The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04/21/1986 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ Meeting National Graphics Corp.. Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ Held April 21, 1986 19 ",...., The regularly scheduled meeting of the Dublin Village Council was called to order by Mayor Michael L. Close at 7:30 P.M. on Monday, April 21, 1986. ..... Mr. Thornton led the Pledge of Allegiance. Members of Council present were: Mr. Amorose, Mayor Close, Mr. Jankowski, Ms. Maurer, Mr. Rozanski, Mr. Sutphen, and Mr. Thornton. Mr. Stephen Smith, Law Director, was present as was Mr. Sheldon, Village Manager. Members of Village staff in attendance were: Mr. Bowman, Ms. Jordan, and Mr. Warner. Mr. Sutphen moved to approve the minutes of the April 7, 1986 meeting of Counci l. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous in favor. "..... Mr. Thornton moved to approve payment of the bills. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. Responding to a question from Mr. Amorose regarding a payment to McGuffey Lane for entertainment for the 4th of July, it was explained that the payment was for the 1986 Fourth of July Celebration. The group has asked for one half of its fee as a retainer to confirm the date. Mr. Amorose also had a question regarding payment of engineering costs on Martin Road to Meijer Inc. Mr. Warner said that those costs were for the rezlignment of the drive- way. The vote on payment of the bills was unanimous in favor. ...... Public Hearing Ordinance No. 25-86 Proposed Ordinance Regarding Land for Schools. r- , L Mayor Close mentioned a memorandum received by members of Council from the Law Director regarding the proposed ordinance and asked Mr. Smith to comment regarding same. Mr. Smith said that his memorandum dealt with statuatory provisions, the case law, appropriate previous interpretations and other matters. Mr. Smith went on the say that it was his opinion that as the proposed ordinance is written, that it would not stand a challenge in the court. He said that he had not precluded a different approach or perhaps a different type of legislation to accomplish the same thing. Mr. Smith said that he would be happy to meet with Mr. Rich, the School Board's representative. Mr. Smith also said that there is an equal protection question; a statuatory interpretation as to what authority and how taxes are levied; there are equal protection arguments about the fact that the district encompasses outside Dublin; there is the issue of whether Dublin would be acting outside of "normal Village functions". Mayor Close commented that in view of the recommendation of the Law Director that he would recommend that the matter be tabled. Ms. Maurer said that she was concerned with tabling a matter on which a public hearing had been scheduled with notices having been sent out, etc. Mayor Close cited the rules for a Public Hearing as written in Dublin's Council Rules of Order. Registering Joe Riedel. Registering as proponents were Mr. Jeff Rich, Mr. Tony Wall, and Mr. as opponents were Mr. Bob Harrison and Mr. Martin Graff. I ~... AJ inutes of RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ Meeting National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097..... Held April 21, 1986 19 """'" .... "..... ..... [ Page Two Mr. Joe Riedel, Superintendent of the Dublin Local Schools referred to a letter which he had sent to the members of Council in which he pointed out three issues that he thought were very important to the School Board, the Administration, and to the community: 1. Planning. As the Dublin school district grows to its projected enrollment and additional 21 school sites will be needed. A land ordinance of school sites would assis in assuring that the sites will be available when needed. 2. Cost. As the cost of sites continues to increase, the stabilizing effects would help reduce levy/bond issue requirements. 3. Impact on taxpayer. Essential that the two largest users of tax dollars work together to hold to a minimum the impact on the taxpayer. Mr. Riedel mentioned that the City of Gahanna has some type of ordinance for land, and suggested proceeding in the interest of the taxpayer and proceed with the opportunity for the developers to "turn a profit" with the obligation to share the financial burden which is placed on the community. Mr. Bob Harrison, a Dublin Village resident, said that he had a difficult time with the Village of Dublin assuming responsibility for generating money and land for the school system and proceeded to make the following comments: 1. They are both separate political entities with boundaries which both have in place procedures revenue and acquiring land. Question the fairness of the ordinance - the ordinance basically amounts to discrimatory pass-through tax only onto buyers and renters of new homes and apartments within Dublin while at the same time there are no similar procedures in place for development outside of the Village but yet within the school system. Under the proposed ordinance new residents in Dublin or development in Dublin would be placed in the position of subsidizing development in surrounding areas. The Village should investigate other alternatives which are more fair and less discrimatory - such as requiring developers to set aside land for School Board purchase with the funding to come from a transfer tax on all homes sold within Dublin. At the same time encouragement should be given to Columbus to adopt similar ordinances. Until such time cooperation is attained from Columbus no action should be instituted on the part of the Village. What also needs to be studied is the potential economic impact upon Dublin. Proposed that the ordinance be tabled indefinitely until such time that an economic impact study be commissioned prior to reconsidering the ordinance. different geographica for generating 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Mr. Tony Wall, Assistant Superintendent of the schools expressed his appreciation to Councilmen Amorose and Sutphen who initiated the conversations regarding the ordinance. The ordinance presented was in conjunction with the school's legal counse 1. Mr. Wall suggested that the Village's counsel be directed to work with the school's counsel to address the concerns have been raised. Mr. Martin Graff representing the Building Industry Association of Central Ohio presented his concerns before Council. He noted that they are a trade association with a membership comprised of approximately 600 members who are involved in the residential construction industry. ...-..'~ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ Meeting National Graphics Corp.. Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ Held April 21, 1986 19 Page Three "..... On behalf of the BIA, Mr. Graff requested that the proposal be tabled in order them to study the proposal further and make an "educated opinion on it". He indicated that their legal counsel questions the constitutionality of the proposal. t ! ...... r- f L..... Mr. Jeff Rich, legal counsel for the Dublin School Board also discussed the issue. Mr. Rich mentioned the positive aspects of the two groups of elected officials coming together to try to work together for what is best for the community (the voters). He indicated that he felt that both the members of the Dublin Village Council and the Dublin Board of Education owe their primary responsibility to the voters to try to keep taxes at an absolute minimum. Mr. Rich noted that the ordinance is modeled after what-are called "impact fees" that require developers to set aside a certain amount of land for parks or as an alternative, a certain amount of money. He said that he felt that their ordinance was more firm on constitutional groups for the following reasons - the Village's is not based on any law ever passed by the General Assembly. He indicated that there is a law that was passed by the General Assembly 10 years ago (Ohio Revised Code, 755.16) and it allows for, encourages joint development by a Village, by a City, and a School District of properties that can be used by the entire community - parks, gymnasiums, swimming pools, etc. Mr. Rich indicated that he would be very willing to discuss the issue with Mr. Smith. ,...... i '-- Mayor Close commented on a prov~s~on in the ordinance that provides that prior to submitting a plat, 60 days in advance thereof, that the school be given a copy so that they can comment. He suggested that the 60 days was probably an unreasonable long period of time and wondered if the School Board would be agreeable to a shorter period of time (perhaps three weeks). Mr. Rich said that he thought that three weeks would be long enough. Mr. Rozanski asked Mr. Rich if the ordinance was being passed on to all the municipalities in the Dublin School District. Mr. Wall said that the ordinance had been passed on to the Northwest Task Force and they will be forwarding it to the Columbus City Council as a part of their recommendation for consideration. Ms. Maurer commented that she thought that perhaps the Village would perhaps be imposing a school tax. She also said that she was not willing to support an ordinance that which takes an action which is in violation of the State law and the Constitution. She said that she felt that it was important for the Council to consider the legality and constitutionali y of items that have questions about them. Mayor Close said that he agreed that a transfer tax sounded more attractiv than what was proposed. Mayor Close said that the ordinance would be held over for a third and final meeting at the second Council meeting in May (May 19, 1986). Ordinance No. 70-85 - Rezone 4.082 Acres on Hartin Road - DeLong Property. Third Reading. Mr. Smith explained that the recommendation of Planning and Zoning was to disapprove the request. Mayor Close said that if two thirds of the members of Council vote to approve the rezoning request (from SO to CC), then they would be, in fact, overriding the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Bowman reported that staff recommended in favor of the request, based on the fact that the land use is overwhelmingly commercial anyway, and gives the opportunity for the Village to build a road where one did not exist before. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS lHinutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ Meeting National Graphics Corp.. Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ Held April 21, 1986 19. Page Four "...... ! ..... Mr. Bowman also said that the Planning and Zoning Commission generally felt that there could be more control over the property by zoning into a Planned Commercial Development District, preferring that the actual user be known before zoning it commercial. Mr. Amorose said that he voted no because he felt that by voting for the CC zoning on the property that there would not be as much control over what happens on the piece of ground. Mr. Bowman also pointed out that the property would be subject to Corridor District Review - curb cuts, mounding, landscaping, e.g. Mr. Amorose also said that he felt that the area was being "loaded up with strip shopping centers" which will create traffic problems Mr. Thornton remembered that several months ago Council requested that the people involved get together and arrived at a solution. He said that he felt that the people had done as requested. Mr. Amorose expressed concern regarding the servicing of a shopping center with a 26' road and not being able to negotiate the turn with semis, suggesting that the entire 36' be put in immediately Mr. Bowman said that staff recommended that additional right-of-way be dedicated along Sawmill Road (50' from centerlin) and that when they come back for Corridor Review on the lot that the road be widened to 36'. r- . l... The vote on the ordinance was as follows: Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Thornton, yes; Mayor Close, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Amorose, no; Mr. Rozanski, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes. Ordinance No. 20-86 - Amend Compensation Plan - Ordinances 52-81 and 48-84. Third Reading. Mr. Jankowski moved to amend Section 6 of the ordinance to give guide- lines for the granting of overtime or formal comp time as recommended by the Village Attorney Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous in favor of the amendment. The vote was 7-0 in favor of the ordinance. Ordinance No. 22-86 Second Reading. Mayor Close said that the ordinance would be read for the third reading at the Council Meeting on May 5, 1986. Accept Annexation of 101.3 Acres North of School. [ Resolution No. 07-86 - Locating School Site in Earlington Subdivision. First Reading. Mr. Sutphen introduced the Resolution. Mr. Tony Wall said that they feel a definite need for that parcel and hope that there can be some kind of agreement as to their use of the property. Mayor Close said that after the item was put on the agenda for the Council Meeting two weeks ago there was a letter circulated from the President of the School Board concerning the possible acquisition of some land virtually across the road in the Muirfield One project. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ Meeting National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ Held April 21, 1986 19 Page Five c Mr. Wall said that the 10 acres that was in the original Muirfield plan off of Ashbaugh Road that they were unaware of. Therefore, it was not part of their original planning. He said that they felt that they could substantiate the use of both sites - Brandon, Earlington, Indian Run Meadow, etc. He noted that discussions are being held with Muirfield about some other property which they have and hopefully some agreement can be reached. If not, the Ashbaugh Road property would again be considered. He also said that they would both be elementary school sites. Mr. Rozanski said that he thought that in the original platting of Muirfield that there was 55 acres set aside for schools. Mr. Wall said that that was on the original development plan. Mr. Rozanski asked what has happened to that original acreage. Mr. Wall said that some of that was released by previous Boards of Education and Administrations. He said that the Ashbaugh Road property was not released. ,.... It was noted that the site for the Deer Run Elementary School was purchased from Muirfield. When Muirfield was originally platted there were planned approximately 6200 homes. At the present time there are approximately 1800 homes. The Schools have indicated that anywhere from 420 to 475 homes constitutes a need for an elementary school. With 1800 homes there would then be a need for approximately three elementary schools in the Muirfield area. Originally there was a site at Muirfield and Glick Road but it was a site that was inappropriate to build on - the site being 20 acres where Weybridge is now. There was close to 26 acres around Deer Run, and 10 acres at Brand and Ashbaugh. There was another site at Glick Road close to SlRl 745 that was turned down. ...... Mayor Close noted that the principle of the resolution being suggested is whether or not the Village is will to agree, in principle, to let a portion of the Village's 26fi acre site be used for school purposes rather than park purposes. Ms. Maurer said that it was her understanding that the Village was being presented with a proposal that the school lease the property for the building of a school; that the property would never leave the owner- ship of the Village. She indicated that she had proposed that a condition of the lease would be that the first time the school population dropped the first building that would be emptied would be that one and it would be returned to the Village for use by the Village's Parks and Recreation activities. ~ Mayor Close said that those concerns were relayed to the appropriate parties - that in the event the Village gave a school site and they had to shut down, that the site be given back first, and that the Village would be able to examine their plans so that the site could then function as part of the Village's parks and recreation activities. Mayor Close said that those concerns were relayed to the appropriate parties - that in the event the Village gave a school site and they had to shut down, that the site be given back first and that the Village would be able to examine their plans so that the site could then function as part of the Village's parks and recreation activities. That what is ultimately agreed to as part of the lease agreement will deal also with the accessibility of outdoor bathroom facilities, landscaping, etc. Mayor Close said that he has recommended a reverter clause in the lease. By this resolution Mayor Close indicated that what was being said is that the Village is willing to talk to the School Board about entering into a lease which must be approved by subsequent ordinance to allow the development of the site. .... RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ Meeting National Graphics Corp.. Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ Held April 21, 1986 19_ Page Six ",..... ..... Ms. Maurer said that she would prefer to see the specifics in the ordinance - that it be a lease - that there be a reverter clause _ that it be a certain number of acres... Mr. Amorose said that he was concerned with the use of the Village's park ground, green space for use by the schools. Mr. Rozanski said that he felt that this was an opportunity for both the School Board and the Village Council to show the community that the groups can work together for the benefit of all. Mayor Close announced that the second reading of the ordinance would be be May 5, 1986 meeting of Council. Mayor Close said that he appreciated the participation in the discussion by the representatives of the Dublin schools and invited them to return for future discussion. Resolution No. 08-86 - Regulation of Traffic in Muirfield During Tournamen . First Reading. Mr. Thornton introduced the resolution. r .... Mr. Thornton moved to do away with the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous in favor of the motion. The vote on the resolution was 7-0 in favor. Ordinance No. 26-86 - Rezone 9.02 Acres on South Side of Dublin-Granville Road. First Reading. Mr. Amorose introduced the ordinance. Mr. Amorose moved to refer the ordinance to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous in favor of the motion. Ordinance No. 27-86 - Amend Annual Appropriations for Fiscal 1986. First Reading. Mr. Rozanski introduced the ordinance. Ms. Maurer moved to do away with the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Jankowski seconded the motion. The vote on the motion was 7-0 in favor. The vote on the ordinance was unanimous in favor. ,.... I ! ..... Ordinance No. 28-86 - Accept Bid on Rotary Mower for Parks and Recreation. First Reading. Mr. Sutphen introduced the ordinance. Mr. Sutphen asked Ms. Jordan about the fact that the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Department was not for the low bidder. Ms. Jordan noted that it was the recommendation of Mr. Hahn, Parks Maintenance Supervisor that the Toro tractor be purchased. It was noted that the Toro machine is an easier machine to operate as well as being more powerful. I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS l'-linutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ Meeting National Graphics Corp.. Cols.. O. Form No. 1097 ~ Held ..__April__2J,_L986. 19 Page Seven r I ...... Ms. Maurer moved to pass the ordinance with the recommendation of the Village Manager that the bid be awarded to Century Equipment Company in the amount of $6,895.00 for a Toro Groundmaster 217D. Mr. Jankowski seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous in favor of the motion. Mr. Thornton moved to do away with the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Sutphen seconded the motion. The vote was 7-0 in favor. The vote was unanimous in favor of the ordinance. Ordinance No. 29-86 - Accept Bid for Comprehensive Fleet Insurance. First Reading. Mr. Jankowski introduced the ordinance. Mr. Jankowski moved to amend the ordinance to accept the recommendation of the Village Manager to accept the bid from the Security Plus Insurance Agency in the amount of $8,550.00. Mr. Rozanski seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous in favor of the motion. r- ~ Mr. Jankowski moved to do away with the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Thornton seconded the motion. The vote was 7-0 in favor of the motion. The vote on the ordinance was unanimous in favor. Ordinance No. 30-86 - Authorize Purchase of Land for Parks and Recreation. First Reading. Mr. Amorose introduced the ordinance. ... Mayor Close announced that the second reading of the ordinance would be held at the May 5, 1986 Council Meeting and that a Public Hearing would be scheduled on same. Ordinance No. 31-86 First Reading. Mr. Rozanski introduced the ordinance. Adopt 1986 Capital Improvement Plan in Principle. Mr. Sutphen moved to raised the amount of money appropriated for the Frantz Road Boulevard landscaping from $13,000.00 to $15,500.00. There was no second to the motion. ..... Mr. Warner showed to members of Council the plan for the landscaping prepared by Buck and Sons Landscaping. Mr. Sutphen moved to raised the amount of money appropriated for the trees on the Frantz Road Boulevard from $13,000.00 to $38,000.00, amending the ordinance. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. The total for the 1986 Capital Improvement Plan (in principle) would be adjusted by $25,000.00. The vote was as follows: Mr. Amorose, yes; Mayor Close, yes; Mr. Jankowski yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Rozanski, yes; Mr. Sutphen, yes; Mr. Thornton, no. .... Ms. Maurer moved that two of the items in Exhibit "A", Capital Improve- ments Proposed for 1986, which appear as "estimates" be listed as "maximum amounts" - 1. The amount to acquire right-of-way to create a turn lane at Wendy's International offices - $20,000.00 2. In conjunction with the developer, extend Muirfield Drive north to Indian Run Meadow Subdivision boundary - $250,000.00. I RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ Meeting National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ Held April 21, 1986 19 Page Eight ",... L Ms. Maurer also recommended that the Council title the following item which appeared under "streets" (Frantz Road concrete median to eliminate Frantz Road southbound traffic from left turns into the Plaza Shopping Center) subject to further study by Council prior to an allocation of funds as follows: a solution for the shopping center ingress/egress, depending on the studies outcome, but not a median necessarily. The motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Rozanski moved to waive the three time reading rule and treat as an emergency. Mr. Jankowski seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous in favor. The vote on the ordinance was 7-0 in favor. [ Other Preliminary Plat Approval - Dublin Village Center Mr. Sutphen expressed some concerns with regard to the road; a five lane road going to two and one half or three lanes which would eventually connect to Tuller Road. Mr. Sutphen said that he did not believe that the road was large enough. Mr. Bowman said that the road will be 40' wide, and also said that the traffic consultant said that three lanes around the shopping center would be adequate. It was also noted that there is proposed a signal on Sawmill Road. Mr. Bowman said that the Village's traffic consultant did not condcut a "full blown" traffic study. Mr. Rozanski said that he felt that the amount of traffic was being underestimated. Mr. Amorose said that the issue had been discussed at length at the Planning and Zoning Commission meetings. He said that the applicant said that if the road would need to be widened it would not interfere with the mounding and landscaping. He also indicated that it should be done "right the first time". He also said that the developer agreed to widen Dublin Village Boulevard if the Village deemed it was necessary. Mr. Ben Hale, Jr., representing the applicant, said that they did hire a traffic engineer to make recommendations regarding the size of all roads in the site, and with regard to the road under discussion this particular evening recommended a 36' road (a three lane road). It was a request of the Planning Commission that the planning provide for the widening of the roadway if the situation in the future required same. ".... t I It was noted that all of the roadways would be curb and gutter. It was also noted the roadways would be built and then they would come in for Final Corridor Development Review to approve the actual building and type of landscaping. Mr. Hale said that all of the buildings will be in prior to occupancy of buildings. Mr. Jankowski moved to accept the preliminary plat - Dublin Village Center Ms. Maurer seconded the motion. The vote was as follows: Mayor Close, yes; Mr. Thornton, yes; Ms. Maurer, yes; Mr. Sutphen, no; Mr. Amorose, yes; Mr. Jankowski, yes; Mr. Rozanski, yes. .... r Minutes of RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Dublin Village Council Meeting ~ M eetillg National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ Held April 21, 1986 19_ ""... .... ,.... f i ...... r ,~ ... Page Nine Final Plat Approval - Llewellyn Farms - Frantz Road Corporate Center Mr. Thornton moved to approve. Mr. Amorose seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous in favor of approval of the final plat. Appeal for a Variance on Type of Sidewalk - Mr. Ron Stone. Mr. Stone said that this was to be a "Williamsburg-type" project, and the architect felt that a brick sidewalk would be appropriate. The Village of Dublin codified ordinances, Section 1317.06 states that all sidewalks shall be concrete. There was discussion regarding how said sidewalks would be constructed as well as maintenance responsibility. Council members seemed to feel that the brick sidewalks were a positive factor; however, they said that they would recommend that Mr. Stone present exact specifications so that it could be determined exactly how these sidewalks would be built. Since this project would require a variance to the Dublin codified ordinances Mayor Close suggested that the request be put in the form of a resolution; for presentation at a later Council meeting. Council Roundtable Discussion 1. Mr. Rozanski Mr. Rozanski cited a number of code violations that he had recently observed- those being as follows: A. The bags of mulch in the Kroger parking lot, obstructing views of traffic for drivers of automobiles. B. In violation of an agreement the garage doors on the west side of Roush Hardware are being left open during the day. C. Roush Hardware is using the sidewalk for retail sales space _ if that is the case then additional parking spaces must be obtained for the retail selling space. D. C&SOE has left utility poles at the intersection of Franklin and Bridge Street. E. The pile of gravel in the school parking lot at W. Bridge Street in front of the 1919 building. F. Regarding the Dublin Techmart site. The lack of mounding and the piles of dirt behind the brick arches for their signage. Mr. Jankowski 2. Referred to Mr. Warner's response for a school crosswalk in the vicinity of the Dublin High School. In his memorandum Mr. Warner recommended that nothing be done until the revised plan for the drive into the school site is completed. He also indicated that upon observation students crossing the street did not have any undue delay in crossing Coffman Road. Referred to the Needs Assessment Survey by the Parks and Recreation Commission, specifically with respect to the swimming pool option. He said that he felt that it was time for Council to evaluate what the options are and then to make a decision to do something or to do nothing. He indicated that if Council did nothing that he felt that there may be some private groups who may be willing to undertake some type of development. He said that he was asking permission from Council to work with the Parks and Recreation Committee to come up with some proposals to present to Council as a whole. There were no objections from Council as to M~. Jankowski proceeding on the matter. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin Village Council Meeting Meeting ~ National Graphics Corp., Cols., O. Form No. 1097 ~ Held _uApril_2J..L1986 19_ Page Ten c 3. Ms. Maurer Ms. Maurer referred to two memorandums that she had addressed to Mayor Close and members of Council, and asked them to review and study same. 4. Mr. Sutphen Mr. Sutphen noted that the warning siren has been inoperable for approximately two weeks and asked if there was a "loaner" siren available that could be used in the meantime. Mr. Sheldon said that he did not think that one was available, but that he would research the matter further. Mayor Close adjourned the meeting at 9:59 P.M. MaY~iCer ... ..... ~ ~ ~' / . ~/w. ~ C erk of Cou cil r- J .... ~1W"-F r 1 Banc Ohio National Bank Central Ohio Disposal Central Ohio Inspection Service Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Callaghan & Co. ~Columbus City Treasurer ; 8hio Dept. of Health . i'he Columbus Dispatch \...i.aw Enforcerrent Equiprent National League of Cities O.C.A. Business Equiprent Police Pension Fund RPM Maintenance Marianne Rennie Sun Life of Canada Atlas Blue Print & Supply E. C. Babbert Banks Baldwin Publishing Co. Basic Distribution BOCA International Boehm Stamp & Printing Ann Bohman W. Born & Assoc. Bruning Buckeye Landscape Burgess & Niple, Limited ('". Betty Carr Central Communications Central Oh~o Disposal Central Ohio Police Supply rolumbus Builders Supply ~ ~ngs Sign Co. Inc. I )arby Sales Co. -.....oays of Creation Diehl Columbus Dispatch Downtown Printing & Graphics Dublin Cardinal Food Gallery Dublin Hardware & Paint Dublin Tractor Co. Dublin Villager Dyna Serv Elder & Elder Truck Tire Center Federal Supply & Equipment Gordon Flesch Franklin Co. Sheriffs Dept. Graf & Sons f/flIIIo.. BILL LIsrING APRIL 21, 1986 5037.50 548.35 4614.91 3792.09 88.51 135.00 77 . 00 136.32 48.00 120.00 430.00 21247.54 543.33 93.00 126.50 392.79 203.00 99.46 37.95 39.00 81.20 20.00 141. 00 240.00 750.00 1500.00 20.00 39.70 9173.52 412.49 236.40 50.00 35.57 250.00 152.37 112.88 1086.00 52.75 31. 04 16.86 101. 00 86.52 298.32 92.75 251. 75 280.00 3065.00 Coupon Interest Due 5-1-86 Lift charges, rental and delivery Electrical Inspections Electric Service Matthews Municipal Ord. Jury Fees - Dublin Case Alcohol tests Ad - Electrical Inspector Take down. & Alley Lights On Site Registration Fees Maintenance Agreerrent-Typewriter Employers portion - 1st qtr. Janitorial Services Golden Gatherings Lunch & Trip Life Insurance premiums Mylars printed wi borders Curb Inlet Top for Stonn Sewers Update of Ohio Revised Code Wire for Municipal Building Autanatic OBOC Update Letterhead Stationary-Office of the Mgr. Refund for Antique Class Police Evidence Kits & Crime Kits Maintenance Agreerrent-Print Machine Deicing Salt Post Road Waterline Refund for Post Road Waterline Repair Walkie #14 Residential Collections - March Replacerrent uniforms for police officers Cement & Concrete Refund variance application fee Film and Batteries Instructor Fee-Kids Arts Festival Office Supplies Advertisement-Bid for Rotary Mower Printing of Brochures for Parks & Rec Golden Gatherings Rope, Stencils, Screws, Etc Weed Eater Line & Cable Ads-Police Auction, Custodian, Council Corrputer Paper Parts for Maintanance Tubes for Equipment Repairs Copier paper Prisoner Boarding-March Maintenance Overhead Door Repairs -- ( . . Bill Listing - Page 2 Laurence Graham International Assoc - Chiefs/ Police JD Equiprent John David Jones & Assoc. """..,..Key Blue Prints ~.J. Saunders, Inc U~~ C:i: Service McGuffey Lane Miami Township Police Academy Meijer Inc Moore Business Forms Olen Corporation Debby Murphy Nancy Patton Photographic Perspectives Pitney Bowes Radio Shack Ray Rieser Trophy SNP Sutherland Building Products Union Oil of California Janet Jordan Disaster Services Gordan Forsmark Scott Davis Payroll -.~ TOI'AL '-" - \ 16.00 50.00 3.93 3540.00 40.00 39.90 110.00 145.50 1250.00 20.00 2551.63 62.31 582.01 20.00 20.00 61.82 33.55 59.76 96.0 31.50 24.98 143.01 106.47 1257.53 70.00 35.99 44506.43 111,265.69 Refund - Sr. Trip to Roseville Dues 1986 Lubricant and o-rings for repairs Engineering services, traffic signals Enlarging a map Time Cards for Police Coffee, cream, sugar, etc Grass Seed Entertainment for 4th of July Tuition-Missing Children Course Engineering Costs on Martin Road Receipt Books gravel Refund for Antique Class Refund for Antique Class Film & Processing Postage Meter Ink & Tape Super Tape- Gold 90 Plaques for Headlee & Lewis Legal ads Supplies for Avery Park Maint. & Repair Parts & Labor on car repairs Travel Reimburserrent 1986 Proportionate Share APWA/SMSU 1986 Conf. Reimburse for Work Shoes Payroll for 4-15