HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-05-2016 Council MinutesRECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes q1 Dublin City �nunrJl _ i1r.nPie
9APREITBFOIHEAS.M»IfN.Ol110 i..i,
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Peterson called the Monday, December 5, 2016 Regular Meeting of Dublin City
Council to order at 6:00 p.m, in Council Chambers at Dublin City Hall.
ROLL CALL
Present were Mayor Peterson, Vice Mayor Reiner, Ms. Alutto, Ms. Amorose Groomes,
Mr. Lecklider and Ms. Salay. (Mr. Keenan arrived late due to flight delay.)
Staff members present were Mr. McDaniel, Ms. Crandall, Ms. Mumma, Ms. Readier,
Ms. Goss, Ms. O'Callaghan, Mr. Rogers, Mr. McCollough, Mr. Earman, Mr. Foegler, Mr.
Papsidero, Mr. Gaines, Mr. Hammersmith, Ms. Gilger, Ms. Richison, Ms. Kennedy, Ms.
Burness, Mr. Ashford, Ms. Gibson, Ms. Rauch, Ms. Burchett, Ms. Wawskiewicz and
Mr. Plouck.
ADJOURNMENT TO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Mayor Peterson moved to adjourn to executive session for conferences with an
attorney for the public body concerning disputes involving the public body that are
the subject of pending or imminent court action and for discussion of the purchase of
property for public purposes.
Vice Mayor Reiner seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes;
Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes. (Mr. Keenan joined the
executive session in progress.)
The meeting was reconvened at 7:10 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mr. Lecklider led the Pledge of Allegiance
PROCLAMATION
Dublin Veterinary Clinic— 50th Anniversary
Mayor Peterson presented a proclamation to Drs. Todd and Brigette Lightell from the
Dublin Veterinary Clinic in recognition of the clinic's 50th anniversary.
They thanked the City for this special acknowledgment and shared some historical
information about the building and practice.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
There were no comments from citizens regarding items not on the agenda.
CONSENT AGENDA
After consultation with the Law Director, Ms. Amorose Groomes stated that she will
abstain from voting on Resolutions 67 -16 and 70 -16.
Ms. Readier stated that these can be voted upon separately from the other items on
the Consent Agenda.
Mayor Peterson moved approval of the remaining eight items on the Consent
Agenda.
Mr. Lecklider seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Ms. Salay, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes;
Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes.
• Approval of Minutes of Council meeting of 11 -21 -16
• Notice to Legislative Authority — New D1 liquor permit for Penny Lane Enterprises
LLC dba Moe's SW Grill, 7000 Hospital Drive, Dublin, OH 43016
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
mutes of _ n tiu„ r•n, Caunril _ Meeting
8PFflT90.bD160.9- DAYIY1N MO ry�p�p�
Held December 5, 2016 Page 2 of 19
• Resolution 63 -16 (Introduction /public hearing /vote)
Requesting the Delaware, Franklin and Union County Auditors to Draw Money
that May Be in the County Treasuries and to Issue a Draft to the Director of
Finance of the City of Dublin for any Money that May be in the Accounts for the
City of Dublin.
• Resolution 64 -16 (Introduction /public hearing /vote)
Accepting the Lowest and Best Bid for the Dublin Community Recreation Center
Cleaning Services and Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Contract for
the Project.
• Resolution 65 -16 (Introduction /public hearing /vote)
Accepting the Lowest and Best Bid for the Smiley Park Shared -Use Path and
Discovery Boulevard/Wall Street Shared -Use Path Project.
• Resolution 66 -16 (Introduction /public hearing /vote)
Accepting the Lowest and Best Bid for the Tunnel Improvements — Carnoustie
Drive at Preston Mill Way Project.
• Resolution 68 -16 (Introduction /public hearing /vote)
Accepting the Lowest and Best Bid for the 2017 South Landscape Maintenance,
and Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Contract for the Project.
• Resolution 69 -16 (Introduction /public hearing /vote)
Accepting the Lowest and Best Bid for the 2017 Facilities Landscape Maintenance,
and Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Contract for the Project.
Mayor Peterson moved approval of Resolutions 67 -16 and 70 -16.
Vice Mayor Reiner seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Mr,
Keenan, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, abstain.
• Resolution 67 -16 (Introduction /public hearing /vote)
Accepting the Lowest and Best Bid for the 2017 North Landscape Maintenance,
and Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Contract for the Project.
• Resolution 70 -16 (Introduction /public hearing /vote)
Accepting the Lowest and Best Bid for the 2017 Muirfield Landscape Maintenance,
and Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Contract for the Project.
OTHER
Appeal re. Charles Penzone Grand Salon
Ms. Burchett stated that Council's consideration tonight is to affirm, reverse or
otherwise modify a decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their
October 13, 2016 meeting. The appeal is of a condition of approval for a site plan
review to satisfy a requirement of the site zoning district.
• The existing Charles Penzone Salon is located on the same parcel to the north
of the proposed structure. Dublin Village center is located to the east and the
Greystone Mews subdivision is to the west. The site plan shows a 12,600
square -foot salon and parking plan.
• The Bridge Street District requirements based on the street network
framework require the site to accommodate a future neighborhood street.
Staff has conditioned the approval of the site plan on the accommodation of
this neighborhood street right -of -way.
• The appeal is specifically related to the condition that the applicant work with
staff to determine a location of a neighborhood street dedication at no cost to
the City. The applicant has filed an appeal to waive this requirement. The
Planning and Zoning Commission did not have the authority to remove the
requirement of the Bridge Street Code and therefore, they approved the
project with the noted condition. City Council is the only body with the
authority to remove the requirement of the Code.
Minutes
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Dublin City rhi mr i Meeting
December 5, 2016 Page 3 of 19
One of the primary objectives of the Bridge Street District is that it be
walkable. The Street District Map identifies the connectivity and different
levels of relationships between the streets. On the east side of the river, the
grid shows only Tuller Road and 161, which are already in place. The Bridge
Street District plan shows that there is a potential of nine routes being
constructed, but it will be done in a way to preserve the comfort level of
pedestrians and bicyclists. If there is a permanent interruption in the grid, it
Will burden the other routes. It will take time to see all streets develop and
see it in place, but each link must be built with the walkable community in
mind.
City Council has the authority to: affirm the decision of the Planning and
Zoning Commission's approval, which would include the right -of -way
dedication for the neighborhood street; reverse the decision of the Planning
and Zoning Commission, which would require the applicant to file a new site
plan review application; or modify the decision of the Planning and Zoning
Commission to eliminate the condition of the requirement of the right -of -way,
which would include directing staff to revise the street network map within the
Bridge Street Zoning Code to eliminate the neighborhood street requirement
for this site.
Ms. Salay asked for clarification regarding an illustration that was provided.
Ms. Burchett responded that the street drawing illustration was hypothetical and that
there was nothing prohibiting any other connections at this time.
[Mayor Peterson administered the adjudicatory swearing in of those in attendance
who desired to testify on the appeal issue.]
Rob Rishell, 300E Broad St.. Columbus, Attorney and Development Consultant for
Charles Penzone Salons, stated that with tonight to respond to any questions are
Charles Penzone, Founder; Debra Penzone, President; Matt Dunlap, Chief Operating
Officer; Chris Myers, Project Architect; Jared Kem, Capital Equities; and Steve Cutler,
Attorney.
• Mr. Rishell stated that Charles Penzone has been operating in Dublin for over
25 years. The condition that is the subject of the appeal was added late in
the review process and the company has been vocal in their opposition to it.
At the request of the applicant, the Planning and Zoning Commission did
unanimously approve a motion urging the applicant to appeal to Council.
There was a very strong negative reaction to the condition by the Commission
members.
• The company does still contend that the Planning and Zoning Commission did
have the authority to waive the requirement, but out of respect for the
process, they have directed this appeal to City Council.
• The site plan review process did find this project to support the concept of
walkable urbanism.
Charles Penzone stated that the company was founded in 1969. Mr. Penzone
illustrated the parking needs of the Dublin salon, both past and present. He does not
believe he can give up the parking spaces needed for the dedication of a street.
Roger Ansel 4232 Hobbs Landing Drive West. Dublin stated that he has lived in
Greystone Mews subdivision for eight years. The definition for "Mews" is a hideaway
or retreat. Within the subdivision, there are 132 condominiums valued at over $40
million, and residents pay over a million dollars in property taxes. There are 200
voters living in Greystone Mews. It is already a walkable community. There are
three existing entrances into the area, and he does not believe another is needed.
Minutes
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
December 5, 2016 Page 4 of 19
Ms. Alutto inquired about what view Mr. Ansel has of the salon from his property and
Mr. Ansel pointed out his property on the map.
Jenni DiPaolo. 6713 Hobbs Landing Drive East. Dublin stated that she is the original
owner of her unit, which she purchased in 2011. She was told at that time that the
green space in front of her condominium would remain into the future. As shown on
the street network slide, the proposed street would dead-end into her front yard and
cause headlights to shine in her front windows. She pays taxes in Dublin, not for the
School District per se, but for the safety services. This planned connection would
cause her to move, and she urged Council not to allow the street to be built.
Mr. Lecklider pointed out that Ms. DiPaolo was likely informed by the builder /seller of
her unit that the green space in front of her home would remain open space in
perpetuity. No one from the City would have made this statement.
Shelly Schwartz. 6705 Hobbs Landing Drive East. Dublin stated that her
neighborhood has endured a spring /summer of violent crime where fences were
climbed and windows broken. She is investing in a security system. If the required
road is built, it will invite more people into her neighborhood and she will move. At
the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, it was referred to by those opposed to
it as a "road to nowhere."
Bill Fullarton 4223 Tuller Ridge Drive. Dublin stated that he has lived in Dublin since
2009. He asked about the origin of this connection concept and why it is needed.
Designing a street grid for the future seems to be the responsible thing to do, but it
also seems reasonable to adjust or revise it as circumstances change. He cannot
understand why the connection is needed and why money needs to be spent to
create this roadway between Village Parkway and Hobbs Landing East. He added that
he recalls that Dublin was voted as one of the top Intelligent Communities, and he is
counting on Council to continue that and vote this down!
Mr. Lecklider stated that although he is willing to listen to more testimony, and
although he is not certain of his colleagues' position on this matter, he would support
a motion to modify the previous decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Mayor Peterson agreed, noting that the plans are designed in somewhat of a
"vacuum" and in this situation, a retrofit of an existing neighborhood is involved.
Mayor Peterson moved to modify the decision of the Planning and Zoning
Commission, eliminating the condition for the future neighborhood street right -of-
way and directing staff to revise the network map to eliminate that neighborhood
street connection for that site for the future.
Ms. Alutto seconded the motion.
Mr. Lecklider asked everyone to appreciate the situation Council is in with regard to
this grid street system. With reference to the speaker who mentioned the statement
about a "road to nowhere" — clearly, there is resistance to complying with the future
street grid to the east. Further, Mr. Lecklider noted that although he, personally, is
in favor of granting an exception to the Code in this case, Council is in a difficult
position. When everything is an exception to the rule, there will not be a grid street
system in the end. Years of thought has gone into the grid street concept in the
Bridge Street District, and therefore he wants to reserve all rights to otherwise
maintain the grid street system going forward in all other locations shown on the
City's plans. If everything is an exception, then there is not a rule.
Ms. Alutto agreed with Mr. Lecklider that managing by exception is never a good
idea; however, the Bridge Street Code was a form -based code imposed on the
existing businesses and residents in the area. When retrofitting an area, what is
Minutes
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
December 5, 2016 Page 5 of 19
encountered cannot always be anticipated. She agrees that the Code should be
maintained as best as is possible, with the understanding that these types of
exceptions do occur from time to time. It is important to consider the impacts of the
Code on the residents and businesses. An exception must truly be warranted.
In response to Mr. Lecklider's question about the Commission's discussion, Ms. Salay
stated that the Commission discussed not necessarily doing away with the connection
but instead taking the auto portion out and leaving a bicycle path in place. She, too,
is in favor of granting the waiver, but wants to make sure that no precedent is
created. She does not believe there are other owner- occupied neighborhoods in this
grid system. This is the exception she is willing to make for existing homeowners in
an existing neighborhood that is heavily impacted by this retrofit. Perhaps a bikeway
or pedestrian path could be explored. She would support finding a solution to the
connectivity that would benefit Penzone's, the Bridge Street District and future
development in Dublin Village Center.
Ms. Amorose Groomes stated she would not support a pedestrian path coming into
that area because there is no clear way to get out. In order to move through the
neighborhood, either north or south, the distance is the same.
Mr. Keenan asked Chief von Eckartsberg to provide follow -up regarding the criminal
activity that was alluded to in earlier testimony.
Vote on the motion: Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Mr.
Keenan, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes.
SECOND READING /PUBLIC HEARING — ORDINANCES
Ordinance 51 -16
Amending Section 2 (Wage & Salary Structure/Administration) of
Ordinance No. 73 -06 ( "Compensation Plan for Non -Union Personnel").
Mr. McDaniel stated that this Ordinance amends the compensation plan to establish
new positions for Information Technology and Engineering in accordance with the
approved 2017 Operating Budget.
Vote on the Ordinance: Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor
Peterson, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes.
Ordinance 52 -16
Appropriating a 0.078 -Acre, More or Less, Permanent Easement from 495
Metro Place LLC, Located on Metro Place South, for the Public Purpose of
Constructing a Public Shared -Use Path and Related Improvements.
Mr. McDaniel stated there are no changes to this Ordinance since the first reading.
Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms.
Amorose Groomes, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes.
Ordinance 53 -16
Appropriating a 0.180 -acre, More or Less, Permanent Easement from
Westpointe Metro Lakes SPE, LLC, Located at 485 Metro Place South, for
the Public Purpose of Constructing a Public Shared -Use Path and Related
Improvements.
Mr. McDaniel stated there are no changes to this Ordinance since the first reading.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of NHM City Cni inrol _ Meeting
BARIIEI'1'90.1YIlIFA9- GAYtON, 01110 fwm Mal
Held
December 5, 2016 Page 6 of 19
Vote on the Ordinance: Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms.
Alutto, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan,
yes.
Ordinance 54- 16(Amended)
Amending the Annual Appropriations Ordinance for the Fiscal Year Ending
December 31, 2016.
Ms. Mumma stated that at the first reading, she indicated there was a possibility that
this Ordinance would need to be amended, and that is the case.
There are two items to highlight, as detailed in the staff memo.
1. The first is a revised Section 12, which supplementally appropriates $20
million within the Upper Metro TIF. The City entered into a state
infrastructure bank loan for the construction of the interchange. Despite the
fact that the City does not actually facilitate the payments of that loan as the
State is handling the payments, from an accounting perspective, the City is
required to show the expenditures and revenues that are paid on its behalf.
2. The second item relates to advances. Throughout the course of the year, a
number of the City's Capital Improvement Projects that are approved by
Council are actually funded by means of an advance from the General Fund or
the Capital Improvement Tax Fund. These items are both discussed during
the operating budget process, but the City's auditors recommended having a
more formal Council approval process. Therefore, looking forward to 2017,
these advances are budgeted in the Appropriation ordinance.
Ms. Amorose Groomes asked about the information stating that the City has
expended 125 percent of the 2016 budget for remittance of hotel -motel tax to the
DCVB. Is it possible to have the balances of the various funds available on an
ongoing basis so that Council could have a better sense of their status?
Following brief discussion, Ms. Mumma stated that she would provide Council a fund
balance report in conjunction with the monthly financials.
Vote on the Ordinance: Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes,
yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes.
Ordinance 55 -16
Approving Ohio University's Framework Plan for its Dublin Campus. (16-
093ADM)
Mr. McDaniel stated there are no changes to this Ordinance since the first reading.
He thanked Ohio University and their efforts on public engagement and
presentations. He also thanked them for their ongoing partnership.
Vote on the Ordinance: Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes;
Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes.
Ordinance 56 -16
Establishing Appropriations Based on the 2017 Operating Budget of the
City of Dublin, State of Ohio, for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2017.
Ms. Mumma stated that there are no changes from the first reading of this
Ordinance.
Vote on the Ordinance: Ms. Alutto, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor
Peterson, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Duhlin City COLInCII Meeting
Held December 5, 2016 Page 7 of 19
Ordinance 57 -16
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Development Agreement and
Other Necessary Documents with the Columbus Metropolitan Library
("CML") to Facilitate the Building of a Parking Garage, Library and
Adjacent Streets on the Current Library Site in the Historic District.
Mayor Peterson moved to postpone action on Ordinance 57 -16 until the January 10,
2017 meeting.
Vice Mayor Reiner seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor
Peterson, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes.
Ms. Amorose Groomes pointed out a few typographical errors in the documents
related to the abbreviation for Dublin City Schools and asked that these be corrected.
Ordinance 58 -16
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Real Estate and Transfer of
Property Agreement and Other Necessary Documents with the Dublin City
School District ( "DCSD ") to Facilitate the Building of a Parking Garage,
Library and Adjacent Streets on the Current Library Site in the Historic
District.
Mr. Foegler stated that a question was raised at the first reading about how Franklin
Street proceeded from North Street down to S.R. 161. A graphic has been
distributed tonight that provides that detail. The agreement with the School District is
able to move forward at this time because the language in the agreement has
contemplated both scenarios of the Library project moving forward as well as the
possibility of it not moving forward. Procuring the land needed for a future Franklin
Street extension as well as the piece of North Street between Darby and Franklin that
the City does not own is provided for within the agreement. The Dublin Board of
Education has not yet taken action on this agreement, and therefore the agreement
would not be executed by Dublin staff until that action by the Board occurs in the
near future.
Ms. Amorose Groomes stated that she is concerned that Rock Cress is too close in
proximity to the Grounds of Remembrance.
Mayor Peterson stated he was at the Grounds of Remembrance recently and
wondered how a street could be accommodated in that Library area.
Mr. Foegler responded that Council affirmed in July the placement of this road. That
landscape design is being advanced and details will be shared with Council in the
near future. Rock Cress has been moved south as far as possible. There have been
many sessions with the planners and landscape designers to think through how these
considerations will be dealt with moving forward.
He also noted that the Planning staff has made it very clear to the Library that the
City does not want the north side of the Library building to be viewed as some sort of
"back door" to the building. The same thinking will be applied in relation to the
parking structure. The parking structure will help to bring people into the area due
to elevators that will bring them down to grade at both the cemetery and the
Grounds of Remembrance.
Mr. Keenan stated that the property to the west is also important as things change
and the potential for future development unfolds.
Mayor Peterson invited public testimony
Held
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
- 1 �11 Meeting
December 5, 2016
Page 8 of 19
Jane Fox. 6193 Dublin Road. Dublin. asked Council to consider that in the Historic
Dublin area, it is not just Historic Dublin by its architecture but also Historic Dublin by
its cultural landscape. There are two unique treasures in Historic Dublin -- the
vernacular architecture and the intimate streetscape, as well as wonderful cultural
landscapes that she views as the skeleton to the Historic District -- the Indian Run
Falls and the riverfront. These are cemented into Dublin's history, relating to the
Indians who lived here, river traffic and the quarries. Therefore, how it will be
impacted by the streetscapes and buildings up against them needs to be carefully
considered. Many who walk through the Historic District find a Zen -like peacefulness
by walking the Indian Run ravine or by walking along the riverfront. She noticed that
there is no preservation plan for the City's cultural landscapes and the treasures of
Historic Dublin. Once the cultural landscapes are impacted, there is no going back.
She encouraged Council to be attentive to what they are trying to preserve. It is a
delicate balance — identifying what we have, what we want to keep and cherish,
what Is being done that will impact it — negatively or positively, and what will be
done to make it right.
Ms. Amorose Groomes noted that she has made good points. In looking at Rock
Cress and the creek, they will be very close together. It is a shame to place a
roadway up against the creek. There are options to explore for road placement and
a finite number of natural resources in the community.
Vote on the Ordinance: Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Ms. Salay,
yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes.
INTRODUCTION /FIRST READING — ORDINANCES
Ordinance 59 -16
Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Cooperative Development
Agreement with the City of Marysville and Union County.
Mr. Keenan introduced the ordinance.
Mr. McDaniel stated that this development agreement establishes a water and sewer
boundary. This boundary has been under discussion for several years. The adoption
of the agreement is important, as it will facilitate economic development to create or
preserve jobs and employment opportunities to improve the economic welfare of
Marysville, Union County and Dublin. It delineates the sanitary sewer and water
service areas for Marysville and Dublin. Dialogue continues with these entities to
refine the cooperative development agreement and to assess their willingness in
terms of establishing a boundary. Mr. McDaniel is hopeful to have these discussions
completed by the time of the second reading /public hearing in January.
Mr. Lecklider complimented Mr. McDaniel for the letter sent to Union County and
Marysville summarizing the circumstances and outlining the City's objectives.
There will be a second reading /public hearing at the January 10, 2017 Council
meeting.
INTRODUCTION /PUBLIC HEARING /VOTE — RESOLUTIONS
Resolution 71 -16
Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into an Agreement for the
Establishment of the Northwest 33 Innovation Corridor Council of
Governments.
Mr. Lecklider introduced the resolution.
Mr. McDaniel stated that a Council of Governments (COG) would serve as an
administrative institution created to manage numerous projects of regional interest
and impact, including economic development, infrastructure and services. Another
reason for the establishment of the COG is the recent award of an Advanced
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of D,hrn n04 Q nr6 i Meeting
held
December 5, 2016 Page 9 of 19
Transportation Congestion Management Technology Deployment Grant in the
amount of $5.9 million. The entities involved in the COG would be the City of
Dublin, the City of Marysville, Union County and the Union County Port Authority.
Staff recommends adoption of this Resolution in order to continue a good productive
partnership with the entities along the US 33 Corridor.
Ms. Amorose Groomes asked about any fees or dues related to membership in the
COG.
Mr. McDaniel responded that he does not know the exact cost at this time, but it will
not be substantial, based on his knowledge.
Vote on the Resolution: Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Vice Mayor
Reiner, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms. Salay, yes.
Resolution 72 -16
Authorizing the City Manager to Cooperate and Enter into an Agreement
with the Ohio Department of Transportation for the Logan /Union /Franidin
— Smart Mobility. (PID Number 103719)
Mr. Lecklider introduced the resolution.
Mr. McDaniel stated this is a design /build project of approximately 100 miles of
ground fiber optic lines constructed along two different routes. The first route would
be along U.S. 33 from Dublin to East Liberty, Ohio. The second route would be a
return route along Industrial Parkway. This project is completely funded by the U.S.
Department of Transportation.
Mr. Reiner noted that the only expense is essentially the costs involved with the
connection to the Dublink system.
Mr. McDaniel responded that is correct. It is possible that they will connect to
Dublink, although that is not all finalized at this time. They will be installing a fairly
significant sized fiber optic line, but Dublin will ensure there is such connectivity to
the local data center as well as the GENI rack and the OARNET connectivity that is
critical to make this research and development backbone work.
Vote on the Resolution: Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms.
Amorose Groomes, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes.
OTHER
Basic Plan Review - Riverside Park, Phase 1
Ms. Rauch addressed the process portions of this plan review, noting that Mr. Meyer
of MKSK will review the details of the park, followed by updates from Ms. O'Callaghan
regarding the pedestrian bridge.
Council approved a resolution adopting the Master Plan for the park on May 23,
2016. This Master Plan is the guiding document for the park development on both
sides of the river and is based on extensive collaboration among staff, consultants,
and public input. Tonight, Council is reviewing the first phase. The packet
documents outline the phase one improvements. There was an informal joint review
with the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Architectural Review Board in
November to seek their input and feedback. The general feedback was supportive.
Before Council tonight is the Basic Plan, and staff is seeking guidance in the form of
two motions. The first motion requested is approval of the recommendation from
the Administrative Review Team (ART) with four conditions as outlined in the staff
report; the second motion is to determine who the required reviewing body will be
moving forward. It is Council's discretion per the Code to determine who will review
the subsequent applications for site plan review going forward.
Minutes
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
n ffir„ rit 1t Council Meeting
1U. OAYttMM. f6101
December 5, 2016 Page 10 of 19
Mr. Lecklider asked for an update about the ice rink.
Ms. Rauch responded that, although it could be considered at a later date, it is not
currently included in the plan.
Mr. Meyer presented the park design. A development of the Master Plan included
public input sessions, which indicated the importance of better access to the river
and a desire for increased use of the river. Community input also dictated that the
natural green space and naturalized passive space must be preserved. The east and
west landings of the pedestrian bridge and how they connect to the urban fabric on
either side of the river are also considerations at this stage. The drivers of what is
included in this first phase are support of the pedestrian bridge and some spaces that
are supporting those bridge landings.
The east landing of the pedestrian bridge is likely to be one of the most active areas
because of the gateways to the park. This is where it is anticipated a large amount
of passive use will take place. They are working with Parks and Recreation to
understand what activities would be anticipated in conjunction with this space.
The major features of the east landing space are the pavilion, a small water feature,
and terraces that will take users of the park to upper and lower levels. With regard
to architectural materials, the quality is consistent through the Bridge Street District
and park areas.
• The pavilion is considered to become a centerpiece of the park for activities
and events, provide comfort for users such as restroom area, etc., and will be
a building within a park, not a building that dominates the park.
• The water feature on the east landing will not recreate what exists at
Ballantrae, but will be more of a reach and touch lower waterfall feature
versus a water "play" type feature. It will also be accented with lighting
features.
• The terraces offer a few different approaches. The difference in grade
between Riverside Drive down to the lower path is between 13 to 15 feet.
In response to Ms. Amorose Groomes, Mr. Meyer indicated that the percent slope
varies through the park, but from Riverside Drive where it is flat toward the center of
the park is about a four to five percent slope. The goal is to have the transition in
grade be as smooth as possible from street level to the "heart of the park," meaning
the green space.
Mr. Meyer continued:
• There are two levels of landings with a variety of ways to access the grade
change in the plan to accommodate users' abilities to navigate the park. The
terraces offer a resting place for people to take in the scenery and activities in
the park. There will also be some seating options between the terraces.
• With regard to the ice rink possibilities, there are a number of ways that ice
rinks can be implemented in public spaces. They range from built in place
with all plumbing, refrigeration and railings to a scenario where everything is
brought in and then taken out after winter. The pros and cons were weighed
in the planning process, and it was determined that -- while they did not want
to preclude the possibility of having an ice rink brought in -- the idea of a
permanent ice rink, the maintenance and what it would look like in the off
season was not the best use of the space.
In response to Mr. Keenan's question, Mr. Meyer stated that there are companies
that will lease the equipment needed for an ice rink. Therefore, if an ice rink was
desired in the space for one year, but not the next year, it would be possible.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Dublin City (7m,r4l Meettng
December 5, 2016 Page 11 of 19
Mr. Meyer then presented to Council some illustrations of what is planned on the
park property to date and discussed the grade changes and slope percentages. For
example, approximately 20 -30 feet behind the sidewalk there will be a low wall that
could function as a grade change device, but also as an informal seating in an
amphitheater style.
In response to Mr. Reiner, Mr. Meyer stated that there are two to three acres of lawn
space.
Mr. Reiner asked if additional water features have been considered because of the
river. He thought it would be a great opportunity to showcase another water feature
in that steep slope area by the river.
Mr. Meyer stated that had not been considered, but agreed it was a great idea.
Ms. Amorose Groomes asked what is available from the lower walkway to the water
of the river.
Mr. Meyer responded that they are exploring options for a natural path or some
access to the river on the east side.
In response to Ms. Amorose Groomes' question regarding clearing of the area, Mr.
Meyer stated that there will be selective clearing of invasive plants, but in general,
mature trees will be preserved.
Mr. Meyer continued his presentation of slides and illustrations regarding grade
changes, storage spaces and materials used in keeping with the integrity of Historic
Dublin.
• For the west landing, similar to what was shown on the east side, Historic
Dublin brick will be used for continuity. Sculptural seat walls and plantings are
also being considered for the west side. The approach to the landings on both
the east or west side off the pedestrian bridge will have similar continuity in
railing detail.
Ms. Amorose Groomes inquired about the application submitted for development for
the park. Based on the applicants listed, will the park be City-owned property or
privately owned?
Mr. Foegler stated that Crawford Hoying is still the owner of record of the property
but land transfers will take place as development continues, and it will be a City-
owned park.
Ms. Amorose Groomes asked for more information about the pavilion and the space
behind the glass.
Mr. Meyer stated this area will be open to the public 365 days a year. The space
includes a warming kitchen for public events; restrooms; and an outdoor fireplace.
Ms. Amorose Groomes asked about cleaning and security of the pavilion.
Mr. Earman stated that this facility will be included in the rotation of the normal city
facility cleaning. As for the locking of the facility, it would be on an automatic timed
lock.
Ms. Amorose Groomes stated that she strongly believes that the building should be
stone and not the brick as shown on the plans.
She added that she attended the NLC conference in November and had the
opportunity to tour Schenley Plaza and speak to the person responsible for
programming the park. They discussed the importance of making the park a multi -
generational park. There were permanent structures In place, including a carousel,
coffee shops, and green space in Schenley Plaza, which offered something for
everyone. She would like to see some of the same ideas and activities for everyone
in this new park. She believes that programming planning should be initiated in
order that the activities can be well executed. She does not see enough in the park
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes o/ n hr„ r' *� Council 11
enxaertexanieac- o�nox,
December 5, 2016 Page 12 of 19
to attract different generations of people. She wants to ensure the programing is
age appropriate, engaging, and intentional and that we begin with the end in mind.
Mr. Keenan stated that there were some interactive water activities included in
Homestead Park in Washington Township that were successful, so there is value in
age appropriate interactive water features.
Mr. McDaniel concluded by noting he is seeking clarification regarding some
comments made tonight about finishes, etc. He wants to ensure that the majority is
on board with what has been presented to Council tonight. If there is a desire for
material changes, it would be important to know that now in terms of efficiency in
the process. At this point, not hearing other support for material changes, he
assumes what was presented tonight is acceptable moving forward.
(No further comments were made.)
Mr. McDaniel asked Ms. O'Callaghan to provide a brief update on the pedestrian
bridge prior to Council considering a motion in regard to the Basic Plan Review for
the riverside park.
Ms. O'Callaghan provided an update on the design effort for the pedestrian bridge.
• The design concept remains consistent with what was planned and the tower
height remains at 110 feet above the deck for a total height of 169 feet as
discussed previously.
• The suspended span length remains at 500 feet.
• She shared some updated renderings with Council.
• One aspect of the bridge that has been a challenge moving forward has been
the lighting. Three levels of conceptual lighting were discussed with Council
last summer, and Council selected the intermediate level lighting package.
The intermediate package includes many lighting elements, and the majority
of the elements have been able to be maintained in the planning process.
The lights are LED, color programmable, the walkway is lit, the keyhole is lit,
the pylon base has up lighting and the underside of the bridge also has
lighting.
• Challenges have been encountered, however, with the hanger cable lighting.
There are concerns with the up close appearance of the cables with the
lighting wrapped around it. There are also concerns with the increased
loading of the hanger cable lighting elements. Other options are being
explored, but no solution has been identified yet.
In response to Mr. Keenan, she indicated that the LED diodes on the cable lighting
are one inch in diameter.
Mr. Keenan agreed that other options should be explored. He also mentioned that
discussion was held regarding incorporating some lighting on the State Route 161
bridge in conjunction with the lighting on the new pedestrian bridge. Ms. O'Callaghan
had responded that she was aware of bridges that use these LED diodes on vehicular
bridges. Are these still being considered for the SR 161 bridge?
Ms. O'Callaghan responded that lighting for the SR 161 bridge is on the "radar;' but
planning and design has not begun for that bridge.
Mr. McDaniel stated that he recalls a discussion about the SR 161 bridge lighting, and
assured Council that staff has not forgotten about it.
Ms. O'Callaghan stated that an update will be provided to Council when a solution to
the hanger cable lighting for the pedestrian bridge has been identified.
Regarding the construction budget and schedule, she stated that the construction
budget remains within the budget discussed during the CIP process. Staff is working
toward a 90% design submission by the end of the month, with final construction
documents anticipated in February 2017. Construction is anticipated to begin in the
spring and the pedestrian bridge will be completed in approximately two years.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of _ n hian ra., rmnril 11e,-mr
RARRG NRdI M- DAYMN,011M
Held December 5, 2016 Page 13 of 19
In the October update, Council was informed of staff's desire to use a qualification -
based selection process. Since that time, a Request for Qualifications was sent out
and four bids from construction companies were received last week. Staff is very
pleased with the interest in the project. The proposals are currently being evaluated
and a contractor will be selected.
Mayor Peterson moved approval of the Basic Site Plan for riverside park with the four
conditions as recommended by the Administrative Review Team.
Vice Mayor Reiner seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes;
Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes.
Mayor Peterson moved that the Planning and Zoning Commission be the reviewing
body going forward.
Ms. Readier clarified that the option identified is to have both PZC and ARB be the
reviewing bodies, as both have jurisdiction. However, because of the level of
investment, the fact that it is a City project and the fact that ARB and PZC have
already reviewed the project, staff is recommending that Council retain the final
reviewing body authority for the riverside park.
Mayor Peterson withdrew his motion.
Ms. Amorose Groomes moved that PZC and ARB continue to hold joint reviews and
provide feedback to Council, and that Council retain final reviewing authority.
Ms. Alutto seconded the motion.
Mr. Keenan and Ms. Salay clarified that PZC and ARB will offer input only, achieved
through their joint meetings. Council will be the final determining body.
Vote on the motion: Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes;
Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes.
North High Street Widening and Downtown Dublin Improvements and
Communication Plan Update
Mr. Foegler stated that a lot of attention and focus in terms of construction activity
has been on the east side of the river, with some on the west side. He will give an
overview of what is being initiated in the downtown Dublin area.
Mr. Foegler provided a slide presentation of the improvements scheduled in the
District. The major purpose of this presentation is to provide information about a
construction project ready to begin, which will be most impactful to the area -- the
widening of North High Street. A contemplated roadway system around the library
and parking garage is in the preliminary engineering stage and will move forward
with the development of the parking garage and library. If the development and
engineering process moves as quickly as it could, construction could begin in the fall
of 2017. Under the proposed agreement with the library, the development of the
library, parking garage and roadway will all be done through one construction
manager. The retention wall may need to be moved forward more quickly than the
construction of the bridge due to some of the logistics anticipated with the bridge
construction. Collectively, this project -- including the pedestrian bridge, the
infrastructure, road improvements, public improvements, and private investment --
totals approximately $120 million in this portion of the district. The backbone for all
of this is the reconstruction of North High Street.
Ms. O'Callaghan stated that the North High Street widening project is out to bid. It is
anticipated that legislation to accept a bid will be brought to Council in January.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
mules of fow
vaxerreaarxeu- o�rrou.axio ,..,
December 5, 2016 Page 14 of 19
Beginning in February, North High Street will be completely reconstructed between
North Street and Indian Run Drive. It will be most impactful to local traffic and is
central to all the improvements on the west side of the river. The scope of the work
includes the widening to accommodate a new public roadway intersection at Rock
Cress as well as the extension of North Riverview Street at Indian Run Drive. This
improvement provides access for new private development; new pedestrian
crossings, highlighted with brick pavers to improve the pedestrian and bicycle
experience at those crossing; a median with turn lanes; and on- street parking with
brick pavers as seen in the streetscape features on the other side of the river in the
Bridge Street District. There is also an existing ditch along N. High that will be
eliminated as part of this project. That ditch has been difficult to maintain, so that
will be an improvement as well.
Ms. Amorose Groomes asked her to point out the location of the ditch. She asked if
all of the rock face will be lost to the intersection construction.
Mike Brehm. EMH &T the designer for these improvements stated that there is an
existing concrete path in this general location, with an exposed rock face, a utility
pole and a ditch. As N. High Street is widened to three lanes, the majority of the
widening occurs on the east side to take advantage of the developments occurring
and some of the retaining that naturally occurs with that development. The
southbound right turn at Rock Cress does require some widening on the west side,
and that is all contained within the existing right -of -way of N. High Street. The
existing concrete bikepath, at its current grade, will shift about 10 feet to the west.
Some of that rock face will be filled up against it. The path shifts 10 feet to the west,
so whatever rock face is above the path today would continue to be above the path
and exposed.
Ms. Amorose Groomes recalls when the Fire Department washed the soil clean to
uncover that rock face through there. It is unfortunate that this will be impacted.
Ms. O'Callaghan noted that the standard Historic Dublin brick and lighting will be
incorporated throughout the limits of this widening section as well. In addition to the
widening of the roadway, extensive utility upgrades will be accomplished, including
the next phase of the Historic Dublin overhead utilities burial; a new water main; new
storm sewer; and electrical and telecommunications duct bank. Much of this work is
occurring along North High Street within the limits of the widening being discussed.
There will also be utility work along North Street between North High Street and the
Indian Run parking lot. The work associated with that utility work is planned while
school is on summer break — between June and mid - August.
Ms. Alutto inquired about the length of time the project will require for completion.
Ms. O'Callaghan responded that the duration of the project will be all next year
through November. Of course, all of this is weather dependent.
Mr. Keenan asked if the utility line that is located just to the north could be included
in the project. He stated that the residents of Indian Run are regularly experiencing
power outages.
Ms. O'Callaghan will investigate whether or not that can be included in the project.
Ms. O'Callaghan stated that the water main improvement is a significant
infrastructure Improvement and will provide citywide benefit. She shared an exhibit
that illustrates there are utilities located throughout this roadway for which
accommodation must be made for construction. She shared a map of Dublin's water
service districts. The 24 -inch water main that will be constructed through the N.
High Street widening project is a very significant infrastructure improvement for the
City and provides citywide benefit. This water main serves the Post District, which
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of n hlin City r'n nr'I Meeting
Held December 5, 2016 Page 15 of 19
serves over 50 percent of Dublin's population. She shared exhibits depicting current
conditions of the roadway and surrounding area, which demonstrates the constraints
that must be worked within.
The project does require some modest land acquisition. The exhibit depicts the
temporary acquisitions needed for construction of the project. These primarily
consist of areas for grading and blending the project into the existing land. The
impact to properties owned by 72 High Company, 84 High Company, Columbus
Metropolitan Library and Dublin City School District are outlined on the exhibit, and
staff will continue working with those property owners.
Due to all of the constraints and the narrow widths, the steep slopes, the extensive
utility work occurring within the roadway — all of these constraints result in
accommodating only one lane of traffic during construction. The design team
has spent countless months extensively studying possible maintenance of traffic
scenarios — but the conclusion is it is not feasible to maintain two lanes of traffic.
One lane of traffic will be maintained in the southbound direction throughout a
majority of the duration of the construction, which will begin at the end of
January/early February and continue through November of 2017. The limits of the
one lane in the southbound direction are Indian Run to the north down to North
Street. South of North Street, N. High Street will remain open to traffic in both
directions. The graphic shows one phase of the construction project. Staff is still
working through the details of providing access to the parking and the businesses in
the area. Additional details will be shared in the future. Northbound traffic will have
the newly opened Riverside Drive and roundabout to use during this project, which is
a convenient alternate route for northbound traffic.
There are accommodations for pedestrian and bicyclist connectivity throughout the
project. A communication plan is being prepared to ensure that residents are aware
of the travel limitations well in advance, offered alternate routes, and are well
prepared for the construction Impacts. A communication plan is also being
developed specifically for the businesses that will be impacted during construction.
She described the various communication tools that will be used to share
information.
The project is out to bid and the bid will be awarded in January.
Mr. Keenan asked about a specific communication plan for the Indian Run residents.
He suggested a communication piece be mailed to each of those residents.
Ms. O'Callaghan stated that she will work with Community Relations to provide
something specifically targeted to that group.
Mr. McDaniel added that Ms. Goss met last week with the Historic District stakeholder
group and shared this information. Staff is engaged in a comprehensive
communication plan with all parties affected.
In response to Ms. Alutto's question about whether the City will gain parking with this
project, Ms. O'Callaghan shared a graphic and indicated that the current number of
parking spots will be maintained.
STAFF COMMENTS
Mr. McDaniel:
1. Noted that staff has had a presence at the Statehouse (he referenced
the Legislative Update in the packet) and is monitoring some
significant legislative issues including: S6331, SB235 and some
potential impacts to Home Rule. The newly formed Ohio Mayor's
Alliance and the established Central Ohio Mayors and Managers
Association has helped the City stay on top of these issues.
MJnules
Held
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Dublin City Connctl Afeelmg
December 5, 2016 Page 16 of 19
2. Called attention to memos in the packet regarding the park naming
and recommendations of CSAC.
3. Noted that a legal assessment was provided about regulating medical
marijuana as well as what other cities are doing. A letter arrived today
from Dublin A.C.T. on the same topic. Staff does not believe there is
an urgent need to address this matter, but as policymakers, Council
can certainly make that decision.
4. Pointed out the proposed 2017 Council work session dates and noted
he is looking forward to working with the Administrative Committee on
topics of discussion. He asked that Council members forward any topic
suggestions to him.
S. Stated that 2016 has been a great year! He appreciates Council's
guidance and support, the engagement of the residents and the hard
work of staff. He looks forward to 2016!
Mayor Peterson commented in regard to the park naming, and asked for confirmation
that Council has all of the information submitted to date for the park naming process.
Mr. McDaniel confirmed that is correct.
Mayor Peterson suggested this item be scheduled for the January 10 agenda, unless
there is objection.
Ms. Amorose Groomes asked if Council must select the name from the list of
recommendations. There are some names that were eliminated that she would like
to have considered.
Mr. McDaniel stated that the process is at Council's discretion.
It was the consensus of Council to schedule this Rem for the January 10 agenda.
Mr. McDaniel added that if Council has other suggestions for names, staff can update
the memo to include them for the January 10 packet.
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
Finance Committee
Mr. Keenan. Committee Chair stated that there was a lengthy discussion at the
meeting regarding the Hotel /Motel Tax funding policy. There were discussions
regarding the walking, running, and biking events that involve temporary closure of
roadways. Mr. Keenan referenced a memo prepared by the Finance Director
outlining a policy that would allow the Administration to deny a request for such an
event. While it does not preclude anyone from requesting to hold such an event, the
applicant would be required to undergo the Event Administration process and obtain
permission in order to proceed with their event.
Mr. Lecklider added that discussion took place previously about a charitable
organization that had filed an application for a race event last year and questions
were raised about the City's policy regarding the Memorial Tournament running event
and the City's support. Has there been resolution to the issue?
Mr. Keenan clarified that the policy includes the flexibility to make exceptions as
circumstances may dictate. However, it would mean that this type of an event is not
really within the scope of the hotel /motel tax criteria for funding.
Ms. Mumma added that there are options for an organization to have a hearing
before the Committee or Council if their event permit is denied administratively.
Mr. Keenan stated that the volume of these types of events has increased so
significantly that something needed to be done to address the issue.
Mr. Keenan moved approval of the Finance Committee recommendation to exclude
these types of events from grant eligibility, noting that the Finance Department will
include this exclusion in materials related to the bed tax grant process.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of hlin 0tv Cnuncil Meeting
December 5, 2016 Page 17 of 19
Ms. Alutto seconded the motion.
Vote on the motion: Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes;
Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms. Amorose Groomes, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes.
Mr. Keenan moved approval of the Finance Committee recommendations for 2017
grant awards.
Ms. Alutto seconded the motion.
• Arthritis Foundation Classic Auto Show and Cruise -in — Cost of City services
not to exceed $10,000
• Dublin Kiwanis Frog Jump— Cost of City services not to exceed $5,000
• Dublin A.M. Rotary Blarney Bash — Cost of City services not to exceed $10,000
• Dublin Soccer League Charity Cup — Not to exceed $13,798 as itemized in
grant application
• Club Ohio Soccer — Nike Cup and Fall Classic - Cost of City services not to
exceed $11,000 for the Nike Cup and $2,000 for the Fall Classic
• National Intercollegiate Flying Association: Safecon — $10,000 to assist with
Safecon2017
• Dublin Jerome High School Homecoming Parade (2016 event cancelled, funds
encumbered in 2016) — allow the funds awarded to 2016 to roll over to 2017
• Dublin Youth Athletics — Wayne Williams Memorial Tournament Cost of City
services not to exceed $22,150
• Dublin Scioto Lacrosse Boosters — Ohio Middle School Boys State Lacrosse
Championship - Cost of City services not to exceed $8,000
• Dublin United Soccer Club — Dublin United Champions Cup - Cost of City
services not to exceed $4,000
• Ohio Premier Soccer — Ohio Premier Invitational - Cost of City services not to
exceed $7,000
• Historic Dublin Business Association — Community engagement not to exceed
$50,000
• Dublin Arts Council — waiver of City services and grant of $23,000 as seed
money for the BREAD! Festival
• Ohio University Tantrum Theater — grant not to exceed $18,000 as seed
money to assist with housing and hiring additional theater professionals for
the summer season
• Grant's SIDS — grant not to exceed $1,000 to assist with walk in Coffman Park
(request granted based on no public roads will be closed)
• Dublin Special Olympics Shamrock Games — no representative present at
Committee review meeting; therefore, the request was not heard and was
recommended for denial
• Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Take Steps Walk — no representative present at
Committee review meeting; therefore, the request was not heard and was
recommended for denial
Vote on the motion: Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor Peterson, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Ms.
Amorose Groomes, yes; Vice Mayor Reiner, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; Ms. Alutto, yes.
Mr. Keenan also noted that the Finance Committee kept the grants awarded within
the budget of $200,000.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of D_ ub!'n r'h ra ind Meeting
a�aasrrasamrat.unrron.auo wmeioi
Held December 5, 2016 Page 18 of 19
Administrative Committee
Mr. Keenan, Committee Chair stated that a facilitator has been selected for the
Council Retreat. Mr. McDaniel is working on the contract for services for Julia Novak.
Mr. Keenan stated that several topics will be discussed at the retreat, so the
possibility exists of having fewer Council work sessions.
Ms. Salay stated that she wants to make sure the retreat and goal - setting sessions
remain separate and less like a regular meeting. The retreat is an opportunity to talk
about the future and work on big picture items outside of the regular meeting
setting.
Mr. Keenan agreed, but added that having meetings on every Monday evening of the
month, given the contemplated work session schedule can be a hardship for some
members.
COUNCIL ROUND TABLE
Ms. Amorose Groomes stated:
1. She appreciated the opportunity to attend the NLC Summit in Pittsburgh.
2. She found the Sawmill Road Corridor Meeting on November 29a to be very
informative.
3. On December 8, Dublin Coffman High School is sponsoring a corn hole event
where they hope to break a world record!
4. The Historic Dublin Stakeholders meeting brought forward an issue — namely,
that more education may be needed in terms of the "lens" through which ARB
Views matters. The parameters of the ARB are not strictly Code; there are also
historic guidelines as well. She believes additional education may be needed.
S. She would like to see more information about the Muirfleld /Memorial Drive
roundabout proposal and possibly some opportunities for public Input.
Ms. Sala y:
1. Recalls it was agreed in previous discussions that the commercial "For
Sale /For Lease" signs placed in front of commercial buildings are not
necessary. She asked for the status of this matter.
Mr. McDaniel confirmed there was such a discussion, but staff is behind schedule in
the implementation of the removal of such signs. In addition, there is a recent
Supreme Court ruling regarding temporary signs and therefore the City must be
cautious in the timing of the implementation.
Mr. Keenan requested additional information from staff regarding the ruling that was
mentioned.
2. Noted that she has visited some other Central Ohio communities in the
evenings and believes that Dublin's holiday decorations need to be updated
and improved.
3. Thanked staff for all of their hard work this year!
Mr. Lecklider:
1. Thanked staff for the memo about regulating medical marijuana. He would
like Council to consider taking some type of action on the matter. He added
that he is not unsympathetic to those who need this drug as part of their
medical treatment. He asked his colleagues for some consideration about this
matter in 2017.
2. Thanked staff and his colleagues for all the hard work, noting he is looking
forward to 2017.
Vice Mayor Reiner wished everyone a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Minutes of Dublin ribs C nj inri! Meeting
RARRF'T'T RQiYTtJIP0C _ nAv'rnXT nuin
Held
December 5, 2016
Page 19 of 19
Mayor Peterson:
1. cot- nmented that the city recently received a proclamation from the Ohio
Senate signed by President Keith Faber and senator Jim Hughes in recognition
of Dublin being narfled "Hest Suburb for Business" by U.0 Magazine.
2. Wished everyone a happy holiday9
AD OURNMENT
T meeting wa 'oureed at 10-J Y p.m.
OayVr Presiding Officer
Clerk of Council