed to be the entrance through the parking lot. He suggested that a landscaped corridor could be brought into the parking lot to the entrance of the building. 97- 084FDP 5165 Emerald Parkway Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - July 6, 1995 Page 9 Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher said another issue was that this applicant does not own the east property and may not ever. It may be some other company with which they would share access. Mr. Fishman clarified that he envisioned a tree lined corridor directing traffic to the front of the CellularOne building. Mr. Sutphen said Metro Center had a tree lined corridor. Mr. Foegler said a tabling would require a special meeting by the Commission. Mr. Fishman asked if the applicant could agree to condition #1 with the understanding that barring an acceptable solution, they come back to the Commission. - Mr. Foegler said the applicant did not agree to this condition under any circumstance. Mr. Zawaly suggested the language: "that the full access curbcut be moved to the east, subject to agreement between the applicant and Staff'. Mr. Banchefsky said that was done often and there was no problem with it if the applicant agrees. Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher and Mr. Park discussed possible language for this condition. Mr. Park agreed to the amended condition #1 listed below. Mr. Zawaly made the motion to approve this final development plan because it conforms with the preliminary development plan, is consistent with the high quality office development along I -270, and exceeds the minimum setback along Willow Grove, with the following six conditions: 1) That the full access curb cut be relocated to the east, subject to agreement between the applicant and Staff, or that its placement be resolved by the Planning Commission at a later date if agreement is not reached; 2) That the stormwater plan conform with engineering requirements; 3) That site lighting conform with Dublin Lighting Guidelines; 4) That the landscape treatment along the west property line be subject to acceptance by the Willow Grove Civic Association as outlined in Section 1.08(10) of the zoning text; 5) That the I -270 landscape treatment be subject to approval by the Planning Commission at a later date along with connector road; and 6) That the landscape treatment along the north border of the subject site, adjacent to the connector road, be in conformance with the landscape plan for the entire roadway landscape/buffer treatment plan. The motion was seconded by Mr. Sutphen and the vote was as follows: Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Peplow, yes; Ms. Chinnici - Zuercher, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; and Mr. Zawaly, yes. (Approved 5 -0.) Z Ms. C ' ' i- Zuercher stated at staff should info a Chair prior to a meeting if a ss is n to discuss iss She said such a can be placed 1 in the agenda avoid d ys for everyone . Sutphen said the r est should be in Ting. 97- 084FDP 5165 Emerald Parkway DUBLIN PLANNING AND ZONING COMAMSION RECORD OF ACTION MAY 3 AND 49 1995 CITY OF DUBLIN The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following actions at its special meeting, May 3, 1995 and regular meeting, May 4, 1995: 1. Rezoning Application Z95 -004 - McKitriek Office Park - Revised Preliminary Development Plan . Location: 149.62 acres located on the north side of I -270, from Dublin - Bellepoint Road (SR 745) on the east to Coffman Road on the west. sting Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit. Development District (McKitrick Office Plan). Request: Revision of Preliminary Development Plan for PUD, Planned Unit Development District. Proposed Use: Office park with revisions including an increase in density from 10,000 square feet per acre to 15,000 square feet per acre for portions of the site. Applicant: Mclatrick Properties, Inc. and Bethel Road Investment Company c/o Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215. MOTION #1: To approve this rezoning application with the following 22 conditions: 1) That the east -west road and the bridge over the Indian Run be designed with maximum sensitivity to the neighboring residential environment and with input from the neighborhood representatives; 2) That the east -west road and the bridge over the Indian Run be designed to mitigate noise pollution; 3) That the design of the east -west road and bridge over the Indian Run be subject to approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission; 4) That an appropriate buffer /landscaping treatment along the east -west road be submitted in conjunction with #3 above, subject to approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission; 5) That an innovative design standard and landscape plan be established along the new east -west road; 6) That a landscape plan that graphically represents the buffering standard along Willow Grove be submitted subject to staff approval; 7) That development standards including setbacks, utility service and placement, preservation areas, parkland, for the single- family area (Subarea 4) be established at the time of preliminary plat; 8) That additional development criteria be established in the text for daycare facilities; 9) That the architectural quality of the proposed office park reflect the standard of development for other existing signature office buildings along I -270 in Dublin, such as OCLC and Metro Center; 97- 084FDP Page 1 of 3 5165 Emerald Parkway Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Record of Action May 3 and 4, 1995 1. Rezoning Application Z95 -004 - McKitrick Office Park - Revised Preliminary Development Plan (Cont.) 10) That the commitment to handle and detain storm water from Willow Grove continue to be honored; 11) That right -of way be dedicated for Dublin Road (40 feet from centerline) and the east -west road (100 feet wide) and with additional right -of -way provided at the intersections consistent with the findings of the area traffic impact study prepared by Burgess and Wple; 12) That adequate right -of -way or easements be dedicated to include any additional roadside mounding (designed with a mowable slope); 13) That a tree preservation plan and conceptual plan be .submitted prior to filing a final development plan for any treed portion of the site that outlines standards for development, including utility. placement, sets preservation zones and provides appropriate development standards for all phases of construction for wooded area located along the Indian Run and existing tree rows, it being understood that the developer will be allowed to locate buildings, parking, access driveways, and related amenities within the existing treed area consistent with a tree preservation plan that preserves the natural beauty of the site, subject to staff approval; 14) That the ravine be properly protected by environmentally sensitive site design(s) and limitation on grading, and by utilization of appropriate construction practices during all phases of construction, in accordance with a staff approved preservation Pte; 15) That the cemetery be established as a no-build zone and be appropriately preserved; 16) That parking to facilitate use of the existing public park within the development be resolved at final development plan review and should it be located south of the road, it may be established by revokable license; 17) That bikepaths be provided along the east -west road and Dublin Road frontages consistent with the Community Plan; 18) That the plan and text be modified as appropriate prior to the public hearing at City Council; 19) That the applicant submit a finalized legal description for the acreage to be rezoned for inclusion in the rezoning ordinance; 20) That the use of Subarea 4 to the west of the Indian Run be limited to playing and practice fields and parks, with any proposed lighting to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission; 21) That buildings in Subarea 2 shall be limited to a maximum five -story height (plus mechanicals) limit, that buildings shall be limited to 80 feet in height at the minimum setback lines, and that buildings exceeding 80 feet in height shall be set back an additional two feet for each additional one foot in building height; and 22) That buildings in Subarea 1 shall be limited to a maximum four -story height (plus mechanicals) limit, that buildings shall be limited to 56 feet in height at the minimum setback lines, and that buildings exceeding 56 feet in height shall be set back an additional two feet for each additional one foot in building height. * Ben W. Hale, Jr. agreed to the above conditions. 97- 084FDP Page 2 of 3 5165 Emerald Parkway Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Record of Action May 3 and 4, 1995 1. Rezoning Application Z95 -004 - McKitrick Office Park - Revised Preliminary Development Plan (Cont.) VOTE: May 3, 1995 - Approved 7 -0. RESULT: This rezoning application will be forwarded to City Council with a favorable recommendation. At the Planning Commission's regular meeting on May 4, 1995, as a follow -up to the above action, the following motion was introduced and passed: MOTION #2: Upon consideration of the new traffic generated by the development of the McKitrick property, the Planning and Zoning Commission strongly recommends that Council place a high priority on the following five traffic network issues: 1) The capacity and potential for expansion of the two lane Post Road bridge over I -270 should be sufficiently studied; 2) The connector road through the McKitrick property should be constructed between Dublin Road and Coffman Road as one project, not in segments. This connector road should be designed and installed in its final form, preferably as a four -lane boulevarded street with a landscaped median; 3) The east -west road project should include adequate upgrades to the intersections created at Coffman Road and at Dublin Road; 4) Dublin Road should be preserved and protected as a scenic collector. This includes minimizing any necessary widening of this road to the greatest extent possible; and 5) That funding will be provided for the two bridges, (one over the Scioto and the other over SR 161), within the current 5 -year C.I.P. VOTE: May 4, 1995 - Approved 5-0-1. RESULT: These traffic network issues will be forwarded to City Council for consideration in connection with the McKitrick Office Park rezoning application. STAFF CERTIFICATION Barbara M. Clarke Planning Director 97- 084FDP Page 3 of 3 5165 Emerald Parkway RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 5 Meeting Held June 5, 1995 19 the middle of lots. Ms. Clarke confirmed t is the developer's responsibility to resolve th y thb time of preliminary plat a The Commission members were very clear about expectation is this regard. President, Northwood Land Corporation, addr Council, noting: 1. The cost of the bridge is estimated at $432, the extra lots are requested to help reduce the impact of the bridge cost on th eloper. The extra 3 lots reduce the cost of the bridge project to about $330,000. 2. He agrees with Mrs. King that for major infrastructures should be spread across a larger area in the future. 3. After the many h Planning do Zoning Commission, Mr. Haid has agreed all 12 of the conditions. Council had no firth estions for Mr. Haid. In response to r Campbell, Mr. Haid stated that he is in agreement 12 conditions. There be a third reading of the ordinance at the June 19 Coun Ordinance No. 20.95 An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 149.629 Acres of Land Located on the North Side of 1- 270, from Dublin- Beltepolnt Road (State Route 745) on the East to Coffman Road on the West, from: PM, Planned Unit Development District to: PM, Planned Unit Development District. (Revised McKitrick 1-270 Preliminary Development Plan) (Public Hearing) (Applicant: Bethel Road Investment Co. and McKitrick Properties Inc., c% Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, 37 W. Broad Street, Columbus, OR 43215) Registered as proponents of the rezoning were Joe Harian, 7087 Coventry Woods, Drive, Ron Geese, 5964 Brand Road; Ben Hale, 37 W. Broad Street, Columbus; and Dave McKee, 7127 Coventry Woods Drive. Registered as opponents of the rezoning were Claire Wolfe, 5521 Indian Hill Road; Jan Henderson, 5190 Willow Grove Place N.; Lee Grabill, 5242 Willow Grove Place N.; Don Buctanger, 6747 Willow Grove Place E.; Tina Eversole, 5241 Willow Grove Place N.; Jim Fox, 5177 Willow Grove Place S.; Barry Hanks, 6763 Willow Grove Place; Lynn Fox, 5177 Willow Grove Place S.; Randy Roth, 6987 Grandee Cliffs Drive; David Buzzee:, 5248 Willow Grove Place S.; and Peg DaCapio, 6679 Willow Grove Lane. Ms. Clarke gave a slide presentation on the rezoning which involves 150 acres along 1 -270 and is bounded on the east by Dublin Road and by Coffman Road on the west. This land has been toned for an office park since 1985. The 1985 development text for an office park called for a net density across the site of 10,000 square feet per acre and approximately 1.5 million square feet of proposed office s pace. This new application increases the density for the area located to the south of the east - west road - a major road proposed from Coffman Road to Dublin Road, with an extension across the Scioto River at the Gocl enbach property, and with an extension over to Sawmill Road via several road extensions called for in the Thoroughfare Plan. The road will also be extended to the south and west as the Coffman Road extension south of 33. There are several issues involved with this development: 1. Land set aside along the freeway was constricted, and several small parcels of land are proposed for trade with the school system in order to widen out the area right along the freeway and to slightly realign that proposed road. This is a PUD, and in a PUD the road alignment is actually set. 2. The 1985 plan did little in terms of providing for generalized standards of development and providing buffers. The Willow Grove buffer has been renegotiated as a part of this rezoning application. Since the application was filed, Subarea 4, the northwest block of the property will be down -zoned to either single -family or school use for practice fields. 3. This plan incorporates some, but not all of the bike paths shown on the Thoroughfare Plan. It includes a bike path along the east -west road and one along the Dublin road right -of -way. 4. The City is in a position to facilitate development at this time by using the tax increment financing for the road construction. This roadway will be an important link for Dublin. 5. There are two major users for the development as proposed, one of which is interested in dewelopmg a major headquarters to be developed over the next five or so years. 6. In the initial 1985 rezoning. a waiver was granted of the 240 day requirement within which to file the final development plan for at least 20 percent of the property. In this application, the waiver will be requested as well. She then proceeded with a slide presentation of the site and surrounding area, describing the road alignments as well as the five -year capital improvement projects involved with this roadway. 97- 084FDP 5165 Emerald ParkwaY 0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 5 Meeting; Held June 5, 1995 _ __ 19 the middle of I Ms. Clark onfirmed that it is the developer's res sibility to resolve this by the ti of prSe imi y plat stage. 71ie Commission members ere very clear about their expectatio to this reg David Maid, President, Northwood Lan orporation, addressed Council, notin . 1. The cost of the bridge is es ' ated at $432,000 and the extra lots • e requested to help reduce the impact of the edge cost on the developer. The extra ots reduce the cost of the bridge project to out $330,000. 2. He agrees with . King that costs for major infrastruc should be spread acros a larger area in a future. 3. After the ny hearings at Planning & Zoning Com ' sion, Mr. Haid has agr o all 12 of the nditions. Council ha no further questions for Mr. Haid. In resp se to Mayor Campbell, Mr. Haid stated th a is in agreement with al 2 conditions. will be a third reading of the ordinanceot the June 19 Council Ordinance No. 20-95 An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 149.629 Acres of Land Located on the North Side of I -270, from Dublin- Bellepoint Road (State Route 745) on the East to Coffman Road on the West, from: PUD, Planned Unit Development District to: PUD, Planned Unit Development District. (Revised MclUtrick I -270 Preliminary Development Plan) (Public Hearing) (Applicant: Bethel Road Investment Co. and McKitrick Properties Inc., c/o Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, 37 W. Broad Street, Columbus, OH 43215) Registered as proponents of the rezoning were Joe Harian, 7087 Coventry Woods, Drive; Ron Geese, 5964 Brand Road; Ben Hale, 37 W. Broad Street, Columbus; and Dave McKee, 7127 Coventry Woods Drive. Registered as opponents of the rezoning were Claire Wolfe, 5521 Indian Hill Road; Jan Henderson, 5190 Willow Grove Place N.; Lee Grabill, 5242 Willow Grove Place N.; Don Burtanger, 6747 Willow Grove Place E.; Tina Eversole, 5241 Willow Grove Place N.; Jim Fox, 5177 Willow Grove Place S.; Barry Hanks, 6763 Willow Grove Place; Lynn Fox, 5177 Willow Grove Place S.; Randy Roth, 6987 Grandee Cliffs Drive; David Buzzee, 5248 Willow Grove Place S.; and Peg DaCapio, 6679 Willow Grove Lane. Ms. Clarke gave a slide presentation on the rezoning which involves 150 acres along I -270 and is bounded on the east by Dublin Road and by Coffman Road on the west. This land has been zoned for an office park since 1985. The 1985 development text for an office park called for a net density across the site of 10,000 square feet per acre and approximately 1.5 million square feet of proposed office space. This new application increases the density for the area located to the south of the east - west road - a major road proposed from Coffman Road to Dublin Road, with an extension across the Scioto River at the Gockenbach property, and with an extension over to Sawmill Road via several road extensions called for in the Thoroughfare Plan. The road will also be extended to the south and west as the Coffman Road extension south of 33. There are several issues involved with this development: 1. Land set aside along the freeway was constricted, and several small parcels of land are proposed for trade with the school system in order to widen out the area right along the freeway and to slightly realign that proposed road. This is a PUD, and in a PUD the road alignment is actually set. 2. The 1985 plan did little in terms of providing for generalized §tandards of development and providing buffers. The Willow Grove buffer has been renegotiated as a part of this rezoning application. Since the application was filed, Subarea 4, the northwest block of the property will be down -zoned to either single- family or school use for practice fields. 3. This plan incorporates some, but not all of the bike paths shown on the Thoroughfare Plan. It includes a bikepath along the east -west road and one along the Dublin road right -of -way. 4. The City is in a position to facilitate development at this time by using the tax increment financing for the road construction. This roadway will be an important link for Dublin. 5. There are two major users for the development as proposed, one of which is interested in developing a major headquarters to be developed over the next five or so years. 6. In the initial 1985 rezoning, a waiver was granted of the 240 day requirement within which to file the final development plan for at least 20 percent of the property. In this application, the waiver will be requested as well. She then proceeded with a slide presentation of the site and surrounding area, describing the road alignments as well as the five -year capital improvement projects involved with this roadway. 97- 084FDP 5165 Emerald Parkway RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 6 Meeting Held— June 5, 1995 19 She noted that Planning Commission held several work sessions to provide all of the neighbors with a fair hearing of their issues. Planning Commission recommended approval on May 3, '1995 with 22 conditions: 1. That the east -west road and the bridge over the Indian Run be designed with maximum sensitivity to the neighboring residential environment and with input from the neighborhood representatives; 2. That the east -west road and the bridge over the Indian Run be designed to mitigate noise pollution; 3. That the design of the east -west road and bridge over the Indian Run be subject to the approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission; She noted that in this case, the city is in fact the developer of the road and thus will be subject to the same criteria as any other developer. 4. That an appropriate buffer /landscaping treatment along the east -west road be submitted in conjunction with #3 above, subject to approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission; 5. That an innovative design standard and landscape plan be established along the new east -west road; 6. That a landscape plan that graphically represents the buffering standard along Willow Grove be submitted subject to staff approval; 7. That development standards, including setbacks, utility service and placement, preservation areas, and parkland for the single - family area (Subarea 4) be established at the time of preliminary plat; 8. That additional development criteria be established in the text for daycare facilities; 9. That the architectural quality of the proposed office park reflect the standard of development for other existing signature office buildings along 1 -270 in Dublin, such as OCLC and Metro Center; 10. That the commitment to handle and detain storm water from Willow Grove continue to be honored; 11. That right -0f - -way be dedicated for Dublin Road (40 feet from centerline) and the east -west road (100 feet wide) with additional right -of -way provided at the intersections consistent with the findings of the area traffic impact study prepared by Burgess and Niple; 12. That adequate right -of -way for easements be dedicated to include any additional roadside mounding (designed with a mowable slope); 13. That a tree preservation plan and conceptual plan be submitted prior to filing a final development plan for any treed portion of the site that outlines standards for development, including utility placement, sets preservation zones and provides appropriate development standards for all phases of construction for wooded areas located along the Indian Run and existing tree rows, it being understood that the developer will be allowed to locate buildings, parking, access driveways, and related amenities within the existing treed area consistent with a tree preservation plan that preserves the natural beauty of the site, subject to staff approval; 14. That the ravine be properly protected by environmentally sensitive site design(s) and limitation on grading, and by utilization of appropriate construction practices during all phases of construction, in accordance with a staff approved preservation plan; 15. That the cemetery be established as a no -build zone and be appropriately preserved; 16. That parking to facilitate use of the existing public park within the development be resolved at final development plan review and should it be located south of the road, it may be established by revokable license; 17. That bikepaths be provided along the east -west road and Dublin Road frontages consistent with the Community Plan; 18. That the plan and text be modified as appropriate prior to the pubic hearing at City Council; 19. That the applicant submit a finalized legal description for the acreage to be rezoned for inclusion in the rezoning ordinance; 20. That the use of Subarea 4 to the west of the Indian Rim be limited to playing and practice fields and parks, with any proposed lighting to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission; 21. That buildings in Subarea 2 shall be limited to a maximum five -story height (plus mechanicals) limit, that buildings shall be limited to 80 feet in height at the minimum setback lines, and that buildings exceeding 80 feet in height shall be set back an additional two feet for each additional one foot in building height; and 22. That buildings in Subarea I shall be limited to a maximum four -story height (plus mechanicals) limit, that buildings shall be limited to 56 feet in height at the minimum setback lines, and that buildings exceeding 56 feet in height shall be set back an additional two feet for each additional one foot in building height. 97- 084FDP 5165 Emerald Parkway RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 7 Held June 5, 1995 19 Regarding conditions 21 and 22, Ms. Clarke noted that the neighbors of areas to the north and south were concerned about the heights of buildings in comparison to their own residences. The Willow Grove neighbors are still dissatisfied with Condition 22 as drafted. The Planning Commission felt that the City must take an extremely aggressive role in terms of providing an adequate network of roads to support this development scheduled to begin this year. At their May 4 meeting, a second motion was made as follows: Upon consideration of the new traffic generated by the development of the McKitrick property, the Planning and Zoning Commission strongly recommends that Council place a high priority on the following five traffic network issues: 1. The capacity and potential for expansion of the two lane Post Road bridge over I -270 should be sufficiently studied; 2. The connector road through the McKitrick property should be constructed between Dublin Road and Coffman Road as one project, not in segments. This connector road should be designed and installed in its final form, preferably as a four - lane boulevarded street with a landscaped median; 3. The east -west road project should include adequate upgrades to the intersections created at Coffman Road and at Dublin Road; 4. Dublin Road should be preserved and protected as a scenic collector. This includes minimizing any necessary widening of this road to the greatest extent possible; and 5. That funding will be provided for the two bridges (one over the Scioto and the other over SR 161) within the current five -year C.I.P. The Planning Commission approved that motion with a vote of 5 -0-1. Ms. Clarke also noted that a consistent look for the streetscape all the way from Dublin Road to Coffman can be achieved with this development, setting the standard for future development on the road as it extends both to the east and to the southwest. In consideration of this, staff believes that improvement of the landscaping along 270 over the basic Code requirements would be desirable. She noted that a couple of pieces of property are being traded with the school system to align the roadway. There is still concern by school officials about the need for a substantial barrier between sports fields and the new road. Mrs. King asked whether information is available about the estimated traffic counts for this 6,000 foot roadway expanse at five and ten year intervals and about differences in traffic generated from single - family development versus office development in Subarea 4. Ms. Clarke responded that the 2020 figure is in the low 20,000 car per day range. The single- family zoning for Subarea 4 will generate about 750 cars per day versus 6,000 per day for office use at 10,000 square ft. per acre density. Mrs. Boring expressed concern about the intersection of 745 and the new connector and taking additional traffic to an already "gridlocked" area. She also has concerns about the residents of Shannon Park and their ability to access Coffman Road. Mr. Kindra then introduced Jim Dippel, Project Engineer from Burgess & Niple who showed diagrams of the alignment of the east -west road and provided background information on the development of the present alignment. The roadway was tied into the municipal building entrance due to the Community Center entranceway at this location and to avoid encouraging through traffic into the existing local residential area of Shannon Park. He describe¢ the road cut which benefits Coventry Woods in terms of noise abatement. He showed the typical cross - section for the four -lane boulevard, with two 12 -foot lanes on each side, an 18 -foot median, curbed, with an 8 -foot bikepath on one side and a 5 -foot sidewalk on the other. Phillip L. Hall, Project Engineer. Burgess & Niple presented the McKitrick Site Area Traffic Impact Study to Council. The traffic figures in the report are based on a MORPC traffic network analysis made on April 14, 1995. The report shows figures in the 20,000 range average daily traffic for the connector road for year 2020. For the Post Road bridge, traffic in the year 2020 is not estimated to increase substantially due to the alternative routes which will be available at that time. Generally speaking, in 2020 there will be five lanes at the intersections with left turn lanes and two through lanes. At 745 and Dublin Road, there will be 5 lanes in every direction, but it will require an additional turning lane on the bridge west bound. Mr. Foegler noted that the 5 lanes north and south on 745 at the intersection would be consistent with the graphics presented to Council with the Scioto bridge analysis in 1990. 1 97-084FDP 5165 Emerald Parkway Minutes of RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin City Council Meeting Page 8 Held June 5, 1995 19 Meeting Ige vino chi. Bur$ Ni le gave a brief presentation regarding the Noise Predicted Model for die McKitrick site between Coffman Road and SR 745. This was based on the design year 2020 noise levels and traffic produced according to MORPC predictions. Based on die noise abatement criteria designed by the Federal Highway Administration which states that a decibel level exceeding 67 will be an excessive traffic noise impact, all of the receivers studied for this area do not exceed the 67 decibels. The highest level was at the high school at 62.5 decibels and the lowest reading was south of Lytfield Drive at 50.7 decibels. The study was strictly based on the alignment shown, with depression cuts into the earth, and a noise conscientious bridge. The traffic noise impact can be lessened with mounds or small noise walls. Mayor Campbell asked about the sound impact from I -270. Mr. Ginocchi responded that they did no study on the existing noise, but only on future noise levels. In response to Mrs. Boring, Mr. Ginocchi stated that moving the road north 100 to 120 feet from the Willow Grove area could lessen the noise impact by approximately 3 to 5 decibels. In response to Mr. Strip, Mr. Ginocchi commented that mounding would lessen noise impact, but only lengthy lots of trees would have the same lessening impact. Mrs. Boring commented that the noise impact study is not totally accurate since it does not take into consideration the existing noise at 270. Mayor Campbell stated that the testimony from those in favor of and those opposed to the rezoning would now be taken. He offered to allow the applicant 10 minutes to summarize and a representative of the opposition to summarize. All of the others who testify would have five minutes to speak and the clerk will keep the time. Joe Harian. 7087 Coventry N oods Drive stated that David McKee has yielded his time to Mr. Harian to speak. Mr. Harian stated that he is co -chair of the committee representing Coventry Woods. He read a statement into the record describing the requests of the residents. A copy is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. Ron Geese. 5964 Brand Road stated that he supports this application. Ile has observed through the Planning & Zoning process that the developer has made many changes in the plan to accommodate the residents. He was a member of Planning Commission at the time the Coventry Woods zoning was approved, and it was understood by the future residents at the time that the property to the south would be developed as office use. He also noted that his family has a long history in Dublin, yet is willing to accept change in the future for Dublin. This development represents a great financial opportunity for the City. As a businessman, he believes Cardinal Health is a high quality company and that any suburban City would welcome the corporate headquarters to their community. There will be benefits to the City in terms of income tax, in terms of retention of an $8 billion corporation for many years to come, and because of the high quality level of this development without bringing the additional burden to the schools as would residential development. He urges Council to vote in favor of this ordinance which is very important for the future of Dublin. Ben Hale, 37 W. Broad Street, representing the applicant, gave a brief history of the zoning of this property. The site is located across the freeway from the corporate park of OCLC, and it was always their dream that a major user would come to the City to purchase this property. When this was rezoned in 1984, they were hopeful that a user would be found within two to three years: Until the Alter group and Cardinal Health came along, there was no prospective user for the site. Dublin has a great opportunity with this proposed development. It will provide an aesthetically pleasing entry to Dublin along 270. When the original rezoning was approved in 1984 with a cul-de -sac entry, a requirement was that if Dublin made a decision to take a road through the site, the developer would have to comply. Also since 1984, Coventry Woods was developed north of this site. They have worked with both the Coventry Woods and Willow Grove neighbors to address their concerns. He emphasized that they do not control the road, the City of Dublin controls it. He believes that they have come to a reasonable compromise with the neighbors. This development is the result of a 10 -year cooperative effort with the school system and the community to preserve this site as an economic development opportunity for the City. Dave McKee, Coventry Woods Drive was called but did not testify. Mayor Campbell then called forward those who signed in to testify in opposition to the rezoning. 11 Claire Wolfe. 5521 Indian Hill Road, River Forest stated that she has lived at this location for over 97- 084FDP 5165 Emerald Parkway RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 9 Meetin June 5, 1995 19 22 years. She has written letters to Council expressing her concerns with this rezoning. Her concerns are as follows: 1. She has concerns about taking the east -west connector road into 745, a scenic two -lane road. Her definition of "scenic road" does not include a five lane intersection. The traffic congestion on Dublin Road will continue to increase with the development north on 745 and by bringing the Sawmill Road traffic over to 745 in this location. She believes that traffic studies are needed to determine the impact on 745. 2. Every Council for the past 22 years has committed to no commercial access on 745, and this plan will empty commercial development onto 745. The cul-de -sac in the previous office plan for this site was designed so that the park did not empty onto 745. 3. She is asking that the east -west bridge be extended over 745 to continue onto the connector. This avoids building 5 lanes, avoids blasting 25 feet through bedrock, and does not add traffic onto 745. Mr. Zawaly noted that the letter Ms. Wolfe had sent to Council was faxed to Mr. Foegler for response, and he is prepared to do so this evening. Mr. Foegler commented that the bridge issue was analyzed as part of the 1988 plan as well as the bridge alignment studies undertaken by the City in 1990. One of the primary purposes of this roadway connector is to provide inner connections to major existing collectors. If the connector does not tie in to Dublin Road, a major traffic benefit will be defeated. The 161/Dublin Road intersection is congested because all of the current east -west movement is funneled to that point. Increasing the bridge span as Ms. Wolfe is suggesting would multiply the cost of the bridge three, four or even five -fold. It would also provide far less traffic benefit in the long term. Jan Henderson. 5190 Willow Grove Place N. stated that Willow Grove residents will have to live with the results of this rezoning. The residents are asking that the road be moved north toward the school. This road will be used as a shortcut between Sawmill and the new mall (at Tuttle Crossing), and no one cares that the road will be within 50 feet of the Willow Grove residents' property lines. The residents will have to live with this situation 365 days a year. The school board is going to recoup some additional land in this transaction and the land could easily be used for a band practice area. The residents of Willow Grove do not want to halt development in Dublin, they want it to be done fairly.. Lee Grabill. 5242 Willow Grove Place N. and Don Burtanger, 6747 Willow Grove Place E. stated that they yield their time to their counsel, Mr. Dunbar. Frank Dunbar, representing Willow Grove residents stated that Council members were fazed a memorandum from the Association on Friday. The memo contains the primary concerns of the Willow Grove residents. He summarized the concerns as follows: 1. The location of the Coffman- Sawmill connector road. 2. Mounding, screening and buffering along the northern property lines of the Willow Grove condominium property. 3. Buffering and screening along the parking areas and building on Subarea 1. He noted that agreement has been reached with the Alter group and McKitrick interests in this regard, although it is not yet reflected in the text. Hopefully, changes can be made in the text between now and the third reading which will be incorporated into the final version which Council approves. 4. There is still uncertainty about the type of buffering, screening and mounding in the Blankenship property area if the roadway is moved to align with Shannon Park as Willow Grove is suggesting. The City of Dublin has control over the outcome of this issue. 5. The big issue is that the developers wanted to move the setback for the parking area 100 feet back from the existing zoning. Willow Grove agreed to a 50 feet setback as a compromise. 6. He believes that the school board can find somewhere else on the 17 -1/2 plus acres for the band practice field. 7. Willow Grove residents are not opposed to the development, but are opposed to the road alignment, the noise and the fumes. Mayor Campbell commented that the school board is a separate entity from the City and the City has no control over the school board decisions about the use of their property. If the road were relocated to the north, the City would not have the justification for taking the Blankenship property for the roadway location. Discussion continued about the effects of moving the road alignment to the north. 97- 084FDP 5165 Emerald Parkway RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 10 Meetin June 5, 1995 Tina Eversole. 5241 Willow Grove Place N. was not present and therefore did not testify. Jim Fox, 5177 Willow __rQv_e Place �, thanked Council and City staff members for attending their recent meetings. He noted that residents have worked out their issues with the developers. The remaining issues must be worked out with the City of Dublin and the school administration. He noted that the City has the right of eminent domain over the school board as the school board has the same right over the city in an issue of higher use for land such as with the band practice field. He noted that Willow Grove is now becoming an island, although the City allowed the Willow Grove rezoning some 15 years ago. They are asking that the City ensure that the connector road is aligned properly and that the stacking lanes are built correctly, and that no one ends up located only 50 feet from that type of road. Barry Hanks, 6763 Willow Grove Place E. read a brief statement regarding his observations about the process. He noted that the concerns of the residents of Coventry Woods have been responded to by the developer. The residents of Willow Grove are well educated business professionals who have chosen to live in multi -unit complexes because it is compatible with their busy lifestyles. He cannot believe that the City of Dublin is unwilling to compromise on the vital issue of the roadway alignment at Coffman Road. They have been told that the high school band must practice in the existing field abutting the road to the north and therefore the roadway cannot be moved to the north. This is unreasonable since the Willow Grove residents will live with the noise pollution and safety problems all year long. The Willow Grove residents ask for more adequate buffering during the first phase of the construction project, and a greater highway offset to their northern border. Everyone needs to compromise in this situation - the school board, the City, the developer and the residents. Frank Dunbar spoke again, stating that the residents are also requesting that a liaison person from the City of Dublin be established to work with Willow Grove. He summarized the concerns again: 1) the roadway alignment adjustment of 120 feet to connect to Shannon Park; 2) noise and pollution; and 3) adequate buffering and screening from the noise and activity of the connector road with a commitment in the text. Lynn Fox. 5177 Willow Grove Place S. was called but did not testify. Randy Roth. 6987 Grandee Cliffs Drive stated that engineer Allen Kundtz is out of town and therefore unable to address Council tonight. His concern is a change in the thoroughfare plan from the way it was understood in 1989 -90. Mr. Roth read a statement (Exhibit B) regarding the importance of maintaining the option of extending Frantz Road north from Bridge Street under I -270 at its bridge over Indian Run to the new cross - Dublin connector. His statement is attached as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. David Buzzee. 5248 Willow Grove Place S. noted that Willow Grove will derive no benefit from the placement of the road but will bear several costs: environmental costs such as noise, exhaust, summer heat; financial cost in terms of property value loss. He added that Willow Grove is a "high profit, low cost" neighborhood to the City of Dublin. He appeals to Council not to fence in their area by four five or six -lane highways. Peg DaCapio. 6679 Willow Grove Lane was called but did not testify. Mayor Campbell announced that the public hearing is now closed, and there will be a third reading at the June 19, 1995 Council meeting. Mrs. King stated that she senses other Council members would like some opportunity to question those who testified this evening. Mr. Kranstuber asked how the agreements reached by Willow Grove can be incorporated into the text prior to the third reading. Could this be drafted at staff level for Council consideration at third reading? Mr. Foegler responded that this could be done by motion of Council calling for incorporation of changes at the time of third reading. If Council desires, staff could be directed this evening to incorporate some of the changes into the text for vote by Council at third reading. He will defer to Ms. Clarke on the position of staff about each of the proposed changes. Mr. Dunbar agreed to provide staff with an outline of the agreements reached with the developer for staffs review and recommendation to Council at the third reading. 97- 084FDP 5165 Emerald Parkway RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page I I Meetin Held June 5, 1995 19 Mr. Kranstuber cautioned that there are three parties involved here - the developer, residents and the City. Staff will have to analyze carefully the proposed changes. Mrs. King noted that she several concerns: 1. She does not want Mr. Harian to leave tonight with the expectation that all points raised in his testimony are acceptable to Council. At this point, they are testimony for consideration. She suggested that the Coventry Woods residents utilize the same process as Willow Grove in providing copies to staff for review. 2. She could support moving the roadway north if it is technically feasible, economically reasonable and if it accomplishes the objectives of ingress and egress for Willow Grove, as well as noise abatement and pollution abatement. Buying the Blankenship property is no guarantee that it would remain green space or buffer. 3. Council needs to hear from the residents of Shannon Park about the road alignment issue. 4. In terms of Mr. Roth's idea about connecting the road underneath 270, there would be environmental problems with placement of a road up a stream valley. 5. There needs to be a commitment in the text to buffering of the road on the north side of Willow Grove. Mrs. Boring stated: 1. She is interested in having the road moved north. 2. She believes there is a mutually agreeable solution regarding Shannon Park which will avoid cut - through traffic. 3. Shannon Park residents should be involved in this process. 4. She would support moving the road to the north and wonders if there is enough Council support to do so. Mrs. Stillwell commented: 1. She, too, would be interested in exploring the feasibility of moving the road to the north. and explore whether this would be feasible. 2. The Shannon Park residents should also be involved in the discussion. Mayor Campbell noted: 1. This new east -west roadway will resolve traffic problems by increasing the opportunity for traffic to flow through alternate roads, bridges and intersections. 2. He has no preconceived notion about the option of moving the road to the north. If the schools and engineers agree, he would have no objection. Ile acknowledged that the school district must protect their interests as well. 3. In terms of the "taking" process with the schools, he is not sure this is feasible or even something that the City would want to be involved in. It would be preferable to resolve this with compromise. 4. He thanked everyone who has made presentations this evening for their professionalism and courtesy throughout the process. Joe Riedel. Planner for Dublin City Schools stated that he has been instructed by the schools to convey a message. This matter has been carefully considered by the Board of Education, by the Athletic Department, the Music Department, the Physical Education Department and by himself. The schools feel obligated to protect the right to have all of the activities take place on their property that are desired by the community at large. This area is not just a band practice field. The schools had been encroaching on Mr. McKitrick's property and using 2 fields which never belonged to the school. As the road is constructed, the schools must give up the use of these fields. Moving the roadway to the north would result in a loss of two more fields. The school board was polled today, and stand unanimous on the earlier commitment to support the design of the road as presented tonight. He added that the residents may wish to address this issue further with the school board. Mr. Strip commented: 1. From Council's standpoint, the road location 100 feet to the north or as proposed is not a major issue, although Council certainly hopes to satisfy as many people as possible with the location chosen. 2. The important consideration is that this proposal is an outstanding development opportunity for the City of Dublin and one that the City must have. Council is committed to making the best deal possible for the City in the negotiations with these users. 3. The City of Dublin has no control over school district issues - only the Board of Education can make those decisions. 4. This development proposal with its income tax contributions will help to lower property 97- 084FDP 5165 Emerald Parkway RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 12 Held June 5, 1995 taxes in the future by providing funding sources for new schools, etc. S. Council and staff will continue to negotiate for the best possible deal for the'City and residents. Mayor Campbell noted that there will be a third reading of the ordinance at the June 19 Council meeting. Ordinance No. 17-94,;, Ordinance Granting a Franchise to Col us Southern Power Company to Cons ct, Maintain and Operate Lines, Appurte ces and Appliances for Conducting El ricity In, Over, Under and Through the Str , Avenues, Alleys and Public Places oft City of Dublin. (Tabled Indefinitely) There no further information on this item. The ordi ce remained tabled. Ordinance No. 33 -95 - An Ordinance AmendipeOrdinance No. 122 -94 to Establish a Fee Schedule for Special Event Services Provi d by the City of Dublin. (Third Reading Tabled until June 19, 1995) Mr. Hansley stated that staff will pr tde the additional information as requested prior to third reading scheduled for June 19. Ordinance No. 21 -95 ended) - An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No -88 (Amended) to Update the Art al Traffic Plan for the City of Dublin. (Third Rea ' g) Mayor Campb stated that staff has requested that this item be tabled tl the July 17 meeting. Mr. Foegl commented that staff is seeking input from Council me rs regarding their comments about iculaz roads where they have specific issues. M . awaly moved to table the ordinance until July 17, 199 . Mrs. Stillwell seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mayor Campbell, yes; Mrs. Ki , yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes. Mr. Zawaly asked for clarification regarding title of the ordinance - are the Arterial Traffic Plan and the Thoroughfare Plan one and the s e document? Mr. Foegler responded that the till on the ordinance is consistent with the language ' the Community Plan. In all other c , it is referred to as the Thoroughfare Plan. In o r to be consistent with the Communi Ian, the ordinance has been titled as such. Ordinance No. 34-95 ended) - An Ordinance Amending Sections 305 (j) and 311.03 of the Dublin Codi d Ordinances to Eliminate References Zineeded es and Play Streets. ('Third Read" Mayor C bell noted that a slight amendment to the languin the third paragraph w here ' should state "Public Services Committee f Dublin and also to delete the 1 age at the end of paragraph 4, "for citizens who use a roadways ". Mrs. Stillwell moved to amend the ordinance as ed. Mr. Strip seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Zawaly, yes; King, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mayor Campbell, y , Mr. Strip, yes. Vote on the ordinance - Mrs. Kin , yes; Mayor Campbell, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. ip, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes. Ordinance No. 35-95,-An Ordinance Declaring Certain City Owngd Pro y as Surplus and Authorizing a City Manager to Dispose of Said }'roperty in A dance with the Ohio Revised Cod ection 721.15. (Second Reading) Ordin me o. 37 -95 - An Ordinance to Amend Chapter 1305 o e Codified Ordinances of �hhr e C' of Dublin, Ohio Relating U► the One, Two and Thr amity Dwelling Code. nd Reading) dinance No. 38 -95 - An Ordinance to Amend Seclio 60.05 of the Codified Ordinances the City of Dublin, Ohio Relating to the Buildi Construction Appeals Board. (S nd Reading) Mayor Campbell noted that Ordinance No. 35- is listed as a consent item. Mrs. Stillwell commented that she sees no on not to treat each of the second r items. There was no objection from Counci embers. 97-084FDP Mrs. Stillwell moved that the sec d reading of Ordinance Nos. 3/37- and that they be held over for third reading. 5165 Emerald Parkway Mrs. King seconded the otion adding that there are no citi RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 5 Meeting Held June 19, 1995 19 'Ordinance No. 20-95 (Amended) - An Ordinance Providing for a Change in Zoning for 152.4071 Acres of Land Located on the North Side of I -270, from Dublin- Bellepoint Road (State Route 745) on the East to Coffman Road on the West, from: PUD, Planned Unit Development District to: PUD, Planned Unit Development District. (Revised McKitrick I -270 Preliminary Development Plan) (Third Reading) (Applicant: Bethel Road Investment Co. and McKitrick Properties Inc., c/o Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, 37 W. Broad Street, Columbus, OH 43215) Ms. Clarke noted that an amended ordinance has been submitted to Council this evening containing the revised acreage and legal description for the 152.4071 acres as well as the revised text dated June 15, 1995 which reflects the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. She reported that the document provided by Mr. Harlan of Coventry Woods has been reviewed by staff and notations added regarding the status of the various items. Mayor Campbell stated that it is important that the commitments made to the residents be reflected in the text in order that they are binding. Following brief discussion, Mr. Foegler offered that if Council wants to strengthen the commitments made by adding them as conditions, that would be within Council's discretion. Ms. Clarke noted that most of the remaining issues would be addressed at the time of preliminary plat, but Council has the option of adding them as conditions at this time. She added that a condition of the rezoning is that the design of the road is to be reviewed by Planning Commission to assure that it is designed in a manner compatible with the residential neighbors. The burden is on the City as the developer of the road to prove to the Commission that all reasonable efforts have been taken to mitigate the noise and to make it aesthetically pleasing. Ms. Clarke also reported that an outstanding issue remains with Willow Grove regarding buffering. The residents have requested some typ6 of a six-foot high buffer between their property and the roadway. The difficulty is that this zoning application applies to 152 acres, and the Blankenship property is not part of the rezoning document. The City has hired a consultant to design this buffer and the schematic is before Council this evening. The residents have responded positively to the proposal. Mrs. King has an amendment to propose regarding the buffering requirement. Staff is willing to work through the issues involved with acquisition of additional property currently held by Blankenship and design of an appropriate buffer acceptable to the Willow Grove residents. Mrs. King stated that she has drafted a memo to Council regarding a proposed amendment addressing the concerns of Willow Grove residents. Mr. Dunbar has suggested that rather than amending condition number 4, he would suggest that Council adopt his proposal for an amendment to Section 1.08, item 9 in the June 12 text which was contained in his memo to Council dated June 13, 1995. Mrs. King's amendment reads as follows: That the text be amended so that Section 1.08, item 9 of the text be revised to read as follows: After consultation with the Willow Grove neighborhood representatives, the City of Dublin agrees to construct as a part of the construction of the Coffman Sawmill connector road noise mitigating, earth mounding or other landscape buffer treatments north of the property line of Willow Grove and south of the roadway pavement. This buffer treatment shall be not less than 6 feet in elevation above the roadway pavement adjacent to it. She emphasized that approval from Willow Grove would not be required as this is a staff function. Mr. Zawaly seconded the motion and suggested that the attorney representing Willow Grove respond. Ruth Reiss. Tree and Landscape Commission commented that she has provided a memo to Council alerting them to the fact that there is a landmark tree on this property. The Commission would favor buffering, but not so that it would damage the landmark tree. i Frank Dunbar. attorney representing_ Willow Grove residents stated that he agrees with all elements of Mrs. King's motion. He believes that more precise language has been proposed, however, in his June memo to Council. He suggests adding an additional sentence: "If an acceptable landscape buffering plan cannot be agreed to by Willow Grove and the City of Dublin, the Planning and II Zoning Commission shall then determine the final and acceptable landscape buffering treatment." Mayor Campbell expressed concern that this action would effectively authorize the Planning 97- 084FDP 5165 Emerald Parkway HLUORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 6 Meeting June 19, 1995 Commission to expend City funds, and only Council can do this. Mr. Dunbar suggested that the language be changed to City Council instead of Planning Commission. Mayor Campbell proposed that language be added to include, "subject to review by Council if necessary." This would resolve any dispute between staff and Willow Grove residents. Mrs. King then revised her motion to reads as follows: That the following language be substituted for Section 1.08 item 9 of the text of the McKitrick rezoning. That after consultation with Willow Grove neighborhood representatives and subject to review by City Council if necessary, the City of Dublin agrees to construct as a part of the construction of the Coffman- Sawmill connector road noise mitigating, earth mounding or other landscaping buffering treatment north of the property line of Willow Grove and Willow Grove Condominium Association and between the Willow Grove condominium and the pavement of the east -west connector road. This buffer treatment shall be not less than 6 feet in elevation above the roadway pavement adjacent to it. Mr. Zawaly accepted the revisions. Vote on the revised motion - Mr. Strip, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes. Ms. Clarke requested that Council amend the legislation to include the revisions submitted with the ordinance in Thursday's packet. Mr. Zawaly so moved. Mrs. Stillwell seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Strip, yes; MA. Boring, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes. Mrs. Boring thanked the residents for their input in the process. She has concerns about the Thoroughfare Plan in terms of adopting this zoning and the assumptions for the future made within the rezoning. She asked about the status of the previously proposed connector road to the south and whether any right -of -way is being set aside for this purpose. Mr. Foegler responded that he and the City Engineer met with Doyle Clear regarding the history of this issue and the analysis which had been done. Mr. Clear indicated that this had been previously explored in an effort to provide access to the site prior to the bridge proposal, the Coffman Road widening, and Perimeter extension. ODOT was receptive to the notion that physically, this three -lane structure could fit under the 270 bridge over the north fork of the Indian Run. But no detailed feasibility work was ever performed for this project. There are also considerations, as Mrs. King has noted, regarding the environmental impact of construction through this scenic corridor. A full traffic analysis of its impacts was never done, and it was not incorporated into the adopted Thoroughfare Plan in 1988. Staff therefore believes that it would be inappropriate to incorporate this as a condition of this rezoning. Discussion followed about the impacts of this roadway on the location and alignment of roadways to the east and west. Mr. Foegler emphasized that the storage lanes required at the intersection with Dublin Road are consistent with the policies of Council to preserve the carrying capacity of the roadway. He doesn't believe this is inconsistent with Council's goal of preserving the scenic collector character of Dublin Road. He added that Burgess & Niple had done preliminary work in response to the proposal of a bridge overpass on Dublin Road. Given the length of the span, it would effectively double the cost of the Scioto bridge which is currently estimated at $6 million. This overpass would also compound the traffic problems at the 161 bridge. Mrs. Boring summarized that her concerns are with the roadway system established with this rezoning and how it will impact the entire city. She would have preferred taking more time with these issues via the Thoroughfare Plan update. i i Mayor Campbell commented that: I 1. The bridge location was determined five years ago after months of study and was based upon expert testimony regarding the benefits of the location. 97_084FDP 5165 Emerald Parkway RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 7 Held June 19, 1995 19 2. The road for this particular site opens up valuable, income- producing land, provides attractive freeway frontage, and allows the residents to the north a significant buffer from the business use. Council is also committed to mitigating the impact to the Willow Grove residents. 3. There has been some implication that Council believes the Dublin schools are not cooperating in resolving some of the issues of this rezoning. This is false. The schools have agreed to land trades while looking out for their interests as well. 4. The City and the schools have worked together on this project which will benefit the citizens of Dublin and the Dublin Schools. Mr. Strip added that the Dublin Schools have worked hard to resolve the issues and met late today to see if an option was viable to move the roadway to the north while not compromising the safety of their playing fields. Mrs. King noted that: 1. Coventry Woods residents are now comfortable with the fact that most all of their issues have been addressed within the text or conditions, or will be dealt with at an appropriate point in the plat approval process. The only issue not addressed which is also of concern to Willow Grove residents is the noise pollution issue. She noted that a number of Council members have expressed an interest in a noise control ordinance and she pledges to Council and the public that a noise control ordinance will be proposed for public discussion before the end of the year. 2. She thanked the staff, the applicants and the residents for their hard work in this consensus building effort. 3. She believes a commitment is still needed that the City will acquire the Blankenship property which she believes is essential for construction of the road. Mr. Smith suggested that this be done by separate motion and not as a condition of the rezoning. A separate motion directing staff to takd action to acquire this property would be appropriate. 4. She suggests that Council reaffirm as a part of this process the commitment to keep 745 as a scenic collector and minimize any necessary widening to no more than four lanes at the intersection of 745 and the connector road. Mrs. Boring suggested that State Route 257 be included in this reaffirmation. Mrs. King stated that she is not willing to restrict S.R. 257 to four lanes. Mr. Foegler noted that Riverside Drive is at least a minor arterial and not designated as a scenic collector. 5. Mrs. King added that this rezoning represents a tremendous asset being brought to the City and is important economically as well as from a transportation standpoint. Mr. Zawaly commented as follows: 1. Congratulations to the staff, to the residents who participated in the process, to the applicant, and to the Planning Commission members who have worked very hard in extra sessions on this particular rezoning. 2. This rezoning brings quality economic development to Dublin to help ensure a balanced tax base in the future, and paves the way for Cardinal Health to build their corporate headquarters in Dublin. Mrs. Boring noted that economic development does not come without a cost - it brings children into the school system and a greater demand on City services. Many long -time residents are concerned about losing the sense of community as it presently exists. Mrs. Stillwell commented that consensus requires compromise and communication, and it is a tribute to all involved that they have come to this point this evening. Mayor Campbell noted that approval of this rezoning which will allow the opportunity for high I quality office development will help to assure the economic health of the City of Dublin for decades fl into the future. It also allows the City the opportunity to retain Cardinal Health and at the same time help traffic flow in the City via the road improvements. II it Mr. Zawaly moved to approve the ordinance with the 22 conditions from the Planning Commission. Mr. Strip seconded the motion. Mrs. Stillwell clarified that their motion includes the revised ordinance and text submitted to Council in the June 15 packet. They concurred. 97- 084FDP 5165 Emerald Parkway HLUUKU Uf- PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council Meeting Page 8 Meeting June 19, 1995 19 Vote on the ordinance - Mayor Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes (• ); Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes. (•) Important note: Later in the meeting, Mrs. Boring stated that her "yes" vote was for the revisions to the ordinance submitted in the June 15 packet. She was not aware that the motion included approval of the ordinance as well as the revisions of June 15, 1995. She requested that the �i record be changed to reflect that she voted against Ordinance No. 20 -95. Mr. Foegler stated that Steve Park of the Alter Group would like to address Council. Steve Park. Alter Group thanked everyone involved in this rezoning process and noted that CellularOne will break ground shortly for their new headquarters on this site. The initial building will consist of 120,000 square feet and they hope to build a second phase in the future of another 120,000 square feet. CellularOne is a growth industry, as is Cardinal Health, and one they believe will be an excellent corporate neighbor. i Mrs. King moved that the City staff take steps to acquire the Blankenship property to the north of the Willow Grove condominiums and south of the Dublin- Coffman High School as a part of the east - west connector road construction. Mrs. Stillwell seconded the motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Strip, yes; Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. King, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes. Mrs. King moved that Council reaffirm their intent to preserve Dublin Road as a scenic collector and minimize any unnecessary widening of this road to the greatest extent possible. Mr. Strip seconded the motion. Mrs. Boring moved to amend this motion to include State Route 257 as well. Mr. Strip seconded the motion to amend. Mrs. King accepted the amendment with the clarification that S.R. 257 is not classified as a scenic collector at this time. Mr. Foegler suggested language such as "preserve the scenic character of Riverside Drive ". Mrs. King then clarified that she would accept an amendment to her motion that Dublin Road should be preserved and protected as a scenic collector, and that the scenic character of State Route 257 should be protected and preserved, including minimizing any necessary widening to the greatest extent possible. Mrs. Boring agreed with this clarification. Mr. Strip seconded the amended motion. Vote on the motion - Mr. Zawaly, yes; Mrs. Stillwell, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Strip, yes; Mayor Campbell, yes; Mrs. King, yes. Mrs. Stillwell noted that Planning Commission also approved a second motion regarding five traffic network issues to be addressed. Mr. Zawaly indicated that, for the record, Council is aware of this motion and will take it into consideration during the upcoming capital budget discussions. Mayor Campbell asked that Mr. Zawaly convey to Planning Commission Council's appreciation for the tremendous amount of time spent on this application. He further stated that Council will report back to the Commission regarding their second motion following the capital budget discussions. Mr. Foegler noted that during the next 60 days as part of the commitments relative to development agreements for these projects, Council will be addressing many of Planning Commission's traffic network concerns. Mrs. King requested that staff investigate the landmark tree location noted by Ms. Reiss so that this does not delay the project later in the process. Ms. Reiss commented that the tree is located in the wooded area north of Willow Grove, approximately 20 feet south of where the wooded area ends on the north side. She added that the Commission's concern would be with berming which could kill the root system for this landmark tree. 97- 084FDP 5165 Emerald Parkway