Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/19/2002 1.1 ,.. 'n ri',r,i fl'j~r! ;W~'+tt1*!:".lIii;fttU:1f!(~"ttLittjtJ~I~t!n:l!%t!l!i"rfW'F..'.l"Uez~~:lJ':~~i~Jtl~ I: I I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS mm,__,,,_,,w='m,,,,ww""'~_'mm,__~,,,~il},!:!t~~~~Lh'_m'~~h='='=="_m_'__~'~==_=~'__m=bD11blinw"Ci~"Col1ucil_",,_,,____"mm"="_w~w'mmw="Qw''''_~__'''b_'''WW_b'''W''_'b~~~J;l,~gb~'''''_='' DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO.. FORM NO. 1014l::1 HeIr] August 19,2002 19 : Mayor McCash called the Dublin City Council meeting of August 19,2002 to order at 7:00 p.m. Mrs. Boring led the Pledge of Allegiance. Roll Call Council members present were: Mayor McCash, Mrs. Boring, Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, Mr. Kranstuber, Mr. Lecklider, and Ms. Salay. Mr. Reiner arrived at 7:10 p.m. Staff members present were: Ms. Brautigaum, Ms. Grigsby, Mr. Smith, Mr. Harding, Mr. Hammersmith, Mr. Stevens, Ms. Clarke, Mr. Hahn, Ms. Crandall, Ms. Hoyle, Mr. Richardson, and Interim Chief Epperson. Approval of Minutes of AU2:ust 12. 2002 Re2:ular Meetin2: The Clerk reported that the minutes of August 12th will be forwarded to Council when they are completed. ' Approval of the minutes of August 12th was postponed until the September 3rd meeting. Correspondence The Clerk reported that a Notice to Legislative Authority was sent regarding transfer of liquor permits to Dublin Xpress at 7000 Perimeter Loop Road. There was no objection to the issuance of these permits. Special Reco2:nition City Beautification Awards Ms. Chope, City Forester stated that this is the 13th year ofthe program. Twenty-five entries were received this year. Four criteria for awards are first impression, design, execution of design and maintenance. Ms. Chope announced the winners and Mayor McCash presented _-'t the awards. Citizen Comments Joel Campbell, Board Member, and Scott Dring, Executive Director, Dublin Convention and Visitors Bureau addressed Council regarding a proposal for the Dublin High School Holiday Basketball Classic ToUrnament to be held beginning in 2004. This is part of an effort by the DCVB to improve room bookings in December when there is the most room availability. The plan is to recruit high profile teams from around the state to attend the tournament, such as from Cleveland and Cincinnati. They will focus first on the Coffman and Scioto High school teams participation, due to scheduling and availability. They plan to eventually include Jerome High School and girls' teams as well. They are looking forward to working with the City, the Schools and the Bureau on this program for the benefit of the entire community. Jean-Leon Bouchenoire, 5772 Banavie Court addressed Council regarding the decision made on August 8th by Planning & Zoning Commission in regard to the National Century Financial expansion at Muirfield Square. He questioned the need to "break the rules" in this matter by approving a 133 percent increase of square footage for a business located in a residential area. The staff had recommended disapproval for seven reasons, as outlined in his letter sent to P&Z and as listed in the staff report. In 1986, staff recommended that Muirfield Square function in a retail center of neighborhood scale, intensity, use and appearance and that it be properly integrated into its residential surroundings. The rules in this case have been broken, and something has been lost in terms of respect for the rules. Donna Krohn, 5508 Cara Court presented a petition to City Council for City water services. They have obtained 15 signatures of the 17 homeowners in the neighborhood. The other two are on vacation at this time. They have not contacted the township Community Center about this effort. This is viewed as the best solution to the current well water problems they are experiencing. An existing waterline is located 600 feet from their area. She asked that Council consider extending water service to their neighborhood. Mr. Kranstuber moved to refer this matter to the Public Services Committee for further review and recommendation to Council. ---If "",,'.' "V"I';"1"""n'Yf"1!-:<~;;11.R" PIf~'ft"'n'HIl_ H:'.1}, ~rrtlh~!' ,HI' ',1' II:""'~ ~t!lI'lf.j'!-,tt!.',':iiI1l1'-.j:f"~!iffl'", !' ,I;,' I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS m~..~,,_~"=mm_h_"#=__=m,,~=_M!E~Jesm~l#_#~~~___~H_m'___~h~'___~~~~~=~=~~H,nublin"Cit~mC,Quncil.m~_~~_mh~mmmQ_'=h~'~~_~m~~Eage,,2~~.._mh'~~til}~g =_,~Q~~ DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO., FORM NO. 10148 HeIr] August 19,2002 19 Ms. Salay seconded the motion. Mrs. Boring suggested that this instead be referred to the Community Services Advisory Committee in order to look at this issue comprehensively. After reviewing the entire area and all of the issues, they can recommend a policy for Council to adopt. This would be similar to what was done for the traffic calming policy. Mr. Kranstuber stated that he is not opposed to referring a general policy issue to CSAC, but believes that Council's process to date has been to address petitions such as these at the Public Services Committee. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher asked about the proximity of water lines to the Cara Court/Cara Road area. Mr. Hammersmith responded that they are not immediately adjacent to them - it would require some extension. Mr. Lecklider noted that the Public Services Committee had brief discussion about prioritization for areas without water/sewer services. He asked for suggestions from Council on what they expect in terms of the scope of a recommendation. Mrs. Boring stated that some areas have waited for 30 years for development to bring water lines; Indian Run subdivision annexed only a short time ago and the residents are now asking for the same consideration. Mayor McCash pointed out that this neighborhood has been affected by the well issue, which is why the request for service has been brought forward. Ms. Krohn noted that the residents have "dirty" water - and cannot rely on having an acceptable water source. Lowering the pumps is not a permanent solution. Mr. Kranstuber stated that this is a situation which arose because of the wells affected by the recent development. He believes that the issue should be addressed as quickly as feasible, separate from the long-term policy issues. At the least, the residents will be looking for the ~".---... City to extend the main line at City expense. Secondly, the question is should the City assist in paying for hook-ups, due to the fact that their ground water was affected by the developments. Mrs. Boring asked about the timeframe for providing City water, even if it were approved tonight. Mr. Hammersmith responded that this would require a year or more. Ms. Salay stated that she was under the impression that the City is working with all property owners whose wells have been impacted. The property owners are to be reimbursed if the situation is determined to be the fault of the City or other parties involved with the golf course and park development. Ms. Krohn noted that they are seeking a long-term solution and are concerned about the impact the water situation will have on their property values. They have lived in their property for 26 years and have previously never had a problem with their well. Mr. Lecklider asked what distinguishes Cara Court from the other areas affected by the golf course and park development. Mr. Kranstuber stated that it is the same situation - he is surprised that other property owners did not ask for waterlines to be extended to their properties as a permanent solution to the problem. Discussion continued. Mr. Lecklider asked if this issue should be treated on a case-by-case basis, or ifthe issue should be discussed more comprehensively. :;~ Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher suggested that Council proceed to vote on the motion on the table. The larger policy issue can be dealt with in a second motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, no. Mrs. Boring moved to refer to Community Services Advisory Commission the issue of providing water and sewer service to those in Dublin without services, how these areas are prioritized if services were to be provided, and to forward a draft policy to Council for reVIew. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion. She asked that Council be informed of meeting dates on this matter in case they desire to attend the meeting. Vote on the motion: Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. L... i I I II li+I'I+I" ."1[11.11I"'.' ....,,1 ! , , ,"",,'''>;',l; ~.",,;~ ~T1;'''''''''''''~~'V'!1-t1'';~Ll..:;.;tll)jjJ!'",f'IP''r' TIY:1;!i!W""~'lth1nI1<'f',~"i~ht I" I I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS w,wm"mmm"m'm_m==m_mm"m_m=m}1i~~!~m~mhm~~'~mmm~=m~m~_=m__m~=m=h_m=_~~,llublin"Cit}lmCOJlllCil~mm_h_wQmmm=_'~'mmQ_h=mmm=,__E,age,3m'~, Meeting " " "'#'="",W"'=""""'//QM">Z"^"""",__ffM'_=//"""'_="'''".,~""" DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO.. FORM NO 1014tl Held August 19, 2002 19 Mr. Reiner asked that staff provide the following information for the Public Services Committee: the current status of the wells; an estimate of the cost to drill a deeper well; and the cost to run a waterline. ~ Ms. Salay noted that information about the future A very Road widening and related waterline extension would be helpful for the deliberation. Wallace Maurer, 7451 Dublin Road read from Section 5.04(a) of the Charter which relates to the powers of the City Manager and Section 6.03(b) which is applicable to the firing of the City Engineer. He noted that the City Manager's appointment and removal of the Directors of Law and Finance are subject to the consent and approval of Council. Per Charter Section 6.03(b), all other directors are appointed by the Manager and serve at the pleasure of the City Manager. These two clauses are very comprehensive and provide as much latitude as could conceivably be given anyone he could recall in history. He will continue his comments at the next meeting. LEGISLATION 1. Second ReadinglPublic Hearing of Ordinance 110-02 Accepting the Lowest and Best Bid for the Monterey Gazebo Installation and Playground Replacement Project in the City of Dublin, and Declaring an Emergency. Ms. Brautigam reported that there have been no changes since the time of first reading. As requested by Council, a rendering has been provided. Staff is recommending passage at this time. -- Mr. Kranstuber moved for emergency passage. Ms. Salay seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. Vote on the Ordinance: Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. 2. Second Reading/Public Hearing of Ordinance 111-02 Accepting the Lowest and Best Bid for Fitness Equipment for the Community Recreation Center, and Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Contract for ProcurememofSmdEqmpmen~ Ms. Brautigam pointed out that additional information was provided to Council regarding the disposition of the old equipment and the possibility of using some of this equipment at the Service Center facility. Vote on the Ordinance: Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor McCash, yes. 3. Second Reading/Public Hearing of Ordinance 112-02 Amending Chapter 115 of the Dublin Codified Ordinances Regulating Peddlers and Solicitors. ---,.....-- Ms. Brautigam stated that staffhas suggested some amendments, and Legal review is required of the proposed amendments. Staff is therefore recommending that Council postpone the public hearing until the September 3rd Council meeting. Mrs. Boring moved to postpone the public hearing until September 3,2002. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes. The public hearing will be held on September 3, 2002. 4. Second Reading/Public Hearing of Ordinance 114-02 Accepting the Lowest/Best Bid for the Dublin Road Bikepath - Main Library to Emerald Parkway Project, and Declaring an Emergency. : I I II :H:, ":",,,11';" I I : . .' [. I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS __="n"M_=m'mhn~~'=_'mmn~_~l!llll~~-2L~==m_~m~~m_mhm_d~~m~_m~dmQ~m=<"nubliu,Cit;y;,1:!1UJ1CiLmmh~mmmm~'~~"_mmmM_n~mMn,Eage~4mmmmhmmm,M,~eti~Kmm_d,~mn,,=mn DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO.. FORM NO lU141j .. HeIr] August 19,2002 19 " Ms. Brautigam noted that there is no additional information from staff at this time. A map has been provided, as Council requested at the last hearing. - Mayor McCash stated that one citizen has signed in to testify. Wallace Maurer, 7451 Dublin Road: 1. Asked if Council is aware ofthe attitude and status ofthose living on Dublin Road between Emerald Parkway and S.R. 161? Have they all consented to this project? Ms. Grigsby stated that all but one have consented to the projected; negotiations are still underway with one property owner. 2. Asked if Council is aware of a $erious accident which took place on the bikeway in front of his property? A driver lost control coming from the north, resulting in a serious accident along the bikeway; fortunately, there were no serious injuries. Had there been any cyclists or pedestrians on the path at the time, they would have been "mowed down." It is a very vulnerable street for accidents. Some of the bikeway runs very close to the roadway, and this remains a concern. Mr. Kranstuber moved for emergency passage. Mr. Reiner seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes. Vote on the Ordinance: Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. 5. Second Reading/Public Hearing of Ordinance 115-02(Amended) Accepting the Lowest/Best Bid for the Glick Road/ Muirfield Drive Intersection ~ Improvements Project, and Declaring an Emergency. Ms. Brautigam noted that late Friday, the City received a letter from a representative of the apparent low bidder, withdrawing the bid submitted by Miller Paving. Trucco Construction is therefore the low bidder on this project. Mr. Hammersmith reported that the bid summary indicates that Trucco's bid fell within the guidelines established by Council last September in term of funding allocated to the roadway and landscaping portions ofthe project. Secondly, the completion date for the roadway elements, particularly curb, gutter and intermediate asphalt, is November 22. The final completion date for all items is May 14, 2003, prior to the Memorial Tournament. In regard to maintenance of the project upon completion, discussion took place with Mr. Holbrook and Mr. Fishman of the Muirfield Association. The proposal is that Muirfield Association would continue to maintain the reserve areas as they are presently doing, and the City would continue to maintain the right-of-way as is the current practice. Mr. Lecklider asked for clarification about the specific areas which will be maintained by the City versus those to be maintained by the Association. Staff distributed a drawing showing the right-of-way and private reserve areas. Mr. Hammersmith noted that the light pink areas are the Association reserve areas presently maintained by the Association which will continue to be maintained by them. On the northeast and southeast comers of Muir field/Glick, there are some permanent right-of-way /.,..-- takings for site visibility reasons which will be maintained in the future by the City. Mr. Lecklider asked if the landscaping improvements are predominantly within the reserve or the right-of-way. Mr. Hammersmith estimated that 70 percent would be within the reserve and 30 percent within the right-of-way, based on a visual inspection of the documents. Mr. Lecklider asked if it will be difficult for the crews to determine their area of responsibility. Mr. Hammersmith noted that this can be worked out satisfactorily. Mr. Lecklider asked ifthe project is irrigated. Mr. Hammersmith stated that he does not believe so. Mr. Lecklider summarized that this proposal for maintenance is consistent with the manner in which maintenance has been performed in the past for this intersection. Ms. Salay asked if it is consistent with neighborhood entryways in other areas of the City? , I I Ii i:i"HU I IT : '."1 --,- RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ~mQm_,__=m='_hM'~h~u_~in~!u~~~~_u_,~~m=uM~=hmmu____~Mm~,_,Dub.linuCit}L,CQunciL_'M=U~U~QUU'''U~'~'_U'=_'_MM~J?~e.5.umUM'MmQ~~~!~!?-=~,u~'_~_"M DAYTON LEGAL BU\NK CO.. FORM NO. 10148 HeIr] August.19,2002 19 . Mr. Hammersmith responded that it is generally consistent with these policies. He noted that within the newer developments, reserve areas are sometimes maintained by the homeowners associations, although the City may actually retain ownership of the land. - Mayor McCash commented that he had previously assumed that much of the landscaping would be within the right-of-way and now finds that a considerable amount of it is not. There was information previously provided to Council by Legal staff about spending public dollars on private property. It indicated that the City can spend public dollars for reasons of general health, safety and welfare. While the road portion is a safety concern, the additional landscaping being added away from the intersection to improve site visibility seems questionable. Mr. Hammersmith stated that many of the reserve areas are temporary grading easements which will have to be blended back in with the lowered roadway. As a result of the blending, existing landscaping will be disrupted. The goal is to restore it in the same or better state than it is presently. Mr. Smith commented that there is a safety issue involved. Moreover, cities are allowed to spend public funds on private property if it improves the overall aesthetics for the City. There is existing case law on this point. Mrs. Boring asked for clarification about the southwest comer where the permanent right- of-way takes occur. Mr. Hammersmith responded that Reserve QQQ will continue to be maintained by the Association as it is presently. Mr. Reiner moved for emergency passage, based upon the recommendation of the City Engineer. ~ Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. Mr. Kranstuber moved to amend the language to specify Trucco Construction Cos., Inc. throughout the document, and to specify a bid amount of$I,327,342.56. Mr. Reiner seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Kran~tuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes. V ote on the Ordinance: Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mayor McCash, no; Ms. Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. 6. Second Reading/Public Hearing of Ordinance 116-02 Accepting the Lowest/Best Bid for the Southwest Area Traffic Calming Plan - Phase 3 Project, and Declaring an Emergency. Ms. Brautigam reported that there are no changes since the time of first reading. Mayor McCash noted that three residents have signed in to testify: Will Givens. 6057 Heather Bluff Drive stated that he and his two neighbors are representing property owners on their street. He has lived in this residence for three years, and the street /~ is currently a dead-end street. The calming plan extends Heather Bluff Drive to connect to Wilcox, with a continuous turn. They spoke with City representatives and with Mr. Yoder on this item two years ago, but were not able to obtain a favorable outcome. For the record, their neighborhood is opposed to connecting their street through. The plan funnels all of the traffic from Wilcox down their quiet, neighborhood street which has 16 children 10 years of age and younger residing on it. Lastly, their initial understanding was that the acreage behind Heather Bluff, currently a wooded area with two homes, was to be developed with six more houses and therefore, a through road made sense. Now, they have learned that the plans have changed and there are no houses to be built. Why is it necessary then that the roadway go through? While it is part of the overall calming for some areas, it will make their street a thoroughfare. Davin Ng. 6041 Heather Bluff Drive learned about the meeting just today, so he not well prepared. Based upon the construction drawing he viewed today, there are some items : . I I II Iln.uI..r Iii. TI iiil.;: --.- RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS _""~m,m,_~,_==,_m_,,~_~inutew~ oL~,~-"-,-~='=_"m__~-=~,~Dublin..city.LollllCiL_Q,,,w,w_""m_~_=www"mw_,_wJ:~age=6w~''''_~~m~!:!~~~'=''~'~h''=''_ DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO., FORM NO 1()14B Helr] August 19,2002 19 missing that were discussed two years ago. A stop sign at the intersection between Heather Bluff Drive and Wilcox Road was to be installed; and there was to be directional signage for motorists to direct them to Wilcox Road. In the future, if traffic volumes are high, will - speed humps be installed in this area? He still does not understand why the City is I concerned with calming down traffic along Wilcox, while diverting the traffic onto their street. Mr. Kranstuber stated that tonight's vote is on the construction bid. However, he disagrees with the impact on Heather Bluff Drive, based on the study done by the Task Force. Regarding the stop sign issue, he asked Mr. Yoder to respond. Bill Yoder, Southwest Traffic Calming Task Force stated that he worked with staff in reviewing the plans for conformity with the direction of the Task Force. He believes that all items have been included. In this case, there were no homes on Heather Bluff at the time of the study. One resident, Mike Meadows, bought his home prior to the July of 1999 vote on the traffic calming plan. The other residents would have had the opportunity to learn about the plan prior to purchase of their homes. Mr. Kranstuber asked specifically about the stop sign issue. Mr. Hammersmith stated that staff can research this and report back on this and the directional signage to access Wilcox Road. Mr. Kranstuber asked if minor changes can be made internally so that Council can proceed with a vote tonight. Mr. Hammersmith agreed that this can be done. Seno Ramaswamy, 6040 Heather Bluff Drive stated that he recognizes this is not the forum - for debate about the plan, but whatever can be done would be appreciated. At the time they purchased their home, they were somewhat misled about the road configuration by Rockford Homes. They were not made aware of the future plan for extension. He thanked Council for their time. Mr. Lecklider asked about the width of Heather Bluff Drive. Mr. Hammersmith responded that it is 26 feet back to back of curb. Ms. Salay thanked the residents for coming in. She suggested they contact Mr. Yoder to understand the goals of the traffic calming plan and how the various components work together. The plan should eliminate through traffic for the entire area north of W oerner- Temple. Thanks again to the Task Force members for their hard work on obtaining the concurrence ofthe property owners affected by the plan. It is unfortunate that the builder misinformed the newer property owners. In regard to the six homes to be developed at the end of the street, the owner sold off a portion ofthe property and changed his plans. Mrs. Boring noted that she is sympathetic with these residents. The traffic calming plan was well thought out, and it is disheartening to hear someone say that the homeowners who were buying homes should have know. In actuality, most of those who complained about the traffic bought their houses knowing that Wilcox was a through street. She does not hear much sympathy from the other Council Members about these residents of Heather Bluff Drive. It is unfortunate that their views were not considered. - Mr. Kranstuber disagreed, noting that they were taken into consideration. There were 15-20 major elements ofthe plan, and all of the components were necessary for an effective plan. He complimented Mr. Yoder and the Task Force for their success with the plan - it has made a tremendous difference in the area since four years ago. Mayor McCash noted that, after review of the plans and discussion with Mr. Yoder, he doesn't believe that this extension will create a cut-through situation for traffic. Mr. Reiner thanked Mr. Yoder and the other Task Force volunteers who have worked very hard to improve the appearance and aesthetics of the entire southwest area. It has been a successful effort. Ms. Salay moved for emergency passage. i I I II III!"" ",,",,1 I' !:'] :! .. 'L" ',,"" ',-I.'"~; .u..~" ',,;;;.'.,f'W~"W;'l'..1<'"II1 M'Nl.'l1 ','.; !'J' i.':'l(f'l\U1!'!"'!!'11 ,.Wjl~H,l*.l:"'H4'-'iil>:;".:ii~'1 "i:t',iio~iit.:.i: 1. I , , RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ~"_~m_h"=~mQ_,,~,,__ Ml!ll!!~~~~m~--m~~~__~=m__~~#~___QDJ.lblin"Cii}LffCollllCiL'~'''ff'ff'ff~~ffm'_'~h~_~'ff'ff~Qff'=ffP..age"Lff"ffff"ffffff~~~!inlL_ffff==~=m DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO.. fORM NO. lQ14l:l HeIr] August 19,2002 19 Mr. Kranstuber seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Ms. Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mrs. Boring, no; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. r- Vote on the Ordinance: Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, no; Mr. Reiner, yes. 7. Second Reading/Public Hearing of Ordinance 117-02 Authorizing the Purchase of a .597 Acre, More Or Less, Permanent Bikepath Easement and a .006 Acre, More Or Less, Temporary Construction Easement, from American Italian Golf Association, Located East of Avery Road, City of Dublin, County of Franklin, State of Ohio. Ms. Brautigam reported that there is no additional information on this item. Vote on the Ordinance: Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Ms. Salay, yes. 8. Introduction & First Reading of Ordinance 118-02 Adopting and Enacting a Supplement to the Code of Ordinances for the City of Dublin. (Request to dispense with public hearing) Mr. Kranstuber introduced the ordinance. Ms. Brautigam noted that this provides for an update to the Code of Ordinances. Mayor McCash moved to dispense with the public hearing. Ms. Salay seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Ms. Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. - Lecklider, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mayor McCash, yes. Vote on the Ordinance: Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. 9. Introduction & First Reading of Ordinance 119-02 Providing for a Change in Zoning for Approximately 26.062 Acres Located on the East Side of A very Road,' Opposite Dan Sherri A venue and Tuswell Drive, Approximately 500 Feet South of Irelan Place, from RI, Restricted Industrial District, to: PUD, Planned Unit Development District. (Case No. 02-084Z - Avery Road Condominiums). Mrs. Boring introduced the ordinance and moved referral to Planning & Zoning Commission. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes. 10. Introduction & First Reading of Ordinance 120-02 Providing for a Change in Zoning for Approximately 65.03 Acres Located on the North Side of Summit view Road, Approximately 960 Feet West of Trails ~ End Drive, from R -1, Restricted Suburban Residential District, To: PLR, Planned Low Density Residential District. (Case No. 02-094Z - Conine Property - 7240 Summitview Road). Mrs. Boring introduced the ordinance and moved referral to Planning & Zoning Commission. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. II. Introduction & Public Hearing of Resolution 34-02 I I. II ' IT, "Hm "'., ,II I .L! , , RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 'hQ~mm_~~=hmhm=mh='_m_= Mi!].ute~-5>i__=m~=_~~m_mhQm___m_~~_,~D:ublin..city=Coll1lCiL_"Qmm_"mmh~"m"hQ~m_.__~m_Eage.Km.~=m,,~~e~inIi_m~~hQ_mh'=. DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO., FORM NO 10148 HeIr] August 19, 2002 19 Authorizing the City Manager to Consent to a Mortgage or Other Liens on the Leasehold Under that Certain Ground Lease and Operating Agreement Between the City and Tartan Golf Company, LLC. ;-- Ms. Salay introduced the resolution. t Ms. Brautigam noted that Huntington National Bank has requested this item which relates to the golf course property. Staff recommends adoption of this resolution which authorizes her to execute the agreement. Mayor McCash stated that this is a follow-up related to additional financing. V ote on the Resolution: Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Ms. Salay, yes. OTHER BUSINESS 12. Final Plat - Park Place, Section 1 Ms. Clarke stated that this is a subdivision of mostly 80-90 foot lots, 130 feet deep on average, zoned PLR. It is located on the west side of Dublin along Hyland-Croy Road and is the first section of a subdivision. TheP&Z Commission approved this on July 18, 2002 with 15 conditions as contained in the Record of Action. Mr. Reiner noted that the retention basin is located in the front. Is there adequate easement so that a future road widening would not impact it? Ms. Clarke responded that this has been addressed in the design, and there is also a left turn lane currently under construction for access to the site. Mr. Reiner asked if all of the utilities will be underground. Ms. Clarke responded affirmatively. - Mr. Kranstuber moved approval of the final plat. Mrs. Boring seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. 13. Final Plat - Belvedere, Section 3 Ms. Clarke noted that this is the northeast section of Belvedere containing 42 lots. There was an adjustment to Belvedere after the preliminary plat. The developer requested wider lots - these are all nearly 100 feet wide. The site backs up to the Dublin Jerome High School. Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval on July 11, 2002 with 8 conditions contained in the Record of Action. Mrs. Boring moved approval of the final plat. Mr. Lecklider seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. 14. Final Plat - Bryson Cove This subdivision is located across from Dublin Scioto High School and consists of one phase. It backs up to Kiplinger Estates, and much of the discussion at P&Z related to ~ appropriate buffers at the southern end. P&Z recommended approval on January 17,2002 with 16 conditions contained in the Record of Action. The final plat portion ofthe final development plan is forwarded to Council for action. The lots are an average of 80 feet wide and160 feet deep. Mr. Kranstuber noted that he has had some calls from people concerned about what type of development is underway. The signageon the site does not indicate a single-family subdivision development. Staffwill check on this item and report back. Mr. Reiner asked if there is another option to handle traffic other than three curb cuts on Hard Road. Ms. Clarke responded that there may have been other alternatives, but this was approved by City Council as part of the zoning plan in 1990 and again in 1995. It has not been changed subsequent to the time of rezoning. Mr. Kranstuber moved approval of the final plat. 1 I I Ii HII.I:i!ih II I :' -- w,"' , , RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS phm"__'''~mmhm='~'mm_m_ Mill!: te,~ o'!~_m__mm__"'_~_=Q~~~"",,nubli1L.cit~L,CQllnciLQ_'_Q"___=__"_,_=_J.age"~,&=mmm,.,~~~tin[,,,~mm~hmmm,mm. DAYTON LEGAL B NK .. ! '" i HeIr] August 19,2002 19 r Mr. Lecklider seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Mr. Lecklider, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Kranstuber, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes. p--. Ms. Brautigam noted that in the packets this week, the large plat maps were included. In the f future, she and the Clerk would like to eliminate these from the packet and substitute a I. smaller version. Mr. Kranstuber stated that he does not desire the large documents at the final plat stage, but at the time of the rezoning/preliminary plat stage, he would prefer to have them included. Council agreed. 15. Update re Coffinan Park Expansion Task Force Mayor McCash summarized that at the last Council meeting, Council indicated their desire for an update on the status of the Task Force and their progress. Mr. Kranstuber and Ms. Salay serve on the Task Force, and Mr. Blosser, Chair, is present to discuss this item. Mr. Kranstuber stated that from a process point of view, he wants to ensure that the scope of the Task Force is in keeping with Council's direction. Mr. Blosser, Chair ofthe Task Force, stated that it is appropriate to request an update at this stage. He acknowledged the contributions and hard work of the members of the Task Force. He believes that they are headed in the right direction. 1. At the outset, the T~sk Force was charged with review of the expansion of Coffinan Park, while accommodating the existing residents of the area. The ~ starting point was the resolution approved by Council in August of2001 which indicates the City's desire to acquire residential properties as they become available, from willing sellers, at a reasonable market price, for the expansion of Coffinan Park. 2. After discussion, it became evident that the policy mayor may not come to fruition. There is a need to focus on the existing properties held by the City and what could be done with development of a park to meet the future needs of Dublin while accommodating the existing residents. Those goals have not changed in the process of looking at various options and brainstorming. 3. Council has approved a traffic study, which was requested by the Task Force. In looking at future plans including a City Hall and for expansion, it became evident that traffic was an important consideration. The Task Force believes that there are two portions of the park: the east end ofthe park which mayor may not include a City Hall and which is tied into the existing, active Coffinan Park which is fairly active; the west end ofthe park which mayor may not be expanded and which should remain passive, to accommodate the existing residents and to complement the park as a whole. 4. The first issue reviewed is whether the active side of the park should have a unified campus feel, and the question came up of whether Post Road between Emerald and the Recreation Center needed to be modified in some way. 5. They have tried to ensure that the surrounding area residents have been informed .".,..... about their meetings and their discussions. They have had involvement from Tara Hill residents. 6. They expect the results ofthe traffic study to be completed for presentation at the meeting of Monday, August 26. This should help to evaluate the feasibility of many of the concepts explored. 7. Their goal is to be inclusive, and to involve the property owners. Many ideas have been suggested as outlined in their minutes. Much will depend on the traffic study results. 8. The plan proposed by Mr. Yoder was tweaked by staff and modified somewhat. There was a broad, generalized consensus that the Task Force was on track with the concept so far. 9. Their focus is to tie all of the elements ofthe park together, without impacting Tara Hill; to accommodate the existing residents; to encourage passive uses at 1 I.' il : .ili.HH.,,,,,, ! i : : : : ","'" ',"',"""',',"','"'' '" P"''',_,( 1'" :":'HiUlHV':IH',"'IIf':HJ'l"'M"'1~''''1~~:F'':P?~,-,t i, I I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS "~~=~m"'mmQ~_~hm'=~m_' l\f2~~tes oLm,~_'=__mmm"m~__M'_m__m=m__,Dublin,Cit}LCounciL,,~_mmm=__"'_mm='~~'_#mhw--Eage,,,,l!l,w__~~m~!~~g"='_Qm_~m"" DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO., FORM NO 10148 HeIr] August 19, 2002 19 the west end of the park; and to make a recommendation to Council for their final consideration. --. Mr. Kranstuber clarified that he does not believe the scope has been too broad; he wanted to reaffirm that Council endorses the scope oftheir work. ! Mrs. Boring noted that she has reviewed the Council minutes regarding the charge of the task force. She believes that the City Hall location is not being considered, although this was part of the charge; secondly, the focus was to be on the land already owned by the City, not future purchases; and she has heard that they are considering programming ideas for the park, although all other park locations in Dublin should be considered in the context of this discussion. Mr. Blosser stated that he could not find documentation from Council which declared where the future City Hall is to be located. Everyone seems to know where it will be, as there was land purchased with that intent. But because there was no definitive record of Council about the City Hall specific location, the Task Force made the assumption that it would be located somewhere within the park, not necessarily on land already owned by the City. So they have operated at somewhat of a disadvantage. Staff provided an overlay on the Yoder plan to the Task Force which specifies a general City Hall location. The consensus ofthe Task Force is to have the City Hall on the east end as a general campus area tying in with the park. In terms of programming, concepts of a horse farm or petting zoo were proposed in a conceptual form. One of the parcels under review includes a wonderful barn, and they were attempting to accommodate in the plan. ,..-... Mrs. Boring noted her concern that all of these wish list items result in maintenance costs for the future, and perhaps this is not the best choice from a fiscal standpoint for the future. If the Task Force recommends preserving the barn, that is fine. But what to do with the barn should not be their consideration. Mr. Kranstuber stated that this discussion arose from the desire to protect and enhance the existing landowners, versus forcing a use such as the Community Relations Center within the park. Mr. Blosser stated that one of the biggest fears of the residents is that the existing structures will fall into disrepair, or that the City will use them for storage or office use. The considerations were cost, maintenance, retaining value for the current residential property owners, and not detracting from the property, but enhancing it. The residents do want to preserve viable buildings and incorporate them into the park. The question then becomes what will be done with the buildings and who will pay to maintain them. They are merely brainstorming at this point - aIld trying to keep everyone happy and comfortable in the process. In terms of focusing on the land already owned by the City, if Dublin never purchases additional parkland in this area, that is fine. What they are focusing on is what Dublin owns at this time. Having said that, one or two more purchases would help to round out or improve the overall picture. The Task Force is focusing on what is owned by the City now; ~ if other parcels are added, the decisions Gan be revisited. They do not want the residents to feel threatened by the City's acquisition of parkland. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher noted that she somewhat disagrees with Mrs. Boring. It is necessary to brainstorm about the possible activities for the land in order to understand why to keep it. The important thing is that discussions become expectations for people. At the time that minutes are written and when the report ultimately comes back to Council, it needs to be clarified that the report includes a laundry list of possible activities versus one or two. In terms of additional land, the focus should first be on that land currently owned by the City. But Council's expectation is that the Task Force would still discuss future land acquisition in terms of what it could do in .enhancing it and integrating it with the community. Mr. Blosser responded that the Task ForGe is eager to see the entire park developed, which includes some of the properties not currently owned by the City. Therefore, they constantly i I I' ii J..I,t IIIUll". .lli +.1 .Hn+! .. i! .! : RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS _~_mmm~_,_m_hmm_,=m_M,in~!~~mhm~LNm~~m_=___m____N~~'-=mhDublin,.Cit}cCollnciL=N,~"__mmm'''mmmmQm~~mm_m~m=Ellgem,lLc=mhM~.E:!!~K=,_"mmm_N'N DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO.. F=-ORM NO lQ14l;;1 "i Helrl August 19,2002 19 I I have to "lower their expectations" to stay focused on the property currently owned. The recommendations for further acquisitions will be included in the report - currently, there are three properties desired for acquisition. - f Mrs. Boring stated that this is her concern. At some point, are there boundaries to be I I established for Coffinan Park? A Master Plan was previously done for Coffinan Park and it I , has now been completed. Will a task force be set up for every park about future land desired? It is a matter of setting priorities for land acquisition and having limits. There is a need for a land acquisition session as part of goal setting. She is frustrated with the process. Green space needs to be provided in all areas of the City, not just around Coffinan Park. Mayor McCash stated that the effort is to review what currently exists in Coffinan Park. If Council decides to further expand the park, what amenities can that provide - this is what the Task Force is considering. Mr. Kranstuber added that this is to ensure that what is done at this point is not inconsistent with the future vision. A future Council mayor may not purchase additional properties. He strongly disagrees with Mrs. Boring's comments about the history ofthis area. Planning efforts have been underway since the late 80's about this corridor and its future development. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher stated that her understanding is that the concern was that it appeared that the City had a plan for this area but was not sharing it with the residents. This was an opportunity to be inclusive in discussions with staff, who seemed to have a clearer understanding than Council about this matter. Mr. Hahn produced a concept or bubble plan - for the expansion of the park, and Council referred it to PRAC for recommendation. Mrs. Boring asked ifthere is a plan for land acquisition in this area - is there a limit to what is to be acquired? Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher stated that she recalls that Council previously voted to acquire land along Post Road up to the Halloran property, if the homeowner approached the City about purchase. That was voted on last year. Mrs. Boring stated that her understanding is that the land south of Post Road was purchased for the future City Hall. Mr. Kranstuber pointed out that restricting the parameters to a great extent is contrary to the desire for a public process for the residents. Ms. Salay agreed with Mr. Kranstuber. The Task Force is not mandating purchase of property to have a workable plan. To the contrary, they are looking at using the land already acquired. The results ofthe traffic study are an important and necessary consideration for the group. There is an entire section in the Community Plan which focuses on the civic core ofthe City within the park. She would like to continue working with the Task Force. It has been a goodprocess, has secured participation from the public, and will result in a great park which will accommodate the existing residents. ~ Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher commented that in terms ofland acquisition, this could be a topic for another specialized committee - perhaps it could be assigned to an existing Commission. The charge could be given to a Commission to establish criteria and recommendations over the next 6-12 months, and Council could discuss this at goal setting and incorporate this into the CIP. Mayor McCash stated that the Task Force is operating in keeping with the Community Plan - looking at the existing land and possible phasing for the future. He does not envision the Task Force demanding the purchase of additional lands to accommodate their vision. He noted that there is a need for a land acquisition session to prioritize Council goals for the future. This has been suggested by staff, and it should be scheduled in the near future. Land acquisition matters are more appropriate for executive session of Council. Mr. Kranstuber agreed. I I ill.' '1' 1.1 I I lio: .' I, , , RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS _"hM$m'_~,mmh"'_h~=m~_M Mi~u !es ~ of ~_~m=~='=m~_M~==~-----~~"Dublin~it~Counci1"'m_'~~'M~=",_.._mmm==#m_,Eageh12#m"mm,,~!:eti~~=~m=mmh_'=" DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO., FORM NO 1U14tl HeIr] August 19,2002 19 Mr. Lecklider agreed that this type of meeting is desirable. In regard to the Task Force discussion, he agrees that the Task Force scope should be larger as opposed to smaller. They should take into consideration issues such as the siting of the new municipal complex ,........ and other items which would be feasible with additional land acquisition. The traffic study ! is an important consideration. He is confident that the Task Force is headed in the right direction. He acknowledged the hard work ofthe members. Mr. Reiner echoed these comments. The City has never been threatening in their approach to land acquisition, opting instead to acquire land from willing sellers. This policy remains in place. Mayor McCash asked about the timeframes for the traffic study and the recommendation. Mr. Hammersmith stated that the traffic study will be presented on August 26th. Mr. Blosser stated that the timeframe is dependent upon the traffic study. If the study validates some ofthe options, the Task Force will move quickly to forward some oftheir recommendations to Council. lfthe study does not support their options, he is not certain of the timing of their recommendation. He is willing to provide an update to Council after the traffic study is presented to the Task Force. Mayor McCash agreed with this plan. Ms. Brautigam asked if Council would prefer that staff to schedule an executive session for review of land acquisition items prior to an upcoming Council. Mayor McCash agreed with this concept. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher suggesting scheduling this type of meeting for an off-Monday to ensure there is adequate time for discussion. ~ Ms. Brautigam agreed to report to Council at the September 3rd meeting about a recommended date/time for a land acquisition session in the near future. Council Committee Reports/Council Round Table Mr. Lecklider, Public Services Committee Chair, reported that the Committee will meet at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, August 27 in Council Chambers regarding the feasibility study for water and sewer service for Indian Run subdivision. Mr. Hammersmith asked what information will be needed from staff. Mrs. Boring requested that staff provide alternatives on approaching this, specifically, whether planned development in the area could accommodate this request or not. Mr. Lecklider noted that staff had previously indicated some options in their feasibility study - he requested the cost associated with the various options be provided. Mrs. Chinnici-Zuercher, Finance Committee Chair reminded Council Members that the second workshop session for the CIP is scheduled for Wednesday, August 21 at 6:30 p.m. Mr. Reiner: 1. Thanks to Ms. Brautigam for the clarification regarding the J enmar Court properties which was included in the packet. 2. Regarding the Appearance Code meetings, it might be preferable to draft a list of - items that are fixed, rigid, and non-negotiable. Builders object to the f bureaucracy of another review group slowing down the process. Mr. Kranstuber commented that he is hopeful that the experts on the Committee can take the lead on some of these items. The group is taking somewhat of an esoteric approach to the issues. He, too, would prefer to develop some specific guidelines, but the Committee wanted to do some "big picture" work atthe outset of this process. Many of the members are unfamiliar with Dublin's process and history. Mr. Lecklider commented that the subcommittee at P&Z had agreed upon many ofthe elements desired; hopefully, this work will not have to be repeated. Mayor McCash stated that it is important to have a basis for items to avoid being considered arbitrary. The Committee is focusing on understanding what Dublin wants to be in terms of appearance/theme, so that they can recommend how that can be achieved. Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher: i 'I I II Li[l ',! Ii iUll! , . :' RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ~~~H"h"m,"~mQm,_~_,= M~!!~i~H~_M_m~___=_m~=~_~.-w~,DllblinJ:it}:J:o.llUcilHMH__h..~mm'."=_"H_mm"_"~=_=~HEage.,j,~,_,,_,~~~t~~!lL"__M="__'=' DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO., FORM NO. lU14Cl HeIr] August 19, 2002 19 1. Requested that on a regular basis, Council is given a summary of losses in income tax revenue due to closings, downsizings, etc. 2. Requested a periodic report from Economic Development about the City's efforts to - retain or attract new businesses. She is not familiar with what is being actively pursued in this regard. 3. Asked about the status of the former Crescendo's property. There appears to be some kind of clean up underway on the site. Staff will report back on this item. 4. Recommended that the City investigate issues at the entry water park at Ballantrae: signage is needed about curbing dogs; trash receptacles are needed; and a major concern is with the safety of children who are climbing up on the stones above the waterfall. She has observed children climbing on these areas while parents watch. This is very dangerous, and at a minimum, signage should be installed to prohibit this in some way. Ms. Brautigam will report back to Council after investigation of these matters. 5. Asked about clarification of the City's plans for observance of the September 11 th anniversary. She noted that flyers have indicated that the City is a sponsor of an event at the Dublin Coffman stadium. Interim Chief Epperson responded that the Washington Township Fire Department is the sponsor of the event at the stadium; the City has a very minor presence. However, all citizens are welcome to attend, Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher noted that there are area events at the Crew Stadium and at the Statehouse which all county residents are encouraged to attend. Many state officials reside in Dublin and will be expected to attend these regional events. She believes that it is important, however, for the City to recognize the citizens' desire to honor those who died on September 11, 2001 in some way. At a minimum, they should be informed about what is ~ available in the Central Ohio area for observance of the anniversary. Ms. Brautigam noted that she will work with the Community Relations division on this matter. Mr. Kranstuber noted that there is a vacant house under construction south of Old Dublin which has been sitting for a couple of years and not completed. He asked if staff could report back on this item. Mayor McCash noted that this house is located in the township. Mr. Kranstuber asked that staff check with township officials. Mr. Lecklider: 1. Requested that staff check on a report of broken glass in the bikepath tunnel at A verylMuirfield. 2. Asked whether the Sandy Comers Park design would affect the entry feature irrigation system. Mr. Hahn responded that this conflict has been resolved, and they are now out to bid. 3. Noticed a reference to the repair of irrigation at Darree Fields. He asked for clarification. Mr. Hahn responded that the irrigation system is included in next year's CIP; this repair involved a temporary system. 4. In regard to pruning of trees, does this include cuI de sacs? - Mr. Hahn responded that courts are the last item in the rotation of pruning of trees. Mr. Lecklider asked about the policy of maintenance of landscaped islands within cuI de sacs. Mr. Hahn stated that this varies with subdivisions. Some homeowners have taken the responsibility for these; others are maintained by the City. Mr. Lecklider noted that the island on Violet Vale court is very large and the homeowners are responsible for its maintenance. It consists of only grass, and is very large. He asked that Council give some consideration to having the City maintain this. Mr. Hahn noted that he recalls at the time of development that 5-7 residents ofthe cuI de sac were to organize a volunteer effort to maintain this particular island. There has been minimal landscaping installed on the island. Mr. Lecklider asked that Council members view the site and provide feedback to him. : '!' I il 'II 'I;:: Ii!. .!I. I,,.. ,. ! , , RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS m"~","",_,",,_""'_"~""m_,,~,,~Mil!~!~~Q",g!_m"~="~"m=Q_pm_m""m__~Hm_m"m=~~>>_Dllhlin"Cit~"C.Q:unciL_'Qw",~=,,__,_~,,~__P~g~"14w_,=~~~e!!~,,g:'''''''''''h>>''~=_ I DAYTON LEGAL BLANK CO., FORM NO. 10148 Helr] August 19, 2002 19 5. In the report on the wells, a comment was included regarding the A very Road Farm Market where the complaint was that the well was pumping sand. In the notes, the report indicates that pumping sand was considered as a low priority. Mr. Hammersmith responded that when they visited the site, the consultant could not ..--. determine that the well was in fact pumping sand. 6. Asked if the traffic pre-emption system proposed is the same one presented to Council last year. Ms. Crandall stated that a determination about the vendor has not been made. The decision will be left up to the fire department. 7. Asked about the date for the Halloween Spooktacular. This should be noted on the calendar. Ms. Salay: 1. Requested a sketch of the parks being developed in the southwest - Balgriffin, Sandy Comers, Heather Glen North, and for the area north of Woemer- Temple which is currently an open field. Mr. Hahn responded that he can provide the plans for Balgriffin and Sandy Comers. There has been no design work done for Heather Glen North, but Ms. Karagory has met with the residents for input. She asked that this be provided in her Council mailbox. 2. Noted that a letter was sent by the Historic Dublin Association regarding the UDC process. She would like Planning staff to respond to the HDA that their letter has been received, along with an update on the process and where the City stands relative to making decisions affecting their area. 3. Acknowledged Mr. Hammersmith for the very thorough report on the well situation. ....- Mayor McCash noted that he received a letter from Goodwill Rehabilitation Service praising Ms. Nardecchia for her efforts in coordinating the volunteer program. She is definitely putting forth an extra effort with the program. Mayor McCash moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:50 p.m. Ms. Salay seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Ms. Chinnici-Zuercher, yes; Mayor Kranstuber, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mayor McCash, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes. ~~~~ lerk of CouncIl ~