Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout66-06 Ordinance RECORD OF ORDINANCES Dayton Legal Blank, ]nc. Fonn No. 30043 66-06 Ordinance No. Passed , 20 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT A DEDICATION OF TWO PARCELS TOTALLING 8.817 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF POST ROAD AND DISCOVERY BOULEVARD, CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, STATE OF OHIO. WHEREAS, the developer of the Village at Coffman Park is required to dedicate parkland as part of the development process; and WHEREAS, it is a stated goal of the City to obtain additional parkland in the City of Dublin; and WHEREAS, the developer of the Village at Coffinan Park has notified the City of Dublin of the desire to dedicate 8.817 acres, more or less, located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Post Road and Discovery Boulevard, as depicted on the attached legal description , Exhibits A 1 and A2, to the City; and WHEREAS, the City desires to accept the dedication of open space from the developer of the Village at Coffinan Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council, of the City of Dublin, State of Ohio, of the elected members concurring that: Section 1. The donation of open space described in the attached legal description is hereby accepted. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after the earliest date provided by law. Passed this (~7~1 day of ~ D U e/n ~ e% 2006. Mayor -Presiding Officer ATTEST: to Clerk of Council I hereby certify that copies of this Ordinance/Resolution were posted in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 731.25 of the Ohio Revised Code. . 5~ De ty Clerk of Council, Dublin, Ohio Office of the City Manager 5200 Emerald Parkway • Dublin, Ohio 43017 Phone: 614-410-4400 -Fax: 614-410-4900 M e m o CITY OF DUBLIN_ To: Members of City Council ~1 , From: Jane S. Brautigam, City Manage~~ r Date: October 11, 2006 Initiated By: Gary P. Gunderman, AICP, Assistant Director of Land Use and Long Range Planning Re: Ordinance 66-06 -Acceptance of Open Space Dedication Summary The attached ordinance will accept the dedication of two parcels of land totaling 8.817 acres as open space in the Village at Coffman Park condominium development. The parcels are located generally at the southeast corner of Post Road and Discovery Boulevard. Discussion The Village at Coffman Park is a 66-unit residential condominium development at the southeast corner of Post Road and Discovery Boulevard that is currently under construction. The rezoning for this property was approved by City Council on March 14, 2005. As part of the review process, the developer is required to dedicate 4.25 acres of open space. The Final Development Plan approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 6, 2005 showed 4.37 acres of open space to be dedicated to the City. Parkland dedication within residential areas is usually tied with the Final Plat approval process; however, because this is a condominium development without public streets no plat will be recorded. As a result, City Council must approve an ordinance accepting the dedication of the required parkland. The proposed 8.817-acre dedication, not including the stormwater pond and the area within the setbacks, equals the 4.37 acres shown on the Final Development Plan. The proposed dedication includes a 3.86-acre stormwater pond and 0.584 acres within the setbacks that do not count toward the open space requirement. With the exception of the stormwater functionality of the pond, the dedicated land will be maintained by the Village at Coffman Park homeowners association. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 66-06 to accept the dedication of open space. PROPOSED DEDICATION LOCATION Parkland The Village at Coffman Park site a _ _ ree EXHIBIT Al 2 P.B. 6s,_PC. s7 _ MF,TATF~' BLVD. ~ _ ~ o N 0538:30" E a. ~ ~ ~ O 121, 03' ~ M ip I ~~1 C O tit V y ti Z ~ O y 9 2 ,17Q ~v"vN~2 ~ a ~~N for I C N o Na nti NI ~~n~ti ~o 00 ~ ~2 ~ Wti ~ ~ m I to Cr, ~ ti ~ ~ ~ Z 2 ~ ~ ~ N N I ~ O d= 0474 2B" O d= 8278'50" o `b ~ R = 500.00' R s 30.00' ~O~ L=3701' L=43.19' C/~ ~ Ch = 37.00' Ch = 39.55' ~ Imo] ~ N 0331'16" E N 46 52 55" E b 0~0 ~ ~ w~, O~ ~ uN N ~ Ib ~ 2~ w . ~ o ~ O t?j a O ~7 V,M,S. 2999 y .I V.M.S 2542 ~ - - - _ ~ - - p Z ~ ~ d 0201'00" ~ ~ R = 5759, 70' O) L = 202.73' O ~caj Ch 202.72' Z ~ N 87'06'50" E I ~ ~ ~ I Z' ~ ' rv N ~ S 0152'40" E v ~ ~ 28.76' 2 4,°~cnn w w rn O_ i. ~ t. rv 0'•\ yv ml Opn~ °i o a ~ -n ~ e ~ o m . o I ~ ~ ~P~E of oy ~ S 03'54'20" E G~ h 53.90' ~ w o ~ n ~~0 1 ~ POST HSO-LLC ~ n ~ ~ ~ BhX7Eh ~ 1.790 AC. ~ ~ '9FS-76970; / NSTR. 200505060086 15 I Q/ST~P.,' P. N. 273-00296 0°> ~ o s~RvEYOF . BASIS OF BEARINGS.• The Center Line of Post Rood, Being SCALE.' 1" = 160' N 88' 07' 20" E (East of Metotec Bou/vord), as Shown of 0 160 320 480 Record in Plat Book 85, Pages 51, 52 & 53, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio. GRAPHIC SCALE -'O- 3/4" I.D. Iron Pipe Found Unless Otherwise Shown EXHIBIT FORA 1.902 ACRE TRACT ALONG POST ROAD AT METATEC BOULEVARD, CITY OF DUBLIN, FRANKLIN CO., OHIO (V. M. S. 2542 & 2999) SCALE: 1 " = 160' JULY 14, 2006 C. F. Bird & R. J. Bull, Inc. 2875 W. Dublin-Granville Rd. By Columbus, Ohio 43235 Kevin L. Baxter ~ Ohio Surveyor No. 7697 /Exhibits\Phase Exhlbits,dwo 1/3/~ 1 7 00-027 EXHIBIT A 1 July 14, 2006 DESCRIPTION OF A 1.902 ACRE TRACT ON PUS'T ROAD, EAST OF META1'EC BOULEVARD, CI'T'Y OF DUBLIN, FILANKLIN CO., OHIO Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, in Virginia Military Survey Nos. 2542 and 2999, and being a portion of a 22.657 acre tract of land conveyed to The Village at Coffnuui Park LLC, by deed of record in Instrument 200601090004938, all records referenced to the Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio, and bounded and described as follows: Beginuing, for reference, a[ a point at the intersection of the centerline of Post Road (60 feet in width) with the centerline of Metatec Boulevard (variable width) (originally Discovery Boulevard), as Post Road is shown upon the plat entitled "Post Road, Wilcox Road, Perimeter Drive & Ease- ments Dedication Plat", of record in Plat Book 85, Pages 51, 52 and 53, and as Metatec Boulevard is shown upon the plat entitled "Dedication of Discovery Boulevard & Easements", of record in Plat Book 66, Page 97; thence N 89° 07' 19" E along the centerline of Post Road a distance of 68.45 feet to a point; thence N 88° 07' 20" E along the centerline of Post Road a distance of 7.29 feet to a point; thence S 01 ° 52' 40" E perpendicular to the centerline of Post Road a distance of 30.00 feet to a 314" I.D. iron pipe found at the east end of the curve connecting the south line of Pvst Road with the east line of Metatec Boulevard, at a corner of said 22.657 acre tract and at the true place of beginning of the tract herein intended to be described; thence N 88° 07' 20" E along the south line of Post Road and along a north line of said 22.657 acre tract a distance of 598.12 feet to a 3/4" LD. iron pipe found at a point of curvature; thence easterly along a portion of the curved south line of Post Road, along a portion of a curved north line of said 22.657 acre tract and with a curve to the left, data of which is: radius = 5,759.70 feet and delta = 02° O1' 00", arc length = 202.73 feet, a chord distance of 202,72 feet bearing N 87° 06' S0" E to a 3/4" LD. iron pipe found; thence N 86° 06' 20" E along the south line of Post Road and along a north line of said 22.657 acre tract a distance of 342.76 feet to a 3/4" LD, iron pipe found at a northwest corner of said 22.657 acre tract, at the northwest corner of a 1.790 acre tract of land conveyed to Post HSO-LLC by deed of re- cord in Instrument 200505060086715 and at the southwest corner of a 0.234 acre tract of land con- veyed to The City of Dublin, Ohio, fvr Post Road right-of-way purposes, by deed of record in Offi- cial Record 13444, Page J O6; thence S 03° 54' 20" E along a portion of an east line of said 22.657 acre tract and along a portion of the west line of said 1.790 acre tract a distance of 53.90 feet to a 3/4" LD. iron pipe set; thence S 88° 07' 20" W crossing a portion of said 22.657 acre tract a distance of 19(1.59 feet to a 3/4" LD. iron pipe set; thence S O1° 52' 40" E crossing a portion of'said 22,657 acre tract a distance of 28.76 feet to a 3/4" I.D. iron pipe set; thence S 88° 07' 20" W crossing a portion of said 22.657 acre tract a distance of 936.65 feet to a 3/4" LD. iron pipe set; thence S 01° 52' 40" E crossing a portion of said 22.657 acre tract a distance of 115.90 feet to a 3/4" LD. iron pipe set; thence S 88° 07' 20" W crossing a portion of said 22.657 acre tract a distance of 61.07 feet to a 3/4" LD, iron pipe set in the curved easterly line of Metatec Boulevard and in the curved westerly line of said 22.657 acre tract; thence northerly along a portion of the curved easterly line of Metatec Boulevard, along a portion of the curved westerly line of said 22.657 acre tract and with a curve to the right, data of which is: ra- dius 500.00 feet and delta = 04° 14' 28", arc length = 37.01 feet, a chord distance of 37.00 feet bearing N 03° 31' 16" E to a 3/4" LD. iron pipe found at a point of tangency; thence N OS° 38' 30" E along the east line of Metatec Boulevard and along a west line of said 22.657 acre tract a distance of 121,03 feet to a 3/4" LD. iron pipe found at a point of curvature at the south end of said connecting curve; 00-027/Parkland-2. DOC 213 EX H I B I T A 1 July,4, 2°°6 thence northeasterly along said connecting curve, along the curved northwest line of said 22.657 acre tract and with a curve to the right, data of which is: radius = 30.00 feet and delta = 82° 28' S0", arc length = 43.19 feet, a chord distance of 39.55 feet bearing N 46° 52' S5" E to the true place of begin- ning; containing 1.902 acres of land more or less and being subject to all easements and restrictions of re- cord. An exhibit of this description is attached hereto and made a part thereof. The above description was prepared by Kevin L. Baxter, Ohio Surveyor No. 7697, of C.F. Bird & R.J. Bull, Inc., Consulting Engineers & Surveyors, Columbus, Ohio, from actual field surveys in April, 1975, in October, 1985, in November, 1986, in April, 1990, in July, 1996, in July, 1998 and January, 2006. Basis of bearings is the centerline of Post Road, being N 88° 07' 20" E (east of Metatec Bou evard), as shown of record in Plat Book 85, Pages 51, 52 and 53, Recorder's Office, Frankli o ty, Ohio. Kevin L, Baxter ~ o~ Ohio Surveyor #7697 ~ s=~,ci! y ~ i :S ~cirlt i C.. f"' ~,,.~~.SURVE`~~~, 00-027/Parkland-2. DOC 313 EXHIBIT A2 THE CITY OF DUBLIN, OHIO from Ref. Point of 0.234 AC, d = 0758'00" Beginning O.R. 13444, PG. ? 0 R = 308.83' L = 42.94' N 12:36'59" E _ .-.-7---- ~ Ch = 42.91' O 102.14' S 61'13'40" E d 1879'34" O R = 500.00' Z L 161.38' o ~ Ch 160.68' ~ \ N 0372'12" E POST HSO-LLC ~ `s?? `rS~~ ©N 0552'35" W N 1,790 AC. ' ° j~ ~ ss• u 165.17 INSTR. 200505060086715 ~ Asg Ao~A°~~,~2,° F OD N 8407'25" E P. N. 273- 00296 ti 3D. oo' ss~ n, , 6 ~ Q ~ b THE VILLAGE AT COFFMAN PARK LLC 4?~,jB" <Y 4 '1',SS~o'`o~'~, A" o~ ~^o~ 22.657 AC. ?os?AO. 'a \ INSTR. 200601090004938 ~s9, ~ P. N. 273- 000180 \ N 33'07'20" E N 02'53'01 " W WALL STREET ru 60 77'17 44.03' S 56'52'40" E P.B. 104, Pg. 1~_ N 33'07'20" E 17,93' 4e.7o' p"E METRO NORTH BUSINESS p~ p ~ PARK P. B. 66, PC. 71 ~ N 33'07'20" E 6p~p5NbB7.41'30" E CITY OF DUBLI 49.25' 19,37' LOT 1 1.804 AC. INST. 19gg111so2es555 ~ 5 5652'40" E JENTGEN-KLEIN COMPANY 28, 76' d ORIG. 31.380 AC. WALL STREET \ 1 2 Og S 5652'40" E HOLDINGS LLC 9.00' cn O. R, 5771, PG. B O1 2.374 AC. ,o ti P. N. 273-003965 INST 199911190289558 ` O N 4477'31 " E ~ w O d = 21 57'51 " O d = 19'02'56" P. N. 273- 010195 S 8573'08 9 E ° R = 24.50' R = 112, 00' ~ ~ 14,87 ~ L = 9.39' L 37.24' Ch = 9.33' Ch 37 06' ~ , ; d = 08'09'18" N 63'10'28" E N 6437'56" f o R = 330.00' I a o L= 46.97' O d= 0575'12"O d 90'00'00" ~ Ch = 46.93' R = 122.00' R = 4.00' N 0957'14" W L = 11.54' L 6,28' z Ch = 11,54' Ch = 5.66' a N 47'00'07" f N 17 52'40" W WALL STREET HOLDINGS LLC ~ N 2.802 AC. ! ~ t,i Od = 10'15'24" O d = 89'14'54" INST. 200003010041125 v TRUE PLACE OF BEGIN. R = 358.00' R = 4,00' P. N. 273- 010195 I ~ FOR 6.915 AC 7RAC7 L = 64.09' L = 6.23' Ch = 64.00' Ch = 5.62' N 62'00'22" W S 6734'11 " W Concrete Monument A/'r"r d = 89'09'57"Od 147929" WALL STREET HOLDINGS LLC OA OO O Found p",~~ ; OR = 4.50' R = 358.00' 4.958 AC. Ref Point of ~ cv'a°~ L = 700' L = 90.55' INST. 200106250142042 Beginning of S 87'06'59" W Ch = 6.32' Ch = 90.30' P. N. 2 73-01 06 99 Perimeter Dr/ve 383.00' N 3073'54" N 8258'52" W WALL STREET 60' PERI4.230 AC, LTD. Od = 11.10'11" P. B. 92, PG. 8 R 223.00' INSTR, 199811190298745 L 43.47' P. N. 273-009872 cn 43.40' SCALE: 1 " = 160' N 38'42'25" E BASIS OF BEARINGS: The Center Line of Posf Road, Being 0 160 320 480 N 88' 07' 20" E (East of Metatec Boulvord), as Shown of Record in Plot Book 85, Pages 51, 52 & 53, Recorder's Office, Fr MT'~bucl,~; Ohio. GRAPHIC SCALE t o~ ~y~` 3/4" I.D. Iron Pipe Set with a plastic cop stamped G,y//"""'~~~ "Bird & Bull, Inc. Unless Otherwise Shown KEV19~! Drill Hole Set depending upon conditions offer construction is complete. ~ ~ 9 &7697 O } ~ EXHIBIT FORA 6.915 ACRE TRACT ~Q~s POST ROAD AND ALONG WALL STREET, s~gv~Y°,,,,,~ITY OF DUBLIN, FRANKLIN CO., OHIO (V. M. S. 2542) SCALE: 1 " = 160' JULY 14, 2006 C. F Bird & R. J. Bull, Inc. 2875 W. Dublin-Granville Rd. By Co/umbus, Ohio 43235 ~ f w I Kevin L. Baxter ~ Ohio Surveyor No. 7697 /Exhibits\Phase Exhiblts,dwo 1/3/. I L.~ ~0 AM EST 00-027 EX H I B I T A2 July 14, 2006 DESCRIPTION OF A 6.915 ACRE TRACT ALONG POST ROAD A1VD ALONG WALL STREET, CITY OF DUBLIN, FRANKLIN, CO., OHIO Situated in the State of Ohio, County of Franklin, City of Dublin, in Virginia Military Survey No. 2542 and being a portion of a 22.657 acre tract of land conveyed to The Village at Coffman Park LLC, by deed of record in Instrument 200601090004938, all records referenced to the Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio, and bounded and described as follows; Beginning, for reference, at a point at the intersection of the centerline of Perimeter Drive (80 feet in width), as shown upon the plat entitled Post Road, Wilcox Road, Perimeter Drive & Easements Dedication Plat, of record in Plat Book 85, Pages 51, 52 and 53, with the centerline of Wall Street (60 feet in width), as shown upon the plat of Wall Stree[ & Easements Dedication Plat, of record in Plat Book 92, Page 8; thence along the centerline of Wall Street the following three (3) courses: 1. N 12° 36' S9" E a distance of 102.14 feet to a point of curvature; 2. northerly and with a curve to the left, data of which is: radius = 500.00 feet, and delta = 1 R° 29' 34", arc length = 161.38 feet, a chord distance of 160.68 feet bearing N 03° 22' 12" E to a point of tangency; 3. N OS° 52' 35" W a distance of 165.17 feet to a point in the north end of said Wall Street and in the south end of a 1.804 acre tract of land conveyed, for Wall Street right-of-way purposes (60 feet in width), to City of Dublin by deed of record in ln- sttument 199911190289555, and as shown upon the plat of Wall Street & Easements Dedication Plat, of record in Plat Book 104, Page 10; thence N 84° 07' 25" E perpendicular to the centerline of Wall Street a distance of 30.00 feet to a 3/4" I.D, iron pipe previously set in concrete at the southeast corner of Wall Street as shown upon said plat recorded in Plat Book 104, Page 10, at a southwest corner of said 22,657 acre tract, at the northwest corner of a 4.230 acre tract of land conveyed to Perimeter A, Ltd., by deed of record in Instrument 199811190298745 and at the true place of beginning of the tract herein intended to be described; thence N OS° 52' 35" W along the east line of said 1.804 acre tract and along a west line of said 22.657 acre tract a distance of 435.67 feet to a 3/4" I.D. iron pipe found at a point of curvature; thence northwesterly along a portion of the curved northeasterly line of said 1.804 acre tract, along a portion of the curved southwesterly line of said 22.657 acre tract and with a curve to the left, data of which is: radius = 330.00 feet, and delta = 08° 09' 18", arc length = 46.97 feet, a chord distance of 46.93 feet bearing N 09° 57' 14" W to a drill hole set in the proposed walk/back of curb and at a point of curvature; thence crossing a portion of said 22.657 acre tract the following twenty-six (26) courses: 1. northeasterly and with anon-tangent curve to the right, data of which is: radius = 24.50 feet, and delta = 21° 57' S1", arc length = 9.39 feet, a chord distance of 9.33 feet bearing N 63° 10' 28" E to a drill hole set in the proposed walk/back of curb and at a point of reverse curvature; 2. northeasterly and with a curve to the left, data of which is: radius = 1 12.00 feet, and delta = 19° 02' S6", arc length = 37.24 feet, a chord distance of 37.06 feet bearing N 64° 37' S6" E to a drill hole set in the proposed walk/back of curb and at a point of non-tangency; 3. S 85° 23' OS" E a distance of 14.87 feet to a drill hole set in the proposed walk/back of curb and at a point of curvature; 4, northeasterly and with anon-tangent curve to the left, data of which is: radius = 122.00 feet, and delta = OS° 25' 12", arc length = 11.54 feet, a chord distance of 11.54 feet bearing N 47° 00' 07" E to a drill hole set in the proposed walk/back of curb and at the point of tangency; 5. N 44° 17' 31" E a distance of 50.99 feet to a drill hole set in the proposed walkiback of curb and at a point of curvature; 2/ / 00-027/Parkland-1 DOC EXHIBIT A2 July 14, 2006 6. northeasterly and with a curve to the left, data of which is: radius = 223.00 feet, and delta = 11° 10' I I", arc length = 43,47 feet, a chord distance of 43.40 feet bearing N 38° 42' 25" E to a drill hole set in the proposed walk/back of curb and at the point of tangency; 7. N 33° 07' 20" E a distance of 49.25 feet to a drill hole set in the proposed walk/back of curb; 8. S 56° 52' 40" E a distance of 9.00 feet to a drill hole set in the proposed walk/back of curb; 9. N 33° 07' 20" E a distance of 48.70 feet to a drill hole set in the proposed walk; 10. S 56° 52' 40" E a distance of 28.76 feet to a 3/4" I.D. iron pipe set at the edge of a pond; 11. N 60° 00' 00" E a distance of 105.16 feet to a 3/4" I,D, iron pipe set at the edge of a pond; 12. S 56° 52' 40" E a distance of 17.93 feet to a 3/4" I.D. iron pipe set at the edge of a pond; 13. N 87° 41' 30" E a distance of 19.37 feet to a 3/4" I.D, iron pipe set at the edge of a pond; 14. N 33° 07' 20" E a distance of 77.17 feet to a 3/4" LD. iron pipe set; 15. N 02° 53' Ol" W a distance of 44.03 feet to a 3/4" LD. iron pipe set; 16. N 56° 52' 40" W a distance of 200,69 feet to a drill hole set in the proposed curb and at a point of curvature; 17. northerly and with a curve to the right, data of which is: radius = 4.00 feet, and delta = 90° 00' 00'", arc length = 6,28 feet, a chord distance of 5.66 feet bearing N 11° 52' 40" W to a drill hole set in the proposed curb and at the point of tangency; l8. N 33° 07' 20" E a distance of 15.00 feet to a drill hole set in the proposed curb; 19. N 56° 52' 40" W a distance of 12.38 feet to a drill hole set in the proposed curb and at a point of curvature; 20. northeasterly and with a curve to the left, data of which is: radius = 358.00 feet, and delta = 10° 15' 24", arc length = 64.09 feet, a chord distance of 64.00 feet bearing N 62° 00' 22" W to a drill hole set in the proposed curb and at the point of non- tangency; 21, S 22° 56' 44" W a distance of 15.03 feet to a drill hole set in the proposed curb and at a point of curvature; 22, southwesterly and with a curve to the right, data of which is: radius = 4.00 feet, and delta = 89° 14' S4", arc length = 6.23 feet, a chord distance of 5.62 feet bearing S 67° 34' 11" W to a drill hole set in the proposed curb and at the point of tangency; 23, N 71° 23' 38" W a distance of 42.43 feet to a drill hole set in the proposed curb and at a point of curvature; 24. northwesterly and with a curve to the right, data of which is: radius = 4.50 feet, and delta = 89° 09' S7", arc length = 7.00 feet, a chord distance of 6.32 feet bearing N 30° 23' S4" W to a drill hole set in the proposed curb and at the point of tangency; 25. N 14° 11' 04" E a distance of 14.54 feet to a drill hole set in the proposed curb and at a point of curvature; 26. westerly and with a curve to the left, data of which is: radius = 358.00 feet, and delta = 14° 29' 29", arc length = 90.55 feet, a chord distance of 90.30 feet bearing N 82° 58' S2" W to a 3/4" I.D, iron pipe set in a west line of said 22.657 acre tract and in the east line of a 1.790 acre tract of land conveyed to Post HSO-LLC by deed of record in Instrument 200505060086715; thence N 03° 54' 20" W along a portion of a west line of said 22.657 acre tract and along a portion of the east line of said 1.790 acre tract a distance of 193.46 feet to a 3/4" I.D. iron pipe set in the curved south line of Post Road, at the northeast corner of said 1,790 acre tract and at the southeast corner of 3/4 00-027/Parkland-1 DOC EXHIBIT A2 July 14,2006 a 0.234 acre tract of land conveyed to The City of Dublin, Ohio, for Post Road right-of-way pur- poses, by deed of record in Official Record 13444, Page J 06; thence southeasterly along a portion of the curved south line of Post Road, along a curved north line of said 22.657 acre tract and with a curve to the right, data of which is; radius = 308.83 feet and sub- delta = 07° 58' 00", arc length = 42.94 feet, a sub-chord distance of 42.91 feet bearing S 61 ° 13' 40" E to a 3/4" LD. iron pipe set at the point of tangency; thence S S7° 14' 40" E along the southerly line of Post Road and along a northerly line of said 22.657 acre tract a distance of 422.32 feet to a 3i4'" LU. iron pipe found at a northeast corner of said original 42.592 acre tract and in the west line, extended northerly, of Lot Number One (1) on the plat of Metro North Business Park, as shown of record in Plat Book 66, Page 71; thence S 02° 53' Ol" E along the east line of said 22.657 acre tract, along the west line of said Lot No. 1 and along a portion of the west line of an original 31.380 acre tract of land conveyed to Jent- gen-Klein Company by deed of record in Official Record 5771, Page B O1 a distance of 908.74 feet to a 3/4" LD, iron pipe found at the northeast corner of said 4.230 acre tract; thence S 87° 06' S9" W along a south line of said 22.657 acre tract and along the north line of said 4,230 acre tract a distance of 383.00 feet to the true place of beginning; containing 6.915 acres of land more or less and being subject to all easements and restrictions of re- cord. An exhibit of this description is attached hereto and made a part thereof The above description was prepared by Kevin L. Baxter, Ohio Surveyor No. 7697, of C.F. Bird & R.J. Bull, lnc., Consulting Engineers & Surveyors, Columbus, Ohio, from actual field surveys in April, 1975, in October, 1985, in November, 1986, in April, 1990, in July, 1996, in July, 1998 and January, 2006. Basis of bearings is the centerline of Post Road, being N 88° 07' 20" E (east of Metatec Boulevard), as shown of record in Plat Book 85, Pages 51, 52 and 53, Recorder's Office, Franklin County, Ohio. All calls for 3/4" I.D. iron pipe set will have a plastic cap stamped "Bird & Bull, Inc.", all calls for drill holes set are dependent upon the conditions after construction is com- plete. ~ ~ ~<<.,~~~ 1 Kevin L. Baxter ~ Iy~,X' E_~ ~9 S-769" Via,; , Ohio Surveyor #7697 MFG/ST~Q~`.~ ~4 . .~~RVE`~ 414 00-027/Parkland-1.DOC PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION SEPTEMBER 21, 2006 CITY OF DUBLI[V,. Land Use and The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: long Range Planning 0 Shier-Rings Road ' lin, Ohio 43016.1236 3. Amended Final Development Plan - 06-118AFDP -The Village at Coffman roans: 614-410-4600 Park -Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Fax: 614.410-4747 Location: 22.821 acres located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Post Web Site: www.dublin.oh.us Road and Discovery Boulevard. E$isting Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development (Homestead at Coffman Park plan)• Request: Review and approval of an amended final development plan under the PUD provisions of Code Section 153.053 (E)(2)(b) and 153.455(B). Proposed Use: Modifications to a previously approved residential condominium development, including the removal of a stormwater pond, additional trim color options, and grouped mailboxes. Applicant: Patrick M. Grabill, Village at Coffman Park, LLC, 109 South High Street, Dublin, Ohio 43017; represented by Jason Stults, Glavan Feher Architects, Inc., 2 Miranova Place, Suite 700, Columbus, Ohio 43215. . Staff Contact: Judson J. Rex, Planner. Contact Information: (614) 410-4654/Email: jrex@dublin.oh.us. MOTION: To approve this amended final development plan because the proposed modifications will enhance the overall appearance of this site and continue to promote high-quality residential development, with four conditions: 1) That the applicant submit revised construction drawings for site plan permit approval; 2) That the applicant submits a revised Stormwater Management Plan for review and approval; 3) That the applicant retain the hedges shown on the plans and incorporating stone walls into the landscaping treatment along Post Road, subject to staff approval; and, 4) That the landscaping plans be revised to reflect the comments in the staff report, subject to staff approval. * Pat Grabill agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 5 - 0. ' RESULT: This amended final development plan was approved. STAFF CERTIFICATION J on J. Rex Pl er Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -September 21, 2006 Page 22 of 27 n 3. Amended Final Development Plan 06-118AFDP -The Village at Coffman Park -Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Mr. Gerber swore in the applicant, Patrick M. Grabill. Mr. Grabill agreed to the four conditions listed below as contained in the staff report. Motion and Vote: Mr. Gerber moved for approval of this Amended Final Development Plan because the proposed modifications will enhance the overall appearance of this site and continue to promote high- quality residential development, with four the following four conditions: 1) That the applicant submit revised construction drawings for site plan permit approval; 2) That the applicant submits a revised Stormwater Management Plan for review and approval; 3) That the applicant retain the hedges shown on the plans and incorporating stone walls into the landscaping treatment along Post Road, subject to staff approval; and, 4) That the landscaping plans be revised to reflect the comments in the staff report, subject to staff approval. Mr. Zimmerman seconded the motion to approve and the vote was as follows: Mr. Fishman, yes; Mr. Walter, yes; Ms. Jones, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; and Mr. Gerber, yes. (Approved 5- 0) AMENDED PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION OCTOBER 6, 200 :[TY OF DUBL[N_ Laad Use and loag Ronge Plaaaiag 5800 Shier-Rings Road Did-' `Ihio 4301b-1236 Ph: 14-410-4600 k -010-4741 Web site: www.dabhn.oh.us The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 9. Final Development Plan - OS-152FDP -Villages At Coffman Park -Post Road Location: 22.66 acres located at the southeast comer of the intersection of Discovery Boulevard and Post Road. Existing Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Homestead at Coffman Park plan). Request: Review and approval of a final development plan under the under the PUD provisions of Section 153.055 (B). Proposed Use: Asingle-family condominium development of 63 detached residential units, 3 live-work units, a community building, and 4.37 acres of open space. Applicant: Grabill and Company, LLC., c/o Pat Grabill, 109 South High Street, Dublin, Ohio 43017; represented by Glen A. Dugger, Smith and Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, Ohio 43215. Staff Contact: Judson J. Rex, Planner. Contact Information: Phone: {614) 4i0-4654 / Email: jrex@dublinoh.us. MOTION: To approve this Final Development Plan because it complies with the final development plan regulations and the intent of the preliminary development plan, it will provide a mix of housing types and uses needed within the City, and it will enhance the overall appearance of scenic Post Road, with l6 conditions: 1) That all plans that include streets with the name Danielle be changed to Kinzie, as approved by the Engineering Division; 2) That the relocation of existing trees along Post Road be kept to a minimum, and that detailed speciftcations regarding their relocation be submitted prior to the issuance of any building permits, subject to staff approval; 3) That relocated Post Road trees that die or are damaged be replaced on an inch-for- inch basis within five years and tree-for-tree subsequently, subject to staff approval; 4) That the landscape plans be revised to incorporate the comments within this staff report prior to building permit submission, subject to staff approval; 5) That the design of all private drives, parking areas, and drive approaches meet or exceed the requirements and standards of the Engineering Division; Page t of 2 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard AMENDED PLANMNG AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION OCTOBER 6, 2005 9. Final Development Plan - OS-1~2FDP -Villages At Coffman Park -Post Road (Continued) 6) That all utility cocuiections and/or extensions meet or exceed the requirements and standards of the Engineering Division; 7) That the site stormwater management be in compliance with the current Storniwater Regulations, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 8} That the existing wet pond located along the east side of Wall Street not be modified or changed in any way; 9) That the applicant and Engineering Division staff met prior to applying for a building permit to review stormwater management; 10) That the text be modified to include the following language: "at least 50 percent of the exterior surfaces of the long dimension of homes adjacent to a public or private street shall utilize a stone veneer", subject to staff approval; 11) That all required general warranty deeds for parkland dedication be submitted to the City of Dublin prior to issuance of the bt~ildmg occupancy* permit; 12) That staff meet with the owner of the daycare adjacent to the site to review the proposed landscape buffer; 13) That the proposed Sugar Maples along Wall Street be substituted with a hardier species, subject to staff approval; 14) That the ornamental trees shown on the plans not be substituted with larger shade trees, subject to staff approval; i5) That the Stella d'Oro daylilies shown on the plans not be substituted with another species, subject to staff approval; and 16) That a small post-mounted sign be placed on Kinzie Lane to display the addresses for home sites 35 through 43, subject to staff approval_ *As amended by vote on May 1 i, 2006 by the Commission_ 13en W_ 1-{ale, 1r., Smith and Hale, agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 7-0_ RESULT: This Final Development Plan was approved_ STAFF CERTIFICA O Gar _ Gunderman Assistant Director of P'~~--~~~ 06-118AFDP Page 2 of 2 Amended Final Development 1?lan The Village at Coffman Fark. Post Road and Discovery Baulevarc Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 6, 2005 Page 1 S Ms. Adkins referred Mr. G er to the Proposed Text odifications, on the backs e of the map in the submittal. She sal the addendum was simila to what was done for Wed ewood Glen and Subarea I of Tartan W st. John Messineo ed what were the "other proved composite product , 'referred to in the last sentence in th ist of trim materials- j Mr. Sim etti said they were com site products that the Ap earance Code approves v~ the City o ublin -masonry-driven oducts that they are sayin they want to stay consist t with, if it atches the architectural st e. odd Zimmerman said he ad seen blended stone and tucco for chimneys before,/and asked if that was what they wer going to have. ~ Mr. Simonelli said o_ Mr. Messineo larified that it would not a false-aged look. Mr_ Sim etti agreed to the one con Ilion listed below. Mr erber made the motion o approve this Amende~inal Development Plan cause the endments will maintain t`~increase the high-quality rchitecture of the subare ,and the text amendment provides the st alternative to the e sting text for this develo ment with one condition: 1) That the applica submits a revised and si ed text amendment fort development within 30 days. Mr. Zimme an seconded the motion, a d the vote was as follows: s. Reiss, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Ms. J es, yes; Mr. Messineo, ye ; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; a Mr. Gerber, yes. (Approved 6-0.) 9. Final Development Plan/Final Plat - 0~-152FDP/FP -Villages at Coffman Park -Post Road Rick Gerber said staff had been doing a very good job with staff reports, but he thought Judson Rex had done a particularly good job on this one. He found it easy to read which he appreciated. Mr. Rex said this site was formerly known as the Homestead at Coffman Park. He presented the case and slides. This proposed 22.66-acce residential development consists of 63 single-family units, 3 live-work units, and 4.37 acres of open space. He described the existing site conditions and zonings- Mr. Rex said one access point is proposed on Discovery Boulevard, and two on Wall Street. He said the site is required to provide 4.25 acres of open space, and 4.37 acres of open space is proposed. An existing pond wilt be incorporated into the design and an additional pond will be constructed along Post Road. Mr_ Rex said all open space areas will be dedicated to the City and maintained by the Homeowners' Association. He said because of the adjacent uses, landscaping will be provided along the perimeter of the site to buffer those uses. 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevarc Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 6, 2005 Page 16 Mr. Rex said the text requires that natural materials, such as stone, cultured stone and wood, be used on all home exteriors. He said the text also requires that homes comply with the Residential Appearance Code standards. He said the proposal does meet those text requirements. Mr. Rex said that the development incorporated three live-work buildings on the western edge of the development. The buildings will be architecturally similar to the single-family homes throughout the development. Mr. Rex said the proposed signage shown was very similar to signage used at the Town Center [ project in Historic Dublin, and is in conformance with the text requirements_ The clubhouse proposed for the use of the residents will be 1,800 square feet. The boardwalk and surrounding path system can be used by any Dublin resident_ Mr. Rex said a gazebo on the western edge of the site, near the Discovery Boulevard entrance, is proposed to be painted to match the trim of the homes and live-work traits the development. A service shelter will be placed south of Post Road, near the center of the site. Mr. Rex stated that additional landscaping and pedestrian amenities are proposed along Post Road. A stone wall and three-rail fence treatments will accent the Post Road corridor. Gates and fences will be painted a light beige color to match the building trim. Mr. Rex said two 10-square-foot entry signs were approved at the rezoning stage. He said the signs would be placed on the Discovery Boulevard and Wall Street entrances. Mr. Rex reported that this Final Development Plan met and exceeded the development standards approved at the rezoning stage, and staff recommends approval with the 11 conditions in the staff report: 1) That alt plans that include streets with the name Danielle be changed to Kinzie, as approved by the Engineering Division; 2) That the relocation of existing trees along Post Road be kept to a minimum, and that detailed specifications regarding their relocation be submitted prior to the issuance of any building permits, subject to staff approval; 3) That relocated Post Road trees that die or are damaged be replaced on an inch-for-inch basis within ftve years and tree-for-tree subsequently, subject to staff approval; 4) That the landscape plans be revised to incorporate the comments within this staff report prior to building permit submission, subject to staff approval; 5) That the design of all private drives, parking areas, and drive approaches meet or exceed the requirements and standards of the Engineering Division; 6) That all utility connections and/or extensions meet or exceed the requirements and standards of the Engineering Division; 7) That the site stormwater management be in compliance with the current Stormwater Regulations, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; 8) That the existing wet pond located along the east side of Wall Street not be disturbed; 9) That the applicant and Engineering Division staff met prior to applying for a building permit to review storrrtwater management; 10) That the text be modified to include the following language: "at least 50 percent of the exterior surfaces of the long dimension of homes adjacent to a public or private street shall 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 6, 2005 Page 17 utilize a stone veneer"; and 11)That all required general warranty deeds for parkland dedication be submitted to the City of Dublin prior to building permit issuance. Ben W. Hale, Jr., Smith and Hale, on behalf of the applicants, consented to the 1 1 conditions as listed above. Mr. Gerber asked why Danielle Street was to be changed to Kinzie Lane. Mr_ Rex answered that it was just a technicality because the Engineering Department had approved the name Kinzie bane previously; however it had not been changed on some of the plans submitted. Cathy Boring referred to the daycare buffer, and asked if anyone had contacted the daycare center to see if they approved of the buffering because at the time of zoning, they were part of the process. She wondered if they were looking for a solid fence. Mr. Rex said staff had not contacted the daycare center. Ms. Boring wanted to make sure the daycare is contacted since they previously were concerned. Ms. Boring said the problem was that it was approved with asix-foot solid privacy fence and now the applicant is changing it at the Final Development Plan stage. She said the daycare believes now that they have asix-foot privacy fence. She suggested a condition that the daycare be contacted. Mr. Hale agreed to contact the daycare center about the issue. Pat Grabill, the applicant, said staff had specifically requested that they change the buffer. He said they assumed it was with the daycare's input. He said they would do it either way. Mr. Gerber asked if it was previously part of the text. Mr_ Rex believed that the Perimeter Center text may have addressed the buffer on the daycare. Mr. Gerber asked if a fence was mentioned in the text. Gary Gunderman said he did not know if it was in the original text, but as a result of the process, this site has recently been rezoned. He said there is now a new text and he believed it was consistent with it. Ms. Boring asked that a condition be suggested on the fence issue to check with the daycare. Mr. Gunderman replied that if Ms. Boring was agreeable, it could be conditioned upon the approval of the proposal by the daycare center. 06-11 SAFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 6, 2005 Page 18 Mr. Hale suggested the condition: That staff will contact the daycare center and review the proposal and at staff s discretion, they can require the applicant to do the fence. He said it is not that the daycare has to say yes -staff can just talk to them about it. Ms. Boring agreed that the above would be Condition 12. Ms. Boring said she had always understood that Sugar maples often were not good street trees. Mr. Rex said the landscape architect for the project recently had contacted staff concerned because that species does not work well with road salt. He said staff is amenable to work with them to change the species. Ms. Boring asked if that was a condition. Mr. Rex said it was encompassed with Condition 4 above. He asked if Ms. Boring preferred a separate condition. Ms. Boring said she did not understand because the staff report stated that Green Mountain Sugar maple is a street tree species and that it should be added to the plan and that Red oak was the street tree for Post Road. She requested staff review the subject of Sugar maples and consider a hardier species. Jim Burkart, James Burkart Associates, Inc., said it was his understanding that Dublin's Street Tree Plan originally called for Ash trees. He believed that the City Forester had recommended that they use Sugar maples. However, he thought that was an overlooked error. He did not recommend using Sugar maples. Ms. Boring requested that there be a condition removing the Sugar maples from the landscape plan. Mr. Gunderman suggested Condition 13 read: That the Sugar maples be switched out with another suitable species. Ms. Boring said the species used should be "hardier." Ms. Boring read from the staff report that the applicant is proposing ornamental trees for all the replacements. She said while she understood that they were high maintenance, she thought they gave a very nice look to the street. She asked why staff was recommending no ornamental trees. She also asked who would maintain the trees. Mr. Rex replied that the Homeowner's Association would be responsible for maintaining the trees. Ms. Boring questioned the reason staff recommended against the ornamental trees if the association would be responsible for maintenance. Mr_ Rex said staff was concerned with general maintenance and placing a burden on the Homeowners' Association to maintain the ornamental trees. 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 6, 200 Page l9 Ms. Boring repeated that the applicant was proposing the ornamental trees and felt that the Association could maintain them. Mr. Burkart said they selected ornamentals for color and interest and they are re-utilizing them. He said the houses are close together and he was concerned that if they used medium and large shade trees, that within five to ten years, grass would not grow because they would be so overgrown. He said they want to use low maintenance ornamental trees. He said deciduous shade trees would totally overgrow the site. Ms. Boring requested that Condition 14 state that the ornamental trees proposed by the applicant on the plan submitted be used. Ted Saneholtz noted that the staff report indicated that staff opposed the use of the ornamental trees as replacement trees. He said he appreciated the ornamental effect, etc., but thought that replacing all 225 caliper inches with large deciduous trees was not practical. He suggested shade-type trees be used in some of the open space. Mr. Burkart said there were over 400-600 trees being planted on the site, of which only 100 or so were ornamental trees. He said it was almost over-landscaped. Mr. Saneholtz asked if proposed Condition 14 would prohibit the use of medium and large sized shade trees. Mr. Rex said he did not think that was the intent. He thought it was to provide a mix. Mr_ Saneholtz understood. He wanted a mixture of trees_ John Messineo referred to Condition 3 above. He suggested that it was confusing as written and suggested it be reworded: That relocated Post Road trees that die or are damaged within five years be replaced on an inch-for-inch basis and tree-for-tree subsequently, subject to staff approval. Ms. Boring liked the idea of the variety of daylilies, however she said one of Dublin's standards seemed to be the proposed daylilies throughout the City. Mr. Burkart said they selected the Stella D'Oro daylilies because they bloomed all summer and were small in height. He said they had agreed with the staff report condition about the daylilies, but they did not think that was the best thing for their project. He said however, they could go either way. Mr. Gerber suggested Condition 15 be regarding the use of Stella D' Oro daylilies. Ms. Boring asked about the color of the fence. Mr. Rex provided a sample board which indicated the color of the fence. Ruth Reiss asked what the street addresses were for Lots 35 through 43. 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 6, 2005 Page 20 Mr. Rex said the lots would have the main street address, Kinzie Lane. Ms. Reiss suggested because the fronts of the houses would face the courtyards, there be identification signs indicating the Location of the street numbers. Mr. Grabill agreed they would submit a post identification sign, similar to the street posts, for staff approval. Mr. Gerber noted that it would also need approval of the fire department_ Mr. Messineo requested that in Condition 8, `'not be disturbed" be replaced with "not be modified or changed in any way," and that `'subject to staff approval" be added to Condition 10. Ms. Boring asked if the vote should be on the Amended Finai Development plan due to the modification of the text. Mr. Rex said no, the Code allowed minor modifications to the text at the Final Development Plan stage if the applicant gave justification for such changes. Mr. Gerber said the address posts on Kinzie Lane would be Condition l6. Mr. Hale consented to the following 16 amended and added conditions: 1) That all plans that include streets with the name Danielle be changed to Kinzie, as approved by the Engineering Division; 2) That the relocation of existing trees along Post Road be kept to a minimum, and that detailed specifications regarding their relocation be submitted prior to the issuance of any building permits, subject to staff approval; 3) That relocated Post Road trees that die or are damaged be replaced on an inch-for-inch basis within five years and tree-for-tree subsequently, subject to staff approval; 4) That the landscape plans be revised to incorporate the comments within this staff report prior to building permit submission, subject to staff approval; 5) That the design of all private drives, parking areas, and drive approaches meet or exceed the requirements and standards of the Engineering Division; 6) That all utility connections and/or extensions meet or exceed the requirements and standards of the Engineering' Division; 7) That the site stormwater management be in compliance with the current Stormwater Regulations, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, 8) That the existing wet pond located along the east side of Wali Street not be modified or changed in any way; 9) That the applicant and Engineering Division staff met prior to apptying for a building permit to review stormwater management; 10) That the text be modified to include the following language: "at least 50 percent of the exterior surfaces of the tong dimension of homes adjacent to a public or private street shall utilize a stone veneer", subject to staff approval; 11) That all required general warranty deeds for parkland dedication be submitted to the City of Dublin prior to building permit issuance; 12) That staff meet with the owner of the daycare adjacent to the site t~ review the nrooosed landscape buffer; 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevarc Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -October 6, 2005 Page 21 13) That the proposed Sugar Maples along Wall Street be substituted with a hardier species, subject to staff approval; 14) That the ornamental trees shown on the plans not be substituted with lazger shade trees, subject to staff approval; 15) That the Stella d'Oro daylilies shown on the plans not be substituted with another species, subject to staff approval; and 16) That a small post-mounted sign be placed on Kinzie bane to display the addresses for home sites 35 through 43, subject to staff approval- Mr. Gerber moved to approve this I~ inai Development Plan because it complies with the final development plan regulations and the intent of the preliminary development plan, it will provide a mix of housing types and uses needed within the City, and it will enhance the overall appearance of scenic Post Road, with the 16 conditions listed above. Todd Zimmerman seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Ms. Reiss, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Ms. Jones, yes; Mr. Saneholtz, yes; Mr. Messineo, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; and Mr. Gerber, yes. (Approved 7-0.) The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Respectfully s/uf b~m~it'te/d,/ Libby arley Administrative Assistant Land Use and Long Range Planning 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of _ _ _Du~- it ~ou~~tl_ _ Meeting _ - - March 14, 2005---- _ - - j - Held - - 'fl 1 - , - Mayor Chinnici-Zuerc r called the regular meetin f Dublin City Council to orde at 7:00 p.m on Mo ay, March 14, 2005 at the blin Municipal Building. III PLEDGE O LLEGIANCE Avery S ,three-year old Dublin re ent, granddaughter of law ector Steve Smit rid daughter of Prosecutor tephen Smith recited the Ple e of Allegiance. .Boring then led the audio e m reciting the Pledge of AI glance ~lll ROLL CALL ++I Present were: tilay Chinnia-Zuercher, Vice Ma Lecklider, Mrs. Boring, Mr. { McCash. Mr Ke~ an. Mr. Reiner and Ms. Sal it Staff me ors present were: Ms Brau am, Mr Smith. Ms. Grigsby, r. McD el. Mr- Bird. Mr Hammersm , Mr Harding, Mr Hahn, Ms uskarcik. ,i C .f Epperson, Ms. Hoyle, Ms- andall, and Ms. Heat. II APPROVAL 01= MINUT Mr. Lecklider moved royal of the minutes of the eting of March 7, 2005. 1 Ms. Salay second the motion. j Mr. McCash n d a correction on paye five, f rth paragraph, where it sho j state that s made a determination, not ecommendation_ Vote on e minutes as corrected- Mr- cCash, yes; Mayor Chinnici- etcher, yes, r- Reiner, yes; Mrs. Bonny, ; Mr. Keenan, yes: Ms. Sal ,yes; Mr. klider, yes- { iI CORRESPONDENCE i The derk reported th there was no corresponden requiring Council action. CITIZEN CO ENTS (!TENS NOT ON TH -AGENDA) Am Ke9e 0542 MacKenzie Wad note hat she is a senior at Dublin offman High a is a participant in the Youn rofessionals Academy- She as enjoyed a l vat le teaming experience in w my with the Community Rel ions staff. She I anked Council for [heir conf ed support of this program t provides students with excellent opportunitie - or hands-on experience in b mess. I W_ allace Maurer 7 1 Dublin Road stated: L This he night that Council wilt giv im the date for the reinstatem ~ o ~e Gty Engineer He noted t he would give up any ten of ~ podium speaking opportuniti to join Council in one executiv session ' if a date has not been se ~r the reinstatement of the En eer, he plans ii to return on Wednes , or between now and the nex ouncil meeting ~ to undertake a co rtutional movement. 2 tie did riot f]ni is comments at a previous m tiny regarding a response t ~e City Manager s reorganiza of the administration of j the Cit e recalled that long ago, Pre ent Kennedy had a press J: ~ con rence and a reporter asked a v y long question with man eambles to which President K nedy responded, "yes. M curer { personally posed a sirnilady q question [o the City Ma ger regarding ~I the usefulness of the CiY ' reorganization and she re onded, "yes " I~ 3 He yielded his rernai y time- LEGISLATION V/ ~ SECOND READING/PUBLIC HEARING ~I 71` REZONING J~ Ordinance 13-04 Providing for a Change in Zoning For 22.657 Acres Located on the Southeast I Corner of Metatec Boulevard (now known as Discovery Boulevard) and Post I 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS tytinutes of Dublin City Council _ Meeting - - - - - March 14, 2005 Page 2 Held _ 20 Road, From: PUD, Planned Unit Development District, To: PUD, Planned Unit Development District. (Case No_ 04-028Z - Homestead at Coffman Park) ~ Mr. Bird stated that this is an amended preliminary development plan and zoning adjustment for the Homestead at Coffman Park. A memo in the packet contains ' the plans and development plan approval history for the project. He provided a j brief overview of the project, noting that the applicant is present- The site is L-shaped and is bordered on the north by residential use, to the south i by commercial and vacant property, and to the west and east by office use. The property is zoned planned unit development and was rezoned in 2000 by Council for residential use. The site plan shows 63 single-family units and 3 units on the i northwest portion called "hve/work" units. The proposed public open space is j located along Post Road and around the detention pond. The open space is ~ ~I approximately 4 4 acres, and the requirement is 4.25 acres. He showed a map I~ with the extensive landscape features, including stonewalls and agazebo- The livelwork units would provide for a small shop on the first floor, with a residential unit on the second floor. The architecture is a combination of traditional stone and ~ wood, with a majority of 1-1/2 to two-story traditionally styled homes- tt includes a community center facility of less than 5,000 square feet for use by the residents, located on the north side of the pond. The Planning Commission recommended approval with seven conditions, six of which have already been addressed. The type of fencing around the periphery of the development wiH be addressed at the final development plan stage. The development is consistent with the principles contained in the Community Plan, is an appropriate transition from residential to office use, and provides alternative housing types along Post Road. ' Eien Hale. Jry 37 W-Broad Street, Columbus noted he represents the applicant. 1 j Pat Grabill, a principal with Homestead Communities. After reviewing the site plan following his purchase of Homestead, Mr. Grabill retained Jim Burkhart, local I landscape architect to make some improvements to the site plan. The differences j were substantial enough to require a rezoning process. The previous plan had ~ issues related to fire department access to the site. With alt of these revisions, eight units were eliminated. Fie invited Mr. Grabill to speak about the product and ' [he market Pat Grabill, f 82 South Hir h Street, Dublin stated that he is pleased with the Tina( evolution of the floor plans. They alt include first floor master bedrooms and are designed for those who want to downsize, yet want the independence of a detached home with atwo-car garage in the Dublin area, and want to be within ~ walking distance of the Rec Center. This provides another housing alternative for those who want to stay m the Dublin community when their families are grown. Mr_ Reiner stated that he was not present at Coundl for the vote on the first i rezoning of this property. This represents a change from [he Community Plan i' designation of income produdng office use to residential - an extraordinary action. Ai this point, there is nothing that can be done to change that decision. From the ,I i legal opinion, he understands that the conservation design resolution does not 1 apply to this site- He is almost certain he would not have voted in favor of ~i changing commercial office zoning to residential zoning. There is nothing to be done at this point. 1~ ~ Mr. McCash noted that on Danielle Court, d appears that there is asphalt loop for two parallel parking spaces. Does it make sense to have all of this asphalt for two parking spaces versus having more greenspace for the front entries of those four ~ ' units Mr_ Hale responded that there are actually four parking spaces in that location. The desire is to have guest parking in front of these units. Mr- Grabill added that this might also relate to discussions with the fire department j~ regarding egwprnent access- i 06-118AFDP I Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of Dublin City Council _ _ Meeting - - a..K.~a,..~«~.w.«..o ~o - - - - - - o„n - - - - - - March 14, 2005 Page 3 Held- _ 20 Mr. McCash stated that this seems too tight of a radius for fire equipment. This seems an ideal place to add more greenspace between the units. Mc Grabill commented that this could be reviewed in conjunction with preparation of the final development plan. Mr. McCash asked if elevators are required for the live/work units. Under the fair ~ ttousing guidelines, he believes this would he required- The HUD guidelines are fairly dear. Mr. Grabill responded that their architect has indicated that elevators are not 1 required. j Mr. McCash asked if the 8velwork units were a key part of the Planning 8 Zoning ~,i Commission's support of the project. Mr. Hate stated that there was some discussion about eliminating these units, but { some Commission Members wanted them left in. One live/work unit was dropped for parking space, resulting in three live/work ~nits- Mr- McCash does not foresee that the live/work units can actually be built there. Mr. Grabill stated that they were part of the original approval and were subsequently relocated. Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher asked that staff review the HUD requirements and report back to Council. Mr- Bird agreed io do so. Mr. Keenan asked atx>ut the timeline for build ouL When will the project be completed? Mr_ Grabill responded that following [he approval process, they hope to initiate the project this fall- Completion is scheduled no later than three years out. Mr. Keenan asked staff about the timing for the Avery-MuirfieldlPost Road ~ intersection improvements. There is much traffic congestion already in this Location. 1~ Mr. Hammersmith responded that the improvements are scheduled for [he summer of 2006. Ms Satay commented that her understanding is that a residential use of this site versus office will actually have positive impacts from a traffic standpoint. Mr. Hammersmith responded that, generally speaking, the trip generation from residential zoning is actually less than office use- Tha[ information was provided to the Commission. Ms. Salay disclosed that she met previously with Mr. Grabill and the landscape architect to discuss [his project She served on Planning Commissron at the time the project first came through under the previous rezoning. The landscaping along ~I Post Road is very nice as proposed. She pointed out that it is important for staff to 1 focus on the e{emenis in terrns of serving as the gateway location into Coffman Park- i his development will be a nice addition to the area Mr. fecklider staled that he has been generally supportive of this project from the outset. Ne likes the concept of the live/work units, which have been successful in I) other IocaUons. The proposed development lends to the residential character of ~I this portion of Post Road- It provides alternative housing stock for the community- Given the capacity to handle traffic in the area, it is positive. Regarding the conversion from cornrnercial use, it may prove to be a positive in terms of the traffic generation. Mayor Chinnici-7_uercher noted that she met in January with Mr Grabill and his iI ~ associates to review the project. She is very supportive of the provision of diverse i housing. She is hopeful that the live/work units can be included, as [hey will be a ~I good addition where currently proposed- She appreciates Mr. Refiner's comments j-: I 06-llBAFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS _ Minutes of --Dublin City Council Meeting d,..a.~a.~..~.r_~.. - - - - - - - March t4, 2005--T _ Page 4 - Hetd _20 about the loss of income tax revenue, but the transition from the residential across the street is better with this type of residential units versus traditional businesses- She invited public testimony. ~II i~ Edith Driscoll, 6230 Post Road stated that she has fived in her home for 46 years next month. She keeps a diary and noticed that ten years ago, Dublin was in the i~ process of updating its Community Plan, approved in 1997. She recently reviewed ;j the Post Road portion. In Chapter 2 of the Plan. `Environment' it lists scenic roads io be maintained, including Avery, Brand and post Road. The proposed development wilt add to this feel for Posi Road, with mounding, water features. ' fencing, and bikepath_ It wilt fulfill the vision of the Community Plan for this area. The neighbors along Post Road are in support of the proposal that will help fo 1~ maintain the character of Post Road. She urged Council to approve the proposed rezoning. i 1 Wallace Maurer, 7451 Dublin Road_ asked about the ownership of the development 1 1 company listed as Continental/NRI Ventures Ltd. ~ Mr_ Grabill responded that the land is owned currently by Nationwide Insurance The development is a joint venture with partners of his and Continental Real Estate. Mr. Maurer noted that he was concerned with whether there was a "cookie-cutter" 'i i principle involved here- In reading the materials, however, he noticed that Mr. Grabill is targeting variation. The materials refer to a community center. With the ~ location across from the Dublin Community Rec Center, is there any possibility that it will take overflow from the DCRC? Mr_ Grabill noted that this center is for the exclusive use of the owners of the units in the development. i . Mr. Maurer noted that it has been determined that this development is not subject j to the conservation design principles- From here on out, there are apt to be more developments with conservation design development involved. Will there be some clashes between the character of this and future development, or will ~t be a healthy diversity? !f Dublin has remaining land not amenable to conservation design, the City should consider another sector of buyers- The Minerva Park area strikes him as an amazing feat, with an arresting and magnetic diversity. The homes are only 20-30 feet apart, and it is a model of high-density development- , Chris Cline, 6060 Posf Road noted that their home is one of the two remaining Ij residential neighbors of the subject property. They are in favor of this project- This is the original Wellington School site, which [hen became the Dublin Tech Park. At it the time of the Perimeter Center zoning, they lobbied and were successful in changing the zoning for this section- That was back in the 1980's and the site never sold. They view this as appropriate for residential zoning, although the market didn't view it this way. It became apparent that it was a third tier site, and I! that what was proposed to be built there in recent years was not of high quality. I 1 They are very pleased that the direction has changed- This development is more compatible with the view along Post Road_ The Coffman Park Task Force felt that I' this was an important entry for the municipal complex at Coffman Park- This will be j ~ a much better view along Post Road for the residents as well as for those who ! travel along Post Road. They strongly support this rezoning. ' Vote on the Ordinance- Mr. Keenan, yes: Mrs- Boring, yes; Mayor Chinnici- ~ ! Zuercher, yes; Mr Reiner, no; Ms. Salay, yes: Mr_ McCash, yes; Mr Lecklider, yes. i~ Mr. Reiner stated that Mr. Grabill has done many wonderful projects in Dublin, but j 1 personally, he remains concerned about residential Development on the south side ~ I of Post Road, invading a cornmerda!!y zoned area- He would have opposed th,s if he were present at the time of the original vote- He does not see this as a positive 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Minutes of _ Dublin City Council Meeting March 14, 2005 Page S Held _20 for the citizens of Dublin from a tax base perspective, as it constitutes tightly packed residential development amidst commercial zoning j BID ACCEPTANCE Ordinance 16-05 Accepting the Lo sUBest Bid for the North Eas uad Park North Paving Project, Appro aring Funds Therefor, and D aring an Emergency. ~ There were questions of staff. it Ms. Sal moved for emergency passag {I Mr. cklider seconded the motion. I, to on the motion: Mrs. Boring es; Mr. Keenan, yes; Mr. Reiner es; Ms. Safay, l yes; Mayor Chinnici-Zuercher es: Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. Mc h, yes. ~j Vote on the Ordinance: . Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; . McCash, yes; Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mayor innici-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Kee .yes; Mr. Reiner, yes. ;I Ordinance 17 1 Acceptin a LowesUBest Bid for the S mwater Management Syste Maint ance Program -General Con uction Service Contract 200 nd D aring an Emergency. ere were no questions of sta Mr. Lecklider moved for em ency passage. i Mr. Reiner seconded th otion. Vote on the motion- rs. Boring, yes; Mr. Keenan, y , Mr_ Reiner, yes; Ms. Salay. yes; Mayor Chin ~-Zuercher, yes; Mr. Lecklider, s; Mr_ McCash, yes. Mayor C ~ Hitt-Zuercher noted that Mr. M rer had requested to testify. Wall Maurer 7451 Dublin Road no d that the formula used in th id is $918 i p our for labor and machinery- hat about the total number ours for the { overall program? Mr. Hammersmith stated that the hourly estimate given is -total of ati items included in the bid - bgekhoe, labor and other equip t. It provides a unit basis on which to comp~e-bids- For any activity or tas contractor is asked to perfor ! they must prove a quote that is reviewed an pproved by staff before work commence -on that particular task- ~ Mrs oring asked if staff has set ap for ibis project, per the bud i Hammersmith responded t there is an annual cap form enance activities of $250,000. Vote on the Ordin fie: Mr. Lecklider, yes; Mr. McC ,yes; Mayor Chinnici- Zuercher, yes; s. Salay, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; .Keenan, yes; Mrs- Boring, ye I'+ LAND QUISITION i! Or ance 18-05 thorizing the Purchase of a 13 Acre, More or Less, Fee SJ~ ple Interest, a 0.202 Acre, More or less andscape Easement, and a O.Q32 Acres, More or Less Drainage Easem~t, From RR Partners, Located V1Gest of Rings Road, 1~ City of Oublin, County of Franklin, State of Ohio. ' Ms. 8rautigam s~t~d that this relates to the final ac isition of property in connection w h the southwest traffic-calming pr ct. ~I Vote on t Ordinance: Mayor Chinnici-Zuer er, yes; Mr. Keenan, yes; M j Reine , es; Ms. Salay, yes; Mayor McC ,yes; Mr Lecklider, yes; Mr oring, I! I 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park ! Post Road and Discovery Boulevard I PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION FEBRUARY 17, 2005 :ITY OF DUBLIN_ .md Use aad _oe~:: ° uge Planaiag i8f et-Rings Road hd Ihio 43016-1236 'lane.614-410-4600 ax 614A10-4141 Neb Site_ www-drd><in-oh_us The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 1. Rezoning - Revised Preliminary Development Plan 04-0282 - Homestead at Coffman Park Location: 22.66 acres located at the southeast corner of Discovery Boulevard and Post Road. Existing Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Perimeter Center plan). Request: Review and approval of a revised preliminary development plan under the PUD provisions of Section 153.053. Proposed Use: Asingle-family condominium development of 63 detached residential units, 3 live-work units, a community building and 4.37 acres of open space. Applicant: Patrick Grabill, Homestead Communities, LLC, 109 S_ High Street, Dublin, OH 43017; represented by Ben W_ Hale Jr., Smith & Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, Ohio 43215. Staff Contact: Danielle M. Devlin, A1CP, Senior Planner_ Contact Information: Phone: (614) 410-4649-E-mail. ddevlin@dublin_oh.us. MOTION: To approve this rezoning/revised preliminary development plan because it provides a needed alternative housing type for the community, its uses serve as an appropriate transition Gom the commercial uses to the south and the residential properties north of Post Road while preserving the intent of the Community Plan by allowing a "live-work" element, it towers the density from the existing zoning standards, potentially reducing off-site traffic impacts, the landscape treatments and pedestrian amenities will substantially increase the visual quality of the Post Road corridor, and will blend with the proposed expansion plans for Coffman Park; and the appearance of a regional stormwater retention pond will be enhanced, with seven conditions: Conditions: 1 } That the design of all private drives, parking areas, and drive approaches meet Engineering requirements for strength, durability and geometries; 2) That no alterations for the proposed boardwalk, community center and or walking path be made that reduce overall storage capacity of the pond, subject to staff approval; 3) That all utility connections meet or exceed Division of Engineering Standards; Page 1 of 2 06-ll8AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Pnct Rnarl a„rl T~icnnverv Rrntlevard PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION FEBRUARY 17, 2005 1. Rezoning -Revised Preliminary Development Plan 04-0282 -Homestead at Coffman Park (Continued) 4) That all required general warranty deeds for parkland dedication be submitted to the City of Dublin prior to recording of the final plat; 5) That complete and revised civil engineering drawings and tree replacement and relocation plans drawn at an appropriate scale, subject to staff approval, be submitted as part of the final development plan; 6) That the final development plans show the extension of the walkway from the pond to connect to the existing bike path in the northeastern area of the site as described in the development text; and 7) That the fencing be a certain design and color other than white, as discussed at this meeting, subject to staff approval. * Patrick Grabill, the applicant, agreed to the above conditions. VOTE: 6- t _ RESULT: This rezoning/revised preliminary development plan application was approved. It will be forwarded to City Council with a positive recommendation. STAFF CERTIF[CATION Danielle M. Devlin, AICP Senior Planner Land Use and Long Range Planning 06-118AFDP Page 2 of 2 Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffinan Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -February 17, 2005 Page 2 Mr. Gerber said th staff works hard all w ,and he hated to up their free time o Saturday for the ork Session. He ask - the Work Session co be held at the end o e March 3 me ~ng agenda instead. The Co issioners all agreed tot arch 3 Workshop f owing the two regular es on the agen Therefore the Worksh session on February 2 as cancelled. Mr_ Bird mentioned at the Commissione had received invita ~ ns to the Regional Growth/Route 33 rridor Meeting on ch 9, at the Union ounty Service Center Marysville at 6: p_m_ F + Admini ative [3usiness Re ing the January 13, 2 meeting minutes, M aneholtz requested th they reflect that was present Mr_ Mes ~ eo noted that he was o present at the meetin Mr. Gerber's mo ~ n was to approve the anuary 13, 2005 rneeti minutes as amended. r. Zimmerman conded the motion, the vote was as fo ws: Mr_ Messineo, s; Mr. Saneholt es; Mr_ Sprague, yes- s_ Reiss, yes; Mr. Z~ erman, yes; and Mr. erber, yes. egarding the Janu 0, 2005, Ms_ Reiss re sted that the time she rrived be corrected t 6:35 p.m_ She al requested that on Pa 21, in the third para ph, it read: He sal the difficulty that ~ght be presented is w~ this field in terms ~ long balls going er the fence into t neighboring yards. f,. Mr erber's motion was to pprove the January 20 X005 meeting minute as amended. Mr. immerman seconded t motion, and the vot was as follows: _ Messineo, yes; Mr. Saneholtz, yes; Mr_ S ague, abstain; Ms_ Rei ,yes; Mr. Zimmerma ,yes; and Mr. Gerber, _ (Approved 6-0.) ~ For the r rd, Mr_ Gerber stated ~t the Planning and ng Commission is an visory board to C' Council when rezonip~s of property are un r consideration. [n s cases the City Heil wilt receive reco endations from the C fission and conduct other public hearing to approve or disappr e the rezoning. Ins e other cases the Co fission has the decisio making responsibi ~ y, such as approving ecific development p( based on a prior rezo ~ g. Anyone who i nds to address the Co nission on any of thes ases must be sworn in_ Mr_ Ge er announced that the plicants for Cases 1, 2 ,and 5 had consented the conditions lis in the staff report. e pulsed Cases l and from the Consent Ag a because it was ~ndicated that there wes onunission issues to discussed regarding t e cases. The order of the agenda was Case'L, 3, 1, 4, 5, and G. jT minutes reflect the pub ed agenda order., 1. Rezoning - Kevised Preliminary Development Plan 04-028`L -Homestead at Coffman Park Mr. Gerber announced that this is for review and approval of a rezoning/revised preluninary development plan that was tabled at the January 20, 2005 meeting after much discussion. Mr_ Gerber asked that the presentation from the last time not be repeated, but that an update be 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -February 17, 2005 Page 3 given. Mr_ Gerber swore in those who intended to testify in regards to this case. Danielle Devlin said she would shave the slides with the updates to this plan. On the updated open space slide, she noted it showed the area where the number of live/work units from four to three_ The parking has been increased in the area by adding spaces on two sides of the live/work units, thereby creating 40 parking spaces within 300 feet of the units_ Other parking has been increased to total 99 spaces within the entire development. Removal of the live/work unit increases Area A open space slightly to L55 acres_ Open space totaling 4.37 acres is to be dedicated, which exceeds the Code requirement of42~ acres_ Ms. Devlin said the Cherry grove and gazebo still remain on the plan. The frontage amenities also remain the same_ Elevations of the live/work units and text clarification of them has been submitted concerning the square footage and permitted uses. The word Retail has been removed and Commercial has been defined to include the sale and display of goods for studios_ Ms. Devlin said staff recommends approval of this revised preliminary development plan with six conditions= 1) That the design of all private drives, parking areas, and drive approaches meet Engineering requirements for strength, durability and geometries; 2) That no alterations for the proposed boardwalk, community center and or walking path be made that reduces overall storage capacity of the pond, subject to staff approval; 3) That all utility connections meet or exceed Division of Engineering Standards; 4) That all required general warranty deeds for parkland dedication be submitted to the City of Dublin prior to recording of the Etna( plat; 5} That complete and revised civil engineering drawings and tree replacement and relocation plans drawn at an appropriate scale, subject to staff approval, be submitted as part of the final development plan; and 6) That the final development plans show the extension of the walkway from the pond to connect to the existing bike path in the northeastern area of the site as described in the development text. Applicant Pat tirabil(, president of Homestead Communities, said they had responded to the seven issues the Conunission had at the last meeting. Mr. Gerber asked Mr. Grabill to address each of the Commission issues after those who wished to speak in the audience spoke. Edith Driscoll, 6230 Post Road, representing the Post Road residents, stated her support of this development. She said at their January meeting, Mike Spitale, president of the Post Road Civic Association indicated that they were 100 percent in support of this development_ She said she and her husband would be pleased if ttte Commission forwarded this application to City Council for its consideration. Cathy Boring asked about flipping Units 26 through 34 around so the alley and garages would not be in front of Wall Street. She said the fronts would then face Wail Street. Mr. Grabill said the main roadway acid turning radii had been redesigned at the request of the fire department_ He did not think the fire department would find backing vehicles into that roadway acceptable_ Ne also said it lost the sense of community they were trying to create. Ali the units 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -February 17, 2005 Page 4 have porches and living areas oriented towards the streetscape with no garages shown from the street. He said the site was narrow and it did not provide much freedom to plan it any other way_ Ms. Boring asked if the landscaping could be restructured between the garages and Wall Street. Jim Burkhart, Jim Burkhart and Associates Landscape Architects, said they were proposing a continuous solid hedge along that street. He said they proposed that it be evergreen material to provide a living evergreen fence. Ms. Boring stated she did not care for the white fence proposed because it tends to give an impression of other communities rather than Dublin. Mr. Burkhart said they had no objections to darkening the fence or using something other than a three- or four-rail horse fence. He said it could be split rail. He said the white horse fences had been a theme for Homestead Communities, but they had no objection to using something else. Ms. Boring asked for a suggested fence that would be different yet still have Homestead's theme. Mr. Burkhart said instead of using the usual 1 by 6, three- or four-rail system, they could use a round rail or something that would provide uniqueness, but still maintain the image. Mr. Grabill mentioned they were trying to Dublinize this site with the dark green shutters with shamrocks. He suggested a dark green fencing, if acceptable. Mr. Burkhart said he knew of a fence company in Massachusetts that makes a sophisticated fence with round rails. He wanted to class up the fence, still toning it down_ Ms. Boring asked if the Commissioners felt comfortable leaving the fence type and color subject to staff approval. Mr. Gerber suggested Condition 7: That fencing be of a certain design and a color other than white, subject to staff approval. Ms. Boring added to Condition 7: ...as discussed in this meeting. She stated she did not want to design the fence. Ms. Devlin noted that fence detail will return for the Commission's review and approval at the final development plan stage_ Mr. Burkhart said several different alternatives will be presented at that time_ Ruth Reiss asked if a diversity matrix for the color palette was needed so two units next to each other would not be the same color. Ms. Devlin said all of units are proposed to be beige, so the color palette would only refer to the trim. She said the text stated that no two trim palettes would be the same. Mr. Gerber asked if the red barn was the red as depicted in the drawing. 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Pest Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -February 17, 2005 Page ~ Mr. Grabill said it was about the same dark red as his building at 109 South High Street, and an approved color in the Historic District.. Mr_ Grabill thought a metal standing seam or wood shingle barn roof would look more authentic than the asbestos roof preferred by staff. Ms. Boring agreed with Mr. Grabill that the red barn would look better with the different roof material. Mr. Gerber said this would be seen again at the final_ Ms. Reiss asked about homeowner's association maintenance of the bam roof Mr. Grabill said standing seam would last longer than the composition roof. He leaned more towards the wood shingle because it was a softer look. However, he wanted time to study it. Mr. Gerber said that would be fine since this would be seen again by the Commission. Ms. Boring referred to the Architectural Diversity section of the Staff Report where it stated that the frontages needed to be stone, etc. She asked about wraparound requirements_ Ms. Devlin said wraparound was a requirement of the Architectural Diversity Code, and it would be included. Ms. Boring noted that all the garages shown were two-car garages_ She asked about the option for three-car garages. Mr. Grabill said he did not think many buyers would take that option_ He said the two-car garages are oversized. Mr. Grabill agreed to the seven conditions as listed below_ Mr. Gerber made the motion to approve this rezoning/preliminary development plan because it provides a needed alternative housing type for the community, its uses serve as an appropriate transition from the commercial uses to the south and the residential properties north of Post Road while preserving the intent of the Community Plan by allowing a "live-work" element, it lowers the density from the existing zoning standards, potentially reducing off-site traffic impacts, the landscape treatments and pedestrian amenities witl substantially increase the visual quality of the Post Road corridor, and will blend with the proposed expansion plans for Coffman Park, and the appearance of a regional stormwater retention pond will be enhanced, with seven conditions: 1) That the design of all private drives, parking areas, and drive approaches meet Engineering requirements for strength, durability and geometries; 2) That no alterations for the proposed boardwalk, community center and or walking path be made that reduces overall storage capacity of the pond, subject to staff approval; 3) That all utility connections meet or exceed Division of Engineering Standards; 4) That all required general warranty deeds for parkland dedication be submitted to the City of Dublin prior to recording of the final plat; 06-ll8AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -February 17, 200 Page 6 5) That complete and revised civil engineering drawings and tree replacement and relocation plans drawn at an appropriate scale, subject to staff approval, be submitted as part of the final development plan; 6) That the final development plans show the extension of the walkway from the pond to connect to the existing bike path in the northeastern area of the site as described in the development text; and 7) That the fencing be a certain design and color other than white, as discussed at this meeting, subject to staff approval. Mr_ Zimmerman seconded the motion, and the vote was as follows: Ms. Reiss, yes; Ms. Boring, yes; Mr. Sprague, yes; Mr. Saneholtz, no; Mr_ Messineo, yes; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; and Mr. Gerber, yes. (Approved b- l 2. Amende final Development an 04-066AFDP - erimeter Office Ce e 2 - 5920- 6000 nture Drive Mr. G er swore in Frank epherd, who represe d the applicant and ers who wished to tes ' in regards to this c Mr_ Shepherd agre to the conditions list elow_ Mr. Gerber de the motion to ap ve this amended Fi Development Plan ause it meets the new armed District reg lions and the revi condition will al the proposed devel ment to meet the int t of the previously roved Perimeter Ce r development text, wi two conditions: That Condition l m the approved Rec of Action dated Jul 5, 2004 be revised t ead "That docume lion be provided ver~ ing that the propos office development been incorporate into the existing Pe ' eter Office Centre ondominium Associ 'on, to the satisfact' of staff'; and 2) That documentation of fie Condominium D aration Amendmen and Contract for ition to Condomini e provided prior to ilding permit issuanc _ s. Reiss seconded t motion, and the vote as as follows: Ms. B ng, yes; Mr. Zimme an, yes; Mr. Sprague, s; Mr. Sanehoitz, ye - r_ Messineo, yes; .Reiss, yes; and Mr. rber, yes. (Approve -0.) 3. ended Final Devel ment Plan 04-175A P -Tartan West, S Lion 1 (Subarea .1) . Gerber said this as an application f approval and revi of an amended F' al eveiopment Plan a gazebo with a chanical room with' the building setbac along Nyland-Croy Ro . Mr. Gerb swore in the applica ,Steve Simonetti, T n Development Co any, and those who w' ed to testify in regar to this case. r. Simonetti agreed t e condition listed b w. 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION JANUARY 20, 2005 CITY OF DUBLIN_ land Use and g Range Planning D Shier-Rims Road in, Ohio 43016-1236 Phone: 614-410-4600 Fax: 614-410-4147 Web Site: www.dabbn-oh.us The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 2. Rezoning -Revised Preliminary Development Plan 04-0282 -Homestead at Coffman Park Location: 22.46 acres located at the southeast corner of Discovery Boulevard and Post Road. Existing Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Perimeter Center plan). Request: Review and approval of a revised preliminary development plan under the PUD provisions of Section 153.053. Proposed Use: Asingle-family condominium development of 63 detached residential units, 4 live-work units, a community building and 4.3 acres of open space. Applicant: Patrick Grabill, Continental/NRI Office Ventures Limited, 109 S. High Street, Dublin, Ohio 43017; represented by Ben W. Hale Jr., Smith & Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, Ohio 43215. Staff Contact: Danielle M. Devlin, AICP, Senior Planner. Contact Information: Phone: (614) 410-4649/E-mail: ddevlin@dublin.oh.us. MOTION: To table this Preliminary Development Plan for the purpose of collecting additional information, and waive the Commission's 15-Day Rule for additional information. Ben W. Hale, Jr., representing the applicant, agreed to the tabling. VOTE: 3-2. RESULT: This Preliminary Development Plan was tabled after much discussion. Information addressing the following issues was requested by the Commission: 1) Traffic study analyzing internal and external traffic patterns. 2) Parking analysis for live/work units. 3) Chip and seal surface for walking path. 4) Decreased density. Page 1 of 2 PLANNING AND ZONING COMNIISSION RECORD OF ACTION JANUARY 20, 2005 2. Rezoning -Revised Preliminary Development Plan 04-0282 -Homestead at Coffman Park (Continued) 5) Method to restrict non-owner occupancy. 6) Clarification of commercial floor area oflive/work units in text. 7) Diversity matrix. The 15-Day Rule will not be imposed. Provided the requested information is submitted by February 2, 2005, this case will be placed on the February 17, 2005, agenda. The Commission is to be updated by staff at the February 3, 2005 meeting as to the progress of this case. STAFF CERTIFICATION Daniel D. Bird, AICP Director of Land Use and Long Range Planning Page 2 of 2 Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -January 20, 2005 Page 2 Mr. Gerber announce that all tonight's appl~ is had consented to a conditions listed in t staff report. He ed Cases 2 and 3 fr the Consent Agenda ecause it was indicate that there were Co fission issues to be "scussed. He announ- the order of tonight' agenda would be es 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 2, an He later amended t order to hear Case 3 ore Case 2 since t e were more residents resent to speak for C 3. [The minutes refl the published age a order] 1. Administrati Request 04-080A -Amendments to a Corridor Devel ment District ( D) Mr. Ger said the Commissio ast saw this request o anuary 13. The rev" ed ordinance langua prepared by the Law irector's office was pr ~ded to the Cornmissi ers in a separate pa et on Wednesday. e Commissioners pre - nt indicated they ha read it and had no anges to be made_ Mr. Gerber m e the motion to reco end approval oft Amendment to the orridor Developme istrict to City Coune~ . Mr. "rd indicated that Ms. eiss had requested t word new be elimi led from the first s ence of Section 2: Si age sha115e reviewed s part of a CDD app ~ anon whenever a r4ew uilding is constructe r modified, because it as redundant. Mr_ Gerber ad to his previous moti that the word, new eliminated from Sectio 2 of the proposed o nance as requested. Mr. essineo seconded th otion, and the vote as as follows: Mr. Zi merman, yes; Mr. neholtz, yes; Mr. Mes " eo, yes; and Mr. Ger r, yes. (Approved 4-0. 2. Rezoning -Revised Preliminary Development Plan 04-0282 -Homestead at Coffman Park Mt. Gerber said this case was tabled on April 1, 2004, at the request of the applicant. EIe said this is a request for review and approval of a Revised Preliminary Development Plan for asingle- family condominium development of 63 detached residential units, four live/work units, an 1,800 square foot community building, and 4.3 acres of open space_ He said this rezoning application sets up specific standards that will be binding. This meeting is a recommendation hearing. At a later date, City Council will schedule a public hearing, and a vote to approve or disapprove the proposal. Danielle Devlin presented this case. The site is located centrally within the City, south of Post Road, and east of Discovery Boulevard. She showed on an aerial slide the 22.46 acre site, the office development to the south, the park, recreation center, the residential development to the north, and the stormwater retention, pond on the site. "[~he site is zoned residential, PUD, Planned Unit Development. Sites to the south and west are coned PCD, Placuied Commercial District_ The area to the east is zoned LI, Limited Industrial District, and to the north is residential, and PUD, Planned Unit Development District. 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -January 20, 2005 Page 3 Ms. Devlin said the four live/work units are located at the primary entrance at Discovery Boulevard and Post Road. Sixty-three detached single-family units are to be accessed through the alleys into rear load garages. The streets within the development are private. The 4.31 acre open space shown on the plan is in Area A, Area B, which continues along Post Road, and Area C, which circles the retention pond. The openspace required is 436 acres, but the developer has agreed to a fee in lieu of the dedication for the remaining .OS acres. Ms. Devlin showed slides of the landscape plan and the proposed amenity treatments. A gazebo will be nestled into a flowering cherry grove, and then wilt open up into a prairie area and a linear pond feature. An existing bikepath will connect to a proposed gravel walkway that will continue along Area B and circle the retention pond. The clubhouse will overtook the retention pond. Slides of the elevations of the frontage amenities proposed showed the gazebo area, the cherry trees, the dry laid stone wail treatments, and the pond area. Slides of the elevations of the proposed community center and the live/work units proposed. Ms. Devlin said the lower floor of the live/work units can be either retail or office/commercial uses. She said the upper floor can be either two dwelling units or a dwelling unit and an office. Slides of the proposed single-family unit elevation and of an elevation at an existing development (Scioto Reserve) were shown. There are two primary entrances to the development with one sign at each entrance. Ms. Devlin said staff is recommending approval of this Revised Preliminary Development Pian with the following 13 conditions: 1) That the proposed pavement setbacks specified in the text specifically match those shown on the plans; 2) That the design of all private drives, parking areas, and drive approaches meet Engineering requirements for strength, durability and geometries; 3) That no alterations for the proposed boardwalk, community center and or walking path be made that reduces overall storage capacity of the pond, subject to staff approval; 4) That all utility connections meet or exceed Division of Engineering Standards; 5) That internal signage specifying areas of one-way travel and prohibited and allowable parking areas be installed subject to staff approval; 6) That the applicant provide street names, subject to staff approval, and a digital site plan for addressing purposes prior to submittal of a final development plan; 7) That any additional future home models for use within the development be submitted, subject to staff approval; 8) That all required parkland dedication fees and general warranty deeds be submitted to the City of Dublin prior to recording of the final plat; 9) That the construction of all amenities planned for the reserve Area B and C are completed prior to the initiation of Phase [I and those planned for Area A are completed prior to the initiation of Phase III; 10) That complete and revised civil engineering drawings and tree replacement and relocation plans drawn at an appropriate scale, subject to staff approval, be submitted as part of the final development plan; 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -January 20, 2005 Page 4 11) That the applicants consult with the City Forester prior to the final development plan to verify that Ash trees remain the preferred species of street tree along Wall Street; 12) That the walkway leading to the pond be extended to connect to the existing bike path in the northeastern area of the site; and 13) That the applicants revise the 87 parking spaces referenced in the text to reflect the 86 spaces shown on the plans. Ben W. Hale, Jr., representing the applicant, Homestead Communities said Pat Grabill, a Dublin resident had become an investor in this development. He said that Nationwide actually owned this site. He said Mr. Grabill had made some significant, but important changes to the original approved site pian_ Mc Hale said the architecture of the units had been upgraded and the location of the live/work units had been also been changed_ Mr. Hale said they had met with their neighbors who he thought would speak favorably about this development. Mr. Hale said the live/work units were relocated onto Discovery Boulevard and had slightly more square footage (7,500 versus 10,000 square feet). He said the previous fire accessibility and garage access issues have been addressed with this site plan. Jim Burkhart, James Burkhart and Associates, inc., said they were initially concerned with the Post Road area. He said a previous Landscape design showed what he thought were insignificant, small ponds. Mr. Burkhart said Dublin stone wails have been added at the entranceway and aesthetically between the housing units for screening of any vehicular use areas, i.e. the alleyways. He said a public shelter or gazebo would be added which would be related to the bikepath. Mr. Burkhart said they might add white columns, instead of the typical cedar square to the shelter_ He said the rafters might be white and it might have a shake roof. He said where the original mounding was located, they propose a mass of cherry trees at the intersection. He said semi-circular walls would visually consiect the homes and provide visual screening of the vehicles. He said gates would provide character to the stone watts. Mr_ Burkhart said his new landscape plan was simple, but elegant, and he had made it "Dublin." He thought this would be an asset to the community_ Pat Grabill, Homestead Communities, LLC_, said he had been contacted by many people who wanted to be on a waiting list for these units_ He said this represents the diversity of housing that current Dublin residents are looking for -something close, in a condominium format, but detached. It is close to the recreation center and close to shopping_ Mr. Grabill said they had followed through with previous comments made to have the majority of the street facing facades to have Dublin-type stone veneer. He said a benefit of this community to him was that it was the fourth generation of the communities they had done, so they were able to refine the floor plans and a community center for gatherings, etc. in the barn- iike building. Ms. Devlin said two letters from interested parties were provided on the dais to the Commissioners tonight. 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -January 20, 2005 Page S Chris Cline, 6060 Post Road, said since 1980, they had been interested in the development of this property across from their home. He reiterated the two issues he had stated in his E-mail distributed to the Commission. He said it was very important that this was a compatible land use, not just in the case of being a transition between residential and commercial, but also visibly compatible with both the residential feel and the park nature of Post Road. Speaking as a member of the Coffman Park Taskforce, they were very interested in a similar concept which was apark-like feel for all of Post Road. They wanted private residential and public areas that would begin the feeling of entering into the Coffman Park area to the east. Mr. Cline said he felt this concept did that_ He said they supported this development and warranted the Commission's approval. Mr. Cline said they have always wanted to preserve Dublin's rural heritage and do rural feeling things in Dublin. He said this project has a rural feel. E1e said tying this project with the white Orr barn, the Kinman's resident, and possibly the old Coffman Farmhouse, would provide a theme on Post Road. s Gary Kinman, 6080 Post Road, said they supported this development. He said they had 600 feet of contiguous property. He felt this would be an excellent buffer between his residence and the large buildings across the street. He said he thought the landscape design was good_ Mr_ Kinman said they supported this project 1,000 percent. Michael Spitale, 6313 Post Road, president of the Post Road Neighborhood Association, stated that he felt the entire street fully supported: He said Mr. Grabill and Mc. Thomas both had discussed this project with them and asked him to visit their Home Road project. Mr. Gerber was not sure he agreed with the staff report that Conservation Design could not be done on this site, and it was an issue for discussion. Mr. Gerber said this case was tabled April 1, 2004. The Conservation Design resolution was passed in June 2004. He asked given that timing sequence, does the resolution apply to this application. Jennifer Readier, said the Law Director's office had reviewed the issue, and determined that given the time the application was filed, and the passage of the Conservation Design resolution, that the applicant was vested under the standards that apply at the time of the filing. Therefore, the Conservation Design resolution would not apply to this specific application. She provided the Commissioners a memo outlining the reasons why they came to that conclusion_ Mr. Gerber requested and Ms. Readier agreed that the memo, dated January 19, 2005, would become part of tonight's record. The Commissioners had no questions or comments about the memo Mr. Saneholtz asked about the proximity of the homes on the north side of Post Road_ 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission ' Minutes -January 20, 2005 Page 6 Ms. Devlin indicated that the closest home, near Open space B appeared to be approximately 100 feet_ One is set back approximately 300-400 feet. Anne Wanner reported that all the homes on the north side of Post Road to the east had been acquired by the City. Ms_ Devlin, looking at the drawing, estimated that the closest residence to Post Road on the north side was 250 feet. Mr. Saneholtz asked how close was the two-story building on Achill Court and Schoolcraft Drive to the corner of Sells Mill and Muirfield Drive. Ms. Devlin did not have that information, but per Mr. Saneholtz's request, agreed to provide it later. Mr. Saneholtz was not in agreement that this property is transitional He said this was commercial property, while he realized it is not currently zoned Commercial, there are other commercial developments much closer to residential properties than this proposal. Mr. Saneholtz said he was having a hard time using that as justification for this residential development on the south side of Post Road. He said there were many other neighborhoods near commercial property. Mr. Saneholtz asked if there was sufficient parking for the work/live units_ Ms. Devlin said staff believed there was sufficient parking for the work/live units. She said there were 32 spaces within 300 feet of the live/work units, as well as the garages for the residents of those units. Mr. Saneholtz understood from the staff report that garages were included as commercial parking spaces. Ms. Devlin said the garages were not counted as commercial parking spaces. Mr. Gerber referred to the text, Section 2, Paragraph 2, C, items I forward, and asked what type of retail was being considered. He said the uses looked proper on the face, but he wanted to make sure that a dry cleaners or something more consumer-oriented that would increase traffic flow would not be permitted. He said the text might need to be revised to effectuate that. Mr. Messineo envisioned an architect or law office, or some sort of professional office. Mr. Gerber asked if the owner of the building will also be residing in the same building, or would an unrelated person run the business. Mr. 1-iale did not believe there were any restrictions, however he thought some people would do that. 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -January 20, 2005 Page 7 Mr. Grabill said under the traditional live/work concepts in an urban environment, theoretically, there could be an art studio downstairs, and the artist would live upstairs. He said that is not what this is going to be. He said it is going to be an insurance agency downstairs and perhaps a college-aged son upstairs, or it might be used as a renta{ investment. Mr. Grabill believed it was for a retail use such as an architect, engineer, insurance agent, or interior designer, not a pizza shop or dry cleaners_ He said it would be single ownership. Mr. Grabill said as designed, the front unit could either be offices that could be incorporated with the downstairs, if needed, or as a second residential unit. Mr. Saneholtz understood there could be three unrelated occupants in the unit_ He read from the proposed text under Section 1 B-Existing and Proposed Land Uses: The existing site is undeveloped land zoned as PUD, Planned Unit Development. The applicant proposes to construct 63 single family detached homes and four livelwork units to be maintained in perpetuity in a condominium association with private street system. Each unit wilt have a two car garage and shall have a minimum living area of 2,000 square feet. He asked if the commercial space was living azea. Ms. Devlin said the commercial space is restricted to 1,800 square feet and was not living azea_ Mr. Saneholtz noted that the units were proposed at 3,400 square feet. Ms. Devlin said the residential units will have a living area of 2,000 square feet. Mr. Saneholtz referred to the live/work units, and asked if the first level was rented, could the upstairs be 2,000 square feet of living space in a 4,000 square foot building. Ms. Devlin said the proposal is for the upper level to be either an office and a dwelling unit, or two dwelling units. Mr. Saneholtz asked if they would meet the 2,000 square foot living space requirement. Mr. Hale said it was an inconsistency in the text. He said the 2,000 square foot applied to the detached single-family units. He said the livelwork units are not 2,000 square feet apiece. He suggested that the text needed to be clarified. Mr. Gerber interpreted that Section 2, A2 discussed limitations on single-tenant size, with some exceptions. Mr. Saneholtz questioned the limitation on the net leaseable space on the live/work units at 1,800 squaze feet. He guessed from the footprint sketch that the first level is 1,700 square feet. Ms. Devlin had scaled them out to be about 1,800 square feet. Mr. Saneholtz asked if even the limitation on the net leasable space on the livelwork units was at 1,800 square feet, was not the full level 1,700 square feet. 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -January 20, 2005 Page 8 Mr. Hale said they would have their architect make sure the text is internally consistent. He said it could be made a condition of approval, if desired. Mr. Saneholtz noted that 32 parking spaces were proposed within 300 feet- He asked if 300 feet was the general standard. Ms. Devlin said 300 feet was derived from the rule from churches, where as long as all the parking is within 300 feet, it does not necessarily have to be on the same parcel- Mr. Hale said they had 85 non-garage spaces that could be used throughout the area. Mr. Saneholtz was concerned that the parking for the live/work units would be disruptive to the residents. Mr. Gerber asked if the traffic flow had been studied. Ms. Devlin said there had been no indication of traffic flow issues. She said on-street parking, other than the parallel spaces indicated, will not be allowed because there is not sufficient width. She said the spaces in the vicinity of the live/work units have been concentrated for the purpose of confining the parking to that area, and not dispersing live/work parking into the residential areas towards the rear. Ms. Devlin said there were 16 in front of the live/work units, 6 across the street, and four east of the units along the main roadway. Mr. Saneholtz noted that in the immediate proximity of the live/work units there were 22 parking spaces, and 34 spaces were required. Mc Hale said most residents would be working while the businesses are open, so there should be plenty of parking. Mr. Saneholtz said he thought who got the garage and front parking spaces should be addressed. Mr. Gerber wanted to make sure the parking capacity could handle retail uses. Mr. Zimmerman said the spaces in the area are also available to other tenants and homeowners. If the garage space is filled, the street must be used to park. This is not a typical commercial site. He said the closest units to the east were walk units, and to gain access you must go a couple of hundred feet to the end and park at the street. He asked the applicant if he was steadfast with putting alive/work unit scenario in this development. Mr. Hale said if the Commission wanted residential and not live/work units, they would do that. Mr. Gerber said the live/work unit concept made sense since many residents worked at home. 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -January 20, 2005 Page 9 Mr. Saneholtz felt the commerciaVretail aspect of this was an attempt to make this transitional, not just a condominium complex. Mr_ Gerber wanted to see information on traffic flow and parking issues from staff. Ms_ Reiss said signage for the live/work units was not well addressed in the text_ Mr_ Hale said the sign shown on their drawing was similar to those at Perimeter Center_ Ms. Devon said the signage is referenced in the text, and it will be further addressed at the time of the Final Development Plan_ Mr. Gerber said the Commission's first mission on a Preliminary Development Plan was to set boundaries, ensure traff c flow, general concepts as it relates to landscaping, architecture and building materials, and text_ He said the signs and colors will be tweaked at the time of the final development plan review_ Mr. Gerber asked if investors could buy two or three units at a time_ Mr. Hale said these units were too expensive to buy as an investment to rent. Mr_ Gerber wanted to limit the ownership as had previously been done with condominiums. Mr_ Hale agreed. Ms. Reiss wanted to make sure the Commission would have the ability to modify or review the items promised in the text at the final development plan stage, such as the signage on the live/work unit. Mr. Hale read Page 10, paragraph G of the proposed text, and Mr. Gerber said the language of the proposed text assures that the Commission will have that review_ Mr_ Hale said they would reference in the text the signs Mr. Grabill used in Old Dublin because that is what he intends to do on this project_ Mr_ Gerber said the Community Plan indicated that Post Road was a rural road and it was the aim of the City/Community Plan to keep that character He said part of the rural character was the gateway feature (stone). He asked that how the materials and designs of the structures comport with the rural character_ Mr. Burkhart said the connection between the buildings with the semicircular walls and the old- type gates were very rural_ Architecturally, he thought the buildings had a lot of rural character. Mr_ Saneholtz noted that there was an existing commercial contemporary looking building on the south side of Wall Street. He said that the nearby daycare building did not look rural_ He said only the north side of the street looked rural. 06-ll 8AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -January 20, 2005 Page 10 Ms. Reiss noted that a few of the residential units had garages facing Post Road. She said the Commission was trying to avoid that, especially facing a main street. Mr. Saneholtz asked which phase the live/work units would be built. Ms. Devlin said the live/work units would be built in Phase 3. Mr. Grabill said the drawing of the four live/work units elevations showed them all in one line, not how they would sit on the street. Mr. Burkhart said the park area and mounding will screen the garages facing Post Road. Ms. Devlin said the mounding was approximately ttuee feet high_ Mr. Zimmerman said he had visited the development at Scioto Reserve. He asked for a comparison of the width between those units and these_ Mr. Hale said it was about the same - 12 to 14 feet between the units. Mr. Zimmerman said he liked Scioto Reserve - it was different. He asked if the public would have total access around the lake_ Ms. Devlin said there would be a public walking path around the entire lake. Mr. Gerber asked if there would be a sign saying it was public. Ms. Devlin said there could be a sign. Ms. Reiss returned to the garage issue. She said because there were alleys in this neighborhood, she wondered if those units facing Post Road could be flipped since the alley was their only access_ Ms. Devlin said some of the units front onto a pedestrian courtyard area, but they are all accessed by alleys, through the garage. Mr. Saneholtz suggested the garages on the eight similar units fronting onto Wall Street could be reoriented to make the garages internal instead of external_ Ms. Devlin said it was felt by staff that the proposed orientation creates a neo-traditional type of streetscape or a main street. She said when the auto orientation is to the rear and away from the main street, it creates more of a pedestrian orientation. Ms. Devlin said staff believes that with the landscape plan, there will be adequate screening. Ms. Devlin said the existing bikepath is along Post Road and will remain. She said the applicant is proposing to add a gravel walkway to connect to the existing bikepath and to the courtyards. 06-ll8AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -January 20, 2005 Page 11 The gravel walking path will circle the pond and provide another connection to the bikepath at the eastern boundary of the property. Mr. Gerber asked about the purpose of the gravel paths. Mr. Hale said they also could do blackcap and tar and chip the path so it would look like gravel. He said the idea was to have an informal walking path which would be aesthetic. Mr. Gerber asked if there was another material that could be used. Mr. Burkhart suggested shoot and chip (asphalt and stone). Mr. Grabill said the paths would be maintained by the homeowners, and did not expect maintenance would be an issue_ Mr. Zimmerman said there needed to be a distinction between the public and private paths. Ms. Reiss asked where would the trash be picked up. Mr. Grabill said trash will be collected in the alley of each unit or at the end of the street. Mr. Saneholtz referred to the correspondence received from Nationwide and asked what was their interest in this project. Mr. Hale said they owned almost all the property nearby and this parcel. Ms. Reiss asked if the Fire Department had reviewed the alley for emergency vehicle access. Ms. Devlin said both the Engineering and Fire Departments had commented on this plan. Revisions were made accordingly. Barb Cox said she needed to check her 1999 report on the original project to see if a complete traffic study was completed. She recollected that the previous zoning was an ofFice/industrial type use. Ms. Cox said any previous modeling would have had that kind of land use on it, based on the Community Plan. She said going through a residential use is a Less intense use. She said the traffic generation off this project is going to be enough since the commerciaVoffice use that would have been on it would have had a bigger impact versus residentia! use. Ms. Cox said the Post Road access has been a big issue over the years. She said that had been eliminated from this plan_ She agreed to check files for a traffic study and what the thought process was. Ms. Cox said the Code regarding emergency vehicle access had changed since this project started. Fire Marshall Alan Perkins, Washington Township Fire Department, said their issues regarding emergency vehicle access and turning radii had been addressed. He said having emergency access within 150 feet of a dwelling is generally reserved for commercial projects, but they 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -January 20, 2005 Page l2 looked at that, particularly with the rental properties. Fire Marshall Perkins said because of the close proximity of these buildings, they wanted to make sure they could get to them, particularly the street going down the center was very critical for the fire department, to be able to make the turns, have the proper hydrants, etc. He said for the most part, the applicant met all that the fire department required for this project. Mr. Saneholtz referred to the proposed text, Section B, Item 7 -Density, Height, Setbacks: Minimum pavement setbacks shall be ten feet... He continued to the next page and said something was inconsistent in the text. He asked Ms. Devlin to clarify. Ms. Devlin said the minimum that has been shown on the site plan is 10 feet. She said there are other areas of pavement where that setback is exceeded. Ms. Devlin said that statement said that the minimum that has been shown on the site plan is ten feet, but there are other areas of pavement that is exceeded_ In most other cases, the pavement setback is the same as the building setback, except near Buildings 55 and 62. She said that is the only place where the building and pavement setbacks are not the same, other than in those areas where it is ten feet. Ms. Devlin said one of the conditions was that the applicant submit either additional language or an exhibit showing the exact pavement setbacks. Mr. Saneholtz asked if the pavement setback for Building 62 encroached into the right-of-way_ Ms. Devlin said near Building 62, the pavement setback was more than ten, but less than the 30 feet that is shown for the building setback. She said the statement was confusing, and that is the reason for the condition for an exhibit that graphically displays all of the parking setbacks, or that additional language be added to clarify_ Mr. Zimmerman asked if a diversity matrix will be required on this development, similar to any other residential development since the housing styles vary. Mr. Hale said they do a diversity matrix so that the buildings side-by-side and across the street are not the same unit. He agreed to submit their matrix at the time of the final development plan. Ms. Reiss said because so much of this parcel will be of impervious surface, the stormwater issues are very important due to the proximity of the South Fork of the Indian Run. Flooding, because of stormwater runoff from here of Coffman Park or the neighbors to the north of Post Road should be avoided. She would like to see a few units removed so there is less impervious surface and more green space (not necessarily public). She said this was a very intense use of the property. She liked the project. Mr. Gerber reiterated the seven issues discussed tonight as: • Text consistency. Ownedoperator issue as opposed to investment. Clarification of language as it relates to the live/work units with respect to the size and square footage. 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -January 20, 2005 Page 13 • Parking issue as it relates to the live/work units and the effect of that to the surrounding area daily. • Chip and seal pavement on walking path. • Overall traffic study. • Diversity matrix. Density Mr. Gerber said additional information is needed and suggested a tabling. Mr. Hale said most of the issues could be addressed with staff, but the density cannot be redone at the time of the final. He said assuming that the old zoning went away, this property is zoned office/industrial, which would have a 70 percent lot occupancy. He said this occupancy is much less than the original He said their understanding of the basic engineering for this project was that there is more than adequate storm maintenance already in place as pact of the original development plan. Other stormwater facilities should not be needed. Mr_ Gerber said a traffic study is an important part of the Commission's review of the preliminary development plan. How the live/work units fit or do not fit needs to be determined. Mr. Gerber said he was not comfortable going to a final with that option open. If commercial, it would be a more intense use. He was in favor of this project, but he needed more information before it went to the final development plan stage. Mr. Saneholtz did not think this was good planning for this area. He said it should be commercial property. He said he would not vote for residential housing on this property. Mr. Saneholtz said there was nothing in this new proposal that changed his mind. He said the issue for him was proper overall planning. He did not believe the south side of Post Road is rural in any way. Mr. Saneholtz said he did not believe the bulk of what is in this section of Dublin is anything but commercial buildings and offices. He thought that was the best use for Dublin as a whole. Mr. Zimmerman expressed his opinion that the commercial use parking will take away from the residents. He was not just concerned about the four live/work units, but the parking for the entire development_ Mr. Zimmerman needed more information about the commercial five/work units. Mr. Saneholtz asked what was transitional about this development_ Mr. Gerber explained there was not anything transitional about the development, but that was not the issue before the Commission tonight because a prior City Council approved the rezoning and this Commission cannot undo that_ He said Conservation Design does not apply_ Mr. Gerber said the product had been approved since the development was last seen. Mr. Gerber said if the Commissioners needed more information to make an informed decision, this case needed to be tabled. Mr. Gerber said he was not comfortable going forward tonight without the information, some of which was fundamental for every preliminary. He said a traffic study and the affect on the surrounding area of the live/work units and what traffic they may or 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -January 20, 2005 Page 14 may not generate day in/day out is something he would like to know before moving forward. He explained that this applicant is entitled to this project by law. Mr_ Saneholtz requested a more detailed plan than the 8 % x 11 one provided, showing the current zoning because he was completely unfamiliar with it_ Mr. Gerber suggested that Mr. Saneholtz meet with Ms. Devlin to go over the history, the Council and Commission minutes and those original plans to learn how this project got to where it was tonight_ Mr. Gerber suggested either a tabling to get more information or to vote on this application. Mr. Bird concluded that the Commissioners were favorably disposed to the use, but additional information is necessary to complete their deliberations_ Mr. Gerber said four Commissioners were supporting this project, three needed more information, and another was not sure this was proper. Ms. Reiss' preference was to vote on this case tonight. Mr. Gerber said he could not support it tonight because he did not have enough information. Mr. Hale agreed to a tabling to provide the additional information. Mr. Gerber said the ODOT-type of traffic study was necessary. Anne Wanner said these roads were designed for office use, and knowing that the use has been downgraded, engineering has determined that road improvements in place are adequate for the site. She apologized if that was not directly stated in the staff report_ She said that could be addressed if this case is tabled. Ms. Wanner said other iterations of the plan included access onto Post Road, and a left turn lane. S since that access is not there, there are no traffic improvements required along Post Road_ Mr. Gerber said the City had taken a natural east/west connector and downgraded it. He said if that was the City's objective, the Commission wants to understand what kind of impact it will have. Mr. Hale asked about the 1 S-day Rule requirement. Ms. Wanner said the time allows staff to route the new information to the entities within the City. Mr. Hale asked if they should take the live/work units out of the proposal. Mr. Gerber said yes, because he had a feeling an impact will be seen in this area that both the applicant and the Commission will not like. 06-118AFD P Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard Dublin Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -January 20, 2005 Page 15 Cynthia Kinman, 6080 Post Road, said there are beautiful park areas being developed with this project which should be used by people. She said if commercial development on the other side of Post Road is what is being savored, then she thought the park development was going to go for naught. She said these residential developments are vital to the community, and the neighbors that will benefit from the park usage_ She said now, there was a very abrupt division between the north and south sides of Post Road with residential on one side, and commercial on the other. Ms. Kinman said Post Road was very unattractive now and had aghost-tike atmosphere because of the commercial development. She said warehouse parking lots across from Post Road are not attractive or appealing. She said Post Road was a designated, beautiful corridor, and commercial along the south side will not enhance the beauty - it wilt bring more warehouse look and parking area. Mr. Gerber reiterated that this property had been rezoned for residential. He said the issue before the Commission is: Does this particular plan fit? He said it was not to go back to square one to ask the question: Should this be residential or commercial'? It is rezoned for residential, therefore by taw, it is going to be that_ Ms. Kinman said she was sympathetic because the applicant had worked very hard on this project. She said there have been ordinance and Fire Code changes which the applicant has complied with, but the line keeps being put farther and farther back. She thought there needed to be some fairness to these developers. Mr. Gerber explained that the Commission was discussing on what agenda this case can now be placed. He said more information regarding traffic flow in the area and how it will affect the other surrounding area was being requested. Mr. Gerber said the consensus regarding architecture, gateway features, and issues relating to the bikepaths around the pond seemed to be satisfactory. Mr. Bird suggested it might be helpful to the applicant if the Commission would waive the 15- day Rule but provide staff adequate time for routing of the information. Mr. Gerber requested an update from staff at the February 3 Commission meeting regarding the submittal of the requested information. Mr. Gerber made the motion to table this rezoning application revised preliminary development plan for the purpose of collecting additional information as it relates to a traffic study addressing both internally and externally surrounding property and the affect of parking and traffic as it relates to the livelwork units, waiving the 1 S-Day Rute requirements so that the case can be heard again on February 17. Mr. Zimmerman seconded the motion. `I`he vote was as follows: Mr. Saneholtz, no; Mr_ Messineo, yes; Ms. Reiss, no; Mr. Zimmerman, yes; and Mr_ Gerber, yes. (Tabled 3-2.) 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffinan Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECORD OF ACTION APRIL 1, 2004 ITY OE DUBLIN_ Ili a al Plawirg SI hier~ags toad a66 as ~31i16-IY36 ne/IQO: 614 10-1600 fax: 614-Ib16566 b Sae: www.du65a_oli.us The Planning and Zoning Commission took the following action at this meeting: 2. Rezoning -Revised Preliminary Development Plan 04-028Z - Homestead at Coffman Park Location: 22.462 acres located at the southeast corner of Discovery Boulevard (former Metatec Boulevard) and Post Road_ Fzisting Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development District (Perimeter Center plan)_ Request: Review and approval of a revised preliminary development plan under the PUD provisions of Section I S3.OS6_ Proposed Use: Asingle-family condominium development of 68 detached residential units and f3.77 acres of openspace_ Applicant: Patrick Grabill, ContinentaUNRI Office Ventures Limited, t SO East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 4321 S; represented by Ben W_ Hale 1r_, Smith & Hale, 37 West Broad Street, Suite 725, Columbus, Ohio 43215_ Staff Contact: Carson C. Combs, A[CP, Senior Planner_ MOTION: To table this rezoning application as requested by tvlr_ Hale in writing_ VOTE: 6-0_ RESULT: This rezoning application was tabled as requested_ STAFF CERTiF[CAT[ON Frank A_ Ciaroclu Acting Planning Director 06-118AFDP Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS _ _ _ _ Minu[es of __Dublin City Councl . - Meetirtg___ o..~,:~.~:...~..~.,a...~a.:-- - _--Fetxua 17, 2004 - - Page 8 _ !J Held 20 !J ~l - - 1 - { Ms. G ~ y responded that the public and p ~ areas will be identified, and access ~ Ii j~ provided to the public sites thr a bike th. Staff can ovide a ma i Pa Pr a next meeting showing the public versus ~ to parklands. ~ There was no further coraxnent public testimony. ~ I !I There will be a sew adirag/public hearing at the March 1 ndl meeting- 'j I: 8l0 { Ordin a 10-04 li piing the Lowest and Best Bid for a Landscape Installation Right-of- Project i~ ~ Mrs. Boring introduced the ordi +1 ! Ms. Brautigam stated that excellent bid was received for this pr from Miller li II Paving in the araaoun f 18,239_ The budgeted amount For project was $138,000 I, and the estimat ojed cost was $128,000. Staff is re mending acceptance of the it bid at the 1 Councl meeting. li II There be a second reading/public hearing a March 1 Council meeting- 1. j CODE AMENDMENTS ~I Ordinance 11-04 is Amending Section 76A2 of the Dublin Codified Ordinances arding the ~j Posting of Handica Parking Fine Amount, and Decla ' an Emergency. Ms. Salay introd d the ordinance. ;i ! Ms_ Brauti stated that in view of the fact that th are not five members present I requir or passage of the ordinance by emer cY, staff recommends this be held ov u arch 1. .Brautigam stated that in late su r of 2003, Council passed legislatio arding L posting of signs regarding the $ minimum fine for parking in handi parking spaces throughout the Cit en state law changed in early 200 the ordinances ii were recodified, the ge was not included in the Dublin .This ordinance will 1~ li address (his. There will b second reading/public hearing at th rch 1 Council meeting. i~ l~ 1 O ance 12-04 ~I I ending Sections 93.03 (20), 93. rivate Fire Hydrants) and 150.19 ire Hydrant Permits) of the Codif rdinances of the City of Dublin_ it Ms. Brautigam stated that ~ change is brought forward as a resu recent Coundt ~i it discussions regardin vate fire hydrants. IY incorporates int e Code the changes ?i requested by Co I, including yearly inspection and fill reports. The information i was prepay y Sara Ott, Training and Accreditati anager from the Service 1'• jj Oepa ni_ She is available to respond to q oral. ~ T e will be a second readinglpublic he a[ the March 1 Councl meeting. jj REZONINGS I: Ordinance 13-04 ii j' Providing for a Change in Zoning of 22.ti57 Acres located on the Southeast Corner I~ of Metatec Boulevard and Post Road, From: PUO, Planned Unit Development ' ' District, To: PUO, Planned Unit Development District. (Case No. 04-0282 - " ;I Homestead at Coffman Park) Ms- Salay introduced the ordinance and moved referral to Planning ~ Zoning Commission- ~ Mrs. Boring seconded the motion. Vote on the motion: Ms. Salay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr. Reiner, yes; Mc Leddider, yes. ii Ordinance 14-04 j; Providing for a Change in Zoning 6.87 Acres Located on the Ea ode of Eiterman Road, Southwest of Post RoadlUS 33 Interchange om: R, Rural and RI, Restricted Industrial ~ rict, To: PCD, Planned Comme District. (Case No. 04- I 0212 -Gateway Prof oval Center) Ms. Salay intr the ordinance and moved referr the Planning 8 Zoning Commissio Mrs. g seconded the motion- ' on the motion- Mr_ Reiner, yes; alay, yes; Mrs. Boring, yes; Mr 06-11SAFDP - Amended Final Development Plan The Village at Coffman Park Post Road and Discovery Boulevard