The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution 032-16RECORD OF RESOLUTIONS Dayton Legal Blank, Inc., Form No. 30045 Resolution No. 32-16 Passed A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE MASTER PLAN FOR THE SCIOTO RIVERSIDE PARK ,20 WHEREAS, the City of Dublin delivers high quality parks, recreation facilities and leisure services that enhance the quality of life of the community; and WHEREAS, the City of Dublin consistently improves the level of service of park and recreational facilities, preserves the natural environment and plans for the future recreational needs of its citizens; and WHEREAS, recent surveys of Dublin residents indicate that the acquisition of additional river fronting park land is their highest priority parkland and open space pursuit by the City; and WHEREAS, Council authorized the Bridge Street District River Corridor Framework Plan in early 2013; and WHEREAS, from that beginning of the Framework planning process, the City has advanced the formal planning for a major new park area and related facilities along both sides of the Scioto River within the Bridge Street District; and WHEREAS, the planning of an extraordinary array of other key public improvements and private developments (representing hundreds of millions of dollars in investment) within the river corridor are now under construction; and WHEREAS, the City of Dublin has been acquiring the land necessary for the Scioto Riverside Park, consistent with the planning undertaken to date; and WHEREAS, the planning for the attached Scioto Riverside Park Master Plan has involved extensive public input and engagement over the past three years has informed the development of the Master Plan consistent with the desires and needs of the community; and WHEREAS, approving this Master Plan will facilitate the City's ability to advance the design of the first phase of park improvements (such as the plazas at either end of the pedestrian bridge) and guide the acquisition of additional land, as well as help inform future capital planning decisions by the City for possible future phases of the park; and WHEREAS, this Master Plan is a policy document that informs future planning, implementation and decision- making by the City; and WHEREAS, implementation of the public improvements outlined in the Master Plan will be determined through the City's annual Five -year Capital Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, the City seeks to preserve the public health, safety and welfare by managing the City's parks and recreational services. NOW, T EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, 7 of the elected members concurring that: Section 1. The Master Plan for the Scioto Riverside Park be, and hereby is, adopted. Section 2. The 2009 Parks and Recreation Master Plan shall be updated to reflect the geographic area depicted within the approved Master Plan for the Scioto Riverside Park. Section 3. Staff is hereby instructed to prepare and process any necessary amendments to the Dublin Community Plan to reflect the geographic area depicted within the approved Master Plan for the Scioto Riverside Park. RECORD OF RESOLUTIONS Dayton Legal Blank, Inc., Form No. 30045 Resolution No. 32 -16 Passed Page 2 of 2 , 20 Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect and be in force upon passage in accordance with Section 4.04(a) of the Revised Charter. Pa Eethis K of , 2016 Mayor - Pqe�i'dir44 Officer ATTEST: Clerk of Council Office of the City Manager 600 Fmerald Parkway � Dublin, OH 43017 -1090 Cif of Dub�In Phone: 614.410.4400 � Fax; 614-410-4490 To; Members of Dublin City Council from; Dana L. McDaniel Ci Mana er / �, ��:, Date; May 19, 2016 Initiated By� Matt Farman, Director of Parks and Recreation ite; Resolution 32 -16 _Adopting the Master Plan for the Scioto Riverside Park Background As discussed at the City Council workshop held an Monday, April 18, 2016, staff has prepared Resolution 32.16, Adopting the Master Plan for the Scioto Riverside Park for consideration, Attached is a copy of the proposed Master Plan for your reference, As Council will recall, City Council authorized the River Corridor Framework Planning effort in early 2013, with the expectation it would establish the early stage conceptual planning and design framework for the many public infrastructure/park projects and the private development opportunities that were under consideration within this important area of the Bridge Street District This Framework plan was publicly unveiled and commented upon at swell- attended community workshop at the OCLC Conference Center in October of 2013 At this workshop, the Scioto Riverside Park concept plan (including the pedestrian bridge), the location of the proposed Riverside Drive and the SR 161- Riverside roundabout projects, as well as the first concepts for private redevelopment within the river corridor were all presented, and public input was obtained. Soon after that public session, City Council authorized the Administration to move forward with preliminary engineering for the key roadway and infrastructure improvements (including the pedestrian bridgeJ as well as to advance the planning of the river corridor park itself, Through a series of subsequent public engagements, the collection of information has continued to provide guidance toward the planning of the park that resulted in supplementary modifications and refinements to the original park design, its amenities, the park's programming and the park layout to ensure the desires and needs of the community have been fully considered, By and large, feedback received by the community has been tremendously supportive of the Master Plan, and although a number of minor adjustments have been made during that engagement process, the conceptual plan has remained remarkably intact since its first major public review and presentation in October of 2013. Since the initial Framework Planning effort, an extraordinary array of private development and major public infrastructure projects are now under construction, with many first phase improvements being completed this year. The park's final planning and implementation have been, by necessity, fallowing behind these other projects, in part because a substantial portion of the new park area (especially an the east side of the Scioto River) will not be available for construction until the existing Riverside Drive is removed from service later this year, Finalizing and adopting the Master Plan for this park will facilitate the City's ability to better advance the design of key phase 1 park improvements (such as the plazas at either end of the pedestrian bridgeJ, as well as help inform future capital planning decisions of the Ciry for possible future phases of Resolution 32 -16 -- Adopting the Master Plan for the Scioto Riverside May 19, 2016 Page 2 of 2 the park The formal adoption of the master plan is not intended to limit the ability of the Ciiy to amend the park plan as Dublin begins to implement the park improvements, Approving the master plan does, however, establish a coherent planning and financial framework within which the 1:Inai design of certain phase 1 components of the park can move forward, and for which well- informed future project phasing and capital programming can be properly considered, Ali features of the proposed Master Plan work together towards the major transformative move of enhancing, restoring and rediscovering the great natural amenity at the heart of the Dublin Community. The Scioto River. The planning for the Riverside Park envisions increased recreation, scenic, and education opportunities along the riverfront while providing protection for sensitive natural features and enhancing ecological systems, The major features of the Riverside Park are outlined and briefly described Below. Pedestrian Bridge; Iconic pedestrian and bicycle crossing that serves both as a critical transportation link and a regional destination, featuring the scenic Scioto River corridor. Bridge landings & Plazas; Centers of park activity and events at the interface between neighborhoods, park and river. These plazas provide the opportunity for active park programming (iae, lunchtime concerts) and seasonal activities (i,e, ice skating), The Greens Flexible lawn space for festivals, events, passive recreation and leisure The Green is the central feature of the park on the east side of the Scioto River and creates the setting for a wide range of passive and active recreational activities, Pathways & Trails Recreation and immersion in nature within the park as well as connections to the community and river system Indian Run Falls; Creative and sensitive access to one of the most dramatic natural features in the region, River Access & Overlooks Providing views and direct access to water's edge for fishing, canoeing, kayaking, exploring and education, Recommendation After more than two years of planning and extensive pubiic engagement, staff recommends that City Council formally approve Resolution 32 -16, Adopting the Master Pian for the Scioto Riverside Park, Upon its adoption, and unless otherwise directed by Council, staff will implement the City's formal park naming process, guided by the Park Naming Policy that was adopted by City Council on April S, 2004 (Park Naming Policy attached.) Please note that the Policy offers the option of a "Kids Vate" or a ' "Public Naming Procedure,° both of which refer to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission (PRAC) as the recommending body, As you will recall, City Council took action to combine the PRAC with the Community Service Advisory Commission (CSAC) in 2013; therefore, CSAC will be the recommending body referenced in the Poiicy. Staff is seeking direction from City Council as to its preferred option to solicit a "'Kids Vote," a "Public Naming Procedure° or other Council preferred method By which the park will be formally named, If you have any questions related to Resolution 32.16, please feel free to contact Matt Farman or Terry Foegler directly. I'arls Naming Policy D� f irritr`ars ON of'Duhlin I'm'k Svstem The City ofDublin park system is comprised of all (:'ity owned lall dslfactics intended for recreational use, Components of the system include, but are not limited to. community parks, neighborht��od parks buildings and structures (e.g, recreation center, shelter houses), hike paths, gateways, natural areas, and dedicated green spaces, All components of the City park system are intended far the use/enjoyment of the general public. C'o�nn�u��i1 }� I'rrrk �. �1s defined by the I'r�rk, I�ccreation, Open !pace and L;reenway CJuidelines developed by the National Recreation and bark Association and the American Academy for Park and Recreation Administration, "Community parks are larger in site and serve a broader purpose than neighborhood parks. 'their focus is on mecting the recreation needs of several neighborhoods or large sections ai'the community, as well as preserving unique landscapes and open spaces, 1'lzcy allow for group activities and offer ocher recreational opportunities not feasible- and perhaps not desirable- at the neighbor °hood IeveL As with neighborhood parks, they should be developed for both passive and active activities "'. A��drharlaoorl 1'rsrk As defined by the lark, Recreation, Open Space and Greenway Guidelines developed by the National B�eercation and Park Association and the American Academy for Park and Recreation Administration, '`Neighborhood perks remain the basic unit of the park. system and serve as the reereationa9 and soci�il focus of tl�e neighborhood. They should be developed for both active and passive recreation activities geared specifically for those living within the service area. Accommodating a wide variety of age and user groups, including children, adults, the elderly, and special populations, is u��portant, ('aeatii�g a sense of place by bringing together the unique character ofthe site with that oP °the neigi�borhnod is vital to sueeessful design''. C "it�t�,fc�rililres- .include all C'itywowned buildings and structures, ti�tR�ung of Park�IFacilitics (. "ity parks and facilities, or portions thereof. will be named accordiz�g to the policy set forth herein and as directed by f)ublin City Council IV`ar��e Uri,�rius Criteria for selecting nan�cs fear (:'ity parksl {aeilitics will include, but are not limited toy � (.ie�agrapl7ical names descriptive al' the location or significaC�t natural features in or near the park r�� °facility. liistorical names relevant to the park or facility. � i�;aelic�`Celtic references relevar�l to either the historical or geographical significance of the park or facility. � park ar Iacility (or po ►lion tl�ereof� may be named fog° an individual or sponsor if the land and/or develop►ttent of the parklf "acility is privately donatedil`�mded. Dublin City CoUmcil m► ►st apprr ►ve da►7ations and naming commitments prior to the City's acceptance Cl'l the, donation, 1'r� ►ccss for Park Naming Community input concerning a park name will he sought in accordance with the following procedure, ON Council shall determine whether the park . should be named by a kris Vote or by a public naming procedure. 2. In the event the City Council determines that a lids Vote is appropriate, the Council skull refer the matter to the Park and Recreation Advisory C'onvnission, which shall develop a list of possible park names lior approval by Council, The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission will solicit public input in developing this list of names. Council ~hall approve a complete list of potential park names bel'ore the question is placed on the kids Vote ballot. The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission shall forward the results of the kids Vote ballot to the City Council for adoption by Resolution, :i. In the event the City Council determines that a public nan7ing procedure is al?prapriate, City slafl' shall generate a notice soliciting nominations from thi; public for park or facility name °s utilizing appmpri�rte ��►oans oi' communication, Communication venues �r�ay include place►ncnt of G► notice or a►ticic in local newspapers; the City's official website; dissemination of w► °itten materials through the Dublin City Schools, thane schools within the Billiard City 5ehooC District which Dublin residents attend. and private schools located v,�ithin Dt►blin; by means t►f a posting at the l)ubl'u� Community Recreation � "enter and the affected site at least 30 days prior t►� a Park and Rea °eatio�7 Adviso ►� ( "ommission meeting; or other communication vem ►es commonly utilied by Chc City, �omin;�►lions shall be sent to the Park and Recreation Advisory Commissi�►n which will reviev,% all submissions and o��ake a formal recommendation to �'itv C °ouncil. �, (:ity Council will have final approval ��f "the park or Facility nan�c and shall adept such name by means of`a Resolution April 5, 2004 QTHr-R PRAC Recommendation re Park Namin Polio Mr, McDaniel stated that Council referred this issue to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission. A policy for naming parks has been developed, which has been forwarded to Council. Wallace Maurer, 741 Dublin Road stated the PRAC policy states that Council shall decide whether parks shall be named by a kid's vote or by a public naming procedure, However, the actual policy wording is; ''PRAC shall develop a list of passible park names for approval by Council." now much input do children actually have? Mr McDaniel responded that although the policy does not state this, the Commission's practice has been to involve the community, including children, in the development of a list of suggested names, Mayor Chinnici- Zuercher requested that the policy be amended to clarify that public input is included in developing the list of possible names. Mr. McDaniel stated that a second sentence would be inserted in #2, "Process far Park Naming," to indicate that public input would be solicited in developing the list of potential names. That may be achieved in any number of innovative methods. Mrs, Baring moved to include language in the palicy that indicates public input would be solicited in developing the list of potential names, Mr. Keenan seconded the motion, Vote on the motion; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr, Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mrs. Baring, yes; Mayor ChinniciuZuercher, yes; Ms. Salay, yes; Mr. McCash, yes. Vote on the olio as amended: Mrs. Baring, yes; Ms. Safay, yes; Mr McCash, yes; Mayor Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr, Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes. Ll 61= 1 Pedestrian Bridge East Plaza 21 Pedestrian Bridge West Plaza -J 9: r ;Join] V 4 x + I� LJ 31 Pedestrian Bridge J4 [ -P The Green � 51 Pathways & Trails u � J I 61 Indian Run Falls Trail 11 ❑ 71 River Access & Overlooks 81 John Shields Parkway Plaza DUBLIN RIVERSIDE PARK MASTER PLAN - Park Context: The Heart of the Bridge Street District Through early community planning for the Bridge Street District, the Scioto River corridor through Historic Dublin was identified as the focal point for initial public investment. The invaluable community assets of the river and historic core offered the foundation for both expanded civic space within the heart of the community and for seminal private investment within the Bridge Street District. The proposed Riverside Park was one of a core group of public space and public infrastructure projects that was identified in early 2013 as having the potential to best leverage quality private development and provide the greatest community benefit within the emerging Bridge Street District. The park was selected as one of these catalytic projects due to the demonstrated and measured ability of high quality urban parks to provide a wide and sustainable range of benefits to their surrounding communities. Like all great urban green space, the Riverside Park has the potential to demonstrate: - A positive increase in adjacent real estate value and incentive for private development - Economic development value through the creation of lifestyle amenities that lead directly to talent attraction and retention - Indirect economic benefit through ecosystem services (reduced air temperature, pollutant removal, reduced runoff, improved water quality, energy conservation, aquifer /groundwater protection, erosion control, emission control, and flood control) - Community marketing collateral and visitor attraction qualities - Health and wellness benefits through recreation -based preventative health opportunities - Social fabric building through community events and activities El LI d DIED ST S0IOi0 RIVER RIVERSIDE DR.ISE) Q EJ ❑ O z I Public Conversation: Park Master Plan Development Over the past three years, there has been significant public dialogue and community input regarding the development of the Riverside Park and surrounding context. The public forums are outlined below and began in early 2013 with initial studies of the park extents and the interface between park, public streets and future private development. Through multiple community opinion surveys and recent public meetings, the major features of the park have started to come into focus. The desire for more access to the Scioto River and natural parkland is a significant theme in both survey results and first- hand conversations with local residents, and this preference creates the overarching approach to park design and planning. Public Engagement 2013 January & March - City Council & Planning Commission Joint Work Sessions 2013 May through August - Community Interviews 2013 September - City Council Work Session 2013 October- Public Meeting 2015 April - HOA Annual Meeting 2016 March - Public Meeting 19:1 Park Master Plan: Park Features & Activities All features of the proposed Riverside Park work together towards the major transformative move of enhancing, restoring and rediscovering the great natural amenity at the heart of the Dublin Community: the Scioto River. The planning for the Riverside Park envisions increased recreation, scenic, and education opportunities along the riverfront while providing protection for sensitive natural features and enhancing ecological systems. The major features of the Riverside Park are outlined and briefly described below: Pedestrian Bridge: Iconic pedestrian and bicycle crossing that serves both a critical transportation link and a regional destination, featuring the scenic Scioto River corridor. Bridge Landings & Plazas: Centers of park activity and events at the interface between neighborhood, park and river. These plazas provide the opportunity for active park programming (i.e., lunchtime concerts) and seasonal activities i.e., ice skating). The Green: Flexible lawn space for festivals, events, passive recreation and leisure. The Green is the central feature of the park on the east side of the Scioto River and creates the setting for a wide range of park and community activities. Pathways & Trails: Recreation and immersion in nature within the park as well as connections to the community and larger river system. Indian Run Falls: Creative and sensitive access to one of the most dramatic natural features in the region. River Access & Overlooks: Providing views and direct access to water's edge for fishing, canoeing, kayaking, exploring and education. MKSK MKSKSTUDIOS.COM + I I� Al 4 � e — rl ot -�• 4 - 4 1 I PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE EAST PLAZA r plip r� -r7 7F Al u o &IF ISrsa.�l 0 s T J� .41111^ o &IF ISrsa.�l 0 s T J� M1%•- 4 1 luw` N04 77 T, w.t 4 _� A• Ty. - ,It* 4 r -. N R ty oil Nil �q r 1.. 1 � R I w P" Via• -.-:�:. 1M ec- _ .'�.� —" �. 2 I PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE WEST PLAZA .. _. r I -.. I f to I �_ �_ 1. ,� i I � I� 1 w�� Y •�- z._ • =�`� ,, - � �, _ „; . . _- �, '�y �: �"i \, ,,y; d F Y � �.. �. r R'� y9r� . d .� -.�. ' .-... Y!_ i•: �`� 'n'"�yy,�� .amt �L�- � .a� 1' j%.�: v f S� ,r j �A i ._ <'. �� .e�.; yam. -'_ �'”: �..,. �r -: --. �1 f�^rY �. �ti .i ..Y��: � 1 ! �� ' M • _ _ fie' � Q�b`` f y t7$� ',. �... �.,' q' }• '; �� _!:.r. -„� �" ;� _fit �° �. ^�,'.a�� !�� \ � `, � � �i i ''?' .. -, �f A �..� - ,y1• C �� c {r � � � • �' 1 n' �/] ' r � � -:' , xE as � i,r i � i \ r��` rat �.. � �e 5' lr%�, [ Zr r �� a., ( i � � 6y, l t �"2�'i r �� 1� S� 0 � 'OM 'l% I .p,�f � ! 'r• 1 - ! �r rC � 'i� i (� .�• � �. IOM 1 d e i I�.p A ,A�. C�} ��.t�. ®rE rr'V �'• ' I ,e M�._ � - .. - . f ' � �J ,� \, e\ �;�j �1� I ��'I � ',` (Y��, "�� S� {r,� �Ir .�'d' �i Ai��1�.��R ,� .?- Jt�'S+` � �,�, _ ,;, t �� 'i ' ti �` �'l J � ,Pr � � �r � �/aa � � y. ��d,f !i'r.:. �..'� � w i ' „I �� Xi r�l 'I rr ' d.��w Ya 15 �r.P �% a 1 46 , a F 91 r t - _ r • '�F 1�1 J t I -W40 in. I-- 1 + * = T Ap 1 I ' 1 r • •� �— - � f I � r { y d% ql r �. • } i � J 1 r F f . i 1 •I I • a —rte • � j R 1h _ ` •II 11 1 r It m T t �1 r 1+ ,y r 7y i ly F p T Y • r r. 5 L {' ► •5: '�rY ;F 4' f" i '• y .r , �_ •� } L - L_ Y •- � � ; YJ�4 •i_-' .•, . jr MM- - - W- • ,. � T A 1 N� H U Kk4„ If ter. -S 'tt If r %' ° �► P m, I Or f' \.' ;fin. i It If r �1 n - 01 ,. POP- POP.;..__ h+ 1 :. a Vj f .' 14 /y''(� s. .s: at . { .c7y v . P. � -a�.. ..Jli�+f ��i k.7./►0R!`.LeL�biR�. •fl�f?�'\Y .,.uLF1l.C'1.�w�1/A�id7r�1� ,r 4I THE GREEN a' is _ - -1 �... .. •. f `2. 9 Jw - M Y It hx 4, S was Lill M n, b POT. ! y "yv .y,y.,�, rr" k I.e' Or morr i rav (Pl. I •• ilr , r�,� +Ir 1 i .'. f It JII .J 1 -' {` �y v {t 0; I 9.1`r.X, ��V �,i' f of - - _ ,, j ..�N 5 'I r'' d�... F.. ]' _ aJ, •r`� ;.. .. _ r,r vya- FJIL44 a vp 4 1 • q w� IL ■ fM '�� r 1 `• d r 1 f r• 1y - t IV,, .b 1 i i V` R .' rr �, NIL ;.. . i 1 r# 1: INL 5 I PATH_ WAYS & TRAILS -�= :�-•�i fl�'�� it ' -k' i.__I =J' ,!i I� 5 �.►7 M6- ry.rriilefl�i. •ir�R r � A • a f i lN ! F1 f .��J - { �: r �FrF� 1 r i.4 } If rm ■.: r � di F AL ro JIN • 1 1. #. • + y r k i k• �. 4* lb i V •" AM & AM fit•• y1, • . •, 1 4' *. ip . DIP y a .. 1 ■ A. 1 } l 1 . I_t r IF Op + r r Y T OIFVNI II, If ' L * '1 + r + :•• r * +. i �� E. lip Apr Ai. Ar }* 40 tvp +x.'. Y #? h • 7 � .1� * 1 _ F � Air dp I r P, r r } Ad • -ref w• -, � � - : • _ . f ++ • i ++: 1 +•i! r �► - i 4 • t ., e dr df 4 4IF 1 � _ 4 ! •K 4L# r+ -16 q_ f PA #lr ■ 4y ' h J � 1 : � np�.7y� � r '. j s ■ r- : . MKSKSTUDIOs. M r Jr� Y h • r • -ref w• -, � � - : • _ . f ++ • i ++: 1 +•i! r �► - i 4 • t ., e dr df 4 4IF 1 � _ 4 ! •K 4L# r+ -16 q_ f PA #lr ■ 4y ' h J � 1 : � np�.7y� � r '. j s ■ r- : . MKSKSTUDIOs. M / u L p r^ f or 4*i iti! - y l^ 7 v, s wa _ LL i ' '.. L4 .`•4' fr _ �u" ~ ' xis.. t 6 INDIAN RUN FALLS TRAIL _ =vim �e �r _ L kkkk t spy__ T rr7 Nip IN I at +� .014k, a d 1 9 2C err % -y - P." 7 PA ; •' / ,, _ ems' 1 ,• , .. ,(_$ ",; Ott COP' ukaki, �£i Opinion of Probable Cost A ■ Pedestrian Bridge 'Cr 131 SI G� ED D G++ ■ a Ped Bridge West Plaza • Eli H a� • 1 1 1 1 11 Pedestrian _fir ■ ■� - - East Open Space & Event �.-- • "i► s . ■ ■ R i•ii1:'iC��l ■Ir�� !'::�I 000P000 n Run Connection t} -f 11 111 WON 10 John Shields Parkway Plaza • IIM► 11 111 East Bluff Climbing Access n.- a x f 1 1 111 I* East River Access ..F T e �� '� a[N'•�'� - ..' 000P000 11■ n - _. — Between yLOt. • Pedestrian a G�a��•�r :-�. d O gi�04- OY �- �y s _.c. __ -�=-a ,�- � =�...e•�•o �ua9 =ae•r_vro(v Bridge .f ��Q o'efOrw . •a.e ®�aael4n'ZPa1- g�e�YwZZOTO�T of �l1 SZO�� .•s=¢� ess iota Iasi oro ia•►57 _°my�.. .es - U�71vJlOipia, Irt 1 Ul 01lYY� , A+`i[i,� NORTH Il .a'�,1�.�J— VI'IA�1��11ei� �:� Bridge Landing, River Access &The Green • i • Riverside Drive & Roundabout Pedestrian Bridge ohn f Bridge Park East MKSK MKSKSTUDIOS.COM